{"id":1919,"date":"2016-05-22T20:06:39","date_gmt":"2016-05-22T17:06:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/?p=1919"},"modified":"2021-08-30T15:06:26","modified_gmt":"2021-08-30T12:06:26","slug":"basit-dolandiricilik-sucu-tck-md-157","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/basit-dolandiricilik-sucu-tck-md-157\/","title":{"rendered":"BAS\u0130T DOLANDIRICILIK SU\u00c7U (TCK Md. 157)"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00a0BAS\u0130T DOLANDIRICILIK SU\u00c7U<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

TCK 157<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

2.1. Uygulamada S\u0131k\u00e7a Rastlan\u0131lan Basit Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k Halleri<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

2.1.1. Bul Karay\u0131 Al Paray\u0131 Oyunu<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

S\u00f6z konusu oyunda, san\u0131k veya san\u0131kla birlikte yan\u0131ndaki ki\u015filer eylem ve fikir birli\u011fi i\u00e7inde hareket ederek, ma\u011fdurun yanlar\u0131na yakla\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayarak ma\u011fduru oyuna dahil etmektedirler. Bu \u015fekilde, birtak\u0131m hileler yap\u0131larak ma\u011fdurdan haks\u0131z menfaat temin edilir. Bu oyunda ma\u011fdurun kazanma imkan\u0131 yoktur. Bu nitelikteki dosyalarda, birden fazla san\u0131k bulunmas\u0131 halinde, bu ki\u015filer aras\u0131nda eylem ve fikir birli\u011fi bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ispat edilmeli, hangi san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ne \u015fekilde su\u00e7a i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi kesin olarak belirlenmelidir. Bu a\u015famada, eylemin, TCK’n\u0131n 37. veya 39. madde kapsam\u0131nda kal\u0131p kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 her olaya g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015febilecektir.<\/p>\n

Bu eylemle ilgili baz\u0131 kararlar\u0131 \u00f6rnek olarak aktaracak olursak;<\/p>\n

-Bul karay\u0131 al paray\u0131 oyunu oyununda, oyunu oynayan ki\u015finin kazanma ihtimali yoktur.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc dola\u015fmakta olan ma\u011fdurun yan\u0131na gelen san\u0131klar\u0131n, “bul karay\u0131 al paray\u0131” tabir edilen oyun ve \u00e7evresinde oyundan kazan\u0131yor rol\u00fc yapan elemanlar\u0131n\u0131n yard\u0131m\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu oyunun ger\u00e7ekten kazan\u0131labilece\u011fine y\u00f6nelik sergiledikleri hileli davran\u0131\u015flarla ma\u011fduru kand\u0131rd\u0131ktan sonra, oynatan\u0131n istemedi\u011fi takdirde oyuncunun kazanma ihtimali bulunmayan \u00fc\u00e7 ka\u011f\u0131t oyununu ma\u011fdura oynat\u0131p, sonras\u0131nda kaybetti\u011finden bahisle kat\u0131lan\u0131n 100 TL paras\u0131n\u0131 alarak haks\u0131z menfaat temin ettiklerinin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda; olu\u015fa, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmalar\u0131na, ma\u011fdurun beyanlar\u0131na, te\u015fhis tutanaklar\u0131na ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; san\u0131klar\u0131n, bu \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclen eylemlerinin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 03\/11\/2014 Tarih ve 2014\/18627 Esas, 2014\/17860 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Bu oyunda san\u0131k, ba\u015fka faillerle birlikte hareket eder ve o ki\u015filer de oyun oynuyormu\u015f izlenimi verilerek m\u00fc\u015fteki kand\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Sokak \u00fczerinde kimli\u011fi tespit edilemeyen arkada\u015flar\u0131yla birlikte “\u00fc\u00e7 ka\u011f\u0131t” diye tabir edilen oyun d\u00fczeni kuran san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, merak\u0131 \u00fczerine yan\u0131na gelen \u015fikayet\u00e7iye, “senin yerine oynuyorum” dedi\u011fi ve iskambil ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stererek 150 TL kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, ikinci kez de ayn\u0131 oyunu oynayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7iye “150 TL daha kazand\u0131n” dedi\u011fi, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 paray\u0131 istemesi \u00fczerine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, yan\u0131nda kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kadar para olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sordu\u011fu, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin de cebindeki 600 Euroyu g\u00f6stermesi \u00fczerine, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu paray\u0131 al\u0131p uzakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 sabit olmakla, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun olu\u015ftu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

-\u015eikayet\u00e7inin, Fuar \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bulunan k\u00f6pr\u00fc \u00fcst\u00fcnde y\u00fcr\u00fcrken \u00fc\u00e7 ka\u011f\u0131t ya da bul karay\u0131 al paray\u0131 denilen oyunu oynatan san\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, oynayanlar\u0131n kendisini yanlar\u0131na\u00a0\u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir m\u00fcddet oyunu oynayanlar\u0131 izlemeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha sonra san\u0131\u011f\u0131n paran var m\u0131 diye sordu\u011fu, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin var demesi \u00fczerine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n “paran\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar” diyerek, elinde bulunan kartonun \u00fczerindeki 3 adet kapal\u0131 iskambil ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131ndan birini g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u0131srarl\u0131 davranarak \u015fikayet\u00e7inin cebinden \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 20.00 TL’yi bile\u011finden tutup ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131n \u00fczerine koydu\u011fu esnada kolluk g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin olaya m\u00fcdahale etti\u011fi, bu \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu hileli davran\u0131\u015flar ile kazanma \u015fans\u0131 olmayan \u015fikayet\u00e7ide kazanaca\u011f\u0131na dair inan\u00e7 olu\u015fturup kand\u0131rarak doland\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ikrar\u0131, \u015fikayet\u00e7i ve tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, mahkemenin kabul ve uygulamas\u0131nda isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.(Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 08\/07\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/20826 Esas, 2014\/13689 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-\u015eikayet\u00e7inin, D. ili garaj civar\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 ka\u011f\u0131t tabir edilen oyunu oynatan san\u0131k X ile temyiz incelemesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki san\u0131k Y’yi g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve yanlar\u0131na gitti\u011fi, san\u0131k X1n \u015fikayet\u00e7iye “Senin \u00fczerinde para var m\u0131? Ben oyun oynanan k\u00e2\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131 k\u0131rd\u0131m, istersen senin i\u00e7in oynar\u0131m.” demesi \u00fczerine, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin 50 TL’yi oyunu oynatan X’e verdi\u011fi, X’\u00een \u015fikayet\u00e7iye oyunu kazanmas\u0131 halinde 100 TL verece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin oyunu kaybetmesi \u00fczerine san\u0131klar\u0131n \u0131srar\u0131 sonucu 30 TL daha koydu\u011fu ve bu paray\u0131 da kaybetti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu \u015fekilde hileli hareketlerle \u015fikayet\u00e7iyi aldatmak suretiyle haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmesi \u015feklindeki eyleminin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 29\/04\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/16344 Esas, 2014\/8395 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.2. Ara\u00e7 Sat\u0131n Alan San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, Deneme S\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f\u00fc veya\u00a0Ba\u015fka Bahanelerle Ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Arac\u0131 Geri Getirmemesi<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

San\u0131k, arac\u0131 sat\u0131n alma bahanesiyle ma\u011fdurun ara\u00e7 satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fyerine ya da ma\u011fdurun arac\u0131 satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 yere gelir, arac\u0131 kontrol ama\u00e7l\u0131 bakt\u0131raca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek al\u0131p ma\u011fdurun yan\u0131ndan ayr\u0131l\u0131r, kendisi ile gelen ma\u011fdurun i\u015f\u00e7isi ya da ma\u011fduru bir \u015fekilde kand\u0131rarak ara\u00e7la birlikte ortadan kaybolur. Burada ara\u00e7 hile ile al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in eylem doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k kapsam\u0131nda kalacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lan\u0131n \u0130\u015fletti\u011fi oto galeriye gelerek, bir ara\u00e7 sat\u0131n\u00a0almak istedi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi\u00a0ve … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 ara\u00e7 i\u00e7in pazarl\u0131k yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, taraflar\u0131n 1.8,000 li ‘ye anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0arac\u0131 sanayide g\u00f6sterdikten sonra alabilece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n bunu kabul ederek\u00a0san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yan\u0131na kendi eleman\u0131n\u0131 verip ara\u00e7la birlikte sanayiye g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sanayiye\u00a0ula\u015fmas\u0131ndan sonra, yan\u0131ndaki ki\u015finin k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre ara\u00e7tan inmesini f\u0131rsat bilerek arac\u0131\u00a0\u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131p olay yerinden uzakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve A iline\u00a0ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, belli bir s\u00fcre sonra A ilinde polisler\u00a0\u00a0taraf\u0131ndan yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lan ve tan\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan te\u015fhis edilen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 tebcil etti\u011fi, b\u00f6ylece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hileli hareketler kullanarak kendi lehine haks\u0131z menfaat temin olayda doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun i\u015flendi\u011fine dair mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u00a0(Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 15\/01\/2013 Tarih ve 2011\/18060 Esas, 2013\/238 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131k, deneme s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yapmak i\u00e7in arac\u0131 hileyle al\u0131p getirmedi\u011fi takdirde doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u olu\u015fur.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

M\u00fc\u015ftekinin kendisine ait arac\u0131n\u0131 satmak \u00fczere araba pazar\u0131na g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n al\u0131c\u0131 olmas\u0131 \u00fczerine kimli\u011fini ibraz ederek m\u00fc\u015ftekiye gerekli g\u00fcveni sa\u011flayarak ara\u00e7 deneme s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yapmak i\u00e7in al\u0131p bir daha geri getirmedi\u011fi \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eylemde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 25\/04\/2012 Tarih ve 2011\/12707 Esas, 2012\/35688 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131k, \u00e7o\u011fu zaman gazetedeki ara\u00e7 sat\u0131\u015f ilanlar\u0131n\u0131 takip ederek m\u00fc\u015ftekiye ula\u015f\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

-M\u00fc\u015ftekilerin, … plakal\u0131 … marka arac\u0131 satmak amac\u0131yla .. Gazetesine ilan verdikleri, san\u0131klardan X’in Almanya’da \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu ve g\u00fczel bir ara\u00e7 almak istedi\u011fi, ancak hasat d\u00f6nemi olmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7\u0131kamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, arac\u0131n A. K\u00f6y\u00fcne getirilmesini, araan devri i\u00e7in de ad\u0131na s\u00fcreli vekaletname d\u00fczenlettirmelerini, paray\u0131 pe\u015fin verece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin de inanarak, san\u0131k X. ad\u0131na vekaletname d\u00fczenlettirdikleri ve m\u00fc\u015fteki M’nin su\u00e7a konu arac\u0131 A K\u00f6y\u00fcne getirdi\u011fi, san\u0131k X. ile di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n kendilerini kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131k X ile su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk Y’nin, su\u00e7a konu arac\u0131 deneme s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yapmak amac\u0131yla alarak olay mahallinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131, arac\u0131n torpido g\u00f6z\u00fcndeki vekaletnameyi bulup alarak, I. ilinde arac\u0131 san\u0131k X’in damad\u0131 olan Y’ye satt\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin \u015f\u00fcphelenerek sormas\u0131 \u00fczerine de \u00f6nce bankadan para \u00e7ekmek istediklerini ancak i\u015flerinin uzad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra da arac\u0131n ar\u0131za yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledikleri, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin ise doland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlay\u0131p, \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerinin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 23\/10\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/1673 Esas, 2014\/17092 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131k, deneme s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn yan\u0131s\u0131ra, arac\u0131 kendi hakimiyetine almak i\u00e7in birtak\u0131m hileler uydurarak arac\u0131 m\u00fc\u015ftekiden teslim al\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

-Kat\u0131lan\u0131n, B il\u00e7esi otomobil pazar\u0131nda sat\u0131l\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 … plakal\u0131 arac\u0131 sat\u0131n almak isteyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lan ile pazarl\u0131k yaparak s\u00f6z konusu arac\u0131 kendisinin s\u00f6yledi\u011fi bir fiyata sat\u0131n alma hususunda anla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, E il\u00e7esine gelece\u011fini ve arac\u0131 sat\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn kat\u0131lan\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 taksi dura\u011f\u0131na gelerek arac\u0131n deneme s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc yapmak istedi\u011fini belirtti\u011fi ve deneme s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc yapt\u0131ktan sonra arac\u0131 e\u015fine g\u00f6sterip geri getirece\u011fine dair yalan s\u00f6yleyerek bu duruma inanan kat\u0131landan arac\u0131 teslim al\u0131p g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve bir daha geri getirmeyerek \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 olan nitelikli h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, olu\u015fa, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmalar\u0131na, kat\u0131lan\u0131n iddialar\u0131na, tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, bu \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclen eyleminin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k\u00a0su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 10\/11\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/2658 Esas, 2014\/18388 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Ara\u00e7 hile kullan\u0131lmadan \u00e7al\u0131nm\u0131\u015fsa su\u00e7 h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k olacakt\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, gazete ilan\u0131 \u00fczerine arac\u0131n\u0131 satmak isteyen \u015fikayet\u00e7i ile i\u015fyerine gelerek bulu\u015ftu\u011fu, para vermek ve deneme s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yapmak bahanesi ile birlikte Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y’e gittikleri, burada bir kafede oturduklar\u0131, bu s\u0131rada m\u00fc\u015ftekinin masadan kalkmas\u0131 \u00fczerine masan\u0131n \u00fczerinde bulunan anahtar\u0131 al\u0131p arac\u0131 g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bir s\u00fcre kullan\u0131p terk etti\u011fi \u015feklindeki eyleminin h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeksizin su\u00e7 vasf\u0131nda yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 21\/01\/2013 Tarih ve 2011\/18373 Esas, 2013\/805 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Ara\u00e7 sat\u0131n al\u0131nmadan, sadece oto kiralamadan kiralan\u0131p geri getirilmedi\u011fi takdirde, eylem doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k de\u011fil TCK’nm 155\/1. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturacakt\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, su\u00e7 tarihinde … plakal\u0131 otomobili oto kiralama i\u015fi ile u\u011fra\u015fan kat\u0131landan 27\/04\/2007 g\u00fcn\u00fc bir haftal\u0131\u011f\u0131na kiralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde geri getirmedi\u011fi olayda, eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 155\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 19\/02\/2015 Tarih ve 2013\/8353 Esas, 2015\/21083 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lan\u0131n i\u015fletmecili\u011fini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 oto kiralama \u015firketine m\u00fcracaat ederek 7.5.2009 tarihinden 9.5.2009 tarihine kadar kullanmak \u00fczere 180 TL kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 arac\u0131 kiralad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak kira s\u00fcresi bitti\u011fi halde su\u00e7a konu arac\u0131 getirip teslim etmedi\u011fi, bilahare kat\u0131lan\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7i olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 5.8.2009 tarihinde s\u00f6z konusu arac\u0131 kolluk g\u00fc\u00e7lerine teslim etti\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, su\u00e7a konu arac\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa yerine getirmi\u015f oldu\u011fu meslek veya hizmet dolay\u0131s\u0131yla verilmedi\u011fi cihetle, hizmet nedeniyle g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unun yasal unsurlann\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, bu nedenle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin TCK’n\u0131n 155\/1. maddesine uyan g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden su\u00e7 vasf\u0131nda yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde hizmet nedeniyle g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7undan mahkumiyete h\u00fckmolunmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 26\/06\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/19771 Esas, 2014\/13002 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131k kiralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131, sanki kendisininmi\u015f gibi hile yaparak ba\u015fkas\u0131na satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, ger\u00e7ek i\u00e7tima h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde, oto kiralamac\u0131 ma\u011fdura kar\u015f\u0131 TCK’nm 155\/1. maddesindeki g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7u olu\u015facak, arac\u0131 kendisininmi\u015f gibi g\u00f6stererek sat\u0131p paras\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 da kural olarak, TCK’n\u0131n 157\/1. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda basit doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u olu\u015facak, sahte ruhsat olu\u015fturulmak suretiyle ara\u00e7 sat\u0131l\u0131rsa, eylem TCK 158\/1-d su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturacakt\u0131r. Burada sonu\u00e7 itibariyle birden fazla eylem oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in fikri i\u00e7tima h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

