{"id":444,"date":"2015-11-16T01:12:56","date_gmt":"2015-11-15T23:12:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/?p=444"},"modified":"2023-05-07T20:31:42","modified_gmt":"2023-05-07T17:31:42","slug":"kesinlesmeden-icraya-konulamayan-ilamlar-nelerdir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/kesinlesmeden-icraya-konulamayan-ilamlar-nelerdir\/","title":{"rendered":"Kesinle\u015fmeden \u0130craya Konulamayan \u0130lamlar Nelerdir?"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Mahkeme ilam\u0131n\u0131n icraya konulabilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fme, kural olarak \u015fart de\u011fildir. Ancak bu kural\u0131n baz\u0131 istisnalar\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen bu istisnai durumlarda, karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi ile kastedilen, Yarg\u0131tay denetiminden ge\u00e7mesi veya kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcreler i\u00e7erisinde karar\u0131n taraflarca temyiz edilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar d\u00fczeltme yolu, bir k\u0131s\u0131m kararlar i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131k olup, e\u011fer mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm i\u00e7in karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k ise, karar d\u00fczeltme yoluna ba\u015fvurma s\u00fcresi dolmad\u0131k\u00e7a veya bu yola ba\u015fvurulmu\u015f ise karar d\u00fczeltme talebi sonu\u00e7lanmad\u0131k\u00e7a, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fti\u011finden bahsetmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olamayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek yarg\u0131tay denetiminden ge\u00e7erek, gerekse temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulmayarak kesinle\u015fen karar\u0131n arkas\u0131na, hangi tarihte ve ne surette kesinle\u015fti\u011fi hususu, kalem m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan \u015ferh edilir ve bu \u015ferh, hakim taraf\u0131ndan imzalan\u0131r. Buna \u201ckesinle\u015fme \u015ferhi\u201d ad\u0131 verilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HMK 305 ve 306. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen tavzih yolu ise kesinle\u015fmeyi etkilemez. Yani temyiz ve (a\u00e7\u0131k ise) karar d\u00fczeltme yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fckenmesi nedeniyle kesinle\u015fen bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn tavzihi talep edilse dahi, tavzih talebinin sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 beklenmeksizin karar\u0131n icraya konulmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulamayan ilamlardaki yarg\u0131lama giderleri, tazminat, faiz gibi eklentiler de, h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulamaz . Takibe konulabilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi aranan bir karar\u0131n, takibe konuldu\u011fu tarihte kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. Takip tarihinde kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f ilam i\u00e7in, sonradan kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olsa dahi, \u015fikayet yolu ile takibin iptaline gidilebilir. elbette ki bu durum, karar kesinle\u015ftikten sonra ilam\u0131n yeniden icraya konulmas\u0131na engel te\u015fkil etmeyecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130lam\u0131n, kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulup konulamayaca\u011f\u0131 hususunu icra m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn denetlemesi gerekmektedir. \u0130craya konulabilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fme \u015fart\u0131 aranan bir ilam\u0131n, kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulmas\u0131 halinde, icra mahkemesine s\u00fcresiz \u015fikayet yolu ile ilaml\u0131 takibin iptali i\u00e7in m\u00fcracaat edilebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>\u0130craya konulabilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi \u015fart olan ilamlar\u0131;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>1-Gayrimenkul\u00fcn ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilamlar (Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131ndan kaynakl\u0131 (S\u00fckna, oturma, irtifak vs.) davalarda h\u00fckmedilen ecrimisil; kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulamaz)<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>2-Aile ve ki\u015filer hukukuna ili\u015fkin ilamlar,<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>3-Yabanc\u0131 mahkeme veya hakem kararlar\u0131n\u0131n tenfizine ili\u015fkin verilen ilamlar,<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>4-Menfi tespit veya istirdat (geri al\u0131m) davalar\u0131nda verilen ilamlar,<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>5-Say\u0131\u015ftay ilamlar\u0131,<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>6-\u0130stihkak davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin karardaki yarg\u0131lama gideri (Davan\u0131n reddi halinde ise kesinle\u015fme gerekmemektedir.)<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>7-Bayra\u011f\u0131na ve sicil kayd\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn gemilere ve bunlarla ilgili ayni haklara ili\u015fkin ilamlar \u015feklinde s\u0131ralayabiliriz.<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uygulamada, bir karar\u0131n, gayrimenkul\u00fcn ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitinde yorum hatalar\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na rastlanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">E\u011fer mahkeme sonucu verilecek h\u00fck\u00fcm, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi gibi bir sonu\u00e7 do\u011furacaksa, davan\u0131n, gayrimenkul\u00fcn ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funa \u015f\u00fcphe yoktur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tapu iptali ve tescil davalar\u0131, \u015fufa (\u00f6nal\u0131m) davalar\u0131 buna \u00f6rnek olarak g\u00f6sterilebilir. M\u00fcdahalenin meni davalar\u0131nda ise, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 iddias\u0131 olup olmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re durum de\u011fi\u015fmektedir. E\u011fer dava, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin meni davas\u0131 ise, karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi aranacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ancak, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n herhangi bir m\u00fclkiyet iddias\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fil ise, ortada m\u00fclkiyetin kime ait oldu\u011fu konusunda bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu t\u00fcr m\u00fcdahalenin meni davalar\u0131nda kesinle\u015fme aranmayacakt\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin kirac\u0131n\u0131n, kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak fazladan i\u015fgal etti\u011fi \u2013 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131mlar s\u00f6z konusu ise ve bu k\u0131s\u0131mlar i\u00e7in m\u00fcdahalenin meni talep edilmi\u015fse, ortada m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 ile ilgili herhangi bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu t\u00fcr kararlar\u0131n infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fme aranmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tapu k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde yer alan \u015ferhin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talepli bir davada, davaya konu \u015ferh, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 niteli\u011finde ise, dava yine gayrimenkul\u00fcn ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131ndan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz\u0131n\u0131n istenebilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi gerekecektir.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p id=\"viewer-eoo44\" class=\"mm8Nw _1j-51 roLFQS _1FoOD _78FBa sk96G9 roLFQS public-DraftStyleDefault-block-depth0 fixed-tab-size public-DraftStyleDefault-text-ltr\"><span class=\"_2PHJq public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr\">M\u00fclkiyetin tan\u0131m\u0131, T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu (TMK)\u2019nda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re<em>, <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"viewer-c8kr1\" class=\"mm8Nw _1j-51 roLFQS _1FoOD _78FBa sk96G9 roLFQS public-DraftStyleDefault-block-depth0 fixed-tab-size public-DraftStyleDefault-text-ltr\"><span class=\"_2PHJq public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr\"><em>\u201cBir \u015feye malik olan kimse, hukuk d\u00fczeninin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde, o \u015fey \u00fczerinde diledi\u011fi gibi kullanma, yararlanma ve tasarrufta bulunma yetkisine sahiptir.\u201d <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gayrimenkul\u00fcn ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilamlarda, ilam\u0131n eki niteli\u011finde yer alan h\u00fck\u00fcmler de kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulamaz. \u00d6rne\u011fin tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131nda, h\u00fckm\u00fcn tapu iptali k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi beklenip, eklenti niteli\u011finde olan yarg\u0131lama giderleri ve vekalet \u00fccretinin icraya konulmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Kira tespit davalar\u0131 ile verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, gayrimenkul\u00fcn ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin de\u011fil ise de, Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a g\u00f6re kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulamayacak ilamlardand\u0131r. Aile ve ki\u015filer hukukuna (MK m.8-494) ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler, kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulamaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buradan anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken, isim tashihi, soyisim tashihi, ya\u015f tashihi, velayetin nez\u2019i, babal\u0131k davas\u0131, nesep tashihi, bo\u015fanma ve bunun eki niteli\u011findeki h\u00fck\u00fcmler gibi ki\u015finin do\u011frudan \u015fahs\u0131 ya da ailevi yap\u0131s\u0131yla ilgili hukuki durumunda de\u011fi\u015fiklik yaratan ilamlar ile bu ilamlar\u0131n eki niteli\u011findeki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerdir. T\u00fczel ki\u015filer de ki\u015fi kavram\u0131 i\u00e7inde kabul edilmektedir. \u00c7ocuk teslimine ve \u00e7ocukla \u015fahsi m\u00fcnasebet tesisine ili\u015fkin ilamlar \u00a0da, kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulamazlar. Fikri ve s\u0131nai haklar (hukuk) mahkemesinin \u00fcr\u00fcn benzerli\u011fi yoluyla tescili tasar\u0131m\u0131na haks\u0131z m\u00fcdahalenin \u00f6nlenmesine y\u00f6nelik olarak olu\u015fan h\u00fck\u00fcm, \u00a0\u015fahs\u0131n hukukuna ili\u015fkin tescilli hakka tecav\u00fcz niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fundan, bu nitelikteki ilamlar da kesinle\u015fmeden infaz edilemezler. Bo\u015fanmayla birlikte verilen maddi ve manevi tazminat\u0131n tahsili i\u00e7in takibe konu olan ilam\u0131n bo\u015fanmaya ili\u015fkin b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesi gerekir. \u0130lam\u0131n bu b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc kesinle\u015fmeden eklentileri niteli\u011finde olan tazminat ve faizleri istenilemez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ancak nafakada durum biraz daha farkl\u0131d\u0131r. \u015e\u00f6yle ki; Tedbir nafakas\u0131nda, \u00a0nafaka verilmesine ili\u015fkin bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyiz edilmesi, ilam\u0131n icras\u0131n\u0131 durdurmaz. Hatta nafaka alaca\u011f\u0131nda, teminat kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 dahi ilam\u0131n icras\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 (Tehir-i icra) m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Ancak Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a g\u00f6re, yoksulluk ve i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131 i\u00e7in, maddi manevi tazminatta oldu\u011fu gibi, icra takibi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fme aranmaktad\u0131r. Yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 hususu tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilir ise de, i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk i\u00e7in \u00f6denen katk\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fundan ve karar temyiz a\u015famas\u0131ndayken, m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk \/ \u00e7ocuklar, velayet kendisinde b\u0131rak\u0131lan tarafta olaca\u011f\u0131ndan, velayet kendisine b\u0131rak\u0131lan taraf\u0131n, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcklerin ge\u00e7imi i\u00e7in ihtiya\u00e7 duyaca\u011f\u0131 bu i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131ndan, karar kesinle\u015finceye kadar mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelir ki bize g\u00f6re bu durum pek hakkaniyetle ba\u011fda\u015fmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere, yarg\u0131lama devam ederken mahkemece e\u015f i\u00e7in h\u00fckmedilen \u00a0nafaka, yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 de\u011fil, tedbir nafakas\u0131d\u0131r ve tedbiren h\u00fckmedilen bu nafakan\u0131n talep edilebilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fme aramak, tedbirin ruhuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacakt\u0131r. Ancak bo\u015fanmadan sonraki d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ve e\u015fe \u00f6denmesine karar verilen nafaka, art\u0131k tedbir de\u011fil, yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 olup, bu h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulamayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi, an\u0131lan nafakan\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dair verilecek mahkeme karar\u0131 da ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde kesinle\u015fmeden infaz edilemeyecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bo\u015fanma ilam\u0131nda, nafakan\u0131n kesilmesine karar verilir ise, bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fc kesinle\u015fmeden icra olunamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, nafakan\u0131n kesilmesi hakk\u0131ndaki k\u0131s\u0131m da ilam kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e icra olunamayacak yani, bo\u015fanma ilam\u0131 kesinle\u015finceye kadar nafaka \u00f6denmesi gerekecektir. Aile hukukunda yer almakta ise de, katk\u0131 pay\u0131na ili\u015fkin davalar, bo\u015fanma ilam\u0131n\u0131n eki niteli\u011finde olmay\u0131p ondan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olan edaya ili\u015fkin ilamlard\u0131r. Bu y\u00fczden katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilamlar\u0131n icraya konulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fme gerekmemektedir. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde, bo\u015fanma karar\u0131nda h\u00fckmedilen ziynet e\u015fyas\u0131 bedeli, bo\u015fanma karar\u0131n\u0131n eki niteli\u011finde olmay\u0131p, bo\u015fanma davas\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir dava oldu\u011fundan kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konulabilecek ilamlardand\u0131r.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>BO\u015eANMA DAVALARINDA KES\u0130NLE\u015eMEDEN \u0130CRAYA KONULACAK KARARLAR TEDB\u0130R NAFAKASINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130ND\u0130R. YOKSULLUK VE \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASININ KES\u0130NLE\u015eMES\u0130 GEREK\u0130R.