{"id":658,"date":"2015-12-05T01:36:59","date_gmt":"2015-12-04T23:36:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/?p=658"},"modified":"2023-05-07T20:52:11","modified_gmt":"2023-05-07T17:52:11","slug":"tehdit-sucu-tck-md-106","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/tehdit-sucu-tck-md-106\/","title":{"rendered":"TEHD\u0130T SU\u00c7U &#8211; TCK Md 106"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tehdit ve Kavgada K\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131kla S\u00f6ylenen S\u00f6zler<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">TCK Md 106 Gerek\u00e7e: <\/span>MADDE 106.\u2013 Maddeyle, \u201ctehdit\u201d bizatihi su\u00e7 h\u00e2line getirilmi\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere tehdit di\u011fer baz\u0131 su\u00e7larda ayr\u0131ca unsur olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Burada tehdidin korudu\u011fu hukuk\u00ee de\u011fer, ki\u015filerin huzur ve s\u00fckunudur; b\u00f6ylece ki\u015filerde bir g\u00fcvensizlik duygusunun meydana gelmesi engellenmektedir. Bu nedenle, s\u00f6z konusu madde ile insan\u0131n kendisine \u00f6zg\u00fc sulh ve s\u00fckununa kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenen sald\u0131r\u0131lar cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmaktad\u0131r. Fakat, tehdidin bu maddeyle korumak istedi\u011fi esas de\u011fer, ki\u015finin karar verme ve hareket etme h\u00fcrriyetidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit, \u00e7o\u011fu zaman ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7un unsurunu olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Ancak, bu su\u00e7 tan\u0131m\u0131nda, tehdidin kendisi ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir su\u00e7 olarak tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu bak\u0131mdan tehdit su\u00e7u, genel ve tamamlay\u0131c\u0131 bir su\u00e7tur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit h\u00e2linde, ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi failin iste\u011finin yerine getirilmemesi kayd\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 bir tecav\u00fcz, k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck ma\u011fdura bildirilmektedir. Tehdidin konusunu, ki\u015finin hayat\u0131n\u0131n veya v\u00fccut b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn tehlikeye maruz b\u0131rak\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, su\u00e7 te\u015fkil eden belli bir fiilin i\u015flenece\u011finin, genel olarak kuvvet kullan\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n veya herhangi bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn, haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilece\u011finin bildirilmesi olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdidin \u00f6zelli\u011fi, k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyece\u011finin, tehdit edenin iradesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Tehdit konusu k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemesi, ger\u00e7ekten veya en az\u0131ndan g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f itibar\u0131yla failin takdirine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Fakat bu, k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn mutlaka tehdit eden taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilece\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmez; bir \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi vas\u0131tas\u0131yla bu k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilece\u011finin bildirilmesi ile de, tehditte bulunulabilir.<br \/>\nSu\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan tehdit konusu k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemesi, \u00f6nemli de\u011fildir. Tehdidin objektif olarak cidd\u00ee bir mahiyet arzetmesi gerekir. Yani, istenilenin yerine getirilmemesi h\u00e2linde tehdit konusu k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015fece\u011fi ihtimali objektif olarak mevcut olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Sarfedilen s\u00f6zler, ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen davran\u0131\u015f muhatap al\u0131nan ki\u015fi \u00fczerinde cidd\u00ee bir korku yaratma a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 almaya elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun de\u011filse, tehdidin olu\u015ftu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclemez. Failin s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n muhatab\u0131 \u00fczerinde cidd\u00ee \u015fekilde korku ve endi\u015fe yaratacak uygunluk ve yeterlilik i\u00e7erip i\u00e7ermedi\u011finin her somut olayda ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Objektif olarak cidd\u00ee bir mahiyet arzeden tehdidin somut olayda muhatab\u0131 \u00fczerinde etkili olmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. Ki\u015fi, fail, objektif olarak cidd\u00ee bir mahiyet arzeden s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015flarla ma\u011fduru tehdit etmek istemi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen; ma\u011fdur, bu s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 ciddiye almam\u0131\u015f olabilir. Bu durumda tehdit yine ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Tehdidin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemesi, muhatab\u0131 \u00fczerinde etkili olup olmamas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 tutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Failin de kendisinin tehdit konusu tecav\u00fcz\u00fc ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilecek imk\u00e2n ve iktidara sahip oldu\u011fu kanaatini kar\u015f\u0131 tarafta uyand\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmesi gerekir. Ma\u011fdurda bu kanaat uyand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra, failin tehdit konusu tecav\u00fcz\u00fc ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilecek imkan ve iktidara ger\u00e7ekte sahip olmamas\u0131n\u0131n bir \u00f6nemi yoktur. Ma\u011fdur tehdit konusu tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn cidd\u00ee oldu\u011funa hile kullan\u0131lmak suretiyle inand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olabilir. Fakat, bat\u0131l inan\u00e7lara dayan\u0131larak bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe maruz b\u0131rak\u0131labilece\u011fi beyan\u0131yla, bir kimse tehdit edilmi\u015f olmaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit konusu k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck, ma\u011fdura de\u011fil de, bir \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fahsa y\u00f6nelik olabilir. Ancak, bu durumda ma\u011fdur ile \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi aras\u0131nda belli bir akrabal\u0131k, yak\u0131nl\u0131k ili\u015fkisi mevcut olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit h\u00e2linde ki\u015fi, tehdit konusu tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn ileride vuku bulaca\u011f\u0131 beyan\u0131yla korkutularak, belli bir davran\u0131\u015fta bulunmaya zorlanmaktad\u0131r, mecbur edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan tan\u0131mda, tehdidin y\u00f6neldi\u011fi hukuk\u00ee de\u011fere g\u00f6re bir ay\u0131r\u0131m yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re, tehdidin, ma\u011fdurun kendisinin veya yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131na, v\u00fccut veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir sald\u0131r\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011finden bahisle yap\u0131lmas\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu su\u00e7un temel \u015feklini olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, tehdidin, ma\u011fduru malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 itibar\u0131yla b\u00fcy\u00fck bir zarara u\u011frataca\u011f\u0131ndan veya sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck edece\u011finden bahisle yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ise, su\u00e7un temel \u015fekline g\u00f6re daha az cezay\u0131 gerektirmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca, bu su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131, ma\u011fdurun \u015fik\u00e2yetine ba\u011fl\u0131 k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda tehdidin daha a\u011f\u0131r cezay\u0131 gerektiren nitelikli h\u00e2lleri g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00e2ller, tehdidin kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 korkutma g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn cidd\u00eeli\u011fi ve yo\u011funlu\u011fu hususunda ma\u011fdurda cidd\u00ee kayg\u0131lar meydana getirmeye elveri\u015fli durumlard\u0131r. Tehdit sil\u00e2hla icra olunursa bunun cidd\u00eeli\u011fi hususunda bir korkunun meydana gelmesi \u00e7ok daha kolay olur. Ayn\u0131 suretle kendisini tan\u0131nmayacak bir h\u00e2le getiren ki\u015finin veya bir ka\u00e7 ki\u015finin birlikte olarak tehdit icra etmeleri h\u00e2linde meydana gelen korku \u00e7ok yo\u011fun olur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130mzas\u0131z bir mektup veya \u00f6zel i\u015faretler kullanarak bir ki\u015finin tehdit edilmesi h\u00e2linde de meydana gelen korku bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bir duraksama meydana gelmez. S\u00f6z gelimi bir kimseye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olan imzas\u0131z mektup ki\u015finin kendisini savunma olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 giderece\u011finden a\u011f\u0131r tehdidi olu\u015fturacakt\u0131r. Yine bir kimseye kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olan mektuplarda ucundan kan damlayan b\u0131\u00e7ak resimlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 yani b\u00f6ylece \u00f6zel i\u015faret kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 korkuyu yo\u011funla\u015ft\u0131rabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gizli veya a\u00e7\u0131k, var olan veya var say\u0131lan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin olu\u015fturduklar\u0131 tehdit g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn de, ki\u015fileri pani\u011fe kap\u0131lacak surette korkutabilmesi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, su\u00e7un nitelikli h\u00e2li olarak say\u0131lmas\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda, tehdit amac\u0131yla kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, kasten yaralama veya mala zarar verme su\u00e7unun i\u015flenmesi h\u00e2linde, ayr\u0131ca bu su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 cezaya h\u00fckmedilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ki\u015fi tehdidinin ciddili\u011fini vurgulamak i\u00e7in, bir ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f veya yaralam\u0131\u015f ya da mal\u0131na zarar vermi\u015f olabilir. Bu gibi durumlarda ger\u00e7ek i\u00e7tima h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanarak ayr\u0131ca bu su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 da cezaya h\u00fckmedilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6fke kast\u0131 kald\u0131ran bir husus de\u011fildir.Tehdidin su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmas\u0131 i\u00e7in,\u00a0 kat\u0131lan \u00fczerinde ciddi bir korku olu\u015fturacak elveri\u015flilikte olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u00a0 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)Tehdit(threat) fiili, ki\u015finin ruh dinginli\u011fini bozan, i\u00e7 huzurunu, bilin\u00e7 ve irade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal eden bir olgudur. Fiilin ma\u011fdur \u00fczerinde ciddi bir korku yaratabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 almaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca tehdidin somut olayda muhatap \u00fczerinde etkili olmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle ma\u011fdurun korkup korkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez.Tehdit su\u00e7unun manevi \u00f6\u011fesi genel kasttan ibaret olup su\u00e7un yasal tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek i\u015flenmesini ifade eder. Olayda tasarlaman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, saikin de \u00f6nemi yoktur.Kavga ve tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda haks\u0131z bir fiilin kendisinde husule getirdi\u011fi \u015fiddetli \u00f6fke ve elemin (gazab\u0131n ) failin iradesini etkileyen bir etken olarak kusur yetene\u011finde meydana getirdi\u011fi azalma nedeniyle ko\u015fullar\u0131 varsa ancak yasal indirim nedeni olarak kabul edilebilir ise de,\u00a0 kast\u0131 kald\u0131ran ve su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engelleyen bir husus olarak kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu ba\u011flamda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yak\u0131nana y\u00f6neltti\u011fi seni \u00f6ld\u00fcrece\u011fim bi\u00e7imindeki s\u00f6zlerin tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015ftuur;(4CD. 13.6.2006 tarih ve Esas No:2005\/6095 Karar No:2006\/12388 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)Tehdit(threat) su\u00e7unda \u00f6fkeninin\u00a0 su\u00e7 kast\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131ran\u00a0 bir etkisi bulunmamaktad\u0131r.Tehdidin;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">a-) Ciddi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">b-) Ge\u00e7ekle\u015fme ihtimali olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131;<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">c-)Kat\u0131lan\u0131n iradelerini etkileme dereceleri;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda sarf edilen s\u00f6zlerin\u00a0 tehdit iradesiyle olmayaca\u011f\u0131 varsay\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc\u00a0 yasal de\u011fildir.<em><strong>(2.CD 19.03.2009 tarihli ve 2008\/17471,2009\/14214 YKD Haziran 2009)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-)Tehdit (threat) i\u00e7erikli s\u00f6zleri do\u011frulayan \u015fahit ifadelerine\u00a0 itibar edilmemesinin\u00a0 gerek\u00e7eleri kararda g\u00f6sterilmelidir.\u00d6te yandan, tehdidin(threat)\u00a0\u00a0 kat\u0131lan \u00fczerinde ciddi korku yaratacak elveri\u015flilikte olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 olay\u00a0 ve ko\u015fullara\u00a0 belirlenmelidir.Kavga esnas\u0131ndaki\u00a0 tehdit(threat) i\u00e7erikli s\u00f6zlerin tehdit\u00a0 iradesiyle olmayaca\u011f\u0131 varsay\u0131m\u0131n kabul\u00fc do\u011fru de\u011fildir.(2.CD09.04.2009 tarihli ve 2008\/19032Esas ve 2009\/18866, YKD Haziran 2009)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4-)Tehdit fiili, ki\u015finin ruh dinginli\u011fini bozan, i\u00e7 huzurunu, bilin\u00e7 ve irade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal eden bir olgudur. Fiilin ma\u011fdur \u00fczerinde ciddi bir korku yaratabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 almaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca tehdidin somut olayda muhatap \u00fczerinde etkili olmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle ma\u011fdurun korkup korkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez. Tehdit su\u00e7unun manevi \u00f6gesi genel kasttan ibaret olup su\u00e7un yasal tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek i\u015flenmesini ifade eder. Olayda tasarlaman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, saikin de \u00f6nemi yoktur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kavga ve tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda haks\u0131z bir fiilin kendisinde getirdi\u011fi \u015fiddetli \u00f6fke ve elemin (gazab\u0131n) failin iradesini etkileyen bir etken olarak kusur yetene\u011finde meydana getirdi\u011fi azalma nedeniyle ko\u015fullar\u0131 varsa ancak yasal indirim nedeni olarak kabul edilebilmesi olanakl\u0131 ise de, \u00f6nceden ilke boyutunda kast\u0131 kald\u0131ran ve su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engelleyen bir husus olarak kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar do\u011frultusunda t\u00fcm kan\u0131tlar tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p de\u011ferlendirilerek sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tehdit s\u00f6zlerini, kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda sinirle fevren s\u00f6yledi\u011fi ve y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kast ve taksirin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bi\u00e7imindeki yasal olmayan gerek\u00e7e ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraatine karar verilmesi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r(4.CD\u00a0 08.06.2010 tarihli ve\u00a0 Esas No:2008\/14673\u00a0 Karar No:2010\/11147\u00a0 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5-)Tehdit fiili, ki\u015finin ruh dinginli\u011fini bozan, i\u00e7 huzurunu, bilin\u00e7 ve irade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal eden bir olgudur. Fiilin ma\u011fdur \u00fczerinde ciddi bir korku yaratabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 almaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca tehdidin somut olayda muhatap \u00fczerinde etkili olmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle ma\u011fdurun korkup korkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7unun manevi \u00f6\u011fesi genel kasttan ibaret olup su\u00e7un yasal tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek i\u015flenmesini ifade eder. Olayda tasarlaman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, saikin de \u00f6nemi yoktur.Kavga ve tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda haks\u0131z bir fiilin kendisinde husule getirdi\u011fi \u015fiddetli \u00f6fke ve elemin (gazab\u0131n) failin iradesini etkileyen bir etken olarak kusur yetene\u011finde meydana getirdi\u011fi azalma nedeniyle ko\u015fullar\u0131 varsa ancak yasal indirim nedeni olarak kabul edilebilmesi olanakl\u0131 ise de, \u00f6nceden ilke boyutunda kast\u0131 kald\u0131ran ve su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engelleyen bir husus olarak kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisini terk eden ma\u011fdureye cep telefonu mesaj\u0131yla &#8220;sen ba\u015flatt\u0131n bu harbi, \u00e7ok kan akacak&#8221; \u015feklinde tehdit etmesinin TCY.n\u0131n 106\/1. f\u0131kra, 1. c\u00fcmlesinde tan\u0131mlanan su\u00e7u olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden &#8220;&#8230; ma\u011fdurenin kendisini terk etmesine sinirlenip k\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131kla mesaj \u00e7ekti\u011fi&#8230;&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle, \u00f6fke, elem ve gazab\u0131 kast\u0131n olu\u015fumunu engelleyen bir husus olarak kabul\u00fcyle beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi,hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r(4.CD\u00a0 25.01.2011 tarihli ve\u00a0 Esas No : 2008\/21284\u00a0 Karar No : 2011\/227 k\u00fcnyeli i\u00e7tihad\u0131<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6-)Tehdit fiili, ki\u015finin ruh dinginli\u011fini bozan, i\u00e7 huzurunu, bilin\u00e7 ve irade\u00a0 \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal eden bir olgudur. Fiilin ma\u011fdur \u00fczerinde ciddi\u00a0 bir korku yaratabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 almaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun\u00a0 olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca tehdidin somut olayda muhatap \u00fczerinde etkili olmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle ma\u011fdurun korkup korkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7unun manevi \u00f6\u011fesi genel kasttan ibaret olup su\u00e7un\u00a0 yasal tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek i\u015flenmesini ifade eder. Olayda tasarlaman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, saikin de \u00f6nemi yoktur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kavga ve tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda haks\u0131z bir fiilin kendisinde husule\u00a0 getirdi\u011fi \u015fiddetli \u00f6fke ve elemin (gazab\u0131n) failin iradesini etkileyen bir etken olarak\u00a0 kusur yetene\u011finde meydana getirdi\u011fi azalma nedeniyle ko\u015fullar\u0131 varsa ancak yasal indirim nedeni olarak kabul edilebilmesi olanakl\u0131 ise de, \u00f6nceden\u00a0 ilke boyutunda kast\u0131 kald\u0131ran ve su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engelleyen bir husus olarak kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalara g\u00f6re; incelenen dosyada; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fduru tehdit etti\u011finin kabul edilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n, tehdit s\u00f6zlerinin fevren s\u00f6ylenmesinin ve ma\u011fdurun korkmamas\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engellemeyece\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, yasal olmayan gerek\u00e7elerle beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi,hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r,(4.CD\u00a0 22.02.2011 tarihli ve\u00a0 Esas No:2009\/10485 Karar No:2011\/2223 k\u00fcnyeli i\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit Su\u00e7u Yap\u0131lacak Bir K\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn Ma\u011fdura \u0130letilmesidir.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 1. maddesine g\u00f6re, tehdit su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in,\u00a0 ki\u015finin kendisinin veya yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0 hayat\u0131na,\u00a0 v\u00fcc\u00fct ve cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na\u00a0 y\u00f6nelik sald\u0131r\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fini kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa bildirmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)Tehdit fiilinin, ma\u011fdurun kendisine veya ma\u011fdurun yak\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)Tehdit\u00a0 su\u00e7u, ma\u011fdurun veya ma\u011fdurun yak\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131na, v\u00fcc\u00fct ve cinsel b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik olursa bu durumda 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/1. maddesi uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-)Tehdit etme fiili, s\u00f6z, yaz\u0131, resim, sembol, tav\u0131r, ba\u015fka \u015fekilde\u00a0 ma\u011fdur veya ma\u011fdura iletilmek g\u0131yab\u0131nda yap\u0131labilir.Kavga ortam\u0131nda hi\u00e7 bir s\u00f6z s\u00f6ylemeden b\u0131\u00e7ak \u00e7ekmek fiili tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturur<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4-)Tehdit su\u00e7unun, ma\u011fdurun hayat\u0131, cinsel ve v\u00fcc\u00fct b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda\u00a0 mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 itibariyle b\u00fcy\u00fck bir zarara veya\u00a0 sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck yapaca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise\u00a0 bu durumda mezkur maddenin 106\/1(2.c\u00fcmle) uygulanmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit Su\u00e7unun \u00c7e\u015fitleri:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7unun \u00e7e\u015fitleri a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilmi\u015ftir<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-) Silahl\u0131 Tehdit Su\u00e7u Tehdit su\u00e7u silahla irtikap edilirse cezas\u0131 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/2(a) maddesi gere\u011fince verilecek cezan\u0131n\u00a0 artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Ancak ma\u011fdur tabancan\u0131n kurus\u0131k\u0131 oldu\u011funu anlar ve failin \u00fczerine y\u00fcr\u00fcrse silah\u0131n korkutucu etkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan\u00a0 silahtan dolay\u0131 cezay\u0131 artt\u0131rmamak gerekir. Silahl\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7u, Silahl\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7u, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T TCK 106\/2(a) maddesinde tanzim edilmi\u015f\u00a0\u00a0 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir su\u00e7tur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)G\u0131yapta Tehdit.\u00a0 Tehdit su\u00e7u vicahen irtikap edilebildi\u011fi gibi, g\u0131yapta da irtikap edilebilir . Ancak g\u0131yapta tehdit su\u00e7unun olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, failin &#8216;iletme kast\u0131n\u0131n&#8217; kast\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131 gerekir. Failin, iletme kast\u0131 yoksa bu durumda g\u0131y\u0131pta tehdit su\u00e7u tekevv\u00fcn etmez.4.CD 05.06.2006 tarihli ve 6926\/11765 k\u00fcnyeli i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re,\u00a0 failin kast\u0131n\u0131n, \u015fahidin, mutat davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0 tehdit i\u00e7iren s\u00f6zleri gizli tutup\u00a0 hi\u00e7 kimseye s\u00f6ylememek mi\u00a0\u00a0 yoksa \u00f6nlem a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan m\u00fc\u015fteki&#8217;ye s\u00f6ylemek mi oldu\u011funun tetkik edilip \u015fahs\u0131n kast\u0131 tespit edildikten sonra h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilmesi gerekir.G\u0131yapta yap\u0131lan tehdit su\u00e7unda, fail tehditin kendisine bildirildi\u011fi anda su\u00e7 tekemm\u00fcl etmi\u015f olur.Failin tehdit su\u00e7unu\u00a0 da \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi yer de su\u00e7 mahallidir. Mesela\u00a0 fail,\u00a0 Alanya&#8217;da bulunan \u015fahide telefon edip, Ele\u015fkirt&#8217;te bulunan ma\u011fduru \u00f6ld\u00fcrece\u011fini s\u00f6yleyip, \u015fahitte durumu, Ele\u015fkirt il\u00e7esinde bulunan ma\u011fdura telefonla bildirmesi halinde su\u00e7 mahalli Elek\u015fkirt il\u00e7esidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-) Vicahen Yap\u0131lan tehdit. Tehdit su\u00e7u,\u00a0 genelde y\u00fcze kar\u015f\u0131 irtikap edilir. Bu durumda ma\u011fdur tehdit tehdit su\u00e7unu hemen \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f olur, su\u00e7 yeri de ayn\u0131 zamanda tehdit su\u00e7unun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerdir.Vicahen yap\u0131lan tehdit su\u00e7unda, tehdit su\u00e7una \u015fahit olanlar\u0131n tespit edilip dinlenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4-)Basit Tehdit su\u00e7u Basit tehdit su\u00e7u 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/1(2.c\u00fcmlesi)\u00a0 maddesinde tanzim edilmi\u015ftir. Ki\u015finin hayat\u0131, sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u00a0 ve cinsel b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn d\u0131\u015f\u0131na da, haks\u0131z sald\u0131r\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011finden bahisle yap\u0131lan tahdittir. Ki\u015finin mal\u0131na zarar verme bu kapsama girer veya sair k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmesi bu kapsama girer. Basit tehdit su\u00e7u, uzla\u015fma kapsam\u0131ndad\u0131r ve \u015fikayete tabidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5-)Tehdit su\u00e7unun\u00a0 Temel \u015fekli. Tehdit\u00a0 su\u00e7unun temel \u015fekli 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza\u00a0 Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/1(1.c\u00fcmle) tanzim edilmi\u015ftir. Tehdit su\u00e7unun temel \u015fekli ki\u015finin hayat\u0131na, sa\u011fl\u0131na veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na bir sald\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bildirilmesidir. Tehdit su\u00e7unun temel \u015fekli \u015fik\u00e2yete tabi de\u011fildir. Uzla\u015fma kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6-)Nitelikli Tehdit Su\u00e7u\u00a0 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0 106\/2. maddesinde tanzim edilmi\u015ftir. Tehdit su\u00e7unun vas\u0131fl\u0131 \u015fekilleri\u00a0 tehdit su\u00e7unun silahla irtikap edilmesi, tehdit su\u00e7unun\u00a0 birden fazla ki\u015fiyle irtikap edilmesi,\u00a0 tehdit su\u00e7unun ili\u015fkinin kendini tan\u0131nmayacak hale koymak, imzas\u0131z mektupla irtikap edilmesi veya sair i\u015faretlerle irtikap edilmesi ya da var olan veya varsay\u0131l\u0131n su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin\u00a0 g\u00fc\u00e7lerini veya adlar\u0131n\u0131 kullanarak tehdit su\u00e7unun i\u015flenmesi halinde\u00a0 vas\u0131fl\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7u olu\u015fur Nitelikli tehdit su\u00e7u ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir su\u00e7tur. tehdit su\u00e7unun a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u015fekli\u00a0 de\u011fildir. Alt\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 iki y\u0131l olarak tayin edilmi\u015f bir su\u00e7tur. Nitelikle tehdit su\u00e7unun \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 be\u015f y\u0131ld\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7-)Tehdit amac\u0131yla kasten yaralama su\u00e7unun i\u015flenmesi. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/3. maddesine g\u00f6re\u00a0 tehdit amac\u0131yla kasten yaralama su\u00e7unun i\u015flenmesi halinde hem tehdit\u00a0 hem de kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan dolay\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm verilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">8-)Tehdit Amac\u0131yla mala zarar verme su\u00e7unun i\u015flenmesi . Tehdit su\u00e7uyla nas\u0131 \u0131zrar su\u00e7unun irtikap edilmesi halinde\u00a0 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/3. maddesine g\u00f6re ger\u00e7ek i\u00e7tima h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tatbik edilerek hem\u00a0 mala zarar verme\u00a0 hem de tehdit su\u00e7undan dolay\u0131\u00a0 h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">9-)Tehdit amac\u0131yla kasten adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unun i\u015flenmesi Tehdit amac\u0131yla kasten adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unun irtikap edilmesi halinde\u00a0 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/3. maddesine g\u00f6re hem tehdit hem de adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan ceza verilir.Yani ger\u00e7ek i\u00e7tima h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tatbik edilir<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">10-)Tehdit su\u00e7unun ayn\u0131 anda birden fazla halini birlikte irtikap edilmesi. Tehdit su\u00e7unun ayn\u0131 anda birden fazla halinin irtikap edilmesi halinde, en fazla cezay\u0131 gerektiren halden\u00a0 h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulur .Ancak 61. madde gere\u011fince alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">11-)Tehdit su\u00e7unun tesels\u00fclen irtikap edilmesi. Tehdit su\u00e7unun tesels\u00fclen irtikap edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu durumda tesels\u00fcl su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler tatbik edilir. Ayn\u0131 ama\u00e7 do\u011frultusunda bir ki\u015finin farkl\u0131 zamanlarda\u00a0 tehdit edilmesi halinde\u00a0 m\u00fcteselsil su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler tatbik edilmesi gerekir.Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde, tek bir\u00a0 fiille birden fazla ki\u015fimin tehdit edilmesi halinde de 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 43\/2.maddesi gere\u011fince\u00a0 zincirleme su\u00e7 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin tatbik edilmesi gerekir<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Vas\u0131flar\u0131na G\u00f6re Tehdit Su\u00e7lar\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7u, vasf\u0131na g\u00f6re, basit(sair) tehdit su\u00e7u, tehdit su\u00e7u ve nitelikli tehdit su\u00e7u olarak a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re\u00a0 ba\u015fl\u0131ca \u00fc\u00e7 gruba ayr\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)Basit tehdit su\u00e7u 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/1(2. c\u00fcmlede) tanzim edilmi\u015ftir.\u015eikayete tabidir. Basit tahdit su\u00e7unun konusu mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 itibariyle b\u00fcy\u00fck bir zarara u\u011fratmak veya sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck verece\u011finden bahisle yap\u0131lan tehdittir.Basit tehdit su\u00e7u, tehdit su\u00e7un, hafif halidir.Tart\u0131\u015fma ortam\u0131nda hi\u00e7 bir \u015fey s\u00f6ylemeden silah \u00e7ekmek fiili, silahl\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturur.Basit Tehdit su\u00e7u alt\u0131 aya kadar hapis veya adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. Basit Tehdit su\u00e7u m\u00fcstakil bir su\u00e7tur ve sulh ceza mahkemesine dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r.Basit tehdit veya sair tehdit istisnai bir su\u00e7tur. As\u0131l olan\u00a0 mezkur maddenin 1. c\u00fcmlesine m\u00fcmas su\u00e7tur. Bundan dolay\u0131 ikinci c\u00fcmleye giren fiiller dar yorumlanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)Tehdit\u00a0 Su\u00e7unun Temel \u015eekli\u00a0\u00a0 5237 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/1(1.c\u00fcmlesinde) tanzim edilmi\u015ftir.Bir ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin\u00a0 veya\u00a0 yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131na,\u00a0 v\u00fcc\u00fct veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na\u00a0 sald\u0131r\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011finden bahisle\u00a0 tehdit edilmesi halinde alt\u0131 aydan iki y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131yla tecviz edilirTehdit su\u00e7u m\u00fcstakil bir su\u00e7tur. asliye ceza mahkemesine dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-) Nitelikli Tehdit Su\u00e7u Tehdit su\u00e7un vas\u0131fl\u0131 halleri 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/2. maddesinde tanzim edilmi\u015ftir.Mezkur f\u0131kra ile\u00a0 tehdit su\u00e7unun nitelikli halleri ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir su\u00e7 haline getirilmi\u015ftir.Ceza iki y\u0131ldan be\u015f y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131d\u0131r.G\u00f6revli mahkeme\u00a0 asliye ceza mahkemesidir. Yetkili mahkeme de ma\u011fdurun tehdit fiiline muttali oldu\u011fu yerdir. Ma\u011fdur telefonla veya mektupla yap\u0131lan tehtide nerede muttali olursa su\u00e7 yeri oras\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">a-) Silahla yap\u0131lan Tehdit.Tehdit su\u00e7unun silahla irtikap edilmesi halinde\u00a0 verilen ceza artt\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Kavga ortam\u0131nda, hi\u00e7 bir tehdit edici s\u00f6z s\u00f6ylemeden, silah te\u015fhir edilmesi veya silah \u00e7ekilmesi halinde, silah\u0131n korkutucu etkisi kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in su\u00e7 silahla irtikap edilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">b-) \u0130mzas\u0131z mektupla yap\u0131lan tehdit.Bu tehdit su\u00e7unu ma\u011fdur\u00a0 nerede \u00f6\u011frenirse su\u00e7 yeri oras\u0131d\u0131r.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">c-) Hususi i\u015faretlerle yap\u0131lan tehdit<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">d-)Ki\u015finin kendini tan\u0131nmayacak hale koymak suretiyle yap\u0131lan tehdit<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">e-)Birden fazla ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan tehdit.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">f-)Var olan veya varsay\u0131lan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin korkutucu etkisinden yararlanarak yap\u0131lan tehdit<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4-) Tehdit Su\u00e7unun Birden Fazla \u015eekliyle Birlikte \u0130rtikap Edilmesi\u00a0 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/2. maddesinde belirtilen vas\u0131fl\u0131 unsurlar\u0131n birden fazla en iki hali bir araya gelerek\u00a0 tehdit su\u00e7u irtikap edilmesi halinde 61. maddeye g\u00f6re temel cezan\u0131n tayininde dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir.Maskeli ve silahl\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015finin ma\u011fdureyi \u00f6l\u00fcmle tehdit etmesi h\u00e2li misal olarak verilebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5-)Tehdit amac\u0131yla kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, kasten yaralama ve nas\u0131 \u0131zrar su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n irtikap edilmesi\u00a0 halinde, hem tehdit hem de di\u011fer su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 ceza verilir. Ger\u00e7ek i\u00e7tima h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Silahl\u0131 Tehdit Su\u00e7u Hakk\u0131nda Umumi Malumat:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Silahl\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7u 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/2(a) maddesinde tanzim edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)Silahl\u0131 tehdit (nitelikli tehdit) su\u00e7unun tekemm\u00fcl etmesi i\u00e7in,\u00a0 silah\u0131n ma\u011fdura tevcih edilmesi veya\u00a0 ma\u011fdura g\u00f6sterilmesi yeterlidir.Ayr\u0131ca tehditi havi s\u00f6zlerin s\u00f6ylenmesi zorunlu de\u011fildir.