{"id":1953,"date":"2016-05-26T01:02:40","date_gmt":"2016-05-25T22:02:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/?p=1953"},"modified":"2024-01-08T19:43:42","modified_gmt":"2024-01-08T16:43:42","slug":"ceza-yargilamasina-hakim-olan-ilkeler-masumiyet-karinesinin-bir-uzantisi-olan-supheden-sanik-yararlanir-ilkesinin-ceza-yargilamasi-hukukunun-evrensel-nitelikteki-onemli-ilkelerinden-birisi-oldugu-b","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/ceza-yargilamasina-hakim-olan-ilkeler-masumiyet-karinesinin-bir-uzantisi-olan-supheden-sanik-yararlanir-ilkesinin-ceza-yargilamasi-hukukunun-evrensel-nitelikteki-onemli-ilkelerinden-birisi-oldugu-b\/","title":{"rendered":"CEZA YARGILAMASINA HAK\u0130M OLAN \u0130LKELER-\u015e\u00dcPHEDEN SANIK YARARLANIR \u0130LKES\u0130 ve MASUM\u0130YET KAR\u0130NES\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/span><\/p>\n

YARGITAY \u00dcN\u0130VERS\u0130TES\u0130<\/span><\/p>\n

CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/span><\/p>\n

E. 2011\/10-776<\/span><\/p>\n

K. 2012\/252<\/span><\/p>\n

T. 26.6.2012<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022\u00a0UYU\u015eTURUCU MADDE T\u0130CARET\u0130 YAPMA SU\u00c7U<\/span> (San\u0131\u011fa At\u0131l\u0131 Su\u00e7u \u0130\u015fledi\u011finin \u015e\u00fcphe Boyutunda Kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 – Mahkumiyet H\u00fckm\u00fc Kurulabilmesi \u0130\u00e7in Su\u00e7un Sabit Olmas\u0131 Aksi Durumda \u0130se G\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde Kabul G\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f Evrensel Bir \u0130lke Olan \u015e\u00fcpheden San\u0131k Yararlan\u0131r \u0130lkesi Uyar\u0131nca San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Beraat\u0131na H\u00fckmolunmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 \u015e\u00dcPHEDEN SANIK YARARLANIR \u0130LKES\u0130<\/span> (San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Uyu\u015fturucu Madde Ticareti Su\u00e7unu \u0130\u015fledi\u011fi Y\u00f6n\u00fcnde Ayn\u0131 Su\u00e7 \u0130le \u0130lgili Di\u011fer Dosyada Yarg\u0131lanan San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Sonradan De\u011fi\u015fen Anlat\u0131m\u0131 D\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Mahkumiyetine Yeterli Kan\u0131t Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 – \u015e\u00fcpheden San\u0131k Yararlan\u0131r \u0130lkesi Uyar\u0131nca San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Beraatine Karar Verilmesi Gerekti\u011fi)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 MASUM\u0130YET KAR\u0130NES\u0130<\/span> (\u015e\u00fcpheli ve Ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lamam\u0131\u015f Olaylar ve \u0130ddialar San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Aleyhine Yorumlanarak H\u00fck\u00fcm Tesis Edilemeyece\u011fi – San\u0131\u011fa At\u0131l\u0131 Uyu\u015fturucu Madde Ticareti Su\u00e7unu \u0130\u015fledi\u011finin \u015e\u00fcphe Boyutunda Kald\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Beraat\u0131na H\u00fckmolunmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 CEZA YARGILAMASINA HAK\u0130M OLAN \u0130LKELER<\/span> (Masumiyet Karinesinin Bir Uzant\u0131s\u0131 Olan \u015e\u00fcpheden San\u0131k Yararlan\u0131r \u0130lkesinin Ceza Yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 Hukukunun Evrensel Nitelikteki \u00d6nemli \u0130lkelerinden Birisi Oldu\u011fu – Bu \u0130lke Gere\u011fi San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015e\u00fcphe Boyutunda Kalan Uyu\u015fturucu Madde Ticareti Su\u00e7undan Beraat\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi)<\/span><\/p>\n