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY 8. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>ESAS: 2013\/18343<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>KARAR: 2014\/7453<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden Daire\u00b4ye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Takibe dayanak &#8230;4. Aile Mahkemesi\u00b4nin 2012\/583 E. 2013\/171 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda Mahkemece, taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmas\u0131na, ortak \u00e7ocuk i\u00e7in dava tarihinden itibaren 150 TL. tedbir nafakas\u0131na (karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinden sonra i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131 olarak devam\u0131na), davac\u0131 lehine maddi ve manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmi\u015f olup takip dosyas\u0131ndan takip talebinde birikmi\u015f nafaka alaca\u011f\u0131, maddi ve manevi tazminat alacaklar\u0131 yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vekalet \u00fccretinin takibe konuldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bor\u00e7lu \u0130cra Mahkemesi\u00b4ne ba\u015fvurusunda, maddi ve manevi tazminat\u0131n bo\u015fanman\u0131n eklentisi olmas\u0131 nedeniyle bo\u015fanma ilam\u0131 kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek takibin iptalini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece HMK.nun 367\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince bo\u015fanma ilam\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi gerekti\u011fi bildirilerek takibin iptaline karar verilmi\u015f, karar alacakl\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u00b4un 30. Maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna eklenen &#8220;Ge\u00e7ici Madde 3&#8221; atf\u0131yla uygulanmas\u0131 gereken HUMK\u00b4nun 443\/4 (HMK.nun 367\/2.) maddesi gere\u011fince aile ve \u015fahs\u0131n hukuku ile ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmler kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e takibe konu edilemezler. Ayr\u0131ca, bo\u015fanma karar\u0131n\u0131n eklentisi olan tazminat, vekalet \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama giderine y\u00f6nelik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri de ayn\u0131 kurala tabidirler. Ancak, bo\u015fanma ilam\u0131 kesinle\u015fti\u011fi takdirde, tazminat, vekalet \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama gideri isteklerinin takibe konulabilmesi i\u00e7in nitelikleri g\u00f6zetilerek kesinle\u015fmeleri gerekli de\u011fildir (HGK. 28.2.2001 tarih 2001\/12-206 E. 2001\/217 K. ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An\u0131lan yasal d\u00fczenleme gere\u011fince; yoksulluk ve i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131n\u0131n talep edilebilmesi i\u00e7in bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesi zorunlu ise de tedbir nafakas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmez. Bu durumda, takipte talep edilen birikmi\u015f nafaka alaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bo\u015fanma ilam\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinin aranmayaca\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak Mahkemece bu k\u0131s\u0131m y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken takibin t\u00fcmden iptali isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7:<\/strong> Alacakl\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K.nun 366. ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK.nun Ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK.nun 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, taraflarca HUMK\u00b4nun 388\/4. (HMK m. 297\/\u00e7) ve \u0130\u0130K\u00b4nun 366\/3. maddeleri gere\u011fince Yarg\u0131tay Daire ilam\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren ilama kar\u015f\u0131 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finde bulunulabilece\u011fine 17.04.2014 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>12.HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>ESAS NO: 2005\/6009<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>KARAR NO: 2005\/9100<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130: 28.04.2005<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00d6ZET:<\/strong> Somut olayda bo\u015fanma ile ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcm b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc daha \u00f6nce onanm\u0131\u015f ve bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda, sonradan h\u00fckmedilen ihtilaf konusu tazminat b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin takibe konulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesine gerek yoktur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(1086 S. K. m. 443\/4)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Dava<\/strong>: Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki alacakl\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olmakla okundu ve gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karar:<\/strong> HUMK. nun 443\/4. maddesi gere\u011fince aile ve \u015fahs\u0131n hukuku ile ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmler kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e takibe konu edilemezler. Ayr\u0131ca, bo\u015fanma karar\u0131n\u0131n eklentisi olan tazminat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri de ayn\u0131 kurala tabidirler. Ancak, bo\u015fanma ilam\u0131 kesinle\u015fti\u011fi takdirde tazminat isteklerinin takibe konulabilmesi i\u00e7in nitelikleri g\u00f6zetilerek kesinle\u015fmeleri gerekli de\u011fildir. (HGK. 28.2.2001 tarih 2001\/12-206E. 2001\/217 K.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda bo\u015fanma ile ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcm b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc daha \u00f6nce onanm\u0131\u015f ve bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda, sonradan h\u00fckmedilen ihtilaf konusu tazminat b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin takibe konulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesine gerek yoktur. (HGK. 23.10.2002 tarih 2002\/11-633 E. 2002\/847 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde \u015fikayetin reddi yerine kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7:<\/strong> Alacakl\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K.366. ve HUMK.428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 28.04.2005 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<div class=\"short_content\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi karar\u0131.<\/div>\n<div id=\"news_content\" class=\"text_content\">\n<h6 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">8. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">ESAS NO. 2016\/7478<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR NO. 2016\/10845<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130. 20.06.2016<\/span><\/strong><\/h6>\n<p><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u0130LAMIN KES\u0130NLE\u015eMEDEN TAK\u0130BE KONULAB\u0130LECE\u011e\u0130 \u0130ST\u0130SNA\u0130 KURALLAR\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>1086\/m. 443\/1-4<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m. 367\/1<\/p>\n<p>5275\/m. 4<\/p>\n<p>2004\/m. 16, 72<\/p>\n<p>832\/m. 64<\/p>\n<p>2577\/m. 28\/1<\/p>\n<p>12.11.1979 tarih 1979\/1-3 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00d6ZET :<\/strong> \u015eikayet\u00e7i bor\u00e7lu vekili dilek\u00e7esinde di\u011fer \u015fikayet nedenlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra takip dayana\u011f\u0131 ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtip takibin iptalini istemi\u015ftir. Temyiz karar\u0131n icras\u0131n\u0131 durdurmaz, ancak, bu kural\u0131n istisnalar\u0131 yasalarda d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>&#8211; Ta\u015f\u0131nmaza ve buna ili\u015fkin ayni haklara, aile ve \u015fahs\u0131n hukukuna ili\u015fkin ilamlar,<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>&#8211; Mahkumiyete ili\u015fkin ceza ilamlar\u0131n\u0131n tazminat ve yarg\u0131lama giderlerine ili\u015fkin k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131,<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>&#8211; Kira tespit ilamlar\u0131,<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>&#8211; Menfi tespit davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilamlar,<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>&#8211; Yabanc\u0131 Mahkeme ilamlar\u0131n\u0131n tenfizi hakk\u0131ndaki kararlar,<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>&#8211; Say\u0131\u015ftay kararlar\u0131,<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>&#8211; \u0130dare aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan haciz veya ihtiyati haciz uygulamalar\u0131 ile ilgili davalarda verilen kararlar, infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmez. Dayanak ilam, eda h\u00fckm\u00fc i\u00e7eren alacak davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olup infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmez.<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>DAVA :\u00a0<\/strong>Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki temyiz eden daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden Daire&#8217;ye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>KARAR :<\/strong> \u015eikayet\u00e7i bor\u00e7lu vekili dilek\u00e7esinde\u00a0di\u011fer \u015fikayet nedenlerinin yan\u0131s\u0131ra takip dayana\u011f\u0131 ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtip takibin iptalini istemi\u015f, mahkemece \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fc ile takibin iptaline karar verilmi\u015f olup h\u00fck\u00fcm alacakl\u0131 vekilince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun Ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla uygulanmas\u0131 gereken HUMK&#8217;nun 443\/1 (HMK. 367\/1 m.) maddesi gere\u011fince, temyiz karar\u0131n icras\u0131n\u0131 durdurmaz. Yani kural olarak karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f olmas\u0131, karar\u0131n yerine getirilmesini \u00f6nlemez. Bu kural\u0131n istisnalar\u0131 da yine yasalarda d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>Ta\u015f\u0131nmaza ve buna ili\u015fkin ayni haklara, aile ve \u015fahs\u0131n hukukuna ili\u015fkin ilamlar (HUMK. 443\/4 m.),<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>Mahkumiyete ili\u015fkin ceza ilamlar\u0131n\u0131n tazminat ve yarg\u0131lama giderlerine ili\u015fkin k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131, (5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun&#8217;un 4. maddesi),<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>Kira tespit ilamlar\u0131 (12.11.1979 tarih 1979\/1-3 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131), Menfi tespit davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilamlar (\u0130\u0130K 72. madde), Yabanc\u0131 Mahkeme ilamlar\u0131n\u0131n tenfizi hakk\u0131ndaki kararlar (M\u00d6HUK. 41\/2),<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>Say\u0131\u015ftay kararlar\u0131 (832 say\u0131l\u0131 Say\u0131\u015ftay Kanunu 64. madde),<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em>\u0130dare aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan haciz veya ihtiyati haciz uygulamalar\u0131 ile ilgili davalarda verilen kararlar (2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130YUK 28\/1)<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130cra takibinin dayana\u011f\u0131 \u0130stanbul 1. T\u00fcketici Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 23.12.2014 tarih 2010\/721 Esas 2014\/2187 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a 2006\/2007, 2007\/2008, 2008\/2009 e\u011fitim ve \u00f6\u011fretim y\u0131llar\u0131na ait ders ve yurt \u00fccretleri toplam\u0131 olan 41.010,00 TL&#8217;nin daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesi talep edilmi\u015f olup mahkemece de davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne 30.478,00 TL&#8217;nin dava tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek avans faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu haliyle dayanak ilam, eda h\u00fckm\u00fc i\u00e7eren alacak davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olup infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmez. Mahkemece di\u011fer \u015fikayet nedenleri incelenerek sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7 :<\/strong>\u00a0Alacakl\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366 ve HUMK\u2019nun 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca\u00a0BOZULMASINA,\u00a0taraflarca \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366\/3. maddesi gere\u011fince Yarg\u0131tay Daire ilam\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren ilama kar\u015f\u0131 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finde bulunulabilece\u011fine ve 27,70 TL pe\u015fin harc\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edene iadesine, 20.06.2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Esas<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2018\/7307<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Karar<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2020\/7733<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Tarih<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 01.12.2020<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daire ilam\u0131nda, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan sunulan emsal kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin bilirki\u015filerce de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fine, Gelir Vergisi ve Emlak Vergisi Kanunlar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili maddelerine at\u0131f yap\u0131larak\u00a0ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u00a0arsa de\u011feri \u00fczerinden\u00a0ecrimisil\u00a0<wbr \/>hesaplanmas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, \u00f6te yandan, <strong>elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi davalar\u0131\u00a0ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u00a0ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin olup, bu t\u00fcr kararlar kesinle\u015fmeden infaz edilemeyece\u011finden,<\/strong> Akyaz\u0131 Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2009\/385 E, 2010\/153 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0kesinle\u015fme\u00a0tarihine kadar (23.12.2010) belirlenecek\u00a0ecrimisil\u00a0yerine, karar tarihine (30.03.2010) kadar ecrimisile h\u00fckmedilmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funa i\u015faret edilerek taraflarca sunulan\/sunulacak emsal kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin de\u011ferlendirilip, bu emsaller ile dava konusu\u00a0ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u00a0<wbr \/>kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 yap\u0131larak bilirki\u015filerce ilk d\u00f6nem (31.01.2007)\u00a0ecrimisil\u00a0<wbr \/>miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi, sonraki y\u0131llar i\u00e7in ise \u00dcFE art\u0131\u015f oran\u0131 uygulanmak suretiyle\u00a0ecrimisil\u00a0miktar\u0131 hesap edilerek, bu miktar \u00fczerinden (23.12.2010 tarihine kadar) ecrimisile karar verilmek \u00fczere h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<div dir=\"auto\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/center><\/div>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Esas<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2015\/16074<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Karar<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2017\/8058<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Tarih<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 31.05.2017<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, takip dayana\u011f\u0131 ilam, elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi ve\u00a0ecrimisil\u00a0istemine ili\u015fkindir. \u0130lama ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131lamada daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n <strong>kendi lehine m\u00fclkiyet iddias\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan\u00a0ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u00a0<wbr \/>ayn\u0131n\u0131n ihtilafl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/strong> bu nedenle ilam\u0131n icras\u0131 i\u00e7in\u00a0kesinle\u015fme\u00a0\u015fart\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekir.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Esas<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2013\/5595<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Karar<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2013\/10537<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Tarih<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 05.07.2013<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div dir=\"auto\">\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : \u015eikayet<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden Daire&#8217;ye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">K A R A R<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7lu vekili, m\u00fcvekkili aleyhine meni m\u00fcdahale ve\u00a0ecrimisil\u00a0ilam\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, takibe konu ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fini, kesinle\u015fmeden icra edilemeyece\u011fini, bu nedenle takibin iptaline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, talebin reddine karar verilmesi \u00fczerine, h\u00fck\u00fcm, alacakl\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Talep, \u0130\u0130K.nun 41. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla \u0130\u0130K.nun 16. maddesine dayal\u0131 \u015fikayete ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 HMK.nun Ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla uygulanmas\u0131 gereken HUMK.nun 443\/1 (HMK. 367\/1 m.) maddesi gere\u011fince, temyiz karar\u0131n icras\u0131n\u0131 durdurmaz. Yani kural olarak karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f olmas\u0131, karar\u0131n yerine getirilmesini \u00f6nlemez. Bu kural\u0131n istisnalar\u0131 da yine yasalarda d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">Ta\u015f\u0131nmaza ve buna ili\u015fkin ayni haklara, aile ve \u015fahs\u0131n hukukuna ili\u015fkin ilamlar<\/span> (HUMK.443\/4)<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Mahkumiyete ili\u015fkin ceza ilamlar\u0131n\u0131n tazminat ve yarg\u0131lama giderlerine ili\u015fkin k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131, (5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun&#8217;un 4.maddesi),<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kira tespit ilamlar\u0131 (12.11.1979 tarih 1979\/1-3 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131),<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Menfi tespit davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilamlar ( \u0130\u0130K 72. madde),<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Yabanc\u0131 Mahkeme ilamlar\u0131n\u0131n tenfizi hakk\u0131ndaki kararlar ( M\u00d6HUK. 41\/2 ),<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Say\u0131\u015ftay Kararlar\u0131 (832 say\u0131l\u0131 Say\u0131\u015ftay Kanunu 64. Madde), \u0130dare aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan haciz veya ihtiyati haciz uygulamalar\u0131 ile ilgili davalarda verilen kararlar (2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130YUK 28\/1,)<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>M\u00fclkiyetin tespitine ili\u015fkin olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle istihkak davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne dair ilamlar, kesinle\u015fmeden icra edilemez.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p>Somut olayda, icra takibinin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan Tuzla 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 2007\/1244 Esas, 2009\/1238 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 24.12.2009 tarihli ilam\u0131nda; daval\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fclkiyet iddias\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkemece dava konusu yerin davac\u0131ya ait oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek\u00a0<span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>ecrimisil\u00a0davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul edildi\u011fi,<\/strong> <\/span>davac\u0131n\u0131n meni m\u00fcdahale davas\u0131n\u0131n atiye b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu konuda karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda ilamda m\u00fclkiyet hususu tart\u0131\u015f\u0131larak sonuca gidilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>O halde, Mahkemece ilam\u0131n\u00a0ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u00a0ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu (m\u00fclkiyet tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 bulundu\u011fu) nazara al\u0131narak \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fc ile takibin iptaline karar verilmesi yerine, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle istemin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>SONU\u00c7:<\/strong> Bor\u00e7lu vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K.nun 366. ve HUMK.nun 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, taraflarca HUMK&#8217;nun 388\/4. (HMK m.297\/\u00e7) ve \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366\/3. maddeleri gere\u011fince Yarg\u0131tay Daire ilam\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren ilama kar\u015f\u0131 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finde bulunulabilece\u011fine, 05.06. 2013 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Esas<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2013\/2504<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Karar<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2013\/6416<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Tarih<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 02.05.2013<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div dir=\"auto\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : \u015eikayet<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki davac\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden Daire&#8217;ye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7lular aleyhinde &#8230; 12. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 2010\/124 Esas, 2011\/708 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak 22.643,25 TL alaca\u011f\u0131n tahsili ve dava konusu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn tahliye ve teslimi talebiyle ilaml\u0131 takip ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131 &#8211; bor\u00e7lular vekili, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n gayrimenkul\u00fcn ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu ve kesinle\u015fmeden icra takibine konu edilemeyece\u011finden bahisle takibin iptalini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, \u015fikayet\u00e7i bor\u00e7lular\u0131n fuzuli i\u015fgal oldu\u011fundan bahisle ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeye muhta\u00e7 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun Ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesine g\u00f6re, 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK&#8217;nun temyize ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin (HUMK&#8217;nun 427 ila 444. maddeleri) uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunur. Buna g\u00f6re, uygulanmas\u0131 gereken HUMK&#8217;nun 443\/4. maddesine g\u00f6re \u015fahs\u0131n hukukuna ve\u00a0<span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u00a0ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilamlar kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e takip konusu yap\u0131lamaz.<\/strong><\/span> Somut olayda, takibe dayanak ilamda taraflar\u0131n iddias\u0131 m\u00fclkiyetin kendilerine ait oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundu\u011fundan\u00a0ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u00a0<wbr \/>m\u00fclkiyeti tart\u0131\u015f\u0131larak\u00a0ecrimisil\u00a0talebi hakk\u0131nda sonuca var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda\u00a0<strong>ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u00a0ayn\u0131n\u0131n uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu oldu\u011funun ve ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekir.<\/strong> O halde, takibin iptali gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmesi isabetsiz bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7:<\/strong> Davac\u0131 &#8211; bor\u00e7lular vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366 ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun Ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla HUMK&#8217;nun 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, taraflarca HUMK&#8217;nun 388\/4. (HMK m.297\/\u00e7) ve \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366\/3. maddeleri gere\u011fince Yarg\u0131tay Daire ilam\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren ilama kar\u015f\u0131 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finde bulunulabilece\u011fine 02.05.2013 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: red;\">\u0130lamda yazan t\u00fcm alacak kalemleri de ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte muaccel hale gelecektir; bu nedenle vekalet \u00fccreti dahil olmak \u00fczere ilamda ki t\u00fcm alacak kalemlerine karar\u0131 kesinle\u015fmesinden itibaren faiz istenebilecektir.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>YARGITAY12.Hukuk Dairesi Esas: 2010\/33157 Karar:2011\/14002 Karar Tarihi: 07.07.2011 karar\u0131<\/b> \u201cSomut olayda takip konusu ilam\u0131n incelenmesinde bor\u00e7lunun alacakl\u0131 aleyhine tapu iptal ve tescil davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkemesince bor\u00e7lunun isteminin reddine alacakl\u0131 lehine yarg\u0131lama gideri ile vekalet \u00fccretine karar verildi\u011fi, ilam\u0131n hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.Bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131 ihtilafl\u0131 oldu\u011fundan takip konusu ilam\u0131n infaza konulabilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi zorunludur. \u0130lam bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olup, ilamda yer alan eklentiler de ayn\u0131 kurala tabidir<b><u>, ilamda yer alan t\u00fcm alacak kalemlerinin ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte muaccel hale gelece\u011fi<\/u><\/b> belirgin olmakla, ilam kesinle\u015fmeden eklentilerin ayr\u0131ca takibe konu edilmeleri de s\u00f6z konusu olamayacakt\u0131r. Bu kalemlerin kesinle\u015fmesi ve infaz\u0131 ancak bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla,ilam\u0131n esas hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fc kesinle\u015fmeden vekalet \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama giderlerine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ayr\u0131ca infaz ve icra takibine konu edilemez(HGK&#8217;nun 05.10.2005 T., 2005\/12-534 E., 2005\/554 K.).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>YARGITAY 12.Hukuk Dairesi Esas: 2009\/25151 Karar:2010\/7082 Karar Tarihi: 25.03.2010 karar\u0131<\/b> \u201cDi\u011fer taraftan 12\/11\/1979 tarih ve 1\/3say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca, kira paras\u0131n\u0131n tespitine dair ilamlar kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulamaz. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde, HGK&#8217;nun 30\/05\/2001 tarih,2001\/12-423 E., 2001\/456 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere; &lt;Kira tespit ilamlar\u0131 kesinle\u015fmeden infaz olunamaz. Karar\u0131n kendisi kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e takip yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi, ilamda yaz\u0131l\u0131 yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vekalet \u00fccreti vb.taleplerin de karar kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e infaz\u0131 istenemez.&gt; <b><u>Bu itibarla faizin de karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fme tarihinden itibaren istenebilece\u011fi tabiidir<\/u><\/b>. (\u0130BHGK&#8217;nun 24\/11\/1995 tarih, 1994\/2 E. 1995\/2K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: red;\">M\u00fclkiyet iddias\u0131 bulunmayan bor\u00e7luyla ilgili Ta\u015f\u0131nmaza M\u00fcdahalenin men\u2019i ile ilgili karar ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131yla ilgili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesinin beklenilmesi gerekmemektedir.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>YARGITAY 12.Hukuk Dairesi Esas: 2009\/21774 Karar:2010\/3308 Karar Tarihi: 16.02.2010 karar\u0131<\/b> \u201cSomut olayda, takip konusu Milas 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 28\/01\/2009 tarih ve 2005\/152 Esas, 2009\/20 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde; alacakl\u0131 vak\u0131f ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan davaya konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaza, <b><u>ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde m\u00fclkiyet iddias\u0131 bulunmayan bor\u00e7lunun yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcdahalenin menine karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu durumda, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131 ihtilafl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ilam\u0131n infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesine gerek bulunmamaktad\u0131r<\/u><\/b>. O halde, \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken ilam\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131 ile ilgili bulundu\u011fu ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kesinle\u015fmeden icra takibine konulamayaca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle istemin kabul\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 isabetsizdir.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: red;\">Ayn\u0131 dava da birden fazla istem varsa kesinle\u015fmesi zorunlu olmayan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z di\u011fer alacak kalemleri ile bu k\u0131s\u0131mlara ait yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin takibinde herhangi bir sak\u0131nca bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>YARGITAY 12.Hukuk Dairesi Esas: 2009\/3408 Karar:2009\/10930 Karar Tarihi: 25.05.2009 karar\u0131<\/b>\u201d <b><u>Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere ayn\u0131 davada birden \u00e7ok istem yer alabilir. Bu istemlerin baz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konulamayacak olmas\u0131, bundan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z di\u011fer alacak kalemlerinin takibine engel de\u011fildir<\/u><\/b>. Nitekim alacakl\u0131n\u0131n,yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin 190\/240&#8217;\u0131n\u0131 takibe koydu\u011fu, tapu iptal ve tescil ile ilgili &lt;b&gt; bendindeki karara isabet eden yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6zenle ay\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, ilam\u0131n alaca\u011fa ili\u015fkin b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konulmas\u0131 do\u011fru olup, mahkemece \u015fikayetin reddi yerine aksi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 isabetsizdir.