{"id":2182,"date":"2016-08-13T18:28:06","date_gmt":"2016-08-13T15:28:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/?p=2182"},"modified":"2026-03-26T00:44:45","modified_gmt":"2026-03-25T21:44:45","slug":"usulsuz-tebligata-iliskin-sikayet-yargitay-hukuk-genel-kurulu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/usulsuz-tebligata-iliskin-sikayet-yargitay-hukuk-genel-kurulu\/","title":{"rendered":"TEBL\u0130GAT HUKUKU\/USULS\u00dcZ TEBL\u0130\u011e NED\u0130R? TEBL\u0130GAT MAZBATASINDA YER ALMASI GEREKENLER ve ELEKTRON\u0130K TEBL\u0130GAT H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FTEBL%C4%B0GAT-HUKUKU.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/TEBL\u0130GAT-HUKUKU.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/TEBL\u0130GAT-HUKUKU.pdf\" download>Download <\/a><\/p><\/div><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mevzuat.gov.tr\/MevzuatMetin\/1.3.7201.pdf\">TEBL\u0130GAT KANUNU <\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/mevzuat.meb.gov.tr\/html\/10303_0.html\">TEBL\u0130GAT T\u00dcZ\u00dc\u011e\u00dc<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.resmigazete.gov.tr\/eskiler\/2012\/01\/20120125-7.htm\">TEBL\u0130GAT KANUNUNUN UYGULANMASINA DA\u0130R Y\u00d6NETMEL\u0130K<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.resmigazete.gov.tr\/eskiler\/2013\/01\/20130119-8.htm\">ELEKTRON\u0130K TEBL\u0130GAT Y\u00d6NETMEL\u0130\u011e\u0130<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/archive.ismmmo.org.tr\/docs\/malicozum\/104malicozum\/15%20ayse%20ginali.pdf\">VERG\u0130 DA\u0130RELER\u0130NCE YAPILAN TEBL\u0130\u011eLER <\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Tebligat<\/strong> <\/span>kural olarak <em><strong>tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahsa bilinen en son adresinde yap\u0131l\u0131r<\/strong> <\/em>(TebK md. 10, f.1). Burada belirtilen \u015fah\u0131s (tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131) kanunun \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fekilde ad\u0131na tebli\u011f \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken ki\u015fidir. Muhatap ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi olabilece\u011fi gibi bir t\u00fczel ki\u015fi de (TebK md. 12) olabilir. Kanunda yer alan d\u00fczenlemede tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131n kendisine yap\u0131lmas\u0131 kural iken bu duruma baz\u0131 istisnalar da getirilmi\u015ftir (TebK md. 13, 14, 16, 17 ve 18). \u00d6rne\u011fin t\u00fczel ki\u015filere tebligat t\u00fczel ki\u015finin adresinde ve yetkili temsilcilerine yap\u0131labilir (TebK md. 12) ancak ilgili t\u00fczel ki\u015fi ad\u0131na tebligat\u0131 almaya yetkili bir kimsenin herhangi bir sebeple mutat i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015f yerinde bulunmamas\u0131 veya evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak oldu\u011fu takdirde tebli\u011f orada haz\u0131r bulunan bir memur veya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlardan birine yap\u0131labilir (TebK md. 13). Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fah\u0131s adresinde bulunmazsa tebli\u011f kendisi ile ayn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015filere veya hizmet\u00e7ilerden birine yap\u0131labilir (TebK md. 16). Burada an\u0131lan istisnalarda muhatap yerine kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimsenin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f itibariyle on sekiz ya\u015f\u0131ndan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmamas\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde ehliyetsiz bulunmamas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r (TebK md. 22). <span style=\"color: #99cc00;\"><em><strong>\u201cHasma tebli\u011f yasa\u011f\u0131\u201d<\/strong> <\/em><\/span>olarak bilinen kural uyar\u0131nca kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan kimselerin tebligata konu ilgili davada has\u0131m olarak ilgileri varsa muhatap ad\u0131na kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lamaz (TebK md. 39; TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 62). Yani, hasma tebli\u011f yasa\u011f\u0131ndan bahsedebilmek i\u00e7in tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 caiz olan ki\u015finin muhatab\u0131n taraf oldu\u011fu davada, davac\u0131 veya daval\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131na sahip olarak kar\u015f\u0131 tarafta olmas\u0131 zorunlu olmay\u0131p bu ki\u015finin sadece has\u0131m olarak ilgisinin bulunmas\u0131 yeterlidir . Adli tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada kanunen tebell\u00fc\u011fe yetkili olan bir \u015fah\u0131s (TebK md. 13, 14, 16, 17 ve 18) ile muhatap aras\u0131nda bir husumet bulunuyorsa bu ki\u015fiye yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f TebK md. 32\u2019ye g\u00f6re <strong>usuls\u00fcz bir tebli\u011f<\/strong> olacakt\u0131r. <em>\u00d6rne\u011fin,<\/em> bir babal\u0131k davas\u0131nda tebligat\u0131n anne yerine kendisi ile beraber ayn\u0131 evde ya\u015fayan ve davada has\u0131m olan \u00e7ocu\u011funa tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 veya bir ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davas\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n payda\u015f\u0131 ve davada taraf olan bir kimse ad\u0131na davada yer alan di\u011fer payda\u015flardan birinin annesine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fcz olmas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furacakt\u0131r. Burada <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fcz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle tebli\u011f tarihi art\u0131k muhatab\u0131n tebli\u011fin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi tarih olacakt\u0131r<\/span> . Vekil vas\u0131tas\u0131yla takip edilen i\u015flerde tebligat vekile yap\u0131l\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin avukat taraf\u0131ndan takip edilen bir davada yap\u0131lacak olan b\u00fct\u00fcn tebli\u011flerin do\u011frudan vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir, aksi halde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan tebligat h\u00fck\u00fcm ve sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz . Hatta ve hatta bir duru\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda m\u00fcvekkil haz\u0131r bulunsa dahi tebligat\u0131n avukata yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur . E\u011fer muhatab\u0131n birden \u00e7ok vekili var ise bunlardan birine tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 yeterlidir ve bu \u015fekilde tebli\u011f birden fazla vekile yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise ilk vekile usul\u00fcne uygun olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f tebli\u011f tarihi as\u0131l tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r (TebK md. 11, f.1). Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde kanuni temsilcisi bulunan kimselere yap\u0131lacak olan tebligatlar da, kanunda bizzat muhataba tebli\u011f yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir \u00f6zel bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmuyorsa, temsilciye yap\u0131l\u0131r.\u00a0Tebligat resmi ve adli tatil g\u00fcnlerinde ve gece vakti de yap\u0131labilir (TebK md. 33; TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 54, 55). E\u011fer bir i\u015f avukat taraf\u0131ndan takip edilmekte ise avukat\u0131n b\u00fcrosuna yap\u0131lacak tebligatlar resmi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma g\u00fcn ve saatleri i\u00e7inde yap\u0131l\u0131r (TebK md. 11, f.2).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #008080;\">Kural:<\/span> <span style=\"color: #800000;\">Bilinen Adreste Tebligat Tebligat,<\/span><\/strong> kural olarak muhatab\u0131n bilinen en son adresinde ve kendisine yap\u0131l\u0131r. Bilinen en son adresin tespitinde, tebli\u011f \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyenin beyan\u0131, muhatab\u0131n veya di\u011fer ilgililerin bildirimleri ya da mevcut belgeler esas al\u0131n\u0131r (TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 16, f.1). Ancak muhatab\u0131n m\u00fcracaat\u0131 veya kabul\u00fc \u015fart\u0131 ile her yerde tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (TebK md. 10, f.3; TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 17, f.1, 2). E\u011fer bilinen en son adresin tebligata elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa (misal adreste g\u00f6r\u00fcnen bina in\u015faat halindeyse) veya tebligat bu adrese yap\u0131lamazsa, muhatab\u0131n adres kay\u0131t sisteminde bulunan yerle\u015fim yeri adresi, bilinen en son adresi olarak kabul edilir ve tebligat buraya yap\u0131l\u0131r (TebK md. 10, f.2). Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca bir adres ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 yap\u0131lmaz (TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 16, f.2). Bir dava yahut icra takibinde muhatab\u0131n bilinen en son adresi mahkeme veya icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan adres ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 yap\u0131larak de\u011fil dava veya icra takip dosyas\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fine bak\u0131larak belirlenir . TebK md. 10\u2019da belirtilen adres kavram\u0131 TebK md. 9, b.1 uyar\u0131nca muhatab\u0131n ikametg\u00e2h, mesken veya i\u015fyeri adreslerini de i\u00e7ine alacak \u015fekilde geni\u015f bir kapsam\u0131 ifade etmektedir. Buna g\u00f6re yap\u0131lacak olan tebligat bu adreslerden herhangi birine yap\u0131labilir. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle, bilinen en son adres muhatab\u0131n s\u00fcrekli yerle\u015fme niyetine veya i\u015fyeri olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tespit edilmi\u015f ise burada an\u0131lanlardan herhangi bir adrese yap\u0131lacak olan tebligat ge\u00e7erli olacakt\u0131r . Ad\u0131na tebligat \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan ki\u015fi \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015fse veya g\u00f6sterilen adresten s\u00fcrekli olarak ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve yeni adresi de tebli\u011f memurunca tespit edilememi\u015f ise tebligat evrak\u0131 tebligat\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karan mercie geri g\u00f6nderilir (TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 30, f.2 ve 3). Tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lacak oldu\u011fu adreste muhatap ya da muhatap ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131labilecek kimselerden (TebK md. 13, 14, 16, 17 ve 19) hi\u00e7biri g\u00f6sterilen adreste bulunmaz veya tebell\u00fc\u011fden ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131rlarsa tebli\u011f memuru tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131 o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti veya meclis \u00fcyesinden birine ya da kolluk amir veya memuruna imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda teslim eder. Ayr\u0131ca teslim alan ki\u015finin adresini i\u00e7eren bir ihbarnameyi tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 adresteki binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131r ve durumun muhataba haber verilmesi i\u00e7in en yak\u0131n kom\u015fulardan birine yahut y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya hususu bildirir. \u0130hbarnamenin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde, e\u011fer g\u00f6sterilen adres muhatab\u0131n adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki adresi olup muhatap o adreste hi\u00e7 oturmam\u0131\u015f veya o adresten s\u00fcrekli ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa bile, tebli\u011f memuru tebligat\u0131 o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti \u00fcyelerinden birine veyahut kolluk amir veya memuruna imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda teslim eder ve teslim alan ki\u015finin adresini i\u00e7eren ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresteki binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131r. Bu durumda da ihbarnamenin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131lacakt\u0131r (TebK md. 21; TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 31).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Adres De\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi Halinde<\/strong> <strong>Tebligat<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kazai bir merci taraf\u0131ndan daha \u00f6nce kendisine ve adresine usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011fde bulunulmu\u015f olan ki\u015fi adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirirse, yenisini derhal tebli\u011fi yapt\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olan kaza merciine bildirmeye mecburdur. Adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin bildirilmesi sonucunda daha sonra yap\u0131lacak olan tebli\u011fler yeni adrese yap\u0131l\u0131r (TebK md. 35, f.1). Ancak, ki\u015finin adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fini bildirmemesi ve adres kay\u0131t sisteminde yerle\u015fim yeri adresi de tespit edilemedi\u011fi takdirde tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131n bir n\u00fcshas\u0131 eski adrese ait binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na as\u0131l\u0131r, as\u0131lma tarihi tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r ve bundan sonra eski adrese \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebli\u011fler muhataba yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r (TebK md. 35, f.2 ve 3). Yani bir adres kay\u0131t sistemi olu\u015fturulmas\u0131 sonucuna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak tebligat memuru ayr\u0131ca bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmayacak ve kay\u0131t sistemindeki bilgilere dayan\u0131larak tebligat yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Burada dikkat edilmesi gereken husus TebK md. 34 gere\u011fi TebK md. 35\u2019e g\u00f6re yap\u0131lacak tebligatlar\u0131n sadece adli, idari ve askeri kaza mercileri taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131labilecek olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Yani, TebK md. 1\u2019de say\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan baro, noter, belediye gibi kurumlar taraf\u0131ndan bu \u015fekilde bir tebligat ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilemez. Kazai mercilerin de bu madde h\u00fckm\u00fcne uygun olarak tebligat yapabilmeleri i\u00e7in muhataba daha \u00f6nce bir tebligat yapm\u0131\u015f olmalar\u0131 gerekmektedir . T\u00fczel ki\u015filer a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ise durum daha farkl\u0131d\u0131r. Daha \u00f6nce bir tebligat yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olsa bile, t\u00fczel ki\u015filerin resmi kay\u0131tlardaki adresleri esas al\u0131n\u0131r ve burada yer alan adrese kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca tebligat yap\u0131l\u0131r (TebK md. 35, f.4). Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle, muhatab\u0131n t\u00fczel ki\u015fi olmas\u0131 halinde daha \u00f6nce tebligat yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olma ko\u015fulu aranmaks\u0131z\u0131n t\u00fczel ki\u015finin ticaret sicilinde yer alan adresine tebligat \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131l\u0131r ve bu adresin yeni yahut eski adres olmas\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n tebli\u011f i\u015flemi ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmler (TebK md. 35, f.2 ve 3) uyar\u0131nca ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015f olur. Daha \u00f6nce yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki adresine tebligat yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f T\u00fcrk vatanda\u015f\u0131n\u0131n yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi ve bunu tebli\u011f \u00e7\u0131karan kazai merciye bildirmemesi ve adres kay\u0131t sisteminden de yerle\u015fim yeri adresinin tespit edilememesi halinde ise, bu ki\u015finin yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda daha \u00f6nce tebligat yap\u0131lan adresine T\u00fcrk B\u00fcy\u00fckel\u00e7ili\u011fi veya Konsoloslu\u011funca TebK md. 25\/a uyar\u0131nca g\u00f6nderilen bildirimin adrese ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belgelendi\u011fi tarihten itibaren otuz g\u00fcn sonra tebligat yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r (TebK md. 35, f.5). \u0130\u0130K md. 21, f.1 ve \u0130\u0130K md. 57, f.1 uyar\u0131nca icra daireleri taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak tebli\u011fler kural olarak TebK h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine tabidir. \u0130\u0130K 57, f.1\u2019e g\u00f6re icra tebli\u011fleri TebK h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lacak olup bor\u00e7lunun kanunen kendisine temsilci atanmas\u0131 gereken \u015fah\u0131slardan birisi olmas\u0131 halinde icra memuru ilgili makamdan bor\u00e7luya bir temsilci atanmas\u0131n\u0131 ister ve tebligat o ki\u015fiye yap\u0131l\u0131r. Bunun yan\u0131nda TebK md. 35, f.2 ve 3\u2019\u00fcn kazai ve icra mercileri taraf\u0131ndan uygulanma esaslar\u0131 farkl\u0131l\u0131k arz etmektedir. \u015e\u00f6yle ki, bir ilamda ve \u0130\u0130K md. 38\u2019e g\u00f6re ilam h\u00fckm\u00fcnde say\u0131lan belgelerle ipotek senedinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 olan adresini de\u011fi\u015ftiren alacakl\u0131 veya bor\u00e7lu; durumu birbirlerine noter vas\u0131tas\u0131yla bildirmi\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a tebligat ayn\u0131 adrese yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r ve taraflardan biri bu adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde TebK md. 35 h\u00fckm\u00fc uygulanacakt\u0131r (\u0130\u0130K md. 21, f.2). Ancak alacakl\u0131 veya bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi di\u011fer tarafa tebli\u011f edilmesine ra\u011fmen eski adrese tebligat yapt\u0131rarak TebK md. 35\u2019den faydalanm\u0131\u015f olan taraf bu suretle di\u011fer tarafa verdi\u011fi b\u00fct\u00fcn zararlar\u0131 y\u00fczde 15 fazlas\u0131yla \u00f6demeye mecburdur ve hakk\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca \u0130\u0130K md. 343\u2019de belirtilen ceza uygulan\u0131r (\u0130\u0130K md. 21, f.3). Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle, TebK md. 35, f.1\u2019de kazai merciler i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen daha \u00f6nce tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131 \u0130\u0130K md. 21, f.2\u2019de say\u0131lan belgelerdeki adresini de\u011fi\u015ftiren alacakl\u0131 veya bor\u00e7luya yap\u0131lacak icra tebli\u011flerinde aranmamaktad\u0131r . Son olarak, \u0130\u0130K md. 68\/b, 148\/a ve 150\/\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinde de adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine ili\u015fkin hususlar yer almaktad\u0131r. \u0130\u0130K md. 68\/b uyar\u0131nca bor\u00e7lu cari hesap veya k\u0131sa, orta, uzun vadeli kredi \u015feklinde i\u015fleyen krediyi kulland\u0131ran taraf\u0131n, krediyi kullanan taraf\u0131n kredi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde belirtmi\u015f oldu\u011fu adresine, bor\u00e7lu cari hesap s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde belirtilen d\u00f6nemleri veya k\u0131sa, orta,\u00a0uzun vadeli kredi s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 faiz tahakkuk d\u00f6nemlerini takip eden on be\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde bir hesap \u00f6zetini noter arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile g\u00f6nderme y\u00fck\u00fcm\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu s\u00f6zle\u015fmede belirtilen adresin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi, yurt i\u00e7inde bir adresin noter arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla kredi kulland\u0131ran tarafa bildirilmesi halinde sonu\u00e7 do\u011furur ve bu \u015fekilde bir bildirimin olmamas\u0131 halinde hesap \u00f6zetinin eski adrese ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r . Bu madde ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak \u0130\u0130K md. 150\/\u0131 alt\u0131nda bor\u00e7lu cari hesap veya k\u0131sa, orta, uzun vadeli kredi \u015feklinde i\u015fleyen nakdi veya gayrinakdi bir krediyi kulland\u0131ran taraf krediyi kullanan tarafa ait ilgili hesap \u00f6zetinin veya tazmin talebinin veya borcun \u00f6denmesine ili\u015fkin ihtar\u0131n noter arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla krediyi kullanan tarafa kredi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 ya da ipotek akit tablosunda belirtilen adrese g\u00f6nderilmek suretiyle tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini veya \u0130\u0130K md. 68\/b gere\u011fince tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f say\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren noterden tasdikli bir sureti icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ibraz ederek \u0130\u0130K md. 149 uyar\u0131nca i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilir. \u0130\u0130K md. 148\/a, f.1 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca ise ipotek s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin taraflar\u0131n\u0131n, ipotekli ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 daha sonra sat\u0131n alanlar\u0131n ya da bunlar\u0131n haleflerinin tapu sicil m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yurt i\u00e7inde bir tebligat adresi bildirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r. Belirtilen adresin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi ancak durumun tapu sicil m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne bildirilmesi halinde sonu\u00e7 do\u011furur. Yeni adresin bildirilmemesi halinde tebligatlar\u0131n eski adrese ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih tebell\u00fc\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r (\u0130\u0130K md. 148\/a, f.2).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>\u0130lan Yoluyla Tebligat<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat mevzuat\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re kendisine tebligat yap\u0131lamayan ve tebli\u011f memuru taraf\u0131ndan ikametg\u00e2h\u0131, meskeni veya i\u015fyeri tespit edilemeyen ve adres kay\u0131t sisteminde de yerle\u015fim yeri adresi bulunmayan bir kimsenin adresinin tespiti i\u00e7in tebligat\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karan merci taraf\u0131ndan adres ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 yap\u0131l\u0131r (TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 48, f.1). Tebligat\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karan merci, muhatab\u0131n adresini \u00f6ncelikle resmi veya \u00f6zel kurum ve dairelerden, bunlardan sonu\u00e7 al\u0131namad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde kolluk vas\u0131tas\u0131yla ara\u015ft\u0131rabilir ve tespit ettirebilir. Burada belirtilen ara\u015ft\u0131rmalara ra\u011fmen muhatab\u0131n adresi tespit edilemezse adres me\u00e7hul say\u0131l\u0131r ve bu ki\u015filere tebligat ilanen yap\u0131l\u0131r (TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 48, f.2 ve 3). Bu durum alt\u0131nda tebli\u011f memuru taraf\u0131ndan mahalle veya k\u00f6y muhtar\u0131na \u015ferh verdirilmek suretiyle husus tespit edilir (TebK md. 28, f.2). \u0130lan yoluyla tebli\u011f yukar\u0131da belirtilen usuller izlendikten sonra ba\u015fvurulacak en son \u00e7are olup muhatab\u0131n durumu en g\u00fcvenilir bir \u015fekilde \u00f6\u011frenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek ve varsa tebli\u011fi \u00e7\u0131karan merciin bulundu\u011fu yerde yay\u0131nlanan bir gazetede ve ayr\u0131ca elektronik ortamda yap\u0131l\u0131r (TebK md. 29). \u0130lanen tebli\u011fde son ilan tarihinden yedi g\u00fcn sonra tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Ancak ilan\u0131 yapan merci halin icab\u0131na g\u00f6re on be\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc ge\u00e7meyecek \u015fekilde daha uzun bir s\u00fcre tayin edebilir (TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 52). Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde ilgili merci iki ilan aras\u0131nda en az bir hafta olmas\u0131 kayd\u0131yla ilan\u0131n ikinci defa yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verebilir (TebK md. 29, f.3).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Elektronik Tebligat<\/strong> <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">11.01.2001 tarih ve 6099 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu ve Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun ile TebK\u2019ya 7\/a maddesi eklenmi\u015f ve bu madde ile kanunda belirtilen usullerin yan\u0131nda elektronik tebligat\u0131n da yap\u0131labilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Elektronik tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in temel ko\u015ful muhatab\u0131n tebligata elveri\u015fli bir elektronik adres vererek bu adrese tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmesidir (TebK md. 7\/a, f.1). Burada elektronik tebligat bir zorunluluk olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bu imk\u00e2n ve kolayl\u0131ktan faydalanmak isteyenlere bir alternatif olarak sunulmu\u015ftur. Ancak anonim, limited ve sermayesi paylara b\u00f6l\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015f komandit \u015firketlere elektronik yolla tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 6099 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun md. 18\u2019e g\u00f6re 19.01.2013\u2019den itibaren ge\u00e7erli olmak \u00fczere zorunlu hale getirilmi\u015ftir (TebK md. 7\/a, f.2). TebK md. 1\u2019de belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere elektronik tebligatlar da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere maddede say\u0131lan mercilerin \u00e7\u0131karaca\u011f\u0131 tebligatlar PTT veya memur arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle, elektronik tebligatlar\u0131 g\u00f6nderme i\u015flemi PTT veya memur arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile yap\u0131lmak durumundad\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde \u0130\u0130K md. 27, f.1 ve md. 57, f.1 gere\u011fi elektronik icra tebli\u011fleri de TebK\u2019ya uygun olarak PTT veya memur vas\u0131tas\u0131 ile yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Elektronik tebligat\u0131n zorunlu olup olmas\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n zorunlu bir sebeple yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 halinde tebligat TebK\u2019da belirtilen di\u011fer usullere g\u00f6re yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r (TebK md. 7\/a, f.3). Elektronik tebligatta tebli\u011f, tebli\u011fin muhatab\u0131n elektronik adresine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin, elektronik tebligat posta kutusuna 01.01.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc ula\u015fm\u0131\u015fsa ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn hesaba kat\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n o g\u00fcn\u00fc takip eden be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda 06.01.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Usuls\u00fcz Tebli\u011f<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebli\u011fin yasada veya hukukta belirtilen usule uygun olarak yap\u0131lmamas\u0131na usuls\u00fcz tebli\u011f denilmektedir . Konumuz itibariyle ise usuls\u00fcz tebli\u011f, yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan tebligat\u0131n TebK h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine tam ve do\u011fru bir \u015fekilde uyulmaks\u0131z\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmektedir. \u00d6rne\u011fin tebligat\u0131n TebK h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca tebligat\u0131 almaya yetkili bir \u015fah\u0131s (TebK md. 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19) d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda birine yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde veya TebK md. 21\u2019e g\u00f6re tebligat yap\u0131lmak istenen ki\u015finin adreste bulunamamas\u0131 halinde ihbarnamenin kap\u0131ya as\u0131lmamas\u0131 gibi hallerde usuls\u00fcz bir tebli\u011fden bahsedilebilir. Burada belirtilmesi gereken \u00f6nemli bir husus ise usuls\u00fcz tebli\u011f ile tebligat\u0131n yoklu\u011fu kavramlar\u0131n\u0131n fark\u0131d\u0131r. \u015e\u00f6yle ki, tebligat\u0131n yok olmas\u0131ndan kas\u0131t ortada tebligat olarak nitelendirilebilecek bir hukuki i\u015flemin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 iken usuls\u00fcz tebli\u011fden kas\u0131t ortada bir tebli\u011f i\u015flemi bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bunun TebK\u2019n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fu usule uygun olarak yap\u0131lmamas\u0131d\u0131r . Yani tebligat yoklu\u011funda tebligat\u0131n unsurlar\u0131ndan olan yaz\u0131l\u0131 bildirim ve belgelendirme i\u015flemlerinden herhangi birinin veya ikisinin yap\u0131lan i\u015flem i\u00e7erisinde varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsedilememektedir. \u00d6rne\u011fin, bir dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda daval\u0131 yerine ba\u015fka bir kimse ad\u0131na tebligat \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde veya daval\u0131n\u0131n adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fini bildirmek i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruda bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen tebligat\u0131n eski adresine \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na devam edilmesi halinde ortada bir tebligat yoklu\u011fu bulunmaktad\u0131r. B\u00f6yle bir durum alt\u0131nda daval\u0131 yerine kendisine tebligat \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan ki\u015fi tebligat\u0131 usul\u00fcne uygun olarak alm\u0131\u015f olsa da dava i\u015flemleri y\u00fcr\u00fcmeyecektir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc ortada herhangi bir \u015fekilde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir tebligattan bahsedilemez. Usuls\u00fcz tebli\u011fde ise ilgili tebligat tebli\u011fi almaya yetkili olmayan bir ki\u015fiye yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa dahi ortada bir tebligat\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsedilebilecek ancak usuls\u00fcz olmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak di\u011fer i\u015flemler devam edecektir. Tebli\u011f usul\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa bile muhatap tebli\u011fi \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi takdirde tebligat ge\u00e7erli say\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Aksi takdirde yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Burada muhatab\u0131n tebli\u011fi \u00f6\u011frenmesinden kas\u0131t bir \u015fekilde tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131 veya davetiyeyi almas\u0131 ya da bunlar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fini \u00f6\u011frenmesidir (TebK md. 53, f.1). G\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi \u00fczere, usuls\u00fcz tebli\u011fde tebligat yoklu\u011fundan farkl\u0131 olarak muhatab\u0131n tebli\u011fi \u00f6\u011frenmesi sonucunda tebligat kendine atfedilen h\u00fck\u00fcm ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011furmaktad\u0131r. Tebli\u011fe ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak i\u015flemlerin ve s\u00fcrelerin devam\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak muhatab\u0131n tebli\u011fi \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi tarih tebli\u011f tarihi olarak kabul edilir (TebK md. 53, f.2). Usuls\u00fcz bir tebli\u011f halinde muhatab\u0131n tebli\u011fi \u00f6\u011frendi\u011finin ve bunun tarihinin iddia ve ispat\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir (TebK md. 53, f.3). Tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131nda da s\u0131k\u00e7a irdelenmi\u015ftir. Bir dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 taraf te\u015fkili, adil yarg\u0131lanma ve hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6nem arz etmektedir21 . Burada belirtilen haklar\u0131n ihlali sonucunu do\u011furacak olan usuls\u00fcz bir tebli\u011fin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir bozma sebebi olarak kabul edilmektedir . Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn daval\u0131ya tebli\u011finin usuls\u00fcz olmas\u0131 savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlayaca\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in bir bozma sebebi olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Milletleraras\u0131 Tebligat Milletleraras\u0131 tebligata ili\u015fkin usul<\/strong> <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">TebK md. 25 \u2013 27, TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 38 \u2013 47, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin taraf oldu\u011fu iki tarafl\u0131 ve \u00e7ok tarafl\u0131 anla\u015fmalar (01.03.1954 tarihli Lahey Hukuk Usul\u00fcne Dair Anla\u015fma ve 15.11.1964 tarihli Hukuki ve Ticari Konularda Adli ve Gayri Adli Belgelerin Yabanc\u0131 Memleketlerde Tebli\u011fine Dair Lahey Anla\u015fmas\u0131) ile d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Burada TebK h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine gidilebilmesi i\u00e7in T\u00fcrkiye ile tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fclke aras\u0131nda tebligat usul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin iki ya da \u00e7ok tarafl\u0131 milletleraras\u0131 bir anla\u015fman\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 gerekmektedir. E\u011fer b\u00f6yle bir anla\u015fma varsa orada belirtilen tebligat usul\u00fc do\u011frultusunda i\u015flem yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Her takvim y\u0131l\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131nda, tebligat i\u015fleriyle ilgili anla\u015fma h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, m\u00fctekabiliyet esaslar\u0131 ve hangi \u00fclkeler i\u00e7in avans olarak ne kadar tebli\u011f masraf\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019nca D\u0131\u015f \u0130\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019ndan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f al\u0131narak Resmi Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlan\u0131r ve bir y\u0131l i\u00e7erisinde meydana gelen de\u011fi\u015fiklikler ayn\u0131 usul ile ilan edilir (TebK Y\u00f6n. md. 39, f.3 ve 4). B\u00f6yle bir anla\u015fma bulunmuyor ise, yabanc\u0131 bir \u00fclkedeki muhataba tebligatta, muhatab\u0131n bulundu\u011fu \u00fclkedeki kanunlar\u0131n uygun olmas\u0131 veya iki \u00fclke aras\u0131nda tebligata cevaz veren bir anla\u015fman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde, T\u00fcrk siyasi memuru veya konsolosu ilgili tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 o yabanc\u0131 \u00fclkenin yetkili makamlar\u0131ndan ister (TebK md. 25, f.1). Bu i\u015flem yap\u0131l\u0131rken ilgili evrak tebligat\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karacak olan merciinin ba\u011fl\u0131 bulundu\u011fu bakanl\u0131k \u00fczerinden D\u0131\u015f \u0130\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na, oradan da memuriyet b\u00f6lgesi dikkate al\u0131narak ilgili T\u00fcrkiye El\u00e7ili\u011fi\u2019ne veya Konsoloslu\u011fu\u2019na g\u00f6nderilir (TebK md. 25, f.2). Ayr\u0131ca, D\u0131\u015f \u0130\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na l\u00fczum g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen hallerde tebligat evrak\u0131, ilgili Bakanl\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frudan do\u011fruya tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u00fclkedeki T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fckel\u00e7ili\u011fi veya Ba\u015fkonsoloslu\u011fu\u2019na g\u00f6nderilebilir (TebK md. 25, f.3). Yabanc\u0131 \u00fclkede kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimsenin T\u00fcrk vatanda\u015f\u0131 olmas\u0131 halinde tebli\u011f o yerdeki T\u00fcrk B\u00fcy\u00fckel\u00e7ili\u011fi veya Konsoloslu\u011fu veya bunlar\u0131n g\u00f6revlendirece\u011fi bir memur arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla yap\u0131l\u0131r (TebK md. 25\/a, f.1 ve 2). Bu maddeye g\u00f6re kazai merciler taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lacak tebligatta, tebli\u011f evrak\u0131 do\u011frudan o yerdeki T\u00fcrk B\u00fcy\u00fckel\u00e7ili\u011fi veya Konsoloslu\u011fu\u2019na g\u00f6nderilebilir (TebK md. 25\/a, f.4). B\u00f6yle bir tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde evrak\u0131n ilgili \u00fclke mevzuat\u0131na uygun olarak muhataba tebli\u011f edildi\u011finin belgelenmesi ve otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fckel\u00e7ili\u011fi veya Konsoloslu\u011fu\u2019na herhangi bir ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde tebligat otuzuncu g\u00fcn\u00fcn bitiminde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Muhatab\u0131n B\u00fcy\u00fckel\u00e7ili\u011fe veya Konsoloslu\u011fa ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 halinde tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131 almaktan ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131rsa bu hususta d\u00fczenlenecek tutanak tarihinde tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r (TebK md. 25\/a, f.4).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">TEBL\u0130GAT KURAL OLARAK <b>\u0130\u015eLEM\u0130N MUHATABINA <\/b>YAPILMALIDIR.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>\u0130ST\u0130SNALARI:<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1)VEK\u0130L \u0130LE TAK\u0130P ED\u0130LEN \u0130\u015eLERDE VEK\u0130LE<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2) KANUN\u0130 M\u00dcMESS\u0130LLERE (KAYYUM,VAS\u0130. TEMS\u0130LC\u0130)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3) MUHATAB ADRESTE BULUNAMAZ \u0130SE MUHATAB YER\u0130NE TEBL\u0130GATI ALAB\u0130LECEK K\u0130\u015e\u0130LERE<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>MUHATAB ADRESTE BULUNAMAZ \u0130SE MUHATAB ADINA TEBL\u0130\u011e YAPILAB\u0130LECEK K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>1)<\/b>H\u00dcKM\u0130 \u015eAHISLARDA <b>MEMUR VE M\u00dcSTAHDEMLER <\/b>\u0097<b>( MADDE 13)<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>2) <\/b>ASKER\u0130 \u015eAHISLARDA <b>KITA KUMANDANI VE M\u00dcESSESE AM\u0130R\u0130 G\u0130B\u0130 EN YAKIN \u00dcST, N\u00d6BET\u00c7\u0130 AM\u0130R VEYA SUBAY (MADDE 14) <\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>3) <\/b>AYNI KONUTTA OTURAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER VEYA H\u0130ZMET\u00c7\u0130LER<b> (MADDE 16) <\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>4)<\/b>AYNI YERDE \u00c7ALI\u015eAN DA\u0130M\u0130 MEMUR VE M\u00dcSTAHDEMLER <b>(MADDE 17) <\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>5) <\/b>\u0130DARE EDEN VEYA MUHATABIN BULUNDU\u011eU KISIM AM\u0130R\u0130<b> ( MADDE 18) <\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>H\u00dcKM\u0130 \u015eAHISLARA VE T\u0130CARETHANELERE TEBL\u0130GAT (<\/b><\/u><u><b>MADDE<\/b><\/u><u><b> 12)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>H\u00dcKM\u0130 \u015eAHISLARA (<\/b><\/u><u><b>KURAL OLARAK)<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">-YETK\u0130L\u0130 M\u00dcMESS\u0130LLER\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">-BUNLAR B\u0130RDEN Z\u0130YADE \u0130SE, YALNIZ B\u0130R\u0130NE YAPILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>B\u0130R T\u0130CARETHANEN\u0130N MUAMELELER\u0130NDEN DO\u011eAN \u0130HT\u0130LAFLARDA<\/b><\/u>, T\u0130CAR\u0130 M\u00dcMESS\u0130L\u0130NE YAPILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>H\u00dcKM\u0130 \u015eAHISLARIN MEMUR VE M\u00dcSTAHDEMLER\u0130NE TEBL\u0130GAT (<\/b><\/u><u><b>MADDE: 13)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>YETK\u0130L\u0130 M\u00dcMESS\u0130L\u0130N HER HANG\u0130 B\u0130R SEBEPLE <\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211;<\/b>MUTAT \u0130\u015e SAATLER\u0130NDE \u0130\u015e YER\u0130NDE BULUNMAMASI,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8211; VEYA O SIRADA EVRAKI B\u0130ZZAT ALAMAYACAK B\u0130R HALDE OLMASI HAL\u0130NDE TEBL\u0130GAT,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">YETK\u0130 D\u0130KKATE ALINARAK <b>MEMUR VEYA M\u00dcSTAHDEMLERDEN B\u0130R\u0130NE YAPILIR<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>ASKER\u0130 \u015eAHISLARA TEBL\u0130GAT (<\/b><\/u><u><b>MADDE:14)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>ASTSUBAYLAR HAR\u0130C\u0130 ERATA TEBL\u0130GAT: <\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KITA KUMANDANI VE M\u00dcESSESE AM\u0130R\u0130 G\u0130B\u0130 EN YAKIN \u00dcSTE YAPILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>D\u0130\u011eER ASKER\u0130 \u015eAHISLARA TEBL\u0130GAT<\/b><\/u>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130N YAPILMASINI <b>N\u00d6BET\u00c7\u0130 AM\u0130R\u0130 VEYA SUBAYI TEM\u0130N EDER<\/b>. -BUNLAR TARAFINDAN MUHATAP DERHAL BULDURULAMAZ VEYA TEBELL\u00dc\u011eDEN \u0130MT\u0130NA EDERSE YAHUT DA D\u0130\u011eER B\u0130R SEBEPLE TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130N TEM\u0130N\u0130 M\u00dcMK\u00dcN OLMAZSA, <b>TEBL\u0130\u011e O N\u00d6BET\u00c7\u0130 AM\u0130R\u0130 VEYA SUBAYINA YAPILIR.\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>AYNI KONUTTA OTURAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER VEYA H\u0130ZMET\u00c7\u0130LERE TEBL\u0130GAT<\/b><u><b> (MADDE:16<\/b><\/u> -22)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>AYNI KONUTTA OTURULMASI, <\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">MUHATAP YER\u0130NE TEBL\u0130GATI ALACAK K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N <u><b>18 YA\u015eINDAN A\u015eA\u011eI OLMAMASI VE A\u00c7IK B\u0130R \u015eEK\u0130LDE EHL\u0130YETS\u0130Z BULUNMAMASI<\/b><\/u> GEREK\u0130R.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>EHL\u0130YETS\u0130ZL\u0130K:<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">TEBL\u0130GAT T\u00dcZ\u00dc\u011e\u00dcN\u00dcN 32.MADDES\u0130NDE; <b>\u201c\u2026AKIL HASTALI\u011eI, AKIL ZAYIFLI\u011eI VEYA D\u0130\u011eER B\u0130R HASTALIK, SA\u011eIRLIK, K\u00d6RL\u00dcK VE D\u0130LS\u0130ZL\u0130K G\u0130B\u0130 SEBEPLERDEN B\u0130R\u0130 \u0130LE KEND\u0130S\u0130YLE ANLA\u015eMA \u0130MKANI OLMAYAN K\u0130MSE EHL\u0130YETS\u0130Z SAYILIR<\/b>. DEN\u0130LM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>MESLEK -SANAT ERBABINA TEBL\u0130GAT (MADDE 17.)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BELL\u0130 B\u0130R YERDE DEVAMLI OLARAK MESLEK VEYA SANATINI \u0130CRA EDENLER, O YERDE BULUNMADIKLARI TAKD\u0130RDE TEBL\u0130\u011e, <b>AYNI YERDEK\u0130 DA\u0130M\u0130 MEMUR VEYA M\u00dcSTAHDEMLER\u0130NDEN B\u0130R\u0130NE<\/b>,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">MESLEK VEYA <b>SANATINI EV\u0130NDE \u0130CRA <\/b>EDENLER\u0130N MEMUR VE M\u00dcSTAHDEMLER\u0130NDEN B\u0130R\u0130 BULUNMADI\u011eI TAKD\u0130RDE AYNI KONUTTA OTURAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130LERE VEYA H\u0130ZMET\u00c7\u0130LER\u0130NDEN B\u0130R\u0130NE YAPILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>MADDE 18:OTEL, HASTANE, FABR\u0130KA, OKUL, YURT G\u0130B\u0130 \u0130\u00c7\u0130NE SERBEST\u00c7E G\u0130R\u0130LEMEYEN ve ARANANIN KOLAYCA BULUNMASI M\u00dcMK\u00dcN OLMAYAN YERLERDEK\u0130 K\u0130\u015e\u0130LERE TEBL\u0130GAT<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130N YAPILMASINI <u><b>O YER\u0130 \u0130DARE EDEN(M\u00dcD\u00dcR) VEYA MUHATABIN BULUNDU\u011eU KISMIN AM\u0130R\u0130<\/b><\/u> <u><b>TEM\u0130N EDER<\/b><\/u>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">-BUNLAR TARAFINDAN MUHATAP DERHAL BULUNDURULAMAZ<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">-VEYA MUHATAP TEBELL\u00dc\u011eDEN \u0130MT\u0130NA EDERSE<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">-YAHUT DA D\u0130\u011eER B\u0130R SEBEPLE TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130N TEM\u0130N\u0130 M\u00dcMK\u00dcN OLMAZSA, <u><b>TEBL\u0130\u011e O YER\u0130 \u0130DARE EDEN VEYA MUHATABIN BULUNDU\u011eU KISMIN AM\u0130R\u0130NE YAPILIR<\/b><\/u><b>.<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>TUTUKUKLU VE H\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dcLERE TEBL\u0130GAT (MADDE: 19)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BUNLARIN BULUNDU\u011eU M\u00dcESSESE M\u00dcD\u00dcR\u00dc VEYA MEMURU TEM\u0130N EDER<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>MUHATAB ADRESTE BULUNAMAZ \u0130SE MUHATAB YER\u0130NE\u00a0\u00a0 TEBL\u0130GATTA D\u0130KKAT ED\u0130LECEK HUSULAR<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">MUHATABIN <b>BULUNMAMA SEBEB\u0130 YAZILMALI <\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">MUHATAP \u0130LE <b>AYNI \u00c7ALTI ALTINDA OTURDU\u011eU \u015eERH\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLMEL\u0130 <\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">MUHATABIN YER\u0130NE TEBL\u0130GATI ALAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N <b>A\u00c7IK AD. SOYAD VE MUHATTABA YAKINLI\u011eI <\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">MUHATAP YER\u0130NE TEBL\u0130GATI ALACAK K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N <u><b>18 YA\u015eINDAN A\u015eA\u011eI OLMAMASI<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>A\u00c7IK B\u0130R \u015eEK\u0130LDE EHL\u0130YETS\u0130Z BULUNMAMASI<\/b><\/u> GEREK\u0130R. (MADDE:22)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>TEBL\u0130\u011e \u0130MKANSIZLI\u011eI VE TEBELL\u00dc\u011eDEN \u0130MT\u0130NA (MADDE: 21)<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>A) TEBL\u0130\u011e \u0130MKANSIZLI\u011eI <\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>1) KES\u0130N \u0130MKANSIZLIK (T\u00dcZ. MADDE 28)<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211;<\/b> MUHATAP \u00d6LM\u00dc\u015eSE (\u0130\u015eLEM\u0130N N\u0130TEL\u0130\u011eNE G\u00d6RE KARAR VER\u0130L\u0130R<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211;<\/b> G\u00d6STER\u0130LEN ADRESTEN DEVAMLI OLARAK AYRILMI\u015e \u0130SE, TESP\u0130T ED\u0130LEN YEN\u0130 ADRESE TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 \u0130MKANSIZLIK (T\u00dcZ\u00dcK :28-30)<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0KEND\u0130S\u0130NE TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILACAK K\u0130MSE VEYA YUKARIDAK\u0130 MADDELER MUC\u0130B\u0130NCE TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILAB\u0130LECEK K\u0130MSELERDEN H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R\u0130N\u0130N <b>G\u00d6STER\u0130LEN ADRESTE <\/b><u><b>O AN \u0130\u00c7\u0130N <\/b><\/u><b>BULUNMAMALARI HAL\u0130D\u0130R.<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>G\u00d6STER\u0130LEN ADRESTE O AN \u0130\u00c7\u0130N H\u0130\u00c7 K\u0130MSE YOKSA TEBL\u0130GAT <\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211; <\/b>\u00a0BULUNMAMA SEBEB\u0130 TESP\u0130T ED\u0130L\u0130R(YAKIN KOM\u015eU, AKRABA, Y\u00d6NET\u0130C\u0130, KAPIC VS.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211; <\/b>TESP\u0130T ED\u0130LEN SEBEP EVRAKA YAZILIR VE BEYAN EDEN\u0130N \u0130MZASINI ALINIR. \u0130MZADAN \u0130MT\u0130NA HAL\u0130NDE \u0130MT\u0130NA \u015eERH\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcR,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211; <\/b>EVRAK, O YER\u0130N MUHTAR VEYA \u0130HT\u0130YAR HEYET\u0130 AZASINDAN B\u0130R\u0130NE VEYAHUT ZABITA AM\u0130R VE MEMURLARINA \u0130MZA MUKAB\u0130L\u0130NDE TESL\u0130M ED\u0130L\u0130R<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211;<\/b>TESL\u0130M ED\u0130LEN\u0130N ADRES\u0130N\u0130 \u0130HT\u0130VA EDEN \u0130HBARNAME, G\u00d6STER\u0130LEN ADRESTEK\u0130 B\u0130NANIN KAPISINA YAPI\u015eTILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211;<\/b> <u>MUHATABA HABER VER\u0130LMES \u0130\u00c7\u0130N M\u00dcMK\u00dcN OLDUK\u00c7A EN YAKIN KOM\u015eULARINDAN B\u0130R\u0130NE, VARSA Y\u00d6NET\u0130C\u0130 VEYA KAPICIYA DA B\u0130LD\u0130R\u0130L\u0130R. <\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211; \u0130HBARNAMEN\u0130N KAPIYA YAPI\u015eTIRILDI\u011eI TAR\u0130H, TEBL\u0130\u011e TAR\u0130H\u0130 SAYILIR<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00a0TEBELL\u00dc\u011eDEN \u0130MT\u0130NA<\/span><\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>1) MUHATABIN \u0130MT\u0130NASI<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8211; \u0130MT\u0130NA \u015eERH\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">-EVRAK, \u0130MZA MUKAB\u0130L\u0130NDE O YER\u0130N MUHTAR VEYA \u0130HT\u0130YAR HEYET\u0130 AZASINDAN B\u0130R\u0130NE VEYAHUT ZABITA AM\u0130R VE MEMURLARINA TESL\u0130M ED\u0130L\u0130R)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211;<\/b>TESELL\u00dcM EDEN\u0130N ADRES\u0130N\u0130 \u0130HT\u0130VA EDEN \u0130HBARNAME, G\u00d6STER\u0130LEN ADRESTEK\u0130 B\u0130NANIN KAPISINA YAPI\u015eTILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>\u00a0&#8211; \u0130HBARNAMEN\u0130N KAPIYA YAPI\u015eTIRILDI\u011eI TAR\u0130H, TEBL\u0130\u011e TAR\u0130H\u0130 SAYILIR<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>2)MUHATAP ADINA KABUL EDEB\u0130LECEK K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER\u0130N TEBELL\u00dc\u011eDEN \u0130MT\u0130NASI<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">-TEBL\u0130\u011e EDEN BU \u0130MT\u0130NAYI \u015eERH VE \u0130MZA EDER.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0EVRAK, O YER\u0130N MUHTAR VEYA \u0130HT\u0130YAR HEYET\u0130 AZASINDAN B\u0130R\u0130NE VEYAHUT ZABITA AM\u0130R VE MEMURLARINA \u0130MZA MUKAB\u0130L\u0130NDE TESL\u0130M ED\u0130L\u0130R (CEZA\u0130 MECBUR\u0130YET)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211;<\/b>TESL\u0130M ED\u0130LEN\u0130N ADRES\u0130N\u0130 \u0130HT\u0130VA EDEN \u0130HBARNAME, G\u00d6STER\u0130LEN ADRESTEK\u0130 B\u0130NANIN KAPISINA YAPI\u015eTILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211; \u0130HBARNAMEN\u0130N KAPIYA YAPI\u015eTIRILDI\u011eI TAR\u0130H, TEBL\u0130\u011e TAR\u0130H\u0130 SAYILIR<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>MUHATABIN GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 OLARAK BA\u015eKA YERE G\u0130TMES\u0130 (MADDE :20)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>1)<\/b>H\u00dcKM\u0130 \u015eAHISLARIN MEMUR VE M\u00dcSTAHDEMLER\u0130<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>2) <\/b>KITA KUMANDANI VE M\u00dcESSESE AM\u0130R\u0130 G\u0130B\u0130 EN YAKIN \u00dcST, N\u00d6BET\u00c7\u0130 AM\u0130R VEYA SUBAY<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>3)<\/b>AYNI KONUTTA OTURAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER VEYA H\u0130ZMET\u00c7\u0130LER<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>4)<\/b>AYNI YERDE \u00c7ALI\u015eAN DA\u0130M\u0130 MEMUR VE M\u00dcSTAHDEMLER<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>5) <\/b>\u0130DARE EDEN VEYA MUHATABIN BULUNDU\u011eU KISIM AM\u0130R\u0130 <u><b>MUHATABIN MUVAKKATEN BA\u015eKA YERE G\u0130TT\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 BEL\u0130RT\u0130RLERSE;<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>BEYANINI (MUVAKKATEN AYRILMA) \u0130MZA EDER VE EVRAKI ALIR \u0130SE;<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1) KEYF\u0130YET VE BEYANDA BULUNANIN ADI, SOYADI, MUHATABLA OLAN \u0130LG\u0130S\u0130 YAZILIR VE \u0130MZASI ALINIR,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3) TEBL\u0130\u011e EVRAKI BU K\u0130\u015e\u0130YE VER\u0130L\u0130R<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4) <u><b>BU DURUMDA TEBL\u0130\u011e, <span style=\"color: #000000;\">EVRAKIN VER\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130 TAR\u0130HTE YAPILMI\u015e SAYILIR<\/span><\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b><span style=\"color: #000000;\">BEYANINI \u0130MZADAN \u0130MT\u0130NA <\/span>EDERSE<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">-TEBL\u0130\u011e EDEN BU BEYANI \u015eERH VE \u0130MZA EDER.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8211; EVRAK, O YER\u0130N MUHTAR VEYA \u0130HT\u0130YAR HEYET\u0130 AZASINDAN B\u0130R\u0130NE VEYAHUT ZABITA AM\u0130R VE MEMURLARINA \u0130MZA MUKAB\u0130L\u0130NDE TESL\u0130M ED\u0130L\u0130R<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211;<\/b>TESELL\u00dcM EDEN\u0130N ADRES\u0130N\u0130 \u0130HT\u0130VA EDEN \u0130HBARNAME, G\u00d6STER\u0130LEN ADRESTEK\u0130 B\u0130NANIN KAPISINA YAPI\u015eTILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211;<\/b> TEBL\u0130\u011e OLUNACAK \u015eAHSA KEYF\u0130YET\u0130N HABER VER\u0130LMES\u0130 \u0130\u00c7\u0130N M\u00dcMK\u00dcN OLDUK\u00c7A EN YAKIN KOM\u015eULARINDAN B\u0130R\u0130NE, VARSA Y\u00d6NET\u0130C\u0130 VEYA KAPICIYA DA B\u0130LD\u0130R\u0130L\u0130R<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">-TEBL\u0130\u011e,\u0130HBARNAME KAPIYA YAPI\u015eTIRILDI\u011eI TAR\u0130HTEN \u0130T\u0130BAREN <b>ONBE\u015e G\u00dcN SONRA<\/b> YAPILMI\u015e SAYILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>\u0130LANEN TEBL\u0130GAT (MADDE :28)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130LANEN TEBL\u0130GAT SON \u00c7ARED\u0130R<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">ADRES\u0130 ME\u00c7HUL OLANLARA TEBL\u0130GAT \u0130LANEN YAPILIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>MECHUL ADRES:<\/b><\/u> YUKARI K\u0130 MADDELER MUC\u0130B\u0130NCE TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILAMIYAN VE \u0130KAMETGAHI, MESKEN\u0130 VEYA \u0130\u015e YER\u0130 DE BULUNAMIYAN K\u0130MSEN\u0130N ADRES\u0130 ME\u00c7HUL SAYILIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>\u0130LANEN TEBL\u0130GATTA USUL:<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>1)<\/b>\u0130LAN; MUHATABIN, EN EM\u0130N \u015eEK\u0130LDE B\u0130LG\u0130 ED\u0130NEB\u0130LECE\u011e\u0130 UMULAN VE VARSA AYRICA TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u00c7IKARAN MERC\u0130\u0130N BULUNDU\u011eU YERDE \u00c7IKAN GAZETEDE YAPILIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>2)<\/b> TEBL\u0130\u011e OLUNACAK EVRAK VE \u0130LAN SURET\u0130, TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u00c7IKARAN MERC\u0130\u0130N HERKES\u0130N KOLAYCA G\u00d6REB\u0130LECE\u011e\u0130 B\u0130R YER\u0130NE DE ASILIR.(B\u0130R AY S\u00dcRE \u0130LE)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>3) <\/b>MERC\u0130, \u0130CABINA G\u00d6RE \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 DEFA \u0130LAN YAPILMASINA KARAR VEREB\u0130L\u0130R. \u0130K\u0130 \u0130LAN ARASINDAK\u0130 M\u00dcDDET B\u0130R HAFTADAN A\u015eA\u011eI OLAMAZ<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>\u0130LANEN TEBL\u0130GATTA TEBL\u0130\u011e TAR\u0130H\u0130:(MADDE :31)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130LANEN TEBL\u0130\u011e, SON \u0130LAN TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u0130T\u0130BAREN YED\u0130 G\u00dcN SONRA YAPILMI\u015e SAYILIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130LANEN TEBL\u0130\u011eE KARAR VEREN MERC\u0130, \u0130CABINA G\u00d6RE DAHA UZUN B\u0130R M\u00dcDDET TAY\u0130N EDEB\u0130L\u0130R. ANCAK, BU S\u00dcRE 15 G\u00dcN\u00dc GE\u00c7EMEZ.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>DO\u011eRU ZAMANDA TEBL\u0130GAT<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1) \u00a0RESM\u0130 VE ADL\u0130 TAT\u0130L G\u00dcNLER\u0130NDE VE GECE TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILAB\u0130L\u0130R<u><b> (KANUN MADDE 33-T\u00dcZ\u00dcK MADDE:52)<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>2) <\/b><\/u><u>\u0130DAR\u0130 \u0130\u015eEM\u0130N BEL\u0130RL\u0130 B\u0130R S\u00dcREDE K\u0130\u015e\u0130YE TEBL\u0130\u011e ZORUNLULU\u011eU ( ZAMANA\u015eIMI- HAK D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcM\u00dc)<\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u0130Z\u0130N VE RAPORDA TEBL\u0130GAT: (657 \/62)<\/span> <\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130LK DEFA VEYA YEN\u0130DEN VEYAHUT YER DE\u011e\u0130\u015eT\u0130RME SURET\u0130YLE ATAMALARDA <u><b>MEMURUN \u0130Z\u0130NL\u0130 VE RAPORLU OLMASI TEBL\u0130GATA ENGEL DE\u011e\u0130LD\u0130R.<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><b>ANCAK G\u00d6REVE BA\u015eLANILMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N BEL\u0130RLENEN S\u00dcRELER <\/b><\/u>\u0130Z\u0130N VE RAPOR M\u00dcDDET\u0130N\u0130N B\u0130TMES\u0130NDE BA\u015eLAR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>DE\u011e\u0130\u015eEN ADRESLER\u0130N B\u0130LD\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130 MECBUR\u0130YET\u0130 (MADDE: 35-49-)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KANUNUN G\u00d6STERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 USULLERE G\u00d6RE <u><b>TEBL\u0130\u011e YAPILMI\u015e OLAN<\/b><\/u> K\u0130MSE, ADRES\u0130N\u0130 DE\u011e\u0130\u015eT\u0130R\u0130RSE, YEN\u0130S\u0130N\u0130 HEMEN TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130 YAPTIRMI\u015e OLAN MERC\u0130\u0130NE B\u0130LD\u0130RMEYE MECBURDUR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>\u00a0<\/b>ADRES DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130\u011e\u0130 B\u0130LD\u0130R\u0130LMEZ VE YEN\u0130 ADRESDE TEBL\u0130\u011e MEMURUNCA TESP\u0130T ED\u0130LEMEZ \u0130SE TEBL\u0130\u011e OLUNACAK EVRAKIN B\u0130R N\u00dcSHASI ESK\u0130 ADRESE A\u0130T B\u0130NANIN KAPISINA ASILIR VE ASILMA TAR\u0130H\u0130, TEBL\u0130\u011e TAR\u0130H\u0130 SAYILIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>MUHATABIN \u0130MZA EDEMEYECEK DURUMDA OLMASI (KANUN MADDE 24- T\u00dcZ\u00dcK 35) <\/b><\/u><b>(YAZI B\u0130LMEMEK, K\u00d6RL\u00dcK, HASTALIK, VS )<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>1<\/b><u><b>) <\/b><\/u><u>OKUR YAZAR KOM\u015eULARINDAN B\u0130R K\u0130\u015e\u0130 HUZURUNDA<\/u><u><b>;<\/b><\/u> SOL EL\u0130N\u0130N BA\u015e PARMA\u011eI BASTIRILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>2)<\/b>\u00a0SOL EL\u0130N\u0130N BA\u015e PARMA\u011eI YOK \u0130SE AYNI EL\u0130N\u0130N D\u0130\u011eER B\u0130R PARMA\u011eI VE SOL EL\u0130 YOKSA SA\u011e EL\u0130N\u0130N BA\u015e PARMA\u011eI VE BU DA MEVCUT DE\u011e\u0130LSE D\u0130\u011eER PARMAKLARINDAN B\u0130R\u0130 BASTIRILIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0<b>3)<\/b> TEBL\u0130\u011e YAPILACAK K\u0130MSEN\u0130N \u0130K\u0130 EL\u0130 DE YOKSA TEBL\u0130\u011e EVRAKI KEND\u0130S\u0130NE VER\u0130L\u0130R.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>\u00a04)<\/b>YUKARDAK\u0130 FIKRALARDA YAZILI HALLERDE KEYF\u0130YET, \u015eERH ED\u0130L\u0130R ED\u0130L\u0130R VE HAZIR BULUNAN \u015eAHSA DA \u0130MZA ETT\u0130R\u0130L\u0130R.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>5)<\/b> OKUR YAZAR B\u0130R KOM\u015eU BULUNMAZ VEYA BULUNAN KOM\u015eU \u0130MZADAN \u0130MT\u0130NA EDERSE, TEBL\u0130\u011e MEMURU O MAHALLE VEYA K\u00d6Y\u00dcN MUHTAR VEYA \u0130HT\u0130YAR HEYET\u0130 AZASINDAN B\u0130R\u0130N\u0130 VEYAHUT B\u0130R ZABITA HUZURUNDA YAPILIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>YABANCI MEMLEKETTE TEBL\u0130GAT (<\/b><\/u><b>MADDE 25<\/b><b>)<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">TEBL\u0130GATI \u00c7IKARAN MERC\u0130\u0130N BA\u011eLI BULUNDU\u011eU BAKANLIK VASITAS\u0130YLE DI\u015e\u0130\u015eLER\u0130 BAKANLI\u011eINA, ORADAN DA MEMUR\u0130YET HAVZASI NAZARI \u0130T\u0130BARA ALINARAK \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 T\u00dcRK\u0130YE EL\u00c7\u0130L\u0130\u011e\u0130NE VEYA KONSOLOSLU\u011eUNA G\u00d6NDER\u0130L\u0130R<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>USUL\u00dcNE AYKIRI TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130N H\u00dcKM\u00dc: (MADDE 32)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">TEBL\u0130\u011e USUL\u00dcNE AYKIRI YAPILMI\u015e OLSA B\u0130LE, MUHATABI TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u00d6\u011eRENM\u0130\u015e \u0130SE GE\u00c7ERL\u0130 SAYILIR. ANCAK, MUHATABIN BEYAN ETT\u0130\u011e\u0130 TAR\u0130H, TEBL\u0130\u011e TAR\u0130H\u0130 SAYILIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>CEZA\u0130 H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER (MADDE 52-53-54-55-56)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8211;<b>YANLI\u015e ADRES,\u0130S\u0130M,SO\u0130S\u0130M B\u0130LD\u0130RMEK,<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211; KANUNUN UYGULAMASINDA G\u00d6REVL\u0130 OLAN MEMURLARLARIN G\u00d6REVL\u0130LER\u0130N YAPMAMASI (MUHTAR, AZA VS.)<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>-TEBL\u0130GATI ALMAMA (MUHATAB VE MUHATAB ADINA EVRAKI KABUL ETMES\u0130 GEREKEN K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER)<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>-TEBL\u0130\u011e EVRAKININ MUHATABINA VER\u0130LMEMES\u0130 SEBEB\u0130 \u0130LE GEC\u0130KME VEYA ZARAR VUKUA GELMES\u0130,<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>-YALAN BEYAN<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>&#8211;<\/b><b><i>\u00a0<\/i><\/b><b>TEBL\u0130\u011e EVRAKININ VEYA \u0130HBARNAMEN\u0130N KAPIYA ASILMASINA KAR\u015eI KOYANLAR \u0130LE ASILAN BU EVRAKI BULUNDU\u011eU YERDEN KOPARAN, \u0130MHA EDEN VEYA OKUNAMAZ HALE GET\u0130RENLER <\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><u><b>\u00d6RNEK YARGI KARARLARI<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>1)<\/b>MUHATABIN YER\u0130NE, TEBL\u0130GATI ALAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N \u201c<b>MUHATAP \u0130LE AYNI \u00c7ATI ALTINDA OTURDU\u011eU\u201d TEBL\u0130\u011e MAZBATASINDA BEL\u0130RT\u0130LMEM\u0130\u015e \u0130SE<\/b> YAPILAN TEBL\u0130GAT GE\u00c7ERL\u0130 DE\u011e\u0130LD\u0130R,(Yarg\u0131tay 12.HD.5.6.2000 T. E.2000\/\/8695,K.2000\/9268)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2) MUHATAP \u0130LE <b>AYNI \u00c7ATI ALTINA OTURMAYAN YA DA AYNI \u00c7ATI ALTINDA OTURDU\u011eU MAZBATAYA YAZILMADAN, \u00d6RNE\u011e\u0130N \u201c<\/b><u><b>MUHATABIN AB\u0130S\u0130NE<\/b><\/u>\u201d \u015eEKL\u0130NDE YAPILAN TEBL\u0130GATIN DA GE\u00c7ERS\u0130Z OLDU\u011eUNA H\u00dcKMETM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R (YARGITAY)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>HERHANG\u0130 B\u0130R \u0130S\u0130M YAZILMADAN <\/b>\u201c<b>B\u0130RL\u0130KTE OTURAN<\/b>\u201d \u015eEKL\u0130NDE YAPILMI\u015e B\u0130R TEBL\u0130GATTA USULS\u00dcZ B\u0130R TEBL\u0130GATTIR<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3) <b>APARTMANIN KAPICISI,<\/b> <b>TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILACAK K\u0130\u015e\u0130 \u0130LE B\u0130RL\u0130KTE OTURAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130 DE\u011e\u0130LD\u0130R<\/b>. DOLAYISIYLA MUHATABA G\u00d6NDER\u0130LEN TEBL\u0130GATIN APARTMAN KAPICISININ \u0130MZASINA TEBL\u0130\u011e ED\u0130LMES\u0130, USULS\u00dcZ B\u0130R TEBL\u0130GATTIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>4) MUHATAP BULUNMADI\u011eINDAN\u201d VEYA BENZER\u0130 B\u0130R \u0130FADE KULLANIMDAN <\/b>(MAZBATAYA YAZILMADAN) \u201c<b>A\u0130LE EFRADINA<\/b>\u201d YAPILAN B\u0130RTEBL\u0130GAT GE\u00c7ERS\u0130ZD\u0130R.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>5<\/b>) MUTLAKA <b>MUHATABIN TEBL\u0130GAT ADRES\u0130NDE O ANDA BULUNMAMA SEBEB\u0130 YAZILMALIDIR<\/b> (BULUNMAMA SEBEB\u0130 MAKUL, MANTIKLI OLMALI, O ANDA BULUNMAMASINI \u0130ZAH ED\u0130C\u0130 B\u0130R GEREK\u00c7E \u0130\u00c7ERMEL\u0130D\u0130R<b>.)<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>6)T\u00dcZEL K\u0130\u015e\u0130LERE TEBL\u0130GAT YETK\u0130L\u0130 TEMS\u0130LC\u0130S\u0130NE YAPILIR. <\/b>TEBL\u0130GATIN YAPILACA\u011eI K\u0130\u015e\u0130 HERHANG\u0130 B\u0130R NEDENLE MUTAT \u0130\u015e SAAT\u0130NDE \u0130\u015eYER\u0130NDE BULUNMADI\u011eI VEYA EVRAKI ALAMAYACA\u011eI B\u0130R HALDE \u0130SE, TEBL\u0130GAT HAZIR OLAN MEMUR YADA \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130YE YAPILIR. ANCAK <b>YETK\u0130L\u0130 K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER\u0130N BULUNMADI\u011eI TEBL\u0130\u011e MAZBATASINDA YAZILMADI\u011eINDAN YAPILAN TEBL\u0130GAT GE\u00c7ERL\u0130 DE\u011e\u0130LD\u0130R. <\/b>\u0097(YARGITAY 12.HD 18.11.2003 T. 2003\/23298 E, 2003\/22884 K<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">8) VEK\u0130L \u0130LE TAK\u0130P ED\u0130LEN B\u0130R \u0130\u015eTE MUTLAKA <b>VEK\u0130LE (AVUKATA) TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILMALIDIR<\/b>.AS\u0130LE YAPILAN TEBL\u0130GAT GE\u00c7ERS\u0130ZD\u0130R. AVUKATIN \u0130\u015eYER\u0130NE TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILMALIDIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>9) FABR\u0130KADA \u00c7ALI\u015eAN B\u0130R \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130N\u0130N TEBL\u0130GATININ; <\/b>FABR\u0130KA M\u00dcD\u00dcR\u00dcNE VEYA \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130N\u0130N \u00c7ALI\u015eTI\u011eI KISIM AM\u0130R\u0130NE YAPILMASI YER\u0130NE <b>FABR\u0130KA SEKRETER\u0130NE YAPILMASI USULS\u00dcZD\u00dcR<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>10)<\/b> <b>HABER KA\u011eIDININ <\/b>KAPIYA YAPI\u015eTIRILMASI YER\u0130NE, K<b>OM\u015eUSUNA VER\u0130LMES\u0130 <\/b>HAL\u0130NDE, TEBL\u0130GATIN GE\u00c7ERS\u0130Z OLACA\u011eINA H\u00dcKMETM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R. (DANI\u015eTAY 7.DA\u0130RES\u0130 <b>)<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>11)<\/strong>\u00a0<b>MUHATABIN ADRES\u0130NDE BULUNMADI\u011eI YAZILMI\u015e, ANCAK BU B\u0130LG\u0130Y\u0130 VEREN K\u0130\u015e\u0130 VEYA K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER\u0130N VE BU DURUMUN HABER VER\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130 KOM\u015eUNUN \u0130S\u0130MLER\u0130 YAZILMAMI\u015e VE \u0130MZALAR ALINMAMI\u015e<\/b>, DO\u011eRUDAN MUHTAR \u0130MZASINA TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILMI\u015eTIR. TEBL\u0130GAT GE\u00c7ERS\u0130ZD\u0130R.\u201d YARGITAY 18.HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 ESAS: 2007\/1169, KARAR: 2007\/2984 KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130: 02.04.2007<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>12)<\/b> \u201cTEBL\u0130\u011e SIRASINDA <u><b>YETK\u0130L\u0130 K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N BULUNMAMASI DURUMUNDA BU HUSUSUN TEBL\u0130\u011e BELGES\u0130NE YAZILMASI KO\u015eULUYLA<\/b><\/u>, TEBL\u0130GAT \u0130\u015eLEM\u0130 T\u00dcZEL K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N PERSONEL\u0130NE YAPILAB\u0130L\u0130R.\u201d \u015eEKL\u0130NDE KARAR VERM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R YARGITAY 12. HD 29.03.2004 Tarih ve 2004\/1748 E, 2004\/7348<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">13) T\u00dcZEL K\u0130\u015e\u0130YE TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILIRKEN; \u201c\u2026SEKRETER\u0130 FATMA\u2019YA\u2026\u201d, \u201c..<b>MUHASEBEC\u0130S\u0130 AL\u0130\u2019YE\u2026\u201d, \u201c\u2026M\u00dcD\u00dcR\u00dcNE\u2026\u201d, \u201c\u2026\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130S\u0130NE\u2026\u201d, \u201c\u2026MEMURUNA<\/b>\u2026\u201d \u015eEKL\u0130NDEK\u0130 \u0130BARELERLE YAPILAN TEBL\u0130GATLAR GE\u00c7ERS\u0130ZD\u0130R<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>14)<\/b> <b>\u015e\u0130RKET YETK\u0130L\u0130S\u0130N\u0130N \u0130\u015eYER\u0130NDE BULUNMADI\u011eI, TEBL\u0130GATI ALACAK DURUMDA OLMADI\u011eI YOLUNDA HER HANG\u0130 B\u0130R KAYIT D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLMEDEN \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130S\u0130 OLDU\u011eU BEL\u0130RT\u0130LEN \u015eAHSA TEBL\u0130\u011e ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130 ANLA\u015eILDI\u011eINDAN<\/b> KARARIN BOZULMASINA KARAR VER\u0130LMEL\u0130D\u0130R.\u201dSONUCUNA VARMI\u015eTIR. DANI\u015eTAY 4.D. E. 2006\/791, K. 2006\/1983, 19.10.2006<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>15)<\/b> AVUKATLAR A\u00c7ISINDA, VEK\u0130L \u0130LE TAK\u0130P ED\u0130LEN B\u0130R \u0130\u015eTE MUTLAKA VEK\u0130LE(AVUKATA) TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILMALIDIR. AS\u0130LE YAPILAN TEBL\u0130GAT GE\u00c7ERS\u0130ZD\u0130R. <b>AVUKATIN \u0130\u015eYER\u0130NE TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILMALIDIR<\/b>. BARO, AVUKATIN \u0130\u015eYER\u0130 OLMADI\u011eINDAN, AVUKATIN \u0130\u015e ADRES\u0130 YER\u0130NE BARO\u2019YA YAPILAN TEBL\u0130GAT USULS\u00dcZD\u00dcR.(HGK 06.02.1972 T. 1972\/2-776 E,1972\/99K)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>16)<\/b> OTELDE KALIP KALMADI\u011eI ARA\u015eTIRILMADAN, OTEL \u0130DARE EDEN K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N YER\u0130NE <b>OTEL RESEPS\u0130YONUN DA G\u00d6REVL\u0130 K\u0130\u015e\u0130YE YAPILAN <\/b>TEBL\u0130GAT USULS\u00dcZD\u00dcR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>17)<\/b> FABR\u0130KADA \u00c7ALI\u015eAN B\u0130R \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130N\u0130N TEBL\u0130GATI; FABR\u0130KA M\u00dcD\u00dcR\u00dcNE VEYA \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130N\u0130N \u00c7ALI\u015eTI\u011eI KISIM AM\u0130R\u0130NE YAPILMASI YER\u0130NE <b>FABR\u0130KA SEKRETER\u0130NE<\/b> YAPILAN TEBL\u0130GAT USULS\u00dcZD\u00dcR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>18)<\/b> HASTANEDE TEDAV\u0130 G\u00d6RE K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N TEBL\u0130GATI DA HASTANE M\u00dcD\u00dcR\u00dc YADA \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 KISIM AM\u0130R\u0130 VASITASIYLA YAPILAMADAN, DO\u011eRUDAN <b>N\u00d6BET\u00c7\u0130 HEM\u015e\u0130REYE<\/b> YAPILAN TEBL\u0130GAT HUKUKEN GE\u00c7ERS\u0130ZD\u0130R<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">ELEKTRON\u0130K TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILMASI HAKKINDA USUL VE ESASLARI \u0130\u00c7EREN TEBL\u0130\u011e YAYINLANMI\u015eTIR.<\/span> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">213 say\u0131l\u0131 Vergi Usul Kanunu\u2019nun 107\/A maddesinde ;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201cBu kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimselere, 93\u2019nc\u00fc maddede say\u0131lan usullere ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n<strong>, tebli\u011fe elveri\u015fli elektronik bir adres vas\u0131tas\u0131yla elektronik ortamda tebli\u011f yap\u0131labilir.<\/strong> <strong>Elektronik ortamda tebligat, muhatab\u0131n elektronik adresine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r<\/strong>.\u201d<\/em> H\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">456 S\u0131ra no\u2019lu Vergi Usul Kanunu Genel Tebli\u011fi 27.08.2015 tarih 29458 say\u0131l\u0131 resmi gazetede yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu tebli\u011fde elektronik tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki usul ve esaslar a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">ELEKTRON\u0130K ADRES KULLANMA ZORUNLULU\u011eU GET\u0130R\u0130LEN K\u0130\u015e\u0130 VE KURUMLAR<\/span> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">456 S\u0131ra no\u2019lu tebli\u011f ile a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki ki\u015fi ve kurumlara 01.01.2016 tarihinden itibaren elektronik tebligat kullanma zorunlulu\u011fu getirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kurumlar vergisi m\u00fckellefleri<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ticari, zirai ve mesleki kazan\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden gelir vergisi m\u00fckellefiyeti bulunanlar<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ste\u011fe ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak kendilerine elektronik tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep edenler<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>KURUMLAR VERG\u0130S\u0130 M\u00dcKELLEFLER\u0130N\u0130N B\u0130LD\u0130R\u0130M\u0130 VE M\u00dcRACAAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Kurumlar vergisi m\u00fckellefleri <\/strong><strong>01.01.2016 tarihine kadar<\/strong> \u00f6rne\u011fi Tebli\u011f ekinde yer alan \u201cElektronik Tebligat Talep Bildirimi (EK:1) kurumlar vergisi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u011fl\u0131 bulunduklar\u0131 vergi dairesine vermeleri gerekmektedir. Bu m\u00fckellefler, s\u00f6z konusu bildirimi kanuni temsilcileri veya elektronik tebligat sistemi ile ilgili i\u015flemleri yapmaya y\u00f6nelik \u00f6zel yetki i\u00e7eren noterde verilmi\u015f vek\u00e2letnameyle yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan ki\u015filer arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla bizzat teslim edeceklerdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 01 Ocak 2016 tarihinden sonra m\u00fckellefiyet tesis ettiren kurumlar vergisi m\u00fckellefleri ise i\u015fe ba\u015flama tarihini takip eden 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde elektronik tebligat telep bildiriminde bulunmak zorundad\u0131rlar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 GEL\u0130R VERG\u0130S\u0130 M\u00dcKELLEFLER\u0130N\u0130N B\u0130LD\u0130R\u0130M\u0130 VE\u00a0 M\u00dcRACAAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130<\/span> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <strong>Gelir Vergisi m\u00fckellefleride <\/strong><strong>01.01.2016 tarihine kadar<\/strong> \u00f6rne\u011fi Tebli\u011f ekinde yer alan \u201cElektronik Tebligat Talep Bildirimi (Ger\u00e7ek Ki\u015filer \u0130\u00e7in)\u201dni (EK:2) internet vergi dairesinde elektronik ortamda doldurmalar\u0131 ve elektronik tebligat sistemini kullanmaya ba\u015flamalar\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0Bu m\u00fckelleflerin, s\u00f6z konusu bildirimi kendileri veya elektronik tebligat sistemi ile ilgili i\u015flemleri yapmaya y\u00f6nelik \u00f6zel yetki i\u00e7eren noterde verilmi\u015f vek\u00e2letnameyle yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan ki\u015filer arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla gelir vergisi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u011fl\u0131 bulunduklar\u0131 vergi dairesine bizzat vermeleri de m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130nternet vergi dairesini kullanarak elektronik ortamda bildirimde bulunan gelir vergisi m\u00fckelleflerine internet vergi dairesi kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu, parola ve \u015fifresi verilmeyecek olup bu m\u00fckellefler sisteme her giri\u015flerinde sistem taraf\u0131ndan kimlik do\u011frulamas\u0131 yap\u0131lmak suretiyle elektronik tebligat sistemini kullanabileceklerdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Vergi dairesine bizzat veya vekili arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ba\u015fvuran ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi m\u00fckelleflerin ba\u015fvurular\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilecek ve gerekli \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan m\u00fckelleflere internet vergi dairesi kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu, parola ve \u015fifresi verilecektir<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>\u0130NTERNET VERG\u0130 DA\u0130RES\u0130 KULLANICI KODU, PAROLA VE \u015e\u0130FRE ED\u0130NME<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Elektronik tebligat sistemini kullanmak \u00fczere, Tebli\u011f ekinde yer alan Elektronik Tebligat Talep Bildirimi ile bildirimde bulunan m\u00fckelleflere vergi dairesince, m\u00fcracaat an\u0131nda sistemden \u00fcretilecek internet vergi dairesi kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu, parola ve \u015fifreyi ihtiva eden kapal\u0131 bir zarf verilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Kurumlar vergisi ve Gelir vergisi m\u00fckelleflerinden daha \u00f6nce internet vergi dairesi kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu ve \u015fifresi olanlar;<strong>\u00a0 Elektronik tebligat talep bildirim formunda yer alan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cDaha \u00f6nceden internet vergi dairesi kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu ve \u015fifrem bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle, \u015fifremi elektronik tebligat alma i\u015flemlerinde de kullanmak istiyorum.\u201d<\/strong> Kutucu\u011funu i\u015faretlemeleri durumunda, ayn\u0131 kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu ve \u015fifreyi elektronik tebligat alma i\u015flemlerinde de kullanmalar\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olacakt\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">ELEKTRON\u0130K TEBL\u0130GATIN G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130 VE MUHATABINA \u0130LET\u0130LMES\u0130<\/span> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">213 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tebli\u011fi gereken evrak, elektronik imza ile imzalanacak ve vergi dairesi ad\u0131na Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak muhatab\u0131n elektronik tebligat adresine iletilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Elektronik tebligat sistemine internet vergi dairesi \u00fczerinden eri\u015filecektir. \u0130nternet vergi dairesi kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu, parola ve \u015fifresine sahip olan ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczel ki\u015filer \u015fifreleriyle elektronik tebligat adreslerine ula\u015facaklard\u0131r. \u0130nternet vergi dairesi kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu, parola ve \u015fifresi olmayan ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer ise sisteme her giri\u015fte yap\u0131lan kimlik do\u011frulamas\u0131 ile elektronik tebligat adreslerine eri\u015feceklerdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kanunun 107\/A maddesi gere\u011fince, elektronik imzal\u0131 tebli\u011f evrak\u0131, muhatab\u0131n elektronik ortamdaki adresine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen <u>be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda<\/u> tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f say\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Olay kay\u0131tlar\u0131, \u0130\u015flem Zaman Bilgisi eklenerek, eri\u015filebilir \u015fekilde ar\u015fivlerde otuz y\u0131l s\u00fcreyle saklanacakt\u0131r<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hesaba eri\u015fim bilgilerinin iletimi ile sisteme eri\u015fimin g\u00fcvenli bir \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli tedbirler Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nacak olup talep halinde elektronik tebligata ili\u015fkin delil kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ilgilisine veya yetkili mercilere sunulacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">ELEKTRON\u0130K TEBL\u0130GAT S\u0130STEM\u0130NDEN \u00c7IKI\u015e<\/span> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zorunlu veya ihtiyari olarak elektronik tebligat sistemine dahil olanlar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki durumlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda sistemden \u00e7\u0131kmalar\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">T\u00fczel ki\u015filerde ticaret sicil kayd\u0131n\u0131n silindi\u011fi (nevi de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ve birle\u015fme halleri dahil) tarih itibar\u0131yla, elektronik tebligat adresi kapat\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filerde ise ilgilinin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc veya gaipli\u011fine karar verildi\u011finin idare taraf\u0131ndan tespit edildi\u011fi durumlarda \u00f6l\u00fcm\/karar tarihi itibar\u0131yla ilgilinin elektronik tebligat adresi re\u2019sen kapat\u0131l\u0131r. Miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n ba\u011fl\u0131 olunan vergi dairesine ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 halinde de m\u00fcteveffan\u0131n elektronik tebligat adresi kullan\u0131ma kapat\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">M\u00dcKELLEFLER\u0130N SORUMLULU\u011eU<\/span> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>M\u00fckellefler;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a) Elektronik Tebligat Talep Bildirimini s\u00fcresinde, tam ve do\u011fru olarak vergi dairesine beyan etmekle,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b) Beyan edilen bilgilerde meydana gelecek de\u011fi\u015fiklikleri \u00f6ncesinde veya en ge\u00e7 de\u011fi\u015fiklik tarihinde vergi dairesine bildirmekle,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">c) Elektronik Tebligat Talep Bildiriminde belirtilen t\u00fcm \u015fartlara riayet etmekle,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00e7) Sistem kullan\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak kendisine verilmi\u015f olan kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu, parola ve \u015fifre gibi bilgilerini korumakla, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerle payla\u015fmamakla ve ba\u015fkas\u0131na kulland\u0131rmamakla,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">d) Sistem kullan\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak kendisine verilmi\u015f olan kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu, parola ve \u015fifre gibi bilgilerin istenmeyen \u015fekilde \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin eline ge\u00e7ti\u011fini tespit etti\u011finde derhal vergi dairesine bilgi vermekle,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da yer verilen sorumluluklar\u0131n yerine getirilmemesinden do\u011facak hukuki sonu\u00e7lar muhatab\u0131n sorumlulu\u011funda olup t\u00fcm bildirimler vergi dairesine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 anda sonu\u00e7 do\u011furur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">CEZA H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130 VE D\u0130\u011eER KONULAR<\/span> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Elektronik tebligat sistemine dahil olmas\u0131 zorunlu olanlardan bu Tebli\u011f ile getirilen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklere uymayanlar i\u00e7in Kanunun 148, 149 ve m\u00fckerrer 257 nci maddeleri uyar\u0131nca, Kanunun M\u00fckerrer 355 inci maddesindeki cezai m\u00fceyyide uygulan\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Ceza uygulamas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda re\u2019sen olu\u015fturulan internet vergi dairesi kullan\u0131c\u0131 kodu, parola ve \u015fifresi ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filerde m\u00fckellefe, t\u00fczel ki\u015filer ile t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fi olmayan te\u015fekk\u00fcllerde do\u011frudan kanuni temsilcisine tebli\u011f edilir ve elektronik tebligat adreslerine tebligat g\u00f6nderimine ba\u015flan\u0131l\u0131r. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tebli\u011fi gereken evrak muhataplara elektronik tebligat sistemi ile tebli\u011f edilebilece\u011fi gibi Kanunda yer verilen di\u011fer tebligat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re de tebli\u011f edilebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00a0<\/em><strong><em>Elektronik Tebligat uygulamas\u0131na, 01.01.2016 tarihi itibariyle ba\u015flan\u0131lacakt\u0131r. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Ancak bu tarihten \u00f6nce bildirimde bulunanlara 01.10.2015 tarihinden itibaren elektronik tebligat yap\u0131labilir.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Detayl\u0131 bilgi i\u00e7in bkz. <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Mahmut B\u0130LGEN Tebligat HUKUKU Kitab\u0131<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/12-187<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2016\/14<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 20.1.2016<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GATA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N \u015e\u0130KAYET ( Bor\u00e7lu \u015eirketin Takip Talebindeki Adrese G\u00f6nderilen\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Bila Tebli\u011f D\u00f6nmesi \u00dczerine Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funa M\u00fczekkere Yaz\u0131larak \u015eirketin Son Sicil Adresinin Bildirilmesinin \u0130stendi\u011fi &#8211; Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funun Bildirdi\u011fi Adresin Bila Tebli\u011f D\u00f6nen Adres Oldu\u011funun Anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00dczerine Ayn\u0131 Adrese 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 35. Maddesi Gere\u011fince Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131labilece\u011fi\/\u015eikayetin Reddine Karar Verilece\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEBL\u0130GAT KANUNU&#8217;NUN 35. MADDES\u0130NE G\u00d6RE\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0YAPILMASI ( Bor\u00e7lu \u015eirketin Takip Talebindeki Adrese G\u00f6nderilen\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Bila Tebli\u011f D\u00f6nmesi \u00dczerine Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funa M\u00fczekkere Yaz\u0131larak \u015eirketin Son Sicil Adresinin Bildirilmesinin \u0130stendi\u011fi &#8211; Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funun Bildirdi\u011fi Adresin Bila Tebli\u011f D\u00f6nen Adres Oldu\u011funun Anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00dczerine Ayn\u0131 Adrese 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 35. Maddesi Gere\u011fince\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131labilece\u011fi\/\u015eikayetin Rededilece\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 BOR\u00c7LU \u015e\u0130RKET\u0130N ADRES DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 T\u0130CARET S\u0130C\u0130L MEMURLU\u011eUNA B\u0130LD\u0130RMES\u0130 ( Bor\u00e7lu \u015eirketin Takip Talebindeki Adrese G\u00f6nderilen\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Bila Tebli\u011f D\u00f6nmesi \u00dczerine Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funa M\u00fczekkere Yaz\u0131larak \u015eirketin Son Sicil Adresinin Bildirilmesinin \u0130stendi\u011fi &#8211; Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funun Bildirdi\u011fi Adresin Bila Tebli\u011f D\u00f6nen Adres Oldu\u011funun Anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00dczerine Ayn\u0131 Adrese 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 35. Maddesi Gere\u011fince\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131labilece\u011fi\/\u015eikayetin Reddine Karar Verilece\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2004\/m.\u00a016<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.\u00a010,\u00a035<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0\u0130stem, \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkindir. Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u015fikayet eden bor\u00e7lu aleyhine takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, takip talebindeki adrese g\u00f6nderilen\u00a0tebligat\u0131n bila tebli\u011f d\u00f6nmesi \u00fczerine bor\u00e7lu taraf \u015firket oldu\u011fundan Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funa m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak \u015firketin son sicil adresinin bildirilmesinin istendi\u011fi, Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funun bildirdi\u011fi adresin bila tebli\u011f d\u00f6nen adres oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine ayn\u0131 adrese 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035. maddesi gere\u011fince\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun\u00a010. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, \u015firketin adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi halinde adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fini Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funa bildirmesi gerekti\u011fi, b\u00f6yle bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik bildirimi de olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ticaret sicilinde kay\u0131tl\u0131 adrese yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201c\u015fikayet\u201d kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurudan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesince istemin reddine dair verilen 16.10.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/749 E. 2012\/873 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi davac\u0131 (bor\u00e7lu) vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine,\u00a0Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesinin 21.03.2013 g\u00fcn ve 2013\/1124\u00a0E. 2013\/10651 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(\u2026 Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu \u015firket hakk\u0131nda adi kiraya ve has\u0131lat kiralar\u0131na ait icra takibi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bor\u00e7lu \u015firket vekilinin icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurusunda \u00f6deme emri\u00a0tebligat\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011funa dair \u015fikayette bulunarak, \u0131tt\u0131la tarihinin 27.08.2012 olarak tespitini talep etti\u011fi; mahkemece,\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle \u015fikayetin reddine karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, bor\u00e7lu \u015firket ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u00f6deme emri\u00a0tebligat\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek 04.07.2012 tarihinde bila tebli\u011f iade edildi\u011fi, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n talebi ile &#8230; Ticaret Odas\u0131 Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011fundan yap\u0131lan adres ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 sonucu bildirilen adresin daha \u00f6nce \u00f6deme emri \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan ve tebli\u011f edilemeden iade edilen adresle ayn\u0131 oldu\u011fu, s\u00f6z konusu adrese 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035.maddesi gere\u011fince \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak 17.08.2012 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 10. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 &#8220;Tebligat tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahsa bilinen en son adreste yap\u0131l\u0131r&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm t\u00fczel ki\u015filer i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir. \u015eirketin son adresi bilinmiyor ise, ticaret sicilinde adres de\u011fi\u015ftirmi\u015f ise, ticaret sicil gazetesinde yeni adresin yay\u0131m\u0131ndan itibaren\u00a0tebligatlar yeni adrese yap\u0131l\u0131r. T\u00fczel ki\u015filik olan bor\u00e7lu \u015firketin ticaret sicilinde kay\u0131tl\u0131 bulunan &#8220;&#8230;.. &#8220;adresinin, bilinen en son adresi oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in, takibin a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131ndan ve \u00f6deme emrinin g\u00f6nderilmesinden \u00f6nce bor\u00e7lu \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan ticaret siciline, tebli\u011f merciine ya da alacakl\u0131ya adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine dair bir bildiriminin yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. Bor\u00e7lu \u015firketin Ticaret Sicil adresinden ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yeni adresinin &#8220;&#8230;..&#8221; adresi oldu\u011fu T\u00fcrkiye Ticaret Sicili Gazetesinin 12.03.2004 tarihli 6006 Say\u0131l\u0131 n\u00fcshas\u0131nda yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde mahkemece bor\u00e7lu \u015firketin tebli\u011fe yarar adresinin tespiti i\u00e7in gerekli inceleme yap\u0131larak sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken bu konuda bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n, \u00f6deme emrinin bor\u00e7luya\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 35. maddesine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile \u015fikayetin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir&#8230;),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0\u0130stem, \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 (\u015fikayet eden-bor\u00e7lu) &#8230; vekili; m\u00fcvekkili \u015firket ile daval\u0131 \u015firket aras\u0131nda akdedilen 15.12 2011 ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihli kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin binan\u0131n \u0131s\u0131nma sisteminin ve iskan\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 sebebiyle &#8230; Noterli\u011finin 07.02.2012 tarihli ihtarnamesi ile kendileri taraf\u0131ndan feshedildi\u011fini, buna ra\u011fmen daval\u0131 \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 olarak aleyhlerine \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 2012\/8345 Say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile takip yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6deme emritebligat\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun 35. maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011funu belirterek; \u00f6deme emrinin\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne, tebli\u011f tarihinin \u00f6\u011frenme tarihi olan 27\/08\/2012 olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 (alacakl\u0131) &#8230; vekili;\u00a0tebligat\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi adresin hem kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde hem de noter arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u00e7ekilen ihtarnamedeki adresle ayn\u0131 oldu\u011funu ayr\u0131ca bu adresin davac\u0131 \u015firketin ticaret sicil sorgulamas\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan ticaret sicilindeki adres oldu\u011funu, basiretli bir tacirin farkl\u0131 bir adresi iddia etmesi halinde bunu ispat etmesi gerekti\u011fini,\u00a0tebligat\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair \u015fikayetin\u00a0usuls\u00fcz, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve zaman kazanmaya y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n esasa y\u00f6nelik iddialar\u0131n\u0131n da ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011funun mahkeme karar\u0131yla ortaya konuldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyerek davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece,\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle \u015fikayetin reddine dair verilen karar, \u00d6zel Dairece yukarda yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle bozulmu\u015f; Yerel Mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 (bor\u00e7lu) vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme yoluyla Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; davac\u0131 (bor\u00e7lu) \u015firkete yap\u0131lan \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011finin usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, var\u0131lacak sonuca g\u00f6re de \u015fikayetin kabul edilip edilemeyece\u011fi noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ncelikle uyu\u015fmazl\u0131ktaki yasal d\u00fczenlemenin ortaya konulmas\u0131nda yarar vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a010. maddesi;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cTebligat, tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahsa bilinen en son adresinde yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilinen en son adresin\u00a0tebligata elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 veya\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, muhatab\u0131n adres kay\u0131t sisteminde bulunan yerle\u015fim yeri adresi, bilinen en son adresi olarak kabul edilir ve\u00a0tebligat\u00a0buraya yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu kadar ki; kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahs\u0131n m\u00fcracaat\u0131 veya kabul\u00fc \u015fart\u0131yla her yerde\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 caizdir.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenleme t\u00fczel ki\u015filer i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir. \u015eirketin son adresi bilinmiyor ise, ticaret sicilindeki adrese, adres de\u011fi\u015ftirmi\u015f ise, tebli\u011fatlar ticaret sicil gazetesindeki yeni adresin yay\u0131m\u0131ndan itibaren bu yeni adrese yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda; Ankara 30. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2012\/8345 Say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u015fikayet eden bor\u00e7lu aleyhine takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, takip talebindeki adrese g\u00f6nderilen\u00a0tebligat\u0131n bila tebli\u011f d\u00f6nmesi \u00fczerine bor\u00e7lu taraf \u015firket oldu\u011fundan Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funa m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak \u015firketin son sicil adresinin bildirilmesinin istendi\u011fi, Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funun bildirdi\u011fi adresin bila tebli\u011f d\u00f6nen adres oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine ayn\u0131 adrese 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035. maddesi gere\u011fince\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun\u00a010. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, \u015firketin adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi halinde adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fini Ticaret Sicil Memurlu\u011funa bildirmesi gerekti\u011fi, b\u00f6yle bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik bildirimi de olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ticaret sicilinde kay\u0131tl\u0131 adrese yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmesinde isabetsizlik bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, yukarda a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenleme ve ilkeler g\u00f6zeltilerek \u015fikayetin reddine dair olarak yerel mahkemece verilen direnme karar\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun olup onanmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Davac\u0131 (bor\u00e7lu) vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n ONANMASINA, gerekli temyiz ilam harc\u0131 pe\u015fin al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fkaca har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na mahal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, 20.01.2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2015\/4-483<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2015\/1069<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 25.3.2015<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130\u011e ( Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n Taraflara Tebli\u011f Edilmemesi Tebli\u011fin Ge\u00e7ersiz Olmas\u0131 veya\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebli\u011f Hallerinin H\u00fckm\u00fcn Bozulmas\u0131 \u0130\u00e7in Bir Neden Olarak Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 GEREK\u00c7EL\u0130 KARARIN TARAFLARA TEBL\u0130\u011e ED\u0130LMEMES\u0130 ( Tebli\u011fin Ge\u00e7ersiz Olmas\u0131 veya\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebli\u011f Hallerinin Bir Geri \u00c7evirme Nedeni Olarak Kabul Edilip An\u0131lan Eksikli\u011fin Giderilmesi \u0130\u00e7in Dosyan\u0131n Yerel Mahkemeye \u0130adesine Karar Verilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 DOSYANIN \u0130ADES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130 ( Yarg\u0131tay Sapma G\u00f6stermeyen Uygulamas\u0131na G\u00f6re Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n Taraflara Tebli\u011f Edilmemesi Tebli\u011fin Ge\u00e7ersiz Olmas\u0131 veya\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebli\u011f Hallerinin Bir Geri \u00c7evirme Nedeni Olarak Kabul Edilip An\u0131lan Eksikli\u011fin Giderilmesi \u0130\u00e7in Dosyan\u0131n Yerel Mahkemeye \u0130adesine Karar Verilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086\/m.428<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava, \u00f6l\u00fcml\u00fc trafik kazas\u0131na dayal\u0131 maddi ve manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n taraflara tebli\u011f edilmemesi, tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7ersiz olmas\u0131 veya\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebli\u011f hallerinin, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir neden olarak kabul edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Nitekim, Yarg\u0131tay sapma g\u00f6stermeyen uygulamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n taraflara tebli\u011f edilmemesi, tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7ersiz olmas\u0131 veya\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebli\u011f hallerinin bir geri \u00e7evirme nedeni olarak kabul edilip; an\u0131lan eksikli\u011fin giderilmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n yerel mahkemeye iadesine karar verilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; yerel mahkemenin, \u00d6zel Daire bozma ilam\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 &#8220;&#8230;karar\u0131n taraflara tebli\u011f edilmemesinin bozma sebeplerinden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8230;&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00f6nceki karar\u0131nda direnmesi usul ve yasaya uygundur. Ne var ki bozma nedenine g\u00f6re i\u015fin esas\u0131na dair temyiz itirazlar\u0131 incelenmedi\u011finden, bu y\u00f6nde inceleme yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n \u00d6zel Daireye g\u00f6nderilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;maddi ve manevi tazminat&#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Beypazar\u0131 Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesince davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 17.6.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/117 E-2010\/148 K. Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi daval\u0131lardan M. B. miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131yla D. G. vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesinin 8.2.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/12959 E- 2012\/1677 K.say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Dava, \u00f6l\u00fcml\u00fc trafik kazas\u0131na dayal\u0131 maddi ve manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131lardan D. G. ve M. B. miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya kapsam\u0131ndan daval\u0131lardan C. O.&#8217;a karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi i\u00e7in \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n adresten ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle iade edildi\u011fi, bunun \u00fczerine an\u0131lan daval\u0131n\u0131n ceza davas\u0131ndaki vekiline karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Oysa, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131ndaki vekilinin eldeki dava dosyas\u0131nda vekaletnamesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu sebeple vekile yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f usul\u00fcne uygun de\u011fildir.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununda yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikler ve adrese dayal\u0131 kay\u0131t sistemi uyar\u0131nca daval\u0131 C. O.&#8217;\u0131n adresi ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi gerekirken bu hususun g\u00f6zetilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H.G.K.nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Dava, \u00f6l\u00fcml\u00fc trafik kazas\u0131na dayal\u0131 maddi ve manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karar daval\u0131lardan M. B. miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131yla D. G. vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine, \u00d6zel Dairece yukarda yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle bozulmu\u015ftur. yerel mahkemece, &#8220;&#8230; karar\u0131n taraflara tebli\u011f edilmemesinin H.U.M.K.nun\u00a0428\u00a0vd. maddelerinde belirtilen bozma sebeplerinden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8230;&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir. Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131lardan M. B. miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131yla D. G. vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme yoluyla H.G.K. \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; gerek\u00e7eli karar tebli\u011finin yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 hususunun bozma nedeni yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere; 01 Ekim 2011 tarihinde 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015f; an\u0131lan Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0450. maddesiyle de 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu ek ve de\u011fi\u015fiklikleriyle birlikte t\u00fcm\u00fcyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte yasa koyucu uygulamada birtak\u0131m sorunlar\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek i\u00e7in, 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunda ge\u00e7i\u015f h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini ayr\u0131ca d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6217 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a030. maddesiyle 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen Ge\u00e7ici Madde 3 ( Ek:31.3.2011-6217\/30 md. ):<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8221; ( 1 ) B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin, 26.9.2004 tarihli ve 5235 Say\u0131l\u0131 Adli Yarg\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemeleriyle B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f, G\u00f6rev ve Yetkileri Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun ge\u00e7ici\u00a02. maddesi uyar\u0131nca Resmi Gazetede ilan edilecek g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihine kadar, 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun temyize dair y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihinden \u00f6nce aleyhine temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015f olan kararlar hakk\u0131nda, kesinle\u015finceye kadar\u00a01086\u00a0Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 26.9.2004 tarihli ve 5236 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nceki 427 ila 454. madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunur. ( 3 ) Bu Kanunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerine g\u00f6rev verilen hallerde bu mahkemelerin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihine kadar 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun bu Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmayan h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r.&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesini i\u00e7ermektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131daki madde metninden, b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihinden \u00f6nce aleyhine temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015f olan kararlar hakk\u0131nda kesinle\u015finceye kadar\u00a01086\u00a0Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 26.9.2004 tarih ve 5236 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;la yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nceki 427 ila 454. madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re, 7.10.2004 tarih ve 25606 Say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanan 26.9.2004 kabul tarihli ve 5236 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a016. maddesiyle yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nce y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 H.U.M.K.nun\u00a0428. maddesi: &#8220;Mahkemei Temyiz a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da beyan olunan esbaptan dolay\u0131 temyiz olunan h\u00fckm\u00fc nakzeder.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- )Kanunun ve iki taraf beynindeki mukavelenin yanl\u0131\u015f tatbik edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- )Mahkemenin davay\u0131 r\u00fcyete vazifedar bulunmamas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- )\u0130ki taraf\u0131 ve sebebi m\u00fcttehit bir dava hakk\u0131nda yekdi\u011ferine m\u00fctenak\u0131z kararlar verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4- )Usul\u00fc muhakemeye muhalefet edilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5- )Meselei maddiyenin takdirinde hata edilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6- )\u0130ki taraftan birinin davas\u0131n\u0131 ispat i\u00e7in serdetti\u011fi delillerin sebebi kanuniye m\u00fcstenit olm\u0131yarak kabul edilmemesi, Usul\u00fc muhakemeye muhalefetten dolay\u0131 bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn nakzolunabilmesi mahkemeye ait vazaifte usul\u00fc muhakemenin ihlal olunmas\u0131na ve i\u015fbu kusur ve hatan\u0131n lahik olan h\u00fckm\u00fc ta\u011fyir edecek derecede bulunmas\u0131na veya m\u00fcddei, yahut m\u00fcddeaaleyh taraf\u0131ndan usul\u00fc muhakemenin ta\u011fyir ve ihlal olundu\u011funu ispat edecek derecede itiraz olunup da mahkemede tetkik edilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131na m\u00fctevakk\u0131ft\u0131r.&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Maddede, yarg\u0131tay\u0131n hangi sebeplerden dolay\u0131 temyiz olunan karar\u0131 bozaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmektedir. G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, an\u0131lan madde metninde gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n taraflara tebli\u011f edilmemesi, tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7ersiz olmas\u0131 veya\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebli\u011f hallerinin, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir neden olarak kabul edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim, Yarg\u0131tay sapma g\u00f6stermeyen uygulamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n taraflara tebli\u011f edilmemesi, tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7ersiz olmas\u0131 veya\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebli\u011f hallerinin bir geri \u00e7evirme nedeni olarak kabul edilip; an\u0131lan eksikli\u011fin giderilmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n yerel mahkemeye iadesine karar verilmektedir (\u00a0H.G.K.nun 3.12.2014 g\u00fcn ve 2014\/11-698\u00a0E., K:2014\/1005 Say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; yerel mahkemenin, \u00d6zel Daire bozma ilam\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 &#8220;&#8230; karar\u0131n taraflara tebli\u011f edilmemesinin bozma sebeplerinden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8230;&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00f6nceki karar\u0131nda direnmesi usul ve yasaya uygundur. Ne var ki bozma nedenine g\u00f6re i\u015fin esas\u0131na dair temyiz itirazlar\u0131 incelenmedi\u011finden, bu y\u00f6nde inceleme yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n \u00d6zel Daireye g\u00f6nderilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle direnme uygun bulundu\u011fundan, daval\u0131lardan M. B. miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131yla D. G. vekilinin i\u015fin esas\u0131na dair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n 4. hukuk dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 25.03.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2013\/5-1093<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2014\/847<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 5.11.2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 ANON\u0130M \u015e\u0130RKETE KAMULA\u015eTIRMA \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130N\u0130N TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130N USUL\u00dcNE UYGUN OLUP OLMADI\u011eI ( Tebli\u011f Evrak\u0131n\u0131n \u015eirketin \u201cDaimi \u0130\u015f\u00e7isine Tebli\u011f Edildi\u201d Denmek Suretiyle Tebli\u011f Edildi\u011fi &#8211; S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumunu ve Onlara Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedenini \u015eerh Edilmesi Gerekirken Hi\u00e7bir A\u00e7\u0131klamaya Yer Vermeden Do\u011frudan Davac\u0131n\u0131n \u0130\u015f\u00e7isine Yap\u0131lan\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEBL\u0130\u011eE YETK\u0130L\u0130 K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER\u0130N DURUMU VE TEBL\u0130\u011e YAPILAMAMA NEDEN\u0130N\u0130N A\u00c7IKLANMASI ( Anonim \u015eirkete Tebli\u011f &#8211; Tebli\u011f Evrak\u0131nda S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumunu ve Onlara Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedeni Belirtilece\u011fi\/Do\u011frudan \u015eirketin Daimi \u0130\u015f\u00e7isine Yap\u0131lan\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( Anonim \u015eirkete Tebli\u011f &#8211;\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Hi\u00e7bir A\u00e7\u0131klama ve \u015eerh D\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmeksizin \u015eirketin \u201cDaimi \u0130\u015f\u00e7isine Tebli\u011f Edildi\u201d Denmek Suretiyle Tebli\u011finin\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu\/S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumunu ve Onlara Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedenini Belirtilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 \u015e\u0130RKET\u0130N DA\u0130M\u0130 \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130S\u0130NE YAPILAN\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumunu ve Onlara Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedenini Belirtildikten Sonra Daimi \u0130\u015f\u00e7iye Tebli\u011f Yap\u0131labilece\u011fi &#8211; Hi\u00e7bir A\u00e7\u0131klama Yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n Do\u011frudan \u0130\u015f\u00e7iye Yap\u0131lan\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu\/Anonim \u015eirkete Tebli\u011f )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.12<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, davac\u0131 anonim \u015firkete kamula\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemlerinin tebli\u011finin usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Somut olayda; davac\u0131 \u015firkete g\u00f6nderilen kamula\u015ft\u0131rma belgelerinin \u201cdaimi i\u015f\u00e7isine tebli\u011f edildi\u201d denmek suretiyle tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Ne var ki, bu\u00a0tebligat\u00a0par\u00e7as\u0131nda ba\u015fkaca herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verilmedi\u011fi gibi, davac\u0131 \u015firketin yetkili temsilcisinin veya ondan sonraki yetkili ki\u015finin adreste olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve nedenleri de \u015ferh edilmemi\u015ftir.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda s\u0131ras\u0131yla tebli\u011fe yetkili ki\u015filerin durumunu ve onlara tebli\u011f edilememe nedenini \u015ferh edilmesi gerekirken, hi\u00e7bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermeden do\u011frudan davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7isine tebli\u011f etmi\u015ftir.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0bu haliyle,\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201ckamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedelinin art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; B\u00fcy\u00fck\u00e7ekmece Asliye 3.Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nce davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 31.12.2008 g\u00fcn ve 2006\/179 E. 2008\/1580 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 5.Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 29.11.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/9730 E. 2010\/19984 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile \u00f6nce onanm\u0131\u015f; daha sonra daval\u0131 vekilinin karar d\u00fczeltme istemi \u00fczerine bu istem kabul edilerek 17.05.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/4529 E. 2012\/10182 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Dosyada bulunan kan\u0131t ve belgelere, Yarg\u0131tay ilam\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elere g\u00f6re; daval\u0131 idare vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bent kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair karar d\u00fczeltme istekleri H.U.M.K.&#8217;nun\u00a0440. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden hi\u00e7birisine uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yerinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ancak;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kamula\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemlerinin 08.04.1993 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde davac\u0131n\u0131n daimi i\u015f\u00e7isi A. K.&#8217;e tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken kabul\u00fcne karar verildi\u011fi, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n bu nedenle bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 idare vekilinin karar d\u00fczeltme isteminin kabul\u00fcne, Dairemizin 29.11.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/9730-19984 say\u0131l\u0131 onama karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildikten sonra yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava, kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedelinin artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindir. ,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, bozma karar\u0131na uyularak davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm; daval\u0131 idare vekilince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda, Ambarl\u0131 &#8211; \u0130kitelli Enerji nakil hatt\u0131 nedeniyle yap\u0131lan kamula\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemlerinin 08.04.1993 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde davac\u0131n\u0131n daimi i\u015f\u00e7isi A.. K..e tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n Kamula\u015ft\u0131rma Kanununun 14. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre nedeniyle reddi yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle kabul karar\u0131 verilmesi, Do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Dava, kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedelinin art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n maliki oldu\u011fu 128 parsel nolu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131ndan daval\u0131 idare taraf\u0131ndan kamula\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n enerji nakil hatt\u0131 ge\u00e7irildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek tazminat istemi\u015f ise de, yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporu \u00fczerine kamula\u015ft\u0131rma karar\u0131 al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini belirterek \u0131slahen davas\u0131n\u0131 kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedelinin artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemine d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrerek 42.936.000.000 TL kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedelinin \u00f6denmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 idare, istenilen bedelin fahi\u015f oldu\u011funu bildirerek, davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece verilen ilk kararda enerji nakil hatt\u0131 ge\u00e7irilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 2090 m2 lik k\u0131sm\u0131n irtifak hakk\u0131 kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedeli toplam\u0131 28.730.000.000 TL&#8217; nin faiziyle tahsiline h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 \u0130dare vekilinin temyizi \u00fczerine h\u00fck\u00fcm \u00d6zel Dairece, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n arsa niteli\u011finde kabul\u00fc ile emsal kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 yap\u0131larak de\u011fer bi\u00e7ilmesinde y\u00f6ntem itibariyle bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi, ancak dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n da i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu bir \u00e7ok parselden daval\u0131 idare taraf\u0131ndan iki ayr\u0131 enerji nakil hatt\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lan imar uygulamas\u0131 sonucunda da bu b\u00f6lgede \u015fuyuuland\u0131rma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u015fuyuuland\u0131r\u0131lmaya tabi tutulup tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tabi tutulmu\u015f ise \u015fuyuuland\u0131rma sonucu, dava konusu edilen ta\u015f\u0131nmazdan davac\u0131ya verilen b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, var ise yeni olu\u015fan bu parsel numaras\u0131n\u0131n tesbit edilmesi ve davac\u0131ya verilen bu yeni parselden enerji nakil hatt\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ip ge\u00e7medi\u011fi, pilon dikilip dikilmedi\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece bozma ilam\u0131na uyularak verilen ikinci kararda 128 nolu parselin ( imar uygulamas\u0131 nedeniyle gittileri 382 ada 1, 2 ,3 ,4,11 parseller, 383 ada 3 parsel, 383 ada 1 parsel ve 305 ada 49 parsel ) \u00fczerindeki Enerji Nakil Hatt\u0131 ( ENH ) nedeniyle daval\u0131 idarece takdir edilen kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedelinin 28.730,00 YTL&#8217; ye \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131larak faiziyle tahsiline h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 \u0130dare vekilinin temyizi \u00fczerine karar, \u00d6zel Dairece onanm\u0131\u015f; daval\u0131 vekilinin karar d\u00fczeltme istemi \u00fczerine ise, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda, Ambarl\u0131 &#8211; \u0130kitelli Enerji nakil hatt\u0131 nedeniyle yap\u0131lan kamula\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemlerinin 08.04.1993 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde davac\u0131n\u0131n daimi i\u015f\u00e7isi A. K.&#8217;e tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n Kamula\u015ft\u0131rma Kanunu&#8217;nun 14. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre nedeniyle reddi gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkeme, anonim \u015firkete yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc i\u00e7in bu tebligat\u0131n \u015firketin yetkili temsilcisine; onun herhangi bir nedenle tebli\u011f alacak durumda olmamas\u0131 halinde usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan ki\u015fiye; \u015fayet bunlar yoksa veya\u00a0tebligat\u0131 alamayacak durumda iseler bu durum tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na \u015ferh edilerek o yerde haz\u0131r bulunan tebli\u011fe yetkili memur ve m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine o da yoksa herhangi bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yap\u0131lmas\u0131;\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda da s\u0131ras\u0131yla tebli\u011fe yetkili ki\u015filerin durumu ve onlara tebli\u011f edilmeme nedeninin \u015ferh edilmesi gerekti\u011fi, burada bu usule uyulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davac\u0131 yana yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile \u00f6nceki kararda direnmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131, daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, davac\u0131 anonim \u015firkete kamula\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemlerinin tebli\u011finin usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; buna g\u00f6re davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve toplanan delillerden; davac\u0131 \u015firketin maliki oldu\u011fu 128 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazdan 17.10.1988 tarihinde al\u0131nan kamula\u015ft\u0131rma karar\u0131 ile daval\u0131 idare taraf\u0131ndan enerji nakil hatt\u0131 ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ilk olarak 1999 y\u0131l\u0131nda yap\u0131lan imar uygulamas\u0131 ile ba\u015fka parsellere gitti\u011fi ve sonras\u0131nda da ba\u015fkaca imar uygulamalar\u0131 yap\u0131larak yeni parsel numaralar\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kamula\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015fleminin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Kamula\u015ft\u0131rma Kanunu&#8217;nun 14.maddesi uyar\u0131nca kamula\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015fleminin mal sahibine ayn\u0131 kanunun 13.maddesi uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fi ile dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresi ba\u015flar. Dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n maliki olan \u015firkete\u00a0tebligat\u0131n ise ne \u015fekilde yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ve t\u00fcz\u00fckte d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere, tebli\u011f ile ilgili 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ve\u00a0tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ( halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan y\u00f6netmelik ) h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tamamen \u015feklidir. Gerek tebli\u011f i\u015flemi ve gerekse tebli\u011f tarihi, Kanun ve ilgili ikincil mevzuatta emredilen \u015fekillerle ispat olunabilir. An\u0131lan kanun ve t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ( y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin ) bu konuda etkili \u00f6nlemler alm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n tek amac\u0131, tebli\u011fin muhatab\u0131na ula\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 ve onun taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmesini sa\u011flamakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re;\u00a0tebligat, bir davaya ili\u015fkin i\u015flemleri o davayla ilgili ki\u015filere bildirmek i\u00e7in, mahkemelerce kanuna uygun bi\u00e7imde yap\u0131lan bir belgelendirme i\u015flemidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, Kanun ve Y\u00f6netmelik (\u00a0tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ) h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin en k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131na kadar uygulanmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6yle ise t\u00fczel ki\u015filere yap\u0131lacak\u00a0tebligata ili\u015fkin yasal d\u00fczenlemelerin irdelenmesinde yarar vard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun \u201cH\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slara ve Ticarethanelere Tebligat\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 12.maddesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cH\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slara tebli\u011f, salahiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine, bunlar birden ziyade ise, yaln\u0131z birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir ticarethanenin muamelelerinden do\u011fan ihtilaflarda, ticari m\u00fcmessiline yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f muteberdir.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cH\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slar\u0131n Memur ve M\u00fcstahdemlerine Tebligat\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 13.maddesinde ise;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cH\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slar nam\u0131na kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimseler her hangi bir sebeple mutad i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015f yerinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 veya o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde olduklar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f, orada haz\u0131r bulunan memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">h\u00fck\u00fcmleri yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yine,\u00a0tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan m\u00fclga\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn \u201cH\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slara ve Ticarethanelere Tebligat\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 17.maddesinde ;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cH\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slara tebli\u011f salahiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine, bunlar birden ziyade ise yaln\u0131z birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Vekaletlerin ve bunlar\u0131n te\u015fkilat\u0131n\u0131n, m\u00fclhak ve hususi b\u00fct\u00e7eli idarelerle belediyelerin, k\u00f6ylerin ve hususi kanunlar\u0131na m\u00fcsteniden kurulmu\u015f olan te\u015fekk\u00fcllerle, \u015firketlerin ve cemiyetlerin salahiyetli olduklar\u0131 m\u00fcmessilleri tabi kanunlara ve stat\u00fclerine g\u00f6re tayin edilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckmi ve hakiki \u015fahsa ait bir ticarethanenin muamelelerinden do\u011fan ihtilaflarda, ticarethanenin o muamelede salahiyetli ticari m\u00fcmessiline yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f muteberdir.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cH\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slar\u0131n Memur ve M\u00fcstahdemlerine Tebligat\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 18.maddesinde ise:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cYukar\u0131ki madde mucibince tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimseler herhangi bir sebeple mutad i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015fyerinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 veya o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde olduklar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f, h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n o yerdeki memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu kadar ki, kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak memur veya m\u00fcstahdemin, h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n yerdeki te\u015fkilat\u0131 veya personeli i\u00e7inde vazife itibariyle\u00a0tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131 olan h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n m\u00fcmessilinden sonra gelen bir kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi esasen bu kabil i\u015flerle tavzif edilmi\u015f bir \u015fah\u0131s olmas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bunlar\u0131n da bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda tesbit edildi\u011fi takdirde\u00a0tebligat, o yerdeki di\u011fer bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yap\u0131l\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">d\u00fczenlemelerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hemen belirtilmelidir ki, ticaret \u015firketleri h\u00fckmi \u015fahsiyeti haiz olup \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slar ile olan ili\u015fkilerinde ortaklardan olu\u015fan m\u00fcmessil-organ veya d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan tayin edilen sair m\u00fcmessiller taraf\u0131ndan temsil olunurlar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckmi \u015fahsiyeti haiz olmalar\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ticaret \u015firketlerinde\u00a0tebligat\u0131n \u015firketlerin \u201csal\u00e2hiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine\u201d yap\u0131lmas\u0131 icap eder. Sal\u00e2hiyetli m\u00fcmessiller ibaresiyle evvela \u015firketleri kanunen temsile yetkili organlar ve bu organlar ad\u0131na hareket edenler kastedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a012. ve\u00a013.maddeleri ile m\u00fclga Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 17 ve 18.maddelerinde t\u00fczel ki\u015filere tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lma usul\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f;\u00a0tebligat\u0131n, bunlar\u0131n tabi olduklar\u0131 kanunlara ve stat\u00fclerine g\u00f6re belirlenecek yetkili temsilcilerine, e\u011fer t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisi yoksa veya evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde ise; g\u00f6rev itibariyle temsilciden sonra gelen kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi bu i\u015fle g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f bir ki\u015fiye, o da yoksa t\u00fczel ki\u015finin o yerdeki memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisine yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve s\u0131ral\u0131 ki\u015filere yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, bunun nedenlerinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak\u00a0tebligat mazbatas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 gere\u011fine de i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim\u00a0Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 04.04.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2007\/12-200\u00a0E. 2007\/187 K.;\u00a0Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 30.12.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/12-563\u00a0E. 2009\/600 K. ile\u00a0Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 13.05.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/12-184\u00a0E. 2009\/187 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131nda da ayn\u0131 husus vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; davac\u0131 \u015firkete g\u00f6nderilen kamula\u015ft\u0131rma belgelerinin \u201cdaimi i\u015f\u00e7isi A. K.&#8217;e tebli\u011f edildi\u201d denmek suretiyle tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ne var ki, bu\u00a0tebligat\u00a0par\u00e7as\u0131nda ba\u015fkaca herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verilmedi\u011fi gibi, davac\u0131 \u015firketin yetkili temsilcisinin veya ondan sonraki yetkili ki\u015finin adreste olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve nedenleri de \u015ferh edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, davac\u0131 \u015firkete yap\u0131lan tebligatta tebli\u011f memurunun bu\u00a0tebligat\u0131 \u015firketin yetkili temsilcisine; onun herhangi bir nedenle tebli\u011fi alacak durumda olmamas\u0131 halinde de usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan ki\u015fiye; \u015fayet bunlar yoksa veya\u00a0tebligat\u0131 alamayacak durumda iseler bu durumu tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na \u015ferh ederek o yerde haz\u0131r bulunan tebli\u011fe yetkili memur ve m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine o da yoksa herhangi bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yapmas\u0131;\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda da s\u0131ras\u0131yla tebli\u011fe yetkili ki\u015filerin durumunu ve onlara tebli\u011f edilememe nedenini \u015ferh etmesi gerekirken, hi\u00e7bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermeden do\u011frudan davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7isine tebli\u011f etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat bu haliyle, a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemelere ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup,\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, yerel mahkemenin davan\u0131n s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair direnmesi yerindedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ne var ki, \u00d6zel Daire i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131 incelememi\u015f bulundu\u011fundan, i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n \u00d6zel Daire&#8217;ye g\u00f6nderilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eyle direnme uygun bulundu\u011fundan, daval\u0131 vekilinin di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n 5.HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130NE G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 05.11.2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/4-371<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2014\/675<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 21.5.2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 HAK\u0130MLER\u0130N HUKUK\u0130 SORUMLULU\u011eUNA DAYALI TAZM\u0130NAT \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Mahkumiyet Karar\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebli\u011f \u0130\u015flemine Dayal\u0131 Olarak Kesinle\u015ftirilmesi\/Ki\u015fi \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn Yasaya Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Olarak K\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 &#8211; Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcne Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Karar Verildi\u011fi Ve Zarar\u0131n Meydana Geldi\u011fi\/Hakimin Sorumlulu\u011fu Ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n Olu\u015ftu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 YARGISAL FAAL\u0130YETTEN DOLAYI DEVLET ALEYH\u0130NE A\u00c7ILAN TAZM\u0130NAT DAVASI ( Hukuken Kesinle\u015fmi\u015f Say\u0131lamayacak Nitelikteki Bir Mahkumiyet Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130nfaz Edilmesi Ve Davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Yoksun B\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 &#8211; A\u00e7\u0131k Ve Kesin Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcne Ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k Nedeniyle Hakimin Sorumlulu\u011funun Ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n Olu\u015ftu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 K\u0130\u015e\u0130 \u00d6ZG\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dcN\u00dcN YASAYA AYKIRI OLARAK KISITLANMASI ( Davac\u0131n\u0131n M\u00fcdafii Bulundu\u011fu Halde Mahkumiyetine Dair Karar\u0131n Asile Tebli\u011f Edilerek Kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi Gibi\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Da\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Olarak Davac\u0131n\u0131n En Son Sorgusunun Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Celsede Bildirdi\u011fi Adres Yerine \u0130ddianamedeki Adresine Tebli\u011f Edilmesi\/M\u00fcdafiinin \u0130nfaz\u0131n Durdurulmas\u0131 \u0130steminin Reddedilmesi &#8211; A\u00e7\u0131k Ve Kesin Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcne Ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k Nedeniyle Hakimin Sorumlulu\u011funun Ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n Olu\u015ftu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 A\u00c7IK VE KES\u0130N KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dcNE AYKIRIRLIK ( Hukuken Kesinle\u015fmi\u015f Say\u0131lamayacak Nitelikteki Bir Mahkumiyet Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130nfaz Edilmesi Ve Davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Yoksun B\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 &#8211; Hakimin Sorumluluk Ko\u015fullar\u0131 Olu\u015ftu\u011fundan Davac\u0131 Yarar\u0131na Uygun Bir Tazminata H\u00fckmedilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( Hakimlerin Hukuki Sorumlulu\u011fu &#8211; Davac\u0131n\u0131n M\u00fcdafii Bulundu\u011fu Halde Mahkumiyetine Dair Karar\u0131n Asile Tebli\u011f Edilerek Kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi Gibi\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Da\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Olarak Davac\u0131n\u0131n En Son Sorgusunun Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Celsede Bildirdi\u011fi Adres Yerine \u0130ddianamedeki Adresine Tebli\u011f Edilmesi\/Sorumluluk Ko\u015fullar\u0131 Olu\u015ftu\u011fundan Davac\u0131 Yarar\u0131na Uygun Bir Tazminata H\u00fckmedilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m.\u00a046,49<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086\/m.\u00a0573,576<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.\u00a011<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava, hakimlerin hukuki sorumlulu\u011funa dayal\u0131 olarak maddi ve manevi tazminat istemlerine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, sorumlulu\u011fa dayanak yap\u0131lan olgular; mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebli\u011f i\u015flemine dayal\u0131 olarak kesinle\u015ftirilmesi; infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 isteminin reddedilmesi ve kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f bir karar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 sonucunda, ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f bulunmas\u0131d\u0131r.Hukuken kesinle\u015fmi\u015f say\u0131lamayacak nitelikteki bir mahkumiyet karar\u0131 infaz edilmi\u015f ve davac\u0131 \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup; zararl\u0131 sonu\u00e7 da meydana gelmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcdafii bulundu\u011fu halde 7201 S.K. 11. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak mahkumiyetine dair karar\u0131n m\u00fcdafii yerine asile tebli\u011f edilerek kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131ya yap\u0131lan bu\u00a0tebligat\u00a0da\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olup, davac\u0131n\u0131n en son, sorgusunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 celsede bildirdi\u011fi adres yerine, iddianamedeki adresine 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu m. 35&#8217;e g\u00f6re tebli\u011f i\u015flemi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 ( san\u0131k ) hakk\u0131ndaki mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015ftirilmesi \u00fczerine cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu durumu m\u00fcdafii a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dile getirerek, kendisinin san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii oldu\u011funu, dosyada vekaletnamesinin bulundu\u011funu,tebligat\u0131n kendisine yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, kald\u0131 ki dosyada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilinen son adresine de\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlatarak, infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 istemesine ra\u011fmen, bu talebi ve temyiz talebi mahkemece ret edilmi\u015ftir. Bu sebeple hakimin sorumlulu\u011funun ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H.M.K.n\u0131n\u00a046\/c maddesi uyar\u0131nca farkl\u0131 bir anlam y\u00fcklenemeyecek kadar a\u00e7\u0131k ve kesin bir kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, hakimlerin yarg\u0131lama faaliyetinden dolay\u0131 daval\u0131n\u0131n sorumlulu\u011fu ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015ftu\u011fundan davac\u0131 yarar\u0131na uygun bir tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bidayet mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla karar veren \u00d6zel Dairenin davan\u0131n reddine karar vermesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan incelemesi sonucunda ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesince:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; DAVA: Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, davac\u0131n\u0131n istanbul 12. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 14.5.2008 g\u00fcn ve 2007\/68-2008\/115 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 10 ay hapis cezas\u0131na mahkum edildi\u011fi ve karar\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olarak kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi; mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcnden, yakalama karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine haberdar olundu\u011fu; karar\u0131n, infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 istemli olarak temyiz edildi\u011fi;ancak. mahkemece infaz\u0131n durdurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n 4 ay sonra \u015fartla tahliye edildi\u011fi; Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan karar\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olarak kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011finin tespit edildi\u011fi ve zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 sebebiyle de davan\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi;\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0kesinle\u015ftirme i\u015flemine dayal\u0131 olarak cezan\u0131n infaz edilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve sorumlulu\u011fu gerektirdi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek; 1.908,72-TL maddi ve 20.000,00-TL manevi tazminata h\u00fckmolunmas\u0131, talep olunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">CEVAP: Cevap dilek\u00e7esinde, istemin C.M.K.nun\u00a0141. vd. maddeleri kapsam\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu ve a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu: hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi; esas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise, sorumluluk ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">GEREK\u00c7E: Dava, hakimlerin hukuki sorumlulu\u011funa dayal\u0131 olarak maddi ve manevi tazminat istemlerine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hakimlerin yarg\u0131sal faaliyetleri sebebiyle sorumluluklar\u0131, olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan H.U.M.K.nun\u00a0573-576. maddelerinde ve dava tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan H.M.K.nun\u00a046-49. maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r. Her iki Yasa&#8217;da da g\u00f6sterilen sorumluluk nedenleri, \u00f6rnek niteli\u011finde olmay\u0131p; s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 ve say\u0131l\u0131 durumlar\u0131 ifade etmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, sorumlulu\u011fa dayanak yap\u0131lan olgular; mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebli\u011f i\u015flemine dayal\u0131 olarak kesinle\u015ftirilmesi; infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 isteminin reddedilmesi ve kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f bir karar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 sonucunda, ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f bulunmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya kapsam\u0131ndan; davac\u0131n\u0131n, san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130stanbul 12. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 14.5.2008 g\u00fcn ve 2007\/68-2008\/115 Say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda 10 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi; karara, 17.7.2008 tarihinde temyiz edilmeksizin kesinle\u015fti\u011fi \u015ferhinin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc; h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaza verildi\u011fi ve bu a\u015famada san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii s\u0131fat\u0131 ile Av. Erhan Aslaner taraf\u0131ndan sunulan 23.1.2009 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7ede; karar\u0131n tebli\u011finin\u00a0usuls\u00fczoldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi, infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131n talep ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn de temyiz edildi\u011fi; istanbul 12. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 27.1.2009 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla istemlerin reddedildi\u011fi; bu karar\u0131n da temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin 22.9.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/9593-2011\/27183 Say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile; m\u00fcdafiiyle temsil edilen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verilen karar\u0131n vekil yerine san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011finin\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011fu belirtilerek, ek karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 sebebiyle de kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verildi\u011fi; ancak, s\u00fcre\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinde ve 22.1.2009-22.5.2009 tarihleri aras\u0131nda davac\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn,\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0kesinle\u015ftirme karar\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak infaz edildi\u011fi, anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6n sorun olarak, davan\u0131n 6110 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a012. maddesiyle d\u00fczenlenen 2802 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a093\/A maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen, bir y\u0131ll\u0131k hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 irdelenmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava konusu edilen i\u015flemlerle ilgili ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin 22.9.2011 tarihli karar\u0131yla sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015f; eldeki dava ise, 24.9.2012 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00fcrenin, Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin taraflara tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi dosya kapsam\u0131ndan belirlenemeyen 22.9.2011 tarihli karar\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, sorumluluk davas\u0131n\u0131n en ge\u00e7 22.9.2012 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu tarih ise, cumartesi g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc denk gelmekte olup: takip eden ilk i\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc olan 24.9.2012 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n, s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise: ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda m\u00fcdafiiyle temsil edilen davac\u0131n\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verilen karar\u0131n, vekil yerine asile tebli\u011f edilmesi; bu \u015fekilde,\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebligata dayal\u0131 olarak h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015ftirilmesi; durumun, m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan verilen 23.1.2009 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle bildirilmesine ra\u011fmen, 27.1.2009 tarihli ek kararla infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 ve temyiz istemlerinin reddedilmesi; 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a011. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Bu y\u00f6n, Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin 22.9.2011 tarihli ve 2010\/9593-2011\/27183 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da tespit olunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer yandan, hukuken kesinle\u015fmi\u015f say\u0131lamayacak nitelikteki bir mahkumiyet karar\u0131 infaz edilmi\u015f ve davac\u0131 \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup; zararl\u0131 sonu\u00e7 da meydana gelmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava, olay tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan H.U.M.K.nun\u00a0573\/2.bendiyle dava tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren H.M.K.nun\u00a046\/c bendi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup: yasa h\u00fckm\u00fcne a\u00e7\u0131k ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k gerek\u00e7esiyle sorumlu bulunuldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava konusu olayda, davac\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 eylemle ilgili iddianamenin 13.12.2000 tarihinde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi; davaya konu yaz\u0131n\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gazetenin k\u00fcnyesindeki y\u00f6netim yeri ve yaz\u0131\u015fma adresinin: ( Tarlaba\u015f\u0131 Cad. No: &#8230; Beyo\u011flu\/\u0130stanbul ) iddianamede yaz\u0131l\u0131 bulundu\u011fu; yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda g\u00f6revsizlik ve birle\u015ftirme kararlar\u0131 verildi\u011fi; san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafiinin uzun s\u00fcre yarg\u0131lamalara kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii Av. E. A. taraf\u0131ndan sunulan 5.12.2005 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle dosyan\u0131n fotokopisinin talep edildi\u011fi ve vekaletname \u00f6rne\u011finin sunuldu\u011fu; sonras\u0131nda, 7.5.2008 tarihli oturumda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Yurt Mal\u0131. &#8230; Sok. E&#8230; Apt. C\/Blok No: &#8230; -Seyhan\/Adana adresinde ikamet etti\u011finin tutanaklara ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi; karar \u00f6rne\u011finin, iddianamede yaz\u0131l\u0131 adrese 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi; infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 ve temyiz isteminin reddine dair 27.1.2009 tarihli ek karar\u0131n da, davaya konu yaz\u0131n\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gazetenin y\u00f6netim adresine tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5187 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bas\u0131n Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a029. maddesi gere\u011fince: &#8220;S\u00fcreli yay\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6netim yeri,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0i\u015flemleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, yay\u0131n sahibinin ve temsilcisinin, g\u00f6revi devam etti\u011fi s\u00fcrece sorumlu m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn yerle\u015fim yeri say\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemenin, karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi i\u015flemiyle infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 ve temyiz istemlerinin reddine dair ek karar\u0131, yukarda yaz\u0131l\u0131 Yasa h\u00fckm\u00fcne dayand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">T\u00fcm bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalardan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n vekil temsil edildi\u011finin mahkemece g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sorun, bu durumun: &#8220;Farkl\u0131 bir anlam y\u00fcklenemeyecek kadar a\u00e7\u0131k ve kesin kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k&#8221; olarak nitelendirilip nitelendirilemeyece\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ncelikle mahkemenin, 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a011. maddesine dair bir tespiti ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak da de\u011ferlendirmesi bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Aksine, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n vekil temsil edildi\u011fi olgusu g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; bu durum, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan verilen 23.1.2009 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle bildirilmi\u015f; ancak, mahkemece yine g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilmi\u015f ve zarar\u0131 sonu\u00e7 ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosyada mevcut vekaletnamenin g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, maddi bir olgu olup; insani hata niteli\u011findedir. Hemen t\u00fcm yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, e\u015f veya benzer yan\u0131lg\u0131lara d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ve muhtemel olup: bu durum, nispi de\u011fer h\u00fckm\u00fc ta\u015f\u0131yan yarg\u0131sal faaliyetlerin do\u011fas\u0131ndan kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r. Bu sebeple ola\u011fan yasa yollar\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f; yetinilmemi\u015f, ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc yasa yollar\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f; \u00f6tesinde, uluslararas\u0131 yarg\u0131 yolu da benimsenmi\u015ftir. \u015eu durumda, hakimin hukuki sorumlulu\u011funa dair ko\u015fullar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemez. Davan\u0131n, a\u00e7\u0131klanan bu sebeplerle reddine karar verilmek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer yandan, 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a049. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, davan\u0131n esastan reddi halinde disiplin para cezas\u0131n\u0131n takdir edilerek h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu konuda, para cezas\u0131nda yeniden de\u011ferleme oran\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken artt\u0131r\u0131m miktar\u0131yla davaya konu olay\u0131n geli\u015fim bi\u00e7imi ve dosyaya yans\u0131yan olgular g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- )Davan\u0131n reddine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- )H.M.K.nun 49. maddesi uyar\u0131nca takdiren 600,00-TL disiplin para cezas\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak Hazine&#8217;ye gelir kaydedilmesine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- )Davan\u0131n reddi sebebiyle al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 24,30.-TL maktu karar ve ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n pe\u015fin al\u0131nan 325,34.-TL&#8217;den d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcyle kalan 301,04.-TL&#8217;nin istenmesi halinde davac\u0131ya iadesine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4- )Karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Avukatl\u0131k \u00dccret Tarifesi uyar\u0131nca reddedilen maddi ve manevi tazminat istemleri itibariyle daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na takdir olunan ( 3.080,00 )-TL maktu avukatl\u0131k \u00fccretinin davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak daval\u0131ya verilmesine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5- )Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan giderlerin \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dair oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla verilen 1.10.2013 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/58-2013\/69 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine karar\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131ndan ve dosyadaki t\u00fcm ka\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131n okunmas\u0131ndan sonra gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Davac\u0131 vekili 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 H.M.K.46. maddesine dayanarak yarg\u0131sal faaliyetten dolay\u0131 devlet aleyhine tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemece yukarda ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne al\u0131nan gerek\u00e7eyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hakimlerin hukuki sorumluluk halleri 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 H.U.M.K.n\u0131n\u00a0573\u00a0( olay tarihi ) ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 H.M.K. m.\u00a046&#8217;da ( dava tarihi ) d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. H.M.K. m.\u00a046\u00a0uyar\u0131nca Hakimlerin yarg\u0131lama faaliyetinden dolay\u0131 hukuki sorumluluk halleri \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">i. Kay\u0131rma veya taraf tutma yahut taraflardan birine olan kin veya d\u00fc\u015fmanl\u0131k sebebiyle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir h\u00fck\u00fcm veya karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">ii. Sa\u011flanan veya vaat edilen bir menfaat sebebiyle yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir h\u00fck\u00fcm veya karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">iii. Farkl\u0131 bir anlam y\u00fcklenemeyecek kadar a\u00e7\u0131k ve kesin bir kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar veya h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">iv. Duru\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131nda mevcut olmayan bir sebebe dayan\u0131larak h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">v. Duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcm veya kararlar\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f yahut tahrif edilmi\u015f veya s\u00f6ylenmeyen bir s\u00f6z\u00fcn h\u00fck\u00fcm ya da karara etkili olacak \u015fekilde s\u00f6ylenmi\u015f gibi g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f ve buna dayan\u0131larak h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">iv. Hakk\u0131n yerine getirilmesinden ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, Kanunda sorumluluk halleri s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 ( tahdidi ) olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. E\u015f s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle hakimlerin hukuki sorumlulu\u011fu i\u00e7in Kanun&#8217;da say\u0131lan hallerden birisinin mevcut olmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131n\u0131n istanbul 12. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nce 10 ay hapis cezas\u0131na mahkum edildi\u011fi ve karar\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olarak kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fini, zira\u00a0tebligat\u0131n m\u00fcdafii yerine asile tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini, butebligat\u0131n dahi\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011funu iddiayla maddi ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda davac\u0131n\u0131n \u0130stanbul 12. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 2007\/68-2008\/115 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 10 ay hapis cezas\u0131na mahkum edildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finde 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanun&#8217;a ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, zira davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcdafii bulundu\u011fu halde ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a011. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak mahkumiyetine dair karar\u0131n m\u00fcdafii yerine asile tebli\u011f edilerek kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Esasen davac\u0131ya yap\u0131lan bu\u00a0tebligat\u0131n dahi\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011fu belirgindir. Zira davac\u0131n\u0131n en son, sorgusunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 celsede adresini, &#8220;Yurt Mah. &#8230; Sok. E&#8230; Apt. C\/Blok No: &#8230;- Seyhan\/Adana&#8221; olarak bildirmi\u015ftir. Buna ra\u011fmen kendisine karar tebli\u011fi bilinen en son adresi yerine, iddianamedeki adres olan sahibi bulundu\u011fu gazetenin k\u00fcnyesindeki &#8220;Tarlaba\u015f\u0131 Cad. No: &#8230; Beyo\u011flu\/istanbul&#8221; adresine 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu m. 35&#8217;e g\u00f6re yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Oysa\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu 10\/1. maddesinde; &#8220;tebligat, tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahsa bilinen en son adresinde yap\u0131l\u0131r&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir. Olayda davac\u0131n\u0131n bilinen en son adresine dahi\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmadan karar kesinle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. \u015eu halde a\u00e7\u0131k kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir karar verildi\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Eldeki olayda 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 T.K.&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a011. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak karar kesinle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Bir an i\u00e7in san\u0131\u011f\u0131n vekil temsil edildi\u011finin mahkemece g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclse bile, belirtmek gerekir ki davac\u0131 ( san\u0131k ) hakk\u0131ndaki mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015ftirilmesi \u00fczerine cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu durumu m\u00fcdafii a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dile getirerek, kendisinin san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii oldu\u011funu, dosyada vekaletnamesinin bulundu\u011funu,\u00a0tebligat\u0131n kendisine yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, kald\u0131 ki dosyada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilinen son adresine de\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlatarak, infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 istemesine ra\u011fmen, bu talebi ve temyiz talebi mahkemece ret edilmi\u015ftir. Bu sebeple hakimin sorumlu\u011funun ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. San\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki ceza h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn temyizen incelenmesi, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddinin temyizi \u00fczerine m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmu\u015f, bu durum Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin &#8220;m\u00fcdafii yerine karar tebli\u011finin san\u0131\u011fa yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011funu tespit ve san\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki cezan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden bahisle d\u00fc\u015fmesine&#8221; dair verdi\u011fi, 22.9.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/9593-2011\/27183 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar ile de tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131na 22.1.2009 tarihinde ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f olup, Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nce d\u00fc\u015fme karar verildi\u011fi 22.9.2011 tarihinden \u00e7ok \u00f6nce, 22.5.2009 tarihinde ceza infaz edilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6ylece zararda meydana gelmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan t\u00fcm bu sebeplerle H.M.K.46\/c maddesi uyar\u0131nca farkl\u0131 bir anlam y\u00fcklenemeyecek kadar a\u00e7\u0131k ve kesin bir kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, hakimlerin yarg\u0131lama faaliyetinden dolay\u0131 daval\u0131n\u0131n sorumlulu\u011fu ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015ftu\u011fundan davac\u0131 yarar\u0131na uygun bir tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bidayet mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla karar veren \u00d6zel Dairenin yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde davan\u0131n reddine karar vermesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u00fcyelerce., \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n yerinde oldu\u011fu, verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f belirtilen sebeplerle Kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca benimsenmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n, yukarda a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple 6217 s Kanunun 30. maddesiyle 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen &#8220;Ge\u00e7ici madde 3&#8221; atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0429. maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, istenmesi halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana iadesine, ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 440. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011fden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 21.05.2014 tarihinde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2013\/9-634<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2014\/143<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 26.2.2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 \u0130HBAR VE KIDEM TAZM\u0130NATI DAVASI (Davan\u0131n Reddi Y\u00f6n\u00fcnde Yerel Mahkemenin Direnme Karar\u0131 &#8211; \u00d6zel Dairenin Bozma Karar\u0131n\u0131n Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Tebli\u011f Edilmedi\u011fi\/Taraf Te\u015fkili Sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Hukuki Dinlenme Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali\/Savunma Hakk\u0131\/Tebli\u011fat)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 \u00d6ZEL DA\u0130RE BOZMA KARARININ USUL\u00dcNE UYGUN OLARAK TEBL\u0130\u011e ED\u0130LMEMES\u0130 (Tebli\u011fat\u0131n Daval\u0131 \u015eirketin Avukat\u0131 ile Birlikte \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan B.G.&#8217;nin Yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mzal\u0131 Beyan\u0131 ile &#8220;Vekillikten \u0130stifa Sebebiyle \u0130ade&#8221; \u015eeklinde Bila Tebli\u011f \u0130ade Edilmi\u015f Oldu\u011fu)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 DAVALI \u015e\u0130RKET\u0130N VEK\u0130L\u0130N\u0130N \u0130ST\u0130FASI \u0130LE \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 DOSYADA B\u0130R BELGE BULUNMADI\u011eI (Daval\u0131 Vekilinin \u0130stifa Etti\u011fine Dair Bir \u0130rade Beyan\u0131n\u0131n Mahkemeye Ula\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Vekilin Daval\u0131y\u0131 Temsil Yetkisinin Devam Etmekte Oldu\u011funun Kabul\u00fc\/Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebli\u011fat)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TARAF TE\u015eK\u0130L\u0130 SA\u011eLANMADAN D\u0130RENME KARARI VER\u0130LEMECE\u011e\u0130 (Mahkemece Daval\u0131ya Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Zapta Ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f Oldu\u011fu &#8211;\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebli\u011fata Ra\u011fmen Bozma \u0130lam\u0131na Kar\u015f\u0131 Direnilmesine Karar Verilmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 HUKUK\u0130 D\u0130NLENME HAKKININ \u0130HLAL\u0130 (\u00d6zel Daire Bozma Karar\u0131n Yasa ve Y\u00f6netmeliklere Uygun Olarak Taraflara Tebli\u011f Edilece\u011fi &#8211; Taraf Te\u015fkili Sa\u011fland\u0131ktan Sonra Bozma Karar\u0131na Uyulup Uyulmayaca\u011f\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcnde Karar Verilmesi Gerekti\u011fi\/Direnme Karar\u0131)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 VEK\u0130LL\u0130KTEN \u0130ST\u0130FA NEDEN\u0130YLE TEBL\u0130\u011eATIN \u0130ADE ED\u0130LMES\u0130 (Daval\u0131 \u015eirketin Avukat\u0131 Yan\u0131nda \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n\u0131n Beyan\u0131na G\u00f6re Hareket Edilmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Dava Dosyas\u0131 \u0130\u00e7erisinde Vekillikten \u0130stifa ile \u0130lgili Bir Belge Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n G\u00f6zetilece\u011fi)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TARAF TE\u015eK\u0130L\u0130 SA\u011eLANMASININ DAVA \u015eARTI MAH\u0130YET\u0130 BULUNDU\u011eU (Davan\u0131n Her A\u015famas\u0131nda Mahkemece Re&#8217;sen Nazara Al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 SAVUNMA HAKKININ KISITLANMASI (Bozma \u0130lam\u0131 ve Bozma Sonras\u0131 Duru\u015fma G\u00fcn\u00fc Daval\u0131ya Usul\u00fcnce Tebli\u011f Edilmi\u015f Gibi \u0130\u015flem Tesis Edilerek ve Taraf Te\u015fkili Sa\u011flanmadan Duru\u015fma A\u00e7\u0131larak Daval\u0131n\u0131n Yoklu\u011funda Direnme Karar\u0131 Verilemece\u011finin Kabul\u00fc)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 S\u0130LAHLARIN E\u015e\u0130TL\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u0130LKES\u0130 (Taraflar\u0131n Denge \u0130\u00e7erisine Olmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi &#8211; Davan\u0131n Taraflar\u0131ndan Birini Di\u011feri Kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Avantajs\u0131z Duruma D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeyecek \u015eekilde Deliller ve \u0130ddia ve Savunmas\u0131n\u0131 Ortaya Konulaca\u011f\u0131\/Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4857\/m.\u00a017,18,25\/II<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6098\/m.\u00a0512<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m.\u00a027<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2709\/m.\u00a036<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086\/m.\u00a0429<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava, ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 istemlerine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkeme, daval\u0131 \u015firketin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini fesihte hakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.Ancak \u00d6zel Daire taraf\u0131ndan karar bozulmu\u015f ve yerel mahkeme karar\u0131nda direnmi\u015ftir.H.G.K.&#8217;nda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, ilk olarak, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren vekilinin, vekillikten istifa edip etmedi\u011fi hususunun ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n geri \u00e7evrilmesine gerek olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6n sorun olarak incelenmi\u015ftir.\u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131 sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7eren tensip tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firket vekiline tebli\u011fini i\u00e7eren\u00a0tebligat\u00a0par\u00e7as\u0131; 16.04.2012 tarihinde &#8220;Muhatap Av. ile birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan B.G.&#8217;nun yaz\u0131l\u0131 imzal\u0131 beyan\u0131 ile, ..vekillikten istifa sebebiyle iade&#8221; \u015ferhiyle bila tebli\u011f iade edilmi\u015f, direnme karar\u0131 ise daval\u0131 \u015firket vekili Av. D. A.&#8217;a &#8220;Muhatab\u0131n o an d\u0131\u015far\u0131da olmas\u0131 sebebiyle ayn\u0131 adreste kendisiyle birlikte s\u00fcrekli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan ve imzaya ehil olan B.G. imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir&#8221; me\u015fruat\u0131 ile 12.12.2012 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olup, dosya i\u00e7erisinde daval\u0131 \u015firket vekili Av. D. A. taraf\u0131ndan ibraz edilmi\u015f bir istifa dilek\u00e7esi bulunmamaktad\u0131r.Daval\u0131 vekilinin istifa etti\u011fine dair; vekilden sad\u0131r olan bir irade beyan\u0131 mahkemeye ula\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, vekilin daval\u0131y\u0131 temsil yetkisinin devam etmekte oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gereklidir.Bu halde, daval\u0131 vekilinin istifaya dair beyan\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 ve hakimin taraf vekilinin istifas\u0131n\u0131 re&#8217;sen ara\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden s\u00f6zetmenin de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 hususlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, dosyan\u0131n taraf vekilinin istifa beyan\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in geri \u00e7evrilmesine gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ilk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede oybirli\u011fiyle karar verilmi\u015ftir.Esasa ge\u00e7ilmeden 2. olarak; bozma ilam\u0131ndan sonra daval\u0131 i\u015fveren \u015firkete yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla taraf te\u015fkilinin y\u00f6ntemine uygun \u015fekilde sa\u011flan\u0131p sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan direnme karar\u0131 verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu \u00f6n sorun olarak incelenmi\u015ftir.Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi, iddia ve savunmayla ilgili delillerin eksiksiz toplan\u0131p tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilmesi, itirazlar\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi, davan\u0131n s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131labilmesi; bozma sonras\u0131 yarg\u0131laman\u0131n devam\u0131, uyup uymama y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki karar\u0131n verilebilmesi, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden usul\u00fcnce haberdar edilmesi ve b\u00f6ylece taraf te\u015fkilinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131yla m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.Buna g\u00f6re, taraf te\u015fkili dava \u015fart\u0131 olup, davan\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda mahkemece re&#8217;sen nazara al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken bir olgudur.G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, taraf te\u015fkili sadece davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131nda de\u011fil, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n di\u011fer a\u015famalar\u0131nda da \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Mahkemenin, bozma ilam\u0131na uyma ya da direnme konusunu karara ba\u011flamadan \u00f6nce de, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131 ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc taraflara kendili\u011finden tebli\u011f edip taraf te\u015fkilini sa\u011flamas\u0131, pe\u015fin al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olan gideri kullanmak suretiyle, kendili\u011finden taraflar\u0131 duru\u015fmaya davet edip dinledikten sonra, Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131n bozma karar\u0131na uyulup uyulmayaca\u011f\u0131na karar vermesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkeme, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131 taraflara tebli\u011f edip; kendili\u011finden taraflar\u0131 duru\u015fmaya davet etmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.Belirtilen usul\u00fc i\u015flemler tamamlanmadan ve bozma sonras\u0131 taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan, mahkemece direnme ya da uyma karar\u0131 verilmesi olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir.Mahkemece \u00d6zel Daire bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131n ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn tebli\u011fi i\u00e7in daval\u0131 vekiline g\u00f6nderilen\u00a0tebligat\u00a0&#8220;Muhatap Av. ile birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan B.G.&#8217;nun yaz\u0131l\u0131 imzal\u0131 beyan\u0131 ile, ..vekillikten istifa sebebiyle iade&#8221; a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131yla bila tebli\u011f iade edilmi\u015f, mahkemece daval\u0131ya usul\u00fcne uygun olarak\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zapta ge\u00e7irilerek, bozma ilam\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 direnilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.\u015eu durumda, mahkemece, bozma ilam\u0131 ve bozma sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc daval\u0131ya usul\u00fcnce tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f gibi i\u015flem tesis edilip, taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131larak; daval\u0131n\u0131n yoklu\u011funda ve onun savunma hakk\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlar bi\u00e7imde yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131l\u0131p direnme karar\u0131 verilmesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r. \u00d6zel Daire bozma ilam\u0131yla duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn usul\u00fcne uygun olarak daval\u0131ya tebli\u011fiyle taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve ancak bu usul\u00fc gerek tamamland\u0131ktan sonra bir karar vermek gerekir.Bu sebeple \u00f6n sorunun a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle kabul\u00fcyle direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer hususlar incelenmeksizin bu de\u011fi\u015fik ve usule dair sebeplerle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131&#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; \u0130zmir 6. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi&#8217;nce davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen 30.7.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/658 E.-2009\/335 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 20.2.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/39155 E.-2012\/4897 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(&#8230; A-) Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n \u015fikayetleri sebebiyle daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan feshedildi\u011fini, \u0130zmir 9. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 2006\/573 E. 2007\/82 K. say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan i\u015fe iade davas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fveren feshinin ge\u00e7erli nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedildi\u011fini ve ilgili karar\u0131 temyiz ettiklerini, karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 9.H.D.&#8217;nin 2007\/14835 E. 2007\/36284 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla onanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, maddi hatan\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi talebininde reddine karar verildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n tahsilini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">B-)Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n formen olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlardan maddi menfaatler elde etti\u011fini, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda izin kulland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bayan i\u015f\u00e7iler hakk\u0131nda cinsel imalarda bulundu\u011funu, i\u015f akdinin hakl\u0131 sebeple feshedildi\u011fini savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">C-)Yerel Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, toplanan kan\u0131tlar ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna dayan\u0131larak, daval\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini fesihte hakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">D-)Temyiz:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar\u0131 davac\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">E-)Gerek\u00e7e:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015fe iade davas\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 de\u011fil, ge\u00e7erli sebeple feshedildi\u011fi kabul edilerek sonuca gidilmi\u015f ve bu h\u00fck\u00fcm Yarg\u0131tay denetiminden ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu saptama k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131na y\u00f6nelik eldeki davada ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 nitelik ta\u015f\u0131makta olup, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 sebeple feshedildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131larak davan\u0131n reddi bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir&#8230;),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H.G.K.nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Dava, ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 istemlerine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f akdinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan noter ihtar\u0131yla toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin disiplin h\u00fck\u00fcmleri b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn 14 ve 20. bendi uyar\u0131nca 4857 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a025\/II-e maddesine g\u00f6re feshedildi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fe iade davas\u0131n\u0131n ise davac\u0131ya isnat edilen davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n ge\u00e7erli fesih nedeni oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek reddine karar verildi\u011fini, bu durumda i\u015f akdi 18. madde kapsam\u0131nda sonland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fini, i\u015f arkada\u015flar\u0131 ve i\u015fverene kar\u015f\u0131 olumsuz davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyanla, ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 P&#8230; Entegre Et ve Un Sanayi A.\u015e. vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u015f arkada\u015flar\u0131ndan menfaat temin etmesi ve i\u015fyerindeki bayan i\u015f\u00e7iler hakk\u0131nda cinsel imalarda bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle \u0130\u015f Kanunu&#8217;nun 25\/II. maddesine g\u00f6re feshedildi\u011fini, i\u015fe iade davas\u0131nda verilen kararda mahkemenin, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerinde sergiledi\u011fi davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 i\u015f akdinin feshi i\u00e7in yeterli kanaat sebebi olarak g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131n ancak 17 ve 18. maddelere g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan fesihlere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak istenebilecek tazminatlar oldu\u011funu, i\u015fe iade karar\u0131nda feshin 17 ve 18. maddelere dayal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmedi\u011fini belirtilerek, davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, &#8220;davac\u0131n\u0131n, emri alt\u0131nda olan i\u015f\u00e7ilerden maddi menfaat temin etti\u011fi, bayan personel hakk\u0131nda, rencide edici, uygunsuz ve iffetlerini zedeleyici i\u00e7erikte konu\u015fmalar yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyeri bar\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n ve huzurunun bozulmas\u0131na sebep oldu\u011fu, bu eylem 4857 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un II\/ b), c), d) ve e) bendi kapsam\u0131nda kalmakla birlikte, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren fesih sebebiyle ba\u011fl\u0131 bulundu\u011fundan, i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f akdinin feshinin 4857 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un II\/e) bendi kapsam\u0131nda hakl\u0131 fesih sebebine dayan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle, davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen karar davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine, \u00d6zel Daire&#8217;ce yukarda ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle bozulmu\u015f, mahkemece &#8220;i\u015fe iade talebinin reddine dair ilamda, fesih sebebinin hakl\u0131 sebep olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir tespitte bulunulmad\u0131, feshin ge\u00e7erli sebebe dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 saptamas\u0131 gerek\u00e7elendirilirken dayanak sebeplerin her birinin, 4857 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un II. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda hakl\u0131 fesih sebebi olu\u015fturdu\u011fu&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine dair \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I-)Yarg\u0131tay H.G.K.&#8217;nda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, ilk olarak, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren vekilinin, vekillikten istifa edip etmedi\u011fi hususunun ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n geri \u00e7evrilmesine gerek olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6n sorun olarak incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131 sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7eren tensip tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 P. A.\u015e. vekili Av. D. A.&#8217;a tebli\u011fini i\u00e7eren\u00a0tebligat\u00a0par\u00e7as\u0131; 16.4.2012 tarihinde &#8220;Muhatap Av. ile birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan B.G.&#8217;nun yaz\u0131l\u0131 imzal\u0131 beyan\u0131 ile, ..vekillikten istifa sebebiyle iade&#8221; \u015ferhiyle bila tebli\u011f iade edilmi\u015f, direnme karar\u0131 ise daval\u0131 P. A.\u015e. vekili Av. D. A.&#8217;a &#8220;Muhatab\u0131n o an d\u0131\u015far\u0131da olmas\u0131 sebebiyle ayn\u0131 adreste kendisiyle birlikte s\u00fcrekli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan ve imzaya ehil olan B.G. imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir&#8221; me\u015fruat\u0131 ile 12.12.2012 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olup, dosya i\u00e7erisinde daval\u0131 P. A.\u015e. vekili Av. D. A. taraf\u0131ndan ibraz edilmi\u015f bir istifa dilek\u00e7esi bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere, vekalet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin, hizmetle ilgili di\u011fer s\u00f6zle\u015fmelere oranla, \u00e7ok daha s\u0131k\u0131 bir \u015fekilde kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00fcvene dayal\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u00f6\u011freti ve uygulamada ittifakla benimsenmektedir. Vekalet ili\u015fkisinin kurulmu\u015f olmas\u0131, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00fcven unsurunun vekalet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin kurulmas\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131nda her iki taraf y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mevcut olmas\u0131yla m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr ve bunun o a\u015famada varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6stergesidir. Ne var ki, vekalet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin niteli\u011fi gere\u011fince, bu unsur, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin devam\u0131 s\u00fcresince de varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 korumal\u0131d\u0131r. E\u011fer, ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta mevcut olan kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00fcven, s\u00f6zle\u015fme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen olgulardan dolay\u0131 bir taraf y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hakl\u0131 olarak zedelenir veya ortadan kalkarsa, o taraf s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi her zaman feshedebilir. Bu ilke, m\u00fclga 818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0396\/1. maddesinde, &#8220;Vekaletten azil ve ondan istifa her zaman caizdir&#8221; \u015feklinde ifade edilmi\u015f, ayn\u0131 ilke 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0512. maddesinde de belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Azil ve istifa beyan\u0131 yenilik do\u011furan tek yanl\u0131 bir i\u015flemdir ve irade beyan\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa ula\u015fmas\u0131yla vekalet ili\u015fkisini &#8220;tasfiye edilmesi gerekli&#8221; bir ili\u015fki durumuna sokar (Hatemi\/Serozan\/Arpac\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Hukuku \u00d6zel B\u00f6l\u00fcm. \u0130stanbul 1992 s.435).