5237\/m.188<\/p>\n

\u00d6ZET :<\/span> Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma su\u00e7unun sabit olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir. Latince “in dubio pro reo” olarak ifade edilen ve masumiyet (su\u00e7suzluk) karinesinin bir uzant\u0131s\u0131 olan “\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r ilkesi” ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 hukukunun evrensel nitelikteki \u00f6nemli ilkelerinden birisidir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir su\u00e7tan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n temel ko\u015fulu, su\u00e7un ku\u015fkuya yer vermeyen bir kesinlikle ispat edilmesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. \u015e\u00fcpheli ve ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lamam\u0131\u015f olaylar ve iddialar san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine yorumlanarak h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilemez. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde, ayn\u0131 su\u00e7 ile ilgili olarak di\u011fer dosyada yarg\u0131lanan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonradan de\u011fi\u015fen anlat\u0131m\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, mahkumiyetine yeterli kan\u0131t bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki, yap\u0131lan ihbarda san\u0131\u011fa ait ara\u00e7 plakas\u0131 verilmi\u015f, kimlikleri a\u00e7\u0131klanmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015fiden bahsedilmi\u015f ve bildirilen ara\u00e7ta da san\u0131klar yakalanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n, baz\u0131 san\u0131klar\u0131n \u00e7uvallar\u0131 samanl\u0131\u011fa b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesi, di\u011fer tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n da, aramadan bir g\u00fcn \u00f6nce ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en \u00fc\u00e7 \u015fahs\u0131 a\u011fabeyinin evine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcp misafir ettiklerini s\u00f6ylemesi ve uyu\u015fturucu maddenin tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u011fabeyinin samanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, san\u0131\u011fa at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi \u015f\u00fcphe boyutunda kalmaktad\u0131r. Mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulabilmesi i\u00e7in su\u00e7un sabit olmas\u0131, aksi durumda ise, g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde kabul g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f evrensel bir ilke olan \u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r ilkesi uyar\u0131nca, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat\u0131na h\u00fckmolunmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

DAVA : Uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti su\u00e7undan san\u0131k Sabahattin’in, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY’n\u0131n 188\/3, 62, 52 ve 53. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 6 y\u0131l 8 ay hapis ve 6.000 Lira adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve hak yoksunlu\u011funa ili\u015fkin, Diyarbak\u0131r 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 05.05.2009 g\u00fcn ve 636-170 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 10. Ceza Dairesinin 27.10.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/16653-16450 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n

“… Uyu\u015fturucu madde satt\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya bulundurdu\u011funa ili\u015fkin hakk\u0131nda her hangi bir bilgi veya ihbar bulunmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fine dair, ayn\u0131 su\u00e7tan yarg\u0131lanarak mahkumiyetine karar verilen Niyazi’nin sonradan d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc beyan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ku\u015fkudan uzak ve mahkumiyetine yeterli delil elde edilemedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, beraati yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi…”,<\/p>\n

\u0130sabetsizli\u011finden h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Yerel mahkeme ise 02.02.2010 g\u00fcn ve 471-50 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n

“… San\u0131k Sabahattin’in beyanlar\u0131 ile di\u011ferlerinin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n birbirleri ile \u00e7eli\u015fti\u011fi, di\u011fer ki\u015filerin, san\u0131k Sabahattin ile birlikte Diyarbak\u0131r \u0130line geldiklerini, Alabal K\u00f6y\u00fcne gittiklerini s\u00f6ylemeleri,uyu\u015fturucu maddelerin de Alabal K\u00f6y\u00fcnde ele ge\u00e7irilmesi, Niyazi’nin a\u015famalardaki beyanlar\u0131, san\u0131k Sabahattin’in di\u011fer ki\u015filerin beyanlar\u0131 ile \u00e7eli\u015fen ve kendisini su\u00e7tan kurtarmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan beyanlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131k Sebahattin’in ve m\u00fcdafiinin savunmalar\u0131na de\u011fer verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, bu itibarla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ruhsats\u0131z olarak uyu\u015fturucumadde bulundurmak ve nakletmek su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi…”,<\/p>\n

Gerek\u00e7esiyle ilk h\u00fckm\u00fcnde direnmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn de san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ve o yer Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n “bozma” istemli 14.12.2011 g\u00fcn ve 223052 say\u0131l\u0131 tebli\u011fnamesiyle Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n

KARAR : \u00d6zel Daire ile yerel mahkeme aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma su\u00e7unun sabit olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