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: red;\">\u0130lama ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7eren \u015fikayetler kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fundan 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 16\/2 maddesi gere\u011fi s\u00fcreye tabi de\u011fildir; kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulan ilamlar ve bu ilamlar\u0131n yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin icraya konulmas\u0131 da ilama ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olarak kabul edilerek \u015fikayet s\u00fcreye tabi de\u011fildir<\/span><span style=\"color: #000000;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>YARGITAY 8.Hukuk Dairesi Esas: 2012\/2661 Karar: 2012\/2958Karar Tarihi: 17.04.2012 karar\u0131<\/b>\u201d Somut olayda takibe dayanak yap\u0131lan \u0130stanbul 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin 24.10.2005 tarih 2004\/2010 E, 2005\/12231 K say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda &lt;dava konusu i\u015flemin 116.752.290.000 TL&#8217;lik k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n iptaline\u2026&gt; karar verilmi\u015f, ilamla davac\u0131 (alacakl\u0131n\u0131n) daval\u0131(bor\u00e7luya-idareye) iptal edilen para cezas\u0131 miktar\u0131nca bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015f, likit bir miktar\u0131n \u00f6denmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde eda h\u00fckm\u00fc olu\u015fturulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi halinde yarg\u0131lama giderleri ve vekalet \u00fccreti kalemlerin istenebilmesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda icra yolu ile infaz\u0131 da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u0130\u0130K\u2019nun16\/2. maddesinde, bir hakk\u0131n yerine getirilmesinden kaynaklanan \u015fikayetler s\u00fcre ile s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130stem ilama ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7ermekte ve ilama ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k \u015fikayeti kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fundan \u0130\u0130K\u2019nun 16\/2. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilip \u015fikayet konusu as\u0131l alacak ve i\u015flemi\u015f faiz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden takibin iptaline karar verilmesi yerine \u015fikayetin s\u00fcreden reddi isabetsizdir.<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">30130 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi gazetede yay\u0131mlanan 2017\/2 Esas, 2017\/3 Karar, 21.07.2017 tarihli Genel kurul karar\u0131na g\u00f6re kurul \u201c<i>ilaml\u0131 takiplerin ilams\u0131z takiplere konu edilmesinin\u00a0icra hukukuna ve yarg\u0131lama tekni\u011fine uygun d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi, bu yola ba\u015fvurmakla alacakl\u0131n\u0131n hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu yola ba\u015fvurarak bor\u00e7lunun y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 nihayetinde taraflar aras\u0131ndaki dengenin bozuldu\u011fu\u201d\u00a0<\/i>sonucuna vararak ilaml\u0131 alacaklar\u0131n ilams\u0131z takibe konu olamayaca\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>\u0130lam,<\/strong><\/span> herhangi yarg\u0131lama sonucunda mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131larak taraflara verilen, imzal\u0131 ve m\u00fch\u00fcrl\u00fc resmi belgedir. Her bir yaz\u0131l\u0131 eday\u0131 ifa h\u00fckm\u00fc i\u00e7eren mahkeme karar\u0131 ilamd\u0131r.H\u00fckm\u00fcn ilam niteli\u011fine haiz olabilmesi i\u00e7in ilam\u0131n karar\u0131 veren h\u00e2kim ve zab\u0131t k\u00e2tibi taraf\u0131ndan imzalanmas\u0131 ve mahkemenin m\u00fchr\u00fc ile m\u00fch\u00fcrlenmesi gerekmektedir.Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu 08.10.1997 Tarih ve 1997\/12-517 Esas, 1997\/776 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda\u00a0<i>\u201cilamlar\u0131n infaz edilecek k\u0131sm\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcd\u00fcr. Di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla, h\u00fckm\u00fcn i\u00e7eri\u011finin aynen infaz\u0131 zorunludur\u201d <\/i>H\u00fck\u00fcm b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde belirtilen tutarlar i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ilaml\u0131 icra takibi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Her bir alacak kaleminin bulundu\u011fu tek bir takip yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>\u0130lam niteli\u011findeki Kararlar;<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8211;<em>Sulh hukuk, asliye hukuk ve asliye ticaret mahkemeleri ile \u00f6zel mahkemelerden (kadastro, i\u015f mahkemeleri vb.) al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f (eda h\u00fckm\u00fc i\u00e7eren) nihai kararlar,<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Ceza mahkemelerinin ilamlar\u0131n\u0131n tazminata veya yarg\u0131lama giderlerine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131, (CMUK Md. 324)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Say\u0131\u015ftay ilamlar\u0131, (6085 say\u0131l\u0131 Say\u0131\u015ftay Kanunu m. 50\/II-e)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Tam yarg\u0131 davalar\u0131nda verilen idari yarg\u0131 mercilerinin ilamlar\u0131 (\u0130YUK Md. 28 vd.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Tenfizine karar verilen yabanc\u0131 mahkeme ilamlar\u0131, (M\u00d6HUK Md. 57)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n ilk ve son derece mahkemesi olarak bak\u0131p sonu\u00e7land\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 davalar, (Yarg\u0131tay Kanunu Md. 13 vd.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>-T\u00fcm davalarda h\u00fckmedilen vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama giderleri.<\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><i>\u201c\u2026idare mahkemesinde verilen ilamlar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden icra takibi ba\u015flat\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin yasal bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin takibe konu olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in\u2026\u201d<\/i><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi 2015\/8021 Esas, 2017\/9173 Karar, 17.02.2015 Tarihli karar\u0131<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #99cc00;\"><b>*\u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nun 38. maddesinde ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en ilam niteli\u011findeki belgeler \u015funlard\u0131r;<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Mahkeme huzurunda yap\u0131lan sulhlar (HMK Md. 313-315) ve kabuller, (HMK Md. 307 vd.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Kay\u0131ts\u0131z ve \u015farts\u0131z para borcunu ikrar eden re\u2019sen tanzim edilen noter senetleri,<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; \u0130stinaf ve temyiz kefaletnameleri, (HMK Md 350,367)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; \u0130cra kefaletnameleri.<\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0\u201c<i>takip dayana\u011f\u0131 ipotek, bor\u00e7lu M.D.\u2019e a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131lacak her t\u00fcrl\u00fc krediler, do\u011fmu\u015f ve do\u011facak her t\u00fcrl\u00fc bor\u00e7lar\u0131n teminat\u0131n\u0131 te\u015fkil etmek \u00fczere tesis edilmi\u015ftir. Alacakl\u0131 banka icra takibinden \u00f6nce, bor\u00e7luya\u2026 Noterli\u011finin 27.03.2007 tarihli ihtarname ve hesap \u00f6zetlerini g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir. Bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda alacakl\u0131 \u0130\u0130K\u2019 n\u0131n 150\/\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca ilaml\u0131 icra takibine ge\u00e7mi\u015f ve icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce \u00f6rnek(6)\u00a0<u>icra emri<\/u>\u00a0d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir<\/i>.\u00a0<i>Bu hususta \u0130cra emrine kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz hakk\u0131nda \u0130\u0130K\u2019 nun 149\/a maddesi gere\u011fince ilamlar\u0131n icras\u0131na ili\u015fkin 33. Madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 34. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca ilam niteli\u011findeki bu belge i\u00e7in her icra dairesinde bu takip yap\u0131labilece\u011fine&#8230;&#8221;<\/i><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesinin 2010\/17392 Esas, 2010\/30434 Karar,16.12.2010 tarihli karar\u0131<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #99cc00;\"><b>\u00d6zel Kanunlarda D\u00fczenlenen \u0130lam Niteli\u011finde Belgeler<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8211;<em>Avukatlar hakk\u0131nda verilen para cezas\u0131na ve giderlere ili\u015fkin, (116 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun Mad. 162 vd.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Avukatlar taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen uzla\u015ft\u0131rma tutanaklar\u0131, (4667 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 23. maddesi ile eklenen 35\/A Mad.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Esnaf ve Sanatk\u00e2rlar Meslek Kurulu\u015flar\u0131 Kanunu\u2019nun y\u0131ll\u0131k aidat ve kat\u0131l\u0131m pay\u0131 ile ilgili kararlar\u0131 (5362 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun Mad. 61)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Hukuk Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131nda Arabuluculuk Kanunu\u2019na g\u00f6re d\u00fczenlenen anla\u015fma belgesi (6125 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun Mad. 18\/II)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; M\u00fchendis ve mimar odalar\u0131n\u0131n verdi\u011fi aidat ve para cezalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin kararlar (6235 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun Mad. 30)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Tahkim Kanunu gere\u011fi, hakemler taraf\u0131ndan verilen kararlar (3533 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun Mad. 7)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Hakem ile yabanc\u0131 hakem kararlar\u0131 (HMK Md. 439)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; T\u00fcketici Hakem Heyeti Kararlar\u0131 (6502 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun Mad. 70\/1)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019na g\u00f6re d\u00fczenlenen uzla\u015fma belgesi (5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun Mad. 253\/19)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; T\u00fcrkiye Odalar ve Borsalar Birli\u011fi \u0130le Odalar ve Borsalar Kanunu\u2019nun kay\u0131t \u00fccretleri, y\u0131ll\u0131k aidat, munzam aidat, navlun h\u00e2s\u0131lat\u0131ndan al\u0131nacak oda paylar\u0131 ve Birlik aidat\u0131 ile borsa tescil \u00fccreti ve bunlara ait kesinle\u015fen gecikme zamlar\u0131 ile para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n tahsiline ili\u015fkin olarak oda, borsa ve Birlik Y\u00f6netim Kurulunca verilen kararlar, (5174 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun Mad. 77 Vd.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8211; Kooperatiflerin kredi ile ilgili alacak senetleri, k\u00e2\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131 ve her t\u00fcrl\u00fc taahh\u00fctname ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler orta\u011f\u0131n oturdu\u011fu veya kooperatifin bulundu\u011fu k\u00f6y veya mahalle ihtiyar heyetleri taraf\u0131ndan paras\u0131z olarak tasdik olunan senet ve belgeler, (1581 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunu Mad. 12 vd.)<\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim ilam niteli\u011findeki belgeler her ne kadar ilaml\u0131 icra takibine konu olsa da maddi anlamda kesin h\u00fck\u00fcm te\u015fkil etmemektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ilam niteli\u011finde belgeler aleyhine ilgili mahkemelerde menfi tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 da hukuken m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. \u201c<i>A\u00e7\u0131lan i\u015f bu dava, icra mahkemelerinin s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 inceleme yetkisi kapsam\u0131nda olmay\u0131p, genel mahkemede a\u00e7\u0131lan menfi tespit davas\u0131 oldu\u011fundan, dava tarihinde davac\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7makta hakl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131larak, gerekirse imza incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131larak olu\u015facak uygun sonu\u00e7 dairesinde vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin hangi tarafa y\u00fcklenece\u011finin belirlenmesi\u201d <\/i><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">Yarg\u0131tay 23. Hukuk Dairesi 2012\/3820 Esas, 2012\/5658 Karar, 03.10.2012 Tarihli karar\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">Kesinle\u015fmeden \u0130cra Takibine Konu Olamayacak \u0130lamlar;<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>&#8211; Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallara ili\u015fkin ayni haklardan kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar,<\/strong><\/em> (HMK m. 443 vd.)Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallar \u00fczerindeki \u0130stihkak davas\u0131 (TMK m.683), \u00f6nal\u0131m davas\u0131 (TMK 734), tescil davas\u0131 (TMK m.713), yolsuz tescilin silinmesi veya d\u00fczeltilmesi davas\u0131 (TMK m.1025) gibi ayni haklardan do\u011fan davalar ve bu davalar\u0131n neticesinde verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlere ili\u015fkin icra takibi h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmeden ba\u015flat\u0131lamamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>&#8211; Aile ve \u015fahs\u0131n hukukuna ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler,<\/strong><\/em> (HMK m. 443)Aile Hukuku\u2019ndan kaynaklanan bo\u015fanma (TMK Mad. 166 vd.), babal\u0131k davas\u0131 (TMK Mad. 303 vd.), \u00e7ocuk teslimi (\u0130\u0130K Mad.25 vd.) veya \u00e7ocukla \u015fahs\u00ee ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na (\u0130\u0130K Mad. 25\/a) uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda verilen kararlar\u0131n ilaml\u0131 icra takibine konu olabilmesi i\u00e7in mutlak kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmektedir.Bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fc kesinle\u015firse i\u015ftirak ve yoksulluk nafakalar\u0131n\u0131n icras\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi beklenmez. Hukuk Genel Kurulu <i>\u201c\u2026Bo\u015fanma ilam\u0131 daha \u00f6nce kesinle\u015fmi\u015f ise, i\u015ftirak-yoksulluk nafakas\u0131, tazminat, vekalet \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama gideri isteklerinin takibe konulabilmesi i\u00e7in nitelikleri g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde..\u201d\u00a0<\/i>kesinle\u015fmelerine gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. <span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu 2001\/12-206 Esas, 2001\/217 Karar, 28.2.2001 Tarihli Karar\u0131<\/span>.