TCK’n\u0131n 158\/1-g maddesinde, bas\u0131n ve yay\u0131m yoluyla nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir, hangi durumlarda bu nitelikli halin olu\u015faca\u011f\u0131, ilgili madde ile ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcmde ayr\u0131ca a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n gazeteye ilan vererek doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 her olayda nitelikli halin uygulanmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olmayacak, bu nitelikli halin uygulanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in baz\u0131 \u015fartlar aranacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fteki N.G’ye ait .. isimli oto kiralama i\u015fyerine gelerek sahte n\u00fcfus c\u00fczdan\u0131 ile kiralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde teslim etmeyerek gazete ilan\u0131 verip sat\u0131\u015fa \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131, sat\u0131\u015f ilan\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6ren bir ki\u015finin, m\u00fc\u015ftekiyi aramas\u0131 \u00fczerine, olaydan haberdar olan m\u00fc\u015ftekinin, arkada\u015f\u0131 olan F.\u00c7. isimli ki\u015fiyi san\u0131kla ara\u00e7 sat\u0131\u015f\u0131nda pazarl\u0131k yapmak \u00fczere g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi, arac\u0131n bu ki\u015fiye sat\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda, daha \u00f6nce haber verilen kollu\u011fun olay yerine gelmesi nedeniyle ara\u00e7 tesliminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, icra hareketlerinin yar\u0131da kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda, mahkemenin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011fa te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7unun olu\u015ftu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 03\/05\/2012 Tarih ve 2011\/12833 Esas, 2012\/36270 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.3. Arac\u0131n Noterde Devrinin Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 S\u0131ras\u0131nda,\u00a0Paran\u0131n Hileyle Ma\u011fdura Verilmemesi<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

-Bu nitelikteki olaylarda, san\u0131k, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin arac\u0131n\u0131 almak i\u00e7in pazarl\u0131k yapmaya ba\u015flar, paras\u0131n\u0131n bankada oldu\u011funu vs. s\u00f6yleyerek arac\u0131n devrini ald\u0131ktan sonra hileli hareketlerine devam ederek, m\u00fc\u015ftekiyi atlat\u0131p paray\u0131 vermeden ortadan kaybolur, \u00e7o\u011fu zaman ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn veya ertesi g\u00fcn, arac\u0131n ba\u015fkas\u0131na devredilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr. Bu eylemde, Noter bir kamu kumu olarak kabul edilmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in, ba\u015fka \u015fartlar yoksa TCK’n\u0131n 158\/1-d maddesi yerine TCK 157\/1 maddesi uygulan\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

M\u00fc\u015ftekilerin a\u015famalarda de\u011fi\u015fmeyen ve olay\u0131n olu\u015funa uygun bulunan anlat\u0131mlar\u0131nda, m\u00fc\u015fteki A’n\u0131n su\u00e7a konu minib\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc satmak amac\u0131yla gazeteye ilan verdi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n araca m\u00fc\u015fteri oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi\u011fi ve fiyatta anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n X isimli arkada\u015f\u0131 ile sat\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc notere geldikleri ve arac\u0131n devir i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lmakta oldu\u011fu s\u0131rada, paran\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n e\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan bankadan \u00e7ekilmekte oldu\u011funu, devir i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 bu arada paran\u0131n gelece\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek m\u00fc\u015ftekileri kand\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131, noterdeki sat\u0131\u015f i\u015flemi sonras\u0131nda ise paran\u0131n gelmemesi nedeniyle m\u00fc\u015ftekilerle tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekiyi dosyada mevcut doktor raporuna g\u00f6re burun kemi\u011fini k\u0131racak \u015fekilde d\u00f6verek yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay tarihinden d\u00f6rt g\u00fcn sonra su\u00e7a konu arac\u0131 bir ba\u015fkas\u0131na satt\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay tarihinden k\u0131sa s\u00fcre sonra al\u0131nan ifadesinde arac\u0131 ka\u00e7a sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kimden sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlamamas\u0131n\u0131n da\u00a0hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na uygun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u00a0baytar\u0131 beri doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k kast\u0131 \u0130le hareket etti\u011fi ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi g\u00f6z\u00a0\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmadan taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u0130htilaf\u0131n hukuki nitelikte bulundu\u011fu belirtilerek beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 06\/02\/2012 Tarih ve 2011\/ 201 l\/\u0131 1236 Esas 2012\/7024 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.4. Yard\u0131m Yapma Bahanesiyle Doland\u0131rma<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay, ki\u015filere kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan hilelerde, \u00e7ok bariz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece ma\u011fduru kand\u0131ran b\u00fct\u00fcn hileleri doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yeterli g\u00f6rmektedir. S\u00f6z konusu olayda ma\u011fdur kand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, su\u00e7un sabit oldu\u011funu kabul etmek gerekecektir. Yard\u0131m yapma bahanesiyle yap\u0131lan doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131klarda, ma\u011fdurun, Devlete olan inanc\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131larak su\u00e7 islenmekte, ki\u015filerin, bir anlamda zaaflar\u0131 istismar edilmektedir.<\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisini belediye g\u00f6revlisi olarak tan\u0131tarak, d\u0131\u015far\u0131da g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve daha \u00f6nce tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kat\u0131lana, yard\u0131ma ihtiyac\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sordu\u011fu, kat\u0131lan\u0131n ihtiyac\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lanla birlikte eve gitti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, yard\u0131m verebilmek i\u00e7in bankadan para ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n deftere bakay\u0131m dedi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan\u0131n, kartla para ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u00a0belirtmesi \u00fczerine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, paray\u0131 getir numaralar\u0131n\u0131 yazay\u0131m dedi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan\u0131n, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck b\u00eer defter aras\u0131nda paray\u0131 getirip san\u0131\u011fa verdi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan\u0131n, san\u0131\u011fa g\u00fcvenerek b\u00eer i\u015fi i\u00e7in ba\u015fka bir odaya ge\u00e7ti\u011fi s\u0131rada, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ben paray\u0131 buraya b\u0131rak\u0131yorum, az sonra yard\u0131m paketini al\u0131p gelece\u011fim dedi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n oradan uzakla\u015fmas\u0131ndan sonra, kat\u0131lan\u0131n, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n paray\u0131 b\u0131rakt\u0131m dedi\u011fi yere geldi\u011fi; fakat paray\u0131, burada bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, giden san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da geriye d\u00f6nmedi\u011fi olayda doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun olu\u015ftu\u011funa dair kabulde bir isabetsizlik bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 19\/03\/2012 Tarih ve 2011\/11816 Esas, 2012\/32070 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.5. Hileyle Telefonun Al\u0131n\u0131p Verilmemesi<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Telefon veya ba\u015fka bir e\u015fya, ma\u011fdurun elinden hileyle al\u0131n\u0131rsa, zilyetli\u011fin tesliminden \u00f6nce bir senaryo uydurulur ve bu senaryo \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde e\u015fya al\u0131n\u0131rsa, eylem, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturacakt\u0131r, fakat san\u0131k, k\u0131sa bir konu\u015fma yapma amac\u0131yla telefonu al\u0131p olay yerinden uzakla\u015f\u0131rsa eylem TCK’n\u0131n 141. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, bir e\u015fyay\u0131 ma\u011fdurdan emaneten al\u0131p iade etmemesi eylemi TCK’nm 155\/1. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturacakken bir hizmet ili\u015fkisi kapsam\u0131nda alman mal iade edilmezse bu kez, TCK’nm 155\/2. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda hizmet nedeniyle g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7u olu\u015facakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay g\u00fcn\u00fc m\u00fc\u015ftekinin \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fyerine gelerek patronun yak\u0131n\u0131 ve A. \u015firketi sahibi olarak kendisini tan\u0131tt\u0131ktan sonra \u015farj\u0131n\u0131n bitti\u011fim s\u00f6yleyip numara almak i\u00e7in cep telefonunu istedi\u011fi, m\u00fc\u015fteki telefonu verip arkas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6nerek masas\u0131na y\u00f6nelince oradan uzakla\u015fmas\u0131 suretiyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eyleminin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu\u00a0olu\u015fturdu\u011funa dair\u00a0mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 18\/06\/2012 Tarih ve 2011\/14431 Esas, 2012\/39358 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yolculuk esnas\u0131nda tan\u0131\u015f\u0131p arkada\u015f olduklar\u0131 ma\u011fdur ile iki \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn sonra E iline gitti\u011finde bulu\u015ftuklar\u0131, ma\u011fdurun san\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenci evine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcp misafir etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdura patronunun \u00e7inicilik i\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, E ilinde \u00e7inicilik d\u00fckkan\u0131 a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, san\u0131k ite ma\u011fdur birlikte E otogar\u0131na 14.12.2006 g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 17.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda geldiklerinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdurun cep telefonunu hatt\u0131 ile birlikte kullanmak i\u00e7in ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha sonra telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fece\u011fi ki\u015finin arabayla kendilerini almaya gelece\u011fini s\u00f6yleyip, benzin almak i\u00e7inde 35 TL para al\u0131p ortadan kayboldu\u011fu \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclen eyleminin, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 157\/1. maddesinde tan\u0131mlanan doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden, su\u00e7 vasf\u0131nda yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek eylemin h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan bahisle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 18\/06\/2012 Tarih ve 2013\/32151 Esas, 2015\/1320 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-M\u00fc\u015ftekinin, cep telefonunu satmak i\u00e7in internette ilan verdi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sat\u0131n almak i\u00e7in talip oldu\u011fu ve B. Gar\u0131nda bulu\u015ftuklar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n rent a cardan kiralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u00e7 ile m\u00fc\u015ftekiyi araca ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, M. semtine var\u0131nca m\u00fc\u015ftekiye sen ara\u00e7ta bekle ben cep telefonunu yak\u0131n\u0131ma g\u00f6sterip gelece\u011fim diye cep telefonunu al\u0131p ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda, eylemin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 157\/1 maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden su\u00e7 vasf\u0131nda yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 13\/01\/2015 Tarih ve 2014\/23892 Esas, 2015\/171 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lan ve e\u015finin i\u015fletti\u011fi telefon bayiine gelerek kullanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu cep telefonuna 100 kont\u00f6r y\u00fckletti\u011fi, akabinde kont\u00f6r paras\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demek i\u00e7in cebinden 50 TL \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131p tan\u0131k H’ye uzatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak “dur ben sana 4 TL bozuk para vereyim” diyerek uzatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 50 TL’yi geri \u00e7ekti\u011fi, daha sonra san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 50 TL paray\u0131 vermek i\u00e7in kat\u0131lan M’nin yan\u0131na do\u011fru gitti\u011fi, buradan 4 TL bozuk paray\u0131 tan\u0131k H’ye uzatarak 50 TL paray\u0131 kat\u0131lana vermeden tan\u0131k H’nin yan\u0131na tekrar gelip para \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fc istedi\u011fi, tan\u0131k H’nin de 40 TL para \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fc san\u0131\u011fa verdi\u011fi, bilahare san\u0131\u011f\u0131n cep telefonunu ve para \u00fcst\u00fc olan 40 TL’yi alarak i\u015f yerinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hileli hareketlerle haks\u0131z menfaat temin ederek \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ba\u015ftan beri doland\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k kast\u0131yla hareket ederek kat\u0131lana para vermeden su\u00e7a konu kont\u00f6rleri ve para \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fc al\u0131p haks\u0131z menfaat temin etme d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinde oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131 itibariyle olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin bu haliyle TCK’n\u0131n 157\/1. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen doland\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden su\u00e7 vasf\u0131nda yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 15\/01\/2015 Tarih ve 2013\/17298 Esas, 2015\/538 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, daha \u00f6nceden m\u00fc\u015fteri olarak gitti\u011fi lokantada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan ma\u011fdurun yan\u0131na gitti\u011fi, akabinde \u00e7ocu\u011funun ameliyat olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir yeri aramas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek ma\u011fdurdan cep telefonunu istedi\u011fi, ma\u011fdurun da san\u0131\u011fa inanarak su\u00e7a konu cep telefonunu konu\u015fup geri iade etmesi i\u00e7in san\u0131\u011fa verdi\u011fi, ancak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu cep telefonunu ma\u011fdura geri vermeden olay mahallinden ayr\u0131larak gitti\u011fi, daha sonra su\u00e7a konu\u00a0telefonu ba\u015fka birine satt\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu \u0130\u015fledi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ba\u015ftan beri doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k kast\u0131yla hareket edip m\u00fc\u015ftekinin cep telefonunu alarak haks\u0131z menfaat temin etme d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinde oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unun unsurlan itibariyle olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin bu haliyle TCK’n\u0131n 157\/1. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden su\u00e7 vasf\u0131nda yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 15\/01\/2015 Tarih ve 2013\/17296 Esas, 2015\/552 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7 tarihinde \u015fikayet\u00e7iden g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yapmak \u00fczere istedi\u011fi cep telefonunu ald\u0131ktan sonra olay yerinden uzakla\u015farak gitti\u011fi ve daha sonra da cep telefonunu \u015fikayet\u00e7iye iade etmedi\u011finin iddia ve kabul olunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, zilyetli\u011fin san\u0131\u011fa devredilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, eylemin h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden su\u00e7 vasf\u0131n\u0131n tayininde yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi sonucu doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,(Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 05\/03\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/10179 Esas, 2014\/4003 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Zilyedinin r\u0131zas\u0131 olmadan ba\u015fkas\u0131na ait ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r bir mal\u0131, kendisine veya ba\u015fkas\u0131na bir yarar sa\u011flamak maksad\u0131yla bulundu\u011fu yerden almak, h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unun temel \u015feklidir. Ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r mal\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7 olu\u015fturabilmesi i\u00e7in, zilyedinin r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 gerekir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, arkada\u015f\u0131 olan \u015fikayet\u00e7iden, k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131 aramak i\u00e7in bir s\u00fcreli\u011fine kullan\u0131p iade etmek \u00fczere ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 cep telefonunu bir ba\u015fkas\u0131na satt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun 12\/06\/2012 tarih ve 2011\/15-440 Esas, 2012\/229 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 gere\u011fince, eylemin TCK’n\u0131n 141\/1. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden su\u00e7 vasf\u0131nda yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 10\/12\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/4371 Esas, 2014\/20960 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun 12.06.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/15-440 2012\/225 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 da nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131 aramak i\u00e7in cep telefonunu istedi\u011fi, konu\u015fmas\u0131 bittikten sonra yak\u0131ndaki parka do\u011fru giderek oradan uzakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 14\/11\/2006 tarihli kolluk ifadesinde de paraya ihtiyac\u0131 oldu\u011fundan su\u00e7a konu telefonu tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 birine satt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi eyleminde, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin ge\u00e7ici de olsa zilyetli\u011fi devir iradesinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, fiili hakimiyetin kayb\u0131 sonucu olu\u015fan zilyetlik ile de h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unun olu\u015faca\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 03\/12\/2014 Tarih ve 2014\/20185 Esas, 2014\/20240 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131landan k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli\u011fine kullan\u0131p iade etmek \u00fczere ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 cep telefonunu iade etmeyerek, olay yerinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n iddia ve kabul olunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemin h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, g\u00f6zetilmeden olu\u015fa uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyen gerek\u00e7eyle eylemin g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma olarak kabul\u00fcyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 19\/01\/2015 Tarih ve 2014\/23756 Esas, 2015\/569 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.6. Sahte Alt\u0131n ve Heykelin Ger\u00e7ek Diye Verilmesi Suretiyle Haks\u0131z Menfaat Temin Edilmesi<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Bu eylemlerde, san\u0131k, ya sahte alt\u0131n\u0131 kuyumcuya sat\u0131p haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmektedir ya da ma\u011fdura, elinde sat\u0131lmaya haz\u0131r alt\u0131n oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyip ma\u011fdurun da numune olarak g\u00f6sterilen ger\u00e7ek alt\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnce san\u0131\u011fa inan\u0131p paran\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 san\u0131\u011fa verdi\u011fi olaylard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