\u0130ncelenen dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden;<\/p>\n

Olay tarihinden \u00f6nce, haber eleman\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, Van’dan \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015finin Diyarbak\u0131r’a esrar getirip sataca\u011f\u0131 bilgisinin jandarmaya iletildi\u011fi, Umut’a ait arac\u0131n Diyarbak\u0131r \u015fehir merkezine girdi\u011finde ara\u00e7 plakas\u0131n\u0131n kollu\u011fa bildirildi\u011fi, ancak ara\u00e7ta yap\u0131lan aramada herhangi bir su\u00e7 unsuruna rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bunun \u00fczerine kollu\u011fun yeniden haber eleman\u0131yla irtibata ge\u00e7mesi sonucunda, \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n uyu\u015fturucu maddeyi yakalanma riski nedeniyle Diyarbak\u0131r merkeze ba\u011fl\u0131 Alabal K\u00f6y\u00fcnde ikamet etmekte olan akrabalar\u0131 Niyazi’nin samanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda saklad\u0131klar\u0131 bilgisine ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en \u015fahs\u0131n samanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 07.01.2006 tarihinde yap\u0131lan aramada, saman y\u0131\u011f\u0131nlar\u0131 aras\u0131na gizlenmi\u015f halde 58 paket halinde toplam 58 kilo 500 gram toz esrar maddesinin ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi, 06.01.2006 tarihinde ise ayn\u0131 k\u00f6yden Umut’a ait ara\u00e7 ile d\u00f6nmekte olan Umut, Zeynal ve Murat’\u0131n yakaland\u0131klar\u0131,<\/p>\n

Diyarbak\u0131r Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 2006\/245 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma sonucunda, uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti su\u00e7undan Niyazi, Murat, Zeynal ve Umut hakk\u0131nda 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY’n\u0131n 188\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, Diyarbak\u0131r 4. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 13.10.2006 g\u00fcn ve 2006\/231 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda an\u0131lan su\u00e7tan kurulan mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn, Yarg\u0131tay 10. Ceza Dairesinin 14.03.2007 g\u00fcnl\u00fc karar\u0131 ile onanarak kesinle\u015fti\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Bu karar ile san\u0131k Sabahattin hakk\u0131nda da Cumhuriyet savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunuldu\u011fu ve ayn\u0131 su\u00e7tan san\u0131k Sabahattin hakk\u0131nda 10.12.2007 tarihinde kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 dosyada san\u0131k Niyazi’nin, jandarmadaki ilk ifadesinde; i\u00e7erisinde esrar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu \u00e7uvallar\u0131 4 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce, sonradan almak \u00fczere emaneten san\u0131klar Murat ve Zeynal’\u0131n getirip samanl\u0131\u011fa saklamadan b\u0131rakt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, esrar maddesi oldu\u011funu bilmedi\u011fini belirtti\u011fi, devam eden a\u015famalarda ise \u00e7uvallar\u0131 yengesinin a\u011fabeyi olan Sabahattin ile Zeynal ve Murat’\u0131n getirdi\u011fini, arac\u0131n yan\u0131nda Umut’un kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015f ise de, incelemeye konu dosyada tan\u0131k olarak verdi\u011fi beyan\u0131nda, \u00e7uvallar\u0131 Zeynal, Murat ve Umut’un b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Sabahattin’in herhangi bir su\u00e7unun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, akraba olduklar\u0131ndan Sabahattin’in kendisine komplo kurdu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in, onun da ismini verdi\u011fini, ancak bu durumun do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Ayn\u0131 olayda yarg\u0131lan\u0131p mahkum olan Zeynal, Murat ve Umut’un, incelemeye konu dosyada tan\u0131k olarak verdikleri beyanlar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; yarg\u0131lan\u0131p mahkum olduklar\u0131 dosyadaki savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru oldu\u011funu, uyu\u015fturucu i\u015fi yapmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, kendilerinin ve Sabahattin’in olayla bir ilgisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olaydan \u00f6nce d\u00f6rd\u00fcn\u00fcn birlikte mazot satmak amac\u0131yla Tatvan’a gelip, buradan Diyarbak\u0131r’a ge\u00e7tiklerini, e\u011flencede paray\u0131 harcad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, polisin hacizli olan ara\u00e7lar\u0131na el koymas\u0131 \u00fczerine Alabal K\u00f6y\u00fcne 06.01.2006 tarihinde Sabahattin olmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcn\u00fcn giderek Niyazi’yi misafir olup bor\u00e7 para ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yolunda yakaland\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirttikleri,<\/p>\n

