{"id":596,"date":"2015-12-04T23:37:26","date_gmt":"2015-12-04T21:37:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/?p=596"},"modified":"2025-10-13T17:27:07","modified_gmt":"2025-10-13T14:27:07","slug":"gorevi-ihmal-ve-gorevi-kotuye-kullanma-suclari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/gorevi-ihmal-ve-gorevi-kotuye-kullanma-suclari\/","title":{"rendered":"G\u00d6REV\u0130 \u0130HMAL VE G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA SU\u00c7LARI"},"content":{"rendered":"

G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMAK SU\u00c7U ( TCK Md 257 )\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

A)G\u00d6REV\u0130 \u0130HMAL (m. 257\/2) :<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

G\u00d6REV\u0130N\u0130N GEREKLER\u0130N\u0130, YAPMAKTA \u0130HMAL VEYA GEC\u0130KME<\/strong> G\u00d6STEREREK, K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER\u0130N MA\u011eDUR\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130 VEYA KAMU ZARARINA NEDEN OLMAK, YA DA K\u0130\u015e\u0130LERE HAKSIZ B\u0130R KAZAN\u00c7 SA\u011eLAMAKTIR.<\/p>\n

B)G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA (m. 257\/1) : <\/strong><\/p>\n

G\u00d6REV\u0130N\u0130N GEREKLER\u0130NE AYKIRI HARAKET ETMEK SURET\u0130 \u0130LE, K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER\u0130N MA\u011eDUR\u0130YET\u0130NE VEYA KAMUNUN ZARARINA NEDEN OLMAK YA DA, K\u0130\u015e\u0130LERE HAKSIZ B\u0130R KAZAN\u00c7 SA\u011eLAMAKTIR..<\/p>\n

C)MA\u011eDUR\u0130YET KO\u015eULU : <\/strong><\/p>\n

MA\u011eDUR\u0130YET, ZARAR VEYA HAKSIZ KAZAN\u00c7 KO\u015eULLARINA BA\u011eLIDIR.<\/p>\n

D)SU\u00c7U \u0130\u015eLEYEB\u0130LECEK K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER : <\/strong><\/p>\n

-G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA SU\u00c7UNUN FA\u0130L\u0130, 5237 TCK m. 6\/1-c MADDES\u0130NDE TANIMLANAN KAMU G\u00d6REVL\u0130S\u0130D\u0130R. <\/strong><\/p>\n

-KAMU G\u00d6REVL\u0130S\u0130 :<\/strong> KAMUSAL FAAL\u0130YET\u0130N Y\u00dcR\u00dcT\u00dcLMES\u0130NE ATAMA VEYA SE\u00c7\u0130LME YOLU \u0130LE VEYA HER HANG\u0130 B\u0130R \u015eEK\u0130LDE S\u00dcREKL\u0130, S\u00dcREL\u0130 VEYA GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 OLARAK KATILAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130D\u0130R.<\/p>\n

-KAMU G\u00d6REVL\u0130LER\u0130NE \u00d6RNEK OLARAK : MEMUR, S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMEL\u0130 VEYA GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 PERSONEL, \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130LER, DEVLET DA\u0130RELER\u0130NDE VE KAMU \u0130DARELER\u0130NDE \u00c7ALI\u015eAN Y\u00d6NET\u0130C\u0130, B\u00dcRO MEMURU, HEK\u0130M, HEM\u015e\u0130RE, LABORANT, TEKN\u0130SYEN, H\u0130ZMETL\u0130, \u015eOF\u00d6R, SAVUNMA G\u00d6REV\u0130 YAPAN AVUKATLAR, HUKUK\u0130 \u0130\u015eLEM VE BELGELER\u0130N TESP\u0130T\u0130N\u0130 Y\u00dcR\u00dcTEN NOTERLER, B\u0130L\u0130RK\u0130\u015e\u0130, TERC\u00dcMAN, MUHTAR, \u0130HT\u0130YAR HEYET\u0130 \u00dcYELER\u0130, BELED\u0130YE MECL\u0130S\u0130 VE \u0130L GENEL MECL\u0130S\u0130 \u00dcYELER\u0130, KOOPERAT\u0130FLER KANUNUN m. 62YE G\u00d6RE KOOPERAT\u0130F Y\u00d6NET\u0130M KURULU \u00dcYELER\u0130, TARAFINDAN \u0130\u015eLENEB\u0130L\u0130R.<\/p>\n

E)CEZASI : <\/strong><\/p>\n

-G\u00d6REV\u0130 \u0130HMAL SU\u00c7UNUN CEZASI, 257\/2YE G\u00d6RE 6 AYDAN 2 YILA KADAR HAP\u0130S.<\/p>\n

-G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMANIN CEZASI, 257\/1E G\u00d6RE 1 YILDAN 3 YILA KADAR HAP\u0130S CEZASIDIR.<\/p>\n

6086 SAYILI, 08.12.2010 KABUL, 19.12.2010 YAYIM TAR\u0130HL\u0130 T\u00dcRK CEZA KANUNUNDA DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130K YAPILMASINA DA\u0130R KANUN \u0130LE, 257. MADDEDE, \u00d6NEML\u0130 B\u0130R DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130K YAPILMI\u015eTIR. <\/strong><\/p>\n

6086 SAYILI TCK 257. MADDEDE DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130K YAPAN KANUN, 19.12.2010 TAR\u0130H\u0130NDE Y\u00dcR\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011eE G\u0130RM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R. <\/strong><\/p>\n

TCK m. 257DE DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130K YAPAN, 6086 SAYILI YASANIN 1. MADDE \u015e\u00d6YLED\u0130R : 26\/9\/2004 TAR\u0130HL\u0130 VE 5237 SAYILI T\u00dcRK CEZA KANUNUNUN 257 NC\u0130 MADDES\u0130N\u0130N B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 VE \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 FIKRALARINDA YER ALAN KAZAN\u00c7 \u0130BARELER\u0130 MENFAAT, B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 FIKRASINDA YER ALAN B\u0130R YILDAN \u00dc\u00c7 YILA KADAR \u0130BARES\u0130 ALTI AYDAN \u0130K\u0130 YILA KADAR \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 FIKRASINDA YER ALAN ALTI AYDAN \u0130K\u0130 YILA KADAR\ufffd \u0130BARES\u0130 \u00dc\u00c7 AYDAN B\u0130R YILA KADAR VE \u00dc\u00c7\u00dcNC\u00dc FIKRASINDA YER ALAN B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 FIKRA H\u00dcKM\u00dcNE G\u00d6RE \u0130BARES\u0130 B\u0130R YILDAN \u00dc\u00c7 YILA KADAR HAP\u0130S VE BE\u015eB\u0130N G\u00dcNE KADAR ADL\u0130 PARA CEZASI \u0130LE CEZALANDIRILIR..<\/strong><\/p>\n

G\u00d6REV\u0130 \u0130HMAL VE G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA SU\u00c7LARINDA YETK\u0130L\u0130 VE G\u00d6REVL\u0130 MAHKEME- DAVA ZAMANA\u015eIMI…<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

G\u00d6REV\u0130 \u0130HMAL VE G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA SU\u00c7LARINDA, KOVU\u015eTURMA, MERC\u0130\u0130NDEN \u0130Z\u0130N ALINARAK YAPILACAKTIR.. -YETK\u0130L\u0130 MAHKEME : SU\u00c7UN \u0130\u015eLEND\u0130\u011e\u0130 YER MAHKEMES\u0130D\u0130R. -G\u00d6REVL\u0130 MAHKEME : G\u00d6REV\u0130 \u0130HMALDE G\u00d6REVL\u0130 MAHKEME SULH CEZA, G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMADA, G\u00d6REVL\u0130 MAHKEME ASL\u0130YE CEZA MAHKEMES\u0130D\u0130R.<\/p>\n

DAVA ZAMANA\u015eIMI :<\/strong><\/p>\n

G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA SU\u00c7UNUN, T\u00dcM \u0130\u015eLEN\u0130\u015e B\u0130\u00c7\u0130MLER\u0130 BAKIMINDAN DAVA ZAMANA\u015eIMI S\u00dcRES\u0130, 5237 TCK m. 66\/1-e BEND\u0130 UYARINCA 8 YILDIR. ZAMANA\u015eIMINI KESEN S\u00d6Z KONUSU HUKUK\u0130 \u0130\u015eLEMLER OLDU\u011eU TAKT\u0130RDE, ZAMANA\u015eIMI, \u00bd ARTIRILARAK, 8 YILLIK ZAMANA\u015eIMI, 12 YILA \u00c7IKMAKTADIR.<\/p>\n

G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA SU\u00c7UNUN, MADD\u0130 UNSURLARI..<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

a)G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA SU\u00c7UNUN B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 UNSURU :<\/strong><\/p>\n

KAMU G\u00d6REVL\u0130S\u0130, \u0130CRA\u0130 HAREKETLE G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMALIDIR. \u00d6RNEK, BELED\u0130YE BA\u015eKANININ, SINAVI KAZANMAYAN B\u0130R\u0130S\u0130N\u0130, YASAYA AYKIRI OLARAK MEMUR OLARAK ATAMASI G\u0130B\u0130.<\/p>\n

b)G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMANIN \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 UNSURU : <\/strong><\/p>\n

EYLEM, K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER\u0130N MA\u011eDUR\u0130YET\u0130NE VEYA KAMUNUN EKONOM\u0130K BAKIMDAN ZARARINA NEDEN OLMALI VEYA K\u0130\u015e\u0130LERE HAKSIZ B\u0130R KAZAN\u00c7 SA\u011eLANMALIDIR. \u00d6RNE\u011e\u0130N,<\/p>\n

-B\u0130R \u0130MAR PLANI UYGULAMASINDA, BELL\u0130 B\u0130R PARSEL, SAH\u0130B\u0130NE DUYULAN HUSUMET DOLAYISIYLA, PLAN TEKN\u0130\u011e\u0130NE AYKIRI OLARAK, YE\u015e\u0130L ALAN OLARAK G\u00d6STER\u0130LMES\u0130.<\/p>\n

-\u0130\u015e, MAL VEYA H\u0130ZMET \u0130\u00c7\u0130N FAZLA \u00d6DEME YAPILMASI,<\/p>\n

-MAL ALINMADAN, \u0130\u015e VEYA H\u0130ZMET YAPTIRILMADAN \u00d6DEME YAPILMASI,<\/p>\n

-\u0130\u015e, MAL VEYA H\u0130ZMET\u0130N RAY\u0130\u00c7 BEDEL\u0130NHDEN DAHA Y\u00dcKSEK F\u0130YATLA ALINMASI, (\u0130SMA\u0130L ERCAN : CEZA HUKUKU, GENEL VE \u00d6ZEL H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER, YEN\u0130LENM\u0130\u015e 4. BASKI, A\u011eUSTOS 2008, Sh:662-663)<\/p>\n

B\u0130R DOKTORUN G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA SU\u00c7UNA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N, \u00d6RNEK…<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

a)SANIK, \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 E\u011e\u0130T\u0130M VE ARA\u015eTIRMA HASTANES\u0130NDE, G\u00d6Z DOKTORU OLARAK \u00c7ALI\u015eMAKTADIR.<\/p>\n

b)EMEKL\u0130 SANDI\u011eI SA\u011eLIK YARDIMINDAN YARARLANAN HASTALARI, \u00d6ZEL KL\u0130N\u0130KTE MUAYENE ETMEKTED\u0130R.<\/p>\n

c)RESM\u0130 KAYIT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130N\u0130, HASTA VE YAKINLARI OLMAKSIZIN YAPTIRACA\u011eINI BEL\u0130RTM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R.<\/p>\n

d)\u00d6ZEL RE\u00c7ETELER VE HASTALARA A\u0130T SA\u011eLIK KARNELER\u0130N\u0130 ALARAK, G\u00d6REVL\u0130 OLDU\u011eU HASTANES\u0130NDE, HASTALAR, HASTANEYE GELMED\u0130\u011e\u0130 HALDE, HASTANE PROTOKOL DEFTER\u0130NE KAYDEDEREK,<\/p>\n

e)\u00d6ZEL MUAYENE SONU\u00c7LARINA G\u00d6RE \u00d6ZEL RE\u00c7ETELER\u0130 SA\u011eLIK KARNELEREN\u0130 YAZMI\u015eTIR.<\/p>\n

\u00d6ZETLE, DOKTOR, HASTA VE HASTA YAKINLARI, HASTANEYE GELMED\u0130\u011e\u0130 HALDE, HASTANE PROTOKOL DEFTER\u0130NE KAYDED\u0130LMES\u0130, G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA SU\u00c7UNU OLU\u015eTURMAKTADIR. (11. CD. 14.11.2007 T., E: 8473 K: 7935)<\/strong><\/p>\n

BELED\u0130YE BA\u015eKANI VE BELED\u0130YE FEN MEMURU OLAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER\u0130N, G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA \u0130LE \u0130LGL\u0130 \u00d6RNEK<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

a)SANIKLAR BELED\u0130YE BA\u015eKANI VE BELED\u0130YE FEN MEMURUDUR.<\/p>\n

b)YAPTIKLARI DENET\u0130M SONUCUNDA, YAPIMI DEVAM ETMEKTE OLAN, B\u0130NA \u0130N\u015eAATININ, RUHSAT VE PROJES\u0130NE AYKIRI OLDU\u011eUNU BEL\u0130RLEM\u0130\u015eLERD\u0130R. <\/strong><\/p>\n

c)\u0130MAR MEVZUATINDA MEVCUT \u0130DAR\u0130 VE CEZA\u0130 N\u0130TEL\u0130KTEK\u0130 YAPTIRIM YOLLARINA BA\u015eVURMAMI\u015eLARDIR. <\/strong><\/p>\n

d)ANILAN \u0130N\u015eAATIN FAAL\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130 S\u00dcRD\u00dcRMES\u0130 VE TAMAMLANMASINA NEDEN OLDUKLARI ANLA\u015eILMI\u015eTIR.<\/p>\n

e)5237 TCK m. 257DE \u00d6NG\u00d6R\u00dcLEN \u00d6\u011eELER\u0130N BULUNDU\u011eU TESP\u0130T ED\u0130LM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R.<\/p>\n

f)SANIKLAR, G\u00d6REV\u0130 SAVSAMA (=\u0130HMAL) SU\u00c7UNDAN, MAHKUM ED\u0130LMEL\u0130D\u0130R. (4. CD. 01.05.2007 T., 2045\/4120)<\/p>\n

g)BELED\u0130YE BA\u015eKANI, G\u00d6REV\u0130 \u0130HMAL SU\u00c7UNU \u0130\u015eLEMEMEK \u0130\u00c7\u0130N, RUHSAT VE PROJEYE AYKIRI OLAN DURUM \u0130\u00c7\u0130N, \u0130DAR\u0130 VE CEZA\u0130 N\u0130TEL\u0130KTEK\u0130 YAPTIRIM YOLLARINA BA\u015eVURMALARI GEREK\u0130RD\u0130. <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130DARE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARINI UYGULAMAMAK \u0130LE \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 \u00d6RNEK..<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

a)SANIK, \u0130DARE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARINA DAYANARAK G\u00d6REVE BA\u015eLATILAN, KATILANI, Y\u0130NE AYNI G\u00dcN GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 B\u0130R G\u00d6REVLE, B\u0130R BA\u015eKA \u0130L\u00c7EDE, S\u00dcRES\u0130Z OLARAK G\u00d6REVLEND\u0130RM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R.<\/p>\n

b)B\u00d6YLECE, ANAYASININ 138\/SON MADDES\u0130 VE 2577 SAYILI \u0130DAR\u0130 YARGILAMA USUL YASASININ 28\/1. MADDES\u0130NE AYKIRI OLARAK, \u0130DARE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARINI UYGULAMI\u015e G\u0130B\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dcN\u00dcP, SONU\u00c7LARINI ETK\u0130S\u0130Z HALE GET\u0130RM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R.<\/p>\n

c)KATILANI MA\u011eDUR ETM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R.<\/p>\n

d)EYLEM, 5237 SAYILI YEN\u0130 T\u00dcRK CEZA YASAMIZIN 257\/1. MADDES\u0130NDEK\u0130 SU\u00c7 T\u0130P\u0130NE T\u00dcM UNSURLARI VE KO\u015eULLARI \u0130LE UYMAKTADIR.<\/p>\n

e)KATILANA, GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 G\u00d6REVL\u0130 BULUNDU\u011eU S\u00dcRE \u0130\u00c7ER\u0130S\u0130NDE, HARCIRAH \u00d6DENMES\u0130 VEYA G\u00d6REV\u0130N \u00d6NCEK\u0130 G\u00d6REVE DENK OLMASI MA\u011eDUR\u0130Y\u0130 G\u0130DERMEYE YETMEZ, SU\u00c7UN OLU\u015eUMUNU DA ENGELLEMEYE YETMEZ.<\/p>\n

f)MAHKEME KARARLARI, YASAL Y\u00d6NTEM \u0130LE, ORTADAN KALKMADIK\u00c7A, HUKUKEN GE\u00c7ERL\u0130 VE UYGULANMASI ZORUNLU, YAPTIRIM G\u00dcC\u00dcNE SAH\u0130P BELGELERD\u0130R.<\/p>\n