-Katilar\u0131m, tan\u0131k B. arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile san\u0131kla tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lana, numune olarak ger\u00e7ek bir alt\u0131n vererek kendisinde \u00fc\u00e7 bin adet alt\u0131n oldu\u011funu, asl\u0131nda tanesi 220 TL olan alt\u0131nlar\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 fiyat\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131nda 80.000 TL’ye satabilece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan\u0131n da bu teklifi kabul etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kimli\u011fi me\u00e7hul bir ki\u015fiyle birlikte kat\u0131lan ve tan\u0131kla bulu\u015ftu\u011fu, birilerini ar\u0131yormu\u015f gibi yaparak i\u00e7inde sahte alt\u0131n olan kavanozu kat\u0131lana verdi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan\u0131n paray\u0131 teslim alarak a\u011fz\u0131 kapal\u0131 olan sahte alt\u0131nlar\u0131 teslim ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha sonra yap\u0131lan incelemede, s\u00f6z konusu alt\u0131nlar\u0131n sahte oldu\u011funun belirlendi\u011fi, bir daha da san\u0131\u011fa ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hileli hareketlerle kat\u0131lan aleyhine haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmek suretiyle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, san\u0131k, kat\u0131lan ve tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131, te\u015fhis ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, su\u00e7un san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flendi\u011fi sabit olmakla bu gerek\u00e7elere dayanan mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 12\/01\/2015 Tarih ve 2013\/6795 Esas, 2015\/24 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131k X’in temyiz d\u0131\u015f\u0131 san\u0131k Y’nin \u0130stanbul Beyaz\u0131t semtinde bulunan L. Kuyumculuk adl\u0131 i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, di\u011fer san\u0131k Z’ye piyasaya s\u00fcr\u00fclmek \u00fczere sahte alt\u0131n tak\u0131lar verdi\u011fi, san\u0131k Cin de 29.04.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc A. Kuyumculuk adl\u0131 i\u015fyerini i\u015fleten ma\u011fdur H’ye 7 adet sahte \u00e7eyrek ziynet e\u015fyas\u0131n\u0131 1.100 TL kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda satt\u0131\u011f\u0131, A… Kuyumculuk isimli i\u015fyerini i\u015fleten ma\u011fdur A’ya yedi adet sahte \u00e7eyrek ziynet e\u015fyas\u0131n\u0131 1.065 TL kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda satt\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fteki A’n\u0131n i\u015fletti\u011fi Y. Kuyumculuk isimli i\u015fyerine giderek m\u00fc\u015fteki A\/ye \u00e7eyrek alt\u0131n diyerek 7 adet sahte \u00e7eyrek ziynet e\u015fyas\u0131n\u0131 1.100 TL kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda satmak istedi\u011fi s\u0131rada m\u00fc\u015ftekinin polis \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda, san\u0131k X’in ma\u011fdurlar H. ve A\/ya kar\u015f\u0131 eyleminin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, m\u00fc\u015fteki A’\u015fa kar\u015f\u0131 eyleminin ise doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011fa te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, san\u0131k Y’nin eyleminin de san\u0131k X’in ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k eylemlerine do\u011frudan do\u011fruya i\u015ftirak etme oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden yard\u0131m etti\u011finden bahisle eksik ceza tayin edilmesi aleyhe temyiz bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bozma nedeni yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 14\/01\/2015 Tarih ve 2013\/6635 Esas, 2015\/392 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.7. \u0130\u015f Bulma Vaadiyle Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

San\u0131k, ma\u011fdur ya da ma\u011fdurlara i\u015f bulabilece\u011fini vadederek onlardan haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmektedir. San\u0131k, bazen hilesini daha da g\u00fc\u00e7lendirmek i\u00e7in ma\u011fdurdan i\u015f ba\u015fvurusu i\u00e7in baz\u0131 belgeler ister, bazen de kendisini, i\u015fe almada yetkili biri olarak tan\u0131t\u0131r. San\u0131\u011fa haks\u0131z menfaatin banka yoluyla g\u00f6nderilmesi durumunda, banka sadece \u00f6deme arac\u0131 oldu\u011fundan, TCK’n\u0131n 158\/1-f, son maddesi kapsam\u0131nda bankan\u0131n arac\u0131 k\u0131l\u0131nmas\u0131 suretiyle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u yerine basit doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u olu\u015facakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

San\u0131k, bu doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirirken bir kamu kurumunu maddi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kullanarak su\u00e7u i\u015flerse, bu durumda eylem, TCK’n\u0131n 158\/1-d maddesi kapsam\u0131nda kal\u0131r, \u00f6rne\u011fin, san\u0131k, bir kamu kurumunda g\u00f6revli oldu\u011funa dair, o kurumun belgesini sahte olarak d\u00fczenler ve ma\u011fduru bu belgeyle kand\u0131r\u0131rsa nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u olu\u015facakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

San\u0131k, o anda kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131ndaki birden fazla ki\u015fiye, ayn\u0131 s\u00f6zleri s\u00f6yleyerek kand\u0131r\u0131p haks\u0131z menfaat temin ederse; TCK’n\u0131n 43\/2. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda zincirleme doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u olu\u015facakt\u0131r, bu durumda, ma\u011fdurlar taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fi\u015fik tarihlerde haks\u0131z menfaatin san\u0131\u011fa verilmesinin bir \u00f6nemi yoktur. \u00d6nemli olan san\u0131\u011fm hileli hareketleri ayn\u0131 anda b\u00fct\u00fcn ma\u011fdurlara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131p yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, bir ma\u011fdura i\u015f vaadinde bulunup haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmesinden sonra, o ma\u011fdurun gidip arkada\u015f\u0131na s\u00f6yleyerek, o arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fe girmesini sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in ondan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 paray\u0131 san\u0131\u011fa verirse, bu \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde san\u0131kla muhatap olmazsa, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 hileli bir hareketi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu ki\u015fiye y\u00f6nelik eylem, ayr\u0131 bir doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ma\u011fdurlarla ayn zamanlarda muhatap olarak ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmesi halinde, ma\u011fdur say\u0131s\u0131nca doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u olu\u015facakt\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

San\u0131k, kendisinin \u00f6nemli bir mevkide oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi veya kendisinin a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde bir makamda oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyerek i\u015f bulma vaadiyle haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmesi halinde eylem, TCK’n\u0131n 157\/1. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda basit doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturacakt\u0131r. Buna ra\u011fmen, ad\u0131n\u0131 ya da makam\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi kamu g\u00f6revlisini iyi tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek i\u015f bulma vaadiyle ma\u011fduru kand\u0131r\u0131rsa, eylem, TCK’n\u0131n 158\/2. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturur. \u00d6rne\u011fin, san\u0131k, kendisinin kaymakam oldu\u011funu, ya da X yeri kaymakam\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemesi halinde veya bakanl\u0131kta tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyerek haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmesi eylemi, basit doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131kt\u0131r. Fakat X yeri kaymakam\u0131n\u0131 tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, X bakan\u0131m veya X yerindeki Y genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylerse eylem, TCK 158\/2 maddesi kapsam\u0131nda kal\u0131r. TCK 158\/2 maddesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisinin \u00f6nemli biri oldu\u011funu de\u011fil \u00f6nemli mevkide olan ba\u015fka birini tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmeli ve bu ba\u015fka birinin de ya a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ad\u0131m s\u00f6ylemeli ya da makam\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmelidir. \u00d6rne\u011fin Yarg\u0131tay’da tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 daire ba\u015fkanlar\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylese, eylem, TCK 157\/1 kapsam\u0131ndad\u0131r, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc, bu kurumda, birden fazla daire ba\u015fkan\u0131 vard\u0131r, e\u011fer X dairesi ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131\u00a0tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131m s\u00f6ylerse, eylem TCK 158\/2 maddesi kapsam\u0131nda kalacakt\u0131r. Bu husustaki ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 ve ilgili kararlar\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerde aktaraca\u011f\u0131z.<\/p>\n

San\u0131k, ayn\u0131 ma\u011fdurdan, \u00f6nce belli bir miktar haks\u0131z menfaat temin ettikten sonra ayn\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131yla yine haks\u0131z menfaat temin ederse, bu durumda, TCK’n\u0131n 43\/1, maddesi kapsam\u0131nda zincirleme doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u olu\u015facakt\u0131r, fakat san\u0131k ba\u015ftan belirledi\u011fi paray\u0131 taksitler halinde ma\u011fdurdan al\u0131rsa, bu durumda tek bir su\u00e7 i\u015flenmi\u015f olacakt\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin, san\u0131k, para miktar\u0131m ba\u015ftan belirlemeden, m\u00fc\u015ftekiden, \u00f6nce 100 TL, sonra 50 TL, sonra 200 TL isterse zincirleme su\u00e7 olu\u015fur. E\u011fer san\u0131k, para miktar\u0131n\u0131 1.000 TL olarak ba\u015ftan belirleyip, ma\u011fdurdan bu paray\u0131 taksit taksit al\u0131rsa, san\u0131\u011fa tek bir su\u00e7tan ceza verilecek, zincirleme su\u00e7 h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

San\u0131k, ma\u011fdur ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadesi al\u0131n\u0131rken, \u00f6zellikle bu t\u00fcr eylemlerde, zincirleme su\u00e7, tek su\u00e7 veya ayn su\u00e7 olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan gerekli detay sorular sorulmal\u0131, buna ili\u015fkin kay\u0131tlar getirtilmeli, TCK’n\u0131n 43. maddesi iddianamede g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015f ise, san\u0131k ya da m\u00fcdafiine ek savunma hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n aksine, m\u00fclga 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’da, i\u015f bulma vaadiyle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k eylemi, nitelikli bir doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k olarak kabul edilmekteydi.<\/p>\n