\u00d6nceki yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda tan\u0131k Mehmet’in; Murat, Zeynal ve Umut’un \u00e7uvallar\u0131 samanl\u0131\u011fa b\u0131rakt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc beyan etti\u011fi; tan\u0131k Sadun’un da aramadan bir g\u00fcn \u00f6nce ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en \u00fc\u00e7 \u015fahs\u0131 a\u011fabeyi Niyazi’nin evine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcp misafir ettiklerini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda ifadesi al\u0131namayan san\u0131k Sabahattin’in ise, kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki savunmas\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Niyazi’nin, eni\u015ftesi Nevzat’\u0131n a\u011fabeyi oldu\u011funu, Murat, Zeynal ve Umut’u Van’da tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en \u015fah\u0131slar ve ele ge\u00e7irilen uyu\u015fturucu ile bir ilgisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Diyarbak\u0131r’da ikamet eden k\u0131z karde\u015finin yan\u0131na 26.12.2005 tarihinde gitti\u011fini ve rahats\u0131z olan kay\u0131nvalidesine de ge\u00e7mi\u015f olsun ziyareti i\u00e7in 27.12.2005 g\u00fcn\u00fc Alabal K\u00f6y\u00fcne gitti\u011fini, su\u00e7u ihbar edenin kendisi oldu\u011fu zann\u0131yla isminin verildi\u011fini, su\u00e7u i\u015flemedi\u011fini belirtti\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY’n\u0131n \u201cUyu\u015fturucu veya Uyar\u0131c\u0131 Madde \u0130mal ve Ticareti\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 188. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 \u201cUyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 maddeleri ruhsats\u0131z veya ruhsata ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak \u00fclke i\u00e7inde satan, sat\u0131\u015fa arz eden, ba\u015fkalar\u0131na veren, sevk eden, nakleden, depolayan, sat\u0131n alan, kabul eden, bulunduran ki\u015fi, be\u015f y\u0131ldan onbe\u015f y\u0131la kadar hapis ve yirmibin g\u00fcne kadar adl\u00ee para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r\u201d bi\u00e7iminde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

An\u0131lan madde uyar\u0131nca bir mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulabilmesi i\u00e7in, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin ve yeterli kan\u0131t elde edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

Latince \u201cin dubio pro reo\u201d olarak ifade edilen ve masumiyet (su\u00e7suzluk) karinesinin bir uzant\u0131s\u0131 olan \u201c\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r ilkesi\u201d ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 hukukunun evrensel nitelikteki \u00f6nemli ilkelerinden birisidir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir su\u00e7tan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n temel ko\u015fulu, su\u00e7un ku\u015fkuya yer vermeyen bir kesinlikle ispat edilmesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. \u015e\u00fcpheli ve ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lamam\u0131\u015f olaylar ve iddialar san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine yorumlanarak h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilemez. Ceza mahk\u00fbmiyeti bir ihtimale de\u011fil, kesin ve a\u00e7\u0131k bir ispata dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ispat, teorik de olsa hi\u00e7bir ku\u015fku ve ba\u015fka t\u00fcrl\u00fc bir olu\u015fa olanak vermemelidir. Y\u00fcksek de olsa bir ihtimale dayan\u0131larak san\u0131\u011f\u0131 cezaland\u0131rmak, ceza yarg\u0131-lamas\u0131n\u0131n en \u00f6nemli amac\u0131 olan ger\u00e7e\u011fe ula\u015fmadan h\u00fck\u00fcm vermektir. \u0130htimallere dayanan gerek\u00e7e ile h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulamaz.<\/p>\n

Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde, ayn\u0131 su\u00e7 ile ilgili olarak di\u011fer dosyada yarg\u0131lanan san\u0131k Niyazi’nin sonradan de\u011fi\u015fen anlat\u0131m\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, mahkumiyetine yeterli kan\u0131t bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki, yap\u0131lan ihbarda san\u0131k Umut’a ait ara\u00e7 plakas\u0131 verilmi\u015f, kimlikleri a\u00e7\u0131klanmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015fiden bahsedilmi\u015f ve bildirilen ara\u00e7ta da san\u0131klar Umut, Zeynal ve Murat yakalanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Tan\u0131k Mehmet’in, Murat, Zeynal ve Umut’un \u00e7uvallar\u0131 samanl\u0131\u011fa b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesi, tan\u0131k Sadun ‘un da, aramadan bir g\u00fcn \u00f6nce ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en \u00fc\u00e7 \u015fahs\u0131 a\u011fabeyi Niyazi’nin evine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcp misafir ettiklerini s\u00f6ylemesi ve uyu\u015fturucu maddenin Niyazi’nin samanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, san\u0131\u011fa at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi \u015f\u00fcphe boyutunda kalmaktad\u0131r. Mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulabilmesi i\u00e7in su\u00e7un sabit olmas\u0131, aksi durumda ise, g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde kabul g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f evrensel bir ilke olan \u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r ilkesi uyar\u0131nca, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat\u0131na h\u00fckmolunmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