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Herhangi bir \u015fekle tabi olmayan istifa beyan\u0131; vekalet ili\u015fkisini ileriye do\u011fru sona erdiren, bozucu yenilik do\u011furan tek tarafl\u0131 bir hukuki muameledir ve do\u011furdu\u011fu bozucu yenilik do\u011furan etki nedeniyle, istifaya dair irade beyan\u0131n\u0131n bizzat vekilden gelmesinde zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan, m\u00fclga 818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a037. ve\u00a0396. maddelerinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere temsil yetkisinin son bulmas\u0131, vekilin yetkisiz temsilci haline gelmesi ve yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemlerin bu sebeple ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, azil keyfiyetinin temsilciye ula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re, davada bir taraf\u0131n vekilinin istifa etti\u011finin mahkemeye ve kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa bildirilmesi zorunludur. Aksi halde kar\u015f\u0131 taraf (ve mahkeme) hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm ifade etmez. Buradan gidilerek temsilciye ya da \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere temsil yetkisinin geri al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, y\u00f6ntemine uygun bi\u00e7imde ula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131k\u00e7a bu yetkinin devam etti\u011fi kabul edilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta daval\u0131 vekilinin istifas\u0131na dair dosya kapsam\u0131nda her hangi bir belge yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0\u00fczerine dercedilen ve vekilin istifa etti\u011fine dair beyan\u0131n ise vekile de\u011fil, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131na ait oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, daval\u0131 vekilinin istifa etti\u011fine dair; vekilden sad\u0131r olan bir irade beyan\u0131 mahkemeye ula\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, vekilin daval\u0131y\u0131 temsil yetkisinin devam etmekte oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu halde, daval\u0131 vekilinin istifaya dair beyan\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 ve hakimin taraf vekilinin istifas\u0131n\u0131 re&#8217;sen ara\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden s\u00f6zetmenin de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 hususlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, dosyan\u0131n taraf vekilinin istifa beyan\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in geri \u00e7evrilmesine gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na 19.02.2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde yap\u0131lan ilk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede oybirli\u011fiyle karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">II-Yarg\u0131tay H.G.K.&#8217;nda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, 2. olarak; bozma ilam\u0131ndan sonra daval\u0131 i\u015fveren \u015firkete yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla taraf te\u015fkilinin y\u00f6ntemine uygun \u015fekilde sa\u011flan\u0131p sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan direnme karar\u0131 verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu \u00f6n sorun olarak incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00f6ncelikle &#8220;tebligat&#8221;, &#8220;taraf te\u015fkili&#8221;, &#8220;adil yarg\u0131lanma&#8221; ve &#8220;hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131&#8221; kavramlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131nda yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere, \u00e7eki\u015fmeli yarg\u0131da kural olarak, duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Buna g\u00f6re, hakim iddia ve savunma haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanabilmeleri i\u00e7in taraflar\u0131 duru\u015fmaya \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rmak zorundad\u0131r. Kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi istisnalar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hakim taraflar\u0131 dinlemeden veya iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeleri i\u00e7in yasaya uygun bi\u00e7imde davet etmeden h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc veremez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taraflar duru\u015fmaya \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmadan, e\u015f anlat\u0131mla; taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan h\u00fck\u00fcm verilememesi, Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesiyle d\u00fczenlenen iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na olanak tan\u0131nmas\u0131 ilkesinin do\u011fal bir sonucudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ger\u00e7ekten savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na alan T.C.Anayasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 36. maddesiyle 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 H.U.M.K.nun\u00a073. maddesinde de (6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 H.M.K.nun\u00a027. maddesi) a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, mahkemece daval\u0131 yan; dinlenmek ve savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nmak \u00fczere kanuni \u015fekillere uygun olarak davet edilmedik\u00e7e h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamaktad\u0131r, aksi halde savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, gerek \u00f6\u011freti, gerekse yarg\u0131sal kararlarda tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z olarak kabul edilmektedir (B. Kuru, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc, 6. Bask\u0131, Cilt II, s.1876 vd).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1.10.2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun &#8220;Hukuki Dinlenilme Hakk\u0131&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 27. maddesi (M\u00fclga 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a073. maddesi) uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131, kendi haklar\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na sahip olup, bu hak, yarg\u0131lamayla ilgili bilgi sahibi olunmas\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7erir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re mahkeme, iki tarafa e\u015fit \u015fekilde hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131 tan\u0131yarak h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc vermelidir. Taraflara hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131 verilmesi anayasal bir hakt\u0131r. Anayasam\u0131z\u0131n 36. maddesine g\u00f6re teminat alt\u0131na al\u0131nan iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131yla adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131, hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7ermektedir. Yine \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi&#8217;nde de hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 i\u00e7inde teminat alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu hakka, taraf\u0131n hakime meram\u0131n\u0131 anlatma hakk\u0131 ya da iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131 da denilmektedir. Ancak, hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131, bu ifadeleri de kapsayan daha geni\u015f bir anlama sahiptir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a027. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;(I) Davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131, m\u00fcdahiller ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n di\u011fer ilgilileri, kendi haklar\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na sahiptirler.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(2) Bu hak;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a-) Yarg\u0131lamayla ilgili olarak bilgi sahibi olunmas\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b-) A\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat hakk\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">c-) Mahkemenin, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dikkate alarak de\u011ferlendirmesini ve kararlar\u0131n somut ve a\u00e7\u0131k olarak gerek\u00e7elendirilmesini,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">i\u00e7erir&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131 olarak maddede ifade edilen ve uluslararas\u0131 metinlerde de yer bulan bu hak, \u00e7o\u011funlukla &#8220;iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131&#8221; olarak bilinmektedir. Ancak, hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131, iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131 kavram\u0131na g\u00f6re daha geni\u015f ve \u00fcst bir kavramd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu hak, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n taraflar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, m\u00fcdahiller ve yarg\u0131lama konusuyla ilgili olanlar\u0131 da kapsam\u0131na almaktad\u0131r. Ancak, her yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcjesi kendi hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 ve orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak bu hakka sahiptir. Hakk\u0131n temel unsurlar\u0131 maddede tek tek belirtilmi\u015f, b\u00f6ylece uygulamada bu temel yarg\u0131sal hak konusundaki teredd\u00fctlerin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesi ama\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n gerek yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca gerekse kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler konusunda bilgilendirilmeleri zorunludur. Ki\u015finin kendisinden habersiz yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131larak karar verilmesi, kural olarak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu hakk\u0131n 2. unsuru, a\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat hakk\u0131d\u0131r. Taraflar, yarg\u0131lamayla ilgili a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunma, bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrme ve ispat etme hakk\u0131na sahiptirler. Her iki taraf da bu haktan e\u015fit \u015fekilde yararlan\u0131rlar. Bu durum &#8220;silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesi&#8221; olarak da ifade edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu hakk\u0131n 3. unsuru, taraflar\u0131n iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak dikkate al\u0131p de\u011ferlendirmesidir. Bu de\u011ferlendirmenin de, kararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir (B.K.. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 H.M.K.nun H\u00fck\u00fcmet Gerek\u00e7esi madde 32).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131, sadece belli bir yarg\u0131lama i\u00e7in ya da yarg\u0131laman\u0131n belli bir a\u015famas\u0131 i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli olan bir ilke de\u011fildir. T\u00fcm yarg\u0131lamalar i\u00e7in ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda uyulmas\u0131 gereken bir ilkedir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede gerek \u00e7eki\u015fmeli ve \u00e7eki\u015fmesiz yarg\u0131 i\u015flerinde gerekse bu yarg\u0131lamalarla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7ici hukuki korumalarda, icra takiplerinde, tahkim yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda, hatta hukuki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarla ilgili yarg\u0131lama d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm yollar\u0131nda, her bir yarg\u0131lama, \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm yolu ve uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n niteli\u011fiyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na uygun davran\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k -bir istinaf gerek\u00e7esi ve- temyizde de bozma sebebidir. Hakk\u0131n ihlalinin niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi sebebi olarak kabul edilebilir. Ayr\u0131ca adil yarg\u0131lanma ihlali \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi&#8217;ne ba\u015fvurulabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanunda da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi gibi, hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n temel \u00fc\u00e7 unsuru bulunmaktad\u0131r (6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 H.M.K.\u00a027\/2).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bunlardan ilki &#8220;Bilgilenme Hakk\u0131&#8221; d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re, hak sahibinin kendisiyle ilgili yarg\u0131lama ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi hakk\u0131nda tam bir \u015fekilde bilgi sahibi olmas\u0131 sa\u011flanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bilgilenme hakk\u0131, gerek kar\u015f\u0131 taraf gerekse yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flemleri ve dosya kapsam\u0131na girip yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 etkileyen her \u015feyi kapsar. Taraf\u0131n bilgi sahibi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemler, belge ve bilgiler yarg\u0131lamada esas al\u0131namaz. Bilgilenmenin \u015fekli bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na uygun davran\u0131lmal\u0131, ilgilinin bilgilenmesi \u015feklen de\u011fil, ger\u00e7ekten sa\u011flanmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u00d6zellikle\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ve davetiye kurallar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131nda \u00f6zen g\u00f6sterilmelidir. Usul\u00fcne uygun\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmadan, davetiye \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmadan, tefhimi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse tefhim ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeden yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler taraflar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz. Taraflardan gizli yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, yarg\u0131lamaya dahil olan her i\u015flem bak\u0131m\u0131ndan taraflar, dosyan\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir s\u0131n\u0131rlamaya tabi olmadan tam olarak bilgilenme hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanabilirler. Bu s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar da bilgilenme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte olmay\u0131p sadece kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 i\u015flemesi i\u00e7in belirli kurallara ba\u011flamak \u015feklinde olabilir. Taraflar\u0131n bilgisine a\u00e7\u0131k olmayan hi\u00e7bir husus h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hakkaniyete uygun bir yarg\u0131lanman\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini sa\u011flayacak en \u00f6nemli ilke ise silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesidir. A\u0130HM&#8217;nin 6. maddesinin 1.bendinin ilk c\u00fcmlesinde yer alan silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesi, yine, A\u0130HM&#8217;ne g\u00f6re, mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde sahip olunan hak ve vecibeler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan taraflar aras\u0131nda tam bir e\u015fitli\u011fin bulunmas\u0131 ve bu dengenin b\u00fct\u00fcn yarg\u0131lama boyunca korunmas\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle, silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesi, davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131ndan birini di\u011feri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda avantajs\u0131z bir duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeyecek \u015fekilde her iki taraf\u0131n deliller de dahil olmak \u00fczere, iddia ve savunmas\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koymak i\u00e7in makul bir olana\u011fa sahip olmas\u0131, taraflar\u0131n denge i\u00e7inde olmas\u0131 demektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S\u00f6z konusu ilke taraflar\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olarak mahkemenin \u00f6n\u00fcne gelmelerini sa\u011flayan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0i\u015flemi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemlidir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc ancak hukuka uygun bir usulde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen\u00a0tebligat\u00a0\u00fczerine, durumdan haberdar olan taraflar iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 e\u015fit \u015fekilde yapabileceklerdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n yeterince kullan\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n do\u011fru sonu\u00e7lar vermesi beklenemez. Adil yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye y\u00f6nelik her hukuk kural\u0131 savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edecektir. Hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve bunun somut unsurlar\u0131ndan biri olan savunman\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesinin ilk ko\u015fulu ise tebligatt\u0131r. Bir yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda taraflar, yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131ndaki ilk bilgilere ve bunun sonucunda iddia ve savunma yapabilme haklar\u0131na ancak usul\u00fcne uygun\u00a0tebligatla kavu\u015fabilecek ve bu \u015fekilde savunma yap\u0131labilecektir. Bunun tersi olarak ge\u00e7erli ve usul\u00fcne uygun bir\u00a0tebligat\u00a0olmaks\u0131z\u0131n yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ise, savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, en temel insan haklar\u0131ndan birinin ihlali anlam\u0131na gelecektir (M. Ru\u015fen G\u00fcltekin, Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini Sa\u011flayan Ara\u00e7lardan Milletleraras\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0ve \u0130stinabe, (Doktora Tezi), Ankara 2006, s. 17 vd.).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi, iddia ve savunmayla ilgili delillerin eksiksiz toplan\u0131p tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilmesi, itirazlar\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi, davan\u0131n s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131labilmesi, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden haberdar edilmesiyle m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olur. Ki\u015finin hangi yarg\u0131 merciinde duru\u015fmas\u0131 bulundu\u011funu, hakk\u0131ndaki iddia ve isnatlar\u0131n nelerden ibaret oldu\u011funu bilmesi,\u00a07201\u00a0Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ve Y\u00f6netmelikte a\u00e7\u0131klanan usule uygun\u00a0tebligatyap\u0131lmas\u0131yla sa\u011flanabilir (HGK&#8217;nun 4.3.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/9-52\u00a0E. 2009\/105 K.; 14.4.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/21-200 E. 2010\/216 K.; 20.4.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/5-175 E. 2011\/202 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yetkili makamlar taraf\u0131ndan bir tak\u0131m hukuki i\u015flemlerin, bunlar\u0131n hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan etkilenmeleri ama\u00e7lanan kimselere yasaya uygun \u015fekilde bildirimi ve bu bildirimin de usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belgelenmesi olarak tan\u0131mlanan\u00a0tebligat, Anayasayla g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, daha da \u00f6zelde hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve bu suretle adil bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli bir ara\u00e7t\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir davada daval\u0131n\u0131n, davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu davadan haberdar olmas\u0131, davaya cevap vermesi ve hatta cevap s\u00fcresinin i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamas\u0131 i\u00e7in dava dilek\u00e7esinin tebli\u011f edilmesi gerekir. Aksi durumun, ilgilinin hak arama h\u00fcrriyetini k\u0131s\u0131tlayaca\u011f\u0131na \u015f\u00fcphe yoktur. Asl\u0131nda hemen her hukuksal i\u015flemin\u00a0tebligatla sonu\u00e7 do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir davada taraflar\u0131n te\u015fkil edilebilmesi, bu sayede davada kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131l\u0131k, \u00e7eli\u015fikli\u011fin sa\u011flanabilmesi ve iddia ve savunmalarda bulunulabilmesi i\u00e7in taraflarla, taraflar d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k ve bilirki\u015fi gibi \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere usul\u00fcne uyguntebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklidir.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0sayesinde, ilgililer duru\u015fmaya davet olunur ve kendilerine, yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131ndaki ilk bilgiler, tebli\u011f konusu dilek\u00e7eler verilir.\u00a0Tebligat, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede yap\u0131l\u0131p sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, hak ve adaletin gecikmeden yerine getirilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli bir usuli i\u015flemdir (M. Ru\u015fen G\u00fcltekin, a.g.e., s. 16, 17).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu bak\u0131mdan, davetiyenin ve tebli\u011f tutanakl\u0131 zarf\u0131n, davadaki ve takipteki \u00f6nemi b\u00fcy\u00fckt\u00fcr. Tebligat; bilgilendirme yan\u0131nda belgelendirme \u00f6zelli\u011fi de bulunan bir usul i\u015flemi oldu\u011fundan\u00a0tebligatla ilgili olarak 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0TebligatKanunu ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tamamen \u015feklidir. Kanun ve y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin amac\u0131\u00a0tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131na en k\u0131sa zamanda ula\u015fmas\u0131, konusuyla ilgili olan ki\u015filerin bilgilendirilmesi ve bu hususlar\u0131n belgeye ba\u011flanmas\u0131d\u0131r. Gerek tebli\u011f i\u015flemi ve gerekse tebli\u011f tarihi ancak yasa ve t\u00fcz\u00fckte emredilen \u015fekillerle tevsik ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ispat olunabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Kanunuyla Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fekilde i\u015flem yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a tebli\u011f memuru taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyan onun m\u00fccerret s\u00f6z\u00fcnden ibaret kal\u0131r ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla belgelendirilmi\u015f say\u0131lmaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu hale g\u00f6re; yaz\u0131l\u0131\u00a0tebligat, bir davaya dair i\u015flemleri o davayla ilgili ki\u015filere bildirmek i\u00e7in, mahkemelerce Yasaya uygun bi\u00e7imde yap\u0131lan bir belgelendirme i\u015flemidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, kanun ve y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin en ufak ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131na kadar uygulanmas\u0131 zorunludur. Kanunun ve Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin belirledi\u011fi \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve belgelendirilmemi\u015f olan\u00a0tebligatlar\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olmayaca\u011f\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131daki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda k\u0131saca belirtmek gerekirse, \u00e7eki\u015fmeli yarg\u0131da kural olarak, duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Buna g\u00f6re, hakim iddia ve savunma haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanabilmeleri i\u00e7in taraflar\u0131 duru\u015fmaya \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rmak zorundad\u0131r. Kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi istisnalar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hakim taraflar\u0131 dinlemeden veya iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeleri i\u00e7in yasaya uygun bi\u00e7imde davet etmeden h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc veremez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re, taraf te\u015fkili dava \u015fart\u0131 olup, davan\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda mahkemece re&#8217;sen nazara al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken bir olgudur ve mahkemenin, duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc, karar\u0131n\u0131, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131, bozma sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc ve direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 taraflara kendili\u011finden tebli\u011f edip taraf te\u015fkilini sa\u011flamas\u0131, usul\u00fcn amir h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi, iddia ve savunmayla ilgili delillerin eksiksiz toplan\u0131p tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilmesi, itirazlar\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi, davan\u0131n s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131labilmesi; bozma sonras\u0131 yarg\u0131laman\u0131n devam\u0131, uyup uymama y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki karar\u0131n verilebilmesi, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden usul\u00fcnce haberdar edilmesi ve b\u00f6ylece taraf te\u015fkilinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131yla m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu yolla ki\u015fi, hangi yarg\u0131 merciinde duru\u015fmas\u0131 bulundu\u011funa, hakk\u0131ndaki iddia ve isnatlar\u0131n nelerden ibaret oldu\u011funa, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n safahat\u0131na, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fine, bozma sonras\u0131 duru\u015fman\u0131n hangi tarihte yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na, verilen karar\u0131n ne oldu\u011funa, 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ve Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finde a\u00e7\u0131klanan usule uygun\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131yla vak\u0131f olabilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, taraf te\u015fkili sadece davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131nda de\u011fil, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n di\u011fer a\u015famalar\u0131nda da \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemenin, bozma ilam\u0131na uyma ya da direnme konusunu karara ba\u011flamadan \u00f6nce de, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131 ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc taraflara kendili\u011finden tebli\u011f edip taraf te\u015fkilini sa\u011flamas\u0131, 6217 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a030. maddesiyle 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu (H.M.K.&#8217;na eklenen &#8220;Ge\u00e7ici madde 3&#8221; atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu (H.U.M.K.&#8217;nun\u00a0429. maddesinin amir h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi, zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim, bozma sonras\u0131 mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015flemleri d\u00fczenleyen 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 H.U.M.K.nun\u00a0429\/2. maddesinde, &#8220;\u2026Mahkeme, temyiz edenden 434. madde uyar\u0131nca pe\u015fin al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olan gideri kullanmak suretiyle, kendili\u011finden taraflar\u0131 duru\u015fmaya davet edip dinledikten sonra, Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131n bozma karar\u0131na uyulup uyulmayaca\u011f\u0131na karar verir.&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u00e7\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcm kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda mahkeme, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131 taraflara tebli\u011f edip; kendili\u011finden taraflar\u0131 duru\u015fmaya davet etmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Belirtilen usul\u00fc i\u015flemler tamamlanmadan ve bozma sonras\u0131 taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan, mahkemece direnme ya da uyma karar\u0131 verilmesi olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0H.G.K.&#8217;nun 26.12.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/11-1065\u00a0E., 2012\/1438 K.; H.G.K.&#8217;nun 14.12.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/21-866 E. 2011\/752 K.;\u00a0H.G.K.&#8217;nun 23.11.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/11-554\u00a0E. 2011\/684 K.;\u00a0H.G.K.&#8217;nun 20.4.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/5-175\u00a0E. 2011\/202 K.;\u00a0H.G.K.&#8217;nun 14.4.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/21-200\u00a0E. 2010\/216 K.;\u00a0H.G.K.&#8217;nun 26.9.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2007\/11-652\u00a0E. 2007\/624 K ile\u00a0H.G.K.&#8217;nun 2.7.2003 g\u00fcn ve 2003\/2-408\u00a0E. 2003\/467 K. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda da ayn\u0131 ilkeler benimsenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve konuya dair ilkeler g\u00f6zetilerek, somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece \u00d6zel Daire bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131n ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn tebli\u011fi i\u00e7in daval\u0131 vekiline g\u00f6nderilen\u00a0tebligat\u00a0&#8220;Muhatap Av. ile birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan B.G.&#8217;nun yaz\u0131l\u0131 imzal\u0131 beyan\u0131 ile, &#8230;vekillikten istifa sebebiyle iade&#8221; a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131yla bila tebli\u011f iade edilmi\u015f, mahkemece daval\u0131ya usul\u00fcne uygun olarak\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zapta ge\u00e7irilerek, bozma ilam\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 direnilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu durumda, mahkemece, bozma ilam\u0131 ve bozma sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc daval\u0131ya usul\u00fcnce tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f gibi i\u015flem tesis edilip, taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131larak; daval\u0131n\u0131n yoklu\u011funda ve onun savunma hakk\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlar bi\u00e7imde yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131l\u0131p direnme karar\u0131 verilmesi, usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015f; \u00d6zel Daire bozma ilam\u0131yla duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uygun olarak daval\u0131ya y\u00f6ntemince tebli\u011fiyle taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve ancak bu usul\u00fc gerek tamamland\u0131ktan sonra bir karar vermek olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu sebeple \u00f6n sorunun a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle kabul\u00fcyle direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer hususlar incelenmeksizin bu de\u011fi\u015fik ve usule dair sebeplerle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukarda g\u00f6sterilen de\u011fi\u015fik nedenlerden dolay\u0131 6217 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a030. maddesiyle 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen &#8220;Ge\u00e7ici madde 3&#8221; atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0429. maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, bozma nedenine g\u00f6re sair hususlara y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine \u015fimdilik yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, istenmesi halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana iadesine, 5521 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a08\/3. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca karar d\u00fczeltme yolu kapal\u0131 olmak \u00fczere, 26.02.2014 tarihinde yap\u0131lan 2. g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2013\/12-100<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2013\/1643<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 4.12.2013<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0\u015eikayet kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru nedeniyle yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Kad\u0131k\u00f6y 1.\u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nce \u015fikayetin reddine dair verilen 09.12.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/362 E., 2011\/1773 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi \u015fikayet\u00e7i-bor\u00e7lu vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 12.Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 31.05.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/2092-18668 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(&#8230;Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu hakk\u0131nda kambiyo senetlerine \u00f6zg\u00fc haciz yoluyla ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibinde bor\u00e7lu,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 35. maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki \u015fikayeti ile birlikte takibin iptalini talep etmi\u015f, mahkemece bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebligat \u015fikayetinin reddine di\u011fer \u015fikayetlerinin ise s\u00fcreden reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun bilinen adrese\u00a0tebligat\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 10 maddesinin 1.f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re\u00a0tebligat, muhataba bilinen en son adresinde yap\u0131l\u0131r. 6099 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a03.maddesi ile eklenen ayn\u0131 maddenin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re ise, bilinen en son adresin\u00a0tebligata elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 veya\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, muhatab\u0131n adres kay\u0131t sisteminde bulunan yerle\u015fim yeri adresi, bilinen en son adresi olarak kabul edilir ve\u00a0tebligat\u00a0bu adrese yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayn\u0131 Kanununun tebli\u011f imk\u00e2ns\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tebell\u00fc\u011fden imtina ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 21. maddesine 6099 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a05. maddesi ile eklenen 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; \u201cG\u00f6sterilen adres muhatab\u0131n adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki adresi olup, muhatap o adreste hi\u00e7 oturmam\u0131\u015f veya o adresten s\u00fcrekli olarak ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa dahi, tebli\u011f memuru tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir veya memurlar\u0131na imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda teslim eder ve tesell\u00fcm edenin adresini ihtiva eden ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresteki binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131r. \u0130hbarnamenin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a023\/8.maddesi uyar\u0131nca,\u00a0tebligat\u0131n adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki adrese yap\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda buna ili\u015fkin kayd\u0131n\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131 \u00fczerine yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Bir di\u011fer anlat\u0131mla 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a021\/2.maddesine g\u00f6re\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, tebli\u011fi \u00e7\u0131karan mercice,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0\u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan adresin, muhatab\u0131n adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki adresi oldu\u011funa dair tebli\u011f evrak\u0131 \u00fczerine kay\u0131t d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer taraftan, 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035.maddesine g\u00f6re\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ise, bu maddenin 6099 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a09.maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 2.f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca, muhatab\u0131n, adres kay\u0131t sisteminde yerle\u015fim yeri adresinin tespit edilememi\u015f olmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kambiyo senetlerine \u00f6zg\u00fc haciz yolu ile icra takibine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6rnek 10 numaral\u0131 \u00f6deme emrinin bor\u00e7lunun \u00f6deme emri adresi ile ayn\u0131 adres olan ticaret sicili adresine g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131n bila tebli\u011f iade edilmesi \u00fczerine, ayn\u0131 adreste 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a035.maddesine g\u00f6re 18.01.2011 tarihinde tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca tespit edilen adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki yerle\u015fim yeri adresine yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n ise bila tebli\u011f iade edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7lunun tespit edilen adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki adresine 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a021.maddesine 6099 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a05. maddesi ile eklenen 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011fi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken bu prosed\u00fcre uyulmadan 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035.maddesine g\u00f6re\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemelere ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde mahkemece bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebligat \u015fikayeti kabul edilip, bor\u00e7lunun sair \u015fikayetleri incelenerek olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7e ile \u015fikayetin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir&#8230;.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu\u2019nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki k\u00e2\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0\u0130stek, \u015fikayet yolu ile \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011finin\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve takibin iptaline ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece, \u201c&#8230;\u00d6deme emri tebli\u011finin usul\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011fu ve s\u00fcresinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer \u015fikayetlerin kabul g\u00f6rmedi\u011fi\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebligat \u015fikayetin reddine dair verilen karar, \u015fikayet\u00e7i-bor\u00e7lu vekilinin temyizi \u00fczerine, \u00d6zel Daire&#8217;ce, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle bozulmu\u015ftur. Yerel Mahkemece, \u201cTebligat Kanunu&#8217;ndaki de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin bu dosyada uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fc \u015fikayet\u00e7i-bor\u00e7lu vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; icra takibinde bor\u00e7luya g\u00f6nderilen \u00f6deme emrinin\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 35. maddesine g\u00f6re usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilip edilmedi\u011fi; var\u0131lacak sonuca g\u00f6re, bor\u00e7lunun sair \u015fikayetlerinin yerel mahkemece incelenmesi gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ncelikle, \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011finin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 18.01.2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan ve somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta g\u00f6zetilmesi gereken konuya ili\u015fkin yasal d\u00fczenlemeler \u00fczerinde durulmal\u0131d\u0131r;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu\u2019nun 19.03.2003 g\u00fcn ve 4829 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a011.maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik \u201cAdres De\u011fi\u015ftirmenin Bildirilmesi Mecburiyeti\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 35.maddesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cKendisine veya adresine kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi usullere g\u00f6re tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan kimse, adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirirse, yenisini hemen tebli\u011fi yapt\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olan kaza merciine bildirmeye mecburdur. Bu takdirde bundan sonraki tebli\u011fler bildirilen yeni adrese yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(De\u011fi\u015fik f\u0131kra: 19\/03\/2003-4829 S.K.\/11.md.) Adresini de\u011fi\u015ftiren kimse yenisini bildirmedi\u011fi ve yeni adres tebli\u011f memurunca da tespit edilemedi\u011fi takdirde tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131n bir n\u00fcshas\u0131 eski adrese ait binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na as\u0131l\u0131r ve as\u0131lma tarihi, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(De\u011fi\u015fik f\u0131kra: 19\/03\/2003-4829 S.K.\/11.md.) Bundan sonra eski adrese \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebli\u011fler muhataba yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(Ek f\u0131kra: 06\/06\/1985-3220\/12.md.) Daha \u00f6nce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olsa bile, taraflar aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan, imzas\u0131 resmi merciler \u00f6n\u00fcnde ikrar olunmu\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde belirtilen adresler ile kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131 ve kamu kurumu niteli\u011findeki meslek kurulu\u015flar\u0131na, ticaret sicillerine ve esnaf ve sanatkarlar sicillerine verilen en son adreslerdeki de\u011fi\u015fiklikler hakk\u0131nda da bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madde metninde ge\u00e7en \u2018kaza mercii\u2019nden ne anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, \u2018Kazai Tebligat\u2019 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu\u2019nun 2. Bab\u0131n\u0131n 1. Fasl\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu fas\u0131lda adli, idari ve askeri kaza mercilerince yap\u0131lacak tebli\u011flerde uygulanacak \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmler i\u00e7ermektedir (Teb.K.m.34\/1).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kazai mercilerin yapacaklar\u0131\u00a0tebligat,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu\u2019nun \u201cUmumi H\u00fck\u00fcmler\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan Birinci Bab\u0131n\u0131n genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine (Teb.K.m.1-33) tabi oldu\u011fu gibi, sadece kazai merciler taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligatlarda uygulanmak \u00fczere vaz edilen \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere (Teb.K.m.34-44)de tabi k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 35.maddesi, hem kazai tebli\u011fler ve hem de icra tebli\u011fleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygulanabilen bir h\u00fck\u00fcmd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 35.maddesi yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda taraflardan birinin adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirmi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, bundan sonraki kazai tebli\u011flerin nas\u0131l yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenlemektedir. Kazai tebli\u011fler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 35.maddenin uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in, taraflardan birinin o dava ile ilgili olarak kendisine tebli\u011fin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 adresini daha sonra de\u011fi\u015ftirmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">E\u011fer, taraflardan birine bir dava ile ilgili olarak ilk defa tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak ise, muhatab\u0131n, adresini tebli\u011fden \u00f6nce de\u011fi\u015ftirmi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde 35.madde kural olarak uygulanmaz. Bu kural\u0131n istisnas\u0131 ayn\u0131 maddenin son f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015ftirilen adresin kazai mercie hemen bildirilmesi halinde, bundan sonraki tebli\u011fler muhatab\u0131n bildirdi\u011fi yeni adresine yap\u0131l\u0131r (Teb.K.m.35\/1).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebli\u011fin yap\u0131lmas\u0131ndan sonra adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirdi\u011fi halde, yeni adresini tebli\u011fi \u00e7\u0131karan kazai mercie bildirmemi\u015f olan muhatab\u0131n yeni adresi tebli\u011f memurunca da tespit edilemedi\u011fi taktirde, tebli\u011f 35.maddenin 2. ve 3.f\u0131kralar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131l\u0131r. Tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131n bir n\u00fcshas\u0131 eski adrese ait binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na as\u0131l\u0131r ve as\u0131lma tarihi, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r. Tebli\u011fe ba\u011flanan hukuki sonu\u00e7lar da bu tarihten itibaren do\u011far. Bundan sonra eski adrese \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebli\u011fler muhataba yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayn\u0131 maddenin son f\u0131kras\u0131nda, adresini de\u011fi\u015ftiren muhataba kazai merci taraf\u0131ndan daha \u00f6nce bir tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olsa bile, yeni tebli\u011flerin 2. ve 3.f\u0131kraya g\u00f6re yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 istinaen kabul etmi\u015ftir. Bu halde, muhatab\u0131n daha \u00f6nce tebli\u011f yap\u0131lan adresinin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi de\u011fil, de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fi i\u00e7in tebli\u011f yap\u0131lamay\u0131p, tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131n iade edilmesine yol a\u00e7an adres sebebiyle 2. ve 3.f\u0131kran\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusudur. (Timu\u00e7in, Mu\u015ful:\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Hukuku, 2.Bas\u0131, \u0130stanbul 2008, syf.108-113).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hemen belirtmelidir ki,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ile ilgili Kanun ve T\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tamamen \u015feklidir. De\u011finilen i\u015flemler, bilgilendirme yan\u0131nda belgelendirme \u00f6zelli\u011fi de bulunan bir usul i\u015flemi olmakla, gerek tebli\u011f i\u015flemi ve gerekse tebli\u011f tarihi ancak Kanun ve T\u00fcz\u00fckte emredilen \u015fekillerle tevsik ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ispat olunabilir. Bu sebeple\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul yasalar\u0131 ile ili\u015fkisi de daima g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanun ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn amac\u0131\u00a0tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131na en k\u0131sa zamanda ula\u015fmas\u0131, konusu ile ilgili olan ki\u015filerin bilgilendirilmesi ve bu hususlar\u0131n belgeye ba\u011flanmas\u0131d\u0131r. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, Kanun ve T\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin en ufak ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131na kadar uygulanmas\u0131 zorunludur.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ile T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019nde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fekilde i\u015flem yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a tebli\u011f memuru taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyan onun m\u00fccerret s\u00f6z\u00fcnden ibaret kal\u0131r ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla belgelendirilmi\u015f say\u0131lmaz. Nitekim, Kanunun ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn belirledi\u011fi \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve belgelendirilmemi\u015f olan\u00a0tebligatlar\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olmayaca\u011f\u0131 yerle\u015fik yarg\u0131sal i\u00e7tihatlarda da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayn\u0131 ilkeler Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 31.03.2010 g\u00fcn ve E:2010\/6-140, K:2010\/194 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda da benimsenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olaya gelince; Kad\u0131k\u00f6y 1.\u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 2010\/25963 esas say\u0131l\u0131 takip dosyas\u0131nda \u015fikayet\u00e7i-bor\u00e7lunun \u201c..Cad. No:..\u00c7anakkale\u201d adresine g\u00f6nderilen \u00d6rnek 10 \u00d6deme Emri,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 35.maddesine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f; tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda \u201c7210 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu 35.maddesine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f edildi. 18.01.2011\u201d \u015ferhine yer verilmekle birlikte mazbatada tebli\u011f memurunun ad\u0131 ve imzas\u0131n\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fcnmektedir. Yerel mahkemenin direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 35.maddesinde 6099 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a09.maddesiyle yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin, tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 18.01.2011 tarihinden sonra (19.01.2011 tarihinde) y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin direnmesi gerek\u00e7esi usul ve yasaya uygundur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ne varki, bor\u00e7luya yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 35.maddesine uyar\u0131nca tebligat yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmesine ra\u011fmen tebli\u011fin ne \u015fekilde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0par\u00e7as\u0131n\u0131n adresteki kap\u0131ya as\u0131l\u0131p as\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu haliyle, \u00f6deme emrinin\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 35.maddesine g\u00f6re, usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edildi\u011finden bahsedilemez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu bak\u0131mdan, mahkemenin tebli\u011fin usul\u00fcne uygun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin direnme gerek\u00e7esi yerinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu\u2019ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u00fcyeler,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;un 35.maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin usul\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle yerel mahkeme direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de; yukar\u0131da belirtilen nedenlerle, an\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f, Kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu durumda, bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebligata ili\u015fkin \u015fikayeti kabul edilip, bor\u00e7lunun sair \u015fikayetleri incelenerek olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken, tebli\u011fin usul\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011fundan bahisle \u015fikayetin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sonu\u00e7 itibariyle; direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da belirtilen de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7eyle bozulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0\u015eikayet\u00e7i-bor\u00e7lu A.B.. vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7e ve nedenlerden dolay\u0131 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a030. maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici Madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 429.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n geri verilmesine, 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019na 5311 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a029. maddesi ile eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici Madde 7\u201d atf\u0131yla ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 366. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011fden itibaren 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 04.12.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2013\/12-19<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2013\/817<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 12.6.2013<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 \u00d6DEME EMR\u0130 TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130N\u00a0USULS\u00dcZL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc ( Muhatab\u0131n Neden Adreste Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Adresten K\u0131sa S\u00fcreli mi Uzun S\u00fcreli mi Ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Kay\u0131t Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; 7201 S.K. Md.21&#8217;e Uygun\u00a0TebligatYap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa da Tebli\u011f \u0130\u015fleminin Usul\u00fcne Uygun Oldu\u011fu S\u00f6ylenemeyece\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( \u00d6deme Emrinin Adreste Bulunmayan Bor\u00e7luya 7201 S.K. Md.21&#8217;e G\u00f6re Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Ancak\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Evrak\u0131nda Muhatab\u0131n Neden Adreste Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Kay\u0131t Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Tebli\u011f Tarihinin \u00d6\u011frenme Tarihine G\u00f6re D\u00fczeltilmesine Karar Verilece\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 MUHATABIN ADRESTE OLMAMASI ( Tebli\u011f Memurunca Neden Adreste Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 K\u0131sa ya da Uzun S\u00fcreli veya Ge\u00e7ici Olarak m\u0131 Adresten Ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 Tevziat Saatlerinden Sonra Gelip Gelmeyece\u011fi Hususlar\u0131 Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Sonucunun Tebli\u011f Evrak\u0131na Yaz\u0131l\u0131p \u0130lgilisine \u0130mzalat\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEBL\u0130\u011e \u0130MKANSIZLI\u011eI ( Muhatab\u0131n Adreste Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Tebligat\u0131n 7201 S.K. Md.21&#8217;e G\u00f6re Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Muhatab\u0131n Neden Adreste Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Adresten K\u0131sa S\u00fcreli mi Uzun S\u00fcreli mi Ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Kay\u0131t Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Tebligat\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.\u00a021,\u00a032<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\/m.28<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0\u0130stek, borca ve yetkiye itiraz ile \u00f6deme emrinin iptali istemine ili\u015fkindir. M\u00fclga\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 28.maddesi gere\u011fince, tebli\u011f memurunca muhatab\u0131n neden adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, k\u0131sa ya da uzun s\u00fcreli veya ge\u00e7ici olarak m\u0131 adresten ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tevziat saatlerinden sonra gelip gelmeyece\u011fi hususlar\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak, ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucu tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na yaz\u0131l\u0131p ilgilisine imzalat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak bu \u015fekilde yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0i\u015fleminin usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, hakim taraf\u0131ndan denetlenebilir. Bor\u00e7luya g\u00f6nderilen \u00f6deme emri TK 21. maddeye g\u00f6re yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; ancak\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda muhatab\u0131n neden adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, adresten k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli mi yoksa uzun s\u00fcreli mi ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir kay\u0131t bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bor\u00e7luya yap\u0131lan \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fi i\u015fleminin usul\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011fundan s\u00f6z edilemez. Tebli\u011f tarihinin \u00f6\u011frenme tarihine g\u00f6re d\u00fczeltilmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201c\u015fikayet\u201d isteminden dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Ankara 3. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nce \u015fikayetin reddine dair verilen 25.11.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/1253 E., 2010\/1434 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi \u015fikayet\u00e7i\/bor\u00e7lu vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 25.10.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/3926 E., 2011\/20217 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Bor\u00e7luya \u00f6rnek 7 \u00f6deme emrinin 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a021. maddesi uygulanmak suretiyle tebli\u011f edilmek istenildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun &#8220;Tebli\u011f imkans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tebell\u00fc\u011fden imtina&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 21. maddesinde; &#8220;Kendisine\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lacak kimse veya yukar\u0131daki maddeler mucibince\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131labilecek kimselerden hi\u00e7biri g\u00f6sterilen adreste bulunmaz veya tebell\u00fc\u011fden imtina ederse, tebli\u011f memuru tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir ve memuruna imza mukabilinde teslim eder ve tesell\u00fcm edenin adresini ihtiva eden ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresteki binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmakla beraber, adreste bulunmama halinde tebli\u011f olunacak \u015fahsa keyfiyetin haber verilmesini de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olduk\u00e7a en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirir. \u0130hbarnamenin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Madde bu haliyle iki hali birlikte d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. Bunlardan ilki &#8220;adreste bulunmama&#8221;, di\u011feri ise &#8220;tebell\u00fc\u011fden imtina&#8221;d\u0131r. Muhatab\u0131n adreste bulunmamas\u0131 halinde tebli\u011f memurunun ne \u015fekilde davranmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini d\u00fczenleyen\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 28. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda; &#8220;Muhatap veya ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131labilecek olanlardan hi\u00e7biri g\u00f6sterilen adreste bulunmazsa, tebli\u011f memurunun adreste bulunmama sebebini bilmesi muhtemel kom\u015fu, y\u00f6netici, kap\u0131c\u0131, muhtar, ihtiyar kurulu veya meclisi \u00fcyeleri, zab\u0131ta amir ve memurlar\u0131ndan tahkik ederek beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 tebli\u011f tutana\u011f\u0131na yaz\u0131p alt\u0131n\u0131 imzalatmas\u0131, imzadan \u00e7ekinmeleri halinde de bu durumu yazarak kendisinin imzalamas\u0131 gerekir.&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Burada T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 28. maddesi, tebli\u011f memuruna ilgilinin neden adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 &#8220;tahkik etme&#8221; g\u00f6revini y\u00fcklemi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re tebli\u011f memuru tahkik etmekle kalmay\u0131p, buna tevsike y\u00f6nelik olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tahkikat\u0131n sonucunu tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na yazacak ve maddede a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere ilgilisine imzalatacakt\u0131r. Ancak bu \u015fekilde yap\u0131lan i\u015flemin usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Hakim taraf\u0131ndan denetlenebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Muhatab\u0131n tebli\u011f adresinde ikamet etmekle birlikte, k\u0131sa ya da uzun s\u00fcreli ve ge\u00e7ici olarak adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, tevziat saatlerinden sonra gelece\u011finin beyan ve bunun tevsik edilmesi halinde ancak; maddede say\u0131lanlardan, \u00f6rne\u011fin muhtara imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 tebli\u011f edilip, 2 numaral\u0131 fi\u015fin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve kom\u015funun durumdan haberdar edilmesi i\u015flemlerine ge\u00e7ilebilecektir. Tahkikatta muhatab\u0131n adresten kesin olarak ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ya da \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn tespiti halinde ise T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 28. maddesinin 2.,3.,4. f\u0131kralar\u0131 gere\u011fince i\u015flem yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla; T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 28. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fekilde ve maddede belirtilen ki\u015filere sorularak imzalar\u0131 da al\u0131nmak suretiyle, \u015fayet imzadan \u00e7ekinmeleri halinde bu husus da belirtilerek; muhatab\u0131n adreste ge\u00e7ici olarak bulunmama sebebi ve tevziat saatlerinden sonra gelece\u011fi &#8220;tevsik edilmeden&#8221;, Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 21. maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0i\u015flemi ge\u00e7ersizdir. Zira bu belgeleme i\u015flemi, devam\u0131 i\u015flemleri belirlemesi yan\u0131nda muamelenin do\u011fru olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yard\u0131mc\u0131 olacak ve tebli\u011fi isteyen makam ve Hakimin denetimini sa\u011flayacakt\u0131r. 21. maddeye g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligatlarda tebli\u011f tarihi, maddenin son c\u00fcmlesinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, iki numaral\u0131 fi\u015fin yani ihbarnamenin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihtir. Tebli\u011f tarihinin bu \u015fekilde belirlenmesi ve ge\u00e7erli say\u0131labilmesi, tebli\u011f memurunun yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ara\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131 mutlaka yapmas\u0131na ve belgelemesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. ( HGK. nun 25.01.2006 tarih ve 200512-772\/17 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ) Somut olayda tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin, muhatab\u0131n adresinin kapal\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeni ile\u00a0tebligat\u0131n mahalle muhtar\u0131 imzas\u0131na teslim edilip 2 no&#8217;lu form\u00fcl\u00fcn kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak beyanda bulunan\u0131n imzadan imtina etti\u011fi belirtilmek suretiyle yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere muhatab\u0131n tevziat saatlerinden sonra adresine d\u00f6n\u00fcp d\u00f6nmeyece\u011fi, d\u00f6necekse ne zaman d\u00f6nece\u011fi tevsik edilmedi\u011finden \u00f6deme emrinin\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 21.maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu durumda 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a032. maddesi gere\u011fince tebli\u011f tarihinin \u00f6\u011frenme tarihine g\u00f6re d\u00fczeltilmesine karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0\u0130stek, borca ve yetkiye itiraz ile \u00f6deme emrinin iptali istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eikayet\u00e7i\/bor\u00e7lu vekili; kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\/alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan m\u00fcvekkili aleyhine Ankara 17. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 2010\/12975 E say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin adresinin \u201cHarbiye Mah. Abdi \u0130pek\u00e7i Cad. No: &#8230; Daire: &#8230; \u015ei\u015fli-\u0130stanbul\u201d oldu\u011funu, bu durumun vekaletname ve muhtarl\u0131ktan al\u0131nan belge ile sabit oldu\u011funu, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n kasten ve k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli olarak m\u00fcvekkili ile ilgisi olmayan bir adrese \u00f6deme emrini tebli\u011f ettirdi\u011fini,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lan adresin D&#8230;-Dizayn A\u015e.&#8217;nin yasal ikametgah\u0131 oldu\u011funu, yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin icra takibinden 18.10.2010 tarihinde tapuda i\u015flem yapt\u0131rmak isterken haberdar oldu\u011funu belirterek, Ankara \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn yetkisizli\u011fine, \u00f6deme emrinin iptaline, takibin durdurulmas\u0131na, hacizlerin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\/alacakl\u0131 vekili; \u015fikayet\u00e7inin, m\u00fcvekkili aleyhine ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130stanbul 8. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 2009\/32784 E say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda, 154 ada 99 parselin sat\u0131\u015f\u0131na ili\u015fkin resmi senette, 28.03.2007 tarihli sat\u0131\u015f senedinde ve bir \u00e7ok belgede adresini \u201cTarlaba\u015f\u0131 Bulvar\u0131 \u015eimal Sok. No: &#8230;, A&#8230; D&#8230; \u0130\u015f Merkezi, \u015ei\u015fhane \u0130stanbul\u201d olarak bildirdi\u011fini, bor\u00e7luya yap\u0131lan \u00f6deme emri\u00a0tebligat\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011funu belirterek \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, \u015fikayetin reddine dair verilen karar, \u015fikayet\u00e7i vekilinin temyizi \u00fczerine \u00d6zel Daire&#8217;ce ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yer alan gerek\u00e7e ile bozulmu\u015f, Yerel Mahkemece, bor\u00e7luya yap\u0131lan \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011fine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin\u00a0TebligatKanunu&#8217;nun 21. maddesine g\u00f6re usul\u00fcne uygun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc, \u015fikayet\u00e7i\/bor\u00e7lu vekili temyize getirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme yoluyla Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; bor\u00e7luya yap\u0131lan \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fine dair i\u015flemin\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu 21. maddesi ve m\u00fclga\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 28. maddesine g\u00f6re usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktalar\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hemen belirtmek gerekir ki; tebli\u011f ile ilgili 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu ve Y\u00f6netmelik ( tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ) h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tamamen \u015feklidir. Gerek tebli\u011f i\u015flemi ve gerekse tebli\u011f tarihi, Kanun ve Y\u00f6netmelikte ( tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;nde ) emredilen \u015fekillerle ispat olunabilir. An\u0131lan Kanun ve Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin (\u00a0tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn ) bu konuda etkili \u00f6nlemler alm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n tek amac\u0131, tebli\u011fin muhatab\u0131na ula\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 ve onun taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmesini sa\u011flamakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re;\u00a0tebligat, bir davaya ili\u015fkin i\u015flemleri o davayla ilgili ki\u015filere bildirmek i\u00e7in, mahkemelerce Kanuna uygun bi\u00e7imde yap\u0131lan bir belgelendirme i\u015flemidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, Kanun ve Y\u00f6netmelik (\u00a0tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ) h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin en k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131na kadar uygulanmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Muhatab\u0131n adreste bulunmamas\u0131 halinde tebli\u011f memurunun ne \u015fekilde davranmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 21. maddesi ile\u00a0tebligat\u00a0tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan m\u00fclga\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 28. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. M\u00fclga T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 28.maddesi gere\u011fince, tebli\u011f memurunca muhatab\u0131n neden adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, k\u0131sa ya da uzun s\u00fcreli veya ge\u00e7ici olarak m\u0131 adresten ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tevziat saatlerinden sonra gelip gelmeyece\u011fi hususlar\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak, ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucu tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na yaz\u0131l\u0131p ilgilisine imzalat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak bu \u015fekilde yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0i\u015fleminin usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, H\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan denetlenebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">T\u00fcm bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olaya bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; bor\u00e7luya g\u00f6nderilen \u00f6deme emri TK 21. maddeye g\u00f6re yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; ancak\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda muhatab\u0131n neden adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, adresten k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli mi yoksa uzun s\u00fcreli mi ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir kay\u0131t bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bor\u00e7luya yap\u0131lan \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fi i\u015fleminin usul\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011fundan s\u00f6z edilemez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; ayn\u0131 hususa i\u015faret eden ve Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca da benimsenen \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131na uyulmas\u0131 gerekirken, \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0\u015eikayet\u00e7i\/bor\u00e7lu vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n bozma ilam\u0131nda ve yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a030. maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 429.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n geri verilmesine, 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu&#8217;na 5311 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a029. maddesi ile eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici Madde 7\u201d atf\u0131yla ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 366. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011fden itibaren 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 12.06.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2012\/19-580<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2012\/1105<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 12.12.2012<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 ALACAK DAVASINDA GE\u00c7ERS\u0130Z TEBL\u0130\u011eAT YAPILMASI ( Temyiz S\u00fcresini Ge\u00e7irilmesi Nedeniyle Karar D\u00fczeltme Talebi\/Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131n Davac\u0131ya Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olarak Tebli\u011f Edilmedi\u011fi &#8211; Davac\u0131 Vekili Yerine Ba\u015fka Bir Avukata Tebli\u011fat Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 MUHATABIN GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 OLARAK BA\u015eKA YERE G\u0130TMES\u0130 ( Davac\u0131 Vekilinden Ba\u015fka Bir Avukata Yap\u0131lan Tebli\u011fat\u0131n\u0131n Ge\u00e7ersiz Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEBL\u0130\u011eATIN YAPILDI\u011eI AVUKATIN DAVACI VEK\u0130L\u0130N\u0130N MEMUR YA DA M\u00dcSTAHDEM\u0130 SIFATI BULUNMADI\u011eI ( Tebli\u011fat\u0131n Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Av. S&#8217;nin Ayn\u0131 Binada Ba\u015fka Bir Vergi Kayd\u0131 ile B\u00fcrosu Bulundu\u011fu &#8211; Davac\u0131 Vekiline Yap\u0131lmayan Tebli\u011fat\u0131n Yasal Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Kabul\u00fc )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 GE\u00c7ERS\u0130Z TEBL\u0130\u011eAT ( Temyiz S\u00fcresinin Ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ya da Temyiz S\u00fcresinin Ge\u00e7irildi\u011finin Kabul Edilemeyece\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 D\u0130RENME KARARININ HUKUK\u0130 OLUP OLMADI\u011eI ( H\u00fck\u00fcm Sonucu K\u0131sm\u0131nda Gerek\u00e7eye Ait Herhangi Bir S\u00f6z Tekrar Edilmeksizin \u0130steklerin Her Biri Hakk\u0131nda A\u00e7\u0131k ve Teredd\u00fct Mahal Vermeyecek \u015eekilde H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi &#8211; Karar\u0131n Gerek\u00e7eli Olmas\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 MAHKEMEN\u0130N D\u0130RENME KARARININ YETERS\u0130Z OLDU\u011eU ( Sadece &#8220;Direnilmesine&#8221; Denilerek \u00d6nceki Karara At\u0131f Yap\u0131lmakla Yetinilmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131n HGK&#8217;nun \u0130ncelemesine Olanak Verir Mahiyette Gerek\u00e7eli Olmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 MAHKEME KARARININ A\u00c7IK VE TEREDD\u00dcTE MAHAL VERMEYECEK \u015eEK\u0130LDE OLMASI GERE\u011e\u0130 ( Taraflara Y\u00fcklenen Bor\u00e7lar ve Tan\u0131nan Haklar\u0131n S\u0131ra Numaras\u0131 Alt\u0131nda A\u00e7\u0131k ve Anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r ve \u0130nfazda \u015e\u00fcphe Uyand\u0131rmayacak \u015eekilde Kararda \u0130fade Edilmesi Gere\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m.\u00a073,294,297<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.\u00a011,17,29<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava, alacak istemine ili\u015fkindir.Mahkemece istemin reddine karar verilmi\u015f ve temyiz istemi \u00fczerine karar esastan bozulmu\u015ftur.Bozma \u00fczerine mahkemece ilk kararda direnilmi\u015f; direnme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz istemi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda, yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra ibraz edilen temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddine karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekil karar d\u00fczeltme isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.Mevcut hukuki d\u00fczenlemeler dikkate al\u0131narak dava de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde davac\u0131 vekilinin, \u201c\u2026 Sivas\u201d adresinde mesle\u011fini icra etmektedir. Direnme karar\u0131 Avukat E.&#8217;ye, \u201c\u2026Sivas\u201d adresine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, \u201ctebli\u011fat evrak\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7isi ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ),memur ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ), amiri ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ) Av. S. imzas\u0131na 23.08.2011 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir\u201d \u015fekliyle tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.Dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re \u201cAv S.\u201d davac\u0131 vekili de\u011fildir ve yine dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re ayn\u0131 binada 501 numaral\u0131 i\u015fyerine ait vergi kayd\u0131 da bulunmaktad\u0131r. Av. S&#8217;nin 7201 S.K. 17. M. belirtilen \u201cdaimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdem\u201d niteli\u011finde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re\u00a0tebligat\u00a0i\u015fleminin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z olup, ge\u00e7ersiz\u00a0tebligat\u00a0nedeni ile temyiz s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve temyiz s\u00fcresinin ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.Bu nedenle karar d\u00fczeltme isteminin kabul\u00fc ile\u00a0Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;na ait 01.02.2012 g\u00fcn 2012\/19-60-45 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce \u00f6nsorun olarak usul\u00fcne uygun bir direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n var olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.Mahkeme kararlar\u0131nda nelerin yaz\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun297. maddesinde belirtilmi\u015ftir.H\u00fck\u00fcm sonucu k\u0131sm\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eye ait her hangi bir s\u00f6z tekrar edilmeksizin isteklerin her biri hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmle, taraflara y\u00fcklenen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan haklar\u0131n s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k, \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak \u015fekilde g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekir.Mahkemece aslolan k\u0131sa kararda yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan mevzuata uygun h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131 olu\u015fturulmam\u0131\u015f sadece &#8220;direnilmesine &#8221; denilerek \u00f6nceki karara at\u0131f yap\u0131lmakla yetinilmi\u015ftir.Bu durumda, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde usul\u00fcn \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anlamda olu\u015fturulmu\u015f bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, direnme kararlar\u0131n\u0131 denetleyen Hukuk Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan incelenebilecek nitelikte teknik anlamda bir direnme h\u00fckm\u00fc de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 her t\u00fcrl\u00fc duraksamadan uzakt\u0131r.\u015eu durumda, dosya kapsam\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak taraflara y\u00fcklenen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan hakk\u0131n s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k, infazda \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak bi\u00e7imde, usul\u00fcn arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 niteliklere haiz k\u0131sa karar ve buna uygun gerek\u00e7eli karar olu\u015fturulmas\u0131d\u0131r.Mahkemenin, yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131klanan bi\u00e7imde usul\u00fcn \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc niteliklere haiz bulunmayan k\u0131sa karar\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davadan dolay\u0131, bozma \u00fczerine direnme yoluyla; Kangal Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinden verilen 04.05.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/50 E., 2011\/87 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan temyiz isteminin reddini kapsayan ve Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 01.02.2012 g\u00fcn, 2012\/19-60\u00a0E., 2012\/45 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131n, karar d\u00fczeltme yoluyla incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan verilen dilek\u00e7e ile istenilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca dilek\u00e7e, 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a030.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun440.maddesi gere\u011fince, d\u00fczeltilmesi istenen ilam ve dosyadaki ilgili b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a01-Dava alacak istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece istemin reddine karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz istemi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 19. Hukuk Dairesinin 03.05.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/7412-5365 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile esastan bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bozma \u00fczerine mahkemece ilk kararda direnilmi\u015f; direnme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz istemi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda, Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;na ait 01.02.2012 g\u00fcn 2012\/19-60-45 say\u0131l\u0131 karar ile yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra ibraz edilen temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddine karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekil karar d\u00fczeltme isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n belirli bir yerde meslek icra eden davac\u0131 avukat\u0131na usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilip edilmedi\u011finin \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a011., Avukatl\u0131k Kanununun 41. ve Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 73. maddeleri gere\u011fince vekil ile takip edilen i\u015flerde\u00a0tebligat\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun \u201cBelli bir yerde veya evde meslek ve sanat icras\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 17. maddesinde; \u201cbelli bir yerde devaml\u0131 olarak meslek veya sanat\u0131n\u0131 icra edenler, o yerde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f ayn\u0131 yerdeki daimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine\u2026 yap\u0131l\u0131r.\u201d denilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebli\u011f tarihi itibariyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn \u201cMeslek ve sanat erbab\u0131na tebligat\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 23. maddesinde, belli bir yerde devaml\u0131 olarak meslek veya sanat\u0131n\u0131 icra edenlerin, o yerde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011fin ayn\u0131 yerdeki daimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Rehberinin \u201cMuhatab\u0131n Ge\u00e7ici Olarak Ba\u015fka Yere Gitmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 59. maddesine g\u00f6re de; muhatap ad\u0131na kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen ki\u015filerin, muhatab\u0131n ge\u00e7ici olarak ba\u015fka yere gitti\u011fini belirtmeleri halinde, keyfiyet ve beyanda bulunan\u0131n h\u00fcviyetinin tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131na yaz\u0131larak alt\u0131n\u0131n beyan yapana imzalat\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 ve tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131n bu ki\u015filere verilece\u011fi, bu ki\u015filerin tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131 kabule mecbur oldu\u011fu, kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimsenin ge\u00e7ici olarak ba\u015fka bir yere gitti\u011fini belirten kimsenin beyan\u0131n\u0131 imzadan ka\u00e7\u0131nmas\u0131 halinde posta memurunun beyana g\u00f6re gerekli \u015ferhi vererek imzalayaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mevcut d\u00fczenleme dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda belli bir yerde devaml\u0131 olarak meslek veya sanat\u0131n\u0131 icra edenler, o yerde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 takdirde bunlara yap\u0131lacak tebli\u011f, o ki\u015finin ayn\u0131 yerdeki daimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle muhatab\u0131n daimi i\u015f\u00e7isi \u015feklinde yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olabilmesi i\u00e7in, muhatap ad\u0131na\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lan ki\u015finin ger\u00e7ekte muhatab\u0131n daimi i\u015f\u00e7isi olmas\u0131 ve muhatab\u0131n bulunamamas\u0131 halinde ise yukar\u0131da mevzuatta belirtilen \u015fekli i\u015flemlerin yerine getirilerek\u00a0tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklidir. Aksi takdirde yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">25.01.2012 tarihli Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131nlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun Uygulanmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin \u201cMuhatab\u0131n ge\u00e7ici olarak ba\u015fka yere gitmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 29. maddesinde de; tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak olan\u0131n ge\u00e7ici olarak ba\u015fka yere gitti\u011fini belirtmesi halinde, tebli\u011f memurunun muhatab\u0131n hangi sebeple adresten ge\u00e7ici olarak ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, beyanda bulunan\u0131n ad\u0131 ve soyad\u0131 ile s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 tebli\u011f tutana\u011f\u0131na yazaca\u011f\u0131, tebli\u011f tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyanda bulunana imzalatt\u0131raca\u011f\u0131 ve tebli\u011f edilecek evrak\u0131 beyanda bulunana verece\u011fi ve bu ki\u015filerin, tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131 kabule mecbur oldu\u011fu, bu ki\u015filerin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 imzadan ka\u00e7\u0131nmalar\u0131 ve tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmemeleri durumunda, tebli\u011f memurunun bu hususu tutana\u011fa yazarak imzalayaca\u011f\u0131 ve tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti \u00fcyesinden birine ya da kolluk amir veya memurlar\u0131na imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda teslim edece\u011fi ve teslim etti\u011fi ki\u015finin adresini i\u00e7eren ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresin kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131raca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda; davac\u0131 vekili, \u201c\u2026 Sivas\u201d adresinde mesle\u011fini icra etmektedir. Direnme karar\u0131 Avukat E.&#8217;ye, \u201c\u2026Sivas\u201d adresine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, \u201ctebli\u011fat evrak\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7isi ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ),memur ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ), amiri ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ) Av. S. imzas\u0131na 23.08.2011 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir\u201d \u015fekliyle tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re \u201cAv S.\u201d davac\u0131 vekili de\u011fildir ve yine dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re ayn\u0131 binada 501 numaral\u0131 i\u015fyerine ait vergi kayd\u0131 da bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da belirtilen yasal d\u00fczenlemeler dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lan Av. S&#8217;nin 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a017. maddesinde belirtilen \u201cdaimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdem\u201d niteli\u011finde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re 23.08.2011 tarihli\u00a0tebligati\u015fleminin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z olup, ge\u00e7ersiz\u00a0tebligat\u00a0nedeni ile temyiz s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve temyiz s\u00fcresinin ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle karar d\u00fczeltme isteminin kabul\u00fc ile Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;na ait 01.02.2012 g\u00fcn 2012\/19-60-45 say\u0131l\u0131 bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-\u0130\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce \u00f6nsorun olarak usul\u00fcne uygun bir direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n var olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkeme kararlar\u0131nda nelerin yaz\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0297. maddesinde belirtilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fck\u00fcm sonucu k\u0131sm\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eye ait her hangi bir s\u00f6z tekrar edilmeksizin isteklerin her biri hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmle, taraflara y\u00fcklenen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan haklar\u0131n s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k, \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak \u015fekilde g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HMK&#8217;nun\u00a0294. maddesinin 3 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise \u201cH\u00fckm\u00fcn tefhimi herhalde h\u00fck\u00fcm sonucunun duru\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131na ge\u00e7irilerek okunmas\u0131 suretiyle olur\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayr\u0131ca, bozma karar\u0131 ile ilk h\u00fck\u00fcm hayatiyetini yitirdi\u011finden ona at\u0131f suretiyle h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisinin yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan kurallara uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyece\u011fi de a\u015fikard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131n yerle\u015fmi\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc de bu y\u00f6ndedir ( Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 19.6.1991 g\u00fcn 323-391 say\u0131l\u0131; 10.09.1991 g\u00fcn 281-415 say\u0131l\u0131; 25.9.1991 g\u00fcn 355-440 say\u0131l\u0131; 05.12.2007 g\u00fcn 981-936 say\u0131l\u0131; 23.01.2008 g\u00fcn 29-4 say\u0131l\u0131; 05.10.2011 g\u00fcn 607-604 kararlar\u0131 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olaya gelince; mahkemece aslolan k\u0131sa kararda yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan mevzuata uygun h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131 olu\u015fturulmam\u0131\u015f sadece &#8220;direnilmesine &#8221; denilerek \u00f6nceki karara at\u0131f yap\u0131lmakla yetinilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu durumda, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde usul\u00fcn \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anlamda olu\u015fturulmu\u015f bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, direnme kararlar\u0131n\u0131 denetleyen Hukuk Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan incelenebilecek nitelikte teknik anlamda bir direnme h\u00fckm\u00fc de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 her t\u00fcrl\u00fc duraksamadan uzakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu durumda mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015f; dosya kapsam\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak taraflara y\u00fcklenen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan hakk\u0131n s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k, infazda \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak bi\u00e7imde, usul\u00fcn arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 niteliklere haiz k\u0131sa karar ve buna uygun gerek\u00e7eli karar olu\u015fturulmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemenin, yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131klanan bi\u00e7imde usul\u00fcn \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc niteliklere haiz bulunmayan k\u0131sa karar\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n bu nedenle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Yukar\u0131da ( 1 ) numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a030.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0440.maddesi gere\u011fince yap\u0131lan karar d\u00fczeltme incelemesi sonunda davac\u0131 vekilinin karar d\u00fczeltme isteminin kabul\u00fc ile,\u00a0Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 01.02.2012 tarih ve 2012\/19-60\u00a0E, 45 K.say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da ( 2 ) numaral\u0131 bentte g\u00f6sterilen de\u011fi\u015fik nedenden dolay\u0131 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a030.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 H.U.M.K.&#8217;nun\u00a0429.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, bozma nedenine g\u00f6re sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fimdilik incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 440\/III. maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 12.12.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2011\/21-869<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2011\/754<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 14.12.2011<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 \u0130T\u0130BAR\u0130 H\u0130ZMET S\u00dcRES\u0130N\u0130N TESP\u0130T\u0130 TALEB\u0130 ( Hukuki Dinlenilme Hakk\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan De\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Evrak\u0131nda S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumunu ve Onlara Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedenini \u015eerh Edilmeden Do\u011frudan Sekretere\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n Hukuka Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Olaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 HUKUK\u0130 D\u0130NLEN\u0130LME HAKKI ( Davan\u0131n Taraflar\u0131n\u0131n Kendi Haklar\u0131 \u0130le Ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 Olarak Hukuki Dinlenilme Hakk\u0131na Sahip Oldu\u011fu &#8211; \u0130tibari Hizmet S\u00fcresinin Tespiti Talebi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( Daval\u0131 \u015eirkete Yap\u0131lan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Evrak\u0131nda S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumunu ve Onlara Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedenini \u015eerh Edilmeden Do\u011frudan Sekretere\u00a0TebligatYap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; \u0130tibari Hizmet S\u00fcresinin Tespiti Talebi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 DO\u011eRUDAN SEKRETERE YAPILAN\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( Daval\u0131 \u015eirkete Yap\u0131lan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Evrak\u0131nda S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumunu ve Onlara Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedenini \u015eerh Edilmeden Do\u011frudan Sekretere\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 SAVUNMA HAKKININ KISITLANMASI ( Daval\u0131 \u015eirkete Yap\u0131lan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Evrak\u0131nda S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumunu ve Onlara Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedenini \u015eerh Edilmeden Do\u011frudan SekretereTebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 &#8211; Savunma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n K\u0131s\u0131tlanarak H\u00fck\u00fcm Verilemeyece\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">6100\/m.73<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">7201\/m.12<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava, itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinin tespiti istemine ili\u015fkindir. Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren \u015firkete yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla taraf te\u015fkilinin y\u00f6ntemine uygun \u015fekilde sa\u011flan\u0131p sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan direnme karar\u0131 verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu \u00f6n sorun olarak incelenmi\u015ftir. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun &#8220;Hukuki Dinlenilme Hakk\u0131&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 27. maddesi ( M\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanununun\u00a073. maddesi ) uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131, kendi haklar\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na sahip olup, bu hak, yarg\u0131lama ile ilgili bilgi sahibi olunmas\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7erir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 anonim \u015firkete dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; tebli\u011f memuru bu\u00a0tebligat\u0131 \u015firketin yetkili temsilcisine; onun herhangi bir nedenle tebli\u011fi alacak durumda olmamas\u0131 halinde de usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan ki\u015fiye; \u015fayet bunlar yoksa veya\u00a0tebligat\u0131 alamayacak durumda iseler bu durumu tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na \u015ferh ederek o yerde haz\u0131r bulunan tebli\u011fe yetkili memur ve m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine o da yoksa herhangi bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yapmas\u0131;\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda da s\u0131ras\u0131yla tebli\u011fe yetkili ki\u015filerin durumunu ve onlara tebli\u011f edilememe nedenini \u015ferh etmesi gerekirken, hi\u00e7bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermeden do\u011frudan sekretere tebli\u011f etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 \u015firketin savunma hakk\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlanarak h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat bu haliyle, a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemelere ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup,\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinin tespiti&#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 13. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesince davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 17.11.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/833 E., 2009\/939 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili ile daval\u0131lardan SGK vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 21. Hukuk Dairesinin 21.03.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/2232 E., 2011\/2501 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( \u2026 1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillere, h\u00fckm\u00fcn dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerektirici nedenlere g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm, daval\u0131 Kurumun a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-Davac\u0131, daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde bas\u0131m ve matbaac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015finde 07.11.1995-30.11.2006 tarihleri aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n Ek\u00a05\/2 madde kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funun tespiti ile bu s\u00fcrenin hizmet s\u00fcresine eklenmesini, malull\u00fck ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ve \u00f6l\u00fcm sigorta primlerinin ge\u00e7mi\u015fe d\u00f6n\u00fck olarak 7.11.1995-30.11.2006 tarihleri aras\u0131nda % 22 \u00fczerinden hesaplanmak suretiyle ek % 2&#8217;lik fark\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015fe y\u00f6nelik olarak daval\u0131 i\u015fverenden gecikme zamm\u0131 ile al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131, 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n Ek\u00a039\u00a0madde uyar\u0131nca sigortal\u0131l\u0131k s\u00fcresine ilave edilen g\u00fcn say\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n 5 y\u0131ldan az olmamak \u00fczere 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a060\u00a0ve Ge\u00e7ici\u00a081. maddelerinde belirtilen ya\u015f hadlerinden indirilerek bunlar\u0131n emeklilik i\u015flemlerinde dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 i\u015fveren \u015firkete ait ( 375639 ) sigorta nolu i\u015fyerinde ge\u00e7en 3930 g\u00fcn sigortal\u0131 hizmetin 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n Ek\u00a05\u00a0maddesi gere\u011fince itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinden yararland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, bu s\u00fcrenin emeklilik i\u015flemleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda S.G.K taraf\u0131ndan dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131na, sigorta prim fark\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 i\u015fverenden tahsili isteminin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosyadaki kay\u0131t ve belgelerden; davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde 7.11.1995-30.11.2006 tarihleri aras\u0131nda toplam 3930 g\u00fcn matbaa eleman\u0131 olarak bask\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkemece yap\u0131lan ke\u015fifte dinlenen tan\u0131klar\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n bask\u0131 i\u015finde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, kimyasal etkiye maruz kald\u0131klar\u0131, i\u015fyerinde g\u00fcnd\u00fcz 50-60, gece 15-20 ki\u015finin \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ortam\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011funu beyan ettikleri anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bas\u0131m ve gazetecilik i\u015fyerindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131 nedeniyle itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinden yararlanabilmenin yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n Ek\u00a05\/II. maddesidir. An\u0131lan maddeye g\u00f6re, sigortal\u0131lar\u0131n itibari hizmetten yararlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in iki ko\u015fulun birlikte ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi zorunludur. Bunlardan birinci ko\u015ful, sigortal\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;bas\u0131m ve gazetecilik&#8221; i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. S\u00f6zkonusu maddede, bas\u0131m ve gazetecilik i\u015fyeri birlikte ifade edilmi\u015f ise de; gazetecilik i\u015fi yap\u0131lmayan sadece bas\u0131m i\u015fi yap\u0131lan i\u015fyerlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan sigortal\u0131lar da, maddenin alt bentlerinde say\u0131lan ko\u015fullardan herhangi birisi olu\u015ftu\u011fu takdirde itibari hizmetten yararlanacaklar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. &#8220;Bas\u0131m&#8221; i\u015finin matbaa i\u015fyerinde mevkute \u00e7\u0131karmaya y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu ise s\u00f6z g\u00f6t\u00fcrmez. \u0130kinci ko\u015ful ise, yine ayn\u0131 maddenin II. alt bendinin ( a-f ) i\u015faretli alt bentlerinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 fiziksel d\u0131\u015f etkenlerden birinin olayda ayr\u0131ca ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f bulunmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, , daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde de\u011fi\u015fik firmalar\u0131n mamullerinin ambalajlanmas\u0131 ile ilgili olarak dokuz renge kadar bask\u0131, laminasyon, kli\u015fe, grafik ve film haz\u0131rlama i\u015flerinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;bas\u0131m&#8221; i\u015fyeri \u00f6zelli\u011fi bulunmayan bu i\u015fyerinde matbaada bask\u0131 elman\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, yukar\u0131da s\u00f6z\u00fc ge\u00e7en maddenin \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc birinci ko\u015fulun davac\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, giderek davac\u0131 &#8220;bas\u0131m&#8221; i\u015finde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan itibari hizmetten yararlanamayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k-se\u00e7iktir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, bu maddi ve hukuki olgular g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve \u00f6zellikle davan\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, bozma nedenidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde, daval\u0131 Kurumun bu y\u00f6nleri ama\u00e7layan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 kabul edilmeli ve h\u00fck\u00fcm bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r\u2026 ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle, davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 ( 1 ) maddede g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerle reddedilip, ( 2 ) maddede g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerle daval\u0131 SGK vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Dava, itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinin tespiti istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131 \u015firkete ait i\u015fyerinde ambalaj, bas\u0131m ve matbaac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015fi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyanla davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde ge\u00e7en \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun Ek\u00a05\/2. bendi kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funun, itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinin sigortal\u0131l\u0131k s\u00fcrelerine eklenmesi gerekti\u011finin tespitini ve eklenen s\u00fcrelerin ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131na esas ya\u015f hadlerinden indirilmesiyle fark primin daval\u0131dan tahsilini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Kurumu vekili, hizmetin Ek 5. madde kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n bas\u0131m ve gazetecilik i\u015fyerinde olmas\u0131 ile birlikte maddenin II. Bendinin ( a ) ila ( f ) alt bentlerinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 fiziksel etkenlerden birinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirterek davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 i\u015fveren \u015firket yaz\u0131l\u0131 veya s\u00f6zl\u00fc beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece, &#8220;i\u015fyerinin bas\u0131m i\u015fyeri oldu\u011fu ve Ek 5. maddede d\u00fczenlenen nedenlerden birden fazlas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerinde mevcut oldu\u011fu&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile davac\u0131n\u0131n itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinden yararland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, sigorta prim fark\u0131 tahsili ve itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinin ya\u015f hadlerinden indirilmesi taleplerinin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili ile daval\u0131lardan SGK vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine karar, \u00d6zel Daire&#8217;ce yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece &#8220;mevkute d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u015feyler bas\u0131lan ancak ayn\u0131 olumsuz \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan i\u015fyerlerinin bas\u0131m i\u015fyeri olarak kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131 daval\u0131 SGK vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren \u015firkete yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla taraf te\u015fkilinin y\u00f6ntemine uygun \u015fekilde sa\u011flan\u0131p sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan direnme karar\u0131 verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu \u00f6n sorun olarak incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere 01.10.2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun &#8220;Hukuki Dinlenilme Hakk\u0131&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 27. maddesi ( M\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanununun\u00a073. maddesi ) uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131, kendi haklar\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na sahip olup, bu hak, yarg\u0131lama ile ilgili bilgi sahibi olunmas\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7erir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu kapsamda kural olarak, duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlu olan \u00e7eki\u015fmeli yarg\u0131da hakim, Kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi istisnalar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda taraflar\u0131 dinlemeden veya iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeleri i\u00e7in kanuna uygun bi\u00e7imde davet etmeden h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc veremez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n gere\u011fi olarak taraflar duru\u015fmaya \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmadan, e\u015f anlat\u0131mla; taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan h\u00fck\u00fcm verilememesi, Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesi ile d\u00fczenlenen iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na olanak tan\u0131nmas\u0131 ilkesinin do\u011fal bir sonucudur ve ayn\u0131 zamanda Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 6. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n da en \u00f6nemli unsurudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n gerek yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca gerekse kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler konusunda bilgilendirilmeleri zorunludur. Ki\u015finin kendisinden habersiz yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131larak karar verilmesi, kural olarak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir ( H. Pekcan\u0131tez, O. Atalay, M. \u00d6zekes, Medeni Usul Hukuku, 11. Bas\u0131, 2011, s. 273 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ger\u00e7ekten savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na alan T.C. Anayasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 36. maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun\u00a027. maddesinde de a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, mahkemece daval\u0131 yan, dinlenmek ve savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nmak \u00fczere kanuni \u015fekillere uygun olarak davet edilmedik\u00e7e h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan, taraf te\u015fkili dava \u015fart\u0131 olup, davan\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda mahkemece re&#8217;sen nazara al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken bir olgudur ve mahkemenin, dava dilek\u00e7esi ile duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc, karar\u0131, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131 ve direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 taraflara kendili\u011finden tebli\u011f edip taraf te\u015fkilini sa\u011flamas\u0131, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun amir h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi, iddia ve savunma ile ilgili delillerin eksiksiz toplan\u0131p tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilmesi, itirazlar\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi, davan\u0131n s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131labilmesi, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden haberdar edilmesi ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olur. Ki\u015finin hangi yarg\u0131 merciinde duru\u015fmas\u0131 bulundu\u011funu, hakk\u0131ndaki iddia ve isnatlar\u0131n nelerden ibaret oldu\u011funu bilmesi, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ve\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klanan usule uygun\u00a0tebligatyap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile sa\u011flanabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu bak\u0131mdan, davetiyenin ve tebli\u011f tutanakl\u0131 zarf\u0131n, davadaki ve takipteki \u00f6nemi b\u00fcy\u00fckt\u00fcr. As\u0131l olan taraflar\u0131n huzurunda yarg\u0131laman\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi olmakla birlikte, hukuk mahkemelerinde taraflar yarg\u0131lamaya kat\u0131lmasalar dahi mutlaka duru\u015fmadan haberdar edilmelidir. Duru\u015fmaya gelmese dahi yoklukta davaya devam edilip karar verilmesine usul\u00fcn olanak tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 hallerde, yasan\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc uyar\u0131y\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan davetiyenin tebli\u011f edilmesinden ve yasaya uygun taraf te\u015fkilinin tamamlanmas\u0131ndan sonra i\u015fin esas\u0131na giri\u015filmesi ve delillerin toplanarak bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat; bilgilendirme yan\u0131nda belgelendirme \u00f6zelli\u011fi de bulunan bir usul i\u015flemi oldu\u011fundan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ile ilgili olarak 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan T\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tamamen \u015feklidir. Kanun ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn amac\u0131\u00a0tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131na en k\u0131sa zamanda ula\u015fmas\u0131, konusu ile ilgili olan ki\u015filerin bilgilendirilmesi ve bu hususlar\u0131n belgeye ba\u011flanmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek tebli\u011f i\u015flemi ve gerekse tebli\u011f tarihi ancak yasa ve t\u00fcz\u00fckte emredilen \u015fekillerle tevsik ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ispat olunabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Kanunu ile T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;nde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fekilde i\u015flem yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a tebli\u011f memuru taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyan onun m\u00fccerret s\u00f6z\u00fcnden ibaret kal\u0131r ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla belgelendirilmi\u015f say\u0131lmaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, yasa ve t\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin en ufak ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131na kadar uygulanmas\u0131 zorunludur. Kanunun ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn belirledi\u011fi \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve belgelendirilmemi\u015f olan\u00a0tebligatlar\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olmayaca\u011f\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde t\u00fczel ki\u015filere yap\u0131lacak\u00a0tebligata ili\u015fkin yasal d\u00fczenlemelerin de irdelenmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slara Ve Ticarethanelere Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 12. maddesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slara tebli\u011f, salahiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine, bunlar birden ziyade ise, yaln\u0131z birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir ticarethanenin muamelelerinden do\u011fan ihtilaflarda, ticari m\u00fcmessiline yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f muteberdir.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slar\u0131n Memur Ve M\u00fcstahdemlerine Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 13. maddesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slar nam\u0131na kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimseler her hangi bir sebeple m\u00fbtat i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015f yerinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 veya o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde olduklar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f, orada haz\u0131r bulunan memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fck\u00fcmleri yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yine,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slara Ve Ticarethanelere Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 17. maddesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slara tebli\u011f salahiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine, bunlar birden ziyade ise yaln\u0131z birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Vekaletlerin ve bunlar\u0131n te\u015fkilat\u0131n\u0131n, m\u00fclhak ve hususi b\u00fct\u00e7eli idarelerle belediyelerin, k\u00f6ylerin ve hususi kanunlar\u0131na m\u00fcsteniden kurulmu\u015f olan te\u015fekk\u00fcllerle, \u015firketlerin ve cemiyetlerin salahiyetli olduklar\u0131 m\u00fcmessilleri tabi kanunlara ve stat\u00fclerine g\u00f6re tayin edilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckmi ve hakiki \u015fahsa ait bir ticarethanenin muamelelerinden do\u011fan ihtilaflarda, ticarethanenin o muamelede salahiyetli ticari m\u00fcmessiline yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f muteberdir.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slar\u0131n Memur Ve M\u00fcstahdemlerine Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 18. maddesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Yukar\u0131ki Madde mucibince tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimseler herhangi bir sebeple m\u00fctat i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015fyerinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 veya o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alam\u0131yacak bir halde olduklar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f, h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n o yerdeki memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu kadar ki, kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak memur veya m\u00fcstahdemin, h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n yerdeki te\u015fkilat\u0131 veya personeli i\u00e7inde vazife itibariyle\u00a0tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131 olan h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n m\u00fcmessilinden sonra gelen bir kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi esasen bu kabil i\u015flerle tavzif edilmi\u015f bir \u015fah\u0131s olmas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bunlar\u0131n da bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda tesbit edildi\u011fi takdirde\u00a0tebligat, o yerdeki di\u011fer bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yap\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">D\u00fczenlemelerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yeri gelmi\u015fken belirtilmelidir ki, 6762 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ticaret Kanunu&#8217;nda d\u00fczenlenen ticaret \u015firketleri h\u00fckmi \u015fahsiyeti haiz olup \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slar ile olan ili\u015fkilerinde ortaklardan olu\u015fan m\u00fcmessil-organ veya d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan tayin edilen sair m\u00fcmessiller taraf\u0131ndan temsil olunurlar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckmi \u015fahsiyeti haiz olmalar\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ticaret \u015firketlerinde\u00a0tebligat\u0131n \u015firketlerin &#8220;sal\u00e2hiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine&#8221; yap\u0131lmas\u0131 icap eder. Sal\u00e2hiyetli m\u00fcmessiller ibaresiyle evvela \u015firketleri kanunen temsile yetkili organlar ve bu organlar ad\u0131na hareket edenler kastedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 13. maddesi ile Nizamname&#8217;nin buna tekab\u00fcl eden 18. maddesi birlikte tatbik edildi\u011finde, kendisine tebligat yap\u0131lacak \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n derecelendirildikleri g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bir kere, h\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slar nam\u0131na kendilerine tebligat yap\u0131labilecek sal\u00e2hiyetli m\u00fcmessiller m\u00fbtad i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015fyerlerinde bulunduklar\u0131 ve o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alacak durumda olduklar\u0131 takdirde memur ve m\u00fcstahdemlere tebligat yap\u0131lamaz. Saniyen, memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlere tebligat yap\u0131labilecek hallerde de, \u00f6nce kendisine tebligat yap\u0131lacak \u015fahs\u0131n, \u015firketin o yerdeki te\u015fkilat\u0131 veya personeli i\u00e7inde vazife itibariyle muhatap h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n m\u00fcmessilinden sonra gelen veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi esasen bu i\u015flerle tavzif edilmi\u015f bir kimse olmas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r. B\u00f6yle bir kimsenin bulunmamas\u0131 halindedir ki ( bu durum tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131na dercedilmek suretiyle ) o yerdeki di\u011fer bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131labilir. Daha \u00f6nce kendisine\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken kimselerin bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 veya\u00a0tebligat\u0131 bizzat alamayacak durumda olduklar\u0131n\u0131n ispat\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan mazbatada yer alacak kay\u0131t bilhassa \u00f6nemlidir ( E. Moro\u011flu, Makalelerim I, \u0130stanbul 2001, s. 4-5 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir ki, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a012. ve\u00a013. maddeleri ile Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 17. ve 18. maddelerinde t\u00fczel ki\u015filere tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lma usul\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f;\u00a0tebligat\u0131n, bunlar\u0131n tabi olduklar\u0131 kanunlara ve stat\u00fclerine g\u00f6re belirlenecek yetkili temsilcilerine, e\u011fer t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisi yoksa veya evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde ise; g\u00f6rev itibariyle temsilciden sonra gelen kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi bu i\u015fle g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f bir ki\u015fiye, o da yoksa t\u00fczel ki\u015finin o yerdeki memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine, yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. E\u011fer,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisine yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve s\u0131ral\u0131 ki\u015filere yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, bunun nedenlerinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olaraktebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 gere\u011fine de i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 04.04.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2007\/12-200\u00a0E. 2007\/187 K., 30.12.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/12-563 E. 2009\/600 K. ile 13.05.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/12-184 E. 2009\/187 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131nda da ayn\u0131 husus vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve konuya ili\u015fkin ilkeler g\u00f6zetilerek, somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 i\u015fveren s\u0131fat\u0131yla anonim \u015firket aleyhine dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan dava dilek\u00e7esinde bildirilen adrese \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan ve dava dilek\u00e7esi ile duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7eren tebligat; daval\u0131 anonim \u015firket ad\u0131na &#8220;G\u00f6sterilen adreste muhatab\u0131n daimi birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r Sekreter Fatma Demirkol&#8221; imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ne var ki, dava dilek\u00e7esinin ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn tebli\u011fine ili\u015fkin bu\u00a0tebligat\u00a0par\u00e7as\u0131nda ba\u015fkaca herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verilmedi\u011fi gibi, anonim \u015firketin yetkili temsilcisinin veya ondan sonraki yetkili ki\u015finin adreste olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve nedenleri de \u015ferh edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece, gerek\u00e7eli karar tebli\u011fi i\u00e7in, daval\u0131 anonim \u015firkete \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n &#8220;Muhatap adresten soruldu. Ta\u015f\u0131nm\u0131\u015f&#8221; \u015ferhi ile bila tebli\u011f iade edilmesi \u00fczerine, daval\u0131 anonim \u015firkete dava dilek\u00e7esi usulen tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f gibi i\u015flem yap\u0131larak, bundan sonraki\u00a0tebligatlar, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a035. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, yine ayn\u0131 adrese yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hemen burada, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035.maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131 olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tve buna y\u00f6nelik olarak da daval\u0131 anonim \u015firkete dava dilek\u00e7esi ile duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn tebli\u011fine ili\u015fkin\u00a0tebligat\u00a0i\u015fleminin usul\u00fcnce ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finin belirlenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, daval\u0131 anonim \u015firkete dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; tebli\u011f memuru bu\u00a0tebligat\u0131 \u015firketin yetkili temsilcisine; onun herhangi bir nedenle tebli\u011fi alacak durumda olmamas\u0131 halinde de usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan ki\u015fiye; \u015fayet bunlar yoksa veya\u00a0tebligat\u0131 alamayacak durumda iseler bu durumu tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na \u015ferh ederek o yerde haz\u0131r bulunan tebli\u011fe yetkili memur ve m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine o da yoksa herhangi bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yapmas\u0131;\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda da s\u0131ras\u0131yla tebli\u011fe yetkili ki\u015filerin durumunu ve onlara tebli\u011f edilememe nedenini \u015ferh etmesi gerekirken, hi\u00e7bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermeden do\u011frudan sekretere tebli\u011f etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat bu haliyle, a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemelere ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup,\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011fi\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olmakla ve b\u00f6ylece daval\u0131 \u015firkete usul\u00fcnce yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir\u00a0tebligat\u00a0bulunmamakla, savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlar bi\u00e7imde devam\u0131 tebli\u011flerin 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035.maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca daval\u0131\/i\u015fveren anonim \u015firkete usul\u00fcnce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve y\u00f6ntemince taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan dosya i\u00e7erisindeki beyan ve belgelerden daval\u0131 anonim \u015firketin iflas\u0131 talebi ile dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 da anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu durumda, mahkemece daval\u0131 \u015firkete usul\u00fcnce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmadan, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan savunma hakk\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlanarak direnme karar\u0131 verilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015f; daval\u0131 anonim \u015firket hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 beyan edilen iflas talebine ili\u015fkin dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n celbi ile ticaret sicil memurlu\u011fundan da sorulmak suretiyle daval\u0131 anonim \u015firketin h\u00fckmi \u015fahsiyetinin devam edip edilmedi\u011finin tespiti ile \u015firketin i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu yasal durum itibariyle tabi olduklar\u0131 kanunlara ve stat\u00fclerine g\u00f6re belirlenecek yetkili temsilcilerine, e\u011fer t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisi yoksa veya evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde ise; g\u00f6rev itibariyle temsilciden sonra gelen kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi bu i\u015fle g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f bir ki\u015fiye, o da yoksa t\u00fczel ki\u015finin o yerdeki memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine, e\u011fer\u00a0tebligat\u00a0t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisine yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve s\u0131ral\u0131 ki\u015filere yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, bunun nedenlerinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle bu ki\u015filere dava dilek\u00e7esi, karar ve bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6ntemince tebli\u011f edilmesi ve taraf te\u015fkilinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan hususlar g\u00f6zetilmeden, daval\u0131 \u015firketin savunma hakk\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlanarak h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun olmay\u0131p, \u00f6n sorunun a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle kabul\u00fc ile direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n bu de\u011fi\u015fik ve usule ili\u015fkin nedenlerle bozulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Daval\u0131 SGK vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen de\u011fi\u015fik nedenlerden dolay\u0131 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a030.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen &#8220;Ge\u00e7ici madde 3&#8221; atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0429. Maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, 14.12.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2012\/19-60<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2012\/45<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 1.2.2012<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 VEKALETTEN \u00c7EK\u0130LEN AVUKAT ( Belli Bir \u0130\u015fi Takipten veya Savunmadan \u0130ste\u011fiyle \u00c7ekilen Avukat\u0131n O \u0130\u015fe Ait Vekalet G\u00f6revi Durumu M\u00fcvekkiline Tebli\u011finden \u0130tibaren Onbe\u015f G\u00fcn S\u00fcreyle Devam Edece\u011fi)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130Z S\u00dcRES\u0130 GE\u00c7T\u0130KTEN SONRA \u0130\u015e\u0130 BIRAKTI\u011eININ B\u0130LD\u0130REN AVUKAT ( Karar\u0131n Tebli\u011fini Beklemeksizin \u0130\u015fi B\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 A\u015famada M\u00fcvekkiline ve Mahkemeye Durumu Bildirmemi\u015f Olmakla S\u00fcreye Tabi \u0130\u015flerde \u0130\u015fi Yapma ya da Bildirim Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Kurtulamayaca\u011f\u0131)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 B\u0130RDEN FAZLA VEK\u0130L BULUNMASI ( Vekillerden Her Biri Vekaletten Kaynaklanan Yetkileri Di\u011ferinden Ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z Olarak Kullanabilece\u011fi &#8211; Aksi Y\u00f6ndeki S\u0131n\u0131rlamalar Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Ge\u00e7ersiz Oldu\u011fu)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 GEC\u0130KMES\u0130NDE SAKINCA BULUNAN \u0130\u015eLER\u0130N YAPILMASI ( Vekaletten \u00c7ekilen Avukat &#8211; Davac\u0131n\u0131n Birden Fazla Vekili Bulundu\u011funa G\u00f6re Vekillerinden Birisinin Engeli Bulunsa Dahi Di\u011fer Vekillerince de Gecikmesinde Zarar Umulan \u0130\u015flemin Yap\u0131labilece\u011fi)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( Birden Fazla Vekili Olan Davac\u0131n\u0131n Vekillerinden Birine Yap\u0131lan\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na Kar\u015f\u0131n Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131n Di\u011fer Vekiline Yap\u0131lan 2.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Sonuca Etkili Olmay\u0131p Temyiz S\u00fcresi \u0130lk Tebli\u011fden \u0130tibaren Ba\u015flamakla 15 G\u00fcnl\u00fck Yasal Temyiz S\u00fcresi Ge\u00e7tikten Sonra Yap\u0131lan Temyiz \u0130steminin Reddi Gerekti\u011fi)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">1136\/m.34,41<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">7201\/m.11<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a01136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a041. maddesi gere\u011fince belli bir i\u015fi takipten veya savunmadan iste\u011fiyle \u00e7ekilen avukat\u0131n o i\u015fe ait vekalet g\u00f6revi, durumu m\u00fcvekkiline tebli\u011finden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle devam eder. \u0130\u015fi b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra bildiren avukat karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini beklemeksizin i\u015fi b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u015famada m\u00fcvekkiline ve mahkemeye durumu bildirmemi\u015f olmakla s\u00fcreye tabi i\u015flerde i\u015fi yapma ya da bildirim y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden kurtulamaz. Davac\u0131n\u0131n birden fazla vekili bulundu\u011funa g\u00f6re vekillerinden birisinin engeli bulunsa dahi di\u011fer vekillerince de gecikmesinde zarar umulan i\u015flemin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 olanakl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz talebinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun &#8220;Birden Fazla Vekil G\u00f6revlendirilmesi&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 75. maddesi gere\u011fince: Dava i\u00e7in birden fazla vekil g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f ise vekillerden her biri, vekaletten kaynaklanan yetkileri, di\u011ferinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak kullanabilir. Aksi y\u00f6ndeki s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar, kar\u015f\u0131 taraf bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ersizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Birden fazla vekili olan davac\u0131n\u0131n vekillerinden birine yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n di\u011fer vekiline yap\u0131lan 2.\u00a0tebligat\u00a0sonuca etkili olmay\u0131p, temyiz s\u00fcresi ilk tebli\u011fden itibaren ba\u015flamakla 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra yap\u0131lan temyiz isteminin reddi gerekir. Daval\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen usuli kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hakk\u0131n, m\u00fcvekkil vekil aras\u0131nda etkili olabilecek hususlara dayan\u0131larak ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki alacak davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Kangal Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesince davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen 1.4.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2006\/59 E- 2009\/100 K. Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 19. Hukuk Dairesinin 3.5.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/7412 E- 2010\/5365 K. Say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H.G.K.nca incelenerek dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Yerel Mahkemenin 4.5.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/50 E.-2011\/87 K. say\u0131l\u0131 direnme karar\u0131 29.8.2011 tarihinde davac\u0131 vekili Avukat E. D.&#8217;n\u0131n dosyaya bildirdi\u011fi adresinde ayn\u0131 adreste bulunan Avukat S. C. imzas\u0131na olmak \u00fczere usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.\u00a0Tebligatta\u00a0tebligat\u0131 alan avukat\u0131n ayn\u0131 i\u015fyerinde bulundu\u011fu bilgisi yer almaktad\u0131r. Resmi mercilere bildirilen adres as\u0131l olup, usul\u00fcnce de\u011fi\u015fiklik bildirilmedi\u011fi durumda bu adreste yap\u0131lantebligatlar ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekilinin karar a\u015famas\u0131ndan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0a\u015famas\u0131na kadar adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ya da vekillikten ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair mahkemeye yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir bildirimi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi asilin de bu y\u00f6nde bir bildirimi olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra ileri s\u00fcren ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en vekilin bu durumu m\u00fcvekkiline ve mahkemeye bildirdi\u011fine dair bir bilgi ya da belge dosya kapsam\u0131nda yer almamaktad\u0131r. Mahkemenin m\u00fcvekkil-vekil aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fki kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken hususlar\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve bildirme y\u00fck\u00fcm\u00fc bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra verdi\u011fi 27.9.2011 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0say\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, karar\u0131n asile tebli\u011fini istemi\u015f; mahkemece temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7irildikten sonra verilen bu dilek\u00e7e \u00fczerine\u00a0tebligat\u00a0konusunda bir karar verilmeksizin birden fazla vekille kendisini temsil ettirdi\u011fi dosyada bulunan vekaletnameyle sabit olan asilin di\u011fer vekillerine de\u011fil asile\u00a0tebligat\u00a0\u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve davac\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndan beri vekili olan di\u011fer vekili Avukat Z. K. Y. taraf\u0131ndan 3.10.2011 tarihinde har\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lan dilek\u00e7eyle karar temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekili temyize cevab\u0131nda temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine ge\u00e7ilmezden evvel temyiz isteminin yasal s\u00fcrede yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6n sorun olarak ele al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hemen belirtmelidir ki, 1136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a034. maddesine g\u00f6re: &#8220;Avukatlar, y\u00fcklendikleri g\u00f6revleri bu g\u00f6revin kutsall\u0131\u011f\u0131na yak\u0131\u015f\u0131r bir \u015fekilde \u00f6zen, do\u011fruluk ve onur i\u00e7inde yerine getirmek ve avukatl\u0131k unvan\u0131n\u0131n gerektirdi\u011fi sayg\u0131 ve g\u00fcvene uygun bi\u00e7imde davranmak ve T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fince belirlenen meslek kurallar\u0131na uymakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcrler.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yine ayn\u0131 Kanunun &#8220;Avukat\u0131n vekaletten \u00e7ekilmesini d\u00fczenleyen 41. maddesi gere\u011fince: &#8220;Belli bir i\u015fi takipten veya savunmadan iste\u011fiyle \u00e7ekilen avukat\u0131n o i\u015fe ait vekalet g\u00f6revi, durumu m\u00fcvekkiline tebli\u011finden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle devam eder&#8230;.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun &#8220;Vekilin \u0130stifas\u0131&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 82 nci maddesi de: &#8221; ( 1)\u0130stifa eden vekilin vekalet g\u00f6revi, istifan\u0131n m\u00fcvekkiline tebli\u011finden itibaren iki hafta s\u00fcreyle devam eder.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2)Vekilin istifa etmi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, vekalet veren davay\u0131 takip etmez ve ba\u015fka bir vekil de g\u00f6revlendirmez ise taraf\u0131n yoklu\u011fu halinde uygulanacak h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re i\u015flem yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 3)Yukar\u0131daki f\u0131kralarda yer alan hususlar, istifa eden vekilin istifa dilek\u00e7esiyle birlikte vekalet verene ihtaren bildirilir.&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer taraftan, 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a011. maddesi gere\u011fince: &#8220;Vekil vas\u0131tas\u0131yla takip edilen i\u015flerde\u00a0tebligat\u00a0vekile yap\u0131l\u0131r. Vekil birden \u00e7ok ise bunlardan birine\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 yeterlidir. E\u011fer\u00a0tebligat\u00a0birden fazla vekile yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise, bunlardan ilkine yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f tarihi as\u0131l tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r&#8230;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosyan\u0131n tetkikinden davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndan beri kendisini birden fazla vekille temsil ettirdi\u011fi sunulan vekaletname \u00f6rne\u011fiyle belirgindir. Mahkemece, bozma sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn bildirilmesine dair\u00a0tebligat\u00a0karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda isim ve adresi bulunan Avukat E. D. adresine \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, bu\u00a0tebligat\u00a0adreste ayn\u0131 i\u015fyerinde bulundu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131yla Avukat S. C. imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Avukat E. D. 4.5.2011 tarihli direnme celsesine kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; butebligat\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enin kendisinin b\u00fcrosunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir itiraz ileri s\u00fcrmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar\u0131n tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 istemi davac\u0131n\u0131n vekillerinden Avukat T. K. taraf\u0131ndan 12.8.2011 tarihinde istenmi\u015f; ancak Avukat E. D. y\u00f6n\u00fcnden vekilli\u011fi b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde veya\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lacak adres konusunda bir bildirim yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Direnme karar\u0131 karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ismi bulunan Avukat E. D. adresine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve adreste yukarda a\u00e7\u0131klanan \u015fekilde usul\u00fcnce 29.8.2011 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Bu\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ile 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck temyiz s\u00fcresi ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili Avukat E. D. i\u015fyerini kapatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve Cumhuriyet \u00dcniversitesinde \u00f6\u011fretim g\u00f6revlisi olarak g\u00f6reve ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonraki bir tarih olan 27.9.2011 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle mahkemeye bildirmi\u015ftir. Ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enin barodan kayd\u0131n\u0131 sildirdi\u011fine dair bir bildirimi ve belgesi ise bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da aynen al\u0131nan 1136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a041. maddesi gere\u011fince belli bir i\u015fi takipten veya savunmadan iste\u011fiyle \u00e7ekilen avukat\u0131n o i\u015fe ait vekalet g\u00f6revi, durumu m\u00fcvekkiline tebli\u011finden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle devam eder. \u0130\u015fi b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra bildiren avukat karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini beklemeksizin i\u015fi b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u015famada m\u00fcvekkiline ve mahkemeye durumu bildirmemi\u015f olmakla s\u00fcreye tabi i\u015flerde i\u015fi yapma ya da bildirim y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden kurtulamaz. Davac\u0131n\u0131n birden fazla vekili bulundu\u011funa g\u00f6re vekillerinden birisinin engeli bulunsa dahi di\u011fer vekillerince de gecikmesinde zarar umulan i\u015flemin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 olanakl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim, temyiz talebinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 3.10.2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun &#8220;Birden Fazla Vekil G\u00f6revlendirilmesi&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 75. maddesi gere\u011fince: Dava i\u00e7in birden fazla vekil g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f ise vekillerden her biri, vekaletten kaynaklanan yetkileri, di\u011ferinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak kullanabilir. Aksi y\u00f6ndeki s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar, kar\u015f\u0131 taraf bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ersizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Birden fazla vekili olan davac\u0131n\u0131n vekillerinden birine 29.8.2011 tarihinde yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n di\u011fer vekiline yap\u0131lan 2.\u00a0tebligat\u00a0sonuca etkili olmay\u0131p, temyiz s\u00fcresi ilk tebli\u011fden itibaren ba\u015flamakla 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra 3.10.2011 tarihinde yap\u0131lan temyiz isteminin reddi gerekir. Daval\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen usuli kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hakk\u0131n, m\u00fcvekkil vekil aras\u0131nda etkili olabilecek hususlara dayan\u0131larak ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim, birden fazla vekille temsile dair ayn\u0131 ilkeler\u00a0H.G.K.&#8217;nun 29.4.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/10-129\u00a0Esas, 2011\/244 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda da vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu sebeple yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7irildikten sonra ibraz edilen temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle yasal s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra verilen temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddine, istenmesi halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n iadesine, 01.02.2012 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2011\/21-878<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2011\/763<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 14.12.2011<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 \u0130T\u0130BAR\u0130 H\u0130ZMET S\u00dcRES\u0130N\u0130N TESP\u0130T\u0130 DAVASI (\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Hi\u00e7bir A\u00e7\u0131klamaya Yer Verilmeden Sekretere Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u2013 Taraf Te\u015fkilinin Sa\u011flanaca\u011f\u0131\/Usul\u00fcne Uygun\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 T\u00dcZEL K\u0130\u015e\u0130LERE YAPILACAK\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( \u015eirketin Yetkili Temsilcisine Onun Herhangi Bir Nedenle Tebli\u011fi Alacak Durumda Olmamas\u0131 Halinde Yetkili K\u0131l\u0131nan Ki\u015fiye Tebli\u011f Edilmesi Gere\u011fi \u2013 Yetkili de Yoksa Tebli\u011f Edilmeme Nedeninin \u015eerh Edilece\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 SEKRETERE YAPILAN\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( \u0130tibari Hizmet S\u00fcresinin Tespiti Davas\u0131 \u2013\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Usul\u00fcne Uygun Yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131\/Taraf Te\u015fkilinin Sa\u011flanaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TARAF TE\u015eK\u0130L\u0130 ( \u0130tibari Hizmet S\u00fcresinin Tespiti Davas\u0131\/Tebligat\u0131n Hi\u00e7bir Gerek\u00e7e G\u00f6sterilmeden Sekretere Tebli\u011f Edildi\u011fi \u2013 Taraf Te\u015fkilinin Sa\u011flanaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 SAVUNMA HAKKI ( \u0130tibari Hizmet S\u00fcresinin Tespiti Davas\u0131\/Tebligat\u0131n Hi\u00e7bir Gerek\u00e7e G\u00f6sterilmeden Sekretere Tebli\u011f Edildi\u011fi \u2013 Savunma Hakk\u0131na Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">506\/m.Ek.5<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.35<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0\u0130tibari hizmet s\u00fcresinin tespiti davas\u0131nda; daval\u0131 anonim \u015firkete dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; tebli\u011f memuru bu\u00a0tebligat\u0131 \u015firketin yetkili temsilcisine; onun herhangi bir nedenle tebli\u011fi alacak durumda olmamas\u0131 halinde de usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan ki\u015fiye; \u015fayet bunlar yoksa veya\u00a0tebligat\u0131 alamayacak durumda iseler bu durumu tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na \u015ferh ederek o yerde haz\u0131r bulunan tebli\u011fe yetkili memur ve m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine o da yoksa herhangi bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yapmas\u0131;\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda da s\u0131ras\u0131yla tebli\u011fe yetkili ki\u015filerin durumunu ve onlara tebli\u011f edilememe nedenini \u015ferh etmesi gerekirken, hi\u00e7bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermeden do\u011frudan sekretere tebli\u011f etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat bu haliyle, a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemelere ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup,\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr. Daval\u0131\/i\u015fveren anonim \u015firkete usul\u00fcnce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve y\u00f6ntemince taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan dosya i\u00e7erisindeki beyan ve belgelerden daval\u0131 anonim \u015firketin iflas\u0131 talebi ile dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 da anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u015eu durumda, mahkemece daval\u0131 \u015firkete usul\u00fcnce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmadan, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan savunma hakk\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlanarak direnme karar\u0131 verilmesi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinin tespiti&#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; B&#8230; 13. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesince davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 17.11.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/842 E., 2009\/948 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili ile daval\u0131lardan SGK vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 21. Hukuk Dairesinin 21.03.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/2227 E., 2011\/2498 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( \u2026 1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillere, h\u00fckm\u00fcn dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerektirici nedenlere g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm, daval\u0131 Kurumun a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-Davac\u0131, daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde bas\u0131m ve matbaac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015finde 20.2.1997-16.04.2008 tarihleri aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n Ek\u00a05\/2 madde kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funun tespiti ile bu s\u00fcrenin hizmet s\u00fcresine eklenmesini, malull\u00fck ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ve \u00f6l\u00fcm sigorta primlerinin ge\u00e7mi\u015fe d\u00f6n\u00fck olarak 20.2.1997-16.4.2008 tarihleri aras\u0131nda % 22 oran\u0131 \u00fczerinden hesaplanmak suretiyle ek % 2 oranl\u0131k fark\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015fe y\u00f6nelik olarak daval\u0131 i\u015fverenden gecikme zamm\u0131 ile al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131, 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n Ek\u00a039\u00a0madde uyar\u0131nca sigortal\u0131l\u0131k s\u00fcresine ilave edilen g\u00fcn say\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n 5 y\u0131ldan az olmamak \u00fczere 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a060\u00a0ve Ge\u00e7ici\u00a081. maddelerinde belirtilen ya\u015f hadlerinden indirilerek bunlar\u0131n emeklilik i\u015flemlerinde dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 i\u015fveren \u015firkete ait 375639 sigorta nolu i\u015fyerinde ge\u00e7en 4008 g\u00fcn sigortal\u0131 hizmetin 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n Ek\u00a05\u00a0maddesi gere\u011fince itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinden yararland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, bu s\u00fcrenin emeklilik i\u015flemleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda S.G.K taraf\u0131ndan dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131na, sigorta prim fark\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 i\u015fverenden tahsili isteminin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosyadaki kay\u0131t ve belgelerden; davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde 20.02.1997-16.4.2008 tarihleri aras\u0131nda toplam 4008 g\u00fcn \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve g\u00f6revlendirme belgesinde i\u015finin depo elaman\u0131 oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi, mahkemece yap\u0131lan ke\u015fifte dinlenen tan\u0131klar\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n depoda boylar\u0131n haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 i\u015finde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, kimyasal etkiye maruz kald\u0131klar\u0131, i\u015fyerinde g\u00fcnd\u00fcz 50-60, gece 15-20 ki\u015finin \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ortam\u0131n\u0131n G\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011funu beyan ettikleri anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bas\u0131m ve gazetecilik i\u015fyerindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131 nedeniyle itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinden yararlanabilmenin yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n Ek\u00a05\/II. maddesidir. An\u0131lan maddeye g\u00f6re, sigortal\u0131lar\u0131n itibari hizmetten yararlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in iki ko\u015fulun birlikte ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi zorunludur. Bunlardan birinci ko\u015ful, sigortal\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;bas\u0131m ve gazetecilik&#8221; i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu maddede, bas\u0131m ve gazetecilik i\u015fyeri birlikte ifade edilmi\u015f ise de; gazetecilik i\u015fi yap\u0131lmayan sadece bas\u0131m i\u015fi yap\u0131lan i\u015fyerlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan sigortal\u0131lar da, maddenin alt bentlerinde say\u0131lan ko\u015fullardan herhangi birisi olu\u015ftu\u011fu takdirde itibari hizmetten yararlanacaklar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. &#8220;Bas\u0131m&#8221; i\u015finin matbaa i\u015fyerinde mevkute \u00e7\u0131karmaya y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu ise s\u00f6z g\u00f6t\u00fcrmez. \u0130kinci ko\u015ful ise, yine ayn\u0131 maddenin II. alt bendinin ( a-f ) i\u015faretli alt bentlerinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 fiziksel d\u0131\u015f etkenlerden birinin olayda ayr\u0131ca ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f bulunmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, , daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde de\u011fi\u015fik firmalar\u0131n mamullerinin ambalajlanmas\u0131 ile ilgili olarak dokuz renge kadar bask\u0131, laminasyon, kli\u015fe, grafik ve film haz\u0131rlama i\u015flerinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;bas\u0131m&#8221; i\u015fyeri \u00f6zelli\u011fi bulunmayan bu i\u015fyerinde depo eleman\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, yukar\u0131da s\u00f6z\u00fc ge\u00e7en maddenin \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc birinci ko\u015fulun davac\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, giderek davac\u0131 &#8220;bas\u0131m&#8221; i\u015finde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan itibari hizmetten yararlanamayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k-se\u00e7iktir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, bu maddi ve hukuki olgular g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve \u00f6zellikle davan\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, bozma nedenidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde, daval\u0131 Kurumun bu y\u00f6nleri ama\u00e7layan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 kabul edilmeli ve h\u00fck\u00fcm bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r\u2026 ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle, davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 ( 1 ) maddede g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerle reddedilip, ( 2 ) maddede g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerle daval\u0131 SGK vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Dava, itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinin tespiti istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131 \u015firkete ait i\u015fyerinde ambalaj, bas\u0131m ve matbaac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015fi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyanla davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde ge\u00e7en \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun Ek\u00a05\/2. bendi kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funun, itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinin sigortal\u0131l\u0131k s\u00fcrelerine eklenmesi gerekti\u011finin tespitini ve eklenen s\u00fcrelerin ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131na esas ya\u015f hadlerinden indirilmesiyle fark primin daval\u0131dan tahsilini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Kurumu vekili, hizmetin Ek 5. madde kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n bas\u0131m ve gazetecilik i\u015fyerinde olmas\u0131 ile birlikte maddenin II. Bendinin ( a ) ila ( f ) alt bentlerinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 fiziksel etkenlerden birinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirterek davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 i\u015fveren \u015firket yaz\u0131l\u0131 veya s\u00f6zl\u00fc beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece, &#8220;i\u015fyerinin bas\u0131m i\u015fyeri oldu\u011fu ve Ek 5. maddede d\u00fczenlenen nedenlerden birden fazlas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerinde mevcut oldu\u011fu&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile davac\u0131n\u0131n itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinden yararland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, sigorta prim fark\u0131 tahsili ve itibari hizmet s\u00fcresinin ya\u015f hadlerinden indirilmesi taleplerinin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili ile daval\u0131lardan SGK vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine karar, \u00d6zel Daire&#8217;ce yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece &#8220;mevkute d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u015feyler bas\u0131lan ancak ayn\u0131 olumsuz \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan i\u015fyerlerinin bas\u0131m i\u015fyeri olarak kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131 daval\u0131 SGK vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren \u015firkete yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla taraf te\u015fkilinin y\u00f6ntemine uygun \u015fekilde sa\u011flan\u0131p sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan direnme karar\u0131 verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu \u00f6n sorun olarak incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere 01.10.2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun &#8220;Hukuki Dinlenilme Hakk\u0131&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 27. maddesi ( M\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanununun\u00a073. maddesi ) uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131, kendi haklar\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na sahip olup, bu hak, yarg\u0131lama ile ilgili bilgi sahibi olunmas\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7erir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu kapsamda kural olarak, duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlu olan \u00e7eki\u015fmeli yarg\u0131da hakim, Kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi istisnalar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda taraflar\u0131 dinlemeden veya iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeleri i\u00e7in kanuna uygun bi\u00e7imde davet etmeden h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc veremez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n gere\u011fi olarak taraflar duru\u015fmaya \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmadan, e\u015f anlat\u0131mla; taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan h\u00fck\u00fcm verilememesi, Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesi ile d\u00fczenlenen iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na olanak tan\u0131nmas\u0131 ilkesinin do\u011fal bir sonucudur ve ayn\u0131 zamanda Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 6. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen A&#8230; yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n da en \u00f6nemli unsurudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n gerek yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca gerekse kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler konusunda bilgilendirilmeleri zorunludur. Ki\u015finin kendisinden habersiz yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131larak karar verilmesi, kural olarak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir ( H. Pekcan\u0131tez, O. Atalay, M. \u00d6zekes, Medeni Usul Hukuku, 11. Bas\u0131, 2011, s. 273 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ger\u00e7ekten savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na alan T.C. Anayasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 36. maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun\u00a027. maddesinde de a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, mahkemece daval\u0131 yan, dinlenmek ve savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nmak \u00fczere kanuni \u015fekillere uygun olarak davet edilmedik\u00e7e h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan, taraf te\u015fkili dava \u015fart\u0131 olup, davan\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda mahkemece re&#8217;sen nazara al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken bir olgudur ve mahkemenin, dava dilek\u00e7esi ile duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc, karar\u0131, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131 ve direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 taraflara kendili\u011finden tebli\u011f edip taraf te\u015fkilini sa\u011flamas\u0131, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun amir h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi, iddia ve savunma ile ilgili delillerin eksiksiz toplan\u0131p tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilmesi, itirazlar\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi, davan\u0131n s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131labilmesi, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden haberdar edilmesi ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olur. Ki\u015finin hangi yarg\u0131 merciinde duru\u015fmas\u0131 bulundu\u011funu, hakk\u0131ndaki iddia ve isnatlar\u0131n nelerden ibaret oldu\u011funu bilmesi, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ve\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klanan usule uygun\u00a0tebligatyap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile sa\u011flanabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu bak\u0131mdan, davetiyenin ve tebli\u011f tutanakl\u0131 zarf\u0131n, davadaki ve takipteki \u00f6nemi b\u00fcy\u00fckt\u00fcr. As\u0131l olan taraflar\u0131n huzurunda yarg\u0131laman\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi olmakla birlikte, hukuk mahkemelerinde taraflar yarg\u0131lamaya kat\u0131lmasalar dahi mutlaka duru\u015fmadan haberdar edilmelidir. Duru\u015fmaya gelmese dahi yoklukta davaya devam edilip karar verilmesine usul\u00fcn olanak tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 hallerde, yasan\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc uyar\u0131y\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan davetiyenin tebli\u011f edilmesinden ve yasaya uygun taraf te\u015fkilinin tamamlanmas\u0131ndan sonra i\u015fin esas\u0131na giri\u015filmesi ve delillerin toplanarak bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat; bilgilendirme yan\u0131nda belgelendirme \u00f6zelli\u011fi de bulunan bir usul i\u015flemi oldu\u011fundan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ile ilgili olarak 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan T\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tamamen \u015feklidir. Kanun ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn amac\u0131\u00a0tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131na en k\u0131sa zamanda ula\u015fmas\u0131, konusu ile ilgili olan ki\u015filerin bilgilendirilmesi ve bu hususlar\u0131n belgeye ba\u011flanmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek tebli\u011f i\u015flemi ve gerekse tebli\u011f tarihi ancak yasa ve t\u00fcz\u00fckte emredilen \u015fekillerle tevsik ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ispat olunabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Kanunu ile T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;nde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fekilde i\u015flem yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a tebli\u011f memuru taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyan onun m\u00fccerret s\u00f6z\u00fcnden ibaret kal\u0131r ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla belgelendirilmi\u015f say\u0131lmaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, yasa ve t\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin en ufak ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131na kadar uygulanmas\u0131 zorunludur. Kanunun ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn belirledi\u011fi \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve belgelendirilmemi\u015f olan\u00a0tebligatlar\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olmayaca\u011f\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde t\u00fczel ki\u015filere yap\u0131lacak\u00a0tebligata ili\u015fkin yasal d\u00fczenlemelerin de irdelenmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slara Ve Ticarethanelere Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 12. maddesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slara tebli\u011f, salahiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine, bunlar birden ziyade ise, yaln\u0131z birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir ticarethanenin muamelelerinden do\u011fan ihtilaflarda, ticari m\u00fcmessiline yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f muteberdir.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slar\u0131n Memur Ve M\u00fcstahdemlerine Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 13. maddesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slar nam\u0131na kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimseler her hangi bir sebeple m\u00fbtat i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015f yerinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 veya o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde olduklar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f, orada haz\u0131r bulunan memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fck\u00fcmleri yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yine,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slara Ve Ticarethanelere Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 17. maddesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slara tebli\u011f salahiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine, bunlar birden ziyade ise yaln\u0131z birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Vekaletlerin ve bunlar\u0131n te\u015fkilat\u0131n\u0131n, m\u00fclhak ve hususi b\u00fct\u00e7eli idarelerle belediyelerin, k\u00f6ylerin ve hususi kanunlar\u0131na m\u00fcsteniden kurulmu\u015f olan te\u015fekk\u00fcllerle, \u015firketlerin ve cemiyetlerin salahiyetli olduklar\u0131 m\u00fcmessilleri tabi kanunlara ve stat\u00fclerine g\u00f6re tayin edilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckmi ve hakiki \u015fahsa ait bir ticarethanenin muamelelerinden do\u011fan ihtilaflarda, ticarethanenin o muamelede salahiyetli ticari m\u00fcmessiline yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f muteberdir.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slar\u0131n Memur Ve M\u00fcstahdemlerine Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 18. maddesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Yukar\u0131 ki Madde mucibince tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimseler herhangi bir sebeple m\u00fctat i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015fyerinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 veya o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alam\u0131yacak bir halde olduklar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f, h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n o yerdeki memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu kadar ki, kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak memur veya m\u00fcstahdemin, h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n yerdeki te\u015fkilat\u0131 veya personeli i\u00e7inde vazife itibariyle\u00a0tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131 olan h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n m\u00fcmessilinden sonra gelen bir kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi esasen bu kabil i\u015flerle tavzif edilmi\u015f bir \u015fah\u0131s olmas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bunlar\u0131n da bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda tesbit edildi\u011fi takdirde\u00a0tebligat, o yerdeki di\u011fer bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yap\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">D\u00fczenlemelerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yeri gelmi\u015fken belirtilmelidir ki, 6762 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ticaret Kanunu&#8217;nda d\u00fczenlenen ticaret \u015firketleri h\u00fckmi \u015fahsiyeti haiz olup \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slar ile olan ili\u015fkilerinde ortaklardan olu\u015fan m\u00fcmessil-organ veya d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan tayin edilen sair m\u00fcmessiller taraf\u0131ndan temsil olunurlar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckmi \u015fahsiyeti haiz olmalar\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ticaret \u015firketlerinde\u00a0tebligat\u0131n \u015firketlerin &#8220;sal\u00e2hiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine&#8221; yap\u0131lmas\u0131 icap eder. Sal\u00e2hiyetli m\u00fcmessiller ibaresiyle evvela \u015firketleri kanunen temsile yetkili organlar ve bu organlar ad\u0131na hareket edenler kastedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 13. maddesi ile Nizamname&#8217;nin buna tekab\u00fcl eden 18. maddesi birlikte tatbik edildi\u011finde, kendisine tebligat yap\u0131lacak \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n derecelendirildikleri g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bir kere, h\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slar nam\u0131na kendilerine tebligat yap\u0131labilecek sal\u00e2hiyetli m\u00fcmessiller m\u00fbtad i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015fyerlerinde bulunduklar\u0131 ve o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alacak durumda olduklar\u0131 takdirde memur ve m\u00fcstahdemlere tebligat yap\u0131lamaz. Saniyen, memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlere tebligat yap\u0131labilecek hallerde de, \u00f6nce kendisine tebligat yap\u0131lacak \u015fahs\u0131n, \u015firketin o yerdeki te\u015fkilat\u0131 veya personeli i\u00e7inde vazife itibariyle muhatap h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n m\u00fcmessilinden sonra gelen veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi esasen bu i\u015flerle tavzif edilmi\u015f bir kimse olmas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r. B\u00f6yle bir kimsenin bulunmamas\u0131 halindedir ki ( bu durum tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131na dercedilmek suretiyle ) o yerdeki di\u011fer bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131labilir. Daha \u00f6nce kendisine\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken kimselerin bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 veya\u00a0tebligat\u0131 bizzat alamayacak durumda olduklar\u0131n\u0131n ispat\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan mazbatada yer alacak kay\u0131t bilhassa \u00f6nemlidir ( E. Moro\u011flu, Makalelerim I, \u0130stanbul 2001, s. 4-5 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir ki, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a012. ve\u00a013. maddeleri ile Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 17. ve 18. maddelerinde t\u00fczel ki\u015filere tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lma usul\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f;\u00a0tebligat\u0131n, bunlar\u0131n tabi olduklar\u0131 kanunlara ve stat\u00fclerine g\u00f6re belirlenecek yetkili temsilcilerine, e\u011fer t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisi yoksa veya evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde ise; g\u00f6rev itibariyle temsilciden sonra gelen kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi bu i\u015fle g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f bir ki\u015fiye, o da yoksa t\u00fczel ki\u015finin o yerdeki memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine, yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. E\u011fer,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisine yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve s\u0131ral\u0131 ki\u015filere yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, bunun nedenlerinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olaraktebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 gere\u011fine de i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 04.04.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2007\/12-200\u00a0E. 2007\/187 K., 30.12.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/12-563 E. 2009\/600 K. ile 13.05.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/12-184 E. 2009\/187 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131nda da ayn\u0131 husus vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve konuya ili\u015fkin ilkeler g\u00f6zetilerek, somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 i\u015fveren s\u0131fat\u0131yla anonim \u015firket aleyhine dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan dava dilek\u00e7esinde bildirilen adrese \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan ve dava dilek\u00e7esi ile duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7eren tebligat; daval\u0131 anonim \u015firket ad\u0131na &#8220;G\u00f6sterilen adreste muhatab\u0131n daimi birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r Sekreter F&#8230;. D&#8230;&#8221; imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ne var ki, dava dilek\u00e7esinin ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn tebli\u011fine ili\u015fkin bu\u00a0tebligat\u00a0par\u00e7as\u0131nda ba\u015fkaca herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verilmedi\u011fi gibi, anonim \u015firketin yetkili temsilcisinin veya ondan sonraki yetkili ki\u015finin adreste olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve nedenleri de \u015ferh edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece, gerek\u00e7eli karar tebli\u011fi i\u00e7in, daval\u0131 anonim \u015firkete \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n &#8220;Muhatap adresten soruldu. Ta\u015f\u0131nm\u0131\u015f&#8221; \u015ferhi ile bila tebli\u011f iade edilmesi \u00fczerine, daval\u0131 anonim \u015firkete dava dilek\u00e7esi usulen tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f gibi i\u015flem yap\u0131larak, bundan sonraki\u00a0tebligatlar, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a035. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, yine ayn\u0131 adrese yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hemen burada, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035.maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131 olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tve buna y\u00f6nelik olarak da daval\u0131 anonim \u015firkete dava dilek\u00e7esi ile duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn tebli\u011fine ili\u015fkin\u00a0tebligat\u00a0i\u015fleminin usul\u00fcnce ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finin belirlenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, daval\u0131 anonim \u015firkete dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; tebli\u011f memuru bu\u00a0tebligat\u0131 \u015firketin yetkili temsilcisine; onun herhangi bir nedenle tebli\u011fi alacak durumda olmamas\u0131 halinde de usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan ki\u015fiye; \u015fayet bunlar yoksa veya\u00a0tebligat\u0131 alamayacak durumda iseler bu durumu tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na \u015ferh ederek o yerde haz\u0131r bulunan tebli\u011fe yetkili memur ve m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine o da yoksa herhangi bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yapmas\u0131;\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda da s\u0131ras\u0131yla tebli\u011fe yetkili ki\u015filerin durumunu ve onlara tebli\u011f edilememe nedenini \u015ferh etmesi gerekirken, hi\u00e7bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermeden do\u011frudan sekretere tebli\u011f etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat bu haliyle, a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemelere ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup,\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011fi\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olmakla ve b\u00f6ylece daval\u0131 \u015firkete usul\u00fcnce yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir\u00a0tebligat\u00a0bulunmamakla, savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlar bi\u00e7imde devam\u0131 tebli\u011flerin 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035.maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca daval\u0131\/i\u015fveren anonim \u015firkete usul\u00fcnce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve y\u00f6ntemince taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan dosya i\u00e7erisindeki beyan ve belgelerden daval\u0131 anonim \u015firketin iflas\u0131 talebi ile dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 da anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu durumda, mahkemece daval\u0131 \u015firkete usul\u00fcnce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmadan, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan savunma hakk\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlanarak direnme karar\u0131 verilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015f; daval\u0131 anonim \u015firket hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 beyan edilen iflas talebine ili\u015fkin dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n celbi ile ticaret sicil memurlu\u011fundan da sorulmak suretiyle daval\u0131 anonim \u015firketin h\u00fckmi \u015fahsiyetinin devam edip edilmedi\u011finin tespiti ile \u015firketin i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu yasal durum itibariyle tabi olduklar\u0131 kanunlara ve stat\u00fclerine g\u00f6re belirlenecek yetkili temsilcilerine, e\u011fer t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisi yoksa veya evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde ise; g\u00f6rev itibariyle temsilciden sonra gelen kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi bu i\u015fle g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f bir ki\u015fiye, o da yoksa t\u00fczel ki\u015finin o yerdeki memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine, e\u011fer\u00a0tebligat\u00a0t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisine yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve s\u0131ral\u0131 ki\u015filere yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, bunun nedenlerinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle bu ki\u015filere dava dilek\u00e7esi, karar ve bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6ntemince tebli\u011f edilmesi ve taraf te\u015fkilinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan hususlar g\u00f6zetilmeden, daval\u0131 \u015firketin savunma hakk\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlanarak h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun olmay\u0131p, \u00f6n sorunun a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle kabul\u00fc ile direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n bu de\u011fi\u015fik ve usule ili\u015fkin nedenlerle bozulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Daval\u0131 SGK vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen de\u011fi\u015fik nedenlerden dolay\u0131 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a030.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen &#8220;Ge\u00e7ici madde 3&#8221; atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0429. Maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, 14.12.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2011\/11-554<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2011\/684<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 23.11.2011<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TA\u015eIMA S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMES\u0130NDEN KAYNAKLANAN TAZM\u0130NAT ( Daval\u0131ya\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebligat Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Taraf Te\u015fkili Sa\u011flanmadan H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulamayaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Aksinin Hukuki Dinlenilme Hakk\u0131 ve Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali Oldu\u011fu\/\u00d6nsorun Olarak \u0130ncelendi\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 USULSUZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( Dava Dilek\u00e7esi Duru\u015fma G\u00fcn\u00fc Bozma ve Karar D\u00fczeltme \u0130lam\u0131 Bozma Sonras\u0131 Duru\u015fma G\u00fcn\u00fc Direnme Karar\u0131 ve Temyiz Dilek\u00e7esinin \u0130sim Benzerli\u011finden Dolay\u0131 Daval\u0131 D\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Ba\u015fka \u015eahsa Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Taraf Te\u015fkili Sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0TEBL\u0130GATIN DAVALI DI\u015eINDA BA\u015eKA \u015eAHSA YAPILMASI (\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebligat &#8211; Taraf Te\u015fkili Sa\u011flanmadan H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulamayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TARAF TE\u015eK\u0130L\u0130 ( Ta\u015f\u0131ma S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden Kaynaklanan Tazminat\/Daval\u0131ya \u0130sim Benzerli\u011finden Dolay\u0131\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebligat Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130ddia ve Savunma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TUTUKLUYA\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( Ta\u015f\u0131ma S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden Kaynaklanan Tazminat &#8211; Daval\u0131 Tutukluya Usul\u00fcne Uygun\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Taraf Te\u015fkili Sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 HUKUK\u0130 D\u0130NLEN\u0130LME HAKKI ( Daval\u0131ya Tazminat Davas\u0131nda Dava ve Temyiz Dilek\u00e7esi Bozma ve Karar D\u00fczeltme \u0130lam\u0131 Tebli\u011f Edilmedi\u011fi &#8211; \u0130ddia ve Savunma Hakk\u0131n\u0131 Kullanmayan Daval\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan Bu Hakk\u0131n Tam Olarak Kullan\u0131lmayarak Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131 \u0130hlal Etti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 AD\u0130L YARGILANMA HAKKI (\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebligat &#8211; Taraf Te\u015fkili Sa\u011flanmadan Yarg\u0131lama Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n Bu Hakk\u0131 \u0130hlal Edece\u011finin G\u00f6zetilece\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p>1086\/m.73,\u00a0429,\u00a0434<\/p>\n<p>6100\/m.27,\u00a0Ge\u00e7.3<\/p>\n<p>7201\/m.10,\u00a019<\/p>\n<p>2709\/m.36<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc m.25\/2<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi m.6<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava, ta\u015f\u0131ma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan maddi ve manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flan\u0131p sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flan\u0131p savunma hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmadan karar verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 \u00f6n sorun olarak ele al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Taraf te\u015fkili sadece davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131nda de\u011fil, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n di\u011fer a\u015famalar\u0131nda da \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.\u00a0Tebligat, Anayasa ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, daha da \u00f6zelde hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve bu suretle adil bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli bir ara\u00e7t\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc, bozma ilam\u0131, karar d\u00fczeltme ilam\u0131, bozma sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc, direnme karar\u0131 ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin isim benzerli\u011finden dolay\u0131 tutuklu daval\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka \u015fahsa yap\u0131lmas\u0131 iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalidir. Taraf te\u015fkili usul\u00fcnce sa\u011flanmadan h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;maddi ve manevi tazminat&#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Ankara 13. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesince davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul, k\u0131smen reddine dair verilen 21.05.2008 g\u00fcn ve 2006\/136 E., 2008\/180 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi taraf vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 15.12.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/13385 E., 2009\/12985 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Davac\u0131lar vekili, daval\u0131 \u0130&#8230; G&#8230;-G&#8230; Tic. A.\u015e.nin maliki ve i\u015fleteni, daval\u0131 M. Y.&#8217;\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc oldu\u011fu TED Ankara Koleji okul servisinde m\u00fcvekkillerinin murisinin yolcu olarak okuluna gitmekte iken, ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn tam kusuru ile neden oldu\u011fu kazada vefat etti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkillerinin olay nedeniyle desteklerinden yoksun kald\u0131klar\u0131 gibi derin ac\u0131lar ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, fazlaya dair talep ve dava haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmas\u0131 kayd\u0131yla \u015fimdilik, m\u00fcvekkillerinden M\u00fcjde i\u00e7in 200.000 YTL.s\u0131 manevi ve sigorta taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lanmayan k\u0131s\u0131m i\u00e7in 5.000 YTL.s\u0131 maddi, Kamil Haldun i\u00e7in 200.000 YTL.s\u0131 manevi ve sigorta taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lanmayan k\u0131s\u0131m i\u00e7in 5.000 YTL.s\u0131 maddi, Caner i\u00e7in 100.000 YTL.s\u0131 manevi tazminat\u0131n olay tarihinden itibaren avans faizi ile daval\u0131lardan m\u00fcteselsilen tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 \u0130&#8230; G&#8230;- G&#8230; San. Tic. ve Ara\u00e7 Kiralama Hizmetleri ( Rent a Car ) vekili, dava konusu kazay\u0131 yapan arac\u0131n malikinin m\u00fcvekkili olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n arac\u0131n 29.6.2004 tarihinde dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 C&#8230; Tur. Ltd. \u015eti.ne kiraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay\u0131nda bu \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan arac\u0131n i\u015fletilmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana geldi\u011fini, an\u0131lan \u015firketle yap\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 5.12 maddesi uyar\u0131nca trafik kazalar\u0131 da dahil olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm maddi ve manevi zarar ve ziyandan C&#8230;-TUR Tur. Ltd. \u015eti.nin sorumlu olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, keza s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn de bu \u015firketin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 oldu\u011funu, sigorta \u015firketlerinin maddi tazminat taleplerini kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, talep edilen manevi tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n fahi\u015f oldu\u011funu, yasal faiz istenebilece\u011fini savunarak, davan\u0131n usul ve esastan reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 TED Ankara Koleji Vakf\u0131 \u00d6zel \u0130lk\u00f6\u011fretim Okul M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekili, \u00f6\u011frenci servisinin veli ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131ma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile hizmet verdi\u011fini, arac\u0131n okula ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Okul Servis Ara\u00e7lar\u0131 Hizmet Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin 5. ve 7. maddelerinin olayda uygulanma yerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, iddia, savunma,toplanan kan\u0131tlar, bilirki\u015fi raporu ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, murisin okutulmas\u0131 bak\u0131m ve yeti\u015ftirilmesi i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan muhtemel masraf ile sigorta \u015firketleri taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6denen tazminat miktarlar\u0131 indirildikten sonra davac\u0131lar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmam\u0131\u015f maddi tazminat hakk\u0131n\u0131n kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, okul servisinin daval\u0131 TED Ankara Koleji Vakf\u0131 \u00d6zel \u0130lk\u00f6\u011fretim Okul M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, arac\u0131n okulun kullan\u0131m\u0131na tahsis edilmedi\u011fi, servis hizmetinin velilerle yap\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131ma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi gere\u011fi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, olayda kusursuz sorumluluk hallerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile, daval\u0131 TED Ankara Koleji Vakf\u0131 \u00d6zel \u0130lk\u00f6\u011fretim Okul M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n husumet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine, davac\u0131 M\u00fcjde i\u00e7in 20.000 YTL.s\u0131 manevi, davac\u0131 Kamil Haldun i\u00e7in 20.000 YTL.s\u0131 manevi ve karde\u015f Caner i\u00e7in 10.000 YTL.s\u0131 manevi tazminat\u0131n olay tarihinden itibaren yasal faizi ile daval\u0131lar \u0130&#8230; G&#8230;- G&#8230; San. Tic. ve Ara\u00e7 Kiralama Hizmetleri ( Rent a Car ) ve M. Y.