\u00d6rnek olaylara bakacak olursak;<\/em><\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lana fC Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’nde tan\u0131d\u0131klar\u0131 oldu\u011funu, X Adliyesi’nde akrabas\u0131n\u0131n hakim sava olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek i\u015f bulma konusunda yard\u0131mc\u0131 olabilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00fcven telkin edip kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 3.000 TL para ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, aradan zaman ge\u00e7mesine kar\u015f\u0131n katliam i\u015fe yerle\u015ftirmedi\u011fi gibi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 paray\u0131 da iade etmeyerek katliam doland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia olunan somut olayda; tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmayan tan\u0131k H. beyan\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n K. Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’nde ve X Adliyesi’nde tan\u0131d\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi\u011fini beyan etmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin 157\/1. madde kapsam\u0131nda kalan doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde mahkeme kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 08\/07\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/20837 Esas, 2014\/13708 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lana \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde X Te\u015fkilat\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisini kamu kuramlar\u0131nda i\u015fe koyaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek aldat\u0131p i\u015f bulma vaadiyle kat\u0131landan toplam 4.000 TL para almak suretiyle basit doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 26\/11\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/3594 Esas, 2014\/19761 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, i\u015f bulmak amac\u0131yla H. ilinden A. iline gelen \u015fikayet\u00e7ilerle yol sorma bahanesiyle tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, konu\u015ftuklar\u0131 esnada \u015fikayet\u00e7ilere otelde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak isteyip istemediklerini sordu\u011fu, \u015fikayet\u00e7ilerin kabul etmesi \u00fczerine sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek, \u015fikayet\u00e7ilere ait n\u00fcfus c\u00fczdanlar\u0131 ile 110 TL \u015fikayet\u00e7i \u0130’ye, 65 TL \u015fikayet\u00e7i \u0130’ye ait olmak \u00fczere toplam 175 TL paray\u0131 alarak hastane i\u015flerini halletmek \u00fczere uzakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015fikayet\u00e7ilerin hastaneye gittiklerinde pazar g\u00fcn\u00fc sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu verilmedi\u011fini \u00f6\u011frendikleri, bu suretle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n iki \u015fikayet\u00e7iye y\u00f6nelik olarak doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda; \u015fikayet\u00e7i beyanlar\u0131, san\u0131k ikrar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda iki \u015fikayet\u00e7iye y\u00f6nelik olarak zincirleme nitelikte doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan kurulan mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcnde isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 05\/11\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/2392 Esas, 2014\/18131 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-\u015eikayet\u00e7inin i\u015f bulmak i\u00e7in A. iline geldi\u011fi, otogarda san\u0131kla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin san\u0131\u011fa \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak i\u00e7in geldi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir otelde kendisine i\u015f bulabilece\u011fini, bunun i\u00e7in sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin paras\u0131 olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle cep telefonunu satarak 150 TL’yi san\u0131\u011fa verdi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n katliam Devlet hastanesine g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, rapor i\u015flemleri yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyip kat\u0131lan\u0131n yan\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ortadan kayboldu\u011fu olayda, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun olu\u015ftu\u011funa dair kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 01\/04\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/14716 Esas, 2014\/6103 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Ayn\u0131 su\u00e7un birden fazla ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 tek bir fiille i\u015flenmesi durumunda zincirleme su\u00e7 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 43\/2. maddesinde yer alan d\u00fczenleme ve haks\u0131z menfaatin ba\u015ftan belirlenmedi\u011fi ve de\u011fi\u015fik tarihlerde ayn\u0131 kast alt\u0131nda menfaat talep edilmesi halinde TCK’n\u0131n 43. maddesinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131; ba\u015ftan belirlenen haks\u0131z menfaatin de\u011fi\u015fik fas\u0131lalarla kat\u0131lanlardan istenmesi halinde, zincirleme su\u00e7 ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekileri ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ortamlarda aldatmas\u0131 halinde su\u00e7 \u00e7oklu\u011funun s\u00f6z konusu olaca\u011f\u0131 nazara al\u0131narak; birbirlerini \u00f6nceden tan\u0131yan \u015fikayet\u00e7ilerin dosyadaki ifadelerinden san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7ileri ayn\u0131 anda m\u0131 yoksa de\u011fi\u015fik zamanlarda m\u0131 kand\u0131rarak para ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k ve net bir \u015fekilde anla\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle, maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin hi\u00e7bir ku\u015fkuya yer vermeyecek \u015fekilde tespiti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, \u015fikayet\u00e7ilerin yeniden beyanlar\u0131na ba\u015fvurularak, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendilerine y\u00f6nelik hileli hareketleri ve menfaat teminini ayn\u0131 anda yap\u0131p yapmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klatt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve san\u0131k ile \u015fikayet\u00e7iler aras\u0131nda i\u015fe al\u0131nma kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda verilecek olan paran\u0131n ba\u015ftan ne kadar belirlendi\u011fi, ba\u015ftaki anla\u015fma kapsam\u0131nda verilip verilmedi\u011fi hususlar\u0131n\u0131n kesin olarak tespit edilmesinden sonra san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunu tayin ve takdirinin gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, eksik inceleme ve yetersiz gerek\u00e7eyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 14\/10\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/1352 Esas, 2014\/16311 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Ayn\u0131 su\u00e7un birden fazla ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 tek bir fiille i\u015flenmesi durumunda zincirleme su\u00e7 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 43\/2. maddesinde yer alan d\u00fczenleme ve haks\u0131z menfaatin ba\u015ftan belirlenmedi\u011fi ve de\u011fi\u015fik tarihlerde ayn\u0131 kast alt\u0131nda menfaat talep edilmesi halinde TCK’n\u0131n 43. maddesinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131; ba\u015ftan belirlenen haks\u0131z menfaatin de\u011fi\u015fik fas\u0131lalarla kat\u0131lanlardan istenmesi halinde, zincirleme su\u00e7 ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekileri ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ortamlarda aldatmas\u0131 halinde\u00a0su\u00e7 \u00e7oklu\u011funun s\u00f6z konusu olaca\u011f\u0131 nazara al\u0131narak; birbirlerini \u00f6nceden tan\u0131yan kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n dosyadaki ifadelerinden san\u0131klar\u0131n kat\u0131lanlar\u0131 ayn\u0131 anda m\u0131 yoksa de\u011fi\u015fik zamanlarda m\u0131 kand\u0131rarak para ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k ve net bir \u015fekilde anla\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle, maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin hi\u00e7bir ku\u015fkuya yer vermeyecek \u015fekilde tespiti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n yeniden beyanlar\u0131na ba\u015fvurularak, san\u0131klar\u0131n kendilerine y\u00f6nelik hileli hareketleri ve menfaat teminini ayn\u0131 anda yap\u0131p yapmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klatt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve san\u0131klar ile kat\u0131lanlar aras\u0131nda i\u015fe al\u0131nma kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda verilecek olan paran\u0131n ba\u015ftan ne kadar belirlendi\u011fi, kat\u0131lanlar taraf\u0131ndan peyder pey verilen paralar\u0131n, ba\u015ftaki anla\u015fma kapsam\u0131nda verilip verilmedi\u011fi hususlar\u0131n\u0131n kesin olarak tespit edilmesinden sonra san\u0131klar\u0131n hukuki durumlar\u0131n\u0131n tay\u0131n ve takdirinin gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, eksik inceleme ve yetersiz gerek\u00e7eyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 14\/10\/2014 Tarih ve 2014\/11962 Esas, 2014\/14500 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.8. Evlenme Vaadiyle Kand\u0131r\u0131p Menfaat Temin Etme<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Bu nitelikteki dosyalarda; san\u0131k, ma\u011fdurla evlenece\u011fini vadedip ondan haks\u0131z menfaat temin ettikten sonra ortadan kaybolmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda, ger\u00e7ekte ma\u011fdurla evlenen ama \u00e7ok k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde de\u011fi\u015fik nedenlerle ayr\u0131lan ki\u015fileri ayr\u0131 bir noktada de\u011ferlendirmek gerekir, burada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kast\u0131na bak\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r, san\u0131k ger\u00e7ekte evlenme amac\u0131 m\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yor yoksa ma\u011fduru doland\u0131rma amac\u0131yla m\u0131 hareket ediyor hususu ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. San\u0131k, ma\u011fdurla evlenme amac\u0131yla bir araya gelip, daha sonra ma\u011fdurla anla\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in evden ayr\u0131l\u0131rsa, bu durumda su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131 olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131ndan beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekecektir.<\/p>\n

-San\u0131k ile m\u00fc\u015ftekinin olaydan bir s\u00fcre \u00f6nce .. ilinde tesad\u00fcfen kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, konu\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekiye kendini emekli imam olarak bildirdi\u011fi, m\u00fc\u015ftekiye evli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sordu\u011fu, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin e\u015finin iki y\u0131l \u00f6nce \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine bekar olan bald\u0131z\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, onunla evlenmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin de san\u0131\u011fa inand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve teklifini kabul etti\u011fi, ertesi g\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekiye K. Il\u00e7esi’ne gelmesi gerekti\u011fini bildirdi\u011fi, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin de daha sonra \u0130stanbul’dan K. Il\u00e7esi’ne geldi\u011fi, sabah san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekiyi otogarda kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131, birlikte \u015fehir merkezine geldikleri, burada bir parkta oturduklar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tatl\u0131 sipari\u015fi verdi\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek m\u00fc\u015ftekiden para talep etti\u011fi, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin de 700 TL para ile 100 Euroyu san\u0131\u011fa verdi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 paray\u0131 cebine koydu\u011fu, daha sonra evlenece\u011fi kad\u0131n ile tatl\u0131y\u0131 al\u0131p getirece\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yan\u0131ndan ayr\u0131l\u0131p y\u00fcr\u00fcmeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak bir s\u00fcre sonra san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayn\u0131 olaylar nedeniyle ihbar\u0131n\u0131 alan polisler taraf\u0131ndan yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu \u015fekilde \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, san\u0131k ve m\u00fc\u015fteki beyanlar\u0131 ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7un san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla hakk\u0131nda verilen mahkumiyet karar\u0131nda bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f tir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 09\/06\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/18747 Esas, 2014\/11382 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.9. Kendisini Kamu G\u00f6revlisi Gibi Tan\u0131tarak Menfaat Temin Etme<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Somut olayda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lanlardan E. ile kendisini eski… Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u00d6.\u0130’nin ye\u011feni oldu\u011funu, kendisinin de .. M\u00fcste\u015farl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda eksper olup \u00e7evresinin geni\u015f olmakla, kendilerini s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli eleman olarak i\u015fe ay\u0131rabilece\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek para almas\u0131, daha sonrada Erman’dan olay\u0131 duyan di\u011fer kat\u0131lanlardan R. A., M. A. ve \u0130. K. ile ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ferek i\u015f bulaca\u011f\u0131 vaadiyle menfaat sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu ki\u015filer d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n ise Erman ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcp onun taraf\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015f buldu\u011funa dair beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re E’ye evrak ve paralar\u0131 vermeleri, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu ki\u015filerden baz\u0131lar\u0131yla telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi iddia edilen olayda,<\/p>\n

Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 ve san\u0131k savunmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n katmanlardan E. \u0130., R. A., M. A. ve \u0130. K. ile do\u011frudan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcp, kendisinin eski… Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u00d6.\u0130’nin ye\u011feni olup kendilerini i\u015fe yerle\u015ftirece\u011fi vaadiyle para almas\u0131 yan\u0131nda, di\u011fer kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n da san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015f bulaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyarak san\u0131kla ve kat\u0131lan E. ile temas kurmak suretiyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ferek i\u015fe girebilmek i\u00e7in san\u0131\u011fa evrak ve para vermelerinde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00d6.\u0130’den zaten eski … ba\u015fkan\u0131 diye s\u00f6z etmesi yan\u0131nda, bu ki\u015finin … ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 2002 ve \u00f6ncesine ait olup su\u00e7 tarihinin de 2011 sonras\u0131 olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, su\u00e7 tarihi itibariyle \u00d6.\u0130’nin kamu g\u00f6revlisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da g\u00f6revde bulunan ki\u015fi ad\u0131 kullanarak i\u015f bulma vaadinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunun sabit oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n olu\u015fu kabul edilen eylemlerinde TCK’n\u0131n 158\/2 maddesinin unsurlar\u0131 itibariyle olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tebli\u011fnamedeki bozma isteyen d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye bu k\u0131s\u0131m itibariyle i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015f olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n t\u00fcm kat\u0131lanlara kar\u015f\u0131 eyleminin basit doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u vasf\u0131nda bulundu\u011funun g\u00f6zetilmemesi suretiyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde TCK’n\u0131n 158\/2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 10\/03\/2014 Tarih ve 2014\/2940 Esas, 2014\/4313 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.10. Kont\u00f6r Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131k, ma\u011fduru etkileyebilmek i\u00e7in, m\u00fc\u015ftekiye, bilgilerinin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn eline ge\u00e7ti\u011fini, kendilerinin polis, hakim ya da savc\u0131 oldu\u011funu tan\u0131tarak haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmektedirler.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Bu nitelikteki olaylarda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 cihaz\u0131n kim taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Telefon cihaz\u0131n\u0131n kimli\u011fi (IMEI numaras\u0131) \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i beyan\u0131, cihaz\u0131n kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatt\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren ileti\u015fim kay\u0131tlar\u0131, cihaz\u0131n fatura veya garanti belgesi ile belirlenmektedir. \u015eikayet\u00e7i, \u00e7al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi cihaz\u0131n IMEI numaras\u0131n\u0131 bilmiyorsa, olay tarihine kadar cihaz\u0131 hangi sim kartla kullan\u0131yorsa o numaraya g\u00f6re ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131larak \u00f6ncelikle cihaz\u0131n IMEI numaras\u0131 saptanmakta, olay sonras\u0131nda cihaza hangi S\u0130M kartlar\u0131n tak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, abonelerin kimlik ve adreslerinin ikinci bir yaz\u0131yla ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 \u015febekelerden sorulmaktad\u0131r. Bu ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131 yapt\u0131rmak i\u00e7in, GSM hatt\u0131 veya cihaz\u0131n IMEI numaras\u0131ndan her hangi birisinin mutlaka bilinmesi gerekmektedir. Telefon cihazlar\u0131n\u0131n IMEI numaralan ma\u011fdurun ibraz etti\u011fi belgelere, ma\u011fdurun beyan\u0131na veya ma\u011fdurun kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatt\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na g\u00f6re saptanmaktad\u0131r. Buna ra\u011fmen uygulamada, cihaz\u0131n IMEI numaras\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmedi\u011fi de g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n

Hangi su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin olursa olsun, san\u0131\u011fa ait telefondan kimlerle ve ne zaman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair tespit m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. \u0130leti\u015fimin dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131 ile ilgili CMK’nm 135. maddesindeki s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar, ileti\u015fimin tespiti i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