G)SANIK HAKKINDA, 765 TCK 228\/1, 59 VE 35. MADDELER\u0130 UYARINCA 5 AY HAP\u0130S VE 5 AY S\u00dcRE \u0130LE KAMU H\u0130ZMETLER\u0130NDEN YASAKLANMASINA, HAP\u0130S CEZASININ 647 SK. 4,5 VE 6. MADDELER\u0130 UYARINCA G\u00dcNL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc 6 TLDEN PARAYA \u00c7EVR\u0130LEREK 900 TL ADL\u0130 PARA \u0130LE CEZALANDIRILMASINA, CEZANIN TAKS\u0130TLEND\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130NE VE ERTELENMES\u0130NE KARAR VER\u0130LM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R. (CGK 03.10.2006 T., E: 2006\/4-196, K: 2006\/204)<\/p>\n

CEZA YASASI UYGULAMASINDA, MEMUR SAYILAN SANI\u011eIN, \u0130DAR\u0130 YARGI KARARI \u0130LE \u00d6NCEK\u0130 G\u00d6REV\u0130NE \u0130ADE ED\u0130LEN KATILANI G\u00d6REVE BA\u015eLATTIKTAN, B\u0130R KA\u00c7 G\u00dcN SONRA, BU KEZ, GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 OLARAK BA\u015eKA B\u0130R \u0130L\u00c7EDE G\u00d6REVLEND\u0130RME EYLEM\u0130, G\u00d6REVDE KEYF\u0130 \u0130\u015eLEMDE BULUNMA ANLAMINA GEL\u0130R. (GGK 26.09.2006 T., E: 2006\/4-164, K: 2006\/201) <\/strong><\/p>\n

DOKTORLARIN “BI\u00c7AK PARASI ALMASININ” HUKUKUMUZDAK\u0130 YER\u0130.. (R\u00dc\u015eVETM\u0130D\u0130R- G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA MI? )<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

a)R\u00dc\u015eVET ALMA SU\u00c7UNUN MADD\u0130 UNSURUNU, BU Y\u00d6NDE B\u0130R VAAD VEYA TAAHH\u00dcT KABUL ETME EYLEMLER\u0130 OLU\u015eTURMAKTADIR.<\/p>\n

b)BAS\u0130T VEYA N\u0130TEL\u0130KL\u0130 R\u00dc\u015eVET ALMA SU\u00c7UNUN OLU\u015eMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N, TARAFLAR ARASINDA BU HUSUSTA YAPILMI\u015e B\u0130R ANLA\u015eMANIN VARLI\u011eI GEREKL\u0130D\u0130R.<\/p>\n

c)SANIK DOKTOR \u0130LE HASTANIN YAKINLARI ARASINDA, AMEL\u0130YAT \u00d6NCES\u0130NDE R\u00dc\u015eVET ANLA\u015eMASININ YAPILDI\u011eI HUSUSUNDA, TANIKLARIN B\u0130RB\u0130RLER\u0130 \u0130LE VE KEND\u0130 \u0130\u00c7\u0130NDE \u00c7EL\u0130\u015eK\u0130L\u0130 BEYANLARI DI\u015eINDA DEL\u0130L YOKTUR.<\/p>\n

d)SANIK DOKTORUN, HASTANIN AMEL\u0130YATINI YAPIP, HASTA TABURCU ED\u0130LD\u0130KTEN SONRA, HASTA YAKINI <\/strong>TARAFINDAN VER\u0130LEN 50 M\u0130LYON TLY\u0130 KABUL ED\u0130P ALMASI \u015eEKL\u0130NDE GEL\u0130\u015eEN EYLEM, MEMUR\u0130YET G\u00d6REV\u0130N\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMASI OLARAK KABUL ED\u0130LMEL\u0130D\u0130R. (CGK 30.09.2003 T., E: 2003\/5-202, K: 2003\/230) <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130CRA M\u00dcD\u00dcR\u00dcN\u00dcN, G\u00d6REV\u0130 \u0130HMAL \u0130LE \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 \u0130\u015eLED\u0130\u011e\u0130 SU\u00c7A \u00d6RNEK…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

a)\u0130CRA M\u00dcD\u00dcR\u00dc, BOR\u00c7LUNUN EL\u0130NE VER\u0130LEREK KEND\u0130S\u0130NE G\u00d6NDER\u0130LEN, TAL\u0130MAT \u00dcZER\u0130NE, H\u0130\u00c7 B\u0130R ARA\u015eTIRMA YAPMADAN,<\/p>\n

b)\u0130\u0130K. 106. MADDES\u0130NDE, GAYR\u0130MENKULLER \u0130\u00c7\u0130N \u00d6NG\u00d6R\u00dcLEN \u0130K\u0130 YILLIK S\u00dcREN\u0130N HEN\u00dcZ GE\u00c7MED\u0130\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6Z \u00d6N\u00dcNDE BULUNDURMAMI\u015eTIR.<\/p>\n

c)TAPU S\u0130C\u0130L M\u00dcD\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dcNE, YAZI YAZARAK, BOR\u00c7LUNUN, TA\u015eINMAZLARI \u00dcZER\u0130NDEK\u0130, HACZ\u0130N KALDIRILMASINI SA\u011eLAMI\u015eTIR.<\/p>\n

d)BU SURETTE, ALACAKLININ, ALACA\u011eININ B\u0130R KISMI TAHS\u0130L ED\u0130LEMEZ HALE GELM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R.<\/p>\n

e)B\u00d6YLECE, \u0130CRA M\u00dcD\u00dcR\u00dc, ALACAKLININ ZARAR ETMES\u0130NE NEDEN OLMU\u015eTUR.<\/p>\n

f)\u0130CRA M\u00dcD\u00dcR\u00dcN\u00dcN, G\u00d6REV\u0130 \u0130HMAL SU\u00c7UNU \u0130\u015eLED\u0130\u011e\u0130 KABUL ED\u0130LMEL\u0130D\u0130R. (CGK 19.06.2007 T., E: 2007\/5-97, K:2007\/154)<\/strong><\/p>\n

T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n

YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n

5. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n

E. 2017\/5892<\/span><\/p>\n

K. 2018\/8220<\/span><\/p>\n

T. 25.10.2018<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA SU\u00c7U ( Hukuka Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Deliller D\u0131\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Dosya Kapsam\u0131nda San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Mahkumiyetine Yeterli Her T\u00fcrl\u00fc Ku\u015fkudan Uzak Kesin ve \u0130nand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 Delil Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u015e\u00fcpheden San\u0131k Yararlan\u0131r \u0130lkesi Gere\u011fince Y\u00fcklenen Su\u00e7tan Beraati Yerine Yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 De\u011ferlendirmeyle Mahkumiyetine Karar Verilmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n

\u2022 TELEFON\u00a0D\u0130NLENMES\u0130\u00a0SIRASINDA TESAD\u00dcFEN ELDE ED\u0130LEN DEL\u0130LLER ( Dikkate Al\u0131nabilmesi \u0130\u00e7in S\u00f6z Konusu Su\u00e7un da Katalog Su\u00e7lardan Birisine Uygun Olmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi – San\u0131\u011fa \u0130snat Edilen G\u00f6revi K\u00f6t\u00fcye Kullanma Su\u00e7u Katalog Su\u00e7lardan Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u0130leti\u015fim Tespit Tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n Bu Su\u00e7un Delili Olarak Kullan\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n

\u2022\u00a0\u0130LET\u0130\u015e\u0130M\u0130N\u00a0DENETLENMES\u0130 ( Karar\u0131n Katalog Su\u00e7lardan Olan\u00a0<\/a>Uyu\u015fturucu\u00a0Madde Ticareti Su\u00e7una \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddianameye Konu Edilen Telefon G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinin \u0130se Tesad\u00fcfen Elde Edilen Delil Niteli\u011finde Oldu\u011fu – G\u00f6revi K\u00f6t\u00fcye Kullanma Su\u00e7u Katalog Su\u00e7lardan Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u0130leti\u015fim Tespit Tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n Bu Su\u00e7un Delili Olarak Kullan\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n

\u2022 HUKUKA AYKIRI Y\u00d6NTEMLERLE ELDE ED\u0130LEN DEL\u0130LLER ( Elde Edildikleri Tarihte Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte Bulunan Kanunlara Uygun Olarak Tespit Edilmeyen Kan\u0131tlar\u0131n Hukuka Uygun Delil Olduklar\u0131ndan S\u00f6z Edilemeyece\u011fi – Hukuka Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Deliller D\u0131\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Dosya Kapsam\u0131nda San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Mahkumiyetine Yeterli Delil Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/G\u00f6revi K\u00f6t\u00fcye Kullanma )<\/p>\n

\u2022 \u0130KRAR ( \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u0130radeye Dayal\u0131 Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130krarda Bulunan\u0131n Beyan\u0131n Ciddiyetini ve Bundan Do\u011facak Sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 Bilip Bilmedi\u011fi \u0130krar\u0131n Ba\u015fkaca Deliller veya Emarelerle Desteklenip Desteklenmedi\u011fi \u015e\u00fcpheden Ar\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve Belirlili\u011fini Zay\u0131flatacak Bi\u00e7imde \u0130krardan D\u00f6n\u00fcl\u00fcp D\u00f6n\u00fclmedi\u011finin De\u011ferlendirilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n

\u2022 \u015e\u00dcPHEDEN SANIK YARARLANIR \u0130LKES\u0130 ( G\u00f6revi K\u00f6t\u00fcye Kullanma Su\u00e7u – Hukuka Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Deliller D\u0131\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Dosya Kapsam\u0131nda San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Mahkumiyetine Yeterli Her T\u00fcrl\u00fc Ku\u015fkudan Uzak Kesin ve \u0130nand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 Delil Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u015e\u00fcpheden San\u0131k Yararlan\u0131r \u0130lkesi Gere\u011fince Y\u00fcklenen Su\u00e7tan Beraatine Karar Verilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n

\u00d6ZET :\u00a0<\/b>Al\u0131nan\u00a0ileti\u015fimin\u00a0denetlenmesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, CMK’n\u0131n\u00a0135\/8. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki katalog su\u00e7lardan olan\u00a0uyu\u015fturucu\u00a0madde ticareti su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin, iddianameye konu edilen telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinin ise tesad\u00fcfen elde edilen delil niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, telefon dinlemesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda tesad\u00fcfen elde edilen kan\u0131tlar\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nabilmesi i\u00e7in, s\u00f6z konusu su\u00e7un da 135. maddede say\u0131lan katalog su\u00e7lardan birisine uygun olmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7u CMK’n\u0131n\u00a0135\/8. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen katalog su\u00e7lardan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 Kanunun 138\/2. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince ileti\u015fim tespit tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n bu su\u00e7un delili olarak kullan\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, elde edildikleri tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan kanunlara uygun olarak tespit edilmeyen kan\u0131tlar\u0131n hukuka uygun delil olduklar\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, ikrar\u0131n hangi a\u015famada ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ve \u00f6zg\u00fcr iradeye dayal\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ikrarda bulunan\u0131n beyan\u0131n ciddiyetini ve bundan do\u011facak sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 bilip bilmedi\u011fi, ikrar\u0131n ba\u015fkaca deliller veya emarelerle desteklenip desteklenmedi\u011fi, hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na uygun d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi, \u015f\u00fcpheden ar\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve belirlili\u011fini zay\u0131flatacak bi\u00e7imde ikrardan d\u00f6n\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00f6n\u00fclmedi\u011fi gibi hususlar da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmak suretiyle, somut olaydaki ikrar\u0131n delil de\u011ferinin ortaya konulmas\u0131 ve ispat sorununun bu \u015fekilde \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesinin gerekti\u011fi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda,\u00a0ileti\u015fimin tespit tutanaklar\u0131na istinaden al\u0131nan ikrar\u0131n da kanunda g\u00f6sterilen hukuka uygun y\u00f6ntemlerle tespit edilmedi\u011finden su\u00e7un s\u00fcbutunda delil olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi g\u00f6zetilerek, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 deliller d\u0131\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda dosya kapsam\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine yeterli, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ku\u015fkudan uzak, kesin ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, \u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r ilkesi gere\u011fince y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7tan beraati yerine yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahkumiyetine karar verilmesi, hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

DAVA :\u00a0<\/b>Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

KARAR :\u00a0<\/b>Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusunda isabetli bir hukuki \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme ula\u015f\u0131labilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6ncelikle ceza muhakemesi hukukunun en \u00f6nemli ilkelerinden biri olan “delillerin serbestli\u011fi” ve “hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 y\u00f6ntemle elde edilen delillerin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131” konular\u0131 \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Uygulamada ve yerle\u015fmi\u015f i\u00e7tihatlarda da i\u015faret edildi\u011fi \u00fczere, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131, usul kurallar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ilkeler do\u011frultusunda maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak bi\u00e7imde kesin olarak belirlenmesi olup, maddi hakikate ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131nda kullan\u0131lan tek vas\u0131tan\u0131n deliller oldu\u011fu, Anayasa’n\u0131n 38\/6. maddesine g\u00f6re kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak elde edilmi\u015f bulgular\u0131n delil olarak kabul edilemeyece\u011fi, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n “delilleri takdir yetkisi” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 217. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki, “Y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7, hukuka uygun bir \u015fekilde elde edilmi\u015f her t\u00fcrl\u00fc delille ispat edilebilir.” bi\u00e7imindeki d\u00fczenleme ile “delillerin serbestli\u011fi” ilkesine de vurgu yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, buna g\u00f6re; ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda hangi hususun hangi delillerle ispat olunaca\u011f\u0131 konusunda bir s\u0131n\u0131rlama bulunmay\u0131p, yarg\u0131lama yapan hakimin, hukuka uygun \u015fekilde elde edilen t\u00fcm delilleri kullanmak suretiyle, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine oldu\u011fu kadar lehine olan delilleri de ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131p de\u011ferlendirerek, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden ar\u0131nm\u0131\u015f bir neticeye ula\u015fmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden, yarg\u0131lamaya konu olan olay\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 ve maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin bulunabilmesi i\u00e7in ispat amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131lan her arac\u0131n delil olarak kabul edilece\u011fi, bahse konu maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde; “Maddenin son f\u0131kras\u0131, usul hukuku y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131yan ve adil yarg\u0131lama ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 ilkeyi belirtmektedir. \u0130lke, delilin do\u011frulu\u011funu, hakl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hakkaniyete uygunlu\u011funu sa\u011flamak amac\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fctmektedir. B\u00f6ylece ister soru\u015fturma ister kovu\u015fturma evrelerinde olsun, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak; \u00f6rne\u011fin, i\u015fkence, narko analiz, hataya s\u00fcr\u00fckleyici eylemler, sorgulamalar, bask\u0131lar, ki\u015finin fizik ve moral b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne sald\u0131r\u0131lar yolu ile elde edilmi\u015f deliller h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayacakt\u0131r” denilmek suretiyle bir delilin h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131na engel olu\u015fturan hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n “san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temel haklar\u0131n\u0131” ihlal eden ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi, keza CMK’n\u0131n\u00a0206\/2-a maddesinde ortaya konulmas\u0131 istenilen bir delil kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak elde edilmi\u015fse reddolunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 230\/1-b maddesinde ise mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn gerek\u00e7esinde delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve de\u011ferlendirilmesi, h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan ve reddedilen delillerin belirtilmesi; bu kapsamda dosya i\u00e7erisinde bulunan ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 y\u00f6ntemlerle elde edilen delillerin ayr\u0131ca ve a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekti\u011finin ifade edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca, Anayasa’n\u0131n 22. maddesinde herkesin haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetine sahip oldu\u011fu ve haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011finin esas oldu\u011fu, milli g\u00fcvenlik, kamu d\u00fczeni, su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi, genel sa\u011fl\u0131k ve genel ahlak\u0131n korunmas\u0131 veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin korunmas\u0131 sebeplerinden biri veya birka\u00e7\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak usul\u00fcne g\u00f6re verilmi\u015f hakim karar\u0131 olmad\u0131k\u00e7a; yine bu sebeplere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak gecikmesinde sak\u0131nca bulunan hallerde de kanunla yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f merciin yaz\u0131l\u0131 emri bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a haberle\u015fmenin engellenemeyece\u011finin ve gizlili\u011fine dokunulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n