( 4.CD 13.10.2010 tarihli ve\u00a0 Esas No:2010\/19048\u00a0 Karar No:2010\/16611 k\u00fcnyeli i\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)Silahla tehditte silah\u0131n kurus\u0131k\u0131 oldu\u011funun\u00a0 anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, silah\u0131n korkutucu etkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan\u00a0 silah nedeniyle artt\u0131r\u0131m yap\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Silahl\u0131 Tehdit ve Ama\u00e7 D\u0131\u015f\u0131 B\u0131\u00e7ak Ta\u015f\u0131mak:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)Silahla tehdit su\u00e7u, ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131 yasak olmayan b\u0131\u00e7akla irtikap edilebilir. Mesela bir\u00a0 bir ki\u015fi sallama tabir edilen bir b\u0131\u00e7akla bir ki\u015fiyi \u00f6l\u00fcmle tehdit etmesi halinde hem silahl\u0131 tehdit\u00a0 hem de ama\u00e7 d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131\u00e7ak ta\u015f\u0131ma su\u00e7lar\u0131 olu\u015fur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)Silahl\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7u,\u00a0 6136 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0 Kanunun 15\/4. maddesine m\u00fcmas sallama tabir edilen bir b\u0131\u00e7akla irtikap edilirse, ilk \u00f6nce sallamadan dolay\u0131 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 15\/4. maddesi gere\u011fince \u00f6n \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Daha sonra da silahl\u0131 tehdit (kavgada silah te\u015fhir suretiyle hi\u00e7 bir s\u00f6z s\u00f6ylemeden) su\u00e7undan dolay\u0131 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunun 106\/1(2.c\u00fcmle) delaletiyle mezkur Kanunun 106\/2(a) maddesi gere\u011fince i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit ve \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma H\u00fcrriyetini Tahdit:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ticari faaliyeti engellemeye y\u00f6nelik bir fiili tespit edilemezse su\u00e7, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma h\u00fcrriyetini tahdit de\u011fil, silahla tehdit olur<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lana ve i\u015fyeri \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na belli kimselerin bara al\u0131nmamas\u0131 konusunda\u00a0 ihtarda bulunmas\u0131 i\u015fyerinde m\u00fc\u015fterileri rahats\u0131z etmesi ve son olarak da i\u015fyerine gelerek \u00fczerinde ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131, kuru s\u0131k\u0131 tabancay\u0131 i\u015fyeri \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 ay\u00e7a\u00a0 \u00f6zdemir&#8217;in \u00f6n\u00fcndeki masaya kayarak\u00a0 m\u00fcdahili \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rmas\u0131\u00a0 bi\u00e7imindeki fiili, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma h\u00fcrriyetini tahdit de\u011fil; silahla tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturur 4.CD\u00a0 31.01.2011 tarihli ve\u00a0 Esas No:2008\/22422\u00a0 Karar No:2011\/662 k\u00fcnyeli i\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit ve Kavgada Silah Te\u015fhiri Su\u00e7u:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi ile\u00a0 kavgada silah \u00e7ekmek fiili su\u00e7 olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.Ancak fiil, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza\u00a0 Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/1(2.c\u00fcmle) ve\u00a0 mezkur maddenin 2\/(a). maddesinde tanzim edilen\u00a0 silahl\u0131 sair tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)Kavga ortam\u0131nda, tehdidi havi\u00a0 hi\u00e7bir s\u00f6z s\u00f6ylenmese dahi b\u0131\u00e7ak te\u015fhir edilmesi fiili, kavgaya kat\u0131lanlara kar\u015f\u0131 irtikap edilmi\u015f,\u00a0\u00a0 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk\u00a0 Ceza Kanunun 106\/2(a) maddesine m\u00fcmas\u00a0 silahl\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015ftur(4.CD 05.06.2006 tarih ve\u00a0 2004\/18525 esas,2006\/11902\u00a0 ayn\u0131 mahiyette 07.06.2006 tarih ve 2004\/16944 Esas ve\u00a0 2006\/12140 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda cebinden \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ak\u0131 b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n\u0131 herhangi bir s\u00f6z s\u00f6ylemeksizin g\u00f6stermek suretiyle i\u015fledi\u011fi ma\u011fdurlara y\u00f6nelik a\u011f\u0131r ve haks\u0131z zarara u\u011fratmay\u0131 bildirme niteli\u011findeki eylemin silahla tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturur( Esas No:2009\/26675\u00a0 Karar No:2010\/20295 k\u00fcnyeli i\u00e7tihad\u0131<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit ve Kavgada Silah Bo\u015faltmak Su\u00e7lar\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda silah\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kartarak havaya ate\u015f etmesi kavgaya kat\u0131lan ki\u015filere davran\u0131\u015f yoluyla yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f eylemli bir tehdittir. Ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla, ki\u015filer \u00fczerinde \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc ve yaralay\u0131c\u0131 etkisi herkes taraf\u0131ndan bilinen tabancan\u0131n herhangi bir hedef g\u00f6zetilmeksizin havaya do\u011fru ate\u015flenmesi, kavgaya kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunan ki\u015filere yap\u0131labilecek sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn fiili olarak bildirimidir. Bu nedenle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemi 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunun\u00a0 106\/1-2. c\u00fcmlesinde d\u00fczenlenen sair tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturmakta olup, lehe yasa de\u011ferlendirmesinin bu madde ile 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 466\/2. maddesi aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kavgada silah bo\u015faltma su\u00e7undan san\u0131k Mehmet \u00d6zt\u00fcrk\u00fcn beraat\u0131na ili\u015fkin Kad\u0131k\u00f6y 2. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 26.09.2005 g\u00fcn ve 295-784 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm o yer Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 2. Ceza Dairesince 06.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 4113-17737 say\u0131 ile;..olay g\u00fcn\u00fc san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, evlerinin \u00f6n\u00fcne gelip o\u011fluyla tart\u0131\u015fmak i\u00e7in a\u015fa\u011f\u0131ya \u00e7a\u011f\u0131ran ve beklemekte olan m\u00fc\u015ftekileri korkutmak ve da\u011f\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla ruhsatl\u0131 tabancas\u0131 ile bir el havaya ate\u015f etmesi \u015feklindeki eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK nun l06. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 2. c\u00fcmlesinde d\u00fczenlenen su\u00e7u olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131larak bu su\u00e7u olu\u015fturdu\u011funun kabul\u00fc halinde 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK nun 466\/1. maddesi ile 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKnun l06. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 2. c\u00fcmlesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezalardan hangisinin lehe oldu\u011fu belirlenip lehe olan madde uyar\u0131nca ceza tayini, eylemin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK nun l06. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 2. c\u00fcmlesinde d\u00fczenlenen su\u00e7u olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc halinde ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekirken bu eylem y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmadan kavgada silah bo\u015faltmak su\u00e7unun 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217; nda ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat\u0131na karar verilmesi&#8230; gerek\u00e7esiyle oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkeme ise 14.05.2007 g\u00fcn ve 1501-543 say\u0131 ile,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8230;yarg\u0131laman\u0131n devam\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konuldu\u011fu belirtildikten sonra 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY n\u0131n da 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY n\u0131n 466. maddenin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan bir d\u00fczenlemenin yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve b\u00f6ylelikle su\u00e7 tarihinden sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren yasa ile eylemin su\u00e7 olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. \u00d6yle ise Yarg\u0131tay Dairesinin bozma karar\u0131nda belirtilen kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve sonu\u00e7ta yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirme ile beraat karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n mahkememizce kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f gibi bozma karar\u0131 verilmesi yasaya ve usule uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden&#8230; gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcmde direnmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn de Kad\u0131k\u00f6y Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi nedeniyle dosyan\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bozma istemli tebli\u011fnamesiyle, Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilmesi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunca 29.01.2008 g\u00fcn ve 264-9 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bozmadan \u00f6nceki 21.06.2005 tarihli oturumda \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7iler Kemal ve Nerg\u00fcl G\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015fo\u011flu ile Emre Atasoyun talepleri \u00fczerine Yerel Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan davaya kat\u0131lmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f ancak bir sonraki oturumda \u015fik\u00e2yetinden vazge\u00e7mesi nedeniyle Emre Atasoyun m\u00fcdahilli\u011fi CYYn\u0131n 243. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fcz kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kemal ve Nerg\u00fcl G\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015fo\u011flunun kat\u0131lan s\u0131fatlar\u0131n\u0131n devam etmesine kar\u015f\u0131n bozma \u00fczerine yokluklar\u0131nda verilen direnme h\u00fckm\u00fc kendilerine tebli\u011f edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla temyiz incelemesinin yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n kat\u0131lanlara tebli\u011fi, verdikleri takdirde temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 8\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CYUYn\u0131n 316\/1. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f edilmesi ve yap\u0131lacak tebligata ili\u015fkin evrak\u0131n eklenmesi amac\u0131yla dosyan\u0131n mahalline iadesi gerekmektedir gerek\u00e7esiyle direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n kat\u0131lanlara tebli\u011fi ile sair i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131labilmesi amac\u0131yla dosyan\u0131n Kad\u0131k\u00f6y 2. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesi ve belirtilen eksiklik tamamland\u0131ktan sonra dosyan\u0131n temyiz incelemesinin yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in Ceza Genel Kuruluna iadesi kayd\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kat\u0131lanlara tebli\u011f edilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n, kat\u0131lanlarca temyiz edilmemesi \u00fczerine dosya, Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 25.11.2008 g\u00fcnl\u00fc yaz\u0131s\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay 2. Ceza Dairesine, oradan da 18.12.2008 g\u00fcn ve 3662622254 say\u0131l\u0131 kararla Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmekle, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n 21.02.2005 tarihinde meydana gelen kavgada, ta\u015f\u0131ma ruhsatl\u0131 tabancas\u0131yla havaya ate\u015f etmesi \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen yarg\u0131lama konusu olayda \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, bu eylemin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYnda su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenip d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ncelenen dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n o\u011flu Mehmet \u015eahin ile kat\u0131lan Nerg\u00fcl G\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015fo\u011flu aras\u0131nda apartmanda bak\u0131lan bir kedi nedeniyle tart\u0131\u015fma \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lan Nerg\u00fcl\u00fcn yard\u0131m istemesi \u00fczerine kat\u0131lan Kemal G\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015fo\u011flunun yan\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 arkada\u015flar\u0131 ile apartmana gelip zile bast\u0131klar\u0131 ve Mehmet \u015eahini a\u015fa\u011f\u0131ya \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131ya inmeyen Mehmet \u015eahinin telefonla babas\u0131 olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay yerine gelen san\u0131k ile kat\u0131lan Kemal ve arkada\u015flar\u0131 aras\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fma ve iti\u015fme \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, kavgaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fen olayda \u00fczerine do\u011fru gelen ki\u015fileri engellemek ve kavgay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla geriye \u00e7ekilen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerinde ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ruhsatl\u0131 tabancayla havaya bir el ate\u015f etti\u011fi dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fiyle sabittir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenebilmesi i\u00e7in, su\u00e7 tarihinden sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYnda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenip d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi, su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ise hangi su\u00e7u olu\u015fturdu\u011fu tespit edilmeli sonucuna g\u00f6re de kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131larak lehe yasa saptanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anayasan\u0131n 38, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 1. ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 2\/1. maddelerinde ifade edilen ayn\u0131 zamanda evrensel bir kural olan, kanunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a su\u00e7 saymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir fiil i\u00e7in kimseye ceza verilemeyece\u011fi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn zorunlu bir sonucu olarak su\u00e7 te\u015fkil eden eylemlerin yasada a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 466. maddesi; Kavgada korkutmak i\u00e7in silah \u00e7eken bir aydan alt\u0131 aya ve silah bo\u015faltan iki aydan bir seneye kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r \u015feklinde olup maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131, 1889 tarihli \u0130talyan Ceza Kanununun 380. maddesinden al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f bir h\u00fck\u00fcmd\u00fcr. Ger\u00e7ekten de 1889 tarihli \u0130talyan Ceza Kanununun 380. maddesi; Her kim bir kavgaya i\u015ftirak eder de tehdit makam\u0131nda silah atarsa bir seneye kadar hapsolunur \u015feklindedir. Tehdit su\u00e7unun kavga haline m\u00fcnhas\u0131r \u00f6zel bir \u015fekli olan bu su\u00e7un olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in kavga halinde silah\u0131n korkutma amac\u0131yla ate\u015flenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. Majnoya g\u00f6re; bu madde hi\u00e7 kimseye taarruz etmemek suretiyle kavgada silah at\u0131lmas\u0131 fiilini cezaland\u0131rmaktad\u0131r. Kavga halinin bulunmamas\u0131 durumunda ise eylem tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturabilecektir. (Majno, Ceza Kanunu \u015eerhi, Yarg\u0131tay Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, Baylan Matbaas\u0131, Ankara, 1980, C.III, s.296-297).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYnda ise, kavgada silah bo\u015faltma su\u00e7u ayr\u0131 bir ba\u015fl\u0131k alt\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenmemi\u015ftir. Burada kavga halinde silah \u00e7eken veya bo\u015faltan ki\u015finin, bu eyleminin yasan\u0131n di\u011fer maddelerindeki herhangi bir su\u00e7u olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yasa koyucunun bu t\u00fcr eylemleri su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenleyip d\u00fczenlemedi\u011fi belirlenmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7u, an\u0131lan Yasan\u0131n 106. maddesinde, (1) Bir ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin veya yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131na, v\u00fccut veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir sald\u0131r\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011finden bahisle tehdit eden ki\u015fi, alt\u0131 aydan iki y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 itibar\u0131yla b\u00fcy\u00fck bir zarara u\u011frataca\u011f\u0131ndan veya sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck edece\u011finden bahisle tehditte ise, ma\u011fdurun \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine, alt\u0131 aya kadar hapis veya adl\u00ee para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmolunur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(2) Tehdidin;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">a) Silahla,<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">b) Ki\u015finin kendisini tan\u0131nmayacak bir hale koymas\u0131 suretiyle, imzas\u0131z mektupla veya \u00f6zel i\u015faretlerle,<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">c) Birden fazla ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan birlikte,<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">d) Var olan veya var say\u0131lan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin olu\u015fturduklar\u0131 korkutucu g\u00fc\u00e7ten yararlan\u0131larak,<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015flenmesi halinde, fail hakk\u0131nda iki y\u0131ldan be\u015f y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmolunur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(3) Tehdit amac\u0131yla kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, kasten yaralama veya malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131na zarar verme su\u00e7unun i\u015flenmesi halinde, ayr\u0131ca bu su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 ceza verilir \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">T\u00fcrk Dil Kurumunun B\u00fcy\u00fck T\u00fcrk\u00e7e S\u00f6zl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6re, g\u00f6zda\u011f\u0131 verme anlam\u0131na gelen tehdit, bir kimsenin bir zarara veya k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe u\u011frat\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bildirilmesidir. Bu bildirimin s\u00f6zl\u00fc olmas\u0131 olanakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi ba\u015fka yollarla ve bu ba\u011flamda davran\u0131\u015flar yoluyla da yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 106. maddesinde yer alan bahisle kelimesi ile yaln\u0131zca s\u00f6zl\u00fc anlat\u0131mlar de\u011fil, fiili davran\u0131\u015flar da kastedilmektedir. Nitekim yasa koyucu bu maddenin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n b bendinde tehdidin mektupla veya \u00f6zel i\u015faretlerle i\u015flenmesini su\u00e7un nitelikli halleri aras\u0131nda kabul etmi\u015f ve basit \u015fekline g\u00f6re daha a\u011f\u0131r bir ceza ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu nedenle tehdit su\u00e7u, s\u00f6z, yaz\u0131, resim, \u015fekil veya i\u015faret ile de i\u015flenebilecek bir su\u00e7 olup \u00f6nemli olan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilece\u011fi belirtilen haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdurun bilgisine ula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131d\u0131r. <em>(M.E. ARTUK, A.G\u00d6KCEN, A.C.YEN\u0130D\u00dcNYA, Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara, 6. bas\u0131, s.100).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015finin veya ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131na, v\u00fccut veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na, belirli bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kta olmak kayd\u0131yla malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya bunlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe y\u00f6nelik olmas\u0131 gereklidir. Tehdidin, ma\u011fdurun i\u00e7 huzurunu bozmaya, onda korku ve endi\u015fe yaratmaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli olmas\u0131 yeterlidir. Bunun sonucu olarak su\u00e7un olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in ma\u011fdurun i\u00e7 huzurunun bozulup bozulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n veya ma\u011fdurun bundan korkup korkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131ca ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek yoktur. \u00d6nemli olan failin tehdidi olu\u015fturan fiili korkutmak amac\u0131yla yapm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. <em>(MAJNO, C.II, s.127; A.P.G\u00d6Z\u00dcB\u00dcY\u00dcK, Mukayeseli T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu, 5. Bas\u0131, C.II, s.517 ve 873)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7uyla korunan hukuksal yarar 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 106. maddesinin gerek\u00e7esinde; tehdidin korudu\u011fu hukuk\u00ee de\u011fer, ki\u015filerin huzur ve s\u00fck\u00fbnudur; b\u00f6ylece ki\u015filerde bir g\u00fcvensizlik duygusunun meydana gelmesi engellenmektedir. Bu nedenle, s\u00f6z konusu madde ile insan\u0131n kendisine \u00f6zg\u00fc sulh ve s\u00fck\u00fbnuna kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenen sald\u0131r\u0131lar cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmaktad\u0131r. Fakat tehdidin bu maddeyle korumak istedi\u011fi esas de\u011fer, ki\u015finin karar verme ve hareket etme h\u00fcrriyetidir \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n genel g\u00fcvenli\u011fin kasten tehlikeye sokulmas\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 170. maddesinin 1-c maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen korku, kayg\u0131 veya panik yaratabilecek tarzda silahla ate\u015f etme su\u00e7unda korunan hukuksal yarar, ki\u015filerin kapsam\u0131 belirli olmayan tehlikeye maruz kalmalar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesidir. Bu su\u00e7un ma\u011fduru, belirli bir ki\u015fi de\u011fil toplumu olu\u015fturan t\u00fcm bireylerdir. Genel g\u00fcvenli\u011fi kasten tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcren bu t\u00fcr fiillerin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, belirli olmayan ancak bir toplumu olu\u015fturan herkesin esenlik ve g\u00fcvenli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesine dayanmaktad\u0131r. (M.E. ARTUK, A.G\u00d6KCEN, A.C.YEN\u0130D\u00dcNYA, Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara, 6. bas\u0131, s.287-288).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130stikrarl\u0131 yarg\u0131sal kararlar g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa konu eyleminin su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 466. maddenin 2. c\u00fcmlesi kapsam\u0131nda kavgada silah bo\u015faltma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu hususunda bir ku\u015fku bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1 Haziran 2005 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYnda ise kavgada silah bo\u015faltma su\u00e7u ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda bir d\u00fczenlenmeye yer verilmemi\u015ftir. Ancak 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYnda bu isim alt\u0131nda bir d\u00fczenlemenin bulunmamas\u0131, bu eylemin yasa koyucu taraf\u0131ndan su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda silah\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kartarak havaya ate\u015f etmesi kavgaya kat\u0131lan ki\u015filere davran\u0131\u015f yoluyla yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f eylemli bir tehdittir. Ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla, ki\u015filer \u00fczerinde \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc ve yaralay\u0131c\u0131 etkisi herkes taraf\u0131ndan bilinen tabancan\u0131n herhangi bir hedef g\u00f6zetilmeksizin havaya do\u011fru ate\u015flenmesi, kavgaya kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunan ki\u015filere yap\u0131labilecek sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn fiili olarak bildirimidir. Bu nedenle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemi 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 106\/1-2. c\u00fcmlesinde d\u00fczenlenen sair tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturmakta olup, lehe yasa de\u011ferlendirmesinin bu madde ile 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 466\/2. maddesi aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYnda su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat\u0131na h\u00fckmeden yerel mahkeme direnme karar\u0131nda isabet bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kurul \u00fcyelerinden Ali K\u0131nac\u0131:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A) Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n konusu:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken sorun, 21.02.2005 tarihinde, kavgada korkutmak i\u00e7in silah bo\u015faltan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKna g\u00f6re su\u00e7 olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olu\u015fturuyorsa hangi su\u00e7u olu\u015fturdu\u011fudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">B) Konuyla ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu konuda \u00fc\u00e7 de\u011fi\u015fik g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1) 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKda su\u00e7 olarak tan\u0131mlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2) 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKn\u0131n 106. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda tan\u0131mlanan basit tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3) 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKn\u0131n 170. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda tan\u0131mlanan ki\u015filerde korku, kayg\u0131 veya panik yaratabilecek tarzda silahla ate\u015f etme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkeme birinci g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc benimseyerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ceza Genel Kurulu \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu ikinci g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc kabul etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Benim de yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131m az\u0131nl\u0131k ise \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">C) G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin ele\u015ftirisi:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1) 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKn\u0131n 106. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda Bir ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin veya yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131na, v\u00fccut veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir sald\u0131r\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011finden bahisle tehdit eden ki\u015fi, alt\u0131 aydan iki y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 itibar\u0131yla b\u00fcy\u00fck bir zarara u\u011frataca\u011f\u0131ndan veya sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck edece\u011finden bahisle tehditte ise, ma\u011fdurun \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine, alt\u0131 aya kadar hapis veya adl\u00ee para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmolunur denmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, bir ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n veya yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131na, v\u00fccut veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir sald\u0131r\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir s\u00f6z\u00fc veya davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, belirtilen maddedeki tehdit su\u00e7u olu\u015fmaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2) 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKn\u0131n 170. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda ki\u015filerde korku, kayg\u0131 veya panik yaratabilecek tarzda;\u00a0 silahla ate\u015f eden ki\u015fi, alt\u0131 aydan \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in iki ko\u015ful gereklidir:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">aa) Failin kasten silahla ate\u015f etmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">bb) Ate\u015f edilmesinin, objektif olarak, ki\u015filerde korku, kayg\u0131 veya panik yaratabilecek nitelikte olmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, bu iki unsur da ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3) San\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemi 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKn\u0131n 170. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki su\u00e7u olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan, Mahkemenin benimsedi\u011fi birinci g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yerinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">D) San\u0131\u011f\u0131n lehine olan yasan\u0131n belirlenmesi:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemi;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1) Su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKn\u0131n 466. maddesindeki su\u00e7u olu\u015fturmakta olup bu su\u00e7un cezas\u0131 iki aydan bir y\u0131la kadar hapistir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2) Sonradan y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKn\u0131n 170. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki su\u00e7u olu\u015fturmakta olup bu su\u00e7un cezas\u0131 ise alt\u0131 aydan \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131la kadar hapistir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu duruma g\u00f6re 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK san\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha lehinedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>E) Sonu\u00e7:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemi, su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKn\u0131n 466. maddesindeki su\u00e7u, su\u00e7 tarihinden sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKn\u0131n ise 170. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki su\u00e7u olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, daha lehine olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKn\u0131n 466. maddesi gere\u011fince cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken beraat\u0131na karar verilmesi yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn, a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131m bu de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7e ile bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi kan\u0131s\u0131nday\u0131m g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kurul \u00dcyelerinden Hakk\u0131 Manavda, benzer d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 170\/1-c maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen su\u00e7u olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7eyle bozma y\u00f6n\u00fcnde oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>KAR\u015eIOY:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan bir k\u0131s\u0131m Kurul \u00dcyesi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYnda su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi ve bu nedenle de direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle kar\u015f\u0131 oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.(,CGK 24.02.2009 Tarihli ve 2009\/2-17 E 2009\/42 K say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit ve \u015eantaj:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n dilek\u00e7esindeki s\u00f6zlerinin \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131yla ilgili bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle, TCYn\u0131n 107\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen, \u015fantaj su\u00e7unun hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanaca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle i\u015flenmi\u015f olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde de durulmal\u0131d\u0131r. An\u0131lan maddenin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen \u015fantaj su\u00e7u bir hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilerek i\u015flenebilmekte ise de, bu su\u00e7un olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in ma\u011fdurdan istenilen veya beklenilen davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n; kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 veya y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir \u015feyi yapmaya veya yapmamaya ya da haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kar sa\u011flamaya zorlama niteli\u011finde bulunmas\u0131 zorunludur. Bu durumda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n C. Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7enin yasalara uygun olarak i\u015flem g\u00f6rmesini iste\u011fine y\u00f6nelik eyleminde \u015fantaj su\u00e7unun \u00f6\u011felerinin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7undan san\u0131k Cafer Tercan\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 106\/1-2.c.maddesi gere\u011fince 1 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, an\u0131lan Yasan\u0131n 50\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca cezas\u0131n\u0131n 600 YTL adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrilmesine ili\u015fkin Ta\u015fova Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 26.4.2007 tarih, 2007\/ 875\/440 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 aleyhine Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen Yasa Yarar\u0131na Bozma iste\u011fini i\u00e7eren Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 25.9.2007 g\u00fcn ve 183633 say\u0131l\u0131 tebli\u011fnamesiyle dava dosyas\u0131 Daireye g\u00f6nderilmekle incelendi<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebli\u011fnamede\u00a0 T\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re ;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ta\u015fova Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na verdi\u011fi 25.01.2007 tarihli \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esi ve ayn\u0131 tarihli anlat\u0131m\u0131 ile tutulan tutanak i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re g\u00f6revli savc\u0131y\u0131 kastederek &#8220;e\u011fer sizde bu dilek\u00e7eme g\u00f6re davama bakmayacak gibi olursan\u0131z b\u00fct\u00fcn T\u00fcrkiye savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcfetti\u015fi olan Erbaa&#8217;n\u0131n Hac\u0131pazar K\u00f6y\u00fcnden olan bacana\u011f\u0131m say\u0131n m\u00fcfetti\u015fime bilgi verece\u011fim&#8221; \u015feklindeki s\u00f6zlerinin, objektif de\u011ferlendirmeye g\u00f6re, ciddi bir korku ve endi\u015fe yaratmaya elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun olmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeksizin yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesinde,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 58\/6.maddesinde tekerr\u00fcr halinde h\u00fckmolunan cezan\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;un 108.maddesinde de tekerr\u00fcr halinde i\u015flenen su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irilecek s\u00fcrelerin belirtildi\u011fi, an\u0131lan maddede adli para cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeksizin cezan\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine karar verilmesinde,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Kamu g\u00f6revlisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6revini yapmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek amac\u0131yla cebir ve tehdit kullanan ki\u015finin eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 265\/1.maddesindeki su\u00e7 tan\u0131m\u0131na uydu\u011funun g\u00f6zetilmemesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir denilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ncelenen dosyada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ta\u015fova Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na verdi\u011fi 25.1.2007 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde, d\u00fcn\u00fcr\u00fcnden olan alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 alamay\u0131p tehdit edildi\u011finden bahisle yak\u0131nmada bulundu\u011fu ve dilek\u00e7e sonunda da; e\u011fer sizde dilek\u00e7eme g\u00f6re davama bakamayacak olursan\u0131z, b\u00fct\u00fcn T\u00fcrkiye savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcfetti\u015fi olan m\u00fcfetti\u015fime bilgi verecem diye yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan eylemin tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilerek 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY.n\u0131n 106\/1-2.c. uyar\u0131nca 1 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 50.maddesi ile cezas\u0131n\u0131n 600 YTL. adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrildikten sonra 58\/6.maddeye g\u00f6re cezas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine ve cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131ndan sonra denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-Tebli\u011fnamenin 1 numaral\u0131 bendinde belirtilen; tehdit su\u00e7unun yasal \u00f6\u011felerinin olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bozma nedeninin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 106. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7unun tan\u0131m\u0131nda; sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck edece\u011finden bahisle tehdit eyleminden s\u00f6z edilmi\u015f ise de, eylemin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6\u011fesinin olu\u015fmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olayda hukuka uygunluk nedenlerinin bulunmamas\u0131 da zorunludur. TCYn\u0131n 26. maddesinde hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanan ki\u015fiye ceza verilmez h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde ise, herkesin yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde iddia ve savunmada bulunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca, ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer veya resmi mercilerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015flem ve eylemleri nedeniyle ki\u015filerin \u015fikayet haklar\u0131 da hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda bu madde i\u00e7erisinde de\u011ferlendirilmektedir. \u015eikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin veya kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin yasaya uygun davranmad\u0131klar\u0131 iddias\u0131yla idare veya yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131nca denetlenmelerine olanak sa\u011flamaktad\u0131r. \u015eikayet edilen ki\u015finin su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fi i\u00e7in cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 veya kamu g\u00f6revlisinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 nedeniyle disiplin i\u015flemine ya da yarg\u0131lamaya tabi tutulmas\u0131 sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelebilecek ise de, yasal hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamaz. \u015eu halde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n dilek\u00e7esiyle ilgili olarak i\u015flem yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 durumunda \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zlerinin, hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle hukuka uygunluk nedenini olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeyerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Tebli\u011fnamenin 2 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen bozma nedeninin incelenmesinde; yerel mahkemenin, TCYn\u0131n 58.maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. TCY.n\u0131n 50\/5.maddesinde; &#8220;uygulamada as\u0131l mahkumiyet, bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re \u00e7evrilen para cezas\u0131 veya tedbirdir&#8221; denilmektedir. TCYn\u0131n 58.maddesinde ise tekerr\u00fcr h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn uygulanmas\u0131 ko\u015fullar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan 58.maddenin d\u00fczenleni\u015f bi\u00e7iminde hapis ve adli para cezas\u0131 ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmakla birlikte, 6.f\u0131kra uyar\u0131nca cezan\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz bi\u00e7imini d\u00fczenleyen 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 108.maddesinde, bu infaz \u015feklinin yaln\u0131zca hapis cezalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bulundu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n adli para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n infaz y\u00f6netimini g\u00f6steren 106.maddesinde de m\u00fckerrirlikle ilgili bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. A\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemeler de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; mahkemece h\u00fckmolunan adli para cezas\u0131 nedeniyle san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejiminin ve cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131ndan sonra denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilemeyece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu neden bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bozma iste\u011finin kabul\u00fcne karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Tebli\u011fnamenin 3 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen; eylemin TCY.n\u0131n 265\/1.maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7 tan\u0131m\u0131na uyaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bozma nedenine gelince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY.n\u0131n 265.maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, kamu g\u00f6revlisine kar\u015f\u0131, g\u00f6revini yapmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek amac\u0131yla cebir veya tehdit kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Ancak, bu su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da eylemin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00f6yledi\u011fi kabul edilen s\u00f6zler \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle, su\u00e7un hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6\u011fesinin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer taraftan, eylemin iddianamede s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen TCYn\u0131n 277. maddesine uyup uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131na da de\u011finilmelidir. An\u0131lan maddede d\u00fczenlenen yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revini yapan\u0131 etkileme su\u00e7unun \u00f6\u011feleri; yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revi yapanlara emir verme, bask\u0131 yapma veya n\u00fcfuz icra etme veya her ne olursa olsun hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak etkilemeye te\u015febb\u00fcs etme bi\u00e7iminde a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle bu su\u00e7un hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6\u011fesinin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve eylemin yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revini yapan\u0131 etkileme su\u00e7unu da olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131, anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n dilek\u00e7esindeki s\u00f6zlerinin \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131yla ilgili bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle, TCYn\u0131n 107\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen, \u015fantaj su\u00e7unun hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanaca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle i\u015flenmi\u015f olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde de durulmal\u0131d\u0131r. An\u0131lan maddenin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen \u015fantaj su\u00e7u bir hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilerek i\u015flenebilmekte ise de, bu su\u00e7un olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in ma\u011fdurdan istenilen veya beklenilen davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n; kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 veya y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir \u015feyi yapmaya veya yapmamaya ya da haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kar sa\u011flamaya zorlama niteli\u011finde bulunmas\u0131 zorunludur. Bu durumda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n C. Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7enin yasalara uygun olarak i\u015flem g\u00f6rmesini iste\u011fine y\u00f6nelik eyleminde \u015fantaj su\u00e7unun \u00f6\u011felerinin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Belirtilen nedenler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda., tebli\u011fnamenin 3 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen bozma nedeninin yerinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle tebli\u011fnamenin 3 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen nedene ili\u015fkin yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin REDD\u0130NE, ancak mahkemenin san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 vermek yerine tehdit su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131rmas\u0131 ve kabule g\u00f6re de, h\u00fckmedilen adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine ve denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce yerinde bulunarak, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYYn\u0131n 309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca Ta\u015fova Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 26.4.2007 tarihli ve 2007\/875-440 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n YASA YARARINA BOZULMASINA, eylem su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan BERAAT\u0130NE, (4.CDnin 13.02.2008 tarih ve 2007\/9642-2008\/1435 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit ve Ya\u011fma:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-) 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;nda dolayl\u0131 ya\u011fma su\u00e7una yer verilmedi\u011fi, ya\u011fma su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in cebir ve tehdittin mal\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda veya h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7u tamamlanmadan mal\u0131n g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda mal\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)Olu\u015f, kabul ve dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6\u011fle 12.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yan\u0131nda kimli\u011fi tespit edilemeyen bir ba\u015fka \u015fah\u0131sla birlikte yak\u0131nana ait markete geldi\u011fi, 2. \u015fahs\u0131n d\u0131\u015far\u0131daki dolaptan dondurma alma bahanesiyle yak\u0131nan\u0131 oyalarken san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u00e7eride kasan\u0131n oldu\u011fu b\u00f6l\u00fcme ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, yak\u0131nan\u0131n \u015f\u00fcphelenerek i\u00e7eri girmesiyle san\u0131kla kasan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda g\u00f6z g\u00f6ze geldikleri, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yak\u0131nana bir\u015fey yok dedikten sonra, kasadan bir\u015fey almadan ka\u00e7abilmek i\u00e7in yak\u0131nan\u0131n \u00fczerine atlad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bo\u011fu\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, bu arada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yak\u0131nana beni b\u0131rak yoksa s\u00fclalem seni sinkaf eder \u015feklinde tehdit s\u00f6zleri sarfetti\u011fi ancak yak\u0131nan\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u0131rakmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tan\u0131k Okan&#8217;\u0131n yard\u0131m\u0131yla san\u0131\u011f\u0131 polislere teslim ettiklerinin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;nda dolayl\u0131 ya\u011fma su\u00e7una yer verilmedi\u011fi, ya\u011fma su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in cebir ve tehdittin mal\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda veya h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7u tamamlanmadan mal\u0131n g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda mal\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, eylemin bu haliyle 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n 142\/1-b, 35\/2 maddelerine uyan h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa kalk\u0131\u015fma su\u00e7unun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 106\/1 maddesindeki tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funun g\u00f6zetilmemesi, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r(6.CD 21.04.2010 tarihli ve\u00a0 Esas No:2006\/16708\u00a0 Karar No:2010\/4747 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-)San\u0131\u011f\u0131n,TCY&#8217;n\u0131n 6\/1-f maddesi anlam\u0131nda silahtan say\u0131lan b\u0131\u00e7akla tehdit ederek yak\u0131nan\u0131 ya\u011fmalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda;san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 149\/1(a) maddesine uyan su\u00e7u olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden,yak\u0131nan\u0131n sonradan de\u011fi\u015ftirdi\u011fi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131 korumaya y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131narak 148\/1 maddesi ile uygulama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n,tehdit ve zor kullanarak yak\u0131nan\u0131n \u00e7antas\u0131n\u0131 almas\u0131yla su\u00e7un tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden,kalk\u0131\u015fma a\u015famas\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 35.maddesi ile uygulama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle sonu\u00e7ta eksik cezaya h\u00fckmolunmas\u0131,kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bozma nedeni yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f(6.CD23\/7\/2008 tarihli ve Esas No:2007\/15169 Karar No:2008\/15404 K\u00fcnyeli \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4-)M\u00fc\u015ftekiyi\u00a0 ittirip ve evi yakaca\u011f\u0131 tehdidiyle korku vererek, evin kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 kilitlemesini engelleyip evden uzakla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131ktan sonra eve girerek h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k yapmas\u0131 bi\u00e7imindeki olu\u015fta;\u00a0\u00a0 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, m\u00fc\u015ftekiyi\u00a0 korkuya dayal\u0131 olarak olay yerinden uzakla\u015fmak suretiyle, yak\u0131nan\u0131n e\u015fyan\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 koymas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nleyip, bu suretle korunaks\u0131z kalan eve girerek su\u00e7a konu para ve e\u015fyay\u0131 almas\u0131 bi\u00e7imindeki eyleminin bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak ya\u011fma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden,\u00a0 nitelendirmede yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r (6.CD 30\/06\/2010 tarihli ve\u00a0 Esas No: 2008\/9532\u00a0 Karar No: 2010\/11899 k\u00fcnyeli i\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit ve Yarg\u0131 G\u00f6revini Yapan\u0131 Etkileme:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">E\u011fer sizde dilek\u00e7eme g\u00f6re davama bakamayacak olursan\u0131z, b\u00fct\u00fcn T\u00fcrkiye savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcfetti\u015fi olan m\u00fcfetti\u015fime bilgi verecem\u00a0 \u015feklindeki s\u00f6zler\u00a0 yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revini yapan\u0131 etkileme\u00a0 su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturmaz<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7undan san\u0131k Cafer Tercan\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 106\/1-2.c.maddesi gere\u011fince 1 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, an\u0131lan Yasan\u0131n 50\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca cezas\u0131n\u0131n 600 YTL adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrilmesine ili\u015fkin Ta\u015fova Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 26.4.2007 tarih, 2007\/ 875\/440 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 aleyhine Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen Yasa Yarar\u0131na Bozma iste\u011fini i\u00e7eren Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 25.9.2007 g\u00fcn ve 183633 say\u0131l\u0131 tebli\u011fnamesiyle dava dosyas\u0131 Daireye g\u00f6nderilmekle incelendi<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebli\u011fnamede\u00a0 T\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re ;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ta\u015fova Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na verdi\u011fi 25.01.2007 tarihli \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esi ve ayn\u0131 tarihli anlat\u0131m\u0131 ile tutulan tutanak i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re g\u00f6revli savc\u0131y\u0131 kastederek &#8220;e\u011fer sizde bu dilek\u00e7eme g\u00f6re davama bakmayacak gibi olursan\u0131z b\u00fct\u00fcn T\u00fcrkiye savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcfetti\u015fi olan Erbaa&#8217;n\u0131n Hac\u0131pazar K\u00f6y\u00fcnden olan bacana\u011f\u0131m say\u0131n m\u00fcfetti\u015fime bilgi verece\u011fim&#8221; \u015feklindeki s\u00f6zlerinin, objektif de\u011ferlendirmeye g\u00f6re, ciddi bir korku ve endi\u015fe yaratmaya elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun olmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeksizin yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesinde,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 58\/6.maddesinde tekerr\u00fcr halinde h\u00fckmolunan cezan\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;un 108.maddesinde de tekerr\u00fcr halinde i\u015flenen su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irilecek s\u00fcrelerin belirtildi\u011fi, an\u0131lan maddede adli para cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeksizin cezan\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine karar verilmesinde,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Kamu g\u00f6revlisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6revini yapmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek amac\u0131yla cebir ve tehdit kullanan ki\u015finin eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 265\/1.maddesindeki su\u00e7 tan\u0131m\u0131na uydu\u011funun g\u00f6zetilmemesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir denilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ncelenen dosyada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ta\u015fova Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na verdi\u011fi 25.1.2007 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde, d\u00fcn\u00fcr\u00fcnden olan alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 alamay\u0131p tehdit edildi\u011finden bahisle yak\u0131nmada bulundu\u011fu ve dilek\u00e7e sonunda da; e\u011fer sizde dilek\u00e7eme g\u00f6re davama bakamayacak olursan\u0131z, b\u00fct\u00fcn T\u00fcrkiye savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcfetti\u015fi olan m\u00fcfetti\u015fime bilgi verecem diye yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan eylemin tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilerek 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY.n\u0131n 106\/1-2.c. uyar\u0131nca 1 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 50.maddesi ile cezas\u0131n\u0131n 600 YTL. adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrildikten sonra 58\/6.maddeye g\u00f6re cezas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine ve cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131ndan sonra denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-Tebli\u011fnamenin 1 numaral\u0131 bendinde belirtilen; tehdit su\u00e7unun yasal \u00f6\u011felerinin olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bozma nedeninin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 106. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7unun tan\u0131m\u0131nda; sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck edece\u011finden bahisle tehdit eyleminden s\u00f6z edilmi\u015f ise de, eylemin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6\u011fesinin olu\u015fmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olayda hukuka uygunluk nedenlerinin bulunmamas\u0131 da zorunludur. TCYn\u0131n 26. maddesinde hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanan ki\u015fiye ceza verilmez h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde ise, herkesin yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde iddia ve savunmada bulunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca, ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer veya resmi mercilerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015flem ve eylemleri nedeniyle ki\u015filerin \u015fikayet haklar\u0131 da hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda bu madde i\u00e7erisinde de\u011ferlendirilmektedir. \u015eikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin veya kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin yasaya uygun davranmad\u0131klar\u0131 iddias\u0131yla idare veya yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131nca denetlenmelerine olanak sa\u011flamaktad\u0131r. \u015eikayet edilen ki\u015finin su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fi i\u00e7in cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 veya kamu g\u00f6revlisinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 nedeniyle disiplin i\u015flemine ya da yarg\u0131lamaya tabi tutulmas\u0131 sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelebilecek ise de, yasal hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamaz. \u015eu halde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n dilek\u00e7esiyle ilgili olarak i\u015flem yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 durumunda \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zlerinin, hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle hukuka uygunluk nedenini olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeyerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Tebli\u011fnamenin 2 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen bozma nedeninin incelenmesinde; yerel mahkemenin, TCYn\u0131n 58.maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. TCY.n\u0131n 50\/5.maddesinde; &#8220;uygulamada as\u0131l mahkumiyet, bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re \u00e7evrilen para cezas\u0131 veya tedbirdir&#8221; denilmektedir. TCYn\u0131n 58.maddesinde ise tekerr\u00fcr h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn uygulanmas\u0131 ko\u015fullar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan 58.maddenin d\u00fczenleni\u015f bi\u00e7iminde hapis ve adli para cezas\u0131 ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmakla birlikte, 6.f\u0131kra uyar\u0131nca cezan\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz bi\u00e7imini d\u00fczenleyen 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 108.maddesinde, bu infaz \u015feklinin yaln\u0131zca hapis cezalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bulundu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n adli para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n infaz y\u00f6netimini g\u00f6steren 106.maddesinde de m\u00fckerririlkle ilgili bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. A\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemeler de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; mahkemece h\u00fckmolunan adli para cezas\u0131 nedeniyle san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejiminin ve cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131ndan sonra denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilemeyece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu neden bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bozma iste\u011finin kabul\u00fcne karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Tebli\u011fnamenin 3 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen; eylemin TCY.n\u0131n 265\/1.maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7 tan\u0131m\u0131na uyaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bozma nedenine gelince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY.n\u0131n 265.maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, kamu g\u00f6revlisine kar\u015f\u0131, g\u00f6revini yapmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek amac\u0131yla cebir veya tehdit kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Ancak, bu su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da eylemin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00f6yledi\u011fi kabul edilen s\u00f6zler \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle, su\u00e7un hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6\u011fesinin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer taraftan, eylemin iddianamede s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen TCYn\u0131n 277. maddesine uyup uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131na da de\u011finilmelidir. An\u0131lan maddede d\u00fczenlenen yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revini yapan\u0131 etkileme su\u00e7unun \u00f6\u011feleri; yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revi yapanlara emir verme, bask\u0131 yapma veya n\u00fcfuz icra etme veya her ne olursa olsun hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak etkilemeye te\u015febb\u00fcs etme bi\u00e7iminde a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle bu su\u00e7un hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6\u011fesinin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve eylemin yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revini yapan\u0131 etkileme su\u00e7unu da olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131, anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n dilek\u00e7esindeki s\u00f6zlerinin \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131yla ilgili bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle, TCYn\u0131n 107\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen, \u015fantaj su\u00e7unun hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanaca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle i\u015flenmi\u015f olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde de durulmal\u0131d\u0131r. An\u0131lan maddenin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen \u015fantaj su\u00e7u bir hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilerek i\u015flenebilmekte ise de, bu su\u00e7un olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in ma\u011fdurdan istenilen veya beklenilen davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n; kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 veya y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir \u015feyi yapmaya veya yapmamaya ya da haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kar sa\u011flamaya zorlama niteli\u011finde bulunmas\u0131 zorunludur. Bu durumda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n C. Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7enin yasalara uygun olarak i\u015flem g\u00f6rmesini iste\u011fine y\u00f6nelik eyleminde \u015fantaj su\u00e7unun \u00f6\u011felerinin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Belirtilen nedenler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda., tebli\u011fnamenin 3 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen bozma nedeninin yerinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle tebli\u011fnamenin 3 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen nedene ili\u015fkin yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin REDD\u0130NE, ancak mahkemenin san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 vermek yerine tehdit su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131rmas\u0131 ve kabule g\u00f6re de, h\u00fckmedilen adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine ve denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce yerinde bulunarak, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYYn\u0131n 309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca Ta\u015fova Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 26.4.2007 tarihli ve 2007\/875-440 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n YASA YARARINA BOZULMASINA, eylem su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan BERAAT\u0130NE, (4.CDnin 13.02.2008 tarih ve 2007\/9642-2008\/1435 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit ve Haks\u0131z Fiil:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit fiili, ki\u015finin ruh dinginli\u011fini bozan, i\u00e7 huzurunu, bilin\u00e7 ve irade\u00a0 \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal eden bir olgudur. Fiilin ma\u011fdur \u00fczerinde ciddi\u00a0 bir korku yaratabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 almaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun\u00a0 olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca tehdidin somut olayda muhatap \u00fczerinde etkili olmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle ma\u011fdurun korkup korkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez. Tehdit su\u00e7unun manevi \u00f6\u011fesi genel kasttan ibaret olup su\u00e7un\u00a0 yasal tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek i\u015flenmesini ifade eder. Olayda tasarlaman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, saikin de \u00f6nemi yoktur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)Tehdit fiili, ki\u015finin ruh dinginli\u011fini bozan, i\u00e7 huzurunu, bilin\u00e7 ve irade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal eden bir olgudur. Fiilin ma\u011fdur \u00fczerinde ciddi bir korku yaratabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 almaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca tehdidin somut olayda muhatap \u00fczerinde etkili olmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle ma\u011fdurun korkup korkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7unun manevi \u00f6\u011fesi genel kasttan ibaret olup su\u00e7un yasal tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek i\u015flenmesini ifade eder. Olayda tasarlaman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, saikin de \u00f6nemi yoktur.Kavga ve tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda haks\u0131z bir fiilin kendisinde husule getirdi\u011fi \u015fiddetli \u00f6fke ve elemin (gazab\u0131n) failin iradesini etkileyen bir etken olarak kusur yetene\u011finde meydana getirdi\u011fi azalma nedeniyle ko\u015fullar\u0131 varsa ancak yasal indirim nedeni olarak kabul edilebilmesi olanakl\u0131 ise de, \u00f6nceden ilke boyutunda kast\u0131 kald\u0131ran ve su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engelleyen bir husus olarak kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisini terk eden ma\u011fdureye cep telefonu mesaj\u0131yla &#8220;sen ba\u015flatt\u0131n bu harbi, \u00e7ok kan akacak&#8221; \u015feklinde tehdit etmesinin TCY.n\u0131n 106\/1. f\u0131kra, 1. c\u00fcmlesinde tan\u0131mlanan su\u00e7u olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden &#8220;&#8230; ma\u011fdurenin kendisini terk etmesine sinirlenip k\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131kla mesaj \u00e7ekti\u011fi&#8230;&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle, \u00f6fke, elem ve gazab\u0131 kast\u0131n olu\u015fumunu engelleyen bir husus olarak kabul\u00fcyle beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi,hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r(4.CD\u00a0 25.01.2011 tarihli ve\u00a0 Esas No : 2008\/21284\u00a0 Karar No : 2011\/227 k\u00fcnyeli i\u00e7tihad\u0131<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)Tehdit fiili, ki\u015finin ruh dinginli\u011fini bozan, i\u00e7 huzurunu, bilin\u00e7 ve irade\u00a0 \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal eden bir olgudur. Fiilin ma\u011fdur \u00fczerinde ciddi\u00a0 bir korku yaratabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 almaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun\u00a0 olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca tehdidin somut olayda muhatap \u00fczerinde etkili olmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle ma\u011fdurun korkup korkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7unun manevi \u00f6\u011fesi genel kasttan ibaret olup su\u00e7un\u00a0 yasal tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek i\u015flenmesini ifade eder. Olayda tasarlaman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, saikin de \u00f6nemi yoktur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kavga ve tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda haks\u0131z bir fiilin kendisinde husule\u00a0 getirdi\u011fi \u015fiddetli \u00f6fke ve elemin (gazab\u0131n) failin iradesini etkileyen bir etken olarak\u00a0 kusur yetene\u011finde meydana getirdi\u011fi azalma nedeniyle ko\u015fullar\u0131 varsa ancak yasal indirim nedeni olarak kabul edilebilmesi olanakl\u0131 ise de, \u00f6nceden\u00a0 ilke boyutunda kast\u0131 kald\u0131ran ve su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engelleyen bir husus olarak kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalara g\u00f6re; incelenen dosyada; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fduru tehdit etti\u011finin kabul edilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n, tehdit s\u00f6zlerinin fevren s\u00f6ylenmesinin ve ma\u011fdurun korkmamas\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engellemeyece\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, yasal olmayan gerek\u00e7elerle beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi,hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r,(4.CD\u00a0 22.02.2011 tarihli ve\u00a0 Esas No:2009\/10485 Karar No:2011\/2223 k\u00fcnyeli i\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit ve \u015eikayet Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 :\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 106. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7unun tan\u0131m\u0131nda; sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck edece\u011finden bahisle tehdit eyleminden s\u00f6z edilmi\u015f ise de, eylemin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6\u011fesinin olu\u015fmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olayda hukuka uygunluk nedenlerinin bulunmamas\u0131 da zorunludur. TCYn\u0131n 26. maddesinde hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanan ki\u015fiye ceza verilmez h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde ise, herkesin yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde iddia ve savunmada bulunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca, ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer veya resmi mercilerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015flem ve eylemleri nedeniyle ki\u015filerin \u015fikayet haklar\u0131 da hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda bu madde i\u00e7erisinde de\u011ferlendirilmektedir. \u015eikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin veya kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin yasaya uygun davranmad\u0131klar\u0131 iddias\u0131yla idare veya yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131nca denetlenmelerine olanak sa\u011flamaktad\u0131r. \u015eikayet edilen ki\u015finin su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fi i\u00e7in cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 veya kamu g\u00f6revlisinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 nedeniyle disiplin i\u015flemine ya da yarg\u0131lamaya tabi tutulmas\u0131 sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelebilecek ise de, yasal hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamaz. \u015eu halde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n dilek\u00e7esiyle ilgili olarak i\u015flem yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 durumunda \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zlerinin, hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle hukuka uygunluk nedenini olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeyerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7undan san\u0131k Cafer Tercan\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 106\/1-2.c.maddesi gere\u011fince 1 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, an\u0131lan Yasan\u0131n 50\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca cezas\u0131n\u0131n 600 YTL adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrilmesine ili\u015fkin Ta\u015fova Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 26.4.2007 tarih, 2007\/ 875\/440 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 aleyhine Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen Yasa Yarar\u0131na Bozma iste\u011fini i\u00e7eren Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 25.9.2007 g\u00fcn ve 183633 say\u0131l\u0131 tebli\u011fnamesiyle dava dosyas\u0131 Daireye g\u00f6nderilmekle incelendi<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebli\u011fnamede\u00a0 T\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re ;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ta\u015fova Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na verdi\u011fi 25.01.2007 tarihli \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esi ve ayn\u0131 tarihli anlat\u0131m\u0131 ile tutulan tutanak i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re g\u00f6revli savc\u0131y\u0131 kastederek &#8220;e\u011fer sizde bu dilek\u00e7eme g\u00f6re davama bakmayacak gibi olursan\u0131z b\u00fct\u00fcn T\u00fcrkiye savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcfetti\u015fi olan Erbaa&#8217;n\u0131n Hac\u0131pazar K\u00f6y\u00fcnden olan bacana\u011f\u0131m say\u0131n m\u00fcfetti\u015fime bilgi verece\u011fim&#8221; \u015feklindeki s\u00f6zlerinin, objektif de\u011ferlendirmeye g\u00f6re, ciddi bir korku ve endi\u015fe yaratmaya elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun olmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeksizin yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesinde,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 58\/6.maddesinde tekerr\u00fcr halinde h\u00fckmolunan cezan\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;un 108.maddesinde de tekerr\u00fcr halinde i\u015flenen su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irilecek s\u00fcrelerin belirtildi\u011fi, an\u0131lan maddede adli para cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeksizin cezan\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine karar verilmesinde,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Kamu g\u00f6revlisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6revini yapmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek amac\u0131yla cebir ve tehdit kullanan ki\u015finin eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 265\/1.maddesindeki su\u00e7 tan\u0131m\u0131na uydu\u011funun g\u00f6zetilmemesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir denilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ncelenen dosyada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ta\u015fova Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na verdi\u011fi 25.1.2007 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde, d\u00fcn\u00fcr\u00fcnden olan alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 alamay\u0131p tehdit edildi\u011finden bahisle yak\u0131nmada bulundu\u011fu ve dilek\u00e7e sonunda da; e\u011fer sizde dilek\u00e7eme g\u00f6re davama bakamayacak olursan\u0131z, b\u00fct\u00fcn T\u00fcrkiye savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcfetti\u015fi olan m\u00fcfetti\u015fime bilgi verecem diye yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan eylemin tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilerek 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY.n\u0131n 106\/1-2.c. uyar\u0131nca 1 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 50.maddesi ile cezas\u0131n\u0131n 600 YTL. adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrildikten sonra 58\/6.maddeye g\u00f6re cezas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine ve cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131ndan sonra denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-Tebli\u011fnamenin 1 numaral\u0131 bendinde belirtilen; tehdit su\u00e7unun yasal \u00f6\u011felerinin olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bozma nedeninin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYn\u0131n 106. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7unun tan\u0131m\u0131nda; sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fck edece\u011finden bahisle tehdit eyleminden s\u00f6z edilmi\u015f ise de, eylemin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6\u011fesinin olu\u015fmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olayda hukuka uygunluk nedenlerinin bulunmamas\u0131 da zorunludur. TCYn\u0131n 26. maddesinde hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanan ki\u015fiye ceza verilmez h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde ise, herkesin yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde iddia ve savunmada bulunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca, ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer veya resmi mercilerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015flem ve eylemleri nedeniyle ki\u015filerin \u015fikayet haklar\u0131 da hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda bu madde i\u00e7erisinde de\u011ferlendirilmektedir. \u015eikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin veya kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin yasaya uygun davranmad\u0131klar\u0131 iddias\u0131yla idare veya yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131nca denetlenmelerine olanak sa\u011flamaktad\u0131r. \u015eikayet edilen ki\u015finin su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fi i\u00e7in cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 veya kamu g\u00f6revlisinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 nedeniyle disiplin i\u015flemine ya da yarg\u0131lamaya tabi tutulmas\u0131 sair bir k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelebilecek ise de, yasal hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamaz. \u015eu halde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n dilek\u00e7esiyle ilgili olarak i\u015flem yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 durumunda \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zlerinin, hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle hukuka uygunluk nedenini olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeyerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Tebli\u011fnamenin 2 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen bozma nedeninin incelenmesinde; yerel mahkemenin, TCYn\u0131n 58.maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. TCY.n\u0131n 50\/5.maddesinde; &#8220;uygulamada as\u0131l mahkumiyet, bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re \u00e7evrilen para cezas\u0131 veya tedbirdir&#8221; denilmektedir. TCYn\u0131n 58.maddesinde ise tekerr\u00fcr h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn uygulanmas\u0131 ko\u015fullar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan 58.maddenin d\u00fczenleni\u015f bi\u00e7iminde hapis ve adli para cezas\u0131 ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmakla birlikte, 6.f\u0131kra uyar\u0131nca cezan\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz bi\u00e7imini d\u00fczenleyen 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 108.maddesinde, bu infaz \u015feklinin yaln\u0131zca hapis cezalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bulundu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n adli para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n infaz y\u00f6netimini g\u00f6steren 106.maddesinde de m\u00fckerrirlikle ilgili bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. A\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemeler de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; mahkemece h\u00fckmolunan adli para cezas\u0131 nedeniyle san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejiminin ve cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131ndan sonra denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilemeyece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu neden bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bozma iste\u011finin kabul\u00fcne karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Tebli\u011fnamenin 3 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen; eylemin TCY.n\u0131n 265\/1.maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7 tan\u0131m\u0131na uyaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bozma nedenine gelince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY.n\u0131n 265.maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, kamu g\u00f6revlisine kar\u015f\u0131, g\u00f6revini yapmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek amac\u0131yla cebir veya tehdit kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Ancak, bu su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da eylemin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00f6yledi\u011fi kabul edilen s\u00f6zler \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle, su\u00e7un hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6\u011fesinin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer taraftan, eylemin iddianamede s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen TCYn\u0131n 277. maddesine uyup uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131na da de\u011finilmelidir. An\u0131lan maddede d\u00fczenlenen yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revini yapan\u0131 etkileme su\u00e7unun \u00f6\u011feleri; yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revi yapanlara emir verme, bask\u0131 yapma veya n\u00fcfuz icra etme veya her ne olursa olsun hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak etkilemeye te\u015febb\u00fcs etme bi\u00e7iminde a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle bu su\u00e7un hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6\u011fesinin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve eylemin yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revini yapan\u0131 etkileme su\u00e7unu da olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131, anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n dilek\u00e7esindeki s\u00f6zlerinin \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131yla ilgili bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle, TCYn\u0131n 107\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen, \u015fantaj su\u00e7unun hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanaca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle i\u015flenmi\u015f olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde de durulmal\u0131d\u0131r. An\u0131lan maddenin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen \u015fantaj su\u00e7u bir hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilerek i\u015flenebilmekte ise de, bu su\u00e7un olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in ma\u011fdurdan istenilen veya beklenilen davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n; kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 veya y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir \u015feyi yapmaya veya yapmamaya ya da haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kar sa\u011flamaya zorlama niteli\u011finde bulunmas\u0131 zorunludur. Bu durumda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n C. Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7enin yasalara uygun olarak i\u015flem g\u00f6rmesini iste\u011fine y\u00f6nelik eyleminde \u015fantaj su\u00e7unun \u00f6\u011felerinin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Belirtilen nedenler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda., tebli\u011fnamenin 3 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen bozma nedeninin yerinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle tebli\u011fnamenin 3 numaral\u0131 bendinde g\u00f6sterilen nedene ili\u015fkin yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin REDD\u0130NE, ancak mahkemenin san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 vermek yerine tehdit su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131rmas\u0131 ve kabule g\u00f6re de, h\u00fckmedilen adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine ve denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce yerinde bulunarak, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYYn\u0131n 309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca Ta\u015fova Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 26.4.2007 tarihli ve 2007\/875-440 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n YASA YARARINA BOZULMASINA, eylem su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan BERAAT\u0130NE, (4.CDnin 13.02.2008 tarih ve 2007\/9642-2008\/1435 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u0130ddian\u0131n Samimi Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 Gerekir<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eahit olmasa bile, samimi iddia di\u011fer yan delillerle s\u00fcbut bulabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yak\u0131nanlar\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n telefonla arayarak kendilerini tehdit etti\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131n\u0131n inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ileti\u015fimin tespiti suretiyle ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131 al\u0131narak kan\u0131tlar\u0131n birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken, eylemin niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re tan\u0131kla kan\u0131tlama olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden, tan\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle beraat h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r(4.CD\u00a0 07.02.2011 tarihli ve Esas No : 2010\/24469\u00a0\u00a0 Karar No : 2011\/1160 k\u00fcnyeli i\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit Su\u00e7u \u0130rtikap Edilirken Kayda Al\u0131nmas\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7u irtikap edilirken kayda al\u0131n\u0131p bilahare mahkemeye delil olarak ibraz etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)\u015eikayet\u00e7i ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fen ki\u015finin telefonda \u015fikayet\u00e7iye s\u00f6vme ve tehdit i\u00e7eren s\u00f6zler s\u00f6ylemesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan inkar edilen bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmedeki \u015fahs\u0131n san\u0131k olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekirken, dinleme karar\u0131 olmadan iki ki\u015fi aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7en telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinin teybe al\u0131nmas\u0131yla elde edilen delilin 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK na g\u00f6re ge\u00e7erli delil niteli\u011finde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle yasal olmayan gerek\u00e7e ile at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lardan beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi hukuka\u00a0 ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r\u00a0 22.01.2011 tarihli ve 2008\/11929E\u00a0 2009\/92K\u00a0 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit Su\u00e7unda Ma\u011fdurun Korkmas\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit fiili, ki\u015finin ruh dinginli\u011fini bozan, i\u00e7 huzurunu, bilin\u00e7 ve irade\u00a0 \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal eden bir olgudur. Fiilin ma\u011fdur \u00fczerinde ciddi\u00a0 bir korku yaratabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 almaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun\u00a0 olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca tehdidin somut olayda muhatap \u00fczerinde etkili olmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle ma\u011fdurun korkup korkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit fiili, ki\u015finin ruh dinginli\u011fini bozan, i\u00e7 huzurunu, bilin\u00e7 ve irade\u00a0 \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal eden bir olgudur. Fiilin ma\u011fdur \u00fczerinde ciddi\u00a0 bir korku yaratabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 almaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun\u00a0 olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca tehdidin somut olayda muhatap \u00fczerinde etkili olmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle ma\u011fdurun korkup korkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7unun manevi \u00f6\u011fesi genel kasttan ibaret olup su\u00e7un\u00a0 yasal tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek i\u015flenmesini ifade eder. Olayda tasarlaman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, saikin de \u00f6nemi yoktur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kavga ve tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda haks\u0131z bir fiilin kendisinde husule\u00a0 getirdi\u011fi \u015fiddetli \u00f6fke ve elemin (gazab\u0131n) failin iradesini etkileyen bir etken olarak\u00a0 kusur yetene\u011finde meydana getirdi\u011fi azalma nedeniyle ko\u015fullar\u0131 varsa ancak yasal indirim nedeni olarak kabul edilebilmesi olanakl\u0131 ise de, \u00f6nceden\u00a0 ilke boyutunda kast\u0131 kald\u0131ran ve su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engelleyen bir husus olarak kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Yukar\u0131da yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalara g\u00f6re; incelenen dosyada; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fduru tehdit etti\u011finin kabul edilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n, tehdit s\u00f6zlerinin fevren s\u00f6ylenmesinin ve ma\u011fdurun korkmamas\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engellemeyece\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, yasal olmayan gerek\u00e7elerle beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r,(4.CD\u00a0 22.02.2011 tarihli ve\u00a0 Esas No:2009\/10485 Karar No:2011\/2223 k\u00fcnyeli i\u00e7tihad\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tehdit Su\u00e7unda G\u00f6revli Mahkeme:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 106\/2.maddesinde belirtilen tehdit su\u00e7unda g\u00f6revli\u00a0 mahkeme asliye ceza mahkemesidir<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit su\u00e7unun vasf\u0131na g\u00f6re g\u00f6revli mahkemeyi tayin ve tespit etmemiz gerekir. 106\/2. maddesinde belirtilen tehdit su\u00e7u i\u00e7in g\u00f6revli mahkeme asliye ceza mahkemesidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)M\u00fc\u015ftekiler, san\u0131klar\u0131n kendilerini &#8220;bu suyu buradan kesip g\u00f6t\u00fcrece\u011fiz, engellerseniz sizi \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcr\u00fcz&#8221; s\u00f6zleri ile tehdit ettiklerini ileri s\u00fcrmeleri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerinin bu niteli\u011fi itibariyle 765 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0 188\/1 maddesinde belirtilen \u015fartl\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi, bu halde davaya bakma ve delilleri takdir etme g\u00f6revinin Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine ait bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken, yarg\u0131lamaya devamla yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (2.CD 22.02.2007 tarihli ve Esas No:2006\/9707\u00a0 Karar No:2007\/2720<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)M\u00fc\u015ftekiler, san\u0131klar\u0131n kendilerini &#8220;bu suyu buradan kesip g\u00f6t\u00fcrece\u011fiz, engellerseniz sizi \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcr\u00fcz&#8221; s\u00f6zleri ile tehdit ettiklerini ileri s\u00fcrmeleri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerinin bu niteli\u011fi itibariyle 765 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0 188\/1 maddesinde belirtilen \u015fartl\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi, bu halde davaya bakma ve delilleri takdir etme g\u00f6revinin Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine ait bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken, yarg\u0131lamaya devamla yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (2.CD 22.02.2007 tarihli ve Esas No:2006\/9707\u00a0 Karar No:2007\/2720<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)M\u00fc\u015ftekiler, san\u0131klar\u0131n kendilerini &#8220;bu suyu buradan kesip g\u00f6t\u00fcrece\u011fiz, engellerseniz sizi \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcr\u00fcz&#8221; s\u00f6zleri ile tehdit ettiklerini ileri s\u00fcrmeleri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerinin bu niteli\u011fi itibariyle 765 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0 188\/1 maddesinde belirtilen \u015fartl\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi, bu halde davaya bakma ve delilleri takdir etme g\u00f6revinin Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine ait bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken, yarg\u0131lamaya devamla yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (2.CD 22.02.2007 tarihli ve Esas No:2006\/9707\u00a0 Karar No:2007\/2720<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>765 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunu&#8217;nun 188\/1.Maddesine M\u00fcmas su\u00e7ta Uyarlama:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Elde edilen sonu\u00e7 cezalar kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY.n\u0131n failin lehine oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda mahkemenin saptamas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zorlama su\u00e7undan san\u0131k Sebahattin Canzurnan\u0131n, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY.n\u0131n 106\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, bu cezan\u0131n g\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 11.557.000 TLden paraya \u00e7evrilerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonu\u00e7 olarak 2.080.260.000 TL adli para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin, Zeytinburnu 3. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilip kesinle\u015fen, 17.06.2005 g\u00fcnl\u00fc karar\u0131n\u0131n Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca 10.10.2006 g\u00fcn 46407 ve 02.05.2007 tarih ve 23093 say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131 ile yasa yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131n\u0131n istenmesi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 06.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 251269 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 05.06.2007 tarih ve 96745 tebli\u011fnameleriyle dava dosyas\u0131 Daireye g\u00f6nderilmekle incelendi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebli\u011fnamede\u00a0 dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, 1.6.2005 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;un 9\/3.maddesi gere\u011fince lehe olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn, \u00f6nceki ve sonraki kanunlar\u0131n ilgili b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin olaya uygulanarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 birbirleriyle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle belirlenmesi gerekti\u011fi cihetle, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 106\/1.maddesi uyar\u0131nca tayin olunan hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 50 ve 52.maddeleri uyar\u0131nca adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden karma uygulama yap\u0131lmak suretiyle 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 4.maddesi uyar\u0131nca para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrilmesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir denilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosyan\u0131n incelenmesinde 1.6.2004 tarihli mahkemenin karar\u0131nda 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY.n\u0131n 188\/1. 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 4 ve TCY.n\u0131n 72.maddeleri uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonu\u00e7 olarak 2.427.043.000 TL. a\u011f\u0131r para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 7.3.2006 tarihinde uyarlama karar\u0131 istendi\u011fi ve Zeytinburnu 3.Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 17.6.2005 tarihinde 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun zorlama su\u00e7unun kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan 106\/1 maddesinde para cezas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle san\u0131k lehine oldu\u011fundan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 106\/1.maddesi gere\u011fince 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu cezan\u0131n da 11.557.000 TL. den hesaplanarak 2.080.260.000 TL. adli para cezas\u0131 verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK.nun 1.6.2005 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmekle bu tarihten \u00f6nce i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan an\u0131lan Yasan\u0131n zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygulama ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 7.maddesinin 2.f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca failin lehine olan yasan\u0131n saptanmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Lehe yasan\u0131n belirlenmesinde izlenecek y\u00f6ntem ve uygulaman\u0131n nas\u0131l yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 9\/3.maddesinde Lehe olan h\u00fck\u00fcm, \u00f6nceki ve sonraki kanunlar\u0131n ilgili b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00fck\u00fcmleri olaya uygulanarak, ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n birbirleriyle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle belirlenir. bi\u00e7imindeki h\u00fck\u00fcm ile a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmu\u015ftur. Yarg\u0131tay \u0130BK.nun 23.2.1938 tarih ve 1938\/23-9, YCGK.nun 14.10.1985 tarih ve 1985\/194-525, 25.5.1999 tarih ve 1999\/133-142, 23.12.2003 tarih ve 2003\/270-290, 30.3.2004 tarih ve 2004\/46-78, 20.9.2005 tarih ve 2005\/99-103, 27.12.2005 tarih ve 2005\/162-173 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda da lehe yasa belirlenirken g\u00f6zetilecek ilkeler ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararlardan sonuncusunda, &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.sabit kabul edilen olaya her iki yasan\u0131n ilgili t\u00fcm h\u00fck\u00fcmleri birbirine kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n uygulanmak suretiyle ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 sonu\u00e7lar belirlenmesini ve bunlar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. denilmektedir. \u0130ncelenen somut olayda, kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n san\u0131k yarar\u0131na oldu\u011fu tespit edilerek ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 106\/1 maddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011fa 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015f, bu ceza Yasa maddesi g\u00f6sterilmeden g\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 11.557.000 TLden para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Her ne kadar kararda uygulanan yasa maddesi g\u00f6sterilmese de, paraya \u00e7evrili\u015f miktar\u0131na bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 4.maddesi gere\u011fince paraya \u00e7evrilme i\u015fleminin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Temel cezan\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCYye g\u00f6re belirlenmesine kar\u015f\u0131n, paraya \u00e7evirme i\u015fleminin 647 say\u0131l\u0131 C\u0130Yna g\u00f6re yap\u0131lmas\u0131, karma uygulama niteli\u011findedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An\u0131lan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, her iki yasa y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ceza uygulamas\u0131n\u0131 san\u0131k yarar\u0131na, alt s\u0131n\u0131rlardan uzakla\u015fmadan somutla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki sonu\u00e7lara ula\u015f\u0131lacakt\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a)765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKa g\u00f6re: TCK.nun 188\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince 6 ay hapis ve 343 YTL. adli para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, san\u0131\u011fa verilen cezan\u0131n 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 4. maddesine g\u00f6re, su\u00e7 tarihi itibariyle g\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 9 YTLden paraya \u00e7evrilerek 1.620 YTL adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrilmesine, san\u0131\u011fa verilen cezalar\u0131n TCYn\u0131n 72. maddesi uyar\u0131nca toplanarak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonu\u00e7 olarak 1.963 YTL adli para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b) 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCKa g\u00f6re; ise TCK.nun 106\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, san\u0131\u011fa verilen cezan\u0131n an\u0131lan Yasan\u0131n 50. maddesi uyar\u0131nca g\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 20 YTLden paraya \u00e7evrilerek, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonu\u00e7 olarak 3.600 YTL adli para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na \u015feklinde karar verilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Elde edilen sonu\u00e7 cezalar kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY.n\u0131n failin lehine oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda mahkemenin saptamas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenledi\u011fi tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce, yukar\u0131da belirtilen nedenlerle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, Zorlama su\u00e7undan san\u0131k S. Canzurna hakk\u0131nda Zeytinburnu 3. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilip kesinle\u015fen, 17.06.2005 g\u00fcnl\u00fc karar\u0131n, CYY.n\u0131n 309.maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY.n\u0131n 309\/4.maddesine g\u00f6re, karardaki hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k daha hafif bir cezan\u0131n verilmesini gerektirmekle; san\u0131k lehine oldu\u011fu saptanan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY.n\u0131n 188\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince 6 ay hapis ve 343 YTL. adli para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, san\u0131\u011fa verilen cezan\u0131n 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 4. maddesine g\u00f6re, su\u00e7 tarihi itibariyle g\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 9 YTLden paraya \u00e7evrilerek 1.620 YTL adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrilmesine, san\u0131\u011fa verilen adli para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n TCYn\u0131n 72. maddesi uyar\u0131nca toplanarak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonu\u00e7 olarak 1.963 YTL adli para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, karardaki \u00f6b\u00fcr hususlar\u0131n oldu\u011fu gibi b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na, (4.CDnin 07.04.2008 tarih ve 2007\/6576-2008\/5926 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u0130\u00c7T\u0130HADI B\u0130RLE\u015eT\u0130RME GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">E. 1991\/5<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">K. 1993\/1<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">T. 18.1.1993<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEHD\u0130T SU\u00c7UNUN OLU\u015eMASI ( Taamm\u00fct Unsuru &#8211; Kavga S\u0131ras\u0131nda Fevren S\u00f6ylenen S\u00f6zler )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TAAMM\u00dcT UNSURU ( Tehdit Su\u00e7unun Olu\u015fmas\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 KAVGA SIRASINDA FEVREN S\u00d6YLENEN S\u00d6ZLER ( Tehdit Kasd\u0131 Olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">765\/m.191, 188<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">2797\/m.45<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET : Her ne kadar Ceza Genel Kurulu ve \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin yerle\u015fmi\u015f \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ile D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda tehdit su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in taamm\u00fct unsurunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi gerekti\u011fi ve kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerin tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri benimsenmi\u015f ise de, Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen son karar\u0131nda ( taamm\u00fct unsuru )ndan a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a s\u00f6z edilmedi\u011fi, taamm\u00fct unsuruna yer verilmedi\u011fi ancak bunun yan\u0131nda, &#8220;&#8230;k\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131k an\u0131nda sarfedilen geli\u015fi g\u00fczel s\u00f6zlerde tehdit kast\u0131 vard\u0131r denilemez&#8221; \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verildi\u011fi de bir ger\u00e7ektir. Ancak, karar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fc itibariyle de\u011ferlendirilmesi durumunda tehdit su\u00e7unun belirlenmesinde olaysal de\u011ferlendirmeye de a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun olaysal de\u011ferlendirmeye a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k veren yeni temay\u00fcl\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda uygulaman\u0131n netle\u015fmesini beklemek yerinde olaca\u011f\u0131ndan, \u015fimdilik i\u00e7tihad\u0131 birle\u015ftirme yoluna gitmekte hukuki yarar bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA : D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Sami Sel\u00e7uk 1.4.1991 g\u00fcnl\u00fc yaz\u0131 ile T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 191. maddesinde yer alan &#8220;tehdit&#8221; ve 188. maddesinde yer alan, uygulamada &#8220;ko\u015fullu tehdit&#8221; diye an\u0131lan zorlama c\u00fcr\u00fcmlerinde; Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun, kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00f6fkeyle ( fevren ) s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerde tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcn\u00fcn kas\u0131t ( taamm\u00fct ) \u00f6gesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu sebeple de su\u00e7un olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde oldu\u011funu; D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin ise, son kararlar\u0131nda bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc de\u011fi\u015ftirdi\u011fini; bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda yerel mahkemelerde bu konuda duraksamalar meydana geldi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek i\u00e7tihad\u0131 birle\u015ftirme yolu ile ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2797 say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Kanunu&#8217;nun 45\/2 nci maddesi uyar\u0131nca, konuyu inceleyen Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Kurulu&#8217;nca 17.10.1991 g\u00fcn ve 51 say\u0131 ile kararlar aras\u0131nda ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulundu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131larak konunun \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme B\u00fcy\u00fck Genel Kurulu&#8217;nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. 