… y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7inde emekli olan … \u00dcniversitesi … Fak\u00fcltesi eski hocalar\u0131ndan kat\u0131lan\u0131n … tarihinde sabah saat 08.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 … numaral\u0131 telefon hatt\u0131ndan bir erkek \u015fah\u0131s taraf\u0131ndan arand\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fahs\u0131n kendisini ba\u015fkomiser olarak tan\u0131tarak “sizin ad\u0131n\u0131za ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc PKK ye\u015fil pasaport \u00e7\u0131kartm\u0131\u015f, sizin Kuzey Irak’a gidip \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131z tespit edildi, bu olaylarla … C. savc\u0131s\u0131 X ilgileniyor, \u015fimdi ona aktar\u0131yorum” dedi\u011fi ve telefonu ba\u015fka \u015fahsa verdi\u011fi, kendisini ba\u015fsavc\u0131 olarak tan\u0131tan di\u011fer \u015fah\u0131s da kat\u0131lana “cep telefonu numaran\u0131z\u0131n ikizi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, sizin ad\u0131n\u0131za \u00e7ok miktarda t\u0131bbi malzeme Kuzey Irak’a \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, siz de birka\u00e7 kez giri\u015f \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yapm\u0131\u015fs\u0131n\u0131z, bu soru\u015fturma ile ben ilgileniyorum, bunu yaparken teknik takip yap\u0131lacak, bunun i\u00e7in kont\u00f6r g\u00f6ndermeniz gerekir, bu i\u015fi gizli tutun aksi halde … davas\u0131 ile ili\u015fkilendirilecek” kendisini ba\u015fsavc\u0131 olarak tan\u0131tan ki\u015finin bu i\u015fi halletmek i\u00e7in D. iline gidece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, kat\u0131landan ayr\u0131ca telefonu s\u00fcrekli a\u00e7\u0131k tutulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fi, bu \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n konu\u015fmalar\u0131ndan etkilenen kat\u0131lan\u0131n panik halinde kont\u00f6r almak i\u00e7in D. il\u00e7esinden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p 8 km uzakl\u0131ktaki \u00c7. Beldesine giderek X \u015firketine ait… toplam 3.344 TL tutar\u0131nda haz\u0131r kart alarak \u015fifrelerini telefonda konu\u015fan ki\u015fiye bildirdi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca telefondaki \u015fahs\u0131n birden fazla telefon numaras\u0131 yazd\u0131r\u0131p bunlara da 500 l\u00fck kont\u00f6r aktar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fi, ertesi g\u00fcn\u00fc bu \u015fahs\u0131n tekrar arayarak D. ilinde oldu\u011funu, D. ilinde baz\u0131 \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve baz\u0131 isimler bildirdiklerini, bilgisayarlarda da ad\u0131na \u00e7e\u015fitli bankalarda hesaplar a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu hesaplara b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde d\u00f6viz transferi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bunlar\u0131 takip ettiklerini belirtip ondan yeniden kont\u00f6r y\u00fcklemesi gerekti\u011fini ayr\u0131ca varsa banka hesap numaras\u0131n\u0131 sordu\u011fu, kat\u0131lan\u0131n da K. il\u00e7esi X Bankas\u0131 … \u015fubesinde 50.000 TL hesab\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine paran\u0131n g\u00fcvenli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan buradan \u00e7ekilip emniyetli bir hesaba aktar\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini soru\u015fturma ile ilgili olmak \u00fczere kendisinin de \u0130. iline gelece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, bunun \u00fczerine kat\u0131lan pazartesi g\u00fcn\u00fc ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en bankaya giderek hesab\u0131ndaki 50.000 TL yi \u00e7ekti\u011fi, bu arada katliam tekrar arayan \u015fahs\u0131n ” bu paray\u0131 yem olarak kullanaca\u011f\u0131z paray\u0131 M. yerinde \u0130. Spor Merkezi yak\u0131n\u0131ndaki parkta \u00e7al\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n aras\u0131na b\u0131rak bu arada arkana bakma ” dedi\u011fi, bunun \u00fczerine kat\u0131lan\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu yerdeki parka y\u00f6neldi\u011fi arkas\u0131na da bakmadan istenilen yere \u00e7al\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n aras\u0131na 50.000 TL b\u0131rak\u0131p ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, paran\u0131n buradan al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, ertesi g\u00fcn\u00fc kat\u0131lan tekrara aran\u0131p kont\u00f6re ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 oldu\u011fu, Z \u015firketi hatt\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilmesi gerekti\u011fi s\u00f6ylendi\u011fi, Z \u015firketi hatt\u0131 ile ilgili telefon kart\u0131 ve bu kart\u0131n tak\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu telefonunu denize atan kat\u0131lan\u0131n, ba\u015f\u0131na gelen bu durumu e\u015fi tan\u0131k A.O.’ya anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fahsi ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucunda .. Adliye’sinde A.\u00c7. isimli bir savc\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenince e\u015finin doland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek durumu emniyet m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihbar etti\u011fi, \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n katliam tekrar aray\u0131p para talebinde bulunduklar\u0131, bunun \u00fczerine katliam ile irtibat\u0131 kesmeyen polis memurlar\u0131 katliam \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n istedi\u011fi paray\u0131 haz\u0131r etme ve isteklere yere b\u0131rakma nas\u0131l davranaca\u011f\u0131 konusunda bilgilendirdikleri, bunun \u00fczerine kat\u0131lan taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan zarf .. yak\u0131n\u0131nda daha \u00f6nceden istendi\u011fi \u015fekilde \u00e7al\u0131n\u0131n arkas\u0131na b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n ayr\u0131lmas\u0131ndan k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre sonra zarf\u0131n bulundu\u011fu yere gelen san\u0131k F.K. bu zarf\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda; san\u0131k F.K\/nin eyleminin zincirleme \u015fekilde doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa, di\u011fer san\u0131k A.B.’nin ise at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fine dair savunmas\u0131n\u0131n aksine inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 ve yeterli delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan beraatine y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 09\/12\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/5122 Esas, 2014\/20678 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar).<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131klar\u0131n katliam arayarak kendilerini polis olarak tan\u0131tt\u0131ktan sonra, kat\u0131lana arkadaki telsiz sesleri fonu e\u015fli\u011finde baz\u0131 \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n kimlik bilgilerini ele ge\u00e7irdiklerini, yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u015firketler kurmak suretiyle kendisini bor\u00e7land\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bu \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131 yakalamak i\u00e7in operasyon ba\u015flatt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bankada bulunan paray\u0131 hi\u00e7 kimse ile konu\u015fmadan \u00e7ekerek verdikleri hesap numaras\u0131na yat\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemeleri \u00fczerine kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n\u00a0B. il\u00e7esine giderek bankadan paras\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ekti\u011fi, bu s\u0131rada kat\u0131lan\u0131n e\u015fiyle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konferans g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinde evde polislerin arama yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 e\u015finin kendisine bildirmesi \u00fczerine san\u0131klara daha fazla inanan kat\u0131lan\u0131n S. il merkezine giderek san\u0131klar\u0131n y\u00f6nlendirmesiyle vermi\u015f olduklar\u0131 hesap numaralar\u0131na para yat\u0131rmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu kapsamda san\u0131k A.F\/nin, x bankas\u0131ndaki hesab\u0131na 10.000 TL, Y bankas\u0131ndaki hesab\u0131na ise 15.000 TL yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131; 15.015 liray\u0131 ise, san\u0131k Y.\u00d6\/n\u00fcn Z bankas\u0131ndaki hesab\u0131na g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca 1.400 TL tutar\u0131ndaki telefon kont\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc san\u0131klar\u0131n bildirdi\u011fi \u00e7e\u015fitli telefonlara y\u00fckledi\u011fi, san\u0131k A.F\/nin 25.000 TL’yi bankadan \u00e7ekebilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n, san\u0131k Y.\u00d6\/n\u00fcn hesab\u0131na yat\u0131r\u0131lan paran\u0131n bloke edilmesi nedeniyle \u00e7ekilemedi\u011fi, san\u0131k A.n\u0131n kat\u0131lan taraf\u0131ndan yat\u0131r\u0131lan paray\u0131 … ilindeki iki farkl\u0131 bankadan \u00e7ekti\u011fini kabul etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerinin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa dair mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 02\/06\/2014 Tarih ve 2014\/9722 Esas, 2014\/10874 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Kont\u00f6r doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, hatt\u0131n kim taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, olayda \u00f6rg\u00fctsel bir ili\u015fki bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, hatt\u0131 fiili olarak kullanan ki\u015fi ile hatt\u0131n resmi sahibi aras\u0131nda irtibat bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Somut olayda; … il\u00e7esinde oturan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, … g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 11.50 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda, kat\u0131lan M.T\/yi … numaral\u0131 telefondan arayarak, kendisini savc\u0131 M.O olarak tan\u0131tt\u0131ktan sonra, ad\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f kartlar bulundu\u011funu, bu kartlarla ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn i\u015flem yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bunlar\u0131 yakalayabilmek i\u00e7in baz\u0131 telefon numaralar\u0131na para yat\u0131rmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine kat\u0131lan\u0131n, karts\u0131z i\u015flemlerle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n belirtti\u011fi \u00e7ok say\u0131daki GSM hatt\u0131na 9.500,00 TL civar\u0131nda para y\u00fckledi\u011fi, doland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlay\u0131nca da, \u015fikayette bulunmak ve zaman kazanmak amac\u0131yla e\u015fi olan tan\u0131k K.T. ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n telefonla konu\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fik hatlardan arayarak tan\u0131\u011fa a\u00e7\u0131k hat kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu hatlar\u0131n g\u00fcvenilir oldu\u011funu, bir \u015fey oldu\u011funda hatt\u0131 kendisinin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti\u011fi takdirde i\u015ften kurtulabilece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, bu \u015fekilde ya\u015fanan telefon trafi\u011finin ard\u0131ndan tan\u0131k ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n … tarihinde A. ilinde bulu\u015fmaya karar verdiklerinden ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 21.50’de … havaalan\u0131nda g\u00fcvenlik g\u00f6revlilerince yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n … il\u00e7esinde oldu\u011fu s\u0131rada, … g\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6\u011flen saatlerinde A ilinde oturan kat\u0131lan \u00ce.G\/nin kullanmakta oldu\u011fu … numaral\u0131 telefonu, … no’lu GSM hatt\u0131ndan arayarak kendisini … karakolundan polis memuru M.\u00c7 olarak tan\u0131tt\u0131ktan sonra ad\u0131na 3 adet telefon hatt\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bunlar\u0131 ve kimlik bilgilerini kullanarak insanlar\u0131n doland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ki\u015fileri takip edip, operasyon yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bankaya giderek ATM’den kont\u00f6r g\u00f6ndermesi gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan\u0131n buna inanmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine kendisini savc\u0131 M.Y. olarak tan\u0131tan birisine telefonu aktard\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu y\u00fczden endi\u015feye kap\u0131lan ancak s\u00f6yleneni ATM ba\u015f\u0131nda yapmakta teredd\u00fct eden \u0130.\u00d6\/n\u00fcn emniyette g\u00f6revli bir arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131 aramas\u0131 \u00fczerine doland\u0131r\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenip i\u015flem yapmayarak \u015fikayette bulundu\u011fu, yine ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 14:00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu kez … numaral\u0131 hat ile … Merkez Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan kat\u0131lan S.\u00d6\/n\u00fcn kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 cep telefonunu arayarak kendisini 1 \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’nde g\u00f6revli polis\u00a0memuru olarak tan\u0131tt\u0131ktan sonra, kat\u0131lana kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefonun ba\u015fka biri ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011funu,… bankas\u0131 hesab\u0131ndan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne para havalesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, takibe al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle … bankas\u0131ndan havale i\u015flemleri yap\u0131p karakola gelmesini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, buna inanan kat\u0131lan\u0131n hat\u0131rlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 GSM hatt\u0131na … Bankas\u0131 … \u015fubesi ATM’sinden karts\u0131z i\u015flemle 1.575,00 TL g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi, daha sonra \u015f\u00fcphelenerek … karakoluna gitti\u011finde M.\u00c7. isminde bir polis memurunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlayarak \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada \u00fczerinde \u00e7\u0131kan telefonlar\u0131n IMEI numaralar\u0131n\u0131n HTS incelemelerinde, gerek kat\u0131lanlar S. ve B. ile konu\u015fmu\u015f oldu\u011fu, gerekse de tan\u0131k K. ile … tarihinde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc … numaral\u0131 hatt\u0131 kullanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi, tan\u0131k ile kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n ifadelerinde, telefonda konu\u015ftuklar\u0131 ki\u015finin sesinin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sesiyle birebir \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc belirttikleri anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lanlardan M. ve S\/ye y\u00f6nelik eylemlerinin doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, B.’ye kar\u015f\u0131 ise doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011fa te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa dair mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 05\/05\/2014 Tarih ve 2014\/8936 Esas, 2014\/8767 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Kendisini polis olarak tan\u0131t\u0131p de\u011fi\u015fik bahanelerle kont\u00f6r istenmesi eylemi, di\u011fer ko\u015fullar bulunmuyor ise, TCK 157\/1 maddesi kapsam\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