Bu itibarla sabit olmayan at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131 isabetli olup, yerel mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7 : A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n

1- Diyarbak\u0131r 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 02.02.2010 g\u00fcn ve 471-50 say\u0131l\u0131 direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn BOZULMASINA,<\/em><\/p>\n

2- Dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine, 26.06.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede tebli\u011fnamedeki isteme uygun olarak oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\n
Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n temel ilkelerinden biri \u201cdo\u011frudan do\u011fruyal\u0131k \u2013 vas\u0131tas\u0131zl\u0131kt\u0131r.\u201d SEGB\u0130S ise istisnad\u0131r. Duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunmak isteyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulundurulmas\u0131 sadece \u00f6dev de\u011fil ayn\u0131 zamanda bir hakt\u0131r.<\/span> ( Y.C.G.K , 10.06.2008 , 9-148\/169 s.k. )\u00a0YARGITAY 16. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130\u00a0ESAS NO : 2015\/7164 KARAR NO: 2016\/6<\/h5>\n

Cezai bir su\u00e7 ile itam edilen herkesin, kendini savunma, iddia tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 sorguya \u00e7ekme veya \u00e7ektirme, duru\u015fmada kullan\u0131lan dili anlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya konu\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde bir terc\u00fcman yard\u0131m\u0131ndan para \u00f6denmeksizin yararlanmas\u0131 haklar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n bu haklar\u0131 nas\u0131l kullanabilece\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 zordur. ( Colozza v. \u0130talya 12 \u015fubat 1985 )<\/em><\/p>\n

Adli bir ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinin olu\u015fumunda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkeme nezdinde haz\u0131r bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nemi bulunmaktad\u0131r. ( Lala v. Hollanda 22 Eyl\u00fcl 1994 ) Bunun sebebi hem adil yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131n\u0131n mevcudiyeti hem de beyanlar\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ma\u011fdur ile tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131yla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131d\u0131r. ( Sedovi\u00e7 v. \u0130talya )<\/em><\/p>\n

Temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda daval\u0131n\u0131n duru\u015fma salonunda \u015fahsen haz\u0131r bulunmas\u0131 ilk derece mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olan duru\u015fmalarda haz\u0131r bulunmas\u0131na nispeten daha az \u00f6nem arzetmektedir. ( Kamasins\u0131ki v. Avusturya, 19 Aral\u0131k 1989 )<\/em><\/p>\n

Adaletin ger\u00e7ekten adil bir \u015fekilde sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n demokratik bir toplumda tuttu\u011fu yer g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak savunma hakk\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlamas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik her bir tedbirin ciddi \u015fekilde gerekli olmas\u0131na i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir. Daha az k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 bir tedbirin bulunmas\u0131 halinde o uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. ( Van Mechelen ve di\u011ferleri )<\/em><\/p>\n

S\u00f6zle\u015fme ile garanti alt\u0131na al\u0131nan hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131ndan vazge\u00e7ilmesi, bunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a s\u00f6ylenmesi ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilir. ( Zana \/ T\u00fcrkiye )<\/em><\/p>\n

Kanun<\/p>\n

\u00c7ocuk Koruma Kanunu<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Kanun No. 5395<\/u>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Kabul Tarihi : 3.7.2005<\/u><\/p>\n

\u0130\u015ftirak h\u00e2linde i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0MADDE 17. \u2014\u00a0(1) \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n yeti\u015fkinlerle birlikte su\u00e7 i\u015flemesi h\u00e2linde, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma ayr\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(2) Bu h\u00e2lde de \u00e7ocuklar hakk\u0131nda gerekli tedbirler uygulanmakla beraber, mahkeme l\u00fczum g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc takdirde \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131ndaki yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 genel mahkemedeki davan\u0131n sonucuna kadar bekletebilir.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(3) Davalar\u0131n birlikte y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesinin zorunlu g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi h\u00e2linde, genel mahkemelerde, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda, mahkemelerin uygun bulmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131yla birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131 verilebilir. Bu takdirde birle\u015ftirilen davalar genel mahkemelerde g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