&#8217;dan tahsiline, maddi tazminat istemlerinin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar\u0131, davac\u0131lar vekili ve daval\u0131 \u0130&#8230; G&#8230;- G&#8230; San. Tic. ve Ara\u00e7 Kiralama Hizmetleri ( Rent a Car ) vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmesinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamas\u0131na ve davac\u0131lar\u0131n murisinin daval\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131ma \u015firketine ait ara\u00e7ta yolcu olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kusurunun olmamas\u0131na, murisin yeti\u015fti\u011fi aile ortam\u0131 y\u00fcksek tahsil yapmaya y\u00f6nlendirecek \u015fart ve imkanlara sahip olmas\u0131 nedeniyle asgari \u00fccretin \u00fczerinde tazminata esas gelirin belirlenerek maddi tazminat\u0131n hesab\u0131nda bir\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fck bulunmamas\u0131na, ta\u015f\u0131ma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin daval\u0131 \u0130&#8230; G&#8230;- G&#8230; San. Tic. ve Ara\u00e7 Kiralama Hizmetleri ( Rent a Car ) ile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle arac\u0131n fiili ta\u015f\u0131yana kiralanmas\u0131n\u0131n bu daval\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131yan olarak sorumlulu\u011funu ortadan kald\u0131rmayacak olmas\u0131na ve ayr\u0131ca olay tarihinde ge\u00e7erli Okul Servis Ara\u00e7lar\u0131 Hizmet Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin 7. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca da TED Ankara Koleji vakf\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131yan d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir ba\u015fka s\u0131fatla dahi sorumlu tutulmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan hakk\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n husumet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddinde de bir\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fck bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 \u0130&#8230; G&#8230;- G&#8230; San. Tic. ve Ara\u00e7 Kiralama Hizmetleri ( Rent a Car ) vekilinin t\u00fcm ve davac\u0131lar vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bent d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Davac\u0131lar vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131na gelince, dava, ta\u015f\u0131ma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan maddi ve manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece karara esas al\u0131nan 19.03.2008 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda davac\u0131lara Ferdi Kaza Koltuk Sigorta Poli\u00e7esinden \u00f6denen 50.000 YTL.s\u0131 hesap edilen destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131ndan indirilmi\u015f ise de, Ferdi Kaza Sigorta S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde yolcunun \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc halinde sigortac\u0131, bir mebla\u011f sigortas\u0131 bedeli olan \u00f6l\u00fcm tazminat\u0131n\u0131 can sigortas\u0131 ilkeleri uyar\u0131nca aynen \u00f6lenin yasal miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na \u00f6demek y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc alt\u0131ndad\u0131r. Bu itibarla mahkemece, Ferdi Kaza Koltuk Sigorta Poli\u00e7esinden \u00f6denen 50.000 YTL.s\u0131n\u0131n hesap edilen destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131ndan indirilmek suretiyle ve bu durumda tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n negatif bakiye verdi\u011finden bahisle davac\u0131 anne ve baba y\u00f6n\u00fcnden maddi tazminat isteminin reddine karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozulduktan sonra, bu kez davac\u0131lar vekilince reddedilen temyiz itirazlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden karar d\u00fczeltme talebinde bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; 1- Yarg\u0131tay ilam\u0131nda benimsenen gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair karar d\u00fczeltme itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Daval\u0131 TED Ankara Koleji Vakf\u0131 ile daval\u0131 \u0130&#8230; G&#8230;-G&#8230; Sanayi Ticaret Taahh\u00fct Ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k ve Ara\u00e7 Kiralama Hizmetleri aras\u0131nda \u00f6nceden 22.08.2003 tarihinde sonradan da bu s\u00f6zle\u015fme yenilenerek 28.09.2004 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frencilerin ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131 hususunda anla\u015fma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, kazan\u0131n 06.06.2005 tarihi itibariyle s\u00f6zle\u015fme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde meydana geldi\u011fi hususlar\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. S\u00f6zle\u015fme ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8220;\u00d6\u011frenci, \u00f6\u011fretmen ve personel ta\u015f\u0131ma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi&#8221; olup s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin konusu ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131. 2. maddeye g\u00f6re &#8220;TED Ankara Koleji Vakf\u0131 okullar\u0131, \u00f6\u011frenci, \u00f6\u011fretmen ve personelinin Ankara i\u00e7i ile \u0130ncek kampusu aras\u0131nda evden okula, okulda eve g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcp getirilmesi&#8230;&#8221; oldu\u011fu, 3. maddesinde; i\u015fin s\u00fcresinin g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi, 4. maddesinde; g\u00fczergahlar\u0131n, 5. maddesinde; al\u0131nacak \u00fccretlerin, 6. maddesinde; ilgili aysonunda verilen hizmette bir aksama olmas\u0131 halinde kullan\u0131lmak \u00fczere ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n vakfa 100.000 YTL g\u00fcvence bedeli yat\u0131raca\u011f\u0131, 8.maddesinde; ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131n\u0131n 300.000 YTL tutar\u0131nda kesin ve s\u00fcresiz teminat mektubunu vakfa verece\u011fi, 9. maddesinde; vergi, resim ve har\u00e7lar\u0131n, 10. maddesinde; fesih hususlar\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, \u00f6ncelikle 7. maddesinde a ) bendinde; okul servis ara\u00e7lar\u0131 y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uyulaca\u011f\u0131 b ) bendinde; ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131n\u0131n vak\u0131ftan onay almadan herhangi bir de\u011fi\u015fim yapamayaca\u011f\u0131, c ) bendinde; ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131n\u0131n vakf\u0131n belirleyece\u011fi bir sigorta \u015firketine &#8220;Ferdi Kaza Sigortas\u0131&#8221; yapt\u0131rmas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu, d ) bendinde; 3.ki\u015filere verilerek zararlardan dolay\u0131 vakfa r\u00fccu edilemeyece\u011fi, m ) bendinde; ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131n\u0131n personelinin daval\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na ait t\u00fcm kararlar\u0131na ve genelgelerine uymakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olaca\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n da; servis ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n kiralanmas\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015flerinde bulunulmas\u0131, ihalenin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ara\u00e7lar\u0131n se\u00e7im ve denetiminde tamamen okul y\u00f6netiminin etkili ve yetkili oldu\u011fu, \u00f6\u011frenci ve velilerin s\u00f6z sahibi olmad\u0131klar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki beyanlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda daval\u0131 vakf\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu ta\u015f\u0131ma i\u015fini denetleme ve kontrol yetkisine sahip oldu\u011fu bu durumda vakf\u0131n da ta\u015f\u0131yan olarak kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011finden davac\u0131 vekilinin bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fkin karar d\u00fczeltme itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile Dairenin temyiz bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131n ( 1 ) nolu b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn bu hususa ili\u015fen b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131larak yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n bu nedenle de davac\u0131 yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi tarih itibariyle H.U.M.K.2494 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile de\u011fi\u015fik 438\/II.f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince duru\u015fma iste\u011finin reddine karar verilip dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Dava, ta\u015f\u0131ma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan maddi ve manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkemece, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul, k\u0131smen reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taraf vekillerinin temyizi \u00fczerine, \u00d6zel Dairece yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle bozulmu\u015f; davac\u0131lar vekilinin karar d\u00fczeltme istemi \u00fczerine yine yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yer alan bozma nedeni de eklenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015f; h\u00fckm\u00fc davac\u0131lar vekili temyize getirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca yap\u0131lan incelemede i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn daval\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fiye tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flan\u0131p sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flan\u0131p savunma hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmadan yarg\u0131laman\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp, karar verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 \u00f6n sorun olarak ele al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00f6ncelikle &#8220;tebligat&#8221;, &#8220;taraf te\u015fkili&#8221;, &#8220;adil yarg\u0131lanma&#8221; ve &#8220;hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131&#8221; kavramlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131nda yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yetkili makamlar taraf\u0131ndan bir tak\u0131m hukuk\u00ee i\u015flemlerin, bunlar\u0131n hukuk\u00ee sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan etkilenmeleri ama\u00e7lanan kimselere kanuna uygun \u015fekilde bildirimi ve bu bildirimin de usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belgelenmesi olarak tan\u0131mlanan\u00a0tebligat, Anayasa ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, daha da \u00f6zelde hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve bu suretle adil bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli bir ara\u00e7t\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir d\u00e2vada daval\u0131n\u0131n, davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu d\u00e2vadan haberdar olmas\u0131, d\u00e2vaya cevap vermesi ve hatta cevap s\u00fcresinin i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamas\u0131 i\u00e7in d\u00e2va dilek\u00e7esinin tebli\u011f edilmesi gerekir. Aksi durumun, ilgilinin hak arama h\u00fcrriyetini k\u0131s\u0131tlayaca\u011f\u0131na \u015f\u00fcphe yoktur. Asl\u0131nda hemen her hukuksal i\u015flemin\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ile sonu\u00e7 do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi, iddia ve savunma ile ilgili delillerin eksiksiz toplan\u0131p tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilmesi, itirazlar\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi, davan\u0131n s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131labilmesi; bozma sonras\u0131 yarg\u0131laman\u0131n devam\u0131, uyup uymama y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki karar\u0131n verilebilmesi, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden usul\u00fcnce haberdar edilmesi ve b\u00f6ylece taraf te\u015fkilinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu yolla ki\u015fi, hangi yarg\u0131 merciinde duru\u015fmas\u0131 bulundu\u011funa, hakk\u0131ndaki iddia ve isnatlar\u0131n nelerden ibaret oldu\u011funa, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n safahat\u0131na, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fine, bozma sonras\u0131 duru\u015fman\u0131n hangi tarihte yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na, verilen karar\u0131n ne oldu\u011funa, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ve\u00a0TebligatT\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klanan usule uygun\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile vak\u0131f olabilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, taraf te\u015fkili sadece davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131nda de\u011fil, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n di\u011fer a\u015famalar\u0131nda da \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemenin, bozma ilam\u0131na uyma ya da direnme konusunu karara ba\u011flamadan \u00f6nce de, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131 ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc taraflara kendili\u011finden tebli\u011f edip taraf te\u015fkilini sa\u011flamas\u0131, 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a030.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu ( HMK )&#8217;na eklenen &#8220;Ge\u00e7ici madde 3&#8221; atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu ( HUMK )&#8217;nun 429. maddesinin amir h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi, zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim, bozma sonras\u0131 mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015flemleri d\u00fczenleyen 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK&#8217;nun\u00a0429\/2. maddesinde, &#8220;&#8230;Mahkeme, temyiz edenden 434&#8217;nc\u00fc madde uyar\u0131nca pe\u015fin al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olan gideri kullanmak suretiyle, kendili\u011finden taraflar\u0131 duru\u015fmaya davet edip dinledikten sonra, Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131n bozma karar\u0131na uyulup uyulmayaca\u011f\u0131na karar verir.&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u00e7\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcm kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda mahkeme, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131 taraflara tebli\u011f edip; kendili\u011finden taraflar\u0131 duru\u015fmaya davet etmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Belirtilen usul\u00fc i\u015flemler tamamlanmadan ve bozma sonras\u0131 taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan, mahkemece direnme ya da uyma karar\u0131 verilmesi olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir (\u00a0HGK&#8217;nun 26.09.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2007\/11-652\u00a0E. -624 K; 02.07.2003 g\u00fcn ve 2003\/2-408 E.-467 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, yarg\u0131lamada y\u00f6ntemine uygun olarak taraf te\u015fkilinin sa\u011flan\u0131p sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine y\u00f6nelik olarak,\u00a0tebligata ili\u015fkin yasal d\u00fczenlemeler \u00fczerinde de durulmal\u0131d\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ( Teb.K )&#8217;nun 10. maddesinde; &#8220;Tebligat, tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahsa bilinen en son adresinde yap\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6099 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla; bu maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131ndan sonra gelmek \u00fczere &#8220;Bilinen son adresin\u00a0tebligata elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 veya\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 halinde, muhatab\u0131n adres kay\u0131t sisteminde bulunan yerle\u015fim yeri adresi, bilinen en son adresi olarak kabul edilir ve\u00a0tebligat\u00a0buraya yap\u0131l\u0131r&#8221;d\u00fczenlemesi getirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An\u0131lan Kanunun &#8220;Mevkuf ve mahkumlara tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 19. maddesinde: &#8220;Mevkuf ve mahkumlara ait tebli\u011flerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, bunlar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu m\u00fcessese m\u00fcd\u00fcr veya memuru temin eder.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fc yer almakta;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 25. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n son c\u00fcmlesinde de; &#8220;Mahkuma\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lamazsa, tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131na, m\u00fcd\u00fcr veya memur taraf\u0131ndan sebebi g\u00f6sterilmek suretiyle \u015ferh verilir.&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesi bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hemen belirtmelidir ki, tebli\u011f ile ilgili kanun ve t\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tamamen \u015feklidir. Tebligat; bilgilendirme yan\u0131nda belgelendirme \u00f6zelli\u011fi de bulunan bir usul i\u015flemidir. Gerek tebli\u011f i\u015flemi ve gerekse tebli\u011f tarihi ancak yasa ve t\u00fcz\u00fckte emredilen \u015fekillerle tevsik ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ispat olunabilir. Bu sebeple\u00a0tebligat\u0131n, usul yasalar\u0131 ile ili\u015fkisi de daima g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An\u0131lan Kanun ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn bu konuda etkili \u00f6nlemler alm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n tek amac\u0131, tebli\u011fin muhatab\u0131na ula\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 ve onun taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmesini sa\u011flamakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu hale g\u00f6re; yaz\u0131l\u0131\u00a0tebligat, bir davaya ili\u015fkin i\u015flemleri o davayla ilgili ki\u015filere bildirmek i\u00e7in, mahkemelerce Kanuna uygun bi\u00e7imde yap\u0131lan bir belgelendirme i\u015flemidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, Kanun ve T\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin en k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131na kadar uygulanmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taraf te\u015fkili konusuna gelince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir d\u00e2vada taraflar\u0131n te\u015fkil edilebilmesi, bu sayede d\u00e2vada kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131l\u0131k, \u00e7eli\u015fikli\u011fin sa\u011flanabilmesi ve iddia ve savunmalarda bulunulabilmesi i\u00e7in taraflarla, taraflar d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k ve bilirki\u015fi gibi \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere usul\u00fcne uygun tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklidir.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0sayesinde, ilgililer duru\u015fmaya davet olunur ve kendilerine, yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131ndaki ilk bilgiler, tebli\u011f konusu dilek\u00e7eler sayesinde verilir.\u00a0Tebligat, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n mak\u00fbl s\u00fcrede yap\u0131l\u0131p sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, hak ve adaletin gecikmeden yerine getirilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli bir us\u00fbli i\u015flemdir ( Mehmet Ru\u015fen G\u00fcltekin, Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini Sa\u011flayan Ara\u00e7lardan Milletleraras\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0ve \u0130stinabe, ( Doktora Tezi ), Ankara 2006, s. 16, 17 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taraflar duru\u015fmaya \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmadan, e\u015f anlat\u0131mla; taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan h\u00fck\u00fcm verilememesi, Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesi ile d\u00fczenlenen iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na olanak tan\u0131nmas\u0131 ilkesinin do\u011fal bir sonucudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ger\u00e7ekten savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na alan T.C. Anayasas\u0131n\u0131n 36. maddesi ile direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK&#8217;nun\u00a073. maddesinde de ( 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun\u00a027. maddesi ) a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, mahkemece daval\u0131 yan; dinlenmek ve savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nmak \u00fczere kanuni \u015fekillere uygun olarak davet edilmedik\u00e7e h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamaktad\u0131r, aksi halde savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, gerek \u00f6\u011freti, gerekse yarg\u0131sal kararlarda tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z olarak kabul edilmektedir ( Baki Kuru, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc, 6. Bask\u0131, Cilt II, s.1876 vd ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00c7eki\u015fmeli yarg\u0131da kural olarak duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. 01.10.2011 tarihi itibariyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun\u00a027. maddesi uyar\u0131nca Kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi istisnalar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hakim taraflar\u0131 dinlemeden veya iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeleri i\u00e7in kanuna uygun bi\u00e7imde davet etmeden h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc veremez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taraf te\u015fkili dava \u015fart\u0131 olup, davan\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda mahkemece re&#8217;sen nazara al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken bir olgudur ve mahkemenin, duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc, karar\u0131n\u0131, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131, duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc ve direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 taraflara kendili\u011finden tebli\u011f edip taraf te\u015fkilini sa\u011flamas\u0131, usul\u00fcn amir h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi, iddia ve savunma ile ilgili delillerin eksiksiz toplan\u0131p tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilmesi, itirazlar\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi, davan\u0131n s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131labilmesi, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden haberdar edilmesi ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olur. Ki\u015finin hangi yarg\u0131 merciinde duru\u015fmas\u0131 bulundu\u011funu, hakk\u0131ndaki iddia ve isnatlar\u0131n nelerden ibaret oldu\u011funu bilmesi, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ve\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klanan usule uygun\u00a0tebligatyap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile sa\u011flanabilir (\u00a0HGK&#8217;nun 04.03.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/9-52\u00a0E.-2009\/105 K.; 14.04.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/21-200 E. 2010\/216 K.; 20.04.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/5-175 E. 2011\/202 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na gelince:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkeme iki tarafa e\u015fit \u015fekilde hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131 tan\u0131yarak h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc vermelidir. Taraflara hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131 verilmesi anayasal bir hakt\u0131r. Anayasam\u0131z\u0131n 36. maddesine g\u00f6re teminat alt\u0131na al\u0131nan iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131 ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131, hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7ermektedir. Yine \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi&#8217;n\u00f6e de hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 i\u00e7inde teminat alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu hakka, taraf\u0131n h\u00e2kime meram\u0131n\u0131 anlatma hakk\u0131 ya da iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131 da denilmektedir. Ancak, hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131, bu ifadeleri de kapsayan daha geni\u015f bir anlama sahiptir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a027. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8221; ( I ) Davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131, m\u00fcdahiller ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n di\u011fer ilgilileri, kendi haklar\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na sahiptirler.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) Bu hak;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a ) Yarg\u0131lama ile ilgili olarak bilgi sahibi olunmas\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b ) A\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat hakk\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">c ) Mahkemenin, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dikkate alarak de\u011ferlendirmesini ve kararlar\u0131n somut ve a\u00e7\u0131k olarak gerek\u00e7elendirilmesini,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">i\u00e7erir&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131, Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklan S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 6. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n en \u00f6nemli unsurudur. Zira, insan onurunun yarg\u0131lamadaki zorunlu bir sonucu olarak, yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcjelerinin, yarg\u0131lamada \u015feklen yer almalar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, tam olarak bilgi sahibi olmalar\u0131, kendilerini ilgilendiren yarg\u0131lama konusunda a\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat haklar\u0131n\u0131 tam ve e\u015fit olarak kullanmalar\u0131 ve yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n da bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dikkate alarak gere\u011fi gibi de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131p karar vermesi gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131 olarak maddede ifade edilen ve uluslararas\u0131 metinlerde de yer bulan bu hak, \u00e7o\u011funlukla &#8220;iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131&#8221; olarak bilinmektedir. Ancak, hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131, iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131 kavram\u0131na g\u00f6re daha geni\u015f ve \u00fcst bir kavramd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu hak, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n taraflar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, m\u00fcdahiller ve yarg\u0131lama konusu ile ilgili olanlar\u0131 da kapsam\u0131na almaktad\u0131r. Ancak, her yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcjesi kendi hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 ve orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak bu hakka sahiptir. Hakk\u0131n temel unsurlar\u0131 maddede tek tek belirtilmi\u015f, b\u00f6ylece uygulamada bu temel yarg\u0131sal hak konusundaki teredd\u00fctlerin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesi ama\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n gerek yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca gerekse kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler konusunda bilgilendirilmeleri zorunludur. Ki\u015finin kendisinden habersiz yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131larak karar verilmesi, kural olarak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu hakk\u0131n ikinci unsuru, a\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat hakk\u0131d\u0131r. Taraflar, yarg\u0131lamayla ilgili a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunma, bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrme ve ispat etme hakk\u0131na sahiptirler. Her iki taraf da bu haktan e\u015fit \u015fekilde yararlan\u0131rlar. Bu durum &#8220;silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesi&#8221; olarak da ifade edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu hakk\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc unsuru, taraflar\u0131n iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak dikkate al\u0131p de\u011ferlendirmesidir. Bu de\u011ferlendirmenin de, kararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir ( bkz. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK.nun H\u00fck\u00fcmet Gerek\u00e7esi madde 32 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131lama bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, sadece bir taraf\u0131n dinlenmesi, ba\u015fka kimsenin dinlenmemesi, tek y\u00f6nl\u00fc karar verilmesi demektir. Yarg\u0131lamada yer alan taraflar, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n objesi de\u011fil, s\u00fcjesidir. Hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131, do\u011fru karar verilmesinin garantisidir; bu nedenle, haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 koyabilme imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131r. Bu hak, hukuk devletinin, insan onurunun korunmas\u0131 ve e\u015fitlik ilkesinin, hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bir gere\u011fidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131 yarg\u0131laman\u0131n s\u00fcjesi olan herkese aittir. Dava sonunda hukuk\u00ee durumu etkilenecek olan ki\u015filere, yarg\u0131lamadaki durumlar\u0131na uygun \u015fekilde bu hak tan\u0131nacakt\u0131r. Tan\u0131k ve bilirki\u015filerin kendileri ile ilgili bir sonu\u00e7 do\u011fmas\u0131 halleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Davada taraflar, \u00e7eki\u015fmesiz-yarg\u0131 i\u015flerinde ilgililer bu hakka sahip olduklar\u0131 gibi, fer&#8217;i m\u00fcdahilin de kendi hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131, sadece belli bir yarg\u0131lama i\u00e7in ya da yarg\u0131laman\u0131n belli bir a\u015famas\u0131 i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli olan bir ilke de\u011fildir. T\u00fcm yarg\u0131lamalar i\u00e7in ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda uyulmas\u0131 gereken bir ilkedir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede gerek \u00e7eki\u015fmeli ve \u00e7eki\u015fmesiz yarg\u0131 i\u015flerinde gerekse bu yarg\u0131lamalarla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7ici hukuk\u00ee korumalarda, icra takiplerinde, tahkim yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda, hatta hukuk\u00ee uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarla ilgili yarg\u0131lama d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm yollar\u0131nda, her bir yarg\u0131lama, \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm yolu ve uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n niteli\u011fiyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131na uygun davran\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k -bir istinaf gerek\u00e7esi ve -temyizde de bozma sebebidir. Hakk\u0131n ihl\u00e2linin niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi sebebi olarak kabul edilebilir. Ayr\u0131ca adil yarg\u0131lanma ihl\u00e2li \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklan Mahkemesi&#8217;ne ba\u015fvurulabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanunda da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi gibi, hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n temel \u00fc\u00e7 unsuru bulunmaktad\u0131r ( 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK madde 27\/2 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bunlardan ilki &#8220;Bilgilenme Hakk\u0131&#8221; d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re, hak sahibinin kendisi ile ilgili yarg\u0131lama ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi hakk\u0131nda tam bir \u015fekilde bilgi sahibi olmas\u0131 sa\u011flanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bilgilerime hakk\u0131, gerek kar\u015f\u0131 taraf gerekse yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flemleri ve dosya kapsam\u0131na girip yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 etkileyen her \u015feyi kapsar. Taraf\u0131n bilgi sahibi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemler, belge ve bilgiler yarg\u0131lamada esas al\u0131namaz. Bilgilenmenin \u015fekli bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131na uygun davran\u0131lmal\u0131, ilgilinin bilgilenmesi \u015feklen de\u011fil, ger\u00e7ekten sa\u011flanmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u00d6zellikle\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ve davetiye kurallar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131nda \u00f6zen g\u00f6sterilmelidir. Us\u00fbl\u00fcne uygun\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmadan, davetiye \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmadan, tefhimi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse tefhim ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeden yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler taraflar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz.Taraflardan gizli yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, yarg\u0131lamaya d\u00e2hil olan her i\u015flem bak\u0131m\u0131ndan taraflar, dosyan\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir s\u0131n\u0131rlamaya tab\u00ee olmadan tam olarak bilgilenme hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanabilirler. Bu s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar da bilgilenme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte olmay\u0131p sadece kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 i\u015flemesi i\u00e7in belirli kurallara ba\u011flamak \u015feklinde olabilir. Taraflar\u0131n bilgisine a\u00e7\u0131k olmayan hi\u00e7bir husus h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ikinci unsuru &#8220;A\u00e7\u0131klama ve \u0130spat Hakk\u0131&#8221; d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re de, hak sahibinin bilgilendi\u011fi hususlarda a\u00e7\u0131klama hakk\u0131 tam olmal\u0131d\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klama hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131na, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n temelini olu\u015fturan vak\u0131alar, bunlar\u0131n ispat\u0131na ili\u015fkin faaliyet ve hukuk\u00ee sebepler girmektedir. Bununla birlikte, a\u00e7\u0131klama hakk\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z bir i\u00e7ini d\u00f6kme hakk\u0131 de\u011fildir. Bu konuda hakk\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc zedelemeyen, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 i\u015flemesine y\u00f6nelik s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar getirilebilir. Ancak, hakk\u0131 anlams\u0131z k\u0131lacak s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar kabul edilemez. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede \u00f6rne\u011fin, makul kabul edilebilecek, iddia ve savunmay\u0131 geni\u015fletme yasa\u011f\u0131 ile delil g\u00f6sterilmesi konusunda getirilen s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 say\u0131lmaz. Burada, teksif ilkesi ve us\u00fbl ekonomisi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak, hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131 ihl\u00e2li sonucunu do\u011furmayan, teksif ilkesine ve us\u00fbl ekonomisine uygun olan s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar kabul edilebilecektir. A\u00e7\u0131klama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ne \u015fekilde kullan\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ise, kural olarak ilgili yarg\u0131lama us\u00fbl\u00fc belirler.A\u00e7\u0131klama hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ilgiliye gerekli ortam haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, ki\u015fi bu hakk\u0131 kullan\u0131p kullanmamakta serbesttir, hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmayarak haktan feragat edebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc unsuru &#8220;Dikkate Al\u0131nma Hakk\u0131&#8221;d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taraf a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131, tam olarak dikkate al\u0131p de\u011ferlendirmelidir. Ancak bu \u015fekilde ilgililer ger\u00e7ek anlamda yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 etkileyen bir yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcjes\u00ee haline gelmi\u015f olur. Aksi halde bilgilenme ve a\u00e7\u0131klama hakk\u0131 anlams\u0131z kalacakt\u0131r. Bu sebeple, dikkate alma ve de\u011ferlendirme, yarg\u0131 organ\u0131 i\u00e7in mutlak bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckt\u00fcr ( Hakan Pekcan\u0131tez- O\u011fuz Atalay- Muhammet \u00d6zekes, Medeni Usul Hukuku, 11. Bas\u0131, Ankara 2011, s. 272- 278 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hakkaniyete uygun bir yarg\u0131lanman\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini sa\u011flayacak en \u00f6nemli ilke ise sil\u00e2hlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesidir. Sil\u00e2hlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesi, yine, A\u0130HM&#8217;ne g\u00f6re, mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde sahip olunan hak ve vecibeler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan taraflar aras\u0131nda tam bir e\u015fitli\u011fin bulunmas\u0131 ve bu dengenin b\u00fct\u00fcn yarg\u0131lama boyunca korunmas\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle, sil\u00e2hlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesi, d\u00e2van\u0131n taraflar\u0131ndan birini di\u011feri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda avantajs\u0131z bir duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeyecek \u015fekilde her iki taraf\u0131n deliller de dahil olmak \u00fczere, iddia ve savunmas\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koymak i\u00e7in mak\u00fbl bir olana\u011fa sahip olmas\u0131, taraflar\u0131n denge i\u00e7inde olmas\u0131 demektir. Sil\u00e2hlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesi, A\u0130HM&#8217;nin 6. maddesinin 1. bendinin ilk c\u00fcmlesinde ge\u00e7mektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu konuda A\u0130HM&#8217;nin T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;ye ili\u015fkin bir de\u011ferlendirmesi Mehmet G\u00f6\u00e7\/T\u00fcrkiye karar\u0131nda yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u0130HM, &#8220;mahkemece belirlenen tazminat\u0131 yetersiz bulan ba\u015fvurucunun d\u00e2vas\u0131n\u0131n, Yarg\u0131tay a\u015famas\u0131nda devam etmekte oldu\u011fu bir s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucu, Yarg\u0131tay \u00f6n\u00fcndeki yarg\u0131lamada ba\u015far\u0131 olanaklar\u0131n\u0131 zay\u0131flatacak her t\u00fcrl\u00fc sunumdan bilgi edinmek hakk\u0131na sahiptir. Bu nedenle Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;a sundu\u011fu tebli\u011fnamesinin ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmemesi, S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 6. maddesinin ihl\u00e2lidir&#8221; sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S\u00f6z konusu ilke taraflar\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olarak mahkemenin \u00f6n\u00fcne gelmelerini sa\u011flayan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0i\u015flemi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemlidir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc ancak hukuka uygun bir us\u00fblde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen\u00a0tebligat\u00a0\u00fczerine, durumdan haberdar olan taraflar iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 e\u015fit \u015fekilde yapabileceklerdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n yeterince kullan\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n do\u011fru sonu\u00e7lar vermesi beklenemez. Adil yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye y\u00f6nelik her hukuk kural\u0131 savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edecektir. Hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve bunun somut unsurlar\u0131ndan biri olan savunman\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesinin ilk ko\u015fulu ise\u00a0tebligatt\u0131r. Bir yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda taraflar, yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131ndaki ilk bilgilere ve bunun sonucunda iddia ve savunma yapabilme haklar\u0131na ancak usul\u00fcne uygun\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ile kavu\u015fabilecek ve bu \u015fekilde savunma yap\u0131labilecektir. Bunun tersi olarak ge\u00e7erli ve usul\u00fcne uygun bir\u00a0tebligat\u00a0olmaks\u0131z\u0131n yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ise, savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, en temel insan haklar\u0131ndan birinin ihl\u00e2li anlam\u0131na gelecektir ( Mehmet Ru\u015fen G\u00fcltekin, a.g.e., s. 17 vd. ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">T\u00fcm bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc, bozma ilam\u0131, karar d\u00fczeltme ilam\u0131, bozma sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc, direnme karar\u0131 ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin isim benzerli\u011finden dolay\u0131 daval\u0131 M. Y. d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir \u015fahsa yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer taraftan, yerel mahkeme karar\u0131 ile temyiz dilek\u00e7esi de ayn\u0131\u00a0tebligat\u00a0zarf\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde tutukevinde bulunan daval\u0131 M. Y.&#8217;\u0131n tebli\u011f an\u0131nda orada bulunmama nedeni g\u00f6sterilmeden &#8220;yetkili m\u00fcd\u00fcre&#8221; yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0TebligatKanunu&#8217;nun yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan 19.maddesi ve ilgili t\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince, tutukevinde bulunan daval\u0131 M. Y.&#8217;a tebli\u011flerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, bulundu\u011fu m\u00fcessese m\u00fcd\u00fcr veya memurunun temin edip;\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lamazsa, bunlar taraf\u0131ndan sebebi g\u00f6sterilmek suretiyle tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131na \u015ferh verilmesi gerekirken; buna uyulmamakla mahkeme karar\u0131 ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin de usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi, anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle, dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn, bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131n, karar d\u00fczeltme ilam\u0131n\u0131n, bozma sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn, direnme karar\u0131 ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin isim benzerli\u011finden dolay\u0131 daval\u0131 M. Y. d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir \u015fahsa yap\u0131lmas\u0131; ilk karar\u0131n ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin de, a\u00e7\u0131klanan \u015fekilde 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a019. maddesi ve ilgili t\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131; yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131klanan ve ortaya konulan t\u00fcm ilkelerin ihlali anlam\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde, daval\u0131ya dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc, mahkeme karar\u0131, temyiz dilek\u00e7esi, bozma ilam\u0131, karar d\u00fczeltme ilam\u0131 ve bozma sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilmeden, taraf te\u015fkili usul\u00fcnce sa\u011flanmadan yarg\u0131lamaya devam olunup, h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece, dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc, mahkeme karar\u0131, temyiz dilek\u00e7esi, bozma ilam\u0131, karar d\u00fczeltme ilam\u0131 ve bozma sonras\u0131 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc daval\u0131ya usul\u00fcnce tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f gibi i\u015flem tesis edilip, taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmadan duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131larak; daval\u0131n\u0131n yoklu\u011funda ve ona hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmadan, savunma ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlar bi\u00e7imde yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131l\u0131p sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve sonu\u00e7ta da daval\u0131n\u0131n aleyhine karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle \u00f6n sorunun kabul\u00fc ile di\u011fer hususlar incelenmeksizin karar\u0131n salt bu usul\u00fc nedenlerle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan bu de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7e ve nedenlerle direnme karar\u0131 bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Davac\u0131lar vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen de\u011fi\u015fik nedenlerden dolay\u0131 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a030. maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen &#8220;Ge\u00e7ici madde 3&#8221; atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0429. maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, bozma nedenine g\u00f6re sair hususlara y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine \u015fimdilik yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, 23.11.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu karar, kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131m\u0131zdan Say\u0131n Avukat Mehmet DEM\u0130RAYAK taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2011\/12-201<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2011\/309<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 11.5.2011<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 \u015e\u0130KAYET DAVASI ( Bor\u00e7luya \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u00d6deme Emrinin\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Adreste Bulunmamaya \u0130li\u015fkin Kanuni Gerekliliklerin Yerine Getirilmedi\u011fi\/Bor\u00e7lunun Muttali Oldu\u011funu Beyan Etti\u011fi Tarihin Tebli\u011f Tarihi Olarak Kabul Edilece\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( \u015eikayet Davas\u0131\/Bor\u00e7luya \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u00d6deme Emrinin\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Adreste Bulunmamaya \u0130li\u015fkin Kanuni Gerekliliklerin Yerine Getirilmedi\u011fi\/Bor\u00e7lunun Muttali Oldu\u011funu Beyan Etti\u011fi Tarihin Tebli\u011f Tarihi Olarak Kabul\u00fc Gere\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 ADRESTE BULUNMAMA ( \u015eikayet Davas\u0131\/\u00d6deme Emrinin\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Adreste Bulunmamaya \u0130li\u015fkin Usul\u00fcn Yerine Getirilmedi\u011fi\/Bor\u00e7lunun Muttali Oldu\u011funu Beyan Etti\u011fi Tarihin Tebli\u011f Tarihi Olarak Kabul\u00fc Gerekti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p>7201\/m.21<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0\u015eikayet Davas\u0131nda, \u0130cra mahkemesince bor\u00e7luya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn tespiti yerinde ise de, bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebli\u011fe muttali oldu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi tarih yerine 103 haciz tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi tarihin muttali olunan tarih olarak tesbiti do\u011fru de\u011fildir. Adreste bulunmamaya ili\u015fkin ko\u015fullar yerine getirilmemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece bor\u00e7lunun muttali oldu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi tarihi tebli\u011f tarihi olarak tespit etmek gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8221; \u015fikayet &#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Ankara 11. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesince \u015fikayetin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 05.06.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/863 E.,-884 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi davac\u0131\/bor\u00e7lu vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 12.Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 08.02.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/18661 E., 2010\/2372 K.say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; \u0130cra mahkemesince bor\u00e7luya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn tespiti yerinde ise de, bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebli\u011fe muttali oldu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi tarih 28.05.2009 yerine 103 haciz tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi 15.09.2009 tarihinin muttali olunan tarih olarak tesbiti do\u011fru de\u011fildir. Zira incelenen haciz tutana\u011f\u0131nda 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a021.maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f i\u015fleminde T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 28.maddesindeki lazime yerine getirilmemi\u015ftir. ( Adreste bulunmama sebebi ) Hal b\u00f6yle olunca mahkemece bor\u00e7lunun muttali oldu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi tarihi tebli\u011f tarihi olarak tespit etmek gerekirken aksine d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar tesisi isabetsizdir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 iddia ve savunmalar\u0131na, dosyadaki tutanak ve kan\u0131tlara, bozma karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerektirici nedenlere g\u00f6re, Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca da benimsenen \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131na uyulmak gerekirken, \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle direnme karar\u0131 bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131 H.U.M.K.nun\u00a0429.maddesi gere\u011fince ve \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131nda sehven &#8220;15.09.2009&#8221; olarak yaz\u0131lan 103 haciz tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihinin &#8220;15.05.2009&#8221; \u015feklinde d\u00fczeltilerek BOZULMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n geri verilmesine, 11.05.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2011\/11-139<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2011\/235<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 27.4.2011<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 \u0130HRA\u00c7 KARARININ \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Davac\u0131n\u0131n \u0130htarlar\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu Y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki \u0130ddias\u0131 \u0130htarlar\u0131n Tebli\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin PTT&#8217;de Bulunan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Par\u00e7alar\u0131 \u0130stenmeden ve\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebli\u011f \u0130ddias\u0131 \u0130rdelenmeden H\u00fck\u00fcm Olu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130sabetsiz Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 \u0130HTARLARIN\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0OLDU\u011eU Y\u00d6N\u00dcNDEK\u0130 \u0130DD\u0130A ( \u0130htarlar\u0131n Tebli\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin PTT&#8217;de Bulunan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Par\u00e7alar\u0131 \u0130stenmeden ve\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebli\u011f \u0130ddias\u0131 \u0130rdelenmeden H\u00fck\u00fcm Olu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130sabetsiz Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130\u011e ( \u0130hra\u00e7 Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130ptali \u0130stemi &#8211; Davac\u0131n\u0131n \u0130htarlar\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu Y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki \u0130ddias\u0131 \u0130htarlar\u0131n Tebli\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin PTT&#8217;de Bulunan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Par\u00e7alar\u0131 \u0130stenmeden ve\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebli\u011f \u0130ddias\u0131 \u0130rdelenmeden H\u00fck\u00fcm Olu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130sabetsiz Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #800000;\">7201\/m.21<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava ihra\u00e7 karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n ihrac\u0131na dayanak ihtarlar\u0131n\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 21. maddesine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin noter \u015ferhlerine dayan\u0131larak ihrac\u0131n yasa ve ana s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile iyi niyet kurallar\u0131na uygun oldu\u011fu belirtilerek dava reddedilmi\u015f ise de, davac\u0131 yan\u0131n, ihtarlar\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iddias\u0131, ihtarlar\u0131n tebli\u011fine ili\u015fkin PTT&#8217;de bulunan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0par\u00e7alar\u0131 istenmeden ve\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fck tebli\u011f iddias\u0131 irdelenmeden h\u00fck\u00fcm olu\u015fturulmu\u015f bulundu\u011fundan karar\u0131n bu sebeple bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;genel kurul karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali&#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Bal\u0131kesir 1.Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesince davan\u0131n &#8220;reddine&#8221; dair verilen 24.1.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2006\/162-5 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesinin 13.11.2008 g\u00fcn ve 2007\/4438-12785 Say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin 11.2.2006 tarihli genel kurulda ge\u00e7 \u00f6demelerden kaynaklanan faiz borcunu \u00f6demedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle kooperatiften ihra\u00e7 edildi\u011fini, oysa aidatlar\u0131n zaman\u0131nda \u00f6dendi\u011fini, y\u00f6netim kurulunun davac\u0131ya g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi yaz\u0131 ile 12.6.1999 tarihli genel kurulda &#8220;seneye yap\u0131lacak olan genel kuruldan sonra kooperatifin aidatlar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131ndan aidatlar\u0131n 25.000.000-TL olmas\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.&#8221; dendi\u011fini, bu \u015fekilde sonradan aidat \u00f6demesi yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 inanc\u0131na sevk edilen davac\u0131dan, sonradan yap\u0131lan genel kurul kararlar\u0131 ile aidat toplanmas\u0131n\u0131n kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00f6z konusu kararlardan davac\u0131n\u0131n haberdar edilmedi\u011fini temerr\u00fcde d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmeyen davac\u0131dan faiz istenemeyece\u011fini, kooperatifin in\u015faatlar\u0131 bitirdi\u011fini, ortaklara tahsis ve teslim etti\u011fini ve tasfiye karar\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu sebeple aidat toplanmas\u0131na gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, belirlenen aidatlar\u0131n site y\u00f6netimi aidat\u0131 oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ise \u00f6dememe veya ge\u00e7 \u00f6demenin kooperatiften ihra\u00e7 i\u00e7in bir sebep olarak kabul edilemeyece\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, ihraca ili\u015fkin genel kurul karar\u0131n\u0131n iptalini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekili, 21.12.2002 tarihinde al\u0131nan genel kurulunda bir defaya mahsus olmak \u00fczere 100.000.000-TL aidat al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fini, 20.2.1993 tarihli genel kurulda da gecikme halinde % 10 faiz uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n benimsendi\u011fini, yap\u0131lan hesaplamalara g\u00f6nderilen ihtarlara uymayan davac\u0131n\u0131n ihrac\u0131nda\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fck bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, toplanan kan\u0131tlar ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n parasal edimlerini 2 ay geciktirmesi \u00fczerine yasa ve ana s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye uygun olarak kaside ve tebli\u011f edilen ihtarnamelere ra\u011fmen \u00f6deme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu sebeple al\u0131nan ihra\u00e7 karar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle dava reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar\u0131, davac\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- )Dava ihra\u00e7 karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n ihrac\u0131na dayanak ihtarlar\u0131n\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 21. maddesine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin noter \u015ferhlerine dayan\u0131larak ihrac\u0131n yasa ve ana s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile iyi niyet kurallar\u0131na uygun oldu\u011fu belirtilerek dava reddedilmi\u015f ise de, davac\u0131 yan\u0131n, ihtarlar\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iddias\u0131, ihtarlar\u0131n tebli\u011fine ili\u015fkin PTT&#8217;de bulunan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0par\u00e7alar\u0131 istenmeden ve\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fck tebli\u011f iddias\u0131 irdelenmeden h\u00fck\u00fcm olu\u015fturulmu\u015f bulundu\u011fundan karar\u0131n bu sebeple bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- )Bozma sebep ve \u015fekline g\u00f6re davac\u0131 vekilinin di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fimdilik incelenmesine gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H.G.K.nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 iddia ve savunmalar\u0131na, dosyadaki tutanak ve kan\u0131tlara, bozma karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerektirici nedenlere g\u00f6re, H.G.K.&#8217;nca da benimsenen \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131na uyulmak gerekirken, \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Bu sebeple direnme karar\u0131 bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, 27.04.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2009\/12-539<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2010\/16<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 27.1.2010<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 BORCA \u0130T\u0130RAZ DAVASI ( Kambiyo Senedine Dayal\u0131 Takipte &#8211;\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne Dair \u015eikayeti Bulunmayan Bor\u00e7luya \u00d6deme Emrinin Tebli\u011fine Dair \u0130\u015flemin Usul\u00fcne Uygun Yap\u0131l\u0131p Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Mahkemece Kendili\u011finden De\u011ferlendirilmesi ve \u0130ncelenmesinin Olanakl\u0131 Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 KAMB\u0130YO SENED\u0130NE DAYALI TAK\u0130P (\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne Dair \u015eikayeti Bulunmayan Bor\u00e7luya \u00d6deme Emrinin Tebli\u011fine Dair \u0130\u015flemin Usul\u00fcne Uygun Yap\u0131l\u0131p Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Mahkemece Kendili\u011finden De\u011ferlendirilmesi ve \u0130ncelenmesinin Olanakl\u0131 Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0TEBL\u0130GATIN\u00a0USULS\u00dcZL\u00dc\u011e\u00dcNE DA\u0130R \u015e\u0130KAYET ( \u015eikayeti Bulunmayan Bor\u00e7luya \u00d6deme Emrinin Tebli\u011fine Dair \u0130\u015flemin Usul\u00fcne Uygun Yap\u0131l\u0131p Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Mahkemece Kendili\u011finden De\u011ferlendirilmesi ve \u0130ncelenmesinin Olanakl\u0131 Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 S\u00dcRE A\u015eIMI ( \u00d6deme Emrinin Tebli\u011f Tarihine G\u00f6re Yasal Be\u015f G\u00fcnl\u00fck S\u00fcre Ge\u00e7irildikten Sonra Yap\u0131lan \u0130tiraz\u0131n S\u00fcre A\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Nedeniyle Reddine Karar Verilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2004\/m.16,168\/5<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0\u0130stek, kambiyo senedine dayal\u0131 takipte borca itiraza ili\u015fkindir.\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair \u015fikayeti bulunmayan bor\u00e7luya, \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fine dair i\u015flemin usul\u00fcne uygun yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece kendili\u011finden de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve incelenmesi olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece, \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011f tarihine g\u00f6re, yasal be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre ge\u00e7irildikten sonra yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken; yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 te\u015fhis ve de\u011ferlendirme sonucu itiraz\u0131n s\u00fcresinde kabul\u00fcne dair \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;Borca itiraz&#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; \u015eanl\u0131urfa 2. \u0130cra Mahkemesince &#8220;\u0130tiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile takibin durmas\u0131na&#8221; dair verilen 25.2.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/163-2009\/70 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekilince istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesinin 7.7.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/6640-15096 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; \u0130.\u0130.K.&#8217;nun\u00a0168\/5. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi bor\u00e7lunun borcu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya borcun itfa edildi\u011fini, mehil verildi\u011fini, alaca\u011f\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131 sebepleri ile birlikte be\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde \u0130cra Mahkemesine bildirmesi gerekir. Somut olayda, alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bonoya dayal\u0131 olarak kambiyo senetlerine mahsus haciz yolu ile icra takibine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6rnek 10 nolu \u00f6deme emrinin PTT Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015e\u009eanl\u0131urfa PTT Merkez M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn yaz\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re bor\u00e7lu Heybetullah Aksan&#8217;a 07\/04\/2008 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, bor\u00e7lu vekilinin ise \u0130.\u0130.K.&#8217;nun\u00a0168\/5.maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yasal be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcreden sonra mahkemeye ba\u015fvurarak, borcun ibraname ile itfa edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek takibin iptalini istedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bor\u00e7lunun itfa itiraz\u0131na dayanak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ibranamede bir tarih bulunmamakla birlikte, itiraz dilek\u00e7esi i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen \u00f6deme takipten \u00f6nce olup, takibin kesinle\u015fmesinden \u00f6nce borcun itfa edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik itiraz \u0130\u0130K.nun\u00a0168\/5. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda olup, bu maddeye g\u00f6re itiraz\u0131n be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. \u00d6deme emri tebli\u011finin\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de iddia edilmedi\u011finden mahkemece itiraz\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle reddi yerine i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenerek, takibin durmas\u0131na karar verilmesi isabetsizdir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0\u0130stek, kambiyo senedine dayal\u0131 takipte borca itiraza ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131\/alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131\/bor\u00e7lu aleyhine 03.04.2008 tarihinde kambiyo senetlerine mahsus haciz yoluyla takibe giri\u015filmi\u015f; \u00f6rnek 10 nolu \u00f6deme emrinin bor\u00e7luya tebli\u011fine dair belge takip dosyas\u0131nda bulunmamakla birlikte, \u015eanl\u0131urfa PTT Merkez M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;nce \u00f6deme emrinin bor\u00e7lu Heybetullah Aksan&#8217;a 07.04.2008 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131\/bor\u00e7lu \u0130cra Mahkemesine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 18.04.2008 tarihli eldeki itiraz\u0131nda; icra takibinden haricen haberdar oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek, borcun t\u00fcm fer&#8217;ileriyle birlikte \u00f6dendi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle takibin iptalini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130cra Mahkemesi, &#8220;\u00f6deme emrinin bor\u00e7luya tebli\u011fine ili\u015fkin mazbatan\u0131n dosyada bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n denetlenemeyece\u011fi, bu itibarla usul\u00fcne uygun\u00a0tebligat\u00a0bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bor\u00e7lunun takipten haberdar oldu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi dava tarihine g\u00f6re itiraz\u0131n yasal be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcrede yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle, &#8220;\u0153takibin iptaline&#8221;\u009d karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6zel Dairece, \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011finin\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi ve tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin de usul\u00fcne uygun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek, yasal s\u00fcre ge\u00e7irildikten sonra yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle reddi gere\u011fine i\u015faretle h\u00fck\u00fcm bozulmu\u015f; Mahkeme ise, bor\u00e7lunun takipten haricen haberdar oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki beyan\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddias\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7erdi\u011fi ve \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011finin\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eleriyle \u00f6nceki karar\u0131nda direnmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere; bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan borcun itfa edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle takibin iptali istemiyle yap\u0131lan itirazda,\u00a0tebligat\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Mahkemece kabul edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, \u00d6zel Daire&#8221;ce \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011finin\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn iddia edilmedi\u011fi benimsenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde \u00f6n sorun olarak; uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ilk aya\u011f\u0131 olan, \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011finin\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair bor\u00e7lunun iddia ve \u015fikayetinin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle\u00a0tebligat\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece incelenip incelenemeyece\u011finin \u00f6ncelikle \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131; buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak da, itiraz\u0131n be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal s\u00fcrede yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adli i\u015flem niteli\u011findeki icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015flem ve kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu \u015fikayet kurumunu d\u00fczenlemi\u015f ve m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck kararlar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilme ya da iptalini \u015fikayet yoluyla ba\u015fvuru halinde \u0130cra Hakimli\u011finin karar\u0131yla olanakl\u0131 k\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eikayet, icra dairelerinin icra hukukuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan ve hadiseye uygun bulunmayan i\u015flemlerinin iptali ve d\u00fczeltilmesini veya yerine getirilmeyen veya sebepsiz s\u00fcr\u00fcncemede b\u0131rak\u0131lan bir hakk\u0131n yerine getirilmesini sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in kabul edilmi\u015f bir kanun yolu olup; \u015fikayetin konusu, sebepleri, taraflar\u0131, s\u00fcresi ve \u015fikayet usul\u00fc ile sonu\u00e7lar\u0131, \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu&#8217;nda ayr\u0131ca d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu noktada, yeri gelmi\u015fken itiraz ile \u015fikayet aras\u0131ndaki farklar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131nda yarar vard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130tiraz, maddi hukuka dayanan sebeplerden dolay\u0131 takibe kar\u015f\u0131 konulmas\u0131, e\u015f s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle takip konusu yap\u0131lan alaca\u011fa ili\u015fkin bulunmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, \u015fikayette icra dairelerinin icra-iflas hukukuna ili\u015fkin i\u015flemlerine y\u00f6neltilmi\u015f bir kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kma s\u00f6z konusudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen bir sebep, niteli\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan icra m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn kendili\u011finden g\u00f6zetmesi gereken bir husus ise, o takdirde \u015fikayet sebebi te\u015fkil eder. \u0130cra m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc kendili\u011finden g\u00f6zetmesi gereken bir hususa uymam\u0131\u015fsa, yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flem kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131ndan, kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 b\u00f6yle bir i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvurulacak yol da \u015fikayet yoludur ( \u0130\u0130K m.16\u00a0).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130tiraz s\u00fcresi tebli\u011f ile ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, \u015fikayet s\u00fcresi \u00f6\u011frenme ( m.16,I ) ile i\u015flemeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi; baz\u0131 hallerde s\u00fcresiz \u015fikayet m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu halde, s\u00fcresiz itiraz olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yine, itirazda bulunmak hakk\u0131 yaln\u0131z bor\u00e7luya ait olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, \u015fikayet yoluna, hukuki yarar\u0131 bulunan bor\u00e7lu alacakl\u0131 ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer de gidebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">K\u0131saca, itiraz ile \u015fikayet aras\u0131nda mahiyet fark\u0131 bulundu\u011fu gibi, tabi bulunduklar\u0131 usul de farkl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Az yukar\u0131da yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda denilebilir ki; bor\u00e7lunun &#8220;\u0153\u00f6deme emrinin usul\u00fcne uygun tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi&#8221;\u009d y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki talebi, maddi hukuka dayal\u0131 bir sebepten kaynaklanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, takip hukukuna ili\u015fkin b\u00f6yle bir talebin \u015fikayet yoluyla ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fi ku\u015fkusuzdur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda; bor\u00e7lunun talebinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a, takip konusu yap\u0131lan alaca\u011f\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla takibe itiraza ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu, \u0130cra Hakimli\u011fine\u00a0tebligat\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin y\u00f6ntemine uygun olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir \u015fikayet bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde bor\u00e7lunun, takip konusu alacaktan kaynaklanan nedenlerle takibin iptalini istedi\u011fi, talebini takip hukukuna ili\u015fkin olan\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebligat iddias\u0131na dayand\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirgin oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re; direnme karar\u0131nda s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen, bor\u00e7lunun &#8220;haricen haberdar oldu\u011funa&#8221;\u009d dair beyan\u0131n\u0131n,\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebligat iddias\u0131n\u0131 da kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin kabul\u00fcne olanak bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle \u00f6n sorunun oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla reddi ile di\u011fer hususlar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesine ge\u00e7ildi:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sonu\u00e7 itibariyle;\u00a0tebligat\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair \u015fikayeti bulunmayan bor\u00e7luya, \u00f6deme emrinin 07.04.2008 tarihinde tebli\u011fine dair i\u015flemin usul\u00fcne uygun yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece kendili\u011finden de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve incelenmesi olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; Yerel Mahkemece, 07.04.2008 \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011f tarihine g\u00f6re, yasal be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre ge\u00e7irildikten sonra 18.04.2008 tarihinde yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken; yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 te\u015fhis ve de\u011ferlendirme sonucu itiraz\u0131n s\u00fcresinde kabul\u00fcne dair \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Direnme karar\u0131 bu nedenle bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Daval\u0131\/alacakl\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131nda ve yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131 H.U.M.K.nun\u00a0429. maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n geri verilmesine, 27.01.2010 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde yap\u0131lan ikinci g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede \u00f6nsorun y\u00f6n\u00fcnden oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile, di\u011fer y\u00f6nlerden oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu karar, kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131m\u0131zdan Ankara 7. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi Hakimi Say\u0131n \u015e\u00fckr\u00fc BOZER taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2009\/12-563<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2009\/600<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 30.12.2009<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 BELED\u0130YE BA\u015eKANLI\u011eI ADINA \u00c7IKARILAN \u00d6DEME EMR\u0130 ( \u00d6ncelikle Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131na Yoksa\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Evrak\u0131nda S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumu ve Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedeninin \u015eerh Edilmesi Gere\u011fi &#8211; Do\u011frudan Genel Evrak Memuruna Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 \u00d6DEME EMR\u0130 ( Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ad\u0131na \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lan &#8211; Do\u011frudan Genel Evrak Memuruna Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu\/\u00d6ncelikle Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131na Yoksa\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Evrak\u0131nda S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumu ve Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedeninin \u015eerh Edilmesi Gere\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 BELED\u0130YE T\u00dcZEL K\u0130\u015e\u0130L\u0130\u011e\u0130 ( Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n Temsil Edece\u011fi &#8211; Adli \u0130\u015flem Niteli\u011fi Ta\u015f\u0131yan Takip \u0130\u015fleminde \u00d6deme Emri\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6ncelikle Bizzat Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131na Alacak Durumda De\u011filse S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filere Yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ad\u0131na \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u00d6deme Emri &#8211; \u00d6ncelikle Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131na Yoksa\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Evrak\u0131nda S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumu ve Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedeninin \u015eerh Edilmesi Gere\u011fi\/Do\u011frudan Genel Evrak Memuruna Yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ad\u0131na \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u00d6deme Emri &#8211; Do\u011frudan Genel Evrak Memuruna Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Oldu\u011fu\/\u00d6ncelikle Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131na Yoksa\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Evrak\u0131nda S\u0131ras\u0131yla Tebli\u011fe Yetkili Ki\u015filerin Durumu ve Tebli\u011f Edilememe Nedeninin \u015eerh Edilmesi Gere\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p>7201\/m.\u00a012,\u00a013<\/p>\n<p>5393\/m.\u00a037,\u00a038,\u00a042<\/p>\n<p>1580\/m.\u00a0100<\/p>\n<p>Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\/m. 17, 18<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, \u015fikayet\u00e7i\/bor\u00e7lu belediye ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u00f6deme emrinin, tebli\u011fe yetkili ki\u015filere\u00a0tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lamama nedenleri tebli\u011f belgesinde g\u00f6sterilmeksizin, do\u011frudan genel evrak memuru imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n usule uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebli\u011f memurunun; belediye t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fini &#8220;Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8221;n\u0131n temsil edece\u011fini g\u00f6zeterek, adli i\u015flem niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yan takip i\u015fleminde \u00f6deme emri tebligat\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6ncelikle bizzat Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131na, onun herhangi bir nedenle tebli\u011fi alacak durumda olmamas\u0131 durumunda da usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan Hukuk \u0130\u015fleri M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc yada belediye avukatlar\u0131ndan birine yapmas\u0131; \u015fayet bunlar yoksa veya\u00a0tebligat\u0131 alamayacak durumda iseler bu durumu tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na \u015ferh ederek o yerde haz\u0131r bulunan tebli\u011fe yetkili memur ve m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine o da yoksa herhangi bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yapmas\u0131;\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda da s\u0131ras\u0131yla tebli\u011fe yetkili ki\u015filerin durumunu ve onlara tebli\u011f edilememe nedenini \u015ferh etmesi gerekirken, hi\u00e7bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermeden do\u011frudan genel evrak memuruna\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yapmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemelere ve yarg\u0131 karalar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u015fikayet davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Bursa 4.\u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesince \u015fikayetin\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebligat y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine dair verilen 16.04.2008 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/61-246 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi \u015fikayet\u00e7i\/bor\u00e7lu vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesinin 03.11.2008 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/15827-19046 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Alacakl\u0131 vekili bor\u00e7lu belediye aleyhine 15.08.2002 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi kesin hakedi\u015f bakiye bedelinin tahsili talebiyle genel haciz yoluyla icra takibine ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en kurumun ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan \u00f6deme emrinin &#8220;g\u00f6sterilen adreste i\u015fyeri ad\u0131na eleman\u0131 Din\u00e7er Mehmet\u00e7ik&#8217;e 11.01.2008 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi&#8221; g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a012. maddesi ile ilgili\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 17\/2 ve 18\/1 maddelerine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f i\u015flemi t\u00fczel ki\u015finin salahiyetli m\u00fcmessiline yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimseler herhangi bir sebeple mutad i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015fyerinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 veya o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde olduklar\u0131 taktirde tebli\u011f, h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n o yerdeki memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r. D\u00fczenlemesine yer verilmi\u015ftir. 1580 Say\u0131l\u0131 Belediye Kanununun\u00a0100. maddesine g\u00f6re Belediyeyi Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 temsi eder. O halde \u00f6deme emri yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere bizzat belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131na tebli\u011f edilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f i\u015fleminde tebli\u011f memurunca belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n veya ondan sonraki yetkili ki\u015finin belediyede olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu haliyle yap\u0131lan bu tebli\u011f i\u015flemi\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr. Mahkemece\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunun 32. maddesi uyar\u0131nca \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i bor\u00e7lu belediyenin \u015fikayeti kabul edilerek \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011f tarihinin\u00a0tebligattan haberdar olduklar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri 28.01.2008 tarihi olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7e ile bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fkin istemin reddi isabetsizdir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle,yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0\u0130stek, icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015flemini \u015fikayete ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7lu belediye ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, aleyhine ba\u015flat\u0131lan ilams\u0131z icra takibinde \u00f6deme emrinin yetkililerin orada bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmadan belediyenin evrak memuruna tebli\u011f edildi\u011finden bu tebli\u011fin\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011funu ve ayr\u0131ca buusuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebligatla kesinle\u015fen icra takibinde g\u00f6nderilen haciz ihbarnameleri ile kamuya tahsis edilmi\u015f banka hesaplar\u0131 \u00fczerine haks\u0131z haciz ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek eldeki \u015fikayeti yapm\u0131\u015f; mahkemece, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile davac\u0131 belediye ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ait Vak\u0131flar Bankas\u0131 ve Halk Bankas\u0131 Hal \u015eubesi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ait hesaplar \u00fczerindeki haczin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, davac\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0tebligatla ilgili \u015fikayetininise reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fc \u015fikayet\u00e7i\/bor\u00e7lu belediye vekili reddedilen ( tebli\u011fin\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin ) talepleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz etmi\u015f; kar\u015f\u0131 taraf temyiz etmedi\u011finden karar\u0131n haczin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131 kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6zel Dairece, ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne aynen al\u0131nan nedenlerle tebli\u011fin\u00a0usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne i\u015faretle karar bozulmu\u015f; mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 \u015fikayet\u00e7i\/belediye temyize getirmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme yoluyla Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k: \u015fikayet\u00e7i\/bor\u00e7lu belediye ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u00f6deme emrinin, tebli\u011fe yetkili ki\u015filere\u00a0tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lamama nedenleri tebli\u011f belgesinde g\u00f6sterilmeksizin, do\u011frudan genel evrak memuru imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n usule uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ncelikle t\u00fczel ki\u015filere yap\u0131lacak\u00a0tebligata ili\u015fkin yasal d\u00fczenlemelerin irdelenmesinde yarar vard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slara Ve Ticarethanelere Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 12. maddesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slara tebli\u011f, salahiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine, bunlar birden ziyade ise, yaln\u0131z birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir ticarethanenin muamelelerinden do\u011fan ihtilaflarda, ticari m\u00fcmessiline yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f muteberdir.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slar\u0131n Memur Ve M\u00fcstahdemlerine Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 13. maddesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slar nam\u0131na kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimseler her hangi bir sebeple m\u00fbtat i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015f yerinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 veya o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alam\u0131yacak bir halde olduklar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f, orada haz\u0131r bulunan memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fck\u00fcmleri yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yine,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slara Ve Ticarethanelere Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 17. maddesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slara tebli\u011f salahiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine, bunlar birden ziyade ise yaln\u0131z birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Vekaletlerin ve bunlar\u0131n te\u015fkilat\u0131n\u0131n, m\u00fclhak ve hususi b\u00fct\u00e7eli idarelerle belediyelerin, k\u00f6ylerin ve hususi kanunlar\u0131na m\u00fcsteniden kurulmu\u015f olan te\u015fekk\u00fcllerle, \u015firketlerin ve cemiyetlerin salahiyetli olduklar\u0131 m\u00fcmessilleri tabi kanunlara ve stat\u00fclerine g\u00f6re tayin edilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckmi ve hakiki \u015fahsa ait bir ticarethanenin muamelelerinden do\u011fan ihtilaflarda, ticarethanenin o muamelede salahiyetli ticari m\u00fcmessiline yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f muteberdir.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;H\u00fckmi \u015eah\u0131slar\u0131n Memur Ve M\u00fcstahdemlerine Tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 18. maddesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Yukar\u0131ki Madde mucibince tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimseler herhangi bir sebeple mutat i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015fyerinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 veya o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alam\u0131yacak bir halde olduklar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f, h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n o yerdeki memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu kadar ki, kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak memur veya m\u00fcstahdemin, h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n yerdeki te\u015fkilat\u0131 veya personeli i\u00e7inde vazife itibariyle\u00a0tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131 olan h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n m\u00fcmessilinden sonra gelen bir kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi esasen bu kabil i\u015flerle tavzif edilmi\u015f bir \u015fah\u0131s olmas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bunlar\u0131n da bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda tesbit edildi\u011fi takdirde\u00a0tebligat, o yerdeki di\u011fer bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yap\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">D\u00fczenlemelerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir ki, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine yukar\u0131da aynen yer verilen yebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 12. ve 13. ve Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 17. ve 18. maddelerinde t\u00fczel ki\u015filere tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lma usul\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f;\u00a0tebligat\u0131n, bunlar\u0131n tabi olduklar\u0131 kanunlara ve stat\u00fclerine g\u00f6re belirlenecek yetkili temsilcilerine, e\u011fer t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisi yoksa veya evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde ise; g\u00f6rev itibariyle temsilciden sonra gelen kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi bu i\u015fle g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f bir ki\u015fiye, o da yoksa t\u00fczel ki\u015finin o yerdeki memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine, yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. E\u011fer,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0t\u00fczel ki\u015finin yetkili temsilcisine yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve s\u0131ral\u0131 ki\u015filere yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, bunun nedenlerinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 gere\u011fine de i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hemen burada, aleyhine takip yap\u0131lan ve \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011f edilen &#8220;Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; olmakla,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 17\/2 maddesi gere\u011fince, onun ad\u0131na tebli\u011fe yetkili kimselerin kimler oldu\u011funun, tabi olduklar\u0131 kanunlara ve stat\u00fclerine g\u00f6re belirlenmesine y\u00f6nelik olarak 5393 say\u0131l\u0131 Belediyeler Kanunu&#8217;nun ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmleri de de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5393 Say\u0131l\u0131 Belediyeler Kanunu&#8217;nun:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 37. maddesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131, belediye idaresinin ba\u015f\u0131 ve belediye t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011finin temsilcisidir. Belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131, ilgili kanunda g\u00f6sterilen esas ve us\u00fbllere g\u00f6re se\u00e7ilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131, g\u00f6revinin devam\u0131 s\u00fcresince siyasi partilerin y\u00f6netim ve denetim organlar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev alamaz; profesyonel spor kul\u00fcplerinin ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yapamaz ve y\u00f6netiminde bulunamaz.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n G\u00f6rev Ve Yetkileri&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 38. maddesinin ( a ) ve ( c ) bentlerinde,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6rev ve yetkileri \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a ) Belediye te\u015fkil\u00e2t\u0131n\u0131n en \u00fcst amiri olarak belediye te\u015fkil\u00e2t\u0131n\u0131 sevk ve idare etmek, belediyenin hak ve menfaatlerini korumak.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">c ) Belediyeyi Devlet dairelerinde ve t\u00f6renlerde, davac\u0131 veya daval\u0131 olarak da yarg\u0131 yerlerinde temsil etmek veya vekil tayin etmek.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Yetki Devri&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 42. maddesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131, g\u00f6rev ve yetkilerinden bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 uygun g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc takdirde, y\u00f6neticilik s\u0131fat\u0131 bulunan belediye g\u00f6revlilerine devredebilir.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Denilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan bu yasal d\u00fczenlemeler ortaya koymaktad\u0131r ki, belediye t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fini temsil ile yetkili ki\u015fi &#8220;Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8221; d\u0131r ve g\u00f6rev ile yetkilerinden bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 uygun g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc takdirde ancak &#8220;y\u00f6neticilik s\u0131fat\u0131 bulunan&#8221; belediye g\u00f6revlilerine devredebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Burada \u00f6nemle \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gereken husus, yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcndeki temsilin ne \u015fekilde olaca\u011f\u0131 ve bunun yap\u0131lacak tebli\u011fle ili\u015fkisidir. Gerek ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer gerek t\u00fczel ki\u015filer yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde ya bizzat ya da Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmleri de g\u00f6zetilerek avukat s\u0131fat\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan vekilleri vas\u0131tas\u0131yla i\u015flem yapabilirler.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim, konuya ili\u015fkin Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 20.09.2006 g\u00fcn ve 2006\/12-561-535 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda; takibe itiraz eden ki\u015finin &#8220;Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8221; olmay\u0131p, onun yetkilendirdi\u011fi m\u00fcd\u00fcr konumundaki ki\u015fi oldu\u011fu durumda, takibe itiraz eden ki\u015finin avukat ( Belediye vekili ) olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, &#8220;Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8221;n\u0131 temsil yetkisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en taraf\u0131ndan icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015f ve bu kararda takip i\u015fleminin Avukatl\u0131k Kanunun 35. maddesi uyar\u0131nca adli i\u015flem niteli\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131makla bu vekilin baroda yaz\u0131l\u0131 avukat olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, &#8220;Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8221;n\u0131n bu yetkisini herhangi bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme veya y\u00f6netmelik ile bu s\u0131fat\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mayan ki\u015filere devredemeyece\u011fi, gerek\u00e7esine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Takibe itiraz\u0131n bizzat &#8220;Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8221; veya &#8220;onun vekil tayin etti\u011fi avukat s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan ki\u015fi&#8221; taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gere\u011fi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, itiraz s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131na esas al\u0131nan \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011fi de b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hemen belirtmelidir ki,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ile ilgili yasa ve t\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tamamen \u015feklidir. De\u011finilen i\u015flemler nedeniyle bilgilendirme yan\u0131nda belgelendirme \u00f6zelli\u011fi de bulunan bir usul i\u015flemi olmakla, gerek tebli\u011f i\u015flemi ve gerekse tebli\u011f tarihi ancak yasa ve t\u00fcz\u00fckte emredilen \u015fekillerle tevsik ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ispat olunabilir. Bu sebeple\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul yasalar\u0131 ile ili\u015fkisi de daima g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanun ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn amac\u0131\u00a0tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131na en k\u0131sa zamanda ula\u015fmas\u0131, konusu ile ilgili olan ki\u015filerin bilgilendirilmesi ve bu hususlar\u0131n belgeye ba\u011flanmas\u0131d\u0131r. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, yasa ve t\u00fcz\u00fck h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin en ufak ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131na kadar uygulanmas\u0131 zorunludur.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu ile T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;nde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fekilde i\u015flem yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a tebli\u011f memuru taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyan onun m\u00fccerret s\u00f6z\u00fcnden ibaret kal\u0131r ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla belgelendirilmi\u015f say\u0131lmaz. Nitekim, Kanunun ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn belirledi\u011fi \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve belgelendirilmemi\u015f olan\u00a0tebligatlar\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olmayaca\u011f\u0131 yerle\u015fik yarg\u0131sal i\u00e7tihatlarda da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer taraftan, t\u0131pk\u0131 yarg\u0131lamada oldu\u011fu gibi, icra takibinin sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi, itirazlar\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi ve takibin s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131labilmesi, ancak, taraflar\u0131n icra takibinden usul\u00fcnce haberdar edilmesi ile olanakl\u0131d\u0131r. Zira, takip bor\u00e7lusunun hangi icra dairesinde aleyhine takip bulundu\u011funu, hakk\u0131ndaki taleplerin nelerden ibaret oldu\u011funu bilmesi ve varsa itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 zaman\u0131nda ve do\u011fru merciiye y\u00f6neltebilmesi\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nda ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;nde a\u00e7\u0131klanan usule uygun\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile sa\u011flanabilir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, davetiyenin ve tebli\u011f bilgilerini i\u00e7eren zarf\u0131n, takipteki \u00f6nemi b\u00fcy\u00fckt\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An\u0131lan yasal d\u00fczenlemeler ve i\u00e7tihatlar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda,\u00a0tebligat\u0131 yapan memurun, \u00f6ncelikle 5393 Say\u0131l\u0131 Belediyeler .Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a037. ve\u00a038\/c maddeleri gere\u011fince belediye t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011finin yetkili temsilcisi olan Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131na, olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan Hukuk \u0130\u015fleri M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc yada belediye avukatlar\u0131ndan birine \u00f6deme emrini tebli\u011f etmesi, bunlar yoksa veya tebligat\u0131 alamayacak durumda iseler bu durumu tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na \u015ferh ederek haz\u0131r bulunan memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine tebligat\u0131 yapmas\u0131, kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak memur veya m\u00fcstahdemin belediyenin te\u015fkilat\u0131 veya personeli i\u00e7inde vazife itibariyle tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131 olan h\u00fckmi \u015fahs\u0131n m\u00fcmessilinden sonra gelen bir kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi esasen bu kabil i\u015flerle g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f kimse olmas\u0131 gere\u011fini g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne almas\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n da bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde ancak o yerdeki di\u011fer bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdemetebligat\u0131 yapmas\u0131 gerekir. Daha da \u00f6nemlisi, tebli\u011f memuru,\u00a0tebligat\u0131 yetkili temsilciye yapmama ve s\u0131ral\u0131 ki\u015filere yapma nedenlerini de a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na yazmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim, ayn\u0131 ilkeler\u00a0Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 20.09.2006 g\u00fcn ve 2006\/12-561\u00a0esas-2006\/535 karar; 04.04.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2007\/12-200 esas-2007\/187 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131nda da vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda; alacakl\u0131 \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu\/\u015fikayet\u00e7i Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aleyhine 10.01.2008 tarihinde ilams\u0131z takibe giri\u015filerek, toplam 672.910,03 YTL tutar\u0131ndaki alaca\u011f\u0131n tahsili istenmi\u015ftir. Bor\u00e7lu, &#8220;Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u00f6deme emri &#8220;g\u00f6sterilen adreste i\u015fyeri ad\u0131na eleman\u0131 Din\u00e7er Mehmet\u00e7ik imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi&#8221; kayd\u0131yla 11.01.2008 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0par\u00e7as\u0131nda ba\u015fkaca herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verilmedi\u011fi gibi belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n veya ondan sonraki yetkili ki\u015finin belediyede olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve nedenleri de \u015ferh edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Oysa, yukar\u0131da da ayr\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131 ile a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, tebli\u011f memurunun; belediye t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fini &#8220;Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8221;n\u0131n temsil edece\u011fini g\u00f6zeterek, adli i\u015flem niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yan takip i\u015fleminde \u00f6deme emri tebligat\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6ncelikle bizzat Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131na, onun herhangi bir nedenle tebli\u011fi alacak durumda olmamas\u0131 durumunda da usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan Hukuk \u0130\u015fleri M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc yada belediye avukatlar\u0131ndan birine yapmas\u0131; \u015fayet bunlar yoksa veyatebligat\u0131 alamayacak durumda iseler bu durumu tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na \u015ferh ederek o yerde haz\u0131r bulunan tebli\u011fe yetkili memur ve m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine o da yoksa herhangi bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yapmas\u0131;\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda da s\u0131ras\u0131yla tebli\u011fe yetkili ki\u015filerin durumunu ve onlara tebli\u011f edilememe nedenini \u015ferh etmesi gerekirken, hi\u00e7bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermeden do\u011frudan genel evrak memuruna\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yapmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemelere ve yarg\u0131 karalar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 tebli\u011fin h\u00fckm\u00fc ise 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a032.maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f; tebli\u011f usul\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa bile, muhatap tebli\u011fe muttali olmu\u015f ise ge\u00e7erli say\u0131l\u0131p, muhatab\u0131n beyan etti\u011fi tarihin tebli\u011f tarihi olarak kabul edilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde, ayn\u0131 hususlara i\u015faret eden \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131na uyularak, \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i bor\u00e7lu belediyenin \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011finin\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik \u015fikayetinin kabul\u00fc ile tebli\u011f tarihinin\u00a0tebligattan haberdar olundu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen &#8220;28.01.2008&#8221; olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine karar verilmesi gerekirken, \u00f6nceki kararda direnilerek \u015fikayetin reddine karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle direnme karar\u0131 bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0\u015eikayet\u00e7i\/bor\u00e7lu vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131nda ve yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131 H.U.M.K.nun\u00a0429.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n geri verilmesine, 30.12.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde yap\u0131lan ikinci g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2012\/11-1582<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2013\/243<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 7.5.2013<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 DEFTER VE BELGELER\u0130 G\u0130ZLEME SU\u00c7U ( Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n San\u0131\u011fa Tebli\u011fi \u0130\u015flemi Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve Aleyhine G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f \u0130\u00e7eren Tebli\u011fnamenin San\u0131\u011fa Tebli\u011fi Sa\u011flan\u0131lmadan Temyiz \u0130ncelemesi Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130sabetsiz Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130Z \u0130NCELEMES\u0130 ( San\u0131\u011fa Yerel Mahkeme Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n Tebli\u011fi Usul\u00fcne Uygun Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/San\u0131\u011fa D\u00fczelterek Onama \u0130stemli Olmas\u0131ndan Dolay\u0131 Aleyhine G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f \u0130\u00e7eren Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tebli\u011fnamesinin Tebli\u011f Edilmedi\u011fi\/Temyiz \u0130ncelemesi Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130sabetsiz Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Defter ve Belgeleri Gizleme Su\u00e7u )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 GEREK\u00c7EL\u0130 KARARIN\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130 ( Defter ve Belgeleri Gizleme Su\u00e7u\/San\u0131\u011fa Yap\u0131lan Tebli\u011fin San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Bilinen Son Adresi Yerine \u0130ddianamede G\u00f6sterilen ve Terk Etti\u011fi Anla\u015f\u0131lan Eski Adresinde Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n Yasaya Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Gerek\u00e7eli Karar Usul\u00fcne Uygun Tebli\u011f Edilmeden Temyiz \u0130ncelemesi Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n Do\u011fru G\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 YARGITAY CUMHUR\u0130YET BA\u015eSAVCILI\u011eI TEBL\u0130\u011eNAMES\u0130N\u0130N TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130 ( San\u0131\u011fa D\u00fczelterek Onama \u0130stemli Olmas\u0131ndan Dolay\u0131 Aleyhine G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f \u0130\u00e7eren Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tebli\u011fnamesinin Tebli\u011f Edilmeden Temyiz \u0130ncelemesi Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130sabetsiz Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Defter ve Belgeleri Gizleme Su\u00e7u )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1412\/m.316<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.35<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Dava, defter ve belgeleri gizleme su\u00e7una ili\u015fkindir. Yoklu\u011funda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011fa,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun 35. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011f edilmesi, yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilinen son adresi yerine iddianamede g\u00f6sterilen ve terk etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan eski adresinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131, daha \u00f6nce bu adrese adli mercilerce usul\u00fcnce bir\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ve bu adresin 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a035\u00a0\/son maddesi kapsam\u0131nda say\u0131lan adreslerden bulunmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011fa yerel mahkeme gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi usul\u00fcne uygun olmay\u0131p ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. Kald\u0131 ki ; gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi kabul edilse bile, san\u0131\u011fa d\u00fczelterek onama istemli olmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 aleyhine g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f i\u00e7eren Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 tebli\u011fnamesinin tebli\u011f edilmeden temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 da 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun, 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a08. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 316. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Zira an\u0131lan madde uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etmeleri halinde veya aleyhlerine sonu\u00e7 do\u011furabilecek g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f i\u00e7ermesi durumunda, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen tebli\u011fnamenin san\u0131k veya m\u00fcdafii ile kat\u0131lan veya vekiline tebli\u011f edilmesi gerekmektedir. Adil yarg\u0131lanma ve savunma hakk\u0131 ile ilgili bulunan bu h\u00fck\u00fcm emredici nitelikte olup, uyulmas\u0131 zorunludur. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011fi i\u015fleminin usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve aleyhine g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f i\u00e7eren tebli\u011fnamenin san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011fi sa\u011flan\u0131lmadan temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Defter ve belgeleri gizleme su\u00e7undan san\u0131k Abdurrahman&#8217;\u0131n 213 say\u0131l\u0131 Vergi Usul Kanununun\u00a0359\/a-2 ve 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a06. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve ertelemeye ili\u015fkin, \u00dcsk\u00fcdar 3. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 06.02.2009 g\u00fcn ve 966-64 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesinin 28.02.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/166-2438 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; Dosyada mevcut vergi su\u00e7u ve vergi inceleme raporlar\u0131ndan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temsilcisi oldu\u011fu \u015firketin ticari faaliyetini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, defter ve belgelerin ibraz\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan yaz\u0131n\u0131n 14.03.2005 tarihinde i\u015fyeri adresinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan personele tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, faaliyetini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lan san\u0131\u011fa 213 say\u0131l\u0131 Vergi Usul Yasas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0139\/2. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen istisnalardan birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6nceden belirlenmeden yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n hukuki ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 cihetle, m\u00fcsnet su\u00e7un yasal unsurlar\u0131 itibariyle olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraati yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmesi&#8230;&#8221;,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130sabetsizli\u011finden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise 12.04.2012 g\u00fcn ve 200103 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c&#8230; Somut olayda, ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en \u015firketin ger\u00e7ek al\u0131m sat\u0131m kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olmayan sahte fatura ticareti amac\u0131yla kuruldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015f, san\u0131k da savunmas\u0131nda &#8216;paraya ihtiyac\u0131m vard\u0131. P\u2026 ad\u0131nda bir \u015firket oldu\u011funu bilmiyorum. Sadece bana para verdiler. Baz\u0131 ki\u015filer bana \u015firket a\u00e7\u0131yoruz dediler, para kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ben de noterde baz\u0131 k\u00e2\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131 imzalad\u0131m. Bana imza att\u0131ran ki\u015finin ad\u0131 \u00d6nder&#8217;dir. Soyad\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlam\u0131yorum. Sahte evrak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini bilmiyordum, kand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131m&#8217; demi\u015ftir. Bu savunmaya itibar edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Su\u00e7tan kurtulmaya ve ibraz\u0131 istenen defter ve belgeleri gizlemeye y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir. Yine de her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ku\u015fkunun giderilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikletebligat\u0131 alan Saime ile 09.04.2004 tarihli i\u015fe ba\u015flama tutana\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan olarak isimleri ge\u00e7en Ramazan ve Y\u0131ld\u0131z &#8216;\u0131n tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla dinlenmesi, \u015firketin san\u0131k ile ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle sonucuna g\u00f6re,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yoluyla defter ve belgelerin istenmesinin ve incelemenin dairede yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti gerekmektedir&#8230;\u201d,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle itiraz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurarak, \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn eksik soru\u015fturma nedeniyle bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmesi isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">CMK&#8217;nun\u00a0308. maddesi uyar\u0131nca dosyan\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesinin 28.11.2012 g\u00fcn ve 22312-20556 say\u0131 ile, itiraz nedenlerinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden bahisle Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0\u00d6zel Daire ile Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; h\u00fckm\u00fcn eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma nedeni ile bozulmas\u0131 gerekip gerekmedi\u011finin belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin ise de; \u00f6ncelikle gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011fi i\u015fleminin usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve aleyhine g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f i\u00e7eren tebli\u011fnamenin san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011fi sa\u011flan\u0131lmadan temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n isabetli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ncelenen dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ddianamede san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adresinin \u201c\u0130nk\u0131lap Mahallesi, K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcksu Caddesi, Y&#8230; Sokak, No: &#8230; \u00dcmraniye\/\u0130stanbul\u201d olarak g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi, adli mercilerce daha \u00f6nce bu adrese usul\u00fcne uygun bir\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusunda \u201cA\u015fa\u011f\u0131dudullu Mahallesi, Z&#8230; Sokak, No: &#8230; \u00dcmraniye\u201d adresini beyan etti\u011fi, 17.09.2008 tarihli zab\u0131ta ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu adreste 5\/2 numarada oturdu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn tefhiminin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, yerel mahkemece san\u0131\u011fa gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n iddianamede g\u00f6sterilen adresinde\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun 35. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edildi\u011fi, Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 07.12.2011 g\u00fcn ve 200103 say\u0131l\u0131 d\u00fczelterek onama istemli tebli\u011fnamesinin san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011fi sa\u011flan\u0131lmadan temyiz incelemesinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz mahkemesince bir temyiz davas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclebilmesi i\u00e7in, temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 olanlar\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fc tefhim veya tebli\u011f yoluyla \u00f6\u011frenmeleri kanuni bir zorunluluktur. Nitekim 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nun \u201cKararlar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ve tebli\u011fi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 35. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; \u201cKoruma tedbirlerine ili\u015fkin olanlar hari\u00e7, aleyhine kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulabilecek h\u00e2kim veya mahkeme kararlar\u0131, haz\u0131r bulunamayan ilgilisine tebli\u011f olunur\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Bu sa\u011flanmadan, yani kararlar\u0131n ilgili b\u00fct\u00fcn taraflara usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011fi tamamlanmadan sadece bir taraf\u0131n ba\u015fvurusu ile temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lamayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz s\u00fcresinin ilgili taraf a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamas\u0131 i\u00e7in tebli\u011fin usul\u00fcne uygun olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekecek, aksi takdirde temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamayacakt\u0131r. Tebli\u011fin usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu gerek h\u00fckm\u00fc veren mahkemece, gerekse temyiz merciince re&#8217;sen incelenecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011fa yoklu\u011funda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun 35. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi belirtildi\u011finden, tebli\u011fin usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bu maddenin ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun 35. maddesi, san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 16.03.2009 itibariyle \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Kendisine veya adresine kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi usullere g\u00f6re tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan kimse, adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirirse, yenisini hemen tebli\u011fi yapt\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olan kaza merciine bildirmeye mecburdur. Bu takdirde bundan sonraki tebli\u011fler bildirilen yeni adrese yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adresini de\u011fi\u015ftiren kimse yenisini bildirmedi\u011fi ve yeni adres tebli\u011f memurunca da tespit edilemedi\u011fi takdirde tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131n bir n\u00fcshas\u0131 eski adrese ait binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na as\u0131l\u0131r ve as\u0131lma tarihi, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bundan sonra eski adrese \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebli\u011fler muhataba yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daha \u00f6nce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olsa bile, taraflar aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan, imzas\u0131 resmi merciler \u00f6n\u00fcnde ikrar olunmu\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde belirtilen adresler ile kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131 ve kamu kurumu niteli\u011findeki meslek kurulu\u015flar\u0131na, ticaret sicillerine ve esnaf ve sanatk\u00e2rlar sicillerine verilen en son adreslerdeki de\u011fi\u015fiklikler hakk\u0131nda da bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Kanununun 35. maddesinin 1, 2 ve 3. f\u0131kralar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7erli olabilmesi i\u00e7in; ilgilinin kendisine veya ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131labilecek kimselere bu adreste kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi usullere g\u00f6re tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, ilgilinin adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirmesine kar\u015f\u0131n yeni adresini yarg\u0131 merciine bildirmemesi ve yeni adresin tebli\u011f memurunca da tespit edilememesi, 4. f\u0131kra uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7erli olabilmesi i\u00e7in ise; yine ilgilinin adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirmesine kar\u015f\u0131n yeni adresini yarg\u0131 merciine bildirmemesi, yeni adresin tebli\u011f memurunca tespit edilememesi ve tebligat yap\u0131lacak adresin maddede say\u0131lan adreslerden olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere kendi beyan\u0131 ile veya tebli\u011f memurunca yeni adresi tespit edilen bir kimseye bu adresine tebligat \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmadan eski adresine 35. madde uyar\u0131nca\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131labilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a0tebligat\u00a0esaslar\u0131na ili\u015fkin genel h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011findeki 10. maddesinin; &#8220;Tebligat, tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahsa bilinen en son adresinde yap\u0131l\u0131r&#8221; \u015feklindeki amir h\u00fckm\u00fc de bu hususu peki\u015ftirmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011felendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yoklu\u011funda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011fa, 16.03.2009 tarihinde &#8220;\u0130nk\u0131lap Mahallesi, K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcksu Caddesi, Yelkenciler Sokak, No:36 \u00dcmraniye\u201d adresinde\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun 35. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011f edilmesi, yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilinen son adresi yerine iddianamede g\u00f6sterilen ve terk etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan eski adresinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131, daha \u00f6nce bu adrese adli mercilerce usul\u00fcnce bir\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ve bu adresin 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a035\/son maddesi kapsam\u0131nda say\u0131lan adreslerden bulunmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011fa yerel mahkeme gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi usul\u00fcne uygun olmay\u0131p ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. Temyiz incelemesinin yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011fi, verdi\u011fi takdirde temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a08\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 316\/1. maddesine g\u00f6re kat\u0131lana tebli\u011f edilmesi ve yap\u0131lacak t\u00fcm butebligatlara ili\u015fkin evrak\u0131n eklenmesi amac\u0131yla dosyan\u0131n mahalline iadesi gerekmektedir. \u00d6te yandan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etmesi durumunda Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca ek tebli\u011fname d\u00fczenlenmesi ve tebli\u011fnamenin tebli\u011fi zorunlulu\u011fu da do\u011facakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kald\u0131 ki ; gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi kabul edilse bile, san\u0131\u011fa d\u00fczelterek onama istemli olmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 aleyhine g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f i\u00e7eren Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 tebli\u011fnamesinin tebli\u011f edilmeden temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 da 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun, 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a08. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 316. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Zira an\u0131lan madde uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etmeleri halinde veya aleyhlerine sonu\u00e7 do\u011furabilecek g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f i\u00e7ermesi durumunda, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen tebli\u011fnamenin san\u0131k veya m\u00fcdafii ile kat\u0131lan veya vekiline tebli\u011f edilmesi gerekmektedir. Adil yarg\u0131lanma ve savunma hakk\u0131 ile ilgili bulunan bu h\u00fck\u00fcm emredici nitelikte olup, uyulmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla, itiraz\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7eyle kabul\u00fcne, \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, san\u0131\u011fa gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ve tebli\u011fnamenin usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011fi sa\u011flan\u0131p, sonucuna g\u00f6re temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n \u00d6zel Daireye g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7eyle KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesinin 28.02.2012 g\u00fcn ve 166-2438 say\u0131l\u0131 bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- San\u0131\u011fa gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ve tebli\u011fnamenin usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011finden sonra temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 07.05.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2012\/7-1318<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2013\/108<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 26.3.2013<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 F\u0130K\u0130R VE SANAT ESERLER\u0130 KANUNU&#8217;NA AYKIRILIK ( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Soru\u015fturma A\u015famas\u0131nda Saptanan Adresine\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Bu Adreste \u0130kamet Etmedi\u011finin Tespit Edildi\u011fi &#8211; Bu Adrese Sonraki Bir Tarihte Yap\u0131lan\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n 7201 S.K. Md.\/35-1-2-3 Kapsam\u0131nda Ge\u00e7erli Olmayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Daha \u00d6nce Oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Adresine Saptama Sonucu Tekrar\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n 7201 S.K. Md.\/35-4 Kapsam\u0131nda Kabul Edilemeyece\u011fi &#8211; 5846 S.K.&#8217;ya Ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 SANI\u011eIN \u0130KAMET ETMED\u0130\u011e\u0130 ADRES\u0130NE YEN\u0130DEN\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0YAPILMASI ( 7201 S.K. Md.\/35-4 Kapsam\u0131nda Kabul Edilemeyece\u011fi &#8211; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Sonradan Belirlenen Adresine Yap\u0131lan Tebli\u011f \u00dczerine Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Temyiz \u0130steminin Kanuni S\u00fcresinde Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Kabul Edilece\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEBL\u0130GAT KANUNU 35. MADDE UYARINCA\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Soru\u015fturma A\u015famas\u0131nda Saptanan Adresine\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Bu Adreste \u0130kamet Etmedi\u011finin Tespit Edildi\u011fi &#8211; Bu Adrese SonraYap\u0131lanTebligat\u0131n 7201 S.K. Md.\/35-1-2-3 Kapsam\u0131nda Ge\u00e7erli Olmayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130Z BA\u015eVURUSU ( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Sonradan Belirlenen Adresine Yap\u0131lan Tebli\u011f \u00dczerine Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Temyiz \u0130steminin Kanuni S\u00fcresinde Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Kabul Edilece\u011fi &#8211; 5846 S.K.&#8217;ya Ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.35<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5846\/m.81<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a05846 say\u0131l\u0131 kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unda, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011finin ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak da, \u00d6zel Dairenin temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rarak temyiz incelemesi yapmas\u0131n\u0131n isabetli bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktalar\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda saptanan adresinde kendisine hi\u00e7bir tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu adreste ikamet etmedi\u011fi, duru\u015fma davetiyesine ili\u015fkin tebli\u011f belgesine verilen cevap ve\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na verilen me\u015fruhatla sabittir. Bu itibarla daha sonraki tarihte yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fi,7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunun\u00a035. maddesinin 1, 2 ve 3. f\u0131kralar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli saymak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 oturumda adresi, saptanm\u0131\u015f ise de, bu belirleme 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a035. maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kabul edilemez, zira san\u0131\u011f\u0131n saptanan bu adreste ikamet etmedi\u011fi daha \u00f6nceden yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rma ile sabittir. Nitekim mahkemece de, bu adreste san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle hakk\u0131nda zorla getirme karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak, savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nabilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunun\u00a035\/4. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn somut olayda uygulanma ihtimali bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonradan belirlenen adresine yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f \u00fczerine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyiz isteminin kanuni s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcnde zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a05846 say\u0131l\u0131 kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan san\u0131k E. K.&#8217;n\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanunun\u00a081\/9-1-a ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;nun 62. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 2 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin, \u0130zmir 1. Fikri ve S\u0131nai Haklar Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 24.07.2007 g\u00fcn ve 664-634 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, \u0130zmir 1. Fikri ve S\u0131nai Haklar Ceza Mahkemesince 08.04.2008 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/17 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131 ile verilen temyiz istemin reddi karar\u0131n\u0131n da san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesiyle dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 7. Ceza Dairesinin 07.12.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/6388-23951 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha \u00f6nce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmayan adresinde\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun 35. maddesine g\u00f6re karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, temyiz s\u00fcresinde kabul edilerek, temyiz iste\u011finin reddine ili\u015fkin 18.04.2008 g\u00fcn ve 664-17 say\u0131l\u0131 karar kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, 24.07.2007 g\u00fcnl\u00fc h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik olarak yap\u0131lan incelemede,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5728 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile 5846 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunda yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikliklerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekmesi ve ayn\u0131 Kanunun\u00a0562. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 uygulamas\u0131 olanakl\u0131 hale geldi\u011finden, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;nun\u00a07. maddesi g\u00f6zetilerek, yasal ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n saptanmas\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re uygulama yapma g\u00f6revinin de yerel mahkemeye ait bulunmas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu&#8230;&#8221;,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle di\u011fer y\u00f6nleri incelenmeyen h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise 21.03.2012 g\u00fcn ve 18153 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; San\u0131k soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda &#8216;\u00d6zmen Cad. \u00c7atap Apt. No: 120\/4 Buca\/\u0130zmir&#8217; adresinde oturdu\u011funu Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununun 147. maddesine g\u00f6re d\u00fczenlenen 14.06.2006 tarihli ifade verme tutana\u011f\u0131 ile bildirmi\u015ftir. San\u0131k 24.01.2007 tarihli duru\u015fmada da &#8216;iddianamedeki adreste oturur&#8217; bi\u00e7iminde daha \u00f6nce bildirdi\u011fi Buca\/\u0130zmir adresinde oturdu\u011funa dair yap\u0131lan adres teyidine bir itiraz da bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. San\u0131k daha sonra bilinmeyen bir tarihte, \u0130zmir ilinden Tunceli iline ta\u015f\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, fakat bu de\u011fi\u015fiklikleri ne en son oturdu\u011fu mahalle muhtarl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ne de hakk\u0131ndaki yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkemeye hi\u00e7bir surette bildirmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035\/1. maddesi, &#8216;Kendisine veya adresine kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi usullere g\u00f6re tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan kimse, adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirirse, yenisini hemen tebli\u011fi yapt\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olan kaza merciine bildirmeye mecburdur.&#8217; h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Yine ayn\u0131 maddenin 2011 y\u0131l\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi \u00f6ncesi y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 ise; &#8216;Adresini de\u011fi\u015ftiren kimse yenisini bildirmedi\u011fi ve yeni adres tebli\u011f memurunca da tespit edilemedi\u011fi takdirde tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131n bir n\u00fcshas\u0131 eski adrese ait binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na as\u0131l\u0131r ve as\u0131lma tarihi, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r&#8217; kural\u0131n\u0131 getirmektedir. Bu kurallar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fini bildirmeyen ve daha \u00f6nce resmi merciler huzurunda bildirdi\u011fi adrese\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 35. maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7erli say\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olaya benzer bi\u00e7imdeki bir tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin Y\u00fcksek Ceza Genel Kurulu, 31.01.2012 tarih ve 249-1 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7eyle kabul etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay irdelendi\u011finde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8216;San\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha \u00f6nce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmayan adresinde\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 35.maddesine g\u00f6re karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, temyiz s\u00fcresinde kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi\u2026&#8217; y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmak \u015fu nedenlerle imkans\u0131zd\u0131r;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, haz\u0131rl\u0131k a\u015famas\u0131nda bildirdi\u011fi ve daha sonra sorgusunda teyid etti\u011fi adrese yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f ge\u00e7erlidir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc san\u0131k adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fini hi\u00e7bir surette resmi mercilere veya mahkemeye bildirmemi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n resmi mercilere beyan etti\u011fi adresine\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 35. maddesine g\u00f6re usul\u00fcne uygun olarak yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7erli say\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklidir. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bildirdi\u011fi adrese daha \u00f6nce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re 35. maddeye g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7erlili\u011fine karar vermek an\u0131lan h\u00fckm\u00fcn uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 kanun koyucunun amac\u0131n\u0131 a\u015facak \u015fekilde a\u015fmak anlam\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sonu\u00e7 olarak, haz\u0131rl\u0131k a\u015famas\u0131nda bildirdi\u011fi ve daha sonra sorgusunda teyid etti\u011fi adrese yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f ge\u00e7erlidir. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda 35. maddeye g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7erli say\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bildirdi\u011fi adrese daha \u00f6ncetebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n aranmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, somut olayda, yerel mahkemenin san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi temyiz isteminin reddine dair karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin Yarg\u0131tay 7. Ceza Dairesinin an\u0131lan karar\u0131 hukuka uygun de\u011fildir&#8230;&#8221;,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle itiraz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">CMK&#8217;nun\u00a0308. maddesi uyar\u0131nca itiraz\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 7. Ceza Dairesince, itiraz nedenlerinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden bahisle Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0\u00d6zel Daire ile Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011finin ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak da, \u00d6zel Dairenin temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rarak temyiz incelemesi yapmas\u0131n\u0131n isabetli bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktalar\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ncelenen dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince beyan\u0131n\u0131n saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131 14.06.2006 tarihli \u015f\u00fcpheli ifade tutana\u011f\u0131nda ikamet adresinin &#8220;\u00d6zmen Caddesi \u00c7atap Apartman\u0131 No:120\/4 Buca-\u0130zmir&#8221; \u015feklinde belirlendi\u011fi, iddianamede de ayn\u0131 adrese yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ddianame, bilirki\u015fi raporu ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc bilgilerini i\u00e7eren davetiyenin belirtilen adrese tebli\u011f i\u00e7in g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, bu adrese giden posta g\u00f6revlisince davetiyenin; &#8220;muhatab\u0131n tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ayn\u0131 adreste ikamet eden T.G.&#8217;in beyan\u0131ndan \u00f6\u011frenildi. Muhtarl\u0131kta kayd\u0131 yoktur&#8221; a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ile mahkemesine iade edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r edilerek ifadesinin al\u0131nabilmesi amac\u0131yla 14.11.2006 tarihinde zorla getirme karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zorla getirme karar\u0131n\u0131 yerine getiren kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ikamet adresinin &#8220;Sevgi Mahallesi 82. Sokak No: 10\/1 Gaziemir&#8221; olarak tespit edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">24.01.2007 g\u00fcnl\u00fc ilk duru\u015fmada savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kimlik bilgilerinin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131nda &#8220;iddianamedeki adreste oturur&#8221; a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer iki celseye kat\u0131lmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda karar verilerek, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nceden terk etti\u011fi &#8220;\u00d6zmen Caddesi \u00c7atap Apartman\u0131 No:120\/4 Buca-\u0130zmir&#8221; adresine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">11.08.2007 g\u00fcn\u00fc bu adrese giden posta da\u011f\u0131t\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na; &#8220;G\u00f6sterilen adreste ikamet eden T.G.&#8217;in beyan\u0131ndan muhatab\u0131n ismen tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenildi&#8221; a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yaz\u0131larak\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131n\u0131n mahkemesine iade edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece bu kez kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince tesbit edilen &#8220;&#8230; Gaziemir&#8221; adresine karar\u0131n tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">15.09.2007 g\u00fcn\u00fc bu adrese giden posta da\u011f\u0131t\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan da\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na, &#8220;Adreste Serdar .. oturdu\u011funu beyan etti. Muhatap adreste ismen tan\u0131nm\u0131yor kayd\u0131 yok. Evrak merciine iade&#8221; a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yaz\u0131larak,\u00a0tebligatevrak\u0131n\u0131n mahkemesine tekrar iade edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;\u00d6zmen Caddesi \u00c7atap Apartman\u0131 No:120\/4 Buca-\u0130zmir&#8221; adresine 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a035. maddesi gere\u011fince gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0g\u00f6revlisinin 12.11.2007 g\u00fcn\u00fc bu adresin kap\u0131s\u0131na\u00a0tebligatevrak\u0131n\u0131 yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te kollu\u011fa san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adres ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131ran mahkemesince, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n &#8220;Mo\u011fultay Mahallesi Sanat Sokak Starcafe No: 5 Tunceli&#8221; adresinde ikamet etti\u011finin \u00f6\u011frenilmesi \u00fczerine, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n bu kez bu adrese tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine 12.02.2008 tarihinde karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fc 18.02.2008 tarihinde temyiz etmesi \u00fczerine \u0130zmir 1. Fikri ve S\u0131nai Haklar Ceza Mahkemesince 08.04.2008 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/17 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131 ile, s\u00fcresinden sonra yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle temyiz istemin reddine karar verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">01.05.2008 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilen temyiz isteminin reddi karar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan 02.05.2008 tarihinde temyiz edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n ikamet adresi olarak kabul edilen &#8220;\u00d6zmen Caddesi \u00c7atap Apartman\u0131 No:120\/4 Buca-\u0130zmir&#8221; adresinde hi\u00e7bir a\u015famada san\u0131\u011fa\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunun &#8220;Adres de\u011fi\u015ftirmenin bildirilmesi mecburiyeti&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 35. maddesi karar tarihinde; &#8220;Kendisine veya adresine kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi usullere g\u00f6re tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan kimse, adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirirse, yenisini hemen tebli\u011fi yapt\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olan kaza merciine bildirmeye mecburdur. Bu takdirde bundan sonraki tebli\u011fler bildirilen yeni adrese yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adresini de\u011fi\u015ftiren kimse yenisini bildirmedi\u011fi ve yeni adres tebli\u011f memurunca da tespit edilemedi\u011fi takdirde tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131n bir n\u00fcshas\u0131 eski adrese ait binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na as\u0131l\u0131r ve as\u0131lma tarihi, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bundan sonra eski adrese \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebli\u011fler muhataba yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daha \u00f6nce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olsa bile, taraflar aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan, imzas\u0131 resmi merciler \u00f6n\u00fcnde ikrar olunmu\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde belirtilen adresler ile kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131 ve kamu kurumu niteli\u011findeki meslek kurulu\u015flar\u0131na, ticaret sicillerine ve esnaf ve sanatk\u00e2rlar sicillerine verilen en son adreslerdeki de\u011fi\u015fiklikler hakk\u0131nda da bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">35. maddenin 1, 2 ve 3. f\u0131kralar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7erli olabilmesi i\u00e7in, ilgilinin kendisine veya ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131labilecek kimselere bu adreste kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi usullere g\u00f6re tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, ilgilinin adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirmesine kar\u015f\u0131n yeni adresini yarg\u0131 yerine bildirmemesi ve yeni adresin tebli\u011f memurunca da tespit edilememesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda saptanan &#8220;&#8230; Buca-\u0130zmir&#8221; adresinde kendisine hi\u00e7bir tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu adreste ikamet etmedi\u011fi, duru\u015fma davetiyesine ili\u015fkin tebli\u011f belgesine verilen cevap ve 11.08.2007 tarihli\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na verilen me\u015fruhatla sabittir. Bu itibarla 12.11.2007 tarihinde yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fi, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunun\u00a035. maddesinin 1, 2 ve 3. f\u0131kralar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli saymak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 24.01.2007 g\u00fcnl\u00fc oturumda adresi, &#8220;&#8230; Buca-\u0130zmir&#8221; olarak saptanm\u0131\u015f ise de, bu belirleme 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a035. maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kabul edilemez, zira san\u0131\u011f\u0131n saptanan bu adreste ikamet etmedi\u011fi daha \u00f6nceden yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rma ile sabittir. Nitekim mahkemece de, bu adreste san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle hakk\u0131nda zorla getirme karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak, savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nabilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131Tebligat\u00a0Kanunun\u00a035\/4. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn somut olayda uygulanma ihtimali bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a035. maddesi gere\u011fince, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa &#8220;&#8230; Buca-\u0130zmir&#8221; adresinde tebli\u011fi maddenin uygulanma \u015fartlar\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ersiz olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonradan belirlenen &#8220;&#8230; Tunceli&#8221; adresine yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f \u00fczerine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyiz isteminin kanuni s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcnde zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla, yerel mahkemenin usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan temyiz isteminin reddi karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rarak, temyiz incelemesi yapan \u00d6zel Dairenin karar\u0131 isabetli olup, hakl\u0131 nedenlere dayanmayan Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Dosyan\u0131n, mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 26.03.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2022_1018__K__2022_4667.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2022_1018__K__2022_4667.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2022_1018__K__2022_4667.pdf\" download>Download [28.97 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2022_9946__K__2022_12669.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2022_9946__K__2022_12669.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2022_9946__K__2022_12669.pdf\" download>Download [28.21 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2011\/13-385<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2012\/83<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 6.3.2012<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 GEREK\u00c7EL\u0130 KARARIN TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130 ( Tebli\u011f Mazbatas\u0131na Kom\u015fular\u0131ndan Bir Ki\u015fi Huzurunda Tebli\u011f Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na Dair Tebli\u011f Evrak\u0131nda Bir Bilgi Yer Almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Gibi Mahalle Muhtar\u0131 veya \u0130htiyar Heyeti \u00dcyelerinden Biri ya da Bir Zab\u0131ta Memuru Huzurunda da Tebli\u011fin Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Tebli\u011fin Usule Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Oldu\u011fu)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n Tebli\u011fi &#8211; Tebli\u011f Mazbatas\u0131na Kom\u015fular\u0131ndan Bir Ki\u015fi Huzurunda Tebli\u011f Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na Dair Tebli\u011f Evrak\u0131nda Bir Bilgi Yer Almad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Mahalle Muhtar\u0131 veya \u0130htiyar Heyeti \u00dcyelerinden Biri ya da Bir Zab\u0131ta Memuru Huzurunda da Tebli\u011fin Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130Z S\u00dcRES\u0130 ( Tebli\u011fin\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Olarak Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Olmas\u0131 &#8211; Temyiz S\u00fcresi \u00d6\u011frenmeden \u0130tibaren Ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131ndan \u00d6zel Dairece Temyiz S\u00fcresinin Ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n G\u00f6sterilmemesi Gerek\u00e7esiyle Temyizin S\u00fcresinde Oldu\u011funun Kabul\u00fc Gerekti\u011fi)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 YASA YOLU B\u0130LD\u0130R\u0130M\u0130 ( Tebli\u011fin\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Olarak Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Olmas\u0131\/Yerel Mahkeme Karar\u0131ndaki Yasa Yolu Bildiriminin Yasal ve Yeterli Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na Dair Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n De\u011ferlendirilmesine Gerek Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Hakl\u0131 Nedene Dayanmayan Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130tiraz\u0131n\u0131n Reddi Gerekti\u011fi)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.24<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fine dair tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131na, &#8220;san\u0131kla ayn\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131 alt\u0131nda oturan annesi N. \u00c7.nin ba\u015fparma\u011f\u0131 bast\u0131r\u0131larak tebli\u011f edildi&#8221; \u015feklinde \u015ferh d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesine kar\u015f\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan bir ki\u015fi huzurunda tebli\u011f yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair tebli\u011f evrak\u0131nda bir bilgi yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi mahalle muhtar\u0131 veya ihtiyar heyeti \u00fcyelerinden biri ya da bir zab\u0131ta memuru huzurunda da tebli\u011fin yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu tebli\u011f 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a024. maddesinde belirtilen usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu durumda tebli\u011fin\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, temyiz s\u00fcresi \u00f6\u011frenmeden itibaren ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131ndan. \u00d6zel Dairece temyiz s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmemesi gerek\u00e7esiyle temyizin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc, sonucu itibariyle isabetli bir uygulamad\u0131r. Ula\u015f\u0131lan sonuca g\u00f6re, yerel mahkeme karar\u0131ndaki yasa yolu bildiriminin yasal ve yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesine gerek bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu itibarla, hakl\u0131 nedene dayanmayan Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan san\u0131k C. \u00c7.&#8217;nin 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 T.C.K.n\u0131n\u00a0141\/1,\u00a062\u00a0ve 50\/1-a maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 6.000 Lira adli para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dair Yahyal\u0131 Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 20.6.2007 g\u00fcn ve 23-106 Say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm, 17.7.2007 tarihinde ayn\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131 alt\u0131nda oturan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n annesine tebli\u011f edilerek 26.7.2007 tarihinde kesinle\u015ftirilmi\u015f, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklukta verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn kendisine\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olarak tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle ve nedenlerini de g\u00f6stermek suretiyle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyiz istemi yerel mahkemece 17.8.2007 tarihli ek kararla reddedilmi\u015ftir. Temyiz isteminin reddine dair bu karar\u0131n da san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 13. Ceza Dairesinin 14.9.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/2152-852 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verilen k\u0131sa kararla yaz\u0131lan gerek\u00e7eli kararda. 7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck temyiz s\u00fcresinin, karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 hususunun belirtilmemesi suretiyle, s\u00fcrenin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 konusunda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilgilendirilmemi\u015f oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; 17.8.2007 tarihli temyiz isteminin reddine dair karar kald\u0131r\u0131larak yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Su\u00e7 tarihinde sab\u0131kas\u0131z olan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda belirlenen cezan\u0131n iki y\u0131ldan az olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; h\u00fck\u00fcmden sonra 8.2.2008 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5728 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a0562\u00a0nci maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 C.M.K.nun\u00a0231. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ve bu maddenin 6 nc\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131na 25.7.2010 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6008 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a07\u00a0nci maddesiyle eklenen c\u00fcmle de g\u00f6zetilerek, h\u00fckmolunan cezan\u0131n t\u00fcr ve s\u00fcresine g\u00f6re, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131l\u0131p b\u0131rak\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 hususunun de\u011ferlendirilmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131&#8230;&#8221;,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle di\u011fer y\u00f6nleri incelenmeksizin h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise 20.10.2011 g\u00fcn ve 271530 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; Mahalli mahkemece k\u0131sa ve gerek\u00e7eli kararda C.M.K.nun\u00a034\/2,\u00a040\/2 ve 232\/6 nc\u0131 maddelerine uygun bi\u00e7imde temyiz s\u00fcresi ve temyiz yolunun belirtilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen Y\u00fcksek Dairenin, onama istemli karar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 kald\u0131rarak esastan inceleme yapmamas\u0131&#8221; gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle itiraz yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurarak. \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz isteminin reddine dair yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n ONANMASINA karar verilmesi isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmekle. Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0\u00d6zel Daireyle Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; yerel mahkeme karar\u0131ndaki yasa yolu bildiriminin yasal ve yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitine dair ise de, \u00f6ncelikle karar\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilip edilmedi\u011finin belirlenmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ncelenen dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verilen 20.6.2007 tarihli h\u00fck\u00fcmde, yasa yolu bildiriminin &#8220;san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve m\u00fcdahilin yoklu\u011funda &#8230; 7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde Yarg\u0131tay temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere&#8221; \u015feklinde belirtildi\u011fi. \u0130ddianame ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn dosyada bulunan adreste bizzat san\u0131\u011fa 9.3.2007 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, 22.5.2007 tarihli oturumda da san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ikamet olarak ayn\u0131 adresi bildirdi\u011fi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n, &#8220;ayn\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131 alt\u0131nda oturan&#8221; \u015ferhiyle, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n annesi N. \u00c7.nin ba\u015f parma\u011f\u0131 bast\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle 17.7.2007 g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir ki\u015finin imzas\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn 26.7.2007 tarihinde kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n ise, \u0130stanbul&#8217;da ikamet edip \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,\u00a0tebligat\u0131n 60 ya\u015flar\u0131nda ve okuma yazma bilmeyen annesine yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 15.8.2007 tarihinde karardan haberdar oldu\u011funu belirterek. 17.8.2007 g\u00fcn\u00fc h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etti\u011fi ve dosyaya da, tebli\u011fin yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu adresten \u0130stanbul \u0130li Ba\u011fc\u0131lar il\u00e7esi Demirkap\u0131 Mahallesi &#8230; Sokak no: &#8230; adresine ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair 7.12.2004 tarihli nakil ilm\u00fchaberi, \u0130stanbul &#8211; Ba\u011fc\u0131lar&#8217;da belirtilen adreste ikamet etti\u011fine dair 15.8.2007 tarihli ikametgah ilm\u00fchaberiyle Miram Tekstil isimli i\u015fyerinden verilmi\u015f &#8220;bir y\u0131ld\u0131r san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u0130stanbul- G\u00fcng\u00f6ren&#8217;deki i\u015fyerlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na&#8221; dair 15.8.2007 tarihli belgeyi ibraz etti\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkemece, 17.8.2007 tarihli karar ile &#8220;&#8230;gerek soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda gerekse kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ikametgah\u0131n\u0131n \u0130smet Mah. &#8230; Sok. No. &#8230; Yahyal\u0131 \u015feklinde belirtildi\u011fi, bu a\u015famalarda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu adrese hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde itiraz etmedi\u011fi, karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinden sonra ise b\u00f6yle bir itirazda bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n iyi niyet ilkesiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayn\u0131 konutta oturan annesine yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle temyiz talebinin s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine karar verildi\u011fi ve bu karar\u0131n da san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan 21.8.2007 g\u00fcn\u00fc temyiz edildi\u011fi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusunun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6ncelikle karar\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilip edilmedi\u011finin de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n konuya dair &#8220;\u0130mza edemiyecek durumda olmak&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 24. maddesi; &#8220;Kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimse imza edecek kadar yaz\u0131 bilmez veya imza edemeyecek durumda bulunursa, kom\u015fular\u0131ndan bir ki\u015fi huzurunda sol elinin ba\u015fparma\u011f\u0131 bast\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle tebli\u011f yap\u0131l\u0131r. ( &#8230;) Yukar\u0131daki f\u0131kralarda yaz\u0131l\u0131 hallerde keyfiyet, tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda tasrih edilir ve haz\u0131r bulunan \u015fahsa da imza ettirilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Okur yazar bir kom\u015fu bulunmaz veya bulunan kom\u015fu imzadan imtina ederse, tebli\u011f memuru o mahalle veya k\u00f6y\u00fcn muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti azas\u0131ndan birini veyahut bir zab\u0131ta memurunu, tebli\u011f s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunmak \u00fczere davet eder ve\u00a0tebligat\u00a0bunlar\u0131n huzurunda yap\u0131l\u0131r \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fine dair tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131na, &#8220;san\u0131kla ayn\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131 alt\u0131nda oturan annesi N. \u00c7.nin ba\u015fparma\u011f\u0131 bast\u0131r\u0131larak tebli\u011f edildi&#8221; \u015feklinde \u015ferh d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesine kar\u015f\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan bir ki\u015fi huzurunda tebli\u011f yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair tebli\u011f evrak\u0131nda bir bilgi yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi mahalle muhtar\u0131 veya ihtiyar heyeti \u00fcyelerinden biri ya da bir zab\u0131ta memuru huzurunda da tebli\u011fin yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu tebli\u011f 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a024. maddesinde belirtilen usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu durumda tebli\u011fin\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, temyiz s\u00fcresi \u00f6\u011frenmeden itibaren ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131ndan. \u00d6zel Dairece temyiz s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmemesi gerek\u00e7esiyle temyizin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc, sonucu itibariyle isabetli bir uygulamad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ula\u015f\u0131lan sonuca g\u00f6re, yerel mahkeme karar\u0131ndaki yasa yolu bildiriminin yasal ve yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesine gerek bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu itibarla, hakl\u0131 nedene dayanmayan Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-) Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7eyle reddine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-) Dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine, 06.03.2012 tarihinde yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2010\/4-199<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2010\/249<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 7.12.2010<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 S\u0130LAHLA TEHD\u0130T ( San\u0131\u011fa Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n Tebli\u011fi ve 35. Maddenin Uygulanma Ko\u015fullar\u0131 Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Ge\u00e7ersiz Olup San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00d6\u011frenme \u00dczerine Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Temyiz \u0130steminin Yasal S\u00fcresinde Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Kabul\u00fcnde Zorunluluk Bulundu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130Z \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Silahla Tehdit &#8211; San\u0131\u011fa Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n Tebli\u011fi ve 35. Maddenin Uygulanma Ko\u015fullar\u0131 Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Ge\u00e7ersiz Olup San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00d6\u011frenme \u00dczerine Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Temyiz \u0130steminin Yasal S\u00fcresinde Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 GEREK\u00c7EL\u0130 KARAR TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130 ( Silahla Tehdit &#8211; San\u0131\u011fa Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n Tebli\u011fi ve 35. Maddenin Uygulanma Ko\u015fullar\u0131 Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Ge\u00e7ersiz Olup San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00d6\u011frenme \u00dczerine Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Temyiz \u0130steminin Yasal S\u00fcresinde Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Kabul\u00fcnde Zorunluluk Bulundu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.32,35\/4<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0San\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131 oturumda adresi, Tutanaktaki beyan\u0131n sehven yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcnde zorunluluk bulundu\u011fundan, 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a035\/4. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn de somut olayda uygulanma olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a035. maddesi gere\u011fince san\u0131\u011fa gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi, maddenin uygulanma ko\u015fullar\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ersiz olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyiz isteminin, ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 32. maddesi gere\u011fince yasal s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcnde zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n silahla tehdit su\u00e7undan 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 T.C.K.n\u0131n\u00a0106\/2-a,\u00a043\/2-1 ve 62. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 1 y\u0131l 13 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, T.C.K.n\u0131n 53\/1-a-b-c-d-e madde ve bentlerinde belirtilen haklar\u0131 kullanmaktan ceza s\u00fcresince, ( c ) bendinde belirtilen haklardan ise \u015fartla tahliye tarihine kadar yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin, Erzurum 2. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 26.2.2009 g\u00fcn ve 412-130 Say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz istemi Erzurum 2. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince 28.9.2009 g\u00fcn ve 412-130 say\u0131 ile, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CYY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0296\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca red edilmi\u015ftir. Temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n da san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesinin 23.6.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/12215-12321 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; Temyiz s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7mesi, sebebiyle yerel mahkemenin temyiz iste\u011finin reddine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n, tebli\u011fnameye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak reddine, yerel mahkemenin redde ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na&#8230;&#8221; karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca 27.9.2010 g\u00fcn ve 77859 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n ilk adres tespiti kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda 13.6.2007 g\u00fcn\u00fc belirlenmi\u015ftir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadesi sebebiyle d\u00fczenlenen tutanakta adres bilgisi olarak ikamet ve i\u015f adreslerinin belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u0130kamet adresi olarak: Dada\u015fkent Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi &#8230; Blok Kat:&#8230;, No:&#8230; Erzurum; i\u015f adresi olarak da: Erzurum i\u015f Merkezi K\/&#8230;, No: &#8230; H&#8230; K\u0131rtasiye Erzurum adresinin belirlendi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 0505 &#8230; .. .. numaral\u0131 cep telefonu ve &#8230; .. .. numaral\u0131 sabit telefonu kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgilerine yer verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ddianamede san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Dada\u015fkent Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi &#8230; Blok Kat:&#8230;, No:&#8230; ikamet etti\u011fi bilgisi yinelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2.5.2008 g\u00fcn\u00fc duru\u015fmaya haz\u0131rl\u0131k s\u00fcrecinde al\u0131nan ara karar\u0131 gere\u011fince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 7.7.2008 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lmas\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131 ile \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ddianame metnini ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc bilgilerini i\u00e7eren davetiyeyi tebli\u011f i\u00e7in Dada\u015fkent Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi &#8230; Blok Kat:&#8230;, No:&#8230; Erzurum adresine giden posta g\u00f6revlisi, davetiyeyi san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f edememi\u015f, tebli\u011f edememe gerek\u00e7esi olarak mazbataya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclen notta: &#8216;muhatap g\u00f6sterilen adreste tan\u0131nm\u0131yor, mahalle muhtarl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndaki kay\u0131tlarda ismine rastlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan muhtar\u0131n vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu tasdikli imzal\u0131 beyan\u0131 &#8230;&#8217; bilgisine yer verilerek, bu gerek\u00e7e iletebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131n\u0131 mahkemesine iade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece icra edilen 7.7.2008 tarihli oturumda al\u0131nan ara karar\u0131n\u0131n 1. maddesi gere\u011fince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adresinin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Erzurum Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">9.7.2008 tarihli adres ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkerede san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sadece iddianamede belirtilen adres bilgilerine yer verildi\u011fi, i\u015f adresi ve telefon bilgilerine yer verilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu ara karar\u0131 gere\u011fince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adres ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131 yapan kolluk g\u00f6revlileri M. C. ve \u00d6. S. taraf\u0131ndan 22.7.2008 g\u00fcn\u00fc d\u00fczenlenen tutanakta: &#8216;Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi, &#8230; Blok Kat &#8230;, No:&#8230; say\u0131l\u0131 yerde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ikamet etmedi\u011fi, adreste T. \u00d6. ve S. H. isimli \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n ikamet etti\u011fi, \u00e7evreden ve kom\u015fulardan soruldu\u011funda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na &#8230;&#8217; ili\u015fkin bilgiye yer verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece icra edilen 11.11.2008 tarihli duru\u015fmada al\u0131nan ara karar\u0131 gere\u011fince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n tespiti i\u00e7in san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda C.M.K.nun\u00a0199\u00a0ve\u00a098. maddeleri gere\u011fince yakalama emri \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan yakalama emri 19.1.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc infaz edilmi\u015ftir. 19.1.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc yakalanan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda re&#8217;sen celse a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, savunmas\u0131 tespit edilen san\u0131k sal\u0131verilerek duru\u015fma 26.2.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fcne b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n belirlendi\u011fi 19.1.2009 tarihli duru\u015fmada, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adresiyle ilgili olarak s\u00fcre\u00e7te ya\u015fanan s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131lara ra\u011fmen, Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi, &#8230; Blok Kat:&#8230;, No:&#8230; Dada\u015fkent\/Erzurum adresinde ikamet edip etmedi\u011fi, ger\u00e7ek adresinin neresi oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a sorulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n adresi yine yanl\u0131\u015f olarak &#8216;Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi, &#8230; Blok Kat &#8230;, No:&#8230; Dada\u015fkent\/Erzurum&#8217; olarak tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7ilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">26.2.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc icra edilen duru\u015fmada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yoklu\u011funda verilen gerek\u00e7eli karar yine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hi\u00e7bir zaman oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8216;Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi, &#8230; Blok Kat &#8230;, No:&#8230; Dada\u015fkent\/ Erzurum&#8217; adresine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Posta Da\u011f\u0131t\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 24.4.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc bu adrese gitmi\u015ftir,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na &#8216;g\u00f6sterilen adreste muhatab\u0131n tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131, D. A. H.&#8217;nun s\u00f6zl\u00fc beyan\u0131yla anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ilgili mahalle muhtarl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kayd\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan&#8230;&#8217; gerek\u00e7esiyle\u00a0tebligatevrak\u0131n\u0131 Mahkemesine iade etmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme bu kez ayn\u0131 adrese 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a035. maddesi gere\u011fince gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131 i\u00e7eren\u00a0tebligat\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015f,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0g\u00f6revlisi 16.5.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc bu adresin kap\u0131s\u0131na\u00a0tebligatevrak\u0131n\u0131 yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rarak evrak\u0131\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olarak tebli\u011f etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130tiraz Nedenleri<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-) Yerle\u015fim Yeri T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunun 19. Maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re: &#8220;1. Tan\u0131m<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madde 19 &#8211; Yerle\u015fim yeri bir kimsenin s\u00fcrekli kalma niyetiyle oturdu\u011fu yerdir. Bir kimsenin ayn\u0131 zamanda birden \u00e7ok yerle\u015fim yeri olamaz. Bu kural ticari ve s\u0131nai kurulu\u015flar hakk\u0131nda uygulanmaz&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun Uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 13. maddesi &#8216;Bilinen Adreste Tebligat&#8217;: ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madde 13 &#8211; &#8216;Tebligat, tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahsa kendi m\u00fcracaat\u0131, di\u011fer alakal\u0131lar\u0131n bildirmesi, mevcut vesaik tahkikat veya sair suretlerle bilinen en son adresinde yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat yap\u0131lacak adresin takdiren tesbit edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r. G\u00f6sterilen adreste\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmayan ahvalde,\u00a0tebligat\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karan merci taraf\u0131ndan memurlar\u0131n ve di\u011fer meslek ve sanat erbab\u0131n\u0131n adresleri mensup olduklar\u0131 te\u015fkilattan, avukatlar\u0131nki barodan veya Adliye Vekaletinden, askeri \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n adresleri askerlik \u015fubesi, Milli M\u00fcdafaa Vekaleti gibi salahiyetli mercilerden sorulur. Bu merciler sorulan adresi en k\u0131sa zamanda ve sahih olarak bildirirler&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 C.M.K.nun &#8216;Tebligat Usulleri&#8217; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 Madde 37 &#8211; ( 1 ) madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re: &#8216;Tebligat, bu Kanunda belirtilen \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmler sakl\u0131 kalmak ko\u015fuluyla, ilgili kanunda belirtilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re yap\u0131l\u0131r&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Kanununun 35. maddesi &#8216;Adres De\u011fi\u015ftirmenin Bildirilmesi Mecburiyeti&#8217; ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madde 35 &#8211; &#8216;Kendisine veya adresine kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi usullere g\u00f6re tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan kimse, adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirirse, yenisini hemen tebli\u011fi yapt\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olan kaza merciine bildirmeye mecburdur. Bu takdirde bundan sonraki tebli\u011fler bildirilen yeni adrese yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( De\u011fi\u015fik f\u0131kra: 19.3.2003 &#8211; 4829 S.K.\/11. madde ) Adresini de\u011fi\u015ftiren kimse yenisini bildirmedi\u011fi ve yeni adres tebli\u011f memurunca da tespit edilemedi\u011fi takdirde tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131n bir n\u00fcshas\u0131 eski adrese ait binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na as\u0131l\u0131r ve as\u0131lma tarihi, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( De\u011fi\u015fik f\u0131kra: 19.3.2003 &#8211; 4829 S.K.\/11. madde ) Bundan sonra eski adrese \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebli\u011fler muhataba yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( Ek f\u0131kra: 6.6.1985 &#8211; 3220\/12 madde ) Daha \u00f6nce\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olsa bile, taraflar aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan, imzas\u0131 resmi merciler \u00f6n\u00fcnde ikrar olunmu\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde belirtilen adresler ile kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131 ve kamu kurumu niteli\u011findeki meslek kurulu\u015flar\u0131na, ticaret sicillerine ve esnaf ve sanatkarlar sicillerine verilen en son adreslerdeki de\u011fi\u015fiklikler hakk\u0131nda da bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8216;Usul\u00fcne Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Tebli\u011fin H\u00fckm\u00fc&#8217; ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 32. maddesi ne g\u00f6re: Madde 32 &#8211; &#8216;Tebli\u011f usul\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa bile, muhatab\u0131 tebli\u011fe muttali olmu\u015f ise muteber say\u0131l\u0131r. Muhatab\u0131n beyan etti\u011fi tarih, tebli\u011f tarihi addolunur&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k 3.8.2009, 12.10.2009 tarihli dilek\u00e7elerine Yakutiye Kaymakaml\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130l\u00e7e N\u00fcfus M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu &#8216;Yerle\u015fim Yeri ve Di\u011fer Adres Belgesi&#8217; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 belgeleri sunmu\u015ftur. Bu belgelerden San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Erzurum, Aziziye \u0130l\u00e7esi, Abdulhamit Mahallesi, E&#8230; Sokak, D\u0131\u015f Kap\u0131 No: &#8230;., Kap\u0131 No: &#8230; say\u0131l\u0131 yerde oturdu\u011fu bilgilerine yer verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 35. maddesinin bir kimse hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda da hukuksal ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 ancak ilgilisine kendisine veya adresine kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi usullere g\u00f6re tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, ilgilisinin adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirmesine kar\u015f\u0131n yeni adresini yarg\u0131 yerine bildirmemesi ve yeni adresin tebli\u011f memurunca da tespit edilememesi ko\u015fuluyla olanakl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-) Kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n &#8216;Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi, &#8230; Blok Kat &#8230;, No: &#8230; Dada\u015fkent\/Erzurum&#8217; adresinde hi\u00e7bir zaman oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sabittir. Bu adrese\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 35. maddesi gere\u011fince\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-) Mahkeme kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda 29.4.2006 tarihli Resmi Gazete yay\u0131nlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren N\u00fcfus Hizmetleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun &#8216; ( H. ) elektronik ortamda ulusal adres veri taban\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fturulmas\u0131\u2026&#8217;n\u0131 da ama\u00e7layan 1. maddesi gere\u011fince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu n\u00fcfus m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden ikametgah adresini ara\u015ft\u0131rmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkeme san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015fyeri adresine\u00a0tebligat\u00a0\u00e7\u0131karma mekanizmas\u0131n\u0131 da devreye sokmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, san\u0131\u011fa kalemde tebli\u011f i\u00e7in telefon a\u00e7arak ula\u015fma, \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rma y\u00f6ntemini devreye sokmam\u0131\u015f; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurma hak ve yetkisini yasa h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc yanl\u0131\u015f yorumlayarak i\u015fletmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4-) Mahkeme gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren ve 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a035. maddesi gere\u011fince san\u0131k ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0bir\u00a0tebligatt\u0131r. Bu durumda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7medi\u011fi,\u00a0TebligatKanunu&#8217;nun 32. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince temyiz yasa yoluna yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun yasal s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesindeyiz&#8221; gerek\u00e7eleriyle itiraz yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurularak, Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesinin 23.6.2010 g\u00fcn ve 12215-12321 Say\u0131l\u0131 temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n temyiz incelemesi i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmesi talep olunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmekle, Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile \u00d6zel Daire aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011finin ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak da, \u00d6zel Dairenin temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na dair karar\u0131n\u0131n isabetli bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktalar\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r. Dosyan\u0131n incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince beyan\u0131n\u0131n saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131 13.6.2007 tarihli \u015f\u00fcpheli ifade tutana\u011f\u0131nda; \u0130kamet adresinin, Dada\u015fkent Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi &#8230; Blok Kat:&#8230;, No:&#8230; Erzurum;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015f adresinin ise, Erzurum i\u015f Merkezi K\/&#8230;, No: &#8230; H&#8230; K\u0131rtasiye Erzurum, \u015feklinde belirlendi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca cep ve sabit telefon numaralar\u0131n\u0131n da saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130ddianamede de bu tutanaktaki ikamet adresinin belirtildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ddianame ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc bilgilerini i\u00e7eren davetiyenin belirtilen adrese tebli\u011f i\u00e7in g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, bu adrese giden posta g\u00f6revlisince davetiyenin, &#8220;muhatab\u0131n g\u00f6sterilen adreste tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve mahalle muhtarl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndaki kay\u0131tlarda ismine rastlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n muhtar\u0131n vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu tasdikli imzal\u0131 beyan\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ile mahkemesine iade edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece 7.7.2008 tarihli oturumda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adresinin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Erzurum Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">9.7.2008 tarihli adres ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkerede san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sadece iddianamede belirtilen adres bilgilerine yer verildi\u011fi, i\u015f adresi ve telefon bilgilerine yer verilmedi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu ara karar\u0131 gere\u011fince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adres ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131 yapan kolluk g\u00f6revlileri M. C. ve \u00d6. S. taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 22.7.2008 tarihli tutanakta: &#8220;Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi, &#8230; Blok Kat &#8230;, No:&#8230; say\u0131l\u0131 yerde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ikamet etmedi\u011fi, adreste T. \u00d6. ve S. H. isimli \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n ikamet etti\u011fi, \u00e7evreden ve kom\u015fulardan soruldu\u011funda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n &#8230; &#8221; belirtildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece 11.11.2008 tarihli duru\u015fmada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n tespiti i\u00e7in hakk\u0131nda CYY&#8217;n\u0131n 199 ve 98. maddeleri gere\u011fince yakalama emri \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan yakalama emrinin 19.1.