{"id":1403,"date":"2016-02-20T20:35:17","date_gmt":"2016-02-20T18:35:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/?p=1403"},"modified":"2023-11-27T18:29:12","modified_gmt":"2023-11-27T15:29:12","slug":"5237-sayili-turk-ceza-kanununda-olasi-kast-ve-bilincli-taksir-kavramlari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/5237-sayili-turk-ceza-kanununda-olasi-kast-ve-bilincli-taksir-kavramlari\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8221;5237&#8221; Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nda OLASI KAST ve B\u0130L\u0130N\u00c7L\u0130 TAKS\u0130R Kavramlar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"ead-preview\"><div class=\"ead-document\" style=\"position: relative;\"><iframe src=\"\/\/view.officeapps.live.com\/op\/embed.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Ftuncayilcim.av.tr%2Fv5%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F5237-Say%C4%B1l%C4%B1-T%C3%BCrk-Ceza-Kanunu-KAST-1.docx\" title=\"Embedded Document\" class=\"ead-iframe\" style=\"width: 100%;height: 500px;border: none;\"><\/iframe><\/div><p class=\"embed_download\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-content\/uploads\/5237-Say\u0131l\u0131-T\u00fcrk-Ceza-Kanunu-KAST-1.docx\" download>Download <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>ON\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Esas : 2021\/4625<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Karar : 2021\/6670<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Tarih : 07.10.2021<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Olay gecesi san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sevk ve idaresindeki otomobille, ya\u011f\u0131\u015fl\u0131 havada, ayd\u0131nlatman\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, h\u0131z s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 70 km olan, b\u00f6l\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015f ve \u00e7ift \u015feritli Devlet yolunda seyri s\u0131ras\u0131nda, arac\u0131n\u0131n direksiyon hakimiyetini kaybederek, ilk olarak solunda bulunan orta ref\u00fcj \u00fczerine \u00e7\u0131karak 25 metre s\u00fcr\u00fcklenip arac\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011f arka \u00e7amurlu\u011fu ile orta ref\u00fcj \u00fczerindeki ayd\u0131nlatma dire\u011fine \u00e7arpmas\u0131 akabinde, kar\u015f\u0131 y\u00f6n b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne ge\u00e7ip, bu b\u00f6l\u00fcmde kendisine ait sol \u015feritte seyreden kat\u0131lan &#8230; idaresindeki otomobil ile kafa kafaya \u00e7arp\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 olay neticesinde 1 ki\u015finin \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, tamam\u0131 san\u0131ktan \u015fikayet\u00e7i olan 3 ki\u015finin ise nitelikli \u015fekilde yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131; olaydan yakla\u015f\u0131k 3 saat 30 dakika sonra san\u0131\u011f\u0131n v\u00fccudundan al\u0131nan kan numunesi \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda d\u00fczenlenen Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Kimya \u0130htisas Dairesi&#8217;nin 16.12.2016 tarihli raporunda; san\u0131\u011fa ait kanda uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 maddelerden (5,6ng\/ml) esrar etkin maddesi THC metaboliti THC-COOH (tetrahidrokannabinolik asit), (8,6ng\/ml) MDA(Metilendioksiamfetamin), (30,5ng\/ml) MDMA (metilendioksimetamfetamin), kokain metabolitlerinden (1,7ng\/ml) Metilekgonin ile (53,2ng\/ml) Benzoilekgonin bulundu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanununun 48. maddesi ile Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi&#8217;nin 97. maddesinde; uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde alm\u0131\u015f olan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerin karayolunda ara\u00e7 s\u00fcrmelerinin yasak oldu\u011fu, uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde kullanarak karayolunda seyreden s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcler hakk\u0131nda 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f olup; <span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>mevzuattaki d\u00fczenlemeler kapsam\u0131nda, alkoll\u00fc ara\u00e7 kullanan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu alkol miktar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenli s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f yetene\u011fini ortadan kald\u0131racak d\u00fczeyde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tespit edilen alkol promil miktar\u0131 itibariyle s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn emniyetli ara\u00e7 sevk ve idare edebilecek durumda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusu tespit edilen alkol promil miktar\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenirken, uyu\u015fturucu madde alarak trafikte ara\u00e7 kullanan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan mevzuatta bu t\u00fcrden bir say\u0131sal \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm miktar\u0131na yer verilmemi\u015ftir.<\/strong><\/span> Bu itibarla ki\u015filerin uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde kullanarak karayolunda ara\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerin uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde alarak karayolunda emniyetli bir \u015fekilde ara\u00e7 sevk ve idare edemeyecekleri kabul edilirken, bunun i\u00e7in s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerin v\u00fccudundan al\u0131nacak kan, idrar veya t\u00fck\u00fcr\u00fck gibi \u00f6rnekler \u00fczerinde en yak\u0131n adli t\u0131p kurumu, adli tabiplik veya Sa\u011fl\u0131k Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;na ba\u011fl\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu\u015flar\u0131nda yap\u0131lacak inceleme neticesinde uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde kulland\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 aranmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mevzuatta yer alan d\u00fczenlemeler ile t\u00fcm dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fi incelendi\u011finde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n v\u00fccudundan kazadan 3 saat 30 dakika sonra al\u0131nan kan numunesi \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan incelemede, esrar ve kokain etken maddeleri ile amfetamin t\u00fcrevi MDA ve MDMA maddelerinin bulundu\u011funun tespit edilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde etkisi alt\u0131nda bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle kaza an\u0131nda g\u00fcvenli s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f yetene\u011fine sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde trafikte ara\u00e7 kullanarak, tamamen kusurlu eylemi ile 1 ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile birlikte 3 ki\u015finin de nitelikli \u015fekilde yaralanmas\u0131na sebebiyet verdi\u011fi eyleminde bilin\u00e7li taksir ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re tamamen kusurlu oldu\u011fu tespit ve kabul edilen