Taraf oldu\u011fumuz Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 ve Temel \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin Korunmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 8. maddesinde ise, herkesin \u00f6zel ve aile hayat\u0131na, konutuna ve yaz\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu, bu hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na bir kamu otoritesinin m\u00fcdahalesinin ancak ulusal g\u00fcvenlik, kamu emniyeti, \u00fclkenin ekonomik refah\u0131, dirlik ve d\u00fczeninin korunmas\u0131, su\u00e7 i\u015flenilmesinin \u00f6nlenilmesi, sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n veya ahlak\u0131n veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, demokratik bir toplumda zorunlu olan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ve yasayla \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olmak ko\u015fuluyla s\u00f6z konusu olabilece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Telekom\u00fcnikasyon yoluyla yap\u0131lan\u00a0ileti\u015fimin denetlenmesi tedbirinin 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n\u00a0135. maddesinde, bu yolla elde edilen tesad\u00fcfi delillerin hukuki durumunun ise ayn\u0131 Kanunun 138\/2. maddesinde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, buna g\u00f6re telekom\u00fcnikasyon yoluyla yap\u0131lan\u00a0ileti\u015fimin\u00a0denetlenmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda, yap\u0131lmakta olan soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturmayla ilgisi olmayan ve ancak 135. maddenin alt\u0131nc\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda say\u0131lan su\u00e7lardan birinin i\u015flendi\u011fi \u015f\u00fcphesini uyand\u0131rabilecek bir delil elde edilirse bu delilin muhafaza alt\u0131na al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 ve durumun Cumhuriyet savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na derhal bildirilece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Belirtilen d\u00fczenlemeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n

Bucak Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 06\/08\/2013 tarih, 2013\/250 De\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 ile hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 verilen san\u0131k …’\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon hatt\u0131 ile ilgili olarak CMK’n\u0131n\u00a0135\/6-a-7 maddesi uyar\u0131nca 06\/08\/2013-06\/11\/2013 tarihleri aras\u0131ndaki\u00a0ileti\u015fiminin tespiti,\u00a0dinlenmesi, kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve sinyal bilgilerinin de\u011ferlendirilmesi karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi, bu kapsamda yap\u0131lan tespit s\u0131ras\u0131nda san\u0131k …’\u0131n g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilen k\u0131sa mesaj\u0131 ( SMS ) \u00e7ekti\u011finin ve san\u0131k … ile konu\u015fmalar yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi \u00fczerine mesaj ve konu\u015fma i\u00e7eri\u011fi tespit edilerek Cumhuriyet savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup,<\/p>\n

Al\u0131nan\u00a0ileti\u015fimin\u00a0denetlenmesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, CMK’n\u0131n\u00a0135\/8. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki katalog su\u00e7lardan olan\u00a0uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin, iddianameye konu edilen telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinin ise tesad\u00fcfen elde edilen delil niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, Ceza Genel Kurulunun 03\/07\/2018 g\u00fcn ve 2015\/1-396; 2018\/323 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere; telefon dinlemesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda tesad\u00fcfen elde edilen kan\u0131tlar\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nabilmesi i\u00e7in, s\u00f6z konusu su\u00e7un da 135. maddede say\u0131lan katalog su\u00e7lardan birisine uygun olmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7u CMK’n\u0131n\u00a0135\/8. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen katalog su\u00e7lardan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 Kanunun 138\/2. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince ileti\u015fim tespit tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n bu su\u00e7un delili olarak kullan\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, elde edildikleri tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan kanunlara uygun olarak tespit edilmeyen kan\u0131tlar\u0131n hukuka uygun delil olduklar\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, Ceza Genel Kurulunun 26\/01\/2016 g\u00fcn ve 2015\/9-669; 2016\/38 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda i\u015faret edildi\u011fi \u00fczere, ikrar\u0131n hangi a\u015famada ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ve \u00f6zg\u00fcr iradeye dayal\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ikrarda bulunan\u0131n beyan\u0131n ciddiyetini ve bundan do\u011facak sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 bilip bilmedi\u011fi, ikrar\u0131n ba\u015fkaca deliller veya emarelerle desteklenip desteklenmedi\u011fi, hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na uygun d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi, \u015f\u00fcpheden ar\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve belirlili\u011fini zay\u0131flatacak bi\u00e7imde ikrardan d\u00f6n\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00f6n\u00fclmedi\u011fi gibi hususlar da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmak suretiyle, somut olaydaki ikrar\u0131n delil de\u011ferinin ortaya konulmas\u0131 ve ispat sorununun bu \u015fekilde \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesinin gerekti\u011fi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda,\u00a0ileti\u015fimintespit tutanaklar\u0131na istinaden al\u0131nan ikrar\u0131n da kanunda g\u00f6sterilen hukuka uygun y\u00f6ntemlerle tespit edilmedi\u011finden su\u00e7un s\u00fcbutunda delil olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi g\u00f6zetilerek, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 deliller d\u0131\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda dosya kapsam\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine yeterli, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ku\u015fkudan uzak, kesin ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, \u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r ilkesi gere\u011fince y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7tan beraati yerine yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahkumiyetine karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n

Kabule g\u00f6re de;<\/p>\n

\u0130leti\u015fimin tespiti tutanaklar\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan at\u0131lan mesajdan …’\u0131n denetimden sonra haberdar oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme bulunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; TCK’n\u0131n\u00a0257. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca objektif cezaland\u0131rma \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n da ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi gerekti\u011fi cihetle; eylem neticesinde ki\u015fi ma\u011fduriyeti, kamu zarar\u0131 veya ki\u015filere haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131 unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, varsa ne \u015fekilde olu\u015ftu\u011funun denetime imkan verecek \u015fekilde gerek\u00e7eleriyle tart\u0131\u015f\u0131larak neticesine g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun tayin ve takdir edilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden yetersiz gerek\u00e7elerle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

Y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7u TCK’n\u0131n\u00a053\/1-a maddesindeki hak ve yetkiyi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak suretiyle i\u015fledi\u011fi kabul edilen ve adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilen san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 Kanunun 53\/5. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcmde belirtilen g\u00fcn say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n yar\u0131s\u0131ndan bir kat\u0131na kadar bu hak ve yetkinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/b>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un\u00a08\/1. maddesi de g\u00f6zetilerek CMUK’n\u0131n\u00a0321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, 25.10.2018 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

T.C.<\/strong><\/span>
\nYARGITAY<\/strong><\/span>
\nBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130 CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/center><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
Esas<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n: 2014\/8501<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Karar<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n: 2017\/3114<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tarih<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n: 12.07.2017<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

Su\u00e7 tarihinde Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u011fl\u0131 Bal\u0131kesir B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde kadastro teknikeri olarak g\u00f6rev yapan ve Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklerine yaz\u0131lan vak\u0131f \u015ferhinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin yaz\u0131y\u0131 haz\u0131rlama\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0de bulunan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, \u015fikayet\u00e7iye ait 167 ada 1 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu kayd\u0131ndaki \u015ferhin, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin m\u00fcracaat\u0131 \u00fczerine, ayn\u0131 birimde g\u00f6revli ba\u015fka bir tekniker taraf\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin yaz\u0131 Band\u0131rma Tapu Sicil M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6nderildikten ve tapu kayd\u0131ndan bu \u015ferh kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra \u015fikayet\u00e7iyi aray\u0131p, laptop ihtiyac\u0131 oldu\u011fundan bahisle 2.000 TL verdi\u011fi takdirde tapu kayd\u0131ndaki \u015ferhin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 hususunda gerekli i\u015flemleri yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etti\u011fi, ancak \u015fikayet\u00e7inin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu talebinden \u00f6nce haricen yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rma neticesinde tapu kayd\u0131ndaki \u015ferhin kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi ve \u015fikayeti \u00fczerine kendisinden 2.000 TL paray\u0131 al\u0131rken kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan somut olayda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin hukuki niteli\u011finin de\u011ferlendirilmesine gelince;<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 30\/03\/2010 tarih ve 2009\/5-167-2010\/70 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; icbar suretiyle irtikap su\u00e7unda ma\u011fdurun iradesini bask\u0131 alt\u0131nda tutmaya elveri\u015fli olmak ko\u015fuluyla, do\u011frudan do\u011fruya veya dolayl\u0131 bi\u00e7imde yap\u0131lan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc zorlay\u0131c\u0131 hareketin icbar kavram\u0131na dahil oldu\u011fu, manevi cebirin, belli bir \u015fiddete ula\u015fmas\u0131, ciddi olmas\u0131, ma\u011fdurun bask\u0131n\u0131n etkisinden kolayl\u0131kla kurtulma olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Yine, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n r\u00fc\u015fveti tan\u0131mlayan 252. maddesinde su\u00e7 tarihinden \u00f6nce 05\/07\/2012 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6352 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik neticesinde, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin yapmas\u0131 gereken bir i\u015fi yapmas\u0131 ya da yapmamas\u0131 gereken i\u015fi yapmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in yarar sa\u011flamas\u0131n\u0131n da r\u00fc\u015fvet su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Somut olay\u0131n olu\u015f \u015fekline g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6\u011freti ve uygulamada kabul edildi\u011fi \u00fczere Yasan\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anlamda icbar boyutuna varan davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla cebri irtikap su\u00e7unun yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin kendisinden istenen menfaatin haks\u0131z oldu\u011funu bilmesi nedeniyle ikna suretiyle irtikap su\u00e7undan da bahsedilemeyece\u011fi, keza yap\u0131lan ya da yap\u0131lmas\u0131 istenilen i\u015f san\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na girmekte ise de, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haks\u0131z menfaat talebinde bulundu\u011fu tarihte ma\u011fdur taraf\u0131ndan r\u00fc\u015fvete konu i\u015fin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi bilindi\u011finden r\u00fc\u015fvet su\u00e7unun maddi konusunun olay\u0131m\u0131zda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, \u00f6te taraftan TCK’n\u0131n 30. maddesinin gerek\u00e7esinde de ifade edildi\u011fi \u00fczere kast, su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki madd\u00ee unsurlar\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi olup, bu unsurlara ili\u015fkin bilgisizlik, eksik veya yanl\u0131\u015f bilgi sahibi olunmas\u0131 durumunun ise, madd\u00ee unsurlarda hata olarak adland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6yle bir hatan\u0131n kast\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na engel olaca\u011f\u0131, failin bilgisi ger\u00e7e\u011fe uysa idi i\u015fledi\u011fi fiilin haks\u0131zl\u0131k te\u015fkil etmeyece\u011fi ve bu nedenle hata h\u00e2linde kasten i\u015flenmi\u015f bir su\u00e7tan s\u00f6z etmenin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayaca\u011f\u0131, buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k somut olayda gerek fiil gerekse kural \u00fczerinde hataya d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi gibi, i\u015fledi\u011fi fiilin haks\u0131zl\u0131k olu\u015fturdu\u011fu hususunda ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz bir hataya da d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi, ancak ma\u011fdur taraf\u0131ndan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 \u00fczerindeki vak\u0131f \u015ferhinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 hadisesinin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisinden haks\u0131z menfaat istedi\u011fi tarihten evvel \u00f6\u011frenilmesi sebebiyle, bu durum fail taraf\u0131ndan bilinmese de, irtikap ve \u00f6zellikle r\u00fc\u015fvet su\u00e7unun maddi konusunun somut olayda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00fcnl\u00fck hayat tecr\u00fcbelerine g\u00f6re de, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hareketinin sonu\u00e7suz kalmas\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck bir ihtimal i\u00e7inde oldu\u011fu ve ortada elveri\u015fli hareketin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan r\u00fc\u015fvet ve irtikap su\u00e7lar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan i\u015flenemez su\u00e7un mevzubahis oldu\u011fu ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu su\u00e7lardan ve bu su\u00e7lara te\u015febb\u00fcsten dolay\u0131 cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, di\u011fer yandan\u00a0g\u00f6revik\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7unun olu\u015fumu i\u00e7in norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, objektif cezaland\u0131rma \u015fartlar\u0131ndan birinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi gerekti\u011fi ve objektif cezaland\u0131rma \u015fart\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen su\u00e7larda\u00a0te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00a0h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131 ile olay\u0131m\u0131zda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdurdan paray\u0131 al\u0131rken su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 eyleminin\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7unu da olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131, disiplin hukukunun konusunu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7 ve kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, delilleri takdir ve gerek\u00e7esi g\u00f6sterilmek suretiyle verilen beraat h\u00fckm\u00fc usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fundan, yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen O yer Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 ile kat\u0131lan vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn tebli\u011fnameye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak ONANMASINA, 12\/07\/2017 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n

YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n

5. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n

E. 2016\/9638<\/span><\/p>\n

K. 2018\/8609<\/span><\/p>\n

T. 6.11.2018<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 \u0130CBAR SURET\u0130YLE \u0130RT\u0130KABA\u00a0TE\u015eEBB\u00dcS\u00a0SU\u00c7U\u00a0( Avukat Olan Kat\u0131lan\u0131n \u015eikayet Ba\u015fvurusunun Olaydan 22 G\u00fcn Sonra Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi de Nazara Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00d6\u011freti ve Uygulamada Kabul Edildi\u011fi \u00dczere Kanun’un \u00d6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Anlamda \u0130cbar Boyutuna Varan Bir Davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n

\u2022 \u0130KNA SURET\u0130YLE\u00a0<\/a>\u0130RT\u0130KAP\u00a0SU\u00c7U ( Kat\u0131lan\u0131n Kendisinden \u0130stenen Menfaatin Haks\u0131z Oldu\u011funu Bilmesi Sebebiyle\u00a0Su\u00e7un Olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 – \u0130cbar Suretiyle \u0130rtikaba\u00a0Te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00a0Su\u00e7u\u00a0)<\/p>\n

\u2022 ZAMANA\u015eIMI ( G\u00f6rev ve Yetkisi Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Halde Kay\u0131t Silme \u0130\u015fini Yapaca\u011f\u0131 Kanaati Uyand\u0131rarak Menfaat Temin Etmeye \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Eyleminin Su\u00e7 Tarihinde Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte Bulunan 765 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 504\/3. Maddesine Uyan Kamu Kurum ve Kurulu\u015funu Vas\u0131ta Olarak Kullanmak Suretiyle Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011fa\u00a0Te\u015febb\u00fcsSu\u00e7unu Olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 –\u00a0Su\u00e7un 765 S.K. Md. 102\/4 ve 104\/2 Uyar\u0131nca Belirlenen 7 Y\u0131l 6 Ayl\u0131k \u0130laveli Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na Tabi Oldu\u011fu ve Su\u00e7 Tarihi \u0130le H\u00fck\u00fcm Tarihi Aras\u0131nda Azami Dava Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin Doldu\u011fu ve Kamu Davas\u0131n\u0131n D\u00fc\u015fmesine Karar Verilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n

\u00d6ZET :\u00a0<\/b>Dava, icbar suretiyle irtikaba\u00a0te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00a0su\u00e7una ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

Avukat olan kat\u0131lan\u0131n \u015fikayet ba\u015fvurusunun olaydan 22 g\u00fcn sonra ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi de nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, \u00f6\u011freti ve uygulamada kabul edildi\u011fi \u00fczere Kanun’un \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anlamda icbar boyutuna varan bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla cebri irtikap\u00a0su\u00e7unun yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n kendisinden istenen menfaatin haks\u0131z oldu\u011funu bilmesi sebebiyle ikna suretiyle\u00a0irtikap\u00a0su\u00e7undan da bahsedilemeyece\u011fi, bu itibarla g\u00f6rev ve yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde kay\u0131t silme i\u015fini yapaca\u011f\u0131 kanaati uyand\u0131rarak menfaat temin etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n\u00a0504\/3. maddesine uyan kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015funu vas\u0131ta olarak kullanmak suretiyle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011fa\u00a0te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00a0su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131, bu\u00a0su\u00e7un ayn\u0131 Kanunun 102\/4 ve 104\/2. maddelerinde belirlenen 7 y\u0131l 6 ayl\u0131k ilaveli dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabi olup, su\u00e7 tarihi ile h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihi aras\u0131nda azami dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011fu ve kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n