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc infaz edildi\u011fi,. 19.1.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc yakalanan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda re&#8217;sen celse a\u00e7\u0131larak savunmas\u0131n\u0131n saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sal\u0131verilerek duru\u015fman\u0131n 26.2.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fcne b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131 19.1.2009 tarihli duru\u015fmada, yine adresinin Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi, &#8230; Blok Kat:&#8230;, No:&#8230; Dada\u015fkent\/Erzurum olarak tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">26.2.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda karar verilerek, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n yine bu adrese tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">24.4.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc bu adrese giden Posta Da\u011f\u0131t\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na &#8220;G\u00f6sterilen adreste muhatab\u0131n tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, D. A. H.&#8217;nun s\u00f6zl\u00fc beyan\u0131yla anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ilgili mahalle muhtarl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kayd\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8230; &#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131n\u0131n mahkemesine iade edildi\u011fi, Mahkemece bu kez ayn\u0131 adrese 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a035. maddesi gere\u011fince gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0g\u00f6revlisinin 16.5.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc bu adresin kap\u0131s\u0131na\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131n\u0131 yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rarak tebli\u011f i\u015flemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fcn 26.5.2009 tarihinde kesinle\u015ftirilerek 27.5.2009 tarihinde infaza g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n 3.8.2009, 12.10.2009 tarihli dilek\u00e7elerine Yakutiye Kaymakaml\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130l\u00e7e N\u00fcfus M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu &#8220;Yerle\u015fim Yeri ve Di\u011fer Adres Belgesi&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 belgeleri sundu\u011fu, bu belgelerden San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Erzurum, Aziziye \u0130l\u00e7esi, Abdulhamit Mahallesi, E&#8230; Sokak, D\u0131\u015f Kap\u0131 No: &#8230;, Kap\u0131 No: &#8230; say\u0131l\u0131 yerde oturdu\u011fu bilgilerine yer verildi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00fcn kendisine tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fini belirterek, temyiz istemi ve infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 talebinde bulundu\u011fu,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz isteminin Erzurum 2. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince 28.9.2009 g\u00fcn ve 412-130 say\u0131 ile, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CYY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0296\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca red edildi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011fa 9.10.2009 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilen red karar\u0131n\u0131n da san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde 12.10.2009 tarihinde temyiz edildi\u011fi, \u00d6zel Dairece yap\u0131lan incelemede, temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Adres De\u011fi\u015ftirmenin Bildirilmesi Mecburiyeti&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a035. maddesi; &#8220;Kendisine veya adresine kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi usullere g\u00f6re tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan kimse, adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirirse, yenisini hemen tebli\u011fi yapt\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olan kaza merciine bildirmeye mecburdur. Bu takdirde bundan sonraki tebli\u011fler bildirilen yeni adrese yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adresini de\u011fi\u015ftiren kimse yenisini bildirmedi\u011fi ve yeni adres tebli\u011f memurunca da tespit edilemedi\u011fi takdirde tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131n bir n\u00fcshas\u0131 eski adrese ait binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na as\u0131l\u0131r ve as\u0131lma tarihi, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bundan sonra eski adrese \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebli\u011fler muhataba yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daha \u00f6nce tebligat yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olsa bile, taraflar aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan, imzas\u0131 resmi merciler \u00f6n\u00fcnde ikrar olunmu\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde belirtilen adresler ile kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131 ve kamu kurumu niteli\u011findeki meslek kurulu\u015flar\u0131na, ticaret sicillerine ve esnaf ve sanatkarlar sicillerine verilen en son adreslerdeki de\u011fi\u015fiklikler hakk\u0131nda da bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 35. maddesinin 1, 2 ve 3. f\u0131kralar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7erli olabilmesi i\u00e7in, ilgilinin kendisine veya ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131labilecek kimselere bu adreste yasan\u0131n g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi usullere g\u00f6re tebli\u011f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, ilgilinin adresini de\u011fi\u015ftirmesine kar\u015f\u0131n yeni adresini yarg\u0131 yerine bildirmemesi ve yeni adresin tebli\u011f memurunca da tespit edilememesi gerekmektedir. Somut olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda saptanan &#8220;Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi, &#8230; Blok Kat &#8230;, No: &#8230; Dada\u015fkent\/Erzurum&#8221; adresinde kendisine hi\u00e7bir tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu adreste ikamet etmedi\u011fi, duru\u015fma davetiyesine ili\u015fkin tebli\u011f belgesine verilen yan\u0131t, kolluk g\u00f6revlileri M. C. ve \u00d6. S. taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 22.7.2008 tarihli tutanak ve 24.4.2009 tarihli\u00a0tebligat\u00a0mazbatas\u0131na verilen me\u015fruhatla sabittir. Bu itibarla 16.5.2009 tarihinde yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fi 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a035. maddesinin 1, 2 ve 3. f\u0131kralar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli saymak olanaks\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131 19.1.2009 tarihli oturumda adresi, &#8220;Ertur Yap\u0131 Kooperatifi, &#8230; Blok Kat:&#8230;, No:&#8230; Dada\u015fkent\/Erzurum&#8221; olarak saptanm\u0131\u015f ise de, bu belirleme 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a035. maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kabul edilemez, zira san\u0131\u011f\u0131n saptanan bu adreste ikamet etmedi\u011fi daha \u00f6nceden yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rma ile sabittir. Nitekim mahkemece de, bu adreste san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 sebebiyle hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak, savunmas\u0131 saptanabilmi\u015ftir. Hal b\u00f6yle iken tutanaktaki bu beyan\u0131n sehven yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcnde zorunluluk bulundu\u011fundan, 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a035\/4. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn de somut olayda uygulanma olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a035. maddesi gere\u011fince san\u0131\u011fa gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi, maddenin uygulanma ko\u015fullar\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ersiz olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyiz isteminin, ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 32. maddesi gere\u011fince yasal s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcnde zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla Yerel Mahkemece temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin verilen karar ile bu karar\u0131 onayan \u00d6zel Daire ilam\u0131 isabetsiz olup, Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesinin 23.6.2010 g\u00fcn ve 12215-12321 say\u0131l\u0131, temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, dosyan\u0131n temyiz incelemesi i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan d\u00f6rt Kurul \u00dcyesi, yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin yasaya uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile itiraz\u0131n reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-) Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-) Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesinin 23.6.2010 g\u00fcn ve 12215-12321 Say\u0131l\u0131 onama karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-) Dosyan\u0131n temyiz incelemesi i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 7.12.2010 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2009\/5-56<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2009\/70<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 24.3.2009<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( Vekilin Bulunmas\u0131 Halinde\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Vekile Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u015eart Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Belli Bir Yerde Devaml\u0131 Olarak Mesle\u011fini \u0130cra Edenler O Yerde Bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 Takdirde Tebli\u011f Ayn\u0131 Yerdeki Daimi Memur veya M\u00fcstahdemlerinden Birine Yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( Dava S\u0131ras\u0131nda Bildirilmi\u015f Ayr\u0131 Bir Adresi Bulunan Vekilin Kendisine Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gereken\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kat\u0131lan\u0131n Adresine G\u00f6nderilmi\u015f ve Orada Bulunan Evrak Memurunca Tebell\u00fc\u011f Edilmi\u015f Oldu\u011fundan Somut Olayda Yap\u0131lan\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Ge\u00e7ersiz Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 VEK\u0130LE\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( Vekilin Bulunmas\u0131 Halinde\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Vekile Yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u015eart Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Belli Bir Yerde Devaml\u0131 Olarak Mesle\u011fini \u0130cra Edenler O Yerde Bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 Takdirde Tebli\u011f Ayn\u0131 Yerdeki Daimi Memur veya M\u00fcstahdemlerinden Birine Yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 B\u0130LD\u0130R\u0130LM\u0130\u015e AYRI B\u0130R ADRES\u0130 BULUNAN VEK\u0130L ( Kendisine Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gereken\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kat\u0131lan\u0131n Adresine G\u00f6nderilmi\u015f ve Orada Bulunan Evrak Memurunca Tebell\u00fc\u011f Edilmi\u015f Oldu\u011fundan Somut Olayda Yap\u0131lan\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Ge\u00e7ersiz Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.11,17<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a07201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a011. maddesi gere\u011fince vekilin bulunmas\u0131 halinde,\u00a0tebligat\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015fartt\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 17. maddesinde de belli bir yerde veya evde meslek ve sanat icra edenlere\u00a0tebligat\u0131n nas\u0131l yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, belli bir yerde devaml\u0131 olarak mesle\u011fini icra edenler, o yerde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f ayn\u0131 yerdeki daimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 11 ve 17. maddelerine g\u00f6re, dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda bildirilmi\u015f ayr\u0131 bir adresi bulunan vekilin kendisine yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken\u00a0tebligat, kat\u0131lan\u0131n adresine g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f ve orada bulunan evrak memurunca tebell\u00fc\u011f edilmi\u015f oldu\u011fundan somut olayda, yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ge\u00e7ersizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a01233 say\u0131l\u0131 Yaz\u0131c\u0131k Tar\u0131m Kredi Kooperatifi&#8217;nin m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc olan Ya\u015far Uzuno\u011flu&#8217;nun 17.12.1982 ila 27.05.1993 tarihleri aras\u0131nda, bir k\u0131sm\u0131 daha \u00f6nceden \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f olan 438 kooperatif orta\u011f\u0131 ad\u0131na sahte bor\u00e7lanma senedi d\u00fczenleyerek kredi \u00e7ekmek ve kullanmak suretiyle zimmetine para ge\u00e7irdi\u011finden bahisle, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a064, 203 ve\u00a080. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda, Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince 16.05.2001 g\u00fcn ve 131-146 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n &#8220;765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0202\/1,80, 202\/3 maddesinin 2. c\u00fcmlesi ve 59\/2. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 3 y\u0131l 10 ay 20 g\u00fcn a\u011f\u0131r hapis ve 570.947.777 lira a\u011f\u0131r para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0219\/4. maddesi gere\u011fince memuriyetten m\u00fcebbeten mahrumiyetine &#8230;&#8221; h\u00fckmedilmi\u015f, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilen h\u00fck\u00fcm dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 5. Ceza Dairesinin 06.11.2002 g\u00fcn ve 3589-7301 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n zimmetine ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi paralar\u0131 26.04.1996 tarihinde tamamen kapatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki 08.05.2000 g\u00fcnl\u00fc Tar\u0131m Kredi Kooperatifi Sivas B\u00f6lge Birli\u011fi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yaz\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6demenin 19.07.1996 g\u00fcnl\u00fc iddianame kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile TCK.nun 202\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca cezas\u0131ndan 1\/2 yerine 1\/3 nispetinde indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131&#8230;&#8221; isabetsizli\u011finden bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bozma \u00fczerine, Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince 27.10.2004 g\u00fcn ve 42-235 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0202\/1,80, 202\/3 ve 59\/2. maddeleri gere\u011fince 2 y\u0131l 11 ay a\u011f\u0131r hapis ve 407.585.000 lira a\u011f\u0131r para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0219\/4. maddesi uyar\u0131nca memuriyetten m\u00fcebbetten mahrumiyetine&#8230;&#8221; h\u00fckmedilerek, h\u00fck\u00fcm san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edildi\u011finde dosya Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca 24.11.2005 g\u00fcn ve 13802 say\u0131 ile; 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a08\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca mahalline iade edilmi\u015ftir. Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince bu kez 25.06.2007 g\u00fcn ve 24-141 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; San\u0131k Ya\u015far Uzuno\u011flu&#8217;nun 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0202\/1,80, 202\/3,59\/2,5252 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a05. ve\u00a06. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 2 y\u0131l 11 ay hapis ve 407 YTL adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0219\/4. maddesi gere\u011fince memuriyetten m\u00fcebbetten mahrumiyetine&#8230;&#8221; h\u00fckmedildikten sonra; h\u00fck\u00fcm san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ve m\u00fc\u015fteki Bahattin Yan\u0131k vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince 24.07.2007 g\u00fcn ve 24-141 say\u0131 ile; m\u00fcdahillik istemi reddedilen m\u00fc\u015fteki vekilinin s\u00f6zkonusu karar\u0131 temyiz etmeye yetkisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, &#8230; m\u00fc\u015fteki Bahattin Yan\u0131k vekilinin temyiz talebinin CMK.nun\u00a0296. maddesi gere\u011fince reddine,&#8221; karar verilmi\u015f, bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn Bahattin Yan\u0131k vekilince temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda ise, &#8220;temyizin reddine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm&#8221; Yarg\u0131tay 5. Ceza Dairesinin 07.04.2008 g\u00fcn ve 1598-3342 say\u0131 ile onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca 29.05.2008 g\u00fcn ve 259976 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulanacak kanunun; 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK.nun\u00a0202\/2,\u00a080, 202\/3, 59 ve 219 \/son maddeleri gere\u011fince kurulacak h\u00fck\u00fcm ile; 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK.nun\u00a0247\/2,\u00a043, 248\/2, 62, 53. maddelerinin ve sahtecilik su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirilerek \u015fartlar\u0131 varsa bu su\u00e7tan da h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 suretiyle elde edilecek h\u00fck\u00fcmler toplam\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 sonucu belirlenmesi gerekirken, eylemin basit zimmet olarak kabul edilmesi kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r&#8230;&#8221; \u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7e ve &#8220;Y\u00fcksek Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hakk\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmesi&#8221; istemiyle itiraz yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine; Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca 17.06.2008 g\u00fcn ve 155-173 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; 1- Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7e ile kabul\u00fcne,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 24.07.2007 g\u00fcn ve 24-141 say\u0131l\u0131 temyizin reddine ili\u015fkin ek karar\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;temyiz yasa yolunun s\u00fcresi ve \u015feklini&#8221; de kapsayan me\u015fruhatla birlikte Bahattin Yan\u0131k vekiline tebli\u011f edilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.06.2007 g\u00fcn ve 24-141 say\u0131l\u0131 son h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Tar\u0131m Kredi Kooperatifleri Sivas B\u00f6lge Birli\u011fi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekiline tebli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131, suretiyle, y\u00f6ntemince ba\u015fvuru oldu\u011funda onlar\u0131n da de\u011ferlendirilebilmesi amac\u0131yla dosyan\u0131n Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine&#8230;&#8221; karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu karar\u0131n\u0131n kendisine tebli\u011f edilmesi \u00fczerine, Bahattin Yan\u0131k vekili taraf\u0131ndan, 23.10.2008 tarihinde temyizin reddi karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak temyiz dilek\u00e7esi verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmekle, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a01233 say\u0131l\u0131 Yaz\u0131c\u0131k Tar\u0131m Kredi Kooperatifi&#8217;nin m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc olan san\u0131k Ya\u015far Uzuno\u011flu&#8217;nun 17.12.1982 ila 27.05.1993 tarihleri aras\u0131nda, bir k\u0131sm\u0131 daha \u00f6nceden \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f olan 438 kooperatif orta\u011f\u0131 ad\u0131na sahte bor\u00e7lanma senedi d\u00fczenleyerek kredi \u00e7ekmek ve kullanmak suretiyle zimmetine para ge\u00e7irmesi \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen olayla ilgili olarak \u00d6zel Daire ile Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; lehe yasan\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin ise de, Ceza Genel Kurulu Karar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunun \u00f6ncelikle tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya incelendi\u011finde; kat\u0131lan Tar\u0131m Kredi Kooperatifleri Sivas B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;ne yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken\u00a0tebligat\u0131n, kat\u0131lan\u0131n dosyada ad\u0131 ve adresi belli olan bir vekili bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen evrak memuruna yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Oysa; dosyada, kat\u0131lan B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan Sivas 1. Noterli\u011finin 01.06.1995 g\u00fcn ve 12382 say\u0131l\u0131 vekaletnamesi ile vekil olarak atanan, duru\u015fmalara kat\u0131lan ve kat\u0131lma talebinde bulunan Av. Galip Erg\u00fct ile kat\u0131lan B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc aras\u0131ndaki vekalet ili\u015fkisinin sona erdi\u011fine ili\u015fkin herhangi bir bilgi veya belge bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kat\u0131lan vekilinin adresi &#8220;\u015eenyurt Sitesi 3. kat No:308\/S\u0130VAS&#8221; olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, gerek\u00e7eli karar &#8220;Tar\u0131m Kredi Kooperatifleri Sivas B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\/S\u0130VAS&#8221; adresine g\u00f6nderilerek, orada da &#8220;evrak memuru&#8221; s\u0131fat\u0131yla &#8220;Tahir Demirok&#8221; isimli ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan tebell\u00fc\u011f edilmi\u015f, fakat\u00a0tebligat\u0131n alt k\u0131sm\u0131na &#8220;Avukat\u0131 yerine&#8221; \u015ferhi eklenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a011. maddesi gere\u011fince vekilin bulunmas\u0131 halinde,\u00a0tebligat\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015fartt\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 17. maddesinde de belli bir yerde veya evde meslek ve sanat icra edenlere\u00a0tebligat\u0131n nas\u0131l yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, belli bir yerde devaml\u0131 olarak mesle\u011fini icra edenler, o yerde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f ayn\u0131 yerdeki daimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu halde;\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 11 ve 17. maddelerine g\u00f6re, dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda bildirilmi\u015f ayr\u0131 bir adresi bulunan vekilin kendisine yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken\u00a0tebligat, kat\u0131lan\u0131n adresine g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f ve orada bulunan evrak memurunca tebell\u00fc\u011f edilmi\u015f oldu\u011fundan somut olayda, yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ge\u00e7ersizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla; dosyan\u0131n, 17.06.2008 g\u00fcn ve 155-173 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Genel Kurulu Karar\u0131n\u0131n sonu\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yer alan &#8220;3&#8221; nolu paragraf gere\u011finin, &#8220;vekile\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmak&#8221; suretiyle yerine getirilmesi i\u00e7in mahalline g\u00f6nderilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- Kat\u0131lan Sivas Tar\u0131m Kredi Kooperatifi B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekili yerine, evrak memuruna yap\u0131lan\u00a0TEBL\u0130GATIN GE\u00c7ERS\u0130ZL\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Dosyan\u0131n Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.06.2007 g\u00fcn ve 24-141 say\u0131l\u0131 son h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Tar\u0131m Kredi Kooperatifleri Sivas B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekiline tebli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 suretiyle, y\u00f6ntemince ba\u015fvuru oldu\u011funda onun da de\u011ferlendirilebilmesi amac\u0131yla Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 24.03.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2007\/8-146<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2007\/156<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 26.6.2007<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 KANUN YARARINA BOZMA ( San\u0131\u011fa\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebligat Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Mahkumiyet H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi &#8211; Ba\u015fvurulamayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( San\u0131\u011fa Usul\u00fcne Uygun\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Mahkumiyet H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi &#8211; Kanun Yarar\u0131na Bozma Yoluna Ba\u015fvurulamayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 MAHKUM\u0130YET H\u00dcKM\u00dcN\u00dcN KES\u0130NLE\u015eMEMES\u0130 ( San\u0131\u011fa Usul\u00fcne Uygun\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Mahkumiyet H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi &#8211; Kanun Yarar\u0131na Bozma Yoluna Ba\u015fvurulamayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086\/m.429<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine m\u00fcracaat ederek, izinli geldi\u011fini belirterek ifadesinin saptanmas\u0131n\u0131 istemesi \u00fczerine, Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n izinli d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, 10 g\u00fcn sonra yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na gidece\u011fi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc haz\u0131r olamayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek, savunmas\u0131n\u0131n saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n \u00f6nceden at\u0131l\u0131 bulunan tarihe ertelendi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn de, yurti\u00e7inde k\u00f6yde birlikte ikamet etti\u011fini beyan eden day\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ikamet etti\u011fi sabittir, bu nedenle yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fden haberdar oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin herhangi bir bilgi ve belge de bulunmaktad\u0131r. Yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7ersiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmemi\u015ftir. Kesinle\u015fmeyen h\u00fck\u00fcmler hakk\u0131nda yasa yarar\u0131na bozma yasayoluna ba\u015fvurulamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0San\u0131\u011f\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a0170\/1-c,\u00a062\u00a0ve 52. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 3.000 YTL adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, cezas\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 maddenin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 1 er ay ara ile 10 e\u015fit taksitte \u00f6denmek \u00fczere taksitlendirilmesine, taksitlerden birinin s\u00fcresinde \u00f6denmemesi halinde \u00f6denmeyen adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n hapse \u00e7evrilece\u011finin ihtar\u0131na, emanette kay\u0131tl\u0131 tabanca ve \u015farj\u00f6r\u00fcn m\u00fcsaderesine ili\u015fkin Tav\u015fanl\u0131 Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 09.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 554-473 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yasa yarar\u0131na bozmas\u0131 istemi \u00fczerine inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesi 30.04.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2007\/3369-3318 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; Silah niteli\u011finde bulunmayan kurus\u0131k\u0131 tabanca ile havaya ate\u015f etme eyleminin 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0264\/7 ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0170\/1-c madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131nda tan\u0131mlanan, i\u00e7inde silah \u00f6\u011fesi bulunan su\u00e7 tipine uygun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleriyle, Tav\u015fanl\u0131 Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 09.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 554-473 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kanun yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131na, cezan\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine&#8230;&#8221; karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca 08.06.2007 g\u00fcn ve 50767 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Almanya&#8217;da ikamet etti\u011fi, soru\u015fturma s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki ifadesi, kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki savunmas\u0131,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131 ve zab\u0131ta ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 ile sabittir. Mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne ili\u015fkin\u00a0tebligat, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda misafir olarak bulundu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi \u00fclkemizdeki adrese \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve tebli\u011f i\u015flemi bu adreste birlikte oturdu\u011funu beyan eden akrabas\u0131 Co\u015fkun Acar&#8217;a yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu tebli\u011f i\u015flemi\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr. Dosya i\u00e7erisinde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebligat\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir bilgi de bulunmamaktad\u0131r.\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olmas\u0131 nedeniyle mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmemesi nedeniyle kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin reddi yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kabule g\u00f6re ise, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kurus\u0131k\u0131 tabanca ile havaya ate\u015f etme eylemi, 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a036\/1. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 50 YTL idari para cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren kabahat niteli\u011findedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bozma nedenine g\u00f6re, Yerel Mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc bozan Yarg\u0131tay \u00d6zel Dairesinin 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a024. maddesini g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurmak suretiyle ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 36. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca idari para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmetmesi, kabahat konusunu olu\u015fturan e\u015fyan\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya ge\u00e7irilmesine ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kurus\u0131k\u0131 tabanca ve eklerinin sahibine iadesi yerine, &#8220;cezan\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na&#8221; karar verilmesi de isabetsizdir, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleriyle itiraz yasayoluna ba\u015fvurularak, Tav\u015fanl\u0131 Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 09.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 554-473 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmemesi sebebiyle Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesinin 30.04.2007 g\u00fcn ve 3369-3318 say\u0131l\u0131 bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin reddine karar verilmesi isteminde bulunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilmekle, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunca okundu, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a01- Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fip kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip, ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finin belirlenmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finin saptanmas\u0131 halinde ise, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn cezas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na m\u0131, yoksa daha hafif cezaya m\u0131 h\u00fckmedilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerekti\u011fi noktalar\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- H\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fip kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip, ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik de\u011ferlendirme;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a- Yasa yarar\u0131na bozma yasayolunun genel ko\u015fullar\u0131;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6\u011fretide &#8220;ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc temyiz&#8221; olarak da adland\u0131r\u0131lan yasa yarar\u0131na bozma yasayolunun ko\u015fullar\u0131 ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0309\u00a0ve\u00a0310. maddelerinde ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a0309. maddesinde Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na, 310. maddesinde ise Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131na tan\u0131nan yasa yarar\u0131na bozma ba\u015fvuru yetkisi, hakim veya mahkemelerce verilip istinaf veya temyiz incelemesinden ge\u00e7meksizin kesinle\u015fen karar veya h\u00fck\u00fcmlerdeki hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 gidermeyi ama\u00e7layan ola\u011fan \u00fcst\u00fc bir yasa yoludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu \u015fekilde kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bir karar veya h\u00fck\u00fcmde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulundu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frenen Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, o karar veya h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;ca bozulmas\u0131 istemini, yasal nedenlerini a\u00e7\u0131klayarak, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak bildirecektir. Bunun \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 da h\u00fckm\u00fcn veya karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 istemini i\u00e7eren yaz\u0131s\u0131na bu nedenleri aynen yazarak, Yarg\u0131tay ceza dairesine verecek, ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen nedenlerin Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;ca yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi halinde karar veya h\u00fck\u00fcm yasa yarar\u0131na bozulacak, yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmezse istem reddedilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b- H\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fip, kesinle\u015fmedi\u011finin saptanmas\u0131;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ncelenen dosyada; San\u0131k Adem K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckilbo\u011fa&#8217;n\u0131n 05.09.2005 tarihinde \u015f\u00fcpheli olarak saptanan beyan\u0131nda, josefinmen str. 45881 Gelsenkirchen Almanya adresinde ikamet etti\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi, C.Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda da ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde Almanya&#8217;da ikamet etti\u011fini, D\u00fcmrekulu k\u00f6y\u00fc-Tav\u015fanl\u0131&#8217;da misafir kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan oldu\u011fundan bahisle iade edilmesi \u00fczerine, kolluk taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan adres tahkikinde, d\u00fczenlenen 01.02.2006 tarihli tutanakta Almanya&#8217;da oldu\u011funun saptanarak a\u00e7\u0131k adresinin bildirildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n 07.08.2006 tarihinde Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine m\u00fcracaat ederek, izinli geldi\u011fini belirterek ifadesinin saptanmas\u0131n\u0131 istemesi \u00fczerine, Tav\u015fanl\u0131 Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince 07.08.2006 tarihinde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n izinli d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, 10 g\u00fcn sonra yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na gidece\u011fi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc haz\u0131r olamayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek, 07.08.2006 tarihinde savunmas\u0131n\u0131n saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n \u00f6nceden at\u0131l\u0131 bulunan 09.11.2006 tarihine ertelendi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn de, D\u00fcmrekulu k\u00f6y\u00fc Tav\u015fanl\u0131\/K\u00fctahya adresinde, 08.12.2006 tarihinde birlikte ikamet etti\u011fini beyan eden day\u0131s\u0131 Co\u015fkun Acar imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ikamet etti\u011fi sabittir, bu nedenle yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fden haberdar oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin herhangi bir bilgi ve belge de bulunmaktad\u0131r. Yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7ersiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 09.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 554-473 say\u0131l\u0131 mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmemi\u015ftir. Kesinle\u015fmeyen h\u00fck\u00fcmler hakk\u0131nda yasa yarar\u0131na bozma yasayoluna ba\u015fvurulamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin reddine, bu a\u015famada di\u011fer itiraz nedeninin incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesinin 30.04.2007 g\u00fcn ve 3369-3318 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4- Tav\u015fanl\u0131 Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 09.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 554-473 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn san\u0131\u011fa usul\u00fcnce tebli\u011fi hususunda gere\u011finin mahalli mahkemesince ifas\u0131na, dosyan\u0131n Tav\u015fanl\u0131 Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere, Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine, 26.06.2007 g\u00fcn\u00fc oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2007\/16-39<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2007\/36<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 20.2.2007<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0( Muhatap veya Onun Ad\u0131na Tebli\u011f Yap\u0131labilecek Olanlardan Hi\u00e7biri G\u00f6sterilen Adreste Bulunmazsa\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Memurunun Bu Ki\u015filerin Adreste Bulunmama Sebebini Bilmesi Muhtemel Kom\u015fu Y\u00f6netici Kap\u0131c\u0131 Muhtar \u0130htiyar Kurulu veya Meclisi \u00dcyeleri Zab\u0131ta Amir ve Memurlar\u0131ndan Sorup Ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 ADRESTEN DEVAMLI OLARAK AYRILMA ( Muhataplar Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da Yeni Adresini Tespit Edip Edememesine G\u00f6re 28. Maddede Belirtilen Di\u011fer \u0130\u015flemleri Ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEBL\u0130\u011e ANINDA ADRESTE BULUNMAMA ( Tebli\u011f Memurunun Tebli\u011f Olunacak Evrak\u0131 O Yerin Muhtar veya \u0130htiyar Heyeti veya Meclis Azas\u0131ndan Birine veyahut Zab\u0131ta Amir ve Memuruna \u0130mza Kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Teslim Etmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 TEBL\u0130\u011e TAR\u0130H\u0130 ( Tebli\u011f An\u0131nda Adreste Bulunmama Halinde \u0130hbarnameyi\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lacak Adreste Kap\u0131ya Yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 ve Bu Takdirde \u0130hbarnamenin Kap\u0131ya Yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tarihin Tebli\u011f Tarihi Say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Dikkate Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">7201\/m.21<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc m.28,30<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0A- Muhatap veya onun ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131labilecek olanlardan hi\u00e7biri g\u00f6sterilen adreste bulunmazsa,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0memurunun, bu ki\u015filerin adreste bulunmama sebebini bilmesi muhtemel kom\u015fu, y\u00f6netici, kap\u0131c\u0131, muhtar, ihtiyar kurulu veya meclisi \u00fcyeleri, zab\u0131ta amir ve memurlar\u0131ndan sorup ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131, muhatap adresten devaml\u0131 olarak ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f veya \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015fse, buna ili\u015fkin beyanlar\u0131 tutana\u011fa yaz\u0131p alt\u0131n\u0131 beyanda bulunanlara imzalatmas\u0131, imzadan \u00e7ekinmeleri halinde bu durumu yazarak imzalamas\u0131, devam\u0131nda da muhatap \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015fse tebli\u011fi \u00e7\u0131karan mercie iade etmesi, adresten devaml\u0131 olarak ayr\u0131lan muhataplar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da yeni adresini tespit edip edememesine g\u00f6re 28. maddede belirtilen di\u011fer i\u015flemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">B- Muhatap veya ad\u0131na\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lacak ki\u015filer o adreste bulunduklar\u0131 halde tebli\u011f an\u0131nda orada mevcut de\u011fillerse tebli\u011f memurunun, tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti veya meclis azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir ve memuruna imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda teslim etmesi, T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011fe ekli 2 numaral\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fe uygun d\u00fczenleyece\u011fi ihbarnameyi\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lacak adreste kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 ve ayr\u0131ca m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu takdirde, durumu muhataba duyurmas\u0131n\u0131 en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirmesi icap etti\u011fi, bu takdirde ihbarnamenin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihin tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Mal beyan\u0131nda bulunmama eyleminden yarg\u0131lanan Osman Kaz\u0131m Dal&#8217;\u0131n, \u00f6deme emrinin usul\u00fcne uygun bi\u00e7imde tebli\u011f edilmemesi nedeniyle beraatine ili\u015fkin olarak \u0130zmir 7. \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesinden verilen 15.05.2006 g\u00fcn ve 249-1271 say\u0131l\u0131 karara kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fikayet\u00e7i vekilinin itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine \u0130zmir 4. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 23.05.2006 g\u00fcn ve 341 M\u00fct. say\u0131 ile; &#8220;\u00f6deme emri\u00a0tebligat\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, 7. \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u0130\u0130Y&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0337. maddesi uyar\u0131nca Osman Kaz\u0131m Dal&#8217;\u0131n 10 g\u00fcn disiplin hapsi ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adalet Bakan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yasa yarar\u0131na ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi 17.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 5133-7337 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; Dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, ilams\u0131z takiplere ili\u015fkin \u00f6deme emrini i\u00e7erir\u00a0tebligat\u0131n bor\u00e7luya,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun 21. ve\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 28. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak, muhatab\u0131n adresinde bulunmama gerek\u00e7esi ve adresine d\u00f6n\u00fcp d\u00f6nmeyece\u011fi hususlar\u0131 maddede yaz\u0131l\u0131 kimselerden sorulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu \u015fekilde yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, itiraz\u0131n reddi yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi isabetsizdir&#8230;&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle, \u0130zmir 4. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 yasa yarar\u0131na bozmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 06.02.2007 g\u00fcn ve 180183 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Somut olayda, tebligat memuru taraf\u0131ndan muhatap bor\u00e7lunun ve onun ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131labilecek kimselerin o an i\u00e7in adreste bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, muhatab\u0131n adreste bulunmama nedenini bilmesi muhtemel kom\u015fusunun, muhatab\u0131n &#8216;nereye gitti\u011fini bilmedi\u011fi&#8217; y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki beyan\u0131n\u0131n tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irilmesini m\u00fcteakip tebligat evrak\u0131n\u0131n mahalle muhtar\u0131na imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda teslim edildi\u011fi, 2 numaral\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fe uygun d\u00fczenlenen ihbarnamenin muhatap bor\u00e7lunun kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kom\u015fusuna haber verildi\u011fi, bu suretle\u00a0tebligat\u00a0i\u015flemlerinin\u00a0Tebligat Kanununun 21,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 28 ve 30. maddeleri h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uygun olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi,&#8221; g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle itiraz ederek, \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, Adalet Bakan\u0131n\u0131n yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmekle, Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca okundu, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Hukuka uygun y\u00f6ntemle derlenen bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- Yarg\u0131lama konusu maddi olayda;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Bor\u00e7lu Osman Kaz\u0131m Dal aleyhine \u0130zmir 12. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2005\/13672 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen icra takibi s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, 23.12.2005 tarihinde\u00a0tebligat\u00a0belgesinin arkas\u0131na belirli b\u00f6l\u00fcmleri el yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile doldurulmu\u015f olarak ka\u015feyle, &#8216;muhataba aranan saatlerde adreste rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, nereye gitti\u011fini bilmesi muhtemel apartman kom\u015fusu Naime Tuna&#8217;ya soruldu, nereye gitti\u011fini bilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131, bu nedenle evrak Bas\u0131n Sitesi Muhtarl\u0131\u011f\u0131na teslim edilip muhatab\u0131n kolayca g\u00f6rebilece\u011fi kap\u0131s\u0131na 2 nolu haber ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131 haz\u0131rlan\u0131p yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Kom\u015fusu Naime Tuna&#8217;ya haber verildi. Apartman kom\u015fusu Naime Tuna s\u00f6zl\u00fc beyan\u0131n\u0131 imzalamaktan imtina etti.&#8217; \u015ferhinin konuldu\u011fu, Bas\u0131n Sitesi Mahalle Muhtar\u0131 Necati Erg\u00fcn&#8217;\u00fcn ka\u015fesi, m\u00fchr\u00fc ve imzas\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu b\u00f6l\u00fcmde de, &#8220;Tebligat yap\u0131lan\u0131n kayd\u0131 var&#8217; \u015ferhine yer verildi\u011fi&#8221;, bu\u00a0tebligat\u0131 takiben \u00f6deme yapmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine mal beyan\u0131nda bulunmama eylemi nedeniyle bor\u00e7lu hakk\u0131nda dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi ile Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken hukuki ihtilaf\u0131n;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7luya g\u00f6nderilen \u00f6deme emrinin usul\u00fcne uygun bi\u00e7imde tebli\u011f edilip edilmedi\u011finin belirlenmesinden ibaret bulundu\u011fu,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Genel Kurul&#8217;ca yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A-\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 21 ve\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn tebli\u011f imkans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 28. maddesine g\u00f6re, muhatap veya onun ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131labilecek olanlardan hi\u00e7biri g\u00f6sterilen adreste bulunmazsa,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0memurunun, bu ki\u015filerin adreste bulunmama sebebini bilmesi muhtemel kom\u015fu, y\u00f6netici, kap\u0131c\u0131, muhtar, ihtiyar kurulu veya meclisi \u00fcyeleri, zab\u0131ta amir ve memurlar\u0131ndan sorup ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131, muhatap adresten devaml\u0131 olarak ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f veya \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015fse, buna ili\u015fkin beyanlar\u0131 tutana\u011fa yaz\u0131p alt\u0131n\u0131 beyanda bulunanlara imzalatmas\u0131, imzadan \u00e7ekinmeleri halinde bu durumu yazarak imzalamas\u0131, devam\u0131nda da muhatap \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015fse tebli\u011fi \u00e7\u0131karan mercie iade etmesi, adresten devaml\u0131 olarak ayr\u0131lan muhataplar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da yeni adresini tespit edip edememesine g\u00f6re 28. maddede belirtilen di\u011fer i\u015flemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmesi gerekti\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">B- Muhatap veya ad\u0131na\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lacak ki\u015filer o adreste bulunduklar\u0131 halde tebli\u011f an\u0131nda orada mevcut de\u011fillerse T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 30. maddesine g\u00f6re i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131 laz\u0131m geldi\u011fi, bu durumda tebli\u011f memurunun, tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti veya meclis azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir ve memuruna imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda teslim etmesi, T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011fe ekli 2 numaral\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fe uygun d\u00fczenleyece\u011fi ihbarnameyi\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lacak adreste kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 ve ayr\u0131ca m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu takdirde, durumu muhataba duyurmas\u0131n\u0131 en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirmesi icap etti\u011fi, bu takdirde ihbarnamenin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihin tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">C- Somut olayda;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a- Gerek muhtarl\u0131k kay\u0131tlar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak\u00a0tebligat\u00a0belgesi arkas\u0131na konulan a\u00e7\u0131klamadan, gerekse sonradan yap\u0131lan kolluk ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131na verilen yan\u0131ttan, ad\u0131na \u00f6deme emri g\u00f6nderilen bor\u00e7lunun esasen\u00a0tebligat\u00a0tarihinde o adreste oturdu\u011fu ancak tebli\u011f an\u0131nda konutunda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131na,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b- Tebli\u011f memurunca, tebli\u011f evrak\u0131 imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahalle muhtar\u0131na teslim edilip 2 nolu haber ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131 kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra, durumu muhataba bildirmesi i\u00e7in en yak\u0131n kom\u015fusu Naime Tuna&#8217;ya da haber verildi\u011fine g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7luya g\u00f6nderilen \u00f6deme emrinin\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 21. ve\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 28 ile 30. maddelerine uygun bi\u00e7imde tebli\u011f edildi\u011finin ancak bor\u00e7lunun s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde mal beyan\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve kanaati benimsenmekle;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, Adalet Bakan\u0131n\u0131n yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin reddine karar verilmesi gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesinin 17.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 5133-7337 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Adalet Bakan\u0131n\u0131n yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4- Dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine, 20.02.2007 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2006\/4-316<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2006\/308<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 19.12.2006<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 UYARLAMA KARARI ( C.Savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn Yoklu\u011funda Verildi\u011fi &#8211; Karar H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn Bilinen Son Adresi Yerine Terk Etti\u011fi \u00d6nceki Adresinde\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 35. Maddesine G\u00f6re\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebli\u011f Edildi\u011findenTebligat\u0131n Ge\u00e7ersiz Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 C.SAVCISININ VE H\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dcN\u00dcN YOKLU\u011eUNDA VER\u0130LEN KARAR ( Karar H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn Bilinen Son Adresi Yerine Terk Etti\u011fi \u00d6nceki Adresinde\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 35. Maddesine G\u00f6re\u00a0Usuls\u00fcz\u00a0Tebli\u011f Edildi\u011finden\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Ge\u00e7ersiz Oldu\u011fu )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( C.Savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn Yoklu\u011funda Verilen Karar\u0131n H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn Bilinen Son Adresi Yerine Terk Etti\u011fi \u00d6nceki Adresinde\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 35. Maddesine G\u00f6re Tebli\u011f Edilmesi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.35<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Uyarlama karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ad\u0131 Hakim ve Katip adlar\u0131 ile birlikte yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n evrak \u00fczerinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, karar\u0131n giri\u015f k\u0131sm\u0131nda C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, duru\u015fma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve tutanak bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraatine ili\u015fkin uyarlama karar\u0131n\u0131n C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn yoklu\u011funda verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu karar, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn bilinen son adresi yerine, terk etti\u011fi \u00f6nceki adresinde\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 35. maddesine g\u00f6re\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ge\u00e7ersizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Erkan Altun&#8217;un kavgada korkutmak amac\u0131yla silah g\u00f6sterme su\u00e7undan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0466\/1 ve 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a04. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 420 YTL a\u011f\u0131r para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, ili\u015fkin \u0130zmir 12. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinden verilen 22.03.2005 g\u00fcn ve 873-6482 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmeyerek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi \u00fczerine yerel mahkemede duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n evrak \u00fczerinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen uyarlama yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda 23.06.2005 g\u00fcn ve 873-682 say\u0131l\u0131 ek kararla;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Y\u00fcklenen fiilin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasada su\u00e7 olarak tan\u0131mlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle, Erkan Altun&#8217;un beraatine, itiraz\u0131 kabul olmak \u00fczere karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130zmir C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 19.09.2005 havale tarihli bir yaz\u0131 ile itiraz etmesi \u00fczerine Yerel Mahkeme bu kez 21.09.2005 g\u00fcn ve 873-682 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Erkan Altun&#8217;un eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a0106\/2-a maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen su\u00e7u olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, an\u0131lan maddedeki yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n 2 y\u0131ldan 5 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve san\u0131k lehine olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle, itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, 23.06.2005 g\u00fcn ve 873-682 say\u0131l\u0131 ek karar\u0131n iptaline, mahkemenin 22.03.2005 g\u00fcn ve 873-682 say\u0131l\u0131 420 YTL a\u011f\u0131r para cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilam\u0131n\u0131n aynen infaz\u0131na, yasa yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adalet Bakan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminde bulunulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi 04.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 2006\/5344-14844 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Tebli\u011fnamede &#8216;t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; 765 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0466. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen kavgada korkutmak maksad\u0131yla silah g\u00f6stermek su\u00e7u, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;da d\u00fczenlenmemi\u015f olmakla birlikte, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcsnet su\u00e7tan beraatine dair an\u0131lan mahkemenin 23.06.2005 tarihli ve 2004\/873 esas, 2005\/682 say\u0131l\u0131 ek karar\u0131na itiraz\u0131n, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0268. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen s\u00fcreler ge\u00e7irildikten sonra 16.09.2005 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile ek karar\u0131n iptaline karar verilmesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir&#8217; denilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK.nun itiraz usul\u00fc ve inceleme merciini d\u00fczenleyen 268. maddesine g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- Hakim veya mahkeme karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz, kanunun ayr\u0131ca h\u00fck\u00fcm koymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hallerde 35 inci maddeye g\u00f6re ilgililerin karar\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren yedi g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar\u0131 veren mercie verilecek dilek\u00e7e veya tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irilmek ko\u015fulu ile zab\u0131t katibine beyanda bulunmak suretiyle yap\u0131l\u0131r. Tutanakla tespit edilen beyan\u0131 ve imzay\u0131 mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131 veya hakim onaylar. 263 \u00fcnc\u00fc madde h\u00fckm\u00fc sakl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Karar\u0131na itiraz edilen hakim veya mahkeme, itiraz\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcrse karar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczeltir; yerinde g\u00f6rmezse en \u00e7ok \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde, itiraz\u0131 incelemeye yetkili olan mercie g\u00f6nderir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu maddede a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirlendi\u011fi gibi, itiraz s\u00fcresi karar\u0131n verilmesi veya yoklukta verilmi\u015f ise ilgililerin \u00f6\u011frenmesi tarihinden itibaren 7 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr. C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fck arzetmesi nedeniyle, bir C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n huzurunda verilen karar, o yerdeki t\u00fcm savc\u0131lar i\u00e7in s\u00fcreyi ba\u015flat\u0131c\u0131 etki yapacakt\u0131r. Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re, C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n yeniden inceleme talebi \u00fczerine mahkeme 23.06.2005 tarihli kararda, C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n da ad\u0131 yaz\u0131lmak suretiyle ek karar\u0131n\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. O yer C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 vekili ise, bu karara 18.08.2005 tarihinde itiraz etmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015f, itiraz\u0131n s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle reddine olmak gerekirken, eski karar\u0131n aynen infaz\u0131na karar verilmesi yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozma iste\u011fi do\u011frultusunda d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce yukar\u0131da belirtilen nedenlerle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, san\u0131k Erkan Altun hakk\u0131nda \u0130zmir 12. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nce verilip kesinle\u015fen 21.09.2005 tarih ve 2004\/873 esas ve 2005\/682 ek karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK.nun\u00a0309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bozulmas\u0131na, m\u00fcteakip i\u015flemlerin yerel mahkemesince yerine getirilmesine&#8221; karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise 04.12.2006 g\u00fcn ve 60754 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Somut olayda, mahkemenin kesin h\u00fck\u00fcmde de\u011fi\u015fiklik davas\u0131 nedeniyle evrak \u00fczerinde inceleme sonucu verdi\u011fi 23.06.2005 tarihli ek karar\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011finde olup, temyiz yasa yoluna tabi bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu karar, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemeye bildirdi\u011fi son adresi yerine, tebli\u011f i\u00e7in \u00f6nceki adresine g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f oldu\u011fundan, yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr, \u00f6ncelikle san\u0131\u011fa yeniden\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayr\u0131ca, mahkeme 23.6.2005 tarihli ek karar\u0131nda kanun yolunun s\u00fcresini belirtmemi\u015f, yasa yolunu da yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131kla itiraz olarak g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine mahkemece 21.9.2005 g\u00fcnl\u00fc ek karar verilmi\u015ftir. Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n 23.06.2005 tarihli ek karara y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvurusu, temyiz ba\u015fvurusu niteli\u011findedir. Bu durumda mahkeme yasa yolunda hataya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc saptayarak, yasa yolunun temyiz oldu\u011funa i\u015faretle inceleme yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in dosyay\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;a g\u00f6ndermesi gerekirken, kendisini g\u00f6revli ve yetkili sayarak ba\u015fvuruyu sonu\u00e7land\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuruyu inceleme hususunda yetkili bulunmayan yerel mahkemenin verdi\u011fi bu karar hukuken ge\u00e7ersizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemenin 23.06.2005 tarihli ek karar\u0131, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilmemesi ve Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r. Kesinle\u015fmeyen kararlar\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozma yolu ile incelenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle somut olayda, kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin reddine karar verilmesi, Mahkemenin 23.06.2005 g\u00fcnl\u00fc ek karar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin tamamlanmas\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcteakip Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n 18.09.2005 tarihli ba\u015fvurusu nedeniyle dosyan\u0131n temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;a g\u00f6nderilmesi gerekmektedir.&#8221; g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ile itiraz ederek, \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmekle, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca okundu, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Erkan Altun&#8217;un kavgada silah te\u015fhiri su\u00e7undan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0466\/1 ve 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a04. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 420 YTL a\u011f\u0131r para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesinden sonra evrak \u00fczerinde de\u011fi\u015fiklik yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 yapan mahkeme, 23.06.2005 g\u00fcn ve 873-682 say\u0131l\u0131 ek karar ile; kavgada korkutmak maksad\u0131yla silah \u00e7ekme eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasada su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenip yapt\u0131r\u0131ma ba\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle, Erkan Altun&#8217;un at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan beraatine karar vermi\u015f, bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulabilece\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130zmir C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 19.09.2005 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile itiraz etmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvuruyu kendisi sonu\u00e7land\u0131ran yerel mahkeme 21.09.2005 g\u00fcn ve 873-682 say\u0131 ile; itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, 23.06.2005 g\u00fcn ve 873-682 say\u0131l\u0131 ek karar\u0131n iptaline, mahkemenin 22.03.2005 g\u00fcn ve 873-682 say\u0131l\u0131 420 YTL a\u011f\u0131r para cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilam\u0131n\u0131n aynen infaz\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu karara y\u00f6nelik olarak Adalet Bakan\u0131n\u0131n yasa yarar\u0131na ba\u015fvuruda bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine \u00d6zel Daire, itiraz\u0131n CYY&#8217;n\u0131n 268. maddesinde belirtilen s\u00fcre ge\u00e7irildikten sonra yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek, yerel mahkemenin 21.09.2005 tarihli son karar\u0131n\u0131n yasa yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise, 23.06.2005 g\u00fcnl\u00fc ek kararda ba\u015fvurulacak yasa yolunun temyiz yerine hatal\u0131 bi\u00e7imde &#8220;itiraz&#8221; olarak g\u00f6sterildi\u011fini, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n 19.09.2005 havale tarihli yasa yolu ba\u015fvurusunun temyiz olarak kabul\u00fc gerekirken, Yerel Mahkemenin ba\u015fvuruyu itiraz olarak de\u011ferlendirip merciye g\u00f6ndermeksizin bizzat verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n hukuken ge\u00e7ersiz bulundu\u011funu, ayr\u0131ca ek karar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn en son adresi yerine \u00f6nceki adresine tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ge\u00e7ersiz\u00a0tebligat\u00a0nedeniyle uyarlama karar\u0131n\u0131n hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fini, bu durumda yasa yarar\u0131na bozma ba\u015fvurusunun incelenmesi ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek itiraz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi \u00fczere \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc gereken hukuki sorun, yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminde bulunma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">CYY&#8217;n\u0131n 309. ve 310. maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen ve ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc bir denetim muhakemesi olan yasa yarar\u0131na bozma ba\u015fvurusunun incelenebilmesi i\u00e7in, denetimi istenen karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;ca incelenmeksizin kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bulunmas\u0131 gereklidir. Ola\u011fan yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n bu yolla hen\u00fcz denetlenmedi\u011fi veya ba\u015fvuru olmamakla birlikte buna olanak bulundu\u011fu i\u00e7in hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f olan bir karara kar\u015f\u0131 yasa yarar\u0131na bozma istenemeyece\u011fi gibi, yasa yolundaki hatal\u0131 ba\u015fvuru nedeniyle denetim muhakemesinin yetkisiz merci taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi hallerde, bu mercinin verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n hukuki ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu t\u00fcr kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 da yasa yarar\u0131na bozma istenemeyecektir. Bu durumda, ola\u011fan yasa yolu ba\u015fvurusunun, do\u011fru yasa yolunu incelemekle g\u00f6revli ve yetkili merci taraf\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyarlama karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ad\u0131 Hakim ve Katip adlar\u0131 ile birlikte yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n evrak \u00fczerinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, karar\u0131n giri\u015f k\u0131sm\u0131nda C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, duru\u015fma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve tutanak bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraatine ili\u015fkin uyarlama karar\u0131n\u0131n C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn yoklu\u011funda verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu karar, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn bilinen son adresi yerine, terk etti\u011fi \u00f6nceki adresinde\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 35. maddesine g\u00f6re\u00a0usuls\u00fcz\u00a0tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle\u00a0tebligat\u00a0ge\u00e7ersizdir. \u00d6te yandan, evrak \u00fczerinde verilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n C.savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na da tebli\u011f edilmeyen bu kararda yasa yolu s\u00fcresi belirtilmemi\u015f, y\u00f6ntem bildirilmemi\u015f, ba\u015fvurulacak yasa yolu ise &#8220;temyiz&#8221; yerine &#8220;itiraz&#8221; olarak g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. Sonras\u0131nda, \u0130nfaz B\u00fcrosuna bir yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131larak, Erkan Altun&#8217;un beraatine karar verildi\u011fi belirtilip ilam\u0131n bila infaz iadesi istenilmi\u015f ise de, yaz\u0131 ekinde ek karar g\u00f6nderilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yine, \u0130zmir C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Adli Sicil ve \u0130statistik Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ekine tali karar fi\u015fi ile mahkemenin 23.06.2005 tarihli ek karar\u0131 konulmu\u015f ise de, bu yaz\u0131n\u0131n rutin bir yaz\u0131\u015fma i\u015flemi niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu, yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n C.savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi yolundaki bilinen uygulaman\u0131n bir benzeri oldu\u011fu, C.savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n salt bu \u00fcst yaz\u0131 havalesi nedeniyle tebli\u011f yerine ge\u00e7ecek bi\u00e7imde karara muttali olmu\u015f say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ancak \u0130zmir C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu karara, sonradan Adli Sicil ve \u0130statistik Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce yaz\u0131lan ve i\u00e7eri\u011finde; ekte g\u00f6nderilen uyarlama karar\u0131n\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, eylemin yeni yasada da su\u00e7 olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi, bu nedenle beraat karar\u0131 verilmemesi laz\u0131m geldi\u011fi yolunda uyar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan ve karara kar\u015f\u0131 yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6neren yaz\u0131s\u0131 nedeniyle muttali olmu\u015ftur. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, bu \u0131tt\u0131la \u00fczerine 19.09.2005 tarihinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresindedir. Yerel Mahkemenin bu istemi, temyiz ba\u015fvurusu olarak de\u011ferlendirmesi ve incelenmek \u00fczere dosyay\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;a g\u00f6ndermesi gerekirken, itiraz ba\u015fvurusu olarak kabul edip bizzat \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme ba\u011flamak suretiyle verdi\u011fi 21.09.2005 tarihli ek karar hukuken ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. 23.06.2005 tarihli \u00f6nceki ek karara y\u00f6nelik hen\u00fcz \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulmam\u0131\u015f bir temyiz ba\u015fvurusu mevcut oldu\u011fu gibi, itiraz \u00fczerine verilen 21.09.2005 tarihli karar\u0131n hukuki ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi de bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Hukukun ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi olmayan bir karara kar\u015f\u0131 da yasa yarar\u0131na bozma istenemeyece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla; Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin reddine, \u00f6ncelikle 23.06.2005 g\u00fcnl\u00fc ek karar\u0131n ve Yerel C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n temyiz ba\u015fvurusu olarak kabul\u00fc gereken 19.09.2005 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7esinin h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye yerel mahkemece tebli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131, ard\u0131ndan da C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bu ba\u015fvurusu nedeniyle \u00d6zel Dairece temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in iade edilmek \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n Yerel Mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Yarg\u0131tay 4.Ceza Dairesinin 04.11.2006 g\u00fcn ve 5344-14844 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa yarar\u0131na bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Adalet Bakan\u0131n\u0131n, \u0130zmir 12. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 21.09.2005 tarih ve 873-682 say\u0131l\u0131 ek karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4- \u0130zmir 12. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 23.06.2005 g\u00fcn ve 873-682 say\u0131l\u0131 ek karar\u0131 ile C.savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye tebli\u011fini takiben \u0130zmir C.Savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bu karara y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvurusunun temyizen incelenebilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan dosyan\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;a iade edilmek \u00fczere mahalline g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 19.12.2006 g\u00fcn\u00fc oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2002\/4-154<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2002\/282<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 2.7.2002<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( Muhatab\u0131n\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yap\u0131lacak Yerde Olmamas\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 YED\u0130EM\u0130NL\u0130K G\u00d6REV\u0130N\u0130 SU\u0130ST\u0130MAL SU\u00c7U ( 4616 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa Uyar\u0131nca Davan\u0131n Kesin H\u00fckme Ba\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n Ertelenmesi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 4616 SAYILI YASANIN UYGULAMA ALANI ( Yedieminlik G\u00f6revini Suistimal Su\u00e7unun 4616 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n Kapsam\u0131 D\u0131\u015f\u0131nda B\u0131rak\u0131lan Su\u00e7lardan Olmamas\u0131-Davan\u0131n Ertelenmesi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 DAVANIN KES\u0130N H\u00dcKME BA\u011eLANMASININ ERTELENMES\u0130 ( Yedieminlik G\u00f6revini Suistimal Su\u00e7unun 4616 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n Kapsam\u0131 D\u0131\u015f\u0131nda B\u0131rak\u0131lan Su\u00e7lardan Olmamas\u0131 Nedeniyle )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 ERTELEME ( Yedieminlik G\u00f6revini Suistimal Su\u00e7unun 4616 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n Kapsam\u0131 D\u0131\u015f\u0131nda B\u0131rak\u0131lan Su\u00e7lardan Olmamas\u0131-Davan\u0131n Kesin H\u00fckme Ba\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n Ertelenmesi )<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">765\/m.276<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4616\/m.1\/4,1\/5<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m.8,29,30<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a01- Tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada g\u00f6sterilen adreste muhatap veya onun ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimselerden hi\u00e7biri bulunmazsa tebligat evrak\u0131n\u0131n kime teslim edilece\u011fi,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0memurunun s\u0131rayla hangi i\u015flemleri yapaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Kom\u015fuya haber verme keyfiyeti, e\u011fer m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ise s\u00f6z konusu olacakt\u0131r ki ama\u00e7 muhatab\u0131n haberdar olmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamakt\u0131r. Muhatap veya onun ad\u0131na\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131labilecek kimseler yaln\u0131zca tebli\u011f saati itibariyle adreste bulunmamakta, esasen o adreste ikamet etmektedirler. Bu nedenle o an i\u00e7in adreste bulunmamama nedeninin\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131na gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, yasal d\u00fczenlemede de bu y\u00f6nde bir h\u00fckme yer verilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Yedieminlik g\u00f6revini suistimal su\u00e7u bir y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmektedir. San\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7un vas\u0131f ve niteli\u011fine, eylemin 23 Nisan 1999 tarihinden \u00f6nce ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na, yedieminlik g\u00f6revini suistimal su\u00e7unun 4616 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a01\u00a0inci maddesinin 5 inci bendinde say\u0131lan kapsam d\u0131\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7lar aras\u0131nda yer almamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, bu Yasan\u0131n 1 inci maddesine 4758 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile eklenen 4 \u00fcnc\u00fc bendi uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n kesin h\u00fckme ba\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesine yer olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Yerel Mahkemece de\u011ferlendirilmesinde zorunluluk bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Yedieminlik g\u00f6revini suistimal su\u00e7undan san\u0131k Cafer Y.&#8217;\u0131n beraatine ili\u015fkin Eski\u015fehir 4.Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince 16.3.1999 g\u00fcn ve 1235-80 say\u0131 ile verilen karar\u0131n C.Savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 4.Ceza Dairesince 5.6.2000 g\u00fcn ve 2000\/3737-4829 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Tebligat Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 21 ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 28. maddesine g\u00f6re adreste bulunmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na ihbar yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmak ve imza ve isim belirtilmek suretiyle muhtara\u00a0tebligat\u00a0b\u0131rakmak ve kom\u015fusuna haber vermek suretiyle Yasaya uygun i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, &#8220;&#8230;tebligat par\u00e7as\u0131nda adreste bulunmama nedeninin belirtilmemesi ve haber b\u0131rak\u0131lan kom\u015funun ad\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0tebligata yaz\u0131lmamas\u0131..&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilip yediemin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraatine karar verilmesi&#8221; isabetsizli\u011finden h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkeme ise 4.10.2000 g\u00fcn ve 676-685 say\u0131 ile; &#8220;Tebligat par\u00e7as\u0131nda\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 21 ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 28. maddesine g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011fa\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada adresinde bulunmama nedeninin belirtilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve kom\u015fusunun da imzas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda yap\u0131lantebligat\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu nedenle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sat\u0131\u015ftan haberinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcmde direnmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu karar\u0131n da C.Savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya, Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;bozma&#8221; istekli 26.12.2001 g\u00fcnl\u00fc tebli\u011fnamesiyle 4. Ceza Dairesine ve \u00d6zel Dairece Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilmekle CEZA GENEL KURULUnca okundu, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Bor\u00e7lu-san\u0131k Cafer Y. hakk\u0131nda alacakl\u0131 vekilince y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen icra takibi s\u0131ras\u0131nda, ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r mallar\u0131n haczedilip kendisine yediemin s\u0131fat\u0131yla b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu mallar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rma y\u00f6ntemiyle sat\u0131larak paraya \u00e7evrilmesine karar verilip san\u0131k ad\u0131na, \u015fartname ve sat\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 me\u015fruhatl\u0131\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, d\u00f6nen\u00a0tebligat\u00a0par\u00e7as\u0131nda aynen; &#8220;Tebli\u011f saatinde muhatab\u0131n evinde kimse bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0muhtar Ali U. imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi 2 nolu ihbar kap\u0131s\u0131na as\u0131ld\u0131, kom\u015fusuna haber verildi. 17.11.1997&#8221; ibaresinin yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve sat\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc hacizli mallar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f yerine getirilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6zel Daire ile Yerel Mahkeme aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, a\u00e7\u0131klanan bu somut olayda san\u0131\u011fa, hacizli mallar\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f yerinde haz\u0131r etmesi i\u00e7in \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan me\u015fruhatl\u0131\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcnce tebli\u011f edilip edilmedi\u011fi, \u00f6zde y\u00fcklenen yedieminli\u011fi suistimal su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131 itibariyle olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir hukuki \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme ula\u015fabilmek i\u00e7in bu konudaki yasal d\u00fczenlemenin incelenmesinde yarar vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat Yasas\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;Tebli\u011f \u0130mkans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Tebell\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden \u0130mtina&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 21 inci maddesinde; &#8220;Kendisine\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lacak kimse veya yukar\u0131daki maddeler mucibince\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131labilecek kimselerden hi\u00e7biri g\u00f6sterilen adreste bulunmaz veya tebell\u00fc\u011fden imtina ederse, tebli\u011f memuru tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir ve memuruna imza mukabilinde teslim eder ve tesell\u00fcm edenin adresini ihtiva eden ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresteki binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmakla beraber, adreste bulunmama halinde tebli\u011f olunacak \u015fahsa keyfiyetin haber verilmesini de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olduk\u00e7a en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirilir. \u0130hbarnamenin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayn\u0131 konuda\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ise, &#8220;Tebli\u011f \u0130mkans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 28 inci maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131nda; &#8220;Muhatap ve onun yerine\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131lacak kimseler, o adreste bulunduklar\u0131 halde tebli\u011fin yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada orada mevcut de\u011fillerse 30 uncu maddeye g\u00f6re muamele yap\u0131l\u0131r&#8221;;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">30 uncu maddede de; &#8220;28 inci maddenin son f\u0131kras\u0131nda ve 29 uncu maddede zikredilen ahvalde tebli\u011f memuru, tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti veya meclisi azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir veya memuruna imza mukabilinde teslim eder.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebli\u011f memuru, T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011fe ekli 2 numaral\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fe uygun olarak d\u00fczenlenen ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresteki kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131r. Durumu muhataba duyurmas\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130hbarnamenin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221; h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde, tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada g\u00f6sterilen adreste muhatap veya onun ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimselerden hi\u00e7biri bulunmazsa tebligat evrak\u0131n\u0131n kime teslim edilece\u011fi,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0memurunun s\u0131rayla hangi i\u015flemleri yapaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi kom\u015fuya haber verme keyfiyeti, e\u011fer m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ise s\u00f6z konusu olacakt\u0131r ki ama\u00e7 muhatab\u0131n haberdar olmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamakt\u0131r. Muhatap veya onun ad\u0131na\u00a0tebligat\u00a0yap\u0131labilecek kimseler yaln\u0131zca tebli\u011f saati itibariyle adreste bulunmamakta, esasen o adreste ikamet etmektedirler. Bu nedenle o an i\u00e7in adreste bulunmamama nedeninin\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131na gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, yasal d\u00fczenlemede de bu y\u00f6nde bir h\u00fckme yer verilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu yasal d\u00fczenlemeler ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay ele al\u0131n\u0131p de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat memuru taraf\u0131ndan muhatap ve onun ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131labilecek kimselerin o an i\u00e7in adreste bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 saptan\u0131nca, tebligat evrak\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6y muhtar\u0131na teslim edilip imzas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, kom\u015fuya haber verildi\u011fi ve 2 nolu ihbarnamenin de bor\u00e7lu-san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. O halde tebligat memurunun bu i\u015flemleri,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 21 inci maddesine ve\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 28 ve 30 uncu maddelerine uygun olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi sabittir. Bu nedenle Yerel Mahkemece, yasal d\u00fczenlemeye uymayan gerek\u00e7elerle\u00a0tebligat\u0131n ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131lmas\u0131 ve dosya kapsam\u0131na uymayacak \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n y\u00fcklenen yedieminli\u011fi suistimal su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 yerine beraatine karar verilmesi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ancak, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun, direnme karar\u0131ndan sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 4616 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin Anayasa Mahkemesinin, 27.10.2001 g\u00fcnl\u00fc Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131mlanan 18.7.2001 g\u00fcn ve 4-332 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla iptal edilmesi \u00fczerine, iptal edilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin yerine yeni h\u00fck\u00fcmler getiren ve 23.5.2002 g\u00fcnl\u00fc Resmi gazetede yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 4758 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa kapsam\u0131nda ele al\u0131n\u0131p belirlenmesinde zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4758 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a01\u00a0inci maddesi ile 4616 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a01\u00a0inci maddesine eklenen 4 \u00fcnc\u00fc bendinde; &#8220;23 Nisan 1999 tarihine kadar i\u015flenmi\u015f ve ilgili kanun maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fahsi h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezan\u0131n \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 on y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7meyen su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 haklar\u0131nda hen\u00fcz takibata ge\u00e7ilmemi\u015f veya haz\u0131rl\u0131k soru\u015fturmas\u0131na giri\u015filmi\u015f olmakla beraber dava a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f veya son soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f olmakla beraber hen\u00fcz h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmemi\u015f veya verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f ise, davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 veya kesin h\u00fckme ba\u011flanmas\u0131 ertelenir; varsa tutukluluk halinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilir. Bu su\u00e7larla ilgili dosya ve deliller, her bir su\u00e7un dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin sonuna kadar muhafaza edilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Erteleme konusu su\u00e7un dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde bu su\u00e7 ile ayn\u0131 cins veya daha a\u011f\u0131r \u015fahsi h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezay\u0131 gerektiren bir su\u00e7 i\u015flendi\u011finde, erteleme konusu su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 da dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r veya daha \u00f6nce a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunan davaya devam edilerek h\u00fck\u00fcm verilir. Bu s\u00fcre, erteleme konusu su\u00e7 ile ayn\u0131 cins veya daha a\u011f\u0131r \u015fahsi h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezay\u0131 gerektiren bir su\u00e7 i\u015flenmeksizin ge\u00e7irildi\u011finde, ertelemeden yararlanan hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmaz; a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan davan\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu bentle ilgili olarak bu kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarihten itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 ay i\u00e7inde dosyan\u0131n bulundu\u011fu yarg\u0131 merciine ba\u015fvurmak suretiyle soru\u015fturmaya veya davaya devam edilmesini istediklerini bildirenler hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma veya davaya devam olunur. Mahk\u00fbmiyet halinde verilen ceza, dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresince ertelenir. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7in erteleme konusu su\u00e7 ile ayn\u0131 cins veya daha a\u011f\u0131r \u015fahsi h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezay\u0131 gerektiren bir su\u00e7 i\u015flendi\u011finde ertelenen ceza da infaz edilir. Ayn\u0131 s\u00fcre, erteleme konusu su\u00e7 ile ayn\u0131 cins veya daha a\u011f\u0131r \u015fahsi h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezay\u0131 gerektiren bir su\u00e7 i\u015flenmeksizin ge\u00e7irildi\u011finde, mahk\u00fbmiyet vaki olmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 12.1.1998 tarihinde i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilen ve Yerel Mahkemenin beraat h\u00fckm\u00fcne konu olan su\u00e7, TCY.n\u0131n 276 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesinin 2 inci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 yedieminlik g\u00f6revini suistimal su\u00e7u olup bir y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca, bu su\u00e7 4616 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a01\u00a0inci maddesinin 5 inci bendinde say\u0131lan kapsam d\u0131\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7lar aras\u0131nda da bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7un vas\u0131f ve niteli\u011fine, eylemin 23 Nisan 1999 tarihinden \u00f6nce ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na, yedieminlik g\u00f6revini suistimal su\u00e7unun 4616 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a01\u00a0inci maddesinin 5 inci bendinde say\u0131lan kapsam d\u0131\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7lar aras\u0131nda yer almamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, bu Yasan\u0131n 1 inci maddesine 4758 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile eklenen 4 \u00fcnc\u00fc bendi uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n kesin h\u00fckme ba\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesine yer olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Yerel Mahkemece de\u011ferlendirilmesinde zorunluluk bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenle bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle Yerel Mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fc isabetsiz oldu\u011fundan 4758 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasayla de\u011fi\u015fik 4616 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere BOZULMASINA, dosyan\u0131n yerine g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine, 2.7.2002 g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011fnamedeki isteme uygun olarak oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">E. 1994\/4-207<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">K. 1994\/231<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">T. 24.10.1994<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT (\u00a0Tebligat\u0131n Aralar\u0131nda Menfaat \u00c7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 Olan Birine Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022\u00a0USULS\u00dcZ\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT ( Tebli\u011fin E\u015fe Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 )<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 E\u015eE YAPILAN\u00a0TEBL\u0130GAT<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u2022 YED\u0130EM\u0130N\u0130N Y\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dcL\u00dc\u011e\u00dcNDEN KA\u00c7INMASI SU\u00c7U<\/span><\/p>\n<p>765\/m.276<\/p>\n<p>7201\/m.16,39,54<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ZET :\u00a0Kural olarak\u00a0tebligat, tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fah\u0131s bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde birlikte oturan aile fertlerinden birine yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Ancak, &#8220;kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 caiz olan kimselerin o davada has\u0131m olarak ilgileri oldu\u011fu takdirde muhatap nam\u0131na kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131&#8221;da h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.Buna g\u00f6re bor\u00e7lunun mallar\u0131 haczedilip yediemin olarak e\u015fine b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde ikisi aras\u0131nda bir menfaat \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu hacizle ilgili tebli\u011fler ilgisi olmayan e\u015fe yap\u0131lamaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA:\u00a0Yediemin y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden ka\u00e7\u0131nma su\u00e7undan san\u0131k F`nin TCY.n\u0131n 276\/1, 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a04. maddeleri gere\u011fince 550.000 lira a\u011f\u0131r para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve bu cezas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesine ili\u015fkin, Babaeskl Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi`nce verilen 20.11.1992 g\u00fcn, 198\/267 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine; dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi, 7.09.1993 g\u00fcn, 6244-5779 say\u0131 ile; &#8220;Haczedilen e\u015fyay\u0131 belli g\u00fcnde sat\u0131\u015f yerine getirmesi i\u00e7in san\u0131k ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebli\u011f ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n\u0131n bor\u00e7lu olan kocaya tebli\u011f edildi\u011finin, koca taraf\u0131ndan da bu\u00a0tebligat\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa bildirilmedi\u011finin savunulmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, bu husus ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmadan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne karar verilmesi&#8221; isabetsizli\u011finden bozmu\u015f,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkeme, 12.11.1993 g\u00fcn, 254\/274 say\u0131 ile; &#8220;7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa gere\u011fince\u00a0tebligat, tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fah\u0131s bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde birlikte oturan aile fertlerinden birine yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r. 5584 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n\u00a017. maddesi uyar\u0131nca da, taahh\u00fctl\u00fc mektup, al\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde kendisiyle birlikte oturan ailesinden birine veya yeti\u015fkin olan birisine verilecektir. Sat\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc ile ilgili\u00a0tebligat\u00a0san\u0131kla ayn\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131 alt\u0131nda oturan e\u015fine yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erlidir&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcmde direnmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn de Yarg\u0131tay`ca incelenmesi, san\u0131k vekili taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresinde istenildi\u011finden, dosya; Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131`n\u0131n &#8220;onama&#8221; istemli 23.6.1994 g\u00fcnt\u00fc tebli\u011fnamesiyle Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilmekle; Ceza Genel Kurulu`nca okundu, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR:\u00a0Kocas\u0131n\u0131n borcu nedeniyle haczedilen ve yediemin olarak kendisine b\u0131rak\u0131lan mahcuz mallar\u0131, tebli\u011fe ra\u011fmen sat\u0131\u015f yerinde haz\u0131r bulundurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k, C. Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve duru\u015fmada al\u0131nan beyanlar\u0131nda, sat\u0131\u015f yer ve zaman\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in e\u015fyalar\u0131 g\u00f6t\u00fcremedi\u011fi, sat\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc bildirir davetiyenin tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahcuz mallar\u0131n belli g\u00fcn ve saatte sat\u0131\u015f mahallinde haz\u0131r bulundurulmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin icra memurlu\u011fu muht\u0131ras\u0131, 13.7.1992 tarihinde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n e\u015fine, yani icra dosyas\u0131n\u0131n bor\u00e7lusuna tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yediemin y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden ka\u00e7\u0131nma su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in; usul\u00fcne uygun\u00a0tebligata ra\u011fmen mahcuz mallar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f mahallinde haz\u0131r bulundurulmamas\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc bilmesine ra\u011fmen kendisine teslim edilen e\u015fyalar\u0131 haz\u0131r bulundurmayarak, sat\u0131\u015fa bilerek engel olmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a016. maddesi gere\u011fince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n e\u015fine tebli\u011f olunan sat\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc bildirir muht\u0131ran\u0131n, ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 54. maddesi uyar\u0131nca en k\u0131sa zamanda muhatab\u0131 olan san\u0131\u011fa verilmesi gerekmektedir. San\u0131k ise a\u015famalarda, tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131 almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015f ve bu konuda bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan, tebligat\u0131 alan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n e\u015fi, icra dosyas\u0131nda bor\u00e7lu olup haczolunan ve san\u0131\u011fa teslim edilen mallar\u0131n sahibidir. Bu nedenle yediemin olan e\u015fi ile \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Yedieminin sat\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6\u011frenerek e\u015fyalar\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f yerine getirmesi ve sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 aleyhinedir.\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 39. maddesinde &#8220;kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 caiz olan kimselerin o davada has\u0131m olarak ilgileri oldu\u011fu takdirde muhatap nam\u0131na kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131&#8221;da h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle de, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ge\u00e7ersiz olan\u00a0tebligat\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenip \u00f6\u011frenmedi\u011finin,\u00a0tebligat\u0131 alan bor\u00e7lu da dinlenmek suretiyle ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekti\u011finden direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7:\u00a0A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, Yerel Mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, tebli\u011fnamedeki onama isteyen d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak, 24.10.1994 g\u00fcn\u00fc oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2014\/27553<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2017\/2305<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">28.2.2017<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a05237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>53<\/u>. maddesinin baz\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin iptaline dair Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 24\/11\/2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 08\/10\/2015 g\u00fcn ve 2014\/140 esas, 2015\/85 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 da nazara al\u0131narak bu maddede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen hak yoksunluklar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda verilen hapis cezalar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131nda g\u00f6zetilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I-)Su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda mala zarar verme su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mala zarar verme su\u00e7undan do\u011frudan h\u00fckmolunan adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n miktar ve t\u00fcr\u00fcne g\u00f6re; 14.04.2011 tarihli Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 31.03.2011 tarih ve 6217 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0<u>26<\/u>. maddesiyle 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;a eklenen ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesi gere\u011fince do\u011frudan h\u00fckmolunan 3000 TL dahil adli para cezas\u0131na mahkumiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin temyizi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz iste\u011finin 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>317<\/u>. maddesi gere\u011fince istem gibi REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">II-San\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, mala zarar verme, konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bozma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan, su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bozma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131na gelince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n bilinen en son adresinin ayn\u0131 zamanda MERN\u0130S adresi olmas\u0131 ve san\u0131k ad\u0131na MERN\u0130S adresine 28.06.2013 tarihinde gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011f imkans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 sebebiyle muhtara tebli\u011f edildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0<u>21<\/u>\/1. maddesine g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adreste bulunmamas\u0131 halinde, tebli\u011f memurunun tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir veya memurlar\u0131na imza mukabilinde teslim ederek ve tesell\u00fcm edenin adresini ihtiva eden ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresteki binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmakla beraber, adreste bulunmama halinde tebli\u011f olunacak \u015fahsa keyfiyetin\u00a0haber\u00a0verilmesini de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olduk\u00e7a en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirmesi gerekirken; bu i\u015flemler yap\u0131lmadan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n MERN\u0130S adresinde oturup oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya MERN\u0130S adresinden s\u00fcrekli olarak ayr\u0131l\u0131p ayr\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmeden do\u011frudan ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 21\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re i\u015flem yap\u0131larak muhtara teslim edilmesi sebebiyle\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine h\u00fckm\u00fc s\u00fcresinde temyiz etti\u011fi kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya, toplanan delillere, gerek\u00e7eye, hakimin kanaat ve takdirine g\u00f6re temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin istem gibi ONANMASINA, 28.02.2017 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2016\/1940<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2016\/3614<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">25.4.2016<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0I-)San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, yoklu\u011funda verilip sorgu ve ayn\u0131 zamanda mernis adresi olan adresine 09.06.2014 tarihinde usul\u00fcne uygun tebli\u011f edilen h\u00fckm\u00fc 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0<u>8<\/u>\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun\u00a0<u>310<\/u>. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen bir haftal\u0131k yasal s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra 30.09.2014 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle temyiz etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, temyiz isteminin ve yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen eski hale getirme talebinin 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0<u>8<\/u>\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun\u00a0<u>317<\/u>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca istem gibi REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">II-San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine gelince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yoklu\u011funda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilinen en son ve ayn\u0131 zamanda adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki adresine tebli\u011fi s\u0131ras\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adresten ge\u00e7ici ya da s\u00fcrekli ayr\u0131l\u0131p ayr\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda bir a\u00e7\u0131klama ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmadan, en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirilmeden, &#8220;adresin kapal\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131&#8221; ile yetinilip mahalle muhtar\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi ve 2 numaral\u0131\u00a0haber\u00a0ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n\u0131n kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu ve eski hale getirme talebinin yerinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)San\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n &#8220;2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n yan\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yordum, bana kendilerinin \u00fczerinde haciz oldu\u011funu, bu sebeple \u015firket kuramad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, benle ortak \u015firket kurup \u015firketi \u00fczerime yapmak istediklerini s\u00f6ylediler, bende kabul ettim, di\u011fer san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217; \u0131 da bu \u015fah\u0131slar buldu ve birlikte Notere gittik, bu olayda benim herhangi bir su\u00e7um yoktur, ben \u015firketle hi\u00e7 bir zaman ilgilenmedim, benden defter ve belgeler istendi\u011finde de ben &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n yan\u0131na giderek defter ve belgeleri vermesini istedim, ancak bana defter ve belgelerin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylediler, bende veremedim, bu \u015fah\u0131slar beni de ma\u011fdur etmi\u015ftirler&#8221; \u015feklindeki savunmas\u0131, di\u011fer san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n da &#8220;Ben &#8230;&#8217;e i\u015f aramak i\u00e7in gitmi\u015ftim,&#8230; \u0130linde beni &#8230; kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131 ve bana bir arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu ve arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n \u015firketi oldu\u011funu, orada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fabilece\u011fimi ancak noterde birka\u00e7 imza atmam gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi, ben de &#8230; ile birlikte notere gittim, notere gitti\u011fimizde san\u0131k &#8230; de yan\u0131m\u0131zdayd\u0131, ben&#8230;&#8217;a g\u00fcvendi\u011fim i\u00e7in noterde imzalatt\u0131r\u0131lan evraklar\u0131 okumadan imzalad\u0131m, hem &#8230; hem de &#8230; bana \u015firketin sadece sorumlusu olaca\u011f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00f6ylediler, daha sonra &#8230;&#8217;e gitmemi istediler ve 4-5 ay boyunca kendilerini aramamam\u0131 istediler, ben de kendilerini aramad\u0131m, onlar da beni aramad\u0131lar, bu y\u00fczden ben de &#8230;&#8217;de kendime i\u015f buldum ve &#8230;&#8217;e gitmedim, ben herhangi bir \u015fekilde sahte fatura d\u00fczenlemedim, bu olay tamamen &#8230;&#8217;a g\u00fcvendi\u011fimden dolay\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131ma gelmi\u015ftir.&#8221; \u015feklinde san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u0131 teyit eder \u015fekilde savunmada bulunmu\u015f olmas\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n ortak g\u00f6z\u00fckt\u00fckleri \u015firketin Bs formlar\u0131nda sat\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan &#8230;&#8217;un banka arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u00f6dedi\u011fi mal bedellerinin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n vekalet verdi\u011fi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan tahsil edilmesi, &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015firketinin al\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tamamen sahte fatura d\u00fczenlemek i\u00e7in kuruldu\u011funa dair vergi inceleme raporlar\u0131 bulunan &#8230; limited ve &#8230; Metal Limited \u015eirketlerinin ortaklar\u0131 olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; ger\u00e7e\u011fin ku\u015fkuya yer vermeyecek \u015fekilde belirlenmesi ve sahte fatura d\u00fczenleme eyleminin san\u0131k &#8230; ve san\u0131k &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilip ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmedi\u011finin belirlenmesi i\u00e7in san\u0131k &#8230; ve &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan \u015firket faaliyetleriyle ilgili beyanname, \u015firkete ait bir belge d\u00fczenleyip d\u00fczenlemedikleri, m\u00fcd\u00fcr veya ortak s\u0131fat\u0131yla \u015firketten bir maa\u015f ya da pay al\u0131p almad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;ve &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmesi, haklar\u0131nda san\u0131klar\u0131n orta\u011f\u0131 olduklar\u0131 m\u00fckellef \u015firketle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 vergi ve ceza soru\u015fturmalar\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve m\u00fckellef \u015firketin faaliyetini ger\u00e7ekte y\u00fcr\u00fcten ki\u015filer olup olmad\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en ki\u015filere ait \u015firketlerde ortakl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, su\u00e7a konu faturalar ve \u015firketin kurulu\u015f a\u015famas\u0131ndaki belgelerdeki imza ve yaz\u0131lar\u0131n aidiyeti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bu ki\u015filer ile san\u0131klar\u0131n imza ve yaz\u0131 \u00f6rneklerinin al\u0131narak bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, \u015firketin fatura kesti\u011fi \u015firket yetkililerinin belirlenip tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmeleri, dosya i\u00e7erisinde 2009, 2010 y\u0131llar\u0131na ait \u00e7ok say\u0131da fatura ile 2008 y\u0131l\u0131na ait 1 adet faturan\u0131n bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan fatura ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n Vergi Dairesi&#8217;nden sorularak dava a\u00e7\u0131lan her takvim y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in kanaat olu\u015fturacak say\u0131da fatura asl\u0131 ya da onayl\u0131 suretinin de dosya aras\u0131na konulmas\u0131ndan sonra sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi yerine eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kabule g\u00f6re de;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nun\u00a0<u>225<\/u>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fcn konusu, duru\u015fman\u0131n neticesine g\u00f6re iddianamede g\u00f6sterilen fiilden ibaret olup, bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131larak davaya konu edilmeyen eylem esas al\u0131narak h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulamayaca\u011f\u0131 halde san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, vergi tekni\u011fi ve vergi su\u00e7u raporu ile kurum m\u00fctalas\u0131nda yer almay\u0131p iddianame ile de kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olan 2012 takvim y\u0131l\u0131nda da sahte belge d\u00fczenlemek su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyetine h\u00fckmedilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu sebeple yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebepten dolay\u0131 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0<u>8<\/u>\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun\u00a0<u>321<\/u>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esine g\u00f6re temyiz talebi reddedilen san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;a da sirayet ettirilmesine, 25.04.2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2016\/3157<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2016\/2732<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">10.3.2016<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne dair tebligat\u0131n,\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanun&#8217;un 21. maddesine g\u00f6re en yak\u0131n\u00a0kom\u015fuya\u00a0haber verilmesi \u015fart\u0131na uyulmaks\u0131z\u0131n tebli\u011f edilerek kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0usuls\u00fcz olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eski hale getirme ve temyiz iste\u011finin hakl\u0131, temyizin \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine ve s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; eski hale getirme konusunda karar verme yetkisi Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;a ait olup temyiz talebinin reddine dair 06.08.2015 tarihli ek karar\u0131n hukuki de\u011ferden yoksun olmas\u0131 sebebiyle bu karar kald\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle yap\u0131lan incelemede,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131landan sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 mal kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kat\u0131lana su\u00e7a konu sahte \u00e7eki d\u00fczenleyip vermek suretiyle sahtecilik ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia olundu\u011fu olayda;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)Sahtecilik su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131landan sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 mal kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda sahte \u00e7ek d\u00fczenlemek \u015feklindeki eyleminin sahtecilik su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kab\u00fclde isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen ve Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 Say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 08.10.2015 tarih, 2014\/140 E, 2015\/85 Say\u0131l\u0131 iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz a\u015famas\u0131nda g\u00f6zetilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131landan sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 mal kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kat\u0131lana su\u00e7a konu sahte \u00e7eki vermek \u015feklindeki eyleminin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kab\u00fclde isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>158<\/u>. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (e), (f), (j) ve (k) bentlerinde belirtilen nitelikli hallerde su\u00e7tan elde edilen haks\u0131z menfaati belli ise; TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>52<\/u>. madde h\u00fckm\u00fc de g\u00f6zetilmek sureti ile haks\u0131z menfaatin iki kat\u0131ndan az olmayacak \u015fekilde temel adli para cezas\u0131 ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 61. maddesi uyar\u0131nca g\u00fcn olarak belirlenerek art\u0131r\u0131m ve indirimler g\u00fcn \u00fczerinden yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra, ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak sonu\u00e7 g\u00fcn say\u0131s\u0131 ile bir g\u00fcn kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 52\/2. madde h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince 20-100 TL aras\u0131nda takdir edilecek miktar\u0131n \u00e7arp\u0131lmas\u0131 neticesinde sonu\u00e7 adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekirken do\u011frudan elde edilen haks\u0131z menfaatin iki kat\u0131 esas al\u0131nmak suretiyle ceza tayini sonucu etkilemedi\u011finden bozma nedeni yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a-)Kat\u0131lan\u0131n, zarar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan giderilmedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki 17.04.2015 tarihli beyan\u0131ndan sonra, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 16.06.2015 tarihindeki beyan\u0131nda &#8220;\u00e7ek kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan 32.000 TL&#8217;yi mal ile birlikte &#8230;&#8217;e iade ettim, bunun iade edildi\u011fi banka kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda mevcuttur, daha sonra&#8230;&#8217;e kendi \u015firketimin 32.000 TL bedelli \u00e7ekini verdim, ilave senetlerde verdim, daha sonra mallar\u0131 iade ederek al\u0131\u015fveri\u015fimizi sonland\u0131rd\u0131m&#8221; \u015feklinde beyanda bulundu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; kat\u0131lana, zarar\u0131n\u0131n giderilip giderilmedi\u011fi hususunun sorularak ve zarar\u0131n hangi tarihte giderildi\u011fi hususu ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak sonucuna g\u00f6re TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>168<\/u>. maddesinin uygulan\u0131p uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kararda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131,b-TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hak yoksunluklar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 Say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 08.10.2015 tarih, 2014\/140 E, 2015\/85 Say\u0131l\u0131 iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenlerle, 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0<u>8<\/u>\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;un\u00a0<u>321<\/u>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 10\/03\/2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2016\/116<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2016\/3545<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">1.3.2016<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0Yoklu\u011funda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulan san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;e 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a0<u>21<\/u>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 4.4.2014 tarihinde tebligat yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda,\u00a0haber\u00a0verilmesi gereken en yak\u0131n kom\u015fusunun isminin belirtilmemesi ve imzas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmamas\u0131 sebebiyle yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 26.10.2015 havale tarihli temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu belirlenerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>53<\/u>. maddesinin baz\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin iptaline dair Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 24.11.2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 8.10.2015 g\u00fcn ve 2014\/140 esas, 2015\/85 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 da nazara al\u0131narak bu maddede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen hak yoksunluklar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n infaz a\u015famas\u0131nda g\u00f6zetilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmler ile su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk &#8230; hakk\u0131nda konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya, toplanan delillere, gerek\u00e7eye, h\u00e2kimin kanaat ve takdirine g\u00f6re temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin istem gibi ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk &#8230; hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve mala zarar verme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir, Ancak;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>50<\/u>\/3.maddesinde daha \u00f6nce hapis cezas\u0131 ile mahk\u00fbm olmayan 18 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurmam\u0131\u015f \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n mahk\u00fbm edildi\u011fi bir y\u0131l veya daha az s\u00fcreli hapis cezalar\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 se\u00e7enek yapt\u0131r\u0131mlardan birine \u00e7evrilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f, 5275 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0<u>106<\/u>\/4. maddesinde &#8220;\u00c7ocuklar hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckmedilen adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi halinde bu ceza hapse \u00e7evrilemez, bu takdirde onbirinci f\u0131kra h\u00fckm\u00fc uygulan\u0131r.&#8221; \u015feklinde d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Her ne kadar 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>50<\/u>\/6. maddesinde se\u00e7enek tedbirin yerine getirilmemesi halinde tedbire \u00e7evrilen k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n tamamen veya k\u0131smen infaz\u0131na karar verilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f ise de, yukarda a\u00e7\u0131klanan d\u00fczenlemeler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>50<\/u>\/6. maddesinin \u00e7ocuklar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131, h\u00fckmolunan se\u00e7enek tedbirin yerine getirilmemesi halinde di\u011fer se\u00e7enek tedbirlerden birine veya adli para cezas\u0131na karar verilebilece\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131ndan \u00e7evrilen se\u00e7enek tedbirin yerine getirilmemesi halinde hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n tamamen veya k\u0131smen infaz edilece\u011fi ihtar\u0131 yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk m\u00fcdafinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebepten dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, ancak bu ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 322. maddesine g\u00f6re d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fundan, \u201cTaksitlerden birinin \u00f6denmemesi durumunda kalan t\u00fcm taksitlerin SS\u00c7&#8217;dan tahsili ile \u00f6denmeyen para cezas\u0131n\u0131n hapse \u00e7evrilmesine,\u201d dair b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmek suretiyle, di\u011fer y\u00f6nleri usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA, 1.3.2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2015\/9527<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2016\/1875<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">15.2.2016<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Yerel Mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler temyiz edilmekle, kararlar\u0131n nitelik, ceza t\u00fcr\u00fc, s\u00fcresi ve su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re dosya g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0San\u0131\u011fa, 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a0<u>21<\/u>. maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan ilk\u00a0tebligat\u0131n kom\u015fusuna\u00a0haber\u00a0verilmemesi sebebiyle usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; temyizin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fcyle yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fc\u015ftekiye ait 3 plaka say\u0131l\u0131, evin \u00f6n\u00fcndeki otoparkta kilitli vaziyette bulunan arac\u0131 kelebek cam\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131rarak kap\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131p \u00e7almaya kalk\u0131\u015fan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemi 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217; n\u0131n 142\/1-b. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen su\u00e7u olu\u015fturmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi sonu\u00e7 ceza de\u011fi\u015fmeyece\u011finden, bozma nedeni yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin karar tarihinden sonra 24.11.2015 tarihli Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 08.10.2015 g\u00fcn, 2014\/140 Esas ve 2015\/85 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>53<\/u>. maddesinin baz\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin iptaline dair karar\u0131n\u0131n infazda g\u00f6zetilmesi olanakl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya, toplanan delillere, gerek\u00e7eye, hakimin kanaat ve takdirine g\u00f6re san\u0131k C.. T.. &#8216;nun temyiz itiraz\u0131 yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddiyle, ele\u015ftiri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda usul ve yasaya uygun olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mala zarar verme su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ma\u011fdura ait 3 plaka say\u0131l\u0131 arac\u0131 \u00e7almak i\u00e7in san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ara\u00e7 cam\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, d\u00fcz kontak yapabilmek i\u00e7in direksiyon alt\u0131ndaki kutunun s\u00f6k\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, mal\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131nmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda e\u015fyaya verilen zarardan dolay\u0131 ayr\u0131ca mala zarar verme su\u00e7undan ceza verilmeyece\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131k ..&#8217;nun temyiz itiraz\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebepten dolay\u0131 isteme ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak BOZULMASINA, 15\/02\/2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2015\/19569<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2015\/8320<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">17.12.2015<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne dair tebli\u011fat\u0131n, Tebli\u011fat Kanunun 21. maddesine g\u00f6re en yak\u0131n\u00a0kom\u015fuya\u00a0haber verilmesi \u015fart\u0131na uyulmaks\u0131z\u0131n tebli\u011f edilerek kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0usuls\u00fcz olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eski hale getirme ve temyiz iste\u011finin hakl\u0131, temyizin \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine ve s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; eski hale getirme konusunda karar verme yetkisi Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;a ait olup temyiz talebinin reddine dair 26.11.2013 tarihli ek karar\u0131n hukuki de\u011ferden yoksun olmas\u0131 sebebiyle bu karar kald\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle yap\u0131lan incelemede,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyize gelmeyen san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;in kat\u0131lana Giresun televizyonunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yeni bir ma\u011faza a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve hediye da\u011f\u0131tt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek kat\u0131lana bir zarf verdi\u011fi, bir m\u00fcddet sonra kendisini \u015firketin m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc olarak tan\u0131tan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n geldi\u011fi ve birlikte zarf\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 ve san\u0131klar\u0131n zarftan f\u0131r\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve size bilgisayarda getirece\u011fiz ayr\u0131ca 200 TL indirim \u00e7eki kazand\u0131n\u0131z \u015feklinde beyanda bulunarak kat\u0131landan 440 TL ald\u0131klar\u0131 ve kat\u0131lana ger\u00e7ek piyasa de\u011feri 190 TL olan f\u0131r\u0131n ve tencere satt\u0131klar\u0131ndan ve san\u0131klar\u0131n ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ntemle \u015fikayet\u00e7i&#8230; da piyasa de\u011ferlerinin \u00e7ok \u00fczerinde mutfak e\u015fyas\u0131 satarak 495 TL mebla\u011fl\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalatt\u0131klar\u0131ndan fikir ve eylem birli\u011fi i\u00e7erisinde doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015flediklerinin iddia olundu\u011fu olayda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, temyize gelmeyen di\u011fer san\u0131k ile birlikte hileli ve aldat\u0131c\u0131 hareketlerle kat\u0131lan ile \u015fikayet\u00e7inin zarar\u0131na kendi yarar\u0131na haks\u0131z menfaat temin etti\u011finden eylemlerinin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>53<\/u>\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hak yoksunluklar\u0131n\u0131n, Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 Say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 8.10.2015 tarih, 2014\/140 E, 2015\/85 Say\u0131l\u0131 iptal karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda infaz a\u015famas\u0131nda g\u00f6zetilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle beraber, maddenin (b) f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan &#8220;ve di\u011fer siyasi haklar\u0131 kullanmaktan&#8221; \u015feklindeki ibarenin Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan iptal edilmesi ve ayr\u0131ca TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>53<\/u>. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 53\/1-c bendindeki \u201cvelayet hakk\u0131ndan; vesayet veya kayy\u0131ml\u0131\u011fa ait bir hizmette bulunmaktan&#8221; yoksunlu\u011fun san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sadece kendi altsoyu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verme tarihine kadar s\u00fcrece\u011fi, altsoyu haricindekiler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 tamamlan\u0131ncaya kadar devam edece\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 sebebiyle bu hususlar,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0<u>8<\/u>\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>321<\/u>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, ancak yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmeyen bu hususlar\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 322. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>53<\/u>\/1. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131na dair (c) bendinin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerden \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131larak yerine &#8220;TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 1. f\u0131kran\u0131n (c) bendinde yer alan kendi alt soyu \u00fczerindeki velayet, vesayet veya kayy\u0131ml\u0131k yetkilerinin ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihine, altsoyu haricindekiler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 tamamlan\u0131ncaya kadar yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na&#8221; c\u00fcmlesinin eklenmesi ve TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>53<\/u>\/1. maddesinin (b) bendinin uygulanmas\u0131na dair k\u0131s\u0131mlarda yer alan &#8220;ve di\u011fer siyasi haklar\u0131 kullanmaktan&#8221; ibaresinin tamamen \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle sair y\u00f6nleri usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA, 17.12.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2015\/7823<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2015\/17286<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">22.6.2015<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Yerel mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle; ba\u015fvurunun nitelik, ceza t\u00fcr\u00fc, s\u00fcresi ve su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re dosya okunduktan sonra T\u00fcrk Milleti ad\u0131na gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a0San\u0131k m\u00fcdafii 25.03.2014 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde san\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilen\u00a0tebligattan kom\u015fular\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0haberinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bilgi ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n\u0131n kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve muhtar\u0131n m\u00fcvekkilini bilgilendirmedi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n da\u00a0haberi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6ylece yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011funu \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6re, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 MK.nun\u00a0<u>42<\/u>\/1.maddesi uyar\u0131nca temyiz talebini de i\u00e7eren eski hale getirme istemi konusunda karar verme yetkisi dairemize ait bulundu\u011fundan mahkemenin eski hale getirme talebi hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi 28.03.2014 tarihli 2013\/381 esas, 2013\/896 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ek-karar hukuken ge\u00e7ersiz ve yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde olup, bu konuda verilen ek karar kald\u0131r\u0131larak yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n adreste bulunmama sebebi g\u00f6sterilmeyen, ve\u00a0haber\u00a0verilen kom\u015funun ad\u0131 soyad\u0131 imzas\u0131 bulunmayan 05.02.2014 tarihli\u00a0tebligatla yap\u0131lan gerek\u00e7eli karar tebli\u011finin 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131na uygun yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, eski hale getirme talebinin kabul\u00fcyle \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine san\u0131k m\u00fcdaf\u0131inin temyiz istemi yasal s\u00fcresinde kabul edilerek 23.12.2013 tarihli h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya, toplanan ve karar yerinde a\u00e7\u0131klanan delillere, g\u00f6sterilen gerek\u00e7eye ve takdire g\u00f6re san\u0131k m\u00fcdaf\u0131inin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA, 22.06.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2014\/12208<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2014\/14626<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">9.7.2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Yerel mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle; ba\u015fvurunun nitelik, ceza t\u00fcr\u00fc, s\u00fcresi ve su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re dosya okunduktan sonra T\u00fcrk Milleti ad\u0131na gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a01-5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>42<\/u>\/1.maddesi uyar\u0131nca; eski hale getirme iste\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verme g\u00f6revi temyiz incelemesini yapacak Dairemize ait olup, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii temyiz talebi ile beraber eski hale getirme talebinde de bulundu\u011fundan yerel mahkemenin 06.06.2012 tarihli ve 2011\/540 Esas 2011\/104 say\u0131l\u0131 s\u00fcreden sonra yap\u0131lan temyiz talebinin reddine dair karar\u0131 hukuken ge\u00e7ersiz ve yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kabul edilip, kald\u0131r\u0131larak, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin 29.05.2012 tarihli eski hale getirme istemine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n mernis adresinden ta\u015f\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu da belirtilerek do\u011frudan\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu 21.maddesi gere\u011fince,\u00a0kom\u015fuya\u00a0da\u00a0haber\u00a0verilmeden 27.03.2012 tarihinde yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0usuls\u00fcz olup, bu nedenle san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin karardan 28.05.2012 tarihinde\u00a0haberdar olundu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki beyan\u0131 da yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden eski hale getirme talebi kabul edilerek Mersin 3.Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 15.02.2012 tarihli mahkumiyet karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temyiz incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">10.05.2011 tarihli olay, yakalama ve muhafaza alt\u0131na alma ve teslim tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ikametgah\u0131nda aramada 15 adet 6 kg&#8217;l\u0131k dolu O.., 5 adet 6 kg&#8217;l\u0131k dolu A .. 2 adet 1.5 kg&#8217;l\u0131k dolu O.., 2 adet 650 gr&#8217;l\u0131k dolu C.., 230 adet bo\u015f C.. ambalaj\u0131 334 adet bo\u015f O.. ambalaj\u0131, 5 adet bo\u015f A.. ambalaj\u0131, 1 adet silikon tabanca 35 adet dolu silikon t\u00fcp\u00fc, 1 adet ambalaj makinesi ve arac\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7inde 39 adet 6 kg&#8217;l\u0131k dolu O.. ve 11 adet 6 kg&#8217;l\u0131k dolu A..markal\u0131 deterjanlar ve \u00fcr\u00fcnler bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011fa at\u0131l\u0131 marka hakk\u0131na tecav\u00fcz su\u00e7unun 556 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK&#8217;nin 5833 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa ile de\u011fi\u015fik 61\/A-6 maddesi gere\u011fince soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturmas\u0131 \u015fikayete ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Omo, omomatik markalar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda \u00dc.. N.V (\u00dc..S.. ve Tic. A.\u015e.) ad\u0131na Avukat M..Y.. taraf\u0131ndan \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esi verildi\u011fi, dosyada mevcut vekaletnamesinin T\u00fcrk \u015firketi ad\u0131na oldu\u011fu \u00fcnilever San. Ve Tic. A.\u015e. Vekili Av. E.. A..&#8217;\u0131n talimat mahkemesinde kat\u0131lma talebinde bulundu\u011fu, ancak bu vekilin dosyada vekaletnamesinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Calgon, calgonit markalar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda R&#8230; B&#8230; T.. M..San. Tic. A.\u015e. Vekili Av. T.. K.. \u015fikayet\u00e7i olup, ayn\u0131 \u015firket ad\u0131na talimat mahkemesinde Av. \u00c7.. S.. kat\u0131lma talebinde bulundu\u011fu ve her iki vekilinde dosyada vekaletnamelerinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A.., arielmatik markalar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda The P.. G..&amp; C..T\u00fck. Malz. San.Tic. A.\u015e. Vekili Av.S.. M.. demiry\u00fcrek&#8217;in talimat mahkemesinde 12.09.2011 tarihinde kat\u0131lma talebinde bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu \u015firketler ad\u0131na vekaletname veya yetki belgesinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">T\u00fcrk Patent Enstit\u00fcs\u00fcnden su\u00e7 konu markalara ait marka tescil belgeleri celbedilip ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en markalar\u0131n sahiplerinin belirlenmesi, yabanc\u0131 \u015firketler ad\u0131na tescilli iseler bu firmalar\u0131n \u015fikayet eden veya yarg\u0131lamaya kat\u0131lma talep eden firmalara su\u00e7 tahinde ge\u00e7erli lisans s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri ile marka hakk\u0131n\u0131n devri olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya \u015fikayet eden veya kat\u0131lma talep eden vekillere yabanc\u0131 \u015firketler taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f vekaletname veya yetki belgelerinin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak, \u015fikayet eden ve yarg\u0131lamaya kat\u0131lma talep eden ve dosyada vekaletnameleri bulunmayan ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en vekillerin de varsa vekaletname veya yetki belgelerinin temin edilmesinden sonra \u015fikayet ve yarg\u0131lamaya kat\u0131lma haklar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilerek sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekirken eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kabul ve uygulamaya g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-Ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn yap\u0131lan aramada farkl\u0131 firmalar ad\u0131na tescilli markalar\u0131n taklidi olan \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin bulunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>43<\/u>.maddesinin birinci ve ikinci f\u0131kralar\u0131 gere\u011fince bir su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131n\u0131n icras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ayn\u0131 su\u00e7un birden fazla ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 tek bir fiile i\u015flenmesi sebebiyle zincirleme su\u00e7 kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-Su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f bicimi, su\u00e7 konusunun \u00f6nem ve de\u011feri tamamen haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kar sa\u011flama amac\u0131na y\u00f6nelik su\u00e7 sebep ve saiki, fiilden sonraki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek alt s\u0131n\u0131r ceza yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirtildi\u011fi halde takdiren ve te\u015fdiden asgari had a\u015f\u0131l\u0131p yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde ceza tayinini suretiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmde \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden h\u00fckm\u00fcn 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0<u>8<\/u>\/1.maddesi gere\u011fince y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK.nun\u00a0<u>321<\/u>.maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7tan tutuklu veya h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde bu su\u00e7tan TAHL\u0130YES\u0130NE 09.07.2014 g\u00fcn\u00fc oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2010\/1942<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">2011\/36617<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">17.10.2011<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA :\u00a0Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR :\u00a01-) San\u0131k Ayhan Ayd\u0131n&#8217;a 16.7.2007 tarihinde 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a0<u>21<\/u>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan temyiz isteminin reddine dair karar tebli\u011fi, muhatab\u0131n adreste bulunmama nedeninin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 ve kom\u015fusuna\u00a0haber\u00a0verilmemesi sebebiyle usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fundan \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine bu karar\u0131 3.9.2007 tarihinde temyiz eden san\u0131k Ayhan Ayd\u0131n&#8217;\u0131n temyiz isteminin yasal s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu belirlenerek yap\u0131lan incelemede:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n mala zarar verme su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin reddine dair 28.6.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2004\/132 esas-2007\/73 Say\u0131l\u0131 kararda bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden, bu karara y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle, temyiz isteminin reddine dair karar\u0131n istem gibi ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-) San\u0131k Kaan Ayd\u0131n&#8217;\u0131n daha \u00f6nce kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7tan mahkum oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilebilmesi i\u00e7in aranan, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 C.M.K.nun\u00a0<u>231<\/u>\/6. maddesinin (a) bendinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 &#8220;kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7tan mahkum olmama&#8221; ko\u015fulunun bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle, hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilemeyece\u011fi belirlenerek, bu san\u0131k elektrik enerjisi su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131k Kaan Ayd\u0131n&#8217;\u0131n do\u011fum tarihinin 24.8.1967 yerine 20.3.1978 olarak yanl\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 mahallinde d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn maddi hata olarak kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya toplanan delillere, gerek\u00e7eye, hakimin kanaat ve takdirine g\u00f6re temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn istem gibi ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k Ayhan Ayd\u0131n hakk\u0131nda tehdit su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fck\u00fcmden sonra 8.2.2008 tarihli Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131mlanarak ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5728 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a0<u>562<\/u>. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 C.M.K.nun\u00a0<u>231<\/u>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ve bu maddenin 6. f\u0131kras\u0131na 25.7.2010 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6008 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a0<u>7<\/u>. maddesiyle eklenen c\u00fcmle de g\u00f6zetilerek; h\u00fckmolunan cezan\u0131n t\u00fcr ve s\u00fcresine g\u00f6re h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131l\u0131p b\u0131rak\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131 hususunun de\u011ferlendirilmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131k Ayhan Ayd\u0131n&#8217;\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan di\u011fer y\u00f6nleri incelenmeyen h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebeplerden dolay\u0131 istem gibi BOZULMASINA, temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istenmesi halinde iadesine, 17.10.2011 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan tebligatta bor\u00e7lunun adreste bulunmama sebebi ve tevziat saatlerinden sonra d\u00f6n\u00fcp d\u00f6nmeyece\u011fi tespit edilmedi\u011fi gibi, haber verildi\u011fi belirtilen kom\u015fusunun imzas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, imzadan imtina durumunun da belirlenmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden tebli\u011f i\u015flemi 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 21\/1 maddesi ile Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 28. Maddesi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr. Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 28. Maddesi tebli\u011f memuruna ilgilinin neden adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tahkik etme g\u00f6revini y\u00fcklemi\u015ftir.HGK 25.01.2006,2005\/2-772\/17 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">TK&#8217;n\u0131n 21\/1 maddesine g\u00f6re tebli\u011fe \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, an\u0131lan tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda muhatab\u0131n adresten ge\u00e7ici mi ya da s\u00fcrekli mi ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, adreste bulunmama sebebinin ve tevziat saatlerinden sonra d\u00f6n\u00fcp d\u00f6nmeyece\u011finin Tebligat Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi&#8217;nin 35 maddesi gere\u011fince, ayn\u0131 y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 30.maddesinde say\u0131lardan ki\u015filerden sorularak tespit edilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu hali ile tebli\u011f i\u015flemi 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 21\/1 ve 23\/7 . Maddeleri ile Tebligat Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin 30.ve 35. Maddeleri h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uygun yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmakla usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr.Y12HD.10.04.2014,2014\/8115,2014\/10629<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 30. Maddesi, tebli\u011f memuruna ilgilinin neden adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tahkik etme g\u00f6revini y\u00fcklemi\u015ftir.Buna g\u00f6re tebli\u011f memuru tahkik etmekle kalmay\u0131p, tevsike y\u00f6nelik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tahkikat\u0131n sonucunu Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 23\/7. Ve Tebligat Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin 35\/f bendi gere\u011fince tebli\u011f evrak\u0131na yazacak ve maddede a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere ilgilisine imzalatacakt\u0131r. Ancak bu \u015fekilde yap\u0131lan i\u015flemin usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakim taraf\u0131ndan denetlenebilir. Muhatab\u0131n tebli\u011f adresinde ikamet etmekle birlikte k\u0131sa ya da uzun s\u00fcreli ve ge\u00e7ici olarak adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, tevziat saatlerinden sonra gelece\u011finin beyan ve bunun tevsik edilmesi halinde ancak, maddede say\u0131lanlardan, \u00f6rne\u011fin muhtara imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 tebli\u011f edilip, 2 numaral\u0131 fi\u015fin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve kom\u015funun durumdan haberdar edilmesi i\u015flemlerine ge\u00e7ilebilecektir. Y12HD.08.04.2014,2014\/7875,2014\/10307<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebligat par\u00e7as\u0131nda, aran\u0131lan adreste muhataba rastlanmad\u0131, kom\u015fudan soruldu, muhatab\u0131n nerede oldu\u011fu ve ne zaman d\u00f6nece\u011finin bilinmedi\u011fi \u00f6\u011frenildi denilerek muhtara tebli\u011f yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, kom\u015fu Ali D&#8230;&#8217;e haber verildi\u011fi, isim ve imzadan ka\u00e7\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve haber ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131 kap\u0131ya ya\u011f\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p evrak\u0131n mahalle muhtar\u0131na teslim edildi\u011fine dair \u015ferh d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de, da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m saatlerinde daval\u0131n\u0131n nerede oldu\u011fu belirtilmemi\u015ftir. Yukar\u0131da belirtilen d\u00fczenlemeler uyar\u0131nca daval\u0131ya yap\u0131lan gerek\u00e7eli karar tebli\u011fi usul\u00fcne uygun de\u011fildir. Y4HD.18\/11\/2013,2012\/18912,2013\/17966<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebli\u011f evrak\u0131nda muhatab\u0131n neden adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 adresten k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli mi yoksa uzun s\u00fcreli mi ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir kay\u0131t bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Tebli\u011f i\u015flemi usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr YHGK.12.06.2013,2013\/12-19,2013\/817<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nSEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2016\/21933<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2017\/192<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 16.01.2017<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<ul class=\"ak\">\n<li>\u0130CRA EMR\u0130N\u0130N BOR\u00c7LU AS\u0130LE TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130 ZORUNLUDUR<\/li>\n<li>\u0130CRA \u00d6DEME EMR\u0130N\u0130N VEK\u0130LE TEBL\u0130\u011e ZORUNLULU\u011eU<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"irm\">\n<li>1136 s. AK\n<ul class=\"mr\">\n<li>41<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>6100 s. Hukuk Muhakemeleri K\n<ul class=\"mr\">\n<li>73<\/li>\n<li>81<\/li>\n<li>82<\/li>\n<li>83<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>2004 s. \u0130\u0130K\n<ul class=\"mr\">\n<li>61<\/li>\n<li>76<\/li>\n<li>338<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>7201 s. Tebligat K\n<ul class=\"mr\">\n<li>11<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"iom\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"io\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">HMK&#8217;nun 73, 81, 82, 83, Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu&#8217;nun 41., Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 11. maddeleri gere\u011fince\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekille<\/span>\u00a0takip edilen i\u015flerde\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0tebligat zorunludur. An\u0131lan bu d\u00fczenlemeler gere\u011fince tebligat\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile yasal s\u00fcreler i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar, yine bu tariheg\u00f6re takip kesinle\u015ftirilerek takibe devam i\u015flemleri yap\u0131l\u0131r. Ne var ki\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunlulu\u011funun<\/span>\u00a0bulunmas\u0131 asile tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 l\u00fczumunu ortadan kald\u0131rmaz. \u015e\u00f6yle ki, 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra-\u0130flas Kanunu&#8217;nun 76. maddesinde mal beyan\u0131nda bulunmamak su\u00e7u, 338. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hakikate muhalif beyanda bulunma su\u00e7u gibi icra-iflas su\u00e7lar\u0131nda bor\u00e7lunun cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in icra emrinin bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0de\u011fil, kendisine\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. Cezalar\u0131n \u015fahsili\u011fi kural\u0131 gere\u011fince bor\u00e7lu asilin cezai y\u00f6nden sorumlu tutulabilmesi i\u00e7in icra emrinin bor\u00e7lu asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0zorunludur. Bu durumda icra emrinin asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi usuls\u00fcz olmay\u0131p,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0de\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmemesi noktas\u0131nda\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi eksikli\u011fi s\u00f6z konusudur. O halde Mahkemece, icra emrinin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0suretiyle eksikli\u011fin ikmali y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nSEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/div>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2015\/8382<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2017\/9464<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 21.06.2017<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"1\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan davada yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda Mahkemece, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f olup h\u00fckm\u00fcn daval\u0131\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, Dairece dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K A R A R<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7lu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>, bor\u00e7lunun kendisini\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0ile temsil ettirmesine ra\u011fmen bor\u00e7lu asile yap\u0131lan icra emri\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011finin<\/span>\u00a0usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klayarak takibin iptaline karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkeme\u2019ce, bor\u00e7lu ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle tebligat\u0131n iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fck\u00fcm, alacakl\u0131\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HMK&#8217;nun 73, 81, 82, 83, Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu&#8217;nun 41, Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 11. maddeleri gere\u011fince\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekille<\/span>\u00a0takip edilen i\u015flerde\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0tebligat zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ne var ki\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunlulu\u011funun<\/span>\u00a0bulunmas\u0131 asile tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 l\u00fczumunu ortadan kald\u0131rmaz. \u015e\u00f6yle ki; \u0130\u0130K\u2019nun 76. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen mal beyan\u0131nda bulunmamak su\u00e7u, 338. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hakikate muhalif beyanda bulunma su\u00e7u gibi icra-iflas su\u00e7lar\u0131nda bor\u00e7lunun cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in icra emrinin bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0de\u011fil, kendisine\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. (Prof. Dr. Baki Kuru, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc, 6. bask\u0131, cilt 2, sh: 1280) Cezalar\u0131n \u015fahsili\u011fi kural\u0131 gere\u011fince bor\u00e7lu asilin cezai y\u00f6nden sorumlu tutulabilmesi i\u00e7in icra emrinin bor\u00e7lu asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0ile temsil edilmesi nedeniyle icra takibinde\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemlerinin ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 asile yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda icra emrinin asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi usuls\u00fcz olmay\u0131p,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0de icra emrinin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmemesi noktas\u0131nda\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi eksikli\u011fi s\u00f6z konusudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde Mahkeme\u2019ce, yasal s\u00fcrelerin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0ile ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak icra emrinin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0i\u015fleminin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 ve bununla yetinilmesi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle bor\u00e7lu asil ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n iptaline karar verilmesi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7:<\/span> Alacakl\u0131\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekilinin<\/span>\u00a0temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366 ve HUMK\u2019nun 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, taraflarca \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366\/3. maddesi gere\u011fince Yarg\u0131tay Daire ilam\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011finden<\/span>\u00a0itibaren ilama kar\u015f\u0131 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finde bulunulabilece\u011fine, 21.06.2017 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nSEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2015\/11471<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2017\/14044<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 30.10.2017<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"1\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan davada yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda Mahkemece, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f olup h\u00fckm\u00fcn daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, Dairece dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7lu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>; takibe konu dayanak ilamda\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0edeninin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0marifeti ile temsil edildi\u011fini icra emrinin ise\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0de\u011fil asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fini belirterek usuls\u00fcz tebligat\u0131n iptalini talep etmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fc ile icra emrinin iptaline karar verilmi\u015f, karar alacakl\u0131\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HMK&#8217;nun 73, 81, 82, 83, Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu&#8217;nun 41., Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 11. maddeleri gere\u011fince\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekille<\/span>\u00a0takip edilen i\u015flerde\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0tebligat zorunludur. An\u0131lan bu d\u00fczenlemeler gere\u011fince tebligat\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile yasal s\u00fcreler i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar, yine bu tarihe g\u00f6re takip kesinle\u015ftirilerek takibe devam i\u015flemleri yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ne var ki\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunlulu\u011funun<\/span>\u00a0bulunmas\u0131 asile tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 l\u00fczumunu ortadan kald\u0131rmaz. \u015e\u00f6yle ki, 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra-\u0130flas Kanunu&#8217;nun 76. maddesinde mal beyan\u0131nda bulunmamak su\u00e7u, 338. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hakikate muhalif beyanda bulunma su\u00e7u gibi icra-iflas su\u00e7lar\u0131nda bor\u00e7lunun cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in icra emrinin bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0de\u011fil, kendisine\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. (Prof. Dr. Baki Kuru, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc, 6. bask\u0131, cilt 2, sh: 1280) Cezalar\u0131n \u015fahsili\u011fi kural\u0131 gere\u011fince bor\u00e7lu asilin cezai y\u00f6nden sorumlu tutulabilmesi i\u00e7in icra emrinin bor\u00e7lu asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu durumda icra emrinin asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi usuls\u00fcz olmay\u0131p,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0de\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmemesi noktas\u0131nda\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi eksikli\u011fi s\u00f6z konusudur. O halde Mahkemece, icra emrinin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span><span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0suretiyle eksikli\u011fin ikmali y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fc ile bor\u00e7lu asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilen 05.08.2014 tarihli icra emrinin iptaline karar verilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7: <span style=\"color: #003300;\">A<\/span><\/span>lacakl\u0131\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekilinin<\/span>\u00a0temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366. ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun Ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK&#8217;nun 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, taraflarca \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366\/3. maddesi gere\u011fince Yarg\u0131tay Daire ilam\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011finden<\/span>\u00a0itibaren ilama kar\u015f\u0131 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finde bulunulabilece\u011fine, 30.10.2017 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nON\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2018\/2016<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2018\/6338<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 19.06.2018<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<ul class=\"ak\">\n<li>\u0130CRA EMR\u0130N\u0130N VEK\u0130LE TEBL\u0130\u011e ED\u0130LMEMES\u0130<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"irm\">\n<li>7201 s. Tebligat K\n<ul class=\"mr\">\n<li>11<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Tebligat Kanununun Uygulanmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmelik\n<ul class=\"mr\">\n<li>18<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"iom\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"io\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130cra emrinin asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi usuls\u00fcz olmay\u0131p,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0de\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmemesi noktas\u0131nda\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi eksikli\u011fi s\u00f6z konusudur. O halde mahkemece, icra emrinin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0de\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0suretiyle eksikli\u011fin ikmali y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fc ile bor\u00e7lu asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilen icra emrinin iptaline karar verilmesi do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nSEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2014\/25788<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2015\/790<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 16.01.2015<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<ul class=\"ak\">\n<li>AS\u0130LE TEBL\u0130GAT<\/li>\n<li>\u015e\u0130KAYET<\/li>\n<li>VEK\u0130LLE TAK\u0130P ED\u0130LEN \u0130\u015eLERDE TEBL\u0130GAT<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"irm\">\n<li>6100 s. Hukuk Muhakemeleri K\n<ul class=\"mr\">\n<li>73<\/li>\n<li>81<\/li>\n<li>82<\/li>\n<li>83<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>2004 s. \u0130\u0130K\n<ul class=\"mr\">\n<li>76<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>7201 s. Tebligat K\n<ul class=\"mr\">\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">11<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"iom\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"io\">Vekille takip edilen i\u015flerde\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu oldu\u011fu, ancak bu hususun asile tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 l\u00fczumunu ortadan kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131 cezalar\u0131n \u015fahsili\u011fi ilkesi gere\u011fince bor\u00e7lu asilin cezai y\u00f6nden sorumlu tutulabilmesi i\u00e7in icra emrinin bor\u00e7lu asile tebli\u011finin zorunlu oldu\u011fu, somut olayda \u015fikayete konu takip dosyas\u0131nda takip dayana\u011f\u0131 ilamda bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0oldu\u011fu halde takip talebi ve icra emirlerinde ad\u0131 belirtilmedi\u011finden icra emirlerinin bor\u00e7lu asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fi, bu halde icra emirlerinin asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi usuls\u00fcz olmay\u0131p,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0de icra emirlerinin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmemesi noktas\u0131nda\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi eksikli\u011fi s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fundan, Mahkemece, icra emirlerinin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0suretiyle takibe devam edilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nSEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2014\/21149<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2015\/22878<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 21.12.2015<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"1\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu aleyhine ilama dayal\u0131 olarak ba\u015flat\u0131lan takipte, bor\u00e7lu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0\u0130cra Mahkemesi&#8217;ne ba\u015fvurusunda, icra emrinin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0de\u011fil asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fini, icra emrinde alaca\u011f\u0131n hangi aylara ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funun belirtilmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek icra emrinin iptalini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0varken asile tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle icra emrinin iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fck\u00fcm alacakl\u0131\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 11, Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu&#8217;nun 41 ve HMK&#8217;nun 73, 81, 82 ve 83. maddeleri gere\u011fince\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0ile takip edilen i\u015flerde tebligat\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ne var ki\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunlulu\u011funun<\/span>\u00a0bulunmas\u0131 asile tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 l\u00fczumunu ortadan kald\u0131rmaz. \u015e\u00f6yle ki 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra-\u0130flas Kanunu&#8217;nun 76. maddesinde mal beyan\u0131nda bulunmamak su\u00e7u, 338. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hakikate muhalif beyanda bulunma su\u00e7u gibi icra-iflas su\u00e7lar\u0131nda bor\u00e7lunun cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in icra emrinin bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0de\u011fil, kendisine\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. (Prof. Dr. Baki Kuru, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc, 6. bask\u0131, cilt 2, sh: 1280) Cezalar\u0131n \u015fahsili\u011fi kural\u0131 gere\u011fince bor\u00e7lu asilin cezai y\u00f6nden sorumlu tutulabilmesi i\u00e7in icra emrinin bor\u00e7lu asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0zorunludur. \u015eikayete konu Gaziosmanpa\u015fa 1. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 2013\/11033 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 takip dosyas\u0131nda takip dayana\u011f\u0131 ilamda bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0oldu\u011fu halde icra emrinin bor\u00e7lu asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda icra emrinin asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi usuls\u00fcz olmay\u0131p,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0de icra emrinin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmemesi noktas\u0131nda\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemi eksikli\u011fi s\u00f6z konusudur. Ancak, icra emrinin bor\u00e7lu asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmesinden sonra, bor\u00e7lu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekilinin<\/span>\u00a0yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurarak, tebligat\u0131n asile g\u00f6nderilmedi\u011finden bahisle, icra emrinin iptali istemi yan\u0131nda takibin esas\u0131 ile ilgili itiraz ve \u015fikayetlerini de ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enin tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nedeniyle icra emrinin iptalini talep etmesinde hukuki yarar\u0131 kalmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda icra emrinin iptali gerekmez. Mahkemece, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fkin \u015fikayetin reddi gerekirken kabul\u00fc do\u011fru de\u011fildir. Bor\u00e7lunun di\u011fer \u015fikayet nedenleri hakk\u0131nda inceleme yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 ise, temyiz edenin s\u0131fat\u0131 nedeniyle bozma nedeni yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7:<\/span> Alacakl\u0131\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekilinin<\/span>\u00a0temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366. ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun Ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK&#8217;nun 428. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, taraflarca \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366\/3. maddeleri gere\u011fince Yarg\u0131tay Daire ilam\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011finden<\/span>\u00a0itibaren ilama kar\u015f\u0131 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finde bulunulabilece\u011fine ve 25,20 TL pe\u015fin harc\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edene iadesine 21.12.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"iom\">\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">ON\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2014\/23098<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2015\/16100<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 21.10.2015<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"1\">\n<p>Taksirle yaralama su\u00e7undan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>Kat\u0131lan kendisini\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0ile temsil ettirmesine ra\u011fmen h\u00fckm\u00fcn bizzat kat\u0131lana\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fi,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fine dair belgeye dosya i\u00e7inde rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunun 11. maddesi gere\u011fince\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0vas\u0131tas\u0131yla takip edilen i\u015flerde tebligat\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunluluk<\/span>\u00a0bulundu\u011fundan, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmi\u015f ise belgesinin dosyaya konulmas\u0131; edilmemi\u015f ise\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011finin<\/span>\u00a0sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve karar\u0131 temyiz etmesi halinde, temyiz dilek\u00e7esi de eklenip bu hususta ek tebli\u011fname d\u00fczenlendikten sonra iadesinin temini i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 21.10.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nSEK\u0130Z\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2015\/5259<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2017\/4424<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 27.03.2017<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"1\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Dosyan\u0131n heyet\u00e7e yap\u0131lan incelenmesinden; gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n davac\u0131 asile\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fine dair tebligat par\u00e7as\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fine<\/span>\u00a0dair tebligat mazbatas\u0131na rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, oysa davac\u0131 3. ki\u015finin\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0ile temsil edildi\u011fi, HMK&#8217;nun 73, 81, 82, 83, Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu&#8217;nun 41., Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 11. maddeleri gere\u011fince,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekille<\/span>\u00a0takip edilen i\u015flerde\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>tebligat\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunlulu\u011fu<\/span>\u00a0bulundu\u011fundan gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n davac\u0131 3. ki\u015fi\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a07201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilerek temyiz s\u00fcrelerinin beklenilmesi, ondan sonra temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n Mahal Mahkemesi&#8217;ne GER\u0130 \u00c7EVR\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 27.03.2017 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nY\u0130RM\u0130\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2014\/23434<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2014\/27177<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 02.10.2014<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"1\">\n<p>Vekaletname sunulduktan sonra tebligatlar\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">Vekil<\/span>\u00a0ile takip edilen davada asil duru\u015fmada bizzat bulunsa dahi\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fin<\/span>\u00a0ona de\u011fil,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur.\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">Vekile<\/span>\u00a0\u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebligat, kendisine veya kendisi yerine sekreteri veya katibine\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmelidir. Ancak isticvap, yemin gibi \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 i\u015flemlerde, tebligat\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0de\u011fil, bizzat bu i\u015flemi yapacak asile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 kanuni\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunluluktur<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olayda, daval\u0131 G.. \u0130n\u015f. Tem. Tah. Tic. A.\u015e. Davada\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0ile temsil edildi\u011fi halde gerek\u00e7eli karar daval\u0131 \u015firket\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0yerine daval\u0131 \u015firkete\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fckm\u00fcn tefhiminin, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 297. maddesindeki unsurlar\u0131 i\u00e7erir bi\u00e7imde yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n da daval\u0131 G.. \u0130n\u015f. Tem. Tah. Tic. A.\u015e.\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, karar\u0131n y\u00f6ntemince daval\u0131\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilerek temyiz s\u00fcresi beklendikten sonra g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere dosya mahkemesine geri \u00e7evrilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemesine GER\u0130 \u00c7EVR\u0130LMES\u0130NE, temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n bu noksanl\u0131k giderilip dosya geldikten sonra incelenmesine 02.10.2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nON\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2016\/23223<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2017\/952<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 24.01.2017<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"1\">\n<p>Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>Bor\u00e7lunun, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f ilan\u0131n\u0131n, k\u0131ymet takdirine itiraz davas\u0131nda da yer alan\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0var iken asil olarak kendisine\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmesinin usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek, 12\/04\/2016 tarihinde yap\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ihalesinin feshi istemiyle icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu, mahkemece, ihalenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 talimat dosyas\u0131nda bor\u00e7lunun\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0ile temsil edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin belge bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle talebin reddine karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 11 ve Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun Uygulanmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 18. maddeleri gere\u011fince\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0ile takip edilen i\u015flerde, tebligat\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olayda; bor\u00e7lu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0Av. &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n, . \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 21\/01\/2016 tarih ve 2015\/1104 Esas 2016\/94 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 k\u0131ymet takdirine itiraz davas\u0131nda bor\u00e7lu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0oldu\u011fu ve ilgili karar\u0131n talimat dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011finde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu durumda, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan maddeler gere\u011fince, sat\u0131\u015f ilan\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0gerekir. Talimat icra dosyas\u0131na ayr\u0131ca vekaletname sunulmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, bor\u00e7lunun takipte\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekille<\/span>\u00a0temsil edildi\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fini ortadan kald\u0131rmaz. Ayr\u0131ca,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekilin<\/span>\u00a0sat\u0131\u015f karar\u0131ndan \u00f6nce azledildi\u011fine veya vekalet g\u00f6revinden \u00e7ekildi\u011fine dair bir belge de bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Emredici nitelikteki d\u00fczenlemelerden kaynaklanan yasal\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunlulu\u011fa<\/span>\u00a0ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0varken asile g\u00f6nderilen sat\u0131\u015f ilan\u0131 tebligat\u0131 yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde olup sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 127. maddesi uyar\u0131nca sat\u0131\u015f il\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n bir suretinin bor\u00e7luya, bor\u00e7lu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekille<\/span>\u00a0temsil edilmekte ise\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0zorunlu olup, bu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunlulu\u011fun<\/span>\u00a0yerine getirilmemesi tek ba\u015f\u0131na ihalenin feshi nedenidir.<\/p>\n<p>O halde, mahkemece, \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 127. maddesi gere\u011fince ihalenin feshine karar verilmesi gerekirken, talebin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Bor\u00e7lunun temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366 ve HUMK\u2019nun 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca (BOZULMASINA), pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde iadesine, ilam\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011finden<\/span>\u00a0itibaren 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 24.01.2017 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2016\/4264<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2018\/525<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 12.02.2018<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"1\">\n<p>Davac\u0131 &#8230; ile daval\u0131lar &#8230; vs. aras\u0131ndaki davadan dolay\u0131 &#8230;.. 3. Asliye Hukuk Hakimli\u011fince verilen 22.03.2016 g\u00fcn ve 2013\/384-2016\/352 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okundu gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">&#8211; K A R A R &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosya Dairemize g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f ise de dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p>7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 11 ve Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun Uygulanmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 18. maddeleri gere\u011fince\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0ile takip edilen i\u015flerde, tebligat\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Emredici nitelikteki bu d\u00fczenlemelerden kaynaklanan yasal\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunlulu\u011fa<\/span>\u00a0ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0varken asile g\u00f6nderilen tebligatlar yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde olup sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>Somut olay incelendi\u011finde; davac\u0131 &#8230;\u2019n\u0131n davay\u0131 avukat\u0131 &#8230; arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile takip etmesine ra\u011fmen davac\u0131\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0hi\u00e7\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmadan gerek\u00e7eli karar ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin davac\u0131 asilin mernis adresine\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fi, Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 11. ve Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun Uygulanmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 18. maddeleri gere\u011fince davac\u0131 &#8230;\u2019ya gerek\u00e7eli karar ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin usul\u00fcne uygun\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme karar\u0131 ve daval\u0131n\u0131n temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin davac\u0131 &#8230;\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekili<\/span>\u00a0Av. &#8230;\u2019e\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilip temyiz s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7mesi beklendikten ve temyiz halinde gerekli i\u015flemler tamamland\u0131ktan sonra g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n mahalline GER\u0130 \u00c7EVR\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 12.02.2018 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nON\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2014\/11586<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2015\/5628<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 01.04.2015<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"1\">\n<p>Trafik g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye sokma su\u00e7undan; TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 179\/2, 51\/1-3-7. maddeleri gere\u011fince mahk\u00fbmiyet<\/p>\n<p>Taksirle yaralama ve trafik g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye sokma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler, mahalli Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>Kovu\u015fturma evresinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisini vekaletnameli bir\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0ile temsil ettirmesine ra\u011fmen h\u00fckm\u00fcn bizzat san\u0131\u011fa\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fi,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekiline<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fine dair belgeye dosya i\u00e7inde rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunun 11. maddesi gere\u011fince\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0vas\u0131tas\u0131yla takip edilen i\u015flerde tebligat\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunluluk<\/span>\u00a0bulundu\u011fundan, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmi\u015f ise belgesinin dosyaya konulmas\u0131,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmemi\u015f ise\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011finin<\/span>\u00a0sa\u011flanmas\u0131; ayr\u0131ca olay nedeniyle yaralanan 1999 do\u011fumlu ma\u011fdur &#8230; ve 2010 do\u011fumlu &#8230;&#8217;ya CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 234\/2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0atanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ya\u015f\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ma\u011fdurlara zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekil<\/span>\u00a0atanmas\u0131n\u0131n ve gerek\u00e7eli h\u00fckm\u00fcn atanacak\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">vekile<\/span>\u00a0ve san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiine\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fi<\/span>\u00a0ile karar\u0131 temyiz etmeleri durumunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esi ile bu hususta d\u00fczenlenecek ek tebli\u011fnamenin de eklenerek iadesinin temini i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 01.04.