8.5.1992 g\u00fcn\u00fc toplanan-\u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme B\u00fcy\u00fck Genel Kurulu&#8217;nda Raport\u00f6r \u00dcyenin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenerek gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR : \u00d6nce kararlar aras\u0131nda ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u00e7tihad\u0131 birle\u015ftirme yoluna gidilmesine gerek olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fc \u00fczerinde durulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1 ) Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 2.7.1979 g\u00fcn ve 182\/312 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda &#8220;san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tehdide konu edilen s\u00f6zleri, cereyan eden bir a\u011f\u0131z kavgas\u0131 ve \u00e7eki\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren sarfetti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na ve Y\u00fcksek Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131n yerle\u015fmi\u015f i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, hakaretle m\u00fcterafik olarak fevren s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerde tehdit su\u00e7unun taamm\u00fct unsurunun olu\u015famayaca\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re&#8221;; 8.10.1979 g\u00fcnl\u00fc ve 354\/450 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda: &#8220;Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131n kararl\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6steren uygulamalar\u0131na g\u00f6re kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015flarda taamm\u00fct unsuru bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle tehdit su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131na olanak yoktur&#8221;; 27.4.1981 g\u00fcnl\u00fc ve 158\/336 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda &#8220;&#8230; san\u0131klar\u0131n fevren sarfettikleri bu s\u00f6zlerde tehdit su\u00e7unun taamm\u00fct unsurunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden&#8230;&#8221;; 17.12.1984 g\u00fcn, 190\/436 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda ge\u00e7mi\u015f uygulamalara da de\u011finilerek: &#8220;Nitekim Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131m\u0131z bug\u00fcne kadarki uygulamalar\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren sarfetti\u011fi s\u00f6zlerde tehdit su\u00e7unun tasarlama unsurunun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; &#8230; tehdit fiilinin tasarlanarak i\u015flenmesi \u015fartt\u0131r&#8221;; 9.11.1987 g\u00fcn, 376\/533 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda temyize konu davaya esas olan olaylar\u0131n \u00f6zelliklerine de de\u011finilerek: &#8220;Tehdit su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in san\u0131\u011f\u0131n takip etti\u011fi maksad\u0131n\u0131n tehdit fiiline ba\u015fka bir c\u00fcr\u00fcm niteli\u011fi verecek \u015fekilde olu\u015fmamas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r. Tehdit fiili taamm\u00fcden olu\u015fmal\u0131, tehevv\u00fcren tehditte bulunulmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Yerle\u015fmi\u015f uygulamalara g\u00f6re kavgan\u0131n devam\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren sarfedilen s\u00f6zlerde tehdit su\u00e7u ve unsurlar\u0131 bulunmamakta ve yine ortada kavga yokken sarfedilen s\u00f6zlerde olay\u0131n niteli\u011fi de g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak tehdit su\u00e7unun olu\u015faca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir; 5.11.1990 g\u00fcn, 219\/252 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda &#8220;Tehdit su\u00e7undan s\u00f6z edebilmek i\u00e7in tehdide konu s\u00f6zlerde tasarlama unsurunun bulunmas\u0131 gerekir&#8221; denilmi\u015ftir; 18.2.1991 g\u00fcn, 368\/36 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda tehdidin manevi unsurunun &#8220;tasarlamak&#8221; oldu\u011fu; bu itibarla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda s\u00f6yledi\u011fi &#8220;seni \u00f6ld\u00fcrece\u011fim, buraya g\u00f6mece\u011fim&#8221; \u015feklindeki s\u00f6zlerin tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 benimsenmi\u015ftir; 25.3.1991 g\u00fcn, 66\/18 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda ise konu ile ilgili olarak &#8220;Tehdit; ma\u011fduru istenilen bir hakareti yapma\u011fa veya yapmama\u011fa zorlamak ve onu bu y\u00f6nde korkutmak oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re hukuken de\u011ferlendirilebilmesi i\u00e7in belirtilen sonucu do\u011furmaya uygunluk, elveri\u015flilik ve yeterlilik ko\u015fullar\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmelidir. Kavgada k\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131kla s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerde bu ko\u015fullar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finden tehdit su\u00e7u olu\u015fmayacakt\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc s\u00f6ylenmesi i\u00e7in sebep olmayan ve yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmayan k\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131k an\u0131nda sarfedilen geli\u015fig\u00fczel s\u00f6zlerde tehdit kast\u0131 vard\u0131r denilemez&#8221; \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klamalar yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2 ) \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin 18.12.1990 g\u00fcn, 12900\/13326 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda &#8220;M\u00fcnaka\u015fa s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerde tehdit su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine karar verilmesi&#8221; isabetsiz bulunmu\u015f ( 18.12.1990 g\u00fcn, 12947\/13395 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 da ayn\u0131 do\u011frultudad\u0131r ); 19.3.1991 g\u00fcn, 2748\/3010 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda: &#8220;Ortada bir kavga olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 cihetle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sarfetti\u011fi s\u00f6zlerin ciddi bir korku yaratabilecek nitelikte oldu\u011funun ve tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funun kabul\u00fcnde &#8230; bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir&#8221; \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klama yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; 21.3.1991 g\u00fcn, 2397\/3265 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda ise &#8220;Taraflar aras\u0131nda a\u011f\u0131z kavgas\u0131 oldu\u011fu tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 ile anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda sarfedilen s\u00f6zlerin ciddi bir korku yaratmayaca\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla m\u00fcsnet su\u00e7u olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131&#8221; yolunda bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm benimsenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3 ) D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesinin 25.9.1975 g\u00fcn, 4715\/4754 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda &#8220;San\u0131\u011f\u0131n tehdit ta\u015f\u0131yan s\u00f6zleri, taraflar aras\u0131nda husule gelen kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren sarfetti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re olayda tehdit su\u00e7unun taamm\u00fct unsuru yoktur&#8221; denilmi\u015ftir. ( 13.7.1955 g\u00fcn, 7909\/13423 say\u0131; 5.2.1975 g\u00fcn, 452\/ 426 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar da ayn\u0131 do\u011frultuda bulunmaktad\u0131r ). D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin, 26.3.1991 g\u00fcn, 1197\/1920 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda \u00f6nceki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ften d\u00f6n\u00fclerek &#8220;Bir tehlike su\u00e7u olan tehdidin ciddi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu ise, tehlikeyi i\u00e7eren s\u00f6zlerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinin ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olup olmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re de\u011fil, olu\u015ftu\u011fu ortama ve taraflar\u0131n bedensel ve ruhsal durumlar\u0131na g\u00f6re tehdit edici s\u00f6zlerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ma\u011fdurun iradesini etkileme derecesi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcleri i\u00e7inde, \u00f6nceden birbir say\u0131lmas\u0131 olanaks\u0131z etkenler g\u00f6zetilerek, ilk mahkemece de\u011ferlendirilecek olgusal bir sorundur. \u0130lk mahkeme, a\u011f\u0131r olmayan tehditlere kar\u015f\u0131 da cezai yapt\u0131r\u0131m gerektiren TCK. koyucusunun bu konudaki duyarl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da g\u00f6zeterek, tehdidin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015fte ciddi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorununu \u00e7\u00f6zmek zorundad\u0131r. \u00d6yleyse s\u00f6ylenen tehditlerin ciddi olup olamayaca\u011f\u0131 yolunda \u00f6nceden ilke boyutunda ve \u00fcstelik bir olay i\u00e7tihad\u0131 yaratmak olanaks\u0131zd\u0131r. San\u0131\u011fa y\u00fckletilen zorlama su\u00e7unda da tehdit, hareket ve icra amac\u0131 oldu\u011fundan, yukar\u0131daki ba\u011flamda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmek gerekirken tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcn\u00fcn, hukuki ve maddi konular\u0131, su\u00e7 kast\u0131n\u0131n zaman s\u00fcreci i\u00e7indeki olu\u015fumu ve niteli\u011fi, su\u00e7un yap\u0131s\u0131na ili\u015fkin yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenler g\u00f6zetilmeden, tart\u0131\u015fma ve kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda salt \u00f6fkeyle i\u015flenen tehdidin su\u00e7 olamayaca\u011f\u0131 nedenine dayan\u0131larak yasal temelden yoksun gerek\u00e7e ile h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr&#8221; denilmi\u015ftir ( 7.3.1991 g\u00fcn, 670\/1481 say\u0131; 13.3.1991 g\u00fcn, 962\/1628 say\u0131 ve 26.3.1991 g\u00fcn, 1149\/1905 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar da ayn\u0131 do\u011frultuda bulunmaktad\u0131r ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da k\u0131saca \u00f6zetlenen Ceza Genel Kurulu Kararlar\u0131nda yerle\u015fmi\u015f bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f olarak tehdit su\u00e7unun manevi unsurunun tasarlamak oldu\u011fu; kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerde tehdit su\u00e7unun taamm\u00fct unsurunun olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k bir bi\u00e7imde vurgulanarak bu esaslar\u0131n \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda olaylar\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi ile sonuca gidildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun en son 25.3.1991 g\u00fcn ve 66-92 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda ise olaylar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6zel de\u011ferlendirmeye girilmeden \u015fu a\u00e7\u0131klama yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r: &#8220;Tehdit, ma\u011fduru istenilen bir hareketi yapmaya veya yapmamaya zorlamak ve onu bu y\u00f6nde korkutmak oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re hukuken de\u011ferlendirilebilmesi i\u00e7in belirtilen sonucu do\u011furmaya uygunluk, elveri\u015flilik ve yeterlilik ko\u015fullar\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmelidir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, s\u00f6ylenmesi i\u00e7in sebep olmayan ve yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmayan k\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131k an\u0131nda sarfedilen geli\u015fig\u00fczel s\u00f6zlerde tehdit kast\u0131 vard\u0131r denilemez&#8221;. Bu genel a\u00e7\u0131klamalardan sonra uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu olay a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6zel bir de\u011ferlendirmeye girilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi kararlar\u0131nda m\u00fcnaka\u015fa s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerde tehdit su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 esas\u0131 genel olarak benimsenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tehdit ta\u015f\u0131yan s\u00f6zlerinin taraflar aras\u0131nda husule gelen kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren sarfetti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla tehdit su\u00e7unun taamm\u00fct unsurunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyece\u011fi esas\u0131 benimsenmi\u015fken son kararlar\u0131nda &#8220;bir tehlike su\u00e7u olan tehdidi i\u00e7eren s\u00f6zlerin &#8230;. olu\u015ftu\u011fu ortama ve taraflar\u0131n bedensel ve ruhsal durumlar\u0131na g\u00f6re tehdit edici s\u00f6zlerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ma\u011fdurun iradesini etkileme derecesi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcleri i\u00e7inde \u00f6nceden birbir say\u0131lmas\u0131 olanaks\u0131z etkenler g\u00f6zetilmek, ilk mahkemece de\u011ferlendirilecek olgusal bir sorun oldu\u011fu &#8230;. bu nedenler g\u00f6zetilmeden tart\u0131\u015fmaya ve kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda salt \u00f6fkeyle i\u015flenen tehdidin su\u00e7 olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n benimsenemeyece\u011fi&#8221; esas\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda baz\u0131 \u00fcyeler Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun son 25.3.1991 g\u00fcnl\u00fc karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a taamm\u00fct unsuruna yer verilmedi\u011fi; her olay\u0131n kendi ko\u015fullar\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde de\u011ferlendirilmesinin gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn kabul edildi\u011fi ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kararlar aras\u0131nda ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kararlar aras\u0131nda ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n mevcut olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirleme a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ilk oylamada bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f do\u011frultusunda \u00fc\u00e7te iki \u00e7o\u011funluk sa\u011flanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, 8.5.1992 g\u00fcn\u00fc toplanan \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme B\u00fcy\u00fck Genel Kurulu&#8217;nda konu yeniden ele al\u0131n\u0131p tart\u0131\u015f\u0131larak \u015fu sonuca var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ger\u00e7ekten Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun yukar\u0131da k\u0131saca \u00f6zetlenen 25.3.1991 g\u00fcnl\u00fc karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k bir bi\u00e7imde taamm\u00fct unsurundan s\u00f6z edilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ne var ki, Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun bu karar\u0131nda her ne kadar olaylar\u0131n kendi ko\u015fullar\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015f ise de gene bu kararda &#8220;kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerin&#8221; tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 da benimsenmi\u015ftir. D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin kararl\u0131l\u0131k kazanm\u0131\u015f son kararlar\u0131nda ise; kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerin tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bir ilke olarak benimsenemeyece\u011fi esas\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir ki, bu bak\u0131mdan kararlar aras\u0131nda ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulundu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki; Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 25.3.1991 tarihli karar\u0131 ile D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesinin son kararlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir an i\u00e7in kabul edilse dahi Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun di\u011fer kararlar\u0131 ve \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi kararlar\u0131 ile D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin yerle\u015fik son i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n mevcut oldu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fma g\u00f6t\u00fcrmeyecek kadar a\u00e7\u0131k bir keyfiyettir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu sebeplerle, yukar\u0131da s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen kararlar aras\u0131nda ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n mevcut oldu\u011fu sonucuna oybirli\u011fiyle var\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra i\u00e7tihad\u0131 birle\u015ftirme yoluna gidilip gidilmemesi hususunun incelenmesine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Her ne kadar Ceza Genel Kurulu ve \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin yerle\u015fmi\u015f i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ile D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda tehdit su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in taamm\u00fct unsurunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi gerekti\u011fi ve kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda fevren s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerin tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri benimsenmi\u015f ise de, Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun yukar\u0131da s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen son karar\u0131nda ( taamm\u00fct unsuru )ndan a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a s\u00f6z edilmedi\u011fi, taamm\u00fct unsuruna yer verilmedi\u011fi ancak bunun yan\u0131nda, &#8220;&#8230; k\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131k an\u0131nda sarfedilen geli\u015fig\u00fczel s\u00f6zlerde tehdit kast\u0131 vard\u0131r denilemez&#8221; \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verildi\u011fi de bir ger\u00e7ektir. Ancak, karar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fc itibariyle de\u011ferlendirilmesi durumunda tehdit su\u00e7unun belirlenmesinde olaysal de\u011ferlendirmeye de a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun olaysal de\u011ferlendirmeye a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k veren yeni temay\u00fcl\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda uygulaman\u0131n netle\u015fmesini beklemek yerinde olacak ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u015fimdilik i\u00e7tihad\u0131 birle\u015ftirme yoluna gitmekte hukuki yarar bulunmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu sebeplerle, \u015fimdilik i\u00e7tihad\u0131 birle\u015ftirme yoluna gitmeye gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, 18.1.1993 g\u00fcn\u00fc ikinci toplant\u0131da 27 oya kar\u015f\u0131 89 oyla ve \u00fc\u00e7te ikiyi ge\u00e7en \u00e7o\u011funlukla karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>KAR\u015eI OY:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme B\u00fcy\u00fck Kurulu, 8.5.1992 tarihli ilk toplant\u0131s\u0131ndan yakla\u015f\u0131k 9 ay son yap\u0131lan 18.1.1993 tarihli oturumda; Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu ve \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi ile D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin kararlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda, hem g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011funa ve hem de &#8220;olaysal de\u011ferlendirmeye a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k veren&#8221; Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulunun &#8220;yeni e\u011filimi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda uygulaman\u0131n netle\u015fmesini beklemenin yerinde&#8221; oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle &#8220;i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 birle\u015ftirme yoluna gitmekte hukuksal yarar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na&#8221; karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ve sonucu payla\u015fmak olanaks\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u0130lkin, B\u00fcy\u00fck Kurulun karar\u0131nda da vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, kararlar aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7eli\u015fki, yaln\u0131zca olaylar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmede de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda hukuksal de\u011ferlendirme, gerek\u00e7e yakla\u015f\u0131m ve bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131nda ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7larda da bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u0130kincisi, ilk mahkemeler; bu hukuksal de\u011ferlendirme, yakla\u015f\u0131m ve bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n ba\u015fkal\u0131klar\u0131 nedeniyle, 1991 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndan bu yana, duraksamalara d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015fler, uyma ve direnme kararlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda bocalam\u0131\u015flar; C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 da ayn\u0131 durumu ya\u015fayagelmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6ylece, i\u00e7tihatlardaki ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi hukuksal yarar\u0131n da \u00f6tesinde bir zorunluluk olmu\u015ftur.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>1- \u00c7eli\u015fkinin var olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorununu, kararlarda ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7lara g\u00f6re a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bi\u00e7imde \u00f6zetlemek olanakl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>A- Y\u00fcksek \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesinin rapora eklenen ve art\u0131k tasarlamadan ( taamm\u00fctten ) s\u00f6z etmeyen en son kararlar\u0131yla bile D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesinin kararlar\u0131 birbirleriyle \u00e7eli\u015fmektedir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00d6yle ki, rapora eklenmeyen 27.2.1992 tarihli ve 1659 &#8211; 2419 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda, Y\u00fcksek \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131; &#8220;San\u0131klar A.G. ve U.T.&#8217;\u0131n kavga s\u0131ras\u0131nda tehevv\u00fcren sarf ettikleri tehdidamiz s\u00f6zlerin muhatab\u0131 \u00fczerinde ciddi bir korku ve endi\u015fe yaratmaktan uzak niteli\u011fi itibariyle, at\u0131lan tehdit su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 nazara al\u0131nmadan mahkumiyetleri cihetine gidilmesi&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle bozmu\u015f ve yerel mahkeme de; &#8220;Taraflar aras\u0131nda kavga yoktur. San\u0131klar ma\u011fduru d\u00f6vm\u00fc\u015fler, ( ona ) s\u00f6vm\u00fc\u015fler, tehdit etmi\u015flerdir. Ma\u011fdur pasif durumdad\u0131r. Ma\u011fdurun ba\u011f\u0131rmas\u0131, olay\u0131n seyri s\u0131ras\u0131nda ola\u011fan olup kar\u015f\u0131 tarafla kavga yap\u0131yor anlam\u0131na gelemez. Ayr\u0131ca gece kimse yokken ma\u011fdurun \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilip tehdit edilmesi ciddi bir korku ve endi\u015fe yaratmaktan uzak nitelikte de\u011fildir&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle direnmi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Y\u00fcksek \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin bu ve \u00f6b\u00fcr kararlar\u0131na g\u00f6re:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>1- Tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcnde, &#8220;\u00f6fke&#8221; sonucu belirleyici olgudur. Bu nedenle c\u00fcrm\u00fc olu\u015fturan tehdit s\u00f6zlerinin;<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>a- \u00d6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenip s\u00f6ylenmedikleri ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>b- Kavga ya da tart\u0131\u015fma varsa \u00f6fke vard\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>c- S\u00f6zler \u00f6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenmi\u015flerse :<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>aa- Hem su\u00e7un \u00f6\u011feleri olu\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>bb- Hem de muhatapla ciddi korku ve kayg\u0131 yarat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>cc- Bu nedenlerle de su\u00e7 olu\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Burada saydamla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken nokta \u015fudur:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00d6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenen tehdit s\u00f6zlerinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen \u00f6\u011feyle ( \u00f6\u011felerle ) anlat\u0131lmak istenen, besbelli ki, su\u00e7un manevi \u00f6\u011fesidir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc maddi \u00f6\u011fe, tehdit s\u00f6zlerinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f oldu\u011funa ve ayr\u0131ca bu c\u00fcr\u00fcmde, su\u00e7un \u00f6nko\u015fullar\u0131 ve cezaland\u0131rma ko\u015fullar\u0131 gibi \u00f6\u011feler de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re, geriye yaln\u0131zca manevi \u00f6\u011fe kalmaktad\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>B &#8211; Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun kararlar\u0131na gelince:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>1- \u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde de \u00f6zetlendi\u011fi gibi, 17.12.1984 tarihli ve 198-436 say\u0131l\u0131 ve bu karar\u0131n yollamada bulundu\u011fu 10.1.1955, 17.12.1956, 23.12.1957, 27.11.1978, 27.4.1981, 4.5.1981; Y\u00fcksek \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin 20.9.1982; Be\u015finci Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin 26.12.1973 ve D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin eski 10.2.1982 tarihli kararlar\u0131yla&#8221; yine Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 9.11.1987 tarihli ve 376-533 say\u0131l\u0131, 9.10.1991 tarihli ve 240-283 say\u0131l\u0131; 25.6.1990 tarihli ve 149-198 say\u0131l\u0131 18.2.1991 tarihli ve 368-36 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 4.3.1991 tarihli ve 33-60 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda \u015fu hususlar vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>a- Tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcnde manevi \u00f6\u011fe, kast\u0131n en yo\u011fun t\u00fcr\u00fc olan &#8220;tasarlamad\u0131r ( taamm\u00fctt\u00fcr )&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>b- Kavga ya da tart\u0131\u015fma varsa \u00f6fke de vard\u0131r ve bu s\u0131rada \u00f6fkeyle ( tehevv\u00fcren, k\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131kla ) s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zler:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>aa- Failin b\u00f6yle bir anda ciddi bir olay\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmesi olanaks\u0131z bulundu\u011fundan manevi \u00f6\u011feden ( tasarlamadan ) yoksundurlar.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>bb- Ma\u011fduru bir \u015fey yapmaya zorlamaya ya da korkutmaya elveri\u015fli, uygun ve yeterli de\u011fildirler. Zira korkutmak amac\u0131yla s\u00f6ylenmemi\u015fler ve tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n nedenini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye ve hi\u00e7bir engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde sald\u0131r\u0131ya ge\u00e7ilmemi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>2 &#8211; Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 25.3.1991 tarihli ve 66-92 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda ise \u015fu kurallar getirilmi\u015ftir:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>a- K\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131k an\u0131nda geli\u015fig\u00fczel s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerde:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>aa- Tehdit kas\u0131t yoktur.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>bb- Bu s\u00f6zler, ma\u011fduru istenilen davran\u0131\u015fa zorlamaya, korkutmaya uygun, elveri\u015fli ve yeterli de\u011fildirler.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>b- Ancak, failin s\u00f6yledi\u011fi s\u00f6zlerde sergiledi\u011fi ama\u00e7 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015fse, su\u00e7 olu\u015fur.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>3- Yukar\u0131daki kararlar\u0131n kesi\u015fme noktalar\u0131 ve geli\u015fim \u00e7izgileri g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kuruluna g\u00f6re:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>a- \u00d6fke, tehdit su\u00e7unda belirleyici bir olgu oldu\u011fundan:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>aa- \u00f6fkenin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131\/yoklu\u011fu ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>bb- \u00d6fke yoksa ve tehdit s\u00f6zleri \u00f6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenmemi\u015flerse bu su\u00e7 olu\u015fur.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>cc- \u00d6fke varsa ve tehdit s\u00f6zleri \u00f6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenmi\u015flerse:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>aaa- \u0130ster genel kas\u0131t, ister tasarlama ( taamm\u00fct ) olsun su\u00e7un manevi \u00f6\u011fesi yoktur.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>bbb- Ayr\u0131ca korkutmaya ( ihlale ) &#8220;uygun, elveri\u015fli ve yeterli&#8221; de\u011fildirler.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>ccc- Ancak, kural d\u0131\u015f\u0131 olarak, bu s\u00f6ylemlerde sergilenen ama\u00e7 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015fse su\u00e7 olu\u015fur.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>C &#8211; Y\u00fcksek D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin 1991 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndan beri verdi\u011fi kararlar ise son \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmede \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>1- Tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcn\u00fcn manevi \u00f6\u011fesi, genel kas\u0131tt\u0131r; hi\u00e7 bir \u00f6zellik g\u00f6stermez.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>2- \u00d6fke ya da so\u011fukkanl\u0131l\u0131kla s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerin su\u00e7la korunan hukuki varl\u0131\u011f\u0131\/ menfaati\/de\u011feri ihlal edip etmedikleri; ki\u015fiyi korkutup korkutmad\u0131klar\u0131; ortama ve ko\u015fullara g\u00f6re \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclecek eylemsel ( fiili ) bir sorundur. \u00d6fke ve\/ya da so\u011fukkanl\u0131l\u0131k, \u00f6b\u00fcr su\u00e7larda oldu\u011fu gibi, tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcnde de, bir ba\u015flar\u0131na belirleyici \u00f6\u011fe olamaz.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Y\u00fcksek D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi, bu sonu\u00e7lara ula\u015f\u0131rken; Kanada, Avrupa ve Latin Amerika&#8217;da bulunan yirmiye yak\u0131n \u00fclkedeki uygulamayla ve y\u00fcze yak\u0131n yazar\u0131n uygulamaya d\u00f6n\u00fck g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleriyle Yarg\u0131tay\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n kararlar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>II- Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu ve \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi ile D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin kararlar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki ayr\u0131l\u0131klar; gerek\u00e7elerinin dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedenler, hukuksal y\u00f6ntem, bak\u0131\u015f ve de\u011ferlendirme a\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131ndan \u00e7ok \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131d\u0131r. Bu \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 sergilemek i\u00e7in, Y\u00fcksek D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin; yerle\u015fik kararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7elerini, analitik bir yakla\u015f\u0131mla, yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Daire i\u00e7i g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerde nas\u0131l de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fini \u00f6zetlemekte yarar vard\u0131r:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>a- Tasarlama ( taamm\u00fct ), T.C. Yasas\u0131n\u0131n yaln\u0131zca 450\/4, 457\/2. maddelerinde yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6b\u00fcr maddelerde ve bu arada tehdit eyleminin ama\u00e7-tehdit ( md.191 ) ve ara\u00e7-tehdit ( 188, 193, 201, 254, 258, 416, 429, 495 v.b. ) olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hi\u00e7bir su\u00e7 tipinde, tasarlama \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Bir \u00f6\u011fe su\u00e7 tipinde yer almam\u0131\u015fsa elbette g\u00f6zetilemez.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Bilindi\u011fi gibi &#8220;tasarlama&#8221;, her dilde vard\u0131r ve evrensel bir kavramd\u0131r ( taamm\u00fct, premeditation, premeditazione, premeditaci\u00f6n ). \u00d6\u011feleri ve i\u00e7eri\u011fi az \u00e7ok \u00fclkelere g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015fse bile, her \u00fclkede, ba\u015fka s\u00f6zc\u00fck ve anlamlarla kar\u0131\u015fmayacak bi\u00e7imde yerle\u015fmi\u015f ve tekanlaml\u0131l\u0131k ( univacite ) kazanm\u0131\u015f, art\u0131k sokaktaki adam\u0131n bile bildi\u011fi teknik bir hukuk terimidir. Kronolojik a\u00e7\u0131dan kast\u0131n olu\u015fumunda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan ay\u0131r\u0131ma g\u00f6re d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce kas\u0131t ( dole di proposito ) t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn en yo\u011fun bi\u00e7imidir. Yarg\u0131tay\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n k\u00f6kle\u015fmi\u015f kararlar\u0131na g\u00f6re, so\u011fukkanl\u0131l\u0131kla ve plan yapabilmek i\u00e7in yeterli bir zaman\u0131 gerektirir. E\u011fer, tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcnde ( c\u00fcr\u00fcmlerinde ) ger\u00e7ekten tasarlama manevi \u00f6\u011fe olarak yer alsayd\u0131, ister so\u011fukkanl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, isterse, \u00e7o\u011fu kez g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi, \u00f6fke sonucu sergilensin, ani kas\u0131tla ( \u00f6fke ya da co\u015fku kast\u0131: dole d&#8217;impeto ) s\u00f6ylenen tehdit s\u00f6zleri bu su\u00e7u olu\u015fturmaya elbette yetmeyecekti. Ancak Cumhuriyetin ba\u015flar\u0131nda, T\u00fcrk yarg\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n elindeki tek kaynak Majno \u015ferhiydi. Bu \u015ferhin T\u00fcrk\u00e7e \u00e7evirisinde yer alan &#8220;&#8230;prensip, tehdit fiilinin taamm\u00fcden vukua gelmesidir&#8221; c\u00fcmlesi yap\u0131t\u0131n asl\u0131nda yoktu. \u00dcstelik, Majno, yar\u0131 yar\u0131ya k\u0131saltarak T\u00fcrk\u00e7ele\u015ftirilen bu paragrafta 12 Mart 1900 tarihli bir yarg\u0131 karar\u0131na da yollama yaparak, \u00f6fkenin bu su\u00e7ta yaln\u0131zca indirici nedene yol a\u00e7abilece\u011fini de belirtiyordu ( Commente al Codice penale italiano, V. II, Torino, 1922 n. 833 ). Bu ve bir\u00e7ok c\u00fcmle \u00e7evrilen paragrafta yer almam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. \u0130\u015fte Yarg\u0131tay\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n eski ve bug\u00fcn de s\u00fcren kimi kararlar\u0131 bu yanl\u0131\u015f \u00e7eviriye yaslan\u0131yordu. Ancak Y\u00fcce Mahkeme, tasarlama \u00f6\u011fesini, tehdit eyleminin ge\u00e7ti\u011fi her su\u00e7ta de\u011fil; yaln\u0131zca ama\u00e7-tehdidi ( menace fin ) cezaland\u0131ran ba\u015fka yard\u0131mc\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmle ( md. 191 ), ara\u00e7-tehdit ( menace-moyen ) eylemini cezaland\u0131ran ba\u015fka maddelerde 188. maddede ar\u0131yordu. Oysa ara\u00e7-tehdit eylemini cezaland\u0131ran ba\u015fka maddeler de ( 201, 308, 429 gibi ) vard\u0131. \u0130lk iki maddede bu \u00f6\u011fenin aranmas\u0131, \u00f6b\u00fcrlerinde aranmamas\u0131 ku\u015fkusuz a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 olanaks\u0131z bir \u00e7eli\u015fkiydi.