san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda tayin edilen temel ceza miktar\u0131nda ve bilin\u00e7li taksir sebebiyle uygulanan artt\u0131r\u0131m miktar\u0131nda isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YARGITAY <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>E: 2013\/12-692<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>K: 2013\/587<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>K.T: 03.12.2013<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">*<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SANI\u011eIN TAKS\u0130RLE B\u0130R K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM\u00dcNE NEDEN OLMA SU\u00c7UNDAN CEZALANDIRILMASINA KARAR VER\u0130LEN OLAYDA, \u00d6ZEL DA\u0130RE \u0130LE YEREL MAHKEME ARASINDA OLU\u015eAN VE CEZA GENEL KURULUNCA \u00c7\u00d6Z\u00dcMLENMES\u0130 GEREKEN UYU\u015eMAZLIK SANI\u011eIN EYLEM\u0130N\u0130 TAKS\u0130RLE M\u0130 YOKSA B\u0130L\u0130N\u00c7L\u0130 TAKS\u0130R \u0130LE M\u0130 GER\u00c7EKLE\u015eT\u0130RD\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130N BEL\u0130RLENMES\u0130NE \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N OLDU\u011eU<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>*B\u0130L\u0130N\u00c7L\u0130 TAKS\u0130R BAS\u0130T TAKS\u0130R AYRIMI<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237k\/85, 22<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u00d6ZET\u0130:<\/span> S\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesi bulunmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n<\/strong> olay g\u00fcn\u00fc 20.30 sular\u0131nda lamba ile ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f yolda, kendisi ile ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde kald\u0131r\u0131m kenar\u0131nda ve kaplama i\u00e7erisinde y\u00fcr\u00fcyen \u00f6lene, arkas\u0131ndan \u00e7arpmas\u0131 \u015feklinde meydana gelen olayda, bilin\u00e7li taksirin uygulanma \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurularak fazla ceza tayini\u201d isabetsizli\u011finden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yerel mahkemece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ehliyetinin bulunmamas\u0131, eylemin bilin\u00e7li taksirle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fine gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f ise de, <strong>s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n ara\u00e7 kullanmak, tek ba\u015f\u0131na eylemin bilin\u00e7li taksirle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini g\u00f6stermemekte olup,<\/strong> nitekim taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme ve yaralama su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin temyiz incelemesini yapan \u00d6zel Dairece de s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesiz ara\u00e7 kullanmak tek ba\u015f\u0131na bilin\u00e7li taksir hali olarak kabul edilmemi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla, isabetsiz olan yerel mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir. Taksirle \u00f6l\u00fcme sebebiyet verme su\u00e7undan san\u0131k (H.Y.)\u2019\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nun 85\/1 ve 22\/3. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 2 y\u0131l 8 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin, (A.) 10. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 23.06.2010 g\u00fcn ve 613-716 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 12. Ceza Dairesince 04.06.2012 g\u00fcn ve 21409 \u2013 13906 say\u0131 ile; \u201cS\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesi bulunmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay g\u00fcn\u00fc 20.30 sular\u0131nda lamba ile ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f yolda, kendisi ile ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde kald\u0131r\u0131m kenar\u0131nda ve kaplama i\u00e7erisinde y\u00fcr\u00fcyen \u00f6lene, arkas\u0131ndan \u00e7arpmas\u0131 \u015feklinde meydana gelen olayda, bilin\u00e7li taksirin uygulanma \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurularak fazla ceza tayini\u201d isabetsizli\u011finden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkeme ise 03.10.2012 g\u00fcn ve 593 \u2013 644 say\u0131 ile; \u201c\u2026 Ehliyetsiz bir ki\u015finin her taraf\u0131 g\u00f6rebildi\u011fi, lamba ile ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir yolda kald\u0131r\u0131m kenar\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcyen ki\u015fiye \u00e7arparak \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne sebebiyet verdi\u011fi kabul edildi\u011fine g\u00f6re TCK\u2019nun 22\/3. maddenin uygulanmama gerek\u00e7esinin ne oldu\u011fu mahkememizce anla\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. TCK\u2019nun 22\/3. madde de bilin\u00e7li taksir eylemi d\u00fczenlendi\u011finde \u201c\u015fu hallerde bilin\u00e7li taksir olur\u201d \u015feklinde bir bilgi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re bu hususun takdiri yarg\u0131lama yapan mahkemeye b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ara\u00e7 kullanan bir ki\u015finin o arac\u0131 kullanma ehliyetinin bulunmas\u0131 yasal bir ko\u015fuldur. 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunda ehliyetsiz ara\u00e7 kullanman\u0131n kabahat nevi cezaya ba\u011flanmas\u0131 hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde verilecek cezaya bilin\u00e7li taksirin uygulanmas\u0131na engel te\u015fkil edemez. Bu husus kabul edildi\u011finde T\u00fcrkiye genelinde t\u00fcm ehliyetsiz ara\u00e7 kullanan ki\u015filerin neden olabilecekleri ya da neden olduklar\u0131 taksirli \u00f6l\u00fcm olaylar\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksir uygulanamaz sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar ki; bu husus hukuk prensiplerine ve hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da kapsaml\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi g\u00f6sterilecek olsa da ara\u00e7 kullanma ehliyeti bulunmayan bir ki\u015finin kald\u0131r\u0131m kenar\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcyen 19 ya\u015f\u0131nda bir ki\u015fiye tamamen ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f yolda vurmas\u0131 ve \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olmas\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na o arac\u0131 kullanma ehliyetinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n delili kabul edilmi\u015f ve bu nedenle bozma karar\u0131na uyulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u2026 Her \u015feyden \u00f6nce 01\/06\/2005 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK ile kusur oranlama i\u015flemi y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kusur oran\u0131 ne olursa olsun kanunda belirtilen cezan\u0131n alt s\u0131n\u0131rda olsa verilmesi h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 yapan hi\u00e7 bir mahkeme hi\u00e7 bir bilirki\u015fi raporuyla ba\u011fl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi hangi raporun hukuka uygun oldu\u011funu kabul etme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve iradesine sahiptir. Amerika Birle\u015fik Devletleri, \u0130ngiltere ve Anglosakson \u00fclkelerinde sadece ehliyetsiz ara\u00e7 kullanmak suretiyle \u00f6l\u00fcme sebebiyet veren ki\u015filer adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7undan yarg\u0131lanmaktad\u0131rlar. \u00dclkemizde bunu sa\u011flayacak bir yasa h\u00fckm\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesiz bir insan\u0131n ara\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 ancak hakimin verece\u011fi dengeli kararla ceza adaletine yard\u0131mc\u0131 olacakt\u0131r. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n bizzat s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesiz ara\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 asli kusurlu olsun, tali kusurlu olsun olayda her \u015feyden \u00f6nce kusurlu olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli bir nedendir. <strong>Kusurun asli, tali, birinci derecede, ikinci derecede olmas\u0131 sadece Asliye Hukuk Mahkemelerindeki tazminat davalar\u0131n\u0131n konusunu olu\u015fturan bir olgudur.<\/strong> San\u0131k sonu\u00e7 olarak s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesiz, ehliyetsiz bu yeteneklere haiz oldu\u011fu yasaca saptanmadan ara\u00e7 kullanarak 19 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki bir gencin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bilirki\u015fi, olmad\u0131 d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc bilirki\u015fi gibi yollara gidilip kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n ac\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 daha da art\u0131rmak yarg\u0131lama g\u00f6revi yapan hakim taraf\u0131ndan uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ve savunma bu gerek\u00e7elerle kabul edilmemi\u015ftir\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle direnerek, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ilk h\u00fck\u00fcmdeki gibi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn de san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 02.10.2013 g\u00fcn ve 289634 say\u0131l\u0131 \u201cbozma\u201d istekli tebli\u011fnamesi ile Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #333399;\"><strong>T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #333399;\"><strong>CEZA GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n taksirle bir ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilen olayda, \u00d6zel Daire ile yerel mahkeme aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemini taksirle mi, yoksa bilin\u00e7li taksir ile mi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011finin belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir. \u0130ncelenen dosya kapsam\u0131ndan; 21.03.2009 g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 20.30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesi bulunmayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sevk ve idaresindeki ara\u00e7 ile yan\u0131nda arkada\u015f\u0131 tan\u0131k (G.) oldu\u011fu halde seyir halinde iken, olay yeri olan (A.*) il\u00e7esi (F.\u00c7.) Mahallesi (\u2026) Caddeye geldi\u011finde, havan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k ve ya\u011f\u0131\u015fs\u0131z, zeminin asfalt ve kuru, seyir y\u00f6n\u00fcnde hafif e\u011fimli, yatayda virajl\u0131 ve 8 metre geni\u015fli\u011findeki iki y\u00f6nl\u00fc, lamba ile ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f yolda, ta\u015f\u0131t yolu i\u00e7erisinde kald\u0131r\u0131ma yak\u0131n yerde y\u00fcr\u00fcyen \u00f6len (E.)\u2019e arac\u0131n sa\u011f \u00f6n k\u0131sm\u0131 ile arkadan \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7arpma neticesi kald\u0131r\u0131ma f\u0131rlayan (E.)\u2019in olay yerinde \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u00e7arpmadan sonra ka\u00e7an ve ertesi g\u00fcn izinli olarak geldi\u011fi askeri birli\u011fe geri d\u00f6nen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ilk a\u015famada yakalanamamas\u0131 nedeniyle alkol muayenesinin yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay yerinde herhangi bir fren izine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda trafik polisi bilirki\u015finin d\u00fczenledi\u011fi raporda; \u201cyayan\u0131n yaya kald\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ta\u015f\u0131tlar\u0131 g\u00f6remeyecek \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin 138\/a ve b maddesini ihlal etti\u011finden birinci derecede kusurlu oldu\u011fu, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn ise h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 yol ve trafik durumuna g\u00f6re ayarlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 52. maddesini ihlal etmesi nedeniyle ikinci derecede kusurlu oldu\u011fu\u201d a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na yer verildi\u011fi, Mahkemece yap\u0131lan ke\u015fif sonras\u0131 d\u00fczenlenen bilirki\u015fi raporunda da ilk rapordaki benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler yap\u0131larak, \u00f6lenin birinci derecede, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ise ikinci derecede kusurlu oldu\u011funun bildirildi\u011fi, Kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin talebi \u00fczerine dosyan\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi (A.) Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Trafik \u0130htisas Dairesince d\u00fczenlenen raporda ise; \u201c\u2026S\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn ayd\u0131nlatmas\u0131 olan yolda seyrederken, yola gereken dikkatini vermedi\u011fi, h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne ve mahal \u015fartlar\u0131na g\u00f6re ayarlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dalg\u0131n ve dikkatsiz bi\u00e7imde seyrini s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcp \u00f6n\u00fcnde yolun sa\u011f kenar\u0131nda kald\u0131r\u0131ma yak\u0131n yerde ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde y\u00fcr\u00fcmekte olan yayaya tehlikeli bi\u00e7imde yakla\u015f\u0131p arkadan \u00f6nlemsiz-ce \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda asli kusurlu oldu\u011fu, yayan\u0131n ise gece vakti yolun kenar\u0131ndaki 3 metre geni\u015fli\u011finde olan yaya kald\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kullanabilece\u011fi halde bu yeri kullanmay\u0131p kald\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n kenar\u0131na yak\u0131n vaziyette, ta\u015f\u0131t yolu i\u00e7erisinde ve ara\u00e7lara s\u0131rt\u0131 d\u00f6n\u00fck \u015fekilde yol boyunca y\u00fcr\u00fcmekle kendi can g\u00fcvenli\u011fini ve trafik g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, dikkatsizli\u011fi tedbirsizli\u011fi kurallara ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareketiyle sebebiyet verdi\u011fi ve s\u00f6z konusu otomobilin \u00e7arpmas\u0131na maruz kalarak kendi \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle sonu\u00e7lanan olayda tali kusurlu oldu\u011fu\u2026\u201d bilgisinin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, Tan\u0131klar (F.) ve (C.)