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\n\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Esas<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2014\/34254<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Karar<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 2017\/4883<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Tarih<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">: 02.05.2017<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"1\">\n<p>Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n<p>San\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;a\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atanmas\u0131 konusunda yasal bir\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunluluk<\/span>\u00a0bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ihbar sonras\u0131 talimat mahkemesinin 06\/05\/2013 tarihli duru\u015fmas\u0131nda,\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0talebinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesine ra\u011fmen san\u0131\u011fa sorguda atanan Av. &#8230;&#8217;a gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fi ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edildi\u011fi, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;a da\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f <\/span>edilmedi\u011fi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0olarak g\u00f6revlendirilen Av. &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haberdar edilmedi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda;<\/p>\n<p>Ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 Ceza Genel Kurulunun 18.03.2008 g\u00fcnl\u00fc 2008\/9-7-56 ve 13.05.2008 g\u00fcnl\u00fc 2008\/10-101-113 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, kendisine zorunlu m\u00fcdafii atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haberdar edilmedi\u011fi durumlarda, zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafine<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lan tefhim veya\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fin<\/span>\u00a0kendisine ba\u011flanan hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131, bu durumda zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0san\u0131\u011f\u0131n lehine gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcnen baz\u0131 i\u015flemler yapm\u0131\u015f olsa da; \u00f6rne\u011fin temyiz dilek\u00e7esi vermi\u015f olsa dahi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine de\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmesi gerekti\u011fi ve somut olayda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; san\u0131\u011fa gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmesi, temyiz dilek\u00e7esi vermesi halinde dilek\u00e7esi ile birlikte incelenmek \u00fczere iadesinin mahallince sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 02\/05\/2017 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\nCEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table class=\"kny\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Esas<\/td>\n<td>: 2011\/6-155<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Karar<\/td>\n<td>: 2011\/172<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tarih<\/td>\n<td>: 12.07.2011<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<ul class=\"irm\">\n<li>5271 s. Ceza Muhakemesi K\n<ul class=\"mr\">\n<li>150<\/li>\n<li>156<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>2709 s. Anayasa\n<ul class=\"mr\">\n<li>36<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"iom\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"io\">Kendisine zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haberdar edilmedi\u011fi durumlarda zorunlu m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunan tefhim ve\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0kendisine ba\u011flanan hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011furmaz.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"1\">\n<p>San\u0131klar E.K. ve M.M.O.\u2019nun h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019n\u0131n 142\/2-d, 43 ve 143. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 9 y\u0131l 12 ay hapis, konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal su\u00e7undan ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 116\/2-4. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 2 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na ve hak yoksunluklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin, Bursa 9. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 11.12.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2390-1141 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm, san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, Yarg\u0131tay 6. Ceza Dairesince 11.03.2009 g\u00fcn ve 18308-5289 say\u0131 ile; \u201cYokluklar\u0131nda verilip 13.02.2008 tarihinde savunmanlar\u0131na\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>edilen karara kar\u015f\u0131 yasal s\u00fcresinden sonra san\u0131k M.M.O.\u2019nun 21.02.2008 ve san\u0131k E.K.\u2019nin ise 22.02.2008 tarihinde yapt\u0131klar\u0131 temyiz yasa yolu ba\u015fvurusunun 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n 8\/1. maddesi yollamas\u0131 ile 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUY\u2019n\u0131n 317. maddesi uyar\u0131nca reddine\u201d karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise 13.06.2011 g\u00fcn ve 158215 say\u0131 ile; \u201cYarg\u0131tay 6. Ceza Dairesi ile Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z aras\u0131nda gerek tebli\u011fnamenin d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi gerekse karar\u0131n verildi\u011fi a\u015famada herhangi bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k mevcut olmamas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n zaman i\u00e7erisinde de\u011fi\u015fen ve giderek istikrar kazanan i\u00e7tihatlar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda itiraza konu edilen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131klar\u0131n ve atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haberleri olmad\u0131klar\u0131\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafinin<\/span>\u00a0yoklu\u011funda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn zorunlu m\u00fcdafie\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fi ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn kendilerine zorunlu m\u00fcdafii atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haberdar edilmeyen san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan, bu m\u00fcdafie\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fden<\/span>\u00a0itibaren yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi dolduktan sonra yapt\u0131klar\u0131 temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde say\u0131l\u0131p say\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>\u015eu durumda incelenmesi gereken \u00f6n sorun; san\u0131klara baroca tayin edilmi\u015f bulunan zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0huzurunda verilen karar\u0131n ayr\u0131ca san\u0131klar\u0131n kendilerine de\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmesinin gerekip gerekmeyece\u011fi ile ilgilidir. Yukar\u0131da ana hatlar\u0131 ile belirlenen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in bu husustaki d\u00fczenlemeler ve bu d\u00fczenlemelerle ilgili olarak yerle\u015fik uygulamalarda benimsenen ilkeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay\u0131m\u0131za bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda; San\u0131klar haklar\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan Bursa Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 21.11.2000 tarihli iddianame ile kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Bursa 9. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda 21.04.2005 tarihli oturumda Baro Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak san\u0131klara\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0tayini istenmi\u015f, 19.07.2005 tarihinde Baro Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca san\u0131klar\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0olarak g\u00f6revlendirilen Avukat \u00d6.B. 08.12.2005, 09.05.2006, 26.09.2006, 30.11.2006, 19.12.2006 ve 22.03.2007 tarihli oturumlara i\u015ftirak etmesine ra\u011fmen san\u0131klar\u0131n bu oturumlarda kendilerine atanan\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0ile bir araya gelmedikleri gibi dosyada kendilerini temsil eden\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafiden<\/span>\u00a0haberdar edildiklerine dair herhangi bir belgeye rastlan\u0131lamam\u0131\u015f, san\u0131klar\u0131n kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 oturumlarda san\u0131klar\u0131 temsil eden zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0taraf\u0131ndan san\u0131klar lehine taleplerde bulunulmu\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm de yine son oturumda baroca tayin edilmi\u015f bulunan m\u00fcdafiin yoklu\u011funda tefhim edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"2\">\n<p>Avukat \u00d6.B.\u2019ye 13.02.2008 tarihinde h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmi\u015f, san\u0131klar 1 haftal\u0131k yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra 21.02.2008 ve 22.02.2008 tarihli dilek\u00e7eleri ile (s\u00fcresinden sonra) karar\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015ftir. Sonras\u0131nda dosya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131za intikal etmi\u015ftir. Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zca temyiz davas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle temyiz talebinin reddine karar verilmesi talep edilmi\u015f, Yarg\u0131tay 6. Ceza Dairesi de ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. San\u0131klar hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu \u015fekilde temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi kabul edilerek dosyan\u0131n mahalline iade edilmesinden sonra san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan verilen \u00e7e\u015fitli tarihli dilek\u00e7eler sonu\u00e7 itibariyle ret karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 san\u0131klar lehine itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuru talebi olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019n\u0131n 493\/1. maddesinin \u00fcst haddinin 5 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmesi nedeniyle, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 5560 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 21. maddesiyle yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nceki h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince san\u0131klar i\u00e7in bir\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atanmas\u0131 zorunludur. Bu durumda, zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafinin<\/span>\u00a05271 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 156\/1-b maddesi gere\u011fince mahkemenin istemi \u00fczerine baroca atanmas\u0131 gerekmekte olup, olay\u0131m\u0131z a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 5 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 olan h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7uyla ilgili olarak yap\u0131lmakta olan yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda mahkemenin istemi ile baroca zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0olarak Avukat \u00d6.B.\u2019nin tayin edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131nda herhangi bir usuls\u00fczl\u00fck bulunmamaktad\u0131r. \u0130tiraza konu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa benzer bir olayda Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 18.03.2008 tarih, 2008\/8-9 E-2008\/58 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda; 1- Zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atamas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibar\u0131yla y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan usul h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tayin edilmi\u015f zorunlu m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131lan tefhim ve\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>, aynen vekaletnameli m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 do\u011furur. Ancak; bunun \u00f6n \u015fart\u0131, kendisine bir zorunlu m\u00fcdafii atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haberdar edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"3\">\n<p>2- San\u0131\u011f\u0131n zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0azletme ve de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini isteme hakk\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>3- Kendisine zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haberdar olan san\u0131k buna ses \u00e7\u0131karmazsa, zorunlu m\u00fcdafiin yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ve kendisinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm tasarruflar\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na katlanmak zorundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>4- Kendisine zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haberdar edilmedi\u011fi durumlarda ise; zorunlu m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunan tefhim ve\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0kendisine ba\u011flanan hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011furmaz. Bu durumda, velev ki zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0san\u0131\u011f\u0131n lehine gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcnen baz\u0131 i\u015flemleri yapm\u0131\u015f olsa -\u00f6rne\u011fin temyiz dilek\u00e7esi vermi\u015f olsa- dahi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine de\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmesi ve kendisine yap\u0131lan\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0\u00fczerine san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz dilek\u00e7esi verilmesi halinde, temyiz davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekir\u2019 \u015feklinde bir sonuca var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Kald\u0131 ki 01.06.2005 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 150\/3. maddesi gere\u011fince zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0tayini i\u00e7in san\u0131klara isnat edilen su\u00e7un cezan\u0131n \u00fcst haddinin 5 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmesinin aranmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, 18.12.2006 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5560 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 21. maddesi ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015flikten sonra isnat olunan su\u00e7un asgari haddinin 5 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131ndan fazla olmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n getirildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Somut olay\u0131m\u0131zda san\u0131klar isnat edilen su\u00e7un cezas\u0131n\u0131n alt haddinin 5 y\u0131l hapsin alt\u0131nda olmas\u0131 nedeniyle h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihi itibariyle zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atanmas\u0131na gerek de bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Sonu\u00e7 itibariyle Yarg\u0131tay 6. Ceza Dairesinin 11.03.2009 tarih ve 2008\/18308 esas 2009\/5289 karar say\u0131l\u0131 temyiz talebinin reddine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131, yukar\u0131da ana hatlar\u0131yla g\u00f6sterilen kanuni d\u00fczenlemelere ve Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 18.03.2008 tarih ve 2008\/8-9 esas say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil etmektedir\u201d g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle itiraz yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurarak, \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve dosyan\u0131n \u00d6zel Daireye g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmesi isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"4\">\n<p>Dosya Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmekle, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/p>\n<p>CEZA GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6zel Daire ile Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n saptanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan; zorunlu m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan tebligat\u0131n kendilerine zorunlu m\u00fcdafii atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haberdar edilmeyen san\u0131klar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan temyiz s\u00fcresini ba\u015flat\u0131p ba\u015flatmayaca\u011f\u0131 ile h\u00fck\u00fcmde yasa yolu bildiriminin usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130ncelenen dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden;<\/p>\n<p>Bursa Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca san\u0131klar M.M.O., E.K., \u0130.A. ve M.B. hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda san\u0131klar\u0131n savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0olmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi \u00fczerine, yerel mahkemece 21.06.2005 tarihli oturumda; \u201csan\u0131klar\u0131n \u00fczerlerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un niteli\u011fi, sevk maddesindeki cezan\u0131n \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 itibar\u0131yla CYY\u2019n\u0131n 150. maddesi gere\u011fince\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0tayin etme\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunlulu\u011fu<\/span>\u00a0bulunmakla, san\u0131klara\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0tayin edilmesi i\u00e7in baro ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na\u201d karar verildi\u011fi, Bursa Barosu taraf\u0131ndan 19.07.2005 tarihinde Av. \u00d6.B.\u2019nin t\u00fcm san\u0131klar i\u00e7in m\u00fcdafii olarak atand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enin 08.12.2005, 09.05.2006, 26.09.2006, 30.11.2006, 19.12.2006 ve 22.03.2007 tarihli duru\u015fmalara kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fcdafiin haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu bu oturumlara san\u0131klar\u0131n kat\u0131lmad\u0131klar\u0131, San\u0131klar\u0131n h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019n\u0131n 142\/2-d, 43 ve 143. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 9 y\u0131l 12 ay hapis, konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal su\u00e7undan da ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 116\/2-4. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 2 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, San\u0131klar\u0131n ve\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafilerinin<\/span>\u00a0yoklu\u011funda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmdeki yasa yolu bildiriminin, \u201cSan\u0131klar\u0131n yoklu\u011funda, talebe uygun tefhim\/tebli\u011fden itibaren 7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yasal yollar a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilen karar a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a okunup usulen anlat\u0131ld\u0131 \u201d \u015feklinde oldu\u011fu, Yoklukta verilen mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn san\u0131klar m\u00fcdafii Av. \u00d6.B.\u2019ye 13.02.2008 tarihinde san\u0131k M.M.O.\u2019ya ise 19.02.2008 tarihinde\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edildi\u011fi, san\u0131k .E.K.\u2019ye ise h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmedi\u011fi, san\u0131k M.M.O.\u2019nun 22.02.2008 san\u0131k .E.K.\u2019nin ise 21.02.2008 g\u00fcnl\u00fc dilek\u00e7eleri ile yapt\u0131klar\u0131 temyiz istemlerinin, \u00d6zel Dairece s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddine karar verildi\u011fi, Anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Somut olayda; san\u0131klar\u0131n yarg\u0131land\u0131klar\u0131 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019n\u0131n 493\/1. maddesindeki yapt\u0131r\u0131m 3 y\u0131ldan 8 y\u0131la kadar hapis; 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019nda bu maddenin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 te\u015fkil eden 142\/1-d maddesinde ise 2 y\u0131ldan 5 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131d\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, san\u0131klara\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0tayin edilen 19.07.2005 tarihi itibar\u0131yla y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019n\u0131n 150\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131klar i\u00e7in bir m\u00fcdafiin atanmas\u0131 zorunludur. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019n\u0131n 150\/3. maddesinde h\u00fckm\u00fcn verildi\u011fi 11.12.2007 tarihinden \u00f6nce 06.12.2006 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5560 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 21. maddesiyle yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikle, daha \u00f6nce \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 be\u015f y\u0131l ve daha fazla hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren su\u00e7larla ilgili ge\u00e7erli olan\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atama\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">zorunlulu\u011fu<\/span>, alt s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 5 y\u0131ldan fazla hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren su\u00e7lardan yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamalara hasredilmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda atama tarihi itibar\u0131yla, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019n\u0131n 150\/3 ve 156\/1-b maddesi uyar\u0131nca mahkemenin istemi \u00fczerine \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 5 y\u0131l\u0131n \u00fczerinde olan nitelikli h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7uyla ilgili olarak baroca zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0tayin edilmesinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"5\">\n<p>5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019n\u0131n 150. maddesinin 1, 2 ve 3. f\u0131kralar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, gerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemeden talep etmesi ile atanan\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0ile zorunlu olarak atanan\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>aras\u0131nda; gerekse ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 2. maddesindeki tan\u0131ma bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, Ceza Yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 Yasas\u0131 anlam\u0131nda zorunlu (veya istek \u00fczerine atanan) m\u00fcdafii ile vekaletnameli\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>aras\u0131nda her hangi bir fark bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019nda ve Avukatl\u0131k Yasas\u0131\u2019nda, atanm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcdafilikle ilgili ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verilmemi\u015f olup 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CYY\u2019n\u0131n 150\/son madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131 ile bu konudaki ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lacak y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Bu konuda \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu Gere\u011fince\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">M\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0ve Vekillerin G\u00f6revlendirilmeleri ile Yap\u0131lacak \u00d6demelerin Usul ve Esaslar\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Y\u00f6netmelik, g\u00f6revlendirme tarihi olan 19.07.2005 tarihinden daha sonra, fakat h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihi olan 11.12.2007 tarihinden \u00f6nce, 02.03.2007 tarihli Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atamas\u0131 hukuka uygun olmakla birlikte, zorunlu m\u00fcdafiin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, g\u00f6revinin sona ermesi, sorumlulu\u011funun s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 ve san\u0131klarla ili\u015fkileri konusunda y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin de dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 5. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re, san\u0131klara \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunan duru\u015fma davetiyesi \u201ctebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren yedi g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde m\u00fcdafii bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirmesi, bildirimde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde barodan bir\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0g\u00f6revlendirmesinin istenece\u011fi \u2026\u201d me\u015fruhat\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7ermelidir.<\/p>\n<p>Zorunlu m\u00fcdafiin atanm\u0131\u015f ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bunu kabul etmi\u015f ya da bu atamaya kar\u015f\u0131 herhangi bir itirazda bulunmam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu durumlarda; vekaletnameli m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131lan tefhim ve\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fde<\/span>\u00a0oldu\u011fu gibi, zorunlu m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131lan tefhim ve\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fin<\/span>\u00a0de kendisine ba\u011flanan t\u00fcm hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmek gerekir. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle, b\u00f6yle durumlarda asile ayr\u0131ca tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek olmayacakt\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla; somut olayda y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihinden \u00f6nce y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, san\u0131klar\u0131n \u201ctebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren yedi g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafilerinin<\/span>\u00a0bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeleri, bildirimde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 takdirde barodan bir\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0g\u00f6revlendirmesinin istenece\u011fi\u201d \u015ferhini de i\u00e7eren bir davetiye ile duru\u015fmalara davet edilmemi\u015f olmalar\u0131 Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle san\u0131klar\u0131n kendilerine zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haberlerinin oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemeyece\u011finden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131klara da\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilerek, temyiz dilek\u00e7esi vermeleri halinde, temyiz davas\u0131na bak\u0131lmas\u0131 adalete uygun d\u00fc\u015fecektir. Olaya ba\u015fka bir a\u00e7\u0131dan bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde yer alan; \u201cHerkes, me\u015fru vas\u0131ta ve yollardan faydalanmak suretiyle yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde davac\u0131 veya daval\u0131 olarak iddia ve savunma ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na sahiptir\u201d \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenlemenin, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin, \u201cadil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131\u201dn\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 6. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) ve (c) bentlerinde; \u201cHer san\u0131k en az\u0131ndan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki haklara sahiptir: a)\u2026.; b) Savunmas\u0131n\u0131<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"6\">\n<p>haz\u0131rlamak i\u00e7in gerekli zamana ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olmak;<\/p>\n<p>c) Kendi kendini savunmak veya kendi se\u00e7ece\u011fi bir avukat\u0131n yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanmak ve e\u011fer avukat tutmak i\u00e7in mali olanaklardan yoksunsa ve adaletin selameti gerektiriyorsa mahkemece g\u00f6revlendirilecek bir avukat\u0131n para \u00f6demeksizin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanabilmek\u2026\u201d bi\u00e7imindeki d\u00fczenleme ile birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi halinde var\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken sonu\u00e7; savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n,<\/p>\n<p>temel insan haklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda yer alan hak arama h\u00fcrriyetinin bir gere\u011fi oldu\u011fu ve avukat tutma hakk\u0131n\u0131n da savunma hakk\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemeyece\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fidir. Bu durumda, mevzuat\u0131m\u0131zda zorunlu m\u00fcdafilik sistemini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren yasan\u0131n amac\u0131, kendisini savunmak i\u00e7in yeterli maddi olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmayanlar\u0131n bu hakk\u0131 kullanamamalar\u0131ndan kaynaklanabilecek muhtemel hak kay\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla da savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n etkin kullan\u0131labilmesinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 suretiyle, adil yarg\u0131lanman\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesidir. Bunun do\u011fal sonucu olarak, paras\u0131 olan san\u0131k nas\u0131l ki vekaletname verdi\u011fi avukat\u0131 serbest\u00e7e tayin edebiliyorsa, paras\u0131 olmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde avukat\u0131n\u0131 serbest\u00e7e belirleyebilmesi, en az\u0131ndan kendisine tayin edilen avukat\u0131 be\u011fenmedi\u011finde de\u011fi\u015ftirme hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, daha da \u00f6tesi, g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flayacak davada kendisine bir avukat atand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa bildirilmesi gereklidir. Kendisine avukat atand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 dahi bilmeyen ya da kendisine avukat atanmakla birlikte be\u011fenmedi\u011fi takdirde bu avukat\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini isteme hakk\u0131na sahip bulunmayan bir san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, bu avukat\u0131n t\u00fcm tasarruflar\u0131ndan sorumlu tutulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini veya bu avukat\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm i\u015flemleri pe\u015finen kabul etmi\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek nas\u0131l olanakl\u0131 de\u011filse, b\u00f6yle bir durumda savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n tam anlam\u0131yla kullan\u0131labilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmek de olas\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p>\u015eu halde, kendisine zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa bildirilmedi\u011fi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu konudaki iradesine de\u011fer verilmedi\u011fi ya da san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu konudaki iradesinin dosya kapsam\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0yan\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine de\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011finin<\/span>\u00a0adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bir gere\u011fi oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir. \u00d6zellikle vurgulamak gerekirse, bu durum Tebligat Hukuku ile de\u011fil, m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran vazge\u00e7ilemez ve g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilemez nitelikteki savunma hakk\u0131 ve daha geni\u015f anlamda da adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ile ilgilidir. Bu nedenle, \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn tebligata ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler yerine, savunma hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemelerde aranmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"7\">\n<p>Kendisine zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa bildirilmi\u015f ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da buna ses \u00e7\u0131karmam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu durumlarda; zorunlu m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131lan tefhim veya\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0i\u015flemlerinin aynen vekaletnameli\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafide<\/span>\u00a0oldu\u011fu gibi ge\u00e7erli olaca\u011f\u0131 ve gerek tefhime, gerekse\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fe<\/span>\u00a0ba\u011fl\u0131 olan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 hususunda duraksama ya\u015fanmamaktad\u0131r. B\u00f6yle durumlarda Tebligat Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 11. maddesi uyar\u0131nca i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekece\u011finden, tebligat asile de\u011fil m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Aksi halde, zorunlu m\u00fcdafili\u011fe yasan\u0131n arzu etmedi\u011fi anlamda simgesel bir anlam y\u00fcklenmi\u015f olur ki, bu kabul bir\u00e7ok karma\u015fay\u0131 da birlikte getirecektir.<\/p>\n<p>Konuya bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u015fu sonu\u00e7lara var\u0131lmaktad\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p>1- Zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atamas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibar\u0131yla y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan usul h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tayin edilmi\u015f zorunlu m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131lan tefhim ve\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>, aynen vekaletnameli m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furur. Ancak; bunun \u00f6n \u015fart\u0131, kendisine bir zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haberdar edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>2- Kendisine zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haberdar olan san\u0131k buna itiraz etmezse, zorunlu m\u00fcdafiin yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ve kendisinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm tasarruflar\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na katlanmak durumundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>3- Kendisine zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haberdar edilmedi\u011fi durumlarda ise; zorunlu m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunan tefhim ve\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0kendisine ba\u011flanan hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011furmaz.<\/p>\n<p>Nitekim Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 18.03.2008 g\u00fcn ve 7-56 ile, 24.11.2009 g\u00fcn ve 164-275 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere bir\u00e7ok kararlar\u0131 da bu do\u011frultudad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olayda, san\u0131klar kendilerine zorunlu\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0olarak g\u00f6revlendirilen Av. \u00d6.B.\u2019nin atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haberdar edilmedikleri gibi, zorunlu m\u00fcdafiin haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu hi\u00e7bir duru\u015fmaya da kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Yoklukta kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcm de\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">m\u00fcdafi<\/span>\u00a0Av. \u00d6.B.\u2019ye 13.02.2008, san\u0131k M.M.O.\u2019ya 19.02.2008 tarihinde\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmi\u015f, ancak san\u0131k E.K.\u2019ye\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>\u00a0edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"YRG pc\" data-page=\"8\">\n<p>Zorunlu m\u00fcdafie yap\u0131lan\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011f<\/span>, kendisine zorunlu m\u00fcdafii atand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haberdar edilmeyen san\u0131klar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, Av. \u00d6.B.\u2019ye 13.02.2008 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fle<\/span>\u00a0san\u0131klar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan temyiz s\u00fcresi de ba\u015flamayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Kald\u0131 ki, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131nda belirtilmemi\u015f olmakla birlikte, yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcndeki yasa yolu \u015feklini, merciini ve 7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcrenin tefhimden itibaren mi, yoksa\u00a0<span class=\"ara1\">tebli\u011fden<\/span>\u00a0itibaren mi ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hi\u00e7bir ku\u015fkuya yer b\u0131rakmayacak \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmeyen yasa yolu bildirimi de, Ceza Genel Kurulunun duraksamas\u0131z kararlar\u0131na g\u00f6re eksik ve yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 niteliktedir. Bu itibarla, temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131 isabetli bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, san\u0131k E.\u2019nin 21.02.2008 ve san\u0131k M.\u2019nin 22.02.2008 tarihli temyiz dilek\u00e7eleri s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verilmi\u015f oldu\u011fundan temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n \u00d6zel Daireye g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n<p>1- Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n<p>2- Yarg\u0131tay 6. Ceza Dairesinin 11.03.2009 g\u00fcn ve 18308-5289 say\u0131l\u0131 temyizin reddine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>3- Dosyan\u0131n, temyiz incelemesinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay 6. Ceza Dairesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 12.07.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<div class=\"adn ads\" data-message-id=\"#msg-a:r352633205653214651\" data-legacy-message-id=\"17ed18589fd573da\">\n<div class=\"gs\">\n<div class=\"\">\n<div id=\":34r\" class=\"ii gt\">\n<div id=\":34q\" class=\"a3s aiL \">\n<div dir=\"auto\"><center><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>ALTINCI CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/center><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Esas<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2020\/9072<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Karar<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 2021\/10852<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Tarih<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>: 08.06.2021<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div dir=\"auto\">\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p>SU\u00c7 : Nitelikli h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k<\/p>\n<p>H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER : Mahkumiyet<\/p>\n<p>Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>San\u0131klardan &#8230;\u2019in talimat mahkemesince 23.02.2015 tarihinde savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>en son bildirdi\u011fi adresine\u00a0tebligat\u00a0<wbr \/>\u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n do\u011frudan mernis adresine 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 10. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacak \u015fekilde<\/strong><\/span> gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n 24.12.2015 tarihinde usuls\u00fcz tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.2.CD, E. 2017\/3631, K. 2017\/11553, T. 09.11.2017:<\/b><\/span>\u00a0\u201c\u2026.Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 22. maddesine g\u00f6re muhatap yerine kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimsenin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne nazaran onsekiz ya\u015f\u0131ndan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmamas\u0131 ve bariz bir surette ehliyetsiz bulunmamas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r\u201d\u015feklindeki yasal d\u00fczenlemeye ayk\u0131r\u0131 bi\u00e7imde usuls\u00fcz \u015fekilde ayn\u0131 konutta oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne g\u00f6re 15 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 bitirmi\u015f ye\u011fenine yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine h\u00fckm\u00fc s\u00fcresinde temyiz etti\u011fi kabul edilerek ve 19.12.2013 tarih 2012\/799-2013\/626 E-K say\u0131l\u0131 ek karar kald\u0131r\u0131larak yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesinde;\u2026.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.2.CD, E. 2014\/17947, K. 2014\/29695, T. 10.12.2014:<\/b><\/span> \u201c\u2026.Elektronik ortamda UYAP-MERN\u0130S\u2019ten al\u0131nan n\u00fcfus kay\u0131t \u00f6rne\u011fi incelendi\u011finde tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibariyle A. K.&#8217;n\u0131n 17 ya\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca k\u00f6y muhtar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen ve kom\u015fulardan iki ki\u015finin imzas\u0131n\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu 03.07.2008 tarihli tutanakta A. K.&#8217;n\u0131n okuma yazma bilmedi\u011finin belirtilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 22. ve 24. maddelerinde belirtilen y\u00f6ntemlere ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak A. K.&#8217;ya yap\u0131lan tebligat i\u015flemi ge\u00e7ersiz olup, 07.05.2008 tarihli h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.7.CD, E. 2014\/11258, K. 2014\/15392, T. 16.09.2014:<\/b>\u00a0<\/span>\u201c\u2026Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 22.maddesine g\u00f6re &#8220;muhatap yerine kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimsenin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne nazaran onsekiz ya\u015f\u0131ndan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmamas\u0131 ve bariz bir surette ehliyetsiz bulunmamas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r&#8221; amir h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;in g\u0131yab\u0131nda verilen karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kayden 17 ya\u015f\u0131nda olan k\u0131z\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi\u011finden tebli\u011fin usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011funa ve \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine temyizin s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek, mahkemece verilen 09.04.2012 tarih 2011\/621-2012\/25 E.K. say\u0131l\u0131 temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin ek karar kald\u0131r\u0131larak yap\u0131lan incelemede;\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.2.CD, E. 2014\/36971, K. 2017\/6428, T. 01.06.2017<\/b>:<\/span> \u201c\u2026Yoklu\u011funda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulan su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk &#8230;&#8217;in ayn\u0131 konutta oturan karde\u015fine Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 16. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 09\/01\/2014 tarihinde tebligat yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de, an\u0131lan Kanun&#8217;un 22. maddesine g\u00f6re \u201cMuhatap yerine kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimsenin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne nazaran onsekiz ya\u015f\u0131ndan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmamas\u0131 ve bariz bir surette ehliyetsiz bulunmamas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r.\u201d\u015feklindeki d\u00fczenleme ile tebligat yap\u0131lan&#8230;&#8217;in tebligat tarihinde 11 ya\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda yap\u0131lan tebligat usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fundan, su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun 19\/03\/2014 havale tarihli temyiz isteminin \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek ve temyiz isteminin reddine dair 20\/03\/2014 tarihli ek karar kald\u0131r\u0131larak yap\u0131lan incelemede;\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.14.HD, E. 2015\/9474, K. 2017\/2216, T. 23.03.2017<\/b>:<\/span> \u201c\u2026Somut olayda; dava dilek\u00e7esinin, daval\u0131lar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; vasisi &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;nin bilinen en son adreslerine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131l\u0131p bilinen en son adreslerin tebligata elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 veya tebligat yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 halinde, muhataplar\u0131n adres kay\u0131t sisteminde bulunan yerle\u015fim yeri adresleri, bilinen en son adresleri olarak kabul edilip tebligatlar\u0131n buraya yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilerek ilk seferde bu daval\u0131lar\u0131n mernis adreslerine Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 21\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan tebligatlar\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131lar &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;na ise dava dilek\u00e7esi, ayn\u0131 konutta birlikte oturan imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edilmi\u015fse de muhatap yerine kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimsenin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne nazaran onsekiz ya\u015f\u0131ndan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bariz bir surette ehliyetsiz bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tebligat par\u00e7as\u0131na \u015ferh edilmedi\u011finden tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. O halde mahkemece, \u00f6ncelikle duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131larak \u015fikayet\u00e7iye ve kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa (alacakl\u0131ya) an\u0131lan konudaki delillerini sunmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in imkan tan\u0131nmal\u0131, bor\u00e7lu ad\u0131na tebligat yap\u0131lan k\u0131z\u0131 Zehra&#8217;n\u0131n tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmek suretiyle g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne nazaran onsekiz ya\u015f\u0131ndan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bariz bir surette ehliyetsiz olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildikten ve Gaziosmanpa\u015fa \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 2007\/3459 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda bor\u00e7luya tebligat yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u015fikayetin s\u00fcresinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlendikten sonra olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken evrak \u00fczerinde eksik inceleme ile ve alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131n delilleri toplanmadan yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde sonuca gidilmesi isabetsizdir\u2026.\u201d Ayr\u0131ca bkz.; Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi E. 2008\/5220 K. 2008\/7804 T. 15.04.2008.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.12.HD, E. 2016\/15949, K. 2017\/7777, T. 22.05.2017:<\/b>\u00a0<\/span>\u201c\u2026.7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun \u201cAyn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015filere veya hizmet\u00e7iye tebligat\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 16. maddesinde; \u201cKendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fah\u0131s adresinde bulunmazsa tebli\u011f kendisi ile ayn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015filere veya hizmet\u00e7ilerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc, Tebligat Kanununun Uygulanmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 25. maddesinde de; \u201cKendisine tebligat yap\u0131lacak ki\u015fi adresinde bulunmazsa tebli\u011f, kendisi ile ayn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015filere veya hizmet\u00e7ilerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r\u201d d\u00fczenlemesi yer almaktad\u0131r. Yine bahsi ge\u00e7en Kanunun \u201cYa\u015f ve ehliyet \u015fart\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 22. maddesinde; \u201cMuhatap yerine kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimsenin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne nazaran onsekiz ya\u015f\u0131ndan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmamas\u0131 ve bariz bir surette ehliyetsiz bulunmamas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne, \u201cTebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 23. maddesinin 5. bendinde de; \u201cTebli\u011f bir mazbata ile tevsik edilir. Bu mazbatan\u0131n:&#8230;Tebli\u011fin kime yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve tebli\u011f muhatab\u0131ndan ba\u015fkas\u0131na yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise o kimsenin ad\u0131n\u0131, soyad\u0131n\u0131, adresini ve 22. madde gere\u011fince tebell\u00fc\u011fe ehil oldu\u011funu, &#8230;ihtiva etmesi laz\u0131md\u0131r.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir. Mevcut bu mevzuat kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, \u00f6ncelikle kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahs\u0131n adreste bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilerek mazbataya yaz\u0131lmal\u0131, daha sonra ayn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015filere veya hizmet\u00e7ilerinden birine tebligat yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Muhatap yerine tebligat yap\u0131lan ki\u015finin de tebell\u00fc\u011fe ehil oldu\u011funun mazbataya yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Somut olayda, bor\u00e7lu ad\u0131na yap\u0131lan \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011fine ili\u015fkin tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde; \u00f6deme emrinin, 31.03.2014 tarihinde; \u201cAyn\u0131 konutta oturan ehil ki\u015fi day\u0131s\u0131 &#8230; imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi.\u201d a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ile Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 16. maddesine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f edilmek istendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. An\u0131lan mevzuat gere\u011fi, \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011f memurunca, muhatap bor\u00e7lunun adreste bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit ve tevsik edilmeksizin do\u011frudan ayn\u0131 konutta kalan day\u0131s\u0131na tebli\u011f edilmesi usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr. Tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddias\u0131n\u0131n yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 16. maddesi olup, bu y\u00f6ndeki \u015fikayetin, ayn\u0131 maddenin 1.f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca takipten haberdar olundu\u011fu tarihten itibaren 7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde icra mahkemesine yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 32. maddesi gere\u011fince, tebli\u011f usul\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa bile, muhatab\u0131 tebli\u011f i\u015fleminden haberdar olmu\u015f ise ge\u00e7erli say\u0131l\u0131r. Bu durumda, aksine bir belge bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece, muhatab\u0131n beyan etti\u011fi \u00f6\u011frenme tarihi, tebli\u011f tarihi olarak kabul edilir. O halde mahkemece, bor\u00e7lunun \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin \u015fikayetinin kabul\u00fc ile tebli\u011f tarihinin 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 32. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, bor\u00e7lunun \u00f6\u011frenme tarihi olarak beyan etti\u011fi 12.10.2015 tarihi olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine karar verilmesi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle istemin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir\u2026.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.7.CD, E. 2019\/172, K. 2019\/18181, T. 19.02.2019:<\/b><\/span>\u00a0\u201c\u2026San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin 06.02.2018 tarihli temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin eski hale getirme talebi olarak kabul\u00fc ile 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nun 42. maddesi uyar\u0131nca temyiz talebini de i\u00e7eren eski hale getirme istemi konusunda karar verme yetkisinin Dairemize ait bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek, G\u0131yabi karar\u0131n san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;in dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re bilinen en son adresi olan ve yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda bildirilen adresine 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 10. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilmesi, bu adrese \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lacak tebligat\u0131n bila-tebli\u011f edilmesi, halinde ise 6099 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile de\u011fi\u015fik 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 21\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca MERN\u0130S adresine tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken, do\u011frudan mernis adresine yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, eski hale getirme talebinin kabul\u00fc ile \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz iste\u011fi s\u00fcresinde kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.2.CD, E. 2019\/2153, K. 2019\/6664, T. 04.04.2019:<\/b><\/span>\u00a0\u201c\u2026Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n MERN\u0130S adresine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 21 ve Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn, 28.maddeleri uyar\u0131nca, muhatap veya muhatap ad\u0131na tebli\u011f yap\u0131labilecek olanlardan hi\u00e7biri g\u00f6sterilen adreste bulunmazsa, tebli\u011f memurunun, adreste bulunmama sebebini bilmesi muhtemel kom\u015fu y\u00f6netici, kap\u0131c\u0131, muhtar, ihtiyar kurulu veya meclis \u00fcyeleri, zab\u0131ta amir ve memurlar\u0131ndan tahkik ederek beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 tebli\u011f tutana\u011f\u0131na yaz\u0131p alt\u0131n\u0131 imzalatmas\u0131, imzadan \u00e7ekinmeleri halinde de bu durumu yazarak imzalamas\u0131 ve yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucunda muhatap ve onun ad\u0131na tebligat yap\u0131labilecek kimseler o adreste bulunduklar\u0131 halde tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar ve ihtiyar heyeti veya meclis azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir veya memuruna imza mukabilinde teslim etmesi ve T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011fe ekli 2 \u00f6rnek numaral\u0131 ihbarnameyi muhatab\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rarak, durumu en yak\u0131n kom\u015fusundan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirmesi gerekti\u011fi, somut olayda tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131n muhtara b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunun en yak\u0131n kom\u015fusundan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirilmedi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eski hale getirme isteminin kabul\u00fc ile \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu 14.12.2018 tarihli temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.2.CD, E. 2019\/2153, K. 2019\/6664, T. 04.04.2019:<\/b><\/span>\u00a0\u201c\u2026.Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n MERN\u0130S adresine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re,\u2026..somut olayda tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131n muhtara b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunun en yak\u0131n kom\u015fusundan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirilmedi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,dolay\u0131s\u0131yla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eski hale getirme isteminin kabul\u00fc ile \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu 14.12.2018 tarihli temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;\u2026\u201d;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.15.CD, E. 2017\/194 K. 2019\/405 T. 06.02.2019:<\/b><\/span>\u00a0\u201c\u2026.Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 21\/1. maddesine g\u00f6re, muhatab\u0131n ge\u00e7ici olarak adreste bulunmamas\u0131 veya tebell\u00fc\u011fden imtina etmesi halinde, tebli\u011f memurunun tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir veya memurlar\u0131na imza mukabilinde teslim edip tesell\u00fcm edenin adresini ihtiva eden ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresteki binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmakla beraber, adreste bulunmama durumunda tebli\u011f olunacak \u015fahsa keyfiyetin haber verilmesini de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olduk\u00e7a en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirmesinin gerekti\u011fi ve muhatab\u0131n adreste hi\u00e7 oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n veya adresten s\u00fcrekli ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti halinde ise MERN\u0130S adresine 21\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re tebligat yap\u0131labilece\u011fi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, 21. madde kapsam\u0131nda tebligat yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle muhatab\u0131n MERN\u0130S adresinde oturup oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, oturuyor ise da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m s\u0131ras\u0131nda adreste bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, adreste bulunmama halinde ise sebebi ve adresten ge\u00e7ici ya da s\u00fcrekli ayr\u0131l\u0131p ayr\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunun tespitinin gerekti\u011fi; san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n bilinen en son adresinin ayn\u0131 zamanda MERN\u0130S adresi olup, yoklu\u011funda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn tebli\u011fi i\u00e7in bu adrese g\u00f6nderilen evrak\u0131n 22\/07\/2013 tarihinde Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 21\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi olayda; yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan \u015fekilde herhangi bir i\u015flem yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n, do\u011frudan Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 21\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu, san\u0131k &#8230;\u2019\u0131n eski hale getirme talebinin hakl\u0131 nedenlere dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131, temyiz talebinin \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine ve s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede,\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p><b><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Y.10. CD, E. 2013\/9548, K. 2018\/3604, T. 18.4.2018:<\/span>\u00a0<\/b>\u201c\u202628\/10\/2009 tarih 2008\/412 esas ve 2009\/758 karar say\u0131l\u0131 denetimli serbestlik tedbirine dair karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n talimatla al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda belirtti\u011fi \u201c&#8230; Mah. 24. Sok. No:38 D:9 &#8230;\u201d adresine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n belirtilen adresten ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle iade edildi\u011fi, iade \u00fczerine karar\u0131n bu kez ayn\u0131 adrese Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 35. maddesine g\u00f6re 25.12.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi ancak 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 10. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re tebligat\u0131n bilinen en son adrese yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, dosyada bulunan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n talimatla al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131na ekli 17.02.2009 tarihli dilek\u00e7esine g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilinen en son adresinin \u201c&#8230; Mah. 56. Sok. No:3\/4 &#8230;\u201d oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131\u011fa usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilmeyen karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi, bu sebeple daha sonra verilen 20\/02\/2013 tarihli karar\u0131n yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 11.03.2013 tarihli kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurma dilek\u00e7esinin 28\/10\/2009 tarihli denetimli serbestlik tedbiri karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Bilinen en son adres kavram\u0131, yerle\u015fim yerinden farkl\u0131d\u0131r; daha geni\u015f bir i\u00e7eri\u011fe sahiptir. Bkz.;\u00a0 Berkin. Tatbikat\u00e7\u0131lara Medeni Usul Hukuku Rehberi, \u0130stanbul 1981, s. 345; \u00dcst\u00fcnda\u011f, s. 430. Yerle\u015fim yeri, bir kimsenin s\u00fcrekli olarak kendisine ya\u015fam alan\u0131 olarak belirledi\u011fi yerde kalma niyetiyle oturdu\u011fu yer olarak tan\u0131mlanabilir (TMK. m. 19,I). Bilinen son adresin s\u00fcreklilik arz etmesi kavram\u0131, ki\u015finin orada oturmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmemektedir. \u0130lgilinin i\u015f yeri adresi, bilinen son adres niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yabilir. Bilinen en son adresin tespitinde, tebli\u011f isteyenin beyan\u0131, muhatab\u0131n veya di\u011fer ilgililerin bildirimleri veya mevcut olan belgeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>Bkz.; \u015eeker, Hilmi: \u201cUyum\u2019un Takip Versiyonu, Yenilik mi Yinelemek mi?\u201d, ABD. 2012\/3, s. 380.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Y.12.HD, E. 2010\/21608, K. 2010\/23111, T. 12.10.2010: \u201c\u2026.Mahkemece yapt\u0131r\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucunda \u015fikayete konu tebligat\u0131 alan C. A.&#8217;\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7ilerle birlikte ayn\u0131 binada, fakat ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 dairelerde oturduklar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, bu husus karar gerek\u00e7esinde mahkemece kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131 alt\u0131nda ikamet etmekten kast\u0131n ayn\u0131 bina i\u00e7inde ikamet etmek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayn\u0131 binada ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 dairelerde ikamet eden ki\u015finin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 tebligat\u0131n TK&#8217;nun 16. maddesi \u015fartlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, \u015fikayetin kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi halde tebligat\u0131 alan\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7ilere yak\u0131nl\u0131k derecesi ve bu ki\u015fi ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmediklerinin \u015fikayet\u00e7iler taraf\u0131ndan ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleri ile \u015fikayetin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.12.HD, E. 2011\/14175, K. 2011\/13741, T. 30.06.2011<\/b>:<\/span> \u201c\u2026Bor\u00e7lu F.A.S. ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan sat\u0131\u015f tebligat\u0131; \u2018\u2018Muhatab\u0131n e\u015finin iste\u011fi \u00fczerine evrak Silivri PTT da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m merkezinde muhatab\u0131n al\u0131\u015fveri\u015fe gitti\u011fini beyan eden e\u015fi T. imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi\u2019\u2018 \u015feklinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tebligat bu \u015fekli ile Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 16. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Zira bu maddeye g\u00f6re ayn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015fiye tebligat yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahs\u0131n adresinde bulunmamas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, tebligat adresine gidilmeden anla\u015f\u0131lamaz. Nitekim Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 14\/2. maddesinin; \u2018\u2018Tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fah\u0131s, tebli\u011fi \u00e7\u0131kartan mercie veya PTT merkezine veyahut tebli\u011f memuruna m\u00fcracaat ederse kendisine tebligat yap\u0131l\u0131r\u2019\u2018 h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi de PTT merkezinde tebligat sadece muhatab\u0131n kendisine yap\u0131labilir. Bu nedenlerle bor\u00e7luya yap\u0131lan tebligat usuls\u00fcz olup, dairemizin yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na g\u00f6re bor\u00e7luya sat\u0131\u015f ilan\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun tebli\u011f edilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 tek ba\u015f\u0131na ihalenin feshi sebebidir. O halde mahkemece \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fc ile ihalenin feshine karar verilmesi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde istemin reddi isabetsizdir\u2026.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.17.HD, E.2005\/11050, K.2006\/1531, T.01.03.2006:<\/b>\u00a0<\/span>\u201c\u2026KARAR: Dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda verilen temyiz iste\u011finin reddine dair karar\u0131n san\u0131kla ayn\u0131 konutta oturup oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmeden &#8220;V.S., o\u011fluna&#8221; bi\u00e7imde tebli\u011finin Tebligat Kanununun 16. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, karar tebli\u011fi hukuken ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fundan \u0131tt\u0131la \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan temyizin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131larak yap\u0131lan incelemede; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verilen mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 konutta oturup oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlenmeden &#8220;V.S., o\u011fluna&#8221; bi\u00e7iminde tebli\u011finin Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 16. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, karar tebli\u011fi hukuken ge\u00e7ersiz bulundu\u011fundan \u0131tt\u0131la \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan temyizin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek temyiz isteminin s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine dair 25.04.2005 g\u00fcn ve 2004\/7229 Esas, 2005\/929 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ek karar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ile mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik olarak yap\u0131lan incelemede:\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.15.HD, E. 2018\/2252, K. 2018\/3001, T. 10.07.2018:<\/b>\u00a0<\/span>\u201c\u20267201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu 16. maddesinde yer alan &#8220;Kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fah\u0131s adresinde bulunmazsa tebli\u011f kendisi ile ayn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015filere veya hizmet\u00e7ilerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesi gere\u011fi ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filere yap\u0131lacak tebligat ancak ayn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015fiye veya hizmet\u00e7iye yap\u0131labilecektir. Yap\u0131lan incelemede dosyada as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen dosya daval\u0131s\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;a yap\u0131lan tebligatlar\u0131n muhatab\u0131n \u00e7ar\u015f\u0131da olmas\u0131 nedeniyle i\u015f\u00e7isi&#8230;&#8217;a tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi \u015ferhinin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, adresin muhatab\u0131n merniste kay\u0131tl\u0131 ikamet adresi olmas\u0131 nedeniyle i\u015fyeri niteli\u011finde olmayan muhatap adresinde i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131fat\u0131yla&#8230; isimli \u015fahsa yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen dosya daval\u0131s\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;a yap\u0131lan tebligat ge\u00e7ersiz olup, bu durum savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furdu\u011fundan, usul\u00fcne uygun tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmadan, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 27. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder \u015fekilde ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en birle\u015fen daval\u0131n\u0131n savunma hakk\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlanarak davan\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmay\u0131p, h\u00fckm\u00fcn sair y\u00f6nleri incelenmeksizin bu y\u00f6nden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekmi\u015ftir\u2026\u201dYHGK&#8217;nun 07\/04\/1982 tarih ve 1377-337 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.20.HD, E.2017\/2103, K.2018\/7264, T.12.11.2018:<\/b><\/span>\u00a0\u201c\u2026Daval\u0131 &#8230;, tebligat\u0131 alan karde\u015fi &#8230; ile aralar\u0131nda husumet bulundu\u011funu ve ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en ile birlikte ayn\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131 alt\u0131nda ya\u015famad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f, mahkemece bu konuda herhangi bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. O halde, mahkemece bor\u00e7lunun ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc o\u011flu ile ayn\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131 alt\u0131nda oturup oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n taraflar\u0131n delilleri toplanmak ve gerekirse kolluk marifetiyle ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.17.CD, E. 2016\/13107, K. 2018\/13719, T. 01.11.2018<\/b>:<\/span> \u201c\u20267201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun &#8220;Ayn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015filere veya hizmet\u00e7iye tebligat&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 16. maddesinde, kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fah\u0131s adresinde bulunmazsa tebli\u011fin, kendisi ile ayn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015filere veya hizmet\u00e7ilerinden birine yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. \u0130ncelenen dosyada san\u0131k &#8230;\u2019nin yoklu\u011funda verilen karar\u0131n, 13\/05\/2014 tarihinde karde\u015fine tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, tebligat par\u00e7as\u0131na &#8220;Ayn\u0131 konutta sakin karde\u015fi &#8230; tebli\u011f edildi&#8221; \u015feklinde \u015ferh d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ancak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adreste bulunmama sebebi ile tebligat\u0131 alan karde\u015finin tebligat\u0131 almaya ehil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtilmedi\u011fi, bu nedenle san\u0131k ad\u0131na yap\u0131lan tebli\u011fin usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine verildi\u011fi ve s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.12.CD, E. 2017\/1696, K. 2018\/10939, T. 19.11.2018:<\/b>\u00a0<\/span>\u201c\u2026.Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131nda belirtmi\u015f oldu\u011fu &#8230; K\u00f6y\u00fc,&#8230;, &#8230; adresine 01\/05\/2014 tarihinde san\u0131kla ayn\u0131 konutta oturan amcas\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f ise de, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n uyaptaki n\u00fcfus kay\u0131t sisteminde yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rmada, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n &#8230; ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda amcas\u0131n\u0131n olmay\u0131p ayn\u0131 isimde bir karde\u015finin oldu\u011fu, yine sistemden yap\u0131lan sorgulamada, karde\u015finin \u201c&#8230; Mahallesinde&#8230;&#8217;da\u201d san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ise &#8230;\u2019de oturdu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi, &#8230; \u0130l\u00e7e Jandarma g\u00f6revlilerinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 adres ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131nda da tebligat tarihi olan 01\/05\/2014 tarihi, \u00f6ncesi ve sonras\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tebligatta adlar\u0131 ge\u00e7en ki\u015filerle birlikte oturmay\u0131p farkl\u0131 evlerde ikamet ettiklerinin tespit edildi\u011finin belirtilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 16. maddesinde belirtilen \u201dkendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fah\u0131s adresinde bulunmazsa tebli\u011f, kendisiyle ayn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015filere ya da hizmet\u00e7ilere yap\u0131l\u0131r\u201d d\u00fczenlemesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak usul\u00fcne uygun tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131larak elinde olmayan sebeplerle temyiz s\u00fcresini ka\u00e7\u0131ran san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eski hale getirme talebinde bulundu\u011fu, bunun \u00fczerine mahkemece ek karar ile eski hale getirme talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilerek, temyiz incelemesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n Dairemize g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 8. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen uygulanmakta olan 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;un 311.maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re, eski hale getirme istemiyle birlikte temyiz talebinde de bulunulmas\u0131 halinde, inceleme merciinin Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n ilgili dairesi oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek, yerel mahkemenin eski hale getirme talebinin temyiz talebi niteli\u011finde oldu\u011funa ve san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz talebinin kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin 02.03.2015 tarihli ek karar\u0131 hukuki de\u011ferden yoksun kabul edilip bu karar kald\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle yap\u0131lan incelemede\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>Y.3.HD, E. 2017\/10009, K. 2018\/12572, T. 10.12.2018:<\/b><\/span> \u201c\u2026.Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi, iddia ve savunma ile ilgili delillerin eksiksiz toplan\u0131p tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilmesi, itirazlar\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi, davan\u0131n s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131labilmesi, \u00f6ncelikle taraflar\u0131n duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden usul\u00fcnce haberdar edilmesi ve b\u00f6ylece taraf te\u015fkilinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu yolla ki\u015fi, hangi yarg\u0131 merciinde duru\u015fmas\u0131 bulundu\u011funa, hakk\u0131ndaki iddia ve isnatlar\u0131n nelerden ibaret oldu\u011funa, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n safahat\u0131na, duru\u015fman\u0131n hangi tarihte yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na, verilen karar\u0131n ne oldu\u011funa, Tebligat Kanununda a\u00e7\u0131klanan usule uygun tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile vak\u0131f olabilecektir.6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 27. maddesinde &#8220;Hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131&#8221; d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lama ile ilgili bilgi sahibi olma, a\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat hakk\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. Maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere bu hak Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 6. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n en \u00f6nemli unsurudur. \u0130ddia ve savunma hakk\u0131 olarak da bilinen bu hak, taraflar\u0131n yarg\u0131lama konusunda tam bilgi sahibi olmalar\u0131n\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat hakk\u0131n\u0131 tam ve e\u015fit olarak kullanabilmelerini, yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n da bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dikkate alarak gere\u011fi gibi de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131p karar vermelerini zorunlu k\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Hakim taraflar\u0131 dinlemeden veya a\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in kanuna uygun bi\u00e7imde davet etmeden h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc veremez. (YHGK.&#8217;nun 2009\/52 Esas, 2009\/105 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131)Taraf te\u015fkili mahkemece resen ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken bir husustur. Mahkemenin, dava dilek\u00e7esini ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc taraflara kendili\u011finden tebli\u011f edip taraf te\u015fkilini sa\u011flamas\u0131, Usul Kanunu&#8217;nun amir h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fidir. (&#8230;23.11.2011 g\u00fcn ve 11-554 Esas-684 Karar)7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 16.maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re, \u201ckendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fah\u0131s adresinde bulunmazsa tebli\u011f kendisi ile ayn\u0131 konutta oturan ki\u015filere veya hizmet\u00e7ilerinin birine yap\u0131l\u0131r\u201d. Muhatap ad\u0131na tebli\u011fi alacak ki\u015finin, muhatap ile ayn\u0131 konutta birlikte oturmu\u015f, oray\u0131 adres olarak se\u00e7mi\u015f olmas\u0131 \u015fartt\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re; yaz\u0131l\u0131 yasa h\u00fckm\u00fcnde belirtilen \u015fah\u0131slara muhatap ad\u0131na tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, bu ki\u015filerin muhatap ile ayn\u0131 konutta oturuyor olmas\u0131 ve tebligat yap\u0131lan yeri adres olarak se\u00e7mi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Aksi halde bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mayan ki\u015filere tebli\u011f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, tebli\u011f usuls\u00fcz olacakt\u0131r. Temyiz incelemesine konu dosyan\u0131n incelenmesi neticesinde; dava dilek\u00e7esinin sunulmas\u0131ndan sonra mahkemece, dilek\u00e7enin daval\u0131 ad\u0131na ve adresine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, d\u00f6nen tebligat par\u00e7as\u0131ndan tebligat\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fte oldu\u011fu belirterek, ayn\u0131 konutta oturan karde\u015fi &#8230; &#8216;e yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.Yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 yasa h\u00fck\u00fcleri ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"adL\"><div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2019_4721__K__2021_28558.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2019_4721__K__2021_28558.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2019_4721__K__2021_28558.pdf\" download>Download [20.72 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2021_19043__K__2021_21102.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2021_19043__K__2021_21102.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2021_19043__K__2021_21102.pdf\" download>Download [22.78 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2019_5077__K__2019_6288.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2019_5077__K__2019_6288.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2019_5077__K__2019_6288.pdf\" download>Download [30.11 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2013_18215__K__2014_2327.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2013_18215__K__2014_2327.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2013_18215__K__2014_2327.pdf\" download>Download [36.69 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2016_30199__K__2017_10245.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2016_30199__K__2017_10245.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2016_30199__K__2017_10245.pdf\" download>Download [37.38 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2016_13224__K__2016_12445.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2016_13224__K__2016_12445.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2016_13224__K__2016_12445.pdf\" download>Download [35.07 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2018_6479__K__2020_8144.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2018_6479__K__2020_8144.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2018_6479__K__2020_8144.pdf\" download>Download [29.99 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2017_2285__K__2021_855.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2017_2285__K__2021_855.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2017_2285__K__2021_855.pdf\" download>Download [44.77 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2012_26188__K__2012_36219.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2012_26188__K__2012_36219.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2012_26188__K__2012_36219.pdf\" download>Download [28.78 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2012_18555__K__2013_1793.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2012_18555__K__2013_1793.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2012_18555__K__2013_1793.pdf\" download>Download [24.52 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2014_788__K__2014_1842.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2014_788__K__2014_1842.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2014_788__K__2014_1842.pdf\" download>Download [27.86 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2015_3640__K__2015_6502.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2015_3640__K__2015_6502.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2015_3640__K__2015_6502.pdf\" download>Download [24.18 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2014_4282__K__2015_2196.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2014_4282__K__2015_2196.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2014_4282__K__2015_2196.pdf\" download>Download [24.51 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2015_5766__K__2015_13353.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2015_5766__K__2015_13353.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2015_5766__K__2015_13353.pdf\" download>Download [43.65 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2015_2875__K__2015_6997.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2015_2875__K__2015_6997.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2015_2875__K__2015_6997.pdf\" download>Download [24.83 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2015_6136__K__2016_2935.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2015_6136__K__2016_2935.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2015_6136__K__2016_2935.pdf\" download>Download [24.51 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2017_9562__K__2018_8745.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2017_9562__K__2018_8745.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2017_9562__K__2018_8745.pdf\" download>Download [45.94 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2017_2299__K__2018_1853.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2017_2299__K__2018_1853.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2017_2299__K__2018_1853.pdf\" download>Download [44.96 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\n19. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<br \/>\nESAS NO. 2015\/16385<br \/>\nKARAR NO. 2016\/287<br \/>\nKARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130. 19.1.2016<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>USULS\u00dcZ TEBL\u0130GAT &#8211;\u00a0MUHATABIN ADRES\u0130NDE BULUNMAMASI HAL\u0130NDE TEBL\u0130GAT\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>7201\/m. 21<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800080;\"><strong>\u00d6ZET :<\/strong> <\/span>Adreste bulunmama halinde tebli\u011f olunacak \u015fahsa keyfiyetin haber verilmesi, m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olduk\u00e7a en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirilmesi gerekti\u011finden kime haber verildi\u011fi hususu somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n yap\u0131lan tebilgat\u0131n usul\u00fcne g\u00f6re yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800080;\"><strong>DAVA :<\/strong><\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki menfi tespit davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda ilamda yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden dolay\u0131 davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekilince temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800080;\"><strong>KARAR :<\/strong> <\/span>Davac\u0131 asiller, davac\u0131lardan &#8230;&#8217; in daval\u0131dan haricen bir ara\u00e7 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak bu arac\u0131n noterden devrini \u00fczerine almadan haricen satt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu araca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k daval\u0131ya davac\u0131 &#8230;&#8217; in bor\u00e7lu, di\u011fer davac\u0131 &#8230;&#8217; \u0131n kefil oldu\u011fu, 20.08.2010 vade tarihli 4.000-TL bedelli senedin verilmi\u015f oldu\u011funu, senet borcu hen\u00fcz \u00f6denmeden davac\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;in dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 &#8230;&#8217; den &#8230; marka ba\u015fka bir arac\u0131 haricen ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;a olan senet borcuna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k daval\u0131 ile anla\u015farak trafik kayd\u0131 &#8230; \u00fczerine olan bu arac\u0131n daval\u0131ya &#8230; arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile noterden de devredildi\u011fini, bu s\u0131rada dava konusu senet istenmesine ra\u011fmen daval\u0131n\u0131n senedi vermedi\u011fini, daha sonra senedi \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 2011\/566 say\u0131l\u0131 icra dosyas\u0131nda takibe koydu\u011funu belirterek, senetten dolay\u0131 bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ile takibin iptaline, daval\u0131 aleyhine k\u00f6t\u00fcniyet tazminat\u0131na karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 asil, davac\u0131lara 1998 model &#8230;marka minib\u00fcs satt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 4.000-TL ve 10.000-TL bedelli bonolar\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bonolar\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fi gibi, satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131n da davac\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan bir galeriye sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini, davac\u0131lar\u0131n ba\u015fka ara\u00e7 vereceklerini s\u00f6ylemeleri \u00fczerine alaca\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k 10.000-TL bedelle &#8230; marka arac\u0131n kendisine devredildi\u011fini, ancak kendisinin ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta davac\u0131lara verdi\u011fi minib\u00fcs\u00fcn 14.000-TL de\u011ferinde olup, &#8230; marka arac\u0131n devrine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k 10.000-TL lik bonoyu iade etti\u011fini, zira bu arac\u0131n de\u011ferinin bu oldu\u011funu, dava konusu bono bedeli olan 4.000-TL&#8217; lik alaca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6denmedi\u011finden de bonoyu takibe koydu\u011funu beyanla, davan\u0131n reddine ve davac\u0131lar aleyhine tazminata karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda, davan\u0131n kambiyo senedinden dolay\u0131 bor\u00e7lu olunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti istemine ili\u015fkin olup, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n borcun \u00f6deme nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn davac\u0131 tarafta oldu\u011fu, bu kapsamda davac\u0131lar\u0131n takibe dayanak 4.000-TL bedelli senede kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k noterde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f 3 Kas\u0131m 2010 tarihli, sat\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 &#8230;, al\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 daval\u0131 &#8230; olan resmi ara\u00e7 sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini ibraz etti\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca yemin deliline de dayanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, yemin teklif etme hakk\u0131n\u0131n hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00fcresinde sunulan yemin metninin daval\u0131 asil ad\u0131na tebli\u011f edilmesine ra\u011fmen, daval\u0131n\u0131n gelip yemin etmemi\u015f olmakla yemin konusu vak\u0131alar\u0131 ikrar etmi\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eleriyle, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217; n\u00fcn 2011\/566 say\u0131l\u0131 takip dosyas\u0131na konu 25\/08\/2010 tarihli 4.000-TL&#8217;lik senetten dolay\u0131 davac\u0131lar\u0131n bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tespitine, as\u0131l alacak \u00fczerinden %20 tazminat\u0131n daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131 tarafa \u00f6denmesine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131ya \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan yemin davetiyesinin <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Tebligat Kanunu&#8217; nun 21. maddesindeki usule uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi tebligat evrak\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finden anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Zira, dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re mahkemece daval\u0131n\u0131n mernis adresi tespit edilip tebligata da mernis adresi oldu\u011fu \u015ferhi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmedi\u011fi halde daval\u0131n\u0131n mernis adresi imi\u015f gibi tebligat yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ayr\u0131ca adreste bulunmama halinde tebli\u011f olunacak \u015fahsa keyfiyetin haber verilmesinin de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olduk\u00e7a en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirilece\u011fi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn gere\u011fi yap\u0131lmadan, kime haber verildi\u011fi hususu somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n tebligat yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle mahkemece, daval\u0131ya usul\u00fcne uygun olarak yemin davetiyesi \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131l\u0131p sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken, eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800080;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7 :<\/strong><\/span> Yukar\u0131da belirtilen nedenlerle h\u00fckm\u00fcn daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na<em> BOZULMASINA<\/em>, bozma nedenine g\u00f6re sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fimdilik incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, pe\u015fin harc\u0131n istek halinde iadesine, 19.01.2016 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2014\/27553<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2017\/2305<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>28.2.2017<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>KARAR :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a053. maddesinin baz\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin iptaline dair Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 24\/11\/2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 08\/10\/2015 g\u00fcn ve 2014\/140 esas, 2015\/85 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 da nazara al\u0131narak bu maddede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen hak yoksunluklar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda verilen hapis cezalar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131nda g\u00f6zetilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I-)Su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda mala zarar verme su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mala zarar verme su\u00e7undan do\u011frudan h\u00fckmolunan adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n miktar ve t\u00fcr\u00fcne g\u00f6re; 14.04.2011 tarihli Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 31.03.2011 tarih ve 6217 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a026. maddesiyle 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;a eklenen ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesi gere\u011fince do\u011frudan h\u00fckmolunan 3000 TL dahil adli para cezas\u0131na mahkumiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin temyizi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz iste\u011finin 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0317. maddesi gere\u011fince istem gibi REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">II-San\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, mala zarar verme, konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bozma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan, su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bozma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131na gelince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n bilinen en son adresinin ayn\u0131 zamanda MERN\u0130S adresi olmas\u0131 ve san\u0131k ad\u0131na MERN\u0130S adresine 28.06.2013 tarihinde gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011f imkans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 sebebiyle muhtara tebli\u011f edildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a021\/1. maddesine g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adreste bulunmamas\u0131 halinde, tebli\u011f memurunun tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir veya memurlar\u0131na imza mukabilinde teslim ederek ve tesell\u00fcm edenin adresini ihtiva eden ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresteki binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmakla beraber, adreste bulunmama halinde tebli\u011f olunacak \u015fahsa keyfiyetin\u00a0haber verilmesini de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olduk\u00e7a en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirmesi gerekirken; bu i\u015flemler yap\u0131lmadan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n MERN\u0130S adresinde oturup oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya MERN\u0130S adresinden s\u00fcrekli olarak ayr\u0131l\u0131p ayr\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmeden do\u011frudan ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 21\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re i\u015flem yap\u0131larak muhtara teslim edilmesi sebebiyle\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan<\/strong><\/span>; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine h\u00fckm\u00fc s\u00fcresinde temyiz etti\u011fi kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>Yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya, toplanan delillere, gerek\u00e7eye, hakimin kanaat ve takdirine g\u00f6re temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin istem gibi ONANMASINA, 28.02.2017 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2016\/1940<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2016\/3614<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>25.4.2016<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>I-)San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, yoklu\u011funda verilip sorgu ve ayn\u0131 zamanda mernis adresi olan adresine 09.06.2014 tarihinde usul\u00fcne uygun tebli\u011f edilen h\u00fckm\u00fc 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a08\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun\u00a0310. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen bir haftal\u0131k yasal s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra 30.09.2014 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle temyiz etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, temyiz isteminin ve yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen eski hale getirme talebinin 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a08\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun\u00a0317. maddesi uyar\u0131nca istem gibi REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">II-San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine gelince;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yoklu\u011funda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilinen en son ve ayn\u0131 zamanda adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki adresine tebli\u011fi s\u0131ras\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adresten ge\u00e7ici ya da s\u00fcrekli ayr\u0131l\u0131p ayr\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda bir a\u00e7\u0131klama ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmadan, en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirilmeden, &#8220;adresin kapal\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131&#8221; ile yetinilip mahalle muhtar\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi ve 2 numaral\u0131\u00a0<strong>haber<\/strong>\u00a0ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n\u0131n kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan\u00a0<strong>tebligat<\/strong>\u0131n ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu ve eski hale getirme talebinin yerinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)San\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n &#8220;2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n yan\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yordum, bana kendilerinin \u00fczerinde haciz oldu\u011funu, bu sebeple \u015firket kuramad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, benle ortak \u015firket kurup \u015firketi \u00fczerime yapmak istediklerini s\u00f6ylediler, bende kabul ettim, di\u011fer san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217; \u0131 da bu \u015fah\u0131slar buldu ve birlikte Notere gittik, bu olayda benim herhangi bir su\u00e7um yoktur, ben \u015firketle hi\u00e7 bir zaman ilgilenmedim, benden defter ve belgeler istendi\u011finde de ben &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n yan\u0131na giderek defter ve belgeleri vermesini istedim, ancak bana defter ve belgelerin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylediler, bende veremedim, bu \u015fah\u0131slar beni de ma\u011fdur etmi\u015ftirler&#8221; \u015feklindeki savunmas\u0131, di\u011fer san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n da &#8220;Ben &#8230;&#8217;e i\u015f aramak i\u00e7in gitmi\u015ftim,&#8230; \u0130linde beni &#8230; kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131 ve bana bir arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu ve arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n \u015firketi oldu\u011funu, orada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fabilece\u011fimi ancak noterde birka\u00e7 imza atmam gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi, ben de &#8230; ile birlikte notere gittim, notere gitti\u011fimizde san\u0131k &#8230; de yan\u0131m\u0131zdayd\u0131, ben&#8230;&#8217;a g\u00fcvendi\u011fim i\u00e7in noterde imzalatt\u0131r\u0131lan evraklar\u0131 okumadan imzalad\u0131m, hem &#8230; hem de &#8230; bana \u015firketin sadece sorumlusu olaca\u011f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00f6ylediler, daha sonra &#8230;&#8217;e gitmemi istediler ve 4-5 ay boyunca kendilerini aramamam\u0131 istediler, ben de kendilerini aramad\u0131m, onlar da beni aramad\u0131lar, bu y\u00fczden ben de &#8230;&#8217;de kendime i\u015f buldum ve &#8230;&#8217;e gitmedim, ben herhangi bir \u015fekilde sahte fatura d\u00fczenlemedim, bu olay tamamen &#8230;&#8217;a g\u00fcvendi\u011fimden dolay\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131ma gelmi\u015ftir.&#8221; \u015feklinde san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;\u0131 teyit eder \u015fekilde savunmada bulunmu\u015f olmas\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n ortak g\u00f6z\u00fckt\u00fckleri \u015firketin Bs formlar\u0131nda sat\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan &#8230;&#8217;un banka arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u00f6dedi\u011fi mal bedellerinin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n vekalet verdi\u011fi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan tahsil edilmesi, &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015firketinin al\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tamamen sahte fatura d\u00fczenlemek i\u00e7in kuruldu\u011funa dair vergi inceleme raporlar\u0131 bulunan &#8230; limited ve &#8230; Metal Limited \u015eirketlerinin ortaklar\u0131 olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; ger\u00e7e\u011fin ku\u015fkuya yer vermeyecek \u015fekilde belirlenmesi ve sahte fatura d\u00fczenleme eyleminin san\u0131k &#8230; ve san\u0131k &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilip ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmedi\u011finin belirlenmesi i\u00e7in san\u0131k &#8230; ve &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan \u015firket faaliyetleriyle ilgili beyanname, \u015firkete ait bir belge d\u00fczenleyip d\u00fczenlemedikleri, m\u00fcd\u00fcr veya ortak s\u0131fat\u0131yla \u015firketten bir maa\u015f ya da pay al\u0131p almad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;ve &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmesi, haklar\u0131nda san\u0131klar\u0131n orta\u011f\u0131 olduklar\u0131 m\u00fckellef \u015firketle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 vergi ve ceza soru\u015fturmalar\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve m\u00fckellef \u015firketin faaliyetini ger\u00e7ekte y\u00fcr\u00fcten ki\u015filer olup olmad\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en ki\u015filere ait \u015firketlerde ortakl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, su\u00e7a konu faturalar ve \u015firketin kurulu\u015f a\u015famas\u0131ndaki belgelerdeki imza ve yaz\u0131lar\u0131n aidiyeti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bu ki\u015filer ile san\u0131klar\u0131n imza ve yaz\u0131 \u00f6rneklerinin al\u0131narak bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, \u015firketin fatura kesti\u011fi \u015firket yetkililerinin belirlenip tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmeleri, dosya i\u00e7erisinde 2009, 2010 y\u0131llar\u0131na ait \u00e7ok say\u0131da fatura ile 2008 y\u0131l\u0131na ait 1 adet faturan\u0131n bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan fatura ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n Vergi Dairesi&#8217;nden sorularak dava a\u00e7\u0131lan her takvim y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in kanaat olu\u015fturacak say\u0131da fatura asl\u0131 ya da onayl\u0131 suretinin de dosya aras\u0131na konulmas\u0131ndan sonra sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi yerine eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kabule g\u00f6re de;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nun\u00a0225. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fcn konusu, duru\u015fman\u0131n neticesine g\u00f6re iddianamede g\u00f6sterilen fiilden ibaret olup, bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131larak davaya konu edilmeyen eylem esas al\u0131narak h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulamayaca\u011f\u0131 halde san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, vergi tekni\u011fi ve vergi su\u00e7u raporu ile kurum m\u00fctalas\u0131nda yer almay\u0131p iddianame ile de kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olan 2012 takvim y\u0131l\u0131nda da sahte belge d\u00fczenlemek su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyetine h\u00fckmedilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu sebeple yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebepten dolay\u0131 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a08\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun\u00a0321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esine g\u00f6re temyiz talebi reddedilen san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;a da sirayet ettirilmesine, 25.04.2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2016\/3157<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2016\/2732<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>10.3.2016<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>DAVA :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne dair tebligat\u0131n,\u00a0<strong>Tebligat<\/strong>\u00a0Kanun&#8217;un 21. maddesine g\u00f6re en yak\u0131n\u00a0<strong>kom\u015fuya<\/strong>\u00a0haber verilmesi \u015fart\u0131na uyulmaks\u0131z\u0131n tebli\u011f edilerek kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; yap\u0131lan\u00a0<strong>tebligat<\/strong>\u00a0usuls\u00fcz olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eski hale getirme ve temyiz iste\u011finin hakl\u0131, temyizin \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine ve s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; eski hale getirme konusunda karar verme yetkisi Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;a ait olup temyiz talebinin reddine dair 06.08.2015 tarihli ek karar\u0131n hukuki de\u011ferden yoksun olmas\u0131 sebebiyle bu karar kald\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle yap\u0131lan incelemede,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131landan sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 mal kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kat\u0131lana su\u00e7a konu sahte \u00e7eki d\u00fczenleyip vermek suretiyle sahtecilik ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia olundu\u011fu olayda;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)Sahtecilik su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131landan sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 mal kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda sahte \u00e7ek d\u00fczenlemek \u015feklindeki eyleminin sahtecilik su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kab\u00fclde isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen ve Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 Say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 08.10.2015 tarih, 2014\/140 E, 2015\/85 Say\u0131l\u0131 iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz a\u015famas\u0131nda g\u00f6zetilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131landan sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 mal kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kat\u0131lana su\u00e7a konu sahte \u00e7eki vermek \u015feklindeki eyleminin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kab\u00fclde isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0158. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (e), (f), (j) ve (k) bentlerinde belirtilen nitelikli hallerde su\u00e7tan elde edilen haks\u0131z menfaati belli ise; TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a052. madde h\u00fckm\u00fc de g\u00f6zetilmek sureti ile haks\u0131z menfaatin iki kat\u0131ndan az olmayacak \u015fekilde temel adli para cezas\u0131 ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 61. maddesi uyar\u0131nca g\u00fcn olarak belirlenerek art\u0131r\u0131m ve indirimler g\u00fcn \u00fczerinden yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra, ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak sonu\u00e7 g\u00fcn say\u0131s\u0131 ile bir g\u00fcn kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 52\/2. madde h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince 20-100 TL aras\u0131nda takdir edilecek miktar\u0131n \u00e7arp\u0131lmas\u0131 neticesinde sonu\u00e7 adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekirken do\u011frudan elde edilen haks\u0131z menfaatin iki kat\u0131 esas al\u0131nmak suretiyle ceza tayini sonucu etkilemedi\u011finden bozma nedeni yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a-)Kat\u0131lan\u0131n, zarar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan giderilmedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki 17.04.2015 tarihli beyan\u0131ndan sonra, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 16.06.2015 tarihindeki beyan\u0131nda &#8220;\u00e7ek kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan 32.000 TL&#8217;yi mal ile birlikte &#8230;&#8217;e iade ettim, bunun iade edildi\u011fi banka kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda mevcuttur, daha sonra&#8230;&#8217;e kendi \u015firketimin 32.000 TL bedelli \u00e7ekini verdim, ilave senetlerde verdim, daha sonra mallar\u0131 iade ederek al\u0131\u015fveri\u015fimizi sonland\u0131rd\u0131m&#8221; \u015feklinde beyanda bulundu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; kat\u0131lana, zarar\u0131n\u0131n giderilip giderilmedi\u011fi hususunun sorularak ve zarar\u0131n hangi tarihte giderildi\u011fi hususu ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak sonucuna g\u00f6re TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0168. maddesinin uygulan\u0131p uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kararda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131,b-TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hak yoksunluklar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 Say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 08.10.2015 tarih, 2014\/140 E, 2015\/85 Say\u0131l\u0131 iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenlerle, 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a08\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;un\u00a0321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 10\/03\/2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2016\/116<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2016\/3545<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>1.3.2016<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>DAVA :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><em><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Yoklu\u011funda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulan san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;e 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanunu&#8217;nun\u00a021. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 4.4.2014 tarihinde tebligat yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de,\u00a0tebligat\u00a0evrak\u0131nda,\u00a0haber\u00a0verilmesi gereken en yak\u0131n kom\u015fusunun isminin belirtilmemesi ve imzas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmamas\u0131 sebebiyle yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u00a0usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 26.10.2015 havale tarihli temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu belirlenerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a053. maddesinin baz\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin iptaline dair Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 24.11.2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 8.10.2015 g\u00fcn ve 2014\/140 esas, 2015\/85 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 da nazara al\u0131narak bu maddede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen hak yoksunluklar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n infaz a\u015famas\u0131nda g\u00f6zetilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmler ile su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk &#8230; hakk\u0131nda konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya, toplanan delillere, gerek\u00e7eye, h\u00e2kimin kanaat ve takdirine g\u00f6re temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin istem gibi ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk &#8230; hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve mala zarar verme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir, Ancak;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a050\/3.maddesinde daha \u00f6nce hapis cezas\u0131 ile mahk\u00fbm olmayan 18 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurmam\u0131\u015f \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n mahk\u00fbm edildi\u011fi bir y\u0131l veya daha az s\u00fcreli hapis cezalar\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 se\u00e7enek yapt\u0131r\u0131mlardan birine \u00e7evrilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f, 5275 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;un\u00a0106\/4. maddesinde &#8220;\u00c7ocuklar hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckmedilen adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi halinde bu ceza hapse \u00e7evrilemez, bu takdirde onbirinci f\u0131kra h\u00fckm\u00fc uygulan\u0131r.&#8221; \u015feklinde d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Her ne kadar 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a050\/6. maddesinde se\u00e7enek tedbirin yerine getirilmemesi halinde tedbire \u00e7evrilen k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n tamamen veya k\u0131smen infaz\u0131na karar verilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f ise de, yukarda a\u00e7\u0131klanan d\u00fczenlemeler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a050\/6. maddesinin \u00e7ocuklar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131, h\u00fckmolunan se\u00e7enek tedbirin yerine getirilmemesi halinde di\u011fer se\u00e7enek tedbirlerden birine veya adli para cezas\u0131na karar verilebilece\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131ndan \u00e7evrilen se\u00e7enek tedbirin yerine getirilmemesi halinde hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n tamamen veya k\u0131smen infaz edilece\u011fi ihtar\u0131 yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk m\u00fcdafinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebepten dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, ancak bu ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 322. maddesine g\u00f6re d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fundan, \u201cTaksitlerden birinin \u00f6denmemesi durumunda kalan t\u00fcm taksitlerin SS\u00c7&#8217;dan tahsili ile \u00f6denmeyen para cezas\u0131n\u0131n hapse \u00e7evrilmesine,\u201d dair b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmek suretiyle, di\u011fer y\u00f6nleri usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA, 1.3.2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2015\/9527<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2016\/1875<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>15.2.2016<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>Yerel Mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler temyiz edilmekle, kararlar\u0131n nitelik, ceza t\u00fcr\u00fc, s\u00fcresi ve su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re dosya g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>KARAR :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>San\u0131\u011fa, 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a021. maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan ilk\u00a0tebligat\u0131n kom\u015fusuna\u00a0haber\u00a0verilmemesi sebebiyle usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; temyizin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fcyle yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-)San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fc\u015ftekiye ait 3 plaka say\u0131l\u0131, evin \u00f6n\u00fcndeki otoparkta kilitli vaziyette bulunan arac\u0131 kelebek cam\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131rarak kap\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131p \u00e7almaya kalk\u0131\u015fan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemi 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217; n\u0131n 142\/1-b. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen su\u00e7u olu\u015fturmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi sonu\u00e7 ceza de\u011fi\u015fmeyece\u011finden, bozma nedeni yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin karar tarihinden sonra 24.11.2015 tarihli Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 08.10.2015 g\u00fcn, 2014\/140 Esas ve 2015\/85 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a053. maddesinin baz\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin iptaline dair karar\u0131n\u0131n infazda g\u00f6zetilmesi olanakl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya, toplanan delillere, gerek\u00e7eye, hakimin kanaat ve takdirine g\u00f6re san\u0131k C.. T.. &#8216;nun temyiz itiraz\u0131 yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddiyle, ele\u015ftiri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda usul ve yasaya uygun olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-)San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mala zarar verme su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ma\u011fdura ait 3 plaka say\u0131l\u0131 arac\u0131 \u00e7almak i\u00e7in san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ara\u00e7 cam\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, d\u00fcz kontak yapabilmek i\u00e7in direksiyon alt\u0131ndaki kutunun s\u00f6k\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, mal\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131nmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda e\u015fyaya verilen zarardan dolay\u0131 ayr\u0131ca mala zarar verme su\u00e7undan ceza verilmeyece\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131k ..&#8217;nun temyiz itiraz\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebepten dolay\u0131 isteme ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak BOZULMASINA, 15\/02\/2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2015\/19569<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2015\/8320<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>17.12.2015<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>DAVA :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>KARAR :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne dair tebli\u011fat\u0131n, Tebli\u011fat Kanunun 21. maddesine g\u00f6re en yak\u0131n\u00a0<strong>kom\u015fuya<\/strong>\u00a0haber verilmesi \u015fart\u0131na uyulmaks\u0131z\u0131n tebli\u011f edilerek kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; yap\u0131lan\u00a0<strong>tebligat <\/strong>usuls\u00fcz olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eski hale getirme ve temyiz iste\u011finin hakl\u0131, temyizin \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine ve s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; eski hale getirme konusunda karar verme yetkisi Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;a ait olup temyiz talebinin reddine dair 26.11.2013 tarihli ek karar\u0131n hukuki de\u011ferden yoksun olmas\u0131 sebebiyle bu karar kald\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle yap\u0131lan incelemede,<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyize gelmeyen san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;in kat\u0131lana Giresun televizyonunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yeni bir ma\u011faza a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve hediye da\u011f\u0131tt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek kat\u0131lana bir zarf verdi\u011fi, bir m\u00fcddet sonra kendisini \u015firketin m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc olarak tan\u0131tan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n geldi\u011fi ve birlikte zarf\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 ve san\u0131klar\u0131n zarftan f\u0131r\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve size bilgisayarda getirece\u011fiz ayr\u0131ca 200 TL indirim \u00e7eki kazand\u0131n\u0131z \u015feklinde beyanda bulunarak kat\u0131landan 440 TL ald\u0131klar\u0131 ve kat\u0131lana ger\u00e7ek piyasa de\u011feri 190 TL olan f\u0131r\u0131n ve tencere satt\u0131klar\u0131ndan ve san\u0131klar\u0131n ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ntemle \u015fikayet\u00e7i&#8230; da piyasa de\u011ferlerinin \u00e7ok \u00fczerinde mutfak e\u015fyas\u0131 satarak 495 TL mebla\u011fl\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalatt\u0131klar\u0131ndan fikir ve eylem birli\u011fi i\u00e7erisinde doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015flediklerinin iddia olundu\u011fu olayda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, temyize gelmeyen di\u011fer san\u0131k ile birlikte hileli ve aldat\u0131c\u0131 hareketlerle kat\u0131lan ile \u015fikayet\u00e7inin zarar\u0131na kendi yarar\u0131na haks\u0131z menfaat temin etti\u011finden eylemlerinin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a053\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hak yoksunluklar\u0131n\u0131n, Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 Say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 8.10.2015 tarih, 2014\/140 E, 2015\/85 Say\u0131l\u0131 iptal karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda infaz a\u015famas\u0131nda g\u00f6zetilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle beraber, maddenin (b) f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan &#8220;ve di\u011fer siyasi haklar\u0131 kullanmaktan&#8221; \u015feklindeki ibarenin Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan iptal edilmesi ve ayr\u0131ca TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a053. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 53\/1-c bendindeki \u201cvelayet hakk\u0131ndan; vesayet veya kayy\u0131ml\u0131\u011fa ait bir hizmette bulunmaktan&#8221; yoksunlu\u011fun san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sadece kendi altsoyu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verme tarihine kadar s\u00fcrece\u011fi, altsoyu haricindekiler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 tamamlan\u0131ncaya kadar devam edece\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 sebebiyle bu hususlar,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un\u00a08\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a0321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, ancak yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmeyen bu hususlar\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 322. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a053\/1. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131na dair (c) bendinin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerden \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131larak yerine &#8220;TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 1. f\u0131kran\u0131n (c) bendinde yer alan kendi alt soyu \u00fczerindeki velayet, vesayet veya kayy\u0131ml\u0131k yetkilerinin ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihine, altsoyu haricindekiler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 tamamlan\u0131ncaya kadar yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na&#8221; c\u00fcmlesinin eklenmesi ve TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a053\/1. maddesinin (b) bendinin uygulanmas\u0131na dair k\u0131s\u0131mlarda yer alan &#8220;ve di\u011fer siyasi haklar\u0131 kullanmaktan&#8221; ibaresinin tamamen \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle sair y\u00f6nleri usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA, 17.12.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2015\/7823<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2015\/17286<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>22.6.2015<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>DAVA :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Yerel mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle; ba\u015fvurunun nitelik, ceza t\u00fcr\u00fc, s\u00fcresi ve su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re dosya okunduktan sonra T\u00fcrk Milleti ad\u0131na gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>KARAR :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>San\u0131k m\u00fcdafii 25.03.2014 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde san\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilen\u00a0tebligattan kom\u015fular\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0haberinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bilgi ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n\u0131n kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve muhtar\u0131n m\u00fcvekkilini bilgilendirmedi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n da\u00a0haberi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6ylece yap\u0131lan\u00a0tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011funu \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6re, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 MK.nun\u00a042\/1.maddesi uyar\u0131nca temyiz talebini de i\u00e7eren eski hale getirme istemi konusunda karar verme yetkisi dairemize ait bulundu\u011fundan mahkemenin eski hale getirme talebi hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi 28.03.2014 tarihli 2013\/381 esas, 2013\/896 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ek-karar hukuken ge\u00e7ersiz ve yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde olup, bu konuda verilen ek karar kald\u0131r\u0131larak yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n adreste bulunmama sebebi g\u00f6sterilmeyen, ve\u00a0haber\u00a0verilen kom\u015funun ad\u0131 soyad\u0131 imzas\u0131 bulunmayan 05.02.2014 tarihli\u00a0tebligatla yap\u0131lan gerek\u00e7eli karar tebli\u011finin 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Yasas\u0131na uygun yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, eski hale getirme talebinin kabul\u00fcyle \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine san\u0131k m\u00fcdaf\u0131inin temyiz istemi yasal s\u00fcresinde kabul edilerek 23.12.2013 tarihli h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya, toplanan ve karar yerinde a\u00e7\u0131klanan delillere, g\u00f6sterilen gerek\u00e7eye ve takdire g\u00f6re san\u0131k m\u00fcdaf\u0131inin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA, 22.06.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2014\/12208<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2014\/14626<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong> 9.7.2014<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>DAVA :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Yerel mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle; ba\u015fvurunun nitelik, ceza t\u00fcr\u00fc, s\u00fcresi ve su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re dosya okunduktan sonra T\u00fcrk Milleti ad\u0131na gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>1-5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a042\/1.maddesi uyar\u0131nca; eski hale getirme iste\u011fi hakk\u0131nda karar verme g\u00f6revi temyiz incelemesini yapacak Dairemize ait olup, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii temyiz talebi ile beraber eski hale getirme talebinde de bulundu\u011fundan yerel mahkemenin 06.06.2012 tarihli ve 2011\/540 Esas 2011\/104 say\u0131l\u0131 s\u00fcreden sonra yap\u0131lan temyiz talebinin reddine dair karar\u0131 hukuken ge\u00e7ersiz ve yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kabul edilip, kald\u0131r\u0131larak, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin 29.05.2012 tarihli eski hale getirme istemine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n mernis adresinden ta\u015f\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu da belirtilerek do\u011frudan\u00a0<strong>Tebligat<\/strong>\u00a0Kanunu 21.maddesi gere\u011fince,\u00a0<strong>kom\u015fuya<\/strong>\u00a0da\u00a0<strong>haber<\/strong>\u00a0verilmeden 27.03.2012 tarihinde yap\u0131lan\u00a0<strong>tebligat<\/strong>\u00a0usuls\u00fcz olup, bu nedenle san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin karardan 28.05.2012 tarihinde\u00a0<strong>haber<\/strong>dar olundu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki beyan\u0131 da yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden eski hale getirme talebi kabul edilerek Mersin 3.Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 15.02.2012 tarihli mahkumiyet karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temyiz incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">10.05.2011 tarihli olay, yakalama ve muhafaza alt\u0131na alma ve teslim tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ikametgah\u0131nda aramada 15 adet 6 kg&#8217;l\u0131k dolu O.., 5 adet 6 kg&#8217;l\u0131k dolu A .. 2 adet 1.5 kg&#8217;l\u0131k dolu O.., 2 adet 650 gr&#8217;l\u0131k dolu C.., 230 adet bo\u015f C.. ambalaj\u0131 334 adet bo\u015f O.. ambalaj\u0131, 5 adet bo\u015f A.. ambalaj\u0131, 1 adet silikon tabanca 35 adet dolu silikon t\u00fcp\u00fc, 1 adet ambalaj makinesi ve arac\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7inde 39 adet 6 kg&#8217;l\u0131k dolu O.. ve 11 adet 6 kg&#8217;l\u0131k dolu A..markal\u0131 deterjanlar ve \u00fcr\u00fcnler bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011fa at\u0131l\u0131 marka hakk\u0131na tecav\u00fcz su\u00e7unun 556 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK&#8217;nin 5833 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa ile de\u011fi\u015fik 61\/A-6 maddesi gere\u011fince soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturmas\u0131 \u015fikayete ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Omo, omomatik markalar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda \u00dc.. N.V (\u00dc..S.. ve Tic. A.\u015e.) ad\u0131na Avukat M..Y.. taraf\u0131ndan \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esi verildi\u011fi, dosyada mevcut vekaletnamesinin T\u00fcrk \u015firketi ad\u0131na oldu\u011fu \u00fcnilever San. Ve Tic. A.\u015e. Vekili Av. E.. A..&#8217;\u0131n talimat mahkemesinde kat\u0131lma talebinde bulundu\u011fu, ancak bu vekilin dosyada vekaletnamesinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Calgon, calgonit markalar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda R&#8230; B&#8230; T.. M..San. Tic. A.\u015e. Vekili Av. T.. K.. \u015fikayet\u00e7i olup, ayn\u0131 \u015firket ad\u0131na talimat mahkemesinde Av. \u00c7.. S.. kat\u0131lma talebinde bulundu\u011fu ve her iki vekilinde dosyada vekaletnamelerinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A.., arielmatik markalar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda The P.. G..&amp; C..T\u00fck. Malz. San.Tic. A.\u015e. Vekili Av.S.. M.. demiry\u00fcrek&#8217;in talimat mahkemesinde 12.09.2011 tarihinde kat\u0131lma talebinde bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu \u015firketler ad\u0131na vekaletname veya yetki belgesinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">T\u00fcrk Patent Enstit\u00fcs\u00fcnden su\u00e7 konu markalara ait marka tescil belgeleri celbedilip ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en markalar\u0131n sahiplerinin belirlenmesi, yabanc\u0131 \u015firketler ad\u0131na tescilli iseler bu firmalar\u0131n \u015fikayet eden veya yarg\u0131lamaya kat\u0131lma talep eden firmalara su\u00e7 tahinde ge\u00e7erli lisans s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri ile marka hakk\u0131n\u0131n devri olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya \u015fikayet eden veya kat\u0131lma talep eden vekillere yabanc\u0131 \u015firketler taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f vekaletname veya yetki belgelerinin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak, \u015fikayet eden ve yarg\u0131lamaya kat\u0131lma talep eden ve dosyada vekaletnameleri bulunmayan ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en vekillerin de varsa vekaletname veya yetki belgelerinin temin edilmesinden sonra \u015fikayet ve yarg\u0131lamaya kat\u0131lma haklar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilerek sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekirken eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kabul ve uygulamaya g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-Ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn yap\u0131lan aramada farkl\u0131 firmalar ad\u0131na tescilli markalar\u0131n taklidi olan \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin bulunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a043.maddesinin birinci ve ikinci f\u0131kralar\u0131 gere\u011fince bir su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131n\u0131n icras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ayn\u0131 su\u00e7un birden fazla ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 tek bir fiile i\u015flenmesi sebebiyle zincirleme su\u00e7 kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-Su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f bicimi, su\u00e7 konusunun \u00f6nem ve de\u011feri tamamen haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kar sa\u011flama amac\u0131na y\u00f6nelik su\u00e7 sebep ve saiki, fiilden sonraki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek alt s\u0131n\u0131r ceza yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirtildi\u011fi halde takdiren ve te\u015fdiden asgari had a\u015f\u0131l\u0131p yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde ceza tayinini suretiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmde \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden h\u00fckm\u00fcn 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n\u00a08\/1.maddesi gere\u011fince y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK.nun\u00a0321.maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7tan tutuklu veya h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde bu su\u00e7tan TAHL\u0130YES\u0130NE 09.07.2014 g\u00fcn\u00fc oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2010\/1942<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2011\/36617<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>17.10.2011<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>KARAR :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>1-) San\u0131k Ayhan Ayd\u0131n&#8217;a 16.7.2007 tarihinde 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131\u00a0Tebligat\u00a0Kanununun\u00a021. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan temyiz isteminin reddine dair karar tebli\u011fi, muhatab\u0131n adreste bulunmama nedeninin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 ve kom\u015fusuna\u00a0haber\u00a0verilmemesi sebebiyle usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fundan \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine bu karar\u0131 3.9.2007 tarihinde temyiz eden san\u0131k Ayhan Ayd\u0131n&#8217;\u0131n temyiz isteminin yasal s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu belirlenerek yap\u0131lan incelemede:<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n mala zarar verme su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin reddine dair 28.6.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2004\/132 esas-2007\/73 Say\u0131l\u0131 kararda bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden, bu karara y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle, temyiz isteminin reddine dair karar\u0131n istem gibi ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-) San\u0131k Kaan Ayd\u0131n&#8217;\u0131n daha \u00f6nce kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7tan mahkum oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilebilmesi i\u00e7in aranan, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 C.M.K.nun\u00a0231\/6. maddesinin (a) bendinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 &#8220;kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7tan mahkum olmama&#8221; ko\u015fulunun bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle, hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilemeyece\u011fi belirlenerek, bu san\u0131k elektrik enerjisi su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131k Kaan Ayd\u0131n&#8217;\u0131n do\u011fum tarihinin 24.8.1967 yerine 20.3.1978 olarak yanl\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 mahallinde d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn maddi hata olarak kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya toplanan delillere, gerek\u00e7eye, hakimin kanaat ve takdirine g\u00f6re temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn istem gibi ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k Ayhan Ayd\u0131n hakk\u0131nda tehdit su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fck\u00fcmden sonra 8.2.2008 tarihli Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131mlanarak ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5728 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a0562. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 C.M.K.nun\u00a0231. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ve bu maddenin 6. f\u0131kras\u0131na 25.7.2010 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6008 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun\u00a07. maddesiyle eklenen c\u00fcmle de g\u00f6zetilerek; h\u00fckmolunan cezan\u0131n t\u00fcr ve s\u00fcresine g\u00f6re h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131l\u0131p b\u0131rak\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131 hususunun de\u011ferlendirilmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131k Ayhan Ayd\u0131n&#8217;\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan di\u011fer y\u00f6nleri incelenmeyen h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebeplerden dolay\u0131 istem gibi BOZULMASINA, temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istenmesi halinde iadesine, 17.10.2011 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><iframe src=\"\/\/view.officeapps.live.com\/op\/embed.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FUSULS%C3%9CZ-TEBL%C4%B0GAT.docx\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;\"><\/iframe><\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/USULS\u00dcZ-TEBL\u0130GAT.docx\" download>Download [32.12 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\n19. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<br \/>\nE. 2016\/2683<br \/>\nK. 2017\/8879<br \/>\nT. 30.10.2017<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">* YANLI\u015e TEBL\u0130GAT ADRES\u0130 B\u0130LD\u0130RME<\/span>\u00a0<\/b>( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n MERN\u0130S Adresi Olarak \u0130lgili Adresi G\u00f6sterip G\u00f6stermedi\u011fi ve San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u0130lgili D\u00f6nemde An\u0131lan Adreste Oturup Oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Zab\u0131ta Arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla Tespit Edilmeden Eksik Kovu\u015fturma \u0130le Yetinilerek San\u0131k Hakk\u0131nda 7201 S. K.Uyar\u0131nca Mahkumiyet Karar\u0131 Verilmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">* ZABITA ARACILI\u011eI \u0130LE ADRES TESP\u0130T\u0130<\/span>\u00a0<\/b>( Tebligat Yap\u0131lacak Hallerde Adresi Yanl\u0131\u015f Bildirmek &#8211; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Savunmas\u0131nda 2007-2008 Y\u0131llar\u0131 Aras\u0131nda \u0130lgili Adreste Oturmas\u0131na Ra\u011fmen \u0130\u015flerinin K\u00f6t\u00fc Gitmesi Babas\u0131n\u0131 Kaybetmesi ve Aile Fertleri \u0130le Aras\u0131n\u0131n Bozulmas\u0131 \u00dczerine Bu Adresten Ta\u015f\u0131nmak Zorunda Kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015eeklindeki Savunmas\u0131 G\u00f6z \u00d6n\u00fcne Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 2007-2008 Y\u0131llar\u0131 Aras\u0131 San\u0131\u011f\u0131n MERN\u0130S Adresi Olarak Bu Adresi G\u00f6sterip G\u00f6stermedi\u011fi ve San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Bu D\u00f6nemde An\u0131lan Adreste Oturup Oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Zab\u0131ta Arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla Tespit Edilece\u011fi )\u00a0<b>7201\/m.53<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>\u00d6ZET :<\/b><\/span>\u00a0Tebligat yap\u0131lacak hallerde isim veya adresi yanl\u0131\u015f bildirmek su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131nda, 2007-2008 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda bu adreste oturmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen i\u015flerinin k\u00f6t\u00fc gitmesi, babas\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmesi ve aile fertleri ile aras\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine bu adresten ta\u015f\u0131nmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki savunmas\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, 2007-2008 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n MERN\u0130S adresi olarak bu adresi g\u00f6sterip g\u00f6stermedi\u011fi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu d\u00f6nemde an\u0131lan adreste oturup oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zab\u0131ta arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla tespit edilmeden, eksik kovu\u015fturma ile yetinilerek san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun uyar\u0131nca mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi, hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>DAVA :\u00a0<\/b><\/span>Yerel Mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle; ba\u015fvurunun s\u00fcresi,karar\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><b>KARAR :\u00a0<\/b><\/span>Temyiz iste\u011finin reddi nedenleri bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Vicdani kan\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu duru\u015fma s\u00fcrecini yans\u0131tan tutanaklar, belgeler ve gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan Sel\u00e7uklu \u0130l\u00e7e N\u00fcfus M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yaz\u0131lan 05\/12\/2013 tarihli m\u00fczekkerede, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n MERN\u0130S adresi olarak bildirdi\u011fi &#8220;Sancak Mahallesi \u00d6d\u00fcl Sokak G\u00fcl\u015fehir Sitesi No&#8230; ve Sancak Mahallesi \u00d6d\u00fcl Sokak G\u00fcl\u015fehir Sitesi No:&#8230; Sel\u00e7uklu\/ Konya&#8221; adresinde 2009 &#8211; 2013 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda kimlerin oturdu\u011fu, bu adresi kimlerin MERN\u0130S adresi olarak bildirdi\u011fi, \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce \u00d6deme Emri ile Yenileme Emrinin g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi 22\/02\/2012 tarihi ile hacze gidilen 08\/10\/2012 tarihlerinde bu adreste kimlerin oturdu\u011fu ve buna dair belgelerin mahkemeye ibraz\u0131n\u0131n istendi\u011fi, N\u00fcfus M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce g\u00f6nderilen cevabi yaz\u0131da ise, belirtilen adreste 10\/07\/2008 tarihinden itibaren &#8230; ve ailesinin oturdu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi bildirilerek, &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan beyan belgesinin g\u00f6nderildi\u011finin g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ise savunmas\u0131nda, 2007-2008 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda bu adreste oturmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen i\u015flerinin k\u00f6t\u00fc gitmesi, babas\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmesi ve aile fertleri ile aras\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine bu adresten ta\u015f\u0131nmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki savunmas\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, 2007-2008 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n MERN\u0130S adresi olarak bu adresi g\u00f6sterip g\u00f6stermedi\u011fi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu d\u00f6nemde an\u0131lan adreste oturup oturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zab\u0131ta arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla tespit edilmeden, eksik kovu\u015fturma ile yetinilerek san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde 7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun uyar\u0131nca mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span>\u00a0<\/b>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz nedenleri bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden tebli\u011fnameye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak H\u00dcKM\u00dcN 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 8\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;n\u0131n 321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n bozma \u00f6ncesi a\u015famadan ba\u015flayarak s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcp sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 30.10.2017 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<h6 class=\"title gs-title\" style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">VEK\u0130L \u0130LE TAK\u0130P ED\u0130LEN DAVADA AS\u0130L DURU\u015eMADA B\u0130ZZAT BULUNSA DAH\u0130 TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130N ONA DE\u011e\u0130L, VEK\u0130L\u0130NE YAPILMASI ZORUNLUDUR<\/span><\/h6>\n<h6 class=\"lead\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Vekaletname sunulduktan sonra tebligatlar\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Vekil ile takip edilen davada asil duru\u015fmada bizzat bulunsa dahi tebli\u011fin ona de\u011fil, vekiline yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur<\/strong><\/h6>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>9. Hukuk Dairesi \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2020\/4757 E. \u00a0, \u00a02021\/1975 K.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">MAHKEMES\u0130:\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc: ALACAK<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti: Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde 09.10.2005 tarihinden 20.11.2010 tarihine kadar \u015fof\u00f6r olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 20.11.2010 tarihinde, g\u00f6revi ba\u015f\u0131nda iken daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan hi\u00e7bir gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeksizin, s\u00f6zl\u00fc bir \u015fekilde i\u015fine son verildi\u011fini iddia ederek bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 \u015firket vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; davac\u0131n\u0131n taleplerinin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve hukuki dayanaktan yoksun oldu\u011funu savunarak davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.Gerek\u00e7e:Savunma hakk\u0131 Anayasa\u2019m\u0131z\u0131n hak arama h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 36. maddesinde &#8220;Herkes, me\u015fru vas\u0131ta ve yollardan faydalanmak suretiyle yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde davac\u0131 veya daval\u0131 olarak iddia ve savunma ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na sahiptir.&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesi ile a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u0130ddia ve savunma hakk\u0131, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun \u201cHukuki Dinlenilme Hakk\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 27. maddesi ile usul hukukumuza yans\u0131t\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131n\u0131n kendi haklar\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na sahip olduklar\u0131 belirtildikten sonra maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda bu hakk\u0131n &#8220;a\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat hakk\u0131&#8221;n\u0131 da i\u00e7erdi\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131n\u0131n usul hukuku h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmalar\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131, iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furur.6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 27. maddesinde yer bulan \u201cHukuki Dinlenilme Hakk\u0131\u201d gere\u011fince davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131, m\u00fcdahiller ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n di\u011fer ilgilileri, kendi haklar\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131na sahip olup, bu hakk\u0131n yarg\u0131lama ile ilgili olarak bilgi sahibi olunmas\u0131n\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131klama ve ispat hakk\u0131n\u0131, mahkemenin, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dikkate alarak de\u011ferlendirmesini ve kararlar\u0131n somut ve a\u00e7\u0131k olarak gerek\u00e7elendirilmesini i\u00e7ermektedir. Mahkeme, iki tarafa e\u015fit \u015fekilde hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131 tan\u0131yarak h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc vermelidir. Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 6. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n en \u00f6nemli unsuru olan hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 i\u00e7inde teminat alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu hakka, taraf\u0131n h\u00e2kime meram\u0131n\u0131 anlatma hakk\u0131 ya da iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131 da denilmektedir. Ancak, hukuk\u00ee dinlenilme hakk\u0131, bu ifadeleri de kapsayan daha geni\u015f bir anlama sahiptir. Bu hak \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde, taraflar\u0131n gerek yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca gerekse kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler konusunda bilgilendirilmeleri zorunludur. Ki\u015finin kendisinden habersiz yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131larak karar verilmesi, kural olarak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.Bu kapsamda hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n, bilgilenme\/bilgilendirme, a\u00e7\u0131klama yapma, yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca dikkate al\u0131nma ve kararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7eli olmas\u0131 gibi hususlar\u0131 i\u00e7erdi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bilgilenme hakk\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fine dair tam bir bilgi sahibi olman\u0131n yan\u0131nda gerek kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n gerekse de yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine yapm\u0131\u015f olduklar\u0131 i\u015flemleri \u00f6\u011frenmelerini kapsar. Bilgilenme\/bilgilendirme hakk\u0131n\u0131n etkin bi\u00e7imde kullan\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in g\u00f6nderilecek tebligat ve davetiyelerde kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f \u015fekil \u015fartlar\u0131na s\u0131k\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ya uyulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca bu hak sadece davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndaki iddia ve savunmalar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan de\u011fil yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu kapsamda devam eden bir yarg\u0131lamada, taraflar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 i\u00e7in bilgilendirme yeterli olmay\u0131p yarg\u0131lamada yer alan di\u011fer ki\u015filerin (tan\u0131k, bilirki\u015fi gibi) a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da \u00f6nemlidir. Bilgilenme hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun kullan\u0131m\u0131 ile taraflar\u0131n haklar\u0131nda \u00f6\u011frendikleri isnat ve iddialara kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunabilme, davaya y\u00f6nelik bilgi ve belge verebilme yani a\u00e7\u0131klama yapma hakk\u0131 da hukuki g\u00fcvenceye ba\u011flanmaktad\u0131r. B\u00f6ylece davan\u0131n her iki taraf\u0131na e\u015fit \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klama yapma hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmas\u0131 ile adaletin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr k\u0131l\u0131nmas\u0131 sa\u011flanacakt\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunma hakk\u0131, taraflar\u0131n, yaz\u0131l\u0131 veya s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fekilde iddia ve savunmalara kar\u015f\u0131 itirazda bulunabilme, davaya ili\u015fkin beyanda bulunmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi dava ile ilgili olan ki\u015filerin davaya ili\u015fkin bir i\u015flemi \u00f6\u011frenebilmesi i\u00e7in, tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Vekaletname sunulduktan sonra tebligatlar\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Vekil ile takip edilen davada asil duru\u015fmada bizzat bulunsa dahi tebli\u011fin ona de\u011fil, vekiline yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Vekile \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebligat, kendisine veya kendisi yerine sekreteri veya katibine tebli\u011f edilmelidir. Ancak isticvap, yemin gibi \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 i\u015flemlerde, tebligat\u0131n vekile de\u011fil, bizzat bu i\u015flemi yapacak asile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 yasal zorunluluktur.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta; yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda daval\u0131 \u015firket vekillerinin 07.02.2012 tarihli cevap dilek\u00e7esi ile beraber vek\u00e2letnamelerini sundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Vek\u00e2letname sunulduktan sonra tebligatlar\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken, dosya kapsam\u0131nda bir vekillikten \u00e7ekilme dilek\u00e7esi veya azilname bulunmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, yarg\u0131lamada, bilirki\u015fi raporu ile davac\u0131n\u0131n \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esinin daval\u0131 vekili yerine daval\u0131 \u015firketin kendisine tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durum, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK\u2019n\u0131n 27. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hukuki dinlenilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali olup, karar\u0131n salt bu nedenle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.Sonu\u00e7:Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebepten dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, bozma sebebine g\u00f6re daval\u0131n\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n bu a\u015famada incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde daval\u0131ya iadesine, 25.01.2021 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h6 class=\"lead\" style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY 12. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 KARARI; TEBL\u0130\u011e \u0130\u015eLEM\u0130N\u0130N USULS\u00dcZL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc \u0130DD\u0130ASININ MAHKEMECE RE&#8217;SEN NAZARA ALINAMAMASI<\/strong><\/span><\/h6>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong><span style=\"font-family: Tahoma;\">T.C.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><a class=\"klink\" style=\"color: #000000;\" title=\"YARGITAY\" href=\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\/haberleri\/yarg%C4%B1tay\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">YARGITAY<\/a><\/span><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>12. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>E. 2014\/27652<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>K. 2015\/1372<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>T. 21.1.2015<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>* TEBL\u0130\u011e \u0130\u015eLEM\u0130N\u0130N USULS\u00dcZL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc\u00a0\u00a0 <em>\u0130DD\u0130ASININ MAHKEMECE RE&#8217;SEN NAZARA ALINAMAMASI<\/em><\/strong><em> ( Tebli\u011f \u0130\u015fleminin Usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u0130\u015fleminin \u015eikayet Niteli\u011finde Oldu\u011fu &#8211; 7 G\u00fcnl\u00fck S\u00fcreye Tabi Oldu\u011fu\/Kambiyo Senetlerine \u00d6zg\u00fc Haciz Yolu \u0130le Takipte Borca \u0130tiraz\u0131n 5 G\u00fcnl\u00fck S\u00fcrede Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u0130stemin S\u00fcre A\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Nedeniyle Reddedilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/em><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>* KAMB\u0130YO SENETLER\u0130NE \u00d6ZG\u00dc HAC\u0130Z YOLU \u0130LE TAK\u0130PTE BORCA \u0130T\u0130RAZ<\/strong><em> ( Tebligat\u0131n Usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne Y\u00f6nelik \u015eikayette Bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Bu Hususun Re&#8217;sen \u0130ncelenemeyece\u011fi &#8211; \u00d6deme Emrinin Tebli\u011f Tarihine \u0130tirazlar 5 G\u00fcnl\u00fck S\u00fcrede Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u0130stemin S\u00fcre A\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Nedeniyle Reddedilece\u011fi )<\/em><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>* \u00d6DEME EMR\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZ <\/strong><em>( Kambiyo Senetlerine \u00d6zg\u00fc Haciz Yolu \u0130le Takipte Borca \u0130tiraz\u0131n 5 G\u00fcnl\u00fck S\u00fcrede Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u0130stemin S\u00fcre A\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Nedeniyle Reddedilmesi Gerekti\u011fi &#8211; Tebligat\u0131n Usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne Y\u00f6nelik \u015eikayette Bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Bu Hususun Re&#8217;sen \u0130ncelenemeyece\u011fi )<\/em><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">2004\/m. 16, 168<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00d6ZET : <\/strong>Kambiyo senetlerine \u00f6zg\u00fc haciz yolu ile ba\u015flat\u0131lan takip \u00fczerine, yetki itiraz\u0131 ve takibe konu bonolar\u0131n bedelinin \u00f6denmesi sebebiyle borca itirazda bulunulmu\u015f, takibin iptali talep edilmi\u015ftir.<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ba\u015fvuru bu hali ile yetkiye ve borca itiraza dair olup, bu itiraz\u0131n 5 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcrede yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. \u00d6deme emri tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddias\u0131 &#8220;\u015fikayet&#8221; niteli\u011finde olup, 7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcreye tabi oldu\u011fundan, ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi takdirde mahkemece resen nazara al\u0131namaz.<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7lunun itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde, tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik bir \u015fikayette bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde mahkemece bu hususun resen incelenerek tebli\u011f tarihinin d\u00fczeltildi\u011fi ve d\u00fczeltilen tebli\u011f tarihine g\u00f6re yetkiye ve borca itirazlar\u0131n esastan incelenerek reddine karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u015eikayet\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan tebligat usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi, bu durumda \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi tarihe g\u00f6re itirazlar\u0131n 5 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcrede yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek istemin s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 sebebiyle reddi gerekir.<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>DAVA :<\/strong> Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi Asye Parlak taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>KARAR :<\/strong> Bor\u00e7lu, alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bonoya dayal\u0131 olarak hakk\u0131nda kambiyo senetlerine \u00f6zg\u00fc haciz yolu ile ba\u015flat\u0131lan takip \u00fczerine icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurusunda, yetkili yerin Beykoz \u0130cra Daireleri ve mahkemesi oldu\u011funu, ayr\u0131ca takibe konu bonolar\u0131n bedelinin \u00f6denmesi sebebiyle borca itiraz etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek takibin iptalini talep etmi\u015f, mahkemece, tebligat usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fikayetinin kabul\u00fcyle \u0131tt\u0131la tarihinin 20.3.2014 olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine, yetkiye ve borca itiraz\u0131n ise reddine karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ba\u015fvuru bu hali ile yetkiye ve borca itiraza dair olup, \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 168\/5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bu itiraz\u0131n 5 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcrede yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6deme emri tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddias\u0131 &#8220;\u015fikayet&#8221; niteli\u011finde olup, \u0130\u0130K.nun 16\/1.maddesi gere\u011fince 7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcreye tabi oldu\u011fundan, ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi takdirde mahkemece resen nazara al\u0131namaz.<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, bor\u00e7luya \u00f6rnek 10 \u00f6deme emrinin 12.3.2014 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurunun ise 25.3.2014 tarihinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bor\u00e7lunun icra mahkemesine sundu\u011fu itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde, tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik bir \u015fikayette bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde mahkemece bu hususun resen incelenerek tebli\u011f tarihinin d\u00fczeltildi\u011fi ve d\u00fczeltilen tebli\u011f tarihine g\u00f6re yetkiye ve borca itirazlar\u0131n esastan incelenerek reddine karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde mahkemece, \u015fikayet\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan tebligat usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi, bu durumda \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi tarihe g\u00f6re itirazlar\u0131n \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 168\/5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 5 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcrede yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek istemin s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 sebebiyle reddi gerekirken i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7e ile reddi isabetsiz olup, karar\u0131n bu sebeple bozulmas\u0131 gerekir ise de, sonu\u00e7ta istem reddedildi\u011finden sonucu itibariyle do\u011fru olan karar\u0131n onanmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p><strong>SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>Bor\u00e7lunun temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile sonucu do\u011fru mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukarda yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebeplerle \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 366. ve HUMK&#8217;nun 438. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ONANMASINA, al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 27,70 TL temyiz harc\u0131ndan, evvelce al\u0131nan har\u00e7 varsa mahsubu ile eksik harc\u0131n temyiz edenden tahsiline, ilam\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 21.01.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2012\/19-779<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2013\/355<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 13.3.2013<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201citiraz\u0131n iptali\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; \u0130zmir 1. Sulh Hukuk Mahkeme\u2019since davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 14.12.2010 g\u00fcn ve 1257\/1382 E., K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 19. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 26.10.2011 g\u00fcn ve 3278\/13260 E., K say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin hamili oldu\u011fu \u00e7eklerin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n \u0130zmir Kemeralt\u0131 \u015eubesine bankan\u0131n sorumlu oldu\u011fu miktar\u0131n tahsili amac\u0131yla m\u00fcracaat etti\u011fini, olumsuz cevap \u00fczerine daval\u0131 banka aleyhine ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibinin yetkiye ve borca itiraz sonucu durdu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek itiraz\u0131n iptali ile takibin devam\u0131na ve icra inkar tazminat\u0131na karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekili, davan\u0131n yetkisiz mahkemede a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Ayd\u0131n mahkemelerinin yetkili oldu\u011funu, takibe konu \u00e7eklerin takas odas\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ibraz edildi\u011fini belirterek davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda, daval\u0131n\u0131n icra dairesinin ve mahkemenin yetkisine y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n\u0131n yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi, her ne kadar 3167 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kalkm\u0131\u015f ise de 5941 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 8\/4. maddesi ile \u201c Takas odalar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ibraz edilmi\u015f \u00e7ekler i\u00e7in, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirlenen sorumluluk miktar\u0131 dahil k\u0131smi \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmaz. Bu durum muhatap bankan\u0131n sorumluluk tutar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6deme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ortadan kald\u0131rmaz. Ancak takas odalar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ibraz edilen \u00e7ekin, hesapta yeterli kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi halinde muhatap banka taraf\u0131ndan hesapta bulunan k\u0131smi kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k tutar\u0131, \u00e7eki ibraz eden hamil lehine 15 g\u00fcn s\u00fcre ile bloke edilir.\u201d \u015feklinde d\u00fczenleme getirildi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ekler kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorumluluk miktar\u0131ndan sorumlu oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eleriyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne takibe vaki itiraz\u0131n iptaline, as\u0131l alaca\u011fa yasal faiz tahakkuk ettirilmek \u00fczere takibin devam\u0131na ve icra inkar tazminat\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 vekilince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5491 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ek Kanun&#8217;un ge\u00e7ici 1. maddesinin 3. bendinde; Bankalar\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fterilerine verdikleri eski \u00e7ek defterleriyle ilgili olarak, 3167 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3167 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 6. maddesi uyar\u0131nca takas odalar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ibraz edilen \u00e7eklerde ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 10. maddesindeki miktarlar \u00f6denmez. Dava konusu \u00e7eklerin muhatap bankadan ba\u015fka bankalara ibraz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan an\u0131lan yasan\u0131n 6. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru de\u011fildir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu\u2019nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">KARAR : Dava, itiraz\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, icra takibine vaki itiraz\u0131n haks\u0131z oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekilinin temyizi \u00fczerine karar, \u00d6zel Dairece yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerle bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece, \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015f; h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize daval\u0131 vekili getirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesinden \u00f6nce \u00f6n sorun olarak; Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n 8 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde temyiz edilebilmesine ra\u011fmen yerel mahkemece k\u0131sa kararda temyiz s\u00fcresinin \u201ciki hafta\u201d olarak belirtilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle daval\u0131 vekilinin karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden 11 g\u00fcn sonra verdi\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul edilme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ncelikle yasada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcreler, bunlar\u0131n yarg\u0131lamaya etkisi ve yarg\u0131sal uygulaman\u0131n irdelenmesi gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131yla ba\u015flayan yarg\u0131lama faaliyetinde, karara ula\u015fmak bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, mahkeme ve taraflarca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken belirli i\u015flemler vard\u0131r ve her i\u015flemin belli bir zaman aral\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile normatif bir de\u011fer kazanan bu zaman aral\u0131klar\u0131na s\u00fcre denilmektedir. B\u00f6ylece usul i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zamansal olarak taraflar\u0131n ya da mahkemenin arzular\u0131na, inisiyatifine b\u0131rak\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k mahkemeye ta\u015f\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olmakla, kamu alan\u0131na, toplumun da \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131 ilgilendiren bir platforma aktar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle bir davan\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sona erdirilmesinde en az taraflar kadar toplumun da yarar\u0131 vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu halde, s\u00fcreye ili\u015fkin normlar\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle medeni usul hukukunda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmek istenen ama\u00e7lar; adaletin bir an \u00f6nce sa\u011flanmas\u0131, keyfili\u011fin \u00f6nlenmesi, mahkemenin ayn\u0131 i\u015fle uzun s\u00fcre me\u015fgul olmas\u0131n\u0131n, ba\u015fka ifadeyle di\u011fer dava ve i\u015flere yeterince zaman ay\u0131ramaz duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi; uluslar \u00fcst\u00fc ve ulusal nitelikteki emredici normlar uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n belli bir d\u00fczen ve kestirilebilir bir zamansall\u0131kla y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi, ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla yarg\u0131laman\u0131n adil \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 olarak \u00f6zetlenebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S\u00fcrelerin \u00f6nemli bir k\u0131sm\u0131, taraflar i\u00e7in konulmu\u015f s\u00fcrelerdir. Taraflar, bu s\u00fcreler i\u00e7inde belli i\u015flemleri yapabilirler veya yapmalar\u0131 gerekir. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lamayan i\u015flemler, tekrar yap\u0131lamaz ve s\u00fcreyi ka\u00e7\u0131ran taraf aleyhine sonu\u00e7 do\u011furur. Taraflar i\u00e7in konulmu\u015f s\u00fcreler, kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcreler ve h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan belirtilen s\u00fcreler olmak \u00fczere ikiye ayr\u0131l\u0131r. Kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcreler, kanun taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f s\u00fcrelerdir. Cevap s\u00fcresi, temyiz s\u00fcresi gibi. Bu s\u00fcreler kesindir ve bir i\u015flemin kanuni s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkemece re\u2019sen g\u00f6zetilir. H\u00e2kimin tespit etti\u011fi s\u00fcreler ise, kural olarak kesin de\u011fildir. ( Kuru, Baki, Prof. Dr.; Arslan, Ramazan, Prof. Dr.; Y\u0131lmaz, Ejder, Prof. Dr.; Medeni Usul Hukuku Ders Kitab\u0131, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK\u2019na G\u00f6re Yeniden Yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f 22. Bask\u0131, Ankara 2011, s.749 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00e2kim, kendi tayin etmi\u015f oldu\u011fu s\u00fcreyi, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu ( HMK )\u2019nun 90\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re iki taraf\u0131 dinledikten sonra hakl\u0131 nedenlere dayanarak, azalt\u0131p \u00e7o\u011faltabilir. H\u00e2kim, tayin etti\u011fi s\u00fcrenin, kesin oldu\u011funa da karar verebilir ( HMK m.94\/2, HUMK m.163 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere hakim taraf\u0131ndan da s\u00fcrenin belirlenebildi\u011fi durumlar var olmakla birlikte kanunda belirlenen s\u00fcreler \u00fczerinde Hakimin tasarruf yetkisi bulunmamaktad\u0131r. E\u015f s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle kanun \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir s\u00fcre hakim taraf\u0131ndan uzat\u0131l\u0131p k\u0131salt\u0131lamaz. Temyize ili\u015fkin s\u00fcreler de yasa taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen kesin s\u00fcrelerdir ve resen g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK\u2019nun ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesinin ( 1 ). f\u0131kra h\u00fckm\u00fc; \u201cB\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin, 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5235 say\u0131l\u0131 Adli Yarg\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemeleri ile B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f, G\u00f6rev ve Yetkileri Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun ge\u00e7ici 2 nci Maddesi uyar\u0131nca Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de ilan edilecek g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihine kadar, 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun temyize ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunur.\u201d \u015feklindedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK\u2019n\u0131n 437. maddesini yeniden d\u00fczenleyen 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun 16 md. \u00f6ncesindeki hali \u201cSulh mahkemesi kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz s\u00fcresi sekiz g\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu s\u00fcre ilam\u0131n usulen taraflardan herbirine tebli\u011fi ile i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar\u2026.\u201d \u015feklindedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Genel Kurul g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u00fcyelerce; mahkeme karar\u0131nda yanl\u0131\u015f belirtilen s\u00fcrenin davan\u0131n taraf\u0131n\u0131 yan\u0131ltmas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan hak kayb\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesinin gerekti\u011fini ve temyiz incelemesinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015fler iseler de kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f kabul edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal mevzuat \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde sulh hukuk mahkemelerinde verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler i\u00e7in temyiz s\u00fcresi direnme karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi 11.05.2010 tarihi itibariyle 8 g\u00fcn olup, mahkemece bu s\u00fcrenin \u201ciki hafta\u201d olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz edildi\u011fi 22.05.2012 tarihi itibariyle ( 8 ) g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi doldu\u011fundan temyiz isteminin s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddinin gerekti\u011fine kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, daval\u0131 vekilinin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Yukar\u0131da yer alan a\u00e7\u0131klamalara g\u00f6re 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 30.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 26.09.2004 tarih ve 5236 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik \u00f6ncesi y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki \u015fekliyle 437\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince daval\u0131 vekilinin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden REDD\u0130NE, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 440\/III-2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar d\u00fczeltme yolu kapal\u0131 olmak \u00fczere, 13.03.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2012\/19-580<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2012\/1105<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 12.12.2012<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 ALACAK DAVASINDA GE\u00c7ERS\u0130Z TEBL\u0130\u011eAT YAPILMASI ( Temyiz S\u00fcresini Ge\u00e7irilmesi Nedeniyle Karar D\u00fczeltme Talebi\/Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131n Davac\u0131ya Usul\u00fcne Uygun OlarakTebli\u011f Edilmedi\u011fi &#8211; Davac\u0131 Vekili Yerine Ba\u015fka Bir Avukata Tebli\u011fat Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 MUHATABIN GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 OLARAK BA\u015eKA YERE G\u0130TMES\u0130 ( Davac\u0131 Vekilinden Ba\u015fka Bir Avukata Yap\u0131lan Tebli\u011fat\u0131n\u0131n Ge\u00e7ersiz Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEBL\u0130\u011eATIN YAPILDI\u011eI AVUKATIN DAVACI VEK\u0130L\u0130N\u0130N MEMUR YA DA M\u00dcSTAHDEM\u0130 SIFATI BULUNMADI\u011eI ( Tebli\u011fat\u0131n Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Av. S&#8217;nin Ayn\u0131 Binada Ba\u015fka Bir Vergi Kayd\u0131 ile B\u00fcrosu Bulundu\u011fu &#8211; Davac\u0131 Vekiline Yap\u0131lmayan Tebli\u011fat\u0131n Yasal Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Kabul\u00fc )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 GE\u00c7ERS\u0130Z TEBL\u0130\u011eAT ( Temyiz S\u00fcresinin Ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ya da Temyiz S\u00fcresinin Ge\u00e7irildi\u011finin Kabul Edilemeyece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 D\u0130RENME KARARININ HUKUK\u0130 OLUP OLMADI\u011eI ( H\u00fck\u00fcm Sonucu K\u0131sm\u0131nda Gerek\u00e7eye Ait Herhangi Bir S\u00f6z Tekrar Edilmeksizin \u0130steklerin Her Biri Hakk\u0131nda A\u00e7\u0131k ve Teredd\u00fct Mahal Vermeyecek \u015eekilde H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi &#8211; Karar\u0131n Gerek\u00e7eli Olmas\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 MAHKEMEN\u0130N D\u0130RENME KARARININ YETERS\u0130Z OLDU\u011eU ( Sadece &#8220;Direnilmesine&#8221; Denilerek \u00d6nceki Karara At\u0131f Yap\u0131lmakla Yetinilmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131n HGK&#8217;nun \u0130ncelemesine Olanak Verir Mahiyette Gerek\u00e7eli Olmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 MAHKEME KARARININ A\u00c7IK VE TEREDD\u00dcTE MAHAL VERMEYECEK \u015eEK\u0130LDE OLMASI GERE\u011e\u0130 ( Taraflara Y\u00fcklenen Bor\u00e7lar ve Tan\u0131nan Haklar\u0131n S\u0131ra Numaras\u0131 Alt\u0131nda A\u00e7\u0131k ve Anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r ve \u0130nfazda \u015e\u00fcphe Uyand\u0131rmayacak \u015eekilde Kararda \u0130fade Edilmesi Gere\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m. 73,294,297<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201\/m. 11,17,29<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>\u00d6ZET :<\/strong><\/span> Dava, alacak istemine ili\u015fkindir.Mahkemece istemin reddine karar verilmi\u015f ve temyiz istemi \u00fczerine karar esastan bozulmu\u015ftur.Bozma \u00fczerine mahkemece ilk kararda direnilmi\u015f; direnme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz istemi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda, yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra ibraz edilen temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddine karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekil karar d\u00fczeltme isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.Mevcut hukuki d\u00fczenlemeler dikkate al\u0131narak dava de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde davac\u0131 vekilinin, \u201c\u2026 Sivas\u201d adresinde mesle\u011fini icra etmektedir. Direnme karar\u0131 Avukat E.&#8217;ye, \u201c\u2026Sivas\u201d adresine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, \u201ctebli\u011fat evrak\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7isi ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ),memur ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ), amiri ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ) Av. S. imzas\u0131na 23.08.2011 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir\u201d \u015fekliyle tebli\u011fedilmi\u015ftir.Dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re \u201cAv S.\u201d davac\u0131 vekili de\u011fildir ve yine dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re ayn\u0131 binada 501 numaral\u0131 i\u015fyerine ait vergi kayd\u0131 da bulunmaktad\u0131r. Av. S&#8217;nin 7201 S.K. 17. M. belirtilen \u201cdaimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdem\u201d niteli\u011finde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re tebligat i\u015fleminin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z olup, ge\u00e7ersiz tebligat nedeni ile temyiz s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n vetemyiz s\u00fcresinin ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.Bu nedenle karar d\u00fczeltme isteminin kabul\u00fc ile Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;na ait 01.02.2012 g\u00fcn 2012\/19-60-45 say\u0131l\u0131 bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce \u00f6nsorun olarak usul\u00fcne uygun bir direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n var olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.Mahkeme kararlar\u0131nda nelerin yaz\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 297. maddesinde belirtilmi\u015ftir.H\u00fck\u00fcm sonucu k\u0131sm\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eye ait her hangi bir s\u00f6z tekrar edilmeksizin isteklerin her biri hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmle, taraflara y\u00fcklenen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan haklar\u0131n s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k, \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak \u015fekilde g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekir.Mahkemece aslolan k\u0131sa kararda yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan mevzuata uygun h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131 olu\u015fturulmam\u0131\u015f sadece &#8220;direnilmesine &#8221; denilerek \u00f6nceki karara at\u0131f yap\u0131lmakla yetinilmi\u015ftir.Bu durumda, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde usul\u00fcn \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anlamda olu\u015fturulmu\u015f bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, direnme kararlar\u0131n\u0131 denetleyen Hukuk Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan incelenebilecek nitelikte teknik anlamda bir direnme h\u00fckm\u00fc de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 her t\u00fcrl\u00fc duraksamadan uzakt\u0131r.\u015eu durumda, dosya kapsam\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak taraflara y\u00fcklenen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan hakk\u0131n s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k, infazda \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak bi\u00e7imde, usul\u00fcn arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 niteliklere haiz k\u0131sa karar ve buna uygun gerek\u00e7eli karar olu\u015fturulmas\u0131d\u0131r.Mahkemenin, yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131klanan bi\u00e7imde usul\u00fcn \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc niteliklere haiz bulunmayan k\u0131sa karar\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davadan dolay\u0131, bozma \u00fczerine direnme yoluyla; Kangal Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinden verilen 04.05.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/50 E., 2011\/87 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan temyiz isteminin reddini kapsayan ve Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 01.02.2012 g\u00fcn, 2012\/19-60 E., 2012\/45 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131n, karar d\u00fczeltme yoluyla incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan verilen dilek\u00e7e ile istenilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca dilek\u00e7e, 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 30.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 440.maddesi gere\u011fince, d\u00fczeltilmesi istenen ilam ve dosyadaki ilgili b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> 1-Dava alacak istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece istemin reddine karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz istemi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 19. Hukuk Dairesinin 03.05.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/7412-5365 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile esastan bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bozma \u00fczerine mahkemece ilk kararda direnilmi\u015f; direnme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz istemi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda, Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;na ait 01.02.2012 g\u00fcn 2012\/19-60-45 say\u0131l\u0131 karar ile yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra ibraz edilen temyizdilek\u00e7esinin reddine karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekil karar d\u00fczeltme isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n belirli bir yerde meslek icra eden davac\u0131 avukat\u0131na usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilip edilmedi\u011finin \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanununun 11., Avukatl\u0131k Kanununun 41. ve Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 73. maddeleri gere\u011fince vekil ile takip edilen i\u015flerde tebligat\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun \u201cBelli bir yerde veya evde meslek ve sanat icras\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 17. maddesinde; \u201cbelli bir yerde devaml\u0131 olarak meslek veya sanat\u0131n\u0131 icra edenler, o yerde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011f ayn\u0131 yerdeki daimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine\u2026 yap\u0131l\u0131r.