<i>\u201cTedbir nafakas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ara karar ilam olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 38. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 ilam mahiyetini haiz belgelerden de de\u011fildir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ilamlar\u0131n icras\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcmlere tabi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan..\u201d\u00a0<\/i>s\u00f6z konusu ara karar\u0131n ilaml\u0131 icra takibinin konusu olamayaca\u011f\u0131na. <span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi, 2018\/5079 Esas, 2019\/810 Karar, 23.1.2019 Tarihli Karar\u0131<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>&#8211; Yabanc\u0131 mahkeme ilamlar\u0131n\u0131n tenfiz karar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edilmesi, (M\u00d6HUK Mad. 57\/)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>&#8211; Say\u0131\u015ftay ilamlar\u0131, (Say\u0131\u015ftay Kanunu Mad. 53)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>&#8211; Ceza ilamlar\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lama giderleri ve vek\u00e2let \u00fccretine ili\u015fkin alacaklar,<\/strong><\/em> (CGT\u0130HK Mad.4)<i>5275 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 4. maddesi uyar\u0131nca mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e infaz olunamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n eklentisi olarak h\u00fckmolunan tazminat, yarg\u0131lama giderleri ve avukatl\u0131k \u00fccretinin de h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00a0<u>kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e<\/u> asla tabi olarak infaz\u0131n\u0131n istenemeyecektir.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>&#8211; Kira bedelinin tespiti davas\u0131 sonunca verilen ilamlar.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2014_14757__K__2015_16423.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2014_14757__K__2015_16423.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2014_14757__K__2015_16423.pdf\" download>Download [22.41 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong><strong class=\"klink\">Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>12. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2018\/6150 E., 2019\/5015 K.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<h5 class=\"title gs-title\" style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">KES\u0130NLE\u015eMEDEN \u0130CRAYA KONULAMAYAN KARARLARDA FA\u0130Z BA\u015eLANGI\u00c7 TAR\u0130H\u0130 KARARIN KES\u0130NLE\u015eME TAR\u0130H\u0130D\u0130R<\/span><\/h5>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">MAHKEMES\u0130 :<\/span>\u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fil ise de;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7lu, icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurusunda; sair \u015fikayet nedenleri ile birlikte, takip dayana\u011f\u0131 ilamda h\u00fckmedilen vekalet \u00fccretinin 12.602,80 TL olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen icra emrinde 12.682,80 TL istendi\u011fini, ayr\u0131ca ilam vekalet \u00fccreti ile yarg\u0131lama giderleri i\u00e7in takipten sonras\u0131 i\u00e7in yasal faiz talep edilebilece\u011fini, ancak icra emrinde bunlar i\u00e7in de ticari avans faizi istendi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek takibin iptaline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, mahkemece; ilam vekalet \u00fccretinin icra emrinde 80,00 TL fazla yaz\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n maddi hataya m\u00fcstenit oldu\u011fu belirtildikten sonra, takip konusu ilamda, faizin t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn yaz\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumda, takip tarihi itibariyle de\u011fi\u015fen oranlarda avans faizi istendi\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle, istemin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile takip tarihi itibariyle de\u011fi\u015fen oranlarda avans faizi istenebilece\u011fi kabul edilerek, takip tarihinde istenebilecek as\u0131l alaca\u011f\u0131n 205.312,74 TL, 28.11.2014 ile 29.01.2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda ana para faizinin 2.423,17 TL, yarg\u0131lama giderleri ve vekalet \u00fccreti faizinin 305,56 TL olarak tespitine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 08.10.1997 tarih ve 1997\/12-517 E. &#8211; 1997\/776 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; &#8220;\u0130lamlar\u0131n infaz edilecek k\u0131sm\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcd\u00fcr. Di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla h\u00fckm\u00fcn i\u00e7eri\u011finin aynen infaz\u0131 zorunludur. O nedenle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 yetkili icra mahkemesince ilam\u0131n infaz edilecek k\u0131sm\u0131 yorum yoluyla belirlenemez.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu durumda mahkemece, takip dayana\u011f\u0131 ilamda vekalet \u00fccretinin 12.602,80 TL oldu\u011fu, icra emrinde ise 12.682,80 TL talep edildi\u011fi nazara al\u0131narak 80,00 TL vekalet \u00fccreti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden icra emrinin iptaline karar verilmesi gerekirken, mahkemenin, fazla istenen k\u0131sm\u0131n maddi hataya m\u00fcstenit oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7esi yerinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan; ilamda, faiz ve faizin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 konusunda bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamas\u0131 halinde karar tarihinden itibaren yasal faiz istenebilir. Ancak, h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi gereken hallerde, faizin,\u00a0<strong class=\"klink\">karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fme tarihi<\/strong>nden itibaren hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekir (\u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 24.11.1995 tarih, 1994\/2 E. &#8211; 1995\/2 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ve HGK&#8217;.nun 05.04.2000 tarih, 2000\/12\u2013739 E. &#8211; 2000\/746 K. say\u0131l\u0131 il\u00e2mlar\u0131nda vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, icra emrinde, takip dayana\u011f\u0131 ilamda h\u00fckmedilen yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vekalet \u00fccretine ili\u015fkin olarak i\u015flemi\u015f faiz talebinde bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, as\u0131l alacak ve ilam vekalet \u00fccreti ile yarg\u0131lama giderleri toplam\u0131 \u00fczerinden takipten sonras\u0131 i\u00e7in, i\u015fleyecek faiz oran\u0131n\u0131n % 11,75&#8217;ten az olmamak \u00fczere avans faizi olarak istendi\u011fi, bor\u00e7lunun 15.12.2014 tarihli \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esinde, as\u0131l alacak ve buna i\u015fletilen faiz miktar\u0131 ve i\u015fletilecek olan faiz oran\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir itiraz\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015fikayetinin, ilamda h\u00fckmedilen yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vekalet \u00fccretine takipten sonras\u0131 i\u00e7in istenen faiz oran\u0131na y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu, ancak mahkemece bor\u00e7lunun talebi bulunmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, takipten sonras\u0131 i\u00e7in as\u0131l alaca\u011fa i\u015fleyecek faiz oran\u0131 belirlendi\u011fi gibi, yarg\u0131lama giderleri ile vekalet \u00fccretine i\u015fleyecek faiz miktar\u0131n\u0131n tespitine ili\u015fkin olarak bilirki\u015fi raporu al\u0131nmak suretiyle bu y\u00f6nde karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, mahkemece, takip dayana\u011f\u0131 ilamda vekalet \u00fccreti ile yarg\u0131lama giderleri i\u00e7in faiz oran\u0131 konusunda bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, takipten sonras\u0131 i\u00e7in yasal faiz talep edilebilece\u011fi nazara al\u0131narak, bor\u00e7lunun bu y\u00f6ndeki \u015fikayetinin kabul\u00fc ile icra emrinin, ilam vekalet \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama giderleri kalemlerine ili\u015fkin olarak i\u015fleyecek faiz oran\u0131 k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesine karar verilmesi gerekirken, yerinde olmayan gerek\u00e7e ile takipten sonras\u0131 i\u00e7in bu alacak kalemlerine de avans faizi istenebilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar verilmesi isabetsiz oldu\u011fu gibi, bor\u00e7lunun as\u0131l alacak ve faizi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir itiraz\u0131 bulunmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen HMK&#8217;nun 26. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacak \u015fekilde bu hususta da h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7 :<\/strong><\/span>Bor\u00e7lunun temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nin 366. ve HUMK\u2019nin 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca (BOZULMASINA), pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde iadesine, ilam\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 21\/03\/2019 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<div dir=\"auto\" align=\"center\">\n<h5><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Yarg\u0131tay<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">12. Hukuk Dairesi<\/span><\/h5>\n<\/div>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Esas No:2011\/23488<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Karar No:2012\/8426<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>K. Tarihi:19.3.2012<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>Somut olayda, <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re,<\/span> dayanak ilam kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konabilir. O halde mahkemece bor\u00e7lunun ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konamayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fikayetinin reddi ile di\u011fer \u015fikayet nedenleri incelenerek olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle takibin iptali y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 8. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 27\/06\/2011NUMARASI : 2011\/699-2011\/663<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olmakla okundu ve gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc :Ankara 7. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 18.05.2011 tarih, 2006\/415 Esas, 2011\/231 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile &#8220;Davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f bulundu\u011fu davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile dava konusu bulunan Ankara, Ke\u00e7i\u00f6ren, \u015eenlik mah. 4179 ada 15 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki K.\u015e.m. K. caddesi no:&#8230;&#8230;umaral\u0131 kat irtifak\u0131 olmayan ta\u015f\u0131nmaza vaki daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcdalesinin men&#8217;ine&#8221; ve <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>ecrimisile<\/strong><\/span> h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir. Takip konusu ilam, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 i\u015fgal eden ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan men&#8217;i m\u00fcdahale ve ecrimisil davas\u0131 olup, taraflar aras\u0131nda m\u00fclkiyet uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. HUMK&#8217;nun 443\/4. maddesi gere\u011fince <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>gayrimenkule ve buna dair ayni haklara ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e icra olunamaz<\/strong><\/span>.Somut olayda, <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re,<\/span><\/strong> dayanak ilam kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konabilir. O halde mahkemece bor\u00e7lunun ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konamayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fikayetinin reddi ile di\u011fer \u015fikayet nedenleri incelenerek olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle takibin iptali y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7 :<\/strong> <\/span>Alacakl\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K 366 ve HUMK\u2019nun 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca (BOZULMASINA), 19\/03\/2012 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u201c\u0130lam\u0131n, tapu sicilinde de\u011fi\u015fiklik yaratacak mahiyette ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin olup, kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konu edilemeyece\u011fi\u201d<\/span><\/strong>12. HD. 21.02.2019 T. 5566\/2741<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0\u201c\u0130lam\u0131n, tapu sicilinde de\u011fi\u015fiklik yaratacak mahiyette ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin olup, kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konu edilemeyece\u011fi, alacakl\u0131 vekili, ilam\u0131n takip tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015f oldu\u011funu iddia etmedi\u011fi gibi, esasen ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konulabilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde beyanda bulundu\u011fundan, kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f ilama dayal\u0131 olarak ba\u015flat\u0131lan takibin iptaline karar verilmesi gerekece\u011fi\u201d12. HD. 15.01.2019 T. 4915\/170; 18.10.2018 T. 4085\/10203<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cTa\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131 ihtilafl\u0131 oldu\u011fundan, takip konusu ilam\u0131n infaza konulabilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi \u015fart\u0131na uyuldu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ancak, takip konusu yap\u0131lan vekalet \u00fccretinin, karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fme tarihinde muaccel hale gelece\u011fi nazara al\u0131narak kesinle\u015fme tarihinden itibaren faiz hesaplamas\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi\u201d12. HD. 05.06.2018 T. 1995\/5834<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u2018\u015eahsi haklar\u2019<\/em>\u00a0ve ona ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak h\u00fckmedilen \u2018<em>feri nitelikteki y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler<\/em>\u2019in icras\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesine gerek yoktur. Burada \u00f6zellikle bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u201cne zaman ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu\u201d sorusu \u00f6nem arz etmektedir. Yarg\u0131tay, temelinde uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bir ayni haktan kaynaklansa bile, dava sonunda verilen karar ayni hak \u00fczerinde do\u011frudan bir etki do\u011furmayacaksa, bu t\u00fcr kararlar\u0131n icras\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kesinle\u015fme \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 aramamaktad\u0131r. \u00a012. HD. 08.02.2010 T. 21257\/2295 Benzer \u015fekilde; ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131m bedelinin \u00f6denmesi, kira bedelinin \u00f6denmesi, kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle tahliye talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar, ecrimisil davalar\u0131 veya kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atma iddias\u0131na dayal\u0131 tazminat istemine ili\u015fkin davalarda h\u00fckmedilen tazminatlar ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin olmay\u0131p \u015fahsi dava olduklar\u0131ndan, bu davalar sonunda verilen ilamlar kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulabilir. <em>\u00d6ZBEK, M. S.