San\u0131k C.G.’nin, ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan … numaral\u0131 telefon ile ma\u011fdur S.G.’nin kullanmakta oldu\u011fu … nolu telefonu arayarak kendisini … Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’nde g\u00f6revli olarak tan\u0131tt\u0131ktan sonra ma\u011fdurun kullanmakta oldu\u011fu telefonla e\u015fine uygunsuz mesajlar \u00e7ekildi\u011fini soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fcklerini internetten \u00e7ekilen mesaj\u0131 tespit edebilmek i\u00e7in sonradan bedeli emniyetten \u00f6denmek kayd\u0131yla toplam 36 adet, her biri 250’lik olmak \u00fczere kont\u00f6r istedi\u011fi, ma\u011fdurun bu kont\u00f6rleri g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi, 8 adet daha istedi\u011finde ma\u011fdurun durumu polise bildirdi\u011fi, san\u0131k C\/nin bu \u015fekilde \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 11\/06\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/17758 Esas, 2014\/11673 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Kont\u00f6r doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, telefon numaras\u0131n\u0131n kim ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, filen numaran\u0131n kimin taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, abonelik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesindeki imzan\u0131n kime ait oldu\u011fu \u00f6nemlidir.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Kat\u0131lan\u0131n, san\u0131\u011fa ait oldu\u011fu tespit edilen … numaral\u0131 hattan arand\u0131\u011f\u0131, kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon ile \u00fcst d\u00fczey komutanlar\u0131n aranarak ve SMS g\u00f6nderilerek hakaret edildi\u011finin s\u00f6ylendi\u011fi, arkadan gelen telsiz sesleri ve polis konu\u015fmalar\u0131 ile g\u00fcven telkin edilip, faillerin yakalanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kont\u00f6r istendi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan\u0131n toplamda 26 adet 250 kont\u00f6r ve 5 adet de 100 kont\u00f6r \u015fifresini san\u0131\u011fa verdi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi somut olayda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kendisinden habersiz olarak ad\u0131na hat \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, san\u0131\u011fa ait abone s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin asl\u0131 getirtilip imza ve yaz\u0131lar \u00fczerinde bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, bu hatta ili\u015fkin ileti\u015fimin tespiti kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndan bu numara ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fen \u015fah\u0131slar tespit edilip fiilen su\u00e7a konu numaray\u0131 kimin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131, baz istasyonu bilgilerine g\u00f6re de san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adresinin bulundu\u011fu yerden sinyal verilip verilmedi\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmadan sadece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131na itibar edilerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde beraat h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 25\/12\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/6434 Esas, 2014\/22194 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar).<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.11\u00a0\u00a0Arac\u0131n Kilometresini D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmek Suretiyle Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, m\u00fc\u015ftekiye satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131n kilometresini indirmek suretiyle haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmesinde doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u olu\u015fur.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n galericilik yapan san\u0131ktan 1.5.300 TL bedel kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ara\u00e7 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, arac\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra yap\u0131lan kontrol\u00fcnde 72.000 kilometrede oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin bir ar\u0131zas\u0131 nedeniyle arac\u0131 servise g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, burada yap\u0131lan kontrolde arac\u0131n 100,000 kilometrede oldu\u011fu, bak\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n 2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n arac\u0131n kilometresini de\u011fi\u015ftirmek suretiyle kendisine haks\u0131z yarar sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu eylemiyle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n arac\u0131n kilometresinde oynama yaparak hile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fekilde kat\u0131lan\u0131n denetim imkan\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6zel bir bak\u0131m sayesinde durumun farkedildi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n TCK’n\u0131n 157\/1 maddesi gere\u011fince mahkumiyetine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 10\/09\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/3449 Esas, 2014\/14378 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131k S.’nin, kendisine ait 2006 model … marka ve yakla\u015f\u0131k 160.000 km’deki arac\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6stergesinde oynama yaparak 84.478 km’ye indirdikten sonra de\u011ferinin \u00fczerinde 14.500 TL’ye … tarihli noter sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle kat\u0131lan S\/ye satt\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n arac\u0131 almadan \u00f6nce A. ilinde \u00f6zel bir serviste test ettirdi\u011finde kilometresinin normal g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bunun \u00fczerine arac\u0131 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n sonradan arac\u0131 \u00c7. ilinde bulunan … servisine incelettirdi\u011finde arac\u0131n 19.01.2009 tarihi itibariyle 150.380 km’de oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n basit bir incelemeyle anla\u015f\u0131lamayacak ve ancak teknik inceleme sonucu tespiti m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olacak \u015fekilde y\u00fcksek olan kilometre g\u00f6stergesini teknik m\u00fcdahale ile d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrterek arac\u0131n\u0131 ger\u00e7ek de\u011ferinin \u00fczerinde satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 sabit olmakla doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun olu\u015ftu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 03\/07\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/21255 Esas, 2014\/13286 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Kilometresi indirilmi\u015f arac\u0131n internet arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile sat\u0131\u015fa \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, TCK’n\u0131n 158\/1-f maddesinin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir, e\u011fer ilandan sonra san\u0131kla ma\u011fdur bir \u015fekilde y\u00fcz y\u00fcze gelmi\u015fler ise eylem yine TCK 157\/1 kapsam\u0131nda kalacakt\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

San\u0131klar\u0131n hasarl\u0131 ve \u00e7ok say\u0131da bak\u0131m g\u00f6ren arac\u0131, kilometresinde de oynama yapmak suretiyle hileli hareketlerle kat\u0131lana satt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n iddia edildi\u011fi somut olayda; kat\u0131lan\u0131n ifadesinde su\u00e7a konu arac\u0131 www.araba.com<\/em> adresinden g\u00f6rerek be\u011fendi\u011fini, ancak belirtilen \u00f6zellikleri ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131ktan sonra yapt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 kontrolde anlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; su\u00e7a konu araca ili\u015fkin ilan incelenerek, niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re eylemin su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 158\/1-f maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin delillerin takdirinin \u00fcst dereceli A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’ne ait oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi yerine, yarg\u0131lamaya devamla yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 30\/01\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/10091 Esas, 2014\/1536 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar).<\/span><\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n arac\u0131n\u0131 satmak i\u00e7in internet ortam\u0131nda ilan verdi\u011fi, arac\u0131n 84,500 kilometrede ve kazas\u0131z oldu\u011funu ifade etti\u011fi, bunu g\u00f6ren kat\u0131lan\u0131n arac\u0131 almak i\u00e7in san\u0131kla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, 19.750 TL bedelle alma konusunda anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, … tarihinde noter sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131larak kat\u0131lan\u0131n arac\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n 04\/02\/2008 tarihinde arac\u0131 muayene i\u00e7in servise g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, \u00f6nceden iki kez kaza yapm\u0131\u015f ve kilometresinin de 25\/06\/2006 tarihli servis kayd\u0131na g\u00f6re 94.000 olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kilometreyi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcp kazay\u0131 gizleyerek kat\u0131lan\u0131 doland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lan taraf\u0131ndan arac\u0131 sat\u0131n al\u0131rken kontrol etmesine engel olmay\u0131p at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un unsuru olan hilenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131 itibariyle olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraatine dair mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 03\/03\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/17771 Esas, 2014\/3761 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.12. Hasarl\u0131 Arac\u0131n Ma\u011fdura Hasars\u0131z Diyerek Sat\u0131lmas\u0131<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131k, hasarl\u0131 arac\u0131 hasars\u0131z diyerek m\u00fc\u015ftekiye satm\u0131\u015f ise, olay\u0131n durumu ve yap\u0131lan hileye g\u00f6re, eylemin hukuki ihtilaf kapsam\u0131nda kal\u0131p kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Kat\u0131lan\u0131n, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n orta\u011f\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 zamanda yetkili temsilcisi oldu\u011fu \u00dc. Otomotiv adl\u0131 \u015firketten s\u0131f\u0131r kilometre olarak bir ara\u00e7 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu arac\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131k iki y\u0131l kadar kulland\u0131ktan sonra sat\u0131\u015fa \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu araca m\u00fc\u015fteri \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 \u00fczerine … yetkili servisi olan \u0130. A.\u015e. \u0130simli servise g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, burada yap\u0131lan kontrol sonucu ara\u00e7ta vuruk izleri oldu\u011fu ve bir\u00e7ok yerinin boyal\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespit edilerek tutana\u011fa ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yetkilisi oldu\u011fu \u00dc. Otomotiv A.\u015e’den temin edilen kay\u0131tlara g\u00f6re arac\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan sonra da rutin bak\u0131m ve muayenelerinin \u00dc. Otomotive ait serviste yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fterisi olan kat\u0131lana esasen hasarl\u0131 olan ve bu halde iken bak\u0131m ve boyamas\u0131 yap\u0131lan arac\u0131 yeni” 0 ” kilometre ara\u00e7 olarak yetkilisi oldu\u011fu \u015firket ad\u0131na pazarlay\u0131p satarak menfaat temin etti\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n do\u011frudan kat\u0131lana y\u00f6nelik hileli bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n basit bir inceleme ile ara\u00e7 \u00fczerindeki de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi tespit ettirebilece\u011fi ve bu haliyle hilenin yo\u011fun ve ustaca olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n iradesini fesada u\u011fratacak nitelikte bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n denetleme olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, di\u011fer taraftan kat\u0131lan\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu arac\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131k iki y\u0131l s\u00fcreyle kullanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda kaza yapma ve herhangi bir serviste tamir ettirip arac\u0131 boyatma ihtimalinin de mevcut oldu\u011fu, t\u00fcm bu nedenlerle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun unsurlann\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, somut olayda t\u00fcketici mahkemelerinde halli gereken ay\u0131pl\u0131 bir mal\u0131n sat\u0131lmas\u0131 ihtilaf\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, kat\u0131lan\u0131n hukuk mahkemelerinde her zaman dava a\u00e7\u0131p ispatlamas\u0131 halinde zarar\u0131m tazmin ettirme ihtimalinin bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7elerine dayanan mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 16\/01\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/10599 Esas, 2014\/479 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.13. Kap\u0131dan Sat\u0131\u015f Suretiyle Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

-Kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f yapan san\u0131k hileli hareketler yapar, ma\u011fdura hediye vs \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yler veya de\u011ferli bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc fahi\u015f bir fiyata satar ise, bu durumda doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u olu\u015fur, e\u011fer bir \u015firketin faaliyeti \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde su\u00e7 i\u015flenmi\u015fse eylemin TCK’n\u0131n 158\/1-h maddesi kapsam\u0131nda kalaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f i\u015fi yapan D. Limited \u015eirketi isimli bir \u015firketinin bulundu\u011fu, sa-nagm i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan temyiz d\u0131\u015f\u0131 D.ln, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n talimat\u0131yla, seksen iki ya\u015f\u0131nda olan ma\u011fdurun evine gelerek, kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f eleman\u0131 oldu\u011funu, yak\u0131nda yeni bir i\u015fyeri a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, yap\u0131lan hediye \u00e7ekili\u015finde ma\u011fdura hediye \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hediyenin al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in de bir al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirterek ger\u00e7ekte 100 TL de\u011ferindeki elektrikli s\u00fcp\u00fcrgeyi ma\u011fdura 825 Tl\/ye verdi\u011fi, yan\u0131nda hediye olarak verdi\u011fi mini f\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n da asl\u0131nda 30 TL de\u011ferinde oklu\u011fu, ma\u011fdurun s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi imzalad\u0131ktan sonra fiyat\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi, gelen eleman\u0131n, bir hafta sonra garantiyi getireceklerini, bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde kutuyu a\u00e7mamalar\u0131n\u0131, kutunun i\u00e7inde … marka hal\u0131 y\u0131kama makinesinin bulundu\u011funu, ayda sadece 20 TL taksit \u00f6denece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, buna inanan ma\u011fdur ve e\u015finin kutuyu a\u00e7mad\u0131klan, ma\u011fdurun, D\/ye 20 TL pe\u015fin para verdi\u011fi, bir s\u00fcre sonra kutuyu at\u0131klar\u0131nda, i\u00e7inde de\u011fersiz bir e\u015fyan\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ve s\u00f6z konusu e\u015fyan\u0131n belirtilen \u00f6zelliklere haiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bir s\u00fcre sonra da san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdurun evine gelerek ayda 100 TL \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, aksi halde icraya vereceklerini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, b\u00f6ylece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, temyiz d\u0131\u015f\u0131 Dilekle birlikte eylem ve fikir birli\u011fi i\u00e7inde hareket ederek, hediye \u00e7ekili\u015fi bahanesiyle ma\u011fduru kand\u0131r\u0131p, onun okuma yazma bilmemesi ve ya\u015fl\u0131 olmas\u0131ndan da yararlanarak, getirdikleri \u00fcr\u00fcn hakk\u0131nda yanl\u0131\u015f bilgiler verip kutuyu a\u00e7mamalann\u0131 s\u00f6yledikleri, 20 TL paras\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131ktan sonra da ayl\u0131k 100 TL para isteyerek haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmek suretiyle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7una i\u015ftirak etti\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, san\u0131k, ma\u011fdur ve tan\u0131k beyanlan ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, su\u00e7un san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flendi\u011fi sabit olmakla bu gerek\u00e7elere dayanan mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 02\/07\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/20977 Esas, 2014\/13122 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