\u201d denilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tebli\u011f tarihi itibariyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan Tebligat T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn \u201cMeslek ve sanat erbab\u0131na tebligat\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 23. maddesinde, belli bir yerde devaml\u0131 olarak meslek veya sanat\u0131n\u0131 icra edenlerin, o yerde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 takdirde tebli\u011fin ayn\u0131 yerdeki daimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, Tebligat Rehberinin \u201cMuhatab\u0131n Ge\u00e7ici Olarak Ba\u015fka Yere Gitmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 59. maddesine g\u00f6re de; muhatap ad\u0131na kendilerine tebli\u011f yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen ki\u015filerin, muhatab\u0131n ge\u00e7ici olarak ba\u015fka yere gitti\u011fini belirtmeleri halinde, keyfiyet ve beyanda bulunan\u0131n h\u00fcviyetinin tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131na yaz\u0131larak alt\u0131n\u0131n beyan yapana imzalat\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 ve tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131n bu ki\u015filere verilece\u011fi, bu ki\u015filerin tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131 kabule mecbur oldu\u011fu, kendisine tebli\u011fyap\u0131lacak kimsenin ge\u00e7ici olarak ba\u015fka bir yere gitti\u011fini belirten kimsenin beyan\u0131n\u0131 imzadan ka\u00e7\u0131nmas\u0131 halinde posta memurunun beyana g\u00f6re gerekli \u015ferhi vererek imzalayaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mevcut d\u00fczenleme dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda belli bir yerde devaml\u0131 olarak meslek veya sanat\u0131n\u0131 icra edenler, o yerde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 takdirde bunlara yap\u0131lacak tebli\u011f, o ki\u015finin ayn\u0131 yerdeki daimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle muhatab\u0131n daimi i\u015f\u00e7isi \u015feklinde yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olabilmesi i\u00e7in, muhatap ad\u0131na tebligat yap\u0131lan ki\u015finin ger\u00e7ekte muhatab\u0131n daimi i\u015f\u00e7isi olmas\u0131 ve muhatab\u0131n bulunamamas\u0131 halinde ise yukar\u0131da mevzuatta belirtilen \u015fekli i\u015flemlerin yerine getirilerek tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklidir. Aksi takdirde yap\u0131lan tebligat usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">25.01.2012 tarihli Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131nlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Tebligat Kanununun Uygulanmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin \u201cMuhatab\u0131n ge\u00e7ici olarak ba\u015fka yere gitmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 29. maddesinde de; tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak olan\u0131n ge\u00e7ici olarak ba\u015fka yere gitti\u011fini belirtmesi halinde, tebli\u011f memurunun muhatab\u0131n hangi sebeple adresten ge\u00e7ici olarak ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, beyanda bulunan\u0131n ad\u0131 ve soyad\u0131 ile s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 tebli\u011f tutana\u011f\u0131na yazaca\u011f\u0131, tebli\u011f tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyanda bulunana imzalatt\u0131raca\u011f\u0131 ve tebli\u011f edilecek evrak\u0131 beyanda bulunana verece\u011fi ve bu ki\u015filerin, tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131 kabule mecbur oldu\u011fu, bu ki\u015filerin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 imzadan ka\u00e7\u0131nmalar\u0131 ve tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmemeleri durumunda, tebli\u011f memurunun bu hususu tutana\u011fa yazarak imzalayaca\u011f\u0131 ve tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti \u00fcyesinden birine ya da kolluk amir veya memurlar\u0131na imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda teslim edece\u011fi ve teslim etti\u011fi ki\u015finin adresini i\u00e7eren ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresin kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131raca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda; davac\u0131 vekili, \u201c\u2026 Sivas\u201d adresinde mesle\u011fini icra etmektedir. Direnme karar\u0131 Avukat E.&#8217;ye, \u201c\u2026Sivas\u201d adresine tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, \u201ctebli\u011fat evrak\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7isi ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ),memur ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ), amiri ( \u00fczeri \u00e7izilmi\u015f ) Av. S. imzas\u0131na 23.08.2011 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir\u201d \u015fekliyle tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re \u201cAv S.\u201d davac\u0131 vekili de\u011fildir ve yine dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re ayn\u0131 binada 501 numaral\u0131 i\u015fyerine ait vergi kayd\u0131 da bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da belirtilen yasal d\u00fczenlemeler dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tebligat yap\u0131lan Av. S&#8217;nin 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 17. maddesinde belirtilen \u201cdaimi memur veya m\u00fcstahdem\u201d niteli\u011finde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re 23.08.2011 tarihli tebligat i\u015fleminin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z olup, ge\u00e7ersiz tebligat nedeni ile temyiz s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve temyiz s\u00fcresinin ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle karar d\u00fczeltme isteminin kabul\u00fc ile Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;na ait 01.02.2012 g\u00fcn 2012\/19-60-45 say\u0131l\u0131 bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-\u0130\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce \u00f6nsorun olarak usul\u00fcne uygun bir direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n var olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkeme kararlar\u0131nda nelerin yaz\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 297. maddesinde belirtilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fck\u00fcm sonucu k\u0131sm\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eye ait her hangi bir s\u00f6z tekrar edilmeksizin isteklerin her biri hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmle, taraflara y\u00fcklenen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan haklar\u0131n s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k, \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak \u015fekilde g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HMK&#8217;nun 294. maddesinin 3 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise \u201cH\u00fckm\u00fcn tefhimi herhalde h\u00fck\u00fcm sonucunun duru\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131na ge\u00e7irilerek okunmas\u0131 suretiyle olur\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayr\u0131ca, bozma karar\u0131 ile ilk h\u00fck\u00fcm hayatiyetini yitirdi\u011finden ona at\u0131f suretiyle h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisinin yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan kurallara uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyece\u011fi de a\u015fikard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131n yerle\u015fmi\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc de bu y\u00f6ndedir ( Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 19.6.1991 g\u00fcn 323-391 say\u0131l\u0131; 10.09.1991 g\u00fcn 281-415 say\u0131l\u0131; 25.9.1991 g\u00fcn 355-440 say\u0131l\u0131; 05.12.2007 g\u00fcn 981-936 say\u0131l\u0131; 23.01.2008 g\u00fcn 29-4 say\u0131l\u0131; 05.10.2011 g\u00fcn 607-604 kararlar\u0131 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olaya gelince; mahkemece aslolan k\u0131sa kararda yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan mevzuata uygun h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131 olu\u015fturulmam\u0131\u015f sadece &#8220;direnilmesine &#8221; denilerek \u00f6nceki karara at\u0131f yap\u0131lmakla yetinilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu durumda, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde usul\u00fcn \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anlamda olu\u015fturulmu\u015f bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, direnme kararlar\u0131n\u0131 denetleyen Hukuk Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan incelenebilecek nitelikte teknik anlamda bir direnme h\u00fckm\u00fc de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 her t\u00fcrl\u00fc duraksamadan uzakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu durumda mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015f; dosya kapsam\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak taraflara y\u00fcklenen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan hakk\u0131n s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k, infazda \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak bi\u00e7imde, usul\u00fcn arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 niteliklere haiz k\u0131sa karar ve buna uygun gerek\u00e7eli karar olu\u015fturulmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemenin, yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131klanan bi\u00e7imde usul\u00fcn \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc niteliklere haiz bulunmayan k\u0131sa karar\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n bu nedenle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Yukar\u0131da ( 1 ) numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 30.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 440.maddesi gere\u011fince yap\u0131lan karar d\u00fczeltme incelemesi sonunda davac\u0131 vekilinin karar d\u00fczeltme isteminin kabul\u00fc ile, Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 01.02.2012 tarih ve 2012\/19-60 E, 45 K.say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da ( 2 ) numaral\u0131 bentte g\u00f6sterilen de\u011fi\u015fik nedenden dolay\u0131 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 30.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 H.U.M.K.&#8217;nun 429.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, bozma nedenine g\u00f6re sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fimdilik incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 440\/III. maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 12.12.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/4-896<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2016\/332<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 16.3.2016<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 MADD\u0130 VE MANEV\u0130 TAZM\u0130NAT DAVASI ( Haks\u0131z Eylem Sebebiyle\/Davac\u0131n\u0131n Zarar\u0131n\u0131n Maddi Tazminat Miktar\u0131n\u0131n Belirlenmesine Dair Bilirki\u015fi Raporu \u0130le Tespit Edildi\u011fi &#8211; Davac\u0131 Vekili Tebli\u011f Tarihinden On Bir G\u00fcn Sonra Davay\u0131 Islah Etti\u011finden Islaha Konu Talebin Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na U\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Kabul Edilemeyece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 HAKSIZ F\u0130\u0130L ( Davac\u0131n\u0131n Zarar\u0131n\u0131n Maddi Tazminat Miktar\u0131n\u0131n Belirlenmesine Dair Bilirki\u015fi Raporu \u0130le Tespit Edildi\u011fi &#8211; S\u00f6z Konusu Bilirki\u015fi Raporu Davac\u0131 Vekiline Tebli\u011fEdildi\u011fine G\u00f6re Bir Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin Zarar\u0131n \u00d6\u011frenildi\u011fi Tebli\u011f Tarihinden \u0130tibaren Hesaplanmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 ZAMANA\u015eIMININ KES\u0130LMES\u0130 ( Dava A\u00e7\u0131lmakla Fazlaya Dair Haklar Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Kesilmedi\u011finden K\u0131smi Islaha Kar\u015f\u0131 Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Definin \u0130leri S\u00fcr\u00fclmesinde Bir Usuls\u00fczl\u00fck Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Maddi ve Manevi Tazminat Davas\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 ADL\u0130 TIP RAPORU ( Maluliyete Dair Raporunun Davac\u0131ya Tebli\u011f Tarihi Esas Al\u0131narak Islaha Konu Talebin Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na U\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Sonucuna Var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Adli T\u0131p Kurumunun Raporunda Yaralanma Sebebiyle Olu\u015fan Maluliyet Oran\u0131 Belirlenmi\u015f Olup Zarar Miktar\u0131na Dair Bir Tespit \u0130\u00e7ermedi\u011finden Zarar\u0131n \u00d6\u011frenilmesi Olgusuna Esas Al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 ISLAH ( Bir Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin Zarar\u0131n \u00d6\u011frenildi\u011fi Tebli\u011f Tarihinden \u0130tibaren Hesaplanmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi &#8211; Davac\u0131 Vekili Tebli\u011f Tarihinden On Bir G\u00fcn Sonra Davay\u0131 Islah Etti\u011finden Islaha Konu Talebin Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na U\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Kabul Edilemeyece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m.107,109<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">818\/m.60<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> Dava, haks\u0131z eylem sebebiyle maddi ve manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen haks\u0131z eylem sebebiyle daval\u0131 aleyhine fazlaya dair haklar\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutarak maddi ve manevi tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, maluliyet oran\u0131n\u0131n tespitine dair Adli T\u0131p raporunun tebli\u011finden sonra maddi tazminat y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davay\u0131 k\u0131smen \u0131slah etti\u011fi, \u0131slah talebine kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 vekilinin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def&#8217;inde bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Dava a\u00e7\u0131lmakla fazlaya dair haklar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 kesilmedi\u011finden k\u0131smi \u0131slaha kar\u015f\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def&#8217;inin ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesinde bir usuls\u00fczl\u00fck bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yerel mahkemenin bu y\u00f6ne dair direnme gerek\u00e7esi isabetlidir. Ne var ki mahkemece BK.nun 60. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi hesaplan\u0131rken zarar\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarih olarak Adli T\u0131p Kurumunun maluliyete dair raporunun davac\u0131ya tebli\u011f tarihi esas al\u0131narak \u0131slaha konu talebin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Adli T\u0131p Kurumunun s\u00f6z konusu raporunda yaralanma sebebiyle olu\u015fan maluliyet oran\u0131 belirlenmi\u015f olup zarar miktar\u0131na dair bir tespit i\u00e7ermedi\u011finden zarar\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenilmesi olgusuna esas al\u0131namaz. Davac\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131 maddi tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine dair bilirki\u015fi raporu ile tespit edilmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6zkonusu bilirki\u015fi raporu davac\u0131 vekiline tebli\u011fedildi\u011fine g\u00f6re 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin zarar\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekir. Davac\u0131 vekili tebli\u011f tarihinden on bir g\u00fcn sonra davay\u0131 \u0131slah etti\u011finden \u0131slaha konu talebin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilemez. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n maddi tazminata y\u00f6nelik \u0131slah\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle \u0131slah edilen tazminat miktar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan davan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 sebebiyle reddine karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve bu kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA : <\/span>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201cmaddi ve manevi tazminat\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Ankara 23. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesince davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 02.10.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2006\/265 E-2012\/379 K say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi taraflar\u0131n vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesinin 14.11.2013 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/17640 E-2013\/17728 K say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Davac\u0131 M. F. \u00c7. vekili taraf\u0131ndan, daval\u0131 M. E. aleyhine 09\/06\/2006 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde verilen dilek\u00e7eyle haks\u0131z fiil sebebiyle maddi ve manevi tazminat istenmesi \u00fczerine mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 02\/10\/2012 tarihli karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;ca incelenmesi davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131 vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde istenilmekle temyizdilek\u00e7elerinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra tetkik hakimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor ile dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar incelenerek gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> 1- )Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kan\u0131tlarla yasaya uygun gerektirici nedenlere, \u00f6zellikle delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re daval\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131n\u0131n asa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 reddedilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- )Davac\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer temyiz itiraz\u0131na gelince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava, haks\u0131z fiilden kaynaklanan maddi ve manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Yerel mahkemece; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, taraflarca temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z eylemi nedeni ile malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek maddi ve manevi tazminat isteminde bulunmu\u015f, 24\/08\/2012 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle de maddi tazminat talebini \u0131slah ederek art\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daval\u0131, kusursuz oldu\u011funu beyanla davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015f, \u0131slahla art\u0131r\u0131lan b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn de zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve reddi gerekti\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f, maddi tazminat isteminin \u0131slahla art\u0131r\u0131lan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 sebebiyle reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu 176. maddesinde &#8220;Taraflardan her biri yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu usul i\u015flemlerini k\u0131smen veya tamamen \u0131slah edebilir. Ayn\u0131 davada, taraflar ancak bir kez \u0131slah yoluna ba\u015fvurabilir&#8221; \u015feklinde yine ayn\u0131 kanunun 177. maddesinde &#8220;Islah, tahkikat\u0131n sona ermesine kadar yap\u0131labilir&#8221; bi\u00e7iminde d\u00fczenleme getirilmi\u015ftir. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde belirtilen dava konusunun ( m\u00fcddeabihin ) \u0131slah yoluyla art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ek dava niteli\u011finde olmay\u0131p dava dilek\u00e7esinin k\u0131smi \u0131slah\u0131 niteli\u011findedir. Islah kurumu yasada ayr\u0131ca d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc kurallar\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131 sebebiyle ek dava niteli\u011finde kabul edilemeyece\u011finden as\u0131l davaya kar\u015f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilecek zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi, \u0131slah edilen k\u0131sma kar\u015f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclemez. Davac\u0131, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve sadece miktar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davas\u0131n\u0131 \u0131slah etti\u011finden \u0131slah ile art\u0131r\u0131lan miktara dair talebin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klamalar do\u011frultusunda; mahkemece \u0131slah ile art\u0131r\u0131lan maddi tazminat miktar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile red karar\u0131 verilmesi do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015f, bu sebeple karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir &#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Dava,haks\u0131z eylem sebebiyle maddi ve manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili; 28.06.2003 tarihinde davac\u0131 konutunda iken daval\u0131n\u0131n kap\u0131y\u0131 \u00e7ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,davac\u0131n\u0131n kap\u0131y\u0131 a\u00e7mas\u0131 \u00fczerine daval\u0131n\u0131n nedensiz bir \u015fekilde davac\u0131ya k\u00fcf\u00fcr ve hakaret ederek onu darpetti\u011fini, parma\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u0131s\u0131rarak 1\/4 \u00fcn\u00fc kopard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda daval\u0131 hakk\u0131nda mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini, meslek lisesinin elektronik b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6rev yapan davac\u0131n\u0131n parma\u011f\u0131nda meydana gelen yaralanma sebebiyle verimlili\u011finin d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc,emekli olmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,olay sebebiyle itibar kayb\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,evini satarak ba\u015fka yere ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek haks\u0131z fiil nedeni ile fazlaya dair haklar\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutarak \u015fimdilik 1.000 YTL maddi tazminat ile 9.000 YTL manevi tazminat\u0131n olay tarihinden itibaren yasal faizi ile birlikte tahsiline karar verilmesini istemi\u015f,24.08.2012 har\u00e7 tarihli \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile de bakiye maddi tazminat miktar\u0131 olan 7.913.00TL i\u00e7in davay\u0131 \u0131slah etti\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekili ; olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ayn\u0131 apartmanda davac\u0131 ile ayn\u0131 katta oturan k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n evine girerken davac\u0131n\u0131n, daval\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131na s\u00f6zl\u00fc tacizde bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine tart\u0131\u015fma \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n evine girerek kap\u0131y\u0131 kapatmak istedikleri s\u0131rada davac\u0131n\u0131n parma\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kap\u0131ya s\u0131k\u0131\u015farak t\u0131rnak hizas\u0131ndan koptu\u011funu, daval\u0131n\u0131n kusurunun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015f, \u0131slah talebine kar\u015f\u0131 ise zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def&#8217;inde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece; davac\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fi raporu do\u011frultusunda \u0131slah ile artt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 miktar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden talebinin maluliyetle ilgili adli t\u0131p raporundan 07.05.2009 tarihinde haberdar oldu\u011fu halde \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esini 23.08.2012 tarihinde verdi\u011fi, zarar\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenme tarihinden itibaren 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011fu, daval\u0131n\u0131n eylemi nedeni ile davac\u0131n\u0131n parma\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kopmas\u0131 sonucu davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ekmi\u015f oldu\u011fu \u00fcz\u00fcnt\u00fc sebebiyle bir miktar manevi tazminata h\u00fckmolunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilerek davac\u0131n\u0131n \u0131slah ile artt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 miktar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden talebinin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeni ile reddine, davac\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve manevi tazminat talebinin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile, 1.000 TL maddi tazminat\u0131n, 3000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n olay tarihi olan 28.06.2003 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile daval\u0131dan al\u0131n\u0131p davac\u0131ya verilmesine, davac\u0131n\u0131n fazla taleplerinin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili ile daval\u0131 vekilinin temyizi \u00fczerine h\u00fck\u00fcm, \u00d6zel Dairece yukarda yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece; &#8221;Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fil istenebilirli\u011fini ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131r. BK. 133. Maddesinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesen sebepler aras\u0131nda dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 da say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. K\u0131smi davada zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 yaln\u0131zca dava edilen k\u0131s\u0131m i\u00e7in kesilir. Hen\u00fcz a\u00e7\u0131lmayan ve daha sonra \u0131slahla artt\u0131r\u0131lan b\u00f6l\u00fcm i\u00e7in zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 i\u015flemeye devam eder. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 HMK 107. maddesinde d\u00fczenleme alt\u0131na al\u0131nan belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 ve tespit davas\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n iddian\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131 olmadan, kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131na ve \u0131slaha gerek kalmaks\u0131z\u0131n talep sonucunu artt\u0131rabilece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015f, gerek\u00e7esinde de dava ile ilk dava tarihinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 Kanunun 109. maddesindeki k\u0131smi davada zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yoktur. Davam\u0131zda davac\u0131n\u0131n maluliyetle ilgili adli t\u0131p raporundan 07.05.2009 tarihinde haberdar oldu\u011fu, \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esinin 23.08.2012 tarihinde verildi\u011fi, zarar\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenme tarihinden itibaren BK. 60\/1 maddesindeki 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011fu &#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle direnme karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili temyiz etmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile talep edilen tazminata kar\u015f\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def&#8217;inin ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, var\u0131lacak sonuca g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile talep etti\u011fi maddi tazminat y\u00f6n\u00fcnden zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunun 06.03.2013 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/4-824 E., 2013\/305 K.; Hukuk Genel Kurulunun 22.10.2014 g\u00fcn ve 2014\/4-840 E., 2014\/837 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, kavram olarak \u0131slah; taraflardan birinin yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu usul i\u015fleminin tamamen veya k\u0131smen d\u00fczeltilmesine denir ( HUMK. m.83 ); ( Baki, Kuru:Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc, 6.Bask\u0131, C.IV, \u0130stanbul 2001, s.3965 ) Islah m\u00fcessesesi, dava de\u011fi\u015ftirme, ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle iddia ve m\u00fcdafaan\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi veya geni\u015fletilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bertaraf eden bir imkand\u0131r. Zira bu suretle, asl\u0131nda yasal itiraz ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131labilecek olan herhangi bir taraf muamelesi, \u0131slah kurumu yard\u0131m\u0131 ile art\u0131k bu itiraz\u0131 davet etmeksizin yap\u0131labilmektedir ( Saim \u00dcst\u00fcnda\u011f:Medeni Yarg\u0131lama Hukuk, C.I-II, B.5, \u0130stanbul 1992, s.534 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Islah\u0131n konusunun taraflar\u0131n yapm\u0131\u015f olduklar\u0131 usul i\u015flemleri oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, \u0131slahla d\u00fczeltilecek usul i\u015flemlerinin neler oldu\u011fundan da s\u00f6z etmek gerekir. Gerek \u00f6\u011freti, gerekse Yarg\u0131tay uygulamas\u0131 davan\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirebilece\u011fini ve geni\u015fletilebilece\u011fini ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde savunman\u0131n geni\u015fletilebilece\u011fini ilke olarak kabul etmektedir. Yine m\u00fcddeabihin art\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p art\u0131r\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131 hususu da bir usul i\u015flemi olup, \u0131slah\u0131n konusudur ( Baki, Kuru:age, s.4035 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Islah\u0131n amac\u0131, yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde, \u015fekil ve s\u00fcreye ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k sebebiyle ortaya \u00e7\u0131kabilecek maddi hak kay\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmak oldu\u011fundan, hak ve alaca\u011f\u0131 bu s\u00fcrecin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ortadan kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olan i\u015flemlerin, yani maddi hukuk i\u015flemlerinin \u0131slah yoluyla d\u00fczeltilebilmesi elbette ki m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle, maddi hakk\u0131 sona erdiren maddi hukuk i\u015flemleri, \u0131slahla d\u00fczeltilemez. Feragat, kabul, sulh gibi i\u015flemler, velev ki dava i\u00e7inde yap\u0131ls\u0131n, as\u0131l hakk\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131ndan, usul i\u015flemi oldu\u011fu kadar ( davay\u0131 etkiledi\u011fi i\u00e7in usul i\u015flemidir ) maddi hukuk i\u015flemi mahiyetini de ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r ve bu sebeple, bu i\u015flemlerin \u0131slah yoluyla d\u00fczeltilmesi imkans\u0131zd\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc \u0131slah, yarg\u0131lama hukukunun \u015fekle ve s\u00fcreye ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kaynaklanan z\u0131mni hak kay\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131n telafisi i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f bir m\u00fcessesedir. A\u00e7\u0131k bir irade beyan\u0131 ile terk edilen haklar, maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin \u015fekle feda edilmesi gibi bir sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, \u0131slah\u0131n konusu olamaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilindi\u011fi gibi, HUMK&#8217;nun 87.maddesinin son c\u00fcmlesindeki \u201cm\u00fcddei \u0131slah suretiyle m\u00fcddeabihi tezyit edemez\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 20.07.1999 tarih ve E:1999\/1, K:1999\/33 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile iptal edilmi\u015ftir. Bundan b\u00f6yle davac\u0131, dava dilek\u00e7esinde g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi m\u00fcddeabihini ( daval\u0131 muvafakat etmese bile ) ayn\u0131 dava i\u00e7inde \u0131slah yolu ile art\u0131rabilecektir. Bu d\u00fczenleme, davac\u0131n\u0131n ilk dava dilek\u00e7esinde sakl\u0131 tuttu\u011fu fazlaya dair hakk\u0131n\u0131 ek bir dava ile istemesine engel olmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davan\u0131n tamamen \u0131slah\u0131, dava dilek\u00e7esinden itibaren b\u00fct\u00fcn usul i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir ( HUMK.m.87 ). Gerek \u00f6\u011fretide, gerekse yerle\u015fik yarg\u0131sal kararlarda, davan\u0131n tamamen \u0131slah\u0131nda yeni bir dava a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lacak, tamamen \u0131slah edilen dava ilk a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n devam\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fundan, bunun do\u011fal sonucu olarak, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre ilk davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihteki duruma g\u00f6re dikkate al\u0131nacakt\u0131r. Onun i\u00e7in davan\u0131n tamamen \u0131slah\u0131nda \u0131slah olunan dava, ilk dava g\u00fcn\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131lacakt\u0131r ( Baki, Kuru:age., s.3998 vd; Sabri \u015eakir, Ansay; Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri, 1960 bask\u0131 sh:194 vd.; \u0130lhan, Postac\u0131o\u011flu:Medeni Usul Hukuku Dersleri, 1975 Bask\u0131, s.460 vd,; Saim, \u00dcst\u00fcnda\u011f:Medeni Yarg\u0131lama Hukuku Esaslar\u0131, 1973 Bask\u0131, s.335 vd.; ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki HGK&#8217;nun 18.12.1957 g\u00fcn E:2\/66, K:64; 30.1.2002 g\u00fcn E:2002\/2-63, K:23;3.7.2002 g\u00fcn ve E:2002\/9-564, K:572; 5.3.2003 g\u00fcn ve E:2003\/9-76, K:126;06.03.2013 g\u00fcn ve E:2012\/4-824, K:2013\/305 Say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davan\u0131n k\u0131smen \u0131slah\u0131 durumunda ise davac\u0131; k\u0131smi davada sakl\u0131 tuttu\u011fu fazlaya dair haklar\u0131n\u0131, ek bir dava a\u00e7arak isteyebilece\u011fi gibi, m\u00fcddeabihin artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nleyen yasal d\u00fczenlemenin yukarda belirtilen Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin karar\u0131 ile ortadan kalkmas\u0131ndan yararlanarak m\u00fcddeabihi ayn\u0131 davada k\u0131smi \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi verip harc\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmak suretiyle artt\u0131rabilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u015famada a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 gereken di\u011fer bir husus zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilmesi konusudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 kesilir ( M\u00fclga 818 Say\u0131l\u0131 BK.m.133\/2 ). Ancak, kesilen zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, kesilme tarihinden ba\u015flayarak yeniden i\u015fler ( M\u00fclga 818 Say\u0131l\u0131 BK.m.135\/1 ). Dava ile kesilmi\u015f zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, davan\u0131n devam\u0131 s\u00fcresinde taraflardan birinin yarg\u0131lamaya dair her bir i\u015fleminden ve h\u00e2kimin her emir ve h\u00fckm\u00fcnden itibaren yeniden cereyana ba\u015flar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6\u011fretide, k\u0131smi davada dava edilmeyen alacak kesimi i\u00e7in, fazlaya dair hakk\u0131n sakl\u0131 tutulmu\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesmeyece\u011fi kabul edilmektedir ( Baki Kuru, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc, Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Bask\u0131, Cilt:II s.1541 vd.; Pekcan\u0131tez Hakan\/Atalay O\u011fuz\/\u00d6zekes Muhammet, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununa G\u00f6re Medeni Usul Hukuku, 12.Bas\u0131, s.321 ). K\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 yaln\u0131z alaca\u011f\u0131n k\u0131smi davaya konu yap\u0131lan miktar\u0131 i\u00e7in kesilir ( HGK&#8217;nun 20.3.1968 g\u00fcn ve E:1968\/9-210, K:151; 3.7.2002 g\u00fcn ve E:2002\/9-564, K:572; 9.10.2002 g\u00fcn ve E:2002\/9-809, K:802; 06.03.2013 g\u00fcn ve E:2012\/4-824, K:2013\/305 Say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan olay tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun 60. maddesinde &#8220;zarar ve ziyan yahut manevi zarar nam\u0131yla nakdi bir mebla\u011f tediyesine m\u00fcteallik dava, mutazarr\u0131r olan taraf\u0131n zarara ve failine \u0131tt\u0131la tarihinden itibaren bir sene ve her halde zarar\u0131 m\u00fcstelzim fiilin vukuundan itibaren on sene m\u00fcrurundan sonra istima olunmaz. \u015eu kadar ki zarar ve ziyan davas\u0131, ceza kanunlar\u0131 mucibince m\u00fcddeti, daha uzun m\u00fcruru zamana tabi cezay\u0131 m\u00fcstelzim bir fiilden ne\u015fet etmi\u015f olursa \u015fahsi davaya da o m\u00fcruruzaman tatbik olunur&#8230;&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re haks\u0131z fiillerle ilgili \u00fc\u00e7 t\u00fcr zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bunlar; bir y\u0131ll\u0131k k\u0131sa zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131; on y\u0131ll\u0131k uzun zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ile ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc nitelikteki ceza zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131d\u0131r. Haks\u0131z fiil sebebiyle tazminat alacaklar\u0131 bir y\u0131ll\u0131k k\u0131sa zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabi tutulmu\u015f olup, an\u0131lan maddeye g\u00f6re bir y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre &#8220;mutazarr\u0131r olan taraf\u0131n zarara ve failine \u0131tt\u0131la\u0131 tarihinden itibaren&#8221; i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayacakt\u0131r. Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flamas\u0131 i\u00e7in zarar g\u00f6renin hem zarar\u0131 hem de failini \u00f6\u011frenmesi gerekmektedir. Bunlardan sadece birinin \u00f6\u011frenilmesi k\u0131sa zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin i\u015flemesi i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zarar, zarar verici fiil veya olay\u0131n zarar g\u00f6renin hukuki varl\u0131k ve de\u011ferleri \u00fczerindeki olumsuz etki ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 olarak tan\u0131mlanabilir. Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamas\u0131 i\u00e7in zarar verici olay\u0131n de\u011fil zarar\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenilmesi gerekir. Zarar miktar\u0131n\u0131 bilmeyen davac\u0131 rastgele bir miktar \u00fczerinden dava a\u00e7mak zorunda kalacak ya da zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 bask\u0131s\u0131yla rastgele bir miktar \u00fczerinden davas\u0131n\u0131 \u0131slah etmek zorunda kalacakt\u0131r. Zarar\u0131ndan daha y\u00fcksek bir miktar i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ya da davay\u0131 \u0131slah etti\u011finde reddedilen k\u0131s\u0131m y\u00f6n\u00fcnden avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama gideri \u00f6demeye maruz kalacak, zarar\u0131ndan daha d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck bir miktar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ya da davay\u0131 \u0131slah etti\u011finde ise dava a\u00e7makla ama\u00e7lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131na tam olarak kavu\u015famayacakt\u0131r. Bu sebeple zarar miktar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamas\u0131 i\u00e7in zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu ilkeler ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olaya d\u00f6n\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde; davac\u0131n\u0131n 28.06.2003 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen haks\u0131z eylem sebebiyle daval\u0131 aleyhine 09.06.2006 tarihinde fazlaya dair haklar\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutarak maddi ve manevi tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, maluliyet oran\u0131n\u0131n tespitine dair Adli T\u0131p raporunun 07.05.2009 tarihinde tebli\u011finden sonra 24.08.2012 tarihinde maddi tazminat y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davay\u0131 k\u0131smen \u0131slah etti\u011fi,\u0131slah talebine kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 vekilinin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def&#8217;inde bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Dava a\u00e7\u0131lmakla fazlaya dair haklar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 kesilmedi\u011finden k\u0131smi \u0131slaha kar\u015f\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def&#8217;inin ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesinde bir usuls\u00fczl\u00fck bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yerel mahkemenin bu y\u00f6ne dair direnme gerek\u00e7esi isabetlidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ne var ki mahkemece BK.nun 60. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi hesaplan\u0131rken zarar\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarih olarak Adli T\u0131p Kurumunun maluliyete dair raporunun davac\u0131yatebli\u011f tarihi esas al\u0131narak \u0131slaha konu talebin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Adli T\u0131p Kurumunun s\u00f6zkonusu raporunda yaralanma sebebiyle olu\u015fan maluliyet oran\u0131 belirlenmi\u015f olup zarar miktar\u0131na dair bir tespit i\u00e7ermedi\u011finden zarar\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenilmesi olgusuna esas al\u0131namaz.Davac\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131 maddi tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine dair 07.08.2012 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporu ile tespit edilmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6zkonusu bilirki\u015fi raporu 13.08.2012 tarihinde davac\u0131 vekiline tebli\u011f edildi\u011fine g\u00f6re 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin zarar\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi 13.08.2012 tarihinden itibaren hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekir. Davac\u0131 vekili 24.08.2012 tarihinde davay\u0131 \u0131slah etti\u011finden \u0131slaha konu talebin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilemez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n maddi tazminata y\u00f6nelik \u0131slah\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle \u0131slah edilen tazminat miktar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan davan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 sebebiyle reddine karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve bu kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131 yukarda a\u00e7\u0131klanan bu de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7e ile bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukarda g\u00f6sterilen de\u011fi\u015fik nedenlerden dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, istenmesi halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana iadesine, 16.03.2016 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2015\/120<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2015\/313<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 13.10.2015<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 zarara u\u011fratmak kasdiyle mevcudunu eksiltmek su\u00e7undan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 2004 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 331 ve 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;nun 52. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 6 ay hapis ve 2.000 Lira adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin, &#8230; \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesince verilen &#8230; g\u00fcn ve &#8230; say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay &#8230; Ceza Dairesince &#8230;. g\u00fcn ve &#8230;. say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c&#8230;San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin y\u00fcz\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmde temyiz s\u00fcresinin karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren iki hafta olarak g\u00f6sterilmesi, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiine gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n 27.08.2012 tarihinde tebli\u011fedilip, temyiz isteminin 10.09.2012 tarihinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, kararda temyiz hakk\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flama ve s\u00fcresinin yanl\u0131\u015f g\u00f6sterilmesinin san\u0131k aleyhine de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011finden, san\u0131k m\u00fcdaafiinin temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek, tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle, bor\u00e7lu san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;in ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131na, san\u0131k &#8230; lehine alacakl\u0131y\u0131 zarara sokmak kast\u0131yla ipotek tesis edildi\u011finden, san\u0131klar\u0131n \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 331. maddesi uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 istemiyle \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunuldu\u011fu, h\u00fck\u00fcmden sonra \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i vekilinin 23.07.2012 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7esi ile san\u0131klardan &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7ti\u011fi, mahkemenin 03.08.2012 tarihli ek karar\u0131 ile de \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7me nedeni ile san\u0131klardan &#8230; hakk\u0131ndaki cezan\u0131n \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 354. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verildi\u011fi, san\u0131klara at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un i\u015ftirak halinde i\u015flendi\u011fi, 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;nun 73\/5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca i\u015ftirak halinde i\u015flenen su\u00e7larda san\u0131klardan birisi hakk\u0131ndaki vazge\u00e7menin, di\u011ferine de sirayet edece\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi&#8221; sebebiyle bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise 18.11.2014 g\u00fcn ve 389622 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun 310. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, &#8230; g\u00fcn\u00fc y\u00fcze kar\u015f\u0131 verilmi\u015f olan karara y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin tefhimden itibaren bir haftal\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmekte olup, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii bir haftal\u0131k s\u00fcreden sonra 10.09.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Her ne kadar kararda ba\u015fvurulacak kanun yoluna dair bildirimde, s\u00fcrenin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011folarak g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f bulunmas\u0131 ve tebli\u011fden itibaren iki hafta i\u00e7erisinde temyiz edilebilece\u011finin belirtilmesinin yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 mahiyette oldu\u011fu, ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilirse de, bu husus san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bir yan\u0131lg\u0131 olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131ndan kanun yolu s\u00fcresinin i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamas\u0131n\u0131 engellemeyecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zira, mesle\u011fi bir kamu hizmeti niteli\u011findeki avukatl\u0131k olan, san\u0131klar\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcstlenen; savunma ve kanun yollar\u0131na ba\u015fvuru i\u00e7in yeterli d\u00fczeyde hukuki bilgiye sahip olan m\u00fcdafiintemyiz s\u00fcresinin, karar\u0131n y\u00fcze kar\u015f\u0131 verildi\u011fi hallerde tefhimden itibaren i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmemesi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemeyece\u011finden, kanun yolu bildirimindeki bu eksiklik m\u00fcdafii a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bir yan\u0131lg\u0131 ve bu ba\u011flamda hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir engel olu\u015fturmayacakt\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki, san\u0131klar m\u00fcdafii s\u00fcresinden sonra verdi\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde temyiz s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 konusunda kendisinin yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir iddias\u0131 da olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim Ceza Genel Kurulunun 08.05.2012 g\u00fcn ve 129-182 ile 27.12.2011 g\u00fcn ve 377-301 Say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda da ayn\u0131 sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin kanuni s\u00fcreden sonra ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen temyiz talebinin 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 8\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 310 ve 317. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilmesi gerekmektedir&#8221; g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle itiraz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">CMK&#8217;nun 308. maddesi uyar\u0131nca inceleme yapan Yarg\u0131tay &#8230; Ceza Dairesince &#8230; g\u00fcn ve &#8230; say\u0131 ile, itiraz nedenlerinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden bahisle Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> \u0130tiraz\u0131n kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re inceleme san\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6zel Daire ile Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; icra ceza mahkemesince san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ve \u015fikayet\u00e7i vekilinin y\u00fcz\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 tefhim olunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn kanun yolu bildirimindeki temyiz s\u00fcresi ve s\u00fcrenin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131yla ilgili hatan\u0131n eski hale getirme sebebi olarak kabul edilip edilmeyece\u011finin ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak da san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin temyizinin s\u00fcresinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ncelenen dosya kapsam\u0131ndan;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 zarara u\u011fratmak kasdiyle mevcudunu eksiltmek su\u00e7undan \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 331. maddesi uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada \u015fikayet\u00e7i vekili ve san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu &#8230; tarihli duru\u015fmada mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tefhim edilen h\u00fck\u00fcmdeki kanun yolu bildiriminin; \u201cdavac\u0131n\u0131n vekilinin ve daval\u0131 vekilinin huzurunda, i\u015f bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren iki hafta i\u00e7erisinde Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;da temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilen karar a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a okunup usulen anlat\u0131ld\u0131\u201d \u015feklinde oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar\u0131n &#8230; tarihinde m\u00fc\u015fteki vekili ve san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin huzurunda tefhim olunmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n g\u00f6sterilen kanun yolu bildirimi uyar\u0131nca 27.08.2012 tarihinde san\u0131k m\u00fcdafine tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafin de h\u00fckm\u00fc 10.09.2012 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle temyiz etti\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n isabetli bir bi\u00e7imde \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle 2004 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanununda yer alan su\u00e7lara dair verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin t\u00e2bi oldu\u011fu kanun yollar\u0131 ile ilgili bilgi verilmesinde yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 13.02.2007 g\u00fcn ve 16-28 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;da, c\u00fcr\u00fcm-kabahat ayr\u0131m\u0131na son verilmesi \u00fczerine, bu sistem ve yapt\u0131r\u0131m de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin zorunlu sonucu olarak, \u00f6zel kanunlardaki yapt\u0131r\u0131m sisteminin de 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna uyarlanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla 5252 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 7. maddesiyle kanunlarda, yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 hafif hapis ve hafif para cezas\u0131 olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen eylemler ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanununda yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 hafif hapis olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen eylemler idari para cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren kabahatlere d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ancak, bu genel uyarlama h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yetersiz oldu\u011funu g\u00f6ren kanun koyucu, 01.06.2005 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5358 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanununun 16. bab\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki fiilleri ikili bir ayr\u0131ma t\u00e2bi tutarak, bir k\u0131s\u0131m eylemleri su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenleyip, hapis ve adl\u00ee para cezas\u0131 \u015feklinde yapt\u0131r\u0131ma ba\u011flam\u0131\u015f, di\u011fer bir k\u0131s\u0131m eylemleri ise, kabahat olarak d\u00fczenlenmek suretiyle, yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 disiplin veya tazyik hapsi \u015feklinde belirlemi\u015ftir. Bir k\u0131s\u0131m su\u00e7lar\u0131n resen takibi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, di\u011fer bir k\u0131s\u0131m su\u00e7lar\u0131n takibi ise \u015fik\u00e2yet \u015fart\u0131na ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f, bu husus su\u00e7 tan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddelerde; \u201cBu su\u00e7lar alacakl\u0131n\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine takip olunur\u201d, \u201calacakl\u0131n\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine\u201d, \u201cilgilinin \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine\u201d, \u201czarar g\u00f6ren alacakl\u0131n\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine\u201d ibareleriyle a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunundaki yapt\u0131r\u0131m sistemi ilgili yap\u0131lan bu de\u011fi\u015fikliklere kar\u015f\u0131n, bu kanundaki su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kabul edilen \u00f6zel muhakeme usul\u00fcn\u00fc d\u00fczenleyen maddelerde k\u00f6kl\u00fc herhangi bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu sebeple \u0130\u0130K&#8217;da d\u00fczenlenen su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, yeni d\u00f6nemde de, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin de\u011fil, 2004 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunun ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ancak at\u0131f yap\u0131lan hallerde CMK h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanabilece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Di\u011fer taraftan \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanununda kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc bir \u00f6zel yarg\u0131lama sisteminin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131, bu kanunda d\u00fczenlenen su\u00e7lara dair yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerinin ceza muhakemesi faaliyeti olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmemekte olup, aksine s\u0131n\u0131rlay\u0131c\u0131 bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde ve \u00f6zel kanunun ama\u00e7 ve prensiplerine uygun d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ceza muhakemesi kural ve ilkelerinin \u0130\u0130K&#8217;da d\u00fczenlenen su\u00e7lara dair yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamalarda da k\u0131yasen uygulanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2004 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunundaki bu kanunda yer alan su\u00e7lara dair verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin t\u00e2bi oldu\u011fu kanun yollar\u0131 ilgili d\u00fczenlemelere bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda &#8220;itiraz&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 353. maddesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;\u0130cra mahkemesinin verdi\u011fi tazyik ve disiplin hapsine dair kararlara kar\u015f\u0131, tefhim veya tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren yedi g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde itiraz edilebilir. Mahkeme itiraz\u0131 incelemesi i\u00e7in dosyay\u0131 o yerde icra mahkemesinin birden fazla dairesinin bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, numara olarak kendisini izleyen daireye, son numaral\u0131 daire i\u00e7in birinci daireye, o yerde icra mahkemesinin tek dairesi bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde asliye ceza mahkemesine, icra mahkemesi h\u00e2kimi ile asliye ceza mahkemesi h\u00e2kiminin ayn\u0131 h\u00e2kim olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ise en yak\u0131n asliye ceza mahkemesine g\u00f6nderir. \u0130tiraz incelemesi neticesinde verilen karar kesindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130cra mahkemesinin bu Bapta yer alan su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 verdi\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerle ilgili olarak 4.12.2004 tarihli ve 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununun kanun yollar\u0131na dair h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu d\u00fczenleme uyar\u0131nca, icra mahkemesince disiplin veya tazyik hapsini gerektiren fiiller sebebiyle verilen kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvurulabilecek kanun yolu itirazd\u0131r. Su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenen eylemlerden dolay\u0131 verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerle ilgili olarak ise, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nun kanun yollar\u0131na dair h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, bu su\u00e7lar sebebiyle CMK&#8217;nun 223. maddesinde h\u00fck\u00fcm olarak belirtilen beraat, ceza verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahk\u00fbmiyet, g\u00fcvenlik tedbirine h\u00fckmedilmesi, davan\u0131n reddi ve d\u00fc\u015fmesi kararlar\u0131 ile adli yarg\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki bir yarg\u0131 merciine y\u00f6nelik g\u00f6revsizlik kararlar\u0131 temyiz kanun yoluna t\u00e2bidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 353\/2. maddesindeki at\u0131f uyar\u0131nca temyiz kanun yolunun tatbikat\u0131nda 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nun kanun yollar\u0131na dair genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin ve 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 8. maddesi uyar\u0131nca b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemeleri faaliyete ge\u00e7inceye kadar halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun temyize dair h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin (322. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc, be\u015finci ve alt\u0131nc\u0131 f\u0131kralar\u0131 hari\u00e7 olmak \u00fczere, 305 il\u00e2 326. maddelerinin) uygulanmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nun 260 vd. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca kural olarak icra mahkemesince verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmleri; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, m\u00fcdafiinin, yasal temsilcisi ve e\u015finin, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin, vekilinin ve yerel Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n temyiz hakk\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. \u0130cra mahkemesinin kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz yetkisi sadece o yer Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131na ait olup 13.01.1936 g\u00fcn ve 1935\/107 esas, 1936\/25 karar say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca A\u011f\u0131r Ceza (\u00fcst) Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n icra ceza mahkemesinin kararlar\u0131n\u0131 temyize yetkileri yoktur. Ayr\u0131ca yerel Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz yetkisi \u015fahsi hak taleplerini kapsamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 8. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun 310. maddesi uyar\u0131nca da temyiz s\u00fcresi h\u00fckm\u00fcn tefhiminden, tefhim edilmemi\u015f ise tebli\u011finden itibaren ba\u015flamak \u00fczere bir haftad\u0131r. \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 350. maddesi uyar\u0131nca icra mahkemesinde yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmalarda Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 haz\u0131r bulunmamakta ancak 352. maddesi uyar\u0131nca icra mahkemesince verilen karar\u0131n h\u00fclasas\u0131n\u0131n Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131na bildirilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu sebeple Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 29.04.2003 g\u00fcn ve 126-122 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere yerel Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan temyiz s\u00fcresi karar\u0131n savc\u0131l\u0131k makam\u0131na bildirilmesinden itibaren ba\u015flayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer taraftan \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanununun 89\/4. maddesi uyar\u0131nca icra mahkemesine hem cezaland\u0131rma hem de tazminat istemiyle dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu takdirde icra mahkemesi tazminat hakk\u0131ndaki davay\u0131 genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re halledecektir. Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulunun 11.03.1972 g\u00fcn ve 496-192 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere icra mahkemesine tazminat ve cezaland\u0131rma talebiyle birlikte a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda mahkemenin s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n tayininde cezaland\u0131rma talebinin g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gerekmekte olup, davaya ceza mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla bak\u0131lacak fakat ayn\u0131 kararda hem ceza hem de tazminatla ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015f ise temyiz s\u00fcresi ceza ve tazminat y\u00f6n\u00fcnden farkl\u0131 olacakt\u0131r. Nitekim 2004 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunundan kaynaklanan su\u00e7lara dair davalar\u0131 uzun y\u0131llar temyizen inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk ve 11. Ceza Dairelerince tazminat talebi ile ilgili verilen kararlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyizs\u00fcresinin \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 364 ve 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun ge\u00e7ici 3 ile 5236 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un ge\u00e7ici 2. maddeleri yollamas\u0131yla 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK&#8217;nun 432. maddesi uyar\u0131nca gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn oldu\u011fu kabul edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, 2004 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanununda yer alan su\u00e7lara dair verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin t\u00e2bi oldu\u011fu kanun yolu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan karar\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve ba\u015fvuran taraf\u0131n s\u0131fat\u0131na g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015fen ve 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu ile 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanununa g\u00f6re karma\u015f\u0131k bir sistem kabul edilmi\u015f olup, avukatlar da dahil olmak \u00fczere ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n kanun yolunda yan\u0131lmalar\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu sebeple bu su\u00e7lara dair verilen kararlarda kanun yolu bildiriminin hi\u00e7bir teredd\u00fcde yer vermeyecek bi\u00e7imde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmesi \u00f6zellikle \u00f6nem arzetmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gelinen bu a\u015famada kanun yolu bildirimine dair mevzuat\u0131m\u0131zdaki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2709 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131n\u0131n 40\/2. maddesininde; &#8220;Devlet, i\u015flemlerinde, ilgili ki\u015filerin hangi kanun yollar\u0131 ve mercilere ba\u015fvuraca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00fcrelerini belirtmek zorundad\u0131r\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015f,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu d\u00fczenlemeye paralel olarak 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nun 34\/2. maddesinde; \u201cKararlarda, ba\u015fvurulabilecek kanun yolu, s\u00fcresi, mercii ve \u015fekilleri belirtilir\u201d,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">231\/2. maddesinde; \u201cHaz\u0131r bulunan san\u0131\u011fa ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurabilece\u011fi kanun yollar\u0131, mercii ve s\u00fcresi bildirilir\u201d,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">232\/6. maddesinde ise; \u201cH\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131nda, 223. maddeye g\u00f6re verilen karar\u0131n ne oldu\u011funun, uygulanan kanun maddelerinin, verilen ceza miktar\u0131n\u0131n, kanun yollar\u0131na ba\u015fvurma ve tazminat isteme olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, ba\u015fvuru olana\u011f\u0131 varsa s\u00fcresi vemerci-nin teredd\u00fcde yer vermeyecek \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekir\u201d,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eeklindeki emredici d\u00fczenlemeler yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nun 40. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda da, kusuru olmaks\u0131z\u0131n bir s\u00fcreyi ge\u00e7irmi\u015f olan ki\u015finin, eski hale getirme isteminde bulunabilece\u011fi, 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise, kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n kendisine bildirilmemesi halinde, ki\u015finin kusursuz say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An\u0131lan d\u00fczenlemelerden, h\u00fck\u00fcm ve kararlardaki kanun yolu bildiriminin; kanun yolu, mercii, \u015fekli ve s\u00fcresini de kapsamas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu yan\u0131nda, a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131labilir ve her t\u00fcrl\u00fc yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 ifadeden uzak olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu bildirimlerdeki temel ama\u00e7 taraflar\u0131n ba\u015fvuru haklar\u0131n\u0131 etkin bir bi\u00e7imde kullanmalar\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve bu eksiklik sebebiyle hak kay\u0131plar\u0131na yol a\u00e7\u0131lmamas\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak burada dikkat edilmesi gereken husus eksik veya yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 bildirim sebebiyle bir hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenip engellenmedi\u011finin belirlenmesidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130cra ceza mahkemesince san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin y\u00fcz\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 tefhim olunan h\u00fck\u00fcmde, temyiz s\u00fcresi tefhimden itibaren ba\u015flamak \u00fczere bir hafta oldu\u011fu halde, kanun yolu bildirimi \u201cdavac\u0131n\u0131n vekilinin ve daval\u0131 vekilinin huzurunda, i\u015f bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren iki hafta i\u00e7erisinde Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;da temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilen karar a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a okunup usulen anlat\u0131ld\u0131\u201d \u015feklinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, bu bildirim temyizin s\u00fcresi ve ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 itibariyle a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 niteliktedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Her ne kadar mesle\u011fi bir kamu hizmeti niteli\u011findeki avukatl\u0131k olan ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcstlenen; savunma ve kanun yollar\u0131na ba\u015fvuru i\u00e7in yeterli d\u00fczeyde hukuki bilgiye sahip olan m\u00fcdafinin icra mahkemesinin su\u00e7a dair verdi\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde temyiz s\u00fcresinin, karar\u0131n y\u00fcze kar\u015f\u0131 verildi\u011fi hallerde tefhimden itibaren i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve temyiz s\u00fcresinin de bir hafta oldu\u011funu bilmemesi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemeyece\u011finden, kanun yolu bildirimindeki bu eksiklik m\u00fcdafii a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bir yan\u0131lg\u0131 ve bu ba\u011flamda hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir engel olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6ylenebilir ise de; a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere 2004 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanununda yer alan su\u00e7lara dair verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin tabi oldu\u011fu kanun yolu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan karar\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve ba\u015fvuran taraf\u0131n s\u0131fat\u0131na g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015fen ve 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu ile 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanununa g\u00f6re farkl\u0131 ve biraz da karma\u015f\u0131k bir sistem kabul edilmi\u015f olup, avukatlar da dahil olmak \u00fczere ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n kanun yolunda yan\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin 27.08.2012 tarihinde tebli\u011f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckme kar\u015f\u0131 10.09.2012 tarihinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyiz ba\u015fvurusunun, adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeyece\u011fi de g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde g\u00f6sterilen kanun yolu bildirimine uygun olmas\u0131 sebebiyle s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle, \u00d6zel Dairece kat\u0131lan vekilinin temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde kabul edilmesinde herhangi bir isabetsizlik bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla, yerinde olmayan Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-) Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-) Dosyan\u0131n, mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 13.10.2015 tarihinde yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2013\/11-669<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2014\/160<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 1.4.2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u00d6ZEL BELGEDE SAHTEC\u0130L\u0130K SU\u00c7U ( Temyiz Harc\u0131n\u0131n Yat\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f Olmas\u0131 &#8211; Mevcut ve Mer&#8217;i Hukuki D\u00fczenlemeler Kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Ceza Davalar\u0131nda Temyizin Bir \u015eart\u0131 veya Reddi Sebebi Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130Z HARCININ YATIRILMAMI\u015e OLMASI ( \u00d6zel Belgede Sahtecilik Su\u00e7u &#8211; Temyiz S\u00fcresi \u0130\u00e7erisinde Harc\u0131n \u00d6denmemesi Halinde Bu Husus Temyiz \u0130steminin Reddine Karar Verilmesini Gerektirmeyece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130Z HARCININ EKS\u0130K YATIRILMI\u015e OLMASI ( \u00d6zel Belgede Sahtecilik Su\u00e7u &#8211; Harc\u0131n Tahsili Amac\u0131yla Bu Durumun Har\u00e7lar Kanunun 37. Md.si Uyar\u0131nca \u0130lgili Vergi Dairesine Bildirilmesi \u0130le Yetinilece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130Z \u015eARTI ( Temyiz Harc\u0131n\u0131n Yat\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f Olmas\u0131 &#8211; Mevcut ve Mer&#8217;i Hukuki D\u00fczenlemeler Kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Ceza Davalar\u0131nda Temyizin Bir \u015eart\u0131 veya Reddi Sebebi Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Harc\u0131n Tahsili Amac\u0131yla Bu Durumun Har\u00e7lar Kanunun 37. Md.si Uyar\u0131nca \u0130lgili Vergi Dairesine Bildirilmesi \u0130le Yetinilece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1412\/m.310<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">492\/m.13\/1,32,37,127<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava \u00f6zel belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7una ili\u015fkindir. Harc\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f veya eksik yat\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 mevcut ve mer&#8217;i hukuki d\u00fczenlemeler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ceza davalar\u0131nda temyizin bir \u015fart\u0131 veya reddi sebebi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u00e7ersinde harc\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi halinde bu husus temyiz isteminin reddine karar verilmesini gerektirmeyecek ve harc\u0131n tahsili amac\u0131yla bu durumun Har\u00e7lar Kanunun 37. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ilgili vergi dairesine bildirilmesi ile yetinilecektir. Bu itibarla, temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131 temyiz isteminin reddi sebebi olarak de\u011ferlendirmeyen ve temyiz istemini kabul ederek yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc inceleyen \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131nda sonucu itibar\u0131yla bir isabetsizlik bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DAVA : \u00d6zel belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan san\u0131k M.&#8217;in 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;nun 207\/1, 62 ve 58. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 10 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, cezas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine ili\u015fkin, Denizli 4. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 24.11.2011 g\u00fcn ve 206-572 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesinin 04.07.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/1996-13175 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c&#8230; 29.12.2011 g\u00fcn ve 28157 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanan ve yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak alt\u0131 ay sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesinin 20.10.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/54-142 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 13. maddesi ile 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanununun &#8216;V. Temyiz, istinaf ve itiraz har\u00e7lar\u0131&#8217; k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n &#8216;Yarg\u0131tay ceza dairelerine yap\u0131lacak temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda 40 TL&#8217; bi\u00e7imindeki ( b ) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ve iptaline karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00fcresinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyiz isteminin kabul\u00fc gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- )H\u00fckm\u00fcn konusu, iddianamede g\u00f6sterilen eylemden ibaret olup, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun ve Dairemizin yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; bir olay\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir olaydan s\u00f6z edilmesi, o olay hakk\u0131nda da dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermeyece\u011fi cihetle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, &#8230;&#8217;de M. sahte kimlik fotokopisi ile abonelik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzalay\u0131p telefon hatt\u0131 almak suretiyle \u00f6zel belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla d\u00fczenlenen 05.04.2011 g\u00fcn, 2011\/3264-965 say\u0131l\u0131 iddianamede, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 27.04.2009 tarihinde \u0130stanbul ilinde bir ba\u015fka su\u00e7un takibi s\u0131ras\u0131nda yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda A. ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f sahte kimli\u011fi ibraz edip, kendisini bu isimle tan\u0131tmas\u0131ndan bahsedilmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n, A. ismine d\u00fczenlemi\u015f sahte kimli\u011fi kullanmak su\u00e7undan dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermeyece\u011fi, 27.04.2009 tarihinde yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00fczerinden pek \u00e7ok sahte belge \u00e7\u0131kan san\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki soru\u015fturma evrak\u0131n\u0131n tefrik edilerek, su\u00e7 yerleri itibariyle yetkisizlik kararlar\u0131 verilirken t\u00fcm evraklarda m\u00fc\u015fteki olarak A.&#8217;in isminin yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n, t\u00fcm su\u00e7lar\u0131n ma\u011fdurunun bu \u015fah\u0131s oldu\u011fu anlam\u0131na gelmeyece\u011fi gibi san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, A.&#8217;e ait kimlik fotokopisini kullanmas\u0131 fiilinden dolay\u0131 Kad\u0131k\u00f6y Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda i\u015flem yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilmeden, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nun 225. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak iddianame konusu yap\u0131lmayan su\u00e7tan h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- )M. ad\u0131na telefon abonelik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin sahte olarak d\u00fczenlenmesi su\u00e7unun ma\u011fduru olmayan ve bu su\u00e7tan do\u011frudan do\u011fruya zarar g\u00f6rmeyen A.&#8217;in davaya kat\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesi&#8230;&#8221;,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130sabetsizliklerinden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise 11.09.2012 g\u00fcn ve 8584 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8230; 1- )Ceza muhakemesi kurallar\u0131, y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulundu\u011fu s\u00fcrece derhal uygulama ilkesi dikkate al\u0131narak uygulan\u0131r. Bu ilkeden hareketle, bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyiz edilme esas ve ko\u015fullar\u0131 temyizyoluna ba\u015fvuru tarihinde ge\u00e7erli hukuk normlar\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 14.04.2011 tarihinden sonra, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131 hari\u00e7, yap\u0131lan temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda, 02.07.1964 tarihli ve 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanununa g\u00f6re, 40 TLtemyiz harc\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve kararda da bu hususa ili\u015fkin hat\u0131rlatmada bulunulmam\u0131\u015fsa da, mahkemesince, temyiz edene, bu harc\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcrede yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlatan ihtarat\u0131 i\u00e7eren bir tebligat\u0131n 15.12.2011 tarihinde san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi halde san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan eksikli\u011fin ikmal edilmedi\u011fi ve s\u00f6z konusu yasal d\u00fczenlemenin 29.12.2011 g\u00fcn ve 28157 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanan ve yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak alt\u0131 ay sonra 29.06.2012 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesinin 20.10.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/54-142 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 13. maddesi ile 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanununun &#8216;IV. Temyiz, istinaf ve itiraz har\u00e7lar\u0131&#8217; k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n &#8216;Yarg\u0131tay ceza dairelerine yap\u0131lacak temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda 40 TL&#8217; bi\u00e7imindeki ( b ) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ve iptaline karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n temyiz tarihi itibariyle 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanununla de\u011fi\u015fik 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun ilgili h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn halen mer&#8217;i olmas\u0131 nedeniyle temyiz isteminin reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2 )Kabule g\u00f6re de, kanun yolu muhakemesinin dar anlamda ceza davas\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n esasa ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ek tebli\u011fna\u011fme d\u00fczenlenerek sorulmamas\u0131 ceza muhakemesinin temel ilkelerine de uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyecektir&#8230;&#8221;,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle itiraz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">CMK&#8217;nun 308. maddesi uyar\u0131nca inceleme yapan Yarg\u0131tay 11. Dairesince 03.09.2013 g\u00fcn ve 23429-1234 say\u0131 ile; itiraz nedenlerinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden bahisle Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> \u00d6zel Daire ile Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- ) Temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz isteminin reddine karar verilmesinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- ) Temyizin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildiren Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn benimsenmemesi halinde dosyan\u0131n esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin de g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc kapsayacak bi\u00e7imde ek tebli\u011fname d\u00fczenlenmesi istenilmeden temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Noktalar\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130ncelenen dosya kapsam\u0131ndan;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkemece 24.11.2011 tarihinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6zel belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verildi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine s\u00fcresi i\u00e7eresinde 30.11.2011 tarihli s\u00fcre tutum dilek\u00e7esiyle h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etti\u011fi, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n 01.12.2011 tarihinde san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f olundu\u011fu, gerek\u00e7eli kararda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz edebilmesi i\u00e7in temyiz harc\u0131 yat\u0131rmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkin herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkemece 04.12.2011 tarihli yaz\u0131 ile san\u0131\u011fa 40 TL temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, aksi takdirde temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 kendisinin sorumlu olaca\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde ihtaratta bulunuldu\u011fu, bu ihtarat\u0131n 07.12.2011 tarihinde san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, mahkemece 13.12.2011 tarihli ba\u015fka bir yaz\u0131 ile yine ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011fatemyiz harc\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin ihtar edildi\u011fi, bu yaz\u0131n\u0131n da 15.12.2011 tarihinde san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f olundu\u011fu, her iki ihtaratta da san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hangi s\u00fcrede temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ve yat\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde ne gibi bir i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sadece bundan dolay\u0131 sorumlu olaca\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde genel bir ifade ile yetinildi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n t\u00fcm bu ihtarata ra\u011fmen temyizharc\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bunun \u00fczerine mahkemece 29.12.2011 tarihli form ile dosyan\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen 17.01.2012 g\u00fcn ve 8584 say\u0131l\u0131 tebli\u011fnamede temyiz harc\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temyizin reddi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn bildirildi\u011fi ve dosyan\u0131n esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00d6zel Dairece temyizistemi kabul edilerek usuli iki nedenden dolay\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konular\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131ras\u0131yla ele al\u0131nmas\u0131nda yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- ) Temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz isteminin reddine karar verilmesinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">14.04.2011 g\u00fcn ve 27905 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131nlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131 Hizmetlerinin H\u0131zland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 Amac\u0131yla Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanunun 12. maddesi ile 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun &#8220;Har\u00e7tan m\u00fcstesna i\u015flemler&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 13. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ( i ) bendinde yer alan \u201cKamu ad\u0131na C. savc\u0131lar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Hukuk mahkemelerine a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar&#8221; ibaresinden sonra gelmek \u00fczere, \u201cve kanun yolu ba\u015fvurular\u0131 ile ceza mahkemelerinden verilen kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 kanun yolu ba\u015fvurular\u0131\u201d ibaresi, 13. maddesi ile de ayn\u0131 Kanunun ( 1 ) Say\u0131l\u0131 Tarifesinin &#8220;A &#8211; Mahkeme Har\u00e7lar\u0131&#8221; b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne &#8220;Hukuk&#8221; ibaresinden sonra gelmek \u00fczere \u201cceza\u201d ibaresi eklenmi\u015f ve \u201cIV. Temyiz ve itiraz har\u00e7lar\u0131\u201d k\u0131sm\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile birlikte;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;IV. Temyiz, istinaf ve itiraz har\u00e7lar\u0131:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a ) Yarg\u0131tay hukuk dairelerine yap\u0131lacak temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda 90 TL,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b ) Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Dairelerine yap\u0131lacak temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda 40 TL,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">c ) Dan\u0131\u015ftaya yap\u0131lacak temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda 90 TL,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">d ) Y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin itirazlar dahil olmak \u00fczere b\u00f6lge idare mahkemelerine itirazen yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurularda 50 TL,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">e ) B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemeleri hukuk dairelerine yap\u0131lacak istinaf yolu ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda 50 TL,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">f ) B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemeleri ceza dairelerine yap\u0131lacak istinaf yolu ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda 20 TL,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">g ) \u0130dar\u00ee yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar konusunda sulh ceza mahkemelerince verilen son karara kar\u015f\u0131 itirazen yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurularda 20 TL,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">h ) \u0130cra mahkemelerinin kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itirazen yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurularda 20 TL&#8221; \u015feklinde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">De\u011fi\u015fiklik gerek\u00e7esi, 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun genel gerek\u00e7esinde; \u201cTasar\u0131yla mahkeme har\u00e7lar\u0131 yeniden d\u00fczenlenmekte ve \u00f6zellikle ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 kanun yoluna m\u00fcracaatlar\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 esas\u0131 kabul edilerek yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 uzatma amac\u0131na y\u00f6nelik kanun yolu ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesi ama\u00e7lanmaktad\u0131r\u201d, madde gerek\u00e7elerinde ise; \u201cTasar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7er\u00e7eve 13 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesiyle, \u00f6zellikle ceza mahkemelerinin kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 kanun yolu m\u00fcracaatlar\u0131nda har\u00e7 getirildi\u011finden, maddeyle Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n bu t\u00fcr m\u00fcracaatlar\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131nmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmaktad\u0131r\u201d ve \u201cMaddeyle, mahkeme har\u00e7lar\u0131 yeniden d\u00fczenlenmekte ve ceza mahkemesi kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lacak kanun yolu ba\u015fvurular\u0131ndan da har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 kabul edilmektedir. Ba\u015fta Yarg\u0131tay olmak \u00fczere yarg\u0131 mercilerine yap\u0131lacak itiraz, istinaf ve temyiz yolu ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 ile yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 uzatmaya y\u00f6nelik olarak yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurular\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi ve bu suretle yarg\u0131 mercilerindeki i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn azalt\u0131lmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lanmaktad\u0131r\u201d bi\u00e7iminde a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anayasa Mahkemesinin 20.10.2011 g\u00fcn ve 54-142 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile ( 1 ) Say\u0131l\u0131 Tarifenin \u201cA- Mahkeme Har\u00e7lar\u0131\u201d b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn, \u201cIV. Temyiz, istinaf ve itiraz har\u00e7lar\u0131\u201d k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Dairelerine yap\u0131lacak temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda 40 TL&#8221; bi\u00e7imindeki ( b ) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n, 01.11.2012 g\u00fcn ve 64-168 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile de, &#8220;B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemeleri ceza dairelerine yap\u0131lacak istinaf yolu ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda 20 TL&#8221;, &#8220;\u0130dar\u00ee yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar konusunda sulh ceza mahkemelerince verilen son karara kar\u015f\u0131 itirazen yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurularda 20 TL&#8221;, &#8220;\u0130cra mahkemelerinin kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itirazen yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurularda 20 TL&#8221; \u015feklindeki ( f ), ( g ) ve ( h ) f\u0131kralar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ve iptaline karar verilmi\u015f ve uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu ( b ) f\u0131kras\u0131 ile ilgili iptal karar\u0131 29.06.2012 tarihinde, ( f ), ( g ) ve ( h ) f\u0131kralar\u0131 ile ilgili iptal karar\u0131 ise 03.09.2013 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. Gerek bu iptal kararlar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden \u00f6nce gerekse y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmelerinden sonra kanun koyucu taraf\u0131ndan iptal kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda yeni bir d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anayasa Mahkemesinin iptal karar\u0131ndan sonra ayn\u0131 zamanda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusunu te\u015fkil eden kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 14.04.2011-29.06.2012 tarihlerin aras\u0131nda ceza mahkemelerinden verilen kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmayaca\u011f\u0131 ve temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmayanlar\u0131n temyiz isteminin reddine karar verilmesinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi sorunu ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce \u00fclkemizde ceza davalar\u0131nda har\u00e7 uygulamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin tarihsel s\u00fcre\u00e7 \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131nda yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00dclkemizde ceza davalar\u0131nda har\u00e7 uygulamas\u0131 ilk defa 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile getirilmemi\u015ftir. 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunundan \u00f6nce s\u0131ras\u0131yla y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan; 09.06.1934 g\u00fcn ve 2503 say\u0131l\u0131 Adliye Har\u00e7 Tarifesi Kanunu ile 25.02.1952 g\u00fcn ve 5887 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanununda da ceza davalar\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir. 2503 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 2. maddesinde, \u201cMahkemelere, Cumhuriyet m\u00fcddeiumumilikler ile istintak ve icra ve ifl\u00e2s dairelerine verilecek arzuhal ve l\u00e2yihalar\u0131n ve ili\u015fik olarak verilecek ve ibraz olunacak evrak\u0131n her birinden yirmi kuru\u015f kaydiye \u00fccreti al\u0131n\u0131r\u201d \u015feklinde genel bir h\u00fckme yer verildikten sonra, 47 ila 67. maddelerinde ceza davalar\u0131nda al\u0131nacak har\u00e7lar d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f, &#8220;kay\u0131t harc\u0131&#8221;, &#8220;karar ve ilam harc\u0131&#8221;, &#8220;ceza kararnamesi harc\u0131&#8221;, &#8220;istinaf ve temyiz ilam harc\u0131&#8221;, &#8220;di\u011fer kanun yollar\u0131 harc\u0131&#8221;, &#8220;\u015fahs\u00ee dava \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan muhakemeden al\u0131nacak hara\u00e7lar&#8221;, &#8220;davaya m\u00fcdahale harc\u0131&#8221;, &#8220;suret harc\u0131&#8221; gibi \u00e7e\u015fitli har\u00e7lar \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, karar ve ilam har\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinde h\u00fckmolunan cezan\u0131n miktar\u0131 esas al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin; 50.001 kuru\u015ftan 75.000 kuru\u015fa, yahut 1 seneden 2 seneye kadar hapis cezas\u0131 mahkumiyetlerinde 2.800 kuru\u015f har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131, temyiz mahkemesince temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddilmesi halinde 400, temyiz olunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 halinde 500 kuru\u015f maktu, h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131 halinde ise asliye mahkemesince ka\u00e7 kuru\u015f ilam harc\u0131 al\u0131nacaksa o miktar har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 gibi. 5887 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu ile de ceza davalar\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 uygulamas\u0131na devam olunmu\u015f, Kanunun 1 ve 2. maddelerinde her nevi d\u00e2valar ile mahkemeler, h\u00e2kimler ve savc\u0131lar ile ticaret sicil memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan muamelelerle avukatl\u0131k i\u015flerinde bu kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re har\u00e7 al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015f, 12 ila 21. maddeler aras\u0131nda ceza davalar\u0131nda al\u0131nacak har\u00e7lar g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f, ilk defa har\u00e7 miktarlar\u0131 kanun metinlerine b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131yarak ayr\u0131 tarifelere ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f, ( 1 ) Say\u0131l\u0131 Tarifede yarg\u0131 har\u00e7lar\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f, ceza davalar\u0131nda al\u0131nacak har\u00e7lar &#8220;ilam har\u00e7lar\u0131&#8221; ( h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezaya taall\u00fbk eden h\u00fck\u00fcmlerden bir g\u00fcn bir lira hesab\u0131yla bulunacak miktar \u00fczerinden, para cezas\u0131na dair verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerden h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan para cezas\u0131 miktar\u0131 \u00fczerinden %10 ), &#8220;\u015fahsi d\u00e2valar ile takibi \u015fik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131 su\u00e7lara ait d\u00e2valardan al\u0131nacak har\u00e7lar&#8221;, &#8220;karar har\u00e7lar\u0131&#8221; ve &#8220;temyiz har\u00e7lar\u0131&#8221; ( Temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin mahall\u00ee mahkemesince veya Yarg\u0131tayca reddine dair verilen kararlarda 8 Lira, bir ceza il\u00e2m\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca bozulmas\u0131 halinde 10 Lira ) olarak say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan bu d\u00f6nemde 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun 310. maddesinde temyizin \u015fartlar\u0131ndan birinin temyiz eden ilgilinin bir hafta i\u00e7esinde 10 Lira depo etmesi oldu\u011fu, tetkik neticesinde temyiz talebinin kabul edilebilir veya hakl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re bu paran\u0131n ya iade edilece\u011fi ya da hazineye b\u0131rak\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, depo i\u00e7in muayyen olan m\u00fcddetin temyiz istidas\u0131n\u0131n ( dilek\u00e7esinin ) verildi\u011fi veya zab\u0131t k\u00e2tibine beyan\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnden ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131 ile fakir olduklar\u0131na dair belediye ve k\u00f6y ihtiyar heyetinden ilm\u00fchaber getirenlerle, bu hususta b\u00f6l\u00fck komutan veya m\u00fcessese amirlerinden ilm\u00fchaber getirenlerin ve kabahat i\u015flerine taalluk eden h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin temyiz olunmas\u0131nda alakadarlar\u0131n para depo etmekten muaf olduklar\u0131, 305. maddesinde onbe\u015f sene ve ondan yukar\u0131 h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezalara ait h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin hi\u00e7 bir har\u00e7 ve masrafa tabi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca re&#8217;sen tetkik olunaca\u011f\u0131 benimsenmi\u015f, 317. maddesinde ise depo paras\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na m\u00fcteallik kanun\u00ee h\u00fck\u00fcmlere riayet edilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde temyiz mahkemesince temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddine karar verilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ceza davalar\u0131nda har\u00e7 uygulamas\u0131na depo paras\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki har\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 17.07.1964 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu ile, depo paras\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise 04.06.1985 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 3206 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile son verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ceza davalar\u0131nda har\u00e7lar\u0131 kald\u0131ran 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun gerek\u00e7esinde; \u201cCeza d\u00e2valar\u0131ndan al\u0131nacak har\u00e7lar ( \u015fahsi haklarla ilgili d\u00e2valar hari\u00e7 ) ile avukatl\u0131k i\u015flerine m\u00fcteallik har\u00e7lar b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak har\u00e7 mevzuu d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ger\u00e7ekten ceza d\u00e2valar\u0131n\u0131n bir har\u00e7 mevzuu ve sebebi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 har\u00e7lar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 prensip ile ba\u011fda\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lamam\u0131\u015f, Devletin \u00e2mme menfaatine kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza, tedip ve \u0131slah hakk\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7lulara y\u00f6nelen bir har\u00e7 m\u00fckellefiyeti meydana getiremeyece\u011fi neticesine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer taraftan ceza d\u00e2vas\u0131 har\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek bir fiskal de\u011feri de bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Maliye idaresini fuzuli olarak i\u015fgal etmekte, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck miktarlardan terekk\u00fcp etmesine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k binlerce m\u00fckellefe taall\u00fbk etmektedir\u201d, depo \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131ran 3206 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun gerek\u00e7esinde ise;\u201c310 uncu maddede temyiz i\u00e7in y\u00fcz lira ( CMUK&#8217;nun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren ilk halinde 10 lira olan depo paras\u0131 22.06.1979 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 2248 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla 100 Liraya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ) depo \u015fart\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Kabahatlerde ve resen temyize tabi olan \u00f6l\u00fcm, m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis ve on be\u015f seneden ziyade h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezalarda bu depo \u015fart\u0131 aranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n temyizleri ile fakir olduklar\u0131n\u0131 belgeleyenlerin temyiz isteklerinde de bu \u015fart s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. Di\u011fer taraftan bu paran\u0131n veya fakirlik ilm\u00fchaberinin temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde verilmesi temyiz hakk\u0131n\u0131n kaybolmas\u0131na neden olmaktad\u0131r. Keza fakirlik ilm\u00fchaberindeki imza noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fi gibi hallerde de dosyan\u0131n ikmali i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;dan mahalline g\u00f6nderilmesi gibi davan\u0131n sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 uzat\u0131c\u0131 nedenler ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Bu mahzurlar\u0131n giderilmesi maksad\u0131yla esasen c\u00fcz\u00ee miktarda olan depo \u015fart\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u201d denilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">492 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve 3206 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla ceza davalar\u0131ndaki harca ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n har\u00e7 aranan d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin \u00f6rne\u011fin; 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun 305. maddesindeki; &#8220;Ancak, onbe\u015f sene ve ondan yukar\u0131 h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezalara ait h\u00fck\u00fcmleri hi\u00e7 bir har\u00e7 ve masrafa tabi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca re&#8217;sen tetkik olunur&#8221; ve 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunun 13\/f. maddesindeki; &#8220;\u0130cra tetkik mercilerinin cezaya m\u00fctedair kararlar\u0131yla bu kararlar\u0131n temyizi i\u015flemleri ( har\u00e7tan muaft\u0131r )&#8221; \u015feklindeki gibi baz\u0131 d\u00fczenlemeler varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ve y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte kalmaya devam etmi\u015flerdir. Bundan dolay\u0131d\u0131r ki 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girince icra ceza davalar\u0131nda ve re&#8217;sen temyize t\u00e2bi olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde temyiz harc\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile, 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesiyle kald\u0131r\u0131lan ceza davalar\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 uygulamas\u0131na yeniden d\u00f6n\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ve Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Dairelerine yap\u0131lacak temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131ndan 40 TL har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Esas\u0131nda 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmeden \u00f6nce 06.06.2008 g\u00fcn ve 26898 m\u00fckerrer say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5766 say\u0131l\u0131 Amme Alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n Tahsil Usul\u00fc Hakk\u0131nda Kanunda ve Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun 11. maddesinin ( d ) bendi ile 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanununa ba\u011fl\u0131 ( 1 ) Say\u0131l\u0131 Tarifenin \u201cA )Mahkeme Har\u00e7lar\u0131\u201d b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn sonuna eklenen &#8220;IV. Temyiz ve itiraz har\u00e7lar\u0131&#8221; b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn \u201cYarg\u0131tay ve Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;a yap\u0131lacak temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda 60 YTL\u201d Temyiz ( ba\u015fvuru ) harc\u0131 al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ( a ) f\u0131kras\u0131nda &#8220;ceza davalar\u0131\u201d, \u201chukuk davalar\u0131\u201d gibi bir ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle 5766 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla ceza davalar\u0131nda temyiz ba\u015fvuru harc\u0131 getirilip getirilmedi\u011fi konusunda teredd\u00fct ya\u015fanm\u0131\u015f, Ceza Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 31.03.2009 g\u00fcn ve 248-92 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile an\u0131lan h\u00fckm\u00fcn sadece hukuk ve ticaret davalar\u0131yla, idari davalarda ihtilafs\u0131z yarg\u0131 konular\u0131nda ve icra tetkik mercilerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen i\u015flerde s\u00f6z konusu olabilece\u011fi, ceza davalar\u0131nda ise mahkeme har\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla da temyiz ve itiraz harc\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan bahsedilemeyece\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00dclkemizde ceza davalar\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 uygulamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin tarihsel s\u00fcre\u00e7 bu \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131ktan sonra, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu temyiz kanun yolu ile ilgili oldu\u011fundan kanun yolu kavram\u0131 ve sonras\u0131nda temyiz kanun yolu \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanun yollar\u0131, yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 veya yanl\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen kararlar\u0131n, kural olarak, ba\u015fka bir makam taraf\u0131ndan tekrar incelenmesini sa\u011flayan yasal yollard\u0131r. ( Nur Centel-Hamide Zafer, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku, Beta Yay\u0131nevi, \u0130stanbul 2013, 10. Bask\u0131, s. 729 ) B\u00f6ylece, varsa hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k veya yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131n giderilmesi, do\u011fru ve adalete uygun kararlarla, taraflarda ve toplumda g\u00fcven duygusunun g\u00fc\u00e7lendirilmesi ama\u00e7lanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde kabul edilmekte olup bu hakla ilgili gerek uluslararas\u0131 mevzuatta, gerekse i\u00e7 hukukumuzda bir \u00e7ok h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu kapsamda \u00f6rne\u011fin; Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n \u201cHak Arama H\u00fcrriyeti\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 36. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda, \u201cHerkes, me\u015fru vas\u0131ta ve yollardan faydalanmak suretiyle yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde davac\u0131 veya daval\u0131 olarak iddia ve savunma ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na sahiptir\u201d, \u201cTemel Hak ve H\u00fcrriyetlerin Korunmas\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 40. maddesinde ise; \u201c ( 1 ) Anayasa ile tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f hak ve h\u00fcrriyetleri ihl\u00e2l edilen herkes, yetkili makama geciktirilmeden ba\u015fvurma imkan\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131na sahiptir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 )Devlet, i\u015flemlerinde, ilgili ki\u015filerin hangi kanun yollar\u0131 ve mercilere ba\u015fvuraca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00fcrelerini belirtmek zorundad\u0131r\u201d h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesine ek 7. Protokol\u00fcn 2. maddesinde ise; \u201c ( 1 )Bir mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan cezai bir su\u00e7tan mahkum edilen her ki\u015fi, mahkumiyet ya da ceza h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc daha y\u00fcksek bir mahkemeye yeniden inceletme hakk\u0131na haiz olacakt\u0131r. Bu hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, kullan\u0131labilme gerek\u00e7eleri de dahil olmak \u00fczere, kanunla d\u00fczenlenir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) Bu hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, kanunda d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f haliyle \u00f6nem derecesi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ya da ilgilinin birinci derece mahkemesi olarak en y\u00fcksek mahkemede yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya beraatini m\u00fcteakip bunun temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet hallerinde istisnaya tabi tutulabilir\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu s\u00f6zle\u015fme hen\u00fcz TBMM taraf\u0131ndan onaylanmamakla birlikte hukukumuzun kaynaklar\u0131ndan biri olan hukukun evrensel prensipleri aras\u0131ndaki yerini alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim Ceza Genel Kurulunun bir \u00e7ok karar\u0131nda bu protokole at\u0131f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve protokol\u00fcn A\u0130HS&#8217;nin adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 6. maddesine yeni yorum getirdi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir h\u00fck\u00fcm veya karara kar\u015f\u0131 kanun yollar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131 kural, kapal\u0131 olmas\u0131 ise istisnad\u0131r. Bu istisna da hukuk devletinde kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn me\u015fru bir ama\u00e7la, Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen &#8220;hak arama h\u00fcrriyeti&#8221; ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 6. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen &#8220;mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131&#8221; n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcne halel getirmeyecek bi\u00e7imde orant\u0131l\u0131 olmal\u0131 ve kanunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bulunmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz yolu, mahkemelerin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 sona erdiren nitelikteki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinde bulunan kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n bozma veya d\u00fczeltme ( \u0131slah ) kararlar\u0131 ile giderilebilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kabul edilmi\u015f ola\u011fan bir kanun yoludur. 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun 305. maddesi uyar\u0131nca maddede belirtilen veya sair kanunlarda kesin oldu\u011fu yaz\u0131l\u0131 bulunan h\u00fck\u00fcmler d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki t\u00fcm h\u00fck\u00fcmlere kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8. maddesi gere\u011fince halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 310. maddesi uyar\u0131nca temyiz incelemesinin yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in iki \u015fart\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 gereklidir:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bunlardan ilki s\u00fcre \u015fart\u0131d\u0131r. Kanunun 310. maddesinde, genel kural olarak taraflar\u0131n temyiz iste\u011finde bulunabilecekleri s\u00fcre h\u00fckm\u00fcn tefhiminden, tefhim edilmemi\u015fse tebli\u011finden ba\u015flamak \u00fczere bir hafta olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. Temyiz s\u00fcresi 310. maddenin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki farkl\u0131 durum hari\u00e7 olmak \u00fczere, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunanlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bu tarihte, yokluklar\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm verilenler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi tarihinde ba\u015flar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli ikinci \u015fart ise istek \u015fart\u0131d\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lama hukukunun temel prensiplerinden olan &#8220;Davas\u0131z yarg\u0131lama olmaz&#8221; ilkesine uygun olarak temyiz davas\u0131 kendili\u011finden a\u00e7\u0131lmaz, bu konuda bir iste\u011fin bulunmas\u0131 gereklidir. 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 305. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 ile bu kuraldan uzakla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve baz\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r mahk\u00fbmiyetlerde istek \u015fart\u0131ndan san\u0131k lehine vazge\u00e7ilerek, temyiz incelemesinin kendili\u011finden yap\u0131lmas\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK gerekse 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nda &#8220;s\u00fcre&#8221; ve &#8220;istek&#8221; \u015fart\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda temyiz davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ba\u015fka bir \u015fart bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda temyizba\u015fvuru harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 da temyizin \u015fartlar\u0131ndan biri olarak say\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1412 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun \u201cTemyiz Talebinin Kabule \u015eayan Olmamas\u0131ndan Dolay\u0131 H\u00fckm\u00fc Veren Mahkemece Reddi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 315. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda ve \u201cYarg\u0131tayca Temyiz \u0130ste\u011finin Reddi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 317. maddesinde, temyiz talebinin reddi sebepleri;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-Kanun\u00ee s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7mesinden sonra temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bulunulmu\u015f olmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-Karar\u0131n temyiz edilemeyecek nitelikte olmas\u0131<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-Temyiz edenin temyiz hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanunlar\u0131m\u0131zda say\u0131lan bu nedenler d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda temyiz isteminin reddi i\u00e7in kabul edilmi\u015f ba\u015fka bir sebep yoktur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kla ilgili nihai \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme var\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce har\u00e7 kavram\u0131 ve temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi veya eksik \u00f6denmesinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00fczerinde de durulmad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Har\u00e7, kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n sundu\u011fu hizmetlerden yararlananlardan, bu yararlanmalar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 al\u0131nan bedeldir. Kamu hizmetlerinin genel ilke olarak \u00fccretsiz sunulmas\u0131 esas olmakla birlikte sunulan kamu hizmetinden har\u00e7 al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmayaca\u011f\u0131 kanunla d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmak \u015fart\u0131yla kanun koyucunun takdirindedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131 hizmetleri de, \u015f\u00fcphesiz kamu kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n sundu\u011fu en \u00f6nemli hizmetlerden birisi olup Anayasada yarg\u0131 hizmetlerinin devletin har\u00e7 alma yetkisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tutuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu itibarla kanun koyucu, yarg\u0131 hizmetlerinin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bundan yararlananlardan har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 bi\u00e7iminde bir d\u00fczenleme yapmak yetkisine sahiptir. Ancak ceza davalar\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7ine alabilecek \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan bu d\u00fczenlemenin Anayasan\u0131n 36\/1 ve A\u0130HS&#8217;in 6\/1. maddelerinde korunan &#8220;mahkemeye eri\u015fim&#8221; hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmemesi gerekir. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi, bunun i\u00e7in belli kriterler benimsemi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re A\u0130HM;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a ) Harc\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131n makul olmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">c ) Harc\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131nda hakl\u0131 bir amac\u0131n olmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">d ) Ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 ile har\u00e7 aras\u0131nda orant\u0131 olmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">e ) \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fc olmayanlar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan etkili adl\u00ee yard\u0131m sisteminin olmas\u0131 kriterlerini dikkate almaktad\u0131r. ( Tolstoy-Miloslavsky\/\u0130ngiltere, 13.6.1995, No: 18139\/91; Kreuz\/Polonya, 18.6.2001, No: 28249\/95; Bakan\/T\u00fcrkiye, 12.6.2007, No: 50939\/99; \u00dclger\/T\u00fcrkiye, 26.6.2007, No: 25321\/02 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim Anayasa Mahkemesi de, 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun ( 1 ) say\u0131l\u0131 Tarifesinin \u201cA ) Mahkeme Har\u00e7lar\u0131\u201d b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 13. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen &#8220;IV. Temyiz ve itiraz har\u00e7lar\u0131&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ( b ), ( f ), ( g ) ve ( h ) f\u0131kralarda kanun yolu ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131nabilece\u011fi kural\u0131yla birlikte, \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fc olmayanlara etkili adl\u00ee yard\u0131m sa\u011flayacak bir sistemin \u00f6ng\u00fcr\u00fclmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve yarg\u0131lama giderlerinden muafiyet sa\u011flayan adl\u00ee yard\u0131m d\u00fczenlemesinin yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 ile hukukumuzda adl\u00ee yard\u0131ma ili\u015fkin tek d\u00fczenleme olan 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak herhangi bir atf\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 nedenleriyle kanun yolu ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131nabilece\u011fi kural\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fc olmayanlar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131 engelleyecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 2, 5 ve 36. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6rerek iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Harc\u0131n \u00f6denmemesinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na gelince; harc\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi veya eksik \u00f6denmesinin yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanununun 32 ve 127. maddelerinde &#8220;har\u00e7 \u00f6denmedik\u00e7e harca mevzu olan i\u015flemin yap\u0131lmamas\u0131&#8221; \u015feklinde g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. Ancak harc\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi sadece i\u015flemin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ya da y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini durdurmakta olup talebin reddini gerektirmemektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihinde uygulan\u0131lmas\u0131na ba\u015flanacak olan 344. maddesinde ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun ge\u00e7ici 3 ve 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun ge\u00e7ici 2. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihine kadar uygulanacak olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HMUK&#8217;nun 434. maddesinde harc\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi veya eksik \u00f6denmesi durumunda uygulanacak y\u00f6ntem d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun 344. maddesinde; &#8221; ( 1 ) \u0130stinaf dilek\u00e7esi verilirken, istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru harc\u0131 ve tebli\u011f giderleri de d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm giderler \u00f6denir. Bunlar\u0131n hi\u00e7 \u00f6denmedi\u011fi veya eksik \u00f6denmi\u015f oldu\u011fu sonradan anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa, karar\u0131 veren mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan verilecek bir haftal\u0131k kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde tamamlanmas\u0131, aksi h\u00e2lde ba\u015fvurudan vazge\u00e7mi\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 hususu ba\u015fvurana yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak bildirilir. Verilen kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde har\u00e7 ve giderler tamamlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, mahkeme ba\u015fvurunun yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verir. Bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, 346 nc\u0131 maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc k\u0131yas yoluyla uygulan\u0131r&#8221;,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK&#8217;nun 434. maddesinde ( 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nceki hali ); &#8220;Temyiz dilek\u00e7esi hangi mahkemeye verilmi\u015fse o mahkemece temyiz defterine kaydolunur ve temyiz edene \u00fccretsiz bir al\u0131nd\u0131 ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131 verilir. Temyiz iste\u011fi, harca tabi de\u011filse dilek\u00e7enin temyiz defterine kaydedildi\u011fi, harca tabi ise harc\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Temyiz dilek\u00e7esi verilirken gerekli har\u00e7 ve giderlerin tamam\u0131 \u00f6denir. Bunlar\u0131n eksik \u00f6denmi\u015f oldu\u011fu sonradan anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa, karar\u0131 veren hakim veya mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilecek yedi g\u00fcnl\u00fck kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde tamamlanmas\u0131, aksi halde temyizden vazge\u00e7mi\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 hususu temyiz edene yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak bildirilir. Verilen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde har\u00e7 ve giderler tamamlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, mahkeme karar\u0131n temyiz edilmemi\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verir. Bu karar\u0131n da temyiz edilmesi halinde 432 nci maddenin son f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc k\u0131yasen uygulan\u0131r&#8221; \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcmler yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yine 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanununun 48. maddesinin 6. f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki; &#8220;Temyiz dilek\u00e7esi verilirken gerekli har\u00e7 ve giderlerin tamam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde karar\u0131 veren; mahkeme veya Dan\u0131\u015ftay daire ba\u015fkan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilecek onbe\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde tamamlanmas\u0131, aksi halde temyizden vazge\u00e7ilmi\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 hususu temyiz edene yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak bildirilir. Verilen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde har\u00e7 ve giderler tamamlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, mahkeme, ilk derece mahkemesi olarak davaya bakan Dan\u0131\u015ftay dairesi, karar\u0131n temyiz edilmemi\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verir. Temyizin kanuni s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde de karar\u0131 veren mahkeme, ilk derece mahkemesi olarak davaya bakan Dan\u0131\u015ftay dairesi, temyiz isteminin reddine karar verir. Mahkemenin veya Dan\u0131\u015ftay dairesinin bu kararlar\u0131 ile bu maddenin 2 nci f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen temyiz isteminde bulunulmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, tebli\u011f tarihini izleyen g\u00fcnden itibaren yedi g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulabilir&#8221; \u015feklindeki h\u00fck\u00fcmle de idari yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fcnde temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131lma y\u00f6ntemi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna kar\u015f\u0131n ceza davalar\u0131nda temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7 \u00f6denmemesi veya eksik \u00f6denmesi durumunda nas\u0131l davran\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin gerek 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunda gerekse 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nda bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunuyla y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda har\u00e7 uygulamas\u0131na yeniden d\u00f6n\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, ancak harc\u0131n ne zaman yat\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, eksik veya hi\u00e7 \u00f6denmemesi durumunda ne yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131lar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimlerin har\u00e7tan muaf oldu\u011fu, \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fc olmayanlara adl\u00ee yard\u0131m\u0131n nas\u0131l sa\u011flanaca\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131nda bir d\u00fczenleme getirilmedi\u011fi gibi, 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;nda har\u00e7 uygulamas\u0131n ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemlerde mevcut bulunan kurallar\u0131n benzeri de\u011fi\u015fikler yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f, belirtilen konulara ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemeler i\u00e7eren mer&#8217;i di\u011fer kanunlara bir at\u0131fta da bulunulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda belirsizli\u011fin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun ge\u00e7ici 3. ve 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun ge\u00e7ici 2. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HMUK&#8217;nun 434. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn k\u0131yasen ceza davalar\u0131nda da uygulanmas\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnebilecek ise de; istisnai ve s\u0131n\u0131rlay\u0131c\u0131 normlarda k\u0131yas yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Temyizin \u015fartlar\u0131 ve reddi sebepleri 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun 310, 315 ve 317. maddelerinde s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak say\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup harc\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi nedeniyle temyizin reddedilece\u011fine dair bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, temyizin reddine karar verilemeyecek, kanuni a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenleme ve at\u0131f bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a k\u0131yas yoluyla b\u00f6yle bir sonuca g\u00f6t\u00fcrecek uygulama da yap\u0131lamayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Harc\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f veya eksik yat\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 mevcut ve mer&#8217;i hukuki d\u00fczenlemeler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ceza davalar\u0131nda temyizin bir \u015fart\u0131 veya reddi sebebi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u00e7ersinde harc\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi halinde bu husus temyiz isteminin reddine karar verilmesini gerektirmeyecek ve harc\u0131n tahsili amac\u0131yla bu durumun Har\u00e7lar Kanunun 37. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ilgili vergi dairesine bildirilmesi ile yetinilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla, temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131 temyiz isteminin reddi sebebi olarak de\u011ferlendirmeyen ve temyiz istemini kabul ederek yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc inceleyen \u00d6zel Daire karar\u0131nda sonucu itibar\u0131yla bir isabetsizlik bulunmamakta olup hakl\u0131 nedene dayanmayan itiraz\u0131n reddine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan Genel Kurul \u00fcyesi S. Bak\u0131c\u0131;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;T.C. Anayasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 153. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin iptal kararlar\u0131, Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girer ve mahkeme; iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girece\u011fi tarihi, yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnden ba\u015flayarak bir y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7meyecek \u015fekilde ayr\u0131ca kararla\u015ft\u0131rabilir.\u0130ptal kararlar\u0131 geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcmez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 29.12.2011 g\u00fcn ve 28157 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131mlanan 2011\/54 esas, 2011\/142 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere har\u00e7; kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n sundu\u011fu hizmetlerden yararlananlardan, bu yararlanmalar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 al\u0131nan bedeldir. Anayasa&#8217;da yarg\u0131 hizmetlerinin \u00fccretsiz olarak verilece\u011fine ve devletin har\u00e7 alma yetkisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tutuldu\u011funa dair h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Ceza yarg\u0131s\u0131 hizmetlerinden har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Anayasal bir engel bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle Anayasa Mahkemesi har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 2 ve 36. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An\u0131lan kararda da belirtildi\u011fi gibi har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131, A\u0130HS&#8217;ne ayk\u0131r\u0131 de\u011fildir. A\u0130HS&#8217;ni imzalayan \u00fclkelerde har\u00e7 al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi miktarlar\u0131 da T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;deki har\u00e7larla k\u0131yaslanamayacak derecede y\u00fcksek tutardad\u0131r. Bu nedenle; g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda, har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin adil yarg\u0131lamaya ili\u015fkin 6. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, h\u00fck\u00fcm iptal edilmese dahi Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 90. maddesi uyar\u0131nca har\u00e7 al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe i\u015ftirak etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. A\u0130HM kararlar\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n yasalarla d\u00fczenlenebilece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Sadece bu d\u00fczenlemede, &#8220;har\u00e7 miktar\u0131n\u0131n makul olmas\u0131, har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131nda hakl\u0131 bir amac\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 ile har\u00e7 miktar\u0131 aras\u0131nda orant\u0131 olmas\u0131, \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fc olmayanlar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan etkili adli yard\u0131m sisteminin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; aranm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anayasa Mahkemesi har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sadece \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fc olmayanlar i\u00e7in etkili adli yard\u0131m sa\u011flayacak bir sistemin d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fini, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya bu y\u00f6nden bir at\u0131f yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fc olmayanlar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yasal d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini kabul ederek h\u00fckm\u00fc iptal etmi\u015f ve yasal d\u00fczenlemenin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yasa koyucuya alt\u0131 ayl\u0131k bir s\u00fcre vermi\u015ftir. Bu d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan iptal karar\u0131 29.06.2012 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla 29.06.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fcnden sonra ceza yarg\u0131s\u0131nda temyizharc\u0131 al\u0131nmayacak, bu tarihe kadar har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na devam olunacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar\u0131n yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 ile y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarih aras\u0131ndaki alt\u0131 ayl\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde har\u00e7 al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesinde de tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin kabul edildi\u011fini karar ve kar\u015f\u0131 oy yaz\u0131s\u0131ndan anlamaktay\u0131z. Zira kar\u015f\u0131 oy yaz\u0131s\u0131nda, &#8220;s\u00fcre verilmekle bu karar\u0131n alt\u0131 ay daha h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc s\u00fcrd\u00fcrece\u011fi ve Devletin Anayasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak gelir toplanmas\u0131na izin verilmi\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle s\u00fcre verilmemesi gerekti\u011fi&#8221; belirtilmi\u015ftir. \u00c7o\u011funluk, bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re, kar\u015f\u0131 oyun aksine har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla, Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin iptal nedeni ve gerek\u00e7esi ile Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 153. maddesi uyar\u0131nca iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcmeyip 6 ay sonra yani 29.06.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fcnden itibaren uygulanmaya ba\u015flanmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, bu tarihe kadar temyiz harc\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden say\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir&#8221; g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan iki Genel Kurul \u00dcyesi de; benzer d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerle itiraz\u0131n kab\u00fcl\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kar\u015f\u0131oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- ) Temyizin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildiren Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn benimsenmemesi halinde dosyan\u0131n esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin de g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc kapsayacak bi\u00e7imde ek tebli\u011fname d\u00fczenlenmesi istenilmeden temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2797 say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Kanunun \u201cYarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 Ba\u015fyard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 ile Yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n G\u00f6revleri\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 28. maddesi;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cYarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 Ba\u015fyard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n veya Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131vekilinin verece\u011fi g\u00f6revleri yapar. \u00d6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmler sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 ve Vekilinin yoklu\u011funda Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131na vekillik eder. Ba\u015fyard\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n da bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zamanlarda bu g\u00f6revi en k\u0131demli Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 yapar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131, kendilerine verilen dosyalar\u0131n tebli\u011fnamelerini, karar d\u00fczeltme ve itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvurma i\u015flemlerini Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 ad\u0131na d\u00fczenler ve onun yerine imza ederler. Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n verece\u011fi di\u011fer i\u015fleri g\u00f6r\u00fcrler.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun 102 nci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ( 5 ) ve ( 6 ) numaral\u0131 bentleri kapsam\u0131nda olan su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin dava dosyalar\u0131 temyiz \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca tebli\u011fname d\u00fczenlenmeksizin ilgili daireye g\u00f6nderilir. Daire karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n karar d\u00fczeltme ve itiraz kanun yollar\u0131na ba\u015fvurma yetkisi vard\u0131r\u201d \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7 Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin 37. maddesinde ise;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cYarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6revleri:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- Verilen i\u015fleri s\u00fcresinde ve eksiksiz inceleyip Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 ad\u0131na d\u00fczenleyecekleri ve imza edecekleri tebli\u011fnamelere ba\u011fl\u0131yarak sonu\u00e7land\u0131rmak,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Dairelerden \u00e7\u0131kan il\u00e2mlar\u0131 uygulama, i\u00e7tihat ve tebli\u011fnamelere uygunluk a\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131ndan inceleyerek Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne g\u00f6re karar d\u00fczeltme veya itiraz yollar\u0131na gitmek,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 ba\u015fyard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenecek s\u0131raya g\u00f6re Ceza Genel Kurulu ile dairelerin duru\u015fmalar\u0131na kat\u0131larak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesini bildirmek,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4- Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 ba\u015fyard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenecek s\u0131raya g\u00f6re ceza dairelerinin g\u00fcnl\u00fck \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 sona erinceye kadar \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saati d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda n\u00f6bet tutmak,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5- Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilecek ve ayr\u0131ca kanun ve y\u00f6netmelikle verilen di\u011fer g\u00f6revleri yapmakt\u0131r\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An\u0131lan kanun ve i\u00e7 y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yerel mahkemelerce verilen kararlar\u0131n temyiz yoluyla incelenmesinde, Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca, o konudaki hukuki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir tebli\u011fname d\u00fczenlenmesi zorunludur. \u00d6zel Dairelerce temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, temyiz konusu hakk\u0131nda bir tebli\u011fname d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 \u00f6n \u015fartt\u0131r. 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK&#8217;nun 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 8. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 316. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re de, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenecek bu tebli\u011fnamenin, h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etmeleri veya aleyhlerine sonu\u00e7 do\u011furabilecek g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f i\u00e7ermesi halinde san\u0131k veya kat\u0131lan ya da vekillerine dairesince tebli\u011f olunmas\u0131 da gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenecek olan tebli\u011fnamede usul ve esasa ili\u015fkin t\u00fcm hususlarda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmesi yerinde bir uygulama olacakt\u0131r. Zira \u00d6zel Dairece uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas\u0131na girilmesine engel olarak g\u00f6sterilen sebebin kabul edilmeyerek inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Ancak bununla birlikte Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, temyiz isteminin reddine karar verilmesi veya h\u00fckm\u00fcn usuli nedenlerden bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f belirtilen durumlarda, bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn benimsenmeyerek esasa ili\u015fkin temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ihtimaline binaen dosyan\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda da g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirmeye zorlayacak kanuni bir dayanak bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen 09.12.2003 g\u00fcnl\u00fc tebli\u011fnamede san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyizinin reddi gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirildi\u011finden, \u00d6zel Dairece bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn benimsenmeyerek esasa y\u00f6nelik temyiz incelemesine ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dosyan\u0131n esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin de g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc kapsayacak bi\u00e7imde ek tebli\u011fname d\u00fczenlenmesini isteme zorunlulu\u011fu bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle, ek tebli\u011fname d\u00fczenlenmesine gerek g\u00f6rmeksizin temyiz incelemesi yapan \u00d6zel Dairenin uygulamas\u0131nda herhangi bir isabetsizlik bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla, itiraz\u0131n bu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de reddine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusuna ili\u015fkin olarak \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan alt\u0131 Genel Kurul \u00dcyesi; itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle kar\u015f\u0131 oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- )Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n her iki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- )Dosyan\u0131n, mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 01.04.2014 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede her iki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2015\/10-827<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2016\/33<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 20.1.2016<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;i\u015f (kurum i\u015fleminin iptali ) &#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; \u0130\u015f Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 18\/11\/2013 g\u00fcn ve 2013\/1148 E. 2013\/1341 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 10. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 08.05.2014 g\u00fcn ve 2014\/2175 E. 2014\/10253 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla bozulmu\u015f, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonunda gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine yukarda ba\u015fl\u0131kta belirtilen karar ile bozulmu\u015ftur. Bozma \u00fczerine mahkemece ilk kararda direnilmi\u015f, direnme karar\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015f mahkemeleri kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz s\u00fcresi 30\/1\/1950 tarih ve 5521 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 2\/3\/2005 tarih ve 5308 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla de\u011fi\u015fmeden \u00f6nceki 8. maddesine g\u00f6re belirlenmekte ise de, temyiz usul ve i\u015flemlerinde 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;n\u0131n Ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK&#8217;n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Her ne kadar uygulamada i\u015f mahkemesinde kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz yolu ile temyiz hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmamakta ise de gerek i\u015f hukuku mevzuat\u0131nda gerekse de HUMK&#8217;nun temyize ait h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinde bunu engelleyen bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu sebeple 6217 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 30.maddesiyle 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atfiyla uygulanmakta olan 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 433\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin h\u00fck\u00fcm veren mahkeme arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa tebli\u011f edilmesi ve kar\u015f\u0131 tarafatemyiz dilek\u00e7esine kar\u015f\u0131 cevap verme ve kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz isteminde bulunmak hakk\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da yer alan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar do\u011frultusunda yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekiline ait temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin davac\u0131 tarafa tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Temyiz eden daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan sunulan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin, 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nu \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atfiyla uygulanmakta olan HUMK&#8217;nun 433. maddesi gere\u011fince davac\u0131 vekiline Tebligat Kanunu ve ilgili mevzuat dikkate al\u0131narak tebli\u011f edilmeli ve yasal s\u00fcre beklenildikten sonra Hukuk Genel Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple eksiklik giderildikten sonra Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;na g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n mahkemesine geri \u00e7evrilmesi gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple dosyan\u0131n mahkemesine GER\u0130 \u00c7EVR\u0130LMES\u0130NE 20\/01\/2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2015\/2-3037<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2015\/2430<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 4.11.2015<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 BO\u015eANMA DAVASI ( Evlilik Birli\u011finin Sars\u0131lmas\u0131 Sebebine Dayal\u0131 &#8211; Daval\u0131 Kendisine Usule Uygun \u015eekilde Verilen ve Sadece Delil Bildirmeye Y\u00f6nelik Olan Kesin S\u00fcrede Delillerini Bildirmedi\u011finden Daval\u0131n\u0131n Delil Bildirme Hakk\u0131n\u0131n D\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn G\u00f6zetilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 KES\u0130N S\u00dcRE ( Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gereken \u0130\u015flemi S\u00fcresinde Yapmayan Taraf\u0131n O \u0130\u015flemi Yapma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Ortadan Kalkaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Mahkemece Daval\u0131 Vekiline Verilen Kesin S\u00fcre Sadece Delil Bildirmeye \u0130li\u015fkin Olup Ara Karar\u0131nda Delil Avans\u0131n\u0131n G\u00f6sterilmemi\u015f Olmas\u0131n\u0131n Bu Ara Karar\u0131n\u0131 Ge\u00e7ersiz K\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131\/Bo\u015fanma Davas\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 DEL\u0130L B\u0130LD\u0130RME HAKKI ( Bo\u015fanma &#8211; Kesin S\u00fcre \u0130\u00e7inde Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gereken \u0130\u015flemi S\u00fcresinde Yapmayan Taraf\u0131n O \u0130\u015flemi Yapma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Ortadan Kalkaca\u011f\u0131\/Daval\u0131 Kendisine Usule Uygun \u015eekilde Verilen ve Sadece Delil Bildirmeye Y\u00f6nelik Olan Kesin S\u00fcrede Delillerini Bildirmedi\u011finden Daval\u0131n\u0131n Delil Bildirme Hakk\u0131n\u0131n D\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 ARA KARAR ( Delil Bildirme \u0130\u00e7in Tan\u0131nan Kesin S\u00fcre \u0130\u00e7inde \u0130kamesi Talep Edilecek Deliller \u0130\u00e7in Avans Belirlenip Bunun da G\u00f6sterilmesi ve Belirlenen Avans\u0131n Ayn\u0131 Kesin S\u00fcre \u0130\u00e7inde Yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n Delil Bildirmeyle \u0130lgili Ara Karar\u0131nda Yer Almas\u0131 Mecburiyeti Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Bo\u015fanma Davas\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m.94\/3,324\/1<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> Dava, evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine dayal\u0131 bo\u015fanma iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir. Kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015flemi, s\u00fcresinde yapmayan taraf\u0131n o i\u015flemi yapma hakk\u0131 ortadan kalkar. Mahkemece daval\u0131 vekiline verilen kesin s\u00fcre sadece &#8220;delil bildirmeye&#8221; ili\u015fkin olup, ara karar\u0131nda &#8220;delil avans\u0131n\u0131n&#8221; g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131, bu ara karar\u0131n\u0131 ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131lmaz. Delil bildirme i\u00e7in tan\u0131nan kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde, ikamesi talep edilecek deliller i\u00e7in avans belirlenip, bunun da g\u00f6sterilmesi ve belirlenen avans\u0131n ayn\u0131 kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n delil bildirmeyle ilgili ara karar\u0131nda yer almas\u0131 mecburiyeti de bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Taraflar\u0131n her birinin ikamesini talep etti\u011fi delil i\u00e7in mahkemece avans belirlenip, bunun yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ayr\u0131ca kesin s\u00fcre verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Esasen daval\u0131ya delil bildirmesi i\u00e7in kesin s\u00fcre verildi\u011fi s\u0131rada daval\u0131n\u0131n ne t\u00fcr deliller bildirece\u011fi, tan\u0131k bildirecekse ka\u00e7 tan\u0131k bildirece\u011fi, tan\u0131klar\u0131n adresleri itibariyle mahkemece tan\u0131klar\u0131n davetiye ile mi \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 yoksa tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n talimat mahkemesi arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile mi al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ikamesi talep edilecek delilerin neler olaca\u011f\u0131 ve bu delillerin giderlerinin ne olaca\u011f\u0131 da mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan bilinmemektedir. Daval\u0131 kendisine usule uygun \u015fekilde verilen ve sadece \u201cdelil bildirmeye\u201d y\u00f6nelik olan kesin s\u00fcrede delillerini bildirmemi\u015ftir. O halde, daval\u0131n\u0131n delil bildirme hakk\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan direnme karar\u0131 yerindedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201cbo\u015fanma\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Manisa 2. Aile Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 03.04.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/549 E. 2012\/263 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesinin 23.01.2013 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/14017 E. 2013\/1573 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Daval\u0131ya 09.02.2012 tarihli oturumda delillerini bildirmesi i\u00e7in kesin s\u00fcre verilmi\u015f, daval\u0131 03.04.2012 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile delillerini bildirmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece daval\u0131ya delillerini bildirmesi i\u00e7in verilen kesin s\u00fcre, tan\u0131k \u00fccretleri ve davetiye giderleri g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011finden sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz. Daval\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n dinlenip, de\u011ferlendirilerek sonucu uyar\u0131nca karar vermek gerekirken eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Dava, evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine dayal\u0131 bo\u015fanma iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, daval\u0131 vekilinin kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde delillerini bildirmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi deliller toplanmam\u0131\u015f, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n sundu\u011fu delillerle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile bo\u015fanma karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 vekilinin temyizi \u00fczerine, \u00d6zel Dairece yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7e ile h\u00fck\u00fcm bozulmu\u015f, Yerel Mahkeme \u00f6nceki kararda direnmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili temyiz etmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme yolu ile Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; daval\u0131ya delillerini bildirmesi i\u00e7in verilen kesin s\u00fcrede delil avans\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi, daval\u0131ya delillerini bildirmesi i\u00e7in verilen kesin s\u00fcrenin usul\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, var\u0131lacak sonuca g\u00f6re de daval\u0131n\u0131n delil bildirme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kalk\u0131p kalkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ncelikle ifade edilmelidir ki, eldeki dava 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK d\u00f6neminde a\u00e7\u0131lan bir dava olsa da, daval\u0131ya delillerini bildirmesi i\u00e7in verilen kesin s\u00fcrenin tarihi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ortada tamamlanmam\u0131\u015f bir i\u015flem bulundu\u011funa g\u00f6re HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 448. maddesi gere\u011fince 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmleri dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130kinci olarak, kesin s\u00fcrenin hukuki niteli\u011finin irdelenmesinde yarar vard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131yla ba\u015flayan yarg\u0131lama faaliyetinde,karara ula\u015fmak bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, mahkeme ve taraflarca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken belirli i\u015flemler bulunmakta olup, her i\u015flemin belli bir zaman aral\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile normatif bir de\u011fer kazanan bu zaman aral\u0131klar\u0131na s\u00fcre denilmektedir. B\u00f6ylece usul i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zamansal olarak taraflar\u0131n ya da mahkemenin arzular\u0131na, inisiyatifine b\u0131rak\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcreler, nitelikleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, taraflar i\u00e7in ve mahkemeler i\u00e7in konulmu\u015f s\u00fcreler olmak \u00fczere ikiye ayr\u0131l\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemeler i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrelerin, taraflar i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrelerden fark\u0131; s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n, o s\u00fcrede yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen i\u015flemin yap\u0131lma olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmamas\u0131d\u0131r. E\u015f s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle hakim, gecikmeli de olsa s\u00fcreye ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f olan i\u015flemi yapabilir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, gecikmeli de olsa yap\u0131lan i\u015flem, olu\u015fturulan karar hukuken ge\u00e7erlidir ve s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f gibi hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S\u00fcrelerin \u00f6nemli bir k\u0131sm\u0131, taraflar i\u00e7in konulmu\u015f s\u00fcrelerdir. Taraflar, bu s\u00fcreler i\u00e7inde belli i\u015flemleri yapabilirler veya yapmalar\u0131 gerekir. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lamayan i\u015flemler, tekrar yap\u0131lamaz ve s\u00fcreyi ka\u00e7\u0131ran taraf aleyhine sonu\u00e7 do\u011furur. Taraflar i\u00e7in konulmu\u015f s\u00fcreler; kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcreler ve hakim taraf\u0131ndan belirtilen s\u00fcreler olmak \u00fczere ikiye ayr\u0131l\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcreler; kanun taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ( cevap s\u00fcresi, temyiz s\u00fcresi gibi ) s\u00fcreler olup, bu s\u00fcreler kesindir. Bir i\u015flemin kanuni s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkemece re&#8217;sen g\u00f6zetilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hakimin tespit etti\u011fi s\u00fcreler ise, kural olarak kesin de\u011fildir ( Kuru, Baki\/ Arslan Ramazan\/ Y\u0131lmaz, Ejder, Medeni Usul Hukuku Ders Kitab\u0131, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;na G\u00f6re Yeniden Yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f 22. Bask\u0131, Ankara 2011, s.749 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hakim, kendi tayin etmi\u015f oldu\u011fu s\u00fcreyi, HMK&#8217;nun 90\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re iki taraf\u0131 dinledikten sonra hakl\u0131 nedenlere dayanarak, azalt\u0131p \u00e7o\u011faltabilir ve bu s\u00fcrenin, kesin oldu\u011funa da karar verebilir ( HMK m.94\/2, HUMK m.159 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere ilke olarak, hakimin verdi\u011fi s\u00fcre kesin olmay\u0131p, kesinlik i\u00e7in \u015fu iki ko\u015fuldan birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 zorunludur:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130lk ko\u015ful, hakimin kesin oldu\u011funu belirtmeksizin verdi\u011fi ilk s\u00fcrede i\u015flemin yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ilgili taraf\u0131n yeniden s\u00fcre talep hakk\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, bu talep \u00fczerine hakimin verdi\u011fi ikinci s\u00fcrenin kesin olmas\u0131 ve bu kesinli\u011fin yasadan kaynaklanmas\u0131d\u0131r ( HUMK m.163, c.4, HMK. 94\/2 ); bu halde, ikinci kez verilen s\u00fcrenin kesin oldu\u011fu belirtilmemi\u015f ve ihtar edilmemi\u015f olsa dahi, sonu\u00e7 de\u011fi\u015fmez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130kinci halde ise; yasaya g\u00f6re hakimin, tayin etti\u011fi ilk s\u00fcrenin kesin oldu\u011funa da karar verebilmesidir ( HUMK m.163\/3 c.3, HMK m. 94 ). Ancak, b\u00f6yle bir durumda kesin s\u00fcrenin hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furabilmesi i\u00e7in, buna ili\u015fkin ara karar\u0131n\u0131n yasaya ve i\u00e7tihatlara uygun \u015fekilde olu\u015fturulmas\u0131, hi\u00e7bir teredd\u00fcde yer vermeyecek derecede a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131 ve kesin s\u00fcreye uyulmamas\u0131n\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili tarafa ihtar edilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kesin s\u00fcreye ili\u015fkin ara karar\u0131n\u0131n verilmesiyle kar\u015f\u0131 taraf lehine usul\u00fc kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak do\u011fmaktad\u0131r. Bu ilkenin do\u011fal sonucu, yarg\u0131sal kesin s\u00fcreyle sadece taraflar\u0131n de\u011fil, hakimin de ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hakimin bu t\u00fcr bir ara karar\u0131ndan d\u00f6nmesinin hukuken ge\u00e7ersiz olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">K\u0131saca; ister kanun, ister hakim taraf\u0131ndan tayin edilmi\u015f olsun, kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde yerine getirilmeyen bir i\u015flemin, bu s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra yerine getirilmesi olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan, m\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK&#8217;n\u0131n 163. maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 94. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kesin s\u00fcreye ili\u015fkin ara karar\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7bir duraksamaya yer vermeyecek bi\u00e7imde a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131, taraflara y\u00fcklenen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin, yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015flerin neler oldu\u011funun ve her i\u015f i\u00e7in yat\u0131r\u0131lacak \u00fccretin hi\u00e7bir \u015f\u00fcpheye yer vermeyecek \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca verilen s\u00fcrenin amaca uygun, yeterli ve elveri\u015fli olmas\u0131, kesin s\u00fcreye uymaman\u0131n do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131 hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k olarak anlat\u0131lmas\u0131 ve anlat\u0131lanlar\u0131n tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irilmesi, bunlara uyulmamas\u0131 durumunda mevcut kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re karar verilip, gerekti\u011finde davan\u0131n reddedilece\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a bildirilmesi suretiyle ilgili taraf\u0131n uyar\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi her t\u00fcrl\u00fc duraksamadan uzakt\u0131r. Baz\u0131 hallerde kesin s\u00fcrenin ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, o delile veya hakka dayanamamak gibi a\u011f\u0131r sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 birlikte getirmekte, davan\u0131n kaybedilmesine neden olmaktad\u0131r. B\u00f6yle bir durumda, geciken adaletin adaletsizlik oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclerek, davalar\u0131n uzamas\u0131n\u0131 veya uzat\u0131lmak istenmesini engellemek \u00fczere getirilen kesin s\u00fcre kural\u0131, kanunun amac\u0131na uygun olarak kullan\u0131lmal\u0131, davan\u0131n reddi i\u00e7in bir ara\u00e7 say\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu c\u00fcmleden olarak, kesin s\u00fcrenin amac\u0131na uygun olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve yeterli uzunlukta olmas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, taraflar\u0131n yarg\u0131lamadaki tutumlar\u0131 ile s\u00fcreye konu i\u015flemin \u00f6zelli\u011finin de g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekir. ( Benzer ilkelere YHGK&#8217;n\u0131n 18.02.1983 g\u00fcn 1980\/1-1284, 1983\/141; 22.11.1972 g\u00fcn 8\/832, 935; 13.10.2010 g\u00fcn 2010\/17-510-485; 28.04.2010 g\u00fcn 2010\/2-221-241 ve 28.03.2012 g\u00fcn 2012\/19-55-2012-249 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda da de\u011finilmi\u015ftir. ) .<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Delil avans\u0131 ile ilgili yasal d\u00fczenlemeye gelince; 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun delil ikamesi i\u00e7in avans ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 324 maddesinde ise \u201c ( 1 ) Taraflardan her biri ikamesini talep etti\u011fi delil i\u00e7in mahkemece belirlenen avans\u0131, verilen kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yat\u0131rmak zorundad\u0131r. Taraflar birlikte ayn\u0131 delilin ikamesini talep etmi\u015flerse, gereken gideri yar\u0131 yar\u0131ya avans olarak \u00f6derler.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) Taraflardan birisi avans y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmezse, di\u011fer taraf bu avans\u0131 yat\u0131rabilir. Aksi h\u00e2lde talep olunan delilin ikamesinden vazge\u00e7ilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 3 ) Taraflar\u0131n \u00fczerinde serbest\u00e7e tasarruf edemeyece\u011fi dava ve i\u015fler hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcmler sakl\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fc getirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">03.04.2012 tarihli Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131nlanan Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin 45. maddesinde: \u201c ( 1 ) Davac\u0131, yarg\u0131lama har\u00e7lar\u0131 ile her y\u0131l Bakanl\u0131k\u00e7a \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lacak gider avans\u0131 tarifesinde belirlenecek olan tutar\u0131 dava a\u00e7arken mahkeme veznesine yat\u0131rmak zorundad\u0131r. Gider avans\u0131, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc tebligat ve posta \u00fccretleri, ke\u015fif giderleri, bilirki\u015fi ve tan\u0131k \u00fccretleri gibi giderler i\u00e7in davac\u0131dan al\u0131nan mebla\u011f\u0131 ifade eder.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) Adli yard\u0131m talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava ve i\u015flerde adli yard\u0131m konusunda bir karar verilinceye kadar har\u00e7, gider ve delil avans\u0131 al\u0131nmaz. Kanunlardaki \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmler sakl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 3 ) Gider avans\u0131n\u0131n yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, mahkemece bu eksikli\u011fin tamamlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in davac\u0131ya iki haftal\u0131k kesin s\u00fcre verilir. Dava \u015fart\u0131 olan gider avans\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 veya tamamlanmamas\u0131 halinde, dava, dava \u015fart\u0131 yoklu\u011fundan reddedilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 4 ) Taraflardan her biri ikamesini talep etti\u011fi delil i\u00e7in mahkemece belirlenen avans\u0131, verilen kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yat\u0131rmak zorundad\u0131r. Delil avans\u0131, taraflar\u0131n dayand\u0131klar\u0131 delillerin giderlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamak \u00fczere mahkemece belirlenen kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde \u00f6demeleri gereken mebla\u011f\u0131 ifade eder. Taraflar birlikte ayn\u0131 delilin ikamesini talep etmi\u015flerse, gereken gideri yar\u0131 yar\u0131ya avans olarak \u00f6derler. Taraflardan biri avans y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmedi\u011finde, di\u011fer taraf bu avans\u0131 da yat\u0131rabilir. Delil avans\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmayan taraf, o delilin ikamesinden vazge\u00e7mi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Taraflar\u0131n \u00fczerinde tasarruf edemeyecekleri dava ve i\u015flerle, kanunlardaki \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmler sakl\u0131d\u0131r<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 5 ) Delil avans\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesine, h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan dilek\u00e7elerin verilmesi, \u00f6n inceleme a\u015famas\u0131 veya tahkikat\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda karar verilir \u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fc getirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 45. maddesinde gider avans\u0131 ve delil avans\u0131 birlikte d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup, gider avans\u0131n\u0131n, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc tebligat ve posta \u00fccretleri, ke\u015fif giderleri, bilirki\u015fi ve tan\u0131k \u00fccretleri gibi giderler i\u00e7in davac\u0131dan al\u0131nan mebla\u011f\u0131 ifade etti\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n, her y\u0131l Bakanl\u0131k\u00e7a \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lacak gider avans\u0131 tarifesinde belirlenecek olan tutar\u0131 dava a\u00e7arken mahkeme veznesine yat\u0131rmak zorunda oldu\u011fu, delil avans\u0131n\u0131n ise taraflar\u0131n dayand\u0131klar\u0131 delillerin giderlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamak \u00fczere mahkemece belirlenen kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde \u00f6demeleri gereken mebla\u011f\u0131 ifade etti\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava, 29.07.2011 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, dava dilek\u00e7esi ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc daval\u0131ya 03.08.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f, daval\u0131 vekili cevap s\u00fcresinden sonra 31.10.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc davaya cevap vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekiline &#8220;t\u00fcm delilerini bildirmesi&#8221; i\u00e7in 9.2.2012 tarihli oturumda yoklu\u011funda &#8220;iki haftal\u0131k kesin mehil verilmesine&#8221; karar verildi\u011fi, ara karar\u0131na uyulmamas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131 sonucun kararda belirtildi\u011fi; kesin s\u00fcreye ili\u015fkin bu ara karar\u0131n\u0131n 16.2.2012 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, daval\u0131 vekilinin &#8220;tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n isim ve adreslerini&#8221; ihtiva eden delil listesini ise, kesin s\u00fcre sona erdikten sonra 03.04.2012 tarihinde mahkemeye verdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015flemi, s\u00fcresinde yapmayan taraf\u0131n o i\u015flemi yapma hakk\u0131 ortadan kalkar. ( HMK. m. 94\/3 )Mahkemece daval\u0131 vekiline verilen kesin s\u00fcre sadece &#8220;delil bildirmeye&#8221; ili\u015fkin olup, ara karar\u0131nda &#8220;delil avans\u0131n\u0131n&#8221; g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131, bu ara karar\u0131n\u0131 ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131lmaz. Delil bildirme i\u00e7in tan\u0131nan kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde, ikamesi talep edilecek deliller i\u00e7in avans belirlenip, bunun da g\u00f6sterilmesi ve belirlenen avans\u0131n ayn\u0131 kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n delil bildirmeyle ilgili ara karar\u0131nda yer almas\u0131 mecburiyeti de bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Taraflar\u0131n her birinin ikamesini talep etti\u011fi delil i\u00e7in mahkemece avans belirlenip, bunun yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ayr\u0131ca kesin s\u00fcre verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr ( 6100 s. HMK. m. 324\/1 ). Zira Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 45\/5.maddesinde de delil avans\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesine, hakim taraf\u0131ndan dilek\u00e7elerin verilmesi, \u00f6n inceleme a\u015famas\u0131 veya tahkikat\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda karar verilebilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Esasen daval\u0131ya delil bildirmesi i\u00e7in kesin s\u00fcre verildi\u011fi s\u0131rada daval\u0131n\u0131n ne t\u00fcr deliller bildirece\u011fi, tan\u0131k bildirecekse ka\u00e7 tan\u0131k bildirece\u011fi, tan\u0131klar\u0131n adresleri itibariyle mahkemece tan\u0131klar\u0131n davetiye ile mi \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 yoksa tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n talimat mahkemesi arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile mi al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ikamesi talep edilecek delilerin neler olaca\u011f\u0131 ve bu delillerin giderlerinin ne olaca\u011f\u0131 da mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan bilinmemektedir. Daval\u0131 kendisine usule uygun \u015fekilde verilen ve sadece \u201c delil bildirmeye\u201d y\u00f6nelik olan kesin s\u00fcrede delillerini bildirmemi\u015ftir. O halde, daval\u0131n\u0131n delil bildirme hakk\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan direnme karar\u0131 yerindedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ne var ki, \u00d6zel Daire i\u015fin esas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 incelememi\u015f bulundu\u011fundan, i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n \u00d6zel Daireye g\u00f6nderilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eyle direnme uygun bulundu\u011fundan, daval\u0131 vekilinin di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n 2.HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130NE G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 04.11.2015 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/1-1570<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2015\/2009<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 30.9.2015<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u00d6NCEL\u0130KLE TAPU M\u00dcD\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dcNE BA\u015eVURMA ZORUNLULU\u011eU ( Tapu Kayd\u0131nda D\u00fczeltim \u0130stenen \u015eahs\u0131n Has\u0131ms\u0131z Al\u0131nan Miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k Belgesine Dayal\u0131 Olarak \u0130sminin Yanl\u0131\u015f Yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Tescil \u0130\u015flemi Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6ncelikle \u0130lgili Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne Ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 E\u011fer Talebinde \u0130stedi\u011fi Sonucu Alamazsa Daha Sonra Mahkemeye Ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 Gerekece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TAPU M\u00dcD\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dcNE ZORUNLU \u0130DAR\u0130 BA\u015eVURU ( Tapu Kayd\u0131nda D\u00fczeltim \u0130stenen \u015eahs\u0131n Has\u0131ms\u0131z Al\u0131nan Miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k Belgesine Dayal\u0131 Olarak \u0130sminin Yanl\u0131\u015f Yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Tescil \u0130\u015flemi Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6ncelikle \u0130lgili Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne Ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 Gerekt\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TAPU KAYDINDA D\u00dcZELT\u0130M ( Has\u0131ms\u0131z Al\u0131nan Miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k Belgesine Dayal\u0131 Olarak \u0130sminin Yanl\u0131\u015f Yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Tescil \u0130\u015flemi Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6ncelikle \u0130lgili Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne Ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 E\u011fer Talebinde \u0130stedi\u011fi Sonucu Alamazsa Daha Sonra Mahkemeye Ba\u015fvuraca\u011f\u0131\/Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne Zorunlu \u0130dari Ba\u015fvuru )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 HASIMSIZ ALINAN M\u0130RAS\u00c7ILIK BELGES\u0130NE DAYALI \u0130SM\u0130N YANLI\u015e YAZILARAK TESC\u0130L ED\u0130LMES\u0130 ( Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne Zorunlu \u0130dari Ba\u015fvuru &#8211; Davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6ncelikle \u0130lgili Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne Ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 E\u011fer Talebinde \u0130stedi\u011fi Sonucu Alamazsa Daha Sonra Mahkemeye Ba\u015fvuraca\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4721\/m.702,1011,1013,1027<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\/m.28,74<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gere\u011fince \u00f6ncelikle tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvurma zorunlulu\u011funun bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r. Tapu kayd\u0131nda d\u00fczeltim istenen \u015fahs\u0131n has\u0131ms\u0131z al\u0131nan miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesine dayal\u0131 olarak isminin yanl\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tescil i\u015flemi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylece somut olayda T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 74\/3.maddesindeki ko\u015fullar\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu Hukuk Genel Kurulunda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca benimsenmi\u015ftir. \u00d6yle ise; yeni Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 17.8.2013 tarihinden sonra, davac\u0131n\u0131n, mahkemeye m\u00fcracaat etmeden, \u00f6ncelikle ilgili tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvurmas\u0131, e\u011fer bu talebinde istedi\u011fi sonucu alamazsa daha sonra mahkemeye ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 gerekece\u011fi tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; Yerel Mahkemece, Hukuk Genel Kurulunca da benimsenen \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131na uyulmak gerekirken, yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8221; tapu kayd\u0131nda d\u00fczeltim\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Samanda\u011f Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 10.04.2014 g\u00fcn ve 2013\/543 E-2014\/154 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 1.Hukuk Dairesinin 27.05.2014 g\u00fcn ve 2014\/9154 E-2014\/10354 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( \u2026 Dava, tapu kayd\u0131na yanl\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131lan kimlik bilgilerinin d\u00fczeltilmesi iste\u011fine ili\u015fkin olup 20.11.2013 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, mahkemece esastan karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n, kadastro tespiti ya da tapuya tescili s\u0131ras\u0131nda m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 sahibinin ad\u0131, soyad\u0131, baba ad\u0131 gibi kimlik bilgilerinin kayda eksik ya da hatal\u0131 i\u015flenmesi, kay\u0131t d\u00fczeltme taleplerinin kayna\u011f\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturur. Bu t\u00fcr taleplerde kimlik bilgileri d\u00fczeltilirken, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz malikinin de\u011fi\u015fmemesi, di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla m\u00fclkiyet aktar\u0131m\u0131na neden olunmamas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu talepler, 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 1027. maddesi gere\u011fince mahkemeye yap\u0131l\u0131rsa, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 382\/2-\u00e7-1 maddesi gere\u011fince \u00e7eki\u015fmesiz yarg\u0131 usul\u00fcne g\u00f6re sulh hukuk mahkemesinde ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin bulundu\u011fundan, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 12. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bulundu\u011fu yer mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bunun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, 01.01.2002 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren TMK&#8217;n\u0131n 702. maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince ortaklardan her birinin toplulu\u011fa giren haklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilece\u011fi ve bu korumadan b\u00fct\u00fcn ortaklar\u0131n yararlanabilece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinde, ortaklardan her hangi biri de tek ba\u015f\u0131na tapuda murisin kimlik bilgileri ilgili olarak d\u00fczeltme isteyebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bununla birlikte, Bakanlar Kurulunun 22.7.2013 tarihli ve 2013\/5150 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile kabul edilen, 17.8.2013 tarihli ve 28738 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren yeni Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 28. maddesinde, k\u00fct\u00fck sayfas\u0131 malik s\u00fctununda malikin ad\u0131 ve soyad\u0131, baba ad\u0131 ile edinme nedeni, tarih ve yevmiye numaras\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, t\u00fczel ki\u015filerin unvanlar\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak yaz\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 ve payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyette pay miktar\u0131; payda\u015flar\u0131n ad\u0131, soyad\u0131 ve baba ad\u0131ndan sonraki k\u0131s\u0131mda, kesirli olarak g\u00f6sterilece\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayn\u0131 T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 72. maddesinde, \u201cTapu sicilinde de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin, hak sahibinin istemine ya da yetkili makam veya mahkeme karar\u0131na istinaden yap\u0131labilece\u011fi\u201d 74. maddesinde ise \u201cK\u00fct\u00fck, yevmiye defteri ve yard\u0131mc\u0131 sicillerde, belgelere ayk\u0131r\u0131 basit yaz\u0131m hatas\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi h\u00e2linde, m\u00fcd\u00fcr taraf\u0131ndan nedeni d\u00fczeltmeler sicilinde a\u00e7\u0131klanarak, re&#8217;sen d\u00fczeltme yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, istem belgesinde yap\u0131lan yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k veya eksiklik d\u00fczeltilerek, belgenin uygun bir yerine yaz\u0131lmak suretiyle taraflar ve tapu g\u00f6revlilerince imzalanaca\u011f\u0131 ve sicilde buna uygun d\u00fczeltme yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, ana veya yard\u0131mc\u0131 siciller \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hata veya eksikliklerin, ilgililerce sunulan veya ba\u015fka idarelerce d\u00fczenlenen belgelerden kaynaklanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, ilgililerin ger\u00e7ek durumu kan\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 belgelere dayal\u0131 ba\u015fvurular\u0131 \u00fczerine, istem, yevmiye defterine kaydedilerek gerekli d\u00fczeltme yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, k\u00fct\u00fck, yevmiye defteri ve yard\u0131mc\u0131 sicillerde, belgelere ayk\u0131r\u0131 tescil veya esasl\u0131 yaz\u0131m hatas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilebilmesi i\u00e7in ilgililerin yaz\u0131l\u0131 olurunun al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, ilgililerden birisinin yaz\u0131l\u0131 oluru olmazsa, bu durum beyanlar s\u00fctununda belirtilerek, 26.9.2011 tarih ve 659 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lacak d\u00fczeltmeler hatal\u0131 yaz\u0131mdan sonra hak sahibi olmu\u015f ki\u015filerin hakk\u0131n\u0131 etkileyici nitelikte ise, bu hak sahiplerinin de yaz\u0131l\u0131 olurlar\u0131n\u0131n aranaca\u011f\u0131, m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ilgililerin bilgisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemleri tebli\u011f etmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc&#8221; oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 75. maddesine g\u00f6re, \u201cKadastro \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131ndan kaynaklanan malikin veya hak sahibinin ad\u0131, soyad\u0131 ve baba ad\u0131na ili\u015fkin tapu k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcndeki yaz\u0131m hatalar\u0131 ilgilisinin ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 1 ) a ) Senetsizden tespitlerde; n\u00fcfus kay\u0131t \u00f6rne\u011fi ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bulundu\u011fu belediye veya muhtarl\u0131ktan al\u0131nacak foto\u011frafl\u0131 ilm\u00fchaber,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b ) Kayda dayal\u0131 tespitlerde; dayana\u011f\u0131 kay\u0131t ve belgeler, incelenmek ve gerekti\u011finde tan\u0131k ve varsa tespit bilirki\u015fileri dinlemek ve zeminde inceleme yapmak suretiyle istemin ger\u00e7ek hak sahibinden geldi\u011fi belirlenirse, istemin yevmiye defterine kaydedilerek d\u00fczeltilece\u011fi;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) Zeminde incelemenin, kadastro m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc teknik personeli ile birlikte yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 ve inceleme neticesinde teknik rapor d\u00fczenlenece\u011fi, zeminde incelemede, kom\u015fu parsel malikleri, muhtar ve di\u011fer ilgililer dinlenece\u011fi; vergi kayd\u0131 ve di\u011fer her t\u00fcrl\u00fc bilgi ve belgeden yararlan\u0131laca\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 3 ) Tapu sicilindeki bilgilerin g\u00fcncellenmesi ve eksikliklerin giderilmesinde de yukar\u0131daki f\u0131kralar\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 ve<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 4 ) Bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca kay\u0131t d\u00fczeltmeleri i\u00e7in m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklere ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu oldu\u011fu&#8221;,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">belirtilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yine ayn\u0131 T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 26. maddesine g\u00f6re ise mevzuat ve bu T\u00fcz\u00fckte yer alan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere uygun olmayan ve 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 1011 inci maddesine g\u00f6re ge\u00e7ici tescil \u015ferhine de imk\u00e2n bulunmayan istemlerin geciktirilmeden, gerek\u00e7esi, itiraz yeri ve s\u00fcresi de belirtilmek suretiyle reddedilece\u011fi, ret karar\u0131n\u0131n, istem sahibine elden veya 11.2.1959 tarih ve 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f edilece\u011fi ve ret karar\u0131na, tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ba\u011fl\u0131 bulundu\u011fu b\u00f6lge m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne, b\u00f6lge m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 da tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe itiraz edilebilece\u011fi belirtilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan yeni Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve \u00f6zelikle 75. maddesi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklerine olduk\u00e7a geni\u015f yetkiler verilerek tapudaki hatalar\u0131n daha k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcrede, idari yoldan d\u00fczeltilmesine imk\u00e2n verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Yine bu maddenin son f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise \u201cBu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca kay\u0131t d\u00fczeltmeleri i\u00e7in m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklere ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc k\u0131s\u0131tlamamakta, aksine hak arayanlara haklar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ok daha k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcrede, kolay, ucuz ve basit bir \u015fekilde elde etme imk\u00e2n\u0131 vermektedir. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, bu imk\u00e2n\u0131n \u00f6ncelikle t\u00fcketilmesi ve bu yolla bir sonu\u00e7 al\u0131namamas\u0131 durumunda ilgilinin 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunun 1027. maddesi gere\u011fince mahkemeye ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu bulunmaktad\u0131r<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle, yeni Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 17.8.2013 tarihinden sonra, davac\u0131n\u0131n, mahkemeye m\u00fcracaat etmeden, \u00f6ncelikle ilgili tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan prosed\u00fcre uygun \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurmas\u0131, e\u011fer bu talebinde istedi\u011fi sonucu alamazsa daha sonra mahkemeye ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gere\u011fince \u00f6ncelikle tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvurma zorunlulu\u011fu getiren yasal prosed\u00fcr izlenmeden do\u011frudan dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Dava, tapu kayd\u0131ndaki ismin d\u00fczeltilmesi ve tescili istemlerine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili, Samanda\u011f Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinde daval\u0131 \u011eazi Teker hakk\u0131nda ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davalar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu dosyalarda tapudaki isim yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi i\u00e7in kendilerine yetki verildi\u011fi, 2029, 2027, 2183 ve 2609 parsel say\u0131s\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tapuda Gazi Teker ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011funu, oysa ki ad\u0131n\u0131n \u201c\u011eazi\u201d oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek dava konusu tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131na uygun olarak \u201c\u011eazi Teker\u201d olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine ve bu \u015fekliyle tapuya tesciline karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekili, davan\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece; \u011eazi T.&#8217;in isminin veraset karar\u0131na yanl\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tapu kayd\u0131na da yanl\u0131\u015f kay\u0131t edildi\u011fi, bu haliyle maddi hatan\u0131n var oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fcn daval\u0131 Tapu Sicil M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6zel Dairece;&#8221; &#8230;davan\u0131n, tapu kayd\u0131na yanl\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131lan kimlik bilgilerinin d\u00fczeltilmesi iste\u011fine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu ve davan\u0131n 20.11.2013 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkemece esastan karar verildi\u011fi, bu nedenle, yeni Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 17.8.2013 tarihinden sonra, davac\u0131n\u0131n, mahkemeye m\u00fcracaat etmeden, \u00f6ncelikle ilgili tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne prosed\u00fcre uygun \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurmas\u0131, e\u011fer bu talebinde istedi\u011fi sonucu alamazsa daha sonra mahkemeye ba\u015fvurmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekece\u011fi, hal b\u00f6yle olunca, Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gere\u011fince \u00f6ncelikle tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvurma zorunlulu\u011fu getiren yasal prosed\u00fcr izlenmeden do\u011frudan dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmesinin gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesinin do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8230;\u201dgerek\u00e7esiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na ile karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, \u00f6nceki gerek\u00e7elerle ilk kararda direnilmi\u015f; direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc daval\u0131 Tapu Sicil M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekili temyize getirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme yoluyla Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gere\u011fince \u00f6ncelikle tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvurma zorunlulu\u011funun bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ncelikle, tapu kayd\u0131nda d\u00fczeltim davas\u0131n\u0131n yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 ve ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n irdelenmesinde yarar vard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 702.maddesi uyar\u0131nca, \u2018&#8217;\u2026 Ortaklar\u0131n haklar\u0131 ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri, toplulu\u011fu do\u011furan kanun veya s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile belirlenir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanunda veya s\u00f6zle\u015fmede aksine bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a, gerek y\u00f6netim, gerek tasarruf i\u015flemleri i\u00e7in ortaklar\u0131n oybirli\u011fiyle karar vermeleri gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan topluluk devam etti\u011fi s\u00fcrece, payla\u015fma yap\u0131lamaz ve bir pay \u00fczerinde tasarrufta bulunulamaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ortaklardan her biri, toplulu\u011fa giren haklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilir. Bu korumadan b\u00fct\u00fcn ortaklar yararlan\u0131r.