DAVA :\u00a0<\/b>Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle dosya incelendi;<\/p>\n

Ceza miktar\u0131na g\u00f6re ko\u015fullar\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi san\u0131k m\u00fcdafin s\u00fcresinden sonra vaki duru\u015fma isteminin 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un\u00a08\/1. maddesi de g\u00f6zetilerek CMUK’n\u0131n\u00a0318. maddesi uyar\u0131nca REDD\u0130NE, incelemenin duru\u015fmas\u0131z olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildikten sonra gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

KARAR :\u00a0<\/b>Dairemizin 25\/09\/2013 tarih ve 2013\/5618 Esas, 2013\/9320 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla eylemin icbar suretiyle irtikaba\u00a0te\u015febb\u00fcs<\/b>\u00a0su\u00e7u<\/b>nu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle bozma karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f ise de;<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 30\/03\/2010 tarih ve 2009\/5-167-2010\/70 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; icbar suretiyle irtikap\u00a0su\u00e7u<\/b>nda ma\u011fdurun iradesini bask\u0131 alt\u0131nda tutmaya elveri\u015fli olmak ko\u015fuluyla, do\u011frudan do\u011fruya veya dolayl\u0131 bi\u00e7imde yap\u0131lan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc zorlay\u0131c\u0131 hareketin icbar kavram\u0131na dahil oldu\u011fu ancak manevi cebrin, belli bir \u015fiddete ula\u015fmas\u0131, ciddi olmas\u0131, ma\u011fdurun bask\u0131n\u0131n etkisinden kolayl\u0131kla kurtulma olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi hususlar\u0131na nazaran, Bursa Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde polis memuru olarak g\u00f6rev yapan, kay\u0131t silme konusunda herhangi bir g\u00f6rev ve yetkisi bulunmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, olay \u00f6ncesinde tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla bir kurumun avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131na m\u00fcracaat eden kat\u0131lana, emniyet kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda uyu\u015fturucu kullananlar listesinde ad\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, bu kayd\u0131 Ankara’dan sildirebilece\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek onu aldatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, taraflar\u0131n birlikte Ankara’ya gittikleri, burada kat\u0131lan\u0131 i\u00e7eri almadan Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn binas\u0131na girip \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve hakk\u0131ndaki kay\u0131tlar\u0131 sildirdi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, Bursa’ya d\u00f6nmelerinden bir s\u00fcre sonra yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu i\u015f kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak kat\u0131landan 5.000 TL para istedi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan\u0131n ise bu talebi kabul etmeyerek \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011fu s\u00fcbut bulan somut olayda, avukat olan kat\u0131lan\u0131n \u015fikayet ba\u015fvurusunun olaydan 22 g\u00fcn sonra ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi de nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, \u00f6\u011freti ve uygulamada kabul edildi\u011fi \u00fczere Kanun’un \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anlamda icbar boyutuna varan bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla cebri irtikap\u00a0su\u00e7u<\/b>nun yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n kendisinden istenen menfaatin haks\u0131z oldu\u011funu bilmesi sebebiyle ikna suretiyle\u00a0irtikap\u00a0su\u00e7undan da bahsedilemeyece\u011fi, bu itibarla g\u00f6rev ve yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde kay\u0131t silme i\u015fini yapaca\u011f\u0131 kanaati uyand\u0131rarak menfaat temin etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n\u00a0504\/3. maddesine uyan kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015funu vas\u0131ta olarak kullanmak suretiyle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011fa\u00a0te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00a0su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131, bu\u00a0su\u00e7un ayn\u0131 Kanunun 102\/4 ve 104\/2. maddelerinde belirlenen 7 y\u0131l 6 ayl\u0131k ilaveli dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabi olup, su\u00e7 tarihi olan 18\/10\/2004 ile h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihi aras\u0131nda azami dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011fu ve kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/b>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n\u00a07\/2 ve 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un\u00a08\/1. maddeleri de g\u00f6zetilmek suretiyle CMUK’n\u0131n\u00a0321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, ancak bu husus yeniden yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 gerektirmedi\u011finden ayn\u0131 Kanunun 322\/1 ve 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n\u00a0223\/8. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 sebebiyle D\u00dc\u015eMES\u0130NE, 06.11.2018 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

T.C.
\nYARGITAY
\nBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130 CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/b><\/span><\/center><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
Esas<\/span><\/td>\n: 2012\/13543<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Karar<\/span><\/td>\n: 2014\/1283<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n: 11.02.2014<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
    \n
  • G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA<\/li>\n
  • KAMU ZARARI<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
      \n
    • <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
      \n

      \u00d6ZET<\/b><\/p>\n

      San\u0131klar\u0131n\u00a0g\u00f6rev<\/span>\u00a0yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ni\u011fde Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 05\/03\/2008 tarihinde yap\u0131lan asfalt m\u0131c\u0131r\u0131 al\u0131m\u0131 ihalesi s\u00fcrecinde, ihale tarihinden en az 21 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken mahalli gazete ilan\u0131n\u0131n Kamu \u0130hale Kanununun 13\/b-3. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak, ihaleden 19 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce 15\/02\/2008 tarihinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla birlikte, 13\/02\/2008 tarihinde Kamu \u0130hale B\u00fclteninde ilan edilmesi, 4 firman\u0131n \u015fartname al\u0131p bunlardan 3’\u00fcn\u00fcn ihaleye kat\u0131lmas\u0131, ilan s\u00fcresindeki gecikme nedeniyle bir \u015fikayet ba\u015fvurusunun bulunmamas\u0131 ve ihaleyi yapan kurum taraf\u0131ndan, herhangi bir kamu zarar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bildirilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda,\u00a0g\u00f6revi<\/span>\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye<\/span>\u00a0kullanma<\/span>\u00a0su\u00e7unun;\u00a0objektif<\/span>\u00a0cezaland\u0131r\u0131lma<\/span>\u00a0ko\u015fulu<\/span>\u00a0olan kamu zarar\u0131, haks\u0131z menfaat veya ki\u015fi ma\u011fduriyeti unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n somut olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finden san\u0131klar\u0131n beraetlerine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
      \n

      Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

      San\u0131klar\u0131n\u00a0g\u00f6rev<\/span>\u00a0yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ni\u011fde Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 05\/03\/2008 tarihinde yap\u0131lan asfalt m\u0131c\u0131r\u0131 al\u0131m\u0131 ihalesi s\u00fcrecinde, ihale tarihinden en az 21 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken mahalli gazete ilan\u0131n\u0131n Kamu \u0130hale Kanununun 13\/b-3. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak, ihaleden 19 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce 15\/02\/2008 tarihinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla birlikte, 13\/02\/2008 tarihinde Kamu \u0130hale B\u00fclteninde ilan edilmesi, 4 firman\u0131n \u015fartname al\u0131p bunlardan 3’\u00fcn\u00fcn ihaleye kat\u0131lmas\u0131, ilan s\u00fcresindeki gecikme nedeniyle bir \u015fikayet ba\u015fvurusunun bulunmamas\u0131 ve ihaleyi yapan kurum taraf\u0131ndan, herhangi bir kamu zarar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bildirilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda,\u00a0g\u00f6revi<\/span>\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye<\/span>\u00a0kullanma<\/span>\u00a0su\u00e7unun;\u00a0objektif<\/span>\u00a0cezaland\u0131r\u0131lma<\/span>ko\u015fulu<\/span>\u00a0olan kamu zarar\u0131, haks\u0131z menfaat veya ki\u015fi ma\u011fduriyeti unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n somut olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi ve san\u0131klar\u0131n beraetlerine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden olu\u015fa uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyen gerek\u00e7eler ve yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucu yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahkumiyet kararlar\u0131 verilmesi,<\/p>\n

      Kabule g\u00f6re de;<\/p>\n

      5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 53\/1-a maddesindeki yetkiyi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye<\/span>\u00a0kullanmak suretiyle at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fleyen san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 Kanunun 53\/5. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince, cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131ndan sonra ba\u015flamak \u00fczere, h\u00fckmolunan cezan\u0131n yar\u0131s\u0131ndan bir kat\u0131na kadar bu hak ve yetkinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n

      Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131klar m\u00fcdafiilerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8\/1. maddesi de g\u00f6zetilerek CMUK’n\u0131n 321 ve 326\/son maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 11\/02\/2014 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

      T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n

      YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n

      15. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n

      E. 2015\/6093<\/span><\/p>\n

      K. 2018\/5262<\/span><\/p>\n

      T. 11.7.2018<\/span><\/p>\n

      \u2022 H\u0130ZMET SEBEB\u0130YLE G\u00dcVEN\u0130\u00a0K\u00d6T\u00dcYE\u00a0KULLANMA SU\u00c7U ( Hapis Cezas\u0131 Alt S\u0131n\u0131rdan Tayin Olundu\u011fu Halde Ayr\u0131ca Yasal ve Yeterli Gerek\u00e7e G\u00f6sterilmeden Ayn\u0131 Gerek\u00e7eyle Adli Para Cezas\u0131na Esas Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Gereken Tam G\u00fcn Say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n Alt S\u0131n\u0131rdan Uzakla\u015f\u0131larak Tayini Suretiyle \u00c7eli\u015fkiye D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc –\u00a0G\u00f6revi\u00a0K\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0Kullanma\u00a0Su\u00e7u )<\/p>\n

      \u2022\u00a0G\u00d6REV\u0130\u00a0K\u00d6T\u00dcYE\u00a0KULLANMA\u00a0SU\u00c7U ( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n M\u00fcsnet Su\u00e7tan\u00a0Cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u0130\u00e7in Ma\u011fdurun Soyut Beyanlar\u0131 D\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Savunmas\u0131n\u0131n Aksine Somut \u015e\u00fcpheden Uzak Kesin ve \u0130nand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 Delil Elde Edilememesi \u0130le \u015e\u00fcpheden San\u0131k Yararlan\u0131r \u0130lkesi Sebebiyle Beraatine Karar Verilmesi Gerekti\u011fi G\u00f6zetilmeden Mahkumiyetine H\u00fckmolunmas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130sabetsiz Oldu\u011fu – Hizmet Sebebiyle G\u00fcveni\u00a0K\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0Kullanma Su\u00e7u )<\/p>\n

      \u2022 H\u00dcKM\u00dcN A\u00c7IKLANMASININ GER\u0130 BIRAKILMASI ( Su\u00e7 Tarihi \u0130tibariyle Sab\u0131ka Kayd\u0131 Bulunmayan ve Su\u00e7tan Do\u011fan Zarar\u0131 Giderdi\u011fi Anla\u015f\u0131lan San\u0131k Hakk\u0131nda CMK’n\u0131n 231. Maddesinde Yer Alan H\u00fckm\u00fcn A\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n Geri B\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair H\u00fck\u00fcmlerin Uygulan\u0131p Uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu – Hizmet Sebebiyle G\u00fcveni\u00a0K\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0Kullanma\/G\u00f6revi\u00a0K\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0Kullanma\u00a0Su\u00e7lar\u0131 )<\/p>\n

      \u2022 H\u00dcK\u00dcMDE \u00c7EL\u0130\u015eK\u0130 YARATILMASI ( H\u00fckm\u00fcn Esas\u0131n\u0131 Olu\u015fturan K\u0131sa Kararda, San\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0G\u00f6revi\u00a0K\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0Kullanma\u00a0Su\u00e7undan Dolay\u0131 5237 S.K. Md. 257\/2 Gere\u011fince\u00a0Cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na Karar Verildi\u011fi Halde Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n Gerek\u00e7e B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde Md. 257\/1 Gere\u011fince Cezaland\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Yaz\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n Bozmay\u0131 Gerektirdi\u011fi )<\/p>\n

      \u00d6ZET :\u00a0<\/b>Dava, hizmet sebebiyle g\u00fcveni\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma ve\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7lar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

      Hapis cezas\u0131 alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan tayin olundu\u011fu halde, ayr\u0131ca yasal ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeden ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle adli para cezas\u0131na esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken tam g\u00fcn say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131larak tayini suretiyle \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi,<\/p>\n

      Su\u00e7 tarihi itibariyle sab\u0131ka kayd\u0131 bulunmayan ve su\u00e7tan do\u011fan zarar\u0131 giderdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, CMK’n\u0131n\u00a0231. maddesinde yer alan h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na dair h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulan\u0131p uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmamas\u0131,<\/p>\n

      San\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmalar\u0131nda, m\u00fcvekkili ad\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc icra takibi s\u0131ras\u0131nda bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131n anla\u015fma talebi \u00fczerine, m\u00fcvekkili olan ma\u011fduru telefonla arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve protokol yapma hususunda kendisinden onay ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesi, protokol\u00fcn yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn ve bir g\u00fcn \u00f6ncesinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lana ait telefon numaras\u0131n\u0131 arad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair HTS kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 ve telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yan\u0131nda olup konu\u015fmalara tan\u0131kl\u0131k eden \u015fahs\u0131n yeminli anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcsnet su\u00e7tan\u00a0cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ma\u011fdurun soyut beyanlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda savunmas\u0131n\u0131n aksine somut, \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil elde edilememesi ile \u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r ilkesi sebebiyle beraatine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden mahkumiyetine h\u00fckmolunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

      H\u00fckm\u00fcn esas\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan k\u0131sa kararda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7undan dolay\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n\u00a0257\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince\u00a0cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi halde, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7e b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde ayn\u0131 kanunun 257\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince cezaland\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle h\u00fck\u00fcmde \u00e7eli\u015fki yarat\u0131lmas\u0131 bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

      DAVA :\u00a0<\/b>San\u0131\u011f\u0131n hizmet sebebiyle g\u00fcveni\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma ve\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahkumiyetine dair h\u00fck\u00fcmler, o yer Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ile san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

      KARAR :\u00a0<\/b>Hatay Barosu’na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olarak avukatl\u0131k yapan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, D\u00f6rtyol 1. Noterli\u011fi’nin 03\/08\/2006 tarih ve 07834 yevmiye say\u0131l\u0131 vekaletnamesi ile ma\u011fdurun vekilli\u011fini \u00fcstlendi\u011fi, alacakl\u0131 vekili s\u0131fat\u0131yla, bor\u00e7lu hakk\u0131nda 11.349,50 TL as\u0131l alacak, 37.880,59 TL i\u015flemi\u015f faiz olmak \u00fczere toplam 49.230,09 TL alaca\u011f\u0131n tahsili amac\u0131yla D\u00f6rtyol \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 2008\/1026 Say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 icra takibinde, m\u00fcvekkilinin bilgi ve talimat\u0131 olmadan borcun 11.000 TL olarak \u00f6denerek takibin sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na dair 11\/06\/2008 tarihli protokol\u00fc imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, s\u00f6z konusu protokol uyar\u0131nca belirlenen 11.000 TL’yi belirtilen tarih ile 15\/05\/2009 tarihleri aras\u0131nda bor\u00e7ludan haricen tahsil etti\u011fi halde ma\u011fdura vermeyerek uhdesinde tuttu\u011fu iddia edilen olayda;<\/p>\n

      A- ) Hizmet sebebiyle g\u00fcveni\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma su\u00e7undan kurulan mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

      San\u0131\u011f\u0131n hizmet sebebiyle g\u00fcveni\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma su\u00e7undan dolay\u0131 mahkumiyetine dair kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmde, TCK’n\u0131n\u00a0155\/2. maddesi uygulan\u0131rken su\u00e7 vasf\u0131n\u0131n “g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanmak” \u015feklinde yaz\u0131lmas\u0131, mahallince d\u00fczeltilebilir yaz\u0131m hatas\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

      San\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmalar\u0131nda, yap\u0131lan protokol kapsam\u0131nda bor\u00e7ludan tahsil etti\u011fi paralar\u0131 ma\u011fdura teslim etmedi\u011fini tevilli yoldan ikrar etmesi, bu paralar\u0131 m\u00fcvekkili olan ma\u011fdura teslim etti\u011fine dair yaz\u0131l\u0131 herhangi bir belge ibraz edememi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve ma\u011fdurun 05\/04\/2012 havale tarihli \u015fikayetten vazge\u00e7meye dair dilek\u00e7esinde, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan zarar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 hizmet sebebiyle g\u00fcveni\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye<\/b>\u00a0kullanma su\u00e7undan mahkumiyetine dair h\u00fck\u00fcmde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

      Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, o yer Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ile san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafinin sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n

      1- ) Hapis cezas\u0131 alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan tayin olundu\u011fu halde, ayr\u0131ca yasal ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeden ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle adli para cezas\u0131na esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken tam g\u00fcn say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131larak tayini suretiyle \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi,<\/p>\n