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Yeri gelmi\u015fken \u015funu da vurgulamakta yarar vard\u0131r: Bu yanl\u0131\u015f \u00e7eviri yaln\u0131zca yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131na de\u011fil, kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmal\u0131 hukuk \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 yapmam\u0131\u015f, bilimsel merak ve metodik ku\u015fkuyla kayna\u011fa inmemi\u015f kimi rahmetli yazarlar\u0131n yap\u0131tlar\u0131yla T\u00fcrk Ceza Yasas\u0131 \u00d6ntasar\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esine dahi, \u00fczerinde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f bir \u00f6nyarg\u0131 olarak, bir izd\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm halinde, oldu\u011fu gibi yans\u0131m\u0131\u015f, hukukumuza y\u0131llarca etkilemi\u015ftir. Bug\u00fcn de bu etkisini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmektedir. \u00d6yle ki, B\u00fcy\u00fck Kurulun 8.5.1992 tarihli ilk oturumunda \u00e7evirideki bu yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, 18.1.1993 tarihli son oturumda bile B\u00fcy\u00fck Kurulu ayd\u0131nlatmak i\u00e7in sunulan raporda ve bilgide tasarlama kavram\u0131na yine de ba\u015fvurulabilmi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Ku\u015fkusuz Y\u00fcce Mahkemenin Majno \u00e7evirisi do\u011frultusunda T.C. Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 191. ve 188. maddelerinde &#8220;tasarlama&#8221; \u00f6\u011fesini aramas\u0131 bilinen ve beklenen sonuca ula\u015f\u0131yor, bu maddelerin uygulama alanlar\u0131n\u0131 daralt\u0131yordu. Ger\u00e7ekten \u00f6fke sonucu ans\u0131z\u0131n i\u015flenen su\u00e7larda tasarlama \u00f6\u011fesinin bulunmas\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemeyece\u011finden, bu su\u00e7lar\u0131n olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131l\u0131yordu. Su\u00e7 tipinde &#8220;tasarlama&#8221; \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclseydi, bu sonu\u00e7 elbette do\u011fru ve bilimsel olacakt\u0131. Ama, b\u00f6yle bir \u00f6\u011fe yoktu.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>b- Y\u00fcce B\u00fcy\u00fck Kurul&#8217;da yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 25.3.1991 tarihli ve 66-92 say\u0131l\u0131 ve Y\u00fcksek \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesinin son kararlar\u0131nda tasarlama terimine yer verilmedi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ancak, kimi kararlarda eski g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn izlerine \u015fimdi de rastlanmaktad\u0131r. Ger\u00e7ekten, Y\u00fcksek Daire ve Kurulun kararlar\u0131na g\u00f6re, bir beyan su\u00e7u olan tehdit c\u00fcr\u00fcmlerinde \u00f6fke belirleyici ve su\u00e7 kast\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir olgu olmay\u0131 bug\u00fcn de s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmektedir. Genel kas\u0131tla; nitelik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan olas\u0131, dolayl\u0131 ya da belirsiz kas\u0131tla; zaman ve bilin\u00e7lenme s\u00fcreci a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ani kas\u0131tla i\u015flenebilen bir su\u00e7ta, \u00f6fkenin ( k\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131n, tehevv\u00fcr\u00fcn ) su\u00e7 kast\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131raca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00f6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerde kast\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmek, bilimsel a\u00e7\u0131dan a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 olanaks\u0131z bir durumdur. Bunun i\u00e7in birka\u00e7 kaynak vermek yeterlidir: ANTOLISEI, Manuale di diritto penale, p. speciale, I, Milano, 1977, s. 129-133; MANZINI, Trattato di diritto penale, italiano, V. VIII, Torino, 1985, s. 803 vd., \u00f6zellikle 822, DASSANO, Minaccia ( diritto penale ), Enciclopedia di diritto V. XXVI, 1976, s. 340; CRESPI ZUCCOLA-STELLA, Commentano breve al codice penale, Padova, 1986, s. 1001; SEL\u00c7UK, Izrar ve tehdit c\u00fcr\u00fcmlerinde kas\u0131t, Yarg\u0131tay Dergisi, 1985, s. 227-230&#8217;daki yabanc\u0131 kararlar ve yazarlar ). Kanada dahil, inceledi\u011fimiz yukar\u0131daki \u00fclkelerden hi\u00e7 birinde ve s\u00f6zle s\u00f6vme,tehdit gibi hi\u00e7bir beyan c\u00fcrm\u00fcnde \u00f6fke, bu s\u00f6zler rastgele ya da geli\u015fig\u00fczel de a\u011f\u0131zdan \u00e7\u0131ksa, su\u00e7 kast\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rmamaktad\u0131r. Kald\u0131ramaz da. \u00d6fkeyle ya da \u015fiddetli elemle su\u00e7 i\u015flemeyi yaln\u0131zca cezai sorumlulu\u011fu azalt\u0131c\u0131 neden olarak benimseyen ( T.C. Yasas\u0131, md. 51 ) g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fc sarho\u015fluk s\u0131ras\u0131nda su\u00e7 i\u015fleyen i\u00e7in sorumsuzlu\u011fu reddeden ( md. 48 ) ve yar\u0131 ak\u0131l hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ( md. 47 ) bile bilin\u00e7 ve iradenin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren bir sistemde bu elbette olanaks\u0131zd\u0131r ve de yerindedir. Kald\u0131 ki, bu sistemde her \u00f6fkeyle i\u015flenen su\u00e7ta de\u011fil, ancak haks\u0131z k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rtmaya dayal\u0131 \u00f6fkeyle i\u015flenen su\u00e7ta ceza indirilebilmektedir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, hukukta, hi\u00e7 kimse kendi eylemiyle \u00e7eli\u015fen davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyemez ( venire contra factum proprium ). 1930 tarihli \u0130talyan Ceza Yasas\u0131, \u00f6fke, ta\u015fk\u0131nl\u0131k, a\u015fk gibi co\u015fku ya da tutkular\u0131n su\u00e7lanabilirli\u011fi ( isnadiyet = imputabilia ) kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr ( md. 90 ).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Nitekim, Y\u00fcksek \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi, yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan 27.2.1992 tarihli ve 1659-2419 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda, tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcyle birlikte yarg\u0131lanan s\u00f6zle s\u00f6vme su\u00e7u da \u00f6fke s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015flendi\u011fi halde, bu su\u00e7la ilgili olarak kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fc bozmam\u0131\u015f, ancak tehditle kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fc &#8220;\u00f6fke su\u00e7 kast\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131r&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle bozmu\u015ftur. \u00dcstelik Y\u00fcksek \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi ve Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu kararlar\u0131nda, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k ve hukuka uygunluk nedenleri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan konuya yakla\u015fan Y\u00fcksek D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin tersine, s\u00f6vme c\u00fcrm\u00fcnde y\u0131llardan beri \u00f6zel kas\u0131t ( animus iniuriandi ) aranmaktad\u0131r. Bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kar\u015f\u0131n, beyan su\u00e7lar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, &#8220;\u00f6fkeyle ya da geli\u015fig\u00fczel s\u00f6ylenmi\u015ftir&#8221; gibi hukuka yabanc\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle manevi \u00f6\u011fe ( kas\u0131t ) bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ba\u015fka ba\u015fka \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlere ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 ve s\u00f6vme su\u00e7unda &#8220;rastgele ya da geli\u015fig\u00fczel s\u00f6ylenmi\u015f olmak&#8221; su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131na etkili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, T.C. Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 191. ve 188. maddelerinde bunun etkilili\u011finin benimsenmesi, ku\u015fkusuz a\u00e7\u0131klanamaz bir \u00e7eli\u015fkidir. Unutulmamak gerekir ki, su\u00e7 \u00f6\u011feleri genel kuram\u0131 ve \u00e7a\u011fda\u015f ceza hukuku, eyleme yabanc\u0131 \u00f6\u011felere ( aliunde ) g\u00f6re failin eylemini de\u011ferlendirmeyi ve anlamland\u0131rmay\u0131 kesinkes yasaklam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>c- \u00d6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerin ihlal edici ( korkutucu ) olmaya elveri\u015fli, uygun ve yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ciddiye al\u0131nmayacaklar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ise hem ger\u00e7ek\u00e7i ve hem de bilimsel ve mant\u0131kl\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>aa- Ger\u00e7ek\u00e7i de\u011fildir. Zira, \u00f6fkelenmi\u015f, \u00f6fkelendi\u011fi i\u00e7in de iradesine egemen olma g\u00fcc\u00fc zay\u0131flam\u0131\u015f ve bu nedenle de nerede duraca\u011f\u0131 belirsiz birinin tehdit s\u00f6zlerinin ciddiye al\u0131nmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve korkutmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmek, bir\u00e7ok yazar\u0131n belirtti\u011fi gibi, ya\u015fam ger\u00e7eklerine uymamaktad\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, \u00f6fkeli birinin tehdidi, so\u011fukkanl\u0131 i\u015fleyeninkine oranla \u00e7o\u011fun daha \u00e7ok korkutucudur. Hukuki konuyu, yani korunan varl\u0131\u011f\u0131\/menfaati\/de\u011feri daha \u00e7ok ihlal edicidir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>bb- Bilimsel ve mant\u0131kl\u0131 de\u011fildir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu tas\u0131m ( k\u0131yas, syllegisme ) kal\u0131b\u0131 \u015fudur: \u00d6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenen tehdit s\u00f6zleri kimse taraf\u0131ndan ciddiye al\u0131nmaz ve bu y\u00fczden de korkutmaz ( mutlak ve genelle\u015ftirici b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nerme ) \/ Olayda s\u00f6zler \u00f6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenmi\u015ftir ( k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00f6nerme ) \/ \u00d6yleyse ciddi ve korkutucu ( ihlal edici ) de\u011fildirler ( sonu\u00e7 ).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>G\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor ki, burada var\u0131lan sonucu belirleyici olgu, \u00f6fkedir. Her \u00f6fkenin korkutucu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek, yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi gibi, hem ger\u00e7ek\u00e7i de\u011fildir ve hemde bu konuda genel ve a priori bir kural koymak olanaks\u0131zd\u0131r. So\u011fukkanl\u0131l\u0131kla s\u00f6ylenen her s\u00f6z\u00fcn korkutucu oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrmek de b\u00f6yledir. \u00d6fkenin korkutucu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 mutlak bi\u00e7imde iddia etmek asl\u0131nda kan\u0131tlanmaya muhta\u00e7 bir \u00f6nermedir ve bu y\u00fczden tas\u0131m paralojiktir. Zira tas\u0131mlamada ilk \u00f6nerme, &#8220;insan \u00f6l\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr&#8221; gibi bilimin ve herkesin \u00fczerinde kesinkes birle\u015fti\u011fi, tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmayan bir ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmak zorundad\u0131r. Kan\u0131tlanmaya muhta\u00e7 bir \u00f6nermeyi kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f gibi g\u00f6stererek b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nerme olu\u015fturmak ise, mant\u0131k biliminde sav\u0131 kan\u0131tlama ( petition de principe: petizione di principlo = m\u00fcsadere ale-l-matlup ) denilen ve paralojizme yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 yasaklanan bir y\u00f6ntemdir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, b\u00f6yle bir y\u00f6ntemdeki ilk \u00f6nermenin yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bula\u015f\u0131c\u0131d\u0131r ve yanl\u0131\u015f da sonucu belirleyicidir. O nedenle, \u00f6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerin korkutucu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yolundaki mutlak \u00f6nermeye dayanan mant\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve sonucun yanl\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemeye bile gerek yoktur.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00d6yleyse do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f \u015fudur: Tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fc, ister \u00f6fkeyle ister so\u011fukkanl\u0131l\u0131kla i\u015flensin, ihlal edicilik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan her olayda i\u015flendi\u011fi ortama ve somut ko\u015fullara g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken eylemsel bir sorundur. Bu konuda \u00f6nceden ( a priori ) mutlak bir kural getirilemez.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcyle, ki\u015finin ruh d\u00fcnyas\u0131, i\u00e7 huzuru korunur. Bu de\u011ferleri ihlal eden her hareket, ister \u00f6fkeyle ister so\u011fukkanl\u0131l\u0131kla i\u015flensin, su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterlidir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Oysa, Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun yukar\u0131daki ve son kararlar\u0131nda, ortam, hareketin ma\u011fdurun iradesini etkileme derecesi g\u00f6zetilmeli denmi\u015f ve tehdit s\u00f6zlerinin &#8220;uygunluk, elveri\u015flilik ve yeterlili\u011fine&#8221; de\u011finilmi\u015fse de, sergilenen mant\u0131k kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, bunlar s\u00f6zde ve g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015fte kalm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, bu mant\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6re, \u00f6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenen her tehdit s\u00f6z\u00fc; yeterli olmaktan uzakt\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Bir \u00f6nceki b\u00f6l\u00fcmde ( b ) belirtildi\u011fi gibi, &#8220;geli\u015fig\u00fczel s\u00f6ylenmi\u015f olmakl\u0131k&#8221; yaln\u0131z kast a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan de ihlal edicilik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da gerek\u00e7e yap\u0131l\u0131yorsa, tehdidin ara\u00e7 olarak kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7larda da ( md. 188, 192, 193, 201, 254, 258, 416, 429, 495 v.b. ) ayn\u0131 sonuca var\u0131lmak gerekir. Bug\u00fcne de\u011fin kimse bunu ileri s\u00fcrmemi\u015ftir. Dahas\u0131, &#8220;geli\u015fig\u00fczel s\u00f6ylenmi\u015flik&#8221; eylemsel ve g\u00f6rece bir durumdur. Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n bunu dosya incelemesiyle tutanaklara g\u00f6re saptamas\u0131 olanaks\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>d- Genel kas\u0131tla i\u015flenen, \u00f6zel kast\u0131 gerektirmeyen bir c\u00fcr\u00fcmde ama\u00e7 ya da g\u00fcd\u00fc ( saik ) su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir etkiye sahip de\u011fildirler ve g\u00f6zetilemezler. Kaynak Yasa hakk\u0131nda 1887 tarihli Zanardelli raporunda ( LIV ) belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, &#8220;\u0130nsana \u00f6zg\u00fc davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n arkas\u0131ndaki g\u00fcd\u00fclen ( saikleri ) ara\u015ft\u0131rmak ceza adaletini ilgilendirmez&#8221;. Bu, ceza hukukunda temel ilkedir. O y\u00fczden, \u00f6fkeyle i\u015flenen su\u00e7larda failin amac\u0131n\u0131n, tehdidi i\u00e7eren s\u00f6zleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmek olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 aramak, \u00e7a\u011fda\u015f hukuka uygun de\u011fildir. Ama\u00e7, g\u00fcd\u00fc ( saik ) olsa olsa su\u00e7un kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131nda ya da cezan\u0131n takdirinde g\u00f6zetilebilirler; ama, yasal metinde \u00f6zel kas\u0131t s\u00f6z konusu de\u011filse, su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir i\u015fleve sahip de\u011fildirler. Kald\u0131 ki, ama\u00e7 ya da g\u00fcd\u00fcn\u00fcn ( saikin ) su\u00e7 kal\u0131b\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6zel kast\u0131 gerektiren c\u00fcr\u00fcmlerde bile, bu amac\u0131n ( ya da g\u00fcd\u00fcn\u00fcn ) ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi gerekmez. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc bu amac\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi su\u00e7u olu\u015fturan nesnel ( maddi ) \u00f6\u011fenin ( eylemin ) d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kal\u0131r ve failin i\u00e7 d\u00fcnyas\u0131yla ilgilidir, \u00f6zneldir. Bu husus, ceza hukukunda herkesin birle\u015fti\u011fi bir ilkedir. \u00d6yle ki, Antolise yap\u0131t\u0131nda bu son c\u00fcmleleri italik harflerle yazarak belirginle\u015ftirip dikkati \u00e7ekmek gere\u011fi duymu\u015ftur ( \u00dc\u00e7 \u00fclkeden birka\u00e7 kaynak: ANTOLISEI Milano, 1975, s. 384; PAGLIARO, Milano, 1980, s. 387-388; MANTOVANI, Padova, 1980, s. 287; FIANDACA ve MUSCO, Bologna, 1989, s. 273; PANDOVANI, Milano, 1990, s. 128-129; MERLE-VTTU, Paris, 1984, I, n. 553-554; JEANDIDIER, Paris, 1988, n. 328-329; COTE-HARPER, MANGANAS ve TURGEON, Quebec ( Kanada ), 1989, s. 255-259; EREM, Ankara, 1984, l, s. 510 ). S\u00f6zgelimi, se\u00e7enekli \u00f6zel kastla ( evlenmek amac\u0131 ya da \u015fehvet hissi ) i\u015flenen kad\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131rma ( md. 429 ) c\u00fcrm\u00fcnde, su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, failin evlenmesi ya da \u015fehvet hissini \u0131rza ge\u00e7me\/tasaddi gibi eylemlerle doyurmas\u0131 zorunlu de\u011fildir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Nitekim, Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel kurulu&#8217;nun yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan 17.12.1984 tarihli ve 198-436 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda, genel kast\u0131n su\u00e7 tipinde yer alan c\u00fcrmi hareketi ve sonucunu bilmek ve irade etmekten ibaret oldu\u011fu, bunun g\u00fcd\u00fc ( saik ), ama\u00e7 ( maksat ) ve erek ( gaye ) \u00f6\u011felerini i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi; \u0131zrar su\u00e7unun genel kas\u0131tla i\u015flendi\u011fi yerinde olarak vurgulanm\u0131\u015f iken; ayn\u0131 ilamda genel kas\u0131tla, i\u015flenen tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcnde ama\u00e7 kavram\u0131na yer verilmesi, elbette hem yerinde olmam\u0131\u015f ve hemde a\u011f\u0131r bir \u00e7eli\u015fki yarat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcn\u00fcn manevi \u00f6\u011fesi, Y\u00fcksek D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne g\u00f6re, sadece genel kas\u0131tt\u0131r. Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere bilin\u00e7 ve iradeden olu\u015fan genel kas\u0131t, her c\u00fcr\u00fcmde o c\u00fcrm\u00fcn maddi \u00f6\u011fesine g\u00f6re belirlenir. Nas\u0131l s\u00f6vme su\u00e7unda,bu, insan onurunu a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lay\u0131c\u0131 s\u00f6zler s\u00f6ylendi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bilin\u00e7 ve irade ise; tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcnde de ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131 haks\u0131z zarara u\u011frataca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilin\u00e7 ve iradeden ibarettir. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u00f6\u011feler kast\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndad\u0131rlar. Dahas\u0131, ceza hukukunda, irade etmemi\u015f ( istememi\u015f ) olma da, irade etmedir. Ku\u015fku ise bilme say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu kararlar\u0131nda, s\u0131k s\u0131k failin &#8220;korkutma kast\u0131ndan&#8221; s\u00f6z edilmektedir. Buradaki kast s\u00f6zc\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn teknik anlamda de\u011fil, &#8220;ama\u00e7, maksat&#8221; anlamlar\u0131nda kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalardan anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc bunu belirlemekle yetinilmemekte, failin bu amac\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirip ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmedi\u011fi de aranmaktad\u0131r. Bu ise yaln\u0131zca \u00f6zel kast\u0131 kapsay\u0131c\u0131 de\u011fil, \u00f6zel kas\u0131t kavram\u0131n\u0131n da \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7en bir durumdur. B\u00f6ylece, \u00f6zel kas\u0131t aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, genel kast\u0131n yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yolundaki s\u00f6ylemler, s\u00f6zde ve g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015fte kalmaktad\u0131r. Ger\u00e7ekten, \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme B\u00fcy\u00fck Kurulu&#8217;na sunulan raporda ve Y\u00fcksek Kurulun kimi kararlar\u0131nda, iyilik amac\u0131yla \u00e7ocu\u011funu tehdit eden babas\u0131, mal\u0131n\u0131 korumak ve zarar vereni uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmak ama\u00e7lar\u0131yla tehditte bulunan mal sahibinde, hem bu kast\u0131n, hem de tehditte ciddiyetin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. E\u011fer birincisi do\u011fruysa, bunun ad\u0131 \u00f6zel kast\u0131n ve su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bu \u00f6\u011fe aran\u0131yor demektir. E\u011fer ikincisi, yani ciddiyetin arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 do\u011fruysa, kavramlar birbirine kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131yor demektir. Zira, burada eylemi su\u00e7 olmaktan \u00e7\u0131karan \u00f6\u011fe, s\u00f6zlerin ciddi ve korkutucu olmas\u0131 de\u011fil; hukuka uygunluk nedenlerinin ( T\u00fcrk Medeni Yasas\u0131, md. 267, 894 ) bulunmas\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131, tehdit hareketiyle birlikte bir ama\u00e7 ( \u00f6zel kas\u0131t ) s\u00f6z konusu olursa, eylem \u00e7o\u011fu kez bir ba\u015fka su\u00e7u ( md. 188, 201, 308, 429 gibi ) olu\u015fturabilir. S\u00f6zgelimi T. Medeni Yasan\u0131n\u0131n 894. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ko\u015fullar yoksa, TC. Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 308, 61. maddeleri g\u00fcndeme gelebilecek demektir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Bundan ba\u015fka Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu kararlar\u0131nda s\u0131k s\u0131k Say\u0131n Prof. Erem&#8217;in tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcnde &#8220;\u015fuurlu iradeden&#8221; s\u00f6z eden sat\u0131rlar\u0131na yollama yap\u0131lmakta ve Say\u0131n Yazar sanki bu kavramlara ba\u015fka anlamlar veriyormu\u015f gibi alg\u0131lanarak ve s\u00f6z konusu kavramlardan yola \u00e7\u0131k\u0131larak, \u00f6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerde &#8220;iradenin ya da \u015fuurun&#8221; olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi de\u011fi\u015fik bir sonuca var\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Oysa Prof. Erem, genel kast\u0131n iki \u00f6\u011fesini, her c\u00fcr\u00fcm gibi, bu su\u00e7ta da hakl\u0131 olarak aramaktad\u0131r ve bu da yerindedir. &#8220;Tehditte \u015fuurlu irade&#8221; deyi\u015fleri ise, Say\u0131n Yazar\u0131n dilinde, daha fazla bir anlama gelmemektedir. Gelemez de. Kald\u0131 ki, Say\u0131n Profes\u00f6r, ayn\u0131 sayfada &#8220;Hiddet saikas\u0131 ile sarfolunan s\u00f6zlerin her zaman ciddi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmek do\u011fru de\u011fildir&#8221; diyerek ve hakl\u0131 olarak, \u00f6fkeyle s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerde hem c\u00fcr\u00fcm kast\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z benimsemi\u015f ve hem de konuya yaln\u0131zca ihlal edicilik ( korkutuculuk ) boyuta a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yakla\u015farak, bunun da bulunabilece\u011fini belirtmek suretiyle Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131n yerle\u015fik g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ( 1985, c. III, s. 326 ).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>e- Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 25.3.1991 tarihli ve 66-92 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda ise, &#8220;samanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 y\u0131kar\u0131m&#8221; diyen failin bunu y\u0131kmas\u0131, amac\u0131n\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi i\u00e7in, su\u00e7un olu\u015ftu\u011funu g\u00f6steren bir olgu olarak vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Yukar\u0131da belirtti\u011fimiz gibi, ceza hukukunda ne ama\u00e7, ne de onun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemesi, su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131na etkilidir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>S\u00f6zle tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fc ani ve icrai bir su\u00e7tur. Kalk\u0131\u015fmaya elveri\u015fli de\u011fildir. Su\u00e7, a\u011f\u0131zdan \u00e7\u0131kar \u00e7\u0131kmaz olu\u015fur. S\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerde sergilenen amac\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi diye bir cezaland\u0131rma ko\u015fulu, yasal su\u00e7 tiplerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Tehdit su\u00e7uyla korunan varl\u0131k\/menfaat\/de\u011fer ki\u015finin ruh d\u00fcnyas\u0131 ve i\u00e7 huzurudur. Tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fc, potansiyel olarak ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 fizik tehlike nedeniyle de\u011fil, ma\u011fdurda yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131, yol a\u00e7abilece\u011fi ruhsal tedirginlik nedeniyle su\u00e7 say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Oysa an\u0131lan Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131nda, tehdidin korkutuculu\u011fu ve ciddili\u011fiyle tehdidin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyecek olmas\u0131 birbirlerine kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ku\u015fkusuz ikisi birbirinden ayr\u0131d\u0131r ve fa tehdit s\u00f6zlerinde sergiledi\u011fi ama\u00e7lar\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeyi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmese ve istemese bile su\u00e7 olu\u015fur.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Bununla da kal\u0131nmamakta, Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu kararlar\u0131nda tehdit kast\u0131n\u0131n eylemin ciddi olup olmamas\u0131yla belirlendi\u011fi vurgulanmakta ve bu suretle de, kas\u0131t gibi \u00f6znel ( s\u00fcbjektif ) bir \u00f6\u011fe, korkutuculuk gibi nesnel ( objektif ) bir \u00f6\u011fenin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131\/endeksli k\u0131l\u0131nmaktad\u0131r. Burada da kavramlar birbirleriyle kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Zira tehdit c\u00fcrm\u00fcnde ihlal edicilik ( ciddilik, korkutuculuk ) faile g\u00f6re \u00f6znel ola de\u011fil, orta nitelikteki ma\u011fdurlara g\u00f6re nesnel olarak belirlenmek gerekir. Tehdit edilen ma\u011fdura oranla belirlense bile, failin bilin\u00e7 ve iradesine g\u00f6re belirlenen su\u00e7 kast\u0131yla, ma\u011fdurun korkup korkmamas\u0131 olgusunun uzaktan yak\u0131ndan ilgisi yoktur.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>G\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor ki, Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu ile \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin kararlar\u0131nda, yukar\u0131daki temel-s\u00fczme kavramlar i\u00e7 i\u00e7e ve birbirlerine kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak ele al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, Y\u00fcksek D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin kararlar\u0131nda, su\u00e7 kast\u0131yla eylemin ihlal edicili\u011fi birbirinden \u00f6zenle ayr\u0131larak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00d6zetle belirtmek gerekirse, Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu kararlar\u0131nda, temel ve evrensel kavramlar\u0131n \u00e7o\u011fu kez \u00f6zleri ve i\u00e7erikleri bo\u015falt\u0131lmakta, ba\u015fka anlamlarda kullan\u0131lmaktad\u0131rlar. Sergilenen gerek\u00e7elerde ise dayan\u0131lan nedenler, yukar\u0131da da s\u0131k s\u0131k vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, birbirleriyle \u00e7eli\u015fmektedirler. Unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r ki, &#8220;\u00e7eli\u015fen nedenler, birbirlerini yok ederek, gerek\u00e7e yoklu\u011funa yol a\u00e7arlar&#8221;. Frans\u0131z Yarg\u0131tay\u0131 y\u00fcz y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fan bir s\u00fcreden beri \u00e7eli\u015fik nedenlere dayal\u0131 kararlar\u0131, s\u0131k s\u0131k bir \u00f6zdeyi\u015f bi\u00e7iminde yineledi\u011fi bu gerek\u00e7eyle bozmaktad\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>B\u00fct\u00fcn bunlardan \u00e7\u0131kan sonu\u00e7 \u015fudur: Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu ve \u0130kinci Ceza Dairesi kararlar\u0131yla Y\u00fcksek D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Ceza Dairesi kararlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda, gerek gerek\u00e7eler, kavramlar, yakla\u015f\u0131mlar ve gerekse ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan ayr\u0131l\u0131klar; u\u00e7urum boyutundad\u0131rlar ve i\u00e7tihatlar aras\u0131ndaki bu ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n giderilmesi zorunludur.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>III- Hukuk kimli\u011fini Bat\u0131da arayan bir \u00fclkede, k\u00fcreselle\u015fmenin ve medyatik \u00e7a\u011f\u0131n gereklerine uymal\u0131, gelece\u011fin yarg\u0131\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ba\u011flayacak olan b\u00f6ylesine \u00f6nemli ve duyarl\u0131 bir konu; hukuksal kavramlar, terimler ve kurumlar saydamla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak ve bilimsel i\u00e7erikleri do\u011frultusunda kullan\u0131larak B\u00fcy\u00fck Kurulun \u00f6n\u00fcne getirilmeli, kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131 hukuktan eksiksiz yararlan\u0131lmal\u0131 ve her y\u00f6n\u00fcyle tart\u0131\u015f\u0131larak sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131yd\u0131. Yirmibirinci y\u00fczy\u0131la evrilmeye duran T\u00fcrkiye, yanl\u0131\u015f \u00e7evirilerle, eksik \u00f6\u011freti ve yollamalarla yetinme l\u00fcks\u00fcne katlanamaz. Bilimi uygulamaya aktarmay\u0131 ilke edinmek zorundad\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, uygulamay\u0131 bilimselle\u015ftirmeye \u00e7abalamak gibi bir y\u00f6nteme bilimde yer yoktur.<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>B\u00fct\u00fcn bunlara uyularak, yak\u0131n bir gelecekte i\u00e7tihatlar aras\u0131ndaki ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi, ku\u015fkusuz tutulacak en sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 yol olacakt\u0131r.<\/em><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fc\u015fteki ile aras\u0131nda bir alacak meselesi bulunan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin evinin \u00f6n\u00fcne gelip, \u201cbu sana ders olsun\u201d diyerek havaya birka\u00e7 el ate\u015f etmesinden ibaret eyleminin, TCK\u2019n\u0131n 106\/2-a maddesine uyan silahla tehdit ve genel g\u00fcvenli\u011fin kasten tehlikeye sokulmas\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu ancak ayn\u0131 Kanunun 44. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, sadece en a\u011f\u0131r cezay\u0131 gerektiren tehdit su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken, yerinde olmayan gerek\u00e7e ve kanuni olmayan hukuki nitelendirme ile ayr\u0131ca TCK\u2019n\u0131n 170\/1-c maddesindeki genel g\u00fcvenli\u011fin kasten tehlikeye sokulmas\u0131 su\u00e7undan da mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi bozma nedenidir (Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi &#8211; Karar: 2016\/2101).<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin alt\u0131 d\u00fckkan \u00fcst\u00fc ev olan ikametine av t\u00fcfe\u011fiyle iki el ate\u015f etmekten ibaret eyleminin; 106\/2-a maddesine uyan silahla tehdit ve 170\/1-c maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen genel g\u00fcvenli\u011fin kasten tehlikeye sokulmas\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 44. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen fikri i\u00e7tima h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca, sadece daha a\u011f\u0131r cezay\u0131 gerektiren silahla tehdit su\u00e7undan mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken, yetersiz ve Kanuni olmayan gerek\u00e7elerle, 106\/1. maddesinin 1. c\u00fcmlesi kapsam\u0131nda basit tehdit ve ayn\u0131 Kanunun 170\/1-c kapsam\u0131nda genel g\u00fcvenli\u011fin kasten tehlikeye sokulmas\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan iki ayr\u0131 mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi, bozma nedenidir (Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi &#8211; Karar: 2013\/15558).<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">TCK\u2019n\u0131n 106\/2-d maddesinde tan\u0131mlanan a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 nedeninin uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in, tehdit \u201cvar olan veya var say\u0131lan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin olu\u015fturduklar\u0131 korkutucu g\u00fc\u00e7ten yararlan\u0131larak\u201d i\u015flenmelidir. Bendin uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in failin, var olan veya var say\u0131lan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmas\u0131, y\u00f6neticisi olmas\u0131 gerekmedi\u011fi gibi su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn, eylemden \u00f6nce hukuken TCK\u2019n\u0131n 220. maddesi ya da 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct olarak kabul edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 da \u015fart de\u011fildir. Bendin a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 neden olarak kabul\u00fc, tehdidin kayna\u011f\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7la irtibatl\u0131 organize bir g\u00fcce dayanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcksekli\u011fi, tehlikenin nerede, ne zaman ve ne \u015fekilde gelece\u011finin kestirilememesi, buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak da korunma ya da savunma yapman\u0131n zor olu\u015fudur. Korkutucu g\u00fc\u00e7 olarak \u201cvar olan veya var say\u0131lan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin\u201d kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, fiilin tehlikelili\u011fini, failin ise ciddili\u011fini, kararl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyarken, ma\u011fdurda, muhatap olaca\u011f\u0131 bireysel tehdide g\u00f6re daha yo\u011fun korku, kayg\u0131 ve endi\u015fe yaratmaktad\u0131r. Ma\u011fdurun, bireysel tehdide g\u00f6re daha yo\u011fun korku, kayg\u0131 ve endi\u015feye maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in, failin, su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcyle dolayl\u0131 bile olsa ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu veya olabilece\u011fi ya da en az\u0131ndan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ile zay\u0131f da olsa irtibat\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ihtimaline inanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek makul nedenlerinin bulunmas\u0131 gerekir. Yarg\u0131lamaya konu somut olayda; medikal malzeme satan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, e-mail adresinden m\u00fc\u015ftekinin yetkilisi oldu\u011fu \u2026 Gazetesi\u2019nin e-mail adresine \u201c\u0130\u011fren\u00e7 bir milletsiniz, size kucak a\u00e7\u0131p ba\u011fr\u0131na basan bu millete kar\u015f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131z ve bize her f\u0131rsatta \u00e7amur atman\u0131z tam bir i\u011fren\u00e7lik ve bunun sorumlusu bu h\u00fck\u00fcmet. Siz i\u011fren\u00e7, sadakatsiz, \u00fc\u00e7 kuru\u015fa milletini vatan\u0131n\u0131 satacak milletsiniz. Unutmay\u0131n bizde daha \u00e7ok \u00c7atl\u0131lar, Samastlar var pis ermeniler\u201d \u015feklinde tehdit i\u00e7erikli mail g\u00f6ndermesi \u00fczerine, iddianamede san\u0131\u011f\u0131n TCK\u2019n\u0131n 106\/2-b-d maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131 iste\u011fiyle dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle TCK\u2019n\u0131n 106\/2-d maddesiyle mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak, yarg\u0131lama konusu tehdit su\u00e7unda bir su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn olu\u015fturdu\u011fu korkutucu g\u00fc\u00e7ten yararlanma \u00f6\u011fesinin ne \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ve bunun s\u00fcbutuna dair kan\u0131tlar\u0131n neler oldu\u011fu karar yerinde a\u00e7\u0131klan\u0131p, kan\u0131tlarla ili\u015fkili bi\u00e7imde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmadan, eksik inceleme ve yetersiz gerek\u00e7eyle su\u00e7un nitelikli halinin olu\u015ftu\u011fu kabul edilip h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r (Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi &#8211; Karar: 2015\/25931).