– San\u0131k M\/nin kat\u0131lana daha \u00f6nceden kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tansiyon aletinin taksitlerini d\u00fczenli \u00f6dedi\u011fi bahanesiyle, sat\u0131\u015f eleman\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f yerinin sahibi olan san\u0131k B. ile kat\u0131lan\u0131 tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k B\/nin beyaz e\u015fya sat\u0131\u015f\u0131yla ilgili i\u015f yerinin bulundu\u011funu, halen bir kampanyalann\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, 790 TL vergi \u00f6dedi\u011fi takdirde bir adet \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131r makinesi, bir adet televizyon ve bir adet hal\u0131 y\u0131kama makinesi alabilece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan\u0131n da kabul etti\u011fi, kat\u0131lana s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve 780 TL de\u011ferinde senet imzalatt\u0131ktan sonra, hediye oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledikleri bir adet su \u0131s\u0131t\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 ve bir adet… marka elektrik s\u00fcp\u00fcrgesi verdikleri, kat\u0131lan\u0131n bir s\u00fcre beklemesine ve taksitlerinin bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen kendisine vaat edilen e\u015fyalar\u0131n teslim edilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle san\u0131k B\/ye ait i\u015f yerine gitti\u011fi, san\u0131klar\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015f tarihli d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri kat\u0131lana verdikleri, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede san\u0131k M\/nin imzas\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede bir adet … marka elektrik s\u00fcp\u00fcrgesinin 390 TL’ye sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, oysa bunun ger\u00e7ek de\u011ferinin 90 TL oldu\u011fu, di\u011fer s\u00f6zle\u015fmede bir adet ket\u0131l\u0131n de\u011ferinin 390 TL oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi, ger\u00e7ek de\u011ferinin 50 TL oldu\u011fu, san\u0131klar\u0131n sadece vergisini \u00f6deyerek \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131r makinesi, televizyon ve hal\u0131 y\u0131kama makinesi vereceklerini s\u00f6yleyerek kat\u0131landan 780 TL de\u011ferinde senet ald\u0131klan ve vadettikleri e\u015fya yerine kat\u0131lan\u0131n istemedi\u011fi hediye olarak verdiklerini s\u00f6yledikleri 140 TL de\u011ferindeki su \u0131s\u0131t\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 ve el s\u00fcp\u00fcrgesi verdikleri olayda, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun olu\u015ftu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 01\/04\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/14731 Esas, 2014\/6107 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Su\u00e7 tarihleri itibariyle kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f yetkileri iptal edilen K. Limited \u015eirketi’nde pazarlamac\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n ikametlerine farkl\u0131 tarihlerde giderek \u00e7ekili\u015fle ev e\u015fyas\u0131 vereceklerini s\u00f6yleyerek bir zarf \u00e7ektirdi\u011fi, her birine koltuk tak\u0131m\u0131, f\u0131r\u0131n ve buzdolab\u0131 gibi nispeten daha pahal\u0131 olan hediyeler kazand\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek, \u015fimdilik kayd\u0131yla tencere seti ve mini f\u0131r\u0131n gibi \u00fcr\u00fcnler teslim ederek g\u00fcven olu\u015fturduklar\u0131, akabinde katmanlardan bir miktar nakit para al\u0131p, taksitli sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ve bono imzalatt\u0131ktan sonra, herhangi bir fatura ya da s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u00f6rne\u011fi vermeksizin, \u015firketin posta \u00e7eki hesab\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu ka\u011f\u0131t par\u00e7as\u0131 verdikten sonra \u00fccreti bu hesaba yat\u0131rmalar\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, \u015fimdilik kayd\u0131yla verdikleri \u00fcr\u00fcnleri a\u00e7madan yeni a\u00e7\u0131lacak ma\u011fazaya getirdiklerinde kendilerine \u00e7ekili\u015fle kazand\u0131klar\u0131 as\u0131l \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn teslim edilece\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek hileli hareketlerle haks\u0131z menfaat temin etti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n her bir kat\u0131lana y\u00f6nelik eylemi nedeniyle ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan mahkumiyetine dair kabulde isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 06\/03\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/9534 Esas, 2014\/4151 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131klar\u0131n, … tarihinde kat\u0131lan A.S\/nin ikamet etti\u011fi M. k\u00f6y\u00fcne … plakal\u0131 ara\u00e7 ile geldikleri, kendilerini kat\u0131lana B. il\u00e7e merkezinde faaliyet g\u00f6steren K. mobilyada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan elamanlar olarak tan\u0131tt\u0131klar\u0131, kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledikleri, kat\u0131lana kampanyalar\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirterek 5-6 adet zarf i\u00e7erisinden \u00e7ekili\u015f yapt\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131, kat\u0131lana 36 par\u00e7a yemek tak\u0131m\u0131 kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledikleri, bilahare kat\u0131lan’a ba\u015fka kampanyalar\u0131n\u0131n da oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyerek kendisine bir adet buzdolab\u0131, 1 adet derin dondurucu, 1 adet bula\u015f\u0131k makinas\u0131 ve 2 adet kanepe teslim edeceklerini vaadederek kat\u0131landan 1.500,00 TL para istedikleri, katilar\u0131m san\u0131klara 1.250,00 TL para verdi\u011fi, ancak san\u0131klann kat\u0131lana vaadettikleri e\u015fyalan teslim etmedikleri, san\u0131klann bu \u015fekilde hileli s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015flarla ikna ettikleri kat\u0131landan haks\u0131z menfaat elde ettikleri anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un s\u00fcbut buldu\u011funa dair kabul ve uygulamada bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 11\/02\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/8471 Esas, 2014\/2379 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131k, \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc piyasa fiyat\u0131na g\u00f6re fahi\u015f bir fiyata satm\u0131\u015f ise doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k kast\u0131n\u0131n var oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 pazarlama \u015firketinin temsilcisi olarak e\u015fi ile birlikte ya\u015fayan kat\u0131lana masaj aleti ile zay\u0131flama kemeri verip \u00fccretin 50.00 TL’sini pe\u015fin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, kalan 310 TL’nin de on taksit halinde \u00f6denece\u011fine dair 22\/04\/2009 tarihli kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini imzalatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, kalan taksitlerin \u00f6denmemesi \u00fczerine; \u015firketin, 23\/08\/2009 tarihli icra takibi \u00f6ncesi son \u00f6deme uyar\u0131s\u0131 g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi iddia edilen somut olayda; kat\u0131lan\u0131n e\u015fi olan F.C. \u0130le san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yan\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu iddia edilen bayan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k kimlik ve adres bilgileri tespit edilerek tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla duru\u015fmaya \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmalar\u0131 suretiyle bilgi ve g\u00f6rg\u00fclerinin sorulmas\u0131, sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine konu masaj aleti ve zay\u0131flama kemerinin rayi\u00e7 bedel \u00fczerinden sat\u0131l\u0131p sat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihteki piyasa de\u011ferlerinin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p\u00a0t\u00fcm deliller birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun takdir ve tayini\u00a0yerine eksik incelemeyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 30\/04\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/16354 Esas, 2014\/8544 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

Kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f yapan san\u0131k herhangi bir hile kullanmadan normal ticari bir faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctm\u00fc\u015f ise, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u olu\u015fmayacakt\u0131r.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, su\u00e7 tarihinde kat\u0131lan\u0131n ikamet etti\u011fi k\u00f6ye pazarlamac\u0131 olarak geldi\u011fi, akabinde kat\u0131lana tombala \u00e7ektirerek f\u0131r\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak f\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 alabilmesi i\u00e7in kendisinden e\u015fya almas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek kat\u0131lana bir adet s\u00fcp\u00fcrge ve televizyon satt\u0131\u011f\u0131, bunun kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kat\u0131lana 450 TLT\u0131k senet imzalatt\u0131r\u0131p f\u0131r\u0131n ile elektrik s\u00fcp\u00fcrgesini verdi\u011fi, televizyonu ise \u0130stanbul’a gitti\u011finde g\u00f6nderece\u011fini belirtti\u011fi, ancak g\u00f6ndermedi\u011fi, daha sonra kat\u0131lana telefon a\u00e7arak taksitleri g\u00f6ndermesini aksi halde kendisini icraya verece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, bu \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hileli hareketlerle haks\u0131z menfaat temin ederek doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lana kendisinin mal satmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesi ve kendilerinin \u00fcretici firma olduklar\u0131n\u0131 ve kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f yapmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 savunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131yla olu\u015fan ili\u015fkinin ticari ili\u015fki mahiyetinde oldu\u011fu, eylemde doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esine dayanan mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 11\/09\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/2669 Esas, 2014\/14497 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015fta, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k kast\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u015fartlar\u0131, mal\u0131n piyasa fiyat\u0131 veya belgelerin ger\u00e7ek olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bakarak belirlemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Merkezi i ilinde bulunan N. Limited \u015eirketinin M. ili \u015eubesinin yetkilileri olan san\u0131klar\u0131n, kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f y\u00f6ntemiyle \u015firketin \u00fcretti\u011fi e\u011fitim setlerini pazarlad\u0131klar\u0131, \u015firketin pazarlama eleman\u0131 olan san\u0131k \u00d6.Y\/nin kat\u0131lan\u0131n evine gelerek 1 bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00fcnyesinde e\u011fitim seti satt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve ayr\u0131ca \u015firkete ait dershanede \u00fccretsiz olarak \u00f6zel e\u011fitim verdiklerini s\u00f6yleyerek kat\u0131lana e\u011fitim setini satt\u0131\u011f\u0131, 06\/01\/2009 tarihli sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile 790 TL fiyata e\u011fitim setini sat\u0131n alan kat\u0131lan\u0131n sonras\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rma neticesinde; \u00e7ocuklara herhangi bir \u00f6zel e\u011fitimin verilmedi\u011fini tespit etmesi \u00fczerine \u015firket yetkililerinden paras\u0131n\u0131n iadesini istedi\u011fi; ancak s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye g\u00f6re yedi g\u00fcnl\u00fck iade s\u00fcresini ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle paras\u0131n\u0131n iade edilmeyerek haks\u0131z menfaat temin edildi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda;<\/p>\n

Olu\u015fa, san\u0131klar\u0131n savunmalar\u0131na, kat\u0131lan\u0131n a\u015famalardaki beyanlar\u0131na, tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; kat\u0131lan ile N. Limited \u015eirketi aras\u0131nda imzalanan … tarihli sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u00e7eri\u011fi incelendi\u011finde; \u015fartlar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede cayma hakk\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck puntolarla belirtilerek \u00f6deme \u015fartlar\u0131, vade ve miktarlar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi, s\u00f6zle\u015fme i\u00e7eri\u011finde; dershanede veya ba\u015fka bir yerde \u00f6zel olarak herhangi bir e\u011fitim verilece\u011fine dair bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, san\u0131klar\u0131n a\u015famalarda verdikleri ifadelerinde; e\u011fitim setinin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca \u00f6zel ders verilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir vaatte bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, sadece e\u011fitim CD lerin kullan\u0131m\u0131 hususunda \u00f6zel olarak destek verdiklerini savunduklar\u0131 ve ayr\u0131ca san\u0131klar\u0131n ibraz ettikleri iade makbuzlar\u0131na g\u00f6re de; cayma hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanan veya maddi imkans\u0131zl\u0131k nedeniyle \u00f6demeyi yapamayan bir\u00e7ok ki\u015finin paras\u0131n\u0131n iade edildi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131klar\u0131n, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturabilecek nitelikte hileli hareketler sergilediklerine ili\u015fkin somut ve kesin bir delil elde edilemedi\u011fi, kimse, i\u015flendi\u011fi zaman y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Kanun’un su\u00e7 saymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir fiilden dolay\u0131 cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131; ve hi\u00e7 kimse, i\u015flendi\u011fi zaman ulusal veya uluslararas\u0131 hukuka g\u00f6re su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmayan bir eylem veya ihmalden dolay\u0131 su\u00e7lu bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin temel ilkeler dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki nitelikte oldu\u011fu ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 10\/03\/2014 Tarih ve 2012\/19497 Esas, 2014\/4325 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, bir \u015firkette kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f elaman\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken ma\u011fdurun evine gelerek, asl\u0131nda 4.750 TL de\u011ferinde olan R. marka temizlik robotunu 8.000 TL’ye satmak istedi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca ma\u011fdurun eski robotu kendilerine vermesi halinde 2.000 TL indirim yap\u0131labilece\u011fini belirttikten sonra ma\u011fdurun sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ve banka kredi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini imzalayarak \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc teslim ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, yakla\u015f\u0131k bir ay sonra ma\u011fdurun \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc almaktan vazge\u00e7ti\u011fi, bu konuda, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin bir suretinin kendisine verilmemesi nedeniyle cayma hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ilgili hukuk mahkemesine dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yan\u0131nda imzalanan kredi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin kendisinin yan\u0131lt\u0131larak imzalat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu \u015fekilde yap\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyle, bankaya bor\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131larak, bankan\u0131n icra takibine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ederek \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011fu, b\u00f6ylece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hileli hareketlerle haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmek suretiyle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, hile te\u015fkil eden bir eyleminin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin ma\u011fdur taraf\u0131ndan bilerek ve istenerek imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve eylemin, san\u0131kla ma\u011fdur aras\u0131nda hukuki ihtilaf mahiyetinde bulundu\u011fu, bu nedenlerle su\u00e7un yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, bu gerek\u00e7elere dayanan mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 08\/09\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/3031 Esas, 2014\/14014 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar)<\/span><\/p>\n

-Kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f yapan san\u0131k, bir \u015firketin faaliyeti \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde hareket ederek haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmi\u015f ise, eylem, TCK 158\/1-h maddesi kapsam\u0131nda kalacakt\u0131r.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

San\u0131klar\u0131n temyiz talebinde bulunmayan Me., M\u00fc. ve D.\u0130. ile birlikte Y. Firmas\u0131nda g\u00f6revli olup kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f i\u015fi ile u\u011fra\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu k\u00f6ye giderek … isimli televizyon kanal\u0131ndan geldiklerini, A. il\u00e7esi ve … ilinde ma\u011faza a\u00e7acaklar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ma\u011fdurlan veya yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fe alacaklar\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7ekili\u015f sonucu ma\u011fazadan hediye \u00fcr\u00fcn verdiklerini belirtip, \u00e7ekili\u015f yapmak y\u00f6ntemiyle \u00f6nce hediye verdikleri ve hediyeye sahip olabilmek i\u00e7in bir \u00fcr\u00fcn almalar\u0131 gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yleyip senet imzalatt\u0131klar\u0131, kap\u0131dan sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranarak ma\u011fdurlara herhangi bir belge vermemek suretiyle cayma haklar\u0131n\u0131 ellerinden ald\u0131klar\u0131, \u00e7ekili\u015fte \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledikleri bir k\u0131s\u0131n hediyeleri de teslim etmedikleri olayda; san\u0131k \u015e.’nin pazarlama i\u015fi yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mal teslim etti\u011fini, pazarlama i\u015fini C., D. ve M\u00fc\/n\u00fcn yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fterilerle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fini savunmas\u0131, tan\u0131k K\/nin eve gitti\u011finde m\u00fcd\u00fcr oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenen C. isimli ki\u015fi ile mal ta\u015f\u0131yan \u015e\u00fckr\u00fc isimli \u015fahs\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc beyan etmesi, san\u0131klar\u0131n Y. isimli bir i\u015fletmede \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; ger\u00e7e\u011fin ku\u015fkuya yer b\u0131rakmayacak \u015fekilde tespiti i\u00e7in Y. isimli \u015firketin ticaret siciline kay\u0131tl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015firket yetkilisinin kim oldu\u011fu, san\u0131klar\u0131n an\u0131lan \u015firkette \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n \u015firketteki yetki ve sorumluluklar\u0131 tespit edilip sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131klar\u0131n hukuki durumunun takdir ve tayini gerekirken eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, (Yarg\u0131tay 15. CD, 15\/12\/2014 Tarih ve 2013\/5154 Esas, 2014\/21227 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar).<\/span><\/p>\n