      2- ) Ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun, 18.09.2012 tarih ve 2012\/2-168-1776 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; ko\u015fullu bir d\u00fc\u015fme nedeni olu\u015fturan h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 kurumunun, mahk\u00fbmiyet, su\u00e7 niteli\u011fi ve ceza miktar\u0131na dair\u00a0objektif\u00a0ko\u015fullar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde, cezan\u0131n ki\u015fiselle\u015ftirilmesine dair olan, se\u00e7enek yapt\u0131r\u0131ma veya tedbire \u00e7evirme ya da erteleme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden ve 6008 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nce re’sen, bu de\u011fi\u015fiklikten sonra ise, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmesi halinde mahkemece de\u011ferlendirilerek, uygulanmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kanaate ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, hi\u00e7bir isteme ba\u011fl\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u00f6ncelikle uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden, su\u00e7 tarihi itibariyle sab\u0131ka kayd\u0131 bulunmayan ve su\u00e7tan do\u011fan zarar\u0131 giderdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, CMK’n\u0131n\u00a0231. maddesinde yer alan h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na dair h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulan\u0131p uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmamas\u0131,<\/p>\n

      B- )\u00a0G\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7undan kurulan mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

      Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun, 04\/04\/2006 tarih, 2006\/3-35 E, 2006\/97 K say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere \u201c\u2026 ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n en \u00f6nemli ilkelerinden biri olan \u201cin dubio pro reo\u201d ku\u015fkudan san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r kural\u0131 uyar\u0131nca, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir su\u00e7tan\u00a0cezaland\u0131r\u0131lma<\/b>s\u0131n\u0131n temel ko\u015fulu, su\u00e7un ku\u015fkuya yer vermeyen bir kesinlikle ispat edilmesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. \u015e\u00fcpheli ve ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lamam\u0131\u015f olaylar ve iddialar san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine yorumlanarak h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilemez. Ceza mahk\u00fbmiyeti bir ihtimale de\u011fil, kesin ve a\u00e7\u0131k bir ispata dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ispat teorikte olsa hi\u00e7bir ku\u015fku ve ba\u015fka t\u00fcrl\u00fc bir olu\u015fa olanak vermemelidir. Y\u00fcksek de olsa bir ihtimale dayan\u0131larak san\u0131\u011f\u0131 cezaland\u0131rmak, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n en \u00f6nemli amac\u0131 olan ger\u00e7e\u011fe ula\u015fmadan h\u00fck\u00fcm vermektir. O halde ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet, b\u00fcy\u00fck veya k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir ihtimale de\u011fil, ku\u015fkudan uzak bir kesinli\u011fe dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n

      Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmalar\u0131nda, m\u00fcvekkili ad\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc icra takibi s\u0131ras\u0131nda bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131n anla\u015fma talebi \u00fczerine, m\u00fcvekkili olan ma\u011fduru telefonla arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve protokol yapma hususunda kendisinden onay ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesi, protokol\u00fcn yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn ve bir g\u00fcn \u00f6ncesinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lana ait telefon numaras\u0131n\u0131 arad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair HTS kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 ve telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yan\u0131nda olup konu\u015fmalara tan\u0131kl\u0131k eden … ve …’un yeminli anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcsnet su\u00e7tan\u00a0cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ma\u011fdurun soyut beyanlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda savunmas\u0131n\u0131n aksine somut, \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil elde edilememesi ile \u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r ilkesi sebebiyle beraatine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahkumiyetine h\u00fckmolunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

      Kabule g\u00f6re de;<\/p>\n

      H\u00fckm\u00fcn esas\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan k\u0131sa kararda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7undan dolay\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n\u00a0257\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince\u00a0cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi halde, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7e b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde ayn\u0131 kanunun 257\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince cezaland\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle h\u00fck\u00fcmde \u00e7eli\u015fki yarat\u0131lmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

      SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/b>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, o yer Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ile san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu sebeple yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un\u00a08. maddesi gere\u011fince halen uygulanmakta olan 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’n\u0131n\u00a0321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 11.07.2018 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

      T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n

      YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n

      5. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n

      E. 2018\/3681<\/span><\/p>\n

      K. 2018\/9521<\/span><\/p>\n

      T. 5.12.2018<\/span><\/p>\n

      DAVA :\u00a0<\/b>Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

      KARAR :\u00a0<\/b>Su\u00e7 tarihinde Karadirek Belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131 olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, Sand\u0131kl\u0131 Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 2008\/82 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla 657 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde belediyede i\u015fe al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilen \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131 i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karmayarak belediye b\u00fct\u00e7esinden maa\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demeye devam edip \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia ve kabul edilen somut olayda; personeli i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin i\u015fe usuls\u00fcz olarak al\u0131nd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n yetkili bir merci taraf\u0131ndan belirlenip bunun belediyeye bildirimi sonucu ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu hususa ili\u015fkin yetkili merci taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan bir tespit olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve belediyeye bildirimde bulunulup bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ilgili kurumlara m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak tespit edilmesinden sonra kamunun zarar\u0131 veya ki\u015filerin ma\u011fduriyetine neden olma ya da ki\u015filere haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flama bi\u00e7imindeki\u00a0objektif\u00a0cezaland\u0131rma ko\u015fullar\u0131ndan<\/strong><\/span> birinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finin karar yerinde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131larak, su\u00e7 tarihinin bildirimin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn ile iddianame tarihi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulup tespit edilmek suretiyle hukuki durumunun takdir ve tayini gerekirken eksik inceleme ve yetersiz gerek\u00e7eyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

      Kabule g\u00f6re de;<\/p>\n

      San\u0131\u011f\u0131n mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak i\u015fe al\u0131nan ki\u015fileri i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karmama \u015feklinde kabul edilen eyleminin TCK’n\u0131n\u00a0257\/2. maddesindeki ihmali davran\u0131\u015fla g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 257\/1. maddesindeki icrai davran\u0131\u015fla g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7undan\u00a0cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmek suretiyle fazla ceza tayini,<\/p>\n

      Y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7u TCK’n\u0131n\u00a053\/1-a maddesindeki hak ve yetkileri k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak suretiyle i\u015fleyen ve adli para cezas\u0131 ile\u00a0cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilen san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 Kanunun 53\/5. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcmde belirtilen g\u00fcn say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n yar\u0131s\u0131ndan bir kat\u0131na kadar bu hak ve yetkinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n

      San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda tayin edilen hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrilmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda uygulama maddesi olan TCK’n\u0131n\u00a050\/1-a maddesinin h\u00fck\u00fcmde g\u00f6sterilmemesi suretiyle CMK’n\u0131n\u00a0232\/6. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131lmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

      Adli emanetin 2010\/40 s\u0131ras\u0131nda kay\u0131tl\u0131 belgeler hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmemesi,<\/p>\n

      H\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (B) bendinde san\u0131k … y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fck\u00fcm kuruldu\u011fu belirtilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n (B-1) bendinde davada taraf olmayan …’un ismine yer verilerek kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa neden olunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

      SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/b>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un\u00a08\/1. maddesi de g\u00f6zetilerek CMUK’n\u0131n\u00a0321\u00a0ve 326\/son maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 05\/12\/2018 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

      T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n

      YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n

      5. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n

      E. 2016\/10411<\/span><\/p>\n

      K. 2017\/404<\/span><\/p>\n

      T. 7.2.2017<\/span><\/p>\n

      \u2022 AVUKAT OLAN SANI\u011eIN BA\u015eLATTI\u011eI \u0130CRA DOSYALARINDA \u0130\u015eLEM YAPMAYARAK DOSYALARIN \u0130\u015eLEMDEN KALDIRILMASINA NEDEN OLMASI (\u00a0Objektif\u00a0Cezaland\u0131rma \u015eart\u0131 Olan Ki\u015fi Ma\u011fduriyeti Kamu Zarar\u0131 ve Ki\u015filere Haks\u0131z Menfaat Sa\u011flanmas\u0131 Unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n Olu\u015fup Olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Varsa Ne \u015eekilde Olu\u015ftu\u011fu Denetime \u0130mkan Verecek \u015eekilde Gerek\u00e7eleriyle Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n

      \u2022 G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMAK ( Avukat Olan San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u0130cra Dosyalar\u0131nda \u0130\u015flem Yapmayarak Dosyalar\u0131n \u0130\u015flemden Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na Neden Oldu\u011fu \u0130ddias\u0131 – Takip Bor\u00e7lusu Olan Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Dosya Bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 Kurum veya Kurum Vekiline \u00d6dediklerine Y\u00f6nelik Beyanda Bulundu\u011fu\/Tan\u0131k Beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n Do\u011frulu\u011funun Ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 Olarak Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak K\u00f6ylere Hizmet G\u00f6t\u00fcrme Birli\u011finin Hesap D\u00f6k\u00fcmlerinin Bilirki\u015fi Marifetiyle \u0130ncelenece\u011fi )<\/p>\n

      \u2022 AVUKATIN KATILAN KURUM ALEYH\u0130NE A\u00c7ILAN DAVALARDA TANIK L\u0130STES\u0130 VEYA DEL\u0130L \u0130BRAZ ETMED\u0130\u011e\u0130 VE DURU\u015eMALARA KATILMADI\u011eI \u0130DD\u0130ASI ( Dava Dosyalar\u0131nda Dava Dilek\u00e7elerine Dair Tebligatlar\u0131n San\u0131\u011fa Teslim Edildi\u011fine Dair Herhangi Bir Belge Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 – Ki\u015fi Ma\u011fduriyeti Kamu Zarar\u0131 ve Ki\u015filere Haks\u0131z Menfaat Sa\u011flanmas\u0131 Unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n Olu\u015fup Olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Varsa Ne \u015eekilde Olu\u015ftu\u011fu Denetime \u0130mkan Verecek \u015eekilde Gerek\u00e7eleriyle Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n

      \u2022 Z\u0130NC\u0130RLEME SU\u00c7 ( Avukat\u0131n \u0130cra Takiplerinde \u0130\u015flem Yapmayarak Dosyalar\u0131 Takipsiz B\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Dava Dosyalar\u0131nda Tan\u0131k Listesi veya Delil \u0130braz Etmedi\u011fi ve Duru\u015fmalara Kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130ddias\u0131 – Zincirleme Su\u00e7 H\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin Uygulama Ko\u015fu\u0131llar\u0131n\u0131n Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n G\u00f6zetilece\u011fi )<\/p>\n

      \u00d6ZET :\u00a0<\/b>Avukat olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lan kurum ad\u0131na ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 icra takiplerinde dosya alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsiline y\u00f6nelik i\u015flem yapmayarak dosyalar\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve bu suretle alacaklar\u0131n tahsilinde gecikmelere, ayr\u0131ca kat\u0131lan kurum aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan alacak davalar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u00f6n inceleme ve duru\u015fmalarda tan\u0131k listesi veya delil ibraz etmedi\u011fi gibi, azledildi\u011fi tarihe kadar an\u0131lan davalar\u0131n duru\u015fmalar\u0131na da kat\u0131lmayarak kat\u0131lan\u0131n ma\u011fduriyetine neden oldu\u011fu iddia ve kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

      San\u0131\u011f\u0131n icra takip dosyalar\u0131nda kurumun bilgisi ve istemi do\u011frultusunda takip i\u015flemlerini y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015feklindeki savunmas\u0131, takip bor\u00e7lusu olan tan\u0131klar\u0131n dosya bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kurum veya kurum vekiline \u00f6dediklerine y\u00f6nelik beyanlar\u0131 ile dava dosyalar\u0131nda dava dilek\u00e7elerine dair tebligatlar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa teslim edildi\u011fine dair herhangi bir belge bulunmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funun ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak K\u00f6ylere Hizmet G\u00f6t\u00fcrme Birli\u011finin hesap d\u00f6k\u00fcmlerinin bilirki\u015fi marifetiyle incelenmesi gerekir.\u00a0Objektif\u00a0cezaland\u0131rma \u015fart\u0131 olan ki\u015fi ma\u011fduriyeti, kamu zarar\u0131 ve ki\u015filere haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131 unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/strong><\/span> varsa ne \u015fekilde olu\u015ftu\u011fu denetime imkan verecek \u015fekilde gerek\u00e7eleriyle tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n

      Kabule g\u00f6re de;<\/p>\n

      San\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7a konu eyleminin hukuki anlamda tek fiil olu\u015fturmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, zincirleme su\u00e7 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulama ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/p>\n

      DAVA :\u00a0<\/b>Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

      KARAR :\u00a0<\/b>Edirne Barosuna kay\u0131tl\u0131 avukat olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lan kurum ad\u0131na bir k\u0131s\u0131m bor\u00e7lular hakk\u0131nda icra takipleri ba\u015flatmak ve a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar\u0131 takip etmek \u00fczere kat\u0131lan\u0131n vekilli\u011fini \u00fcstlendi\u011fi halde 12 adet icra dosyas\u0131nda takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra dosya alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsiline y\u00f6nelik i\u015flem yapmayarak dosyalar\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve bu suretle alacaklar\u0131n tahsilinde gecikmelere, ayr\u0131ca kat\u0131lan kurum aleyhine Edirne \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi’nin 2013\/45 ve 2013\/47 esaslar\u0131na kayden a\u00e7\u0131lan alacak davalar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u00f6n inceleme ve duru\u015fmalarda tan\u0131k listesi veya delil ibraz etmedi\u011fi gibi, azledildi\u011fi tarihe kadar an\u0131lan davalar\u0131n duru\u015fmalar\u0131na da kat\u0131lmayarak kat\u0131lan\u0131n ma\u011fduriyetine neden oldu\u011fu iddia ve kabul edilmi\u015f ise de; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n icra takip dosyalar\u0131nda kurumun bilgisi ve istemi do\u011frultusunda takip i\u015flemlerini y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015feklindeki savunmas\u0131, takip bor\u00e7lusu olan tan\u0131klar\u0131n dosya bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kurum veya kurum vekiline \u00f6dediklerine y\u00f6nelik beyanlar\u0131 ile dava dosyalar\u0131nda dava dilek\u00e7elerine dair tebligatlar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa teslim edildi\u011fine dair herhangi bir belge bulunmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funun ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak K\u00f6ylere Hizmet G\u00f6t\u00fcrme Birli\u011finin hesap d\u00f6k\u00fcmlerinin bilirki\u015fi marifetiyle incelenmesinden sonra,\u00a0objektif\u00a0cezaland\u0131rma \u015fart\u0131 olan ki\u015fi ma\u011fduriyeti, kamu zarar\u0131 ve ki\u015filere haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131 unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, varsa ne \u015fekilde olu\u015ftu\u011fu denetime imkan verecek \u015fekilde gerek\u00e7eleriyle tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun tayin ve takdir edilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden eksik inceleme ve yetersiz gerek\u00e7elerle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

      Kabule g\u00f6re de;<\/p>\n

      San\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7a konu eyleminin hukuki anlamda tek fiil olu\u015fturmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, zincirleme su\u00e7 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulama ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden TCK’n\u0131n\u00a043. maddesinin tatbiki suretiyle fazla ceza tayini,<\/p>\n

      Y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7u TCK’n\u0131n\u00a053\/1-e maddesindeki hak ve yetkiyi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak suretiyle i\u015fleyen ve adli para cezas\u0131 ile\u00a0cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilen san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 53\/5. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcmde belirtilen g\u00fcn say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n yar\u0131s\u0131ndan bir kat\u0131na kadar bu hak ve yetkinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n

      SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/b>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un\u00a08\/1. maddesi de g\u00f6zetilerek CMUK’n\u0131n\u00a0321\u00a0ve\u00a0326\/ son maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 07.02.2017 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

      T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n

      YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n

      5. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n

      E. 2013\/13223<\/span><\/p>\n

      K. 2015\/15737<\/span><\/p>\n

      T. 02\/11\/2015<\/span><\/p>\n

      DAVA :\u00a0<\/b>Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

      KARAR :\u00a0<\/b>H\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiin y\u00fcz\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 18\/10\/2012 tarihinde tefhim edildi\u011fi, temyiz s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fc olan 25\/10\/2012 tarihinin Kurban Bayram\u0131n\u0131n birinci g\u00fcn\u00fc olarak resmi tatile, takip eden 29\/10\/2012 tarihinin ise Cumhuriyet Bayram\u0131 tatiline geldi\u011fi, bu itibarla 30\/10\/2012 tarihinde yap\u0131lan temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla tebli\u011fnamedeki red d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesine i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