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">15. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2018\/5737<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2019\/424<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 4.2.2019<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 KAZA NEDEN\u0130YLE MADD\u0130 VE MANEV\u0130 TAZM\u0130NAT \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Eser S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden Kaynakl\u0131 &#8211; Sadece 4857 S. Kanun Kapsam\u0131nda Kalan \u0130li\u015fkilerde Uygulanan H\u00fck\u00fcmlere Dayal\u0131 Olarak Verilen Raporun Esas Al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n Do\u011fru G\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi\/Eser S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi Konusunda Uzman \u0130n\u015faat Bilirki\u015fisi Se\u00e7ilmek Suretiyle Y\u00fcklenici Konumundaki Davac\u0131 \u0130le \u0130\u015f Sahibi Durumundaki Daval\u0131n\u0131n Kusur Oranlar\u0131n\u0131n Belirlenece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEHD\u0130T\u00a0EYLEM\u0130 NEDEN\u0130 \u0130LE MANEV\u0130 TAZM\u0130NAT \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Davac\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Nedeniyle Ki\u015filik Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Zarara U\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 Kan\u0131tlamas\u0131 Durumunda Uygun Bir Manevi Tazminat Verilece\u011fi &#8211; Mahkemece\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7u Nedeniyle A\u00e7\u0131lan Davan\u0131n Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 ve Ak\u0131betinin Beklenip Beklenmeyece\u011finin Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130sabetsiz Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 BEKLET\u0130C\u0130 MESELE ( Eser S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden Kaynakl\u0131 Meydana Gelen Kaza Nedeniyle Maddi ve Manevi Tazminat \u0130stemi &#8211; Davac\u0131n\u0131n Yaralanmas\u0131yla \u0130lgili Olarak Ceza Davas\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Davada Rapor Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Mahkemece Ceza Mahkemesinin Dava Dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n Getirtilip \u0130ncelenmek Suretiyle Bekletici Mesele Yap\u0131l\u0131p Yap\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n De\u011ferlendirilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 MANEV\u0130 TAZM\u0130NAT \u0130STEM\u0130 (\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Nedeniyle U\u011fran\u0131lan &#8211; Daval\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131 Davac\u0131 R\u0131zaen Yapm\u0131\u015f Oldu\u011fu Giderleri Talep Edemez \u0130se de\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Nedeniyle Ki\u015filik Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Zarara U\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 Kan\u0131tlamas\u0131 Durumunda Uygun Bir Manevi Tazminat Verilece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0As\u0131l dava, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanmakta olup, meydana gelen kaza nedeniyle maddi ve manevi tazminat, kar\u015f\u0131 dava ise, maddi ve manevi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece sadece 4857 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda kalan ili\u015fkilerde uygulanan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere dayal\u0131 olarak verilen rapor esas al\u0131n\u0131p h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan daval\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131 davas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan hastane masraflar\u0131n\u0131 ve tehdit nedeniyle u\u011fran\u0131lan manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015f ise de,\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7u nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve ak\u0131betinin beklenip beklenmeyece\u011fi tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daval\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 r\u0131zaen yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu giderleri talep edemez ise de,\u00a0tehdit\u00a0nedeniyle ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlamas\u0131 durumunda uygun bir manevi tazminat verilmelidir. Ancak, bu konuda a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunan ceza mahkemesi dosyas\u0131 getirtilip incelenmemi\u015ftir. Yine Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nin dava dosyas\u0131nda da, davac\u0131n\u0131n yaralanmas\u0131yla ilgili olarak ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davada rapor al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakta ise de, bu dava dosyas\u0131 getirtilip kusur y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmemi\u015f ve bekletici mesele yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirilmemi\u015ftir. Bu nedenlerle mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015f, ceza mahkemesinin dava dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n getirtilip incelenmek suretiyle, TBK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a074. ve HMK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0165. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda, bekletici mesele yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilerek, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi konusunda uzman in\u015faat bilirki\u015fisi se\u00e7ilmek suretiyle y\u00fcklenici konumundaki davac\u0131 ile i\u015f sahibi durumundaki daval\u0131n\u0131n kusur oranlar\u0131 belirlenmeli, as\u0131l dava bu y\u00f6nde de\u011ferlendirilmeli, kar\u015f\u0131 davada ise,\u00a0tehdit\u00a0nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucu beklenip daval\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131 ve bu istem y\u00f6n\u00fcnden karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2017\/15-581<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2018\/525<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 13.11.2018<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEHD\u0130T\u00a0( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ma\u011fdurun Ba\u015fkalar\u0131yla da Husumetinin Olmas\u0131 Sebebiyle Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7unun Konusunu Olu\u015fturdu\u011fu \u0130ddia Edilen S\u00f6zleri S\u00f6yledi\u011fi ve\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Kast\u0131n\u0131n Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; S\u00f6ylenen S\u00f6zlerle Ma\u011fduru Korkutmak Amac\u0131 Ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7unun Yasal Unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n Olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 GE\u00c7M\u0130\u015eE Y\u00d6NEL\u0130K S\u00d6Z VE YORUMLAR ( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Daha \u00d6nce Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f Bir Olaya \u0130stinaden S\u00f6yledi\u011fi S\u00f6zlerin Taraflar Aras\u0131ndaki Konu\u015fman\u0131n Geli\u015fimi G\u00f6z \u00d6n\u00fcne Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Ma\u011fduru Korkutmak Amac\u0131 Ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ge\u00e7mi\u015fe Y\u00f6nelik Yorum Ve De\u011ferlendirme Amac\u0131yla S\u00f6ylenen S\u00f6zler Oldu\u011fu \u0130leride Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi Muhtemel Olan Bir Sald\u0131r\u0131 Niteli\u011finde\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0\u0130\u00e7eren S\u00f6zler Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211;\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7unun Olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131\u011fa at\u0131l\u0131 tehdit su\u00e7unun yasal unsurlar\u0131 ile sabit olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ma\u011fdurun y\u00f6neticisi oldu\u011fu kooperatifin \u00fcyesi iken alacak-bor\u00e7 anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 \u00fcyelikten ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu sebeple ma\u011fdurla aralar\u0131nda husumet bulundu\u011fu, kooperatife borcu sebebiyle aleyhinde icra takibi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 08.30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda telefon ile ma\u011fduru arayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u201c\u0130cray\u0131 sen mi g\u00f6nderdin eve\u201d diye sordu\u011fu, ma\u011fdurun da \u201cAvukat g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir\u201d dedi\u011fi, bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeden sonra ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 10.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda evinin \u00f6n\u00fcnde park halindeki arac\u0131na zarar verilmi\u015f oldu\u011funu g\u00f6ren ma\u011fdurun, san\u0131ktan \u015f\u00fcphelenerek telefonla san\u0131\u011f\u0131 arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u201cbenim araban\u0131n camlar\u0131n\u0131 niye k\u0131rd\u0131n\u201d diye sordu\u011funda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u201cBenim bilgim yok, iftira etme, kim bilir kimin can\u0131n\u0131 yakt\u0131n ki bu i\u015fi yapm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6lmedi\u011fine dua et\u201d diyerek tehdit etti\u011fi iddia olunan olayda; t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ma\u011fdurun ba\u015fkalar\u0131yla da husumetinin olmas\u0131 sebebiyle tehdit su\u00e7unun konusunu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu iddia edilen s\u00f6zleri s\u00f6yledi\u011fi ve tehdit kast\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki aksi ispatlanamayan savunmas\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha \u00f6nce ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f bir olaya istinaden s\u00f6yledi\u011fi s\u00f6zlerin taraflar aras\u0131ndaki konu\u015fman\u0131n geli\u015fimi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ma\u011fduru korkutmak amac\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ge\u00e7mi\u015fe y\u00f6nelik yorum ve de\u011ferlendirme amac\u0131yla s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zler oldu\u011fu, ileride ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi muhtemel olan bir sald\u0131r\u0131 niteli\u011finde tehdit i\u00e7eren s\u00f6zler olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, tehdit su\u00e7unun yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2018\/4-394<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2018\/478<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 25.10.2018<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022TEHD\u0130T\u00a0SU\u00c7U ( 5271 S.K. Md. 253\/18 Uyar\u0131nca Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma Giri\u015fiminin Sonu\u00e7suz Kalmas\u0131 H\u00e2linde Tekrar Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma Yoluna Gidilemeyece\u011fi &#8211; T\u00fcrk Ceza Muhakemesi Hukukunun Zaman Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u0130lkesi Olan Derhal Uygulama \u0130lkesinin Uygulanmas\u0131 Geriye Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi ve Bu Sebeple Daha \u00d6nceki Kanun D\u00f6neminde Yap\u0131lan ve Tamamlanm\u0131\u015f Olan \u0130\u015flemlerin Ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini Korumas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi\/Soru\u015fturma Evresinde Taraflar\u0131n Kabul Etmemeleri Sebebiyle Sonu\u00e7suz Kalan Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma Giri\u015fimine Dair \u0130\u015flemlerin Yenilenmesinin Gerekmedi\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 DERHAL UYGULAMA \u0130LKES\u0130 ( Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe Giren Ceza Muhakemesi Kurallar\u0131n\u0131n Aleyhe ya da Lehe Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na Bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe Girdi\u011fi Tarihten Ba\u015flayarak \u0130\u015flenen B\u00fct\u00fcn Olaylara Araya Zaman Girmeksizin Uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 \u0130fade Etti\u011fi &#8211; Soru\u015fturma Evresinde Taraflar\u0131n Kabul Etmemeleri Sebebiyle Sonu\u00e7suz Kalan Uzla\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n Maddi Ceza Hukuku Boyutunu \u0130lgilendirmeyen M\u00fcnhas\u0131ran Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma Y\u00f6ntemine Y\u00f6nelik Olmas\u0131 Sebebiyle Usule Dair Oldu\u011fu Konusunda Ku\u015fku Bulunmayan De\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin Derhal Uygulama \u0130lkesinin Zorunlu Bir Gere\u011fi Olarak Daha \u00d6nce Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Yerine Getirilmi\u015f Olan Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma Giri\u015fimine Dair \u0130\u015flemlerin Yenilenmesini Gerektirmedi\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 UZLA\u015eTIRMA ( 5271 S.K. Md. 253\/18 Uyar\u0131nca Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma Giri\u015fiminin Sonu\u00e7suz Kalmas\u0131 H\u00e2linde Tekrar Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma Yoluna Gidilemeyece\u011fi &#8211; Soru\u015fturma Evresinde Taraflar\u0131n Kabul Etmemeleri Sebebiyle Sonu\u00e7suz Kalan Uzla\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n Maddi Ceza Hukuku Boyutunu \u0130lgilendirmeyen M\u00fcnhas\u0131ran Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma Y\u00f6ntemine Y\u00f6nelik Olmas\u0131 Sebebiyle Usule Dair Oldu\u011fu Konusunda Ku\u015fku Bulunmayan De\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin Daha \u00d6nce Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Yerine Getirilmi\u015f Olan Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma Giri\u015fimine Dair \u0130\u015flemlerin Yenilenmesini Gerektirmedi\u011fi\/Derhal Uygulama \u0130lkesi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava,\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7una ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in, CMK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0253. maddesine, 6763 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile eklenen 24 ve 25. f\u0131kralar\u0131n, karma bir yap\u0131ya sahip olan uzla\u015fman\u0131n hangi boyutuna dair oldu\u011funun tespiti gerekmektedir. 6763 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusunu ilgilendiren f\u0131kralar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; s\u00f6z konusu yasal de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin uzla\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n y\u00f6ntemine dair oldu\u011fu ve bu de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kurumunun ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 olumsuz etkileyen sak\u0131ncalar\u0131n giderilmesinin ve bu alan\u0131n disipline edilmesinin ama\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. CMK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0253\u00a0maddesinin 18 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise uzla\u015ft\u0131rma giri\u015fiminin sonu\u00e7suz kalmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde tekrar uzla\u015ft\u0131rma yoluna gidilemeyece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda soru\u015fturma evresinde taraflar\u0131n kabul etmemeleri sebebiyle sonu\u00e7suz kalan uzla\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n maddi ceza hukuku boyutunu ilgilendirmeyen, m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran uzla\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00f6ntemine y\u00f6nelik olmas\u0131 sebebiyle usule dair oldu\u011fu konusunda ku\u015fku bulunmayan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin, derhal uygulama ilkesinin zorunlu bir gere\u011fi olarak daha \u00f6nce usul\u00fcne uygun olarak yerine getirilmi\u015f olan uzla\u015ft\u0131rma giri\u015fimine dair i\u015flemlerin yenilenmesini gerektirmedi\u011fi kabul edilmelidir. Bu itibarla, yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcndeki direnme gerek\u00e7esinin isabetli oldu\u011funa ve dosyan\u0131n, uygulaman\u0131n denetlenmesi amac\u0131yla \u00d6zel Daireye g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2017\/4-878<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2018\/475<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 25.10.2018<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022\u00a0<a name=\"fm\"><\/a>TEHD\u0130T\u00a0SU\u00c7U ( Maddi Ger\u00e7e\u011fin Hi\u00e7bir Ku\u015fkuya Yer Vermeyecek \u015eekilde Tespiti Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Yakalama Teslim ve Tesell\u00fcm Tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 D\u00fczenleyen ve Olayla \u0130lgili G\u00f6rg\u00fcye Dayal\u0131 Bilgisi Olmas\u0131 Gereken Polis Memurlar\u0131n\u0131n Dinlenip T\u00fcm Kan\u0131tlar Birlikte De\u011ferlendirilerek Sonucuna G\u00f6re San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Hukuki Durumunun Belirlenece\u011fi &#8211; Eksik Ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulmas\u0131 Hatal\u0131 Olup Karar\u0131n Bozulmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 OKUMA &#8211; YAZMA B\u0130LMEME ( Ma\u011fdur ve Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n Kollukta San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ma\u011fduru Silahla\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Etti\u011fini Beyan Etmelerine Ra\u011fmen Mahkemede Okuma Yazma Bilmediklerinden Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fade Tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131 Okumadan \u0130mzalad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve Bu Beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 da Kabul Etmediklerini \u0130fade Etti\u011fi\/Kolluk Tutanaklar\u0131nda da Okur Yazar Olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n Belirtildi\u011fi ve San\u0131\u011f\u0131n At\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Su\u00e7u\u00a0Kabul Etmedi\u011fi &#8211; H\u00e2kimin Karar\u0131n\u0131 Ancak Duru\u015fmaya Getirilmi\u015f ve Huzurunda Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Delillere Dayand\u0131rabilece\u011fi\/T\u00fcm Kan\u0131tlar\u0131n De\u011ferlendirilebilmesi \u0130\u00e7in H\u00fckm\u00fcn Bozulmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 EK\u0130SK ARA\u015eTIRMA \u0130LE H\u00dcK\u00dcM KURULMASI ( Ma\u011fdur ve Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n Okur Yazar Olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n Belirtildi\u011fi ve San\u0131\u011f\u0131n At\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Su\u00e7u\u00a0Kabul Etmedi\u011fi &#8211; Maddi Ger\u00e7e\u011fin Hi\u00e7bir Ku\u015fkuya Yer Vermeyecek \u015eekilde Tespiti Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Yakalama Teslim ve Tesell\u00fcm Tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 D\u00fczenleyen ve Olayla \u0130lgili G\u00f6rg\u00fcye Dayal\u0131 Bilgisi Olmas\u0131 Gereken Polis Memurlar\u0131n\u0131n Dinlenip T\u00fcm Kan\u0131tlar Birlikte De\u011ferlendirilerek Sonucuna G\u00f6re San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Hukuki Durumunun Belirlenece\u011fi\/Karar\u0131n Bozulmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava,\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7una ili\u015fkindir. Olayda, ma\u011fdur ve tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n kollukta san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fduru silahla\u00a0tehdit\u00a0etti\u011fini beyan etmelerine ra\u011fmen mahkemede okuma yazma bilmediklerinden kollukta al\u0131nan ifade tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131 okumadan imzalad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve bu beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 da kabul etmediklerini ifade etmeleri, kollukta d\u00fczenlenen ifade tutanaklar\u0131nda da okur yazar olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n belirtilmesi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u015famalarda at\u0131l\u0131\u00a0su\u00e7u\u00a0kabul etmemesi ve h\u00e2kimin karar\u0131n\u0131 ancak duru\u015fmaya getirilmi\u015f ve huzurunda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f delillere dayand\u0131rabilece\u011fine dair d\u00fczenleme kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin hi\u00e7bir ku\u015fkuya yer vermeyecek \u015fekilde tespiti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, yakalama teslim ve tesell\u00fcm tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen ve olayla ilgili g\u00f6rg\u00fcye dayal\u0131 bilgisi olmas\u0131 gereken polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n dinlenip t\u00fcm kan\u0131tlar birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun belirlenmesi gerekir. Eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olup, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2015\/4-87<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2018\/83<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 13.3.2018<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022\u00a0<a name=\"fm\"><\/a>TEHD\u0130T\u00a0SU\u00c7U (\u00a0Su\u00e7un Yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n Alt\u0131 Aydan \u0130ki Y\u0131la Kadar Hapis Cezas\u0131 Olup Bu\u00a0Su\u00e7un Asli Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin Sekiz Y\u0131l Kesintili Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin On \u0130ki Y\u0131l Oldu\u011fu\/ San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Su\u00e7 Tarihi \u0130tibar\u0131yla Onbe\u015f Ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 Bitirmi\u015f Ancak Onsekiz Ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 Tamamlamam\u0131\u015f Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 Kesen Son \u0130\u015flem Mahk\u00fbmiyet H\u00fckm\u00fc Olup Bu Tarihten Sonra Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 Kesen veya Durduran Bir \u0130\u015flem Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Asli Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin CGK&#8217;nun \u0130nceleme Tarihinden \u00d6nce Dolmu\u015f Oldu\u011fu\/Davan\u0131n D\u00fc\u015fmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 DAVA ZAMANA\u015eIMI S\u00dcRES\u0130 ( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Su\u00e7 Tarihi \u0130tibar\u0131yla Onbe\u015f Ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 Bitirmi\u015f Ancak Onsekiz Ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 Tamamlamam\u0131\u015f Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 Kesen Son \u0130\u015flem Mahk\u00fbmiyet H\u00fckm\u00fc Olup Bu Tarihten Sonra Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 Kesen veya Durduran Bir \u0130\u015flem Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Asli Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin CGK&#8217;nun \u0130nceleme Tarihinden \u00d6nce Dolmu\u015f Oldu\u011fu\/Mahkeme H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Sebebiyle Bozulmas\u0131na San\u0131k Hakk\u0131ndaki Kamu Davas\u0131n\u0131n D\u00fc\u015fmesine Karar Verilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 ZAMANA\u015eIMI S\u00dcRES\u0130N\u0130N DOLMU\u015e OLMASI ( San\u0131k Hakk\u0131nda Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 Kesen Son \u0130\u015flem Mahk\u00fbmiyet H\u00fckm\u00fc Olup Bu Tarihten Sonra Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 Kesen veya Durduran Bir \u0130\u015flem Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Asli Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin CGK&#8217;nun \u0130nceleme Tarihinden \u00d6nce Dolmu\u015f Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Mahkeme H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Sebebiyle Bozulmas\u0131na<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7unun yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 alt\u0131 aydan iki y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 olup, bu\u00a0su\u00e7un asli dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi sekiz y\u0131l, kesintili dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi on iki y\u0131ld\u0131r. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7 tarihi itibar\u0131yla onbe\u015f ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 bitirmi\u015f, ancak onsekiz ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 tamamlamam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, su\u00e7ta asli dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 5 y\u0131l 4 ay, kesintili dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ise 7 y\u0131l 12 ayd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesen son i\u015flem mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc olup, bu tarihten sonra dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesen veya durduran ba\u015fkaca bir i\u015flem bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, asli dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi, CGK&#8217;nun inceleme tarihinden \u00f6nce dolmu\u015ftur. Bu itibarla, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7eyle kabul\u00fcyle \u00f6zel dairenin bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 sebebiyle bozulmas\u0131na, san\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/1-345<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2017\/345<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 20.6.2017<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022\u00a0<a name=\"fm\"><\/a>TEHD\u0130T\u00a0(San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Korkutmak Maksad\u0131yla Ma\u011fduru Yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u0130krar Etti\u011fi\/San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Tehdidinin Ciddili\u011fini Vurgulamak Amac\u0131yla Ma\u011fduru Yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Kasten Yaralama\u00a0Su\u00e7undan da Mahk\u00fbmiyetine Karar Verilmesinde Bir \u0130sabetsizlik Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 KASTEN YARALAMA (San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Korkutmak Maksad\u0131yla Ma\u011fduru Yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u0130krar Etti\u011fi\/San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Tehdidinin Ciddili\u011fini Vurgulamak Amac\u0131yla Ma\u011fduru Yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7undan da Mahk\u00fbmiyetine Karar Verilmesinin Do\u011fru Oldu\u011fu)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 SANI\u011eIN KORKUTMAK MAKSADIYLA MA\u011eDURU YARALAMASI (San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u201cBuradan Git Seni Keserim Seni \u00d6ld\u00fcr\u00fcr\u00fcm\u201d Dedikten Sonra Ma\u011fdurU Yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Tehdidinin Ciddili\u011fini Vurgulamak Amac\u0131yla Ma\u011fduru Yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Kasten Yaralama\u00a0Su\u00e7unun Yan\u0131 S\u0131ra\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7undan da Mahk\u00fbmiyetine Karar Verilece\u011fi)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda kasten yaralama\u00a0su\u00e7u\u00a0yan\u0131nda,\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7unun da olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir. San\u0131k ile ma\u011fdurun karde\u015f olduklar\u0131, san\u0131kla karde\u015fleri aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7imsizlik bulundu\u011fu, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, karde\u015flerinin il\u00e7edeki eve gelmelerine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130stanbul&#8217;da ikamet eden ma\u011fdurun olay g\u00fcn\u00fc il\u00e7eye gelmesi \u00fczerine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdurla tart\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, belinden \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 sustal\u0131 \u00e7ak\u0131y\u0131 ma\u011fdura do\u011fru sallayarak \u201cBuradan git, seni keserim, seni \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcr\u00fcm\u201d dedikten sonra \u00e7ak\u0131 ile ma\u011fdurun g\u00f6\u011fs\u00fcne vurarak yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n korkutmak maksad\u0131yla ma\u011fduru yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ikrar etti\u011fi olayda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, tehdidinin ciddili\u011fini vurgulamak amac\u0131yla ma\u011fduru yaralamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;nun\u00a0106. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca, kasten yaralama\u00a0su\u00e7unun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7undan da mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmesinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/1-115<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2017\/261<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 9.5.2017<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 S\u0130LAHLA TEHD\u0130T\u00a0VE 6136 SAYILI KANUN&#8217;A AYKIRILIK (San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ele Ge\u00e7irilemeyen Ruhsats\u0131z Kala\u015fnikof Marka Uzun Namlulu Silahla Ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n \u0130\u00e7erisinde Bulundu\u011fu Araca\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Kast\u0131 \u0130le Birden \u00c7ok Kez Ate\u015f Etti\u011fi ve Arac\u0131n Bu At\u0131\u015flardan \u0130sabet Almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Su\u00e7lar\u0131n Olu\u015ftu\u011fu\/Mahkumiyet Karar\u0131 Verilece\u011fi)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022\u00a0TEHD\u0130T\u00a0KASTI \u0130LE ARACA ATE\u015e ETME (Ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n Olaydan Hemen Sonra Verdikleri Birbirleriyle ve Dosya \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fiyle \u00d6rt\u00fc\u015fen Beyanlar\u0131 Tan\u0131k \u0130fadesi Olay Yeri Tespit Tutana\u011f\u0131 ve Olay Yerinde Bulunan Sokak Lambas\u0131n\u0131n Faal Durumda Oldu\u011fu ve Olay Yerini Ayd\u0131nlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131na Dair Olay Yeri Krokisi ve Uzmanl\u0131k Raporlar\u0131 Birlikte De\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde Silahla\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0ve 6136 S. Kanuna Ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k Su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n Olu\u015ftu\u011fu)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 RUHSATSIZ KALA\u015eN\u0130KOF MARKA UZUN NAMLULU S\u0130LAHLA ATE\u015e ETME (Silahla\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0ve 6136 S. Kanuna Ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k &#8211; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ele Ge\u00e7irilemeyen Ruhsats\u0131z Kala\u015fnikof Marka Uzun Namlulu Silahla Ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n \u0130\u00e7erisinde Bulundu\u011fu Araca\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Kast\u0131 \u0130le Birden \u00c7ok Kez Ate\u015f Etti\u011fi ve Arac\u0131n Bu At\u0131\u015flardan \u0130sabet Almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Su\u00e7lar\u0131n Olu\u015ftu\u011fu\/Mahkumiyet Karar\u0131 Verilece\u011fi)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 silahla\u00a0tehdit\u00a0ve 6136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n sabit olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ma\u011fdurlardan &#8230; ile san\u0131k &#8230; aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7mi\u015ften kaynaklanan husumet bulundu\u011fu, su\u00e7 tarihinden \u00f6nce san\u0131\u011f\u0131n evinin Kala\u015fnikof marka t\u00fcfekle tarand\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay yerinde 19 adedi ayn\u0131 1 adedi farkl\u0131 olmak \u00fczere iki ayr\u0131 t\u00fcfekten at\u0131lm\u0131\u015f toplam 20 adet Kala\u015fnikof mermi kovan\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu olay sebebiyle ma\u011fdurlardan &#8230;&#8217;tan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011fu, yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda &#8230; hakk\u0131nda delil yetersizli\u011fi sebebiyle beraat karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi, bu olaydan d\u00f6rt ay kadar sonra Erzurum il merkezinde ikamet eden ma\u011fdurlardan &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n bir cenaze sebebiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ba\u015fk\u00f6y k\u00f6y\u00fcne gitti\u011fi, arac\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 di\u011fer ma\u011fdur &#8230; ile k\u00f6yden ayr\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ele ge\u00e7irilemeyen ruhsats\u0131z Kala\u015fnikof marka uzun namlulu silahla, ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n i\u00e7erisinde bulundu\u011fu araca tehdit kast\u0131 ile birden \u00e7ok kez ate\u015f etti\u011fi, arac\u0131n bu at\u0131\u015flardan isabet almad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay yeri inceleme ekibince olay yerinde 3 adet bo\u015f Kala\u015fnikof kovan\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, bulunan bu \u00fc\u00e7 kovan\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n evinin kur\u015funlanmas\u0131 olay\u0131nda olay yerinde bulunan 20 kovandan 1&#8217;i ile ayn\u0131 t\u00fcfekten at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, yine olay yerinde bulunan kovanlar\u0131n ayn\u0131 k\u00f6yde 1997 y\u0131l\u0131nda meydana gelen silahla\u00a0tehdit\u00a0olay\u0131nda kullan\u0131lan t\u00fcfekten at\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun uzmanl\u0131k raporu ile belirlendi\u011fi, tan\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u00fcn de olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda 3 el silah sesi duydu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi olayda; ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n olaydan hemen sonra verdikleri birbirleriyle ve dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fiyle \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fen beyanlar\u0131, tan\u0131k ifadesi, olay yeri tespit tutana\u011f\u0131, olay yerinde bulunan sokak lambas\u0131n\u0131n faal durumda oldu\u011fu ve olay yerini ayd\u0131nlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair olay yeri krokisi ve uzmanl\u0131k raporlar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011fi hi\u00e7bir duraksamaya yer vermeyecek \u015fekilde s\u00fcbuta ermi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n silahla\u00a0tehdit\u00a0ve 6136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyetine dair yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fc isabetlidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2016\/14-995<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2017\/41<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 31.1.2017<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 S\u0130LAHLA TEHD\u0130T\u00a0\/ ATE\u015eL\u0130 S\u0130LAHLAR KANUNU&#8217;NA MUHALEFET (Ki\u015fiyi H\u00fcrriyetinden Yoksun K\u0131lma &#8211; \u0130nceleme D\u0131\u015f\u0131 San\u0131klar \u0130le Ma\u011fdurun M\u00fcmk\u00fcnse San\u0131kla Y\u00fczle\u015ftirilerek M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Takdirde San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Foto\u011fraf\u0131 Ba\u015fka Ki\u015filere Ait Foto\u011fraflarla Birlikte Kendilerine G\u00f6sterilerek Olay\u0131 Ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren Ki\u015finin San\u0131k Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Sorulaca\u011f\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 K\u0130\u015e\u0130Y\u0130 H\u00dcRR\u0130YET\u0130NDEN YOKSUN KILMA (Silahla\u00a0Tehdit\/6136 S. Kanuna Muhalefet &#8211; Su\u00e7 Tarihinde San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 GSM Hatt\u0131na Ait \u0130leti\u015fim Kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n Getirtilerek Olay Yerinden Sinyal Bilgisi Al\u0131p Almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Belirlenece\u011fi\/Farkl\u0131 \u015eehirdeki \u0130\u015f Yerinden San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Su\u00e7 Tarihinde \u0130\u015f Yerinde Fiilen \u00c7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p \u00c7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Sorulmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 SU\u00c7U \u0130\u015eLEYEN K\u0130\u015e\u0130 \u0130LE SANI\u011eIN AYNI K\u0130\u015e\u0130 OLUP OLMADI\u011eI (Di\u011fer San\u0131klarla Ma\u011fdurun San\u0131kla Y\u00fczle\u015ftirilerek M\u00fcmk\u00fcn De\u011filse San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Foto\u011fraf\u0131 Ba\u015fka Ki\u015filerin Foto\u011fraflar\u0131 \u0130le Birlikte G\u00f6sterilerek Olay\u0131 Ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren Ki\u015finin San\u0131k Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Sorulaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Silahla Tehdit\/Ki\u015fiyi H\u00fcrriyetinden Yoksun K\u0131lma\/6136 S. Kanuna Muhalefet)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; yarg\u0131lama konusu su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015fleyen belirtilen isimli ki\u015fi ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayn\u0131 ki\u015fi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma ile h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulup kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kendisinin ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma, silahla\u00a0tehdit\u00a0ve 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 kanuna muhalefet su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fleyen, olay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren ki\u015fi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ma\u011fdur ve inceleme d\u0131\u015f\u0131 san\u0131klar\u0131 tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve askerlik hizmeti d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u0130stanbul ilinden hi\u00e7 ayr\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair istikrarl\u0131 savunmas\u0131; kollukta belirtilen isimli \u015fahs\u0131n fiziksel g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcne dair ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 anlat\u0131m yapan ma\u011fdurun, duru\u015fmada san\u0131\u011fa ait g\u00fcncel foto\u011fraflar g\u00f6sterildi\u011finde olay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren \u015fahs\u0131n kesinlikle foto\u011fraflar\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen ki\u015fi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesi, emin olmamakla birlikte san\u0131\u011fa benzetti\u011fi n\u00fcfus c\u00fczdan\u0131 suretindeki foto\u011fraf\u0131n da olaydan yedi y\u0131l \u00f6ncesine ait olmas\u0131, inceleme d\u0131\u015f\u0131 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n her ne kadar san\u0131\u011f\u0131n siyah beyaz foto\u011fraf\u0131n\u0131n eylemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren ki\u015fiye ait oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015f ise de, bu ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi ki\u015fisel bilgiler ile san\u0131\u011fa ait ki\u015fisel bilgilerin uyumlu olmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; \u00f6ncelikle inceleme d\u0131\u015f\u0131 san\u0131klar ile ma\u011fdurun m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse san\u0131kla y\u00fczle\u015ftirilerek, m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n foto\u011fraf\u0131 ba\u015fka ki\u015filere ait foto\u011fraflarla birlikte kendilerine g\u00f6sterilerek olay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren ki\u015finin san\u0131k olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sorulmas\u0131; su\u00e7 tarihinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 GSM hatt\u0131na ait ileti\u015fim kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n getirtilerek olay yerinden sinyal bilgisi al\u0131p almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi, farkl\u0131 \u015fehirde faaliyet g\u00f6steren i\u015f yerinden san\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7 tarihinde ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en i\u015f yerinde fiilen \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sorulmas\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuk\u00ee durumunun belirlenmesi gerekirken, eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma ile h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2015\/1-364<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2017\/6<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 17.1.2017<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 S\u0130LAHLA TEHD\u0130T\u00a0( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Kendi Odas\u0131ndan Karde\u015fi Ma\u011fdurun Odas\u0131na Do\u011fru Rastgele Ate\u015f Etmek Suretiyle Hem Kendi Odas\u0131n\u0131n Camlar\u0131n\u0131 Hem de Ma\u011fdurun Odas\u0131n\u0131n Camlar\u0131n\u0131 Kur\u015funlamas\u0131 &#8211;\u00a0Su\u00e7un Ma\u011fdurunun \u0130\u00e7 Huzurunu Bozmaya Ma\u011fdurda Korku ve Endi\u015fe Olu\u015fturmaya Objektif Olarak Elveri\u015fli Olmas\u0131 Sebebiyle San\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0TehditKast\u0131yla Hareket Etti\u011finin Kabul\u00fc Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 HUZUR BOZMAYA Y\u00d6NEL\u0130K S\u0130LAHLA ATE\u015e ETME ( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Kendi Odas\u0131ndan Karde\u015fi Ma\u011fdurun Odas\u0131na Do\u011fru Rastgele Ate\u015f Etmek Suretiyle Hem Kendi Odas\u0131n\u0131n Camlar\u0131n\u0131 Hem de Ma\u011fdurun Odas\u0131n\u0131n Camlar\u0131n\u0131 Kur\u015funlamas\u0131 &#8211; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Silahla\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7undan Cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 Z\u0130NC\u0130RLEME SU\u00c7 ( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Kendi Odas\u0131ndan Ma\u011fdurun Odas\u0131na Do\u011fru Rastgele 12 El Ate\u015f Etmek Suretiyle Hem Kendi Hem de Ma\u011fdurun Odas\u0131n\u0131n Camlar\u0131n\u0131 K\u0131rmas\u0131 \u015eeklindeki Eyleminin Ma\u011fdur \u0130le Birlikte Ma\u011fdura da Y\u00f6nelik Olmas\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ayn\u0131\u00a0Su\u00e7u\u00a0Her \u0130ki Ma\u011fdura Kar\u015f\u0131 Hukuken Tek Bir Fiille \u0130\u015flemesi Nedeniyle San\u0131k Hakk\u0131nda Zincirleme Su\u00e7 H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Uygulanmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 silahla tehdit su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, silahla tehdit su\u00e7unun olu\u015ftu\u011funun kabul\u00fc halinde ise, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131\u00a0su\u00e7u\u00a0zincirleme bi\u00e7imde i\u015fleyip i\u015flemedi\u011finin belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir. San\u0131k ve ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n karde\u015f olup ayn\u0131 \u015firketin ortaklar\u0131 oldu\u011fu, \u015firketin \u00fcst kat\u0131nda san\u0131k ile ma\u011fdurun, her biri toplam 12&#8217;\u015fer mm kal\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7ift katl\u0131 camlarla kapat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f b\u00f6lmeleri oda olarak kulland\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131k ile ma\u011fdurun odalar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 olup aralar\u0131nda 2 metre geni\u015fli\u011finde koridor bulundu\u011fu, ma\u011fdurun odas\u0131n\u0131n ise koridorun sonunda oldu\u011fu, san\u0131k ile ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 sona erdirme karar\u0131 almalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu hususta gerekli ad\u0131mlar\u0131 atmad\u0131klar\u0131, olay tarihinde de san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdurlar\u0131 telefonla aray\u0131p bu hususu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek istemesi \u00fczerine, ma\u011fdurun san\u0131\u011f\u0131n odas\u0131na geldi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n masas\u0131nda alkol ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6ren \u0130brahim&#8217;in san\u0131\u011fa, bu halde kendisiyle konu\u015famayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n odas\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p kendi odas\u0131na ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha sonra oturdu\u011fu yerden ruhsatl\u0131 tabancas\u0131 ile kendi odas\u0131n\u0131n jaluzi perdeyle kapat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f camlar\u0131na do\u011fru rastgele 12 el ate\u015f etti\u011fi, kendi odas\u0131n\u0131n camlar\u0131n\u0131 delen mermilerin kar\u015f\u0131da bulunan ma\u011fdurun odas\u0131n\u0131n camlar\u0131n\u0131 da delerek ma\u011fdurun \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma masas\u0131na ve duvar\u0131na isabet etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Somut olayda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendi odas\u0131ndan ma\u011fdurun odas\u0131na do\u011fru rastgele ate\u015f etmek suretiyle, hem kendi odas\u0131n\u0131n camlar\u0131n\u0131 hem de ma\u011fdurun odas\u0131n\u0131n camlar\u0131n\u0131 kur\u015funlamas\u0131 \u015feklindeki eyleminin,\u00a0su\u00e7un ma\u011fdurunun i\u00e7 huzurunu bozmaya, ma\u011fdurda korku ve endi\u015fe olu\u015fturmaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli olmas\u0131 sebebiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0tehdit kast\u0131yla hareket etti\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle, yerel mahkemece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n silahla\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda bir isabetsizlik bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">4. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/35651<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2018\/22047<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 18.12.2018<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 S\u0130LAHLA TEHD\u0130T\u00a0SU\u00c7U ( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u0130stikrarl\u0131 Savunmas\u0131 Kat\u0131lan\u0131n Soyut \u0130ddias\u0131 D\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Delil Bulunmamas\u0131 ve Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n da G\u00f6rg\u00fcye Dayal\u0131 Bilgisinin Olmamas\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Kat\u0131lan\u0131n Beyan\u0131na Ne Suretle \u0130tibar Edildi\u011fi A\u00e7\u0131klanmadan Eksik Kovu\u015fturma ve Yetersiz Gerek\u00e7eyle H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulmas\u0131n\u0131n Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 DEL\u0130L YETERS\u0130ZL\u0130\u011e\u0130 ( Silahla\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0&#8211; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n At\u0131l\u0131 Su\u00e7u \u0130\u015flemedi\u011fine Dair A\u015famalarda De\u011fi\u015fmeyen \u0130stikrarl\u0131 Savunmas\u0131 Kat\u0131lan\u0131n Soyut \u0130ddias\u0131 D\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Delil Bulunmamas\u0131 ve Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n da G\u00f6rg\u00fcye Dayal\u0131 Bilgisinin Olmamas\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Kat\u0131lan\u0131n Beyan\u0131na Ne Suretle \u0130tibar Edildi\u011fi A\u00e7\u0131klanmadan H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulmas\u0131n\u0131n Do\u011fru Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 6136 SAYILI YASAYA MUHALEFET ( Su\u00e7ta Kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130ddia Edilen Silah\u0131n Ele Ge\u00e7irilememesi ve 6136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun Kapsam\u0131nda Yasak Niteli\u011fine Haiz Ate\u015fli Silahlardan Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na Dair Ekspertiz Raporunun da Bulunmamas\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda 6136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya Muhalefet\u00a0Su\u00e7unun\u00a0Yasal\u00a0Unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n Olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0San\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015flemedi\u011fine dair a\u015famalarda de\u011fi\u015fmeyen istikrarl\u0131 savunmas\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n soyut iddias\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda delil bulunmamas\u0131 ve tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n da g\u00f6rg\u00fcye dayal\u0131 bilgisinin olmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, kat\u0131lan\u0131n beyan\u0131na ne suretle itibar edildi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanmadan eksik kovu\u015fturma ve yetersiz gerek\u00e7eyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, hatal\u0131d\u0131r. San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda 6136 Say\u0131l\u0131 yasaya muhalefet su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise; su\u00e7ta kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen silah\u0131n ele ge\u00e7irilememesi ve 6136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda yasak niteli\u011fine haiz ate\u015fli silahlardan olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair ekspertiz raporunun da bulunmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, 6136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya muhalefet\u00a0su\u00e7unun\u00a0yasal\u00a0unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi, isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">4. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/36541<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2018\/22240<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 20.12.2018<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022TEHD\u0130T\u00a0SU\u00c7U ( San\u0131\u011fa Y\u00fcklenen Fiilin Su\u00e7 Olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a Anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 Durumunda Uygulanabilmesi ve Somut Olay Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise B\u00f6yle Bir Durumun S\u00f6z Konusu Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Y\u00f6ntemince Sorgusu Yap\u0131l\u0131p T\u00fcm Deliller Birlikte De\u011ferlendirildikten Sonra H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi G\u00f6zetilmeden ve Ayr\u0131ca San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Vazge\u00e7meyi Kabul Edip Etmedi\u011fi Belirlenmeden San\u0131k Hakk\u0131nda At\u0131l\u0131 Su\u00e7lardan D\u00fc\u015fme Karar\u0131 Verilmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022\u00a0TEHD\u0130T\u00a0SU\u00c7UNUN MANEV\u0130 \u00d6\u011eES\u0130 ( Genel Kast Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Kavga ve Tart\u0131\u015fma S\u0131ras\u0131nda Haks\u0131z Bir Fiilin Kendisinde Husule Getirdi\u011fi \u015eiddetli \u00d6fke ve Elemin Failin \u0130radesini Etkileyen Bir Etken Olarak Kusur Yetene\u011finde Meydana Getirdi\u011fi Azalma Nedeniyle Ko\u015fullar\u0131 Varsa Ancak Yasal \u0130ndirim Nedeni Olarak Kabul Edilebilmesinin Olanakl\u0131 Oldu\u011fu\/\u00d6nceden \u0130lke Boyutunda Kast\u0131 Kald\u0131ran ve Su\u00e7un Olu\u015fumunu Engelleyen Bir Husus Olarak Kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 UZLA\u015eTIRMA ( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Eyleminin\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7u Olarak Kabul\u00fc Halinde ise Uzla\u015fma H\u00fck\u00fcmleri Yeniden D\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ve San\u0131\u011fa \u0130snat Edilen\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7unun Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma Kapsam\u0131nda Bulundu\u011fu Anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma \u0130\u015flemi Uygulanarak Sonucuna G\u00f6re San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Hukuki Durumunun Bu Kapsamda Tekrar De\u011ferlendirilip Belirlenmesinde Zorunluluk Bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n Bozmay\u0131 Gerektirdi\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava,\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7una ili\u015fkindir. San\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen fiilin su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda uygulanabilmesi ve somut olay bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise b\u00f6yle bir durumun s\u00f6z konusu olmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n y\u00f6ntemince sorgusu yap\u0131l\u0131p t\u00fcm deliller birlikte de\u011ferlendirildikten sonra h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden ve ayr\u0131ca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n vazge\u00e7meyi kabul edip etmedi\u011fi belirlenmeden san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lardan d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilmesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7unun\u00a0manevi \u00f6\u011fesi genel kasttan ibaret olup su\u00e7un yasal tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki\u00a0unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek i\u015flenmesini ifade eder. Olayda tasarlaman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, saikin de \u00f6nemi yoktur. Kavga ve tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda haks\u0131z bir fiilin kendisinde husule getirdi\u011fi \u015fiddetli \u00f6fke ve elemin ( gazab\u0131n ) failin iradesini etkileyen bir etken olarak kusur yetene\u011finde meydana getirdi\u011fi azalma nedeniyle ko\u015fullar\u0131 varsa ancak yasal indirim nedeni olarak kabul edilebilmesi olanakl\u0131 ise de, \u00f6nceden ilke boyutunda kast\u0131 kald\u0131ran ve su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engelleyen bir husus olarak kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7u olarak kabul\u00fc halinde ise; uzla\u015fma h\u00fck\u00fcmleri yeniden d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ve san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7unun uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, uzla\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemi uygulanarak sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun bu kapsamda tekrar de\u011ferlendirilip belirlenmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131 bozmay\u0131 gerektirir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n sarf etti\u011fi s\u00f6zlerinin tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden, kanunda d\u00fczenlenen basit\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7undan a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n vazge\u00e7me nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar\u0131 verilmesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">4. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/34468<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2018\/22225<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 20.12.2018<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Yerel Mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle, ba\u015fvurunun s\u00fcresi ve karar\u0131n niteli\u011fi ile su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re dosya g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Temyiz iste\u011finin reddi nedenleri bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Vicdani kan\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu duru\u015fma s\u00fcrecini yans\u0131tan tutanaklar, belgeler ve gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131na, dosyada \u015fikayet\u00e7i s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan kat\u0131lan\u0131 kastederek s\u00f6yledi\u011fi\u00a0<a name=\"fm\"><\/a>tehdit\u00a0i\u00e7eren s\u00f6zlerinin, tutanak d\u00fczenleme yetkisi ve g\u00f6revi olan Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak i\u015flem sonucu, kat\u0131lan &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6\u011frenilebilece\u011fi nazara al\u0131narak, iletme kast\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ve bu nedenle olayda\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7unun\u00a0unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n iletme kast\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki yerinde olmayan gerek\u00e7eyle beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)Bozmaya uyulup\u00a0tehdit\u00a0eyleminden mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131 halinde ;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">02\/12\/2016 tarihli Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak ayn\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6763 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a034. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0253. maddesi ve maddeye eklenen f\u0131kraya g\u00f6re uzla\u015fma h\u00fck\u00fcmleri yeniden d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ve san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0106\/1. maddesi kapsam\u0131ndaki\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7unun uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a02\u00a0ve\u00a07. maddeleri de g\u00f6zetilerek, uzla\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemi uygulanarak sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun bu kapsamda tekrar de\u011ferlendirilip belirlenmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, \u00fcst Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, di\u011fer y\u00f6nleri incelenmeksizin H\u00dcKM\u00dcN 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a08\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n bozma \u00f6ncesi a\u015famadan ba\u015flayarak s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcp sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n esas\/h\u00fck\u00fcm mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 20\/12\/2018 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">4. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/33813<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2018\/20743<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 29.11.2018<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Yerel Mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle, ba\u015fvurunun s\u00fcresi ve karar\u0131n niteli\u011fi ile su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re dosya g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Temyiz iste\u011finin reddi nedenleri bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Vicdani kan\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu duru\u015fma s\u00fcrecini yans\u0131tan tutanaklar, belgeler ve gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan incelemede:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-) 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0106. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde, bir ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin veya yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131na, v\u00fccut veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir sald\u0131r\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011finden bahisle tehdit eden ki\u015finin alt\u0131 aydan iki y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7unun\u00a0temel \u015fekli d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.\u00a0<a name=\"fm\"><\/a>Tehdit\u00a0fiili, ki\u015finin ruh dinginli\u011fini bozan, i\u00e7 huzurunu, bilin\u00e7 ve irade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal eden bir olgudur. Fiilin ma\u011fdur \u00fczerinde ciddi bir korku yaratabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 almaya objektif olarak elveri\u015fli, yeterli ve uygun olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca tehdidin somut olayda muhatap \u00fczerinde etkili olmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle \u00e7ok istisnai haller hari\u00e7 ma\u011fdurun korkup korkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez.\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7unun manevi \u00f6\u011fesi genel kasttan ibaret olup su\u00e7un yasal tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki\u00a0unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek i\u015flenmesini ifade eder. Olayda tasarlaman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, saikin de \u00f6nemi yoktur. Kavga ve tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda haks\u0131z bir fiilin kendisinde husule getirdi\u011fi \u015fiddetli \u00f6fke ve elemin (gazab\u0131n) failin iradesini etkileyen bir etken olarak kusur yetene\u011finde meydana getirdi\u011fi azalma nedeniyle ko\u015fullar\u0131 varsa ancak yasal indirim nedeni olarak kabul edilebilmesi olanakl\u0131 ise de, \u00f6nceden ilke boyutunda kast\u0131 kald\u0131ran ve su\u00e7un olu\u015fumunu engelleyen bir husus olarak kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olaya gelince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u015famalardaki savunmas\u0131nda, aralar\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan tart\u0131\u015fmada ma\u011fdur &#8230;&#8217;e, \u201csenin dilini keserim\u201d dedi\u011fini beyan etmesi, yerel Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan da san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdura an\u0131lan tehdit s\u00f6zlerini s\u00f6yledi\u011finin kabul edilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdura s\u00f6yledi\u011fi kabul edilen \u201csenin dilini keserim\u201d \u015feklindeki s\u00f6zlerinin TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 106\/1-1. c\u00fcmle kapsam\u0131ndaki tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda yasal olmayan gerek\u00e7eyle at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-) San\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0106\/1-1. c\u00fcmle kapsam\u0131ndaki\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funun kabul\u00fc halinde ise; 02\/12\/2016 tarihli Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak ayn\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6763 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a034. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0253. maddesi ve maddeye eklenen f\u0131kraya g\u00f6re uzla\u015fma h\u00fck\u00fcmleri yeniden d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ve san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0106\/1. maddesi kapsam\u0131ndaki\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7unun uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a02\u00a0ve\u00a07. maddeleri de g\u00f6zetilerek, uzla\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemi uygulanarak sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun bu kapsamda tekrar de\u011ferlendirilip belirlenmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, o yer Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, H\u00dcKM\u00dcN BOZULMASINA, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n bozma \u00f6ncesi a\u015famadan ba\u015flayarak s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcp sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n esas\/h\u00fck\u00fcm mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 29.11.2018 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">4. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2018\/4700<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2018\/17612<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 17.10.2018<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEHD\u0130T\u00a0SU\u00c7U ( Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma \u0130\u015flemleri Ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmeden Kurulan ve\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7undan San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Hapis Cezas\u0131yla Cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na Hapis Cezas\u0131n\u0131n Ertelenmesine Dair Kararda \u0130sabet Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 KAMU G\u00d6REVL\u0130S\u0130NE HAKARET ( \u015eikayet Yoklu\u011fu Sebebiyle Kamu Davas\u0131n\u0131n D\u00fc\u015fmesine H\u00fckmolundu\u011fu &#8211; Bu Sebeple de An\u0131lan Su\u00e7un \u0130\u015flendi\u011finden Bahsedilemeyece\u011fi \u0130\u00e7in\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7u Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Uzla\u015ft\u0131rmaya Engel Olan H\u00fckm\u00fcn Uygulanma Olana\u011f\u0131 Kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 UZLA\u015eTIRMA (\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7unun Kamu G\u00f6revlisine Hakaret Su\u00e7uyla Birlikte \u0130\u015flendi\u011finin \u0130ddia Edilmesi Sebebiyle Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma Kapsam\u0131 D\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Kamu G\u00f6revlisine Hakaret Su\u00e7uyla \u0130lgili \u015eikayet Yoklu\u011fu Sebebiyle Kamu Davas\u0131n\u0131n D\u00fc\u015fmesine H\u00fckmolundu\u011fu\/Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7u Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Uzla\u015ft\u0131rmaya Engel Olan H\u00fckm\u00fcn Uygulanma Olana\u011f\u0131 Kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0San\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia olunan TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0125. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n a bendinde d\u00fczenlenen kamu g\u00f6revlisine hakaret su\u00e7u m\u00fcstakilen uzla\u015ft\u0131rmaya tabi de\u011fildir. Yine san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen an\u0131lan Kanun&#8217;un 106. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde d\u00fczenlenen\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7u, su\u00e7 tarihi itibariyle uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131nda bulunmay\u0131p 6763 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu ile Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanunun\u00a034\u00a0ve\u00a035. maddeleriyle, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0253\u00a0ve\u00a0254. maddelerinde yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ancak, somut olayda kamu g\u00f6revlisine hakaret su\u00e7uyla birlikte i\u015flendi\u011finin iddia edilmesi sebebiyle CMK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0253\/3. maddesindeki d\u00fczenleme uyar\u0131nca uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama neticesinde ise, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kamu g\u00f6revlisine hakaret\u00a0su\u00e7unun\u00a0TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0125\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hakaret su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131l\u0131p \u015fikayet yoklu\u011fu sebebiyle kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine h\u00fckmolunmu\u015f, bu sebeple de an\u0131lan su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011finden bahsedilemeyece\u011fi i\u00e7in,\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden uzla\u015ft\u0131rmaya engel olan CMK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0253\/3. maddesinin uygulanma olana\u011f\u0131 kalmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden CMK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0254. maddesi gere\u011fince uzla\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. T\u00fcm bu nedenlerle; uzla\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmeden kurulan ve\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7undan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0106\/1-1. c\u00fcmle, 29 ve 62. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 3 ay 22 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a051. maddesi gere\u011fince hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesine dair kararda isabet bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">4. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2017\/15951<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2018\/9191<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 10.5.2018<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEHD\u0130T\u00a0SU\u00c7U ( Mahkemece San\u0131klar Kat\u0131lan ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00f6ntemince \u0130rdelenmesi ve T\u00fcm Kan\u0131tlar Birlikte De\u011ferlendirilerek Hangi Anlat\u0131ma Hangi Sebeple \u00dcst\u00fcnl\u00fck Tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131klanarak Karar Verilece\u011fi &#8211; San\u0131k Kat\u0131lan ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00c7eli\u015fkili Olmas\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 SANIK KATILAN VE TANIKLARIN ANLATIMLARININ \u00c7EL\u0130\u015eK\u0130L\u0130 OLMASI ( Anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00f6ntemince \u0130rdelenmesi ve T\u00fcm Kan\u0131tlar Birlikte De\u011ferlendirilerek Hangi Anlat\u0131ma Hangi Sebeple \u00dcst\u00fcnl\u00fck Tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131klanarak Karar Verilece\u011fi &#8211;\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7u )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u00c7EL\u0130\u015eK\u0130L\u0130 BEYAN (\u00a0Tehdit\u00a0Su\u00e7u &#8211; San\u0131klar Kat\u0131lan ve Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00f6ntemince \u0130rdelenmesi ve T\u00fcm Kan\u0131tlar Birlikte De\u011ferlendirilerek Hangi Anlat\u0131ma Hangi Sebeple \u00dcst\u00fcnl\u00fck Tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131klanarak Sonuca Gidilece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava; tehdit su\u00e7una ili\u015fkindir. San\u0131klar\u0131n soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma evresinde tutarl\u0131 olarak kat\u0131lan\u0131 tehdit etmedikleri \u015feklindeki savunmalar\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n kovu\u015fturma evresinde, &#8220;\u015fartla tahliye olan &#8230; bana, bir ka\u00e7 y\u0131l da senin i\u00e7in yatar\u0131m diyerek tehdit etti. Olay esnas\u0131nda Ya\u015far&#8217;\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n beni tehdit edip etmediklerini hat\u0131rlam\u0131yorum&#8221; \u015feklindeki anlat\u0131m\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n e\u015fi olan tan\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n &#8220;san\u0131klar Ya\u015far ve Durak&#8217;\u0131n vurun, \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcn diye ba\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duydum&#8221; bi\u00e7imindeki kat\u0131lanla \u00e7eli\u015fir ifadesi ve tan\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;un ise &#8220;ben san\u0131klar\u0131n Murat&#8217;a sinkafl\u0131 s\u00f6v\u00fcp hakaret ettiklerini duydum&#8221; diyerek\u00a0tehdit\u00a0s\u00f6zlerinden hi\u00e7 bahsetmedi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131klar, kat\u0131lan ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6ntemince irdelenmesi ve t\u00fcm kan\u0131tlar birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek hangi anlat\u0131ma hangi sebeple \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klan\u0131p sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131klar\u0131n hukuki durumlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve yetersiz gerek\u00e7e ile\u00a0tehdit\u00a0su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahkumiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmleri kurulmas\u0131, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tehdit ve Kavgada K\u0131zg\u0131nl\u0131kla S\u00f6ylenen S\u00f6zler TCK Md 106 Gerek\u00e7e: MADDE 106.\u2013 Maddeyle, \u201ctehdit\u201d bizatihi su\u00e7 h\u00e2line getirilmi\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere tehdit di\u011fer baz\u0131 su\u00e7larda ayr\u0131ca<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-658","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ceza-hukuku","category-makaleler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=658"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/658\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4597,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/658\/revisions\/4597"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=658"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}