2.1.14. Kartopu S\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri Yapmak Suretiyle Haks\u0131z Menfaat Temin Etme<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Kartopu s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi<\/span><\/strong> ad\u0131 verilen, piramitsel bir yap\u0131lanma i\u00e7erisinde piramidin tepesinde yer alan ki\u015filerin menfaat sa\u011flad\u0131klar\u0131 olayda, dolan dincilik su\u00e7unun olu\u015fup olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde durulmal\u0131d\u0131r, bu sistemde, kat\u0131lanlar\u00a0belli bir miktar para \u00f6demekte ve bu miktarlar topland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7ok y\u00fcksek mebla\u011flara ula\u015fmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Genel Kurulu 24.11.1998 tarih ve ve 280\/359 E. K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda,<\/span> san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, bir sistem kurup, para toplamak ve organizasyonda g\u00f6rev alacak ki\u015fileri saptad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kurucu olarak kendisine T. ve T\u00fcrkiye Direkt\u00f6r\u00fc payesini verdi\u011fi, l\u00fcks yerlerde yemekli ve m\u00fczikli toplant\u0131lar d\u00fczenledi\u011fi, toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lanlann kendi ara\u00e7lar\u0131yla toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lmalar\u0131 ve toplant\u0131dan hemen sonra yine ara\u00e7lar\u0131yla kimse ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeden ayr\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lan konu\u015fmalarla 26 \u00fclkede organize olduklar\u0131, iflas etmelerinin s\u00f6z konusu olmayaca\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde telkinde bulunuldu\u011fu, \u00fcyelere gizlilik anla\u015fmas\u0131 imzalat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, kabul ba\u015fvurusunda uluslararas\u0131 bir yap\u0131land\u0131rma i\u00e7inde olduklar\u0131m g\u00f6sterecek T. ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131m kulland\u0131klar\u0131, gizlilik anla\u015fmas\u0131 ile organizasyon hakk\u0131nda ki\u015filerin birbirlerini bilgilendirmeleri engellenip, konu\u015fulanlar\u0131n gizli kalmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, konu\u015fmac\u0131lara \u00e7e\u015fitli matematiksel tablolar ve i\u015flemlerle \u00fcye olduklar\u0131nda \u00e7ok para kazanacaklar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde telkin ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunuldu\u011fu, kendi servetlerinden \u00f6rnekler verilerek bu sistemin \u00e7ok kazan\u00e7l\u0131 bir sistem oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinin kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n zihninde olu\u015fturuldu\u011fu, \u00fcye olmaya karar verenlere hemen form imzalat\u0131larak alk\u0131\u015flarla, t…l\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilerek tebrik edildi\u011fi ve kendisine lider unvan\u0131 verildi\u011fi, tahsil edilen paralarm T., Direkt\u00f6r, sistem m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc, sistem m\u00fcd\u00fcr yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131, sistem dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131, sistem y\u00f6neticisi, lider ve data aras\u0131nda payla\u015ft\u0131nld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fekilde kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n inceleme ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma e\u011filiminin etkisiz hale getirildi\u011fi, bu organizasyon i\u00e7inde san\u0131k H’nin, T..n ve Direkt\u00f6r, san\u0131k F’nin, \u0130stanbul sistem m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc, A.H\/nin \u0130. ili sistem m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc, S\/nin sistem m\u00fcd\u00fcr yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131, L., R. ve T\/nin data ad\u0131na toplant\u0131lara kat\u0131l\u0131p, bu kurulu\u015f adma faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fckleri, \u00fcye kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131 tuttuklan ve kuryelik yapt\u0131klar\u0131, bu san\u0131klar\u0131n eylem birli\u011fi i\u00e7erisinde^ hile ve desiselerle ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n fikri faaliyetlerini etkiledikleri, onlarda psikolojik bir k\u00f6rl\u00fck yaratt\u0131klar\u0131, matematiksel i\u015flem ve tablolarla \u00fcyelerde hatal\u0131 bir inan\u00e7 meydana getirdikleri, \u00e7ok para kazan\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 vaadi, y\u00fcksek vol\u00fcml\u00fc m\u00fczik, devaml\u0131 alk\u0131\u015flarla kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnme yetene\u011finin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, olu\u015fan hatal\u0131 inan\u00e7 ve kanaatin devam\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, belirtilen\u00a0san\u0131klar\u0131n toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lmalar\u0131ndan \u00fcye olunmas\u0131na kadar ki zaman i\u00e7erisinde ustaca haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f mizansen ve yalanlarla ma\u011fdurlar\u0131 kand\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131, kullan\u0131lan hile ve desisenin ma\u011fdurlarm bulunduklar\u0131 s\u00fcbjektif durum nazara almd\u0131\u011fmda kand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte oldu\u011fu, san\u0131klar\u0131n ger\u00e7ek durumu a\u00e7\u0131klamad\u0131klar\u0131, zira sistem gere\u011fi zincirin halkalar\u0131 geni\u015fledik\u00e7e \u00fcye temin etmenin zorla\u015faca\u011f\u0131, belli bir m\u00fcddet sonra \u00fcye temininin imkans\u0131z hale gelece\u011fi ve sistemin bu a\u015famada \u00e7\u00f6kece\u011fi, son \u00fcye olanlar\u0131n bu i\u015fleyi\u015f i\u00e7erisinde para kazan\u0131m\u0131 olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu durumun bilin\u00e7li olarak gizlendi\u011fi, bu eylemler nedeniyle ma\u011fdurlar zarara u\u011frat\u0131larak san\u0131klar\u0131n haks\u0131z kazan\u00e7 elde ettikleri, bir k\u0131s\u0131m ma\u011fdurlarm ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta \u00f6dedikleri kat\u0131l\u0131m bedelini daha sonra kendilerinin de \u00fcye bulmak suretiyle zararlar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131klar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan olu\u015fan su\u00e7u ortadan kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fekilde san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerinin hukuki boyuttan \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p cezai sorumlulu\u011fu gerektiren doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u niteli\u011fini ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.” denilerek doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun olu\u015ftu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Ancak, y\u00f6netici kadrosunda bulunmayan, bir unvan almam\u0131\u015f olan, sisteme sonradan girip Ceza Genel Kurulu kararmda a\u00e7\u0131klanan hileli hareketlere kat\u0131lmay\u0131p, sisteme \u00fcye olunmas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyip bu ki\u015filerin \u015firketle s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalamalar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6neren ve bu suretle yeni \u00fcyelerin aidat\u0131ndan pay alan \u00fcyelerin eylemleri doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturmayacakt\u0131r. Bu ki\u015filer kand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 hareketlerde bulunmam\u0131\u015flar, sistemi anlatt\u0131klar\u0131 ki\u015filer kurulu\u015fa ba\u015fvurup oradan gerekli bilgileri ald\u0131ktan sonra kendi iradeleri ile s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Yeni \u00fcyeyi kurulu\u015fa g\u00f6nderen eski \u00fcyenin hareketlerinin aldatma niteli\u011fine sahip oldu\u011fu kabul edilemez.<\/p>\n

YARGITAY 15. Ceza Dairesi<\/span>
\nEsas: 2012\/18721\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span>
\nKarar: 2014\/11459<\/span><\/p>\n

Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n

Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in; failin bir kimseyi, kand\u0131rabilecek nitelikte hileli davran\u0131\u015flarla hataya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcp, onun veya ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131na, kendisine veya ba\u015fkas\u0131na yarar sa\u011flamas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Hile nitelikli bir yaland\u0131r. Fail taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hileli davran\u0131\u015f belli oranda a\u011f\u0131r, yo\u011fun ve ustaca olmal\u0131, sergileni\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ma\u011fdurun inceleme olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131racak nitelikte bir tak\u0131m hareketler olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Kullan\u0131lan hileli davran\u0131\u015flarla ma\u011fdur yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmeli ve bu yan\u0131ltma sonucu yalanlara inanan ma\u011fdur taraf\u0131ndan san\u0131k veya bir ba\u015fkas\u0131na haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kar sa\u011flanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Hilenin kand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 olaysal olarak de\u011ferlendirilmeli, olay\u0131n \u00f6zelli\u011fi, fiille olan ili\u015fkisi, ma\u011fdurun durumu, kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa gizlenen veya de\u011fi\u015ftirilen belgenin nitelikleri ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 nazara al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ticar\u00ee faaliyeti meslek olarak icra eden ki\u015filerin, g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fini sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla, bu su\u00e7un, tacir (ki\u015fisel olarak ticaretle u\u011fra\u015fan kimseler) veya \u015firket y\u00f6neticisi olan yada \u015firket ad\u0131na hareket eden ki\u015filerin ticar\u00ee faaliyetleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015flenmesi, TCK\u2019n\u0131n 158\/1-h bendinde nitelikli h\u00e2l kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Bu kavramlar T\u00fcrk Ticaret Kanunun ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re belirlenecektir. T\u00fcrk Ticaret Kanunu\u2019nun 14. maddesinde; Tacir, ki\u015fisel durumlar\u0131 ya da yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flerin niteli\u011fi nedeniyle yahut meslek ve g\u00f6revleri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, kanundan veya bir yarg\u0131 karar\u0131ndan do\u011fan bir yasa\u011fa ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir \u015fekilde ya da ba\u015fka bir ki\u015finin veya resm\u00ee bir makam\u0131n iznine gerek olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen izin veya onay almadan bir ticari i\u015fletmeyi i\u015fleten ki\u015fi de tacir say\u0131l\u0131r. \u201cdenilmektedir. Ticaret \u015firketleri,ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 124. maddesinde, Ticaret \u015firketleri; kollektif, komandit, anonim, limited ve kooperatif \u015firketlerden ibarettir. Bu Kanunda, kollektif ile komandit \u015firket \u015fah\u0131s; anonim, limited ve sermayesi paylara b\u00f6l\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015f komandit \u015firket sermaye \u015firketi say\u0131l\u0131r\u201d \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu su\u00e7un faili tacir veya \u015firket y\u00f6neticisi yada \u015firket ad\u0131na hareket eden ki\u015fi yada kooperatif y\u00f6neticisi olabilir.<\/p>\n

\n

E\u2026 \u0130n\u015faat Mobilya Limited \u015eirketi\u2019nin yetkilisi olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ad\u0131 belirtilen \u015firketin yap\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcstlendi\u011fi E\u2026 Toplu Konut B\u00f6lgesi 46512 ada 1 numaral\u0131 parsel \u00fczerindeki 2 E 12. Blok 3 numaral\u0131 daireyi 31\/03\/2005 tarihinde Ankara 13. Noterli\u011finde d\u00fczenlenen sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle kat\u0131lan K\u2026\u2019e satmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, ayn\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc 08.01.2007 tarihinde d\u00fczenledi\u011fi sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile kat\u0131lan M\u2026\u2019a ikinci defa satarak paras\u0131n\u0131 da pe\u015fin olarak ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayn\u0131 yerde bulunan 4 H 7. Blok 6 numaral\u0131 daireyi 09\/02\/2005 tarihinde Ankara 13.Noterli\u011finde d\u00fczenlenen sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle kat\u0131lan T\u2026\u2019a satmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ayn\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc 30.05.2007 tarihinde d\u00fczenledi\u011fi sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile kat\u0131lan M\u2026\u2019a ikinci defa satarak paras\u0131n\u0131 pe\u015fin olarak ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayn\u0131 yerde bulunan 4 H 7. Blok 13 numaral\u0131 daireyi 21\/07\/2005 tarihinde Ankara 13.Noterli\u011finde d\u00fczenlenen sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle kat\u0131lan \u0130\u2026e satmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ayn\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc 15.03.2008 tarihinde d\u00fczenledi\u011fi sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile kat\u0131lan B\u2026\u2019a ikinci defa satarak paras\u0131n\u0131 pe\u015fin olarak ald\u0131\u011f\u0131; bu sat\u0131\u015flara konu olan s\u00f6z konusu dairelerin in\u015faatlar\u0131n\u0131 tamamlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi kat\u0131lanlardan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 paralar\u0131 da iade etmedi\u011fi, bu \u015fekilde \u015firket y\u00f6neticisi olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ticari faaliyeti kapsam\u0131nda \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 olan nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

1-San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda kat\u0131lanlar M\u2026ve B\u2026\u2019a y\u00f6nelik eylemlerinden verilen mahkumiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan temyiz taleplerinin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

\n

Olu\u015fa, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmalar\u0131na, tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na, sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerine, sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerine ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6re; \u015firket y\u00f6neticisi olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ticari faaliyeti kapsam\u0131nda, kat\u0131lanlar M\u2026 ile B\u2026\u2019a, daha \u00f6nce ba\u015fka \u015fah\u0131slara noterde d\u00fczenlenen sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri ile satmay\u0131 vaat etti\u011fi daireleri satarak ve paralar\u0131n\u0131 pe\u015fin olarak almak suretiyle haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmesi \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclen eyleminin nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa dair kabulde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ile san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine,ancak;<\/p>\n

Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan verilen hapis cezalar\u0131 alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan tayin edildi\u011fi halde adli para cezalar\u0131 belirlenirken yeterli ve yasal gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeksizin, ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle tam g\u00fcn say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n asgari hadden uzakla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle belirlenerek san\u0131\u011fa fazla ceza tayini,<\/p>\n

Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ve san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenlerle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8.maddesi uyar\u0131nca uygulanmas\u0131 gereken CMUK\u2019n\u0131n 321.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA; fakat, bu ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yeniden duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 322.maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan; h\u00fck\u00fcmde yer alan \u201c5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019n\u0131n 158\/1.h,52\/2 maddeleri gere\u011fince sonu\u00e7 olarak verilen 1000 g\u00fcn adli para cezas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ayn\u0131 kanunun 52. maddesi gere\u011fince g\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 20.00 TL\u2019den olmak \u00fczere 20000 TL adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na\u201d ifadelerinin yerine \u201c5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019n\u0131n 158\/1.h maddesi gere\u011fince 5 g\u00fcn adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 52\/2 maddeleri gere\u011fince verilen 5 g\u00fcn adli para cezas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 20.00 TL\u2019den olmak \u00fczere sonu\u00e7 olarak 100.00 TL adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na\u201d, yaz\u0131lmak suretiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n

2- San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda kat\u0131lanlar T\u2026, \u0130\u2026ile K\u2026\u2019e y\u00f6nelik eylemlerinden dolay\u0131 verilen beraat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan temyiz taleplerinin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lanlar \u0130\u2026, K\u2026 ve T\u2026\u2019a s\u00f6z konusu daireleri sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri ile satmay\u0131 vaat etmesi ve sonras\u0131nda dairelerin in\u015faatlar\u0131n\u0131 tamamlamay\u0131p hileli hareketler sergileyerek ayn\u0131 daireleri ba\u015fka \u015fah\u0131slara satarak kat\u0131lanlar\u0131 aldatmak suretiyle haks\u0131z menfaat temin etmesi \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclen eylemlerinin nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131narak mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden delillerin takdir ve de\u011ferlendirilmesinde yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde beraat karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n

Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin bu sebepten dolay\u0131 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK\u2019n\u0131n 321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 09.06.2014 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0BAS\u0130T DOLANDIRICILIK SU\u00c7U TCK 157 2.1. Uygulamada S\u0131k\u00e7a Rastlan\u0131lan Basit Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k Halleri 2.1.1. Bul Karay\u0131 Al Paray\u0131 Oyunu S\u00f6z konusu oyunda, san\u0131k veya san\u0131kla birlikte yan\u0131ndaki [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1919","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ceza-hukuku","category-makaleler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1919","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1919"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1919\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1919"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1919"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1919"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}