      Tokat Barosuna kay\u0131tl\u0131 avukat san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lan vekili olarak takip etti\u011fi Tokat Aile Mahkemesi’nin 2007\/420 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda h\u00fckmedilen 13.000 TL tazminat\u0131 Tokat 2. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2010\/2186 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 takip dosyas\u0131nda har\u00e7, masraf ve vekalet \u00fccretiyle birlikte 13.611 TL olarak takibe koydu\u011fu, 14\/05\/2010 tarihli protokolle hacizlerin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bor\u00e7ludan toplam 15.900 TL bedelli d\u00f6rt \u00e7ek ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7eklerden 4.000 TL bedelli olan\u0131n\u0131 tahsil edip vekalet \u00fccreti ve masraflara mahsuben ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, geri kalan \u00fc\u00e7 \u00e7eki kat\u0131lana vermeyerek bor\u00e7lu vekiline vermek suretiyle g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilmi\u015fse de; 1136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanununun\u00a0166\/1 maddesindeki “Avukat, m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan verilen veya onun nam\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 mallar\u0131, paray\u0131 ve di\u011fer her t\u00fcrl\u00fc k\u0131ymetleri, avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti ve giderin \u00f6denmesine kadar, kendi alaca\u011f\u0131 nispetinde elinde tutabilir.” h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tahsil etti\u011fi para \u00fczerinde hapis hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, bu paran\u0131n Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifeleri uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Tokat Aile Mahkemesi ve Tokat \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nezdindeki hizmetleri gere\u011fi almas\u0131 gereken toplam vekalet \u00fccretinden az olmas\u0131, azledildikten sonra san\u0131\u011f\u0131n uhdesinde bulunan 3 adet \u00e7eki bor\u00e7lu vekiline teslim etmesi, daha sonra \u00e7eklerin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n Sivas Merkez Akbank \u015eubesinden kat\u0131lan taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7ekildi\u011finin belirlenmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 herhangi bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unun\u00a0objektif\u00a0cezaland\u0131rma ko\u015fullar\u0131 olan ki\u015filerin ma\u011fduriyeti, kamunun zarar\u0131 veya ki\u015filere haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flama unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n da ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan beraatine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahkumiyetine h\u00fckmolunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

      Kabule g\u00f6re,Y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7u TCK’n\u0131n\u00a053\/1-e maddesindeki hak ve yetkiyi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak suretiyle i\u015fleyen ve adli para cezas\u0131 ile\u00a0cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilen san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, 53\/5. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcmde belirtilen g\u00fcn say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n yar\u0131s\u0131ndan bir kat\u0131na kadar bu hak ve yetkinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n

      SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un\u00a08\/1. maddesi de g\u00f6zetilerek CMUK’n\u0131n\u00a0321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 02\/11\/2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

      T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n

      YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n

      CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n

      E. 2017\/5-1097<\/span><\/p>\n

      K. 2018\/477<\/span><\/p>\n

      T. 25.10.2018<\/span><\/p>\n

      5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun ikinci kitab\u0131n\u0131n “Millete ve Devlete Kar\u015f\u0131 Su\u00e7lar ve Son H\u00fck\u00fcmler” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n “Kamu \u0130daresinin G\u00fcvenilirli\u011fine ve \u0130\u015fleyi\u015fine Kar\u015f\u0131 Su\u00e7lar” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 birinci b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yer alan su\u00e7lardan TCK’n\u0131n\u00a0257. maddesinde tan\u0131mlanan “G\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma” su\u00e7u;<\/p>\n

      “(1) Kanunda ayr\u0131ca su\u00e7 olarak tan\u0131mlanan haller d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda,\u00a0g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmek suretiyle, ki\u015filerin\u00a0ma\u011fduriyetine veya kamunun zarar\u0131na neden olan ya da ki\u015filere haks\u0131z bir menfaat sa\u011flayan kamu g\u00f6revlisi, alt\u0131 aydan iki y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n

      (2) Kanunda ayr\u0131ca su\u00e7 olarak tan\u0131mlanan haller d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda,\u00a0g\u00f6revinin gereklerini yapmakta ihmal veya gecikme g\u00f6stererek, ki\u015filerin\u00a0ma\u011fduriyetine veya kamunun zarar\u0131na neden olan ya da ki\u015filere haks\u0131z bir menfaat sa\u011flayan kamu g\u00f6revlisi, \u00fc\u00e7 aydan bir y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n

      (3) (M\u00fclga: 2\/7\/2012-6352\/105 md.)” \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

      Maddenin, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kla ilgili birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen icrai davran\u0131\u015flarla\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma su\u00e7u, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmesi ve bu ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f nedeniyle, ki\u015filerin ma\u011fduriyetine veya kamunun zarar\u0131na neden olunmas\u0131 ya da ki\u015filere haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ile olu\u015fmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

      Buna g\u00f6re ilk \u015fart, kamu g\u00f6revlisi olan failin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fle ilgili olarak kanundan veya di\u011fer idari d\u00fczenlemelerden do\u011fan bir\u00a0g\u00f6revinin olmas\u0131 ve bu\u00a0g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmas\u0131d\u0131r. Su\u00e7un olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in, norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f yetmemekte, fiil nedeniyle, ki\u015filerin\u00a0ma\u011fduriyetine veya kamunun zarar\u0131na neden olunmas\u0131 ya da su\u00e7 tarihi itibar\u0131yla ki\u015filere haks\u0131z kazan\u00e7 sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

      An\u0131lan maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde, su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131na dair genel ko\u015fullar;<\/p>\n

      \u201cKamu g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan her fiili cezai yapt\u0131r\u0131m alt\u0131na almak, su\u00e7 ve ceza siyasetinin esaslar\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015fmamaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle, g\u00f6revin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n belli ko\u015fullar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 h\u00e2linde,\u00a0g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, kamu\u00a0g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n, ki\u015filerin\u00a0ma\u011fduriyetiyle sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 veya kamunun ekonomik bak\u0131mdan zarar\u0131na neden olmas\u0131 ya da ki\u015filere haks\u0131z bir kazan\u00e7 sa\u011flam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde,\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7u olu\u015fabilecektir\u201d \u015feklinde vurgulanm\u0131\u015f, gerek\u00e7ede yer verilen “kazan\u00e7” kavram\u0131 6352 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’la yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikle sonradan “menfaat” olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. \u00d6\u011fretide de; TCK’n\u0131n\u00a0257. maddesindeki su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin\u00a0g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmesi sonucunda ki\u015filerin ma\u011fdur olmas\u0131 veya kamunun zarar g\u00f6rmesi ya da ki\u015filere haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131 \u015fartlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, bu sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011furmayan norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n, su\u00e7 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Mehmet Emin Artuk-Ahmet G\u00f6k\u00e7en-Ahmet Caner Yenid\u00fcnya, Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Turhan Kitapevi, 11. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2011, s. 913 vd.; Mahmut Koca-\u0130lhan \u00dcz\u00fclmez, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Adalet Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara, 2013, s. 769; Veli \u00d6zer \u00d6zbek-Mehmet Nihat Kanbur-Koray Do\u011fan-P\u0131nar Bacaks\u0131z-\u0130lker Tepe, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, 2. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2011, s. 974).<\/em><\/p>\n

      G\u00f6revin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmekten, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin\u00a0g\u00f6revini kanun, idari d\u00fczenlemeler veya talimatlar\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc usul ve esaslardan ba\u015fka surette ifa etmesi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu anlamda kamu g\u00f6revlisinin herhangi bir \u015fekilde kanuni yetkisini a\u015fmas\u0131, kanunun arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekil \u015fartlar\u0131na uymamas\u0131, takdir yetkisini amac\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda\u00a0kullanmas\u0131, kanunun emir ve m\u00fcsaade etti\u011fi hareketinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u00f6n \u015fartlara ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmesi, kendisine teslim edilen ve\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0sebebiyle\u00a0kullanmas\u0131 gerekli e\u015fyay\u0131 usuls\u00fcz\u00a0kullanmas\u0131 gibi fiiller\u00a0g\u00f6revin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k kapsam\u0131nda kalmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

      Norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n maddede belirtilen sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011furup do\u011furmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n saptanabilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle \u201cma\u011fduriyet, kamunun zarara u\u011framas\u0131 ve haks\u0131z menfaat\u201d kavramlar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ve somut olayda bunlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmediklerinin belirlenmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

      Ma\u011fduriyet kavram\u0131n\u0131n, sadece ekonomik bak\u0131mdan u\u011fran\u0131lan zararla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmay\u0131p bireysel haklar\u0131n ihlali sonucunu do\u011furan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 ifade etti\u011fi kabul edilmelidir. Bu husus madde gerek\u00e7esinde; “G\u00f6revin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n, ki\u015finin ma\u011fduriyetine neden olunmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu\u00a0ma\u011fduriyet, sadece ekonomik bak\u0131mdan u\u011fran\u0131lan zarar\u0131 ifade etmez.\u00a0Ma\u011fduriyet kavram\u0131, zarar kavram\u0131ndan daha geni\u015f bir anlama sahiptir” \u015feklinde vurgulanm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6\u011fretide de;\u00a0ma\u011fduriyetin sadece ekonomik bak\u0131mdan ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan zarar\u0131 ifade etmeyip daha geni\u015f bir anlama sahip oldu\u011fu, bireyin, sosyal, siyasi, medeni her t\u00fcrl\u00fc haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihl\u00e2li sonucunu do\u011furan hareketlerin ve herhangi bir \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131n zedelenmesine neden olma<\/strong><\/span>n\u0131n da bu kapsamda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fine i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir (Mehmet Emin Artuk-Ahmet G\u00f6k\u00e7en-Ahmet Caner Yenid\u00fcnya, Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Turhan Kitapevi, 11. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2011, s. 911 vd.; Mahmut Koca-\u0130lhan \u00dcz\u00fclmez, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Adalet Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara, 2013, s. 772; Veli \u00d6zer \u00d6zbek-Mehmet Nihat Kanbur-Koray Do\u011fan-P\u0131nar Bacaks\u0131z-\u0130lker Tepe, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, 2. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2011, s. 974).<\/em><\/p>\n

      Ki\u015filere haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131, bir ba\u015fkas\u0131na hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde her t\u00fcrl\u00fc maddi ya da manevi yarar sa\u011flanmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmektedir.<\/p>\n

      Kamunun zarara u\u011framas\u0131 hususuna gelince; madde gerek\u00e7esinde “ekonomik bir zarar” oldu\u011fu vurgulanan an\u0131lan kavramla ilgili olarak kanuni d\u00fczenleme i\u00e7eren 5018 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kamu Mal\u00ee Y\u00f6netimi ve Kontrol Kanunu’nun\u00a071. maddesinde; kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin kast, kusur veya ihmallerinden kaynaklanan mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar, i\u015flem veya eylemleri sonucunda kamu kayna\u011f\u0131nda art\u0131\u015fa engel veya eksilmeye neden olunmas\u0131 \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanan kamu zarar\u0131, her olayda h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan, i\u015f, mal veya hizmetin rayi\u00e7 bedelinden daha y\u00fcksek bir fiyatla al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde yapt\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p yapt\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u00f6zellikleri de dikkate al\u0131narak belirlenmelidir. Bu belirleme; u\u011fran\u0131lan kamu zarar\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131n kesin bir bi\u00e7imde saptanmas\u0131 anlam\u0131nda olmay\u0131p miktar\u0131 saptanamasa dahi, i\u015fin veya hizmetin niteli\u011fi nazara al\u0131narak, rayi\u00e7 bedelden daha y\u00fcksek bir bedelle al\u0131m veya yap\u0131m\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde de kamu zarar\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir. Ancak bu belirleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken, norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 her davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n, kamuya duyulan g\u00fcveni sarst\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, kamu zarar\u0131na yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya zarara u\u011frama ihtimalini ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceyle de hareket edilmemelidir.<\/p>\n

      \n
      Ki\u015filerin ma\u011fduriyetine neden olmak ise,<\/strong><\/span> g\u00f6revin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u00a0 sebebiyle ki\u015finin hakl\u0131\u00a0 bir \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131n zedelenmesine, haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmesine neden olun<\/span>mas\u0131\u00a0 \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re, g\u00f6revin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131\u00a0 davran\u0131\u015f\u00a0 sebebiyle ki\u015filerin sadece ekonomik bak\u0131mdan zarara u\u011framalar\u0131\u00a0 de\u011fil, her hangi bir \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131n zedelenmesine neden olmak da ki\u015fisel ma\u011fduriyet kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilecektir. Bu husus madde gerek\u00e7esinde, \u201cBu ma\u011fduriyet, sadece ekonomik bak\u0131mdan u\u011fran\u0131lan zarar\u0131\u00a0 ifade etmez. Ma\u011fduriyet kavram\u0131, zarar kavram\u0131ndan daha geni\u015f\u00a0 bir anlama sahiptir. \u00d6rne\u011fin ki\u015fi, tabi tutuldu\u011fu s\u0131navda ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131\u00a0 olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131z g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f\u00a0 olabilir. Bir imar plan\u0131\u00a0 uygulamas\u0131nda, belli bir parsel, sahibine duyulan husumet dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, plan tekni\u011fine ayk\u0131r\u0131\u00a0 olarak, ye\u015fil alan olarak g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f\u00a0 olabilir. Ki\u015finin, kamusal bir\u00a0 finans\u00a0 kayna\u011f\u0131ndan yararlanmas\u0131\u00a0 i\u00e7in gerekli\u00a0 \u015fartlar\u0131\u00a0 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131\u00a0 h\u00e2lde, yararlanmas\u0131\u00a0 engellenmi\u015f\u00a0 olabilir. Ki\u015finin, belli bir s\u0131nai veya ticari faaliyetle ilgili olarak gerekli izin ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131\u00a0 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde, bu faaliyeti engellenmi\u015f\u00a0 olabilir.\u201d\u00a0 \u015feklinde izah edilmi\u015ftir.Yarg. 4. CD, 14.10.2010, 2009-14967\/2010\/6924\u00a0<\/span><\/h6>\n<\/blockquote>\n

      T.C.<\/span>
      \nYARGITAY<\/span>
      \nBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130 CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center> <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
      Esas<\/span><\/td>\n: 2013\/10385<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Karar<\/span><\/td>\n: 2015\/12790<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n: 22.06.2015<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
      \n

      Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

      Su\u00e7 tarihinde Turhal Devlet Hastanesi acil poliklini\u011finde n\u00f6bet\u00e7i hekim olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle poliklini\u011fe babas\u0131 ile gelen ma\u011fduru g\u00f6r\u00fcp muayene etmeden, g\u00f6revli hem\u015firelerin hastan\u0131n \u015fikayetlerini aktarmalar\u0131 \u00fczerine telefon ile tedavi uygulatarak ma\u011fduriyetine neden oldu\u011fu iddia edilen olayda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6revinin gereklerini ihmal etti\u011fi t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131 itibariyle sabit olmakla birlikte, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 257. maddesinde belirtilen su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, g\u00f6revin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f yan\u0131nda objektif cezaland\u0131rma \u015fart\u0131 olan \u201cki\u015filerin\u00a0ma\u011fduriyeti” veya “kamunun zarar\u0131” ya da “ki\u015filere haks\u0131z bir menfaat sa\u011flama” \u015fartlar\u0131ndan birinin bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, kendisine serum tak\u0131lan m\u00fc\u015ftekinin serum bittikten sonra rahatlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmesi, bu hususun babas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan da teyit edilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, herhangi bir ma\u011fduriyetinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, di\u011fer objektif cezaland\u0131rma \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n da ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, eylemin disiplin hukukunun konusunu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden unsurlar\u0131 itibariyle olu\u015fmayan su\u00e7tan beraati yerine dosya kapsam\u0131na uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyen gerek\u00e7eler ve yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucu yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahkumiyetine karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n

      Kabule g\u00f6re de;<\/p>\n

      Su\u00e7u TCK’n\u0131n 53\/1-a maddesindeki hak ve yetkiyi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanmak\u00a0suretiyle i\u015fledi\u011fi kabul edilen san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 Kanunun 53\/5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hak yoksunlu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n

      Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8\/1. maddesi de g\u00f6zetilerek CMUK’n\u0131n 321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 22\/06\/2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

      YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n

      CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n

      E. 2016\/5-981<\/span><\/p>\n

      K. 2019\/490<\/span><\/p>\n

      T. 25.6.2019<\/span><\/p>\n

      Ma\u011fduriyet kavram\u0131n\u0131n, sadece ekonomik bak\u0131mdan u\u011fran\u0131lan zararla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmay\u0131p bireysel haklar\u0131n ihlali sonucunu do\u011furan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 ifade etti\u011fi kabul edilmelidir. Bu husus madde gerek\u00e7esinde; “G\u00f6revin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n, ki\u015finin\u00a0ma\u011fduriyetine neden olunmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu ma\u011fduriyet, sadece ekonomik bak\u0131mdan u\u011fran\u0131lan zarar\u0131 ifade etmez. Ma\u011fduriyet kavram\u0131, zarar kavram\u0131ndan daha geni\u015f bir anlama sahiptir.” \u015feklinde vurgulanm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6\u011fretide de;\u00a0ma\u011fduriyetin sadece ekonomik bak\u0131mdan ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan zarar\u0131 ifade etmeyip daha geni\u015f bir anlama sahip oldu\u011fu, bireyin, sosyal, siyasi, medeni her t\u00fcrl\u00fc haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali sonucunu do\u011furan hareketlerin ve herhangi bir \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131n zedelenmesine neden olman\u0131n da bu kapsamda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fine i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir (M. E. Artuk-A. G\u00f6k\u00e7en-A. C. Yenid\u00fcnya, Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, T. Kitapevi, 11. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2011, s. 911 vd.; M. Koca-\u0130lhan \u00dcz\u00fclmez, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Adalet Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara, 2013, s. 772; Veli \u00d6zer \u00d6zbek-M. N. Kanbur-Koray Do\u011fan-P. Bacaks\u0131z-\u0130. Tepe, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, 2. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2011, s. 974).<\/em><\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n
      Maddenin, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kla ilgili birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen icrai davran\u0131\u015flarla g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma su\u00e7u, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmesi ve bu ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f nedeniyle, ki\u015filerin ma\u011fduriyetine veya kamunun zarar\u0131na neden olunmas\u0131 ya da haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ile olu\u015fmaktad\u0131r.<\/div>\n
      \n

      Buna g\u00f6re ilk \u015fart, kamu g\u00f6revlisi olan failin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fle ilgili olarak kanun veya di\u011fer idari d\u00fczenlemelerden do\u011fan bir g\u00f6revinin olmas\u0131 ve bu g\u00f6revi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yetkili bulunmas\u0131d\u0131r. Su\u00e7un olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in, norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f yetmemekte, fiil nedeniyle, ki\u015filerin ma\u011fduriyetine veya kamunun zarar\u0131na neden olunmas\u0131 ya da ki\u015filere haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

      An\u0131lan maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde; su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin genel ko\u015fullar, \u201cKamu g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan her fiili cezai yapt\u0131r\u0131m alt\u0131na almak, su\u00e7 ve ceza siyasetinin esaslar\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015fmamaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle, g\u00f6revin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n belli ko\u015fullar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 h\u00e2linde,\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, kamu g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n, ki\u015filerin ma\u011fduriyetiyle sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 veya kamunun ekonomik bak\u0131mdan zarar\u0131na neden olmas\u0131 ya da ki\u015filere haks\u0131z bir kazan\u00e7 sa\u011flam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde,\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7u olu\u015fabilecektir.\u201d \u015feklinde vurgulanm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6\u011fretide de TCK’n\u0131n\u00a0257. maddesindeki su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin\u00a0g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmesi sonucunda\u00a0ki\u015filerin\u00a0ma\u011fdur olmas\u0131 veya kamunun zarar g\u00f6rmesi ya da haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131 \u015fartlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, bu sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011furmayan norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n, su\u00e7 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. (M. E. Artuk – A. G\u00f6k\u00e7en – A. C. Yenid\u00fcnya, Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, T. Kitapevi, 11. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2011, s. 913 vd.; M. Koca – \u0130lhan \u00dcz\u00fclmez, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Adalet Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara, 2013, s.769; Veli \u00d6zer \u00d6zbek – M. N. Kanbur – Koray Do\u011fan – P. Bacaks\u0131z – \u0130. Tepe, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, 2. B<\/em><\/p>\n

      YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n

      CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n

      E. 2017\/21-525<\/span><\/p>\n

      K. 2019\/307<\/span><\/p>\n

      T. 11.4.2019.<\/span><\/p>\n

      \n

      YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n

      CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n

      E. 2018\/5-341<\/span><\/p>\n

      K. 2019\/161<\/span><\/p>\n

      T. 5.3.2019<\/span><\/p>\n

      san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7undan a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131nda san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemleri neticesinde kazada \u00f6lenlerin yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0ma\u011fduriyetine ne \u015fekilde neden olundu\u011funa ili\u015fkin hi\u00e7bir anlat\u0131ma yer verilmedi\u011fi gibi aksine san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen eylem neticesinde D\u00fcnyaya Bak\u0131\u015f Hava Ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 A.\u015e.’nin haks\u0131z menfaat elde etmesine sebebiyet verildi\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, kazadan sonra yap\u0131lan denetimde tespit edilen eksiklikler nedeniyle s\u00f6z konusu \u015firketin i\u015fletme ruhsat\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilmemesi ya da ask\u0131ya al\u0131nmamas\u0131 neticesinde kazada \u00f6lenlerin yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finden veya \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131n zedelendi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle kazadan sonra yap\u0131lan denetimde tespit edilen eksiklikler ile kazada \u00f6lenlerin yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n haklar\u0131 veya \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda herhangi bir illiyet ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kurulamayaca\u011f\u0131,\u00a0ki\u015filerin\u00a0kendilerini s\u00fcbjektif olarak haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa u\u011fram\u0131\u015f hissetmelerinin,\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7unda tan\u0131mlanan\u00a0ma\u011fduriyetin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli olmayaca\u011f\u0131,<\/strong><\/span> dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu kimselerin objektif olarak su\u00e7tan do\u011frudan do\u011fruya zarar g\u00f6rd\u00fcklerinin kabul edilemeyece\u011fi,<\/div>\n
      \n

      YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n

      CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n

      E. 2017\/5-9<\/span><\/p>\n

      K. 2018\/511<\/span><\/p>\n

      T. 8.11.2018<\/span><\/p>\n

      \n

      Maddenin, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kla ilgili birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen icrai davran\u0131\u015flarla\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma su\u00e7u, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin\u00a0g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmesi ve bu ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f nedeniyle,\u00a0ki\u015filerin ma\u011fduriyetine veya kamunun zarar\u0131na neden olunmas\u0131 ya da haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ile olu\u015fmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

      Buna g\u00f6re ilk \u015fart, kamu g\u00f6revlisi olan failin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fle ilgili olarak kanun veya di\u011fer idari d\u00fczenlemelerden do\u011fan bir\u00a0g\u00f6revinin olmas\u0131 ve bu\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yetkili bulunmas\u0131d\u0131r. Su\u00e7un olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in, norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f yetmemekte, fiil nedeniyle,\u00a0ki\u015filerin ma\u011fduriyetine veya kamunun zarar\u0131na neden olunmas\u0131 ya da ki\u015filere haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

      An\u0131lan maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde; su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131na dair genel ko\u015fullar, \u201cKamu g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan her fiili cezai yapt\u0131r\u0131m alt\u0131na almak, su\u00e7 ve ceza siyasetinin esaslar\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015fmamaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle, g\u00f6revin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n belli ko\u015fullar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 h\u00e2linde,\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, kamu\u00a0g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n,\u00a0ki\u015filerin ma\u011fduriyetiyle sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 veya kamunun ekonomik bak\u0131mdan zarar\u0131na neden olmas\u0131 ya da ki\u015filere haks\u0131z bir kazan\u00e7 sa\u011flam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde,\u00a0g\u00f6revi\u00a0k\u00f6t\u00fcye\u00a0kullanma\u00a0su\u00e7u olu\u015fabilecektir\u201d \u015feklinde vurgulanm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6\u011fretide de; TCK’n\u0131n\u00a0257. maddesindeki su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin\u00a0g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmesi sonucunda\u00a0ki\u015filerin\u00a0ma\u011fdur olmas\u0131 veya kamunun zarar g\u00f6rmesi ya da haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131 \u015fartlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, bu sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011furmayan norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n, su\u00e7 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. ( Mehmet Emin Artuk – Ahmet G\u00f6k\u00e7en – Ahmet Caner Yenid\u00fcnya, Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Turhan Kitapevi, 11. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2011, s. 913 vd.; Mahmut Koca – \u0130lhan \u00dcz\u00fclmez, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Adalet Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara, 2013, s.769; Veli \u00d6zer \u00d6zbek – Mehmet Nihat Kanbur – Koray Do\u011fan – P\u0131nar Bacaks\u0131z – \u0130lker Tepe, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, 2. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2011, s. 974 )<\/em><\/p>\n

      Norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n maddede belirtilen sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011furup do\u011furmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n saptanabilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle \u201cma\u011fduriyet, kamunun zarara u\u011framas\u0131 ve haks\u0131z menfaat\u201d kavramlar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ve somut olayda bunlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmediklerinin belirlenmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

      Ma\u011fduriyet kavram\u0131n\u0131n, sadece ekonomik bak\u0131mdan u\u011fran\u0131lan zararla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmay\u0131p, bireysel haklar\u0131n ihlali sonucunu do\u011furan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 ifade etti\u011fi kabul edilmelidir. Bu husus madde gerek\u00e7esinde; “G\u00f6revin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n, ki\u015finin\u00a0ma\u011fduriyetine neden olunmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu ma\u011fduriyet, sadece ekonomik bak\u0131mdan u\u011fran\u0131lan zarar\u0131 ifade etmez. Ma\u011fduriyet kavram\u0131, zarar kavram\u0131ndan daha geni\u015f bir anlama sahiptir” \u015feklinde vurgulanm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6\u011fretide de;\u00a0ma\u011fduriyetin sadece ekonomik bak\u0131mdan ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan zarar\u0131 ifade etmeyece\u011fi, ma\u011fduriyet kavram\u0131n\u0131n ekonomik zarar kavram\u0131ndan daha geni\u015f bir anlama sahip oldu\u011fu, bireyin, sosyal, siyasi, medeni her t\u00fcrl\u00fc haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali sonucunu do\u011furan hareketlerin ve herhangi bir \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131n zedelenmesine neden olman\u0131n da bu kapsamda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fine i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir. ( Mehmet Emin Artuk – Ahmet G\u00f6k\u00e7en – Ahmet Caner Yenid\u00fcnya, Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Turhan Kitapevi, 11. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2011, s. 911 vd.; Mahmut Koca – \u0130lhan \u00dcz\u00fclmez, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Adalet Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara, 2013, s. 772; Veli \u00d6zer \u00d6zbek – Mehmet Nihat Kanbur – Koray Do\u011fan – P\u0131nar Bacaks\u0131z – \u0130lker Tepe, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, 2. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2011, s. 974 )<\/em><\/p>\n

      Ki\u015filere haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flanmas\u0131, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc maddi ya da manevi yarar\u0131 ifade eder.<\/p>\n

      Kamunun zarara u\u011framas\u0131 hususuna gelince; madde gerek\u00e7esinde “ekonomik bir zarar” oldu\u011fu vurgulanan an\u0131lan kavramla ilgili olarak kanuni d\u00fczenleme i\u00e7eren 5018 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kamu Mal\u00ee Y\u00f6netimi ve Kontrol Kanunu’nun\u00a071. maddesinde; kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin kas\u0131t, kusur veya ihmallerinden kaynaklanan mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar, i\u015flem veya eylemleri sonucunda kamu kayna\u011f\u0131nda art\u0131\u015fa engel veya eksilmeye neden olunmas\u0131 \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanan kamu zarar\u0131, her somut olayda h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan, i\u015f, mal veya hizmetin rayi\u00e7 bedelinden daha y\u00fcksek bir fiyatla al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde yapt\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p yapt\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u00f6zellikleri de dikkate al\u0131narak belirlenmelidir. Bu belirleme; u\u011fran\u0131lan kamu zarar\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131n kesin bir bi\u00e7imde saptanmas\u0131 anlam\u0131nda olmay\u0131p, miktar\u0131 saptanamasa dahi, i\u015fin veya hizmetin niteli\u011fi nazara al\u0131narak, rayi\u00e7 bedelden daha y\u00fcksek bir bedelle al\u0131m veya yap\u0131m\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde de kamu zarar\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir. Ancak bu belirleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken, norma ayk\u0131r\u0131 her davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n, kamuya duyulan g\u00fcveni sarst\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, kamu zarar\u0131na yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya zarara u\u011frama ihtimalini ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceyle de hareket edilmemelidir.<\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

      \n

       <\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

      \n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
      \n
      T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
      YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
      CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
      Esas: 2023\/402<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
      Karar: 2023\/537<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
      Tarih: 18.10.2023<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n
      \n

      Su\u00e7 tarihindeki d\u00fczenleme uyar\u0131nca soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 izne veya talebe ba\u011fl\u0131 olan su\u00e7larda izin al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n veya talep olmaks\u0131z\u0131n iddianame d\u00fczenlenmesi hususu bir iade sebebi olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ve su\u00e7 tarihinden sonra 24.10.2019 tarihli ve 30928 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7188 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile bu husus CMK\u2019n\u0131n 174. maddesine eklenerek iade sebepleri aras\u0131nda yer alm\u0131\u015f ise de kat\u0131lan\u0131n san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada kat\u0131lan hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma izni al\u0131nmadan d\u00fczenlenen iddianamede soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma \u015fart\u0131 olan “izin alma” hususu yerine getirilmeden bu hususun iade nedeni olarak kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi, kald\u0131 ki san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 17.04.2012 tarihli ilk duru\u015fmada davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131nca davaya konu eylemler idari g\u00f6rev kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle soru\u015fturma izni al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilerek durma karar\u0131 verilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen taleplerin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmesi, dosyada san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla yarg\u0131lanan baz\u0131 \u015fah\u0131slarca san\u0131k ile ilgili olarak birinci oturumda yap\u0131lan h\u00e2kimin reddi talebine ili\u015fkin istem hakk\u0131nda san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ilgili merciye g\u00f6nderme yaz\u0131s\u0131nda istemin reddine karar verilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmesi, her ne kadar Silivri A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince istemin reddedilmesi sonras\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n takip eden duru\u015fmalar\u0131n hi\u00e7birine kat\u0131lmayarak adalet komisyonu ba\u015fkan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan devam eden duru\u015fmalar\u0131n hepsine inceleme d\u0131\u015f\u0131 san\u0131k …\u2019in g\u00f6revlendirilmesi \u00fczerine onun taraf\u0131ndan san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla yarg\u0131lanan \u015fah\u0131slar ve kat\u0131lan … hakk\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f\u00a0ise de h\u00e2kimin reddi isteminin reddine dair karar verilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildiren san\u0131\u011f\u0131n devam eden duru\u015fmalara kat\u0131lmamak i\u00e7in rapor, izin gibi yollar kullanarak yakla\u015f\u0131k iki ayda yap\u0131lan be\u015f oturuma kat\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n da san\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7 i\u015fleme kast\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermesi, kat\u0131lan hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan dosyan\u0131n ge\u00e7irmi\u015f oldu\u011fu a\u015famalar ve safahat\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n k\u0131dem ve tecr\u00fcbesi hep birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin takdir hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bilin\u00e7li bir \u015fekilde soru\u015fturma izni al\u0131nmadan d\u00fczenlenmesi nedeni ile iade edilmesi gereken iddianameyi kabul etti\u011fi ve bu suretle g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranarak kat\u0131lan\u0131n ma\u011fduriyetine neden oldu\u011fundan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n

      T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

      \n

      YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

      12. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

      Esas Numaras\u0131: 2022\/7211<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

      Karar Numaras\u0131: 2025\/309<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Karar Tarihi: 09.01.2025<\/strong><\/p>\n

      VER\u0130LER\u0130 HUKUKA AYKIRI OLARAK VERME VEYA ELE GE\u00c7\u0130RME<\/strong><\/p>\n