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanunun 1011.maddesinde ise;&#8221;\u2026 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki h\u00e2llerde ge\u00e7ici tescil \u015ferhi verilebilir:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1. \u0130ddia edilen bir ayn\u00ee hakk\u0131n g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekiyorsa,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2. Tasarruf yetkisini belirleyen belgelerdeki noksanl\u0131klar\u0131n sonradan tamamlanmas\u0131na kanun olanak tan\u0131yorsa.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ge\u00e7ici tescil \u015ferhi, b\u00fct\u00fcn ilgililerin raz\u0131 olmas\u0131na veya h\u00e2kimin karar vermesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. \u015ferhin konusu olan hak sonradan ger\u00e7ekle\u015firse, \u015ferh tarihinden ba\u015flayarak \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere kar\u015f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ge\u00e7ici tescil \u015ferhi verilmesi istemi \u00fczerine h\u00e2kim, taraflar\u0131 dinleyerek veya dosya \u00fczerinde inceleme yaparak \u015ferhe konu olan hakk\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilece\u011fi kanaat\u0131na var\u0131rsa, \u015ferh karar\u0131 verir. Kararda \u015ferhin etki bak\u0131m\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi ve i\u00e7eri\u011fi belirlenir; gerekti\u011finde mahkemeye ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir s\u00fcre verilir.&#8221;d\u00fczenlemesine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An\u0131lan Kanunun 1013.maddesinde, \u2018&#8217;\u2026Tescil, tasarrufa konu olan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz malikinin yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyan\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Edinen kimse, kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcne, kesinle\u015fmi\u015f mahkeme karar\u0131na veya buna e\u015fde\u011fer bir belgeye dayan\u0131yorsa, bu beyana gerek yoktur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir ayn\u00ee hakk\u0131 tescilden \u00f6nce kazanan kimse, gerekli belgeleri ibraz ederek tescili isteyebilir.&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayn\u0131 Kanunun \u2018&#8217;D\u00fczeltme&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 1027. maddesinde de;&#8221;\u2026 \u0130lgililerin yaz\u0131l\u0131 r\u0131zalar\u0131 olmad\u0131k\u00e7a, tapu memuru, tapu sicilindeki yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak mahkeme karar\u0131yla d\u00fczeltebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">D\u00fczeltme, eski tescilin terkini ve yeni bir tescilin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 bi\u00e7iminde de olabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tapu memuru, basit yaz\u0131 yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, t\u00fcz\u00fck kurallar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca resen d\u00fczeltir.&#8221; hususu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6te yandan; Bakanlar Kurulunun 22.7.2013 tarihli ve 2013\/5150 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile kabul edilen, 17.8.2013 tarihli ve 28738 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren yeni Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 28. maddesinde, k\u00fct\u00fck sayfas\u0131 malik s\u00fctununda malikin ad\u0131 ve soyad\u0131, baba ad\u0131 ile edinme nedeni, tarih ve yevmiye numaras\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, t\u00fczel ki\u015filerin unvanlar\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak yaz\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 ve payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyette pay miktar\u0131; payda\u015flar\u0131n ad\u0131, soyad\u0131 ve baba ad\u0131ndan sonraki k\u0131s\u0131mda, kesirli olarak g\u00f6sterilece\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 74. Maddesinde;&#8221;\u2026 ( 1 ) K\u00fct\u00fck, yevmiye defteri ve yard\u0131mc\u0131 sicillerde, belgelere ayk\u0131r\u0131 basit yaz\u0131m hatas\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi h\u00e2linde, m\u00fcd\u00fcr taraf\u0131ndan nedeni d\u00fczeltmeler sicilinde a\u00e7\u0131klanarak, re&#8217;sen d\u00fczeltme yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) \u0130stem belgesinde yap\u0131lan yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k veya eksiklik d\u00fczeltilerek belgenin uygun bir yerine yaz\u0131lmak suretiyle taraflar ve tapu g\u00f6revlilerince imzalan\u0131r ve sicilde buna uygun d\u00fczeltme yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 3 ) Ana veya yard\u0131mc\u0131 siciller \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hata veya eksikliklerin, ilgililerce sunulan veya ba\u015fka idarelerce d\u00fczenlenen belgelerden kaynaklanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, ilgililerin ger\u00e7ek durumu kan\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 belgelere dayal\u0131 ba\u015fvurular\u0131 \u00fczerine, istem yevmiye defterine kaydedilerek gerekli d\u00fczeltme yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 4 ) K\u00fct\u00fck, yevmiye defteri ve yard\u0131mc\u0131 sicillerde, belgelere ayk\u0131r\u0131 tescil veya esasl\u0131 yaz\u0131m hatas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilebilmesi i\u00e7in ilgililerin yaz\u0131l\u0131 olurunun al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir. \u0130lgililerden birisinin yaz\u0131l\u0131 oluru olmazsa, bu durum beyanlar s\u00fctununda belirtilerek, 26\/9\/2011 tarih ve 659 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re i\u015flem yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 5 ) Yap\u0131lacak d\u00fczeltmeler hatal\u0131 yaz\u0131mdan sonra hak sahibi olmu\u015f ki\u015filerin hakk\u0131n\u0131 etkileyici nitelikte ise, bu hak sahiplerinin de yaz\u0131l\u0131 olurlar\u0131 aran\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 6 ) M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck, ilgililerin bilgisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemleri tebli\u011f etmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.&#8221;denilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An\u0131lan T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 75. maddesine g\u00f6re de; \u201cKadastro \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131ndan kaynaklanan malikin veya hak sahibinin ad\u0131, soyad\u0131 ve baba ad\u0131na ili\u015fkin tapu k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcndeki yaz\u0131m hatalar\u0131 ilgilisinin ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 1 ) a ) Senetsizden tespitlerde; n\u00fcfus kay\u0131t \u00f6rne\u011fi ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bulundu\u011fu belediye veya muhtarl\u0131ktan al\u0131nacak foto\u011frafl\u0131 ilm\u00fchaber,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b ) Kayda dayal\u0131 tespitlerde; dayana\u011f\u0131 kay\u0131t ve belgeler, incelenmek ve gerekti\u011finde tan\u0131k ve varsa tespit bilirki\u015fileri dinlemek ve zeminde inceleme yapmak suretiyle istemin ger\u00e7ek hak sahibinden geldi\u011fi belirlenirse, istemin yevmiye defterine kaydedilerek,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">d\u00fczeltilece\u011fi;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) Zeminde incelemenin, kadastro m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc teknik personeli ile birlikte yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 ve inceleme neticesinde teknik rapor d\u00fczenlenece\u011fi, zeminde incelemede, kom\u015fu parsel malikleri, muhtar ve di\u011fer ilgililer dinlenece\u011fi; vergi kayd\u0131 ve di\u011fer her t\u00fcrl\u00fc bilgi ve belgeden yararlan\u0131laca\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 3 ) Tapu sicilindeki bilgilerin g\u00fcncellenmesi ve eksikliklerin giderilmesinde de yukar\u0131daki f\u0131kralar\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 ve<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 4 ) Bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca kay\u0131t d\u00fczeltmeleri i\u00e7in m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklere ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu oldu\u011fu&#8221; belirtilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 26. maddesine g\u00f6re ise; mevzuat ve bu T\u00fcz\u00fckte yer alan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere uygun olmayan ve 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 1011 inci maddesine g\u00f6re ge\u00e7ici tescil \u015ferhine de imk\u00e2n bulunmayan istemlerin geciktirilmeden, gerek\u00e7esi, itiraz yeri ve s\u00fcresi de belirtilmek suretiyle reddedilece\u011fi, ret karar\u0131n\u0131n, istem sahibine elden veya 11.2.1959 tarih ve 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f edilece\u011fi ve ret karar\u0131na, tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ba\u011fl\u0131 bulundu\u011fu b\u00f6lge m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne, b\u00f6lge m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 da tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe itiraz edilebilece\u011fi belirtilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve \u00f6zelikle 75. maddesi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklerine olduk\u00e7a geni\u015f yetkiler verilerek tapudaki hatalar\u0131n daha k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcrede, idari yoldan d\u00fczeltilmesine imk\u00e2n verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Yine bu maddenin son f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise \u201cBu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca kay\u0131t d\u00fczeltmeleri i\u00e7in m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklere ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">T\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131ndan ve yukar\u0131daki belirtilen yasal a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; tapu kayd\u0131nda d\u00fczeltim istenen \u015fahs\u0131n has\u0131ms\u0131z al\u0131nan miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesine dayal\u0131 olarak isminin yanl\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tescil i\u015flemi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylece somut olayda T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 74\/3.maddesindeki ko\u015fullar\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu Hukuk Genel Kurulunda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca benimsenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6yle ise; yeni Tapu Sicil T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 17.8.2013 tarihinden sonra, davac\u0131n\u0131n, mahkemeye m\u00fcracaat etmeden, \u00f6ncelikle ilgili tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan prosed\u00fcre uygun \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurmas\u0131, e\u011fer bu talebinde istedi\u011fi sonucu alamazsa daha sonra mahkemeye ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 gerekece\u011fi tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u00fcyeler taraf\u0131ndan, yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011fu belirtilerek onanmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de, bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f Kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu taraf\u0131ndan yukar\u0131da belirtilen nedenlerle benimsenmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; Yerel Mahkemece, Hukuk Genel Kurulunca da benimsenen \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131na uyulmak gerekirken, yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle direnme karar\u0131 bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Daval\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da ve \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, 30.09.2015 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde yap\u0131lan ikinci g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2015\/22-1052<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2015\/1612<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 17.6.2015<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARININ BEL\u0130RS\u0130Z ALACAK DAVASINA KONU OLUP OLAMAYACA\u011eI ( Yarg\u0131tay 9. ve 22. Hukuk Dairesi Aras\u0131ndaki \u0130\u00e7tihat Farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Taraflar Aras\u0131nda \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma S\u00fcresi Ve \u00dccret Miktar\u0131n\u0131n Tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 Olmas\u0131n\u0131n Tek Ba\u015f\u0131na Alaca\u011f\u0131 Belirsiz Hale Getirmeyece\u011fi\/Davada Bilirki\u015fi \u0130ncelemesine Gidilmesinin Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131n\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131labilmesi \u0130\u00e7in Yeterli Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/\u015eartlar\u0131 Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Halde Dava Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 Olarak A\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Davac\u0131ya Herhangi Bir S\u00fcre Verilmeden Hukuki Yarar Yoklu\u011fundan Davan\u0131n Reddi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACA\u011eININ BEL\u0130RL\u0130 OLUP OLMADI\u011eI KR\u0130TERLER\u0130 ( \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin Davan\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tarihte Alaca\u011f\u0131n Miktar\u0131n\u0131 Yahut De\u011ferini Tam Kesin ve Objektif Olarak Belirleyebilmesinin Kendisinden Beklenemeyece\u011fi Bir Durum Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi &#8211; Alaca\u011f\u0131n De\u011feri Veya Miktar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130\u015fverenin Verece\u011fi Bilgi Veya Tahkikat A\u015famas\u0131nda &#8220;Bilirki\u015fiden Hesap Raporu Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Gibi&#8221; Belirlenebilecek Hale Gelmesi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI ( Fark \u00dccret \u0130le Fark \u0130kramiye Alacaklar\u0131ndan Olu\u015fan Davaya Konu Her Bir Alacak Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u00d6l\u00e7\u00fctler Uygulanarak Belirleme Yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; \u015eartlar\u0131 Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Halde Dava Dilek\u00e7esinde Davan\u0131n Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 Olarak A\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Durumda Davac\u0131ya Herhangi Bir S\u00fcre Verilmeden Hukuki Yarar Yoklu\u011fundan Davan\u0131n Reddi Yoluna Gidilmesi Gerekti\u011fi\/K\u0131smi Dava Olarak Kabul Edilip Karar Verilemeyece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 BEL\u0130RS\u0130Z ALACAK DAVASI ( Davac\u0131n\u0131n Alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Miktar Veya De\u011ferini Belirleyebilmesi \u0130\u00e7in Elinde Bulunmas\u0131 Gerekli Bilgi Ve Belgelere Sahip Olmamas\u0131 Ve Bu Belgelere Dava A\u00e7ma Haz\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 D\u00f6neminde Ula\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n da &#8220;Ger\u00e7ekten&#8221; M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmamas\u0131 Ve Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Alaca\u011f\u0131n Miktar\u0131n\u0131n Belirlenmesinin Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf\u0131n Elinde Bulunan Bilgi Ve Belgelerin Sunulmas\u0131yla M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Hale Gelece\u011fi Durumlarda Alaca\u011f\u0131n Belirsiz Kabul Edilece\u011fi &#8211; Davada Bilirki\u015fi \u0130ncelemesine Gidilmesinin Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131n\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131labilmesi \u0130\u00e7in Yeterli Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Davada Bilirki\u015fiye Ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131na Ra\u011fmen Davac\u0131 Dava A\u00e7arken Alacak Miktar\u0131n\u0131 Belirleyebiliyorsa Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 BEL\u0130RS\u0130Z \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACA\u011eI ( Taraflar Aras\u0131nda \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma S\u00fcresi Ve \u00dccret Miktar\u0131n\u0131n Tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 Olmas\u0131n\u0131n Tek Ba\u015f\u0131na Alaca\u011f\u0131 Belirsiz Hale Getirmedi\u011fi &#8211; Davac\u0131n\u0131n Ne Zamandan Beri \u00c7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 Veya \u00dccretinin Ne Kadar Oldu\u011funu Bilmemesinin Hayat\u0131n Ola\u011fan Ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Olaca\u011f\u0131\/Davac\u0131 \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin Kendisinin Bilmedi\u011fi \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma S\u00fcresini Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Bildi\u011fini Veya Bilirki\u015finin Bilece\u011fini Farzetmenin \u0130spat Kurallar\u0131na da Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Olaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 KISM\u0130 DAVA ( \u0130\u015f\u00e7ilik Alacaklar\u0131\/Alacak Belirli Veya Belirlenebilir \u0130se Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 Ancak \u015eartlar\u0131 Varsa K\u0131smi Dava A\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi &#8211; Davan\u0131n Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 Olarak A\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u015e\u00fcphe Bulunmamas\u0131na G\u00f6re K\u0131smi Dava Olarak Kabul Edilip Sonuca Gidilmesinin Do\u011fru Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Davada Talep Edilen \u0130\u015f\u00e7ilik Alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n Belirsiz Alacak Olarak Kabul Edilemeyece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 BEL\u0130RS\u0130Z ALACAK DAVASI \u0130LE KISM\u0130 DAVAYA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N D\u00dcZENLEMEDEK\u0130 SINIR ( 6100 S.K. \u0130le Birlikte Kabul Edilen Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 \u0130le K\u0131smi Davaya \u0130li\u015fkin Yeni D\u00fczenlemedeki S\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n Tam Olarak Tespit Edilemedi\u011fi\/Bu \u0130ki Davan\u0131n Amac\u0131 ve Niteli\u011finin Ayr\u0131 Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Alacak Belirli veya Belirlenebilir \u0130se Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 Ancak \u015eartlar\u0131 Varsa K\u0131smi Dava A\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 HUKUK\u0130 YARAR \u015eARTI \/ TAMAMLANAB\u0130L\u0130R DAVA \u015eARTI ( Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131\/K\u0131smi Dava &#8211; \u015eartlar\u0131 Olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Halde Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 Halinde Eksiklik S\u00fcre Verilerek Tamamlanamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan Davan\u0131n Hukuki Yarar Yoklu\u011fundan Reddedilmesi Gerekti\u011fi Halde K\u0131smi Dava Olarak Kabul Edilip Karar Verilemeyece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TALEB\u0130N MU\u011eLAK N\u0130TEL\u0130KTE OLMASI ( Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131n\u0131n Ama\u00e7 Ve Nitelik Olarak K\u0131smi Davadan Farkl\u0131 Olmas\u0131 &#8211; Talep T\u00fcr\u00fc Ve Davan\u0131n Niteli\u011fi A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a Anla\u015f\u0131lam\u0131yorsa 6100 S.K. Md. 119\/2 Gere\u011fince Davac\u0131ya Bir Haftal\u0131k Kesin S\u00fcre Verilerek Talebinin Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 m\u0131 Yoksa K\u0131smi Dava m\u0131 Oldu\u011funun Belirtilmesinin \u0130stenmesi Gerekti\u011fi\/Talep Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 \u015eeklinde A\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f Olmakla Birlikte Ger\u00e7ekte Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 \u015eartlar\u0131n\u0131 Ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131yorsa Hukuki Yarar Yoklu\u011fundan Davan\u0131n Reddedilece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TALEPLE BA\u011eLILIK \u0130LKES\u0130 ( \u0130\u015f\u00e7ilik Alacaklar\u0131\/Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 m\u0131 K\u0131smi Dava m\u0131 Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Davac\u0131 Vekilinin Talebinin A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 Oldu\u011fu Halde Mahkemece Davan\u0131n K\u0131smi Dava Kabul Edilerek Karar Verilmesinin Do\u011fru Olmayaca\u011f\u0131\/Somut Olay Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 \u015eartlar\u0131n\u0131n da Olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m. 24,26,107,109,119<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> I- ) Hukuk Genel Kurulundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler a\u015famas\u0131nda davac\u0131 vekilince verilen dilek\u00e7e ile i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na konu olup olamayaca\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi ile 22. Hukuk dairesi kararlar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki i\u00e7tihat farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi i\u00e7in \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n\u0131n Birle\u015ftirilmesi talebinde bulunuldu\u011fu, talebinin sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131na kadar ertelenmesi talep edilmi\u015ftir. \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n Birle\u015ftirilmesi talebinin Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Divan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan hen\u00fcz kabul edilip g\u00fcndeme al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeni ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin ertelenmesi talebinin reddine oybirli\u011fi ile karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">II- ) Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava m\u0131, yoksa belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 m\u0131 oldu\u011fu, fark \u00fccret ile fark ikramiye alacaklar\u0131ndan olu\u015fan alacaklar\u0131n belirsiz alacak t\u00fcr\u00fcnde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 buna g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktalar\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">III- )1- ) Davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 t\u00fcr\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibariyle uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa konu alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar veya de\u011ferinin tam ve kesin olarak davac\u0131 tarafca belirlenememesi gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Her bir davaya konu alacak bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerin somut olaya uygulanarak, belirleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklidir. Alacak, belirli veya belirlenebilir ise, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lamaz; ancak \u015fartlar\u0131 varsa k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- )Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, esasen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin kesintisiz olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen i\u015fyeri kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda aral\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi, i\u015fverenin hileli i\u015flemleriyle davac\u0131n\u0131n ayl\u0131k \u00fccret miktar\u0131n\u0131n ve ikramiye hakedi\u015flerinin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle getirilen \u00fccret zamlar\u0131ndan yararland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vak\u0131alar\u0131na dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, i\u015fverenin s\u00f6zkonusu i\u015flemleri nedeniyle do\u011fan fark ayl\u0131k \u00fccret ve fark ikramiye alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsili talep edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ncelikle, taraflar aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi ve \u00fccret miktar\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 ise de salt s\u00f6zkonusu tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 belirsiz hale getirmez. Keza davac\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini ve \u00fccretini belirleyebilmektedir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n ne zamandan beri \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya \u00fccretinin ne kadar oldu\u011funu bilmemesi ayn\u0131 zamanda hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na da ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin kendisinin bilmedi\u011fi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini, tan\u0131klar\u0131n bildi\u011fini veya bilirki\u015finin bilece\u011fini farzetmek ispat kurallar\u0131na da hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na da ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Keza taraf\u0131n yeterli \u015fekilde somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131p kendisinin bilgisinde dahi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti\u011fi bir hususun mahkemece bilinmesini beklemek de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- ) Zaman zaman, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile birlikte kabul edilen belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 ile k\u0131smi davaya ili\u015fkin yeni d\u00fczenlemedeki s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n tam olarak tespit edilemedi\u011fi, birinin di\u011feri yerine kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Oysa bu iki davan\u0131n amac\u0131 ve niteli\u011fi ayr\u0131d\u0131r. Alacak, belirli veya belirlenebilir ise, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lamaz; ancak \u015fartlar\u0131 varsa k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4- ) Davac\u0131 vekili, dava dilek\u00e7esinin sonu\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131nda talep etti\u011fi her alacak i\u00e7in bir miktar yazd\u0131ktan sonra parantez i\u00e7inde \u201cbelirsiz\u201d ibaresini kullanarak i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re alacak miktar\u0131n\u0131n art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talepli dilek\u00e7esinde ise \u201cbelirsiz alacak davas\u0131ndaki\u201d taleplerini art\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davas\u0131n\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a beyan etmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 vekilinin talebinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 oldu\u011fu halde mahkemece davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava kabul edilerek karar verilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eartlar\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde dava dilek\u00e7esinde davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumda davac\u0131ya herhangi bir s\u00fcre verilmeden hukuki yarar yoklu\u011fundan davan\u0131n reddi yoluna gidilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;i\u015f\u00e7ilik alaca\u011f\u0131&#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Kayseri 1.\u0130\u015f Mahkemesince davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 20.12.2013 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/562 E.-2013\/828 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi taraf vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 22.Hukuk Dairesinin 04.03.2014 g\u00fcn ve 2014\/3767 E.-2014\/4758 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkili i\u015f\u00e7inin daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde kesintisiz \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin devam etti\u011fi bir tarihte m\u00fcvekkili i\u015f\u00e7iyi resmi kay\u0131tlarda i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f gibi g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini, daha sonra ise kayden yeniden i\u015fe giri\u015finin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, muvazaal\u0131 i\u015fe girdi \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 i\u015flemlerinde i\u015fverenin amac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerinde uygulanan toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle verilen \u00fccret zamlar\u0131ndan i\u015f\u00e7iyi mahrum etmek ve yeni bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyle i\u015fe ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f gibi g\u00f6stererek i\u015f\u00e7i \u00fccretlerinin asgari \u00fccret seviyesine d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesi oldu\u011funu, kanuna kar\u015f\u0131 hile olan bu i\u015flem sonucunda m\u00fcvekkilinin \u00fccretinin i\u015fyerine yeni girmi\u015f bir i\u015f\u00e7i gibi asgari \u00fccret seviyesine indirildi\u011fini, toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle getirilen \u00fccret zamlar\u0131ndan yararland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ikramiye hakedi\u015flerinin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken bu i\u015flem nedeniyle do\u011fan fark i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, fark ayl\u0131k \u00fccret ve fark ikramiye alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekili, \u00f6ncelikle zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def&#8217;ini ileri s\u00fcrerek, davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin m\u00fcvekkiline ait i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n aral\u0131kl\u0131 oldu\u011funu, \u00f6nceki d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 sonunda davac\u0131n\u0131n serbest iradesiyle i\u015fverene dilek\u00e7e vererek i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini sonland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve t\u00fcm haklar\u0131n\u0131 alarak i\u015fvereni ibra etti\u011fini, daha sonra ise m\u00fcracaat\u0131 \u00fczerine tekrar i\u015fe ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 gibi di\u011fer i\u015f\u00e7ilere de i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015flar\u0131 sebebiyle ya ihbar s\u00fcrelerinin kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ya da ihbar tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011fini, ayr\u0131ca k\u0131dem tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131n ve sair alacaklar\u0131n da eksiksiz olarak \u00f6dendi\u011fini, taraflar aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yeni s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve belirlenen yeni \u00fccretten de sendikan\u0131n haberdar oldu\u011funu, ne sendikan\u0131n ne de davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccrete herhangi bir itirazda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n dava konusu alacaklara hak kazanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyanla davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, toplanan kan\u0131tlar ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna dayan\u0131larak yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar taraflar vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taraflar aras\u0131nda \u00f6ncelikle \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 t\u00fcr\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131p ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">01.10.2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 107. maddesiyle, m\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nda yer almayan yeni bir dava t\u00fcr\u00fc olarak belirsiz alacak ve tespit davas\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 107. maddesine g\u00f6re,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8221; ( 1 ) Davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 yahut de\u011ferini tam ve kesin olarak belirleyebilmesinin kendisinden beklenemeyece\u011fi veya bunun imk\u00e2ns\u0131z oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde alacakl\u0131, hukuki ili\u015fkiyi ve asgari bir miktar ya da de\u011feri belirtmek suretiyle belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n verdi\u011fi bilgi veya tahkikat sonucu alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131 veya de\u011ferinin tam ve kesin olarak belirlenebilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu anda davac\u0131, iddian\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131na tabi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda belirtmi\u015f oldu\u011fu talebini art\u0131rabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 3 ) Ayr\u0131ca, k\u0131smi eda davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131labildi\u011fi h\u00e2llerde, tespit davas\u0131 da a\u00e7\u0131labilir ve bu durumda hukuki yarar\u0131n var oldu\u011fu kabul edilir.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fck\u00fcmet tasar\u0131s\u0131nda yer almayan bu madde, T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi Adalet Komisyonu taraf\u0131ndan, esasen ba\u015ftan miktar veya de\u011feri tam tespit edilemeyen bir alacakla ilgili hak arama durumunda olan ki\u015finin, hukuk sisteminde kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcklerin bertaraf edilerek hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funca en geni\u015f \u015fekilde korunmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi \u00fczerinde durularak ihdas edilmi\u015f ve nihayetinde kanunla\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 t\u00fcr\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibariyle uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa konu alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar veya de\u011ferinin tam ve kesin olarak davac\u0131 tarafca belirlenememesi gereklidir. Belirleyememe hali, davac\u0131n\u0131n gerekli dikkat ve \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermesine ra\u011fmen miktar veya de\u011ferin belirlenmesinin kendisinden ger\u00e7ekten beklenilmemesi durumuna ya da objektif olarak imkans\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madde gerek\u00e7esinde &#8220;Alacakl\u0131n\u0131n bu t\u00fcr bir dava a\u00e7mas\u0131 i\u00e7in, dava a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 miktar ya da de\u011feri tam ve kesin olarak ger\u00e7ekten belirlemesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamal\u0131 ya da bu objektif olarak imkans\u0131z olmal\u0131d\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131lacak davan\u0131n miktar\u0131 biliniyor yahut tespit edilebiliyorsa, b\u00f6yle bir dava a\u00e7\u0131lamaz. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, her davada arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, burada da hukuki yarar aranacakt\u0131r, b\u00f6yle bir durumda hukuki yarar\u0131n bulundu\u011fundan s\u00f6z edilemez. \u00d6zellikle, k\u0131smi davaya ili\u015fkin yeni h\u00fck\u00fcmler de dikkate al\u0131n\u0131p birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, ba\u015ftan tespiti m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan hallerde bu yola ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 kabul edilemez.&#8221; \u015feklindeki a\u00e7\u0131klamayla, alaca\u011f\u0131n belirli veya belirlenebilir nitelikte olmas\u0131 durumunda, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131larak bu davan\u0131n sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 imkanlardan yararlanman\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 107\/2. maddesinde, sorunun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde yol g\u00f6sterici mahiyette kriterlere yer verilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan madde f\u0131kras\u0131nda, kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n verdi\u011fi bilgi veya tahkikat sonucu alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131 veya de\u011ferinin tam ve kesin olarak belirlenebilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu anda davac\u0131n\u0131n, iddian\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131na tabi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda belirtmi\u015f oldu\u011fu talebini art\u0131rabilece\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, madde gerek\u00e7esinde de &#8220;kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n verdi\u011fi bilgiler ve sundu\u011fu delillerle ya da delillerin incelenmesi ve tahkikat i\u015flemleri sonucu ( \u00f6rne\u011fin bilirki\u015fi ya da ke\u015fif incelemesi sonucu )&#8221; belirlenebilme hali a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n miktar veya de\u011ferini belirleyebilmesi i\u00e7in elinde bulunmas\u0131 gerekli bilgi ve belgelere sahip olmamas\u0131 ve bu belgelere dava a\u00e7ma haz\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6neminde ula\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n da ( ger\u00e7ekten ) m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinin kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n elinde bulunan bilgi ve belgelerin sunulmas\u0131yla m\u00fcmk\u00fcn hale gelece\u011fi durumlarda alacak belirsiz kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S\u0131rf taraflar aras\u0131nda alacak miktar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmas\u0131, talep sonucunun belirlenmesinin davac\u0131dan beklenemeyecek olmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmez. \u00d6nemli olan objektif olarak talep sonucunun belirlenmesinin davac\u0131dan beklenemeyecek olmas\u0131d\u0131r ( H. Pekcan\u0131tez, Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131, Ankara 2011, s. 45; H. Pekcan\u0131tez\/O. Atalay\/M. \u00d6zekes, Medeni Usul Hukuku, 14. Bas\u0131, Ankara 2013, s. 448 ). Sadece alacak miktar\u0131nda taraflar aras\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmas\u0131 ya da miktar\u0131n tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli say\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, neredeyse t\u00fcm davalar\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak kabul\u00fc gerekir ki, bu da kanunun amac\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, zaten uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulundu\u011fu i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7\u0131lmakta ve uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcne gelmektedir. \u00d6nemli olan davac\u0131n\u0131n talebini belirli k\u0131lacak imkana sahip olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Burada, alaca\u011f\u0131n belirlenebilir olmas\u0131 ile ispat edilebilirli\u011finin de ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Davac\u0131n\u0131n talep etti\u011fi alaca\u011f\u0131 belirlemesi objektif olarak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn, ancak belirleyebildi\u011fi alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispat etmesi, kanunun \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fekilde ( elindeki delillerle ) m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011filse, burada da belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131laca\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemez. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, bir alaca\u011f\u0131n belirlenmesi ile onun ispat\u0131 ayr\u0131 \u015feylerdir. Davac\u0131, talep konusu yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ok net \u015fekilde belirleyebilir; ancak her zaman onu ispat edecek durumda olmayabilir. Aksinin kabul\u00fc, her ispat g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olan alaca\u011f\u0131 belirsiz alaca\u011fa d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrmek gibi, hem kanunun amac\u0131na hem de genel ilkelere ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir durumu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kartabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenebilmesinin, tahkikat a\u015famas\u0131nda yap\u0131lacak delillerin incelenmesi, bilirki\u015fi incelemesi veya ke\u015fif gibi sair i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu durumlarda da belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi kabul edilmelidir. Ne var ki, bir davada bilirki\u015fi incelemesine gidilmesi belirsiz alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir. Bir davada bilirki\u015fiye ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen davac\u0131 dava a\u00e7arken alacak miktar\u0131n\u0131 belirleyebiliyorsa, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lamaz ( C. Simil, Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131, I. Bas\u0131, \u0130stanbul 2013, s. 225 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kategorik olarak, belirli bir t\u00fcr davan\u0131n veya belirli ki\u015filerin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davalar\u0131n ba\u015ftan belirli veya belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 oldu\u011fundan da s\u00f6z edilemez. Her bir davaya konu alacak bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerin somut olaya uygulanarak, belirleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hakime alacak miktar\u0131n\u0131n tayin ve tespitinde takdir yetkisi tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 hallerde ( \u00d6rn: 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu md 50, 51,56 ), hakimin kullanaca\u011f\u0131 takdir yetkisi sonucu alacak belirli hale gelebilece\u011finden, davac\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibariyle alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 yahut de\u011ferini tam ve kesin olarak belirleyebilmesinin imkans\u0131z oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir. \u00d6rne\u011fin, i\u015f hukuku uygulamas\u0131nda, Yarg\u0131tayca fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, hafta tatili, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 belgelere ve i\u015fyeri kay\u0131tlar\u0131na dayanmay\u0131p, tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na dayanmas\u0131 halinde, hesaba esas al\u0131nan s\u00fcre ve alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131 nazara al\u0131narak takdir edilecek uygun oranda hakkaniyet indirimi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklili\u011fi kabul edilmektedir. Bu halde, tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak hesaplanan alacak miktar\u0131ndan hakimin takdir yetkisine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lacak indirim oran\u0131 ba\u015ftan belirli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, alacak belirsiz kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile birlikte, yukar\u0131da belirtilen \u00e7er\u00e7evede belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imkan\u0131 tan\u0131narak, belirsiz alacaklar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc geni\u015fletilmi\u015f; bununla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak da hukuki yarar bulunmadan k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7ma imkan\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmakla birlikte, tamamen kald\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zaman zaman, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile birlikte kabul edilen belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 ile k\u0131smi davaya ili\u015fkin yeni d\u00fczenlemedeki s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n tam olarak tespit edilemedi\u011fi, birinin di\u011feri yerine kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Oysa bu iki davan\u0131n amac\u0131 ve niteli\u011fi ayr\u0131d\u0131r. Alacak, belirli veya belirlenebilir ise, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lamaz; ancak \u015fartlar\u0131 varsa k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanunun k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7ma imkan\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamakla birlikte tamamen ortadan kald\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, belirli alacaklar i\u00e7in, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lamasa da, \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015ftu\u011funda ve hukuki yarar bulundu\u011funda k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Aksi halde, sadece ya belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma veya belirli tam alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma \u015feklinde iki imkandan s\u00f6z edilebilir ki, o zaman da k\u0131smi davaya ili\u015fkin 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 109. maddesindeki h\u00fckm\u00fcn fiilen uygulanmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olamayacakt\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131nda zaten belirsiz alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 imkanlardan yararlanarak dava a\u00e7\u0131labilecek; \u015fayet alacak belirli ise de, o zaman sadece tam eda davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilecektir. Oysa kanun koyucunun abesle i\u015ftigal etmeyece\u011fi prensibi gere\u011fi, an\u0131lan maddeyle k\u0131smi davaya ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclerek ve Kanundaki s\u0131n\u0131rlamalara dikkat edilerek k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131labilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu noktada \u015fu da a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmal\u0131d\u0131r ki, \u015fartlar\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde dava dilek\u00e7esinde davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumda davac\u0131ya herhangi bir s\u00fcre verilmeden hukuki yarar yoklu\u011fundan davan\u0131n reddi yoluna gidilmelidir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, alaca\u011f\u0131n belirlenebilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn iken, b\u00f6yle bir davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na Kanun izin vermemi\u015ftir. B\u00f6yle bir durumda, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar yoklu\u011fundan dava reddedilmeli, ek bir s\u00fcre verilmemelidir. Zira, burada talep a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r, bu sebeple 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 119\/1-\u011f. maddesinin uygulanarak s\u00fcre verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir; asl\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi halde belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, bu konudaki eksiklik de s\u00fcre verilerek tamamlanamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, dava hukuki yarar yoklu\u011fundan reddedilmelidir. Buradaki hukuki yarar, sonradan tamamlanacak nitelikte bir hukuki yarar de\u011fildir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda o s\u0131rada mevcut olmayan hukuki yarar, bunun da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a mahkemece bilindi\u011fi bir durumda, tamamlanacak bir hukuki yarar de\u011fildir. Aksinin kabul\u00fc, asl\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k olan talep sonucunun s\u00fcre verilerek davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi ve bulunmayan hukuki yarar\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in davac\u0131ya ek imkan sa\u011flanmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelecektir ki, buna us\u00fbl bak\u0131m\u0131ndan imkan yoktur, b\u00f6yle bir durum taraflar aras\u0131ndaki e\u015fitlik ilkesine de ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacakt\u0131r ( H. Pekcan\u0131tez\/O. Atalay\/M. \u00d6zekes, Medeni Usul Hukuku, 14. Bas\u0131, Ankara 2013, s. 454 ). Bunun yan\u0131nda, \u015fayet a\u00e7\u0131lan davada asgari bir miktar g\u00f6sterilmi\u015fse ve bunun alaca\u011f\u0131n bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla birlikte, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa belirli alacak olmakla birlikte k\u0131smi dava m\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lam\u0131yorsa, bu durumda 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun119\/1-\u011f. maddesinin arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a talep sonucu belirtilmemi\u015f olacakt\u0131r. Talep, talep t\u00fcr\u00fc ve davan\u0131n niteli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131lam\u0131yorsa, talep mu\u011flaksa, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 119\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince, davac\u0131ya bir haftal\u0131k kesin s\u00fcre verilerek talebinin belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 m\u0131, yoksa k\u0131smi dava m\u0131 oldu\u011funun belirtilmesi istenmelidir. Verilen bu s\u00fcreden sonra, davac\u0131n\u0131n talebini a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na g\u00f6re bir yol izlenmelidir. E\u011fer talep, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f olmakla birlikte, ger\u00e7ekte belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131yorsa, o zaman yukar\u0131daki \u015fekilde hareket edilmeli, hukuki yarar yoklu\u011fundan dava reddedilmelidir. A\u00e7\u0131klamadan sonra talep belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yorsa, bu davan\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na g\u00f6re, talep k\u0131smi davan\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yorsa da k\u0131smi davan\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na g\u00f6re dava y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclerek karar verilmelidir ( Dairemizin 31.12.2012 tarih 2012\/30463 esas 2012\/30091 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 110. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen, davac\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 daval\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 birbirinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z birden fazla asli talebini ayn\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcrmesi olarak tan\u0131mlanan davalar\u0131n y\u0131\u011f\u0131lmas\u0131 ( objektif dava birle\u015fmesi ) halinde, talep say\u0131s\u0131 kadar dava bulundu\u011fu kabul edildi\u011finden ve ayn\u0131 Kanunun 297\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca da her bir talep bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi gerekti\u011finden, bu durumda da dava dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen taleplerin belirsiz alacak olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n her bir talep bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">T\u00fcm bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar sonucunda \u015funu belirtmek gerekir ki, i\u015f hukukundan kaynaklanan alacaklar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ba\u015ftan belirli veya belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 \u015feklinde belirleme yapmak kural olarak do\u011fru ve m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu sebeple i\u015f hukukunda da belirsiz alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi, bu davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli \u015fartlar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. E\u011fer bu \u015fartlar varsa, i\u015f hukukunda da belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilir, yoksa a\u00e7\u0131lamaz ( C. Simil, Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131, I. Bas\u0131, \u0130stanbul 2013, s. 414 ). Keza ayn\u0131 \u015fey k\u0131smi dava i\u00e7in de s\u00f6zkonusudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, dava dilek\u00e7esinde davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 t\u00fcr\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle, a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, k\u0131smi dava t\u00fcr\u00fcnde kabul edilerek sonuca gidilmi\u015ftir. Ne var ki, dava dilek\u00e7esinde yer alan a\u00e7\u0131klama ve talep sonucundan davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki, mahkemece de, tensip zapt\u0131nda davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ara karar tesis edilmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 vekilince de, bilirki\u015fi raporunun sunulmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 107\/2. maddesine dayan\u0131larak, talep miktar\u0131 art\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin dilek\u00e7e sunulmu\u015f ve davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tekrar belirtilmi\u015ftir. Hal b\u00f6yleyken, davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde \u015f\u00fcphe yoktur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zellikleri dikkate al\u0131narak, yukar\u0131da belirtilen a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli \u015fartlar\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesine gelince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, esasen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin kesintisiz olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen i\u015fyeri kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda aral\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi, i\u015fverenin hileli i\u015flemleriyle davac\u0131n\u0131n ayl\u0131k \u00fccret miktar\u0131n\u0131n ve ikramiye hakedi\u015flerinin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle getirilen \u00fccret zamlar\u0131ndan yararland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vak\u0131alar\u0131na dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, i\u015fverenin s\u00f6zkonusu i\u015flemleri nedeniyle do\u011fan fark ayl\u0131k \u00fccret ve fark ikramiye alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsili talep edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ncelikle, taraflar aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi ve \u00fccret miktar\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 ise de salt s\u00f6zkonusu tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 belirsiz hale getirmez. Keza davac\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini ve \u00fccretini belirleyebilmektedir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n ne zamandan beri \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya \u00fccretinin ne kadar oldu\u011funu bilmemesi ayn\u0131 zamanda hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na da ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin kendisinin bilmedi\u011fi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini, tan\u0131klar\u0131n bildi\u011fini veya bilirki\u015finin bilece\u011fini farzetmek ispat kurallar\u0131na da hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na da ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Keza taraf\u0131n yeterli \u015fekilde somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131p kendisinin bilgisinde dahi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti\u011fi bir hususun mahkemece bilinmesini beklemek de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer tarafdan davac\u0131, dava konusu alacaklar\u0131n miktarlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinde, i\u015fverenin elinde bulunan bilgi ve belgelere dayanmamakta, aksine i\u015fverence tutulan kay\u0131tlar\u0131n muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle nazara al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmektedir. \u0130\u015fverenin maddi hukuktan do\u011fan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini ( belge ve bordro d\u00fczenleme gibi ) yerine getirmemesi, tuttu\u011fu belgelerin ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmamas\u0131, davadan \u00f6nce i\u015f\u00e7inin alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 inkar etmesi ya da ikrar etmekle beraber yerine getirmemesi davac\u0131ya kural olarak belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imkan\u0131n\u0131 vermez. \u0130\u015f\u00e7i bu durumlarda dahi, alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 veya de\u011ferini belirleyebiliyorsa, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7amaz ( Simil, s. 412 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayr\u0131ca, yukar\u0131da da belirtildi\u011fi gibi, salt bilirki\u015fi incelemesine gidilmesi belirsiz alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, fark ayl\u0131k \u00fccret ve fark ikramiye alacaklar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin kesintisiz kabul edilmesiyle ayl\u0131k \u00fccret miktar\u0131n\u0131n toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uygun \u015fekilde esas al\u0131narak yap\u0131lacak hesaplamayla, i\u015fverence \u00f6ncesinde yap\u0131lan \u00f6demelerin mahsup edilerek fark tutarlar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 talep edilmektedir. Yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere davac\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini, kendisine \u00f6denen ayl\u0131k \u00fccret miktar\u0131n\u0131, almas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini iddia etti\u011fi ayl\u0131k \u00fccret miktar\u0131n\u0131 ve kendisine i\u015fverence yap\u0131lan \u00f6demeleri belirleyebilecek durumdad\u0131r. Bu haliyle, objektif dava birle\u015fmesi \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131lan eldeki davada, talep edilen i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 belirsiz alacak de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava konusu edilen alacaklar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekte belirli bir alacak oldu\u011fu ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na konu edilemeyecekleri anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, hukuki yarar yoklu\u011fundan davan\u0131n reddi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde esasa girilerek karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 olup, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Dava, i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsili istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde kesintisiz olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan ve Toplu \u0130\u015f S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden ( T\u0130S ) yararlanan davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerinde fiilen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131na devam ederken \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f verildi\u011fi k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre sonra da ayn\u0131 i\u015fyerine giri\u015fi yap\u0131larak hileli girdi \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 i\u015flemine tabi tutuldu\u011funu, T\u0130S ile getirilen \u00fccret zamlar\u0131ndan yararland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi almakta oldu\u011fu yevmiyesinden de mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fverenin maksad\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131demli i\u015f\u00e7ileri T\u0130S ile verilen \u00fccret zamlar\u0131ndan mahrum etmek ve yeni bir akitle i\u015fe ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f gibi g\u00f6stererek \u00fccretlerini asgari \u00fccret seviyesine d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmek ayr\u0131ca k\u0131dem s\u00fcresini, par\u00e7alara b\u00f6lerek k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131 etkisizle\u015ftirmek oldu\u011funu, yap\u0131lan muvazaal\u0131 girdi-\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 i\u015flem sonucunda ikramiye alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n da tam olarak \u00f6denmeyerek y\u0131ll\u0131k 120 yevmiye alacaklar\u0131 yerde 6&#215;12=72 yevmiyeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclerek ma\u011fdur edildi\u011fini, ileri s\u00fcrerek belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 \u0130\u015fveren vekili, eski i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin tasfiye edilip yeni i\u015f ili\u015fkisi kuruldu\u011funu, yan\u0131lma, aldanma veya korkutma sonucu olu\u015fturulan i\u015flemlerde bu durumun ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten itibaren 1 y\u0131l i\u00e7erisinde s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeyen taraf\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n reddinin gerekece\u011fini, alacaklar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, HMK 107 ve devam\u0131 gere\u011fince davac\u0131n\u0131n eski yevmiyesini ve yeni yevmiyesini bildi\u011fini, ikramiye say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 da bilmekte oldu\u011funu, bu durumda dava etti\u011fi alacak miktarlar\u0131n\u0131 hesaplamas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ve kendisinden beklenebildi\u011fini, bu davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hukuki yarar yoklu\u011fundan dolay\u0131 davan\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece, i\u015fverenin fesih i\u015fleminin toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden yararlanmaya ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemeleri dolanan, sadece g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcrde bir i\u015flem oldu\u011fu, taraf iradelerinin anla\u015farak s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi sona erdirme \u015feklinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i ile ayn\u0131 durumdaki di\u011fer i\u015f\u00e7ilerin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin kesintisiz devam etti\u011fi kabul edilip, dava dilek\u00e7esinde davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan dava konusu alaca\u011f\u0131n belirsiz oldu\u011funun belirtilmesi a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermeyece\u011fi, k\u0131smi davaya konu edilen alacak da belirsiz alacak niteli\u011finde olmas\u0131 nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0131slaha kar\u015f\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 itiraz\u0131 kabul edilerek davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fcn taraf vekillerinin temyizi \u00fczerine;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6zel Dairece, h\u00fck\u00fcm yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle bozulmu\u015f, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fc temyize taraf vekilleri getirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I- Hukuk Genel Kurulundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler a\u015famas\u0131nda davac\u0131 vekilince verilen dilek\u00e7e ile i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na konu olup olamayaca\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi ile 22. Hukuk dairesi kararlar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki i\u00e7tihat farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi i\u00e7in \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n\u0131n Birle\u015ftirilmesi talebinde bulunuldu\u011fu bu nedenle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n Birle\u015ftirilmesi talebinin sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131na kadar ertelenmesi talep edilmi\u015f ise de \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n Birle\u015ftirilmesi talebinin Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Divan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan hen\u00fcz kabul edilip g\u00fcndeme al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeni ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin ertelenmesi talebinin reddine oybirli\u011fi ile karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">II-\u0130\u015fin esas\u0131na gelince; direnme yoluyla Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava m\u0131, yoksa belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 m\u0131 oldu\u011fu, fark \u00fccret ile fark ikramiye alacaklar\u0131ndan olu\u015fan alacaklar\u0131n belirsiz alacak t\u00fcr\u00fcnde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 buna g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktalar\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 ile k\u0131smi davadan bahsetmekte yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">K\u0131smi dava, alaca\u011f\u0131n yaln\u0131zca bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131lan dava olarak tan\u0131mlanmaktad\u0131r. Bir davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava olarak nitelendirilebilmesi i\u00e7in, alaca\u011f\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn ayn\u0131 hukuki ili\u015fkiden do\u011fmu\u015f olmas\u0131 ve alaca\u011f\u0131n \u015fimdilik belirli bir kesiminin dava edilmesi gerekir. Di\u011fer bir s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle, bir alacak hakk\u0131nda daha fazla bir miktar i\u00e7in tam dava a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, alaca\u011f\u0131n bir kesimi i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131lan davaya, k\u0131smi dava denir. K\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in talep konusunun b\u00f6l\u00fcnebilir olmas\u0131 gerekli olup, a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava oldu\u011funun dava dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez. Dava dilek\u00e7esindeki a\u00e7\u0131klamalardan davac\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daha fazla oldu\u011fu ve istem b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde &#8220;fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutmas\u0131&#8221; ya da &#8220;alaca\u011f\u0131n \u015fimdilik \u015fu kadar\u0131n\u0131 dava ediyorum&#8221; demesi, kural olarak yeterlidir ( Yarg\u0131tay HGK 02.04.2003 g\u00fcn ve 2003\/4-260 Esas 271 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131; Pekcan\u0131tez; H.\/Atalay M.\/\u00d6zekes M.; Medeni Usul Hukuku, 12. Bas\u0131, s. 320; Kuru\/Arslan\/Y\u0131lmaz, Medeni Usul Hukuku, 22. Bas\u0131, s. 286 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanununda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a k\u0131smi dava d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi halde, s\u00f6z konusu Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde de k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmaktayd\u0131. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, alacak hakk\u0131n\u0131n bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn dava edilip geriye kalan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ikinci bir dava ile istenmesini engelleyen bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamaktayd\u0131. K\u0131smi dava, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 109.maddesinde ise, ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda; talep konusunun niteli\u011fi itibar\u0131yla b\u00f6l\u00fcnebilir oldu\u011fu durumlarda, sadece bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n da dava yoluyla ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilece\u011fi; \u0130kinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise; talep konusunun miktar\u0131, taraflar aras\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z veya a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirli ise k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte ikinci f\u0131kra 01.04.2015 tarih ve 6644 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 4.maddesi ile y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131larak alaca\u011f\u0131n taraflar aras\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z ve belirli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 olana\u011f\u0131 sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na gelince, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 107. maddesiyle, m\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nda yer almayan yeni bir dava t\u00fcr\u00fc olarak belirsiz alacak ve tespit davas\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 107. maddesine g\u00f6re,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-Davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 yahut de\u011ferini tam ve kesin olarak belirleyebilmesinin kendisinden beklenemeyece\u011fi veya bunun imk\u00e2ns\u0131z oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde, alacakl\u0131, hukuki ili\u015fkiyi ve asgari bir miktar ya da de\u011feri belirtmek suretiyle belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n verdi\u011fi bilgi veya tahkikat sonucu alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131 veya de\u011ferinin tam ve kesin olarak belirlenebilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu anda davac\u0131, iddian\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131na tabi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda belirtmi\u015f oldu\u011fu talebini art\u0131rabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-Ayr\u0131ca, k\u0131smi eda davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131labildi\u011fi h\u00e2llerde, tespit davas\u0131 da a\u00e7\u0131labilir ve bu durumda hukuki yarar\u0131n var oldu\u011fu kabul edilir.&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesi ile belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilindi\u011fi gibi 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 24. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen tasarruf ilkesi gere\u011fi davac\u0131, davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7arken, talep etti\u011fi hukuki koruman\u0131n ne oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ifade etmesi gerekmektedir (HMKm. 119\/1 b. \u011f ). Dava dilek\u00e7esinde talep sonucunun bulunmamas\u0131 durumunda, hakim davac\u0131ya eksikli\u011fi tamamlamas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir haftal\u0131k kesin s\u00fcre verecek, bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde eksikli\u011fin tamamlanmamas\u0131 halinde dava a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lacakt\u0131r ( HMK m. 119\/2 ). Talep konusunun niteli\u011fi itibar\u0131yla b\u00f6l\u00fcnebilir oldu\u011fu ve k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7man\u0131n caiz oldu\u011fu durumlarda, davac\u0131, talep konusunun sadece bir k\u0131sm\u0131 hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm elde etmek \u00fczere bir dava a\u00e7abilir ( HMK m. 109 ). B\u00f6yle bir durumda, mahkeme, davac\u0131n\u0131n hakk\u0131n\u0131n asl\u0131nda daha fazla oldu\u011funu tespit etse bile, taleple ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131 gere\u011fi, davada talep sonucu olarak g\u00f6sterilen miktar\u0131 a\u015facak \u015fekilde karar veremez ( Varol Karaslan, Medeni Usul Hukukunda Hakimin Davay\u0131 Ayd\u0131nlatma \u00d6devi, Ankara 2013, s. 90 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taleple ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k ilkesi, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 26. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.An\u0131lan Kanunun &#8220;Taleple Ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k \u0130lkesi&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 26. maddesinde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8221; ( 1 ) H\u00e2kim, taraflar\u0131n talep sonu\u00e7lar\u0131yla ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r; ondan fazlas\u0131na veya ba\u015fka bir \u015feye karar veremez. Duruma g\u00f6re, talep sonucundan daha az\u0131na karar verebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) H\u00e2kimin, taraflar\u0131n talebiyle ba\u011fl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri sakl\u0131d\u0131r.&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesi yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda eldeki davada, iddian\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fc\u015f bi\u00e7imi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili, dava dilek\u00e7esinin sonu\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131nda talep etti\u011fi her alacak i\u00e7in bir miktar yazd\u0131ktan sonra parantez i\u00e7inde &#8220;belirsiz&#8221; ibaresini kullanarak i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re alacak miktar\u0131n\u0131n art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talepli dilek\u00e7esinde ise &#8220;belirsiz alacak davas\u0131ndaki&#8221; taleplerini art\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davas\u0131n\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a beyan etmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 vekilinin talebinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 oldu\u011fu halde mahkemece davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava kabul edilerek karar verilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede, dava dilek\u00e7esinde talep sonucunda k\u0131smi miktar belirtilip yan\u0131na parantez i\u00e7inde belirsiz kelimesini yaz\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n tahsil ama\u00e7l\u0131 belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmeyece\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n belirleyebilece\u011fi kadar miktar\u0131 belirlemedi\u011fi ve kalan miktar\u0131 belirledi\u011finde art\u0131r\u0131m dilek\u00e7esi verece\u011finin dava dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, talep sonucuna g\u00f6re de belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 t\u00fcrlerinden olan k\u0131smi eda k\u00fclli tespit davas\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in talep sonucuna g\u00f6re k\u0131smi dava oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan davan\u0131n mahkemece ba\u015ftan itibaren k\u0131smi dava olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi ve sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu taraf\u0131ndan belirtilen nedenlerle kabul edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sonu\u00e7 itibariyle, Hukuk Genel Kurulunca da benimsenen \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131na uyulmak gerekirken, \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle direnme karar\u0131 bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Taraf vekillerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zel Daire bozma ilam\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131ranlara geri verilmesine, 17.06.2015 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde yap\u0131lan ikinci g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KAR\u015eI OY :<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I. UYU\u015eMAZLIK:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Y\u00fcksek Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta temel sorun, Toplu \u0130\u015f S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi kapsam\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin girdi \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 yap\u0131larak kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak \u00fccretinin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesi nedeni ile yakla\u015f\u0131k 5-6 y\u0131l boyunca eksik \u00f6denen \u00fccretten dolay\u0131 olu\u015fan fark \u00fccret, fark ikramiye ile fark fazla mesai \u00fccret alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1 ) Belirsiz alacak davas\u0131-k\u0131smi dava konusu olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2 ) Alacaklar\u0131n davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan belirlenebilir olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3 ) A\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava m\u0131 yoksa belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 m\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4 ) Alacak belirli ise hukuki yarar \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n tamamlanabilir dava \u015fart\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktalar\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkeme, dava dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dava t\u00fcr\u00fc belirtilemeyen, ancak sonu\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131nda k\u0131smi miktar yan\u0131nda parantez i\u00e7inde &#8220;belirsiz&#8221; ibaresi yer alan ve fazlaya ait hak sakl\u0131 tutularak sadece belirtilen miktar\u0131n tahsili istenilen davada, alaca\u011f\u0131n belirsiz oldu\u011funu kabul etmekle birlikte, davay\u0131 k\u0131smi dava olarak nitelemi\u015f ( Gerek\u00e7e: Dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131 ve de\u011ferinin davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tam ve kesin olarak belirlenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin davan\u0131n HMK 107. Maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen belirsiz alacak ve tespit davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi gibi HMK 109. Maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen k\u0131smi dava olarak da a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak kabul\u00fc halinde \u0131slah zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olmayacak bedel art\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 \u015feklinde davaya devam edilecektir. K\u0131smi dava olarak kabul\u00fc halinde ise \u0131slah zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00f6zkonusu olacakt\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan dava konusu alaca\u011f\u0131n belirsiz oldu\u011funun belirtilmesi a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermez, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc k\u0131smi davaya konu edilen alacak da belirsiz alacak niteli\u011findedir. Bu nedenle dava dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 oldu\u011funun ve dava konusu alaca\u011f\u0131n mahkemece tespitinin talep edilmesi gerekir. Bu nedenle a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0131slaha kar\u015f\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 itiraz\u0131 kabul edilerek davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi ) ve yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 savunmas\u0131na itibar ederek ve belirlenen miktar\u0131 \u0131slah\u0131 da dikkate alarak k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar\u0131n taraf vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine ise Y\u00fcksek Yarg\u0131tay 22. Hukuk Dairesi; Dava dilek\u00e7esindeki a\u00e7\u0131klama ve talep sonucundaki belirsiz kelimesi ile yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda art\u0131r\u0131m dilek\u00e7esine g\u00f6re davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 oldu\u011funun a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu, k\u0131smi dava olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde davac\u0131 temyizi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bu nedenle bozma gerek\u00e7esi yap\u0131l\u0131rken, esasen daval\u0131 temyizi dikkate al\u0131narak; &#8220;taraflar aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi ve \u00fccret miktar\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 ise de, salt s\u00f6z konusu tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131 belirsiz hale getirmeyece\u011fi, keza davac\u0131n\u0131n, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini ve \u00fccretini belirleyebildi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n ne zamandan beri \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya \u00fccretinin ne kadar oldu\u011funu bilmemesinin hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin kendisinin bilmedi\u011fi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini, tan\u0131klar\u0131n bildi\u011fini veya bilirki\u015finin bilece\u011fini farzetmek ispat kurallar\u0131na da ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, taraf\u0131n yeterli \u015fekilde somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131p kendisinin bilgisinde dahi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti\u011fi bir hususun mahkemece bilinmesini beklemenin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n, dava konusu alacaklar\u0131n miktarlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinde, i\u015fverenin elinde bulunan bilgi ve belgelere dayanmamakta, aksine i\u015fverence tutulan kay\u0131tlar\u0131n muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle nazara al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti\u011fi, i\u015fverenin maddi hukuktan do\u011fan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini ( belge ve bordro d\u00fczenleme gibi ) yerine getirmemesi, tuttu\u011fu belgelerin ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmamas\u0131, davadan \u00f6nce i\u015f\u00e7inin alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 inkar etmesi ya da ikrar etmekle beraber yerine getirmemesi davac\u0131ya kural olarak belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imkan\u0131n\u0131 vermeyece\u011fi, i\u015f\u00e7inin bu durumlarda dahi, alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 veya de\u011ferini belirleyebiliyorsa, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7amayaca\u011f\u0131, salt bilirki\u015fi incelemesine gidilmesinin belirsiz alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, objektif dava birle\u015fmesi \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131lan eldeki dava taleplerinin her birinin belirsiz alacak olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmesine gelince: fark ayl\u0131k \u00fccret ve fark ikramiye alacaklar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda, davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a, olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini iddia etti\u011fi ayl\u0131k \u00fccret miktar\u0131 esas al\u0131narak yap\u0131lacak hesaplamayla, i\u015fverence \u00f6ncesinde an\u0131lan alacaklar i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan \u00f6demelerin mahsup edilerek fark tutarlar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n talep edildi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n kendisine \u00f6denen ayl\u0131k \u00fccret miktar\u0131n\u0131, almas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini iddia etti\u011fi ayl\u0131k \u00fccret miktar\u0131n\u0131 ve kendisine i\u015fverence yap\u0131lan \u00f6demeleri belirleyebilecek durumda oldu\u011fu, an\u0131lan alacaklar\u0131n belirsiz alacak olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, fark fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise, davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcrelerinin hesaplanmas\u0131 de\u011fil, iddias\u0131na g\u00f6re esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken ayl\u0131k \u00fccret miktar\u0131 nazara al\u0131narak, i\u015fverence \u00f6ncesinde \u00f6denen fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretlerine ili\u015fkin fark alacaklar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n istendi\u011fi, bu alacak bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da, alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 tam ve kesin olarak belirleyememe halinden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011finden, an\u0131lan alaca\u011f\u0131n da belirsiz alacak olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dava konusu edilen alacaklar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekte belirlenebilir bir alacak oldu\u011fu ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na konu edilemeyecekleri anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, hukuki yarar yoklu\u011fundan davan\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fi&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle yerel mahkeme karar\u0131 bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkemece bozma sonras\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, emsal Y\u00fcksek 9. Hukuk Dairesi Kararlar\u0131n\u0131 da gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek, \u00f6nceki gerek\u00e7elerle direnmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar\u0131n taraf vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine ise ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn emsal olarak incelenen ve mahkemelerce belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak nitelendirilen Kayseri 2 ( HGK. 2015\/22-787 Esas vd esaslar ) ve 3. \u0130\u015f ( HGK. 2015\/22-1051 Esas vd esaslar ) Mahkemelerinin alaca\u011f\u0131n belirsiz olmas\u0131 nedeni ile belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn aksine, k\u0131smi dava olarak nitelendiren bu dava dosyalar\u0131nda Kayseri 1. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi&#8217;nin dosyalar\u0131 Y\u00fcksek Genel Kurul&#8217;un \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ile bozulmu\u015ftur. Ancak;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">* Davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131 temyizleri yan\u0131nda,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">* Belirli-belirsiz alacak m\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">* K\u0131smi dava m\u0131 belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 m\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">* Hukuki yarar \u015fart\u0131 tamamlanabilir dava \u015fart\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa do\u011frudan reddi gerektiren dava \u015fart\u0131 m\u0131d\u0131r?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015feklinde ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 oylama yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00fcksek 22. Hukuk Dairesinin hangi bozma nedenine dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131, karar\u0131n davac\u0131 temyizi mi yoksa daval\u0131 temyizi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bozuldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Emsal dosyalarda alaca\u011f\u0131n belirsiz oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildiren say\u0131n \u00fcyelerin davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak nitelenmesi ve davac\u0131 temyizi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde oy kulland\u0131klar\u0131 izlenimi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle bozma \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fi \u015feklinde de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve davac\u0131 temyizine y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">II: BEL\u0130RS\u0130Z ALACAK VE KISM\u0130 DAVA:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc ve anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 ve K\u0131smi Dava kavramlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde normatif d\u00fczenlemeler de dikkate al\u0131narak durmak gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">01.10.2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 107. maddesinde belirsiz alacak ve tespit davas\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda yeni bir dava t\u00fcr\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Maddeye g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8221; ( 1 ) Davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 yahut de\u011ferini tam ve kesin olarak belirleyebilmesinin kendisinden beklenemeyece\u011fi veya bunun imk\u00e2ns\u0131z oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde, alacakl\u0131, hukuki ili\u015fkiyi ve asgari bir miktar ya da de\u011feri belirtmek suretiyle belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n verdi\u011fi bilgi veya tahkikat sonucu alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131 veya de\u011ferinin tam ve kesin olarak belirlenebilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu anda davac\u0131, iddian\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131na tabi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda belirtmi\u015f oldu\u011fu talebini art\u0131rabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 3 ) Ayr\u0131ca, k\u0131smi eda davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131labildi\u011fi h\u00e2llerde, tespit davas\u0131 da a\u00e7\u0131labilir ve bu durumda hukuki yarar\u0131n var oldu\u011fu kabul edilir&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Maddenin gerek\u00e7esine bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131za ise; bu davan\u0131n kabul edilmesinin &#8220;T\u00fcrk hukukunda art\u0131k salt hukuk\u00ee koruman\u0131n \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7ilerek &#8220;etkin hukuk\u00ee koruma&#8221;n\u0131n g\u00fcndeme gelmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n da bunu gerektirdi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131ktan sonra &#8220;bilinmeyen bir alacak i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7maya zorlamak gibi, hak araman\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcyle izah edilemeyecek bir yol ve asl\u0131nda taraf\u0131n kendi ihmali ya da kusuru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde bir yasakla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fmas\u0131 gibi de bir engel s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fu, oysa, hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn, b\u00f6yle bir s\u0131n\u0131rlamay\u0131 ve ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 davranmaya zorlamay\u0131 de\u011fil, ger\u00e7ekten hakk\u0131 ihl\u00e2l edilen veya ihl\u00e2l tehlikesi alt\u0131nda olan ki\u015fiyi, m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funca geni\u015f \u015fekilde korumay\u0131 ama\u00e7lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 veya tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, alacakl\u0131, t\u00fcm miktar\u0131 belirtmese dahi, davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda hukuk\u00ee ili\u015fkiyi somut olarak belirtmek ve tespit edebildi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde de asgar\u00ee miktar\u0131 g\u00f6stermek durumunda oldu\u011fu, belirsiz alacak veya tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n ilerleyen a\u015famalar\u0131nda, kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n verdi\u011fi bilgiler ve sundu\u011fu delillerle ya da delillerin incelenmesi ve tahkikat i\u015flemleri sonucu ( \u00f6rne\u011fin, bilirki\u015fi ya da ke\u015fif incelemesi sonras\u0131 ), ba\u015ftan belirsiz olan alacak belirli h\u00e2le gelmi\u015fse, davac\u0131n\u0131n, iddian\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131na t\u00e2bi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda belirtmi\u015f oldu\u011fu talebini art\u0131rabilmesi benimsendi\u011fi, Miktar\u0131 belirsiz alacaklarda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n dolmas\u0131na \u00e7ok k\u0131sa s\u00fcrenin var oldu\u011fu, hallerde yaln\u0131zca tespit yahut k\u0131smi ed\u00e2 ile birlikte tespit davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi genel olarak kabul edildi\u011fi, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n, yaln\u0131zca ed\u00e2 davas\u0131 veya yaln\u0131zca tespit davas\u0131 yahut k\u0131smi ed\u00e2 ile birlikte k\u00fclli tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilme se\u00e7eneklerine sahip oldu\u011fu&#8221; belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Belirtmek gerekir ki belirsiz alacak ve tespit davas\u0131, madde ve gerek\u00e7esi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131labilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1. Eda ( tahsil talebi ile ) davas\u0131 niteli\u011finde belirsiz alacak davas\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2. Tespit niteli\u011finde belirsiz alaca\u011f\u0131 tespit davas\u0131 ( F\u0131kra 3 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3. K\u0131smi eda ve k\u00fclli tespit davas\u0131 ( Ancak maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde bu davan\u0131n ayn\u0131 zamanda k\u0131smi eda ve k\u00fclli tespit davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu ayn\u0131 kanunun 109 maddesinde belirtilen k\u0131smi dava t\u00fcr\u00fc gibidir. Ancak zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 farkl\u0131 kabul edilebilir ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 tahsil ama\u00e7l\u0131 belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda belirleyebildi\u011fi miktar\u0131 belirterek dava a\u00e7mak zorundad\u0131r. Bu dava eda davas\u0131 olmakla birlikte yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda belirlenecek kalan miktar i\u00e7in tespit niteli\u011findedir. Yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda davac\u0131 belirlenen bakiye miktar\u0131 davan\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi ve de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131na tabi olmadan harc\u0131n\u0131 tamamlayarak h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 talep edebilecektir. Bu durumda alaca\u011f\u0131n tamam\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131ndan ilama dayal\u0131 icra takibi yap\u0131labilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">K\u0131smi eda ve k\u00fclli tespit davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, davac\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta belirleyebildi\u011fi miktar\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde belirtmesine gerek yoktur. K\u0131smi davada oldu\u011fu gibi istedi\u011fi miktarda a\u00e7abilir ve alaca\u011f\u0131n belirleyemedi\u011fi kalan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n da tespitini isteyecektir. Bu durumda mahkeme \u0131slah yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece k\u0131smi olarak talep edileni tahsil, kalan k\u0131sm\u0131 ise tespit h\u00fckm\u00fc olarak h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na alacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ancak belirsiz alacak tespit davas\u0131 niteli\u011finde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, sadece tespit h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulacak ve tespit karar\u0131 ile alacak tespit edilecektir. Bu karar tespit h\u00fckm\u00fc oldu\u011fundan ilaml\u0131 icraya konu olamayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayn\u0131 kanunun dava ve karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 dahil, k\u0131smi dava ile ilgili 109. Maddesine g\u00f6re ise;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8221; ( 1 ) Talep konusunun niteli\u011fi itibar\u0131yla b\u00f6l\u00fcnebilir oldu\u011fu durumlarda, sadece bir k\u0131sm\u0131 da dava yoluyla ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) Talep konusunun miktar\u0131, taraflar aras\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z veya a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirli ise k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lamaz. ( Ki bu f\u0131kra temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 11.04.2015 tarihinde resmi gazetede yay\u0131mlanan 6644 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun ile )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 3 ) Dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131rken, talep konusunun kalan k\u0131sm\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a feragat edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2li d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131, talep konusunun geri kalan k\u0131sm\u0131ndan feragat edildi\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmez&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Belirtilen d\u00fczenleme kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1 ) Talep konusunun niteli\u011fi itibari ile b\u00f6l\u00fcnebilir olmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2 ) Talep konusunun miktar\u0131n\u0131n, taraflar aras\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 veya a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirli olmamas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Her ne kadar 107.madde de belirtilmemi\u015f ise de belirsiz alacak ve tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in k\u0131smi dava ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen HMK.&#8217;un 109\/2 maddesinin dava tarihi itibari ile y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olmas\u0131 nedeni ile g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilmemesi gerekir. Zira h\u00fckme g\u00f6re &#8220;Talep konusunun miktar\u0131, taraflar aras\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z veya a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirli ise k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lamaz&#8221;. Burada talep konusunun taraflar aras\u0131nda belirli olmas\u0131 halinde k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. K\u0131saca davac\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 belirli de\u011fil ise belirsiz alacak ve tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilece\u011fi gibi fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutarak k\u0131smi dava da a\u00e7abilecektir. Alacak miktar\u0131 belirli ise dava tarihi itibari ile k\u0131smi dava veya belirsiz alacak ve tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lamaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde, davac\u0131 dava tarihi itibari ile alacak tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirli de\u011filse, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 ( ki her \u00fc\u00e7 t\u00fcr\u00fc dahil ) yan\u0131nda k\u0131smi dava da a\u00e7abilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim Y\u00fcksek Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi, 27.02.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/1756 Esas, 2012\/5741 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda k\u0131smi dava ile ilgili davada bunu kabul etmi\u015f, direnme \u00fczerine Y\u00fcksek Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;da 17.10.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/9-838 Esas, 2012\/715 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleri i\u00e7tihat etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer taraftan; 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK. 119\/1.\u011f maddesi uyar\u0131nca &#8220;Dava dilek\u00e7esinin talep sonucu ( netice talep; istem sonucu ) b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde davac\u0131, neye karar verilmesini ( daval\u0131n\u0131n neye mahk\u00fbm edilmesini ) istiyorsa onu ( a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde ) yaz\u0131p belirtmelidir&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Talep sonucunun a\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde belirtilmesi ve yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 ile mahkemenin ve uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa bakacak hakimin karar vermesi kolayla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lacakt\u0131r. En \u00f6nemlisi mahkemece;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1 ) Davan\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc saptanacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2 ) Davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc halinde, mahkeme talep sonucunu aynen h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131 olarak karar\u0131na yazabilecektir. ( Md. 297\/1.\u00e7 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3 ) Talep edilenden, fazlas\u0131na karar verilemeyecektir ( Md. 26 ). Bu nedenle davac\u0131, nelerin h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 ( daval\u0131n\u0131n neye mahk\u00fbm edilmesini ) istedi\u011fini, a\u00e7\u0131k ve noksans\u0131z bir \u015fekilde dava dilek\u00e7esinin talep sonucu ( netice-i talep ) b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde bildirmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Talep sonucu a\u00e7\u0131k de\u011filse, mahkeme, davac\u0131ya talep sonucunu a\u00e7\u0131klatt\u0131rmal\u0131d\u0131r ( Md. 31 Hakimin ayd\u0131nlatma g\u00f6revi ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 ile k\u0131smi dava aras\u0131nda ise iki \u00f6nemli fark vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a ) Davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde bir ek dava veya ayn\u0131 davada dava konusunun \u0131slah yolu ile artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 s\u00f6zkonusu olmaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b ) Belirsiz alacak davas\u0131nda miktar belirlendikten sonra, tamam\u0131n\u0131n istenmesi halinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi dikkate al\u0131nmazken, k\u0131smi davada k\u0131smi olarak istenen d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bakiye alacak miktar\u0131n\u0131n ek dava a\u00e7\u0131larak veya \u0131slah sureti ile artt\u0131r\u0131larak istenmesi halinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi ile kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kald\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">III: B\u0130R ALACA\u011eIN BEL\u0130RL\u0130 OLUP OLMADI\u011eI KR\u0130TERLER\u0130;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madde i\u00e7eri\u011finden, en \u00f6nemli kriter davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 yahut de\u011ferini tam ve kesin olarak belirleyebilmesinin;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a ) Davac\u0131n\u0131n kendisinden beklenememeli ( ger\u00e7ekten belirleyememeli-S\u00fcbjektif unsur ) veya )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b ) Bu ( objektif olarak ) olanaks\u0131z olmal\u0131d\u0131r ( objektif unsur ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanun s\u00fcbjektif unsur y\u00f6n\u00fcnden belirlemede vekili de\u011fil, davac\u0131y\u0131 esas alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6nemli olan davac\u0131n\u0131n dava konusu alaca\u011f\u0131 belirleyebilmesidir. Kald\u0131 ki her davac\u0131n\u0131n vekil tutma zorunlulu\u011fu da bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Maddenin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n verdi\u011fi bilgi veya tahkikat sonucu alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131 ve de\u011ferinin tam ve kesin olarak belirlenebilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu anda davac\u0131, iddian\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131na tabi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda belirtmi\u015f oldu\u011fu talebini art\u0131rabilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK.&#8217;un 107\/2 maddesi ile ilgili olarak gerek\u00e7ede \u015funlara yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ba\u015ftan miktar veya de\u011feri tam olarak tespit edilemeyen bir alacak i\u00e7in, davac\u0131n\u0131n b\u00f6yle bir ihmal ya da kusurundan s\u00f6z edilemez. Bu sebeple, belirsiz alacak veya tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n ilerleyen a\u015famalar\u0131nda, kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n verdi\u011fi bilgiler ve sundu\u011fu delilerle ya da delillerin incelenmesi ve tahkikat i\u015flemleri sonucu ( \u00f6rne\u011fin, bilirki\u015fi ya da ke\u015fif incelemesi sonras\u0131 ), ba\u015ftan belirsiz olan alacak belirli hale gelmi\u015fse, ba\u015f\u0131nda belirtmi\u015f oldu\u011fu talebini art\u0131rabilmesi benimsenmi\u015ftir.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buradan hareketle dava konusu alaca\u011f\u0131n de\u011feri veya miktar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n ( i\u015fverenin ) verece\u011fi bilgi veya tahkikat a\u015famas\u0131nda belirlenecek ( bilirki\u015fiden hesap raporu al\u0131nmas\u0131 gibi ) ise alaca\u011f\u0131n dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan objektif olarak belirleyebilmesinin kendisinden beklenemeyece\u011fi kabul edilmelidir. Bu nedenle maddenin birinci ve ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim \u0130svi\u00e7re uygulamas\u0131na yer veren Onursal Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Dr. Mustafa KILI\u00c7O\u011eLU &#8220;Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu El \u015eerhi&#8221; adl\u0131 eserinde bunu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ifade etmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n, dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte, talebinin sonucunu miktar olarak ifade edecek bilgisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; bu bilgiyi ancak kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n verece\u011fi bilgi ya da tahkikat sonucu elde edebilece\u011fi durumlarda alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar veya de\u011ferinin tam ve kesin olarak belirlenmesinin imkans\u0131z oldu\u011fu ya da davac\u0131dan beklenemeyece\u011fi \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi kabul edilmektedir ( BGE 116 II 215,219E. 4.a; 131 III243,246 E. 5.1- K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7o\u011flu, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu El \u015eerhi, Legal Yay\u0131nevi, \u0130stanbul, 2012 s: 580. )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Talep sonucunun rakam olarak ifadesinin imkans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak miktar\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fi ve bu bilgisizli\u011fini daval\u0131n\u0131n sahas\u0131nda bulunan vak\u0131alardan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda s\u00f6z konusudur. Davac\u0131dan davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce \u00fccretini \u00f6deyerek talep konusunun miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlemesi i\u00e7in ekspertizden rapor ve m\u00fctalaa alma, delil tespiti gibi yollara ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 istenemez. Davac\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n miktar olarak tespiti, mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak delil tespitine veya hesap verme ve bilgi vermeye y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcstakil bir davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek oldu\u011fu durumlarda, HMK. m 107 anlam\u0131nda &#8220;Davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 yahut de\u011ferini tam ve kesin olarak belirleyebilmesinin kendisinden beklenemeyece\u011fi&#8221; bir durum s\u00f6z konusudur ( K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7o\u011flu, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu El \u015eerhi, Legal Yay\u0131nevi, \u0130stanbul, 2012 s: 581 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir alaca\u011f\u0131 belirli veya likit olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, hesaplamaya ili\u015fkin hesab\u0131n unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bilinmesi veya bilinmesinin gerekli olmas\u0131 gerekir. K\u0131saca davac\u0131n\u0131n yaln\u0131z ba\u015f\u0131na ne kadar alacakl\u0131 oldu\u011funu tespit edebilir durumda olmas\u0131 gerekir ( HGK. 14.07.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/19-376 E, 2010\/397 K ). Bu ko\u015fullar yoksa, likit bir alacaktan s\u00f6z edilemez. \u0130\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131na hizmets\u00fcresi ve \u00fccret i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131nda hesab\u0131n unsurlar\u0131d\u0131r. Bu unsurlar\u0131n tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 veya belirlenmesinin davac\u0131dan beklenmemesi, alaca\u011f\u0131 belirsiz k\u0131lar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu anlamda dava konusu alacak miktar\u0131n\u0131n veya de\u011ferinin belirlenmesi yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir olgunun ( ki bu i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma olgusu, tazminat ve alacaklara esas s\u00fcre ve \u00fccret y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kendini g\u00f6sterir ) tespitini gerektirdi\u011fi durumlarda alacak belirsiz ve tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 kabul edilmelidir. Zira alacaklar\u0131n belirlenmesine esas s\u00fcre ve \u00fccret \u00f6z\u00fc itibari ile tespit i\u00e7ermekte ve ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na tespit davas\u0131n\u0131n konusu olup, alacak ve tazminat\u0131n belirlenmesinin \u00f6nemli unsurlar\u0131d\u0131r. Alaca\u011f\u0131n belirlenebilmesi i\u00e7in de s\u00fcre ve \u00fccretin tam olarak bilinmesi veya bilinmesinin gerekmekte olmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu unsurlar tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 ise ve davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan HMK.&#8217;un 107. Maddesindeki gerek\u00e7ede belirtildi\u011fi gibi tam ve kesin olarak belirlenemiyor ise alacak belirsizdir ve bu alacak k\u0131smi dava veya belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na konu edilebilecektir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kural olarak ki\u015finin alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirleyebilmesi i\u00e7in, ayn\u0131 zamanda belgeye ba\u011flama yetkisinin olmas\u0131 gerekir. Oysa i\u015f ve sosyal g\u00fcvenlik hukukunda belgeye ba\u011flama g\u00f6rev ve yetkisi i\u015f\u00e7ide de\u011fil, i\u015fverendedir. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu yap\u0131lmayan ve ola\u011fan bir ya\u015famda belgeye ba\u011flama g\u00f6rev ve yetkisi olmayan i\u015f\u00e7iye, sen dava a\u00e7arken alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirleyebilirsin demek, yasa ile verilmeyen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn verilmesi anlam\u0131na gelir ki bu bir \u00e7eli\u015fkidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunundaki bu y\u00f6ndeki h\u00fck\u00fcmlere bak\u0131l\u0131rsa;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madde 8\/3: &#8220;Yaz\u0131l\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme yap\u0131lmayan hallerde i\u015fveren i\u015f\u00e7iye en ge\u00e7 iki ay i\u00e7inde genel ve \u00f6zel \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131, g\u00fcnl\u00fck ya da haftal\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini, temel \u00fccreti ve varsa \u00fccret eklerini, \u00fccret \u00f6deme d\u00f6nemini, s\u00fcresi belirli ise s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin s\u00fcresini, fesih halinde taraflar\u0131n uymak zorunda olduklar\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmleri g\u00f6steren yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir belge vermekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madde 32: &#8220;\u00dccret, prim, ikramiye ve bu nitelikteki her \u00e7e\u015fit istihkak kural olarak, T\u00fcrk paras\u0131 ile i\u015fyerinde veya \u00f6zel olarak a\u00e7\u0131lan bir banka hesab\u0131na \u00f6denir. \u2026 \u00c7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7ilerin \u00fccret, prim, ikramiye ve bu nitelikteki her \u00e7e\u015fit istihkak\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zel olarak a\u00e7\u0131lan banka hesaplar\u0131 vas\u0131tas\u0131yla \u00f6deme zorunlulu\u011funa tabi tutulan i\u015fverenler veya \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer, i\u015f\u00e7ilerinin \u00fccret, prim, ikramiye ve bu nitelikteki her \u00e7e\u015fit istihkaklar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zel olarak a\u00e7\u0131lan banka hesaplar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00f6deyemezler.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madde 37: &#8220;\u0130\u015fveren i\u015fyerinde veya bankaya yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6demelerde i\u015f\u00e7iye \u00fccret hesab\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir imzal\u0131 veya i\u015fyerinin \u00f6zel i\u015faretini ta\u015f\u0131yan bir pusula vermek zorundad\u0131r. Bu pusulada \u00f6demenin g\u00fcn\u00fc ve ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nem ile fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, hafta tatili, bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccretleri gibi as\u0131l \u00fccrete yap\u0131lan her \u00e7e\u015fit eklemeler tutar\u0131n\u0131n ve vergi, sigorta primi, avans mahsubu, nafaka ve icra gibi her \u00e7e\u015fit kesintilerin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekir&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madde 67: &#8220;G\u00fcnl\u00fck \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n ba\u015flama ve biti\u015f saatleri ile dinlenme saatleri i\u015fyerlerinde i\u015f\u00e7ilere duyurulur&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madde 75: &#8220;\u0130\u015fveren \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 her i\u015f\u00e7i i\u00e7in bir \u00f6zl\u00fck dosyas\u0131 d\u00fczenler. \u0130\u015fveren bu dosyada, i\u015f\u00e7inin kimlik bilgilerinin yan\u0131nda, bu Kanun ve di\u011fer kanunlar uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczenlemek zorunda oldu\u011fu her t\u00fcrl\u00fc belge ve kay\u0131tlar\u0131 saklamak ve bunlar\u0131 istendi\u011fi zaman yetkili memur ve mercilere g\u00f6stermek zorundad\u0131r&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu ba\u011flamda i\u015f g\u00f6rme edimleri t\u00fcr\u00fcnde olan vekalet aktinde vekil, serbest meslek makbuzu ile alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belgeye ba\u011flar. Bu nedenle de alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirleyebilmektedir. Keza eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde, eseri yapan, bunun bedelini belgeye ba\u011flayarak kar\u015f\u0131 taraftan isteyebilir. Eser sahibi i\u00e7in alaca\u011f\u0131 belirlidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ancak i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde i\u015f g\u00f6rme edimini yerine getiren i\u015f\u00e7i a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131nda belgeye ba\u011flama yetkisi ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yoktur. \u0130\u015fte bu ilke ( belgeye ba\u011flama ) nedeni ile i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 konusu yap\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. K\u0131saca i\u015f\u00e7inin alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirleyebilmesi i\u00e7in i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan yasaya uygun belgelerin verilmesi gerekir. \u0130\u015fveren bu yasal y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini yerine getirmemi\u015f ve i\u015f\u00e7i i\u015fverenin elindeki kay\u0131tlara dayanarak alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015f ise alaca\u011f\u0131n belirsiz oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmazd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava konusu alacak kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n verece\u011fi bilgi veya belgelerle belirlenecekse, alacak belirsiz kabul edilmelidir. Kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmal\u0131 hukukta ge\u00e7erli olan bu kriter 107. maddenin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131nda &#8220;kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n verece\u011fi bilgi sonucu&#8221; yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda belirlenme olarak kabul edilmi\u015ftir. \u00d6rne\u011fin y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin alaca\u011f\u0131, izin defterinin; fazla mesai ve tatil \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 kayda dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131nda puantaj ( i\u015fe devam \u00e7izelgeleri ) kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan sunulmas\u0131 ile belirlenebilecektir. \u0130\u015f Hukukunda maddi hukuk kurallar\u0131 i\u00e7inde i\u015fverene kay\u0131t tutma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc getirilmi\u015ftir ( Maddeler yukarda belirtilmi\u015ftir ). Bu belgelerle ilgili y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri yerine getirmeyen i\u015fverenin a\u00e7\u0131lacak davada alaca\u011f\u0131n belirlenebilir oldu\u011fu savunmas\u0131 yerinde olmayacakt\u0131r. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi kayda dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, kay\u0131tl\u0131 belgeleri sunmayan veya i\u015f\u00e7iye vermeyen i\u015fveren, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na katlanmak zorundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131lama ( tahkikat a\u015famas\u0131nda ) s\u0131ras\u0131nda hesap raporu al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren her alacak belirsiz kabul edilmelidir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n talep etti\u011fi dava konusu alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131 veya de\u011feri belirli ise hesap raporu al\u0131nmas\u0131na da gerek yoktur. Zira bu durumda hak kazanma veya ispat olgusu ayr\u0131k olmak \u00fczere tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 bir alacaktan s\u00f6z edilemez. Zaten kanunun 107\/2 maddesinde bu olgu &#8220;tahkikat sonucu belirlenme&#8221; olarak vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130\u015f uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131nda genel olarak alaca\u011f\u0131n kesin ve net tutar\u0131, ancak bir yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinden ve hesap raporu sonra tam olarak tespit edilebilmektedir. Bu anlamda k\u0131dem, ihbar ve k\u00f6t\u00fcniyet tazminat\u0131 giydirilmi\u015f \u00fccretten hesaplan\u0131r. Giydirilmi\u015f \u00fccrete i\u015f\u00e7inin \u00e7\u0131plak \u00fccreti yan\u0131nda, \u00fccret eklentileri ve sosyal yard\u0131mlar dahil edilir. ( Y.HGK. 17.10.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/9-838 E, 2012\/715 K ). Ayr\u0131ca belirtmek gerekir ki davac\u0131dan davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce \u00fccretini \u00f6deyerek talep konusunun miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlemesi i\u00e7in ekspertizden rapor ve m\u00fctalaa alma, delil tespiti gibi yollara ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 istenemez. Davac\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n miktar olarak tespiti, mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak delil tespitine veya hesap verme ve bilgi vermeye y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcstakil bir davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek oldu\u011fu durumlarda, HMK. m 107 anlam\u0131nda &#8220;Davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 yahut de\u011ferini tam ve kesin olarak belirleyebilmesinin kendisinden beklenemeyece\u011fi&#8221; bir durum s\u00f6z konusudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hakimin takdiri veya yasal nedenlerle indirim yap\u0131larak alacak miktar\u0131 veya de\u011ferinin belirlenmesi halinde alacak belirsizdir ( Y. 9. HD. 27.02.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/1757 Esas 2012\/5742 Karar\u0131 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesinin k\u0131smi dava ile ilgili verdi\u011fi bu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctleri kabul eden Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu 17.10.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/9-838 Esas, 2012\/715 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda &#8220;\u0130\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zelli\u011fi de dikkate al\u0131narak, bu alacaklarda, talep konusunun miktar\u0131n\u0131n taraflar aras\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z veya a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirli oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek mutlak olarak do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, aksinin kabul\u00fc de do\u011fru olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, talep konusu i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 belirli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zelli\u011fine g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve sonuca gidilmesinin daha do\u011fru olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131&#8221; a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirmi\u015ftir. Bu do\u011fru bir tespittir. Ancak bir alaca\u011f\u0131n veya davan\u0131n belirsiz olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak dilek\u00e7enin verilmesinden sonra ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc talep sonucunun miktar\u0131 dava esnas\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kar. Belirsiz alacak davas\u0131nda davac\u0131, talep sonucunun miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlemenin verilecek bir bilgiye veya toplanan deliller sonucuna ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011funu bildirmelidir ( Prof. Dr. Peter Gottwald. Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 Tebli\u011fi. Medeni Usul ve \u0130cra \u0130flas Hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131 Toplant\u0131s\u0131-X Ekim 2012. \u0130zmir. S:30 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayn\u0131 toplant\u0131da tebli\u011f sunan Prof. Dr.\u0130saak Meer ise tebli\u011finde; Belirsiz alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n yarg\u0131laman\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda miktar\u0131n\u0131 hi\u00e7 belirleyemedi\u011fi veya a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 masraflarla belirleyebildi\u011fi alacaklarda masraf riskini azaltmaya y\u00f6nelik bir ara\u00e7&#8221; olarak tan\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtikten sonra;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1. Daval\u0131n\u0131n maddi hukuksal bilgi verme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmez ise davac\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131 belirleyebilmesinin kendisinden beklenmeyece\u011fi bir imkans\u0131zl\u0131k olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2. Delillerin sunulmas\u0131ndan sonra de\u011ferlendirmenin yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 davalardaki taleplerin, ispat yarg\u0131lamas\u0131ndan sonra belirlenebilen alacaklar\u0131n<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3. Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rmedi\u011fi durumlarda belirlemenin yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 alacaklar\u0131n ve<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4. Takdiri indirim uygulanan alacaklar\u0131n belirsiz oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131n\u0131n etkin koruma olarak getirdiklerine g\u00f6zatmak gerekirse;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">* Maddi hukuk taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcbjektif haklar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini sa\u011flar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">* Hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne hizmet eder.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">* Usul ekonomisine hizmet eder.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">* Davac\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcksek yarg\u0131lama giderlerine katlanma riskini azalt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">* Dava konusu hakk\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frama riskini azalt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">* Ve en \u00f6nemlisi belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fmak istemeyen i\u015fvereni kay\u0131t tutmaya zorlar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Usul kurallar\u0131n\u0131n maddi hukuk i\u00e7in ara\u00e7 oldu\u011fu, ( Maddi hukuk i\u00e7inde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen hakk\u0131n talep edilebilirli\u011fini, tespitini belirli kurallara ba\u011flayan hukuk dal\u0131 ) unutmamak gerekir. O nedenle i\u015f yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 ve bu anlamda Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun i\u015f ve sosyal g\u00fcvenlik hukukuna hizmet ederken, bu hukukun ilkelerini de g\u00f6zard\u0131 etmemelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Belirsiz alacak davas\u0131, silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130\u015f hukukunda da sosyal ve ekonomik a\u00e7\u0131dan g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc olan ve talimat veren i\u015fveren ile ekonomik y\u00f6nden g\u00fc\u00e7s\u00fcz olan ve hukuki ve ki\u015fisel olarak i\u015fverene ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015f\u00e7i, e\u015fit konumda de\u011fildir. Bu e\u015fitsizli\u011fin yarg\u0131lamaya ili\u015fkin kurallar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nmama olana\u011f\u0131 yoktur. Zay\u0131f\u0131n korunmas\u0131, temel bir ilkedir ve yarg\u0131lama hukukunda, \u00f6zellikle i\u015f yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda \u00f6nemli bir yer tutmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer taraftan i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n temel ilkelerinden olan ucuzluk ilkesi kapsam\u0131nda yarg\u0131lama har\u00e7 ve giderlerinden de korunmas\u0131 gerekir. \u0130\u015fte belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7mas\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7iye bu g\u00fcvenceyi sa\u011flamaktad\u0131r. \u0130\u015f\u00e7i belirsiz alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n getirdi\u011fi bu kanunun gerek\u00e7esinden belirtildi\u011fi gibi bu etkin hukuki korumadan faydaland\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">IV. HUKUK\u0130 YARAR \u015eARTI TAMAMLANAB\u0130L\u0130R DAVA \u015eARTIDIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK.&#8217;un 114. Maddesinde davac\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, dava \u015fart\u0131 olarak belirtilmi\u015ftir. Belirsiz alacak ve tespit davas\u0131nda, kanun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a alacak miktar\u0131n\u0131n veya de\u011ferinin belirlenememesi veya olanaks\u0131z olmas\u0131 halinde, davac\u0131n\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7mas\u0131nda hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n varsay\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. K\u0131saca dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda alacak belirli de\u011fil veya tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 ise, belirsiz alacak ve tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in hukuki yarar vard\u0131r. Takip eden 115\/2 maddedeki kurala g\u00f6re ise &#8220;Mahkeme, dava \u015fart\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ederse davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verir. Ancak, dava \u015fart\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ise bunun tamamlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kesin s\u00fcre verir. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde dava \u015fart\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 giderilmemi\u015fse davay\u0131 dava \u015fart\u0131 yoklu\u011fu sebebiyle usulden reddeder&#8221;. D\u00fczenleme gere\u011fince, eksik olan bir dava \u015fart\u0131, belirli bir s\u00fcre verilerek giderilebilecek ise, hakim taraf\u0131ndan eksikli\u011fin giderilmesi i\u00e7in kesin s\u00fcre verilmesi gerekir. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde dava \u015fart\u0131 eksikli\u011fi tamamlanmaz ise dava, dava \u015fart\u0131 yoklu\u011fu sebebiyle usulden reddedilmelidir ( Y. 19. HD. 16.01.2014 g\u00fcn ve 2013\/17366 Esas, 2014\/1329 Karar., Y. 9. HD. . 27.02.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/1757 Esas 2012\/5742 Karar )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130svi\u00e7re Hukukunda da \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 giderilebilir dava \u015fart\u0131 olarak kabul edilmektedir ( Prof. Dr. \u0130brahim Ercan. Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na g\u00f6re Belirsiz Alacak Davas\u0131 tebli\u011fi. Medeni Usul ve \u0130cra \u0130flas Hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131 Toplant\u0131s\u0131-X Ekim 2012. S: 155 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">V. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME VE SONU\u00c7:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1. Davac\u0131n\u0131n dava konusu etti\u011fi fark alacaklar\u0131n belirsiz veya k\u0131smi dava konusu edilip edilmeyece\u011fi, k\u0131saca alaca\u011f\u0131n belirli olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 sorunu:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i sendika \u00fcyesi olup, i\u015fveren \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 &#8211; girdi yapmak suretiyle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck \u00fccretle i\u015fe alm\u0131\u015f ve i\u015f\u00e7i yine toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi kapsam\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temel sorun i\u015fverenin toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi d\u00fczeni olan i\u015fyerinde \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 &#8211; girdi yaparak \u00fccretlerde indirim yap\u0131p yapamayaca\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131ndad\u0131r. Davac\u0131 daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin muvazaal\u0131 ve kanunun emredici h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak \u00fccreti d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bu nedenle yakla\u015f\u0131k 6 y\u0131l kadar \u00fccret ve ikramiyelerini eksik ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek fark \u00fccret ve ikramiye alaca\u011f\u0131 talep etmektedir. Burada davac\u0131n\u0131n ispat etmesi gereken, i\u015fverenin \u00fccret d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmesinin muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve bu i\u015fleminin yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015fveren uygulamalar\u0131 \u00e7ok say\u0131da i\u015f\u00e7i bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 2006, 2007 ve 2008 y\u0131llar\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015f\u00e7i \u00fccretlerinden yap\u0131lan indirim ard\u0131ndan i\u015f\u00e7iler uzun y\u0131llar \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam etmi\u015fler ve birbiri ard\u0131na toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden yaralanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Ancak \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 &#8211; girdi an\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclen \u00fccretleri sebebiyle yap\u0131lan \u00f6demelerin eksik oldu\u011fu iddialar\u0131yla bu davalar\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya i\u00e7erisinde mevcut Toplu \u0130\u015f S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 35. maddesinde 01.03.2006 tarihinde %6 oran\u0131nda, 01.09.2006 tarihinde %6 oran\u0131nda 01.04.2007 tarihinde %4 oran\u0131nda, 01.10.2007 tarihinde %5 oran\u0131nda, 01.04.2008 tarihinde %4 oran\u0131nda, 01.10.2008 tarihinde %4 oran\u0131nda, 01.04.2009 tarihinde %4 oran\u0131nda, 01.10.2009 tarihinde %4 oran\u0131nda, 01.04.2010 tarihinde %4 oran\u0131nda \u00fccret zamm\u0131 yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, 40.maddesi gere\u011fince ayl\u0131k 10 yevmiye ikramiye \u00f6denece\u011finin, 01.04.2007 tarihinden sonra i\u015fe giren ve sendikaya \u00fcye olan i\u015f\u00e7ilere her bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in 72 yevmiye her ay 6 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yevmiye \u00fczerinden ikramiye \u00f6denece\u011finin kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i, \u00fccretin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin yasal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, T\u0130S deki \u00fccret zamlar\u0131 i\u015fletilerek belirlenecek \u00fccrete g\u00f6re fark taleplerde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece resen bir hesaplama yap\u0131lamam\u0131\u015f ve bilirki\u015fi hesap raporuna ihtiya\u00e7 duyulmu\u015ftur. Fark \u00fccret ve ikramiye ise muhasebe i\u015flemi gerektirmekte olup, alaca\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7ek \u00fccret zam oranlar\u0131 uygulanarak belirlenecek ve bordro ile \u00f6denen mahsup edilip fark bulunacakt\u0131r. Fark\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 ise belgeleme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fc olan i\u015fverenin sunaca\u011f\u0131 bordrolar ile hesaplanacakt\u0131r. Zira bordro d\u00fczenleme ve saklama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fc i\u015fverendedir. K\u0131saca davac\u0131n\u0131n fark alaca\u011f\u0131 i\u015fverenin sunaca\u011f\u0131 bordrolara g\u00f6re belirlenecektir. Zaten mahkemede bu y\u00f6ntemi takip etmi\u015f, bordrolar ibraz\u0131ndan sonra hesap raporu alm\u0131\u015f ve buna g\u00f6re karar vermi\u015ftir. Hesap raporu almadan karar vermesi de olanaks\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Al\u0131nan hesap raporunda, i\u015f\u00e7inin temel \u00fccretinin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi varsay\u0131larak toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde her ay i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen zam oranlar\u0131 eklenerek d\u00f6nemsel \u00fccretler belirlenmi\u015f ve zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 define g\u00f6re hak kazan\u0131labilecek tutarlar belirlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin ilk ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 \u00fccretini bildi\u011fi ve toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayanan \u00fccret art\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 hesaplayabildi\u011fi bir an i\u00e7in varsay\u0131lsa dahi, fark hesaplar\u0131 i\u00e7in i\u015fveren uhdesinde olan belgelere ihtiya\u00e7 vard\u0131r. Y\u0131llar i\u00e7inde i\u015f\u00e7iye her ay ne kadar \u00fccret, ne kadar ikramiye ve ne kadar fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00f6dendi\u011fi i\u015f\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan bilinmeli ki aradaki fark hesaplanabilsin. Somut olayda i\u015fverence i\u015f\u00e7iye her ay d\u00fczenli olarak \u00fccret bordrolar\u0131 ile \u00f6deme belgelerinin verildi\u011fi kan\u0131tlanamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015fyerinde personel uzman\u0131, muhasebeci veya avukat stat\u00fcs\u00fcnde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmayan bir i\u015f\u00e7inin y\u0131llar i\u00e7inde her 6 ayda gelen \u00fccret art\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 do\u011fru \u015fekilde uygulamas\u0131 ve 107 maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde belirtildi\u011fi \u015fekilde alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 &#8220;tam olarak ve tamamen&#8221; belirleyebilmesi olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir. Bunun i\u00e7in i\u015fverende bulunan bordrolar\u0131n dosyaya sunulmas\u0131 gerekir. Zaten davac\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a delil listesinde i\u015fyeri \u015fahsi sicil dosyas\u0131 ve bordrolara dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131n\u0131n bu bordrolar olmadan fark alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 hesaplamas\u0131 olana\u011f\u0131 yoktur. Zira bankaya yatan \u00fccret, \u00e7\u0131plak \u00fccret olmay\u0131p, \u00fccretin ekleri, sosyal yard\u0131mlar vard\u0131r. Bu \u00f6demelerin bir k\u0131sm\u0131 \u00e7\u0131plak \u00fccrette, bir k\u0131sm\u0131 ise giydirilmi\u015f \u00fccrete dikkate al\u0131nacak \u00f6demelerdir. Bu \u00f6demelerin ayr\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bordrolar\u0131n dosyaya sunulmas\u0131 gerekir ve bu belgelerde i\u015fverendedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015fverene kar\u015f\u0131 son derece zay\u0131f konumda olan, i\u015fverenin \u00fccret d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrme i\u015flemine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kamayan bir i\u015f\u00e7inin, kendisine verilmeyen, i\u015fveren uhdesindeki belgelere g\u00f6re tam bir hesaplama yaparak dava a\u00e7mas\u0131n\u0131 beklemek do\u011fru bir yakla\u015f\u0131m de\u011fildir. Aksine etkin korunmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f\u00e7inin belirsiz alacak davas\u0131ndan yararland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Mahkemenin bu y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmesi isabetli olup, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu y\u00f6ndeki temyizinin reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2. A\u00e7\u0131lan dava k\u0131smi dava m\u0131 belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 m\u0131d\u0131r?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava dilek\u00e7esinde talep sonucuna bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda, davac\u0131 k\u0131smi miktar belirtmi\u015f ve bu miktar\u0131n yan\u0131na parantez i\u00e7inde belirsiz kelimesini yazm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Talep sonucuna bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda, davac\u0131 tahsil ama\u00e7l\u0131 belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7mam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Zira belirleyebilece\u011fi kadar miktar\u0131 belirlememi\u015f ve dava dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kalan\u0131 belirledi\u011finde art\u0131r\u0131m dilek\u00e7esi verece\u011fini de a\u00e7\u0131klamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu davan\u0131n belirsiz alaca\u011f\u0131n di\u011fer t\u00fcrlerinden olan k\u0131smi eda k\u00fclli tespit davas\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesi olana\u011f\u0131 da talep sonucuna g\u00f6re olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir. Zira k\u0131smi miktar\u0131n tahsili d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan ve belirlenecek alaca\u011f\u0131n tespiti a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a istenmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davan\u0131n talep sonucuna g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a k\u0131smi dava oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. O nedenle mahkemece ba\u015ftan itibaren k\u0131smi dava olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi ve sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 do\u011frudur. Davac\u0131 vekilinin belirsiz kelimesini kullanmas\u0131, o tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan HMK. 109\/2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca belirli alacakta k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7amayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesinden kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle mahkemenin bu y\u00f6ndeki direnmesi yerindedir. Davac\u0131 vekilinin temyizi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3. Hukuki yarar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi sorunu;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir an i\u00e7in fark alacaklar\u0131n belirlenebilir oldu\u011fu kabul edilse bile, alacaklar yarg\u0131lama sonucunda bilirki\u015fi raporu ile belirlenmi\u015f ve \u0131slah sureti ile art\u0131r\u0131larak talep edilmi\u015ftir. Hukuki yarar \u015fart\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Usul ekonomisi ilkesi uyar\u0131nca da alacaklar\u0131n esastan h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 do\u011frudur. Y\u00fcksek 22. Hukuk Dairesinin bu y\u00f6ndeki bozmas\u0131 da yerinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sonu\u00e7 olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Y\u00fcksek Yarg\u0131tay Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131l\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KAR\u015eI OY :<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkeme, dava konusu alacaklar\u0131n HMK&#8217;nun 107. maddesi gere\u011fince belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak veya HMK&#8217;nun 109. maddesi gere\u011fince k\u0131smi alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fini; somut olayda davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, k\u0131smi alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, belirterek; buna g\u00f6re karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6zel daire ise, davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde \u015f\u00fcphe olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yerel mahkemece bu \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan davan\u0131n k\u0131smi alacak davas\u0131 olarak nitelendirilemeyece\u011fini ve ayr\u0131ca dava konusu alacaklar\u0131n belirsiz alacak olarak dava ve talep edilemeyece\u011fini, belirterek; yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 bozmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nda \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn g\u00fcndemin 1-2-4. s\u0131ras\u0131nda kay\u0131tl\u0131 dosya gruplar\u0131nda dava konusu alacaklar\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na konu olabilece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle yerel mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi halde, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ve g\u00fcndemin 3. s\u0131ras\u0131nda kay\u0131tl\u0131 dosya gruplar\u0131nda yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n nedeni, yerel mahkemece belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n k\u0131smi alacak davas\u0131 olarak vas\u0131fland\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu gerek\u00e7eyle bozma yap\u0131l\u0131nca dava konusu alaca\u011f\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine gerek kalmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkemenin karar\u0131 davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">G\u00fcndemin 1-2-3-4. s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki dosya gruplar\u0131n\u0131n birbirine benzemesine ra\u011fmen Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu taraf\u0131ndan g\u00fcndemin 1-2-4. s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki dosya gruplar\u0131 ile 3. s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki dosya gruplar\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00e7eli\u015fkili ( birbirine ayk\u0131r\u0131 ) oy kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi bir yanl\u0131\u015f anlamaya yer verilmemesi i\u00e7in gerek\u00e7eli karar yaz\u0131m\u0131nda bu ayr\u0131nt\u0131ya yer verilmesi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131z\u0131n zorlu g\u00f6revine m\u00fctevazi bir katk\u0131 olarak bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcn dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fcksek takdirlerinize sayg\u0131 ile arz ederim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2013\/9-2193<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2015\/1308<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 6.5.2015<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI DAVASI ( Mahkemenin \u0130lk Karar\u0131n Gerek\u00e7esinde Dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 Hukuki Olguyu De\u011fi\u015ftirerek Karar Vermesi Halinde Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131n Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan S\u00f6z Edilemeyece\u011fi\/Direnme Karar\u0131 Olarak Adland\u0131r\u0131lan Temyize Konu Karar\u0131n Usul Hukuku Anlam\u0131nda Ger\u00e7ek Bir Direnme Karar\u0131 Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Yeni H\u00fckm\u00fcn Temyizen \u0130ncelenmesi G\u00f6revinin \u00d6zel Daireye Ait Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 D\u0130RENME KARARI ( Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130\u00e7in Mahkemenin Bozmadan Esinlenerek Yeni Herhangi Bir Delil Toplamadan \u00d6nceki Deliller \u00c7er\u00e7evesinde Karar Vermesinin Gerekti\u011fi\/Gerek\u00e7enin \u00d6nceki Karara G\u00f6re Geni\u015fletilebilece\u011fi Ama De\u011fi\u015ftirilemeyece\u011fi &#8211; \u0130lk Karar\u0131n Gerek\u00e7esinde Dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 Hukuki Olguyu De\u011fi\u015ftirerek Karar Vermesi Halinde Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131n Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan S\u00f6z Edilemeyece\u011fi\/Temyize Konu Karar\u0131n Usul Hukuku Anlam\u0131nda Ger\u00e7ek Bir Direnme Karar\u0131 Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 HUKUK GENEL KURULU&#8217;NUN G\u00d6REV\u0130 ( Temyize Konu Karar\u0131n Usul Hukuku Anlam\u0131nda Ger\u00e7ek Bir Direnme Karar\u0131 Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Yeni H\u00fckm\u00fcn Temyizen \u0130ncelenmesi G\u00f6revinin \u00d6zel Daireye Ait Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Yeni H\u00fckme Y\u00f6nelik \u0130tirazlar\u0131n \u0130ncelenmesi \u0130\u00e7in \u00d6zel Daireye G\u00f6nderilmesinin Gerekti\u011fi\/\u0130\u015f\u00e7ilik Alacaklar\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 BOZMADAN SONRA YEN\u0130 H\u00dcK\u00dcM KURULMASI ( Halinde Temyizen \u0130nceleme G\u00f6revinin Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;na De\u011fil \u00d6zel Daireye Ait Oldu\u011fu\/ Mahkemenin Direnme Karar\u0131 Olarak Adland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 Temyize Konu Karar\u0131n \u0130lk Kararda Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p De\u011ferlendirilmeyen Yeni Gerek\u00e7eye Dayal\u0131 Bir H\u00fck\u00fcm Niteli\u011finde Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Yeni H\u00fckme Y\u00f6nelik Temyiz\u0130tirazlar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130ncelenmesi \u0130\u00e7in Dosyan\u0131n \u00d6zel Daireye G\u00f6nderilece\u011fi\/\u0130\u015f\u00e7ilik Alacaklar\u0131 Davas\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130ZEN \u0130NCELEME YETK\u0130S\u0130 ( Temyize Konu Karar\u0131n \u0130lk Kararda Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p De\u011ferlendirilmeyen Yeni Gerek\u00e7eye Dayal\u0131 Bir H\u00fck\u00fcm Niteli\u011finde Oldu\u011fu\/Usul Hukuku Anlam\u0131nda Ger\u00e7ek Bir Direnme Karar\u0131 Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Yeni H\u00fckm\u00fcn Temyizen \u0130ncelenmesi G\u00f6revinin Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;na Ait Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086\/m. 429<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m. Ge\u00e7.3<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6217\/m. 30<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET : <\/span>Dava i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsili istemine ili\u015fkindir.Hukuk Genel Kurulundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda, i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinden \u00f6nce, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekte yeni h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; dolay\u0131s\u0131yla temyiz incelemesinin Hukuk Genel Kurulunca m\u0131, yoksa \u00d6zel Dairece mi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi hususu \u00f6n sorun olarak tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere; direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilebilmesi i\u00e7in, mahkeme bozmadan esinlenerek yeni herhangi bir delil toplamadan \u00f6nceki deliller \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde karar vermeli; gerek\u00e7esini \u00f6nceki karar\u0131na g\u00f6re geni\u015fletebilirse de de\u011fi\u015ftirmemelidir Mahkemenin yeni bir bilgi, belge ve delile dayanarak veya bozmadan esinlenip gerek\u00e7esini de\u011fi\u015ftirerek veya daha \u00f6nce \u00fczerinde durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir hususu bozmada i\u015faret olunan \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirerek, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla da ilk karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukuki olguyu de\u011fi\u015ftirerek karar vermi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemenin direnme olarak adland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyize konu karar\u0131n usul hukuku anlam\u0131nda ger\u00e7ek bir direnme karar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; ilk kararda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmeyen yeni gerek\u00e7eye dayal\u0131 bir h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu her t\u00fcrl\u00fc duraksamadan uzakt\u0131r. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; kurulan bu yeni h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyizen incelenmesi g\u00f6revi, Hukuk Genel Kuruluna de\u011fil, \u00d6zel Daireye aittir. Bu nedenle, yeni h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosya \u00d6zel Daireye g\u00f6nderilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201ctazminat ve alacak\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Gebze 2. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesince davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 12.02.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/595 E., 2010\/66 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar, daval\u0131 vekilinin temyizi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesinin 02.10.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/21936 E., 2012\/32772 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; 1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillerle, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-Taraflar aras\u0131nda, i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011fray\u0131p u\u011framad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, alacak hakk\u0131n\u0131n belli bir s\u00fcre kullan\u0131lmamas\u0131 y\u00fcz\u00fcnden dava edilebilme niteli\u011finden yoksun kalmas\u0131n\u0131 ifade eder. Bu tan\u0131mdan da anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, alacak hakk\u0131n\u0131 sona erdirmeyip sadece onu &#8220;eksik bir bor\u00e7&#8221; haline d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fcr ve &#8220;alaca\u011f\u0131n dava edilebilme \u00f6zelli\u011fi&#8221;ni ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 savunmas\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, e\u011fer savunma ger\u00e7ekle\u015firse hakk\u0131n dava edilebilme niteli\u011fi ortadan kalkaca\u011f\u0131ndan, art\u0131k mahkemenin i\u015fin esas\u0131na girip onu incelemesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, bir maddi hukuk kurumu de\u011fildir. Di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, bir borcu do\u011furan, de\u011fi\u015ftiren ortadan kald\u0131ran bir olgu olmay\u0131p, salt do\u011fmu\u015f ve var olan bir hakk\u0131n istenmesini ortadan kald\u0131ran bir savunma arac\u0131d\u0131r. Bu bak\u0131mdan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fil, istenebilirli\u011fini ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131r. Bunun sonucu olarak da, yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan yarg\u0131\u00e7 taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6revinin bir gere\u011fi olarak kendili\u011finden g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulamaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bor\u00e7lunun b\u00f6yle bir olgunun var oldu\u011funu, yasada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcre ve usul i\u00e7inde ileri s\u00fcrmesi zorunludur. Demek oluyor ki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, borcun do\u011fumu ile ilgili olmay\u0131p, istenmesini \u00f6nleyen bir savunma olgusudur. \u015eu durumda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, savunmas\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedik\u00e7e, istemin konusu olan hakk\u0131n var oldu\u011fu ve kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesinde hukuksal ve yasal bir engel bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hemen belirtmelidir ki, gerek \u0130\u015f Kanununda, gerekse Bor\u00e7lar Kanununda, k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 alacaklar\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6zel bir zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uygulama ve \u00f6\u011fretide k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 ve ihbar tazminat\u0131na ili\u015fkin davalar, hakk\u0131n do\u011fumundan itibaren, Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 125. maddesi uyar\u0131nca on y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabi tutulmu\u015ftur. 01.07.2012 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun 146 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesinde de genel zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 10 y\u0131l olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tazminat niteli\u011finde olmalar\u0131 nedeni ile sendikal tazminat, k\u00f6t\u00fcniyet tazminat\u0131, i\u015fe ba\u015flatmama tazminat\u0131, 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanununun; 5. maddesindeki e\u015fit i\u015flem borcuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k nedeni ile tazminat, 26\/2 maddesindeki maddi ve manevi tazminat, 28. maddedeki belgenin zaman\u0131nda verilmemesinden kaynaklanan tazminat, 31 \/son maddesi uyar\u0131nca askerlik sonras\u0131 i\u015fe almama nedeni ile \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat istekleri on y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu noktada, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131na esas al\u0131nan k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fumu ise, i\u015f\u00e7i a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan hizmet aktinin feshedildi\u011fi tarihtir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, harekete ge\u00e7ememek, istemde bulunamamak durumunda bulunan kimsenin aleyhine i\u015flemez. Bir hakk\u0131n, bu ba\u011flamda \u00f6dence isteminin do\u011fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir tarihte, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n istenmesini ve elde edilmesini g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirir, hatta olanaks\u0131z k\u0131lar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015fveren ve i\u015f\u00e7i aras\u0131ndaki hukuki ili\u015fki i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayanmaktad\u0131r. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde i\u015fverene zarar vermesi halinde, i\u015fverenin zarar\u0131n\u0131n tazmini amac\u0131 ile a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 dava Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 125. maddesi ( 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 TBK 146 ) uyar\u0131nca on y\u0131ll\u0131k zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanundan daha \u00f6nce y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1475 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasada \u00fccret alacaklar\u0131yla ilgi olarak \u00f6zel bir zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi halde, 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunun 32\/8 maddesinde, i\u015f\u00e7i \u00fccretinin be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00f6zel bir zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresine tabi oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ancak bu Kanundan \u00f6nce tazminat niteli\u011finde olmayan, \u00fccret niteli\u011fi a\u011f\u0131r basan i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar, Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 126\/1 maddesi ( 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 TBK 147 ) uyar\u0131nca be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi ile muaccel olup d\u00f6nemsel bir nitelik ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu uygulamas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 10 y\u0131ll\u0131k genel zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015fverence i\u015f\u00e7iye fazladan \u00f6denen \u00fccret ve \u00fccret eklerinin geri al\u0131nmas\u0131nda da uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n temelinde s\u00f6zle\u015fme ili\u015fkisi olmakla zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi be\u015f y\u0131l olarak uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dairemizin kararlar\u0131 da bu y\u00f6ndedir ( Yarg\u0131tay 9.HD. 27.02.2012 g\u00fcn 2009\/43216 E, 2012\/6010 K. ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanundaki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcreleri, Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 127. maddesi ( 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 TBK.n\u0131n 148 ) gere\u011fince taraflar\u0131n iradeleri ile de\u011fi\u015ftirilemez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi devam ederken kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken ve i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi ile alacak niteli\u011fi do\u011fan y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin fesih tarihinden ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir (HGK. 05.07.2000 g\u00fcn ve 2000\/9-1079 E, 2000\/1103 K ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan alacaklarda, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n muaccel oldu\u011fu tarihten ba\u015flar. ( BK. m. 128 ). Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 101. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, borcun muaccel olmas\u0131, ifa zaman\u0131n\u0131n gelmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131 ifade eder. Borcun ifas\u0131 hen\u00fcz istenemiyorsa muaccel bir bor\u00e7tan da s\u00f6z edilemez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 128. maddesinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n nas\u0131l hesaplanaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n muaccel oldu\u011fu anda ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 kural\u0131n\u0131 getirmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde d\u00fczenleme 01.07.2012 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun 151. maddesinde yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunun 131. maddesi gere\u011fince, as\u0131l alacak zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda faiz ve di\u011fer ek haklar da zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na, u\u011frar. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle faiz alaca\u011f\u0131 as\u0131l alaca\u011f\u0131n tabi oldu\u011fu zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabi olur. T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun 152. maddesi de ayn\u0131 do\u011frultudad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 133\/2 maddesi ( 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 TBK.n\u0131n 154 ) uyar\u0131nca, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7mas\u0131yla zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 kesilir. Ancak zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilmesi sadece dava konusu alacak i\u00e7in s\u00f6z konusudur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 132\/4 maddesinde \u201cHizmet mukavelesinin devam etti\u011fi m\u00fcddet\u00e7e hizmet\u00e7ilerin, istihdam edenlere kar\u015f\u0131 olan alacaklar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda&#8221; zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flemeyece\u011fi ve duraca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu maddenin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle ba\u011fl\u0131 her ki\u015fiye uygulanmas\u0131 olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Hizmet\u00e7iden kastedilen, kendisine ev i\u015fleri i\u00e7in \u00fccret \u00f6denen, i\u015f sahibiyle ayn\u0131 evde yat\u0131p kalkan, aileden biriymi\u015f gibi ev halk\u0131 ile s\u0131k\u0131 ili\u015fkileri olan kimsedir. 01.07.2012 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun 153\/ 4. maddesinde daha a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verilerek, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n, ev hizmetlileri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hizmet ili\u015fkisi s\u00fcresince i\u015flemeyece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 133. maddesinde ( 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 TBK.n\u0131n 154 ) zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesen nedenler g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. Bunlardan bor\u00e7lunun borcunu ikrar etmesi ( alaca\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131mas\u0131 ), zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesen nedenlerden biridir. Borcun tan\u0131nmas\u0131, tek yanl\u0131 bir irade bildirimi olup; bor\u00e7lunun, kendi borcunun devam etmekte oldu\u011funu kabul anlam\u0131ndad\u0131r. Bor\u00e7 ikrar\u0131n\u0131n sonu\u00e7 do\u011furabilmesi i\u00e7in, eylem yetene\u011fine ve mallar\u0131 \u00fczerinde tasarruf yetkisine sahip olan bor\u00e7lunun veya yetkili k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 vekilinin, bu iradeyi alacakl\u0131ya y\u00f6neltmi\u015f bulunmas\u0131 ve ayr\u0131ca zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin dolmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ger\u00e7ekte de bor\u00e7 ikrar\u0131, ancak, i\u015flemekte olan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 keser; farkl\u0131 anlat\u0131mla zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin tamamlanmas\u0131ndan sonraki bor\u00e7 ikrar\u0131n\u0131n kesme y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131ndan ku\u015fku ve duraksamaya yer olmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 133\/2 maddesi ( 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 TBK.n\u0131n 154\/2 ) h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca, dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 veya icra takibi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesen nedenlerdendir. Yasan\u0131n 135. maddesi ise, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilmesi halinde yeni bir s\u00fcrenin i\u015flemesi gerekti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmi\u015ftir. Madde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fczenlemedi\u011finden ihtiyati tedbir istemi ile mahkemeye ba\u015fvurma veya i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ve \u00f6denmesi i\u00e7in B\u00f6lge \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma \u0130\u015f M\u00fcfetti\u015fli\u011fine \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunma zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesen nedenler olarak kabul edilemez. Ancak i\u015fverenin, \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde alaca\u011f\u0131 ikrar etmesi, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 keser.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uygulamada, fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131n sakl\u0131 tutulmas\u0131, dava a\u00e7ma tekni\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, t\u00fcm\u00fc ihlal ya da ink\u00e2r olunan hakk\u0131n ancak bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn dava edilmesi, di\u011fer b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne ait dava ve talep hakk\u0131n\u0131n baz\u0131 nedenlerle gelece\u011fe b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelir. Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulunca benimsenmi\u015f ilkeye g\u00f6re, k\u0131smi davada fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131n sakl\u0131 tutulmu\u015f olmas\u0131, sakl\u0131 tutulan kesim i\u00e7in zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesmez, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, alaca\u011f\u0131n yaln\u0131z k\u0131smi dava konusu yap\u0131lan miktar i\u00e7in kesilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, dava devam ederken iki taraf\u0131n yarg\u0131lamaya ili\u015fkin her i\u015fleminden ve h\u00e2kimin her emir ve h\u00fckm\u00fcnden itibaren yeniden i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar ve kesilmeden itibaren yeni bir s\u00fcre i\u015fler.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunun 134. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc, &#8220;M\u00fcruruzaman m\u00fcteselsilen bor\u00e7lu olanlardan veya taksimi kabil olmayan bir borcun m\u00fc\u015fterek bor\u00e7lular\u0131ndan birine kar\u015f\u0131 katedilmi\u015f olunca di\u011ferlerine kar\u015f\u0131 da katedilmi\u015f olur&#8221; kural\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7ermektedir. Bu maddeye g\u00f6re, m\u00fcteselsil bor\u00e7lulardan birine kar\u015f\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilmesi di\u011fer m\u00fcteselsil bor\u00e7lulara kar\u015f\u0131 da zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 keser. Benzer bir d\u00fczenleme 01.07.2012 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun 155. maddesinde yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 139. maddesinde ( 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 TBK.n\u0131n 160 ), zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan feragat d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan maddeye g\u00f6re, bor\u00e7lunun zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defini ileri s\u00fcrme hakk\u0131ndan \u00f6nceden feragati ge\u00e7ersizdir. \u00d6nceden feragatten ama\u00e7, s\u00f6zle\u015fme yap\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce veya yap\u0131l\u0131rken vaki feragattir. Oysa daha sonra vazge\u00e7menin ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin yasada herhangi bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamaktad\u0131r. O nedenle bor\u00e7 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131ktan sonra bor\u00e7lu zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defini ileri s\u00fcrmekten feragat edebilir. Zira, burada do\u011fmu\u015f bir defi hakk\u0131ndan feragat s\u00f6z konusudur ve hukuken ge\u00e7erlidir. Bu feragat; bor\u00e7lunun, ileride dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definde bulunmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan feragat anla\u015fmas\u0131yla veya tek yanl\u0131 iradesini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a bildirmesiyle veyahut bu anlama gelecek iradeye delalet edecek bir i\u015flem yapmas\u0131yla m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilece\u011fi gibi, a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir davada zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definde bulunmamas\u0131yla veya defi geri almas\u0131yla da m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin dolmas\u0131ndan sonra alacakl\u0131ya y\u00f6neltilen bor\u00e7 ikrar\u0131n\u0131n, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definden z\u0131mni ( \u00f6rt\u00fcl\u00fc ) feragat anlam\u0131na geldi\u011fi, \u00f6\u011fretideki bask\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerle ve yarg\u0131 inan\u00e7lar\u0131yla da do\u011frulanmaktad\u0131r ( Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 19\/11\/1963 T. 06.05.20155924-6419 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ). Dahas\u0131, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin dolmas\u0131ndan sonra alacakl\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 bir bor\u00e7 ikrar\u0131nda bulunan bor\u00e7lunun, bu bor\u00e7 ikrar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak a\u00e7\u0131lan davada zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defini ileri s\u00fcrmesi, \u00e7eli\u015fkili davran\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturur. Bu durum Medeni Kanunun 2. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, hukuken korunamaz ( HGK. 23.02.2000 g\u00fcn ve 2000\/15-71 E, 2000\/116 K ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5521 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanununun 7. maddesinde, i\u015f mahkemelerinde s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fc uygulan\u0131r. Ancak 01.10.2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 447. maddesi ile s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 316 ve devam\u0131 maddeleri gere\u011fince i\u015f davalar\u0131 i\u00e7in basit yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fc benimsenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fcn\u00fcn uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def&#8217;i ilk oturuma kadar ve en ge\u00e7 ilk oturumda yap\u0131labilir. Ancak 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde 319. madde h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca savunman\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131 cevap dilek\u00e7esinin verilmesiyle ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi cevap dilek\u00e7esi ile ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmelidir. 01.10.2011 tarihinden sonraki d\u00f6nemde ilk oturuma kadar zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definin iler s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi ve hatta ilk oturumda s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak bildirilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava konusunun \u0131slah yoluyla artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda, 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde, \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esinin tebli\u011fini izleyen ilk oturuma kadar ya da ilk oturumda yap\u0131lan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi de \u0131slaha konu alacaklar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fck\u00fcm ifade eder. Ancak Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 01.10.2011 tarihinden sonraki uygulamada, 317\/2 ve 319. maddeler uyar\u0131nca \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esinin daval\u0131 tarafa tebli\u011fi \u00fczerine iki haftal\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde \u0131slaha konu k\u0131s\u0131mlar i\u00e7in zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definde bulunulabilece\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cevap dilek\u00e7esinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmemi\u015f ya da s\u00fcresi i\u00e7ince cevap dilek\u00e7esi verilmemi\u015fse ilerleyen a\u015famalarda 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 141\/2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k muvafakati ile yap\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte iken s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra yap\u0131lan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 define davac\u0131 taraf s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hemen ve a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmam\u0131\u015fsa ( suskun kal\u0131nm\u0131\u015fsa ) zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi ge\u00e7erli say\u0131lmakta iken, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra yap\u0131lan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definin ge\u00e7erli say\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a muvafakat etmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla 01.10.2011 tarihinden sonraki uygulamalar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 define davac\u0131 taraf muvafakat etmez ise zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi dikkate al\u0131nmaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definin cevap dilek\u00e7esinin \u0131slah\u0131 yoluyla ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi de m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr ( Yarg\u0131tay HGK. 04.06.2011 g\u00fcn 2010\/ 9-629 E, 2011\/ 70. K. ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda; daval\u0131 vekilinin \u0131slaha kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 itiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmeden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- Temerr\u00fct ihtar\u0131nda daval\u0131 tarafa tebli\u011finden itibaren 30 g\u00fcn s\u00fcre verildi\u011fi halde temerr\u00fct tarihinin tebli\u011fden sonraki 30. g\u00fcn yerine 20.06.2009 olarak kabul\u00fc de hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esi ile bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki k\u00e2\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Dava i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsili istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda, i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinden \u00f6nce, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekte yeni h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; dolay\u0131s\u0131yla temyiz incelemesinin Hukuk Genel Kurulunca m\u0131, yoksa \u00d6zel Dairece mi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi hususu \u00f6n sorun olarak tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere; direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilebilmesi i\u00e7in, mahkeme bozmadan esinlenerek yeni herhangi bir delil toplamadan \u00f6nceki deliller \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde karar vermeli; gerek\u00e7esini \u00f6nceki karar\u0131na g\u00f6re geni\u015fletebilirse de de\u011fi\u015ftirmemelidir ( 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 30. maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 429. maddesi ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemenin yeni bir bilgi, belge ve delile dayanarak veya bozmadan esinlenip gerek\u00e7esini de\u011fi\u015ftirerek veya daha \u00f6nce \u00fczerinde durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir hususu bozmada i\u015faret olunan \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirerek, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla da ilk karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukuki olguyu de\u011fi\u015ftirerek karar vermi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda yerel mahkeme temyize konu karar\u0131nda, ilk karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde yer vermedi\u011fi \u201c\u2026Davac\u0131, hizmet akdinden kaynaklanan alacaklar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin belgeler daval\u0131 elinde bulundu\u011fundan ve dava tarihi itibariyle alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ne kadar oldu\u011funun tam olarak belirleyemedi\u011finden y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK nun 107 maddesinde tan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 bulan belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak bu yasan\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck tarihinden \u00f6nce alaca\u011f\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131 belirtilerek dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, delillerin toplanmas\u0131ndan sonra bedelin \u0131slah yolu ile artt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa ile tan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 bulan belirsiz alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n yasan\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden \u00f6nce isimsiz olarak fiilen uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0131slahla artt\u0131r\u0131lan bedel i\u00e7in ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurma harc\u0131 al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sadece artt\u0131r\u0131lan k\u0131s\u0131m i\u00e7in eksik kalan harc\u0131n tamamlatt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle ek dava olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi, buna g\u00f6re \u0131slah ile artt\u0131r\u0131lan k\u0131s\u0131m i\u00e7in zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 itiraz\u0131nda bulunulamayaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmekle, \u0131slah ile artt\u0131r\u0131lan miktara daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 itiraz\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f olup, ek rapor da al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bozma ilam\u0131nda belirtilen \u0131slaha kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 itiraz\u0131 ile ek rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131 hususunun de\u011ferlendirilmemesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe bu nedenle uyulmam\u0131\u015f ve \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesine karar verilmi\u015f, ilk kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ve yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7e ile davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne, hakkaniyet indirimi nedeniyle reddedilen miktar i\u00e7in daval\u0131 lehine avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti tayinine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir&#8230;\u201d \u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7eyle direnme olarak adland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemenin direnme olarak adland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyize konu karar\u0131n usul hukuku anlam\u0131nda ger\u00e7ek bir direnme karar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; ilk kararda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmeyen yeni gerek\u00e7eye dayal\u0131 bir h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu her t\u00fcrl\u00fc duraksamadan uzakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; kurulan bu yeni h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyizen incelenmesi g\u00f6revi, Hukuk Genel Kuruluna de\u011fil, \u00d6zel Daireye aittir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle, yeni h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosya \u00d6zel Daireye g\u00f6nderilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerle daval\u0131 vekilinin yeni h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n 9. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130NE G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 06.05.2015 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/9-1438<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2015\/580<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 21.1.2015<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 GEREK\u00c7EL\u0130 KARARIN TARAFLARA TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130 ZORUNLULU\u011eU ( Usul Hukukunda Yer Almamakla Birlikte Uygulamada Tefhimden Sonra Temyiz S\u00fcre Tutum Dilek\u00e7esi Veya Karar\u0131n Tebli\u011finden Sonra Gerek\u00e7eli Temyiz Dilek\u00e7esi Sunarak Karar\u0131n Temyiz Edildi\u011fi Hallerde Karar\u0131n Gerek\u00e7esini Dikkate Alarak Yeni Temyiz Gerek\u00e7elerine Dayan\u0131labilece\u011fi &#8211; Tebli\u011f Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc Yerine Getirmeden Karar\u0131n Kesinle\u015ftirilmesini Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin de Hak \u0130hlali Kabul Etti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130Z S\u00dcRES\u0130 BA\u015eLANGICI \/ TEFH\u0130M \/ TEBL\u0130\u011e ( H\u00fckme \u0130li\u015fkin T\u00fcm Hususlar\u0131n Gerek\u00e7esi \u0130le Birlikte Tefhim Edilemedi\u011fi Hallerde Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n Mutlaka Taraflara Tebli\u011fEdilmesi Gerekti\u011fi\/Temyiz S\u00fcresinin Tefhim De\u011fil Tebli\u011fden \u0130tibaren Ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; \u0130\u015f Mahkemesinin Tefhim Edilen Karar\u0131n\u0131n H\u00fckme \u0130li\u015fkin T\u00fcm Hususlar\u0131 \u0130\u00e7ermemesi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u0130\u015e MAHKEMES\u0130N\u0130N TEFH\u0130M ED\u0130LEN KARARI ( H\u00fckme \u0130li\u015fkin T\u00fcm Hususlar\u0131n Gerek\u00e7esi \u0130le Birlikte Tefhim Edilemedi\u011fi Hallerde Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n Mutlaka Taraflara Tebli\u011fEdilmesi Gerekti\u011fi\/Temyiz S\u00fcresinin Tefhim De\u011fil Tebli\u011fden \u0130tibaren Ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Tebli\u011f Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc Yerine Getirmeden Karar\u0131n Kesinle\u015ftirilmesini Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin de Hak \u0130hlali Kabul Etti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 D\u0130RENME KARARININ TEBL\u0130\u011e ED\u0130LMEMES\u0130 ( Gerek\u00e7eli Karar\u0131n Tebligat Kanunu ve \u0130lgili Mevzuat Dikkate Al\u0131narak Tebli\u011f Edilmesi Gerekti\u011fi &#8211; Temyiz S\u00fcresi Ge\u00e7tikten Sonra ve Gerekti\u011finde 6100 S.K. Ge\u00e7ici madde 3 Atf\u0131yla Uygulanmakta Olan HUMK&#8217;nun 432. Maddesindeki Usul \u0130\u015flemlerinin Yerine Getirilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130Z D\u0130LEK\u00c7ES\u0130N\u0130N KAR\u015eI TARAFA TEBL\u0130\u011e ED\u0130LMEMES\u0130 ( Daval\u0131 Vekiline Ait Dilek\u00e7einin Davac\u0131 Tarafa &#8211; 6100 S.K. Ge\u00e7ici madde 3 Atfiyla Uygulanmakta Olan HUMK&#8217;nun 433. Maddesi Gere\u011fince Davac\u0131 Vekiline Tebligat Kanunu ve \u0130lgili Mevzuat Dikkate Al\u0131narak Tebli\u011f Edilip Yasal S\u00fcre Beklenildikten Sonra Hukuk Genel Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00f6nderilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 AD\u0130L YARGILANMA HAKKININ \u0130HLAL\u0130 ( Usul Hukukunda Yer Almamakla Birlikte Uygulamada Tefhimden Sonra Temyiz S\u00fcre Tutum Dilek\u00e7esi Veya Karar\u0131n Tebli\u011finden Sonra Gerek\u00e7eli Temyiz Dilek\u00e7esi Sunarak Karar\u0131n Temyiz Edildi\u011fi Hallerde Karar\u0131n Gerek\u00e7esini Dikkate Alarak Yeni Temyiz Gerek\u00e7elerine Dayan\u0131labilece\u011fi &#8211; Tebli\u011f Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc Yerine Getirmeden Karar\u0131n Kesinle\u015ftirilmesinin Bu Nitelikte Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5521\/m. 7, 8, 15<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m. 297, 321, 322, 447\/1, Ge\u00e7.3<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086\/m. 432, 433\/1<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> \u0130\u015f mahkemesinin tefhim edilen karar\u0131 h\u00fckme ili\u015fkin t\u00fcm hususlar\u0131 i\u00e7ermiyorsa, yani sadece h\u00fck\u00fcm \u00f6zeti tefhim edilmi\u015f ise temyiz s\u00fcresi tefhimden de\u011fil, tebli\u011fden itibaren ba\u015flar. H\u00fckme ili\u015fkin t\u00fcm hususlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi ile birlikte tefhim edilemedi\u011fi hallerde gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n mutlaka taraflara tebli\u011f edilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 vekiline tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Gerek\u00e7eli karar davac\u0131 vekiline Tebligat Kanunu ve ilgili mevzuat dikkate al\u0131narak tebli\u011f edilmeli, temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra ve gerekti\u011finde 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nu \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 432.maddesindeki usul i\u015flemleri yerine getirilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekiline ait temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin davac\u0131 tarafa tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Temyiz eden daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan sunulan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nu \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atfiyla uygulanmakta olan HUMK&#8217;nun 433. maddesi gere\u011fince davac\u0131 vekiline Tebligat Kanunu ve ilgili mevzuat dikkate al\u0131narak tebli\u011f edilmeli ve yasal s\u00fcre beklenildikten sonra Hukuk Genel Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Usul hukukunda yer almamakla birlikte uygulamada, tefhimden sonra temyiz s\u00fcre tutum dilek\u00e7esi veya karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden sonra gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esi sunmak suretiyle karar\u0131ntemyiz edildi\u011fi hallerde, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esini dikkate alarak yeni temyiz gerek\u00e7elerine dayan\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fundan, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n bu hallerde de taraflara tebli\u011fi gerekir. Anayasa Mahkemesi de bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin getirilmeden karar\u0131n kesinle\u015ftirilmesini hak ihlali olarak kabul etmi\u015ftir. ( Anayasa Mahkemesi ( \u0130kinci B\u00f6l\u00fcm ) 20.03.2014 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/1034 Ba\u015fvuru ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;Alacak ( i\u015f\u00e7i ile i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisinden kaynaklanan )&#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Antalya 3.\u0130\u015f Mahkemesince davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 09.02.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/106 E.-2010\/47 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 9.Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 24.05.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/48425 E.-2012\/18422 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla bozulmu\u015f, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonunda gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131kta belirtilen karar ile bozulmu\u015ftur. Bozma \u00fczerine mahkemece ilk kararda direnilmi\u015f, direnme karar\u0131 davac\u0131\/daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- )5521 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu 7.maddesinde i\u015f mahkemelerinde \u015fifahi yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fcn\u00fcn uygulanaca\u011f\u0131, 15. maddesinde ise bu kanunda a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k olmayan hallerde Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. 12\/01\/2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 447\/1.maddesi uyar\u0131nca di\u011fer kanunlar\u0131n s\u00f6zl\u00fc yahut seri yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fcne at\u0131f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2llerde, HMK&#8217;n\u0131n basit yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fc ile ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlemesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda i\u015f mahkemelerinde basit yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fcn\u00fcn uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Basit yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fcne tabi yarg\u0131lamalara ili\u015fkin olarak 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK.nun \u201cH\u00fck\u00fcm\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 321.maddesinde aynen;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 1 ) Tahkikat\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131ndan sonra, mahkeme taraflar\u0131n son beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131r ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sona erdi\u011fini bildirerek karar\u0131n\u0131 tefhim eder. Taraflara beyanda bulunabilmeleri i\u00e7in ayr\u0131ca s\u00fcre verilmez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( 2 ) Karar\u0131n tefhimi, mahkemece h\u00fckme ili\u015fkin t\u00fcm hususlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi ile birlikte a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir. Ancak zorunlu h\u00e2llerde, h\u00e2kim bu durumun sebebini de tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irmek suretiyle, sadece h\u00fck\u00fcm \u00f6zetini tutana\u011fa yazd\u0131rarak karar\u0131 tefhim edebilir. Bu durumda gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n en ge\u00e7 bir ay i\u00e7inde yaz\u0131larak tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">h\u00fckm\u00fc d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">321.maddedeki \u201ch\u00fckme ili\u015fkin t\u00fcm hususlar\u201d dan kastedilen HMK.nun 297.maddesindeki unsurlard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re; mahkeme, tahkikat\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131ndan sonra, taraflar\u0131n son beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 almal\u0131 ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sona erdi\u011fini bildirdikten sonra h\u00fckm\u00fc tefhim etmelidir. Kural olarak, mahkemece karar\u0131n tefhiminde h\u00fckme ili\u015fkin t\u00fcm hususlar a\u00e7\u0131klanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HMK 322.maddesi atf\u0131 ile uygulanmakta olan HMK 297.maddesinde h\u00fckm\u00fcn kapsam\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re; mahkeme, gerek\u00e7esi ile birlikte tefhim etti\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcm de taleplerden her biri hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmle, taraflara y\u00fcklenen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan haklar\u0131n, yarg\u0131lama giderleri ile taraflardan al\u0131nan avans\u0131n harcanmayan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n iadesi, varsa kanun yollar\u0131 ve s\u00fcresini s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda; a\u00e7\u0131k, \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak \u015fekilde g\u00f6stermesi gereklidir. Bu kanunun getirdi\u011fi bir zorunluluktur. Ancak zorunlu h\u00e2llerde, h\u00e2kim bu durumun sebebini de tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irmek suretiyle sadece h\u00fck\u00fcm \u00f6zetini tutana\u011fa yazd\u0131rarak karar\u0131 tefhim edebilir. Bu durumda gerek\u00e7eli karar en ge\u00e7 bir ay i\u00e7inde yaz\u0131larak tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bir di\u011fer deyi\u015fle HMK 321.maddesinde belirtilen \u015fekilde h\u00fckme ili\u015fkin t\u00fcm hususlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi ile birlikte tefhim edilemedi\u011fi hallerde gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n mutlaka taraflaratebli\u011f edilmesi gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">30\/01\/1950 tarih ve 5521 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 02\/03\/2005 tarih ve 5308 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla de\u011fi\u015fmeden \u00f6nceki 8.maddesine g\u00f6re i\u015f mahkemesinin nihai kararlar\u0131 tefhim tarihinden itibaren sekiz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde temyiz edilebilecektir. Maddedeki \u201ctefhim\u201d kavram\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;h\u00fckme ili\u015fkin t\u00fcm hususlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi ile birlikte a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 hal&#8221; olarak anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Bu nedenle, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nitelikte bir tefhim varsa temyiz s\u00fcresi tefhim tarihinden itibaren, aksi halde gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren ba\u015flayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Usul hukukunda yer almamakla birlikte uygulamada, tefhimden sonra temyiz s\u00fcre tutum dilek\u00e7esi veya karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden sonra gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esi sunmak suretiyle karar\u0131ntemyiz edildi\u011fi hallerde, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esini dikkate alarak yeni temyiz gerek\u00e7elerine dayan\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fundan, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n bu hallerde de taraflara tebli\u011fi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitekim Anayasa Mahkemesi de bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin getirilmeden karar\u0131n kesinle\u015ftirilmesini hak ihlali olarak kabul etmi\u015ftir. ( Anayasa Mahkemesi ( \u0130kinci B\u00f6l\u00fcm ) 20.03.2014 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/1034 Ba\u015fvuru ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- )\u0130\u015f mahkemeleri kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz s\u00fcresi 30\/01\/1950 tarih ve 5521 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 02\/03\/2005 tarih ve 5308 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla de\u011fi\u015fmeden \u00f6nceki 8.maddesine g\u00f6re belirlenmekte ise de, temyiz usul ve i\u015flemlerinde 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;n\u0131n Ge\u00e7ici 3.maddesi yollamas\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK&#8217;n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Her ne kadar uygulamada i\u015f mahkemesinde kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz yolu ile temyiz hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmamakta ise de gerek i\u015f hukuku mevzuat\u0131nda gerekse de HUMK&#8217;nun temyize ait h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinde bunu engelleyen bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu nedenle 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 30.