\u2019in a\u015famalardaki beyanlar\u0131nda; olay yerinin kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda bulunan kald\u0131r\u0131mda y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fckleri esnada \u00f6lenin yolun kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda cadde \u00fczerinde kald\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n kenar\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrken arkas\u0131ndan h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde gelen arac\u0131n fren yapmadan \u00f6lene \u00e7arparak olay yerinden h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yolda ayd\u0131nlatma lambas\u0131 olup, yolun bo\u015f oldu\u011funu belirttikleri, Tan\u0131k (G.)\u2019nin beyan\u0131nda; olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda kendisinin de ara\u00e7ta oldu\u011funu, teyple u\u011fra\u015f\u0131rken bir anda \u00e7arpma sesi duydu\u011funu, herhangi bir kimseye \u00e7arpt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 fark etmedi\u011fini, arac\u0131n ortalama 50 km h\u0131zla gitti\u011fini ifade etti\u011fi, San\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u015famalardaki savunmalar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; askeri birli\u011finden 5 g\u00fcnl\u00fck izin alarak geldi\u011fini, arkada\u015f\u0131 ile ba-bas\u0131na ait otomobili izinsiz alarak gezmeye \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, kazan\u0131n tam olarak nas\u0131l oldu\u011funu anlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yolun karanl\u0131k ve hafif virajl\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in \u015fahs\u0131 g\u00f6remedi\u011fini, ehliyetinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in panikleyerek ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay an\u0131nda 50-60 km h\u0131zla gitti\u011fini savundu\u011fu, Anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir hukuki \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulabilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, taksir ve bilin\u00e7li taksir kavramlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Kural olarak su\u00e7; ancak kastla, kanunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilen hallerde ise taksirle de i\u015flenebilir, istisnai bir kusurluluk \u015fekli olan taksirde, failin cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in mutlaka kanunda a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nun 22\/2. maddesinde taksir; \u201cdikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n, su\u00e7un yasal tan\u0131m\u0131nda belirtilen neticesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmeyerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesidir\u201d \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6\u011fretide de benimsendi\u011fi \u00fczere, Ceza Genel Kurulunun bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda taksirin unsurlar\u0131;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- Fiilin taksirle i\u015flenebilen bir su\u00e7 olmas\u0131,<br \/>\n2- Hareketin iradi olmas\u0131,<br \/>\n3- Sonucun istenmemesi,<br \/>\n4- Hareket ile sonu\u00e7 aras\u0131nda nedensellik ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131,<br \/>\n5- Sonucun \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclememi\u015f olmas\u0131, \u015feklinde kabul edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taksirli su\u00e7larda da, gerek icrai hareketin gerekse ihmali hareketin iradi olmas\u0131 ve meydana gelen neticenin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. \u0130radi bir davran\u0131\u015f bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde taksirden bahsedilemeyece\u011fi gibi, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemeyecek bir sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi halinde de failin taksirli su\u00e7tan sorumlulu\u011funa gidilemeyecektir.<br \/>\nSonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinde, ma\u011fdurun taksirli davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n da etkisinin bulunmas\u0131 halinde, di\u011fer taksirli davran\u0131\u015f nedensellik ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kesmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece bu durum failin taksirli sorumlulu\u011funu ortadan kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi, taksirin niteli\u011fini de de\u011fi\u015ftirmez. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nda kusurun derecelendirilmesi suretiyle herhangi bir ceza indirimi s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu hal ancak temel cezan\u0131n tayininde dikkate al\u0131nabilir. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nda taksir; basit taksir ve bilin\u00e7li taksir \u015feklinde ayr\u0131ma tabi tutulmu\u015f, kanunun 22\/3. f\u0131kras\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksir; \u201cki\u015finin \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc neticeyi istememesine kar\u015f\u0131n, neticenin meydana gelmesi\u201d \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f, bu halde taksirli su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin cezan\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7te birden yar\u0131ya kadar artt\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Basit taksir ile bilin\u00e7li taksir aras\u0131ndaki ay\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct; taksirde failin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir nitelikteki neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6re-memesi, bilin\u00e7li taksir halinde ise bu neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bilin\u00e7li taksirde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sonu\u00e7, fail taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc halde istenmemi\u015ftir. Ger\u00e7ekten neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc halde, s\u0131rf \u015fans\u0131na veya ba\u015fka etkenlere, hatta kendi beceri veya bilgisine g\u00fcvenerek hareket eden kimsenin hali, bunu \u00f6ng\u00f6rmemi\u015f olan kimsenin hali ile bir tutulamaz. Neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6ren kimse, ne olursa olsun, bu sonucu meydana getirecek harekette bulunmamakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n hafif e\u011fimli ve virajl\u0131 yolda, yol \u015fartlar\u0131na g\u00f6re h\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 ayarlamayarak yol kenar\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcmekte olan (E.)\u2019e arkadan \u00e7arparak \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olmas\u0131 \u015feklinde geli\u015fen olayda, <span style=\"color: #333399;\"><strong>alkoll\u00fc oldu\u011fu ya da a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 s\u00fcratli ve tehlikeli \u015fekilde ara\u00e7 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, ara\u00e7 kullanmay\u0131 bilmedi\u011fi de ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmeyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, meydana gelen neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesi gerekti\u011fi halde gerekli dikkat ve \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermeyerek \u00f6ng\u00f6remedi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bilin\u00e7li taksir halinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir.<\/strong><\/span> Yerel mahkemece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ehliyetinin bulunmamas\u0131, eylemin bilin\u00e7li taksirle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fine gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f ise de, <span style=\"color: #333399;\"><strong>s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n ara\u00e7 kullanmak, tek ba\u015f\u0131na eylemin bilin\u00e7li taksirle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini g\u00f6stermemekte olup<\/strong><\/span>, nitekim taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme ve yaralama su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin temyiz incelemesini yapan \u00d6zel Dairece de s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesiz ara\u00e7 kullanmak tek ba\u015f\u0131na bilin\u00e7li taksir hali olarak kabul edilmemi\u015ftir. (12 CD.nin 12.09.2013 g\u00fcn 1592-19861 ve 08.10.2013 g\u00fcn 2681-22998 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu itibarla, isabetsiz olan yerel mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1- (A.) 10. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 03.10.2012 g\u00fcn ve 593 \u2013 644 say\u0131l\u0131 direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemini taksirle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, bilin\u00e7li taksirle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011finin kabul\u00fc ile karar verilmesi isabetsizli\u011finden bozulmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2- Dosyan\u0131n, mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine, 03.12.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>T.C.<br \/>\nYARGITAY<br \/>\n12. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<br \/>\nE. 2020\/4768<br \/>\nK. 2023\/695<br \/>\nT. 7.3.2023<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>B\u0130L\u0130N\u00c7L\u0130 TAKS\u0130R<\/strong>\u00a0<\/span>( Hafif Yoku\u015f Yukar\u0131 Yolda Kap\u0131lar\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131k Vaziyette Yolcunun Yerine Oturmas\u0131n\u0131 Beklemeden Seyreden San\u0131k Hakk\u0131nda Bilin\u00e7li Taksir H\u00fck\u00fcmleri Uygulanmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi &#8211; Cezada Orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k \u0130lkesi Dikkate Al\u0131narak Asli Kusurlu Olarak \u00d6l\u00fcme Sebebiyet Veren San\u0131k Hakk\u0131nda Alt S\u0131n\u0131rdan Makul Oranda Uzakla\u015f\u0131larak Ceza Verilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>YOKU\u015e YUKARI YOLDA KAPILARI A\u00c7IK VAZ\u0130YETTE YOLCUNUN YER\u0130NE OTURMASINI BEKLEMEDEN SEY\u0130R YAPMA<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0( Yolcunun Dolmu\u015fun A\u00e7\u0131k Olan Kap\u0131s\u0131ndan D\u00fc\u015ferek Yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Hastanede Vefat Etti\u011fi &#8211; San\u0131k Hakk\u0131nda Bilin\u00e7li Taksir H\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin Uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">ORANTILILIK<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>( Taksirle \u00d6ld\u00fcrme\/Hafif Yoku\u015f Yukar\u0131 Yolda Kap\u0131lar\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131k Vaziyette Yolcunun Yerine Oturmas\u0131n\u0131 Beklemeden Seyreden Asli Kusurlu Olarak \u00d6l\u00fcme Sebebiyet Veren San\u0131k Hakk\u0131nda Alt S\u0131n\u0131rdan Makul Oranda Uzakla\u015f\u0131larak Ceza Verilmesi Gere\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237\/m.3,61,85<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>\u00d6ZET :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><strong>1-Hafif yoku\u015f yukar\u0131 yolda, kap\u0131lar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k vaziyette, yolcunun yerine oturmas\u0131n\u0131 beklemeden seyreden san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksir h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>2-TCK 61. maddesinde yer verilen, su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f bi\u00e7imi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n taksirinin yo\u011funlu\u011fu, meydana gelen zarar\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler ile ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 3. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131na belirtilen cezada orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesi dikkate al\u0131narak asli kusurlu olarak \u00f6l\u00fcme sebebiyet veren san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan makul oranda uzakla\u015f\u0131larak ceza verilmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">DAVA :<\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn; karar tarihi itibar\u0131yla 6723 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 33. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 8. maddesi gere\u011fi y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun (1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 305. maddesi gere\u011fi temyiz edilebilir oldu\u011fu, karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun 260. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz edenin h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize hak ve yetkisinin bulundu\u011fu, 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 310. maddesi gere\u011fi temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu, ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 317. maddesi gere\u011fi temyiz iste\u011finin reddini gerektirir bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme neticesinde tespit edilmekle, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>KARAR : I. HUKUK\u0130 S\u00dcRE\u00c7<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1. &#8230; 4. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin, 29.09.2015 tarihli ve 2014\/626 Esas, 2015\/487 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 85. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131, 62. maddesi gere\u011fince neticeten 1 y\u0131l 11 ay 10 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, ayn\u0131 kanunun 51. maddesi gere\u011fince hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2. Dava dosyas\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca tanzim olunan 28.09.2020 tarihli ve 2016\/129729 say\u0131l\u0131, san\u0131\u011fa verilen cezan\u0131n az oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7erir Tebli\u011fname ile Daireye tevdi edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>II. TEMY\u0130Z SEBEPLER\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A-) Kat\u0131lanlar vekilin temyiz istemi;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda takdiri indirim uygulanmamas\u0131, san\u0131\u011fa verilen hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmemesi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ehliyetin geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine, ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">B-) San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz istemi;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kusuru bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, beraat etmesi gerekti\u011fine, ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Temyizin kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yerel mahkemenin kabul\u00fc;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yevmiyeli \u015fof\u00f6r olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 minib\u00fcse yolcu olarak &#8230; ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, &#8230;&#8217;nin yerine oturmas\u0131n\u0131 beklemeden ve kap\u0131y\u0131 kapatmadan istikametine g\u00f6re \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f e\u011fimli yolda arac\u0131 hareket ettirdi\u011fi, yolcunun dolmu\u015fun a\u00e7\u0131k olan kap\u0131s\u0131ndan d\u00fc\u015ferek yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131, kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hastanede vefat etti\u011fi olayda; mahkemece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n asli kusurlu oldu\u011fu kabul ve tespit edilerek uygulama yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<div id=\"ad_121\" style=\"text-align: justify;\" data-pagespeed=\"true\" data-advert=\"temedya\" data-channel=\"121\"><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2. San\u0131k savunmas\u0131nda arac\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 kapatt\u0131ktan sonra arac\u0131 hareket ettirdi\u011fini savunmu\u015f, kap\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin a\u015famalarda \u00e7eli\u015fkili beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3. Kat\u0131lanlar san\u0131ktan \u015fikayet\u00e7i olduklar\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc minib\u00fcste yolcu olarak bulunan tan\u0131k Ay\u015feg\u00fcl &#8230; &#8220;Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc makt\u00fcl araca binmi\u015fti. Bende o s\u0131rada ara\u00e7tayd\u0131m. Ayaktayken para uzatt\u0131. \u015e\u00f6f\u00f6rde paray\u0131 ald\u0131. Makt\u00fcl yerine oturmak istedi\u011fi s\u0131rada \u015f\u00f6f\u00f6r hareket etti. O s\u0131rada makt\u00fcl dengesini kaybetti. Eli ile tuttu\u011fu yerden eli bo\u015fald\u0131 ve bir anda kap\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Oradan d\u0131\u015far\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc ve takla atmaya ba\u015flad\u0131. 15-20 metre d\u00f6nerek yerde hareket etti. Bende dolmu\u015fa binmi\u015ftim. Bindi\u011fimden hi\u00e7 kimsenin dengesini kaybederek d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00f6rmedim. Dolmu\u015f normal kalk\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131. Ancak makt\u00fcl ya\u015fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in tutunamad\u0131. Ayr\u0131ca dolmu\u015f rampay\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131yordu. Makt\u00fcl bu y\u00fczden de tutunamam\u0131\u015f olabilir&#8221; demi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5. 19\/10\/2014 tarihli g\u00f6rg\u00fc tespit ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma tutana\u011f\u0131nda olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi yerin Kumbah\u00e7e mah. \u0130\u00e7meler Caddesinde faaliyet g\u00f6steren &#8230; Polyester \u00f6n\u00fc, &#8230; Otelden A\u011fanlar Tersanesi istikametine do\u011fru yolun sa\u011f taraf\u0131 oldu\u011fu, yolun \u00e7ift y\u00f6nl\u00fc oldu\u011fu, geni\u015fli\u011finin 6-7 metre oldu\u011fu, yolda yolu ikiye ay\u0131ran herhangi bir yol \u00e7izgisi ve yol kenarlar\u0131nda bir i\u015faret levhas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay yerinde olay ile alakal\u0131 herhangi bir delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6. Soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bilirki\u015fi raporunda &#8230; plakal\u0131 \u015fehir i\u00e7i ticari minib\u00fcs s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc &#8230;&#8217; \u0131n kap\u0131lar\u0131n kapanmas\u0131n\u0131 beklemeden hareket etmesi sebebiyle kazada asli kusurlu oldu\u011fu, yolcu &#8230;&#8217; nin hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yerine oturmak \u00fczere y\u00f6nelirken a\u00e7\u0131k olan kap\u0131dan d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ancak dengesini korumak i\u00e7in gerekli olan tertibat\u0131n &#8230; i\u00e7inde var oldu\u011fu halde kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden tali kusurlu oldu\u011fu rapor edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7. &#8230; Adli T\u0131p Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen raporda &#8230;&#8217;nin yap\u0131lan, d\u0131\u015f muayene, otopsi bulgular\u0131 ve Kimyasal Tahliller \u0130htisas Dairesi ve histopatoloji raporu dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn k\u00fcnt kafa ve genel v\u00fccut travmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131, kafatas\u0131 kemik k\u0131r\u0131klar\u0131, beyin doku laserasyonu, karaci\u011ferde sentrilob\u00fcler nekroz etkisiyle meydana gelmi\u015f oldu\u011fu rapor edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">8. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n adli sicil kayd\u0131n\u0131n dosyada oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>IV. GEREK\u00c7E<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yap\u0131lan inceleme neticesinde yerel mahkemenin olu\u015f ve kabul\u00fcnde herhangi bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A. Kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin temyiz istemi;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1. Hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmemesi gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 51. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca iki y\u0131l veya daha az s\u00fcreyle hapis cezas\u0131na mahkum edilen ki\u015finin cezas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenebilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup; san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckmedilen sonu\u00e7 ceza olan iki y\u0131l\u0131n alt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan h\u00fck\u00fcmde bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2. San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda takdiri indirim uygulanmamas\u0131 ve ehliyetinin geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 53. maddesinin alt\u0131nc\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 62. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n hakimin takdirinde oldu\u011fu, mahkemece gerek\u00e7eli kararda ehliyetin geri al\u0131nmama ve takdiri indirim uygulanma gerek\u00e7esinin g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla h\u00fck\u00fcmde bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">B. San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz istemi;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kusuru bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, beraat etmesi gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunun olu\u015f ve dosya kapsam\u0131n\u0131n birbiri ile uyumlu oldu\u011fu, kusur durumunu kesin bir \u015fekilde tespit etti\u011fi, bu itibarla su\u00e7u sabit olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">C. Di\u011fer Temyiz sebepleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1. Hafif yoku\u015f yukar\u0131 yolda, kap\u0131lar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k vaziyette, yolcunun yerine oturmas\u0131n\u0131 beklemeden seyreden san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksir h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2. 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 61. maddesinde yer verilen, su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f bi\u00e7imi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n taksirinin yo\u011funlu\u011fu, meydana gelen zarar\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler ile ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 3. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131na belirtilen cezada orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesi dikkate al\u0131narak asli kusurlu olarak \u00f6l\u00fcme sebebiyet veren san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan makul oranda uzakla\u015f\u0131larak ceza verilmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>Gerek\u00e7e b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde C numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle &#8230; 4. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin, 29.09.2015 tarihli ve 2014\/626 Esas, 2015\/487 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ile kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin temyiz iste\u011fi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden h\u00fckm\u00fcn, 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 321. maddesi gere\u011fi, Tebli\u011fnameye uygun olarak, oybirli\u011fiyle BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n, Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 07.03.2023 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>CEZA GENEL KURULU<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Esas : 2013\/484<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Karar : 2014\/162<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Tarih : 01.04.2014<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;nun &#8220;Kast&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 21. maddesi;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;1) Su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 kast\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Kast, su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesidir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2) Ki\u015finin, su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen, fiili i\u015flemesi halinde olas\u0131 kast vard\u0131r&#8221; \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenerek, maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde do\u011frudan kast tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f, 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise; \u00f6\u011freti ve uygulamada &#8220;dolayl\u0131 kast&#8221;, &#8220;belirli olmayan kast&#8221;, &#8220;gayrimuayyen kast&#8221;, &#8220;olursa olsun kast\u0131&#8221; olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan olas\u0131 kast tan\u0131m\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, do\u011frudan kast, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ve su\u00e7 te\u015fkil eden fiili ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye y\u00f6nelik irade olup, kanunda su\u00e7 olarak tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f eylemin bilerek ve istenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi ile olu\u015fur. Fail hareketinin kanuni tipi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fini bilmesi ve istemesi halinde do\u011frudan kast ile hareket etmi\u015f olacak, buna kar\u015f\u0131n, fiilin muhtemel baz\u0131 neticeleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ve bu neticelerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ve muhtemel olarak tasavvur etmesine ra\u011fmen muhtemel neticeyi kabullenerek fiili i\u015flemesi durumunda ise olas\u0131 kast s\u00f6z konusu olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Olas\u0131 kast ile do\u011frudan kast aras\u0131ndaki ay\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcdeki en belirgin unsur, do\u011frudan kasttaki bilme unsurudur. Fail hareketinin kanuni tipi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fini biliyorsa ve bunu istiyorsa do\u011frudan kas\u0131tla hareket etti\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Yine failin hareketiyle hedefledi\u011fi do\u011frudan neticelerle birlikte, hareketin zorunlu veya ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 da, a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a istenmese dahi do\u011frudan kast\u0131n kapsam\u0131 i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Belli bir sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesine y\u00f6nelik hareketin, g\u00fcnl\u00fck hayat tecr\u00fcbelerine g\u00f6re di\u011fer baz\u0131 sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 da do\u011furmas\u0131 muhakkak ise, failin bu sonu\u00e7lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da, do\u011frudan kastla hareket etti\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Olas\u0131 kast\u0131 do\u011frudan kasttan ay\u0131ran di\u011fer \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct ise su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinin muhakkak olmay\u0131p, muhtemel olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Fail, b\u00f6yle bir durumda, muhakkak de\u011fil ama b\u00fcy\u00fck bir ihtimalle ger\u00e7ekle\u015fecek olan neticenin meydana gelmesini kabullenmekte, olursa olsun d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ile g\u00f6ze almakta; sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemesi i\u00e7in \u00e7aba g\u00f6stermemektedir. Olas\u0131 kastta fiilin kanunda tan\u0131mlanan neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesine neden olunaca\u011f\u0131 muhtemel g\u00f6r\u00fclmesine kar\u015f\u0131n, bu neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi fail taraf\u0131ndan kabullenilmektedir.