      K\u0130\u015e\u0130SEL VER\u0130LERE H\u0130ZMET GERE\u011e\u0130 ER\u0130\u015eME YETK\u0130S\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \u00d6ZET\u0130:\u00a0<\/strong>San\u0131k, kurumu taraf\u0131ndan kendisine verilen aparat ve \u015fifre ile kendi hakimiyeti alt\u0131nda bulunan ki\u015fisel verilere ula\u015fm\u0131\u015f ve bakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendi hakimiyeti alt\u0131ndaki bir veriye bakmaktan ibaret olan eyleminin ele ge\u00e7irmek olarak kabul edilemeyece\u011fi bu halin ilgili kurumun i\u00e7 mevzuat\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131na konu edilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu ancak T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu anlam\u0131nda su\u00e7 te\u015fkil etmeyen … niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu…” bi\u00e7imindeki gerek\u00e7elerle kamu kurumlar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapan ve g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131klar\u0131 kuruma ait bili\u015fim sistemindeki ki\u015fisel verilere hizmet gere\u011fi eri\u015fme yetkisi verilen ki\u015filerin; g\u00f6revlerinin kapsam\u0131na ve niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re hizmetin yerine getirilmesi ile hi\u00e7bir ilgisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde, merak, be\u011feni vb. saikler ya da farkl\u0131 ama\u00e7larla, sistemde yer alan ki\u015fisel verileri sorgulamak ve bu verilere salt duyu organlar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla vak\u0131f olmaktan ibaret eylemlerinin, T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

      “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/strong><\/p>\n

      MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n

      SAYISI : 2020\/548 E., 2021\/2016 K.<\/p>\n

      SU\u00c7 : Verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme<\/p>\n

      H\u00dcK\u00dcM : Mahkumiyet<\/p>\n

      TEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : Temyiz istemlerinin esastan reddi ile h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin onanmas\u0131<\/p>\n

      \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik istinaf incelemesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n; san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme neticesinde 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 298\/1. maddesindeki temyiz istemlerinin reddini gerektirir bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmekle, i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

      I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7undan, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 223\/2-a maddesi uyar\u0131nca beraat karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince kat\u0131lan vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine duru\u015fmal\u0131 yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda CMK’n\u0131n 280\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak san\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 136\/1, 137\/1-a, 43\/1, 62\/1, 53\/1-2-3. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve hak yoksunluklar\u0131na, san\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda TCK’n\u0131n 136\/1, 137\/1-a, 62\/1, 53\/1-2-3. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 2 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve hak yoksunluklar\u0131na, karar verilmi\u015f, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca san\u0131klar\u0131n temyiz istemlerinin esastan reddi ile h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin onanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7eren Tebli\u011fname ile dava dosyas\u0131 Daireye tevdi edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

      II. TEMY\u0130Z SEBEPLER\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

      San\u0131klar\u0131n temyiz sebepleri; \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 eylemin kanunda su\u00e7 olarak tan\u0131mlanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle verilen mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

      III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince, dosyada mevcut belge ve bilgiler, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma evrelerinde al\u0131nan beyanlarla birlikte dikkate al\u0131narak yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede; Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Kurumu Bal\u0131kesir \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde kamu g\u00f6revlisi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan san\u0131k …’n\u0131n 23.07.2015 ve 01.06.2017 tarihlerinde, san\u0131k …’in 09.12.2015 tarihinde kendilerine kurum taraf\u0131ndan tahsis edilmi\u015f \u015fifre ile kat\u0131lan Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 …’\u0131n Kimlik Payla\u015f\u0131m Sistemi(KPS) \u00fczerinden ki\u015fisel bilgilerini sorgulamalar\u0131na konu olayda, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 223\/2-a maddesi uyar\u0131nca ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 beraat karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

      B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince duru\u015fmal\u0131 yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda, san\u0131klar\u0131n KPS \u00fczerinden sorgulama yaparak, kat\u0131lan\u0131n ki\u015fisel verilerini g\u00f6rmesi, okumas\u0131 ve i\u00e7eri\u011fini \u00f6\u011frenmesi suretiyle ele ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi kabul edilerek \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi beraat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin kald\u0131r\u0131larak san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 136\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7undan mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, san\u0131k …’n\u0131n eylemini farkl\u0131 tarihlerde birden fazla kez ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmesi nedeniyle ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 43\/1. maddesindeki zincirleme su\u00e7 h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

      IV. GEREK\u00c7E VE KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin us\u00fbl ve kanuna uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, a\u015famalarda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n toplanan t\u00fcm delillerle birlikte gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdan\u00ee kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, san\u0131klar\u0131n yukar\u0131da ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcmde ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bu kapsamdaki temyiz sebeplerinin reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n

      Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu G\u00fcmr\u00fck ve Ticaret B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde memur olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kurumu taraf\u0131ndan kendisine verilen kullan\u0131c\u0131 \u015fifresi ile Kimlik Payla\u015f\u0131m Sistemi’ne eri\u015fim sa\u011flayarak, d\u00f6nemin \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakan\u0131 olan kat\u0131lan\u0131n kimlik ve adres bilgilerine bakmas\u0131 \u015feklindeki eyleminin su\u00e7 te\u015fkil edip etmedi\u011fi, etti\u011finin kabul\u00fc h\u00e2linde, eyleminin verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7unu mu yoksa \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7unu mu olu\u015fturdu\u011funun ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015fledi\u011fi fiilin su\u00e7 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu konusunda haks\u0131zl\u0131k yan\u0131lg\u0131s\u0131 ile hareket edip etmedi\u011finin belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kla ilgili olarak verdi\u011fi 21.06.2023 tarihli ve 2021\/12-384 Esas, 2023\/367 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda, “… san\u0131\u011fa sistemde kay\u0131tl\u0131 ki\u015filerin kimlik ve adres sorgulamalar\u0131n\u0131 yapmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kullan\u0131c\u0131 \u015fifresinin \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 kurum taraf\u0131ndan verilmesi, sisteme girmek i\u00e7in \u00f6zel gayret sarf etmemi\u015f olmas\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n kamuya mal olan ki\u015fili\u011fi nedeniyle kimlik ve adres bilgilerine kolayl\u0131kla eri\u015filebilmesi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n merak saiki ile bu bilgileri sadece okumu\u015f olup ba\u015fkalar\u0131yla payla\u015fmamas\u0131, ayr\u0131ca hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir ama\u00e7 g\u00fctmemesi ve ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi iddia edilen ki\u015fisel verilerin kapsam ve niteli\u011fi ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bilinciyle hareket etmedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki savunmas\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; incelemeye konu olay g\u00f6revin gereklerine uygun olmayan disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 gerektiren eylemin su\u00e7 te\u015fkil etmedi\u011fi kabul edilmelidir… Ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin nitelendirilmesine ve i\u015fledi\u011fi fiilin su\u00e7 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu konusunda haks\u0131zl\u0131k yan\u0131lg\u0131s\u0131 ile hareket edip etmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konular\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmemi\u015ftir…” \u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7elerle uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa konu eylemi, disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 gerektiren ve su\u00e7 te\u015fkil etmeyen … olarak kabul etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

      B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi ceza dairelerince verilen kesin nitelikteki kararlar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi istemine ili\u015fkin Dairemizin 25.04.2024 tarihli ve 2022\/7038 Esas, 2024\/1950 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda ve bu kararla uyum g\u00f6steren Dairemizin 25.04.2024 tarihli ve 2023\/219 Esas, 2024\/1951 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da, “… Dairemizce de benimsenen Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 21.06.2023 tarihli ve 2021\/12-384 Esas, 2023\/367 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7ede de belirtildi\u011fi gibi ele ge\u00e7irme ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n hakimiyeti alt\u0131nda bulunan ki\u015fisel veriyi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 yollarla kendi hakimiyeti alt\u0131na almakla ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir. Olay\u0131m\u0131zda ise san\u0131k, kurumu taraf\u0131ndan kendisine verilen aparat ve \u015fifre ile kendi hakimiyeti alt\u0131nda bulunan ki\u015fisel verilere ula\u015fm\u0131\u015f ve bakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendi hakimiyeti alt\u0131ndaki bir veriye bakmaktan ibaret olan eyleminin ele ge\u00e7irmek olarak kabul edilemeyece\u011fi bu halin ilgili kurumun i\u00e7 mevzuat\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131na konu edilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu ancak TCK anlam\u0131nda su\u00e7 te\u015fkil etmeyen … niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu…” bi\u00e7imindeki gerek\u00e7elerle kamu kurumlar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapan ve g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131klar\u0131 kuruma ait bili\u015fim sistemindeki ki\u015fisel verilere hizmet gere\u011fi eri\u015fme yetkisi verilen ki\u015filerin; g\u00f6revlerinin kapsam\u0131na ve niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re hizmetin yerine getirilmesi ile hi\u00e7bir ilgisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde, merak, be\u011feni vb. saikler ya da farkl\u0131 ama\u00e7larla, sistemde yer alan ki\u015fisel verileri sorgulamak ve bu verilere salt duyu organlar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla vak\u0131f olmaktan ibaret eylemlerinin, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK kapsam\u0131nda su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

      \u00d6zetlenen yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131klar\u0131n, kendilerine g\u00f6revleri gere\u011fi verilen kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu ve \u015fifreyi kullan\u0131p, Kimlik Payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Sisteminde (KPS) sorgulama yapmaktan ibaret yarg\u0131lama konusu eylemlerinde verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7unun yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen beraat kararlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin kald\u0131r\u0131larak san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan mahkumiyete karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n

      Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle san\u0131klar\u0131n temyiz istemleri yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Bursa B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 10. Ceza Dairesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 302\/2. maddesi gere\u011fi, Tebli\u011fname\u2019ye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak, oy birli\u011fiyle BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n

      Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 304\/2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca Bursa B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 10. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

      09.01.2025 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/span><\/p>\n

        \n
      • Yarg\u0131tay 12. Ceza Dairesi 10.04.2019 tarihli, 2018\/8152 E. ve 2019\/4886 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131;<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/span>\u201c\u2026belirtmek gerekir ki, ki\u015fisel verilerin, \u00fczerinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu belgenin bulundu\u011fu yerden al\u0131nmas\u0131 veya kaydedilmi\u015f haliyle ba\u015fka bir nesne \u00fczerine ta\u015f\u0131narak (\u00f6rne\u011fin; yaz\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fka bir ka\u011f\u0131t, defter vb. nesne \u00fczerine ge\u00e7irilmesi, ta\u015f\u0131nabilir belle\u011fe veya CD’ye aktar\u0131lmas\u0131 gibi i\u015flemlerle) sabitlenmesi,\u00a0b\u00f6ylece istenildi\u011finde tekrar kullan\u0131labilmesi olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc faaliyet, ki\u015fisel verileri \u2018ele ge\u00e7irme\u2019 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilebilece\u011fi gibi, <\/strong>ki\u015fisel verilerin kaydedilmeden \u00f6nce \u00f6\u011frenilmesi, ki\u015fisel verilere salt duyu organlar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla vak\u0131f olunmas\u0131 da ayn\u0131 kapsamda de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/li>\n
      • Yarg\u0131tay 12. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 21.10.2020 tarihli, 2019\/578 E. ve 2020\/5427 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131; <\/strong><\/span>\u201c<\/span>San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kurumu taraf\u0131ndan kendisine verilen kullan\u0131c\u0131 \u015fifresi ile Kimlik Payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Sistemi\u2019ne giri\u015f yap\u0131p, keyfi ve usuls\u00fcz sorgulama yaparak,\u00a0\u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakan\u0131 olan kat\u0131lana ait ki\u015fisel veri niteli\u011findeki n\u00fcfus ve adres bilgilerine eri\u015fim sa\u011flay\u0131p, kat\u0131lan\u0131n ki\u015fisel verilerini okumas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7unun yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu<\/strong>\u00a0ve mahkumiyetine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, dosya kapsam\u0131na uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyen yetersiz gerek\u00e7elerle san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda beraat h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131,\u201d<\/em><\/li>\n
      • Yarg\u0131tay 12. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 21.10.2020 tarihli, 2019\/3586 E. ve 2020\/5426 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131;<\/span> <\/strong>\u201cEmniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc te\u015fkilat\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapan baz\u0131 polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n, (\u2026) \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n hem\u015ferisi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 merak edip, kurumu taraf\u0131ndan kendisine verilen kullan\u0131c\u0131 \u015fifresi ile Kimlik Payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Sistemi\u2019ne giri\u015f yaparak, keyfi ve usuls\u00fcz sorgulama yap\u0131p, \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakan\u0131 olan ma\u011fdura ait ki\u015fisel veri niteli\u011findeki n\u00fcfus ve adres bilgilerine eri\u015fim sa\u011flayarak, g\u00f6revinin verdi\u011fi yetkiyi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak suretiyle ma\u011fdurun ki\u015fisel verilerini okumas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7unun yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu\u00a0<\/strong>anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131na dair yerel mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        T.C.<\/strong><\/span>
        \nYARGITAY<\/strong><\/span>
        \nCEZA GENEL KURULU<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

        Esas : 2021\/384<\/strong><\/span>
        \nKarar : 2023\/367<\/strong><\/span>
        \nTarih : 21.06.2023<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

          \n
        • VER\u0130LER\u0130 HUKUKA AYKIRI OLARAK VERME VEYA ELE GE\u00c7\u0130RME<\/li>\n
        • GENEL KAST<\/li>\n
        • SANI\u011eIN MERAK VB. SA\u0130K \u0130LE HAREKET ETMES\u0130N\u0130N – SU\u00c7UN OLU\u015eUMU BAKIMINDAN \u00d6NEML\u0130 OLMADI\u011eI<\/li>\n
        • KANUNUN H\u00dcKM\u00dcN\u00dc YER\u0130NE GET\u0130RME – ME\u015eRU SAVUNMA – KATILANIN RIZASI – HAKKIN KULLANILMASI B\u0130\u00c7\u0130M\u0130NDE HERHANG\u0130 B\u0130R HUKUKA UYGUNLUK NEDEN\u0130N\u0130N BULUNMADI\u011eI<\/li>\n
        • \u00a0HATA H\u00dcKM\u00dcN\u00dcN UYGULANAMAYACA\u011eI<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          ( 5237 s. TCK 24 , 25 , 26 , 30 , 136 )
          \n\u00d6ZET:<\/strong>
          \nSan\u0131\u011f\u0131n; kat\u0131lan\u0131n hem\u015fehrisi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenmeksizin ve kat\u0131lan\u0131n anayasal g\u00fcvenceye ba\u011flanan ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmeksizin de uzun y\u0131llar \u00f6nce ili\u015fi\u011fi kesilen okulla ilgili taleplerini yetkili makamlara iletme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, kat\u0131lan ile ilgili olarak ‘T.C. Kimlik No ile Yerle\u015fim Yeri Bilgisi Sorgulama’ ve ‘T.C. Kimlik No ile Ki\u015fi Bilgileri Sorgulama’<\/strong><\/span> i\u015flemlerini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirip, kat\u0131lana ait ki\u015fisel veri niteli\u011findeki hem n\u00fcfus hem de adres bilgilerine eri\u015fim sa\u011flamas\u0131, bili\u015fim sistemlerini kullanmada ehil olmas\u0131, bilgi d\u00fczeyi, g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc e\u011fitim, i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu sosyal ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel \u00e7evre \u015fartlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, velev ki yakla\u015f\u0131k 24 y\u0131l \u00f6nce ili\u015fi\u011fi kesilen okulla ilgili taleplerini yetkili makamlara iletme amac\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olsa dahi kat\u0131lana ait ki\u015fisel verileri hizmet gere\u011fi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n eri\u015fmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilebilecek durumda bulunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, i\u015fledi\u011fi fiilin su\u00e7 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu konusunda haks\u0131zl\u0131k yan\u0131lg\u0131s\u0131 ile hareket etti\u011finden s\u00f6z edilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla g\u00f6revinin verdi\u011fi yetki k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak suretiyle<\/strong> yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 eylemin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu bilerek ve bu hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 durumu isteyerek kat\u0131lan\u0131n ki\u015fisel verilerini ele ge\u00e7iren san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda TCK’nun ‘Hata’ ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 30\/4 mad. uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131, … kald\u0131 ki genel kastla i\u015flenen verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7unda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n merak vb. saik ile hareket etmesi su\u00e7un olu\u015fumu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong> gibi olayda kanunun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirme, me\u015fru savunma, kat\u0131lan\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131 ve hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 bi\u00e7iminde herhangi bir hukuka uygunluk nedeni de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          G\u00d6REV\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMAK SU\u00c7U ( TCK Md 257 )\u00a0 A)G\u00d6REV\u0130 \u0130HMAL (m. 257\/2) : G\u00d6REV\u0130N\u0130N GEREKLER\u0130N\u0130, YAPMAKTA \u0130HMAL VEYA GEC\u0130KME G\u00d6STEREREK, K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER\u0130N MA\u011eDUR\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130 VEYA KAMU ZARARINA [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":131,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-596","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ceza-hukuku","category-makaleler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/596","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=596"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/596\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5682,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/596\/revisions\/5682"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=596"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=596"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}