Mahkemelerin g\u00f6revi<\/p>\n

MADDE 26- (1) \u00c7ocuk mahkemesi, asliye ceza mahkemesi ile sulh ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuklar hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lacak davalara bakar.<\/p>\n

(2) \u00c7ocuk a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesi, \u00e7ocuklar taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flenen ve a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren su\u00e7larla ilgili davalara bakar.<\/p>\n

(3) Mahkemeler ve \u00e7ocuk hakimi, bu Kanunda ve di\u011fer kanunlarda yer alan tedbirleri almakla g\u00f6revlidir.<\/p>\n

(4) \u00c7ocuklar hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davalar\u0131, Kanunun 17 nci maddesi h\u00fck\u00fcmleri sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla bu Kanunla kurulan mahkemelerde g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr. (Kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda SS\u00c7 nin 18 Ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurmas\u0131)<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00c7OCUK KORUMA KANUNUNUN UYGULANMASINA\u00a0\u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N US\u00dbL VE ESASLAR HAKKINDA Y\u00d6NETMEL\u0130K<\/p>\n

\u0130\u015ftirak h\u00e2linde i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar<\/p>\n

\u00a0Madde 7 –\u00a0(1) \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n yeti\u015fkinlerle birlikte su\u00e7 i\u015flemesi h\u00e2linde, adl\u00ee kolluk taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7ocuklar hakk\u0131nda ayr\u0131 evrak d\u00fczenlenir, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma ayr\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(2) Bu h\u00e2lde de \u00e7ocuklar hakk\u0131nda gerekli tedbirler uygulanmakla beraber, mahkeme l\u00fczum g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc takdirde \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131ndaki yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 genel mahkemedeki davan\u0131n sonucuna kadar bekletebilir.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(3) Davalar\u0131n birlikte y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesinin zorunlu g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi h\u00e2linde, genel mahkemelerde, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda, mahkemelerin uygun bulmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131yla birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131 verilebilir.<\/p>\n

\u00a0 \u00a0a) Birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131 verilmesinin genel mahkemeler taraf\u0131ndan istenildi\u011fi h\u00e2llerde; \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda davay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkeme davalar\u0131n birle\u015ftirilmesini uygun bulursa genel mahkeme iki davan\u0131n birle\u015ftirilmesine dair ara karar\u0131 vererek, bunu \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131ndaki davay\u0131 g\u00f6rmekte bulunan mahkemeye bildirir. Bunun \u00fczerine \u00e7ocuk mahkemesi de birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131 vererek dosyas\u0131n\u0131 esastan kapat\u0131r ve genel mahkemeye g\u00f6nderir. Bu takdirde birle\u015ftirilen davalar genel mahkemelerde g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

\u00a0 \u00a0b) Birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131 verilmesinin \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda davay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan istenildi\u011fi h\u00e2llerde; genel mahkeme davalar\u0131n birle\u015ftirilmesini uygun bulursa iki davan\u0131n birle\u015ftirilmesine dair ara karar\u0131 vererek, bunu \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131ndaki davay\u0131 g\u00f6rmekte bulunan mahkemeye bildirir. Bunun \u00fczerine \u00e7ocuk mahkemesi de birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131 vererek dosyas\u0131n\u0131 esastan kapat\u0131r ve genel mahkemeye g\u00f6nderir. Bu takdirde birle\u015ftirilen davalar genel mahkemelerde g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. YARGITAY \u00dcN\u0130VERS\u0130TES\u0130 CEZA GENEL KURULU E. 2011\/10-776 K. 2012\/252 T. 26.6.2012 \u2022\u00a0UYU\u015eTURUCU MADDE T\u0130CARET\u0130 YAPMA SU\u00c7U (San\u0131\u011fa At\u0131l\u0131 Su\u00e7u \u0130\u015fledi\u011finin \u015e\u00fcphe Boyutunda Kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 – Mahkumiyet [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":234,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1953","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1953","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1953"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1953\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5005,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1953\/revisions\/5005"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/234"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}