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kural olarak su\u00e7; ancak kastla, kanunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilen hallerde ise taksirle de i\u015flenebilecektir. \u0130stisnai bir kusurluluk \u015fekli olan taksirde, failin cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in mutlaka kanunda a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;nun 22\/2. maddesinde taksir; &#8220;dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n, su\u00e7un yasal tan\u0131m\u0131nda belirtilen neticesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmeyerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesidir&#8221; \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6\u011fretide de benimsendi\u011fi \u00fczere, Ceza Genel Kurulunun bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda taksirin unsurlar\u0131;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Fiilin taksirle i\u015flenebilen bir su\u00e7 olmas\u0131,<br \/>\nHareketin iradi olmas\u0131,<br \/>\nSonucun istenmemesi,<br \/>\nHareket ile sonu\u00e7 aras\u0131nda nedensellik ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131,<br \/>\nSonucun \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclememi\u015f olmas\u0131, \u015eeklinde kabul edilmektedir.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taksirli su\u00e7larda da, gerek icrai hareketin, gerekse ihmali hareketin iradi olmas\u0131 ve meydana gelen neticenin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. \u0130radi bir davran\u0131\u015f bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde taksirden bahsedilemeyece\u011fi gibi, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemeyecek bir sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi halinde de failin taksirli su\u00e7tan sorumlulu\u011funa gidilemeyecektir. Sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinde, ma\u011fdurun taksirli davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n etkisinin bulunmas\u0131 halinde taksirli davran\u0131\u015f nedensellik ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kesmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece bu durum failin taksirli sorumlulu\u011funu ortadan kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi, taksirin niteli\u011fini de de\u011fi\u015ftirmeyecektir. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;nda kusurun derecelendirilmesi suretiyle herhangi bir ceza indirimi s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu hal ancak temel cezan\u0131n tayininde dikkate al\u0131nabilecektir. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;nda taksir; basit taksir ve bilin\u00e7li taksir \u015feklinde ayr\u0131ma t\u00e2bi tutulmu\u015f, kanunun 22. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksir; &#8220;ki\u015finin \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc neticeyi istememesine kar\u015f\u0131n, neticenin meydana gelmesi&#8221; \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f, bu halde taksirli su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin cezan\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7te birden yar\u0131ya kadar artt\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Basit taksir ile bilin\u00e7li taksir aras\u0131ndaki ay\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct; taksirde failin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir nitelikteki neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rememesi, bilin\u00e7li taksir halinde ise bu neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bilin\u00e7li taksirde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sonu\u00e7, fail taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc halde istenmemi\u015ftir. Ger\u00e7ekten neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc halde, s\u0131rf \u015fans\u0131na veya ba\u015fka etkenlere, hatta kendi beceri veya bilgisine g\u00fcvenerek hareket eden kimsenin tehlikelilik hali, bunu \u00f6ng\u00f6rememi\u015f olan kimsenin tehlikelilik hali ile bir tutulamayacakt\u0131r. Neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6ren kimse, ne olursa olsun, bu sonucu meydana getirecek harekette bulunmamakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;nun 21. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; &#8220;\u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen, fiili i\u015flemesi&#8221; \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanarak, ba\u015fkaca ay\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir unsuruna yer verilmeyen olas\u0131 kast ile ayn\u0131 kanunun 22. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; &#8220;ki\u015finin \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc neticeyi istememesine kar\u015f\u0131n, neticenin meydana gelmesi halinde bilin\u00e7li taksir vard\u0131r&#8221; bi\u00e7iminde tan\u0131mlanan bilin\u00e7li taksirin kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 hususu \u00f6\u011fretide dile getirilmi\u015f, kanun koyucu da, madde metninde yer vermedi\u011fi &#8220;kabullenme&#8221; \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc, madde gerek\u00e7esinde; &#8220;Olas\u0131 kast durumunda su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131nda yer alan unsurlardan birinin somut olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmesine ra\u011fmen, ki\u015fi fiili i\u015flemektedir. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle, fail unsurlar\u0131n meydana gelmesini kabullenmektedir&#8221; \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klamak suretiyle, olas\u0131 kast\u0131 bilin\u00e7li taksirden ay\u0131racak k\u0131stas\u0131 ortaya koymu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kast, olas\u0131 kast, taksir ve bilin\u00e7li taksir aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiyi k\u0131saca \u00f6zetlemek gerekirse; ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi muhakkak g\u00f6r\u00fcnen neticenin failce bilinmesi ve istenmesi halinde do\u011frudan kast, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen muhtemel neticenin meydana gelmesine kay\u0131ts\u0131z kal\u0131nmas\u0131 durumunda olas\u0131 kast, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen muhtemel neticenin meydana gelmesinin istenmemesine ra\u011fmen objektif \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket edilmek suretiyle neticenin meydana gelmesinin engellenemedi\u011fi ahvalde bilin\u00e7li taksir, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir neticenin objektif \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemedi\u011fi hallerde ise basit taksir s\u00f6z konusu olacakt\u0131r.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. YARGITAY ON\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130 Esas : 2021\/4625 Karar : 2021\/6670 Tarih : 07.10.2021 Olay gecesi san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sevk ve idaresindeki otomobille, ya\u011f\u0131\u015fl\u0131 havada, ayd\u0131nlatman\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, h\u0131z<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ceza-hukuku","category-makaleler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1403"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1403\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4968,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1403\/revisions\/4968"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tuncayilcim.av.tr\/v5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}