\u00a0Kesinle\u015fmeden \u0130cra Edilemeyecek \u0130l\u00e2mlar\u0131n Kesinle\u015fmeden \u0130craya Konulmas\u0131, Ba\u015fkent \u00dcniversitesi Hukuk Fak\u00fcltesi Dergisi, C:2, S:1, 2016, s: 45<\/em><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fc kesinle\u015fmi\u015f ise, eklentilerin (yoksulluk nafakas\u0131, i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131, maddi ve manevi tazminat vs.) infaz edilmesi i\u00e7in karar\u0131n, eklentiler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de kesinle\u015fmesinin gerekmeyece\u011fi\u201d12. HD. 14.01.2019 T. 4967\/43<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cAile ve \u015fahs\u0131n hukuku ile ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e takibe konu edilemeyece\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca, bo\u015fanma karar\u0131n\u0131n \u201ceklentisi\u201d olan yoksulluk, i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131, maddi-manevi tazminat, yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vekalet \u00fccreti de ayn\u0131 kurala tabi olup, icra takibine konu edilebilmesi i\u00e7in bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesi gerekece\u011fi\u201d12. HD. 25.10.2018 T. 4469\/10618<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cBo\u015fanma karar\u0131 kesinle\u015fti\u011fi takdirde ilam\u0131n asl\u0131 ve fer\u2019ilerinin icra edilebilece\u011fi kabul edilerek, \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, itiraz\u0131n iptali y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulamayaca\u011f\u0131\u201d8. HD. 20.12.2012 T. 11973\/12675<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c\u0130cra takibinin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan icra mahkemesinin ilam\u0131, ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131dan kaynaklanan manevi tazminat alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin olup, taraflar\u0131n \u015fahs\u0131 ya da ailevi yap\u0131lar\u0131na ili\u015fkin hukuki durumlar\u0131nda ve bunlara ili\u015fkin sicil ve kay\u0131tlarda bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik yaratmamakta, sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 itibariyle ancak taraflar\u0131n malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 etkiledi\u011fi, bu itibarla ilam\u0131n, yasalarda say\u0131lanlar aras\u0131nda yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, takibe konulabilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmeyece\u011fi\u201d\u00a012. HD. 23.01.2019 T. 5104\/894; 27.09.2018 T. 3740\/8843<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cEser niteli\u011findeki g\u00f6rsellerin izinsiz kullan\u0131m\u0131ndan kaynaklanan telif hakk\u0131 tazminat\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilam\u0131n takibe konulabilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesinin gerekmedi\u011fini\u201d\u00a012. HD. 02.07.2018 T. 3154\/7106<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c\u00d6l\u00fcm ve cismani zarar sebebi ile manevi tazminata ili\u015fkin ilam\u0131n icraya konulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmedi\u011fini\u201d8. HD. 01.03.2016 T. 22557\/3688<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cFikri ve S\u0131nai Haklar Mahkemesi\u2019nce ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 ve haks\u0131z rekabetin \u00f6nlenmesine y\u00f6nelik olarak olu\u015fturulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmeden infaz edilemeyece\u011fi ve eklentisi olan yarg\u0131lama giderleri ile vekalet \u00fccretinin de kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u201d8. HD. 14.01.2014 T. 16\/179<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c\u0130\u015f kazas\u0131 nedeni ile manevi tazminata ili\u015fkin davada verilen karar\u0131n icras\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmenin gerekmedi\u011fini\u201d8. HD. 05.11.2013 T. 8914\/15846<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c\u015eikayet tarihi itibariyle takibe konu ilam hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmedi\u011finden menfi tespit davas\u0131 istirdata d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015f olsa da bu ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden infaz\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayaca\u011f\u0131ndan mahkemece \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekece\u011fi\u201d12. HD. 12.02.2019 T. 5448\/1883<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cMenfi tespit ve yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda istirdata d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fen ilam\u0131n\u00a0kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konu edilemeyece\u011fi\u201d\u00a012. 17.01.2019 T. 4999\/534<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cM\u00fclkiyetin tespitine ili\u015fkin olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r mal haczinden do\u011fan istihkak davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne dair ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden infaz edilemeyece\u011fi\u201d\u00a012. HD. 04.10.2018 T. 3692\/9262<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cTa\u015f\u0131n\u0131r mal haczinden kaynaklanan istihkak davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin icra mahkemesi ilam\u0131n\u0131n (vekalet \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama giderleri) kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konu edilemeyece\u011fi\u201d8. HD 11.06.2015 T. 3240\/13003<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cTakibe dayanak yap\u0131lan \u201ckira bedelinin tespiti\u201d ilam\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0kesinle\u015fmesi halinde yarg\u0131lama giderleri ve vekalet \u00fccreti kalemlerinin istenebilece\u011fini\u201d8. HD 17.05.2017 T. 4973\/7242<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cKira bedelinin tesbitine ili\u015fkin ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinden sonra, bu ilama dayanarak ilamdaki yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vekalet \u00fccreti i\u00e7in icra takibi yap\u0131labilece\u011fini\u201d\u00a012. HD 29.09.2011 T. 1277\/17040<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cCeza Mahkemelerinin, tazminata ve yarg\u0131lama giderlerine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin ilaml\u0131 icra takibine konu edilebilece\u011fi, 5275 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 4. maddesi uyar\u0131nca mahkumiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e infaz olunamayaca\u011f\u0131, mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n eklentisi olarak h\u00fckmolunan tazminat, yarg\u0131lama giderleri ve avukatl\u0131k \u00fccretinin de h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e asla tabi olarak infaz\u0131n\u0131n istenemeyece\u011fini\u201d\u00a08. HD. 17.01.2013 T. 13098\/381<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cTakibe konu edilen \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin ilam\u0131 Ceza Mahkemesinden verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fundan yaz\u0131lan karar\u0131n mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc i\u00e7erdi\u011finin kabul edilemeyece\u011fi, dayanak ilam\u0131n tazminat ilam\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve kesinle\u015fmeden takip konusu yap\u0131labilece\u011fini\u201d 8. HD. 03.10.2013 T. 7585\/14130<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kesinle\u015ftikten sonra takip konusu yap\u0131labilecek olan ilamlar\u0131n, takip tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. Aksi takdirde, takip konusu ilam takip s\u0131ras\u0131nda kesinle\u015fmi\u015f dahi olsa, yap\u0131lan takibin iptali gerekir. Takip konusu ilam\u0131n, icra dairesince <em>\u201ckesinle\u015fti\u011fi \u015fekliyle\u201d<\/em>\u00a0yerine getirilmesi (uygulanmas\u0131) gerekir. \u0130cra m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc, \u201cilam\u0131n ne \u015fekilde infaz edilmesi gerekti\u011fi\u201d konusunda icra mahkemesinden ayd\u0131nlat\u0131c\u0131 bilgi isteyemez. Kendi anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131na g\u00f6re ilam\u0131 uygulamas\u0131 gerekir. \u0130lam\u0131n, ilam i\u00e7eri\u011fine ayk\u0131r\u0131 bi\u00e7imde uygulanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde ilgililer\u00a0\u015fikayet\u00a0yoluna ba\u015fvurabilirler. Keza, icra mahkemesi takip dayana\u011f\u0131 ilam\u0131n \u201ch\u00fck\u00fcm b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc\u201dn\u00fc aynen infazla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olup,\u00a0<em>yorum yoluyla<\/em>\u00a0h\u00fckm\u00fc de\u011fi\u015ftirir nitelikte karar veremez. \u0130lam\u0131n takip konusu yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, \u201ctakip tarihinde\u201d kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekiyorsa, bu hususun yani ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fine dair yaz\u0131n\u0131n ilam\u0131n alt\u0131na veya arkas\u0131na yaz\u0131l\u0131p alt\u0131n\u0131n hakim ve yaz\u0131 i\u015fleri m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan imzalanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir.<em>UYAR, T.\/UYAR, A.\/UYAR, C. age.,s:712- TANRIVER, S. \u0130laml\u0131 \u0130cra Takibinin Dayanaklar\u0131 ve\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u0130cran\u0131n \u0130adesi, 1996, s:162. <\/em>Doktrindeki hakim g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn aksine Yarg\u0131tay; <em>\u201cinfaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi zorunlu olan ilamlar\u0131n takibe konu edildi\u011finde, icra m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn bir icra emri d\u00fczenleyerek bor\u00e7luya tebli\u011f etmesi gerekti\u011fi, <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>icra m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn, ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fip kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fini kendili\u011finden denetleme yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, icra emri tebli\u011f edilen bor\u00e7lunun \u015fikayet talebi \u00fczerine bu konunun icra mahkemesince inceleme konusu yap\u0131labilece\u011fi<\/strong><\/span>\u201d\u00a0<\/em>y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ortaya koyarak, icra m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn \u2018takibe konmak istenen il\u00e2m\u0131n kesinle\u015fip kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi\u2019 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir denetleme yapmas\u0131n\u0131n yetkisi dahilinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.8. HD. 12.02.2015 T. 24928\/3919. Bor\u00e7lu, takip dayana\u011f\u0131 belgenin il\u00e2m niteli\u011finde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya da il\u00e2m niteli\u011finde olmakla birlikte takibe \u201cil\u00e2ml\u0131 icra takibi yolu ile takip edilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi gereken t\u00fcrden bir karar oldu\u011funu\u201d ileri s\u00fcrerek \u2018\u015fikayet yolu\u2019na gidebilir.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5684 say\u0131\u015f\u0131 Sigortac\u0131l\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nun sigortac\u0131l\u0131kta tahkimi d\u00fczenleyen 30. maddesi sigorta hakeminin kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu\u2019na itiraz yolunu \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f ve \u201citiraz \u00fczerine hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n icras\u0131n\u0131n duraca\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u201d belirtmi\u015ftir. Bu d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re, karar\u0131n icras\u0131 i\u00e7in do\u011frudan kesinle\u015fme \u015fart\u0131 aranmamakla birlikte, bu y\u00f6ndeki karar takibe konu edildikten sonra, bu karara itiraz edilmesi durumunda itiraz\u0131n takibi durduraca\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edilmektedir. Ba\u015fka bir ifade ile karar\u0131n takibe konulmas\u0131 halinde burada bir <em>kesinle\u015fme \u015ferhi<\/em>\u00a0aranmamaktad\u0131r. <em>M\u0130HB\u0130R (Medeni Usul ve \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131 Birli\u011fi) XIV. Toplant\u0131, 15-16 Nisan 2016\/Abant, \u201c\u0130l\u00e2ml\u0131 \u0130cra\u201d, s: 26.<\/em>Ayr\u0131ca sigorta tahkimi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re verilen de\u011feri kanunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 miktar\u0131 a\u015fan kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 \u2018temyiz yolu\u2019 a\u00e7\u0131k olup, bu kararlar\u0131n temyiz edilmesi icray\u0131 durdurmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 70. maddesinin ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kralar\u0131; \u201ct\u00fcketici hakem heyetinin kararlar\u0131n\u0131n, \u0130cra ve \u0130fl\u00e2s Kanununun ilamlar\u0131n yerine getirilmesi hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re yerine getirilece\u011fi\u201d ve \u201ct\u00fcketici mahkemesine yap\u0131lacak itiraz\u0131n,\u00a0<em>t\u00fcketici hakem heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n icras\u0131n\u0131 durdurmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131<\/em>\u201d belirtmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re t\u00fcketici hakem heyetinin kararlar\u0131 kesinle\u015fmeden il\u00e2ml\u0131 icra takibine konu edilebilecektir.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0 a) Mahkumiyete dair ceza ilamlar\u0131n\u0131n tazminat ve yarg\u0131lama giderlerine dair k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131,\u00a0<\/strong>(5275 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun\u2019un 4. maddesi) ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesiyle icraya konabilir.\u00a0<em>\u201cMahkumiyete ili\u015fkin ceza h\u00fckm\u00fc\u201d<\/em>nde yer alan avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti, yarg\u0131lama gideri, tazminat gibi il\u00e2m\u0131n eklentisi niteli\u011findeki alacaklar, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00a0<em>\u201cyaz\u0131l\u0131 emir\u201d\u00a0<\/em>ile kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde takibe konu edilemez. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n\u00a0<em>\u201cberaate ili\u015fkin ceza ilamlar\u0131\u201d<\/em>ndaki yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin kesinle\u015fmesinin beklenmemesi gerekti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>b)\u00a0<\/strong><strong>\u201cTicaret sicili memurunun teklifi \u00fczerine, sicilin ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu mahkemece, tescil konusunda verilen kararlar\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>(TK. mad. 35\/IV) ile\u00a0<strong>\u201cilgililerin ticaret siciline yap\u0131lacak tescil veya tadil yahut terkin talepleri \u00fczerine, sicil memurlu\u011funca verilen karara y\u00f6nelik -sekiz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde- yapacaklar\u0131 itiraz \u00fczerine mahkemece verilecek kararlar\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>(TK. mad. 36\/III) da icras\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fme \u015fart\u0131 aranan kararlard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 c)\u00a0<\/strong>\u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019muzun 31\/a-I h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca,\u00a0<strong>\u201cb\u00fct\u00fcn gemilere ve bunlarla ilgili ayn\u00ee haklara ili\u015fkin<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>kararlar<\/strong>\u201d\u0131n il\u00e2ml\u0131 takibe konu edilebilmesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<strong>d)\u00a0<\/strong>\u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu m. 7\/4 h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re,\u00a0<strong>\u201chizmet akdine tabi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n zorunlu sigortal\u0131l\u0131k s\u00fcrelerinin tespitine ili\u015fkin kararlar\u201d<\/strong>\u0131n SGK taraf\u0131ndan uygulanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u015fart olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, i\u015fverene kar\u015f\u0131 icra edilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fme \u015fart\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<strong>e)\u00a0<\/strong>Say\u0131\u015ftay Kanunu\u2019nun m. 53\/I h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince,\u00a0<strong>Say\u0131\u015ftay il\u00e2mlar\u0131n\u0131n icras\u0131\u00a0<\/strong>i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fme ko\u015fulu aranmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<strong>f) \u201cKooperatif ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131karmaya ili\u015fkin kararlar\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>\u015fahs\u0131n hukukuna ili\u015fkin kabul edildi\u011finden icras\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi \u015fartt\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay, bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta ise;<em>\u00a0\u201c<strong>kooperatif \u00fcyeli\u011finin tespitine ili\u015fkin il\u00e2m<\/strong>da \u015fahs\u0131n hukuku kapsam\u0131nda sicil kayd\u0131 olu\u015fturacak nitelikte hakk\u0131n tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve il\u00e2m\u0131n bu hali ile kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konulamayaca\u011f\u0131\u201d<\/em>\u00a0y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar vermi\u015ftir.8. HD. 16.02.2016 T. 23088\/2507<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 g)\u00a0<\/strong>\u00d6zel m\u00fclkiyet konusu kaynak niteli\u011findeki\u00a0<strong>suya yap\u0131lan elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi davas\u0131\u00a0<\/strong>sonunda verilen kararlar\u0131n icraya konulabilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fme \u015fart\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. <em>UYAR, T.\/UYAR, A.\/UYAR, C.\u00a0age., s: 710<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 h) Deniz M\u00fcsadere Mahkemesi Kararlar\u0131\u00a0<\/strong>(3894 s. K. mad. 131\/I) da kesinle\u015fmeden icra edilememektedir.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00d6HUK. (61\/II, 57) h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden \u2018tenfiz edilmi\u015f hakem kararlar\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, \u201cT\u00fcrk mahkemelerinden verilmi\u015f il\u00e2mlar gibi icra olunaca\u011f\u0131\u201d ve \u201ctenfiz talebinin kabul\u00fc veya reddine ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131n temyizinin genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere tabi olaca\u011f\u0131\u201d a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re temyiz, karar\u0131n yerine getirilmesini durduraca\u011f\u0131ndan icra takibi oldu\u011fu yerde durur. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kesinle\u015fme bu kararlar\u0131n icras\u0131 i\u00e7in \u015fartt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0Milletleraras\u0131 Tahkim Kanunu 15\/B-II h\u00fckm\u00fcnde hakem karar\u0131n\u0131n icra edilebilir oldu\u011funa dair \u015ferh verilmesi, ya iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7mesine ya da taraflar\u0131n bu hakk\u0131 kullanmaktan feragat etmesi \u015fart\u0131na ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu hakem kararlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u2018kesinle\u015fmeden takibe konu edilemeyece\u011fi\u2019 sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kira bedelinin tespitine ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden takip konusu yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 12.11.1979 tarih 1\/3 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 ile kabul edilmi\u015f oldu\u011fundan hukukumuz bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, bu kararlar\u0131n da icraya konabilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmalar\u0131 gerekmektedir<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2018Menfi tespit davas\u0131\u2019 sonunda, alacakl\u0131 veya bor\u00e7lu lehine h\u00fckmedilen icra tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denebilmesi i\u00e7in -\u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nun 72\/IV-V h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca- il\u00e2m\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u015fartt\u0131r. Bunun yan\u0131nda, bu davalar sonunda \u2018yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vekalet \u00fccretine ili\u015fkin\u2019 olarak verilecek kararlar\u0131n icras\u0131 da menfi tespit h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Menfi tespit davas\u0131n\u0131n esas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan icran\u0131n k\u0131smen veya tamamen eski hale iadesi Kanunda il\u00e2m\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u015fart\u0131na ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan (\u0130\u0130K. m. 72\/V), menfi tespit davas\u0131n\u0131 kazanan ve lehine tazminata h\u00fckmedilen bor\u00e7lu, menfi tespit il\u00e2m\u0131 kesinle\u015fmeden, il\u00e2mda h\u00fckmedilen tazminat ve yarg\u0131lama giderleri (menfi tespit il\u00e2m\u0131n\u0131n eklentileri) i\u00e7in il\u00e2ml\u0131 icra takibi yapmaz. <em>KURU, B.\u00a0age., s:387-MU\u015eUL, T.\u00a0\u0130cra ve \u0130fl\u00e2s Hukukunda Menfi Tespit ve \u0130stirdat Davalar\u0131, 2014,\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 s: 27-31-YAVUZ, N.\u00a0Uygulama ve \u00d6\u011fretide Menfi Tespit ve \u0130stirdat (Geri Alma) Davas\u0131, 2007, s:217<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HMK. m. 350\/II ve 367\/II h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re ki\u015filer hukukundan kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda verilen kararlar da kesinle\u015fmeden icra edilemezler. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede kanun koyucu ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer ile t\u00fczel ki\u015filer aras\u0131nda bir ayr\u0131m yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <em>M\u0130HB\u0130R (Medeni Usul ve \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131 Birli\u011fi) XIV. Toplant\u0131, 15-16 Nisan 2016\/Abant, \u201c\u0130l\u00e2ml\u0131 \u0130cra\u201d, s: 22<\/em> Buna g\u00f6re uygulamada haks\u0131z marka tescilinden, haks\u0131z rekabetin mennine ili\u015fkin kararlara var\u0131ncaya kadar, bir\u00e7ok uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ki\u015filer hukuku ile ili\u015fki kurularak kesinle\u015fme \u015fart\u0131 aranmaktad\u0131r. Ancak Yarg\u0131tay, takip dayana\u011f\u0131 il\u00e2m\u0131n \u015fahs\u0131n hukuku ile ilgili olmakla birlikte; \u201ctaraflar\u0131n hukuki durumlar\u0131nda, kay\u0131t ve sicillerde de\u011fi\u015fiklik yaratmay\u0131p sadece malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili olmas\u0131\u201d\u00a0durumunda kesinle\u015fme \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 aramamaktad\u0131r<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2018Aile hukuku\u2019ndan kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda verilen kararlar\u0131n ilaml\u0131 icra yoluyla takip edilebilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi \u015fart olmakla birlikte, as\u0131l uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa ba\u011fl\u0131 fer\u2019i y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin il\u00e2ml\u0131 icra takibi yolundan faydalanabilmesi, bu y\u00f6ndeki kararlar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede\u00a0<em>\u2018bo\u015fanma\u2019<\/em>,\u00a0<em>\u2018babal\u0131k davas\u0131\u2019<\/em>,\u00a0<em>\u2018\u00e7ocuk teslimi\u2019<\/em>\u00a0veya\u00a0<em>\u2018\u00e7ocukla \u015fahsi ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131\u2019<\/em>na ili\u015fkin il\u00e2mlar\u0131n icraya konulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmeleri \u015fartt\u0131r.\u00a0<em>\u2018Bo\u015fanma\u2019<\/em>,\u00a0<em>\u2018evlili\u011fin feshi ve butlan\u0131\u2019<\/em>\u00a0davalar\u0131 sonunda verilen bozucu in\u015fai nitelikteki bo\u015fanma, evlili\u011fin feshi ve iptali h\u00fck\u00fcmleri\u00a0kesinle\u015fmeden\u00a0icra edilemez.<em>KURU, B.\u00a0age., s: 923-924, 979, 981<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallar \u00fczerindeki ayni haklardan kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar ve bu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak h\u00fckmedilen feri nitelikteki y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklere ili\u015fkin kararlar kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e yerine getirilemezler (icra edilemezler). Uygulamada s\u0131k\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131lan \u2018tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131\u2019, \u2018\u00f6nal\u0131m davas\u0131\u2019, \u2018ipote\u011fin fekki davas\u0131\u2019, \u2018ecrimisil davas\u0131\u2019 gibi uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc mahkemece verilecek h\u00fck\u00fcmler bu niteliktedir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131n\u0131n ihtilafl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u00a0<em>\u2018m\u00fcdahalenin \u00f6nlenmesi davas\u0131\u2019<\/em>nda verilen karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesine gerek yoktur. Di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>\u2018<em>tapu sicil ve kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fiklik yaratacak mahiyette\u2019<\/em>\u00a0ve\u00a0<em>\u2018ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131na etki eden\u2019<\/em>\u00a0her t\u00fcr davan\u0131n sonucunda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm ilaml\u0131 icraya konulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmeye mecburdur.\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8221; Takibe dayanak ilam\u0131n davac\u0131s\u0131\/bor\u00e7lunun, muris muvazaas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan tapu iptal ve tescil ile sa\u011flararas\u0131 kazand\u0131rmalar\u0131n iptalini talep etti\u011fi, mahkemece; davan\u0131n reddine karar verildi\u011fi ve daval\u0131\/alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ilamda h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan vekalet \u00fccreti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bor\u00e7lu hakk\u0131nda icra takibi ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Mahkemece her ne kadar davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de tapu iptal ve tescil davas\u0131nda gayrimenkulun ayn\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcnde <span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>AYN\u0130 HAKKA ili\u015fkin m\u00fclkiyet ihtilaf\u0131<\/strong><\/span> bulundu\u011fundan ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden infaz edilemeyece\u011finin kab\u00fcl\u00fc gerekmektedir. <em><strong>Yarg\u0131tay 12.HD.22.10.2019 tarih 2018\/11563 E.2019\/15466 K.&#8221;<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Genel kural olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesi \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n aranmamas\u0131: <\/strong><\/span>Alacakl\u0131n\u0131n, bir il\u00e2ma dayanarak il\u00e2ml\u0131 icra takibi yapabilmesi i\u00e7in, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 kural olarak \u015fart de\u011fildir; h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmeden de alacakl\u0131 il\u00e2ml\u0131 icra yoluna ba\u015fvurabilir. Karara kar\u015f\u0131 kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015f olmas\u0131 (istinaf veya temyiz edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131), kural olarak il\u00e2m\u0131n icras\u0131n\u0131 durdurmayacakt\u0131r (HMK m. 350, I; HMK m. 367, I).<em>PEKCANITEZ, H.\/ATALAY, O.\/\u00d6ZKAN, M. S.\/ \u00d6ZEKES, M.\u00a0age., s: 269<\/em><\/p>\n<p id=\"viewer-6jse5\" class=\"mm8Nw _1j-51 roLFQS _1FoOD _78FBa sk96G9 roLFQS public-DraftStyleDefault-block-depth0 fixed-tab-size public-DraftStyleDefault-text-ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"_2PHJq public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>\u0130rtifak hakk\u0131,<\/strong><\/span> tapu siciline tescili gereken ve m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131ndan sonra gelen, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00fck\u00fc ve rehin hakk\u0131 gibi s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 <strong>ayni haklardan biridir.<\/strong> \u0130rtifak hakk\u0131 ve di\u011fer ayni haklar, sahiplerine, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn haklar\u0131n\u0131 ve yetkilerini sa\u011flarlar. Bu haklar, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde, malikin haklar\u0131n\u0131 ve yetkilerini hakk\u0131n kapsam\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcnde daralt\u0131rlar.<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"viewer-rrkr\" class=\"mm8Nw _1j-51 roLFQS _1FoOD _78FBa sk96G9 roLFQS public-DraftStyleDefault-block-depth0 fixed-tab-size public-DraftStyleDefault-text-ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"_2PHJq public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr\">Bir di\u011fer deyi\u015fle, irtifak hakk\u0131;<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"viewer-5j238\" class=\"mm8Nw _1j-51 roLFQS _1FoOD _78FBa sk96G9 roLFQS public-DraftStyleDefault-block-depth0 fixed-tab-size public-DraftStyleDefault-text-ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"_2PHJq public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr\">\u2022 Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde bu hakka sahip olana kullanma ve yararlanma yetkisi sa\u011flar. <\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"viewer-3f29o\" class=\"mm8Nw _1j-51 roLFQS _1FoOD _78FBa sk96G9 roLFQS public-DraftStyleDefault-block-depth0 fixed-tab-size public-DraftStyleDefault-text-ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"_2PHJq public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr\">\u2022 Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ta\u015f\u0131nmaz malikini, di\u011fer bir ki\u015fiye ya da ta\u015f\u0131nmaz malikine kar\u015f\u0131, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n verdi\u011fi yetkilerden baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 kullanmaktan al\u0131koyar ve bunlar\u0131n irtifak hakk\u0131na sahip olan ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan izin verilmesini gerektirir. <\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"viewer-e0a49\" class=\"mm8Nw _1j-51 roLFQS _1FoOD _78FBa sk96G9 roLFQS public-DraftStyleDefault-block-depth0 fixed-tab-size public-DraftStyleDefault-text-ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"_2PHJq public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr\"><em>\u0130rtifak hakk\u0131nda, bu hakka sahip olan ki\u015fi, kullanma ve yararlanma hakk\u0131 elde ederken; irtifak hakk\u0131 kurulan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n maliki ise, bu hakka katlanmak zorunda kalmaktad\u0131r. Bir di\u011fer deyi\u015fle, irtifak hakk\u0131 kurulan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz, y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc duruma gelmektedir. Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki irtifak hakk\u0131ndan bir ba\u015fka ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n yararlanmas\u0131 da olanakl\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ta\u015f\u0131nmaza <strong>\u201ch\u00e2kim ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u201d <\/strong>da denir. <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"viewer-c3jv5\" class=\"mm8Nw _1j-51 roLFQS _1FoOD _78FBa sk96G9 roLFQS public-DraftStyleDefault-block-depth0 fixed-tab-size public-DraftStyleDefault-text-ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"_2PHJq public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>\u0130ntifa Hakk\u0131: <\/strong><\/span>Ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131rlar, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar, haklar veya bir malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde kurulabilir. Bu hak, sahibine, konusu \u00fczerinde tam yararlanma yetkisi sa\u011flar. <strong><em>\u0130ntifa hakk\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131rlarda zilyetli\u011fin devri, alacaklarda alaca\u011f\u0131n devri, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlarda tapu k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne tescil ile kurulur. <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"viewer-3vm60\" class=\"mm8Nw _1j-51 roLFQS _1FoOD _78FBa sk96G9 roLFQS public-DraftStyleDefault-block-depth0 fixed-tab-size public-DraftStyleDefault-text-ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"_2PHJq public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr\">Ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r ve ta\u015f\u0131nmazlarda intifa hakk\u0131n\u0131n kazan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve tescilinde, m\u00fclkiyete ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler uygulan\u0131r. <\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"viewer-4ap1l\" class=\"mm8Nw _1j-51 roLFQS _1FoOD _78FBa sk96G9 roLFQS public-DraftStyleDefault-block-depth0 fixed-tab-size public-DraftStyleDefault-text-ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"_2PHJq public-DraftStyleDefault-ltr\">Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki yasal intifa hakk\u0131 tapu k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne tescil edilmemi\u015f olsa bile, durumu bilenlere kar\u015f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilir. Tescil edilmi\u015f ise, herkese kar\u015f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilir, ayni hak s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131r! Herkese kar\u015f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilen bir hak, \u015fahsi hak olarak nitelendirilemez.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C. YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>12.Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Esas: 2007\/1602<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Karar: 2007\/4614<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Karar Tarihi: 13.03.2007<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u>\u00d6ZET\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 :<\/u><\/span>Takip konusu ilam\u0131n incelenmesinde, fuzuli i\u015fgal nedenine dayal\u0131 olarak bor\u00e7lunun ta\u015f\u0131nmaza el atmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesine, tahliyeye ve haks\u0131z i\u015fgal tazminat\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesinin talep edildi\u011fi ve mahkemece de talep gibi karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.\u00a0Bu durumda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n <strong>ayn\u0131 ihtilafl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan<\/strong> ilam\u0131n infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmez.<br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u>DAVA\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 :<\/u><\/span>Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki alacakl\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olmakla okundu ve gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u>KARAR\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 :<\/u><\/span>HUMK. nun 443\/4. maddesi gere\u011fince ta\u015f\u0131nmaza ve buna ili\u015fkin ayn\u0131 haklara dair h\u00fck\u00fcmler kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e icra edilemez. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k,\u00a0ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin olmayan (ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki ki\u015fisel &lt;\u015fahsi&gt; haklara y\u00f6nelik ) ilamlar\u0131n icraya konulabilmesi i\u00e7in bunlar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmelerine gerek yoktur (Prof. Dr. Baki Kuru, \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Hukuku, 3. cilt, sahife 2212).\u00a0Somut, olayda takip konusu ilam\u0131n incelenmesinde, fuzuli i\u015fgal nedenine dayal\u0131 olarak bor\u00e7lunun ta\u015f\u0131nmaza el atmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesine, tahliyeye ve haks\u0131z i\u015fgal tazminat\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesinin talep edildi\u011fi ve mahkemece de talep gibi karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu durumda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131 ihtilafl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ilam\u0131n infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmez (Prof. Dr. Baki Kuru, a.g.e., sahife 2187). O halde istemin reddi yerine kabul\u00fc isabetsizdir.<br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u>SONU\u00c7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 :<\/u><\/span>Alacakl\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle\u00a0\u0130\u0130K. 366 ve HUMK. nun 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 13.03.2007 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<div class=\"nH if\">\n<div class=\"nH aHU\">\n<div class=\"nH hx aHo\">\n<div class=\"nH\" style=\"text-align: justify;\" role=\"list\">\n<div class=\"h7 ie nH oy8Mbf\" tabindex=\"-1\" role=\"listitem\" aria-expanded=\"true\">\n<div class=\"Bk\">\n<div class=\"G3 G2\">\n<div id=\":2f3\">\n<div class=\"adn ads\" data-message-id=\"#msg-a:r-8514196648954098023\" data-legacy-message-id=\"183bee9191fbd740\">\n<div class=\"gs\">\n<div class=\"\">\n<div id=\":2dw\" class=\"ii gt\">\n<div id=\":2f5\" class=\"a3s aiL \">\n<div dir=\"auto\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">12. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2001\/3806<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2001\/4550<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 19.3.2001<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u2022 \u0130CRAYA KES\u0130NLE\u015eMEDEN KONULAB\u0130LECEK \u0130LAMLAR (Gayrimenkul \u00dczerindeki Ki\u015fisel Haklara \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130lam)<br \/>\n\u2022 GAYRIMENKUL \u00dcZER\u0130NDEK\u0130 K\u0130\u015e\u0130SEL HAKLARA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N \u0130LAM\u00a0(Kesinle\u015fmeden \u0130craya Konulabilece\u011fi)<br \/>\n\u2022 K\u0130\u015e\u0130SEL HAKLARA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N \u0130LAM\u00a0(Gayrimenkul \u00dczerindeki-Kesinle\u015fmeden \u0130craya Konulabilece\u011fi)<br \/>\n\u2022 \u0130LAM\u00a0(Gayrimenkul \u00dczerindeki Ki\u015fisel Haklara \u0130li\u015fkin &#8211; Kesinle\u015fmeden \u0130craya Konulabilece\u011fi)<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u>\u00d6ZET \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 :<\/u><\/span>Gayrimenkul \u00fczerindeki ki\u015fisel &#8220;\u015fahsi&#8221; haklara ili\u015fkin olan ilamlar, kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konabilir.<br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u>DAVA \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 :<\/u><\/span>Mercii karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkikinin alacakl\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden daireye 26.2.2001 tarihinde g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olmakla okundu ve gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u>KARAR \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 :<\/u><\/span>HUMK. n\u0131n 443\/4. maddesi gere\u011fince gayrimenkule ve buna ili\u015fkin ayni haklara dair h\u00fck\u00fcmler kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e icra edilemez. Bu nedenle ayn\u0131 ilamda yaz\u0131l\u0131 eklentilerin de infaz\u0131n\u0131n istenebilmesi i\u00e7in ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p>Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, gayrimenkulun ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin olmayan ( gayrimenkul \u00fczerindeki ki\u015fisel &#8220;\u015fahsi&#8221; haklara ili\u015fkin olan ) ilamlar\u0131n icraya konulabilmesi i\u00e7in bunlar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmelerine gerek yoktur. Yani, bu ilamlar kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulabilir ( Prof. Dr. Baki Kuru, \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Hukuku, 3. cilt, sahile 2212 ). Somut olayda, takip konusu ilam\u0131n incelenmesinde, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan daha \u00f6nce bor\u00e7luya <strong>kiraya verildi\u011fi, kirac\u0131l\u0131k s\u00fcresinin<\/strong> sona erdi\u011fi ve bundan sonra bor\u00e7lunun alacakl\u0131 Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile yeni bir kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzalamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in fuzuli i\u015fgal durumuna d\u00fc\u015fen ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enin m\u00fcdahalesinin men&#8217;ine ve ecrimisile h\u00fckmedilmesinin talep edildi\u011fi ve mahkemece de talep gibi karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu durumda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131 ihtilafl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in ilam\u0131n infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmez ( Prof. Dr. Baki Kuru, A.G.E., Sahife 2187 ). O halde istemin reddi yerine kabul\u00fc isabetsizdir.<br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u>SONU\u00c7 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 :<\/u><\/span>Alacakl\u0131 vekilin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile mercii karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K. 366 ve HUMK. n\u0131n 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ( BOZULMASINA ), 19.3.2001 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"adL\"><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Esas<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2016\/6570<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Karar<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2017\/13023<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Tarih<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 17.10.2017<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Mahkemece, dayanak ilam\u0131n m\u00fclkiyet ve ayni bir hakka ili\u015fkin olmay\u0131p tazminata ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu bu nedenle kesinle\u015fmeden icra edilebilece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Dayanak ilam\u0131n infaz edilecek <span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>h\u00fck\u00fcm k\u0131sm\u0131nda sicil ve kay\u0131tlarda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe yol a\u00e7acak bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/strong> <\/span>bu haliyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fmesi ko\u015fulu bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmesi yerinde olup yerel Mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn onanmas\u0131 gerekirken bozuldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla alacakl\u0131 vekilinin karar d\u00fczeltme isteminin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"nH\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<div dir=\"auto\"><center><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">T.C.<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">SEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/center><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Esas<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">: 2020\/1687<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Karar<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">: 2021\/5183<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Tarih<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">: 16.06.2021<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere ecrimisil, di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle haks\u0131z i\u015fgal tazminat\u0131, hak sahibi olan malikin, hak sahibi ve iyiniyetli olmayan zilyetten isteyebilece\u011fi bir tazminat olup, 08.03.1950 tarihli ve 22\/4 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131nda; fuzuli i\u015fgalin taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 birbirine uygun iradeleri ile kurdu\u011fu kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine benzetilemeyece\u011fi, niteli\u011fi itibar\u0131 ile haks\u0131z bir eylem say\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, haks\u0131z i\u015fgal nedeniyle olu\u015fan zarar\u0131n tazmin edilmesi gerekece\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ecrimisil, haks\u0131z i\u015fgal nedeniyle tazminat olarak nitelendirilen \u00f6zel bir zarar giderim bi\u00e7imi olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, en az\u0131 kira geliri kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 zarard\u0131r. Bu nedenle, haks\u0131z i\u015fgalden do\u011fan normal kullanma sonucu eskime \u015feklinde olu\u015fan ve kullanmadan kaynaklanan olumlu zarar ile malik ya da zilyedin yoksun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 fayda (olumsuz zarar) ecrimisilin kapsam\u0131n\u0131 belirler. Haks\u0131z i\u015fgal, haks\u0131z eylem niteli\u011findedir. (YHGK&#8217;nin 25.02.2004 tarihli ve 2004\/1-120-96 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131) 25.05.1938 tarihli ve 29\/10 say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 ile Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131n ayn\u0131 yoldaki yerle\u015fmi\u015f i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ecrimisil davalar\u0131 be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabi olup bu be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre dava tarihinden geriye do\u011fru i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mahkeme ilam\u0131n\u0131n icraya konulabilmesi i\u00e7in kesinle\u015fme, kural olarak \u015fart de\u011fildir. Ancak bu kural\u0131n baz\u0131 istisnalar\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen bu istisnai durumlarda, karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmeden icraya konulmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":276,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=444"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4595,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444\/revisions\/4595"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/276"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}