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atfiyla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 433\/1.maddesi gere\u011fince temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin h\u00fck\u00fcm veren mahkeme arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa tebli\u011f edilmesi ve kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa temyizdilek\u00e7esine kar\u015f\u0131 cevap verme ve kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz isteminde bulunmak hakk\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3- )Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz eden daval\u0131 vekilinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde temyiz dilek\u00e7esini ibraz etti\u011fi ve ayn\u0131 tarihte hakim taraf\u0131ndan havalesi yap\u0131larak temyiz defterine kay\u0131t edildi\u011fi temyizkarar ve ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n maktu yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Maktu harca tabi davalar\u0131n reddine, kabul\u00fcne veya k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair kararlar ile nispi harca tabi davalar\u0131n reddine dair kararlar\u0131n temyiz edilmesi halinde temyiz tarihindeki 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu uyar\u0131nca \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tarife dikkate al\u0131narak karar\u0131 temyiz eden taraftan maktu temyiz karar ve ilam harc\u0131 ve temyiz ba\u015fvuru harc\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nispi harca tabi davalar\u0131n kabul\u00fcne veya k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131n temyiz edilmesi halinde ise, mahkemece h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan miktar \u00fczerinden hesaplanacak nispi temyiz karar ve ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6rtte biri ve temyiz ba\u015fvuru harc\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">25.01.1985 g\u00fcnl\u00fc 1984\/5 Esas ve 1985\/1 say\u0131l\u0131 Y.\u0130.B. Karar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n mahkeme kalemince hesaplan\u0131p temyiz edenden istendi\u011fi halde s\u00fcresinde \u00f6denmedi\u011fi belgelendirilmemi\u015f oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re eksik har\u00e7 al\u0131narak temyiz defterine kay\u0131t edilen temyiz dilek\u00e7esi hakk\u0131nda 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK.nun 434.maddesi uyar\u0131nca i\u015flem yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olaya gelince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da ( 1 ) numaral\u0131 bentte yer alan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar do\u011frultusunda yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 vekiline tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Gerek\u00e7eli karar davac\u0131 vekiline Tebligat Kanunu ve ilgili mevzuat dikkate al\u0131narak tebli\u011f edilmeli, temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra ve gerekti\u011finde 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nu \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 432.maddesindeki usul i\u015flemleri yerine getirilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da ( 2 ) numaral\u0131 bentte yer alan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar do\u011frultusunda yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekiline ait temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin davac\u0131 tarafa tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Temyiz eden daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan sunulan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nu \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atfiyla uygulanmakta olan HUMK&#8217;nun 433. maddesi gere\u011fince davac\u0131 vekiline Tebligat Kanunu ve ilgili mevzuat dikkate al\u0131narak tebli\u011f edilmeli ve yasal s\u00fcre beklenildikten sonra Hukuk Genel Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle eksikler giderildikten sonra Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;na g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n mahkemesine geri \u00e7evrilmesi gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle dosyan\u0131n mahkemesine GER\u0130 \u00c7EVR\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 21.01.2015 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2014\/19-526<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2014\/1019<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 10.12.2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u0130ST\u0130RDAT DAVASI ( Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131n S\u00fcresinde Temyiz Edilip Edilmedi\u011finin \u00d6nsorun Olarak Ele Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131\/1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun Uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi Kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Temyiz S\u00fcresinin 15 G\u00fcn Oldu\u011fu\/Temyiz Dilek\u00e7esinin S\u00fcre Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Reddi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u00d6NSORUN ( \u0130stirdat Davas\u0131nda Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131n S\u00fcresinde Temyiz Edilip Edilmedi\u011fi\/1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun Uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi Kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Temyiz S\u00fcresinin 15 G\u00fcn Oldu\u011fu\/Temyiz Dilek\u00e7esinin S\u00fcre Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Reddi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 D\u0130RENME KARARININ S\u00dcRES\u0130NDE TEMY\u0130Z\u0130 ( \u0130stirdat Davas\u0131\/\u00d6nsorun Te\u015fkil Etti\u011fi &#8211; 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun Uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi Kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Temyiz S\u00fcresinin 15 G\u00fcn Oldu\u011fu\/Temyiz Dilek\u00e7esinin S\u00fcre Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Reddi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130NCE VER\u0130LEN KARARLARDA TEMY\u0130Z S\u00dcRES\u0130 ( 15 G\u00fcn Oldu\u011fu\/\u0130stirdat Davas\u0131 &#8211; \u00d6nsorun Te\u015fkil Etti\u011fi\/1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun Uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi Kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Temyiz S\u00fcresinin 15 G\u00fcn Oldu\u011fu\/Temyiz Dilek\u00e7esinin S\u00fcre Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Reddi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m. 3\/1<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086\/m. 427, 432, 444, 454<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> Dava, istirdat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekilinin temyiz isteminin yasal s\u00fcrede verilip verilmedi\u011fi \u00f6n sorun olarak ele al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130stinaf mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihine kadar, 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun temyize ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130stinaf mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihinden \u00f6nce aleyhine temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015f olan kararlar hakk\u0131nda, kesinle\u015finceye kadar, HUMK&#8217;nun da 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nceki 427 ila 454 \u00fcnc\u00fc madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HUMK&#8217;a g\u00f6re, Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesince verilecek kararlar\u0131n temyiz s\u00fcresi tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren 15 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkeme direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011fi \u00fczerine, daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra verilen temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201cistirdat\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; \u0130stanbul 6. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesince davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 17.02.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/741 esas, 2011\/48 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 19. Hukuk Dairesinin 28.11.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/11060 esas, 2012\/17935 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR : <\/span>Dava, istirdat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkemece, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karar daval\u0131 vekilinin temyizi \u00fczerine, \u00d6zel Daire taraf\u0131ndan bozulmu\u015f; mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir. Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 vekili temyize getirmi\u015f, Hukuk Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan direnme olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan karar\u0131n yeni bir gerek\u00e7eye dayanmas\u0131 nedeniyle yeni h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle temyizinceleme g\u00f6revinin \u00d6zel Daireye ait oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle yeni h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n \u00d6zel Daireye g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmi\u015f, \u00d6zel Dairece karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yerel mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir. Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili temyize getirmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesine ge\u00e7ilmezden evvel, daval\u0131 vekilinin temyiz isteminin yasal s\u00fcrede verilip verilmedi\u011fi \u00f6n sorun olarak ele al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130stinaf ( b\u00f6lge adliye ) mahkemelerinin Resmi Gazete&#8217;de ilan edilerek g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihine kadar, 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun ( HUMK ) temyize ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin ( HUMK m. 427- 444 ) uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunacakt\u0131r ( 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun ( HMK ) ge\u00e7ici m. 3\/1 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yine, istinaf mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihinden \u00f6nce aleyhine temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015f olan kararlar hakk\u0131nda, kesinle\u015finceye kadar, HUMK&#8217;nun da 26.9.2004 tarih ve 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nceki 427 ila 454 \u00fcnc\u00fc madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunacakt\u0131r ( 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun Ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesi ve HMK&#8217;nun ge\u00e7ici m. 3\/2 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HUMK&#8217;nun 432. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesince verilecek kararlar\u0131n temyiz s\u00fcresi tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda; yerel mahkeme direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n 21.10.2013 tarihinde daval\u0131 ad\u0131na tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131 almaya yetkili g\u00f6revlisine usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn temyizine dair dilek\u00e7enin 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7irildikten sonra, 06.11.2013 tarihinde temyiz harc\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle ibraz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra 06.11.2013 tarihinde verilen temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle yasal s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra verilen temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin REDD\u0130NE, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n iadesine, 10.12.2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2013\/4-1246<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2014\/27<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 22.1.2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 MANEV\u0130 TAZM\u0130NAT DAVASI ( Hakimin Hukuki Sorumlulu\u011funa Dayal\u0131 &#8211; Davac\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Beraat Karar\u0131n\u0131n Kesinle\u015fme Tarihi ve Eldeki Davan\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131lma Tarihi G\u00f6z \u00d6n\u00fcne Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Bir Y\u0131ll\u0131k Hak D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc S\u00fcresinin Ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi\/Davan\u0131n Reddinin Yerinde Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 HAK\u0130M\u0130N HUKUK\u0130 SORUMLULU\u011eU ( Tazminat Davas\u0131n\u0131n Kovu\u015fturmaya Yer Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na Dair Karar veya Kovu\u015fturma Sonucunda veya Dava Sonunda Verilen Karar\u0131n Kesinle\u015fti\u011fi Tarihten \u0130tibaren Bir Y\u0131l \u0130\u00e7inde A\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi &#8211; Bu S\u00fcrenin Ge\u00e7irilmesi Sebebiyle Davan\u0131n Reddinin \u0130sabetli Oldu\u011fu\/Manevi Tazminat )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 HAK D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcR\u00dcC\u00dc S\u00dcRE ( \u0130hbar Olunan C. Savc\u0131s\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan Davac\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda D\u00fczenlenen \u0130ddianame Nedeniyle Tazminat \u0130stemi &#8211; Davac\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Beraat Karar\u0131n\u0131n Kesinle\u015fme Tarihi ve Eldeki Davan\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131lma Tarihi G\u00f6z \u00d6n\u00fcne Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Bir Y\u0131ll\u0131k Hak D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc S\u00fcresinin Ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 KES\u0130NLE\u015eME ( Hakimin Hukuki Sorumlulu\u011funa Dayal\u0131 Manevi Tazminat &#8211; Davac\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Beraat Karar\u0131n\u0131n Kesinle\u015fme Tarihi ve Eldeki Davan\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131lma Tarihi G\u00f6z \u00d6n\u00fcne Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 2802 S. K.&#8217;nun Md. 93\/A H\u00fckm\u00fcnde D\u00fczenlenmi\u015f Bulunan Bir Y\u0131ll\u0131k Hak D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc S\u00fcresinin Ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi\/Davan\u0131n Reddinin Usul ve Yasaya Uygun Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2802\/m.93\/A<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> Dava, hakimin hukuki sorumlulu\u011funa dayal\u0131 olarak manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Dava konusu olayda, ihbar olunan Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen iddianame nedeniyle tazminat isteminde bulunulmu\u015ftur. 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n 93\/A maddesindeki d\u00fczenleme itibariyle; tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n, kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar veya kovu\u015fturma sonucunda veya dava sonunda verilen karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten itibaren bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. \u00d6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcre Yasa&#8217;da belirtilmi\u015f olmakla, hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcs\u00fcresidir ve re&#8217;sen ( kendili\u011finden ) g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gerekir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n, kat\u0131lan\/san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131 ile yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza dosyas\u0131nda; davac\u0131n\u0131n, at\u0131l\u0131 tehdit eylemi nedeniyle beraat karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f olup; kat\u0131lan\/san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131 ile davac\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcz\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 okunmu\u015ftur. Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edilmedi\u011fi; kat\u0131lan\/san\u0131k durumunda bulunan dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015fah\u0131s hakk\u0131ndaki beraat h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn ise, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edildi\u011fi ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015fahsa ili\u015fkin b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fme tarihi ve Eldeki davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lma tarihi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n 93\/A maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bulunan bir y\u0131ll\u0131k hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7irilmi\u015ftir. Davan\u0131n, bu nedenle reddine dair verilen karar usul ve yasaya uygundur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA : <\/span>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan incelemesi sonucunda ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay 4.Hukuk Dairesince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; DAVA: Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, olay tarihinde K\u0131r\u0131kkale Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 olan davac\u0131n\u0131n, y\u0131ll\u0131k izni nedeniyle Tarsus \u0130l\u00e7esi&#8217;nde iken kalp rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi ve 13\/04\/2009 tarihinde Tarsus Devlet Hastanesi&#8217;ne gitti\u011fi; g\u00f6revli hekim olan dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 F. K. ile aralar\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fma ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131; hekimin bir g\u00fcn sonra \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esi verdi\u011fi; ihbar olunan taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonucunda, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tehdit isnad\u0131 ile kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131; oysa ki, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin \u015fikayetinden vazge\u00e7mi\u015f bulundu\u011fu;\u015fikayete ba\u011fl\u0131 bulunan su\u00e7 nedeniyle dava a\u00e7\u0131lmamas\u0131 ve kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda da d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fi; ayr\u0131ca, soru\u015fturman\u0131n 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak kollu\u011fa yapt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131; Ankara 2.A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 29\/07\/2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/74-225 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda beraat h\u00fckm\u00fc verildi\u011fi; ancak,aleyhe temyiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in verilen karar\u0131n temyiz incelemesinden ge\u00e7medi\u011fi; HMK&#8217;nun 46\/1-c maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re kanunun a\u00e7\u0131k d\u00fczenlemesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek;50.000,00-TL manevi tazminat ve yasal faize h\u00fckmedilmesi talep olunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">CEVAP:<\/span> Cevap dilek\u00e7esinde, davan\u0131n s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve esas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da sorumluluk ko\u015fular\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130hbar olunan taraf\u0131ndan verilen dilek\u00e7ede ise; davan\u0131n s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen eylemin de \u015fikayet ko\u015fuluna ba\u011fl\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi talep olunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">GEREK\u00c7E<\/span>: Dava, hakimin hukuki sorumlulu\u011funa dayal\u0131 olarak manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair&#8221; 6110 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa 14\/02\/2011 tarihli Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanmak suretiyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. 6110 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n 12.maddesi ile 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kanunu&#8217;na 93\/A maddesi eklenmi\u015ftir. Maddedeki d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hakim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n bir soru\u015fturma, kovu\u015fturma veya davayla ilgili olarak yapt\u0131klar\u0131 i\u015flem, y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fckleri faaliyet veya verdikleri her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kararlar nedeniyle:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a )Ancak Devlet aleyhine tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b )Ki\u015fisel kusur, haks\u0131z fiil veya di\u011fer sorumluluk sebeplerine dayan\u0131larak da olsa hakim veya savc\u0131 aleyhine tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lamaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Devlet aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lacak tazminat davas\u0131 ancak dava konusu i\u015flem, faaliyet veya karar\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olan;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a )Soru\u015fturma sonucunda verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131n veya kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise kovu\u015fturma sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b )Dava sonunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten itibaren bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131n veya h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesinden \u00f6nce, hakim veya savc\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flem, faaliyet veya karar\u0131yla ilgili olarak g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etmek suretiyle g\u00f6revini k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmaktan mahkumiyeti halinde ise tazminat davas\u0131 bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesinden itibaren bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava konusu olayda, ihbar olunan Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen iddianame nedeniyle tazminat isteminde bulunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131ya aynen al\u0131nt\u0131lanan 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n 93\/A maddesindeki d\u00fczenleme itibariyle; tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n, kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar veya kovu\u015fturma sonucunda veya dava sonunda verilen karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten itibaren bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. \u00d6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcre Yasa&#8217;da belirtilmi\u015f olmakla, hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc s\u00fcresidir ve re&#8217;sen ( kendili\u011finden ) g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131n\u0131n, kat\u0131lan\/san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131 ile yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ankara 2.A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 29\/07\/2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/74-225 say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131nda; davac\u0131n\u0131n, at\u0131l\u0131 tehdit eylemi nedeniyle beraat karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f olup; kat\u0131lan\/san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131 ile davac\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcz\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 okunmu\u015ftur. Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edilmedi\u011fi; kat\u0131lan\/san\u0131k durumunda bulunan dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 F. K. hakk\u0131ndaki beraat h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn ise, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edildi\u011fi ve Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin 08\/02\/2011 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/28569-2011\/1238 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 F. K.&#8217;ye ili\u015fkin b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">CMK&#8217;nun 331. ve CMUK&#8217;nun 310.maddeleri h\u00fck\u00fcmleri g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutuldu\u011funda, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n 08.09.2010 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015f oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Eldeki dava ise, 08.02.2012 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup; 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;n\u0131n93\/A maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bulunan bir y\u0131ll\u0131k hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7irilmi\u015ftir. Davan\u0131n, a\u00e7\u0131klanan bu nedenle reddi gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">H\u00dcK\u00dcM:<\/span> Yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen nedenle;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1-Davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2-Davan\u0131n reddi nedeniyle al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 24,30-TL maktu karar ve ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n pe\u015fin al\u0131nan 742,50.-TL&#8217;den d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc ile kalan 718,20-TL&#8217;nin istek halinde davac\u0131ya iadesine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3-Karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Avukatl\u0131k \u00dccret Tarifesi uyar\u0131nca daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na takdir olunan 2.640,00-TL maktu avukatl\u0131k \u00fccretinin davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak daval\u0131ya verilmesine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4-Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan giderlerin \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na\u2026 ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dair oybirli\u011fi ile verilen 22.01.2013 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/12-2013\/7 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, karar\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131ndan ve dosyadaki t\u00fcm ka\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131n okunmas\u0131ndan sonra gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Davac\u0131, K\u0131r\u0131kkale Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 olup, Hastaneye gitti\u011fini; g\u00f6revli hekim ile aralar\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fma ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; hekimin \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine C.Savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kendisi hakk\u0131nda tehdit isnad\u0131 ile kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; oysa m\u00fc\u015ftekinin \u015fik\u00e2yetinden vazge\u00e7mi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle dava a\u00e7\u0131lmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini; ayr\u0131ca, soru\u015fturman\u0131n 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak kollu\u011fa yapt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; Mahkemece hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini, HMK&#8217;nun 46\/1-c maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek, 50.000,00-TL manevi tazminat talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde, davan\u0131n s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve esas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da sorumluluk ko\u015fular\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne al\u0131nan gerek\u00e7e ile davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosyadaki tutanak ve kan\u0131tlara, bilgi ve belgelere, daire karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerektirici nedenlere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011fu tespit edilen Yarg\u0131tay 4.Hukuk Dairesinin ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n onanmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile 4.Hukuk Dairesinin ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle ONANMASINA, gerekli temyiz ilan harc\u0131 pe\u015fin al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fkaca har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na mahal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, 6110 say\u0131l\u0131 Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun&#8217;un 12.maddesi ile 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen 93\/A-5 f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 30.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen &#8220;Ge\u00e7ici madde 3&#8221; atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 440 maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011fden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 22.01.2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2013\/12-1151<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2014\/28<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 22.1.2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 MADD\u0130 VE MANEV\u0130 TAZM\u0130NAT DAVASI ( Hazine Aleyhine A\u00e7\u0131lan &#8211; \u0130\u015flemin Dayana\u011f\u0131 Olan H\u00fck\u00fcm Hen\u00fcz Kesinle\u015fmedi\u011finden Hen\u00fcz Davac\u0131n\u0131n Zarar\u0131n\u0131n Do\u011fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Dava A\u00e7ma Ko\u015fulu Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finden Davan\u0131n Usulden Reddine Dair Karar\u0131n Yerinde Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 DEVLET ALEYH\u0130NE A\u00c7ILACAK TAZM\u0130NAT DAVASI ( H\u00fckm\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fti\u011fi Tarihten \u0130tibaren Bir Y\u0131l \u0130\u00e7inde A\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi\/\u0130\u015flemin Dayana\u011f\u0131 Olan H\u00fck\u00fcm Hen\u00fcz Kesinle\u015fmedi\u011finden Hen\u00fcz Davac\u0131n\u0131n Zarar\u0131n\u0131n Do\u011fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Davan\u0131n Usulden Reddine Dair Karar\u0131n \u0130sabetli Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Maddi ve Manevi Tazminat )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 H\u00dcKM\u00dcN KES\u0130NLE\u015eMES\u0130 ( \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi H\u00e2kiminin \u0130halenin Feshi Davas\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki Cevabi Yaz\u0131s\u0131 \u0130le Ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 Olan ve Davac\u0131n\u0131n Zarar\u0131na Dayanak Olarak G\u00f6sterdi\u011fi \u0130halenin Feshi Davas\u0131 Derdest Oldu\u011fu\/\u0130\u015flemin Dayana\u011f\u0131 Olan H\u00fckm\u00fcn Hen\u00fcz Kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi &#8211; Dava A\u00e7ma Ko\u015fulunun Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 DAVA \u015eARTI ( 6100 S. HMK&#8217;nun 46. Md. H\u00fckm\u00fc Uyar\u0131nca Hazine Aleyhine A\u00e7\u0131lan Tazminat \u0130stemi &#8211; \u0130\u015flemin Dayana\u011f\u0131 Olan H\u00fckm\u00fcn Hen\u00fcz Kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi\/H\u00fckm\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fmi\u015f Olmas\u0131n\u0131n Dava \u015eart\u0131 Olarak Belirlendi\u011fi\/Dava \u015eart\u0131 Yoklu\u011fundan Davan\u0131n Usulden Reddine Dair Karar\u0131n Yerinde Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2802\/m.93\/A<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m.46,115\/2<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> Dava, 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 46. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hazine aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Devlet aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lacak tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n, karar verildi\u011fi anda kesin ise bu tarihten, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmayarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015f ise karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten; kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015fsa bu ba\u015fvurunun reddi karar\u0131n\u0131ntebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren bir y\u0131ll\u0131k hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Somut olayda, \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi H\u00e2kiminin &#8220;ihalenin feshi davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki&#8221; cevabi yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olan ve davac\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131na dayanak olarak g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi ihalenin feshi davas\u0131 derdest olup, \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. \u0130\u015flemin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan h\u00fck\u00fcm hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmemi\u015ftir. Dava kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fine g\u00f6re hen\u00fcz davac\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131 da do\u011fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla i\u015fbu davada, dava a\u00e7ma ko\u015fulu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemi\u015ftir. H\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131, HMK&#8217;nun 114\/2. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla 2802 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 93\/A-2 maddesi gere\u011fi dava \u015fart\u0131 olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. Dava \u015fart\u0131 \u00f6ncelikle incelenir ve mevcut olmamas\u0131 durumunda ise davan\u0131n esas\u0131na girilmeden dava usulden reddedilir. Nitekim HMK.nun 138. maddesinde, &#8220;mahkeme, \u00f6ncelikle dava \u015fartlar\u0131 ve ilk itirazlar hakk\u0131nda dosya \u00fczerinden karar verir&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesi yer almaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle \u00f6n inceleme duru\u015fmas\u0131 yapmadan, dosya \u00fczerinden davan\u0131n HMK&#8217;nun 115. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Dava usulden reddedildi\u011finden ve HMK&#8217;nun 49. maddesinde usulden red halinde disiplin para cezas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden disiplin para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan incelemesi sonucunda ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesince;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; \u0130DD\u0130A:Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; Alanya 2. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2009\/4546 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 takip dosyas\u0131 alacakl\u0131lar\u0131 olan J. ile G. B.&#8217;\u0131n alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 F. Y.&#8217;a temlik ettiklerini, F.&#8217;in yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 icra takibinin kesinle\u015fti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin \u00bd hissesinin haczedildi\u011fini, 450.000,00 TL olarak k\u0131ymet takdir edilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n sat\u0131\u015fa \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 275.000,00 TL bedel \u00fczerinden alacakl\u0131ya ihale edildi\u011fini, 7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcrede ( 18.02.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc ) ihalenin feshi talebini i\u00e7eren dilek\u00e7eyi Alanya 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Antalya 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesine verdiklerini, 2011\/164 Muh. \u0130le dava har\u00e7 ve masraflar\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce 21.02.2011 tarihinde ihalenin feshi davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n soruldu\u011funu, Alanya 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesince de dava a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bildirmesi \u00fczerine icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce ihale kesinle\u015ftirilerek al\u0131c\u0131 F. Y. ad\u0131na tescili i\u00e7in m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 22.02.2011 tarihinde de ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n F. Y. ad\u0131na tescil edildi\u011fini, ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n F. Y. taraf\u0131ndan F. O.&#8217;a devredildi\u011fini, ihalenin feshi davas\u0131n\u0131n Alanya 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2011\/209 Esas\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte oldu\u011funu, s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131lan bir ihalenin feshi davas\u0131 bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, UYAP ortam\u0131nda gerekli ara\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131 yapmadan davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne bilgi veren ve ihalenin kesinle\u015fmesine neden olan h\u00e2kimin eylemi nedeniyle m\u00fcvekkilinin 295.941,50 TL zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca m\u00fcvekkilinin olay nedeniyle b\u00fcy\u00fck elem duydu\u011funu belirterek 10.000,00 TL manevi, 295.941,50 TL maddi tazminat\u0131n daval\u0131dan yasal faiziyle tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SAVUNMA:<\/span>Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; 2802 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 93\/A maddesi uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n &#8220;h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten itibaren bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde&#8221; a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi durumunda davan\u0131n s\u00fcreden reddi gerekti\u011fini, dava a\u00e7ma \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fini, HMK.nun 46. maddesindeki ko\u015fullar\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sorumluluk nedenlerinin s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 ve say\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011funu, HMK.nun 48. maddesine g\u00f6re dayan\u0131lan sorumluluk nedenlerinin delillerinin de a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmedi\u011fini savunarak davan\u0131n reddini ve HMK.nun 49. maddesi gere\u011fince davac\u0131 aleyhine disiplin para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u0130HBAR OLUNANIN SAVUNMASI:<\/span>\u0130hbar olunana dava dilek\u00e7esi usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi halde, herhangi bir dilek\u00e7e vermedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DEL\u0130LLER\u0130N DE\u011eERLEND\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130 VE HUKUK\u0130 N\u0130TELEND\u0130RME:<\/span> Dava, 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 46. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hazine aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanununu, ek ve de\u011fi\u015fiklikleri ile birlikte t\u00fcm\u00fcyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131ran, 12.01.2011 tarih ve 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu, 01 Ekim 2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015f ve &#8220;H\u00e2kimin Hukuki Sorumlulu\u011fu&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda yer verilen d\u00fczenlemeyle, 46 il\u00e2 49. maddelerinde; sorumluluk sebepleri, yarg\u0131lamada g\u00f6revli mercii, dava dilek\u00e7esine dair \u00f6zel y\u00f6ntem ve davan\u0131n reddi halinde verilecek ceza ile ilgili \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmler getirmi\u015f, h\u00e2kimlerin hukuk\u00ee sorumlulu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeni bir sistem benimsemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayr\u0131ca 6110 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 12.maddesiyle 2802 Say\u0131l\u0131 H\u00e2kimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kanununa 93\/A maddesi eklenmi\u015ftir. Bu maddede: &#8220;H\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n bir soru\u015fturma, kovu\u015fturma veya davayla ilgili olarak yapt\u0131klar\u0131 i\u015flem, y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fckleri faaliyet veya verdikleri her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kararlar nedeniyle; ancak Devlet aleyhine tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi, ki\u015fisel kusur, haks\u0131z fiil veya di\u011fer sorumluluk sebeplerine dayan\u0131larak da olsa h\u00e2kim veya savc\u0131 aleyhine tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, Devlet aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lacak tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n, ancak dava konusu i\u015flem, faaliyet veya karar\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olan soru\u015fturma sonucunda verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131n veya kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise kovu\u015fturma sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn ya da dava sonunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten itibaren bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">G\u00d6REV:<\/span> \u0130cra hukuk mahkemesi h\u00e2kiminin fiil ve kararlar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve bu mahkemenin temyiz mercii de dairemiz oldu\u011fundan, davaya bakmaya ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla dairemiz g\u00f6revli bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUSUMET:<\/span> 2802 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 93\/A maddesinde; &#8220;H\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n bir soru\u015fturma, kovu\u015fturma veya davayla ilgili olarak yapt\u0131klar\u0131 i\u015flem, y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fckleri faaliyet veyaverdikleri her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kararlar nedeniyle ancak Devlet aleyhine tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilir&#8221; denilmekte, 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun 46. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda da; &#8220;H\u00e2kimlerin yarg\u0131lama faaliyetinden dolay\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki sebeplere dayan\u0131larak Devlet aleyhine tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilir&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re h\u00e2kimlerin yarg\u0131sal faaliyetlerinden kaynaklanan zararlardan dolay\u0131 ancak Devlet aleyhine tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilecektir. Davac\u0131 da davas\u0131n\u0131 yukar\u0131daki h\u00fck\u00fcmlere uygun olarak devlete kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u0130HBAR:<\/span> 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 48. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n; &#8220;Mahkeme, a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131, ilgili h\u00e2kime resen ihbar eder&#8221; \u015feklindeki emredici h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi, dava, karar\u0131 veren h\u00e2kim C. O.&#8217;a resen ihbar edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">VEKALET:<\/span> HMK.nun 74. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, vekilin i\u015fbu tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7abilmesi i\u00e7in, vek\u00e2letnamesinde a\u00e7\u0131k yetki bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi halde davac\u0131 vekilince sunulan vek\u00e2letnamede \u00f6zel yetki bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davac\u0131 vekiline &#8220;h\u00e2kimin fiili sebebiyle Devlet aleyhine tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma&#8221; yetkisini i\u00e7eren vek\u00e2letname sunmas\u0131 hususunda tensip tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011fi tarihinden itibaren iki hafta kesin s\u00fcre verilmi\u015f, verilen s\u00fcrede \u00f6zel yetki i\u00e7eren vekaletname sunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HAR\u00c7 VE G\u0130DER AVANSI:<\/span> HMK&#8217;nun 120. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; &#8220;Davac\u0131, yarg\u0131lama har\u00e7lar\u0131 ile her y\u0131l Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lacak gider avans\u0131 tarifesinde belirlenecek olan tutar\u0131, dava a\u00e7arken mahkeme veznesine yat\u0131rmak zorundad\u0131r&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun 120. maddesi gere\u011fi dava a\u00e7arken yat\u0131rmas\u0131 gereken gider avans\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmam\u0131\u015f, daha sonra \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan muht\u0131ra \u00fczerine yat\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6N \u0130NCELEME:<\/span> Dava dilek\u00e7esi ve ekleri, ihbar olunan ile daval\u0131ya, daval\u0131 vekilinin cevap dilek\u00e7esi davac\u0131 vekili ile ihbar olunana tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekilince cevaba cevap dilek\u00e7esi verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">TEM\u0130NAT:<\/span> Teminat yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 dava \u015fart\u0131 oldu\u011fundan, davac\u0131n\u0131n yabanc\u0131 uyruklu olmas\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilerek Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Uluslararas\u0131 Hukuk ve D\u0131\u015f \u0130li\u015fkiler Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, Almanya ile \u00dclkemiz aras\u0131nda teminattan muafiyete dair s\u00f6zle\u015fme ya da kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131l\u0131k olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorulmu\u015f, teminattan muafiyete dair s\u00f6zle\u015fme bulundu\u011fu bildirildi\u011finden, davac\u0131n\u0131n teminat yat\u0131rmas\u0131 istenilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">S\u00dcRE :<\/span> 2802 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 93\/A maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; &#8220;Devlet aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lacak tazminat davas\u0131, ancak dava konusu i\u015flem, faaliyet veya karar\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olan\u2026 h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten itibaren bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131labilir&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesi yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu maddeye g\u00f6re dava a\u00e7man\u0131n \u00f6n ko\u015fulu h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle h\u00e2kimin sorumlulu\u011funu gerektiren i\u015flem, faaliyet veya karar\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olan h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmeden tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle devlet aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lacak tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n, karar verildi\u011fi anda kesin ise bu tarihten, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmayarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015f ise karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten; kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015fsa bu ba\u015fvurunun reddi karar\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren bir y\u0131ll\u0131k hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda, Alanya 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi H\u00e2kiminin &#8220;ihalenin feshi davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki&#8221; cevabi yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olan ve davac\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131na dayanak olarak g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi ihalenin feshi davas\u0131 derdest olup, Alanya 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2011\/209 Esas\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. \u0130\u015flemin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan h\u00fck\u00fcm hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmemi\u015ftir. Dava kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fine g\u00f6re hen\u00fcz davac\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131 da do\u011fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla i\u015fbu davada, dava a\u00e7ma ko\u015fulu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemi\u015ftir. H\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131, HMK&#8217;nun 114\/2. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla 2802 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 93\/A-2 maddesi gere\u011fi dava \u015fart\u0131 olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. Dava \u015fart\u0131 \u00f6ncelikle incelenir ve mevcut olmamas\u0131 durumunda ise davan\u0131n esas\u0131na girilmeden dava usulden reddedilir. Nitekim HMK.nun 138. maddesinde, &#8220;mahkeme, \u00f6ncelikle dava \u015fartlar\u0131 ve ilk itirazlar hakk\u0131nda dosya \u00fczerinden karar verir&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesi yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu nedenle \u00f6n inceleme duru\u015fmas\u0131 yapmadan, dosya \u00fczerinden davan\u0131n HMK&#8217;nun 115. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Dava usulden reddedildi\u011finden ve HMK&#8217;nun 49. maddesinde usulden red halinde disiplin para cezas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden disiplin para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">H\u00dcK\u00dcM:<\/span> Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlere, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 yasal ve hukuksal gerek\u00e7eye, dosyadaki kan\u0131tlara ve heyetin takdirine g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1.2802 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 93\/A maddesinde belirtilen dava a\u00e7ma ko\u015fulu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finden davan\u0131n usulden reddine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2.Dava usulden reddedildi\u011finden HMK&#8217;nun 49. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, disiplin para cezas\u0131 verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3.HMK&#8217;nun 333. maddesi gere\u011fi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesinden sonra, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yat\u0131r\u0131lan gider avans\u0131ndan kullan\u0131lmayan k\u0131s\u0131m kalmas\u0131 halinde, iadesine karar verilerek, tebli\u011f gideri avanstan kar\u015f\u0131lanmak suretiyle iade karar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131ya tebli\u011fine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4.492 Say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu gere\u011fince al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 32,40 TL ba\u015fvurma harc\u0131 yerine 21,15 TL al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan eksik kalan 11,25 TL ba\u015fvurma harc\u0131 ile 32,40 TL maktu karar ve ilam harc\u0131, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan 4543,25 TL har\u00e7tan d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek, arta kalan 4499,60 TL harc\u0131n karar kesinle\u015fti\u011finde ve istek halinde \u00f6deyene iadesine,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5.Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama giderinin \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6.Daval\u0131 kendisini vekille temsil ettirdi\u011finden, karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesinin 7. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na hesaplanan 2.640,00 TL maktu vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak daval\u0131ya verilmesine\u2026 ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dair oybirli\u011fi ile verilen 08.03.2013 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/3-2013\/3 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, karar\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131ndan ve dosyadaki t\u00fcm ka\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131n okunmas\u0131ndan sonra gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Davac\u0131, aleyhine ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibi nedeniyle ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131n haczedildi\u011fini, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n sat\u0131\u015fa \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve alacakl\u0131ya ihale edildi\u011fini, icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce ihalenin feshi davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sorulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, Alanya 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesince de dava a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bildirmesi \u00fczerine, icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce ihale kesinle\u015ftirilerek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n al\u0131c\u0131 ad\u0131na tescil edildi\u011fini, s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131lan bir ihalenin feshi davas\u0131 bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, gerekli ara\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131 yapmadan davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne bilgi veren ve ihalenin kesinle\u015fmesine neden olan h\u00e2kimin eylemi nedeniyle m\u00fcvekkilinin zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, 10.000,00 TL manevi, 295.941,50 TL maddi tazminat\u0131n daval\u0131dan yasal faiziyle tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde, 2802 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 93\/A maddesi uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n &#8220;h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten itibaren bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde&#8221; a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fini dava \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne al\u0131nan gerek\u00e7e ile davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosyadaki tutanak ve kan\u0131tlara, bilgi ve belgelere, daire karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerektirici nedenlere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011fu tespit edilen Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesinin ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n onanmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile 12. Hukuk Dairesinin ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle ONANMASINA, gerekli temyiz ilam harc\u0131 pe\u015fin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fka har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na mahal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, 6110 say\u0131l\u0131 Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun&#8217;un 12. Maddesi ile 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen 93\/A-5 f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 30.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen &#8220;Ge\u00e7ici madde 3&#8221; atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 440 maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011fden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 22.01.2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2013\/15-169<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2013\/1365<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 18.9.2013<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u0130CRA TAK\u0130P DOSYASININ \u0130\u015eLEMDEN KALDIRILMASI ( Takip Derdest Kalmaya Devam Edece\u011finden Takibin Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tarihte \u0130\u015flemekte Olan Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresi Kesildi\u011fi &#8211; \u0130cra Takibinde Dosyan\u0131n \u0130\u015flemden Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u0130le Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 Kesici Etkisinin Ortadan Kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki Gerek\u00e7enin Yerinde Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Alacak Davas\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 ALACAK DAVASI ( Eser S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden Kaynaklanan &#8211; \u0130cra Takibinde Dosyan\u0131n \u0130\u015flemden Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 Halinde Takip Derdest Kalmaya Devam Edece\u011finden Takibin Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tarihte \u0130\u015flemekte Olan Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresi Kesildi\u011fi\/Kesilip Yeniden \u0130\u015flemeye Ba\u015flayan Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresi Ge\u00e7medi\u011finden Def&#8217;in Reddi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 ESER S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMES\u0130 ( Alacak Davas\u0131 &#8211; Be\u015f Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresine Tabi Bulundu\u011fu\/Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan Takibin Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tarih \u0130tibariyle Hen\u00fcz Be\u015f Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131S\u00fcresinin Dolmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Takibin Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tarihte \u0130\u015flemekte Olan Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin Kesildi\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 ZAMANA\u015eIMININ KES\u0130LMES\u0130 ( \u0130cra Takibinde Bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131n Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 Kesen Sebepler Aras\u0131nda Yer Almakta Oldu\u011fu\/\u0130cra Takibinde Dosyan\u0131n \u0130\u015flemden Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 Halinde Takip Derdest Kalmaya Devam Edece\u011finden Takibin Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tarihte \u0130\u015flemekte Olan Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin Kesildi\u011fi &#8211; Alacak Davas\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">818\/m.126\/IV,133\/II<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6098\/m.147\/6,154\/2<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> Dava, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan alacak istemine ili\u015fkindir. Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilmesi, bor\u00e7lunun veya alacakl\u0131n\u0131n veya hakimin belli fiillerinin sonucu olarak, i\u015flemi\u015f bulunan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin yanmas\u0131 ve kesilmeye neden olan olaydan itibaren yeni bir zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamas\u0131d\u0131r. Dava konusu alacak, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanmakta olup BK&#8217;nun 126\/IV. ( TBK&#8217;nun 147\/6. ) maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresine tabi bulunmaktad\u0131r. Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki belgelerden davac\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 alacakla ilgili icra takibi ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, takip dosyas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. BK&#8217;nun 133\/II. ( TBK&#8217;nun 154\/2. ) maddesi gere\u011fince, icra takibinde bulunulmas\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesen sebepler aras\u0131nda yer almakta olup, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan takibin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibariyle hen\u00fcz be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi dolmam\u0131\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r. \u0130cra takibinde dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde takip derdest kalmaya devam edece\u011finden, takibin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte i\u015flemekte olan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi kesilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, mahkemenin icra takibinde dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ile zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesici etkisinin ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki direnmesi yerinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201calacak\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Sincan 1.Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nce davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen 29.12.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/89 E.-2011\/1447 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 15.Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 04.05.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/2360 E.-2012\/3109 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Dava eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan alacak istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle reddine dair verilen karar davac\u0131 vekilince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yanlar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan y\u00fcklenici taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lacak alacak davas\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun 126\/IV.maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcnce 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresine tab\u00eedir. Ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 128.maddesi gere\u011fince zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi alaca\u011f\u0131n muaccel oldu\u011fu tarihten itibaren i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar. BK&#8217;n\u0131n 133\/II.maddesinde icra takibinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131yla zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 kesilmesi halinde o tarihten itibaren yeniden alaca\u011f\u0131n tab\u00ee oldu\u011fu zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Somut olayda eserin teslim tarihi kesin olarak saptanamamakla birlikte mahkemenin de kabul\u00fcnde oldu\u011fu gibi en ge\u00e7 daval\u0131 defterlerine kaydedildi\u011fi 31.12.2003 tarihinde teslim edildi\u011fi ve alaca\u011f\u0131n bu tarihte muaccel oldu\u011fu kabul edildi\u011fi takdirde BK&#8217;n\u0131n 126\/IV.maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi 31.12.2008 tarihinde dolmu\u015f ise de; davac\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 alacakla ilgili Sincan 5.\u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 2007\/413 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda icra takibi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 12.09.2007 tarihi itibariyle BK&#8217;n\u0131n 133\/II.maddesine g\u00f6re zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi kesilmi\u015f ve bu tarih itibariyle 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k yeni s\u00fcre i\u015flemeye ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f ve 17.01.2011 dava tarihinde 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi dolmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130cra dosyas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 takibin yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu sonucunu do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131ndan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesici etkisini kald\u0131rmaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu durumda dava tarihi itibariyle kesilip yeniden i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7medi\u011finden buna y\u00f6nelik def&#8217;in reddi ile i\u015fin esas\u0131na girilerek sonucuna uygun bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yanl\u0131\u015f de\u011ferlendirme ile zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan ret karar\u0131 verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 uygun bulunmu\u015ftur&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle, bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Dava, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan alacak istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131 ile m\u00fcvekkili aras\u0131nda daval\u0131ya ait konut in\u015faat\u0131n\u0131n kablo \u00e7ekimi, bo\u015f pano montaj\u0131 ile montaja haz\u0131r hale getirme i\u015fi konusunda s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile y\u00fcklendi\u011fi edimini yerine getirmesine ra\u011fmen daval\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6demesi gereken bedelin bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demedi\u011fini belirterek, 7.700,00 TL bakiye alaca\u011f\u0131n 13.08.2003 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek ticar\u00ee faiziyle daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkili kooperatif ile davac\u0131 aras\u0131nda elektrik tesisat\u0131 yap\u0131m\u0131 hususunda 05.09.1999 tarihli eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, BK m.355 gere\u011fince, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresine tabi oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fi 2003 y\u0131l\u0131nda tamamlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sekiz y\u0131ll\u0131k aradan sonra a\u00e7\u0131lan davada zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7ti\u011fini belirterek, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece, alaca\u011f\u0131n muaccel oldu\u011fu 31.12.2003 tarihinden davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 27.01.2011 tarihine kadar be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, her nekadar davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131 hakk\u0131nda icra takibi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa da takip dosyas\u0131 yasal bir y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde takip edilmemesi sebebiyle i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilmesi \u015feklinde meydana gelen sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen karar, davac\u0131 vekilinin temyizi \u00d6zel Daire&#8217;ce yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle bozulmu\u015f; Yerel Mahkemece, \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc davac\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Direnme yoluyla Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; alaca\u011f\u0131n tahsili amac\u0131yla ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibinde dosyan\u0131n &#8220;i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131&#8221; halinde, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin kesilip kesilmeyece\u011fi noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi i\u00e7in \u201czamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131\u201d kavram\u0131 \u00fczerinde durulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fclga 818 say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu ( BK )&#8217;nun 125-140. ( 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu ( TBK )&#8217;nun 146-161. ) maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bulunan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, alacak hakk\u0131n\u0131n, belli bir s\u00fcre kullan\u0131l\u00acmamas\u0131 y\u00fcz\u00fcnden \u201cdava edilebilme\u201d niteli\u011finden yoksun kalmas\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Borcun zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011framas\u0131yla, bor\u00e7 ( alacak ) sona ermez, sadece alacakl\u0131n\u0131n dava yoluyla alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 elde etme olana\u011f\u0131, &#8220;alaca\u011f\u0131n dava edilebilme niteli\u011fi&#8221; ortadan kalkar. Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011fram\u0131\u015f bir bor\u00e7, ifa edilebilen, fakat dava edilemeyen eksik bir bor\u00e7tur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011fram\u0131\u015f bor\u00e7 ifa edilirse, ifa ge\u00e7erlidir, bir ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama veya alacakl\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir &#8220;sebepsiz zenginle\u015fme&#8221; s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. Bor\u00e7lu, borcun zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini, bu nedenle hataen ( yan\u0131larak ) \u00f6demede bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek verdi\u011fini geri isteyemez ( BK m. 62; TBK m. 78\/2 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 hukuki a\u00e7\u0131dan &#8220;def&#8217;i&#8221; ( ki\u015fisel savunma nedeni ) niteli\u011findedir. Bor\u00e7lu borcunu ifadan ka\u00e7\u0131nmak istiyorsa, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def&#8217;inde bulunup, alaca\u011f\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dava edilebilme niteli\u011fini kaybetti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrebilir ( BK m. 140; TBK m. 161 ). BK m. 140&#8217;da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, &#8220;zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmezse, hakim bunu kendili\u011finden g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne alamaz&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir alaca\u011f\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011framas\u0131 yani alaca\u011f\u0131n &#8220;dava edilebilme&#8221; niteli\u011fini kaybetmesi i\u00e7in, &#8220;zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi&#8221;nin ge\u00e7mesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BK&#8217;nun 125.maddesi: \u201cBu kanunda ba\u015fka suretle h\u00fck\u00fcm mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, her dava on senelik m\u00fcruru zamana tabidir.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BK m.125&#8217;de \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi genel bir s\u00fcre olup, maddede de ifade edildi\u011fi \u00fczere aksine bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hallerde b\u00fct\u00fcn alacaklar i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erlidir. Aksine h\u00fckm\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu hallerden birisi bu maddeyi takip eden 126. maddede d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan maddede be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabi olan alacaklar alt\u0131 bent halinde h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kanunlarda, BK m. 125 ve 126&#8217;de \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen be\u015f ve on y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcreleri de vard\u0131r ( \u00d6rne\u011fin, TMK m. 639; TBK m. 72; BK. m. 60, 66 gibi ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BK m. 128&#8217;a g\u00f6re, s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan alacaklarda \u201cM\u00fcruru zaman alaca\u011f\u0131n muaccel oldu\u011fu zamandan ba\u015flar\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Borcun yerine getirilmesi bir s\u00fcreye ba\u011flanmam\u0131\u015fsa, borcun do\u011fumu ile birlikte alacak &#8220;muaccel&#8221; olur ( BK m. 74; TBK m. 90 ) ve borcun do\u011fumu ile birlikte zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar&#8221;. S\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan bor\u00e7larda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flenmeye ba\u015flamas\u0131 i\u00e7in alaca\u011f\u0131n muaccel ( istenebilir ) olmas\u0131 yeterlidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Alacakl\u0131, alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haberdar olmasa dahi, alaca\u011f\u0131n muaccel olmas\u0131yla birlikte, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u015fler.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Borcun ifas\u0131 bir s\u00fcreye ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015fsa, alacak, s\u00fcrenin dolmas\u0131 ile, ifa g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn gelmesiyle muaccel olur ve o g\u00fcnden itibaren zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 i\u015fler.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir bor\u00e7 ili\u015fkisinden ( \u00f6rne\u011fin kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden ) muacceliyet tarihleri farkl\u0131, ayn\u0131 nitelikte birden \u00e7ok bor\u00e7 do\u011fmu\u015fsa, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 her alacak i\u00e7in o alaca\u011f\u0131n istenebilece\u011fi tarihten itibaren i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Alaca\u011f\u0131n muacceliyeti, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n bir bildirimine ( ihbar\u0131na ) ba\u011fl\u0131 ise, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 bu bildirimin yap\u0131labilece\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren i\u015fler ( BK m. 128; TBK m. 149\/2 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taliki ( erteleyici ) \u015farta ba\u011fl\u0131 bor\u00e7larda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, \u015fart\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi, bu suretle alacakl\u0131n\u0131n borcun ifas\u0131n\u0131 isteyebilece\u011fi tarihten itibaren i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, infisahi ( bozucu ) \u015farta ba\u011fl\u0131 bor\u00e7larda, \u015farta ra\u011fmen zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 i\u015fler.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u015flemeye ba\u015flad\u0131ktan sonra bor\u00e7lunun baz\u0131 eylemleri, bor\u00e7la ili\u015fkisinin devam etti\u011fini ve bu ili\u015fkiyi devam ettirdi\u011fini, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n baz\u0131 eylemleri ise alacakla ili\u015fkisinin devam etti\u011fi ve hakk\u0131n\u0131n pe\u015finde oldu\u011funu ortaya koyabilir. Bu eylemlere ra\u011fmen, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin i\u015flemeye devam etti\u011fini ve borcu sona erdirdi\u011fini kabul etmek g\u00fc\u00e7t\u00fcr. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda baz\u0131 alacaklar\u0131n nitelikleri ya da alacakl\u0131 ile bor\u00e7lu aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkinin \u00f6zel niteli\u011fi zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin i\u015flemesini hakl\u0131 g\u00f6stermeyebilir. Bu mant\u0131ktan hareket eden T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nda, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 durduran ve kesen sebeplere yer vermi\u015ftir<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n durmas\u0131 demek, o ana kadar i\u015flemi\u015f olan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin i\u015fledi\u011fi noktada durmas\u0131, buna yol a\u00e7an sebebin ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 andan itibaren kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerden i\u015flemeye devam etmesi demektir. Daha \u00f6nce i\u015flemeye ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f bulunan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 durmu\u015fsa, sebep ortadan kalk\u0131nca, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerden i\u015flemesini s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcr. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle, i\u015flemi\u015f bulunan s\u00fcreler dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r, geri kalan s\u00fcre i\u00e7in zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 yeniden i\u015flemeye devam eder ( BK m. 132; TBK m. 153 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilmesi ( kat&#8217;\u0131 ) ise, bor\u00e7lunun veya alacakl\u0131n\u0131n veya hakimin belli fiillerinin sonucu olarak, i\u015flemi\u015f bulunan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin yanmas\u0131 ve kesilmeye neden olan olaydan itibaren yeni bir zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilmesi i\u00e7in, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flemekte olmas\u0131 gerekir. Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi dolmu\u015fsa, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilmesi s\u00f6z konusu olmaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesen sebepler BK m.133 ve 136&#8217;da ( TBK m.154 ve 157&#8217;de ) g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. Bu maddelere g\u00f6re zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131: bor\u00e7lunun bir fiili ile; alacakl\u0131n\u0131n bir fiili ile; yarg\u0131lama ve takibe ili\u015fkin bir i\u015flemle; yarg\u0131c\u0131n emir ve h\u00fckm\u00fcyle kesilebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BK m. 133\/1 ( TBK 154\/1 )&#8217;e g\u00f6re bor\u00e7lunun borcunu kabul etti\u011fini g\u00f6steren, borcun k\u0131smen \u00f6denmesi, g\u00fcvence verilmesi gibi fiiller bizzat bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan veya onun onay\u0131 ile \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131s taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 kesilir. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fahs\u0131n, bor\u00e7lunun bilgisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda alacakl\u0131ya \u00f6demede bulunmas\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesmez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BK m. 133\/2 ( TBK m. 154\/2 ) &#8216;ye g\u00f6re, \u201calacakl\u0131, dava veya def&#8217;i yoluyla mahkemeye veya hakeme ba\u015fvurmu\u015fsa veya icra takibinde bulunmu\u015fsa veya iflas masas\u0131na ba\u015fvurmu\u015fsa\u201d zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 kesilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava, dava dilek\u00e7esinin kaydedildi\u011fi tarihte a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olur ( HMK m. 118 ). Alacakl\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131 i\u00e7in ( di\u011fer k\u0131sma ili\u015fkin iste\u011fini sakl\u0131 tutarak ) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015fsa, veya alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131 i\u00e7in icra takibinde bulunmu\u015f ise, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 sadece dava veya takip edilen k\u0131s\u0131m i\u00e7in kesilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BK m. 136\/1 ( TBK m. 157\/1 )&#8217; e g\u00f6re, bir dava veya def&#8217;i ile kesilmi\u015f bulunan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, dava s\u00fcresince iki taraf\u0131n yarg\u0131lama ile ilgili her i\u015fleminden veya yarg\u0131c\u0131n her karar\u0131ndan sonra ( kesilir ve ) yeniden i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava veya def&#8217;i reddedilirse zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 kesilmi\u015f olmaz. Ancak dava esastan reddedilmemi\u015fse, davan\u0131n yeniden a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse, fakat davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ( def&#8217;in ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ) g\u00fcn ile reddedildi\u011fi tarih aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7en zaman i\u00e7inde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi dolmu\u015fsa, TBK m. 158&#8217;de ( BK m. 137&#8217;de ), belli haller i\u00e7in alacakl\u0131 yarar\u0131na ( reddin kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten itibaren i\u015fleyecek ) bir ek s\u00fcre \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. TBK m. 158&#8217;e g\u00f6re, dava veya def&#8217;i, mahkemenin yetkili veya g\u00f6revli olmamas\u0131 ya da d\u00fczeltilebilecek bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k yap\u0131lmas\u0131 yahut vaktinden \u00f6nce a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle reddedilmi\u015f olup da o arada zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 veya hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre dolmu\u015fsa, alacakl\u0131 altm\u0131\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck ek bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanabilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BK m. 136\/2 ( TBK m. 157\/2 )&#8217; ye g\u00f6re, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, icra takibi ile ( kovu\u015fturulmas\u0131 ile ) kesilmi\u015fse alaca\u011f\u0131n takibine ili\u015fkin her i\u015flemden sonra yeniden i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 kesilince, kesilmeden itibaren yeni bir s\u00fcre i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar ( BK m. 135\/1 ). Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kesilmesinden sonra i\u015fleyecek yeni zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi, eski ( kesilen ) zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131d\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin, be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k bir zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi kesilmi\u015fse, yeniden i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayacak zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi de be\u015f y\u0131ld\u0131r. Bu genel kurala, BK m. 135\/2&#8217;de ( TBK m.156\/2&#8217;de ) iki istisna getirilmi\u015ftir: \u201cBor\u00e7 bir senetle tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f\u201d veya \u201ckesinle\u015fmi\u015f, mahkeme veya hakem karar\u0131 ile sabit olmu\u015fsa\u201d kesilen s\u00fcre daha k\u0131sa olsa bile, yeni zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresidaima on y\u0131ld\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yeri gelmi\u015fken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in icra takibinin i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 78.maddesi \u00fczerinde durmakta yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 78.maddesi:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c\u00d6deme emrindeki m\u00fcddet ge\u00e7tikten ve bor\u00e7lu itiraz etmi\u015f ise itiraz\u0131 refolunduktan sonra mal beyan\u0131n\u0131 beklemeksizin alacakl\u0131 haciz konmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( De\u011fi\u015fik f\u0131kra: 06\/06\/1985 &#8211; 3222\/9 md. ) Haciz istemek hakk\u0131, \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fi tarihinden itibaren bir sene ge\u00e7mekle d\u00fc\u015fer. \u0130tiraz veya dava halinde bunlar\u0131n vukuundan h\u00fckm\u00fcn katile\u015fmesine kadar veya alacakl\u0131yla bor\u00e7lunun icra dairesinde taksit s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri yapmalar\u0131 halinde taksit s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ihlaline kadar ge\u00e7en zaman hesaba kat\u0131lmaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Alacakl\u0131 isterse, haciz talebinin vukuuna dair bir vesika verilir. Bu vesika hi\u00e7 bir har\u00e7 ve resme tabi de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Haciz talebi kanuni m\u00fcddet i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmaz veya geri al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra bu m\u00fcddet i\u00e7inde yenilenmezse dosya muameleden kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yeniden haciz istemek, alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan vukubulan yenileme talebinin bor\u00e7luya tebli\u011fine m\u00fctevakk\u0131ft\u0131r. \u0130lama m\u00fcstenit olmayan takiplerde yenileme talebi \u00fczerine yeniden har\u00e7 al\u0131n\u0131r Yenileme masraf ve har\u00e7lar\u0131 bor\u00e7luya tahmil edilmez.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermekte olup alacakl\u0131n\u0131n haciz isteme hakk\u0131, bir y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcreye tabidir. Haciz isteme hakk\u0131, \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fi tarihinden itibaren bir y\u0131l ge\u00e7mekle d\u00fc\u015fer ( \u0130\u0130K. m.78\/II.C.1 ). Alacakl\u0131, bir y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre ( \u0130\u0130K. m.78\/II ) i\u00e7inde haciz talebinde bulunmaz veya bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 haciz talebini geri al\u0131p da ( ayn\u0131 ) bir y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yeniden haciz talebinde bulunmaz ise, takip dosyas\u0131 i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r ( \u0130\u0130K. m.78\/IV ). Bu halde, takip dosyas\u0131 yaln\u0131z i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r; yoksa icra takibi d\u00fc\u015fmez ( son bulmaz ). \u0130cra Hukukunda takibin yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na dair bir kurum bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan icra takibi derdest kalmakta devam eder. Bu halde alacakl\u0131 yenileme talebinde bulunmak suretiyle ayn\u0131 takip dosyas\u0131nda haciz isteyebilir ( \u0130\u0130K. m. 78\/V ). Takip ilama dayal\u0131 de\u011fil ise, yeniden ba\u015fvurma harc\u0131 ve pe\u015fin har\u00e7 al\u0131n\u0131r ve bu har\u00e7lar bor\u00e7luya y\u00fckletilemez. Hemen belirtmek gerekir ki, bu durumda bor\u00e7luya yenileme tebli\u011f edilir. Yeniden \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011f edilmez. Yenileme emri tebli\u011fi bor\u00e7luya itiraz hakk\u0131 vermez. Kesinle\u015fen takibe devam edilir. ( HGK&#8217;nun 15.05.2013 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/13-1395 E., 2013\/703 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava konusu alacak, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanmakta olup BK&#8217;nun 126\/IV. ( TBK&#8217;nun 147\/6. ) maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresine tabi bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki belgelerden davac\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 alacakla ilgili Sincan 5.\u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 2007\/413 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile 12.09.2007 tarihinde icra takibi ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, 18.11.2008 tarihinde de takip dosyas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Alaca\u011f\u0131n 31.12.2003 tarihinde muaccel oldu\u011fu konusunda ise uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BK&#8217;nun 133\/II. ( TBK&#8217;nun 154\/2. ) maddesi gere\u011fince, icra takibinde bulunulmas\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesen sebepler aras\u0131nda yer almakta olup, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan takibin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 12.09.2007 tarihi itibariyle hen\u00fcz be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi dolmam\u0131\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r. Az yukarda da bahsedildi\u011fi \u00fczere, icra takibinde dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde takip derdest kalmaya devam edece\u011finden, takibin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 12.09.2007 tarihinde i\u015flemekte olan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi kesilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, mahkemenin icra takibinde dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ile zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesici etkisinin ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki direnmesi yerinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; ayn\u0131 hususa i\u015faret eden ve Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca da benimsenen \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131na uyulmas\u0131 gerekirken, \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle direnme karar\u0131 bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n bozma ilam\u0131nda ve yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 30.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici Madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 429.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, istek halinde\u00a0temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 440.maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar d\u00fczeltme yolu kapal\u0131 olmak \u00fczere, 18.09.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2012\/19-779<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2013\/355<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 13.3.2013<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130 ( Kanun \u00d6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Bir S\u00fcrenin Hakim Taraf\u0131ndan Uzat\u0131l\u0131p K\u0131salt\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131 Temyiz Edildi\u011fi Tarih \u0130tibariyle Sekiz G\u00fcnl\u00fck Yasal TemyizS\u00fcresi Doldu\u011fundan Temyiz \u0130steminin S\u00fcre Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Reddinin Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 YASAL TEMY\u0130Z S\u00dcRES\u0130 ( Sulh Hukuk Mahkemelerinde Verilen H\u00fck\u00fcmler \u0130\u00e7in Temyiz S\u00fcresi Direnme Karar\u0131n Tebli\u011f Edildi\u011fi Tarih \u0130tibariyle Sekiz G\u00fcn Olup Mahkemece Bu S\u00fcrenin \u0130ki Hafta Olarak De\u011fi\u015ftirilmesinin M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131 Temyiz Edildi\u011fi Tarih \u0130tibariyle Yasal Temyiz S\u00fcresi Doldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 SULH HUKUK MAHKEMELER\u0130NDE VER\u0130LEN KARARLARIN TEMY\u0130Z\u0130 ( Temyiz S\u00fcresi Direnme Karar\u0131n Tebli\u011f Edildi\u011fi Tarih \u0130tibariyle Sekiz G\u00fcn Olup Mahkemece Bu S\u00fcrenin \u0130ki Hafta Olarak De\u011fi\u015ftirilmesinin M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131 Temyiz Edildi\u011fi Tarih \u0130tibariyle Yasal Temyiz S\u00fcresi Doldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 YASA TARAFINDAN D\u00dcZENLENEN KES\u0130N S\u00dcRE ( Kanun \u00d6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Bir S\u00fcrenin Hakim Taraf\u0131ndan Uzat\u0131l\u0131p K\u0131salt\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131 Temyiz Edildi\u011fi Tarih \u0130tibariyle Sekiz G\u00fcnl\u00fck Yasal Temyiz S\u00fcresi Doldu\u011fundan Temyiz \u0130steminin S\u00fcre Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Reddinin Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 HAK\u0130M TARAFINDAN BEL\u0130RLENEMEYEN S\u00dcRELER ( Kanun \u00d6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Bir S\u00fcrenin Hakim Taraf\u0131ndan Uzat\u0131l\u0131p K\u0131salt\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 &#8211; Direnme Karar\u0131n\u0131 Temyiz Edildi\u011fi Tarih \u0130tibariyle Sekiz G\u00fcnl\u00fck Yasal Temyiz S\u00fcresi Doldu\u011fundan Temyiz \u0130steminin S\u00fcre Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Reddinin Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086\/m.437<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5236\/m.16<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> Dava, itiraz\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkindir. Hakim taraf\u0131ndan da s\u00fcrenin belirlenebildi\u011fi durumlar var olmakla birlikte kanunda belirlenen s\u00fcreler \u00fczerinde Hakimin tasarruf yetkisi bulunmamaktad\u0131r. E\u015f s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle kanun \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir s\u00fcre hakim taraf\u0131ndan uzat\u0131l\u0131p k\u0131salt\u0131lamaz. Temyize ili\u015fkin s\u00fcreler de yasa taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen kesin s\u00fcrelerdir ve resen g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekir. Sulh hukuk mahkemelerinde verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler i\u00e7in temyiz s\u00fcresi direnme karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi tarih itibariyle 8 g\u00fcn olup, mahkemece bu s\u00fcrenin \u201ciki hafta\u201d olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu itibarla, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz edildi\u011fi tarih itibariyle ( 8 ) g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi doldu\u011fundan temyiz isteminin s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddinin gerekti\u011fine kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca karar verilmi\u015ftir. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, daval\u0131 vekilinin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201citiraz\u0131n iptali\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; \u0130zmir 1. Sulh Hukuk Mahkeme&#8217;since davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 14.12.2010 g\u00fcn ve 1257\/1382 E., K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 19. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 26.10.2011 g\u00fcn ve 3278\/13260 E., K say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin hamili oldu\u011fu \u00e7eklerin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n \u0130zmir Kemeralt\u0131 \u015eubesine bankan\u0131n sorumlu oldu\u011fu miktar\u0131n tahsili amac\u0131yla m\u00fcracaat etti\u011fini, olumsuz cevap \u00fczerine daval\u0131 banka aleyhine ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibinin yetkiye ve borca itiraz sonucu durdu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek itiraz\u0131n iptali ile takibin devam\u0131na ve icra inkar tazminat\u0131na karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekili, davan\u0131n yetkisiz mahkemede a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Ayd\u0131n mahkemelerinin yetkili oldu\u011funu, takibe konu \u00e7eklerin takas odas\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ibraz edildi\u011fini belirterek davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda, daval\u0131n\u0131n icra dairesinin ve mahkemenin yetkisine y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n\u0131n yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi, her ne kadar 3167 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kalkm\u0131\u015f ise de 5941 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 8\/4. maddesi ile \u201c Takas odalar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ibraz edilmi\u015f \u00e7ekler i\u00e7in, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirlenen sorumluluk miktar\u0131 dahil k\u0131smi \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmaz. Bu durum muhatap bankan\u0131n sorumluluk tutar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6deme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ortadan kald\u0131rmaz. Ancak takas odalar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ibraz edilen \u00e7ekin, hesapta yeterli kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi halinde muhatap banka taraf\u0131ndan hesapta bulunan k\u0131smi kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k tutar\u0131, \u00e7eki ibraz eden hamil lehine 15 g\u00fcn s\u00fcre ile bloke edilir.\u201d \u015feklinde d\u00fczenleme getirildi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ekler kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorumluluk miktar\u0131ndan sorumlu oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eleriyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne takibe vaki itiraz\u0131n iptaline, as\u0131l alaca\u011fa yasal faiz tahakkuk ettirilmek \u00fczere takibin devam\u0131na ve icra inkar tazminat\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 vekilince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5491 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ek Kanun&#8217;un ge\u00e7ici 1. maddesinin 3. bendinde; Bankalar\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fterilerine verdikleri eski \u00e7ek defterleriyle ilgili olarak, 3167 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3167 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 6. maddesi uyar\u0131nca takas odalar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ibraz edilen \u00e7eklerde ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 10. maddesindeki miktarlar \u00f6denmez. Dava konusu \u00e7eklerin muhatap bankadan ba\u015fka bankalara ibraz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan an\u0131lan yasan\u0131n 6. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru de\u011fildir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Dava, itiraz\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece, icra takibine vaki itiraz\u0131n haks\u0131z oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 vekilinin temyizi \u00fczerine karar, \u00d6zel Dairece yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerle bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel Mahkemece, \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015f; h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize daval\u0131 vekili getirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesinden \u00f6nce \u00f6n sorun olarak; Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n 8 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde temyiz edilebilmesine ra\u011fmen yerel mahkemece k\u0131sa kararda temyiz s\u00fcresinin \u201ciki hafta\u201d olarak belirtilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle daval\u0131 vekilinin karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden 11 g\u00fcn sonra verdi\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul edilme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6ncelikle yasada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcreler, bunlar\u0131n yarg\u0131lamaya etkisi ve yarg\u0131sal uygulaman\u0131n irdelenmesi gereklidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131yla ba\u015flayan yarg\u0131lama faaliyetinde, karara ula\u015fmak bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, mahkeme ve taraflarca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken belirli i\u015flemler vard\u0131r ve her i\u015flemin belli bir zaman aral\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile normatif bir de\u011fer kazanan bu zaman aral\u0131klar\u0131na s\u00fcre denilmektedir. B\u00f6ylece usul i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zamansal olarak taraflar\u0131n ya da mahkemenin arzular\u0131na, inisiyatifine b\u0131rak\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k mahkemeye ta\u015f\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olmakla, kamu alan\u0131na, toplumun da \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131 ilgilendiren bir platforma aktar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle bir davan\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sona erdirilmesinde en az taraflar kadar toplumun da yarar\u0131 vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu halde, s\u00fcreye ili\u015fkin normlar\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle medeni usul hukukunda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmek istenen ama\u00e7lar; adaletin bir an \u00f6nce sa\u011flanmas\u0131, keyfili\u011fin \u00f6nlenmesi, mahkemenin ayn\u0131 i\u015fle uzun s\u00fcre me\u015fgul olmas\u0131n\u0131n, ba\u015fka ifadeyle di\u011fer dava ve i\u015flere yeterince zaman ay\u0131ramaz duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi; uluslar \u00fcst\u00fc ve ulusal nitelikteki emredici normlar uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n belli bir d\u00fczen ve kestirilebilir bir zamansall\u0131kla y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi, ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla yarg\u0131laman\u0131n adil \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 olarak \u00f6zetlenebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S\u00fcrelerin \u00f6nemli bir k\u0131sm\u0131, taraflar i\u00e7in konulmu\u015f s\u00fcrelerdir. Taraflar, bu s\u00fcreler i\u00e7inde belli i\u015flemleri yapabilirler veya yapmalar\u0131 gerekir. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lamayan i\u015flemler, tekrar yap\u0131lamaz ve s\u00fcreyi ka\u00e7\u0131ran taraf aleyhine sonu\u00e7 do\u011furur. Taraflar i\u00e7in konulmu\u015f s\u00fcreler, kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcreler ve h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan belirtilen s\u00fcreler olmak \u00fczere ikiye ayr\u0131l\u0131r. Kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcreler, kanun taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f s\u00fcrelerdir. Cevap s\u00fcresi, temyiz s\u00fcresi gibi. Bu s\u00fcreler kesindir ve bir i\u015flemin kanuni s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, mahkemece re&#8217;sen g\u00f6zetilir. H\u00e2kimin tespit etti\u011fi s\u00fcreler ise, kural olarak kesin de\u011fildir. ( Kuru, Baki, Prof. Dr.; Arslan, Ramazan, Prof. Dr.; Y\u0131lmaz, Ejder, Prof. Dr.; Medeni Usul Hukuku Ders Kitab\u0131, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;na G\u00f6re Yeniden Yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f 22. Bask\u0131, Ankara 2011, s.749 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">H\u00e2kim, kendi tayin etmi\u015f oldu\u011fu s\u00fcreyi, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu ( HMK )&#8217;nun 90\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re iki taraf\u0131 dinledikten sonra hakl\u0131 nedenlere dayanarak, azalt\u0131p \u00e7o\u011faltabilir. H\u00e2kim, tayin etti\u011fi s\u00fcrenin, kesin oldu\u011funa da karar verebilir ( HMK m.94\/2, HUMK m.163 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere hakim taraf\u0131ndan da s\u00fcrenin belirlenebildi\u011fi durumlar var olmakla birlikte kanunda belirlenen s\u00fcreler \u00fczerinde Hakimin tasarruf yetkisi bulunmamaktad\u0131r. E\u015f s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle kanun \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir s\u00fcre hakim taraf\u0131ndan uzat\u0131l\u0131p k\u0131salt\u0131lamaz. Temyize ili\u015fkin s\u00fcreler de yasa taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen kesin s\u00fcrelerdir ve resen g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesinin ( 1 ). f\u0131kra h\u00fckm\u00fc; \u201cB\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin, 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5235 say\u0131l\u0131 Adli Yarg\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemeleri ile B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f, G\u00f6rev ve Yetkileri Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun ge\u00e7ici 2 nci Maddesi uyar\u0131nca Resm\u00ee Gazete&#8217;de ilan edilecek g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihine kadar, 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun temyize ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunur.\u201d \u015feklindedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK&#8217;n\u0131n 437. maddesini yeniden d\u00fczenleyen 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun 16 md. \u00f6ncesindeki hali \u201cSulh mahkemesi kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz s\u00fcresi sekiz g\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu s\u00fcre ilam\u0131n usulen taraflardan herbirine tebli\u011fi ile i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar\u2026.\u201d \u015feklindedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Genel Kurul g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u00fcyelerce; mahkeme karar\u0131nda yanl\u0131\u015f belirtilen s\u00fcrenin davan\u0131n taraf\u0131n\u0131 yan\u0131ltmas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan hak kayb\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesinin gerekti\u011fini vetemyiz incelemesinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015fler iseler de kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f kabul edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal mevzuat \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde sulh hukuk mahkemelerinde verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler i\u00e7in temyiz s\u00fcresi direnme karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi 11.05.2010 tarihi itibariyle 8 g\u00fcn olup, mahkemece bu s\u00fcrenin \u201ciki hafta\u201d olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz edildi\u011fi 22.05.2012 tarihi itibariyle ( 8 ) g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi doldu\u011fundan temyiz isteminin s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddinin gerekti\u011fine kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, daval\u0131 vekilinin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Yukar\u0131da yer alan a\u00e7\u0131klamalara g\u00f6re 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 30.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 26.09.2004 tarih ve 5236 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik \u00f6ncesi y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki \u015fekliyle 437\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince daval\u0131 vekilinin temyizdilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden REDD\u0130NE, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 440\/III-2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar d\u00fczeltme yolu kapal\u0131 olmak \u00fczere, 13.03.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">YARGITAY<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">E. 2011\/5-619<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">K. 2011\/716<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">T. 30.11.2011<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 KAMULA\u015eTIRMASIZ EL ATILAN TA\u015eINMAZA Y\u00d6NEL\u0130K EL ATMANIN \u00d6NLENMES\u0130 KAL VE ECR\u0130M\u0130S\u0130L \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Temyiz \u015eart\u0131 Olan Har\u00e7 \u0130kmal Olunmadan Dosyan\u0131n Temyiz\u0130ncelemesine G\u00f6nderilemeyece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 TEMY\u0130Z HARCININ MAHSUBU ( \u0130lk Temyiz S\u0131ras\u0131nda Yat\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p Bozma \u0130lam\u0131nda \u0130adesine Karar Verilen Miktar Geri Al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015fsa Kendili\u011finden Yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 Gereken Har\u00e7tan Mahsup Edilemeyece\u011fi &#8211; \u0130lgilisi Mahsubu Talep Etmi\u015f ve Bu Durum Belgelendirilmi\u015fse Mahsup Sonras\u0131 \u0130kmali Gereken Har\u00e7 Miktar\u0131 Varsa Bu Miktar\u0131n da Temyiz Edenden Tahsil Olunaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 EKS\u0130K HAR\u00c7 ( \u0130lk Temyiz S\u0131ras\u0131nda Yat\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p Bozma \u0130lam\u0131nda \u0130adesine Karar Verilen Miktar Geri Al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015fsa Kendili\u011finden Yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 Gereken Har\u00e7tan Mahsup Edilemeyece\u011fi\/Eksik Har\u00e7 Miktar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130kmali \u0130kmal Edilmedi\u011fi Takdirde Temyiz Dilek\u00e7esinin Reddedilece\u011fi &#8211; Har\u00e7 \u0130kmal Olunmadan Temyiz \u0130ncelemesine G\u00f6nderilemeyece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">492\/m.1, 2<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1086\/m.434\/3<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6100\/m.344<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET :<\/span> Dava, kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el at\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmaza y\u00f6nelik el atman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi, kal ve ecrimisil istemine ili\u015fkindir. \u0130lk temyiz s\u0131ras\u0131nda yat\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p da, bozma ilam\u0131nda iadesine karar verilen miktar varsa ve ilgilisince dosyadan geri al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015fsa, bu miktar\u0131n kendili\u011finden yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken har\u00e7tan mahsup edilemeyece\u011fi ve mahkemece hesaplanan har\u00e7 ve giderlerin, gerekli har\u00e7 ve giderleri yat\u0131rmakla m\u00fckellef olan, temyiz edenden istenece\u011fi; \u015fayet temyiz eden iadesine karar verildi\u011fi halde almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 harc\u0131n hesaplanan harca mahsubunu talep etmi\u015f ve bu durum belgelendirilmi\u015fse, bu mahsubun belgeye ba\u011flanarak yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, mahsup sonras\u0131 ikmali gereken har\u00e7 miktar\u0131 varsa bu miktar\u0131n da temyiz edenden tahsil olunaca\u011f\u0131; bu i\u015flem yap\u0131lmadan dilek\u00e7enin kaydedilmesi halinde ise eksik har\u00e7 miktar\u0131n\u0131n ikmali, ikmal edilmedi\u011fi takdirde temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddi gerekirken, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 olan har\u00e7 ikmal olunmadan dosyan\u0131n temyiz incelemesine g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span> Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;tazminat&#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Trabzon 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesince davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen 18.03.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/175 E. 2010\/55 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi, davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 5.Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 18.10.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/13395 E.-2010\/17579 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">( &#8230; Dava, kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el at\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmaza y\u00f6nelik el atman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi, kal ve ecrimisil istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131lar vekilince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan incelemede; dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaza, \u0130&#8230; K\u00f6pr\u00fcs\u00fc Mevkii Ta\u015fk\u0131n Koruma \u0130n\u015faat\u0131 Projesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda De\u011firmendere dere yata\u011f\u0131n\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi ve istifli tahkimat duvar\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131na kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc yerine, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle reddine karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">KARAR :<\/span> Dava, kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el at\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmaza y\u00f6nelik el atman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi, kal ve ecrimisil istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131 DS\u0130 Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vekili, davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkemece, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Davac\u0131lar vekilinin temyizi \u00fczerine \u00d6zel Dairece yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eyle h\u00fck\u00fcm bozularak, &#8220;pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istenildi\u011finde iadesine ve temyize ba\u015fvurma harc\u0131n\u0131n Hazineye irad kaydedilmesine&#8221; h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda \u0131srar edilmi\u015f, h\u00fckm\u00fc, davac\u0131lar vekili temyize getirmi\u015f, temyiz ba\u015fvuru ve temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda, i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinden \u00f6nce, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizi s\u0131ras\u0131nda, davac\u0131lar vekilince, \u00f6nceki harc\u0131n mahsubuna ili\u015fkin bir talep ve ayr\u0131ca yat\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; bu konuda a\u00e7\u0131k bir talep olmaks\u0131z\u0131n ilk karar\u0131n temyizi s\u0131ras\u0131nda davac\u0131larca yat\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p; \u00d6zel Dairece bozma ilam\u0131nda iadesine karar verilen ve fakat iade edilmeyen 17.15 TL temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz harc\u0131 olarak kabul edilip edilmeyece\u011fi; buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak da direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edildi\u011fi 29.04.2011 tarihi itibariyle al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131 da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutularak, noksan harc\u0131n ikmali i\u00e7in gerekli i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi hususu \u00f6n sorun olarak nitelendirilerek \u00f6ncelikle bu konunun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc yoluna gidilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi, \u00f6ncelikle har\u00e7lar\u0131n hukuki niteli\u011fi ve \u00f6zellikleri konusunda a\u00e7\u0131klama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda fayda vard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kamu hizmetlerinin kurulmas\u0131 ve y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in gerekli olan mali kayna\u011f\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla devletin, egemenlik g\u00fcc\u00fcne dayanarak koydu\u011fu mali y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerden kaynaklanan alacaklar\u0131 genel olarak kamu alacaklar\u0131 olarak nitelendirilmektedir. Kamu hizmetlerinden faydalananlar\u0131n \u00f6dedikleri har\u00e7lar, kamu alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan gelir kaynaklar\u0131ndan birini olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Har\u00e7lar\u0131n olu\u015fturdu\u011fu mali y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck, teoride &#8220;masraf\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lama&#8221; ve &#8220;faydalanma&#8221; ilkelerine dayand\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Masraf ( lar )\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lama ilkesine g\u00f6re har\u00e7, hizmetin gerektirdi\u011fi maliyetle \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcrken; faydalanma ilkesinde hizmetin maliyeti de\u011fil y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc i\u00e7in ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011fer esas al\u0131nmaktad\u0131r ( PINAR, Burak; Yarg\u0131 ve \u0130cra Har\u00e7lar\u0131, Ankara 2009, 2. bask\u0131, s.1 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Har\u00e7larda, sunulan hizmet nedeniyle bir miktar para al\u0131n\u0131r. Bu paran\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131nda da, hizmete duyulan talep de\u011fil, siyasal s\u00fcre\u00e7 i\u00e7inde al\u0131nan kararlar ve b\u00fct\u00e7e \u00f6denekleri esas al\u0131nmaktad\u0131r ( BULUTO\u011eLU, Kenan; Kamu Ekonomisine Giri\u015f, \u0130stanbul 2003, s.406 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu ba\u011flamda kanunla al\u0131nmalar\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011flanan vergiler d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki mali y\u00fck\u00fcmler ve \u00f6zellikle har\u00e7lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, vergide oldu\u011fu gibi toplam kamu giderlerine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k olma ve mali g\u00fcc\u00fc \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fc olarak alma de\u011fil, k\u0131smen de olsa &#8220;kamu hizmetlerinden yararlanma kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; \u00f6zelli\u011fi s\u00f6zkonusu olmaktad\u0131r ( AYM, 17.06.1970 g\u00fcn ve 1968\/60 E, 1969\/36 K. ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalara g\u00f6re har\u00e7, baz\u0131 kamu hizmetlerinden yararlanan ve hatta kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc ile yararlanmak zorunda b\u0131rak\u0131lan \u00f6zel ve t\u00fczel ki\u015filerin, \u00f6zel menfaatlerine ili\u015fkin olarak, kamu kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n hizmetlerinden yararlanmalar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, belli bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde bu hizmetlerin maliyetine kat\u0131lmalar\u0131 amac\u0131yla konulan ve zor unsuruna dayanan mali y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerdir ( PINAR, Burak; Yarg\u0131 ve \u0130cra Har\u00e7lar\u0131, Ankara 2009, 2. bask\u0131, s.3 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle har\u00e7, adli ve idari hizmetlerde ve bu hizmetin gerektirdi\u011fi masraflar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamak m\u00fclahazas\u0131yla ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczel ki\u015filerden hazinece al\u0131nan bir parad\u0131r. Yap\u0131lan i\u015fler ve g\u00f6r\u00fclen hizmet amme hizmetinden ziyade, ki\u015filerin \u015fahs\u0131na ve menfaatine ili\u015fkindir ( Y.\u0130.B.K. 23.12.1976 g\u00fcn ve 1976\/11-7 E.-6 K. ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Har\u00e7lar\u0131n \u00f6zellikleri \u015fu \u015fekilde s\u0131ralanabilir: Har\u00e7lar, Kanuna dayanarak yetkili kurumlar taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131n\u0131r. Har\u00e7 belirli bir hizmet kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda al\u0131n\u0131r ve harca konu hizmet, ticari ve s\u0131nai nitelikte de\u011fildir; ihtiyaridir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bir kamu hizmetinden dolay\u0131 har\u00e7 al\u0131nabilmesi, bu hizmetin kanunla belirlenmesine ve bu hususla ilgili har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemelerin de, kanunda yer almas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Bu kanunilik ilkesine paralel olarak, 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun 1.maddesinde, bu kanuna g\u00f6re al\u0131nacak har\u00e7lar aras\u0131nda, di\u011fer har\u00e7lar yan\u0131nda yarg\u0131 har\u00e7lar\u0131 da, bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ayn\u0131 Kanunun 2.maddesinde ise, yarg\u0131 i\u015flemlerinden bu Kanuna ba\u011fl\u0131 ( 1 ) say\u0131l\u0131 tarifede yaz\u0131l\u0131 olanlar\u0131n, yarg\u0131 har\u00e7lar\u0131na tabi oldu\u011fu vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131 harc\u0131, devletin mahkemeler arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 hizmete, ondan yararlananlar\u0131n katk\u0131s\u0131d\u0131r ( Y.\u0130.B.K. 16.12.1983 g\u00fcn ve 1983\/5 E.-6 K. ). Yarg\u0131 har\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n konusuna giren, yani yarg\u0131 harc\u0131na tabi i\u015flemler, mahkeme har\u00e7lar\u0131 ile icra ve iflas har\u00e7lar\u0131d\u0131r. Mahkeme har\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 da ba\u015fvurma harc\u0131, celse harc\u0131 ile karar ve ilam harc\u0131 olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ba\u015fvurma harc\u0131, dilek\u00e7e veya tutanakla dava a\u00e7ma, davaya kat\u0131lma, tevdii mahallinin tayini, ihtiyati tedbir, ihtiyati haciz ve delil tespiti ile ilgili taleplerden al\u0131nan ve pe\u015fin olarak \u00f6denmesi gereken maktu bir har\u00e7t\u0131r ve haklar\u0131 ihlal edilen ( veya tehlikeye sokulan ) \u00f6zel ve t\u00fczel ki\u015filerin, bu ihlalin ve tehlikenin bertaraf edilmesi i\u00e7in koruma talep edilmesi \u015feklindeki kamu kurulu\u015flar\u0131ndan yararlanmalar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ihdas edilen mali bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckt\u00fcr ( PINAR, Burak; Yarg\u0131 ve \u0130cra Har\u00e7lar\u0131, Ankara 2009, 2. bask\u0131, s.49 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun, 06.06.2008 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 04.06.2008 g\u00fcn ve 5766 say\u0131l\u0131 Amme Alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n Tahsil Usul\u00fc Hakk\u0131nda Kanunda ve Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun 11.maddesinin ( d\/IV-a ) bendi ile, ( 1 ) say\u0131l\u0131 Tarifenin &#8220;A ) Mahkeme Har\u00e7lar\u0131&#8221; b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn sonuna, ( IV ) numaral\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm eklenerek, Yarg\u0131tay ve Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;a yap\u0131lacak temyiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 hususu kabul edilmi\u015f; bu har\u00e7lar\u0131n miktarlar\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Celse harc\u0131, hukuk ve ticaret mahkemeleri ile idari yarg\u0131 mercilerinde taraflar veya vekillerince ertelenmelerine sebebiyet verilen celseler nedeniyle al\u0131nan har\u00e7t\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar ve ilam harc\u0131 ise, gereksiz davalar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ve di\u011fer taraf\u0131n haks\u0131z yere \u0131zrar edilmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi i\u00e7in ihdas edilmi\u015f bir m\u00fcessesedir ( \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK,Celal; bir Hukuk Davas\u0131nda Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Gereken Har\u00e7 ve Resimler, s.1177-ALDEM\u0130R, H\u00fcsn\u00fc; Hukuk Davalar\u0131nda Yarg\u0131lama Giderleri, Ankara 2000, s.200 ) ve nihai karar verildi\u011fi anda do\u011fmaktad\u0131r. Gerek usule ve gerekse de esasa ili\u015fkin t\u00fcm nihai kararlar, bu harc\u0131n konusunu olu\u015fturur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Karar ve ilam harc\u0131, dava konusunun para ile de\u011ferlendirilebilir olup olmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re maktu veya nispi karar ve ilam harc\u0131 olarak ikiye ayr\u0131l\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna g\u00f6re, konusu para veya para ile de\u011ferlendirilebilen bir \u015fey olan davalarda, esas hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesi ile h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan anla\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu \u00fczerinden nispi karar ve ilam harc\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131r. Bu davalar d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki hallerde ve konusu para ile de\u011ferlendirilemeyen davalarda ise karar ve ilam harc\u0131 maktu olarak al\u0131n\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca esas hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesi anlam\u0131na gelmeyen, usule ili\u015fkin nihai kararlarda ve davan\u0131n konusuz kalmas\u0131 halinde verilecek kararlardan da maktu karar ve ilam harc\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131r ( KURU, Baki; Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc, c.5, \u0130stanbul 2001, s.5307 &#8211; PINAR, Burak; Yarg\u0131 ve \u0130cra Har\u00e7lar\u0131, Ankara 2009, 2. bask\u0131, s.111 ).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 halinde al\u0131nacak karar ve ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinde de davalar\u0131n maktu harca veya nispi harca ba\u011fl\u0131 olup olmamas\u0131 \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Maktu karar ve ilam harc\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 davalar\u0131n kabul ve reddine ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131n temyizi ile nispi karar ve ilam harc\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 davalar\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131n temyizi hallerinde, temyizharc\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fc temyiz tarihindeki tarifeye g\u00f6re maktu ve pe\u015fin olarak al\u0131n\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nispi harca tabi davalar\u0131n kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131n temyizi halinde ise, mahkemece h\u00fckmedilen miktar \u00fczerinden hesaplanan nispi karar ve ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6rtte biri pe\u015fin olarak al\u0131n\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyize ba\u015fvururken karar ve ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n eksik \u00f6dendi\u011fi, temyiz dilek\u00e7esi mahkemece kayda al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa; karar\u0131 vermi\u015f olan mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan verilecek yedi g\u00fcnl\u00fck kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde tamamlanmas\u0131, aksi halde temyizden vazge\u00e7mi\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 hususu temyiz edene bildirilir ( 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK m.434\/3, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK m.344 ). Verilen kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde har\u00e7 ve giderler tamamlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, ihtarda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere temyiz eden bu isteminden vazge\u00e7mi\u015f say\u0131larak, dilek\u00e7e reddedilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nda, mahkemelerce verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin bozulmas\u0131 halinde har\u00e7 al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131na dair bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle, Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131n bozma kararlar\u0131ndan har\u00e7 al\u0131nmaz ( Y\u0130BK. 10.05.1965 g\u00fcn ve 1965\/1 E., 1965\/1 K. ). Bu durumda, temyiz s\u0131ras\u0131nda al\u0131nan temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n, istek halinde yat\u0131rana iadesine karar verilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun 8. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcnden hareketle, bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 takiben yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda verilecek h\u00fck\u00fcmlerden, karar ve ilam harc\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131r; bozulan h\u00fck\u00fcm dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6nceden al\u0131nan karar ve ilam harc\u0131, yeni al\u0131nacak bu har\u00e7tan mahsup edilir. Tahsil edilecek bir har\u00e7 bulunmas\u0131 halinde, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde \u00f6denmeyen har\u00e7lar\u0131n, bu s\u00fcrenin sonundan itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde, harca konu i\u015flemi talep edenden tahsili amac\u0131yla Maliye&#8217;ye m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130lk h\u00fck\u00fcm bozularak ortadan kalkmakla yeni verilen bu karar temyiz edildi\u011fi takdirde, harca tabi temyiz isteklerinde yeniden temyiz ba\u015fvuru harc\u0131 ile temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131 temyiz edenden tahsil edilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yarg\u0131tay temyiz incelemesine ge\u00e7meden evvel, harc\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ederse, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan hallere g\u00f6re ya temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddi ile esas hakk\u0131nda temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmamas\u0131na ya da har\u00e7lar\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yine yukar\u0131da izah olunan prosed\u00fcr tamamlanmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n yerel mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verebilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dosyada ilk temyiz s\u0131ras\u0131nda yat\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p da iadesine karar verilen miktar varsa ve bu miktar ilgilisince dosyadan geri al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015fsa yap\u0131lacak i\u015flemin ne olaca\u011f\u0131 ise eldeki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n konusunu te\u015fkil etmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan bu maddi hukuk kurallar\u0131, somut olay ortaya konularak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Eldeki davada, davac\u0131lar vekiline direnme karar\u0131, 25.04.2011 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f, davac\u0131lar vekilinin temyiz dilek\u00e7esi, 29.04.2011 tarihinde, hakim havalesi ile birlikte, 2011\/60 temyiznumaras\u0131 ile temyiz defterine kaydedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ne var ki, temyiz eden davac\u0131lar vekilince ayr\u0131ca temyiz i\u00e7in gerekli har\u00e7 yat\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f; direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyizine dair temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin arkas\u0131na, Yerel Mahkeme Yaz\u0131 \u0130\u015fleri M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcnce, &#8220;temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n 17.05.2010 tarih, 5285 say\u0131l\u0131 mutemet al\u0131nd\u0131s\u0131 ile tahsil edildi\u011fine&#8221; dair \u015ferh verilmi\u015f ve davac\u0131lar vekilince, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz dilek\u00e7esi ekinde, &#8220;bozma karar\u0131ndan \u00f6nce yat\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan harc\u0131n geri al\u0131nmamas\u0131 halinde, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz ederken yeniden har\u00e7 yat\u0131r\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131 konulu&#8221; doktrin al\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131na dair fotokopi ibraz edilmi\u015f; bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndatemyiz dilek\u00e7esinde herhangi bir mahsup talebinde bulunulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131nda da, \u00d6zel Daire bozma ilam\u0131nda davac\u0131lara iadesine karar verilen harc\u0131n iade edildi\u011fine dair herhangi bir kay\u0131t ya da belgeye rastlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hukuk Genel Kurulunda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede; Yerel Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz edenin temyizi ile bu karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 halinde, \u00d6zel Dairece bozma ilam\u0131 ile &#8220;pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istenildi\u011finde iadesine&#8221; karar verilmesi, ancak bu harc\u0131n, ilk karar\u0131 temyiz edence geri al\u0131nmamas\u0131 durumunda, bozma sonras\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada verilen direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizi s\u0131ras\u0131nda dosyadaki bu harc\u0131n, do\u011frudan direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz harc\u0131 olarak kabul ve bozma karar\u0131ndan \u00f6nce yat\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan har\u00e7tan mahsup edilip edilmeyece\u011fi tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu tart\u0131\u015fmalarda, bozma \u00f6ncesi yat\u0131r\u0131lan ve \u00d6zel Dairece iadesine karar verilen harc\u0131n, dava dosyas\u0131 Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nda incelenmeden \u00f6nce, ilgilisi taraf\u0131ndan Yerel Mahkeme&#8217;ye ba\u015fvurulup geri al\u0131nabilece\u011fi ve bu durumda Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nca dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n har\u00e7s\u0131z olarak incelenmesi ihtimalinin olabilece\u011fi gibi davalar\u0131n denetimindeki aksakl\u0131klar\u0131n giderilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, iade edilen harc\u0131n yat\u0131ran taraf\u0131ndan geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz s\u0131ras\u0131nda yeniden yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekli oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ile bunun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra yat\u0131r\u0131lan harc\u0131n, b\u00fcy\u00fck b\u00fcrokratik s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131lar sonucu iade al\u0131nabilece\u011fi, bu nedenle talep halinde mahsup edilmesinin daha uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan tart\u0131\u015fmalar sonunda; kural olarak, dosyada ilk temyiz s\u0131ras\u0131nda yat\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p da, bozma ilam\u0131nda iadesine karar verilen miktar varsa ve bu miktar ilgilisince dosyadan geri al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015fsa, bu miktar\u0131n kendili\u011finden yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken har\u00e7tan mahsup edilemeyece\u011fi ve mahkemece hesaplanan har\u00e7 ve giderlerin, gerekli har\u00e7 ve giderleri yat\u0131rmakla m\u00fckellef olan, temyizedenden istenece\u011fi; \u015fayet temyiz eden iadesine karar verildi\u011fi halde almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 harc\u0131n hesaplanan harca mahsubunu talep etmi\u015f ve bu durum belgelendirilmi\u015fse, bu mahsubun belgeye ba\u011flanarak yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, mahsup sonras\u0131 ikmali gereken har\u00e7 miktar\u0131 varsa bu miktar\u0131n da temyiz edenden tahsil olunaca\u011f\u0131; bu i\u015flem yap\u0131lmadan dilek\u00e7enin kaydedilmesi halinde ise yukar\u0131da da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere mahkemece 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu ( HUMK ) &#8216;nun 434\/3- 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu ( HMK )&#8217;nun 344- maddesi gere\u011fince i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Olu\u015fan \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Eldeki davada, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz eden davac\u0131lar vekilinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya konulup belgelendirilmi\u015f bir mahsup beyan\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Mahkemenin bu istem olmadan kendili\u011finden harc\u0131 mahsup ederek, temyiz dilek\u00e7esini kaydetmi\u015f olmas\u0131 do\u011fru de\u011fildir. Ayr\u0131ca, ilk karar\u0131n temyizi i\u00e7in yat\u0131r\u0131lan har\u00e7 miktar\u0131, toplam 91.05 TL olup, \u00d6zel Daire bozma ilam\u0131 ile bu har\u00e7tan sadece 17.15 TL temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n iadesine, bakiye 73.90 TL temyize ba\u015fvurma harc\u0131n\u0131n Hazine&#8217;ye irat olarak kayd\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizi nedeniyle al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken harc\u0131n talep tarihindeki miktarlara g\u00f6re hesab\u0131yla, 17.15 TL har\u00e7 bu miktardan mahsup edildi\u011finde dahi temyiz tarihi itibariyle yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken toplam har\u00e7 miktar\u0131 17.15 TL&#8217;den \u00e7ok daha fazla olacakt\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla mahkemece temyiz harc\u0131 olarak kabul edilen miktar, yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken miktar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamamaktad\u0131r. Dilek\u00e7e temyiz defterine kaydedildi\u011fine g\u00f6re, 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu ( HUMK ) &#8216;nun 434\/3 \/6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu ( HMK )&#8217;nun 344\/ maddesi gere\u011fince i\u015flem yap\u0131larak, eksik har\u00e7 miktar\u0131n\u0131n ikmali, ikmal edilmedi\u011fi takdirde temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddi gerekirken, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 olan har\u00e7 ikmal olunmadan dosyan\u0131n temyiz incelemesine g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 da do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015eu durumda mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015f; direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizi nedeniyle yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken toplam harc\u0131n hesab\u0131 ile temyiz eden davac\u0131lar vekilince mahsup talep edildi\u011finde bu husus belgelendirilerek, dosyada iadesi gereken ve mahsubu istenen 17,15 TL harc\u0131n hesaplanan har\u00e7tan mahsubu ile kalan miktar i\u00e7in 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu ( HUMK ) &#8216;nun 434\/3 \/6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu ( HMK )&#8217;nun 344\/ maddesi gere\u011fince i\u015flem yap\u0131larak davac\u0131 tarafa muht\u0131ra g\u00f6nderilmesi ve bu muht\u0131ran\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren verilen kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde eksik harc\u0131n ikmali halinde dosyan\u0131n temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;na g\u00f6nderilmesi; aksi halde muht\u0131rada yer alacak yasal uyar\u0131 gere\u011fince davac\u0131 taraf temyiz talebinden vazge\u00e7mi\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131ndan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddine karar verilmesi olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O halde; an\u0131lan i\u015flemler yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n mahalline geri \u00e7evrilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7 :<\/span> Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan \u015fekilde i\u015flem yap\u0131l\u0131p, eksiklikler tamamland\u0131ktan sonra temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;a yeniden g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in, dosyan\u0131n Yerel Mahkemeye, GER\u0130 \u00c7EVR\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 30.11.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>9. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>2020\/7176 E., 2020\/19662 K.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<br \/>\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : ALACAK<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131n\u0131n Ek Karara Kar\u015f\u0131 Temyiz Ba\u015fvurusu Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;<\/p>\n<p>Dosya i\u00e7erisinde yer alan duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131ndan ve daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya sunulan t\u00fcm dilek\u00e7elerden, daval\u0131 &#8230; Bilgi Teknolojileri San. ve D\u0131\u015f Tic. Ltd. \u015eti.\u2019nin Avukat &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan temsil edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Karar duru\u015fmas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda s\u00fcre tutum dilek\u00e7esi de Avukat &#8230; imzal\u0131 olarak dosyaya ibraz olunmu\u015f, yetkili vekil bu dilek\u00e7esi ile mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n\u0131n taraflar\u0131na tebli\u011finden sonra gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esini sunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Avukat &#8230; \u2018vekil\u2019 olarak g\u00f6sterilmesine ra\u011fmen gerek\u00e7eli karar ve temyiz harc\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin muht\u0131ran\u0131n vekaletnamede ismi olan, ancak, davay\u0131 hi\u00e7 takip etmeyen Avukat &#8230;\u2019a tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Her ne kadar vekalette ismi olsa da, bu tebligat\u0131n talep eden yerine, davay\u0131 takip etmeyen Avukat &#8230;\u2019a yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir. Bu nedenle, Dairemizin 17.06.2020 tarihli Geri \u00c7evirme karar\u0131 sonras\u0131 yetkili vekile bu hususta tebligat \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve gerekli nisbi temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n da tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. An\u0131lan sebeplerle, daval\u0131n\u0131n temyiz isteminin reddine dair karar tesisi hatal\u0131 olup, mahkemece verilen 28.03.2016 tarihli EK KARARIN BOZULARAK ORTADAN KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131n\u0131n As\u0131l Karara Kar\u015f\u0131 Temyiz Ba\u015fvurusu Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;<\/p>\n<p>Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 \u015firkete vekillikten \u00e7ekilme dilek\u00e7esi ile birlikte gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilmesine ra\u011fmen gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esi verilmedi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak, gerek\u00e7esiz temyiz dilek\u00e7esi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde kanunun a\u00e7\u0131k h\u00fckm\u00fcne ve kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesi sonucunda, yerinde bulunmayan ve sebepleri bildirilmi\u015f olmayan bozma iste\u011finin reddiyle usul ve kanuna uygun olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 temyiz giderinin temyiz edene y\u00fckletilmesine, 22.12.2020 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6z\u00fc: Elektronik yolla tebligat, muhatab\u0131n elektronik adresine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Tebligat\u0131n \u00f6nce ya da sonra okunmu\u015f olmas\u0131, tebli\u011f tarihini etkilemez.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Esas : 2020\/547<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Karar : 2020\/924<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Tarih : 24.11.2020<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u0130NCELENEN KARARIN<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 04\/03\/2020<\/p>\n<p>NUMARASI : 2019\/2932-2020\/607<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki &#8220;ihalenin feshi&#8221; isteminden dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda, \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Hukuk Mahkemesi 8. Hukuk Dairesince verilen alacakl\u0131 vekilinin istinaf talebinin kabul\u00fc ile ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, ihalenin feshi isteminin reddine, ihale bedelinin %10\u2019u oran\u0131nda para cezas\u0131n\u0131n bor\u00e7lulardan al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n bor\u00e7lular vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesince yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda bor\u00e7lu &#8230;.. &#8230;.. Reklamc\u0131l\u0131k ve Organizasyon Hiz. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bozulmu\u015f, \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8. Hukuk Dairesince \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Hukuk Genel Kurulunca yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonunda gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>5235 say\u0131l\u0131 Adli Yarg\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemeleri ile B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f G\u00f6rev ve Yetkileri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un ge\u00e7ici 2\/1. maddesinde, \u201c\u2026B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin kurulu\u015flar\u0131, yarg\u0131 \u00e7evreleri ve t\u00fcm yurtta g\u00f6reve ba\u015flayacaklar\u0131 tarih, Resm\u00ee Gazetede il\u00e2n edilir.\u201d d\u00fczenlemesine yer verilmi\u015f ve 07.11.2015 tarihli ve 29525 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de ilan edilerek b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemeleri 20.07.2016 tarihi itibariyle fiil\u00ee olarak g\u00f6reve ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>5235 say\u0131l\u0131 Adli Yarg\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemeleri ile B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f, G\u00f6rev ve Yetkileri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019a paralel olarak, 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu (\u0130\u0130K)&#8217;nun temyiz ve karar d\u00fczeltmeye ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinde de\u011fi\u015fiklik yaparak istinaf ve temyiz ile ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmleri yeniden d\u00fczenleyen 02.03.2005 tarihli ve 5311 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile \u0130\u0130K\u2019ya eklenen ge\u00e7ici 7. maddeye g\u00f6re, 5311 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 20.07.2016 tarihinden sonra verilen kararlar hakk\u0131nda uygulan\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>02.03.2005 tarihli ve 5311 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 25. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u0130K\u2019n\u0131n 364. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re, temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurma ve incelemesi, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu (HMK)\u2019na g\u00f6re yap\u0131l\u0131r. 05.08.2017 tarihli ve 7035 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 31. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik HMK\u2019n\u0131n 361. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ise, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, karar\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren iki hafta i\u00e7inde temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulabilir.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olayda, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz eden bor\u00e7lu &#8230;.. &#8230;.. Reklamc\u0131l\u0131k Ve Organizasyon Hiz. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. vekiline elektronik tebligat yolu ile tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>28.02.2018 tarihli ve 7101 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile de\u011fi\u015fik 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 7\/a maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda (1\/g) baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131l\u0131 avukatlara tebligat\u0131n elektronik yolla yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu oldu\u011fu, 4. f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise elektronik yolla tebligat\u0131n, muhatab\u0131n elektronik adresine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>An\u0131lan maddeye dayan\u0131larak haz\u0131rlanan ve 06.12.2018 tarihli 30617 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanan, elektronik ortamda yap\u0131lacak tebligata ili\u015fkin usul ve esaslar\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen Elektronik Tebligat Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi 01.01.2019 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Elektronik Tebligat Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi\u2019nin 3. maddesinde;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Elektronik tebligat: Tebligat Kanunu ve bu Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe uygun olarak elektronik ortamda yap\u0131lan tebligat,<\/p>\n<p>Elektronik tebligat adresi: PTT taraf\u0131ndan, ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer i\u00e7in kimlik bilgileri, t\u00fczel ki\u015filer i\u00e7in ise tabi olduklar\u0131 sistem bilgileri esas al\u0131nmak suretiyle tek ve benzersiz \u015fekilde olu\u015fturulan ve UETS\u2019ye kaydedilen tebligat adresi,<\/p>\n<p>UETS: Tebligat Kanunu ve bu Y\u00f6netmelik uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan elektronik tebligat i\u015flemlerini y\u00fcr\u00fctmek amac\u0131yla PTT taraf\u0131ndan kurulan, i\u015fletilen ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi sa\u011flanan sistem,<\/p>\n<p>Zaman damgas\u0131: 5070 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (h) bendinde tan\u0131mlanan zaman damgas\u0131&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>olarak tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>5070 say\u0131l\u0131 Elektronik \u0130mza Kanunu&#8217;nda ise &#8220;Zaman damgas\u0131: Bir elektronik verinin, \u00fcretildi\u011fi, de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fi, g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve\/veya kaydedildi\u011fi zaman\u0131n tespit edilmesi amac\u0131yla, elektronik sertifika hizmet sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan elektronik imzayla do\u011frulanan kayd\u0131 ifade eder.&#8221; \u015feklinde belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Elektronik Tebligat Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi\u2019nin 5\/\u011f. maddesinde tebligat\u0131n elektronik yolla yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlu olanlar aras\u0131nda &#8220;Baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131l\u0131 avukatlar&#8221; g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 6. maddesinde elektronik tebligat adresi alma zorunlulu\u011funa tabi olanlar i\u00e7in yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvuru, 8. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda PTT&#8217;nin ba\u015fvurunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten itibaren bir ay i\u00e7inde elektronik tebligat adresini, ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer i\u00e7in kimlik bilgilerini, t\u00fczel ki\u015filer i\u00e7in ise tabi olduklar\u0131 sistem bilgilerini esas almak suretiyle tek ve benzersiz olacak \u015fekilde olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 ve UETS\u2019ye kaydedece\u011fi, elektronik tebligat\u0131n haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 ve muhataba ula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 9. maddesinde tebligat \u00e7\u0131karmaya yetkili makam ve mercinin, elektronik tebligat mesaj\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlayarak, UETS\u2019ye teslim edece\u011fi, UETS&#8217;nin elektronik tebligat mesaj\u0131n\u0131 zaman damgas\u0131yla ili\u015fkilendirerek muhatab\u0131n elektronik tebligat adresine ula\u015ft\u0131raca\u011f\u0131, elektronik yolla tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131n elektronik tebligat adresine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>12 . G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 7\/a maddesinde muhatab\u0131n elektronik tebligat\u0131 tebell\u00fc\u011f etmi\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 tarihe ili\u015fkin \u00f6zel bir d\u00fczenleme yer almaktad\u0131r. Bu d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re &#8220;Elektronik yolla tebligat, muhatab\u0131n elektronik adresine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.&#8221; Bunun sonucu olarak elektronik tebligatta tebell\u00fc\u011f tarihi elektronik tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131n elektronik posta hesab\u0131na ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya okundu\u011fu tarih olmay\u0131p, tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131n elektronik adresine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonu olmaktad\u0131r. B\u00f6ylelikle, muhatab\u0131n kay\u0131tl\u0131 elektronik posta hesab\u0131n\u0131 kontrol etmemek suretiyle tebli\u011fin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 geciktirmesi ihtimali s\u00f6z konusu olmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 7\/a maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan d\u00fczenlemeye benzer bir d\u00fczenleme de 213 say\u0131l\u0131 Vergi Usul Kanunu&#8217;nun 107\/A maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer almakta olup, &#8220;..Elektronik ortamda tebligat, muhatab\u0131n elektronik adresine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r&#8230;&#8221; \u015feklindedir. Bu d\u00fczenlemenin Anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 ile yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine Anayasa Mahkemesinin 19.09.2019 tarihli ve 2018\/144 esas say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda; itiraz konusu kural\u0131n muhataplara \u00f6ncelikle elektronik posta adreslerini belirli aral\u0131klarla kontrol etme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00fckledi\u011fi, bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe be\u015fer g\u00fcnl\u00fck aral\u0131klarla uyuldu\u011fu takdirde hukuki yollara ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden herhangi bir hak kayb\u0131 olmayaca\u011f\u0131, muhatab\u0131n elektronik posta adresini her g\u00fcn ya da be\u015f g\u00fcnden daha az aral\u0131klarla kontrol etmesi h\u00e2linde ise tebli\u011fin yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 tarihten de \u00f6nce tebligattan haberdar olunaca\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir hak kayb\u0131 ya\u015fanmayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi bu s\u00fcrenin birka\u00e7 g\u00fcn daha uzamas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek d\u00fczenlemenin Anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz eden bor\u00e7lu &#8230;.. &#8230;.. Reklamc\u0131l\u0131k ve Organizasyon Hiz. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. vekiline yap\u0131lan elektronik tebligat\u0131n incelenmesinde; &#8220;Tarih 11.03.2020 Muhatap hesab\u0131na teslim edilmek \u00fczere UETS taraf\u0131ndan teslim al\u0131nd\u0131, 11.03.2020 Tebligat al\u0131c\u0131 i\u00e7in ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f tebligat alan\u0131na (hesab\u0131na) ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 bir \u015fekilde konuldu, 16.03.2020 Tebligat al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n hesab\u0131na iletilmesine m\u00fcteakip mevzuat gere\u011fi belirlenen s\u00fcre sonunda otomatik olarak okundu say\u0131ld\u0131&#8221; \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Elektronik Tebligat Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi&#8217;nin 9. maddesinde belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere UETS elektronik tebligat mesaj\u0131n\u0131 zaman damgas\u0131yla ili\u015fkilendirerek 11.03.2020 tarihinde muhatab\u0131n elektronik tebligat adresine ula\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olup, elektronik yolla tebligat muhatab\u0131n elektronik adresine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihi izleyen be\u015finci g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131ndan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n 16.03.2020 tarihinde bor\u00e7lu vekiline tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, yasal s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra 15.06.2020 tarihinde temyiz dilek\u00e7esi verildi\u011fi ve ayn\u0131 tarihte har\u00e7 yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00e2l b\u00f6yle olunca, bor\u00e7lu vekilinin temyiz isteminin 5311 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019la de\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u0130K\u2019n\u0131n 364. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 ile HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 366. maddesinin g\u00f6ndermesi ile uygulanmas\u0131 gereken ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 352. maddesi uyar\u0131nca s\u00fcreden reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">SONU\u00c7:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n<p>Alacakl\u0131 vekilinin temyiz isteminin 5311 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019la de\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u0130K\u2019n\u0131n 364. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 ile HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 366. maddesinin g\u00f6ndermesi ile uygulanmas\u0131 gereken ayn\u0131 Kanunun 352. maddesi uyar\u0131nca s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>\u0130stek h\u00e2linde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine,<\/p>\n<p>Dosyan\u0131n ilk derece mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine 24.11.2020 tarihinde oy birli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>T.C<br \/>\nDANI\u015eTAY<br \/>\n9.DA\u0130RE BA\u015eKANLI\u011eI<br \/>\nESAS NO: 2016\/13601<br \/>\nKARAR NO: 2017\/2726<br \/>\nKARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130:14\/03\/2017<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\nKar\u015f\u0131 Taraf : Amasya Vergi Dairesi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc<\/p>\n<p><strong>&gt;MESA\u0130 SAAT\u0130 GE\u00c7T\u0130KTEN SONRA UYAP \u00dcZER\u0130NDEN VER\u0130LEN D\u0130LEK\u00c7EN\u0130N S\u00dcRE Y\u00d6N\u00dc<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00d6ZET: Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yenileme s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fcnde Uyap \u00fczerinden 22.24&#8217;te verilen yenileme dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda.<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u0130stemin \u00d6zeti :<\/strong>\u00a0Davac\u0131 ad\u0131na, 2010\/Temmuz-Aral\u0131k d\u00f6nemlerine ili\u015fkin olarak re&#8217;sen tarh edilen tapu harc\u0131 ile kesilen vergi ziya\u0131 cezas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davay\u0131 s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddeden Samsun Vergi Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 25\/12\/2015 tarih ve E:2015\/1248, K:2015\/1424 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n; dilek\u00e7ede ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen sebeplerle bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cevab\u0131n \u00d6zeti :<\/strong>\u00a0Yasal dayanaktan yoksun olan temyiz isteminin reddi gerekti\u011fi yolundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Tetkik Hakimi:<\/p>\n<p><strong>D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi:\u00a0<\/strong>Temyiz isteminin kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>H\u00fck\u00fcm veren Dan\u0131\u015ftay Dokuzuncu Dairesince i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, davac\u0131 ad\u0131na 2010\/Temmuz-Aral\u0131k d\u00f6nemlerine ili\u015fkin olarak re&#8217;sen tarh edilen tapu harc\u0131 ile kesilen vergi ziya\u0131 cezas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davay\u0131 s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131mdan m\u0131 reddeden Vergi Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanununun 31. maddesinde; bu Yasada h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmayan hususlarda; hakimin davaya bakmaktan memnuiyeti ve reddi, ehliyet, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n davaya kat\u0131lmas\u0131, davan\u0131n ihbar\u0131, taraflar\u0131n vekilleri, feragat ve kabul, teminat, mukabil dava, bilirki\u015fi, ke\u015fif, delillerin tespiti, yarg\u0131lama giderleri, adli yard\u0131m hallerinde ve duru\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda taraflar\u0131n mahkemenin s\u00fckununu ve inzibat\u0131n\u0131 bozacak hareketlerine kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lacak i\u015flemler ile elektronik i\u015flemlerde Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 kurala ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f;<strong>\u00a06100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun &#8220;Elektronik \u0130\u015flemler&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 445. maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131nda, elektronik ortamda yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerde s\u00fcrenin g\u00fcn sonunda bitece\u011fi, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi&#8217;nin &#8220;Davan\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 36. Maddesinin 10. f\u0131kras\u0131nda davan\u0131n fiziksel ortamda mesai saati, elektronik ortamda ise saat 00:00&#8217;a kadar a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Dosyan\u0131n incelenmesinden;<\/strong>\u00a0davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan vergi ziya\u0131 cezal\u0131 tapu harc\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan vergi ziya\u0131 cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 her bir d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle dilek\u00e7enin reddine karar verildi\u011fi, s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n davac\u0131ya 28.10.2015 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan\u00a0<strong>27.11.2015 tarihinde Amasya 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi kayd\u0131na 22:24&#8217;te UYAP ortam\u0131nda verilen dilek\u00e7e ile davan\u0131n yenilendi\u011fi, Vergi Mahkemesi&#8217;nce; dilek\u00e7enin reddine ili\u015fkin karar \u00fczerine otuz g\u00fcnl\u00fck davay\u0131 yenileme s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fc 27.11.2015 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saati bitimine kadar davan\u0131n yenilenmesi gerekirken, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saati bitiminden sonra yenilenmesi nedeniyle davan\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle reddine karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yukar\u0131da yer alan yasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin de\u011ferlendirilmesinden, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununda yer alan elektronik i\u015flemlere ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemelere \u0130dari\u00a0<strong>Yarg\u0131lama Usul Kanunu&#8217;nda at\u0131f yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, at\u0131f yap\u0131lan ilgili maddede elektronik ortamda yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin g\u00fcn sonuna kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilebilece\u011fi, g\u00fcn sonu ifadesinin ise Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi&#8217;nde 00:00 olarak tan\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda, davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan dilek\u00e7e ret karar\u0131 \u00fczerine en son 27.11.2015 tarihinde saat 00:00&#8217;a kadar elektronik ortamda verilmesi gereken yenileme dilek\u00e7esinin 27.11.2015, saat 22.24&#8217;te verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, s\u00fcresinde yenilenen davan\u0131n esas\u0131 incelenip karar verilmesi gerekirken, 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanununun 15\/1-b maddesi uyar\u0131nca, s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle Vergi Mahkemesince reddedilmesinde hukuka uyarl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, temyiz isteminin kabul\u00fcyle, Samsun Vergi Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 25\/12\/2015 tarih ve E:2015\/1248, K:2015\/1424 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na, bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihini izleyen 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 14\/03\/2017 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>12. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>Esas Numaras\u0131: 2025\/3197<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>Karar Numaras\u0131: 2025\/4761<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>Karar Tarihi: 23.06.2025<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>USULS\u00dcZ TEBL\u0130GAT<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>\u0130\u015e MERKEZ\u0130 B\u0130NA G\u00d6REVL\u0130S\u0130N\u0130N KOM\u015eU OLARAK DE\u011eERLEND\u0130R\u0130LEMEYECE\u011e\u0130<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>HABER VER\u0130LEN K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N \u0130SM\u0130N\u0130N VE SIFATININ USUL\u00dcNE UYGUN B\u0130R \u015eEK\u0130LDE TUTANA\u011eA GE\u00c7\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130 GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>\u00d6ZET\u0130 : <\/strong><\/span>Yarg\u0131tay uygulamalar\u0131nda Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun ilgili maddesinin t\u00fcm ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131k\u0131 bir \u015fekilde uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015f olmakla beraber bunun haber verme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ortadan kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131, tebligat\u0131n s\u0131hhatinin de\u011ferlendirilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise, haber verilen ki\u015finin isminin ve s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun bir \u015fekilde tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irilmesi gerekti\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi, buna g\u00f6re an\u0131l\u0131 tebligatta haber verilen ki\u015finin ismi en yak\u0131n kom\u015fu olarak yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de bu ki\u015finin fazlaca ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn oldu\u011fu i\u015f han\u0131n\u0131n bina g\u00f6revlisi oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015f merkezi bina g\u00f6revlisinin ise kom\u015fu olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi, tebligatlar\u0131n bu hali ile usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu, dolay\u0131s\u0131 ile B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince istinaf\u0131n esastan reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen karar\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki davac\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>\u015eikayet eden 3.ki\u015fi \u015firketin, icra mahkemesine vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu dilek\u00e7e ile kendisine g\u00f6nderilen \u0130\u0130K. 89\/1, 2, 3 haciz ihbarnamelerine ili\u015fkin tebligatlar\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011funun tespiti ile \u0130\u0130K 89\/1 haciz ihbarnamesinin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarihin 11.07.2023 olarak d\u00fczeltilmesini talep etti\u011fi, \u0130cra Mahkemesince davac\u0131 3.\u015fahsa g\u00f6nderilen haciz ihbarnamelerinin usuls\u00fcz tebli\u011finin tespiti ile 89\/1 haciz ihbarnamesinin tebli\u011f tarihinin 11.07.2023 olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine karar verildi\u011fi, daval\u0131 alacakl\u0131n\u0131n karar\u0131 istinaf\u0131 \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc haciz ihbarnamesine ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan tebligat usule uygun oldu\u011fundan mahkemece \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc haciz ihbarnamesinin usuls\u00fcz tebli\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u015fikayetin esastan reddine, usule uygun olan bu tebligat\u0131n tarihine g\u00f6re de birinci ve ikinci haciz ihbarnamelerine y\u00f6nelik usuls\u00fcz tebli\u011f \u015fikayetinin ise s\u00fcreden reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011finden bahisle \u0130cra Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rarak belirtilen \u015fekilde karar verdi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n \u015fikayet eden 3.ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 12. maddesine g\u00f6re, h\u00fckmi \u015fah\u0131slara tebligat selahiyetli m\u00fcmessillerine, bunlar birden fazla ise yaln\u0131z birine yap\u0131l\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 Kanunun 13. maddesine g\u00f6re de, tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak bu ki\u015filer, herhangi bir sebeple mutat i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015fyerinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 veya o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde olduklar\u0131 takdirde, tebli\u011f orada haz\u0131r bulunan memur ve m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r. Tebli\u011f tarihi itibariyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan Tebligat Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi&#8217;nin 21. maddesinde de, t\u00fczel ki\u015filer ad\u0131na tebligat\u0131 almaya yetkili ki\u015filer, herhangi bir sebeple mutat i\u015f saatlerinde i\u015fyerinde bulunmamalar\u0131 veya o s\u0131rada evrak\u0131 bizzat alamayacak bir halde olmalar\u0131 durumunda tebli\u011f, t\u00fczel ki\u015finin o yerdeki s\u00fcrekli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan memur veya m\u00fcstahdemlerinden birine yap\u0131l\u0131r. Ancak, kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak memur veya m\u00fcstahdemin, t\u00fczel ki\u015finin o yerdeki te\u015fkilat\u0131 veya personeli i\u00e7inde g\u00f6rev itibariyle tebligat\u0131n muhatab\u0131 olan t\u00fczel ki\u015finin temsilcisinden sonra gelen bir kimse veya evrak m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc gibi esasen bu t\u00fcr i\u015flerle g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f bir ki\u015fi olmas\u0131 gereklidir. Bu ki\u015filerin de bulunmamas\u0131 halinde, bu husus tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda belirtilir ve tebli\u011f, o yerdeki di\u011fer bir memur veya m\u00fcstahdeme yap\u0131l\u0131r. 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun \u201cTebli\u011f imkans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tebell\u00fc\u011fden imtina\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 21. maddesinde; \u201cKendisine tebligat yap\u0131lacak kimse veya yukar\u0131daki maddeler mucibince tebligat yap\u0131labilecek kimselerden hi\u00e7biri g\u00f6sterilen adreste bulunmaz veya tebell\u00fc\u011fden imtina ederse, tebli\u011f memuru tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir ve memuruna imza mukabilinde teslim eder ve tesell\u00fcm edenin adresini ihtiva eden ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresteki binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmakla beraber, adreste bulunmama halinde tebli\u011f olunacak \u015fahsa keyfiyetin haber verilmesini de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olduk\u00e7a en yak\u0131n kom\u015fular\u0131ndan birine, varsa y\u00f6netici veya kap\u0131c\u0131ya da bildirir. \u0130hbarnamenin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Hukuk Genel Kurulunun 12.07.2023 tarih ve 2023\/294 E.-2023\/749 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da i\u015faret edildi\u011fi \u00fczere, tebligat ile ilgili Kanun ve Y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tamamen \u015feklidir. De\u011finilen i\u015flemler, bilgilendirme yan\u0131nda belgelendirme \u00f6zelli\u011fi de bulunan bir usul i\u015flemi olmakla, gerek tebli\u011f i\u015flemi ve gerekse tebli\u011f tarihi ancak Kanun ve Y\u00f6netmelikte emredilen \u015fekillerle tevsik ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ispat olunabilir. Bu sebeple tebligat\u0131n usul yasalar\u0131 ile ili\u015fkisi de daima g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmal\u0131d\u0131r. H\u00e2l b\u00f6yle olunca,<strong> 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve Y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin en ufak ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131na kadar uygulanmas\u0131 zorunludur.<\/strong> 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile Y\u00f6netmelik\u2019te \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fekilde i\u015flem yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a tebli\u011f memuru taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yaz\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama m\u00fccerret olup, belgelendirilmi\u015f say\u0131lmaz.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Somut olayda, \u015fikayet eden \u015firkete g\u00f6nderilen \u0130\u0130K 89\/3 haciz ihbarnamesinin tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda &#8220;&#8230; muhatab\u0131n \u00e7ar\u015f\u0131da oldu\u011fu bilgisinin kom\u015fu &#8230;&#8217;nin imzal\u0131 beyan\u0131ndan \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi, evrak\u0131n mahalle muhtar\u0131na teslim edildi\u011fi, haber ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, en yak\u0131n kom\u015fusu &#8230;&#8217;ye haber verildi,&#8221; \u015ferhi ile tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda muhatab\u0131n \u00e7ar\u015f\u0131da oldu\u011fu bilgisinin kom\u015fu &#8230;&#8217;nin imzal\u0131 beyan\u0131ndan \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi ve en yak\u0131n kom\u015fusu olarak yine ayn\u0131 ki\u015fiye haber verildi\u011fi \u015ferhi olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen &#8230;&#8217;nin tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda imzas\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, imzadan imtina etti ise bu hususun da mazbataya yaz\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130\u0130K 89\/2 haciz ihbarnamesine ili\u015fkin tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda da ayn\u0131 \u015ferhlerin imzas\u0131z beyan\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u015ferh d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ancak imzas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, sonra imzas\u0131n\u0131n iptal edildi\u011fi, \u0130\u0130K 89\/1 haciz ihbarnamesi tebli\u011f mazbatas\u0131nda da yine muhatab\u0131n \u00e7ar\u015f\u0131da oldu\u011fu \u015ferhi ile evrak\u0131n muhtara b\u0131rak\u0131larak, en yak\u0131n kom\u015fu olarak &#8230;&#8217;ye haber verildi\u011fi \u015ferhi ile tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, bu mazbatada da haber b\u0131rak\u0131lan ki\u015finin imzas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi imzadan imtina etti\u011finin de yaz\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, her ne kadar \u015firketin kapal\u0131 olmas\u0131 durumunda muhatab\u0131n adreste bulunmama nedeninin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmemekte ise de, kom\u015fuya haber verme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn devam etti\u011fi, Dairemiz uygulamalar\u0131nda Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 21\/1. maddesinin t\u00fcm ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131k\u0131 bir \u015fekilde uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015f olmakla beraber bunun haber verme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ortadan kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131, tebligat\u0131n s\u0131hhatinin de\u011ferlendirilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise, haber verilen ki\u015finin isminin ve s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun bir \u015fekilde tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irilmesi gerekti\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi, buna g\u00f6re an\u0131l\u0131 tebligatta haber verilen ki\u015finin ismi en yak\u0131n kom\u015fu olarak yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de bu ki\u015finin fazlaca ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn oldu\u011fu i\u015f han\u0131n\u0131n bina g\u00f6revlisi oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015f merkezi bina g\u00f6revlisinin ise kom\u015fu olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi, tebligatlar\u0131n bu hali ile usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu, dolay\u0131s\u0131 ile B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince istinaf\u0131n esastan reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, belirtilen \u015fekilde karar verilmesi bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<div class=\"google-auto-placed ap_container\"><ins class=\"adsbygoogle adsbygoogle-noablate\" data-ad-format=\"auto\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-2767716813561984\" data-adsbygoogle-status=\"done\" data-ad-status=\"filled\"><\/p>\n<div id=\"aswift_5_host\"><strong>SONU\u00c7: <\/strong>Davac\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015finin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc, \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 28\/03\/2025 tarih ve 2025\/386 Esas -2025\/580 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle, 5311 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile de\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 364\/2. maddesi g\u00f6ndermesiyle uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun 373\/2. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgiliye iadesine, dosyan\u0131n B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 23.06.2025 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/div>\n<p><\/ins><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F20210319082904619.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/20210319082904619.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/20210319082904619.pdf\" download>Download <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2021_3968__K__2022_1995.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2021_3968__K__2022_1995.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2021_3968__K__2022_1995.pdf\" download>Download [41.61 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2021_2573__K__2021_6837.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2021_2573__K__2021_6837.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2021_2573__K__2021_6837.pdf\" download>Download [42.57 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2021_4998__K__2021_14169.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2021_4998__K__2021_14169.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2021_4998__K__2021_14169.pdf\" download>Download [38.90 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><div class=\"ead-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe src=\"\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FE__2020_2761__K__2021_3491.pdf&amp;embedded=true&amp;hl=en\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;visibility: hidden;\"><\/iframe><\/div>\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-loading\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;z-index:10;\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-main\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/loading.svg\" width=\"55\" height=\"55\" alt=\"Loader\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Loading...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-loading-foot-title\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/EAD-logo.svg\" alt=\"EAD Logo\" width=\"36\" height=\"23\"\/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>Taking too long?<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"ead-document-btn ead-reload-btn\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/reload.svg\" alt=\"Reload\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Reload document\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>|<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2020_2761__K__2021_3491.pdf\" class=\"ead-document-btn\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/plugins\/embed-any-document\/images\/open.svg\" alt=\"Open\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\"\/> Open in new tab\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/E__2020_2761__K__2021_3491.pdf\" download>Download [42.60 KB] <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>TEBL\u0130GAT YAPILAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N 18 YA\u015eINDAN K\u00dc\u00c7\u00dcK OLMASI, MUTLAKA TEBL\u0130\u011e \u0130\u015eLEM\u0130N\u0130N USULS\u00dcZL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc SONUCUNU DO\u011eURMAZ<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi 2019\/10790 E. , 2019\/14554 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 19. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen karar\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik H\u00e2kim &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc :<\/p>\n<p>Bor\u00e7lu ve ihaleye konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde lehine aile konutu \u015ferhi bulunan \u015fikayet\u00e7i vekilinin, 07\/11\/2018 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f\u0131na ili\u015fkin sair nedenlerle birlikte sat\u0131\u015f ilan\u0131 tebli\u011finin usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek ihalenin feshi istemi ile icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurduklar\u0131, mahkemece \u015fikayetin reddi ile \u015fikayet\u00e7iler aleyhine para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi\u011fi, karar\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7iler taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince sat\u0131\u015f ilan\u0131 tebli\u011flerinin usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fundan bahisle, istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fc ile ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u015fikayetin kabul\u00fc ile ihalenin feshine karar verildi\u011fi, karar\u0131n alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Serap y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>7201 Say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunun 22. maddesinde ise; \u201cMuhatap yerine kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak kimsenin <strong>g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne nazaran<\/strong> onsekiz ya\u015f\u0131ndan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmamas\u0131 ve bariz bir surette ehliyetsiz bulunmamas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131r\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcmden de anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, bor\u00e7lu ad\u0131na kendisine tebligat yap\u0131lan ki\u015finin 18 ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck olmas\u0131, mutlaka tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sonucunu do\u011furmaz.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olayda, \u015fikayet\u00e7i &#8230;&#8217;a \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 28\/09\/2018 tebli\u011f tarihli sat\u0131\u015f ilan\u0131na ili\u015fkin tebligat\u0131n incelenmesinde; \u201cMuhatab\u0131n i\u015fe gitti\u011fini, ak\u015fam d\u00f6nece\u011fini ve ayn\u0131 konutta birlikte ikamet etti\u011fini beyan eden ehil ve re\u015fit o\u011flu Uygar Karada\u011f imzas\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi&#8221; \u015ferhi ile tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Tebligat Kanununun an\u0131lan maddesine g\u00f6re, tebli\u011fin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fahs\u0131n <strong>g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015fe g\u00f6re re\u015fit olmas\u0131 yeterli olup<\/strong> \u015fikayet\u00e7i Serap&#8217;a yap\u0131lan sat\u0131\u015f ilan\u0131 tebli\u011finin usul\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>O halde, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince, temyiz dilek\u00e7esi i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve ba\u015fkaca fesih nedeni bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK\u2019n\u0131n 353\/1-b-1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca \u015fikayet\u00e7i Serap y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, ihalenin feshi talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde ihalenin feshi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsiz olup, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>SONU\u00c7 :<\/strong> Alacakl\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 19. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 08\/05\/2019 tarih ve 2019\/731 E. &#8211; 2019\/1073 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n 5311 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile de\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 364\/2. maddesinin g\u00f6ndermesiyle uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun 373\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgiliye iadesine, dosyan\u0131n B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 10\/10\/2019 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<blockquote><p>Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Karar\u0131 ile idari izin say\u0131lan g\u00fcnler resmi tatil niteli\u011finde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temyiz (HMK m. 361) s\u00fcresi i\u015flemeye devam eder. <strong>Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2024\/3497 Esas<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li>5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 191\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca verilen <strong>kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesine dair kararlar\u0131n<\/strong> \u015f\u00fcpheli taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frudan haberdar olunmas\u0131 gereken y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck ve uyar\u0131lar i\u00e7ermesi nedeniyle, m\u00fcdafii bulunan soru\u015fturma dosyalar\u0131nda bu kararlar\u0131n <strong>yaln\u0131zca m\u00fcdafilere tebli\u011fi yeterli olmay\u0131p, m\u00fcdafilerle birlikte taraflara da tebli\u011f edilmesi gerekmektedir<\/strong>. Bu \u015fekilde taraflara usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde tebli\u011f edilmeyen erteleme karar\u0131 kesinle\u015fmeyece\u011finden denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin infaz\u0131na ba\u015flanamayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k erteleme s\u00fcresinin de i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamayaca\u011f\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle somut olayda, \u00c7anakkale Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen erteleme karar\u0131n\u0131n, \u015f\u00fcphelinin emniyette al\u0131nan ifadesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunan m\u00fcdafiine usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, ancak karar \u015f\u00fcpheliye tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011finden erteleme karar\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde kesinle\u015fti\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, erteleme s\u00fcresinin karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi ile ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131, bu durumda ihl\u00e2l kabul edilen eylemin erteleme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde i\u015flendi\u011finin s\u00f6ylenemeyece\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla eylemin erteleme karar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan durma karar\u0131 sonu\u00e7 olarak do\u011fru olmakla birlikte gerek\u00e7e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bozulmas\u0131 gerekir. <span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>(Y.10.CD. Esas Numaras\u0131: 2023\/16484 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2025\/1528 Karar Tarihi: 17.02.2025)<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<li>Tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin usuls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddias\u0131n\u0131n yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 \u0130cra ve iflas Kanunu\u2019nun ilgili maddesi olup, bu y\u00f6ndeki \u015fikayetin, ayn\u0131 maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca usuls\u00fcz tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren 7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde icra mahkemesine yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Somut olayda, UYAP evrak i\u015flem k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde yap\u0131lan incelemede, bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6deme emrinin 26.04.2023 tarihinde 15:43 50&#8217;de uyaptan a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle bor\u00e7lunun bu tarih itibariyle takipten haberdar oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan \u015fikayetin yasal 7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcreden sonra 23.05.2023 tarihinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. O halde, mahkemece, \u0131tt\u0131la tarihinin, bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6deme emrinin uyaptan a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih olan 26.04.2023 olarak kabul\u00fc ile \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011f i\u015fleminin usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik 23.05.2023 tarihli \u015fikayetin s\u00fcreden reddine karar verilmesi gerekir. <span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>(Y. 12. HD \u00a0Esas Numaras\u0131: 2025\/519 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2025\/2154 Karar Tarihi: 11.03.2025)<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TEBL\u0130GAT KANUNU TEBL\u0130GAT T\u00dcZ\u00dc\u011e\u00dc TEBL\u0130GAT KANUNUNUN UYGULANMASINA DA\u0130R Y\u00d6NETMEL\u0130K ELEKTRON\u0130K TEBL\u0130GAT Y\u00d6NETMEL\u0130\u011e\u0130 VERG\u0130 DA\u0130RELER\u0130NCE YAPILAN TEBL\u0130\u011eLER Tebligat kural olarak tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahsa bilinen en son adresinde<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":234,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2182","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2182","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2182"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2182\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5845,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2182\/revisions\/5845"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/234"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}